TRAIL BRIDGE RECREATION AREA MASTER PLAN DECEMBER 2012 This plan was developed by the University of Oregon’s Community Planning Workshop (CPW) for the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB). CPW wishes to thank the following individuals for their assistance with this project: Suzanne Adkins, Cheri Wilson, Dennis Harbour, and Debbie Spresser with Eugene Water and Electric Board; Forest Service (USFS) staff Dave Kretzing, Sandra Ratliff, and Dave Sanders; facilitator, Finlay Anderson, with Long View Associates; and the public citizens who participated in interviews on site with the project team. Community Planning Workshop is an experiential learning program affiliated with the Department of Planning, Public Policy and Management at the University of Oregon. Students work in teams under the direction of faculty and Graduate Teaching Fellows to develop proposals, conduct research, analyze and evaluate alternatives, and make recommendations for possible solutions to planning problems in Oregon communities. CPW STAFF Project Lead Bethany Steiner, AICP, Associate Director Project Manager Anya Dobrowolski Project Team Madeline Carroll Jennifer Self COMMUNITY PLANNING WORKSHOP Community Service Center 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403 Phone: 541-346-3615 Acknowledgements I. Introduction II. Design Principles III. Master Plan IV. Appendices Project Context . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Project Boundary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Matrix of Existing Conditions and Programmatic Requirements . . . . . 5 User Intercept Survey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Design Intentions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Current Conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Circulation Hierarchy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Shoreline Focus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Diversity of Site Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Pod Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Public and Private Space Delineation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Concept Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Day Use vs . Camping Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Re-Vegetation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Shoreline Trail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Proposed Amenities Matrix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 I . User Intercept Survey Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 II . Visitation Rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 III . Supporting Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 IV . Viewing Platforms and Decks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Table of Contents Introduction The Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) contracted with the Community Planning Workshop (CPW) to create the Trail Bridge Recreation Area Master Plan. EWEB initiated the master planning process as a response to the requirements of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions Settlement Agreement for the relicensing of the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project (FERC Project #2242). The Trail Bridge Recreation Area (TB-RA) currently functions as a campground and day-use site within the Willamette National Forest, approximately 65 miles east of Eugene, Oregon. Infrastructure within the site was originally constructed in the 1960s and is in need of upgrading to meet the current standards for recreation design, universal accessibility requirements, and the changing preferences of the visitors. This Master Plan document provides a guiding vision for TB-RA improvements and redevelopment that is sustainable and cost effective, playing on the site’s existing infrastructure and assets. Simultaneously, the recommendations in this document meet the requirements of the FERC relicensing agreement. This document presents (1) a description of the project’s context (2) a description of the design methodologies and inputs, including FERC requirements and specific existing site conditions; (3) a set of design principles used to guide the master plan design process; (4) a site improvement Master Plan and recommendations; and (5) appendices with supplementary information to inform subsequent stages of the design process. 1 The Trail Bridge Recreation Area – lies within the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project located on the upper McKenzie River in the Willamette National Forest. (See Fig.1) The hydroelectric project, and all facilities therein, operate under a federal license which establishes a cooperative agreement between the US Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB).1 Under the agreement, EWEB leases land owned by the US Forest Service. The land and facilities are managed primarily by the US Forest Service, with some exceptions. The Trail Bridge Recreation Area includes a campground and day-use site located along the northern shore of Trail Bridge Reservoir. Although the peak usage of the recreation area occurs during the summer months, it remains operational and visited year-round. EWEB built the campground in the 1960s and continues to provide funding for its operation and maintenance. The US Forest Service provides management of the campground including: patrolling, fee collection, and janitorial duties. 1 Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project, Federal Energy Regula- tory Commission (FERC), License No. 2242. Management of the day use area, lying between the campground and the Trail Bridge Reservior is funded by EWEB, with the exception of the boat ramp. In 2008, as part of a relicensing agreement, the Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan (RAMP)2 was completed by EWEB. The plan provides an action plan for the maintenance of all EWEB facilities within the project boundary. EWEB is assigned to maintain and improve facilities on the site under the direction of the US Forest Service. According to the RAMP, the Trail Bridge Recreation Area (TB-RA) is in need of redevelopment and upgrades to existing infrastructure to “improve functionality and to meet current design standards and visitor preferences.”3 This Master Plan evaluates TB-RA infrastructure and provides a plan for site improvements in a manner that is cost effective and sustainable. All recommended site improvements are to be made in compliance with (1) Forest Service 2 Martha Goodavish Planning & Design and Stillwater Sci- ences, Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan, Final Plan, prepared for Eugene Water & Electric Board, October 2008. 3 RAMP, p 17. design standards, (2) the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project operating license, and (3) the programmatic requirements as outlined by the RAMP. This Master Plan also seeks to serve the needs of current users while maintaining the site’s integrity for future visitors. Project Context Fig. 1: Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project, Trail Bridge Recreation Area shown in red. http://www.fs.usda.gov/detailfull/willamette/landmanagement/res ourcemanagement/?cid=stelprdb5043611&width=full The project boundary encompasses the campground and day-use site within the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. The southern and eastern boundaries are defined by the reservoir shoreline. The northern boundary is defined by the McKenzie River Trail and south of EWEB. The western boundary is defined by the Smith River. Project Boundary 126 126 126 M cK en zie H w y NF-730 NF-140 500 ft Trail Bridge Reservoir Boat Ramp McKenzie River Trailhead McKenzie Highway Paved Road Trail Bridge Site Boundary Current Entrance Fig. 2: Trail Bridge Recreation Area redesign project boundary 3 Methods The 2008 Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan identified the Trail Bridge Recreation Area was not being used as intended and in need of overall improvements. Over a five-month period, CPW explored the strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities within the recreation area through the following series of activities: • Conducted a literature review of relevant planning, resource management, and programmatic requirement documents, as well as best practices for campground improvements on federal lands. • Inventoried the existing conditions, infrastructure and facilities within the recreation area and how each was being utilized. • Facilitated public engagement through site user intercept surveys • Developed project design intentions and design principles to guide concept designs • Presented findings and concept designs to EWEB and US Forest Service for comment and review • Developed proposed master plan and recommendations Programmatic Requirements Existing Conditions Site User Intercept Survey Design Intentions Design Principles Design Concept Alternatives Master Plan and Recommendations Fig. 3: Community Planning Workshop methods diagram Design Methods Diagram Existing   Conditions Programmatic   Requirements Notes Campground  Facilities Tent  Campsites 26 26 The  site  currently  has  26  offically  designated  campsites;  however,  the  day-­‐use  area  now  accommodates  additional  informal  camping   areas.  Programmatic  requirements  call  for  "some"  Universally  Accessible  (UA(  campsites  and  do  not  provide  a  specific  number.   Industry  standards  recommended  UA  sites  should  account  for  approximately  10%  of  the  total  number  of  camp  sites.   UA undesignated 3 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  fire  ring. Non-­‐UA undesignated 23 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  non-­‐UA  fire  ring.   Multi-­‐sites undesignated 3 A  multi-­‐site  is  designed  for  group  camping.   RV  Campsites Undefined 8 The  site  currently  does  not  have  designated  RV  camping  sites.  Informal  gravel  areas  and  undefined  day-­‐use  areas  are  currently  being   used  by  RVs.   Camp  Host  Site 1 1 Camp  host  site  currently  has  1  water  spigot.   Day-­‐Use  Facilities Picnic  Unit 22 4 The  programmatic  requirements  call  for  4  "picnic  areas";  however,  it  is  unclear,  what  an  area  entails.  See  Master  Plan  for   interpretation. Boat  ramp 1 1 The  existing  boat  ramp  is  not  UA  compliant.  EWEB’s  programmatic  requirements  and  the  proposed  boat  ramp  are  to  be  UA.   Viewing  Platform  or  Dock 0 2 Shoreline  Path Approx.  100   yards 1 Programmatic  requirements  in  the  RAMP  call  for  a  shoreline  path.    They  do  no  specify  the  appropriate  length  for  a  shoreline  path.   Utilities Flush  Toilet  Building 1 1 Replace  the  existing  flush  toilets  in-­‐kind Pit  Toilet 3 -­‐ The  existing  pit  toilets  threaten  the  surrounding  ecological  habitat  and  ground  water.    The  RAMP  requires  replacement  of  the   existing  pit  toilets  with  an  appropriate  alternative,  which  can  include  vault  toilets.   Vault  Toilet -­‐ -­‐ Programmatic  requirements  call  for  vault  restroom  facilities.   Portable  Toilet 6 -­‐ The  site  currently  contains  portable  toilets  to  accommodate  the  additional  restroom  capacity  needs.   Water  spigot 9 Undefined According  to  EWEB’s  “Master  Drawing”  of  the  site,  there  are  8  water  spigots  or  risers.  I  additional  water  spigot  was  observed  on  site. Other Parking  Spaces  for  Campground Undefined Undefined Large  expanses  of  gravel  areas  now  serve  as  undefined  and  haphazard  parking  areas.  See  Master  Plan  for  proposed  treatments. Parking  Spaces  for  Day-­‐Use Undefined -­‐ See  note  above. Auto  &  Boat  Parking Undefined Undefined See  note  above. Entry  Signage 1 0 The  site  currently  has  a  US  Forest  Service  entry  signage.  Although  programmatic  requirements  do  not  call  for  additional  signage,  the   Master  Plan  will  need  to  consider  the  movement  of  signage  due  to  site  redevelopment.   Informational  Kiosk 2 1 The  site  currently  has  two  informational  kiosks.  The  programmatic  requirements  call  for  a  minimum  of  one.   Self-­‐service  pay  station 1 -­‐ See  note  above. Existing Conditions and Programmatic Requirements 5 User Intercept Survey CPW gathered information regarding the wants and needs of the Trail Bridge Recreation Area by conducting two rounds of user intercept surveys on site. The primary questions we asked users were (1) What changes would make Trail Bridge better?, (2) What’s great about Trail Bridge?, and (3) What activities are you participating in while you’re at Trail Bridge?. Below is a list of key take-aways from the survey. For a more detailed methodology and findings, please refer to Appendix II – User Intercept Surveys. Six Key Take-Aways from User Intercept Survey • Trail Bridge is a tradition. • Site users enjoy the informal feeling of Trail Bridge Recreation Area. • Campers enjoy the flexibility of existing campsites and the ability to be separated from others. • Numerous visitors use the Trail Bridge Campground as a trail head for the McKenzie River Trail. • More oversight from rangers or a campground host is welcomed. • More ground vegetation and shade trees would make the site more comfortable. CPW interacted with 45 site users. Approximately 60% of people we interviewed were campers . . . . . .and 40% were day users . One: Incorporate Universal Design Principles The recreation area should be aesthetic and usable to the greatest extent possible by everyone, regardless of their age, ability, or status in life. Two: Improve Aesthetics and Enhance the Viewshed The recreation area should be functional and also create a sense of place by enhancing a connection to the natural beauty of the area and connecting visitors to key views. Three: Create a Well-Organized Site The layout for the recreation area should be easily legible and programmatic areas on the site should be clearly delineated to minimize user conflicts. Four: Improve the Recreation Experience The recreation area should provide users with a variety of recreational experiences on site and connect them to nearby amenities such as the McKenzie River Trail. Five: Maintain the Historic Character of the Area The natural and built features surrounding the recreation area – such as topography, the reservoir, and the forest – should be highlighted by the design and the historic integrity of the recreation area should be kept intact. Six: Enhance Opportunities for Site Interpretation The recreation should have interpretive signage that emphasizes the natural, built, and historic qualities as well as offering key information germane to the Trail Bridge Reservoir and the entire Carmen Smith Project Area. Seven: Protect and Improve Natural Resources and Habitat The recreation area should maintain and improve upon the health of terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Design Intentions The purpose of this Master Plan is to guide improvements to the recreation area to meet current standards, needs, and function. Design intentions for the Master Plan were derived from the Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan and through collaboration with EWEB staff. These seven design intentions form the backbone of this Master Plan, guiding CPW’s recommendations. 7 Current Conditions FUNC BY CHK APP DES DWN SPONSOR DATE: REV DATE DWN CHK APP SCALE: DWG NO REV EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD - EUGENE, OREGON INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR EWEB USE ONLY AND IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE FOR UNINTENDED PURPOSES. 7/5/2012 12:44 PM STD STANDARDS CHECK 0 1"=50' 07/05/12 D-26635-X1 DAH DAH LYNCH GENERAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION LAND BASE CARMEN-SMITH POWER PLANT/SUB/TRAILBRIDGE CAMPGRAOUND MASTER DRAWING SEE DATE JOB NO. PRELIMINARY SIEGENTHALER 03/06/12 34883 Tent Camping Kiosk Undefined Gravel Area Undefined Gravel Area RV and Tent Camping RV Camping Boat Ram p RV Camping Fishing Auto Circulation Hiking and Mountain Biking Fishing Kiosk Auto and Trailer Parkin g Auto and Trailer Parking Auto and Trailer Parking Undefined Gravel Area Fishing, Swimming Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CURRENT USE N Climbing, Exploring, Viewing Auto Parking Auto Parking Fig. 4: Trail Bridge Recreation Area current use diagram FUNC BY CHK APP DES DWN SPONSOR DATE: REV DATE DWN CHK APP SCALE: DWG NO REV EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD - EUGENE, OREGON INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR EWEB USE ONLY AND IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE FOR UNINTENDED PURPOSES. 7/5/2012 12:44 PM STD STANDARDS CHECK 0 1"=50' 07/05/12 D-26635-X1 DAH DAH LYNCH GENERAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION LAND BASE CARMEN-SMITH POWER PLANT/SUB/TRAILBRIDGE CAMPGRAOUND MASTER DRAWING SEE DATE JOB NO. PRELIMINARY SIEGENTHALER 03/06/12 34883 Healthy native veg Trees, min. understory Few trees, min understory Little to no veg Auto Circulation Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CURRENT VEGE ATION N Hiking and Mountain Biking Fig. 5: Trail Bridge Recreation Area current vegetation diagram 9 CPW developed five design principles specifically for the Trail Bridge Recreation Area (TBRA) by analyzing programmatic requirements, design intentions, existing site conditions, and user feedback from intercept surveys. Although the redevelopment design may change in the future based on agreements between the US Forest Service and EWEB, unknown variables, and available funding, the following principles should remain constant to ensure a user-friendly recreation area that is sustainable, accessible to all, and maintains its integrity: TRAIL BRIDGE RECREATION AREA DESIGN PRINCIPLES • Circulation Hierarchy • Shoreline Focus • Diversity of Site Options • Pod Development • Public and Private Space Delineation These five design principles are the foundation of the TB-RA Master Plan. The subsequent section contains further information for each unique principle, including: (1) a brief explanation, (2) general findings of current conditions, and (3) recommended treatments. Design Principles 11 Circulation throughout the site includes both vehicular roadways and pedestrian pathways. Creating a hierarchy of circulation, through the use of landscape features, makes movement through the site intuitive to users while avoiding a heavy- handed, signage-dependent approach. For this design principle, CPW analyzed designated routes as well as social, or informal, trails created by users within the site over time. FINDINGS ASSETS • Visitors enjoy the more “rustic” pathways, rather than paving. • Gravel roadways help maintain a more “primitive feel” of the site. • Current circulation allows for flexible parking and recreational vehicle (RV) camping. • Current circulation allows for ample day- use parking. • ISSUES • Circulation routes are numerous and often do not aide in directing visitors to a point of interest. • Social trails created by users often attract people into other individuals’ campground site. • Social and designated trails throughout the site are unnecessarily wide due to trampling and lack of natural barriers. • Gravel roadways produce significant dust. • There is currently a need for a defined boat parking area. • Current large expanses of gravel areas are undefined and being used by both vehicular and pedestrian travel. This presents a potential safety concern. RECOMMENDATIONS • The hierarchy encompasses three levels of circulation: 1) Roadways to be shared by automobiles, bicyclists, and pedestrians; 2) Main trails for pedestrians; and 3) Minor trails for pedestrians. • Narrow the existing roadway to better direct vehicular traffic. • Create well-defined, pedestrian-friendly trails from camping and day-use areas to site amenities. • Create Universally Accessible (UA) trails at specified locations composed of a permeable, firm and stable surface. • Continue the use of non-UA trails made from local materials (earthen, woodchips, etc.). • Delineate vehicular roadways and pedestrian trails by landscape features (such as, berms) and vegetation. Circulation Hierarchy Fig. 6: Circulation hierarchy diagram The reservoir is the primary attractor for the TB-RA. While at the site, visitors enjoy activities in and around the reservoir, such as: fishing, boating, swimming, and hiking.1 Because of this focus, design decisions regarding circulation, day-use area location, and sightlines should be directed towards the shoreline. 1 For a complete list of activities visitor’s participate in while at Trail Bridge Recreation Area, see Supplemental Information: Site User Feedback Survey Results. FINDINGS ASSETS • Views and vistas from the shoreline are a significant asset to the site. • Sensitive natural areas occur at specific places along the shoreline. (Aquatics Management Plan, October 2008) • Visitors and campers enjoy the shoreline for a variety of uses: fishing, swimming, relaxing, birding, picnicking, boating, etc. • Private camp sites along Smith River are a prized location for visitors. • Programmatic requirements call for a shoreline trail but do not specify length or exact location. ISSUES • Rogue camping along the shoreline creates a visual and physical barrier for visitors and reservoir access. • Visitors want more shoreline frontage. • Young trees, with low-hanging branches, block the viewshed from the site to the reservoir. • The southern portion of the site along the shoreline is sunny and hot due to a lack of trees or vegetation. • The current asphalt path providing water access for persons with mobility challenges is in disrepair and overgrown. Additionally, this path is located within a sensitive aquatic habitat area. RECOMMENDATIONS • Preserve the reservoir shoreline for day- use activities to provide water access for the greatest number of users. • Limb up existing trees and plant new trees to create site lines with a forced perspective towards the reservoir. • Remove asphalt path in disrepair. • Develop a new shoreline trail within the day-use area with distinct points of interest. • Use permeable firm and stable material for the shoreline trail • Provide a variety of options for accessing the water along the shoreline trail. Shoreline Focus Fig. 7: Shoreline focus diagram 13 Well-planned campgrounds can have a variety of camp site locations and layouts. A diversity in camping options accommodates different user groups – such as 1-2 people camping in an RV, or a large group of 6-8 tent camping – as well as, providing different camping experiences. FINDINGS ASSETS • Site users enjoyed the variety of camping experiences and site locations currently at TBRA. • Although many of the camp sites boundaries are not clearly defined, there are generally four types of camp sites available: (1) walk-in single tent site, (2) walk-in multi-sites for tents (or the ability to have numerous tents together), (3) auto camping, and (4) RV camping. • Current sites provide a variety of privacy levels from secluded to communal. • Current sites are located in diverse landscape settings including close proximity to water and open areas amongst Douglas fir trees. ISSUES • Many campsites and day use ares are unmarked or lack spatial delineation, contributing to user conflicts RECOMMENDATIONS • Provide both pull through and back-in campsites for RVs. • Provide drive-in and walk-in campsites for tent campers. • Provide walk-in campsites that allow campers to have a feeling of solitude. • Provide other, “buddy sites” that walk-in campers can use as individuals sites or as larger groups. • Use vegetation as a buffer between sites (or groupings of sites) to allow for privacy between users. Diversity of Site Options Tent Area Tent Site Fire Ring Shared Fire Ring Picnic Table Vegetated Privacy Buer Fig. 8: Diversity of site options diagram Fig. 9: Buddy sites diagram Day-use areas and camping areas should be developed in “pods” or clusters that incorporate infrastructure amenities in close proximity to one another. Developing campsites and day-use areas to consider the multiple needs of site visitors will help to minimize the impact of social trails and other trampling while improving the experience of site users. FINDINGS ASSETS • Parking for autos and autos with trailers in close proximity to camp sites is preferred. ISSUES • Infrastructure within the site was originally constructed by EWEB in the 1960s and has only received minimal improvements since that time. In the mid-1980s a restroom facility was added to the site and improvements to the water system occurred in 2002 and 2003. • McKenzie River Trail (MRT) trailhead lacks a defined, parking area, information, water, and restroom facilities. • Day-users for the MRT currently park near the boat launch. • Water spigots are difficult to locate and not in close proximity to restrooms. • Site only has one flush toilet building and 2 Pit toilets. 6 portable toilets have been placed on site to accommodate demand. • Portable toilets are unsightly and deter from the natural surroundings. • There is currently no delineated parking area for boats. • Large unsightly and smelly dumpsters are sporadically placed throughout the site. • Site amenities are currently spread widely dispersed and lack coheasiveness. RECOMMENDATIONS • All day-use sites and campsites should have both access to parking and toilets located within a 100’ radius of the site. • TB-RA’s three UA campsites as well as the UA picnic areas should be located closest to both parking and toilet facilities to allow for fast access. • All parking areas and toilets on the site should be UA. • UA sites should have access to UA trails to circulate between the sites and the amenities cited above. Pod Development Fig. 10: Pod development diagram 15 Delineation of public and private space means separating the more public, day- use functions of the site from the camping areas. The road and vegetated buffers will provide this delineation of activity zones. Delineating public and private spaces will minimize user conflict by keeping strangers out of others’ campsites. FINDINGS1 ISSUES • Uses and zones within the campground and rec area are not delineated. • Site information signage uses small fonts and does not help to interpret the layout of the site. • The day-use area is currently being used primarily for informal camping. 1 See page 7: Current Conditions Maps for more detail RECOMMENDATIONS • Reserve waterfront sites along the reservoir for day-use areas. • Use the road as a barrier between day- use from camping sites. • Use ground cover and mid-story vegetation to delineate and screen views to camp sites. • Minimize use of mid-story vegetation to create a sense of openness in day-use areas. • Reserve the northeastern area and the western coast of the site for camping. Public and Private Space Delineation Fig. 11: Public and private space delineation diagram The following master plan provides conceptual maps with recommendations to guide the future re-development of the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. This planning document is intended to provide EWEB direction for improvements to the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. Overall recommendations are presented within the subsequent section, Treatment & Use, followed by annotated graphic concept plan. Additional information on dock precedents to further guide redevelopment and management of the site can be found within Supplemental Information. EWEB is responsible for working with design and architectural (or engineering) professionals to develop specifications for infrastructure construction and placement. Master Plan 17 FUNC BY CHK APP DES DWN SPONSOR DATE: REV DATE DWN CHK APP SCALE: DWG NO REV EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD - EUGENE, OREGON INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR EWEB USE ONLY AND IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE FOR UNINTENDED PURPOSES. 7/5/2012 12:45 PM STD STANDARDS CHECK 0 1"=50' 07/05/12 D-26635-X2 DAH DAH LYNCH GENERAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION LAND BASE CARMEN-SMITH POWER PLANT/SUB/TRAILBRIDGE CAMPGRAOUND MASTER DRAWING 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft Trail Bridge Recreation Area: C NCEPT PLAN NCAMPING KIOSK& PAY STATION Tent Sites UA Site Multi Site RV Site Camp Host Site Auto and/or Boat Parking Picnic Area UA Picnic Areas (2-4 tables per area) UA Water Access Boat Ramp Trailhead Existing Paved Road Gravel Road Entry Road Main Trail UA Trail Minor Trail Dock Vault Toilet Double Vault Toilet Restroom with Flush Toilets Water Spigot LEGEND F 2 Circulation Hierarchy: The Trail Bridge Master Plan defines Trail Bridge Recreation Area’s vehicle and pedestrian circulation corridors. Vehicle access is looped through the site with a wide, two-way gravel road. The main trail system channels heavy pedestrian traffic, with spokes that emphasize connection to the shoreline. Individual tent sites are connected to the main trail system with smaller, more private trails. Universal access trails are provided to day use areas and to a several campsites. Variety of Site Options: Six back- in and two pull-through RV sites are provided, as well as one camp-host RV site. Individual walk-in and drive-up tent sites are provided, as well as flexible “buddy” tent sites and a multi-site for larger groups. Pod Development: Each camping area has convenient access to a restroom, a water spigot, and vehicle parking. Universal Access: Fig. 12: Trail Bridge Recreation Area north-end concept plan Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CONCEPT PLAN N 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft MCKENZIE R IVER TRAIL F MCKENZIE RIVER TRAILHEAD ENTRY SIGN CAMPING KIOSK & PAY STATION DAY USE KIOSK & PAY STATION UA BOAT RAMP UA DOCK DAY USE KIOSK & PAY STATION FOREST SERVICE SIGN Fig. 13: Trail Bridge Recreation Area south-end concept plan FUNC BY CHK APP DES DWN SPONSOR DATE: REV DATE DWN CHK APP SCALE: DWG NO REV EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD - EUGENE, OREGON INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR EWEB USE ONLY AND IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE FOR UNINTENDED PURPOSES. 7/5/2012 12:45 PM STD STANDARDS CHECK 0 1"=50' 07/05/12 D-26635-X2 DAH DAH LYNCH GENERAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION LAND BASE CARMEN-SMITH POWER PLANT/SUB/TRAILBRIDGE CAMPGRAOUND MASTER DRAWING 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft Trail Bridge Recreation Area: C NCEPT PLAN NDAY USE vs CA PIN Day Use Area Camping Area Public and Private Space Deliniation: This map shows which areas of the Trail Bridge Recreation Area will be designated public day use space, and which areas will be designated private camping space. Fig. 14: Trail Bridge Recreation Area north-end space deliniation plan Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CONCEPT PLAN N 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft DAY USE vs CAMPING Day Use Area Camping Area Fig. 15: Trail Bridge Recreation Area south-end space deliniation plan FUNC BY CHK APP DES DWN SPONSOR DATE: REV DATE DWN CHK APP SCALE: DWG NO REV EUGENE WATER & ELECTRIC BOARD - EUGENE, OREGON INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR EWEB USE ONLY AND IS NOT WARRANTED TO BE ACCURATE FOR UNINTENDED PURPOSES. 7/5/2012 12:45 PM STD STANDARDS CHECK 0 1"=50' 07/05/12 D-26635-X2 DAH DAH LYNCH GENERAL MAPS CONSTRUCTION LAND BASE CARMEN-SMITH POWER PLANT/SUB/TRAILBRIDGE CAMPGRAOUND MASTER DRAWING 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft Trail Bridge Recreation Area: C NCEPT PLAN NREVEGE ATIO PLAN New vegetation will provide shade and privacy for visitors while define the edges of trails and roads. This map illustrates the type of vegetative remediation needed in different areas in Trail Bridge. Designated camping areas that are currently unvegetated (in dark green) require new trees, shrubs and ground cover plants. Camping areas that have established canopy cover (in light green) require new shrubs to provide visual screening and ground cover to define trails. Day use areas (in yellow) require less new vegetation, as visual screening and complete shade are less desirable in public spaces. Sensitive habitat in need of restoraion (in blue) requires removal of asphalt and installation of wetland plant species. Fig. 16: Trail Bridge Recreation Area north-end re-vegetation plan Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CONCEPT PLAN N 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft REVEGE ATIO PLAN Trees, shrubs, ground cover Shrubs and ground cover Few shade trees / ground cover Asphalt removal and wetland restoration Fig. 17: Trail Bridge Recreation Area south-end re-vegetation plan Trail Bridge Recreation Area: CONCEPT PLAN N 50 ft0 ft 100 ft 150 ft 200 ft 250 ft BOAT DOCK WATER ACCESS POINT UA DOCK RIPARIAN PENINSULA SHOR LINE TRAIL INTERPRETIVE WAYSIDE PANELS: • Reservoir • Fish passage INTERPRETIVE WAYSIDE PANELS: • Sensitive habitat Shoreline Focus: The Shoreline Trail provides access to the water at key points along the shoreline within the day use area at Trail Bridge. The trail connects day use amenities such as the boat dock and the UA dock, highlights southern view points, and provides opportunity for interpretive signage. Fig. 18: Trail Bridge Recreation Area shoreline trail plan 25 Proposed Amenities The matrix found below contains the detailed information on the existing infrastructure, programmatic requirements for upgrades to the site, and proposed infrastructure included in the Master Plan. Programmatic requirements were derived from the Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan (RAMP). Existing   Conditions Programmatic   Requirements Proposed   Conditions Notes Campground  Facilities Tent  Campsites 26 26 27 The  site  currently  has  26  offically  designated  campsites;  however,  the  day-­‐use  area  now  accommodates  additional  informal  camping  areas.   Programmatic  requirements  call  for  "some"  UA  campsites  and  do  not  provide  a  specific  number.  Industry  standards  recommended  UA  sites   should  account  for  approximately  10%  of  the  total  number  of  camp  sites.  Each  proposed  walk-­‐in  camp  site  would  include:  a    picnic  table  and     firepit. Walk-­‐In  UA undesignated 3 2 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. Walk-­‐In  Non-­‐UA undesignated 23 18 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  non-­‐UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. Walk-­‐In  Multi-­‐sites undesignated 3 3 A  multi-­‐site  is  designed  for  group  camping.  Each  multi-­‐site  can  accommodate  up  to  3  tents.  Auto-­‐Spur  UA -­‐ -­‐ 1 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents.  Proposed  auto-­‐spur  tent  camping  sites  would   include  1  designated  UA  site;  however,  the  design  of  auto-­‐spur  tent  sites  could  likely  accommodate  additional  users  seeking  UA  facilities  given   their  surface  material  and  close  proximity  to  other  amenities.   Auto-­‐Spur  Non-­‐UA -­‐ -­‐ 3 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  non-­‐UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. RV  Campsites Undefined 8 8 The  site  currently  does  not  have  designated  RV  camping  sites.  Informal  gravel  areas  and  undefined  day-­‐use  areas  are  currently  being  used  by   RVs.  Each  proposed  RV  site  would  include:  one  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  firepit. Camp  Host  Site 1 1 1 Camp  host  site  currently  has  1  water  spigot.  Proposed  camp  host  site  would  include:  one  UA  picnic  table,  one  UA  firepit,  and  an  electricity  source Day-­‐Use  Facilities Picnic  Unit 22 4 23 The  programmatic  requirements  call  for  4  "picnic  areas";  however,  it  is  unclear,  what  an  area  entails.  For  purposes  of  the  master  plan,  a  picnic  unit   would  contain  a  picnic  table,  fire  ring,  and  grill.  2-­‐4  units.  A  picnic  unit  would  include  a  picnic  table,  fire  ring,  and  grill. UA 6 Non-­‐UA 15 Boat  ramp 1 1 1 The  existing  boat  ramp  is  not  UA  compliant.  EWEB’s  programmatic  requirements  and  the  proposed  boat  ramp  are  to  be  UA.   Viewing  Platform  or  Dock 0 2 1 A  second  dock  or  viewing  platform  is  being  considered  by  both  interested  parties  -­‐  EWEB  and  the  US  Forest  Service  -­‐  but  has  not  been  included   within  this  Master  Plan.     Shoreline  Path Approx.  100   yards 1 0.5  mile The  existing  UA  shoreline  path  is  in  a  state  of  deferred  maintenance  and  is    approximately  100  yards  in  length.  The  programmatic  requirements   do  no  specify  the  appropriate  length  for  a  UA  shoreline  path.  The  proposed  design  will  abandon  the  existing  shoreline  path  for  reasons  outlined  in   the  report  and  create  a  new  UA  shoreline  path  that  is  1/2  mile  in  length. Utilities Flush  Toilet  Building 1 1 1 The  existing  flush  toilet  building  will  be  replaced  as  called  for  in  programmatic  requirements. Pit  Toilet 3 -­‐ -­‐ The  existing  pit  toilets  threaten  the  surrounding  ecological  habitat  and  ground  water.  Each  pit  toilet  will  be  removed.   Vault  Toilet -­‐ -­‐ 5 All  to  be  UA.  I  double  vault,  4  single-­‐  vault.   Portable  Toilet 6 -­‐ -­‐ The  site  currently  contains  portable  toilets  to  accommodate  the  additional  restroom  capacity  needs.  These  toilets  will  be  removed.   Water  spigot 9 -­‐ 9 According  to  EWEB’s  “Master  Drawing”  of  the  site,  there  are  8  water  spigots  or  risers.  I  additional  water  spigot  was  observed  on  site.  It  is  agreed   that  EWEB  will  provide  access  to  water  through  the  use  of  water  spigots,  or  risers,  throughout  the  site.   Electricity  Hook-­‐ups  for  Camp  Host -­‐ 1 1 Installation  of  electrical  hook-­‐ups  at  the  camp  ground  host  is  an  agreement  between  the  US  Forest  Service  and  EWEB. Other Parking  Spaces  for  Campground Undefined Undefined 35 Large  expanses  of  gravel  areas  now  serve  as  undefined  and  haphazard  parking  areas.  Proposed  parking  spaces  will  be  defined  by  natural  barriers   (such  as  large  boulders  or  logs).  In  the  Master  Plan  there  are  no  designated  UA  parking  spaces.  Once  regrading  and  surface  compaction  are   complete,  parking  areas  will  provide  a  firm  and  stable  surface  for  all  patrons.  See  Master  Plan  for  locations. Parking  Spaces  for  Day-­‐Use Undefined -­‐ 20 Includes  spaces  for  McKenzie  River  Trail  Trailhead Auto  &  Boat  Parking Undefined Undefined 10 The  proposed  auto  and  boat  parking  will  contain  elongated  parking  spaces  to  accommodate  vehicles  with  trailers. Entry  Signage 1 0 2 The  site  currently  has  a  US  Forest  Service  entry  signage.  Proposed  Master  Plan  calls  for  moving  the  current  entry  signage  and  adding  one   directional  sign  for  day-­‐use  and  campground  facilities.   Informational  Kiosk 2 1 2 The  site  currently  has  2  informational  kiosks.  The  proposed  kiosks  will  incorporate  informational  material  and  a  self-­‐service  pay  station. Self-­‐service  pay  station 1 -­‐ 2 See  note  above. Interpretive  Wayside  Panel Undefined Undefined 3 Programmatic  requirements  call  for  "some"  kiosks  and  do  not  provide  a  specific  number.  The  proposed  wayside  panels  are  to  be  placed  at   strategic  locations  throughout  the  site,  such  as  the  boat  ramp,  sensitive  habitat  area,  and  UA  viewing  platform  or  dock. Trash  Containers 4 0 tbd The  existing  trash  containers  are  dumpsters.  Proposed  trash  receptacles  to  be  individual  trash  cans.   **The  proposed  conditions  on  this  page  do  not  include  surface  treatments  and  landscaping.  See  Master  Plan  section  of  document  for  recommendations. Existing   Conditions Programmatic   Requirements Proposed   Conditions Notes Campground  Facilities Tent  Campsites 26 26 27 The  site  currently  has  26  offically  designated  campsites;  however,  the  day-­‐use  area  now  accommodates  additional  informal  camping  areas.   Programmatic  requirements  call  for  "some"  UA  campsites  and  do  not  provide  a  specific  number.  Industry  standards  recommended  UA  sites   should  account  for  approximately  10%  of  the  total  number  of  camp  sites.  Each  proposed  walk-­‐in  camp  site  would  include:  a    picnic  table  and     firepit. Walk-­‐In  UA undesignated 3 2 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. Walk-­‐In  Non-­‐UA undesignated 23 18 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  non-­‐UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. Walk-­‐In  Multi-­‐sites undesignated 3 3 A  multi-­‐site  is  designed  for  group  camping.  Each  multi-­‐site  can  accommodate  up  to  3  tents.  Auto-­‐Spur  UA -­‐ -­‐ 1 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents.  Proposed  auto-­‐spur  tent  camping  sites  would   include  1  designated  UA  site;  however,  the  design  of  auto-­‐spur  tent  sites  could  likely  accommodate  additional  users  seeking  UA  facilities  given   their  surface  material  and  close  proximity  to  other  amenities.   Auto-­‐Spur  Non-­‐UA -­‐ -­‐ 3 One  UA  picnic  table  and  one  non-­‐UA  fire  ring.  Each  UA  campsite  can  accommodate  up  to  2  tents. RV  Campsites Undefined 8 8 The  site  currently  does  not  have  designated  RV  camping  sites.  Informal  gravel  areas  and  undefined  day-­‐use  areas  are  currently  being  used  by   RVs.  Each  proposed  RV  site  would  include:  one  UA  picnic  table  and  one  UA  firepit. Camp  Host  Site 1 1 1 Camp  host  site  currently  has  1  water  spigot.  Proposed  camp  host  site  would  include:  one  UA  picnic  table,  one  UA  firepit,  and  an  electricity  source Day-­‐Use  Facilities Picnic  Unit 22 4 23 The  programmatic  requirements  call  for  4  "picnic  areas";  however,  it  is  unclear,  what  an  area  entails.  For  purposes  of  the  master  plan,  a  picnic  unit   would  contain  a  picnic  table,  fire  ring,  and  grill.  2-­‐4  units.  A  picnic  unit  would  include  a  picnic  table,  fire  ring,  and  grill. UA 6 Non-­‐UA 15 Boat  ramp 1 1 1 The  existing  boat  ramp  is  not  UA  compliant.  EWEB’s  programmatic  requirements  and  the  proposed  boat  ramp  are  to  be  UA.   Viewing  Platform  or  Dock 0 2 1 A  second  dock  or  viewing  platform  is  being  considered  by  both  interested  parties  -­‐  EWEB  and  the  US  Forest  Service  -­‐  but  has  not  been  included   within  this  Master  Plan.     Shoreline  Path Approx.  100   yards 1 0.5  mile The  existing  UA  shoreline  path  is  in  a  state  of  deferred  maintenance  and  is    approximately  100  yards  in  length.  The  programmatic  requirements   do  no  specify  the  appropriate  length  for  a  UA  shoreline  path.  The  proposed  design  will  abandon  the  existing  shoreline  path  for  reasons  outlined  in   the  report  and  create  a  new  UA  shoreline  path  that  is  1/2  mile  in  length. Utilities Flush  Toilet  Building 1 1 1 The  existing  flush  toilet  building  will  be  replaced  as  called  for  in  programmatic  requirements. Pit  Toilet 3 -­‐ -­‐ The  existing  pit  toilets  threaten  the  surrounding  ecological  habitat  and  ground  water.  Each  pit  toilet  will  be  removed.   Vault  Toilet -­‐ -­‐ 5 All  to  be  UA.  I  double  vault,  4  single-­‐  vault.   Portable  Toilet 6 -­‐ -­‐ The  site  currently  contains  portable  toilets  to  accommodate  the  additional  restroom  capacity  needs.  These  toilets  will  be  removed.   Water  spigot 9 -­‐ 9 According  to  EWEB’s  “Master  Drawing”  of  the  site,  there  are  8  water  spigots  or  risers.  I  additional  water  spigot  was  observed  on  site.  It  is  agreed   that  EWEB  will  provide  access  to  water  through  the  use  of  water  spigots,  or  risers,  throughout  the  site.   Electricity  Hook-­‐ups  for  Camp  Host -­‐ 1 1 Installation  of  electrical  hook-­‐ups  at  the  camp  ground  host  is  an  agreement  between  the  US  Forest  Service  and  EWEB. Other Parking  Spaces  for  Campground Undefined Undefined 35 Large  expanses  of  gravel  areas  now  serve  as  undefined  and  haphazard  parking  areas.  Proposed  parking  spaces  will  be  defined  by  natural  barriers   (such  as  large  boulders  or  logs).  In  the  Master  Plan  there  are  no  designated  UA  parking  spaces.  Once  regrading  and  surface  compaction  are   complete,  parking  areas  will  provide  a  firm  and  stable  surface  for  all  patrons.  See  Master  Plan  for  locations. Parking  Spaces  for  Day-­‐Use Undefined -­‐ 20 Includes  spaces  for  McKenzie  River  Trail  Trailhead Auto  &  Boat  Parking Undefined Undefined 10 The  proposed  auto  and  boat  parking  will  contain  elongated  parking  spaces  to  accommodate  vehicles  with  trailers. Entry  Signage 1 0 2 The  site  currently  has  a  US  Forest  Service  entry  signage.  Proposed  Master  Plan  calls  for  moving  the  current  entry  signage  and  adding  one   directional  sign  for  day-­‐use  and  campground  facilities.   Informational  Kiosk 2 1 2 The  site  currently  has  2  informational  kiosks.  The  proposed  kiosks  will  incorporate  informational  material  and  a  self-­‐service  pay  station. Self-­‐service  pay  station 1 -­‐ 2 See  note  above. Interpretive  Wayside  Panel Undefined Undefined 3 Programmatic  requirements  call  for  "some"  kiosks  and  do  not  provide  a  specific  number.  The  proposed  wayside  panels  are  to  be  placed  at   strategic  locations  throughout  the  site,  such  as  the  boat  ramp,  sensitive  habitat  area,  and  UA  viewing  platform  or  dock. Trash  Containers 4 0 tbd The  existing  trash  containers  are  dumpsters.  Proposed  trash  receptacles  to  be  individual  trash  cans.   **The  proposed  conditions  on  this  page  do  not  include  surface  treatments  and  landscaping.  See  Master  Plan  section  of  document  for  recommendations. 27 Appendices Appendix I . User Intercept Survey Results The purpose of the site user intercept surveys were to gather information about the wants and needs of campers and day-users of the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. Site analysis and “secret shopper” observation on Friday, 7/20. Saturday, 7/21 and 7/28, the team participated in a user intercept survey. An information/survey station was established at an activity hub within the recreation area with signs, easels, and free finger sandwiches. Campers and day users were asked to participate in our survey by (1) being approached by a team member as they walked by the station, (2) large flyers posted at three information kiosks throughout the recreation area, and (3) team members going “door-to-door” at campsites asking them to stop by the station. Three large easels with our primary questions were set-up at the station. Primary questions were (1) What changes would make Trail Bridge better?, (2) What’s great about Trail Bridge?, (3) What activities are you participating in while you’re at Trail Bridge?. Team members interacted with campers and day-users then wrote their comments on post-its, which were placed under the appropriate question. Other informal questions were asked during the survey and team members took written notes of the findings. Findings: Team members interacted with 24 people on 7/21 and 21 people on 7/28; approximately 60% campers, 40% day- users. Key take-aways: 1. Trail Bridge is a tradition. Several individuals said they had been coming to this campground for 10-25+ years. This was the only, or one of the few, campgrounds they go to. This campground serves primarily local individuals, rather than tourists from outside of the region. Proximity to their hometown, informal quality of the site, no reservations required, at a lower elevation, recreation opportunities, and family tradition were the primary reasons cited for site users. 2. Trail Bridge serves as a base camp for recreationist. A number of individuals camp at Trail Bridge then fish in surrounding lakes and reservoirs. (Trail Bridge is not particularly a prime destination for fisherman because they prohibited from using live bait with the reservoir.) Many mountain bikers and hikers also use Trail Bridge as a base camp for vehicle parking while they go on the MRT. 3. Maintain the character of Trail Bridge as a spacious, informal, family-friendly campground. During initial questioning, users said they didn’t want any changes to be made to the campground; however, after more discussion they mentioned various ways the campground could be improved – from location of rv sites, improved restroom facilities, etc. The common theme was that users did not want to Trail Bridge to become a highly developed campground, but rather keep the informal feel of the place. Many users expressed concern that the redesign would leave the site feeling crowded, overly developed, and more expensive. RESULTS FROM SURVEY: (1) What changes would make Trail Bridge better? Recreational Facilities • Dishwashing/fish cleaning station (suggestion of team member) • Put back the booms (docks) • Small fishing dock • Allow bait fishing in the reservoir • Water slides • Be able to fish from the shore (such as a dock) • Zip line into the water • Warmer water or a shallow pool area for swimming • Towels • Trailhead improvements • Rope swing • Covered picnic area in hotter parts of the site • A place for kids to play • Better maintained and more accessible paths to rivers and reservoir • Obscure the views of power lines • Day use area on the shoreline Camping Facilities • Dump station • Cabins • A camp store • More spots on the west side (near Smith River) for tent camping • Increase the number of back-in RV camp sites • Separated tent & RV sites • Equal distribution of sites. RVs now claim the best sites (near creek and along shoreline). Should also have tent sites in these locations. • More secluded tent sites. Improve privacy. • Walk-in camping area for hikers/bikers with smaller, more private sites • Free camping sites • Pay per car instead of per site Feeling & Character • Delineation between the campground and day-use areas • Make circulation and camping areas more clear • Keep same number of users/campers. General thought that “improvements” mean more people, which is not desired. • Reduce number of people. • Keep it “primitive” • Have a camp host • More rangers or other oversight • A center, a place where people gravitate towards • More respect for the site, less litter Vegetation & Natural Resources • More lake frontage • More trees for camp sites on the west side of the site • More trees in the exposed areas • More shade throughout the rec area and campground • Trim the younger trees near shoreline for improved viewshed of reservoir • More shading for tent sites • More privacy between sites; a little more foliage • Poison oak control 31 Signage & Wayfinding • Better signage for pay station • Signage with site map • Identification signage of potable water and wayfinding to help find water spigots • More educational signage • Identification of entry • Clear signage regarding fishing regulations Roadways • Maintain gravel (General improvements needed to roadways because it gets very muddy during the rainy season. Lots of erosion from roadways.) • More space for cars to pass each other on the entry road • Less dust but no paving Parking • Clearer delineation of parking areas • Better places to park boats • Have boat parking near camp sites Technology • Electricity • Phone connections • Webcam to assess snow conditions Bathrooms • Another flush toilet restroom on site • Cleaner bathrooms • Shower Facilities, or Exterior showers by bathrooms to rinse off • Restrooms by MRT Water spigots • More water spigots • Water spigot by MRT (2) What’s great about Trail Bridge? Recreational Facilities • Open year round • No hook-ups, like to camp • Mix of uses • No bait fishing – protect the native fish • Very good trails • Lots of fish • Good place to bring dogs • Great location for mountain biking Camping Facilities • Primitive enough that there are always spots available • Private camp sites • Creekside camping • Like it how it is – flexible parking, areas for RVs • Large and flexible campsites Setting • The power plant is an interesting landmark • Lots of room • Camping by the creeks is tucked away/ private • Lake Feeling & Character • Rustic feeling • Not a party place, generally quiet after 9am • Not very developed • No power hook-ups (general consensus that electricity would change the atmosphere of the place) • Not overused • Rustic feel – no paving • Historic feeling (ie-older restroom) • Quiet, peaceful • Openness, spread out • Not motorized on the reservoir • Like it how it is • Familiar • Not crowded • It’s a little rough • Community feeling • It’s not an RV park • Tradition, come back year after year • Quiet, peaceful • Just the right level of development • Informal • It’s unpaved Proximity & Convenience • Close to Albany • It’s close to Eugene • Access from urban areas • McKenzie Bridge market is close by if we forget anything • Access for many activities • This is a base camp for play • I park my car here when I bike on the MRT • Lower elevation Fees • Free in the winter and not many people • No reservations • Reasonable fee Bathrooms • There’s a flush toilet Water Spigots • Running water (3) What activities are you participating in while you’re at Trail Bridge? • Backpacking • Biking • Board games • Boating and canoeing • Camping • Fishing • Geocaching • Hanging out and relaxing • Hiking • Mountain biking on MRT • Parking for day-use and MRT • Swimming • Trail running 33 Appendix II . Visitation Rates This table illustrates the estimated minimum and maximum daily visits to the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. The data was compiled in the 2006 Martha Goodavish Planning & Design and Stillwater Sciences for the Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan. EWEB and design staff can use this table to determine capacity loads for the site. Memorandum Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2242 13 January 2007 Martha Goodavish Planning & Design, and Stillwater Sciences 3 Table-1. Estimated minimum and maximum visits at Project reservoirs. Estimates Dates Location1 Statistic Weekdays Weekends All days Total (includes an adjustment factor for maximum estimates only)2 Minimum 2,289 3,206 5,494 5,494Trail Bridge Reservoir Maximum 11,967 9,255 21,221 10,611 Minimum 1,160 877 2,037 2,037Carmen Diversion Reservoir Maximum 6,992 5,941 12,932 9,699 Minimum 713 922 1,635 1,635 28 May– 6 Sept. Smith Reservoir Maximum 3,189 3,236 6,424 4,818 Minimum 236 198 435 435Trail Bridge Reservoir Maximum3 1,919 1,024 2,943 1,472 Minimum 43 124 167 167Carmen Diversion Reservoir Maximum 3 377 397 774 581 Minimum 102 37 139 139 7 Sept.–30 Nov. Smith Reservoir Maximum 208 87 295 222 1 Dec– 31 Mar. Trail Bridge Reservoir Minimum 261 185 446 446 Minimum 312 212 525 525Trail Bridge Reservoir Maximum 2,515 2,474 4,990 2,495 Minimum 239 121 360 360Carmen Diversion Reservoir Maximum 1,182 704 1,886 1,415 Minimum 206 141 348 348 1 Apr.– 27 May Smith Reservoir Maximum4 470 577 1,047 785 Minimum 6,900Trail Bridge Reservoir Maximum 14,578 Minimum 2,564Carmen Diversion Reservoir Maximum 11,695 Minimum 2,122Smith Reservoir Maximum 5,825 Annual Visits by Site Ice Cap Campground NA 3 3,693 Minimum 15,279Total Annual Visits Maximum 35,791 1 Trail Bridge Reservoir estimate includes use associated with the Smith Lo-Level Road Dispersed Sites; Smith Reservoir estimate includes use associated with the day use area and Lakes End Campground. 2 Adjustment factors are applied to maximum estimates only; 50% reduction applied to visits to Trail Bridge Campground and Day Use Area; 25% reduction applied to Carmen Diversion Reservoir and Smith Reservoir. 3 The USDA Forest Service provided a 2004 use estimate for Ice Cap Creek Campground, but no minimum or maximum estimates were available. This estimate was added to both the minimum and maximum total annual visits. 4 Vehicle counts were obtained at Smith Reservoir during 2006 and were used to recalculate the maximum use estimate for the spring season. During the spring season, 359 vehicles were recorded entering the Smith Reservoir Day Use Area. The revised maximum estimate of 785 visits shown in Table 1 above is substantially lower than the maximum estimate of 1,078 presented in the FLA, which was Appendix III . Supporting Resources The following list contains supplemental resources which could be consulted during the design phase for Trail Bridge Recreation Area redevelopment. • Botanical Report for EWEB Carmen Smith Relicensing Project, August 2012 • Aquatics Management Plan, October 2008 • Wildlife Management Plan, October 2008 • Vegetation Management Plan, October 2008 • Roads, Waste Areas, and Staging Areas Management Plan, October 2008 • Recreation and Aesthetics Management Plan, October 2008 • Historic Properties Management Plan, October 2008 • US Forest Service ORDER #18- 58, V.2007.1, Occupancy and Use, Willamette National Forest, Detroit, Middle Fork, and McKenzie River Ranger Districts • Aesthetic Resources at the Carmen- Smith Hydroelectric Project, Upper McKenzie River Basin, Oregon, April 2006 • Existing Recreational Uses at the Carmen-Smith Hydroelectric Project, Upper McKenzie River Basin, Oregon, March 2006 • USDA The Built Environment Image Guide, For the National Forests and Grasslands, September 2001 35 This supplemental section contains information requested by EWEB pertaining to viewing platforms and docks for the Trail Bridge Recreation Area. VIEWING PLATFORM OR DOCK Programmatic requirements state that EWEB shall construct two floating docks, one of which should be Universally Accessible (UA). Floating docks are preferred to compensate for the fluctuations of the reservoirs water level. This section is intended to provide further guidance to the general type of floating dock to be constructed on site. EWEB is responsible for the final design and compliance. Proposed locations for the docks are included within the Master Plan. The floating docks, to be constructed on- site, shall be used for fishing or as a viewing platform. EWEB and the US Forest Service wish to not encourage the floating docks as a swimming platform. Docks, including posts and rails, should be low-profile so as to not to detract from the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline. Continuous rail stops should be used along the perimeter of the decking for UA compliance. Examples of low-profile floating docks can be seen below. For design guidelines, consult the USDA Floating Trail Bridges and Docks Guidebook: http://www.fs.fed. us/t-d/pubs/pdfpubs/pdf02232812/ pdf02232812dpi72.pdf. East Devil’s Lake, Oregon State Parks, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devils_Lake_State_Recreation_Area East Devil’s Lake, Oregon State Parks, http://www.panoramio.com/photo/4630855 Appendix IV . Viewing Platforms and Decks USDA Floating Trail Bridges and Docks Guidebook 37