The effects of the Integrated Resource Restoration budget pilot on forest service restoration programs
dc.contributor.author | Schultz, Courtney A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mattor, Katherine | |
dc.contributor.author | Moseley, Cassandra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-01T22:26:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-09-01T22:26:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.description | 2 pages | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Forest restoration is a priority for the U.S. Forest Service, but many have argued that the agency is constrained in meeting restoration objectives by its budget structure. In 2012, Congress approved on a pilot basis the Integrated Resource Restoration (IRR) budget line item to consolidate previously separated budget lines. With IRR, the Forest Service introduced new performance measures that increased flexibility to focus on priority restoration activities. The Southwestern, Intermountain, and Northern Regions of the Forest Service have been implementing the IRR since 2012. We were asked by the Forest Service to provide a third-party evaluation of the pilot. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This research was supported by funding from the USDA Forest Service (13-CS-11132420-254), Colorado State University, and the University of Oregon. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/19368 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Ecosystem Workforce Program, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | EWP briefing paper;no. 62 | |
dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Forest restoration | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Expenditures, Public | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | United States. Forest Service | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Federal Forest Restoration Program (Or.) | en_US |
dc.title | The effects of the Integrated Resource Restoration budget pilot on forest service restoration programs | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |