SUBJECT: Washington County Plan Amendment
DLCD File Number 001-13
The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of adoption.
A Copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local 
government office.  
Appeal Procedures*
DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL:  Monday, May 20, 2013 
This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption  pursuant to ORS 197.830(2)(b) 
only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendment 
are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). 
If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government.  If 
you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline.  Copies of the 
notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice
of the final decision from the local government.  The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in 
the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10).  Please call LUBA at 
503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures.
*NOTE:     The Acknowledgment or Appeal Deadline is based upon the date the decision was mailed by local 
        government. A decision may have been mailed to you on a different date than it was mailed to 
        DLCD. As a result, your appeal deadline may be earlier than the above date specified. NO LUBA  
       Notification to the jurisdiction of an appeal by the deadline, this Plan Amendment is acknowledged.
Cc: Aisha Willits, Washington County
Jon Jinings, DLCD Community Services Specialist
Anne Debbaut, DLCD Regional Representative
<paa> YA
NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT
05/06/2013
TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan
or Land Use Regulation Amendments
FROM: Plan Amendment Program Specialist
DLCD 
Notice of Adoption 
This Form 2 must be mailed to DLeD within 20-Working Days after the Final 
Ordinance is signed by the public Official Designated by the jurisdiction 
and all other requirements ofORS 197.6 15 and OAR 660-0 18-000 
•. ,-- .,-- .".,,' -,_. - _._.,.-- ------"---""""---"'---"--- --1 o 111 person 0 electronic 0 mailed I I~ DEPT OF I 
T I 
IE APR 29 0" , ,, ! /., , ~ LU :,1 , 
S 
T 
A 
M 
P 
LAND CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
For Oll1c~ Us.::: Onl y 
Jurisdiction: Washington County Local file number: A-Engrossed Ordinance 760 
Date of Adoption: April 23, 2013 Date Mailed: April 25, 2013 
Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to OLeO? ~ Yes D No Date: 1/18/13 
~ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ~ Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
D Land Use Regulation Amendment D Zoning Map Amendment 
D New Land Use Regulation D Other: 
Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 enlarges Area of Special Concern #1 1 in the Sunset West Community Plan. 
Additional amendments replace existing language relating to the former Sequent master plan with text 
reflecting the current owner's potential development of the propelties. The 2020 Transportation Plan is 
amended to remove certain transportation faci lities contemplated in that master plan. Community plan and 
Community Development Code language is amended to allow for future campus development of the site, to 
allow for greater heights for wayfinding elements and to ensure that signage and street trees required as part of 
the development of vacant sites will conform to those present on the adjacent developed corporate campus site. 
Does the Adoption differ from proposal? No, no explaination is necessary 
Plan Map Changed from: N/A 
Zone Map Changed from: N/A 
to : N/A 
to : N/A 
Location : Northeast corner of 158th and Jenkins Road intersection in unincorporated urban 
Washington County. Acres Involved : Approx. 50 
Specify Density: Previous: N/A New: N/A 
Applicable statewide planning goals: 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
~~ DDDDDD ~ D ~ ~DDDDDDD 
Was an Exception Adopted? D YES ~ NO 
Did OLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment.. 
35-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? 
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? 
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? 
OLeo file No. ____________ _ 
~ Yes 
D Yes 
DYes 
D No 
D No 
D No 
Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies , Local Governments or Special Districts: 
City of Beaverton, Washington County 
Local Contact: Aisha Willits, Principal Planner Phone: (503) 846-3961 Extension : 
Address: ISS N. First Avenue, Suite 350-14 Fax Number: 503-846-4412 
City: Hillsboro Zip: 97124-3072 E-mail Address:aisha_willits@co.washington.or.us 
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This Form 2 must be received by DLCD no later than 20 working days after the ordinance has been signed by 
the public official designated by the jurisdiction to sign the approved ordinance(s) 
per ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660. Division 18 
I. This Form 2 must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant) . 
2. When submitting the adopted amendment, please print a completed copy of Form 2 on light green 
paper if available. 
3. Send this Form 2 and one complete paper copy (documents and maps) of the adopted amendment to the 
address below. 
4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the final signed ord inance(s), all supporting finding(s), 
exhibit(s) and any other supplementary information (ORS 197.6 15 ). 
5. Deadline to appeals to LUBA is ca lculated twenty-one (21) days from the rece ipt (postmark date) by OLCO 
of the adoption (ORS 197.830 to 197.845). 
6. In addition to sending the Form 2 - Notice of Adoption to OLCO, please also remember to notify persons who 
participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final deci sion. (ORS 197.6 15 ). 
7. Submit one complete paper copy via United States Postal Serv ice, Common Carrier or Hand 
Carried to the OLCO Salem Office and stamped with the incoming date stamp. 
8. Please mail the adopted amendment packet to: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
9. Need More Copies? Please print forms on 8Y, -1/2xll green paper only if ava ilable. If you have any 
questions or wo uld like assistance, please contact your OLCO regional representative or contact the OLCO 
Salem Office at (503) 373-0050 x23 8 or e-mai l plan.amcndments(@.statc.or.us. 
http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/forms.shtm l Updated December 6, 2012 
Continued from April 16, 2013 
AGENDA 
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 
Public Hearing - Fourth Reading and Fourth Public Hearing 
Agenda Category: . Land Us~_~_ Tran_S£9ltation; Co--'u"'n"'ty'--'-C_oc-"un"'s:.;:ec..
 _ _ ___ _ _ -->("-"C-"-P--'0'---'Ci )L 
Agenda Title: 
Presented by: 
SUMMARY: 
PROPOSED A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 760 - AN 
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 2020 TRANSPORTATION PLAN, 
THE SUNSET WEST COMMUNITY PLAN, AND THE 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE RELATING TO AREA OF 
SPECIAL CONCERN #1 I 
Andrew Singelakis, Director of Land Use & Transportation 
Alan Rappleyea, CQu.ny_ ~ounsel ________ ______ _ 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 proposes to amend the 2020 Transportation Plan, the Sunset 
West Community Plan, and the Community Development Code by modifying Area of Special 
Concern (ASe) # II. A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 is posted on the county's land use 
ordinance web page at the following link: 
http://www.co.washington .or.us/LUTlDivisions/LongRangePlan ningl20 I3-land-use-ordinances.cfm 
After the Board's initial public hearing for Ordinance No. 760 on March 19,2013, the hearing 
was continued to April 2 to allow for further conversations with the properly owner about 
potential changes to the ASC. On April 2, the Board directed engrossment of the ordinance to 
include changes that would enlarge the area of the ASC and also provide additional flexibility for 
future development on the properties included in the ASC. The hearing was continued to 
April 16, 2013 for the first required hearing for the engrossed ordinance. 
On April 16, the Board held the hearing for A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 and continued the 
hearing to April 23, 2013 for the second required hearing for the engrossed ordinance. A staff 
report will be provided to the Board prior to the April 23 hearing and posted on the above land 
use ordinance web page. Copies of the report will also be available at the Clerk's desk prior to the 
hearing. 
Consistent with Board policy, testimony about the ordinance is limited to two minutes for 
individuals and five minutes for a representative of a group. 
DEPARTMENT'S REQUESTED ACTION: 
Read A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 by title only and conduct the second public hearing on the 
engrossed ordinance. At the conclusion of the hearing, adopt A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. 
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 
I concur with the requested action. 
ADOPTED 
I' Agenda Item No, 3.a. 
lD_a_te:.. __ ___ _ "-04"'12=3'-'/1-=-3 __ --' 
2 
3 
FILED 
APR - 4 2013 
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Washington County 
County Clerk 
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
4 A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
An Ordinance Amending the Washington 
County 2020 Transportation Plan Element of the 
Comprehensive Plan, the Sunset West 
Community Plan, and the Community 
Development Code Relating to Area of Special 
Concern #11 
5 
6 
7 The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Oregon ("Board") ordains 
8 as follows: 
9 SECTION 1 
10 A. The Board recognizes that the Transportation Plan Element of the 
11 Comprehensive Plan (Volume XV) was adopted on October 25, 1988, by way of Ordinance 
12 Nos . 332 and 333, and subsequently amended by Ordinance Nos. 343, 382, 409, 419, 426, 432, 
13 450,463,470,47 1,473,474,480,483-485,493,494,503,515,526,537,542,546,552,556, 
14 588,601,609,611,626,627,631,642,649,663,674,683, 712, 713, 717, 718, 730, 739, 744, 
15 749, and 750. 
16 B. The Board recognizes that the Sunset West Community Plan was adopted by 
17 Ordinance No. 242 and subsequently amended by Ordinance Nos. 278, 280, 292, 294, 348, 
18 366,418,420,485,503,526,531,532,551,552,553,588,610,62O,and7l7. 
19 C. The Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, Oregon, 
20 recognizes that the Community Development Code Element of the Comprehensive Plan 
21 (Volume IV) was readopted with amendments on September 9, 1986, by way of Ordinance No. 
22 308, and subsequently amended by Ordinance Nos. 321, 326, 336-341, 356-363, 372-378, 380, 
Page 1 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL 
155 N. FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 340 
HILlSBORO, OR 97124 
PHONE: 503846-8747 - FAX: 503846-8636 
13-5125 
381,384-386,392, 393,397,399-403,407,412,413,415,417,421-423,428-434,436,437, 
2 439,441-443,449,451-454,456,457,462-464,467-469, 471, 478-481, 486-489,504,506-512, 
3 517-523,525,526,528,529,538,540,545,551-555,558-561 , 573,575-577,581,583,588, 
4 589,591-595,603-605,607-610,612,615,617,618,623,624,628,631,634,635,638,642, 
5 644,645,648,649,654,659-662,667,669,670,674,676,677,682-686,692,694-698,703, 
6 704,708,709,711,712,718-720,722,725 , 730, 732,735, 739, 742-745, and 754-758. 
7 D. Subsequent ongoing planning efforts of the County indicate a need for changes 
8 to the Transportation Plan, the Sunset West Community Plan, and the Community 
9 Development Code to reflect changes and enable anticipated and coordinated future 
10 development, in addition to any other housekeeping changes. The Board takes note that the 
11 changes are necessary for the benefit, safety, and general welfare of the residents of 
12 Washington County, Oregon. 
13 D. Under the provisions of Washington County Charter Chapter X, the Department 
14 of Land Use and Transportation has carried out its responsibilities, including preparation of 
15 notices, and the County Planning Commission has conducted one or more public hearings on the 
16 proposed amendments and has submitted its recommendations to the Board. The Board finds 
17 that this Ordinance is based on those recommendations and any modifications made by the Board 
18 are a result of the public hearings process. 
19 E. The Board finds and takes public notice that it is in receipt of all matters and 
20 information necessary to consider this Ordinance in an adequate manner, and finds that this 
21 . Ordinance complies with the Statewide Planning Goals, the standards for legislative plan 
22 adoption as set forth in Chapters 197 and 215 of the Oregon Revised Statutes, the Washington 
Page 2 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL 
155 N. FIRST A VENUE, SUITE 340 
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 
PHONE: 503846-8747 - FAX: 503846-8636 
13·5125 
County Charter, the Washington County Community Development Code, and the Washington 
2 County Comprehensive Plan. 
3 SECTION 2 
4 The following Exhibits, attached and incorporated herein by reference, are hereby 
5 adopted as amendments to the following documents: 
6 I. Exhibit 1 (3 pages): Amend the Functional Classification System Map in the 
7 Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan to remove the road designations as 
8 shown; 
9 2. Exhibit 2 (4 pages): Amend (1) the Sunset West Community Plan by modifying 
10 text relating to Area of Special Concern #11, as reflected, (2) the Transportation 
11 Functional Classification Map in the Sunset West Community Plan to modify 
12 certain roads, as reflected, (3) the Areas of Special Concern Map in the Sunset 
13 West Community Plan, as reflected, and (4) the Washington County Special Area 
14 Streets, Street Corridor and Arterial Access Designations map of the Sunset West 
15 Community Plan to reflect the removal of Special Area Street designations and 
16 Pathway Connection Points, as reflected; and 
17 3. Exhibit 3 (5 pages): Amend the Community Development Code Section 375 
18 TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICTS and Section 431 TRANSIT ORIENTED 
19 DESIGN PRINCIPLES, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES, as reflected. 
20 SECTION 3 
21 All other Comprehensive Plan provisions that have been adopted by prior ordinance, 
22 which are not expressly amended or repealed herein, shall remain in full force and effect. 
Page 3 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL 
155 N. FIRST AVENUE, Sum 340 
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 
PHONE: 503846-8747 - FAX: 503 846-8636 
13-5125 
SECTION 4 
2 All applications received prior to the effective date shall be processed in accordance with 
3 ORS 215.427. 
4 SECTION 5 
5 If any portion of this Ordinance, including the exhibits, shall for any reason be held 
6 invalid or unconstitutional by a body of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall not be 
7 affected thereby and shall remain in full force and effect. 
8 SECTION 6 
9 The Office of County Counsel and Department of Land Use and Transportation are 
10 authorized to prepare planning documents to reflect the changes adopted under Section 2 of this 
11 Ordinance, including deleting and adding textual material and maps, renumbering pages or 
12 III 
13 
14 III 
15 
16 I!I 
17 
18 I!I 
19 
20 III 
21 
22 I!I 
Page 4 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL 
155 N. FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 340 
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 
PHONE: 503846-11747 - FAX: 503846-8636 
13·5125 
sections, and making any technical changes not affecting the substance of these amendments as 
2 necessary to confonn to the Washington County Comprehensive Plan fonnat. 
3 SECTION 7 
4 This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after adoption. 
5 ENACTED this zg! day of AV{ i \ ,2013, being the fou.r-\-h. reading and 
6 .foU(-t~ public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Washington County, 
7 Oregon. 
8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
9 
10 ADOPTED CHAIRMAN 
Jl 
12 
aB~ 
RECORDING SECRE MY 
13 READING PUBLIC HEARING 
14 
15 
First ()~~l" I \~ First ~~~M Second o DZZ I Second Third ~:l~~/II~ Third Fourth Fourth 0'-\ lZ.3II.3 
16 Fifth Fifth 
Sixth Sixth 
17 P-Atc. \:: I Mo. Ijl'lo",sK i I 
18 
VOTE: Aye: '5c.llo .... +en Terr~ I ~o~e(.5 Nay: I\ol\e 
Recording Secretary: A~Q. D. No'fD Date: 0'1/ z3Jl 3 
19 
20 
21 
22 
Page 5 - A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE 760 
WASHINGTON COUNTY COUNSEL 
155 N . FIRST A VENUE, SUITE 340 
HILLSBORO, OR 97124 
PHONE: 503846-8747 - FAX: 503846-8636 
IJ·5125 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 1 
April 2, 2013 
Page 1 of 3 
Amend the Functional Classification System Map in the Washington County 2020 
Transportation Plan to remove the road designations shown below. 
- Remove Collector Designation 
••• Remove Proposed Collector Designation 
:",C:~ City of Beaverton 
.... : 
. ;.", . . " .. 
Note: Amendments to Map shown in bold solid or dashed line; other features not 
amended by this exhibit remain in effect as shown on the Plan Map. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
a9G4ef Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibi t 1 
April 2, 2013 
Page 2 of 3 
Amend the Lane Numbers Map in the Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan to reflect 
removal of the lane numbers designation for Jay Street, as reflected below. 
Note Amendments to Map shown in bold solid or dashed line ; other features not 
amended by this exhibit remain in effect as shown on the Plan Map. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
aGGGef Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 1 
April 2, 2013 
Page 3 of 3 
Amend the Special Area Street Overlay - Willow Creek, Merlo and Elmonica Areas map in the 
Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan to reflect the removal of Special Area Street 
designations, as reflected below. 
- Remove Special Area Collector Desig nation 
••• Remove Proposed Special Area Col lector Designation 
:T(.,,: ; City of Beaverton 
. - :.' ,', ; .. 
Note: Amendments to Map shown in bold solid or dashed line; other features not 
amended by this exhibit remain in effect as shown on the Plan Map. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
aeGGei Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 2 
April 2, 2013 
Page 1 of 4 
The text relating to Area of Special Concern #11 in the Sunset West Community Plan is 
amended as shown below: 
Area af Seesial Cansern #11 
This area is the fas~s af the Seq~ent Master Plan. In arser ta ashie,'e a ~nifies saFR~~S far Seq~ent 
sar~arate astivities, day Street between 1 §S'" Aven~e aAs B~rliA!ltan Drive FRay be vasates. ""mvever, a 
saAAestiaA fer j3~blis '{ehisle assess ta 1 §S'" A'o'eA~e will be FRaiAtaines, thF9~!lh a ~~blis easeFRent 
~F9'lidiA!l twa travel laAes, ~Atil the j3F9~ased Sj3esial Area Minar Callestar (B~rIiA!ltaA DrivelKall Parkway 
betweeA ',/VallIer Raad aAs deAkiAs Raad) is a~j3raves thra~!lh the FRaster j3laA j3resess aAd dedi sated, 
saAAested aAd saAstr~sted ta a Sj3esial Area MiAar Callestar staAdard. 
Prier ta ass~j3aAsy af any new b~ildiA!l aj3j3F9ved fer develaj3FRent iA Area af Sj3esial CaASeFA #11 after 
the effestive date af this ardinanse, if day Street between 1 §S'o aAd B~rliA!ltaA is 'o'asated, the j3raj3erty 
aWAer shall FRake iFR~F9veFRents ta the 1 §S'"/vValker and 1 §S'"ldenl<iAs intersestiaAs that wa~ld res~lt iA a 
year 2Q1 § PM j3eak ha~r sritisal val~FRe sa~asity ratia eq~al ta ar better than the 2Q1 § PM j3eal< ha~r 
sritisa l val~FRe saj3asity ratia at these intersestiaAs if day Street were nat vasated. 
IA additiaA ta the staAdards af SestiaA 4QS af the CaFRFR~A ity Develaj3FReAt Cade, the Seq~ent Master 
PlaA shall ideAtity aft street j3athways '/lithiA Area af Sj3esial CaAserA #11. The ~athways shall have 
these additiaAal feat~res: ~edestriaA ssale li!lhtiA!l, trees sj3ased Aa FRare thaA ~Q feet aA aAe side, and 
j3edestriaA ssale aFRenities s~ased Aa FRere thaA every aAe h~ndred (1QQ) feet (insl~din!l b~t nat liFR ited 
ta street f~FAit~re, j3lantin!ls, sistinstive ~a"in!l, drinl<in!l fa~ntains, ane ss~lj3t~re). Oft street ~athways 
shall Aat be sanstr~stee af aSj3haltis sansrete. Canstr~stian ~hasin!l af the aft street ~athways shal l be 
eeterFRinee U'lrau!lh the Master Plan ~rasess. The ~alhways shall sannest Paints p, ane Bane Paints A 
and C identified an the CaFRFR~nity Plan Ma~ and shall be na lan!ler than 1.1 tiFRes the shartest eistanse 
between the j3aints. 
In G9nj~nstian with site eevelapFRent, a Pesestrian Pla~a shall be sanstr~stee by the ~raperty aWner at 
the intersestian af the aft street pathway ane the 1 §S'oldenl<ins intersestian. In aeditian ta the staAElaffis 
af Seotian ~SQ af the CaFRFR~nity Devela~FReAt Caee, the peeestriaA pla~a shall be, at a FRiniFR~FR, §QQ 
sq~are feet in area, with a FRiniFR~FR eiFRensian af 2Q feet 
Area of Special Concern #11 
This area includes the existing world headquarters campus of Nike, Inc. and additional adjacent 
land, all of which is located in the TO:EMP (Transit Oriented Employment) district. This Area of 
Special Concern is intended to ensure the capability of the subject properties to accommodate 
future corporate campus development. 
On portions of the subject properties that are 500 feet or more from the nearest residentially-
designated property, buildings may be constructed up to 110 feet in height and up to five 
signature campus wayfi nding elements having a maximum height of 160 feet may be constructed. 
The wayfinding elements shall not be occupiable structures, and each may incorporate identity 
features up to a maximum of 100 square feet per face, 
In order to ensure a consistent campus perimeter landscape deslan required street trees along Walker 
Road, Murray Boulevard Jenkins Road, 158th Avenue, Jay Street and Burlington Drive shall be located a 
minimum of two feet from the back of the adjacent street curb, and a maximum of 100 feet from the back 
of the adjacent street curb. While the minimum guantity of trees adjacent to these streets shall not be, on 
average, less than one (1) tree per 30 linear feet of street frontage, spacing may be varied , and trees may 
be grouped in clusters. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
abBGel Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 2 
April 2, 2013 
Page 2 of 4 
Amend the Transportation Functional Classification Map in the Sunset West Community Plan to 
modify certain roads, as reflected below. 
- Remove "Non-loca l streets and non-special area loca l streets" desig nation 
City of Beaverton 
Note: Amendments to Map shown in bold solid or dashed line; other features not 
amended by this exhib it remain in effect as shown on the Plan Map. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
aBGGeI Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 2 
April 2, 2013 
Page 3 of 4 
Amend the Areas of Special Concern Map in the Sunset West Community Plan to reflect the 
changes shown below. 
-rJe! man 
0° 
Existing Area of Specia l Conce rn #11 
Additi ons to Area of Spec ial Concern #'11 
LSd City of Beaverton 
'. :, 
Proposed additions 
Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibi t 2 
April 2, 2013 
Page 4 of 4 
Amend the Washington County Special Area Streets, Street Corridor & Arterial Access 
Designations map of the Sunset West Community Plan to reflect the removal of Special Area 
Street designations and Pathway Connection Points, as reflected below. 
:' , " 
',: .. 
() Remove Pathway Connection Points A. B & C 
- Remove Special Area Collector Designation 
••• Remove Proposed Special Area Collector Designation 
City of Beaverton 
Note: Amendments to Map shown in bold solid or dashed line; other features not 
amended by this exhibit remain in effect as shown on the Plan Map. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
al3e6e1 Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 3 
April 2, 2013 
Page 1 of 5 
Community Development Code Section 375 TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICTS is amended to reflect the following: 
Table B. Dimensional Requirements for Transit Oriented Districts 
DISTRICT 
DEVELOPMENT DIMENSION TO:RC TO:BUS TO:EMP TO:R9-12 TO:R12-18 TO:R1 8-24 TO:R24-40 
Minimum Lot Area None None None 2000 sq. ft . 2000 sq. ft. None None 
Minimum Average Lot Width None None None 24 feet 20 feet None None 
Minimum Average Lot Oeplh None None None 60 feet 60 feet None None 
Minimum Building Height: 
- wilhin 1300' of a station 
platform or within a Regional 
Center 20 feet 20 feel None None None None None 
- beyond 1300' from a stalion 
plalform None None None None None None None 
- wilhin a designaled Town Center 20 feet 
Core, as defined by an adopted at street 20 feet None None None None None 
Community Plan corners 
- within a designated Town Center 
but outside a Town Center Core, None None None None None None None 
as defined by an adopted 
Communily Plan 
Maximum Building Height (B) 60 feet 80 feet (A) 80 feetJ8.) 40 feet 40 feet 50 feet 60 feet (F) 
Yard Oeplh 
- frontage minimum (C) None None None 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet None 
- frontage maximum (0) 10 feet 10 feet None 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet (G) 
- interior minimum (E) None None None None None None None 
- interior maximum None None None None None None None 
(A) Except where a community plan specifies a higher maximum height. 
(B) Where a building fronts on a pedestrian street, a ten (10) foot setback from the front fa,ade is required for all 
floors above the third. Normal building appurtenances and projection such as spires, belfries, cupolas, 
abcdef Proposed additions 
aG6€Ief Proposed deletions 
TO:R40-80 TO:R80-120 
None None 
None None 
None None 
None None 
None None 
None None 
None None 
80 feet 80 feet 
None None 
10 feel 10 feet 
None None 
None None 
I 
chimneys, ventilators, elevator housings or other roof-mounted structures may extend above the height limit. 
Building height may be limited pursuant to Section 431-8. 
(C) Except as necessary to comply with Section 418, accommodate utility lines and easements. 
(0 ) Required maximum frontage yard dimensions: (1) shall apply to at least 50% of the first floor of a 
building facing a pedestrian street, as defined in Section 431 -3.8; and (2) may be exceeded where the 
applicant demonstrates and the Review Authority finds that larger yards are needed to mitigate noise 
and vibration impacts of transportation operations. 
(E) No minimum interior yard setback is required for transit oriented district except as necessary to comply 
with the screening and buffering standards of Sections 411 and 431 and the standards of the Uniform 
Building Code or the Conference of American Building Officials (CABO) Code, whichever is applicable. 
(F) A modification to the maximum building height may be approved subject to Section 375-7.32.b. Such 
modification may exceed the required sixty (60) foot bui lding height maximum by no more than fifty (5) feet for 
a total of one hundred-ten (110) feet. 
(G) A modification to the maximum front yard depth may be approved subject to Section 375-7.32 .c. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
aGGGef Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 3 
April 2 , 2013 
Page 2 of 5 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 3 
April 2, 2013 
Page 3 of 5 
Community Development Code Section 431 TRANSIT ORIENTED DESIGN PRINCIPLES, 
STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES is amended to reflect the following : 
*.* 
431-4 
431-4.1 
Circulation System Design 
The design and location of the circulation system in a community is the key element 
for determining pedestrian orientation, connectivity and the arrangement of land 
uses. These principles and standards apply to the design and location of the 
circulation system in transit oriented districts. 
Principles: 
A. Pedestrian routes in a Transit Oriented District shall, to the extent practicable, 
directly connect major activity centers (concentrations of employment and 
households, major public buildings and spaces, institutional uses and parks & 
common open spaces, and shopping areas) and transit stops, particularly light 
rail stations; 
B. Block dimensions and perimeters shall be at an urban rather than a suburban 
scale; 
C. Provide accessways and greenways, as needed , to supplement pedestrian 
routes along pedestrian streets; and 
D. Provide clearly marked and well-designed pedestrian street, driveway, loading 
area and surface parking lot crossings. 
431-4.2 Standards: 
A. In addition to the standards of this subsection, development in a transit-oriented 
district shall be subject to the requirements of Section 408, Section 409, and 
Article V. In the event of a conflict between the requirements of Sections 408, 
409, and Article V, the requirements of Section 431-4 shall control. 
B. Other Community Development Code provisions that apply to Collectors shall 
apply to Special Area Collectors; provisions that apply to Neighborhood Routes 
shall apply to Special Area Neighborhood Routes; and provisions that apply to 
Local Streets shal l apply to Special Area Local Streets and Special Area 
Commercial Streets. In the case of a conflict, specific Special Area street 
provisions shall control. 
C. Blocks 
(1) Block perimeters for blocks with more than four sides, as defined by public 
or private streets, accessways or greenways, shall not exceed sixteen 
hundred (1600) feet measured along the nearside curb line of the public or 
abcdef Proposed additions 
a9GGef Proposed deletions 
••• 
431 -11 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 3 
April 2, 2013 
Page 4 of 5 
private street or the centerline of the defining accessway or greenway. 
These standards shall not be used to provide direct connections to collector 
roads where indirect connections are specifically shown in the community 
plan . 
(2) Block lengths for streets, accessways and greenways shall not exceed 
three hundred thirty (330) feet between public or private streets, 
accessways or greenways, measured along the nearside curb line of the 
public or private street or the centerline of the accessway or greenway. 
These standards shall not be used to provide direct connections to collector 
roads where indirect connections are specifically shown in the community 
plan. 
(3) Except for specific transportation facilities identified in the community plan, 
the Review Authority may modify these standards based on findings that 
strict compliance with the standards is not reasonably practicable due to: 
Signs 
(a) Topography; 
(b) The standards of Sections 421 and 422; 
(c) Existing development patterns on abutting property which preclude 
the logical connection of streets or accessways; 
(d) Railroads; 
(e) Traffic safety concerns; 
(I) The functional and operational need to create a large building ;-Gf 
(g) The provisions of Significant Natural Resources as identified in the 
Community Plan~; or 
(h) Campus Development. 
Modifications shall be the minimum necessary to address the constraint. 
The princip les and standards of Sections 431-11.1 and 431-11 .2 below shall apply to 
all permitted sign age within transit oriented districts. Exceptions to these standards 
are designated in Section 431-11 .3. 
431-11 .1 Principles: 
A. Signs in Transit Oriented District communities shall be located and scaled to the 
function of the pedestrian street on which they front. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
ae6€lef Proposed deletions 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Exhibit 3 
Apri l 2, 2013 
Page 5 of 5 
B. Signs within any transit-oriented district shall be consistent with the vi sual quality 
and aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood . 
C. Signage must be of high quality in design and materials. 
D. Sign age shall be consistent throughout a development. 
E. Signage attached to a building shall complement the building's character (e .g., 
wall signs shall avoid covering building columns) . 
431-11 .2 Standards: 
A. In the TO:BUS and TO:RC Districts, the standards of Article IV - Section 414-2 
shall apply, except as noted in Section 431-11.3. 
B. In all transit oriented residential districts the standards of Article IV - Section 
414-1 shall apply. 
C. In the TO:EMP District, the standards of Article IV - Section 414-3 shall apply. 
abcdef Proposed additions 
a9GGel Proposed deletions 
AGENDA 
WASHINGTON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 
Agenda Category: Action - Land Use & Transportation (CPO I) 
Agenda Title: ADOPT FINDINGS FOR A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 760 
Presented by: Andrew Sin~lak i s,pirect9L~ ~1.-_afl<LUse & Transportation 
SUMMARY: 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 amends the 2020 Transportation Plan, the Sunset West 
Community Plan, and the Community Development Code by modi fying Area of Special Concern 
(ASC) #11. The engrossed ordinance includes changes that enlarge the area of the ASC and also 
provide additional flexibility for future development on the properties included in the ASC. 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 is posted on the county's land use ordinance web page at the 
following link : 
http://www.co.washi ngton.or.us/LUT /Di visions/Lon gRan geP Ian n i n g/20 13 -Iand-use-ord i nances.cfm 
As required by ORS 197.615, post acknowledgment comprehensive plan amendments (e.g. , 
amendments made to the County's Comprehensive Plan after it was acknowledged by the State 
Department of Land Conservation and Development as complying with the Statewide Planning 
Goals) must be accompanied by findings setting forth the facts and analysis showing that the 
amendments are consistent with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Oregon Revised 
Statutes, State Administrative Rules and the applicab le provisions of Washington County's 
Comprehensive Plan. Additionally, as required by Title 8 of Metro's Urban Growth Management 
Functional Plan, any amendment to a comprehensive plan or implementing ordinance shall be 
consistent with the requirements of the Functional Plan. 
Attached is the Resolution and Order to adopt the findings for A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. 
The proposed findings will be provided to the Board prior to the hearing and will also be 
available at the Clerk's desk. 
Attachment: Resolution and Order 
DEPARTMENT'S REOUESTED ACTION: 
Adopt the findings for A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 and authorize the Chair to sign the 
Resolution and Order memorializing the action. 
COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S RECOMMENDATION: 
I concur with the requested action. 
RO 13-3Y Agenda Item No. S.a. Date: 04/23113 
" ec.· 
1 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 
2 FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
3 
4 
In the Matter of Adopting 
Legislative Findings in Support 
of A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
) 
) 
) 
RESOLUTION AND ORDER 
No. 13 - 3'-{ 
5 This matter having come before the Washington County Board of Commissioners at its 
6 meeting of April 23, 2013; and 
7 It appearing to the Board that the findings contained in Exhibit "A" summarize relevant facts 
8 and rationales with regard to compliance with the Statewide Planning Goals, Oregon Revised 
9 Statutes and Administrative Rules, Washington County's Comprehensive Plan, and titles of Metro's 
10 Urban Growth Management Functional Plan relating to A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760; and 
11 It appearing to the Board that the findings attached as Exhibit "A" constitute appropriate 
12 legislative findings with respect to the adopted ordinance; and 
13 It appearing to the Board that the Planning Commission, at the conclusion of its public hearing 
14 on March 6, 2013, made a recommendation to the Board, which is in the record and has been 
15 reviewed by the Board; and 
16 It appearing to the Board that, in the course of its deliberations, the Board has considered the 
17 record which consists of all notices, testimony, staff reports, and correspondence from interested 
18 parties, together with a record of the Planning Commission's proceedings, and other items submitted 
19 to the Planning Commission and Board regarding this ordinance; it is therefore, 
.20 RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the attached findings in Exhibit "A" in support of 
21 A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 are hereby adopted . 
22 DATED this 23rd day of April , 2013. 
23 Vo,E: AL-L A'1 r; 
-
24 
25 APPROVED AS TO FORM: 
26 
27 
County Counsel 
28 For Washington Count , Oregon 
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 
FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
Recording Secretary~l 
EXHIBIT A 
FINDINGS FOR A-ENGROSSED ORDINANCE NO. 760 
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2020 
TRANSPORTATION PLAN, THE SUNSET WEST COMMUNITY PLAN AND THE 
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE ELEMENTS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE 
PLAN RELATING TO AREA OF SPECIAL CONCERN #11 
April 23, 2013 
GENERAL FINDINGS 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 amends the 2020 Transportation Plan, the Sunset West 
Community Plan and the Community Development Code to expand Area of Specia l 
Concern # II in the community plan. Changes in the ordinance inc lude amending the ASC map 
and text, as well as amending transportation designations shown both in the community plan and 
the 2020 Transportation Plan. Limited changes to the Community Development Code are made 
to allow fo r consistent development across the affected properties. These changes are needed to 
remove elements defined through the 1998 approval of the Sequent Master Plan, which identified 
the future development ofa corporate campus fo r that specific company. Sequent no longer 
owns the p roperties, and thi s ordinance proposes to remove the Sequent Master Plan elements. 
Key Ordinance Provisions 
>- Amends the Functional Class ification System Map in the 2020 Transportation Plan to 
remove Collector and Proposed Collector designations on SW Jay Street, SW Burlington 
Dri ve and SW Koll Parkway in and near Area of Special Concern # 11 identified in the 
Sunset West Community Plan, resul ting in " local street" designations fo r all three roadways 
~ Removes the "2/3 Lanes" designati on for a portion of SW Jay Street on the Lane Numbers 
Map in the 2020 Transportation Plan 
>- Removes the Special Area Co ll ector and Proposed Special Area Collector designations from 
SW Jay Street, SW Burlington Drive and SW Ko ll Parkway on the Special Area Street 
Ove rl ay - Willow Creek, Merlo and Elmonica Areas map in the 2020 Transportation Plan 
>- Updates the tex t describing Area of Special Concern # 11 in the Sunset West Community 
Plan to reflect the addition of properti es under the same ownershi p, and establi sh minor 
changes to CDC requirements that may be permitted on the affected properties 
". Removes the "Non-local streets and non-specia l area local streets" designation for Jay Street, 
SW Burli ngton Drive and SW Ko ll Parkway shown on the Functional Classification Map in 
the Sunset West Community Plan 
". Mod ifi es the boundary of Area of Special Concern # 11 as shown in the Areas of Special 
Concern Map in the Sunset West Commu nity Plan 
Exhibit A 
Findings - A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
April 23, 2013 
Page 2 of6 
:;. Amends the Washington County Special Area Streets, Street Corridor & Arterial Access 
Designations map of the Sunset West Community Plan to reflect the removal of Special Area 
Street designations and Pathway Connection Points 
:;. Amends Table B (Dimensional Requirements for Transit Oriented Districts) in Section 375 
of the Community Development Code to allow flexibility for greater building heights in the 
Transit Oriented: Employment (TO:EMP) District when authorized by a community plan 
:;. Amends Section 431-4 (Circulation System Design) of the Community Development Code to 
allow exceptions to the block length standards for campus development 
:;. Amends Section 431 -11 (Signs) of the Community Development Code to permit signs in the 
TO:EMP District subject to standards for Industrial District signs 
Because the ordinance would make changes that do not affect compliance with Oregon's 
Statewide Planning Goals (Goals), it is not necessary for these findings to address the Goals with 
respect to each amendment. The Board of County Commissioners (Board) finds that the Goals 
apply to amendments covered by these findings only to the extent noted in specific responses to 
individual applicable Goals, and that each amendment complies with the Goals. Goals 15 
(Wi llamette River Greenway), 16 (Estuarine Resources), 17 (Coastal Wetlands), 18 (Beaches 
and Dunes) and 19 (Ocean Resources) and related Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) are not 
addressed because these resources are not located within Washington County. 
GOAL FINDINGS 
The purpose of the findings in thi s document is to demonstrate that A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 
760 is consistent with Statewide Planning Goals (Goals), Oregon Revised Stahltes (ORS) and 
Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR) requirements, Metro ' s Urban Growth Management 
Functional Plan (UGMFP) and the Washington County Comprehensive Plan. The Washington 
County Comprehensive Plan was adopted to implement the aforementioned planning documents 
and was acknowledged by the State of Oregon. The county follows the post-acknowledgement 
plan amendment (PAPA) process to update the Comprehensive Plan with new state and regional 
regulations as necessary and relies in part upon these prior state review processes to demonstrate 
compliance with all necessary requirements. No Goal compliance issues were rai sed in the 
hearing proceedings described below. In addition, none of the proposed changes to the maps and 
text of the Comprehensive Plan implicate a Goal compliance issue. The following findings are 
provided to demonstrate ongoing compliance. 
Goal ! - Citizen Involvement 
Washington County has an acknowledged citizen invol vement program that provides 
opportunities for ci ti zens and other interested pa rties to participate in all phases of the planning 
process. In add ition, Chapter X of the County Charter sets forth specific requirements for citizen 
involvement during review and ado ption of land use ord inances. Washington County has 
utilized these requirements for the adoption of A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. 
Goal 2 - Land Use Planning 
Statewide Planning Goal 2 addresses Land Use Planning by requiring an adequate factual base to 
support a decision as well as coordination with affected governmental entities. Washington 
Exhibit A 
Findings - A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Apri l 23, 2013 
Page 3 of6 
County has an acknowledged land use planning process that provides for the review and update 
of the various elements of the Comprehensive Plan, which includes documents such as the 
RurallNatural Resource Plan, Comprehensive Framework Plan for the Urban Area (CFP), 
Community Development Code (CDC), Transpol1ation Plan, Community Plans, and Urban 
Planning Area Agreements. Washington County utili zed this process to adopt A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760. Notice was coordinated with all affected governmental entities and no 
comments were received from these parties regarding the ordinance. 
Goal 9 - Economic Development 
Goal 9 requires the provision of adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of 
economic activities vital to the health, welfare and prosperity of citizens. Policy 20 in the CFP 
and Policies 15 , 16,20 and 21 in the RurallNatural Resource Plan set out the county's policies to 
strengthen the local economy. The CDC contributes to a sound economy by providing standards 
that facilitate development in an orderly and efficient fashion. 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 contributes to a healthy economy in Washington County by 
removing development requirements encumbering several properties in the Beaverton area, one 
of the state' s largest cities. The des ign elements and planned transportation facilities in the 
county's Comprehensive Plan were originally adopted to facilitate the plarmed construction of a 
corporate campus. The campus was never built and the land was subsequently sold. Over the past 
several years, county staff has received inquiries regarding the development potential of the 
properties. The specific provisions intended to serve the previous property owner were not 
consistent with the development plans of these parties. The parties contemplating the site 
ultimately rejected it, large ly due to the need for comprehensive plan amendments to remove the 
requirements imposed on the properties. A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 removes regulations 
and transportation requirements that have hi storically impeded the development of this site. 
During the processing of this ordinance, the owner of the affected properties requested that the 
county consider additional amendments to the Comprehensive Plan to further faci litate 
development of both the affected propert ies and adjacent properties that make up the owner' s 
world headquarters campus. The property owner requested modifications to the height limits, 
street tree regulations, and signage requirements that would apply to the new, enlarged Area of 
Special Concern to allow vacant lands to be developed consistent with the existing campus 
development. These regulations provide clarity for future development of the properties and 
ensure a straightforward review process to encourage the economic growth of the properties and 
supporti ng the economy of Washington County. 
Plan compliance with Goal 9 is maintained with the amendments made by A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760. The amendments are consistent with the county' s acknowledged po licies and 
strategies for strengthening the loca l economy as required by Goal 9. 
Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services 
Goal 11 requires a plan for the orderly and efficient arrangement of public fac ilities and services 
to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. Policies 15,25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 
Exhibit A 
Findings - A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
April 23,2013 
Page 4 of6 
31 of the CFP, and Policy 22 of the RurallNatural Resource Plan address the provision of public 
faci lities and services in the urban and rural areas of unincorporated Washington County. 
The CDC requires that adequate public faci lities and services be available for new development. 
Plan compliance with Goal 11 is maintained with the amendments made by A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760. The amendments are consistent with the county's acknowledged policies and 
strategies for the provision of public facilities and services as required by Goal 11. 
Goal 12 - Transportation 
Goal 12 requires the provision and encouragement of a safe, convenient, multi-modal and 
economic transportation system. Policy 32 of the CFP, Policy 23 of the RurallNatural Resource 
Plan, and in particular the Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan, describe the 
transportation system necessary to accommodate the transp0l1ation needs of Washington County 
through the year 2020. Implementing measures are contained in the 2020 Transportation Plan, the 
Sunset West Community Plan and the CDC. 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 would allow campus development within Area of Special 
Concern #11. In order to be consistent with a campus sty le development, A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760 amends the Washington County 2020 Transportation Plan to remove one 
proposed collector, and change the designation of one roadway from collector to local. The 
potential development within the area would not be affected. 
Uti lizing the Metro regional travel demand model, county staff analyzed the associated future 
2035 traffic conditions to evaluate a "reasonable worst-case" development scenario without the 
existing and proposed collector facilities. No land use changes beyond growth assumed in the 
area by the Metro 2035 allocations were contemplated because A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
would not allow additional development beyond the existing land use designations. 
The analysis found that eliminating the connections had the potential to "significantly affect" [as 
defined in OAR 660-012-0060(1)(c)(A)] three existing intersections within the vicinity of the 
properties subject to this plan amendment. The analysis found that eliminating the existing and 
proposed collector facilities redistributed traffic within the vicinity to other fac ilities, increasing 
anticipated future peak-hour vo lumes on other facilities. Three of the intersections were expected 
to exceed level of service standards under either condition; there was no change at the fourth 
intersection. 
Two of the three affected intersections are along Walker Road, which is scheduled for a public 
improvement project through the Washington County Major Street Transportation Improvement 
Program. Staff believes that the improvements scheduled for Walker Road can be designed and 
implemented to adequate ly address the revised future conditions resulting from changes adopted 
by A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. The arteria l-to-arter ial intersection of Murray Boulevard 
and Jenkins Road was recently improved as a condit ion of development occurring on the north-
east corner. Staff believes that as future development occurs within the vicinity , additiona l 
improvements to the intersection can address the revised future conditions proposed by 
Exhibit A 
Findings - A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
April 23, 20 13 
Page 5 of6 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. All of these roadways will continue to operate within their 
arterial functional classification. 
The adjustments to Area of Special Concern # 11 alter the requirements of development on the 
subject properties. One of the changes made to the Community Development Code allows 
"campus development" to be exempt from the requirements of block lengths given that particular 
design type. The property owner has requested this change in order to have the flexibility to 
expand the design characteristics of its adjacent world headquarters campus onto the affected 
properties. 
Plan compliance with Goal 12 is maintained with the amendments made by A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760. The amendments are consistent with the county's acknowledged policies and 
strategies for the provision of transportation facilities and services as required by Goal 12 (the 
Transportation Plmming Rule or TRP, implemented via OAR Chapter 660, Division 12). 
Findings of Compliance with Metro's Urban Growth Management Functional Plan 
for A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 
Title 8 - Compliance Procedures 
Title 8 sets forth Metro's procedures for determining compliance with the Urban Growth 
Management Functional Plan. Included in this title are steps local jurisdictions must take to 
ensure that Metro has the opportunity to review amendments to Comprehensive Plans. 
Title 8 requires jurisdictions to submit notice to Metro at least 45 days prior to the first 
evidentiary hearing for a proposed amendment to a comprehensive plan. Consistent with Title 8, 
staff sent a copy of proposed Ordinance No. 760 to Metro on January 18,20 13 , 46 days prior to 
the first evidentiary hearing. Metro was mailed a copy of A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 on 
AprilS, 20 13. Metro provided no comments on A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760. 
The findings in thi s document demonstrate that the amendments made by this ordinance are in 
compl iance with the UGMFP. 
Findings of Compliance with Metro's Regional TI'ansportation Functional Plan 
A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 amends the Washington County Transportation System Plan 
consistent with the Title 2 " Development and Update of Transportation System Plans" of the 
Regional Transportation Functional Plan (RTFP) Sections 210, 220 and 230. The evaluation of 
transportation needs utilized the Metro 2035 land use allocations and trave l demand forecasts, 
consistent with mobility corrido rs # 19, #22 and #24. A-Engrossed Ordinance No. 760 does not 
add any additional transportation fac ilities or make changes to existing fac ilities that would be 
inconsistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). Staff has identified that existing motor 
veh icle performance standards can be maintained wi th a combination of existing funded 
transportation improvements (which are identified on the Financially Constrained RTP) , and 
intersection improvements likely to be identified through the development review process. As 
Exhibit A 
Findings - A-Engrossed Ord inance No. 760 
April 23, 2013 
Page 6 of 6 
described in the Goal 12 findings above, the multimodal transit oriented district requirements 
will continue to be met through the application of the CDC Section 431. Therefore, A-Engrossed 
Ordinance No. 760 is consistent with the RTFP. 
S: IP LNGI W PSHA REI20 130rdlOrd7 60 _ Slmset IVest lResolution _Findingsvl-EngOrd760 _Findings _Final. doc 
.~ ~,::~
~. 
WASHINGTON COUNTY, OREGON 
Planning and Development Services Division 
Long Range Planning 
155 N First Avenue. Suite 350, MS 14 
Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 
Ffisr GLASS MA! 
Attention: Plan Amendment Specialist 
Department of Land Conservation & 
Development 
635 Capitol St. NE, Suite 150 
Salem, OR 97301-2540 
G U/ U ':'-, 
Fnsr CLASS MAl