Hughes, Heather2012-02-202012-02-20201190 Or. L. Rev. 359 (2011)0196-2043https://hdl.handle.net/1794/1196054 pagesThis Article explores the relationship between one typical form of real estate development finance—the securitized mezzanine loan— and one controversial phenomenon—suburban sprawl. It asks foundational questions about the connection between financial transactions and real-world applications of the capital they raise. In this work, sprawl serves as an example of an environmental consequence of applications of capital raised with a common form of transaction. This Article considers the extent to which commercial finance laws release forceful incentives driven by capital markets upon land use decisions, potentially undermining the collective, morally informed determination such decisions require. It rejects the aesthetic aversion to looking beyond transactional structures in the abstract to consider what results as commercial actors use typical deals to fund typical growth patterns. To the extent that standardized forms of financial transactions fund recurring land uses that many find problematic, the terms and structures of the transactions themselves should be a subject of critical inquiry.en-USrights_reservedReal estate development -- FinanceSprawl, UrbanSuburban sprawlOregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 2, p. 359-412 : Securitization and SuburbiaSecuritization and SuburbiaArticle