The Costs of Freedom: New Institutional Comparison of China’s and the U.S.’s Responses to the Financial Collapse
| dc.contributor.author | Davis, Kent F. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-22T21:35:41Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-05-22T21:35:41Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2014-05-13 | |
| dc.description | 38 pages | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Following the financial collapse of 2008, both China and the United States implemented stimulus plans to minimize adverse market performance. Arguably the vertically integrated institutional structure of China produced a timely and homogenous plan that stimulated market performance. Conversely, the decentralized institutional structure of the United States produced a plan that was delinquent, discordant, and inefficacious. In other words, China’s stimulus plan had a closer fit between means and ends. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | 15 Or. Rev. Int'l. L. 167 (2013) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1543-9860 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/17860 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | University of Oregon School of Law | en_US |
| dc.rights | All Rights Reserved. | en_US |
| dc.title | The Costs of Freedom: New Institutional Comparison of China’s and the U.S.’s Responses to the Financial Collapse | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |