Intersections of diversity and trainee competence problems: Faculty perspectives from context to "colorblindness"

dc.contributor.authorMiller, David Scott
dc.date.accessioned2009-02-16T23:58:26Z
dc.date.available2009-02-16T23:58:26Z
dc.date.issued2008-09
dc.descriptionxvi, 283 p. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number.en
dc.description.abstractThe dual roles of educators and gatekeepers (Laliotis & Grayson, 1985; Vacha-Haase, Davenport, & Kerewsky, 2004) require faculty to identify and work with students who are identified as having problems of professional competence (TIPPC). Although a number of researchers (e.g., Forrest, Elman, Gizara & Vacha-Haase, 1999; Huprich & Rudd, 2004; Vacha-Haase et al.) have found that on average, at least one student per program is identified as having professional competence problems every three to five years, few have explored trainers' experiences working with colleagues and TIPPCs on trainee remediation or dismissal. Even fewer have explored trainers' processes for working at intersections of diversity with TIPPC, leading some researchers (Forrest et al., 1999) to suggest that programs' mechanisms for identifying and remediating problems of professional competence in training have not adequately addressed intersections with diversity. The omission of these variables is particularly troubling as it may pose threats to the retention of diverse cohorts. Using a Grounded Theory approach, interviews with 22 training directors (TDs) and faculty members were analyzed to explore processes for conceptualizing and addressing intersections of diversity with TIPPC. A model emerged in which participants described dilemmas, examined apparent problems, reached decisions and acted on what they had learned. Processes for conceptualizing and addressing these intersections were embedded in contexts of (a) espoused ideologies and (b) program variables that impacted conversations about intersections of diversity with TIPPC. Participants who espoused a context-attentive approach demonstrated less consistency than participants who espoused a colorblind approach, sometimes losing or discontinuing attention to context during their analyses. Possible reasons for this discrepancy, as well as training, research, and political implications are discussed.en
dc.description.sponsorshipAdviser: Linda Forresten
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/8547
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregonen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Oregon theses, Dept. of Counseling Psychology and Human Services, Ph. D., 2008;
dc.subjectEducational psychologyen
dc.subjectSchool counselingen
dc.subjectFacultyen
dc.subjectTrainee competenceen
dc.subjectMulticulturalen
dc.subjectCounseling psychologyen
dc.subjectDiversityen
dc.subjectCompetence problemsen
dc.subjectTrainingen
dc.titleIntersections of diversity and trainee competence problems: Faculty perspectives from context to "colorblindness"en
dc.typeThesisen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Miller_David_PhD_Summer2008.pdf
Size:
3.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
thesis
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.79 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Name:
Miller_David.pdf
Size:
27.42 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
author's permission