The Silent Sovereign: Tipping the Scales in Reverse-Erie Applications of Indian Law
| dc.contributor.author | Van Wieren, Amanda | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-12-01T23:19:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2012-12-01T23:19:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | |
| dc.description | 28 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Part I of this Comment describes the framework that the Supreme Court has supplied for deciding the applicability of state and federal rules in the contexts of Erie, preemption, and reverse-Erie. Part II explores the lopsided results achieved under the current reverse-Erie paradigm and proposes an explanation for the apparent bias towards the federal sovereign: premature considerations of preemption come into play when state courts decide whether the rule they are examining is substantive or procedural. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 91Or. L. Rev. 297 (2012) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/12498 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | rights_reserved | en_US |
| dc.subject | Indian law | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reverse Erie | en_US |
| dc.title | The Silent Sovereign: Tipping the Scales in Reverse-Erie Applications of Indian Law | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |