Batson v. Armstrong: Prosecutorial Bias and the Missing Evidence Problem

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Darryl K.
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-13T16:24:57Z
dc.date.available2022-05-13T16:24:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-12
dc.description56 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractBatson v. Kentucky prohibits prosecutors’ racially motivated decisions to eliminate a potential juror during jury selection. United States v. Armstrong prohibits prosecutors’ racially motivated decisions to charge a defendant with a crime. Scholars uniformly criticize Batson as an ineffectual doctrine. Most Batson challenges fail, but defendants do win those claims occasionally. They virtually never win Armstrong claims. Why is that so? Both decisions specify how the equal protection doctrine’s prohibition on racially motivated state action applies to prosecutorial decisions. Their doctrinal structures are roughly the same—a defendant must offer prima facie proof of a racially motivated decision; if he does, then the prosecutor must offer race-neutral explanations for her actions. Both require defendants to prove prosecutors’ subjective, racially motivated intent. Successful challenges under either doctrine are rare. Yet in the thirty-five years since the Batson decision, defendants have convinced courts hundreds of times—including, repeatedly, the U.S. Supreme Court—that prosecutors acted with racial bias when exercising peremptory challenges during jury selection.en_US
dc.identifier.citation100 Or. L. Rev. 357en_US
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/27166
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.subjectLitigationen_US
dc.subjectPractice of lawen_US
dc.subjectJury selectionen_US
dc.subjectRacial biasen_US
dc.titleBatson v. Armstrong: Prosecutorial Bias and the Missing Evidence Problemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3. Brown_REV.pdf
Size:
1.09 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: