Oregon Law Review : Vol. 78, No. 2, p. 501-550 : State Taxation of Non-Indians Whom Do Business With Indian Tribes: Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State
dc.contributor.author | Ansson, Richard J. Jr. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-07-10T17:09:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-10T17:09:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1999 | |
dc.description | 50 p. | en |
dc.format.extent | 88499 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | 78 Or. L. Rev. 501 (1999) | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/4435 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en |
dc.subject | Tribal government | |
dc.subject | Taxation | |
dc.title | Oregon Law Review : Vol. 78, No. 2, p. 501-550 : State Taxation of Non-Indians Whom Do Business With Indian Tribes: Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State | en |
dc.title.alternative | State Taxation of Non-Indians Whom Do Business With Indian Tribes: Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State | en |
dc.title.alternative | Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State | en |
dc.type | Article | en |