2024-03-28T18:49:54Zhttps://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/oai/requestoai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16782015-06-17T19:52:15Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Begelman, D. A.
2005-10-14T16:38:31Z
2005-10-14T16:38:31Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1678
p. 201-212
Possession states have a remarkably broad transcultural distribution, and mirror the influence of a range of social variables. Encompassing a variety of individual patterns, as a class they virtually confound attempts at "reduction" to pathological conditions or forms of dissociation like multiple personality disorder. Paradoxes exist in both the naturalistic and supernaturalistic approaches to possession. Commentators in both traditions may misconceive the nature of the connection between explanatory schema and treatment packages, while contemporary exorcists may underestimate trends of skepticism about their practices evident in honored theological traditions. Exorcisms are not precluded on "scientific " grounds. Treatment strategies for culture-bound syndromes may have to accommodate to the meanings those who experience them attribute to their plights.
403465 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 201-212 : Possession: interdisciplinary roots
Possession: interdisciplinary roots
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16822010-01-24T10:00:17Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Rosik, Christopher
2005-10-14T16:44:48Z
2005-10-14T16:44:48Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1682
p. 245-249
This response offers brief critiques of the articles by Drs. Coons, Begelman, Bowman, and Fraser, all of which raise important issues concerning the development of dialogue between the psychiatric and religious communities. It is argued that this dialogue on exorcism and possession needs to be characterized by humility on all sides. A rationale for the preservation of humility by those in the dissociative disorders field is given, and some implications of this for further dialogue conclude the paper.
350779 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 245-249 : Establishing a foundation for dialogue: a response to articles on possession, exorcism, and MPD
Establishing a foundation for dialogue: a response to articles on possession, exorcism, and MPD
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16862015-06-17T19:50:55Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Bowman, Elizabeth S.
2005-10-14T16:51:39Z
2005-10-14T16:51:39Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1686
p. 262-263
162217 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 262-263 : Primum non-nocere- a reason for restraint: Dr. Bowman’s reply to Drs. Crabtree, Rosik, and Noll
Primum non-nocere- a reason for restraint: Dr. Bowman’s reply to Drs. Crabtree, Rosik, and Noll
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16882015-06-18T01:29:27Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Fraser, George A.
2005-10-14T16:52:43Z
2005-10-14T16:52:43Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1688
p. 266-267
192877 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 266-267 : Reply to reviewers exorcism report
Reply to reviewers exorcism report
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16812015-06-17T19:42:30Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Fraser, George A.
2005-10-14T16:42:57Z
2005-10-14T16:42:57Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1681
p. 239-244
The persistent belief that spiritual entities can "possess" mere mortals has resulted in various rituals and ceremonies to expel these unwanted intruders. This act has been known as exorcism and is sanctioned even today by many traditional religions. This is pertinent to the field of multiple personality disorder because often the presentation or influence of dissociated ego states fulfills the conceptualized criteria of those who believe in the reality of spirit possession.
This paper addresses the issues of a group of multiple personality patients, treated by the author, who previously had been exposed to exorcism rites. Seven patients were interviewed about the effects of these ceremonies on their ego functioning. The results varied from mildly negative to severely disruptive; they included numbing of religious fervor, struggling physically with the exorcist, attempting suicide, creating demon alters, and believing that an alter had been banished and was perpetually suffering in hell.
The experiences of these patients are discussed, followed by cautions that the author believes should be reviewed before anyone considers an exorcism ceremony, especially if the subject is known to have, or has not yet been assessed for, a dissociative disorder.
328199 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 239-244 : Exorcism rituals: effects on multiple personality disorder patients
Exorcism rituals: effects on multiple personality disorder patients
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16832015-06-17T19:48:50Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Noll, Richard
2005-10-14T16:45:46Z
2005-10-14T16:45:46Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1683
p. 250-253
Commentary is provided on four psychiatric papers concerned with (1) "trance/possession disorder" (TPD) and (2) "exorcism." It is argued that such papers exemplify a centuries-old clash of worldviews between science and religion. Arguments against the inclusion of the proposed diagnostic entity of TPD are outlined. The criteria for TPD are considered too vague for practical clinical use in differential diagnosis and may incite an epidemic of "possession" in North America if included in DSM-IV. The diagnosis of TPD may also enhance the unconscious institutional racism and ethnocentrism of psychiatry. "Exorcism" outcome studies that purport it is harmful to MPD patients are criticized for their lack of operational definitions, selection bias of subjects, and biased framing of quantitative data. Issues regarding the biased framing of data in scientific publications in general are discussed.
287685 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 250-253 : Exorcism and possession: the clash of worldviews and the hubris of psychiatry
Exorcism and possession: the clash of worldviews and the hubris of psychiatry
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16752013-04-10T09:01:54Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
2005-10-14T16:32:54Z
2005-10-14T16:32:54Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1675
Front and back cover and preliminary pages.
377129 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 000 : Cover, table of contents
Other
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16852015-06-17T19:50:39Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Begelman, D. A.
2005-10-14T16:48:32Z
2005-10-14T16:48:32Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1685
p. 260-261
198782 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 260-261 : Response to papers by Rosik, Noll, and Crabtree
Response to papers by Rosik, Noll, and Crabtree
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16842015-06-17T19:48:55Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Crabtree, Adam
2005-10-14T16:47:36Z
2005-10-14T16:47:36Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1684
p. 254-259
Comments on the preceding papers on possession are made from a clinical/historical point of view. A definition of “possession” is proposed based on a phenomenological approach. Categories of possession likely to be encountered by North American clinicians are listed and commented on. The proposed DSM-IV diagnosis of possession is viewed as promising, but the present formulation is considered to be weak. Coon's call for interdisciplinary communication and cooperation is seconded. Acceptance of the new diagnostic category is supported despite the fact that some may misuse its recognition. Evaluations of the dangers of exorcism applied to MPD cases made by Fraser and Bowman are appreciated. Bowman's total rejection of any consideration of exorcism in work with dissociative patients is questioned. Begelman's sortie into the depths beyond phenomenology is accorded praise.
314926 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 254-259 : Puzzling over possession: comments on Dissociation articles on possession
Puzzling over possession: comments on Dissociation articles on possession
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16792015-06-17T19:41:52Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Coons, Philip M.
2005-10-14T16:40:53Z
2005-10-14T16:40:53Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1679
p. 213-221
Although the literature contains numerous historical and contemporary case reports of possession disorder, the possession syndrome has never been an officially approved psychiatric diagnosis. This paper reviews these case reports and suggests a typology for various types of possession disorder. Possession disorder is contrasted with the religious belief of possession and various types of ritual trance possession which are seen worldwide. The psychophysiology of trance and dissociation will be discussed. Finally, the ICD-10 nosology and proposed DSM-IV classification for possession disorder will be reviewed.
417051 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 213-221 : The differential diagnosis of possession states
The differential diagnosis of possession states
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16802015-06-17T19:42:25Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Bowman, Elizabeth S.
2005-10-14T16:41:55Z
2005-10-14T16:41:55Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1680
p. 222-238
Fifteen female multiple personality disorder (MPD) patients who had felt or been told they were possessed or had undergone exorcism were interviewed to study the sequelae of these events. Thirteen had suspected they were possessed either before or after their diagnosis. Fourteen had been told they were possessed, usually before their diagnosis. Fourteen had undergone exorcisms. Seventy-one percent reacted negatively to the suggestion that they were possessed. Initial reactions to exorcisms were negative in about 80% of hosts and alters and positive in 14% of hosts and 9% of alters. Emotional reactions to exorcisms remained fairly stable over time. The exorcisms functioned as traumas and resulted in severely dysphoric feelings, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, and dissociative symptoms. Subjects created new alters and experienced considerable dissociative rearrangements that led to the hospitalization of nine subjects. Spiritual sequelae were the most severe and led to cessation or severe curtailment of religious life for many subjects. The author cautions against exorcizing MPD patients.
398554 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 222-238 : Clinical and spiritual effects of exorcism in fifteen patients with multiple personality disorder
Clinical and spiritual effects of exorcism in fifteen patients with multiple personality disorder
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16762015-06-17T19:51:33Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Kluft, Richard P., 1943-
2005-10-14T16:33:20Z
2005-10-14T16:33:20Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1676
p. 199
48864 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 199 : Editorial
A few good persons: toward a dialog on possession and exorcism
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16772015-06-17T19:52:09Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Begelman, D. A.
2005-10-14T16:37:33Z
2005-10-14T16:37:33Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1677
p. 200
137929 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 200: Preface to papers on possession
Preface to papers on possession
Article
oai:scholarsbank.uoregon.edu:1794/16872015-06-17T19:51:04Zcom_1794_1129col_1794_1198
Coons, Philip M.
2005-10-14T16:52:16Z
2005-10-14T16:52:16Z
1993-12
0896-2863
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/1687
p. 264-265
192025 bytes
application/pdf
en_US
Ridgeview Institute and the International Society for the Study of Dissociation
Dissociation : Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 264-265 : Dr. Coons’ response to commentaries by Drs. Crabtree, Noll, and Rosik
Dr. Coons’ response to commentaries by Drs. Crabtree, Noll, and Rosik
Article