Oregon Law Review : Vol. 84, No. 3, p. 907-934 : All the King’s Horses and All the King’s Men: Are Oregon Courts Putting the Good Faith Obligation Back Together Again?
dc.contributor.author | Peterson, Daniel C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-08-03T16:34:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-08-03T16:34:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.description | 28 p. | en |
dc.format.extent | 114946 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | 84 Or. L. Rev. 907 (2005) | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/4718 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en |
dc.subject | Good faith (Law) -- Oregon | |
dc.title | Oregon Law Review : Vol. 84, No. 3, p. 907-934 : All the King’s Horses and All the King’s Men: Are Oregon Courts Putting the Good Faith Obligation Back Together Again? | en |
dc.title.alternative | All the King’s Horses and All the King’s Men: Are Oregon Courts Putting the Good Faith Obligation Back Together Again? | en |
dc.title.alternative | Are Oregon Courts Putting the Good Faith Obligation Back Together Again? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |