Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 1, p. 191-246 : An “Outside Limit” for Refund Suits: The Case Against the Tax Exception to the Six-Year Bar on Claims Against the Government

dc.contributor.authorGustafson, Adam R. F.
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-16T23:43:19Z
dc.date.available2011-11-16T23:43:19Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description56 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractLongstanding judicial precedent and the official position of the IRS agree that federal tax refund suits are limited only by the two-year statute of limitations of § 6532(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, which is triggered only when the IRS mails the claimant a notice of disallowance. This Article contends that tax refund litigation is also governed by the six-year limitation of 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) on “every civil action commenced against the United States,” which is triggered upon the accrual of a claim. The Supreme Court alluded to this dual-limitation scheme in 2008 in United States v. Clintwood Elkhorn Mining Co., stating in dicta that the six-year bar places an “outside limit” on the tax-specific limitation.en_US
dc.identifier.citation90 Or. L. Rev. 191 (2011)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/11758
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.subjectTax refunds
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 1, p. 191-246 : An “Outside Limit” for Refund Suits: The Case Against the Tax Exception to the Six-Year Bar on Claims Against the Governmenten_US
dc.title.alternativeAn “Outside Limit” for Refund Suits: The Case Against the Tax Exception to the Six-Year Bar on Claims Against the Governmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gustafson.pdf
Size:
239.76 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.13 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: