Oregon Law Review : Vol. 86 No. 3, p. 657-678 : Rethinking Profiling: A Cognitive Model of Bias and Its Legal Implications

dc.contributor.authorGeisinger, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-11T22:41:59Z
dc.date.available2008-07-11T22:41:59Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description22 p.en
dc.description.abstractPart I of this Article provides a short introduction to the problem of profiling and states’ regulatory responses. Part II describes the model of rational behavior that underlies the traditional conception of both profiling and regulatory responses. Part II then provides a new model of “implicit” profiling based primarily on the cognitive processes of categorization, and discusses the way in which this cognitive model reframes the basic profiling debate. Assuming the implicit processes involved in profiling, Part III considers alternative regulatory responses to profiling.en
dc.format.extent113047 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citation86 Or. L. Rev. 657 (2007)en
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/6817
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen
dc.subjectRacial profiling
dc.subjectProfiling
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 86 No. 3, p. 657-678 : Rethinking Profiling: A Cognitive Model of Bias and Its Legal Implicationsen
dc.title.alternativeRethinking Profiling: A Cognitive Model of Bias and Its Legal Implicationsen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
geisinger.pdf
Size:
110.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: