Hessler, JulieCasselman, Rachel2017-09-062017-09-062017-09-06https://hdl.handle.net/1794/22759Russia’s recent increase in acts of aggression against bordering nations is concerning. After Russia’s annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean peninsula, many wondered if the world should anticipate a Baltic intervention. This paper seeks to analyze this question through a comparative study of Russia’s recent interventions in Georgia and Ukraine, an analysis of the Estonian and Latvian Russian-speaking population, and an analysis of the NATO alliance’s strengths and weaknesses in deterring a possible Russian threat. From my analysis, I conclude that a conventional Baltic intervention is unlikely. However, I also conclude that the NATO alliance is not prepared to counter non-conventional acts of aggression and that these tactics could become more common in international conflicts. Therefore, I also conclude that a non-conventional Baltic intervention from Russia is possible and, consequently, the alliance should re-examine its framework.en-USAll Rights Reserved.CompatriotEstoniaHybrid warfareLatviaNATORussiaRussia's Hybrid Warfare: The Prowess and Limitations of Putin's (In)Visible Hand in Estonia and LatviaElectronic Thesis or Dissertation