A Critique of the International Anti-Corruption Debate: Lessons From El Salvador and Pakistan
dc.contributor.advisor | Weiss, Anita | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Johnson, William | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-10-17T16:14:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-10-17T16:14:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014-10-17 | |
dc.description.abstract | Corruption is an age-old problem that affects every society, government, and institution. In recent decades it has received considerable attention from scholars, development experts, and global policy-makers, and anti-corruption reforms now exist in nearly every country in the world. Unfortunately, decades of research and activism have created a proliferation of data and policy prescriptions that continue to follow a set of narrow, misguided assumptions about the causes and consequences of this serious problem. This is a critique of the perspective that has dominated the international anti-corruption debate. Building upon comparative research conducted in El Salvador and Pakistan, this thesis sheds light on how these narrow-minded assumptions lead to misguided and ineffective anti-corruption efforts in two distinct regions of the world. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/18518 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon | en_US |
dc.rights | All Rights Reserved. | en_US |
dc.subject | Corruption | en_US |
dc.subject | El Salvador | en_US |
dc.subject | Impunity | en_US |
dc.subject | Pakistan | en_US |
dc.title | A Critique of the International Anti-Corruption Debate: Lessons From El Salvador and Pakistan | en_US |
dc.type | Electronic Thesis or Dissertation | en_US |
thesis.degree.discipline | Department of International Studies | en_US |
thesis.degree.grantor | University of Oregon | en_US |
thesis.degree.level | masters | en_US |
thesis.degree.name | M.A. | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Johnson_oregon_0171N_11101.pdf
- Size:
- 660.97 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format