Oregon Law Review : Vol. 86 No. 3, p. 635-656 : From Pierce to Smith: The Oregon Connection and Supreme Court Religion Jurisprudence

dc.contributor.authorO'Scannlain, Diarmuid F.
dc.date.accessioned2008-07-11T22:41:04Z
dc.date.available2008-07-11T22:41:04Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description22 p.en
dc.description.abstractAs an Oregonian, as well as a Ninth Circuit judge privileged to have chambers in the Pioneer Courthouse in the heart of downtown Portland, Oregon, I thought it fitting to reflect on the role of two landmark decisions on religion by the Supreme Court of the United States arising out of this state: Pierce v. Society of Sisters,1 decided over eighty years ago, and Employment Division v. Smith,2 decided within the last eighteen. While both cases were brought by religiously observant plaintiffs seeking relief from restrictive state measures, each carries its own significance for religious freedom. Having become fascinated by the increasingly extensive scholarship on these very important cases, I thought it might be useful to explore curious connections between these two decisions, which lead me to some counterintuitive conclusions about their impact on religious freedom.en
dc.format.extent112996 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citation86 Or. L. Rev. 635 (2007)en
dc.identifier.issn0196-2043
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1794/6815
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oregon School of Lawen
dc.subjectFreedom of religion -- Oregon
dc.subjectReligious freedom
dc.titleOregon Law Review : Vol. 86 No. 3, p. 635-656 : From Pierce to Smith: The Oregon Connection and Supreme Court Religion Jurisprudenceen
dc.title.alternativeFrom Pierce to Smith: The Oregon Connection and Supreme Court Religion Jurisprudenceen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
oscannlain.pdf
Size:
110.35 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.2 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: