Oregon Law Review : Vol. 88 No. 3, p.703-744 :Virtue and Contract Law

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorCimino, Chapin F.
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-14T22:37:15Z
dc.date.available2010-10-14T22:37:15Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.description42 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis Article argues that legal scholars, and especially private law scholars, should be paying more attention to virtue theory. Unlike the two dominant normative theories, the analytical approach of virtue theory requires a symbiotic focus on both the means and ends of law. As will be explained below, neither of the two dominant theories account fully for both means and ends; instead, each privileges one over the other. By contrast, because of an inherent interrelationship between means and ends in virtue theory, this theory may offer a much more complete understanding of law, including private law, than the theories of either law and economics or individual rights.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/10804
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon Law Schoolen_US
dc.subjectContracts
dc.subjectContract law
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 88 No. 3, p.703-744 :Virtue and Contract Lawen_US
dc.title.alternativeVirtue and Contract Lawen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
cimino.pdf
Size:
171.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Oregon Law Review : Vol. 88, No. 3 (2009)