Donaldson, Aaron Paul, 1980-2009-11-242009-11-242009-09https://hdl.handle.net/1794/9980xii, 92 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number.The purpose ofthis paper is to advocate Conflict Navigation as a new pedagogy aimed at uniting co-curricular debate educators in the United States. Contemporary collegiate debate demonstrates a crisis in pedagogy as seen in a history of "fractionation through structural fortification". This lack of a sustainable pedagogical community has proven to critically strain the resources and curricula of academic debate. Conflict Navigation (CN) represents a behavior-based approach to conflict with an emphasis on ethical rhetoric. The primary mission of argument within a CN framework is inquiry, cooperation, and engagement.en-USConflict navigationDebates and debatingConflict Navigation as Rhetoric and Pedagogy for Academic Debating in the United StatesThesis