A Critique of the International Anti-Corruption Debate: Lessons From El Salvador and Pakistan

dc.contributor.advisorWeiss, Anitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Williamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-17T16:14:26Z
dc.date.available2014-10-17T16:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-17
dc.description.abstractCorruption is an age-old problem that affects every society, government, and institution. In recent decades it has received considerable attention from scholars, development experts, and global policy-makers, and anti-corruption reforms now exist in nearly every country in the world. Unfortunately, decades of research and activism have created a proliferation of data and policy prescriptions that continue to follow a set of narrow, misguided assumptions about the causes and consequences of this serious problem. This is a critique of the perspective that has dominated the international anti-corruption debate. Building upon comparative research conducted in El Salvador and Pakistan, this thesis sheds light on how these narrow-minded assumptions lead to misguided and ineffective anti-corruption efforts in two distinct regions of the world.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/18518
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregonen_US
dc.rightsAll Rights Reserved.en_US
dc.subjectCorruptionen_US
dc.subjectEl Salvadoren_US
dc.subjectImpunityen_US
dc.subjectPakistanen_US
dc.titleA Critique of the International Anti-Corruption Debate: Lessons From El Salvador and Pakistanen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US
thesis.degree.disciplineDepartment of International Studiesen_US
thesis.degree.grantorUniversity of Oregonen_US
thesis.degree.levelmastersen_US
thesis.degree.nameM.A.en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Johnson_oregon_0171N_11101.pdf
Size:
660.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format