Oregon Law Review : Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 605-640 : [S]ome [A]ccurate [I]nformation is [B]etter than [N]o [I]nformation [A]t [A]ll: Arguments Against an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine Based on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising

Harrison, Jack B.Jefferson, Mina J.2007-07-112007-07-11199978 Or. L. Rev. 605 (1999)0196-2043https://hdl.handle.net/1794/445436 p.83906 bytesapplication/pdfen-USOregon Law Review : Vol. 78, No. 3, p. 605-640 : [S]ome [A]ccurate [I]nformation is [B]etter than [N]o [I]nformation [A]t [A]ll: Arguments Against an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine Based on Direct-to-Consumer Advertising[S]ome [A]ccurate [I]nformation is [B]etter than [N]o [I]nformation [A]t [A]ll: Arguments Against an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine Based on Direct-to-Consumer AdvertisingArguments Against an Exception to the Learned Intermediary Doctrine Based on Direct-to-Consumer AdvertisingSome Accurate Information is Better than No Information At AllArticle