Speculative Fetishism
| dc.contributor.author | McNulty, Tracy | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-22T19:31:37Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-22T19:31:37Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description | 34 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Quentin Meillassoux, like his mentor Alain Badiou, is sometimes accused by his critics of “fetishizing mathematics.” Without embracing the negative judgment implied in such a charge, this essay asks: what might be gained by taking seriously the link between fetishism and speculative philosophy? The claim that Meillassoux “fetishizes” mathematics potentially reveals something fundamental not only about the formalism at the heart of his speculative realism (whose “glaciality,” inanimacy, or inhuman character might sustain a certain disavowal, namely of “finitude” or castration) but about fetishism itself, whose philosophical character is attested not only by its ideality or relation to the absolute, but by its concern with thought or construction. The aim of this essay is thus not to dwell at length on the work of Meillassoux, but rather to think about the “speculative realism” specific to fetishism itself, and its unique contribution to speculative philosophy. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | McNulty, T. (2015). Speculative Fetishism. Konturen, 8, 99-132. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/uo/konturen.8.0.3709 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.5399/uo/konturen.8.0.3709 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1947-3796 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/24418 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
| dc.title | Speculative Fetishism | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |