Abrams, JesseGreiner, MichelleTimberlake, ThomasSchultz, Courtney A.Evans, Alexander M.Huber-Stearns, Heidi2020-10-292020-10-292020https://hdl.handle.net/1794/2584916 pagesThe forest plan revision process presents an opportunity for managers to reorient a national forest’s management direction in pursuit of resilient landscapes, among other goals. It also represents an opportunity for public engagement and the identification of new roles and responsibilities for governmental and non-governmental entities. Through a Joint Fire Science Program-funded project, we compared three recently completed national forest plan revision processes to determine whether and how planners were able to plan for resilient landscape outcomes. Our work helps illustrate the ways that front-line forest planners attempt to promote landscape resilience while reconciling potentially conflicting pressures and management directions. The lessons from our comparative analysis are relevant for forest managers and key stakeholders attempting to plan in pursuit of more resilient landscapes.en-USCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USForest resilienceForest restorationForests and forestry--Climatic factorsForests and forestry--Fire managementUnited States. Forest ServiceWorking Paper