Oregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3, p. 629-662 : On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Court

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGoldberg, Suzanne B.
dc.contributor.authorLatCrit Conference (7th : 2002 : Portland, Or.)
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-31T19:00:29Z
dc.date.available2007-07-31T19:00:29Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.description34 p.en
dc.format.extent161820 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citation81 Or. L. Rev. 629 (2002)en
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/4615
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen
dc.subjectSexual orientation
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3, p. 629-662 : On Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Courten
dc.title.alternativeOn Making Anti-Essentialist and Social Constructionist Arguments in Courten
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
81_Or_L_Rev_629.pdf
Size:
158.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.21 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Oregon Law Review : Vol. 81, No. 3 (Fall 2002)