Oregon Law Review : Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 351-384 : The Guidelines of Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.: A Measured Approach?
dc.contributor.author | Ceder, Timothy C. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-12-14T17:42:55Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-12-14T17:42:55Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.description | 34 p. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This Note analyzes the Comprehensive Drug Testing(CDT) guidelines in five parts. Part I briefly reviews the facts of the case to provide context to the guidelines and their intended application. Part II explains the basic governing law and concedes the point that the government failed to comply with that law. Part III explores how the decision impacts magistrate judges and affects their ability to issue warrants. Part IV discusses the government’s ability to execute warrants after CDT and the guidelines’ impact on cases thus far. Part V discusses whether CDT should be vacated or limited to methods that are implementable and founded on established law. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 89 Or. L. Rev. 351 (2010) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/10904 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon Law School | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug testing -- Law and legislation | |
dc.title | Oregon Law Review : Vol. 89, No. 1, p. 351-384 : The Guidelines of Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.: A Measured Approach? | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | The Guidelines of Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc.: A Measured Approach? | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |