Schlossberg, Marc

Permanent URI for this collection

https://hdl.handle.net/1794/1347

Marc Schlossberg, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor

Planning, Public Policy, and Management

University of Oregon

128 Hendricks Hall

Eugene, OR

(541) 346-2046

(541) 346-2040 (fax)

Email: schlossb@uoregon.edu

Web site.

Browse

Browsing Schlossberg, Marc by Title

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Crest Drive Community Mapping Project - Community Atlas 1.0
    (2006-05-16) Schlossberg, Marc; Heater, Heather; Bargen, Sara; Rolniak, David
    This Atlas contains a series of maps resulting froma community-based mapping project between the University of Oregon and the Crest Drive Citizens Association in Eugene, OR. In the Fall, 2006 academic term, students taking the class “PPPM 4/536: Applied Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Social Planning” worked with residents of the Crest Drive Neighborhood to collect data in the neighborhood of interest to residents. The planning for this project began about four months prior to the term when the Chair of the neighborhood association, Kathy Saranpa, and I, the instructor of the course, met to brainstorm potential project ideas. Over the course of those four months, we eventually decided to conduct a walkability analysis of some central streets between Crest Drive Elementary School and Wayne Morse Ranch. Data was collected using ArcPad GIS with teams of residents and students doing the data collection. In addition to maps showing this data, this final Atlas also includes maps of the neighborhood using other city and census data.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Delineating "Public" and "Participation" in PPGIS
    (Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 2005) Schlossberg, Marc; Shuford, Elliot
    PPGIS is often presented and promoted as a more people-centered GIS compared to a more traditional technocratic,expert-driven tool or methodology. Yet, the umbrella of PPGIS is quite broad. Within such a broad context, it may be helpful for practitioners and scholars of PPGIS to better understand exactly what PPGIS is.
  • ItemMetadata only
    Delineating 'Public' and 'Participation' in PPGIS
    (2003-07) Schlossberg, Marc; Shuford, Elliot
    PPGIS is often presented as a people-centered alternative to the use of GIS compared to a more technocratic,expert-driven methodology. Yet, the umbrella of PPGIS is quite broad. Within such a broad context, it may be helpful for ractitioners of PPGIS and those who may be interested in PPGIS concepts to have a better understanding of exactly what PPGIS is. Or, in other words, having a clearer conception of what ‘public’and ‘participation’ is, and how they relate to expected outcomes and outputs within a GIS context is very important as the ideas and ideals of PPGIS continue to gain momentum. Understanding the variations in the types of ‘public’, cross-referencing them against the distinctions in ‘participation’, and linking the intersection of types of ‘public’ and ‘participation’ to expected GIS outcomes and outputs would greatly enrich the field. Moreover, such delineation would allow PPGIS practitioners and those considering PPGIS approaches to appreciate the linkages of certain types of participation processes, certain elements of the public, and certain types of expected project results. This paper offers a review of key literature relevant to public participation and presents potential integrated matrices to guide future PPGIS thought.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    When GIS was Rejected: Implications for collaborative planning and public participation GIS (PPGIS)
    (2005-09-02T18:01:45Z) Schlossberg, Marc; Mattia, Mathew
    In November of 2001, community residents in the city of Eugene, Oregon stated that there is an “excessive concentration” of social services in two of its neighborhoods. In response, the City Council suggested that mapping and analyzing the spatial distribution of social services would be an important component to understand and address this matter. A Task Force comprised of neighborhood representatives, social service representatives, and two neutral participants was developed to explore this issue in a collaborative method. Mapping services were offered to the task force, but was rejected by the group because members thought that mapping the locations of social service and neighborhoods would not accurately capture the issue, would be too complex, too subjective, and a waste of time. This paper explores the decision of the group to reject the use of GIS, the general failure of the Task Force, and suggests broader implications related to the use of GIS in collaborative and public participation planning endeavors.