Categorical Confidence

dc.contributor.authorFischhoff, Baruch
dc.contributor.authorMacGregor, Donald G.
dc.contributor.authorLichtenstein, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-08T18:25:57Z
dc.date.available2016-11-08T18:25:57Z
dc.date.issued1983-04
dc.description29 pagesen_US
dc.description.abstractPeople tend to be inadequately sensitive to the extent of their own knowledge. This insensitivity typically emerges as overconfidence. That is, people's assessments of the probability of having answered questions correctly are typically too high compared to the portion of questions they get right. Few debiasing procedures have proven effective against this problem. Those that have worked seem to be directive in character. Rather than improving subjects' feeling for how much they know, such procedures may have suggested to subjects how their probability assessments should be changed. These successful manipulations include giving feedback and requiring subjects to provide reasons contradicting their chosen answers. The present study attempted to improve the appropriateness of confidence with a nondirective method. Subjects were asked to sort items into a specified number of piles according to their confidence in the correctness of their answers. Subsequently, they assigned a number to each pile expressing the probability that each item in the pile was correct. It emphasizes confidence assessment over fact assessment; it forces the comparison of knowledge levels for different questions, it deemphasizes the need to produce numbers; it gives different hints as to the fineness of the discrimination that assessors can make. This procedure differed from its predecessors in many respects; nonetheless, performance here was indistinguishable from that observed elsewhere. Although some small pockets of improvement were noted, confidence was largely resistant to this manipulation. Such robustness is discouraging for the developer of elicitation procedures, encouraging for the student of judgmental processes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFischhoff, B., MacGregor, D., & Lichtenstein, S. (1983). Categorical confidence (Report No. 81- 10). Eugene, OR: Decision Research.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/20625
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherDecision Researchen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDecision Research; 81-10;
dc.rightsCreative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-USen_US
dc.subjectCategorical confidenceen_US
dc.subjectOverconfidenceen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectConfidence assessmenten_US
dc.titleCategorical Confidenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
161.pdf
Size:
2.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.23 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: