Beyond Male or Female: Using Nonbinary Gender Identity to Confront Outdated Notions of Sex and Gender in the Law
| dc.contributor.author | Hanssen, Shelby | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-21T23:28:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-12-21T23:28:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2017-12-21 | |
| dc.description | 30 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This Note begins in Part I by discussing concepts of contemporary gender theory necessary to contextualize the Oregon nonbinary ruling. Part II offers a brief history of legal determinations of sex and gender in the United States. Part III provides a thorough explanation of the Oregon and California rulings authenticating nonbinary gender status, as well as pending federal litigation on a similar issue. Part IV explores four major approaches to gender documentation in the United States. Part V suggests two concrete steps for the modernization of gender documentation policies and practices. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 96 OR. L. REV. 283 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/22999 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | All Rights Reserved. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Gender | en_US |
| dc.title | Beyond Male or Female: Using Nonbinary Gender Identity to Confront Outdated Notions of Sex and Gender in the Law | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |