Cultural Heritage and Diplomatic Partnerships Between the United States and Peru
Loading...
Date
2014-06
Authors
Bell, Tracey J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Oregon
Abstract
The United States and Peru have worked collaboratively and independently to
create bilateral programs, which include museum studies internships, anti-trafficking
initiatives, exhibit exchanges, and professional exchanges, aimed at returning the
research, stewardship, and interpretation of Peruvian cultural heritage property back to
Peru. Cultural heritage property includes movable objects of importance to cultural
identity, such as archaeological artifacts. This capstone explores how diplomatic
relationships influence cultural heritage policies, and shows how these policies have
facilitated the shift of study and inquiry of Peruvian archaeological artifacts back to
Peruvian institutions.
Much literature is devoted to the development of cultural heritage law and antitrafficking
initiatives in the international arena, Latin America, and Peru, but there is a
lack of literature exploring the programs that the United States has created in cooperation
with Peru (Guerrero, 2009; Hoffman, 2006; Luke, 2012). This document looks
specifically at how two countries that did not have a direct colonial relationship have
worked together to create programing for the interpretation, repatriation, and exhibition
of Peruvian cultural heritage property. Exploring the influences of cultural diplomacy
and soft power that impact the decisions made in the protection, funding, and
management of cultural heritage property, we see that programming between these two
countries is evolving in a way that aligns with U.S. foreign policy agendas. Through a
critical analysis of the foundations of the policy, laws and programs, this research seeks to identify trends in cultural heritage property programming that have developed as a
result of the Memorandum of Understanding between the U.S. and Peru.
Description
44 pages
Keywords
Peru, Repatriation, Museum studies, Cultural diplomacy, Cultural heritage property, Soft power