Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Winter 2023 Sisters Esme Alexander-Jaffe • Melanie Franco Zavala Report Authors • School of Architecture and Environment Ceara O’Leary Faculty • School of Architecture and Environment COLLEGE OF DESIGN ro of d ec k co tta ge s The authors of this report would like to graciously thank the Sisters community for inviting the students to explore the town and site. We’d also like to thank the Sisters school district and city council for providing support for the students by answering all their questions to design the best outcome and better the overall quality of life in Sisters, Oregon. In particular, we would like to thank: Scott Woodford, City of Sisters Community and Development Director Curtis Scholl, Sisters School District Superintendent Jennifer Holland, Sisters Parks and Recreation District Executive Director Michael Preedin, Mayor, City of Sisters This report represents original student work and recommendations prepared by students in the University of Oregon’s Sustainable City Year Program for the City of Sisters. Text and images contained in this report may not be used without permission from the University of Oregon. Acknowledgements Contents 4 About SCI 4 About SCYP 5 About City of Sisters 6 Course Participants 7 Executive Summary 8 Introduction 9 City Findings 15 About the Site 34 Conclusion 35 Works Cited 36 Appendix: Individual Student Boards 4 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site About SCYP About SCI The Sustainable Cities Institute (SCI) is an applied think tank focusing on sustainability and cities through applied research, teaching, and community partnerships. We work across disciplines that match the complexity of cities to address sustainability challenges, from regional planning to building design and from enhancing engagement of diverse communities to understanding the impacts on municipal budgets from disruptive technologies and many issues in between. SCI focuses on sustainability-based research and teaching opportunities through two primary efforts: 1. Our Sustainable City Year Program (SCYP), a massively scaled university- community partnership program that matches the resources of the University with one Oregon community each year to help advance that community’s sustainability goals; and 2. Our Urbanism Next Center, which focuses on how autonomous vehicles, e-commerce, and the sharing economy will impact the form and function of cities. In all cases, we share our expertise and experiences with scholars, policymakers, community leaders, and project partners. We further extend our impact via an annual Expert-in-Residence Program, SCI China visiting scholars program, study abroad course on redesigning cities for people on bicycle, and through our co- leadership of the Educational Partnerships for Innovation in Communities Network (EPIC-N), which is transferring SCYP to universities and communities across the globe. Our work connects student passion, faculty experience, and community needs to produce innovative, tangible solutions for the creation of a sustainable society. The Sustainable City Year Program (SCYP) is a yearlong partnership between SCI and a partner in Oregon, in which students and faculty in courses from across the university collaborate with a public entity on sustainability and livability projects. SCYP faculty and students work in collaboration with staff from the partner agency through a variety of studio projects and service- learning courses to provide students with real-world projects to investigate. Students bring energy, enthusiasm, and innovative approaches to difficult, persistent problems. SCYP’s primary value derives from collaborations that result in on-the-ground impact and expanded conversations for a community ready to transition to a more sustainable and livable future. 5 About City of Sisters Located at the foot of the Cascade Mountains in Central Oregon, the City of Sisters offers beautiful natural surroundings, a variety of year-round recreational opportunities, and a vibrant local economy. Sisters was a place where Paiute, Warm Springs, and Wasco peoples stopped during movement across central Oregon. The name of Whychus Creek, a tributary that runs through town and joins the Deschutes River just beyond the city limits, comes from a Sahaptin phrase, “The Place We Cross the Water.” Sisters became a way station and became accessible once roads were constructed through McKenzie Pass and Santiam Pass in the Cascade Mountain Range. In the early twentieth century, Sisters was a center for sheep and cattle ranching and later became a focus for the timber industry, with numerous mills surrounding Sisters and even a mill in town. The townsite of Sisters was platted in 1901, although the town was not incorporated until 1946. The original townsite for the City was six blocks in size, circumscribed by Adams Street on the north, Larch Street on the east, Cascade Street on the south, and Elm Street on the west, which represents the downtown core of the City of Sisters north of Cascade Avenue today. With Sisters’ strategic location as the “Gateway to the Cascades,” major industries have included sheepherding, cattle ranching, timber production, and provision of goods and services for travelers. Sisters has capitalized on 6 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site accommodating visitors, initially serving the transient tradesmen that traveled through central Oregon. Many people know Sisters for its Western frontier design theme that derives architectural inspiration from the town’s beginnings in the 1880s. However, Sisters did not always look this way. When Brooks Resources developed Black Butte Ranch, a resort community eight miles west of Sisters, it envisioned a plan to help the Sisters downtown core reinvent itself. In coordination with the City Council, Brooks Resources offered loans, forgiveable after 10 years, to businesses who built with a Western theme. From this idea, the City developed a strong identity that helped attract people to Sisters as a tourism destination. The economy strengthened, the population returned, and in 1992, the Sisters School District reopened its high school after 25 years of sending students to Redmond High School. The 2021 population in Sisters totaled 3,475 residents, a result of the population doubling every decade since the 1990s. Sisters continues to serve as a gateway to the central Oregon region while also being known for local attractions including Hoodoo Ski Area and prominent community events such as the Sisters Rodeo, the Sisters Outdoor Quilt Show, and the Sisters Folk Festival. Master of Architecture Elisia Alampi Ankita Manandhar Andrew Miller Erin Ulcickas Bachelor of Architecture Esme Alexander-Jaffe Aracely Barajassilva Vy Bui Kyle Cadavona Bella Creado Jeremy Krementz Madison Merwine Seunghyeon Park Ervin Taylor Melanie Franco Zavala Course Participants University of Oregon Architecture students proposed site designs and adaptive reuse ideas for the existing Sisters Elementary School and outdoor recreational uses and affordable housing. Student housing proposals fell into four main categories: 1) Housing on top of the school 2) Housing on the west side of the site 3) Housing in groups of clusters 4) Housing as larger volumes Students worked together and independently to improve the quality of life and community in Sisters, Oregon, through design. Students focused on creating spaces for future residents that would serve a range of family sizes and types. Students also proposed outdoor spaces that are designed to serve the community in a variety of ways, mostly through recreational activities such as sports. Proposed designs considered the future Highway 20 roundabout that will be built adjacent to the site, which will slow traffic down as it travels through the central part of Sisters. Students also proposed site layouts that will better accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists as they travel through and around the site. To formulate their designs, students started with case studies, diagrams, and process models. They also completed a detailed site analysis, which included a field trip to the site and the city of Sisters. This helped the students visualize and understand the site, the community, and the community’s needs. Students also researched relevant demographics within Sisters, Oregon, including the school district since their project focus included adaptive reuse of the current elementary school and affordable housing for existing and incoming teachers. Every student designed distinct details within their designs, such as splash pads, a community amphitheater, gardens, and unique connections from the proposed housing to the community spaces. Students strived to reflect the current culture of the community in their designs while adding to the existing beauty of Sisters, Oregon. This report summarizes the three different housing approaches while highlighting details within some of the designs for the affordable housing, adaptive reuse and site design in Sisters, Oregon. 7 About City of Sisters Executive Summary 8 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Introduction As the city of Sisters continues to grow, affordable housing is becoming an increasingly urgent issue. According to niche.com, the public school system in Sisters, Oregon, is ranked #13 out of 159 in Oregon. However, the school district is struggling to hire and retain teachers and staff due to minimal affordable housing in Sisters. With the recent passage of a school bond measure, the school district is building a new elementary school and is seeking adaptive reuse ideas for its existing school. Architecture students developed proposals for the adaptive reuse of the existing elementary school, adding affordable housing and redesigning the site to create a strong center for the community that will include outdoor and indoor recreational facilities. Students considered the future Highway 20 roundabout in their site proposals. Figure 1: Sisters Elementary School Photo: Megan Banks https://www.niche.com/k12/d/sisters-school-district-or/ 9 City Findings Land Use and Zoning To begin the design process for an adaptive and affordable housing project, students started with an understanding of the city of Sisters. To effectively design a site, plans for the city and the city’s overall spirit were considered. Students researched the City’s zoning, existing land uses, community survey data, neighborhood maps, and recent student planning proposals (“A New Future for the Sisters Elementary School Site,” fall 2022) helped students form initial ideas for the site. This process allowed students to shape an image of what the Sisters public wanted to see and experience, and how a new design for the existing elementary school could fit within their community. Figure 2: City of Sisters zoning map ( Source: https://www.ci.sisters. or.us/sites/default/ files/fileattachments/ community_ development/ page/12381/zoning_ map.pdf https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/zo 10 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 3: City of Sisters land types (Source: City of Sisters Buildable Lands Inventory; https:// www.codepublishing. com/OR/Sisters/#!/ SistersDevCode02/ SistersDevCode0202. html#2.2) Figure 4: City of Sisters zoning designations (Source: City of Sisters Buildable Lands Inventory; https:// www.ci.sisters.or.us/ sites/default/files/ fileattachments/ community_ development/ page/12381/2020_ sisters_bli_ revised_032221.pdf) Zoning Zoning https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.codepublishing.com/OR/Sisters/#!/SistersDevCode02/SistersDevCode0202.html#2.2 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 11 City Findings Zoning Figure 5: City of Sisters residential lands development status (Source: City of Sisters Buildable Lands Inventory; https://www.ci.sisters. or.us/sites/default/ files/fileattachments/ community_ development/ page/12381/2020_ sisters_bli_ revised_032221.pdf) https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 https://www.ci.sisters.or.us/sites/default/files/fileattachments/community_development/page/12381/20 12 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Students analyzed traffic patterns, including high and low traffic areas, and speed limits on nearby streets. Students also determined whether additional Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan parking for residential or recreational purposes might be needed. Bicycle routes and other non-vehicle routes were also identified. Figure 6: City of Sisters existing street functional classification map (Source: City of Sisters Transportation System Plan) Figure 7: City of Sisters existing bicycle facilities (Source: City of Sisters Transportation System Plan) 13 City Findings Students reviewed Sisters’ demographic data, including age and income, to help them understand the City’s general Survey Participants Data Survey Results Ideas the community was most interested in: Youth/Community sports spaces Pre-K/ Childcare Outdoor Sports center/Field Ice rink Senior Center Indoor swimming pool Emergency medical facilities Community meeting spaces affluence and potential interest areas (pickleball, team sports, walkability, etc.). Sisters Parks and Recreation District Needs Assessment Focus Group Participants Data Ethnicity—All Participants were White/Caucasian * Note—Three participants did not fill out the demographic’s questionnaire Figure 8: Sisters Parks and Recreation District Needs Assessment focus group participant demographics (Source: Sisters Parks and Recreation District Needs Assessment, July 2022) Figure 9: Idea Generating Survey Results for the Future of the Sisters Elementary School (Source: Sisters Parks and Recreation District Survey; graphic by Madison Merwine) Survey Results Ideas the community was least interested in: Storage Historical Museum Tiny House Village Convention Center Cold weather Shelter Sculpture Garden Figure 10: Idea Generating Survey Results for the Future of the Sisters Elementary School (Source: Sisters Parks and Recreation District Survey; graphic by Madison Merwine) 14 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Students also reviewed regional incomes and teaching salaries in Sisters, Oregon. Figure 11: Sisters School staff and teachers’ salaries as % of AMI Figure 12: Sisters median income data Figure 13: Housing cost-to-income ratio in Sisters Figure 14: Housing units by structure in Sisters 15 About the Site Figure 15: View of the Sisters mountains (Source: City of Sisters) Figure 16: City of Sisters mural (Source: City of Sisters) With a 2021 population of 3,081 residents inside the City (U.S. Census), and 10,000 in the school district (http://ssd6.org/, n.d.), the city of Sisters is relatively small. The entire City can be driven through in a matter of minutes, with West Cascade Avenue bisecting the City. Named after the Three Sisters, the three mountains visible from the City, Sisters experiences typical mountain weather. The hottest month, July, averages a high of 84 degrees while the coldest month is December, which averages 40 degrees. The City experiences an average of 32 inches of snow per year. (Fast Facts about Sisters, Oregon) With its wide range of outdoor activities, Sisters attracts tourists year-round. http://ssd6.org/ 16 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Site Difficulties Students responded to a variety of constraints in their designs, such as: • Future Oregon Department of Transportation Highway 20 roundabout: reduces the amount of school district property available to design • Soil inconsistencies: The east side of the site contains soggy soil. To minimize this constraint, some students placed housing away from this area • Noise and safety concerns on the west and south sections of the site • Parking and parking flow: Parking and parking flow for the proposed housing challenged entrance placement and paving arrangement Figure 17a (left): Sound analysis (Source: Melanie Franco Zavala) Figure 17b (right): Roundabout sound analysis (Source: Melanie Franco Zavala) Figure 17c: Soccer field sound analysis (Source: Melanie Franco Zavala) 17 About the Site Figure 18: Diagramming of school remodel, housing and site organization (Source: Andrew Tesmacher) 18 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site In order to move through the complexities on the site, students created a series of “zones” to inform their layout and respond to the site’s constraints. Formulating a series of solutions based on their design focus, students planned their project on the movement and experience of the users as a means to inform the functionality of their ideas. Site solutions The students split into three groups based on the similarities within their designs: the “west side” group, the “clusters” group, and the “build on top of school” group. West Side Students placed and designed housing on the west side of the site, and created a border of housing that enclosed a true “center of the community.” Figure 19: Site plan by Seunghyeon Park 19 Figure 20: Site plan by Melanie Franco Zavala Figure 21: Site plan by Jeremy Krementz About the Site 20 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Clusters Students from the clusters group designed groupings of freestanding housing mostly on the southeast area of the site. This design location allowed the housing to Figure 22: Site isometric by Jeremy Krementz Figure 23: Site plan by Ervin Taylor be placed next to the existing residential structures, leaving the remaining middle and west sides for recreational activities. 21 Figure 24: Site plan by Esme Alexander-Jaffe Figure 25: Axonometric View Site Plan by Bella Creado About the Site 22 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 26: Site isometric by Madison Merwine Figure 27: Site plan by Madison Merwine Build on top of school This group of students chose to build on top of the existing elementary school to take advantage of the adaptive reuse potential of this project. This group was very efficient with their space as it allows the rest of the site to be available for recreational activities and/or additional housing units. 23 Figure 28: Site isometric by Erin Ulcickas About the Site Housing as Larger Volumes A small handful of students looked to three story multi-family housing models that add a level of density to the site. These proposals allow for more units and cost savings, leading to more options and greater affordability. These projects also intentionally integrate open space and indoor-outdoor recreation to create a welcoming mix of uses for residents and visitors. 24 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 29: Site perspectives by Erin Ulcickas 25 Figure 30: Site section by Vy Bui About the Site The “Missing Middle Housing’’ ideology, which consists of multi-family or clustered housing types used in scale with transitional neighborhoods, was used to design affordable teacher housing. Students focused on three forms of housing, the apartment, duplex, and quadplex. Students then emphasized their choice of units to reflect which scale of housing would be appropriate to accommodate the residents’ needs. Approaches to Affordable Housing Scale and housing options ranged from more condensed apartments to larger townhomes. The choice of housing was chosen to provide the most workforce, specifically teachers, housing possible. Proposals varied from additional housing for more staff to more open space to allow for future expansion. The number of proposed housing units ranged from 26- 130 units. 26 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 31: Site plan by Seunghyeon Park SES REUSE PLAN 1/32” = 1’ 0” N 3 Bed 1.5 Bath Quad First Floor 1/8”= 1’0 3 Bed 1.5 Bath Quad Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 2 Bed 1.5 Bath Duplex Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 2 Bed 1.5 Bath Duplex First Floor 1/8”= 1’0 Alternate Unit: 1 Bed 1 Bath Duplex Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 N N N N N Figure 32: Housing Site plan by Ervin Taylor 27 Figure 33 (left): Site section by Erin Ulcickas Figure 34 (center): Housing site perspective by Erin Ulcickas Figure 35 (right): Site section by Madison Merwine About the Site 28 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 36: Site axonometric by Vy Bui School Redesign Adaptive reuse architecture is defined as the repurposing of an existing structure for a new use. In other words, the structure can be redesigned from the interior, exterior, or even both to fit the building’s new use. These proposals focused on introducing a communal center in place of the current elementary school with students redesigning the building’s interior. Some students expanded the school by adding more floors on top of the existing structure, using these floors as either apartments, a coworker center, or a recreational space. Other designs revolved around the school wing design, and how it was redesigned. A series of recreational centers was proposed for the east wing, with pickleball courts or dance rooms, while other designs extended the locker rooms indoors. Other east wing ideas include office spaces for coworkers or staff. The south wing was proposed as a multi- use space. Originally classrooms, students redesigned this space as a community area or additional recreational space. Office space, an expansion or elimination of the kitchen entirely, or even a remodel of the entry point was proposed for the north end of the school. Students based their elementary school redesign on two approaches, either adapting it for housing to conserve site space, or extending it as a community and recreational center. Both approaches strove to improve the quality of living on the site, whether connecting to the larger Sisters community or creating a central hub on the site. 29 Figure 37: Site plan by Elisia Alampi A14 A12 A10 A8 A6 A4 A3A5A7A9A11A13 A1 A2 A3A A3B A4A B14 B14A B15 B1 B10B11B13 B12 C2 C1 C3 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 B2 B3 B3A B3B B3CB3D B3E B5 B4 B8 B9 B9A B9B B6 D0 D2 D3 D4 D4A D3A A12A A8A A6A A5A A7AA11A C2A C4A C3A C1A B5A E4A OFFICE STAGESCHOOL COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY CENTER GYM BOTH SCHOOL COMMUNITY MAIN ENT. SES REUSE PLAN 1/32” = 1’ 0” N A14 A12 A10 A8 A6 A4 A3A5A7A9A11A13 A1 A2 A3A A3B A4A B14 B14A B15 B1 B10B11B13 B12 C2 C1 C3 E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 B2 B3 B3A B3B B3CB3D B3E B5 B4 B8 B9 B9A B9B B6 D0 D2 D3 D4 D4A D3A A12A A8A A6A A5A A7AA11A C2A C4A C3A C1A B5A E4A OFFICE STAGESCHOOL COMMUNITY CENTER COMMUNITY CENTER GYM BOTH SCHOOL COMMUNITY MAIN ENT. SES REUSE PLAN 1/32” = 1’ 0” N Figure 38: Recreation Center plan by Seunghyeon Park About the Site 30 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 40: Recreation Center plan by Aracely Barajassilva Figure 39: Recreation Center plan by Jeremy Krementz 31 Site Plan and Recreation Design Students refined the organization of their site plans based on their solutions to housing and recreational spaces. Some projects conserved as much of the current space as possible by placing housing on top of the school. Other projects programmed uses to fill the entire site. Students assigned a location to each project element based on safety, noise, recreational use(s), or public and private spaces. Sisters residents identified recreation and sports availability as a high want. The theme of gym and outdoor recreational expansion were common within each design. Students opted to create a multi-use soccer field, which could fit a total of three little league fields, and two middle school soccer fields. Other students also included various sports fields and courts, such as baseball, tennis, pickleball, and even basketball. Each proposal focused on the separation and connectivity of each use as they informed public and private spaces. Each project used a variety of design elements to symbolically walk the occupants through the site. For example, the use of landscaping and other separation strategies were used to ensure privacy for residents living on the site. Walkability of the site was vital to the organization and overall experience of the users. Students applied landscape design to strengthen their path design and guide occupants through the site. Parking was also crucial to the layout and progression of spaces within the site. Many students designed separate smaller parking zones to accommodate parking needs of residents and visitors.Figure 41: Site organization by Madison Merwine About the Site 32 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Figure 42: Site plan by Ervin Taylor Figure 43: Site plan by Madison Merwine 33 Figure 44: Site plan by Elisia Alampi Figure 45: Site plan by Andrew Miller About the Site 34 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Conclusion Studio participants endeavored to address the affordable and workforce housing needs of the city of Sisters while maintaining the City’s cherished qualities of walkability, access to the outdoors, and community. Students developed proposals that adaptively reuse the existing elementary school while adding affordable housing and redesigning the site to create a vibrant community center with indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. Four main approaches—small housing clusters, housing on top of the school, housing on the west side of the site, and housing as larger volumes— showcase a variety of opportunities for the school’s future. 35 Works Cited The Nugget Newspaper. (n.d.). Sisters Oregon guide—fast facts. Fast Facts about Sisters, Oregon. Retrieved May 2, 2023, from http://www.sistersoregonguide.com/ sisters-facts.htm “2022 Sisters School District Rankings.” Niche, https://www.niche.com/k12/d/ sisters-school-district-or/rankings. “Sisters Average Income, Population and Demographics.” Name Census, namecensus.com/demographics/ oregon/deschutes-county/ sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20 total%20of%201%2C558%20housing%20 units%20in,%2883.38%25%29%20 are%20occupied%2C%20and%20259%20 %2816.62%25%29%20are%20vacant. Accessed 12 May 2023. http://www.sistersoregonguide.com/sisters-facts.htm http://www.sistersoregonguide.com/sisters-facts.htm https://www.niche.com/k12/d/sisters-school-district-or/rankings https://www.niche.com/k12/d/sisters-school-district-or/rankings http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C http://namecensus.com/demographics/oregon/deschutes-county/sisters/#:~:text=There%20are%20total%20of%201%2C 36 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Appendix: Individual Student Boards 37 Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Elisia Alampi daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom daycare classroom storage teacher lounge RR RR administration kitchen small community room small community room large community room large community room teen hangout study study community meeting space coworking coworking rooftop terrace Mass Timber Strategies Community Center Level 2 Scale: 3/64”=1’ Community Center Level 1 Scale: 3/64”=1’ Community Center North Elevation Scale: 1/16”=1’ Community Center West Elevation Scale: 1/16”=1’ Ground Level Perspective of Community Center Interior Perspective of Community Center Site Axon Community Center Section Scale: 1/8”=1’ Latitude: 44.29° N Longitude: -121.54° W Snow Load: 29 psf Glu-Lam Roof Beams • Span of 28’ • 24F Douglas Fir o Fb = 24000 psi Live Load = 29 psf Dead Load = 34.5 psf Total Load = 63.5 psf 63.5𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ∗ 19.5𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 = 1238.25𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀!"# = 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙$ 8 = 1238.25𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ∗ (28𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓)$ ∗ 12 8 = 1456182 # − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏ℎ% 12 = (6.75𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)(24𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)% 12 = 7776𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖& 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆' = 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = (1456182 # − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖) ∗ 12 7776𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖& = 2247.2𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 Choose 6.75” X 24” beam: max bending strength of 2400 psi Glu-Lam Columns: Maximum column height: 15ft load on each column: choose 6.75” X 7.5” column: max load of 26491# with a load duration factor of 1.25 CLT Roof: Live Load = 20psf for non-occupied roof Dead Load = 10psf Snow Load = 29 psf 40 ft span Allowed Deflection = L/180 Choose 9-ply SL-V1M2 CLT Max span of 40.25 ft Weight = 34.5psf 12 3/8” thick 1238.25𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ∗ 2�𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 = 24765# Community Center Level 2 Scale: 3/64”=1’ Latitude: 44.29° N Longitude: -121.54° W Snow Load: 29 psf Glu-Lam Roof Beams • Span of 28’ • 24F Douglas Fir o Fb = 24000 psi Live Load = 29 psf Dead Load = 34.5 psf Total Load = 63.5 psf 63.5𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ∗ 19.5𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 = 1238.25𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀!"# = 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙$ 8 = 1238.25𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝 ∗ (28𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓)$ ∗ 12 8 = 1456182 # − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = 𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏ℎ% 12 = (6.75𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)(24𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖)% 12 = 7776𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖& 𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆' = 𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀𝑀 𝐼𝐼𝐼𝐼 = (1456182 # − 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖) ∗ 12 7776𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖& = 2247.2𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 Choose 6.75” X 24” beam: max bending strength of 2400 psi Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Ankita Manandhar SITE PLAN WITH ROOF PLAN SCALE: 1/64”=1’-0” People centric design that promotes the sense of community A 1 4 3 2 B A SECTION AT A-A SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0” DETAIL 1 SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0” DETAIL 4 SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0” DETAIL 2 SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0” DETAIL 3 SCALE: 1/4”=1’-0” SECTION AT B-B SCALE: 1/16”=1’-0” SISTERS STUDIO Winter 2023 Asst. Prof. Ceara O’Leary Ankita Manandhar ECONOMICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIAL Spaces where community can gather, live and rejoice Leasable spaces that generate revenue Adopting passive design measures wherever possible the sense of community Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Andrew Miller UP ������������������� ��� ������� ���������� � ���� ��� ������� ������������������� ��� ������� ��������������������� ��� ������� ������������������� ��� ������� �������������� ������������ ��� ������� ������������������� ��� ������� ������������������� ��� ������� �������� �� � ������� ­���������­������������� ���� ������� ��������������� ������������ ��� ������� ������������� ������������������­������ ��������������������� ��������� � ������� ����� �������������������� ���������������������������� ������������������������ � ­��������� � ������ � �������� ������� ������� ����� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ��� � ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ���� � ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ����� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ���� ��� ���� � ­��������� � ��� � ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ����� ������� ������� ���� � ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � �������� ­��������� � ������ � ������� SECTION A 1/32”=1’ SECTION B 1/32”=1’ NORTH ELEVATION 1/32”=1’ SOUTH ELEVATION 1/32”=1’ Baugruppen Martin Luther King Park by Atelier Jacqueline Osty Natural Play Nydala Project Umea by Anders Nyquist CASCADE COMMONS DESIGN INTENTIONS 611 E Cascade Ave, Sisters, OR 97759 by Erin Ulcickas Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Erin Ulcickas Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Erin Ulcickas 1/32" = 1'-0"1 Level 4 A C B LaundryLibrary A C B 1/32" = 1'-0"1 Level 2 Coworking 1/32" = 1'-0"1 Level 3 A C B PROGRAMMING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 3 BEDROOM UNIT 2 BEDROOM UNIT 1 BEDROOM UNIT PARKS & RECREACTION DAYCARE/PRE-K SECTION C 1/8”=1’ GROUND LEVEL 1/32”=1’ LEVEL 2 1/32”=1’ LEVEL3 1/32”=1’ LEVEL 4 1/32”=1’ Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Esme Alexander-Jaffe S I S T E R SS I S T E R S 1/32” = 1’ - 0”1/32” = 1’ - 0” 1/128” = 1’ - 0”1/128” = 1’ - 0” Tsuga TownhomesTsuga Townhomes Wittman Estes Wittman Estes House in EnvigadoHouse in Envigado Alejandro ArangoAlejandro Arango Gallery of Termeh OfficeGallery of Termeh Office Farshad Mehdizadeh ArchitectsFarshad Mehdizadeh Architects Cortez HouseCortez House Matt Nardella, AIA, Chris KosterMatt Nardella, AIA, Chris Koster PRECEDENTSPRECEDENTS PROCESSPROCESS T H E S I S T E R S S T U D I O Esme Alexander-Jaffe | Arch 484 | Ceara O'Leary Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Eracely Barajassilva Sisters, Oregon Recreational Center & Affordable Housing Aracely Barajas | Winter 2023 Level 1 1/32” = 1’0” Level 2 1/32” = 1’0” Site Plan 1/64” = 1’0” Transverse Section 1/16” = 1’0” Longitudinal Section 1/16” =1’0” Elevation 1/16”=1’0” Pickleball court studio community room cycling cardio Existing Preschool offices equipment issue existing storage Diagrams Precedent Studies Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Vy Bui Sustainable development: repurpose existing school building Create more affordable housing opportunity Maintain open green space Parks and rec activities and resources for residents, perspective residents and tourists Design for equality, accessibility and age-friendly environment D E S I G N I N T E N T I O N S P E R S P E C T I V E S Park and Recs Typical Apartment Unit facing South Townhouses Facing Driveway Restaurant Axon Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Vy Bui Car Pedestrian A R C H 4 8 4 S I S T E R S P R O F E S S O R : C E A R A O ' L E A R Y D I A G R A M S North South Section Looking West - 1/16" = 1'-0" East West Section Looking South - 1/16" = 1'-0" P E R S P E C T I V E C O L L A G E S I T E P L A N - 1 / 6 4 " = 1 ' - 0 " Site Parti Circulation V Y B U I Site Axon Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Kyle Cadavona CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN SISTERS OREGON SITE PROPOSAL 0’ 32’ 64’ 128’ 1/64” = 1’-00” 0’ 16’ 32’ 64’ 1/32” = 1’-00” 0’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 1/8” = 1’-00” 0’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 1/8” = 1’-00” 0’ 4’ 8’ 16’ 1/8” = 1’-00” AXONOMETRIC RENDERING OF SITE PLAN AND SITE SECTION 1 2 3 4 WORKFORCE HOUSING FLOOR PLANS WORKFORCE HOUSING SECTIONS WORKFORCE HOUSING PERSPECTIVE SHOTS WORKFORCE HOUSING ELEVATIONS KYLE CADAVONAKYLE CADAVONA II ARCH 484ARCH 484 II CEARA O’LEARYCEARA O’LEARY II WINTER 2023 TENNIS/TENNIS/ PICKLEBALLPICKLEBALL COURTSCOURTS SOCCER FIELDSSOCCER FIELDS W O RK FO RC E HO US IN G W O RK FO RC E HO US IN G N TA M A RA CK S T. N TA M A RA CK S T. BASEBALLBASEBALL FIELDS FIELDS PLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND PLAYGROUNDPLAYGROUND GARDENGARDEN CASCADE AVECASCADE AVE PROPOSEDPROPOSED ROUNDABOUT ROUNDABOUT N LO CU ST S T. N LO CU ST S T. US 20 US 20 DOG PARKDOG PARK BASKETBALLBASKETBALL COURTSCOURTS COMMUNITY COMMUNITY CENTERCENTER GYMGYM SENIOR SENIOR CENTERCENTER PRESCHOOLPRESCHOOL GARAGEGARAGE GARAGEGARAGE BEDROOMSBEDROOMS BEDROOMSBEDROOMS BEDROOMSBEDROOMS HALLWAYHALLWAY GARAGEGARAGE BEDROOMBEDROOM KITCHEN/LIVING KITCHEN/LIVING ROOMROOM GARAGEGARAGE KITCHEN/KITCHEN/ LIVINGLIVING ROOMROOM KITCHEN/KITCHEN/ LIVINGLIVING ROOMROOM MASTERMASTER BEROOMBEROOM MASTERMASTER BEROOMBEROOMMASTERMASTER BEROOMBEROOM KITCHEN/KITCHEN/ LIVINGLIVING ROOMROOM RESTROOMRESTROOM RESTROOMRESTROOM RESTROOMSRESTROOMS RESTROOMSRESTROOMS RESTROOMSRESTROOMS OUTDOOR OUTDOOR DECKDECK OUTDOOR OUTDOOR DECKDECKOUTDOOR OUTDOOR DECKDECK RESTROOMRESTROOM OUTDOOR PATIOOUTDOOR PATIO OUTDOOR PATIOOUTDOOR PATIO OUTDOOR PATIOOUTDOOR PATIO FLOOR 1FLOOR 1 FLOOR 2FLOOR 2 Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Bella Creado SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE HOUSING ELEVATIONS 1/16” = 1’ E CASCADE AVE. E TIMBER PINE DR. N L O CU ST S T. S LO CU ST S T. WHYCUS CREEK SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE SITE PLAN 1/64” = 1’ N SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1/16” = 1’ DAYCARE WING INDOOR REC CENTER STAGE / GATHERING AREA GYM KITCHEN RECEPTION / ENTRANCE SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE RESIDENTIAL CLUSTER 1/16” = 1’ N SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL CLUSTER 1/16” = 1’ N SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE SISTERS SCHOOL FLOOR PLAN 1/64” = 1’ N 1. CREATING A SPACE THAT BECOMES A COMMUNITY THAT INTER- ACTS WITH EACH OTHER AS WELL AS THE SURROUNDING NATU- RAL ENVIRONMENT 2. CREATING SPACES THAT ARE FOCUSED ON TRANSITION & IN-BE- T WEEN ENVIRONMENTS, BLURRING THE BOUNDARY OF “INSIDE” AND “OUTSIDE” PLACES 3. CREATING POCKETS OF PUBLIC & PRIVATE WITHIN THE RESI- DENTIAL/ PARKS & REC/ COMMUNITY IN TERMS OF THE BROAD SCOPE OF PEOPLE COMING TO THE SITE 4. REFLECTION OF ARCHITECTURAL CONTEXT WHILE BLENDING THE IDEA OF OLD & NEW TO THE REPRESENTATION OF THE SITE 5. CREATE MULI-USE SPACES WITH SUSTAINABILITY AND ENERGY EFFICIENCY DESIGN IN MIND SISTERS ADAPTIVE REUSE STUDIO ISABELLA CREADO // ARCH 484 // WINTER 2023 // CEARA O’LEARY Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Bella Creado E CASCADE AVE. E TIMBER PINE DR. N L O CU ST S T. S LO CU ST S T. WHYCUS CREEK SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE SITE PLAN 1/64” = 1’ N SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE LONGITUDINAL SECTION 1/16” = 1’ SISTER’S ELEMENTARY ADAPTIVE REUSE CROSS SECTION 1/16” = 1’ Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Jeremy Krementz UNIT ARRANGEMENT Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Jeremy Krementz Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Madison Merwine SISTERS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADAPTIVE REUSE Addressing the Needs of a Growing Community Madison Merwine Professor Ceara O’Leary Winter 2023 Sustainable City Year Program site model diagrams pr ec ed en ts site model de ve lo pm en t s ke tc he s plaza community hall Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Seunghyeon Park HOUSING COMMUNITY GREEN PARKING LOT SCHOOL 1. COMMUNITY ZONING All housings near site can access easily to the COMMUNITY ZONE (indoor & outdoor rec) 3. WEAVING HOUSING & COMMUNITY & GREEN Adjacent Housings can share green, and there will be community space between housings. Housing, Community Space, and Green Space are intertwined at one zone. Using GRID System for effective space organization 4. STACKING HOUSINGS The houses were stacked crosswise to use the ceiling downstairs as a terrace. 2. OUTDOOR REC 1) SOCCER 2) BASEBALL 3) MARKET Outdoor Rec Zone can be used for several usage (soccer court, baseball court, flee market) 5. MATERIAL Wood siding materials were used, and wood siding with color was used in the shade of the overall warm wood tone. SECTION A-A’ 1/16” = 1’ 0” ELEVATION 1/16” = 1’ 0” AXONOMETRIC DESIGN INTENSION SISTERS STUDIO/ prof. Ceara O’Leary / WINTER 2023 SEUNGHYEON PARK : Stacking + Weaving Green Community Recreation and Housing : Main Software of Sisters, Oregon SW HOUSING Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Ervin Taylor Sisters, Oregon Affordable Housing and Community Development Tayler Ervin | ARCH 484| Ceara O’Leary | Winter 2023 North Winds Southeast Winds Environmental Context Transportation Key Elements Public vs. Private Interactions Weaving Arrangement Site Plan 1/64”= 1’0 3 Bed 1.5 Bath Quad First Floor 1/8”= 1’0 3 Bed 1.5 Bath Quad Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 2 Bed 1.5 Bath Duplex Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 2 Bed 1.5 Bath Duplex First Floor 1/8”= 1’0 Housing Section 1/8”= 1’0 Housing Elevation 1/8”= 1’0 Alternate Unit: 1 Bed 1 Bath Duplex Ground Floor 1/8”= 1’0 N N N N N N Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Ervin Taylor Weaving Arrangement Housing Section 1/8”= 1’0 Farmer’s Market Section 1/16”= 1’0 Farmer’s Market Elevation 1/16”= 1’0 Elementary School Section 1/32”= 1’0 Elementary School Elevation 1/32”= 1’0 Elementary School Plan 1/32”= 1’0 Farmer’s Market Plan 1/16”= 1’0 Site Section 1/32”= 1’0 N N Appendix: Individual Student Boards—Melanie Franco Zavala 0 20 50 100 1’=1/16”=1” 0 20 50 100 1’=1/16”=1” 0 20 50 100 1’=1/16”=1” 56 Winter 2023 Reimagining Housing Options for the Sisters Elementary School Site Marc Schlossberg SCI Co-Director, and Professor of Planning, Public Policy and Management, University of Oregon Nico Larco SCI Co-Director, and Professor of Architecture, University of Oregon Megan Banks SCYP Director, University of Oregon Danielle Lewis Graphic Designers Colin Miller SCI Directors and Staff