Weaver, Lesley JoHansberger, Dayna2020-12-082020-12-08https://hdl.handle.net/1794/25921Rural Ethiopian families bear the responsibility to invest in their own sanitation, resulting in large disparities in latrine quality. This study analyzes considerations for household latrine purchases, desirable latrine characteristics, and satisfaction among households with unimproved and improved latrines. The mixed-methods study included observations, key informant interviews, household interviews, household surveys, and health worker focus groups. Key findings include a model of shared and distinct sanitation motivations and barriers at two household decision points – the decision to build an unimproved latrine and the decision to purchase a basic improved latrine. Households with improved latrines experienced high levels of satisfaction, compared to households using an unimproved latrine. A human-centered design approach to the improved latrine was integral to the product desirability, effective sales process, and customer satisfaction. Study results are intended to better understand sanitation influences and facilitate practical and incremental improvement in household sanitation facilities.en-USAll Rights Reserved.EthiopiaHuman-Centered DesignLatrinePublic HealthSanitationWaterSanitationand HygieneRural Sanitation Preferences and Household Decisions: A Mixed-Methods Case Study in Wolaita, EthiopiaElectronic Thesis or Dissertation