Evaluation of Community Arts Projects: Comparison among Three Program Evaluation Models
| dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Nayoung | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2008-09-30T17:24:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2008-09-30T17:24:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008-06 | |
| dc.description | 78 p. Examining committee chair: Lori Hager | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Increasingly, funders require that community arts organizations demonstrate evidence of program outcomes on participants and local communities. However, little information exists concerning outcome-based evaluation methods for community arts projects. In this study, a comparative analysis is presented of three arts program evaluation models used in Australia, Northern Ireland, and the United States. To frame the context of the study, a review of literature addresses trends in the field of program evaluation and types of program evaluation--specifically, outcome-based evaluation as applied to the arts and to country-specific evaluations. Findings of the study are presented as a synthesis of comparative analysis with the literature review. The study concludes with a discussion of findings and recommendations for each arts program evaluation model. | en |
| dc.format.extent | 476112 bytes | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1794/7361 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | University of Oregon project, Arts and Administration Program, M.S. 2008 | en |
| dc.subject | Arts program evaluation model | en |
| dc.subject | Community arts | en |
| dc.subject | Outcome-based evaluation | en |
| dc.subject | Program evaluation | en |
| dc.title | Evaluation of Community Arts Projects: Comparison among Three Program Evaluation Models | en |
| dc.type | Other | en |