Route Descriptions Using Maps, Photomaps, and Imagery: An Experimental Analysis

dc.contributor.advisorLobben, Amyen_US
dc.contributor.authorKelley, Maureenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-11T20:12:52Z
dc.date.available2014-12-29T21:12:31Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-11
dc.description.abstractPrevious route description experiments conducted by psychologists show there are differences between males and females in the use of landmarks when describing routes. Previous research has shown that females used landmarks and egocentric forms of turn descriptors more often than males for route descriptions. This method is known as route knowledge in the spatial knowledge literature. Males, conversely, were seen to use fewer landmarks and more cardinal direction descriptions and standard distances when describing routes. Spatial knowledge literature terms this method survey knowledge. The current experiment tested the hypothesis that sex is not the determinant of landmark usage for route descriptions but different cartographic methods depicting the same locale determine whether landmarks are described. Two quasi-experiments were conducted using different map types. Results of the experiments show that map type, not sex, influences landmark usage for route descriptions.en_US
dc.description.embargo10000-01-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/12999
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregonen_US
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.subjectMapsen_US
dc.subjectMap taxonomyen_US
dc.subjectRoute descriptionsen_US
dc.subjectSex differencesen_US
dc.titleRoute Descriptions Using Maps, Photomaps, and Imagery: An Experimental Analysisen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartment of Geographyen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Oregonen_US
thesis.degree.leveldoctoralen_US
thesis.degree.namePh.D.en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
Kelley_oregon_0171A_10628.pdf
Size:
2.16 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format