Why Vague Sentencing Guidelines Violate the Due Process Clause

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2017-03-30

Authors

Heilman, Kelsey McCowan

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Oregon School of Law

Abstract

The United States Sentencing Guidelines (the Guidelines) are used to calculate sentencing ranges for roughly 75,000 defendants each year. Despite that ubiquity, the law is unsettled on a very basic question: whether the Guidelines trigger defendants’ rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Specifically, the federal courts of appeals are split regarding whether use of a vague Guideline at sentencing deprives the defendant of liberty without due process of law. Do defendants have a due process right to Guidelines provisions that can be interpreted with reasonable precision? This Article takes a historical, jurisprudential, and pragmatic approach to that question, examining the roots of the Guidelines, the changes wrought by the shift from mandatory to advisory Guidelines, and the continuing effect of the Guidelines on federal sentencing practice.

Description

44 pages

Keywords

United States Constitution, Fifth Amendment, Defendants’ rights

Citation

95 OR. L. REV. 53