Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 455-494 : The Great Lakes Compact and the Public Trust Doctrine: Beyond Michigan and Wisconsin Common Law

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorDonegan, Bridget
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-24T19:23:20Z
dc.date.available2010-08-24T19:23:20Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description40 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractPart I of this Comment examines the Great Lakes Compact and its effect in Michigan and Wisconsin. Part II provides background on the public trust doctrine and its evolution in Michigan and Wisconsin, including its scope, the obligations of the states as trustees, and the availability of citizen standing to enforce the trust. Part III explains how the Compact’s public trust is distinct from the states’ traditional public trust doctrines. The Comment concludes that judicial recognition of a distinct Compact trust, defined by the scope and purpose of the Compact itself, will best reconcile the Compact’s purposes with traditional state public trust doctrines.en_US
dc.identifier.citation25 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 455 (2009)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1049-0280
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/10632
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.titleJournal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 455-494 : The Great Lakes Compact and the Public Trust Doctrine: Beyond Michigan and Wisconsin Common Lawen_US
dc.title.alternativeThe Great Lakes Compact and the Public Trust Doctrine: Beyond Michigan and Wisconsin Common Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
donegan.pdf
Size:
171.88 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 24, no. 2 (Fall 2009)