A Modest Proposal: Review of the National Consumer Law Center’s Model State Consumer and Employee Justice Enforcement Act
| dc.contributor.author | Brunino, Alex | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-10T18:34:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-10T18:34:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-05-10 | |
| dc.description | 40 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | The foremost law controlling arbitration is the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), which has been in effect for nearly a century. Though originally intended to ensure judicial recognition of arbitration, the FAA has since become a particularly contentious topic, splitting the opinions of pundits, legal scholars, and the Supreme Court. This Comment summarizes the FAA’s long and divisive jurisprudence, culminating in a critical review of the National Consumer Law Center's (NCLC) Model Act. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 95 OR. L. REV. 569 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/22329 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | All Rights Reserved. | en_US |
| dc.title | A Modest Proposal: Review of the National Consumer Law Center’s Model State Consumer and Employee Justice Enforcement Act | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |