Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 037-084 : Test Methods Matter: Representative Sampling and Clean Air Act Test Methods Can Survive EPA’s Credible Evidence Rule
dc.contributor.author | Howard, Robert M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Guerrero, Patricia | |
dc.contributor.author | Ohta, Jason M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-25T18:35:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-25T18:35:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.description | 48 p. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 25 J. ENVTL. L. & LITIG. 37 (2010) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1049-0280 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/10644 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
dc.title | Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation : Vol. 25, No. 1, p. 037-084 : Test Methods Matter: Representative Sampling and Clean Air Act Test Methods Can Survive EPA’s Credible Evidence Rule | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Test Methods Matter: Representative Sampling and Clean Air Act Test Methods Can Survive EPA’s Credible Evidence Rule | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |