Adopted Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan • November 1997 C" ty of Portland Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon To help ensure equal access to information, the City of Portland Bureau of Planning offers accommodation to persons with disabilities. Call 823..7700 in advance to arrange accommodation. TTY: 823...6868 Adopted Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan Adopted by the Portland City Council Ordinance No. 171238, as Amended Substitute Ordinance No. 171239 Resolution No. 35619 November 1997 Bureau of Planning Portland, Oregon Portland ,City Council Vera Katz, Mayor Charlie Hales, Commissioner of Public Safety Gretchen Kafoury, Commissioner of Public Affairs Jim Francesconi, Commissioner of Public Utilities Eric Sten, Commissioner of Public Works Portland Planning Commission Richard Michaelson, President Steve Abel, Vice-President Sarah ffitch Bruce Fong Amanda Fritz Rick Holt Marcy MeInelly Paul Schuback Ruth Scott Noell Webb Acknowledgments Bridgeton Neighborhood Association Walter Valenta, President* John Weigant Matt* and Becky Whitney Bob Wuerth Sharon Kolb* Don Hanson* Gene Miller, Jr* Larry Weiss Gene Miller, Sr Lewis Gress Hal Miller Pamela Ake* Larry Hoffman Pat Bartch Bruce Purdy Joyce Leggatt Bob Nelson Tim Schubert Chris Christiansen * Member of Steering Committee Thanks to the following: Columbia School (for meeting space) Matt and Becky Whitney (for meeting space and ambiance) Portland Bureau of Planning Charlie Hales, Commissioner-in-Charge David C. Knowles, Planning Director Michael S. Harrison, AICP, Chief Planner, Community and Neighborhood Planning Portland Office of Transportation Charlie Hales, Commissioner-in-Charge Felicia Trader, Director Victor F. Rhodes, City Engineer Don Gardner, Manager, Streets Systems Management Project Staff Ellen Ryker, City Planner Laurel Wentworth, Senior Project Coordinator Donah Baribeau, Clerical Specialist Cover and Frontispiece photos by Matt Whitney Drawings courtesy of Judy Galantha, Jim Longstreth, Portland Community Design, and Oregon State Marine Board Neighborhood Plan Technical Advisory Committee David Sweet, Bureau of Buildings Mary Abrams, Bureau of Environmental Services Steve Kenworthy, Bureau of Environmental Services Nea Lynn Robinson, Bureau of Environmental Services Patty Rueter, Bureau of Fire and Emergency Services Bob Weaver, Bureau of Fire and Emergency Services Diana Holuka, Bureau of General Services Judy Sanders, Bureau of Housing and Community Development John Sewell, Bureau of Parks and Recreation Jim Sjulin, Bureau of Parks and Recreation David Yamashita, Bureau of Parks and Recreation Mary Rose Navarro, Bureau of Parks and Recreation, Urban Forestry Division Roberta Jortner, Bureau of Water Barbara Linssen, Metro Mary Weber, Metro Jo Ann Bowman, Multnomah County Commissioner Dan Saltzman, Multnomah County Board of Commissioners Lt. Terry Jones, Multnomah County River Patrol Ben Meyer, National Marine Fisheries Service Kevin Hottman, Office of Transportation Monique Wahba, Office of Transportation Brant Williams, Office of Transportation Sonya Kazen, Oregon Department of Transportation Jerry Hedrick, Oregon Division of State Lands Jim McFerrin, Pacific Power and Light Tim Hayford, Peninsula Drainage District #2 Capt. Dennis Merrill, Police Bureau Carol-Linda Cassin, Portland Development Commission Kerry Hampton, Portland Public Schools Dave Obern, State Marine Board Wayne Shuyler, State Marine Board Phil Colombo, Tri-Met Judy Linnton, U.s. Corps of Engineers Table of Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of this Plan 1 Plan Organization 2 Background 5 Location 5 Characteristics 9 History 15 Bridgeton Neighborhood Association 21 Relationship to Other Plans, Regulations, and Studies 22 Comprehensive Plan 22 Albina Community Plan 22 East Columbia Natural Resources Management Plan 23 Columbia Corridor Transportation Study 23 Design Standards and Guidelines 23 Development Opportunities 25 Plan Process 26 Using the Comprehensive Plan and the Bridgeton Neighborhood 27 Plan in Land Use Reviews Vision, Policies, Objectives and Implementation Actions 29 Vision Statement 31 Goal 33 Policies, Objectives, and Actions 35 Policy 1 Policy 2 Policy 3 Policy 4 Policy 5 Housing, Business and Neighborhood Design Transportation and Public Utilities Descriptions of Selected Actions "Bridgeton Transportation Network Concept Plan" • Action Items • Concept Map • Concept Designs Environment Community Public Safety 37 43 51 46 54-55 57-58 59 65 69 Appendices A. Ordinances and Resolution B. Transmittal Letter from Planning Commission to City Council C. Abbreviations D. Voluntary Neighborhood Design Guidelines E. Desirable Businesses F. Surveys G. Bibliography List of Maps 1. Vicinity Map 2. Neighborhood Map 3. Zoning Map 4. Bridgeton Transportation Network Concept Map Figures 5 7 24 54-55 T1 T2 Proposed Connection between East and West Bridgeton Section at Landscape Feature 57 58 INTRODUCTION Purpose of this Plan The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association in 1995 requested assistaJlce from the Bureau of Planning in preparing a plan for the Bridgeton neighborhood. A unique and desirable part of tne dtYJ Bridgetlbm .is now facing one of the biggest challenges in Us existence ~ the 'ntroduct1on of residential and commercial activHy which could overwhelm .'tSl current residents if not nandled judiciously.. Its lbcartion along the Columbia Riv'er and adjacent to major transportation ,corridors and economic rcenters makes thiS an extremely desirable area. Potential developments could boost the neighborhood's population born its current 300 to over 3,000. The magmtude an ramifications of that growth on Ithe' neighborhood's sense tOf community, 'tl1ansportation system, and use' of the waterfront require that the neigmb-o,rhoodl and the City work ,closely to define 'future direction and amicably reach solutions to potential problems. The Bridgefon Neiglzborlzood Plan' was written to help gUide the neighborhood through thesoe and other changes aIT~icipated in the nexrt 20 years. This, plan helps residents, property owners, l>"usiness owners" dev,elopers ,and ,othelis thinking of locating here understand the desires and vision its current residents have for their future. By participating in the neighborhood planning process, current neighborhood residents and property owners influenced how this neighborhood might change and develop. The plan will also guide the neighborhood association as it works with developers and View west fWID end r:>f Bridg,elon Road of North Portland Harbor and vacant land along the dike Pholo courtesy of David ¥amasIHta, Portland Bureau of Parks and Recreation and businesses on proposed changes. Finally, this plan is intended to guide decision- makers on matters of land use, transportation, capital expenditures and environmental concern, 1 Roth Home prior to being torn down. Plan Organizatian The Bridgeto/1 Neighborhood Plan consists of several parts Th,ey are' the inbo:duction and ba<:kgfound" vision statemen:t and goal, Comprehensive Plan policIes and objecfives. action charts, and appendix. The vision statement, policIes, and obJectives were adopted by ordinance. Most oj tne action charts were adopted by resolution. A special section of the B~tidgeton Neighborhood Plan is the "BridgretQn lransporrahon Network C(>ncept Plan," which was adopted by ordinance. (See below for more information.) Other portions ot the plan will be used by the 11"idgetem Neighborhood Association as part of its. implementatiol1 efforts. The Introduction and Background explain the purpose and organization of the plan ,and set the stage fOJ" the plan etemel'lts. The VisJon Statement contains the aspirations of he current residents oj Bridgeton fublic School District al1Gw the Bridgeton, Neighborhood AS50cia lion to hold its. meetings in the school, but the playfield adjacent to the SdlOOlls one of two main recreational out"lets for "ts residents. The playtield is ,the ()nly open flat green quasi- public area within the neighborhood itself. ... .,:" Columbia SchooL Taken from Historic Resources Inventory The Columbia River is clearly one of the major recreational boating resources in the Pacific Northwest. Contributing to the rise in reclteational 'b'Qa'ting are the flood 'Control dams which make the entire river safer~ regular dredgJng. and channel mainfenance, natural beauty of the river, and the increased ~eisllre time and freedom to explQre the sloughs, channels, and islands. Intereslingly~while most floating home owners also 13 own a separate boat for use on the Columbia, few residents of rowhouses and homes along the Bridgeton Slough own one. There are no direct means for the public to access the Columbia River. Nor are there boat ramps, or docks the public can use for fishing, visiting, or viewing. North Portland Harbor. Photo courtesy of David Yamashita, Portland Bureau of Parks and Recreation North Portland Harbor, looking toward Blidgeton. Photo courtesy of TIle Orego~lifln" 11/9/96 14 History The area now known as Bridgeton was originally part of the vast Columbia River floodplain, filled with abundant and diverse animal and plant life. Early maps consistently indicate that the area between the Columbia River and the Columbia Slough was a narrow floodplain bordering a short steep slope leading up to rolling uplands. The floodplain apparently was marshy, containing ash and wiUow stands. As the area around Fort Vancouver and PQrtland grew, this area of marshes and wetlands began to be used for grazing and farming by recent settlers. With the ()pening of fhe Dreg()n T aU'n 843 and the passage in 1850 of the Donation Land A<::f" more people began to senle along the' south shore of the Columbia. Apparently Bridgeton was originally part of the Joseph R. Switzfer donation land claim. By 1896 the roadway which later waS to become Marine Drive had been constructedT To protect their farms, local residents built a rough dike between 1905 and 1910. The more substantial dike that we know today was begun in 1921. It was improved by the Corps of Engineers between 1939 and 1942, under the Flood Control Act of 1936.3 Bridgeton, bottom left. Photo courtesy of Bob Wuerth 3 Miller, ibid. 15 ..... 0'- ~~~~ r-,"c"----...r, /\/"2 Ie = •• • From Musil, et ai, Cultuml Resource Assessment of Peninsula Drainage District No. 1 17 To protect the dikes and pump and fill the wetlands and side channels between the Columbia River and the Columbia Slough, the state chartered three legal entities called drainage districts. Each was given the authority to levy taxes to fund their operations. Peninsula Drainage District No. 2/ of which Bridgeton is a part, was fonned in 1917. It covers 1,512 acres and is substantially developed with industrial, commercial and residentia~uses. AU st®rmwater runoft drains to ene' of two pumps~either the West Pump Station located immediately west of 1·5 at the southwest corner of the' district or the East rump Station located in the' southeas't c-ccner Qi the district. Both drain to the Columbia Slough. By theearty part of the 19th cen.tury enough poople lived in the area to request a post office. Posfa_ offld.als, howeveli'~ refused to name it Bridgeton due to the use of that name in other par s of the country. To choose' another name, local citizens held a meeting. According to, Oregon Geographic Names, the name, Faloma.• "was made up by using the initials. of three eriginal land. OWnerS in the neighborhood, to-wit·, Messrs. Force, Love and Moore. "4 The original Columbia School, a one room wooden building, was built in 1907 as part of Columbia School District No. 2~ At One time it was owned by Paloma SChool District No. 33..The- present 'C~lumbia Elementary School was built in 1937, ultimately corning to include a 20-acre arboretum, a six aCfre farm, and a greenhouse. i uring its heyday, it served students primarily from Vanport, once the second. largest dty and schoo district in the state. Aile·, the- 1948 flood, Colu_m'bia Schoors student population essentially Stude-nts in front of original. Columbia School shortly alter its: opening. Photo courtesy of HIe Oregonian, May 1, 1983 :::-n'-:::":'-""- ~-- .,.....,.....'. " r,·, k;;,,·.~~, Conceptual schematics by David Yamashita, Portland Bureau of Parks and Recreation Building schematics, North Harbour Corporation, 1996 30 Our Vision of Bridgeton in 2016 Bridgeton is dominated by its environment. Ever-present is the mighty Columbia River, whose periodic floods have shaped the region. The spine of the neighborhood is the dike, a major man-made barrier that enabled development of the land to the south. Whether residing on a houseboat, in one of its charming rowhouses, an older home, or in an upscale condo, all respond to the river. Its daily rhythm is a compelling magnet for neighborhood activities. Shaded Bridgeton Slough, home to wildlife, reminds all that this too was once part of the river's floodplain. Bridgeton exudes a village-like character with a human scale. Bridgeton is a safe place to live, work and play. The dike is topped by Bridgeton Road and, in the newer section, a foot and bicycle promenade that is part of Portland's 40-Mile Loop. Residents throughout the neighborhood enjoy wide vistas, sunsets, activities in the harbor, and snow-capped peaks. To promote alternatives to cars, we have several busy bus stops, a pedestrian and bicycle promenade, and a nearby light rail stop which includes bike lockers to support energy-efficient commuting. Bridgeton Road retains a feature beloved by its residents - the ability for cars, people, and bicyclists to share the roadway in harmony. The special paving materials alerts drivers that they are entering an area shared by all users. Here can be found the older homes, many with trim yards well-landscaped over the years, rowhouses, and houseboats gently swaying with the river's changing dynamics. Its street lighting - upgraded and improved in past years - casts a nostalgic glow while yet retaining its needed brightness for security reasons. Cars drive slowly, since the narrow roadway IS mostly devoted to parking for the houseboats below. Behind many of the homes at the end of the side streets lies Bridgeton Slough. A pathway along Marine Drive provides glimpses into the greenery for those passing through the area. The waterfront is largely dominated by houseboats and marinas, but still finds room for several docks with park benches. These attract people out onto the river. People use the docks for visiting, contemplation, and just strolling. Best of all, restaurants contain dock facilities as well, allowing a constant interchange between life on the land and on the water. 31 Fishing is common. Kayak classes are held in the harbor, dragon boaters and rowers practice, and Christmas Ships parade by in season. The no-wake rule keeps the area calm, and boaters and residents smile and wave at each other. In the newer part of Bridgeton a foot and bike path, now a wide well-lit promenade, continues the direct line of old Bridgeton Road along the top of the dike. The sense of community and close knit feeling Bridgeton residents experience continues as well. Landscaping, benches, lighting, and other amenities foster interaction among the river, marinas and nearby buildings. Buildings are stepped back from the promenade. Housing is denser here, but of high quality that enhances the livability of the rest of the metropolitan area by reducing urban sprawl. Most commercial activity is located in the newer, west section of the neighborhood, with some established along Marine Drive. Businesses center on neighborhood needs and the river. Some river-oriented light industry, including boat services, exist throughout the neighborhood. Many telecommuters and professionals find the area an ideal place to live and work. Parking is contained largely in structures in order to free up space with views for residential and commercial uses. All in all, Bridgeton has grown up - from being a rural outpost of the city to being an important gateway to Portland and Oregon. Its character reflects its rural past and its urban future. Most of all, Bridgeton remains a vital river community, enjoying its beauty and serenity, but respectful of the river's power and majesty. Bridgeton has shown how it is possible to develop a neighborhood as part of a great city. This is Bridgeton - our special neighborhood. 32 Bridgeton Plan Goal Bridgeton is a vital, environmentally sensitive, pedestrian-oriented river community. ;;;6- 2- ! ~ I I ~ .- ~ ~ , 33 ~ r'-....."-.,,,.1 '&\?">-'Wi/ All drawings courtesy of Judy Calantha, Portland Bureau of Planning 34 Policies, Objectives and Actions These policies, objectives and actions are designed to help Bridgeton reach its goal, which is to be a vital, environmentally sensitive, pedestrian-oriented river community. That goal is articulated further in its vision statement. The following policies and objectives were adopted as part of the Portland's Comprehensive Plan. Certain future legislative land use changes and Comprehensive Plan amendment requests in the neighborhood are required to conform with this portion of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. The "Bridgeton Transportation Network Concept Plan" and actions T2 and T3 were adopted by ordinance. Actions, with the exception of actions T2 and T3, were approved by resolution. Courtesy of Judy Galantha, Portland Bureau of Planning 35 Courtesy of Jim Longstreth 36 Policy 1: Housing, Business and Neighborhood Design Policy 1 seeks to protect the livability ()f the Bridgeton neighborhood. It does this by addressing residential and business development, both as independent entities and, in a design context, their relations'hip to each other in the larger neighborhood. Because the entire n-eighborhQod, with the exception of the Columbia School site, lies within either the Mixed C,ommercial/Residential (CM) or General Commercial (CG) zone, it is likely that the neighborhood will see more commercial development in the future. In anticipation of increased development, Policy 1 concentr,ates on three elements: 1) the integration of the new residential and commercial establishments into the overall framework of the neighborhood, 2) development of a o0mpatib!,e streetscape, and 3) identification of types of businesses desired by the ne'igllborhood. Photo taken by Matt Whitney 37 Improve and maintain Bridgeton as a residential and commercial neighborhood with a unique recreational and marine orientation. A. Housing and Business Objectives: 1. Retain houseboats as a unique, viable form of housing in existing moorages. 2. Encourage owner-occupancy. 3. Encourage smaller businesses that meet the needs of local residents and can be reached by walking, biking, or boating to locate in the neighborhood. 4. Encourage new businesses to locate in the west end of the neighborhood. Photo taken by Matt Whitney 38 Drawings courtesy of Judy Galantha, Portland Bureau of Planning Action Chart: Housing and Business Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs PROJECTS HI Develop a plan to encourage middle income and x BNA long-time residents to remain in the neighborhood. This could include such ideas as sharing costs and using neighborhood expertise and skills to upgrade private homes and local infrastructure. H2 Encourage the construction of a public dock for x BNA, Owners, public access to the river from the dike. POC, other Encourage owners and developers to work in public funding cooperation with the Parks Bureau, the Marine agencies Board and other interested agencies. PROGRAMS H3 Encourage developers of large projects to include a x BNA,BOP mixture of housing, commercial, moorages, and restaurants in their Droiects. H4 Support types of businesses identified in x BNA Aonendix E. H5 Seek incentives to encourage businesses identified x BNA in Anoendix E to locate within Bridgeton. Note: Action Charts were approved by Portland City Council by resolution. They are a starting place. All actions have an identified implementor. They were adopted with the understanding that some will need to be adjusted and others replaced with more feasible proposals. Identification of an implementor for an action is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances will affect the implementation leader's abHity to take action. 39 B. Neighborhood Design Objectives: 1. Ensure that all new development enhances the river, natural and village character of Bridgeton. 2. Encourage a mix of housing types that are compatible with Bridgeton's casual lifestyle. 3. Promote a streetscape that reflects and enhances Bridgeton's sense of community on the water and on the land. 4. Ensure that all new harborside developments open directly onto the promenade for public accessibility. 5. Encourage developers to meet the voluntary neighborhood design guidelines in Appendix D. Action Chart: Neighborhood Design Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with goi ng 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yr, PROJECTS H6 Prepare a street lighting plan for Bridgeton. x BNA,PDOT Consider the following: a. Unified architectural design in keeping with the riverfront/northwest neighborhood character; b. Ornamental lights with shaded fixtures; c. Capital and operating costs; d. Glare; and e. View obstrt.Jctions. 40 Action Chart: Neighborhood Design Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs H7 Create gateways into the neighborhood at major x BNA intersections, a. As a part of the transportation concept plan, consider gateways at Gantenbein and Marine Drive. b. When new intersections are created, consider gateways as a part of the engineering design element. c. Develop a design concept for each gateway. d. Determine method of funding, ownership, construction and maintenance, including ways of dealing with vandalism. H8 Identify special or historic structures in Bridgeton x BNA and seek ways to retain them. H9 Improve the streetscape on the dike by: x PDOT, BNA, a. Installing street lighting in keeping with the Developers. FOT, neighborhood character. Owners b. Considering the addition of any or all of the following: street trees, benches, drinking fountains, banners, hanging baskets, street signs, awnings, wall colors and materials, business signs, and ornamental plantings in cement holders. c. Considering alternatives to curbs, gutters and sidewalks. d. Developing guidelines for the placement and style of mailboxes, dumpsters, other trash receptacles, and recycling bins. e. Encouraging owners with small open areas along Bridgeton Road unusable for parking to be used for public use. PROGRAMS HIO Work with developers to ensure that new x BNA developments in old Bridgeton are designed and built only to the 45' allowed under the Mixed Commercial zone. Hll Encourage developers to include representatives x BNA of the neighborhood association early in their development design process. H12 Work with developers and builders to ensure x BNA design, lighting and landscaping which is in character with the neighborhood and which integrates in a cohesive manner with the neighborhood, the multi-use character of the street, and the river. 41 Action Chart: Neighborhood Design Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yr, 20 Plan Yr. HI3 Encourage a variety of building designs which x BNA are also in character with the neighborhood. This could be achieved through the use of different paint, sidings, plantings, window and door treatment, eaves, and lighting. H14 Maintain amenities such as gateways, benches, x BNA hanging baskets, and street trees. Note: Action Charts were approved by Portland City Council by resolution. They are a starting place. All actions have an identified implementor. Tney were adopted with the understanding that some will need to be adjusted and others replaced with more feasible proposals. Identification of an implementor for an action is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances will affect the implementation leader's ability to take action. Courtesy Portland Community Design, Building Blocks for Outer Southeast Neighborhoods 42 Policy 2: , Transportation and Public Utilities Policy 2 addresses issues primarily related to the transportation system in 'Bridgeton. The issues are three-fold. First. Bridgeton Road and its side streets d,efine the current spine of the Bridgeton neighborhood. And Bridgeton residents like Et the way it is. A 1994 survey fQ·und that more than 70 percent of the residents said., '-'Leave' Bridgeton the way it is./I ~ighty~two percent felt the road did not need sidewalks and that people should be able to walk on the road. , . , ,--.... . . . , '. ,,' I, J3nclgeton Road looking east from Gantenbein. Photo by Matt Whitney Nevertheless, traffic is increasing and will continue to increase on Bridget(m Road due to the significant numbers of new housing tlmts {inishe"v- ~""'r '1'Rfl~i .r'!'l.~(1\ /~'1 , / ---~,II {} l,,--- ,- Bridgeton'Transportation Network Concept Plan LEGEND ........ ApprQXimote AttematiYII Looations for N~Ped trian Pathways **** 40 Mile Loop Rec:reot~onal rrnil ------ lYE MA 280' ..... ~ NORTH Bridgeton Slough .A;pproximate Altemoli-re loca'tions for New Streets. Approximate ~fions for' Approved New Streets fnteJ's~ionrmPflovements bl City Oesjgno(ed Neigbborhood Gateways Scenic Corridors o Cl [] •• CO -1 I 55 I ' Riverplace is an award-winning example of a mixed-used project. Housing, commercial, office and recreational uses can complement each other in dose proximity, The diversity of uses increase the presence of people, which decreases the likelihood of crime. (Drawing courtesy of Judy Galantha, Portland Bureau of Planning) ..-::::---- - - - - . Courtesy Judy Galantha, Portland Bureau of Planning 56 "" . t, • 0 j ,. 1, ~ ~ ./ ~ ~ ..... ai - ~,- .. . • ~ • iii • ~. \ ~ - , .,. . . . •• • '* ....,.. --=- ';oCr.. .... ..._-~~"" .- - ' " . ..... _: - ii!' &1 ..;...: ... .. '4.1.' '•• -: -., ,jo • - ~. -, . ;. t1. , .- - ,. ' .. . " . " r aU: 20' 5GAL-C. Figure Tl 57 ,'N-~\I:l • 4 A . , ) I .. ~J'~ . "'V Ji), 1 11~ J '1 "\ ~J It ~40,-1)J 1v~ , SE.GT'ON AT LAH~ 'FeATu~ (LCJOKINq EAc:.,""-we~) Figure T2 58 Policy 3: Environment The primary focus of Policy 3 is to ensure that whatever development occurs in Bridgeton does not degrade the environments of North Portland Harbor or Bridgeton Slough nor threaten the integrity of the dike. Although most residents would like to keep Bridgeton the way it is now, they understand that grQ,wth is c()ming their way. Bridgeton fesidents recognize that". witb changes in (tensity and transpo,rtation patterns, the env.ironmenta in:tegrity of each of their particular environments could be compromised. Bridgeton Slough: photo- by Ma:tt Whitney Bridgeton residents are not the only ones concerned about the environment. The Peninsula Drainage District #2 notes that all development and/or landscaping on or along the Bridgeton Levee section wil! require districf review and participation to ensure compliance to the Corps of Engineers Levee Stan'dards. Photo by Mati Whitney What residents have tried to do in this plan is seek ,ai balance, with the ba ance most favorable 'toward environmental integdty. 'fhis policy addresses the restoration and enhancement of the natural d1aracterisUc$ rOf North Portland Harbor, the dike, and Bridgeton Slough. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association anticipates that tJl\is plan will increase the awareness of f1esidents and developers about the environmental nature of the neighborhood. 60 Protect and enhance the integrity of North Portland Harbor, the shoreline dike, the Bridgeton Slough, and other natural resources of the Bridgeton neighborhood. Objectives: 1. Support developments on and along the dike which enhance the environmental nature of the neighborhood. 2. Enhance and maintain the Bridgeton Slough as a natural amenity in the neighborhood, a drainage system, and a home to wildlife. 3. Enhance and maintain North Portland Harbor as a scenic corridor, waterway, view, fish habitat, home to Bridgeton residents, and recreational amenity. 4. Protect the integrity of the dike for flood control. Black-crowned Night Heron 61 Action Chart: Environment Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with goi ng 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs PROJECTS: General El Identify areas and locations in need of additional x FOT. BNA trees and obtain funding or seek donations of trees. E2 Establish native plant salvage, propagation and x BES, Pvt distribution projects tied to Naturescaping or other native plant education programs. E3 Create incentives for property owners to retrofit x BES their sites and moorages with water quality and quantity controls. E4 Establish a neighborhood committee to monitor x BNA,BES water quality and other environmental issues. E5 Identify scenic views as part of the"scenic x BNA,BOP corridor." PROJECTS: North Portland Harbor and Shoreline Dike E6 Prepare a landscaping plan for the riverbank x BNA,DSL, using the Portland Plant List. POD, BES, PPB, Parks PROJECTS: Brid2eton SlOU2h E7 Prepare a plan, to include each of the following x PDD, BES, DSL, elements, to restore/ clean up the Bridgeton BNA Slough, including restoration and maintenance of wildlife, in a biologically sound manner: a. Water quality, b. Water level, c. Siltation, d. Long-term survival of plants, wildlife and non-rough fish, e. Elimination of rough fish, £. Addition of warm water game fish, and g. Control of mosquitoes. E8 Prepare a drainage analysis of Peninsula Drain- x POD, BES, BNA, age District #2, including the Bridgeton Slough. Metro Prepare drainage and water quality master plan that results in clean water discharges to Bridgeton Slough and North Portland Harbor. 62 Action Chart: Environment Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs E9 Work with developers to design a joint x PDD, BOP, BES. stormwater treatment system which will work in DSL,BNA conjunction with the drainage-related elements of the slough. PROGRAMS: General BID Work with Peninsula Drainage District #2 on x issues of joint concern. a. Encourage the board of directors of the drainage district to include a neighborhood PDD representative on the board. b. Appoint a resident of the Bridgeton neighborhood to sit on the POD Board of Directors or at least to attend each meeting. BNA Ell Encourage owners and developers throughout the x BNA, BOP, BES, neighborhood to: UFD, FOT, a. Create landscaping which adds to the PDOT character of the neighborhood and is wildlife-friendly. b. Restrict the use of pesticides, herbicides, or any other chemical eXfoliate or environmentally hazardous substances. c. Minimize water use. d. Retain mature trees throughout the neighborhood. e. Plant additional trees and shrubs along Marine Drive in order to form a natural noise, air and visual buffer. f. Use landscape areas to retrofit or provide biofiltration and infiltration of stormwater. El2 Encourage owners to remove blackberries and x BNA,BES, other non-native plants in areas covered with an Owners environmental overlay ("c" on the zoning maps). E13 Encourage owners and developers in areas with no x BNA environmental restrictions to add landscape elements which add to the colorful, eclectic character of the neighborhood. E14 Encourage the participation of households, x BES,BNA moorages, businesses, and construction projects in recycling. E15 Conduct biannual neighborhood clean-up days to x BNA,Owners remove trash and refuse from environmentally sensitive areas and plant new vegetation. 63 Action Chart: Environment Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs EI6 Promote the awareness through education of the x BNA neighborhood about the unique environment of Bridgeton and the need to maintain it. PROGRAMS: North Portland Harbor and Shoreline Dike E17 Encourage developers to conserve the unique x BNA environment of the dike and the adjacent waterway in the building, landscaping and transportation improvements. EI8 Keep marinas and moorages clean. Ensure that x BNA individuals, owners and government agencies protect the river from contaminants, including: a. Raw sewage b. Household chemicals, debris and other items c. Oils and other hazardous materials EI9 Allow new construction of buildings and parking x PDD, BOP lots only on the south side of the dike. PROGRAMS: Bridl!;eton Slough E20 Implement the restoration plan and results of the x BNA, PDD, BES, drainage analysis. Metro Note: Action Charts were approved by Portland City Council by resolution. They are a starting place. All actions have an identified implementor. They were adopted with the understanding that some will need to be adjusted and others replaced with more feasible proposals. Identification of an implementor for an action is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances will affect the implementation leader's ability to take action. 64 Policy 4: Community Policy 4 targets three main issues: 1) Columbia School, 2) the Port of Portland, and 3) Bridgeton Neighborhood Association logistics. Residents would like to see the school retained as a community resource. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association holds its monthly meetings at the school. Residents would like to see the open area west of the buildings kept in a form of open space usable for a variety of unstructured activities. Columbia School: photo by Matt Whitney The Port is a close, though not adjacent, neighbor and one whose activities and decisions impact the neighborhood. Through this policy, the neighborhood anticipates more cooperative working relationships with the Port on issues of concern. 65 Maintain the sense of community within the Bridgeton neighborhood. Objectives: 1. Support the use of Columbia School as an educational institution and as a community resource. 2. Ensure that all government agencies notify and cooperate with the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association when making decisions which directly or indirectly affect the neighborhood. 3. Ensure that the Port of Portland and Bridgeton Neighborhood Association cooperate on activities of mutual concern. Action Chart: Community Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 PIan Vrs PROJECTS Cl Work with Portland Public Schools to improve x BNA, Parks access to the Columbia School playfield for nei~hborhood residents. C2 Encourage the Portland Public Schools to prepare x BNA an Impact Mitigation Plan (IMP) for Columbia School. Work with the school district on its IMP. C3 Establish a granting and funding committee for x BNA the nei~hborhood association. C4 Form a design committee within the Bridgeton x BNA Nei~hborhoodAssociation. C5 Set up a neighborhood phone tree to alert x BNA residents and businesses to land use cases, meetin~s, safety concerns and other issues. C6 Create and update periodically a neighborhood x BNA directory. PROGRAMS C7 Work with the Portland Public Schools to keep x BNA Columbia School open: a. As an educational institution and b. As a meeting facility for the neighborhood association and nearby or~anizations 66 Action Chart: Community Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with goi ng 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs C8 Should the Portland Public School District decide x BNA to sell their property: a. Encourage the district to give the neighborhood association, City of Portland, and/or Metro the option to purchase the playfield for open space. b. Participate in the decision-making process. C9 Port of Portland actions: x a. Encourage residents to report noisy airplane BNA overflights to the proper Port of Portland and/or state or federal entity. b. Address airport impacts, including possible BNA, POP air pollution, generated by private, commercial, and military aircraft. c. Work through Bridgeton area representatives to advisory committees to raise important BNA issues with the Port of Portland. d. Update residents of the Bridgeton neighborhood annually on issues of concern. POP e. Work with the Oregon Air National Guard to address the problems, including air pollution BNA and noise, generated for residents by their daily training flights. f. Work with the East Columbia Neighborhood Association to request the Port to remove the BNA fence around its undeveloped land on Marine Drive opposite the golf course and put it into some type of park or river viewing area. ClO Work with the industrial owners, truckers, and x BNA, Pvt adjacent neighborhood associations on all issues of joint concern. CII Encourage property owners and tenants to be x BNA sensitive to their neighbors regarding lighting, fencing, noise and other things which could affect their neighbors' homes and privacy. 67 Action Chart: Community Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs el2 Publish each six months an updated list of x BNA pertinent numbers, including at least the following: a. River Patrol. b. Port of Portland Noise Control Complaints. c. Police Liaison. d. Officers of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association. e. Officers and staff of North Portland Neighborhood Office. f. Crime Watch Committee. g. Columbia School contacts. h. Advisory committees needing representation from Bridgeton. Cl3 Work with the East Columbia Neighborhood x BNA Association to help maintain the 24-acre Arboretum at 6th and Middlefield as a park. Note: Action Charts were approved by Portland City Council by resolution. They are a starting place. All actions have an identified implementor. Tneywere adopted with the understanding that some will need to be adjusted and others replaced with more feasible proposals. Identification of an implementor for an action is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances will affect the implementation leader's ability to take a.ction. 68 Policy 5: Public Safety Bridgeton is considered a safe neighborhood. Its public safety problems arise most frequently with homeless individuals: dumpster digging, littering, and breaking and entering. With several new developments now being built and being reviewed, the number of people who live, work and visit the neighborhood will increase several-fold over the next few years. To date a relatively out-of-the-way neighborhood, Bridgeton will soon become far better known than it is at present. The thrust of this policy is that communication and cooperation among Bridgeton residents and between Bridgeton and the Police Bureau is the most effective method for anticipating and _----"~ ..;V dealing with crime. Noise suppression techniques on aircraft have cut sound levels to livable thresholds. Flood control dams and continued upgrading and maintenance on the dikes have left people with a much greater sense of security about potential flooding. The concerns in this policy raised by the Fire Bureau revolve around the safety of the citizenry in this area. Because of its location, the Bridgeton neighborhood is particularly at risk because of flooding, hazardous material spills, and aircraft accidents. The Fire Bureau specifically asks the neighborhood to address the issues of evacuation, water supply and (emergency vehicle) accessibility under each of the following circumstances: • Light rail construction • New development, both residential and commercial, construction • Times of high traffic volume or congestion on Marine Drive and 1-5 • Fires (water resources available) Unique to most neighborhoods in the city, Bridgeton residents living on houseboats must contend with water-oriented safety issues. These may include floating debris, excessively large wakes that literally can tear a floating home to pieces, rude behavior from transient boaters, flooding, and wind-driven waves. The Oregon State Marine Board (5MB) was created in 1959 specifically to manage recreational boating on waterways in the state, including North Portland Harbor. The 5MB is responsible for registering and titling boats, floating homes and boat houses, regulating the use of styrofoam flotation, making grants to cities and counties to construct boating facilities, placing regulatory buoys and signs, and contracting with county sheriffs and state police for law enforcement. 69 Photo by Matt Whitney In 1995 the OregQn State Marine Board prepared the, Recreational Boating Management Plan for the POJ"ftand Metropolitan Waterways. ~t tecommended that attention be focused on three major areas or tConeern: edmcation, law enforcement, and facilities. During its planning pwcess, Bridg,eton residents, likewise felt there needed to more emphasis on these three issues. 70 Foster and maintain a safe and healthy environment for residents, businesses and visitors. Objectives: 1. Support and participate in community policing. 2. Create street configurations which ensure rapid emergency response. 3. Enhance a feeling of safety through building placement, landscape design, and lighting. 4. Promote safe and courteous boating practices. Action Chart: Public Safety Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Vrs 20 Plan Vrs PROJECTS PSI Work with city agencies to design a street x BNA, PFB, network that will guarantee emergency access PDOT, BOP within time standards while maintaining and enhancing the character of Bridgeton. PS2 Establish emergency access between Bridgeton x PDOT, PFB Road, Frontal'(e Road, and Marine Drive. PS3 Work with the Oregon Department of x BNA,PDOT, Transportation to reduce the impacts of high- ODOT,SMB intensity lights along the freeway. This might include shielding to eliminate glare and light pollution impactinl'( nearby. residents. PS4 Work with trucking companies south of Marine x BNA, Property Drive to review the impacts of noise and high- Owners, Trucking intensity lights on those living north of Marine Interests Drive. PSS Develop a comprehensive plan to reduce auto x BNA, PPB, theft and stereo theft from parking lots. Enlist NPNO the help of persons qualified in this area of expertise. 71 Action Chart: Public Safety Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementor. with goi ng 5 Yr. 20 Plan Yr. PS6 Develop a plan for dealing with emergencies x PFB, BNA which would impact the Bridgeton neighborhood. Include: a. Coordination with adjacent neighborhood associations and commercial!industrial interests. b. A list of meeting places, resources, contacts and escape procedures. c. Creation of a Neighborhood Emergency Team. d. The need to dial 911 first in case of any emergency. PS7 Provide street lights which will enhance the x BNA,PDOT. streetscape, increase the sense of security, and PPB ensure rapid response by emergency vehicles. PROGRAMS PS8 Re-evaluate annually and improve, if necessary, x BNA,PPB the Fourth of Julv plan. PS9 Reduce trespassing by posting "No Trespassing" x Owners signs. PSIO Reduce unauthorized use of dumpsters by properly x Owners locating and securing them. Maintain dumpsters in a clean, orderly manner. PS II Encourage persons involved in Neighbor Watch x BNA,NPNO programs to: a. Meet on an ongoing basis, keep an eye out for each other, and get to know each other. b. Install lighting in strategic locations on their property. c. Educate each resident and business owner on the proper response to safety-related situations. PSI2 Support the Multnomah County Sheriff's River x BNA, MCRP Patrol to enforce boating speeds along the channel. Increase the number of warning signs along the harbor. PSI3 Assign a police liaison officer to the Bridgeton x PPB neighborhood to work with the neighborhood on community policing issues, attend neighborhood meetings and events, and get to know the neighborhood. 72 Action Chart: Public Safety Time # Actions Adopted On- Next 6 to Implementors with going 5 Yrs 20 Plan Yrs PSl4 Ensure that each marina contains easily readable x BNA address signs for emergency identification visible from land and water. PSIS Increase the presence of law enforcement officers x patrolling: a. North Portland Harbor. MCRP b. Bridgeton conununity. PPB PSl6 Encourage residents and businesses to participate x PFB, BNA in emergency preparedness planning, training and cooperative efforts to enhance residents ability to respond in emergencies. NO,te: ~c~io~ Charts were approved by PortlaAd. CHyC unci! by r~solution. The):: are a starting ~Iace, All actions have an Identified Implementor. They were adopted With Ihe understanding that some will need Ito be adjusled ,and others replaced with more feasible proposals. Identification of a,n lmplementof for 111'1 action is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances wi\1 affect the implementation leader' ability 10 take action. Photo by Matt Whitney 73 50ME MERIT5 OF TREE5: • Break the wind. • Help unify buildings of different styles & sizes. • Define arid organize space. • Create a sense of enclosure and privacy. • Provide shade and cooling. • Evolve with the seasons. • Beautify the streetscape. • Allow winter light through. / Courtesy Portland Community Design, Building Blocks for Outer Southeast Neighborhoods 74 Appendix A Ordinances and Resolution ORDINANCE 110. 171238 As Amended Adopt and implement the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. (Ordinance) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Portland's Comprehensive Plan was adopted on October 16 1980, acknowledged for compliance with Statewide Planning Goals on May 3 1981 and updated as a result of periodic review in June 1988, January 1991, March 1991, September 1992, and May 1995. 2. Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 197.640 requires cities and counties to review their comprehensive plans and land use regulations periodically and make changes necessary to keep plans and regulations up-to-date and in compliance with Statewide Planning Goals and State laws. Portland is also required to coordinate its review and update of the Comprehensive Plan and land use regulations with State plans and programs. 3. Portland Comprehensive Plan Goal 10, Plan Review and Administration, states that the Comprehensive Plan will undergo periodic review to assure that it remains an up-to-date and workable framework for land use development. 4. Portland Comprehensive Plan Policy 10.2 (Comprehensive Plan Map Review) implements a community and neighborhood planning process for the review and update of the Portland Comprehensive Plan. 5. Portland Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.6 (Neighborhood Plan) encourages the creation of neighborhood plans to address issues and opportunities at a scale which is more refined and more responsive to neighborhood needs than can be attained under the broad outlines of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The neighborhood plan will serve as a component of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 171238 6. Neighborhood plans are intended to promote patterns of land use, urban design, circulation and services which encourage and contribute to the economic, social, and physical health, welfare, and safety of the neighborhood and the City. 7. The neighborhood plan is an advisory document for directing and managing change over time. The adopted Vision Statement, Policies, and Objectives of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan will serve as an official guide to decision- making, public deliberation, and investments. 8. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan was developed by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association with participation by residents throughout the neighborhood. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association initiated the citizen-based planning effort in mid-1995 and obtained Bureau of Planning staff assistance in March 1996. The resulting plan was approved by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association in October 1996 and December 1996. 9. As part of its budgeting process for FY 1994-95, the City Council directed the Bureau of Planning to facilitate the development of citizen-based planning efforts and prepare such projects for City Council consideration. The Bureau of Planning provided staff for the Bridgeton Planning process in FY1995-96 and FY1996-97. 10. Information used for the formulation of the policies and objectives of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan was based on the Albina Community Plan; Portland land use, natural resource, and public infrastructure inventories; 2 neighborhood-wide surveys, 2 open houses, and 5 neighborhood-wide meetings. 11. There are no Statewide goals, procedures, or timelines to guide the adoption of neighborhood plans other than those addressing citizen involvement (Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 1: Citizen Involvement). Portland's notification procedures, neighborhood-wide surveys, attendance at, and sponsorship of neighborhood meetings and open houses, and the Planning Commission and City Council public hearings maximized opportunities for citizen involvement throughout the plan development process in compliance with Goal 1. All public notification requirements have been met or exceeded. 171238 a. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association began the planning process in mid-1995 and received the assistance of a Bureau of Planning planner in March 1996. b. This work led to the formation of four subcommittees to address identified neighborhood planning issues: • Vision • Transportation • Residential/Commercial/Urban Design • Environment/Public Safety/Community c. Subcommittees met from mid-April to early June 1996 to draft preliminary plan components covering each of their respective topic areas. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association held 3 neighborhood-wide meetings to deal with each individual plan component. Community involvement was encouraged through flyers, other neighborhood outreach efforts, and articles in Shorelines, the newspaper serving Hayden Island, Bridgeton, East Columbia and Delta Park. d. Preliminary plan components, arranged as policies, objectives and actions, were compiled into a Discussion Draft of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. First review of the Discussion Draft by a Portland Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) members took place in July and August 1996. Comments from the TAC were used to guide the direction of future drafts of the plan and identify possible implementation partners. e. Staff compiled comments received from the public and TAC members for review by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. The Neighborhood Association created a Plan Steering Committee specifically to reconcile differences and redraft elements into the first draft. To do that, the Steering Committee met seven times between mid- August and mid-September. Staff met with TAC members as necessary to resolve differences. f. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association notified its residents about a neighborhood-wide meeting on the Steering Committee's recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan to be held in mid-October. At that meeting, residents voted to adopt the plan with the exception of the connection of Bridgeton Road to new 171238 roads built in west Bridgeton and the removal of temporary bollards in five years. g. The results of the October 1996 vote were translated into the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association-Endorsed Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan, published the end of October 1996. This version of the plan was the basis for two open houses held by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association in mid-December 1996. Comments from several implementers and attendees at the open houses were then compiled into the Proposed Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan, which was published on December 27 1996. h. Staff sent a legal notice 30 days in advance of the Planning Commission hearing on January 28 1997 to all property owners and residents. The notice included information about the availability of the Proposed Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan and locations where it could be picked up. Copies of the Proposed Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan were available at the Portland Bureau of Planning, the North Portland Neighborhood Office, and Columbia School. J. The Portland City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Proposed Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan on Tuesday, January 28 1997 at the Portland Building, Room 1002, 1120 SW 5th Avenue, Portland, Oregon. Planning Commissioners requested more information on the structural integrity of the dike, the relationship of Bridgeton Road to the adjacent transportation network, and the configuration and use of Bridgeton Road itself. J. At a work session on March 1l 1997, Planning Commissioners examined the public hearing record and information from the Bureau of Planning, Office of Transportation, and Peninsula Drainage District #2 in answer to their questions. At the conclusion of the work session, the Portland City Planning Commission revised the plan and recommended adoption of the amended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. The Planning Commission amended the Plan to include the requirenlf,f\t that when properties west of N Haight St. develop, the 5tree~ connection will designed as a standard residential city street and separated from Bridgeton Rd. by a 50' landscaped area. The road would be opened to allow 171238 full connection for all modes of transportation only when both the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association and City Council approve the opening. k. The Portland City Council held a public hearing on Wednesday, May 28 1997 to take public testimony and consider adoption of the Planning Commission Recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. The Plan's vision stat~ment, policies and objectives are adopted by ordinance. The Plan's implementation charts are adopted by resolution. 1. Notice of the May 28 1997 Portland City Council public hearing on the recommended adoption of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan was mailed to the Land Conservation and Development Commission more than 45 days before the scheduled public hearing. m. Public notices of the May 281997 Portland City Council public hearing on the adoption of the Planning Commission Recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan were mailed 30 days prior to the City Council hearing to interested parties, property owners, and participants and organizations involved in the plan's neighborhood planning process and Planning Commission public hearing. n. Copies of the Recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan were available to the public for their review 30 days before the scheduled May 28 1997 City Council public hearing. 12. A Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) composed of representatives from public service providers, city agencies, and other governments and organizations participated in the systematic and periodic review of components and drafts of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan throughout its formulation. Members of the TAC are: Bureau of Buildings, Bureau of Environmental Services, Bureau of Fire and Emergency Services, Bureau of General Services, Bureau of Housing and Community Development, Bureau of Parks and Recreation, Bureau of Water, Metro, Multnomah County, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Transportation, Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Division of State Lands, Pacific Power and Light, Peninsula Drainage District #2, Police Bureau, Portland Development Commission, Portland Public Schools, 171238 State Marine Board, Tri-Met, and U.s. Corps of Engineers. These agencies support the adoption of the Recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. Most of these organizations are listed as implementors with the implementation charts for the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. 13. The neighborhood plan is a neighborhood-based and initiated effort supported by private, institutional and public sectors of the community. Other organizations whose future action agenda is reflected in the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan include the North Portland Neighborhood Office, Friends of Trees, and the Port of Portland. 14. Plan provisions reinforce community development efforts by encouraging the development of higher density housing with a commercial component in the vacant area of Bridgeton along the waterfront. Neighborhood design provisions encourage development projects which enhance the river orientation of the area and promote a positive climate attractive to residents, pedestrians, bicyclists, and visitors. Plan vision statement, policies, and objectives focus on the riverfront as the spine of the neighborhood and the Bridgeton Slough as its backbone. 15. Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan provisions provide a basis for integrating new housing, residents, and commercial uses into the neighborhood; transportation linkages within and beyond the neighborhood; development opportunities; and management of North Portland Harbor and Bridgeton Slough within the Columbia River ecosystem. The Plan stresses the development of action charts which ensure that plan policies and objectives will be achieved through the development of comprehensive and realistic implementation programs which involve committed implementors from the public and private sectors of the community. 16. . Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan vision statement, policies, objectives, and action charts, and its planning process are consistent with the criteria established to evaluate neighborhood plans in the Community and Neighborhood Planning Program adopted by the Portland City Council in May 1994. a. The planning process ensured that all members and organizations of the Bridgeton Neighborhood had the opportunity to participate in each phase of the planning program. 171238 b. Over 75% of the action chart items have neighborhood and community based organizations as implementation partners. c. The Housing, Business and Neighborhood Design policy calls for the integration of new residential and commercial establishments into the overall framework of the neighborhood, development of a compatible streetscape, and identification of types of businesses desired by the neighborhood. Zoning within the Bridgeton Neighborhood, adopted as part of the Albina Community Plan, is almost entirely Mixed Residential- Commercial (CM). d. The Transportation and Public Utilities policy stresses the importance of pedestrian and bicycle accessibility within the Bridgeton Neighborhood and the importance of accessibility to mass transit services. The Transportation Network Concept Plan is contained within the Transportation policy. e. The primary focus of the Environment policy is to assure that whatever development occurs in Bridgeton does not degrade the environments of North Portland Harbor or Bridgeton Slough nor threaten the integrity of the dike. f. Each of the above policies are reinforced by the Community and Public Safety policies and objectives. 17. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan recommends provisions to implement City-wide Region 2040 Goals, Transportation Planning Rule, Livable City, and Comprehensive Housing Affordability policies and strategies. 18. Incorporation of the recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan into Policy 3.6 of the Portland Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the use of neighborhood plans to address localized issues, concerns, and opportunities within the framework of the City-wide Comprehensive Plan. Bridgeton provisions are consistent with the Portland Comprehensive Plan. Issues and opportunities shared by Bridgeton Neighborhood with its neighbors were addressed in the Albina Community Plan and have been addressed through on-going dialogue with adjacent neighborhood associations, business associations, and trucking interests. 171238 19. No zoning changes are made as part of the adoption of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan is made part of the Albina Community Plan, Policy 2.27, of the Portland Comprehensive Plan. 20. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan includes action charts which are adopted by resolution. These action charts represent a commitment from public and private groups to help the neighborhood implement the policies and objectives of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. Every listed implementor has agreed to the assigned action item by verbal consent or by submitting a letter of support. 21. On January 28 1996, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan and, after approving several amendments, recommended approval of the Neighborhood's Vision Statement, Policies, Objectives, Action Charts, and Transportation Network Concept Plan. 22. The recommendation of the Planning Commission of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan is in conformance with Portland's Comprehensive Plan and the Statewide Planning Goals as more fully set forth in the Report of the Planning Commission. The findings for the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan are contained in the Report of the Planning Commission, Exhibit B. Exhibit B is attached and incorporated by reference as part of this Ordinance. 23. The Notice of Proposed Action and three copies of the Recommended Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan were mailed to the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development as required by ORS 197.610 on April 15 1997. 24. It is in the public interest that the recommendations on the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan be adopted to direct and manage change in the Bridgeton Neighborhood. NOW THEREFORE, The Council directs: a. The Report and Recommendations of the Planning Commission on the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan and its attached exhibit are adopted and incorporated by reference. b. Ordinance 150580 is amended to incorporate as part of the Comprehensive Plan's vision statement, the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan Vision Statement, as shown in Exhibit A. 171238 c. Ordinance 150580 is amended to add the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan policies 1 through 5 and the objectives associated with each policy, as shown in Exhibit A. Based on the Recommendations of the Planning Commission and the findings of this ordinance, Policy 3.6 (Neighborhood Plan) of the Portland Comprehensive Plan is amended to add the following objective for the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan and add the plan to the list of neighborhood plans adopted by the City Council: Objective A: Foster the Bridgeton Neighborhood as a vital, environmentally sensitive, pedestrian-oriented rIver . community. Passed by the Council, JUH 04 1997 Commissioner Hales Ellen C. Ryker May 281997 Auditor of the City of Portland By _ ~ " n~ Deputy:s~ IF"\-~ ORDINANCE NO. 171239 Establish a Transportation Network Concept Plan for the Bridgeton Neighborhood (Ordinance) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: I. The City Council directed the Office of Transportation to provide street intersection improvements in the Bridgeton Neighborhood to support new and existing development and enhance the neighborhood; and 2. The Office of Transportation and the Bureau of Planning have worked cooperatively on issues of transportation and land use planning to implement the Region 2040 Framework Plan; and 3. The objectives of the Region 2040 Framework Plan call for connecting new or redeveloped areas with a grid network of streets which better serves all modes and destinations in any neighborhood; and 4. To further define the dimensions of the street grid, the Office of Transportation has followed the Metro design directives of spacing between street rights-of-way as 330 feet maximum between bicycle and pedestrian connections and 660 feet maximum between auto streets. These interconnected street spacing distances allow for good internal street circulation for all modes and provide good spacing between intersections between local and neighborhood collector streets; and 5. In the Bridgeton Neighborhood, the areas with mixed use Comprehensive Plan and Zone designations are now being developed parcel by parcel without the benefit of an established transportation network plan; and 6. Through the Bureau of Planning's Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan process, the public was invited to participate in determining the transportation network plan for their neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council directs: a. That the Office of Transportation implement the Bridgeton Neighborhood Transportation Network Concept Plan*as adopted and provide the following public review process regarding the possible future connection of Bridgeton Road: At a minimum, the City will review the potential for the auto con- nection of Bridgeton Road to the west with the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association and other property owners as a part of the following actions: • Update of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan • Update of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan • Update of the Transportation Systems Plan • Transportation Capital Improvement Projects Affecting the Bridgeton Neighborhood * Action Items T2 and T3 in Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan (Ordinance No. 171238 passed by Council June 4, 1997) 171239 In.addition to the above, any individual may petition the City Council to begin a public process the would include a recommendation regarding the auto connection of Bridgeton Road to the west from the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association to the City Council. The City Council would retain authority in making a decision regarding the need for the auto connection and its design. b. The Bureau of Planning and Office of Transportation are directed to cooperatively develop a notation for the City's official zoning maps to indicate that a Transportation Nerwork Plan exists for the Bridgeton Neighborhood. L. Wenrworth June 2, 1997 ~1SSed by Council: JUN 04 1997 BARBARA CLARKAuditor of the City of Portland By' . Deputy 6~O{.s0~ 35619 RESOLUTION NO. Adopt the Implementation Action Charts of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan (Resolution) WHEREAS, the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan is a neighborhood-initiated plan covering the policy areas of Housing, Business and Neighborhood Design; Transportation and Public Utilities; Environment; Community; and Public Safety; and WHEREAS, Bridgeton Neighborhood households, businesses, institutions, public and non-profit service providers, and community-based organizations and associations have participated in the Bridgeton Neighborhood's planning process since March 1996 and worked together to develop a shared vision of the neighborhood's future, identify public and private resources for implementation of the plan's policies and objectives, and coordinate strategies among implementors to achieve the neighborhood's envisioned future; and -" WHEREAS, the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan was systematically reviewed and is supported by the Bureau of Buildings, Bureau of Environmental Services, Bureau of Fire and Emergency Services, Bureau of General, Services, Bureau of Housing and Community Development, Bureau of Parks and Recreation, Bureau of Water, Metro, Multnomah County, National Marine Fisheries Service, Office of Transportation, Oregon Department of Transportation, Oregon Division of State Lands, Pacific Power and Light, Peninsula Drainage District #2, Police Bureau, Portland Development Commission, Portland Public Schools, State Marine Board, Tri-Met, and U.s. Corps of Engineers; and WHEREAS, the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan has been approved by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association; and WHEREAS more than seventy-five percent of the actions listed in the Implementation Chart have as implementors community-based organizations and associations such as the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association, North Portland Neighborhood Office, and Friends of Trees; and 35619 WHEREAS, the action chart implementation framework of 20 years is timed and phased to take into account the incremental achievement of plan policies and objectives within the limited resources available to identified voluntary plan implementors over time; and WHEREAS, identification of an implementor for an action item in an implementation chart is an expression of interest and support with the understanding that circumstances may affect an implementer's ability and timing to take action; and WHEREAS, the attainment of the vision statement, policies and objectives of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan are dependent upon the coordination of independent actions carried out by private interests, non-profit organizations, area institutions, public service providers and community-based associations over the 20 year period of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Portland, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, that the City Council adopts the implementation action charts of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan which was adopted by the Council as Ordinance No. 171238 on June 4,1997, with the exception of Action Items T2 and T3, which was adopted by the Council as Ordinance No. 171239 on June 4, 1997. It is understood that the action charts which specify the projects and programs are a starting place. Implementors, through their listings in the action charts, demonstrate their interest and support for the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan with the understanding that circumstances may affect their ability to take action at the specified time. It is also understood that future circumstances, resource capabilities, and plan performance may require further refinement, replacement, or substitution of existing action chart items and timelines. Adopted by the Council, JUN 04 1997 Commissioner Hales Ellen C. Ryker May 28,1997 Auditor of the City of Portland By _ , ~ Deputy '1,;"\A..lQ:c- G\~rJ\;\... Appendix B Transmittal Letter from Planning Commission to City Council • CI1YOF PORTLAND, OREGON Planning Commission Telephone No. R23·n08 TDD 823·6868 FAX 823·7800 c/o Bureau ofPlonning, Rm. 1002, 1120 SW. Fifth Ave. 97204 May 22,1997 Mayor Vera Katz and Members of the Portland City Council Portland City Hall 1120 SW Fifth Ave. Portland, OR 97204 Dear Mayor Katz and Members of the Portland City Council: The Portland City Planning Commission unanimously recommends City Council adoption of the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan. Our action to recommend adoption was taken after a public hearing on the plan on Tuesday, January 28, 1997 and a work session on March 11, 1997. This plan enjoys a large and wide-ranging level of support from the Bridgeton community. The Bridgeton Neighborhood Association urges your adoption of this plan. The goal of this plan is to foster a thriving neighborhood of homes and small businesses with an emphasis on its proximity and attachment to the Columbia River and Bridgeton Slough. Plan policies and objectives strengthen the role which the river and slough play as the focus of the neighborhood's community orientation. Emphasis on pedestrian and bicycle modes of transportation enhance neighborhood livability. The plan's implementation charts are feasible and realistic. More than seventy-five percent of the actions called for over the next 20 years have as their lead implementor community-based institutions and organizations. The Bridgeton Neighborhood contains about 40 acres of vacant land at its west end. Development of that vacant land, which began last week with the ground-breaking for one major project, could boost the neighborhood's population from its current 300 to over 3,000. The magnitude and ramifications of that growth on the neighborhood's sense of community, transportation system, and use of the waterfront brought to the fore the major 'issue raised at the hearing: how or whether to connect Bridgeton Road to any new street network in the developing area of west Bridgeton. After considerable discussion Planning Commission agreed that, with regard to the connection: 1. There needs to be additional pedestrian connections. 2. It is unnecessary and probably a serious mistake to make the road accessible to general vehicle access today and such access may never be necessary. 3. The City should not forgo the opportunity to provide for automobiles at some point. Planning Commission, therefore, recommended that arlY road connection be opened to general vehicular traffic subject to approval by the Bridgeton Neighborhood Association and City Council. This action recognizes that Bridgeton's unique circumstances warrant a slight diversion from the City's policy on connectivity. The Commission's decision does not mean Commission members disagree about the street connectivity policy. It simply recognizes the unique conditions in this situation at this time. We feel our recommendation gives t,'le City the ability to change the situaiion when necessary and the Neighborhood the time necessary to make the physical and psychological transition from its current low-density population to one with significantly greater density. Again, we urge you to adopt intact the Bridgeton Neighborhood Plan recommended by Planning Commission. Sincerely, Richard Michaelson, President~ Portland City Planning Commission • cc Michael Harrison, AICP, Chief Planner, Neighborhood Planning Don Gardner, Streets Systems Management Ellen Ryker, City Planner Laurel Wentworth, Senior Project Coordinator File Appendix C Abbreviations This is a directory of the abbreviations used for possible implementors of action items. BES BNA BOB BOP CC&R DSL ECNA FOT MCRP Metro NMFS NPNO ODFW ODOT ONG Owners Parks PC PDD PDOT PFB POP PPB PPL PPLst PPS Pvt ROW 5MB UFD USW Bureau of Environmental Services Bridgeton Neighborhood Association Bureau of Buildings Bureau of Planning Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions Oregon Division of State Lands East Columbia Neighborhood Association Friends of Trees Multnomah County River Patrol Metro (formerly the Metropolitan Service District) National Marine Fisheries Service North Portland Neighborhood Office Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon National Guard Land or property owners or their representatives Portland Parks and Recreation Paragon Cable Peninsula Drainage District #2 Portland Office of Transportation Portland Fire Bureau Port of Portland Portland Police Bureau Pacific Power and Light Portland Plant List Portland Public Schools Private owners, truckers, organizations Right-of-Way State Marine Board Urban Forestry Division (Bureau of Parks and Recreation) U. S. West Appendix D Voluntary Neighborhood Design Guidelines These design guidelines have been prepared to assist developers and the neighborhood association to work amicably together to assure that proposed developments both meet the investment and financial requirements of the developer and the aesthetic, safety and privacy concerns of the neighborhood. These guidelines are voluntary and for guidance only; they are not mandatory nor are they required for any development to be approved by the City. They are not part of the Comprehensive Plan. 1. If any adjustments are granted to allow buildings taller than 45' in the western part of Bridgeton: a. Step those buildings back from the promenade and old Bridgeton. b. Increase building height closer to 1-5 and Marine Drive. c. Require open space in equal proportion to the amount of extra height granted. 2. Include more open spaces, landscaping, and pedestrian pathways in and through new developments to encourage a greater sense of community among residents and businesses. Maintain an open character between buildings and the promenade. Buildings should be stair-stepped in height to eliminate casting shadows on public pfaces. Drawing by Judy Galaniha, Portland Bureau of Planning Appendix E Desirable Businesses Residents of the Bridgeton neighborhood identified the following types of businesses which they feel would enhance the neighborhood. Brewpub / microbrewery Yacht sales/brokerage Real estate office Small cafe Starbucks Coffee, Coffee People, Kobos Dry cleaner and laundry Video store Small bookstore Bicycle shop Waterfront eatery Marinas Sandwich shop Oar house Small grocery store - Natures Gift shops Card shops Candy shops Medical/dental offices Professional services: banks, insurance offices, attorneys, CPA Small theater Marine equipment store (i.e. West Marine) Marine repair /boat yard Sail loft Boat canvas/upholstery business . I support the Sandy Barr / Wzcant lAnd Area being zoned to allow "Mixed Use" 76% Yes 24% No Appendix F Surveys Bridgeton Road ) 12% Marina Area o I don't care Moorages( RES U L T S ~ Bridgeton Zoning Survey Sandy Barr I Vacant lAnd 1-5 ~e~ien ) Roth'sl East. SttJiJle Put an X11~I~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiij;~iiiii~ ~iiiii__iiii~__:';;;" on map Marine Drive where you live Any new development in the Sandy Barr / Wzcant Land Area should require a 62% bike path along the dike 46%public access to the river S6%design review 12% other requirements Easy 'll'affic. No Big Stores. No Room For Bike Path (OK to check more than one requirement, does not total 100%) The Moorages Area is zoned General Commercial which is the only zoning that allows houseboat moomges and boat moomges. 50%1 support that zoning 48%There should be a special Marina Zoning 2%Neither The Gantenbien West Area is a mix of commercial and residential. It's zoning should be 45%A "Mixed Use" zoning 36%Low Density Residential 8%High Density Residential o Commercial Only 11 % Other Wetlands. Med density. R-5. R-2.5 . 52 Responses from Approximately 180 Households Generally Bridgeton should be a 24% Residential Neighborhood 0 Commercial Area 64% Mixed Residential! Commercial! Marina Area o Other ----- Sandy Barr / Vacant Land Area should be developed as 4% a big discount store 19% mostly housing with little or no commercial 70% a ''Mixed Use" including moorages, restaurants, hotel, housing & commercial 7% Other City Park. Not Sure. R-IO ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. •.. .. .. • The Gantenbien East Area is mainly single family residences. It's zoning should 46% Only Low Density Residential 18% Allow High Density Residential o Allow Commercial 24% Allow "Mixed Use" zoning 12% Other Med Density. R-W, R-5, R-25 The Airport Noise Overlay could limit the residential zoning to RIO in much of Bridgeton. (one unit per 10,000 sq ft of land or 1 house for every 2 average city lots) 44% Iprefer low density RIO 49% RIO is a bad idea, we should object 7%1 don't care The zoning for Roth's Stable should be 32% A "Mixed Use" zoIiing 44% Low Density Residential 12%High Density Residential o Commercial zoning 12% Other Med Density. R-IO, R-5, R-2.5, Leave as Stable New residential development in Bridgeton should be 51% owner occupied housing 0 rental housing 43 % some of each I live in a 25% House 58% Houseboat 17% Boat I am a 77% Home owner 8% Renter 15% I own other property in Bridgeton o Please contact me about this: Name Phone -----'-------- ------ Other Comments: Thank You For Participating in this Survey Please Return this survey to: your Area Captain or drop into the mailbox of Harry Barmon, 55 NE Bridgeton Road #3 If you have any questions contact Walter Valenta 285-2644 (Over) Roth's Stable Marine Drive I-S~~~=~~~~~~~~;;;-::iiiiiiiI- . ~ ( Moorages )Brid eton Road--- Bike Way? Sidewalks? Sandy Barr's Gantenbien Should BridQ:eton be wider for more Cars? ••••••• mm.~l!Jn.'ll'~ •••.•••• 44 households out of 175 responding 25% of Bridgeton' What is your vision ofBridgeton Road? . Do you see more and more cars driving faster andfaster? Is Bridgeton widened with curbs, gutters and sidewalks on both sides? 0; do you like the unique.charm the road has now? Do you like that people walk and bike right on the road? With the development of the Columbia School and Roth's Stables, the City is trying to decide what kind ofstreet improvements to require. I like the over all feeling and character of Bridgeton Road as it exists now. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ 46% 35% 19% Some improvements of BridgetonRoad would be a good idea. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other '- ~% ~% D% 3% Currently people walk and bicycle on the street We don't really need sidewalks on Bridgeton. o Strongly Agree . 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other ~__ 65% 12% 20% 3% The width of Bridgeton Road should be 75% 0 18 feet wide (the width it is now) 25% 020 feet wide (the width proposed by the city) . o Other " The South side (the house side) should have these street improvements 10% 0 Curbs and Gutters (check all that apply) 13% 0 Sidewalks 9% 0 A place to park cars •68% 0 Be left like it is' Other _ The North side (the moorage side) should have these street improvements 9% 0 Curbs and Gutters (check all that apply) 8% 0 Sidewalks 26% 0 A place to park cars 57% 0 Be left like it is Other • • • • • • • • -~ ~ •• • • •It 8 f) • • • • •~ • • • • • There should be a bike and walkway all the way down the dike to 1-5. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ 49% - 20% 31% There should be a way to get directly onto the 1-5 walkway from the dike o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ SI % 17% 22% 10% What is the best route to access the proposed light rail station near the Expo center? S2% 0 Along the dike, underI-5, then to the Expo center- 43% o Along Mamie Drive, over the 1-5 overpass, then to the Expo center o Another route - S% Don't Know Moorage's sh<;>uld be able to'pave their parking areas on top of the dike o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other ~__ 40% 40% 8% 12% The City should insist the School build expensive sidewalks along the ball fields & school building. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree' 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ S% 7% 83% S% . The city proposes the developer of Roth's Stables maiIitain pedestrian access along 3rd street, the Slough and 5th street. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ 47% 11% 18% 18% 6% There should be a path through the school yard over the Slough to the to the Minute Mart. o Strongly Agree 0 Agree 0 Disagree 0 Don't Care Other _ 7% 22% 39% 32% • • • • • • • • • •Jill • • • •Ii • •fi Ii 6l • • • •6l 6l • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •.. • • • • •.. .. .. ..,. .. .. Church ~ 2nd City should be required to accept Better Signs Clean up Junk Mailbox #417B ~ Bridgetcn Road Bridgeton _~~~.......ioiIiIll__,;"";;,,iij_~!,!!!!!!!~~1I" Neighborhood Gantenbien_ 1 • Dr"manne Ive '. Roth Access onto Marine Drive Slow Down Trucks Speed BUJUps/Control Spe~d Return this sun:ey to: The Neighborhood Mailbox Your Area Captain Or the Meeting April 19th at 7pm at tl1e Columbia Community Bible Church Comments Bridgeton should be one way Appendix G Bibliography Braun Intertec Northwest. A Report for Mayea Construction Geotechnical Evaluation: Proposed Row Houses to be Built in the Small Subdivision off Bridgeton Road, west of its intersection with N.E. Marine Dr. Report 09-114-4500. Portland, Oregon, 1994. Bureau of Environmental Services. Columbia Slough Planning Study Background Report. Portland, Oregon, 1989. Bureau of Planning, City of Portland, Oregon. Albina Community Plan Historic Resources Inventory Update: East Columbia, Bridgeton, and Sunderland Neighborhoods. Portland, Oregon, 1993. Bureau of Planning, City of Portland, Oregon. East Columbia Neighborhood Natural Resources Management Plan. Portland, Oregon, 1990. Bureau of Planning, City of Portland, Oregon. Inventory aud Analysis of Wetlands, Water Bodies and Wildlife Habitat Areas for the Columbia Corridor: Industrial! Environmental Mapping Project. Portland, Oregon, 1989. Hass-Klau, Carmen, et. al. Civilised Streets: A Guide to Traffic Calming. Prepared for Environmental and Transport Planning. Brighton, Britain, June 1992. McArthur, Lewis A. Oregon Geographic Names. Oregon Historical Society. Portland, Oregon, 1965. Miller, John M., et al. East Peninsula Drainage District No. 2 Wetland Assessment. Prepared by Scientific Resources, Inc. for City of Portland. Portland, Oregon, 1989. Minutes of Bridgeton Neighborhood Association meetings July 13, August 23, and October 17, 1995. Musil, Robert R., et al. A Cultural Resource Assessment of Peninsula Drainage District No. 1, Portland, Multnomah County, Oregon. Prepared by Heritage Research Associates, Inc. for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Eugene, Oregon, 1995. Results from Bridgeton Zoning Survey, Bridgeton Neighborhood Associations, April 1993. Royal Dutch Touring Club. Woonerf. The Hague, 1980. Shuyler, Wayne with assistance from J.e. Draggoo & Associates. Recreational Boating Management Plan for the Portland Metropolitan Waterways: A Report to the Oregon State Marine Board. Salem, Oregon, 1995. Shorelines, Excerpts, September 1992 - March 1996. Visioning process, Bridgeton Neighborhood Association meeting April 16, 1996. u.s. Army Corps of Engineers. Draft Peninsula Drainage District No. 1 Detailed Project Report, Section 205. Portland, Oregon, June 1996. Land Use Case Files: LUR 92-00209 CP ZC: Marine Dr. and Vancouver Way LUR 95-00079 SU EN: Roth's Stables, Rowhouses LUR 92-00209 CP ZC: Pace/Costco site (current Sandy Barr/Chiu Trust) • Hobson & Associates for Antonoff Miller Properties, Inc., Need Analysis for a Comprehensive Plan and Zone Change at the Intersection of Interstate-5 and Marine Dr., Portland, Oregon, May, 1992. • Kittleson & Associates, Inc. for Antonoff Miller Properties, Inc, Marine Drive Retail Center Traffic Impact Analysis, May, 1992. LUR 95-00581 MP: Buoy One LUR 95-00387 PU EN: Mariner's Gale Environmental Review LUR 94-00309 PU SU EN: Mariner's Gale Example of a Woonerf in the Netherlands. From the Royal Dutch Touring Club, Woonerf