The Psychological Mechanisms of Oppression: Empathy, Disgust, and the Perception of Group Membership

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Authors

Harris, Alexander

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Oregon

Abstract

From a psychological standpoint, the oppression and marginalization of certain groups can be understood on the basis of two emotional mechanisms, empathy and disgust. This essay seeks to illuminate how both emotions are heavily modulated by the perception of group membership and how both show the capability to be heavily influenced by social and cultural contexts. This cultural prejudice works by determining what markers of difference (such as skin color or religion) are socially salient, which allows groups to build hierarchies based on those differences that would otherwise remain irrelevant. This paper does not seek to justify group domination as an organic product of psychology, but rather to merely give an account of how the psychological phenomena of disgust and empathy accentuate and collapse, respectively, the borders between people on the basis of in-group and out-group perception. Using the results of psychological tests, the author draws out certain arguments that are philosophically telling as well as politically relevant. Taken together, the social and psychological construction of differences between racial groups in the United States has altered how and when empathy and disgust have been elicited, and has thereby facilitated the reification of extraordinarily oppressive and atrocious group biases into a strict hierarchal system. With this understanding of how group oppression is able to take place on a psychological level we can better understand what can be done to mitigate the negative effects of in-group, out-group interaction.

Description

10 pages

Keywords

Oppression, Groups

Citation

Harris, A. (2014). The Psychological Mechanisms of Oppression: Empathy, Disgust, and the Perception of Group Membership. Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal, 7(1). doi:10.5399/uo/ourj.7.1.4