Rules of Engagement in the Conflict Between Businesses and Consumers in Online Contracts

dc.contributor.authorGhirardelli, Aaron E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-17T17:09:35Z
dc.date.available2015-04-17T17:09:35Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-16
dc.description52 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractIn its purest form, the law of contracts is premised on the ideal of a transaction between parties of equal bargaining strength, who enter a mutually binding and beneficial agreement through the give and take of an open and fair negotiation. But the realities of a modern market economy have required adjustments to that ideal. The law pertaining to adhesion contracts provides an apt example of one such adjustment. In those agreements, the negotiated contract gives way to the form contract in order to promote efficiencies of scale that will benefit both businesses and consumers (and the economy in general) by permitting the parties to forego the formalities of negotiation and mutual assent. This alteration to contract law was justified to allow businesses to reduce their transaction costs, which translates as a benefit to consumers in the form of lower prices for goods and services. Any such adjustment, however, should not undermine the basic idea of a mutually beneficial agreement between the parties.en_US
dc.identifier.citation93 OR. L. REV. 719en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/18857
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.subjectDispute resolutionen_US
dc.subjectConsumer rightsen_US
dc.titleRules of Engagement in the Conflict Between Businesses and Consumers in Online Contractsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ghirardelli.pdf
Size:
221.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.13 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: