After Horton—Damages Caps and the Remedy Clause
dc.contributor.author | Hallman, W. Eugene | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-04-11T18:04:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-04-11T18:04:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-04-10 | |
dc.description | 14 pages | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The cap on noneconomic damages of ORS 31.710(1) was declared unconstitutional in 1999 as a violation of the right to a jury trial under article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution. Lakin, in turn, was overruled by Horton v. Oregon Health & Science University. With the removal of the jury trial underpinnings of Lakin, the constitutionality of noneconomic damages caps is again in play. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | 96 OR. L. REV. 585 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0196-2043 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/23202 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
dc.rights | All Rights Reserved. | en_US |
dc.subject | Liability | en_US |
dc.subject | Damages | en_US |
dc.subject | Oregon Constitution | en_US |
dc.title | After Horton—Damages Caps and the Remedy Clause | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |