Comparing morphometric methods in Macaca mulatta crania
| dc.contributor.author | Glenzer, Rachel R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Clarke, Kelsey S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Anderson, Monya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Eller, Andrea R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | White, Frances J. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Frost, Stephen R. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-06-08T23:11:04Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-06-08T23:11:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.description | Single page poster. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Accurate, reliable, cost-effective methods of measuring skeletal remains are vital to biological anthropology and related disciplines. Photogrammetry is a new method that is being utilized in various fields including, but not limited to anthropology, archeology and paleontology[1]. We compared the precision of 3D photogrammetry using Agisoft Photoscan[2], to that of two well-known methods for collecting 3D landmarks: NextEngineLaser Scanner[4] and Microscribe3DX[3]. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/18920 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon Libraries | en_US |
| dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
| dc.subject | Photogrammetry | en_US |
| dc.subject | Skeletal remains | en_US |
| dc.subject | Macaca mulatta | en_US |
| dc.title | Comparing morphometric methods in Macaca mulatta crania | en_US |
| dc.type | Other | en_US |