The Art and Science of Voir Dire: Empirical Research, Anecdotal Lessons from the Masters, and Illustrations Supporting the Ten Commandments of Voir Dire

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-07-01

Authors

Caldwell, Harry Mitchell

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of Oregon School of Law

Abstract

The least examined aspect of trial is voir dire. Although numerous law review articles and textbooks have studied and analyzed opening statements, direct examinations, cross-examinations, and closing arguments, voir dire has largely gone undiscussed. This is, in part, because, with few exceptions, voir dire is the product of local customs and idiosyncrasies that vary not just from state to state, or even from county to county, but oftentimes from courtroom to courtroom within the same courthouse. Another reason for the relative paucity of voir dire research and examination is the freewheeling nature of voir dire itself. As the only aspect of trial where advocates directly interact with persons from outside the justice system, prospective jurors bring an element of uncertainty and unpredictability to voir dire that can defy efforts to suggest generalized approaches let alone specific rules. Yet, despite the somewhat chaotic and even messy nature of voir dire, some truisms can and will assist counsel. This Article speaks to those truisms. The ten commandments set forth in this Article instruct counselors how to effectively conduct voir dire.

Description

30 pages

Keywords

Voir Dire, Trials, Practice of law, Jurors

Citation

98 Or. L. Rev. 577