Effects of Two Marker Placement and Data Analysis Methods on Running Gait Analysis

dc.contributor.authorBecker, James N. M., 1979-
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-18T00:59:38Z
dc.date.available2010-06-18T00:59:38Z
dc.date.issued2010-03
dc.descriptionxiii, 143 p. : ill. A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the effects of two marker placement methods and two data analysis methods on running gait analysis. Markers placed on the shoe heel counter were compared with markers placed directly on the calcaneous and visible through heel windows cut into the shoe. When analyzed using a traditional group design no significant differences were found between marker conditions for rear foot eversion excursion, percent stance at which peak eversion occurred, maximal instantaneous eversion velocity, or maximal instantaneous vertical loading rate. Ankle frontal plane variability was significantly different between conditions. When analyzed with a single subject design some individuals demonstrated significant differences between conditions while others did not. In some individuals the heel windows condition revealed previously masked coupling parameters thought to be related to injury. The results of this study suggest the heel windows method and single subject analysis should be used for a longitudinal study of runners.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCommittee in Charge: Dr. Li-Shan Chou, Chair; Dr. Louis Ostemig; Dr. Stanley Jamesen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/10470
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregonen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUniversity of Oregon theses, Dept. of Human Physiology, M.S., 2010;
dc.subjectGait in humans
dc.titleEffects of Two Marker Placement and Data Analysis Methods on Running Gait Analysisen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Becker_James_N_M_ms2010wi.pdf
Size:
1.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.21 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Name:
Becker_James_N._M..pdf
Size:
27.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
author's permission