Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 703-728 : Tsunami: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Impedes Access to Justice
dc.contributor.author | Sternlight, Jean R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-06T01:14:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-04-06T01:14:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
dc.description | 26 pages | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | It is highly ironic but no less distressing that a case with a name meaning “conception” should come to signify death for the legal claims of many potential plaintiffs. The U.S. Supreme Court’s fiveto- four decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion is proving to be a tsunami that is wiping out existing and potential consumer and employment class actions. This Article will explore the decision; how the decision is being interpreted by lower courts; the decision’s impact on parties to such litigation; and how, if not legislatively limited, this case will substantially harm consumers, employees, and perhaps others. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 90 Or. L. Rev.703 (2012) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/12132 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
dc.rights | rights_reserved | en_US |
dc.title | Oregon Law Review : Vol. 90, No. 3, p. 703-728 : Tsunami: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Impedes Access to Justice | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Tsunami: AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion Impedes Access to Justice | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |