Date: Jurisdiction: Local file no.: DLCD file no.: November 17, 2015 Gilliam County 001-15 001-15 The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of adopted amendment to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation on 11/16/2015. A copy of the adopted amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government office. Notice of the proposed amendment was submitted to DLCD 39 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing. Appeal Procedures Eligibility to appeal this amendment is governed by ORS 197.612, ORS 197.620, and ORS 197.830. Under ORS 197.830(9), a notice of intent to appeal a land use decision to LUBA must be filed no later than 21 days after the date the decision sought to be reviewed became final. If you have questions about the date the decision became final, please contact the jurisdiction that adopted the amendment. A notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR chapter 661, division 10). If the amendment is not appealed, it will be deemed acknowledged as set forth in ORS 197.625(1)(a). Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. If you have questions about this notice, please contact DLCD’s Plan Amendment Specialist at 503- 934-0017 or plan.amendments@state.or.us DLCD Contact NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/Pages/forms.aspx -1- Form updated November 1, 2013 DLCD FORM 2 NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE FOR DLCD USE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR File No.: LAND USE REGULATION Received: 11/16/2015 Local governments are required to send notice of an adopted change to a comprehensive plan or land use regulation no more than 20 days after the adoption. (See OAR 660-018-0040). The rules require that the notice include a completed copy of this form. This notice form is not for submittal of a completed periodic review task or a plan amendment reviewed in the manner of periodic review. Use Form 4 for an adopted urban growth boundary including over 50 acres by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB or an urban growth boundary amendment over 100 acres adopted by a metropolitan service district. Use Form 5 for an adopted urban reserve designation, or amendment to add over 50 acres, by a city with a population greater than 2,500 within the UGB. Use Form 6 with submittal of an adopted periodic review task. Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Local file no.: 001-15 Date of adoption: 10/21/15 Date sent: 11/16/2015 Was Notice of a Proposed Change (Form 1) submitted to DLCD? Yes: Date (use the date of last revision if a revised Form 1was submitted): 7/17/15 No Is the adopted change different from what was described in the Notice of Proposed Change? Yes No If yes, describe how the adoption differs from the proposal: no Local contact (name and title): Michelle Colby, Planning Director Phone: 541-384-2381 E-mail: michelle.colby@co.gilliam.or.us Street address: 221 S. Oregon Street City: Condon Zip: 97823- PLEASE COMPLETE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING SECTIONS THAT APPLY For a change to comprehensive plan text: Identify the sections of the plan that were added or amended and which statewide planning goals those sections implement, if any: Admend Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan; repealed and deleted 1999 TSP from County Comprehensive Plan. Adopt as stand alone document serving at Goal 12 of the County's comprehensive plan the 2015 TSP. For a change to a comprehensive plan map: Identify the former and new map designations and the area affected: Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Change from to acres. A goal exception was required for this change. Location of affected property (T, R, Sec., TL and address): The subject property is entirely within an urban growth boundary http://www.oregon.gov/LCD/Pages/forms.aspx -2- Form updated November 1, 2013 The subject property is partially within an urban growth boundary If the comprehensive plan map change is a UGB amendment including less than 50 acres and/or by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres of the former rural plan designation, by type, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use – Acres: Non-resource – Acres: Forest – Acres: Marginal Lands – Acres: Rural Residential – Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space – Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial – Acres: Other: – Acres: If the comprehensive plan map change is an urban reserve amendment including less than 50 acres, or establishment or amendment of an urban reserve by a city with a population less than 2,500 in the urban area, indicate the number of acres, by plan designation, included in the boundary. Exclusive Farm Use – Acres: Non-resource – Acres: Forest – Acres: Marginal Lands – Acres: Rural Residential – Acres: Natural Resource/Coastal/Open Space – Acres: Rural Commercial or Industrial – Acres: Other: – Acres: For a change to the text of an ordinance or code: Identify the sections of the ordinance or code that were added or amended by title and number: Adopted Ordinance No. 2015-02: an ordinance amending the county's comprehensive plan, amended by Ordinance No. 2011-04, repealing and deleting the 1999 TSP and adopting the 2015 TSP written by Kittelson & Associates of Bend, OR. The 2015 TSP was adopted as a stand alone document serving as Goal 12 of the County's comprehensive plan on October 21, 2015. For a change to a zoning map: Identify the former and new base zone designations and the area affected: Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Change from to Acres: Identify additions to or removal from an overlay zone designation and the area affected: Overlay zone designation: Acres added: Acres removed: Location of affected property (T, R, Sec., TL and address): List affected state or federal agencies, local governments and special districts: Identify supplemental information that is included because it may be useful to inform DLCD or members of the public of the effect of the actual change that has been submitted with this Notice of Adopted Change, if any. If the submittal, including supplementary materials, exceeds 100 pages, include a summary of the amendment briefly describing its purpose and requirements. GILLIAM COUNTY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN VOLUME 1 October 2015 Prepared for: Gilliam County & Oregon Department of Transportation Prepared by: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. In association with: Tenneson Engineering Corporation Browne Consulting, LLC Transportation System Plan Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon Prepared For: Gilliam County, Oregon 221 S. Oregon St., Rm 104 PO Box 427 Condon, OR 97823 (541) 384-2381 City of Arlington, Oregon 500 West 1st Street Arlington, OR 97812 (541) 454-2743 City of Condon, Oregon 128 S Main Street PO Box 445 Condon, OR 97823 (541) 384-2711 Prepared By: Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 354 SW Upper Terrace Dr, Suite 101 Bend, OR 97702 (541) 312-8300 In Association With: Tenneson Engineering Corporation Browne Consulting, LLC October 2015 This project is partially funded by a grant from the Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) Program, a joint program of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) and the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). This TGM grant is financed, in part, by federal Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), local government, and the State of Oregon funds. The contents of this document do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the State or Oregon. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon ii Table of Contents SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................. 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 2 Background ............................................................................................................ 2 TSP Process ............................................................................................................ 3 Public Involvement .................................................................................................. 4 Plan Study Area ...................................................................................................... 4 TSP Organization and Methodology ............................................................................ 6 SECTION 2 PLANS, POLICIES, AND STANDARDS REVIEW ................. 7 Plans, Policies, and Standards Review ........................................................................... 8 SECTION 3 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................ 9 Goals and Objectives ................................................................................................ 10 Goal 1: mobility and connectivity ............................................................................ 10 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 10 Goal 2: Economic Development .............................................................................. 11 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 11 Goal 3: Safety ...................................................................................................... 11 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 12 Goal 4: Multimodal Users ....................................................................................... 12 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 12 Goal 5: Environment ............................................................................................. 13 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 13 Goal 6: Planning and Funding ................................................................................. 13 Objectives ......................................................................................................... 13 SECTION 4 EXISTING 2015 TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ......... 15 Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions...................................................................... 16 Street System and Traffic Analysis .......................................................................... 16 Street System Overview ..................................................................................... 16 State Roadways .............................................................................................. 16 County Roadways ........................................................................................... 16 City Roadways ................................................................................................ 17 Street System Characteristics .............................................................................. 17 Street System Traffic Analysis ............................................................................. 17 Analysis Methodology and Performance Standards .............................................. 17 Road Safety.......................................................................................................... 24 County Historic Crash Analysis ............................................................................. 25 County Crash Patterns ..................................................................................... 27 Intersection and Segment Crash Analysis .............................................................. 28 Statewide Priority Index System (SPIS) ................................................................ 29 Observed Safety Issues ...................................................................................... 29 Pedestrian and Bicyclist System .............................................................................. 30 Public Transportation System ................................................................................. 33 Truck Freight Routes ............................................................................................. 33 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon iii Rail System .......................................................................................................... 34 Air Transportation System ...................................................................................... 36 Arlington Airport ................................................................................................ 36 Condon Airport .................................................................................................. 37 InterModal Connections ......................................................................................... 38 Freight Transportation ........................................................................................ 38 Passenger Transportation .................................................................................... 39 Bridge Conditions .................................................................................................. 39 Marine Transportation System ................................................................................ 40 Pipeline transportation system ................................................................................ 40 Existing Conditions Summary ................................................................................. 40 SECTION 5 FUTURE 2035 TRANSPORTATION CONDITIONS ............ 42 Future 2035 Transportation Conditions ....................................................................... 43 Population and Employment Projections ................................................................... 43 Future Traffic Conditions and Needs ........................................................................ 43 Year 2035 Forecast Traffic Volumes ...................................................................... 43 Year 2035 Forecast Intersection Operations ........................................................... 44 Year 2035 Forecast Roadway Segment Operations ................................................. 46 SECTION 6 FUTURE 2035 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS & ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................... 48 Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives ......................................................... 49 Roadway Needs ................................................................................................. 49 Transportation Safety Needs................................................................................ 50 Systemic Safety Program ................................................................................. 51 Systemic Safety Prioritization Methodology ..................................................... 52 Systemic Safety Projects ............................................................................... 55 Pedestrian Needs ............................................................................................... 58 Bicycle Needs .................................................................................................... 59 Transit Needs .................................................................................................... 60 Downtown Parking Needs .................................................................................... 60 Freight Needs .................................................................................................... 60 Aviation Needs ................................................................................................... 61 Rail Needs ......................................................................................................... 61 Bridge Needs ..................................................................................................... 61 SECTION 7 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN ................................. 62 Transportation System Plan ....................................................................................... 63 Roadway System Plan ............................................................................................ 63 Functional Classifications..................................................................................... 63 Design Standards ............................................................................................... 66 Rural Design Standards ................................................................................... 66 City of Arlington Design Standards .................................................................... 67 City of Condon Design Standards ...................................................................... 69 Access Management Policy .................................................................................. 69 Traffic Operations Standards ............................................................................... 70 Systemic Safety Plan .......................................................................................... 70 Roadway System Plan ............................................................................................ 74 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon iv Roadway Transportation Plan Elements ................................................................. 75 Pedestrian and Bicycle System Plan ......................................................................... 79 Public Transportation Plan ...................................................................................... 83 Air Service ........................................................................................................... 83 Marine System Plan ............................................................................................... 84 Rail Service .......................................................................................................... 84 Pipeline and Transmission System Plan .................................................................... 85 SECTION 8 TRANSPORTATION FINANCE ELEMENT ......................... 87 Transportation Finance Element ................................................................................. 88 Current Gilliam County Transportation Funding Revenues ....................................... 88 Transportation Funding Options ........................................................................... 90 Identify Additional Grant Opportunities .............................................................. 90 Public/Private Sponsorship Opportunities ........................................................... 92 Local Taxes and User Fees ............................................................................... 92 Development Code Updates .............................................................................. 92 SECTION 9 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE FINDINGS ............ 94 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings ................................................................ 95 Background .......................................................................................................... 95 Findings of Fact .................................................................................................... 95 Consistency with Statewide Planning Goals ............................................................ 95 Goal 2 Land Use Planning ................................................................................. 96 Goal 3 Agricultural Lands ................................................................................. 96 Goal 4 Forest Lands ......................................................................................... 96 Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Hazards ............................................................ 97 Goal 8 Recreational Needs ................................................................................ 97 Goal 9 Economic Development .......................................................................... 97 Goal 10 Housing ............................................................................................. 98 Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services ................................................................. 98 Goal 12 Transportation .................................................................................... 98 Goal 13 Energy Conservation ............................................................................ 98 Goal 14 Urbanization ....................................................................................... 99 Goal 15 through Goal 19 are not applicable to the Gilliam County TSP Update ........ 99 Consistency with OAR 660 Division 12 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) ................ 99 Section 660-012-0005 through 660-012-0055 .................................................... 99 Section 660-012-0060 ................................................................................... 100 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 100 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon v List of Figures Figure 1-1 Study Area Map ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 4-1 Reported Crashes in Gilliam County, by Severity (2009 – 2013) ........................................................... 26 Figure 4-2 Pedestrian System Inventory ................................................................................................................. 31 Figure 4-3 Bicyclist System Inventory ..................................................................................................................... 32 Figure 4-4 State Freight Routes .............................................................................................................................. 35 Figure 7-1 Gilliam County Proposed Functional Classification ................................................................................ 65 Figure 7-2 Systemic Safety Projects ........................................................................................................................ 71 Figure 7-3 Planned Transportation Improvements in Gilliam County .................................................................... 76 Figure 7-4 Gilliam County Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvement Map ................................................................... 81 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon vi List of Tables Table 4-1 Volume to Capacity Ratio Targets for Peak Hour Operation Conditions ............................................... 19 Table 4-2 Intersection Performance Standards ..................................................................................................... 20 Table 4-3 Roadway Segment Operations Analysis................................................................................................. 22 Table 4-4 Intersection Operational Analysis Results ............................................................................................. 24 Table 4-5 Reported Crashes by Severity in Gilliam County (2009 – 2013) ............................................................ 27 Table 5-1 2035 Roadway Segment Operations ..................................................................................................... 47 Table 6-1 Systemic Safety Countermeasure Toolbox for Rural Roadways ............................................................ 53 Table 6-2 Systemic Safety Countermeasure Toolbox for Rural Intersections ....................................................... 54 Table 6-3 Objective Criteria for Identifying and Prioritizing Systemic Safety Projects .......................................... 55 Table 6-4 Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects ....................................................................................... 56 Table 6-5 Systemic Safety Intersection Projects .................................................................................................... 57 Table 7-1 Gilliam County Functional Classification Descriptions ........................................................................... 64 Table 7-2 Access Management Spacing Standards for Rural Gilliam County Roadways ....................................... 70 Table 7-3 Access Management Spacing Standards for Urban Roadways .............................................................. 70 Table 7-4 Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects ....................................................................................... 72 Table 7-5 Systemic Safety Intersection Projects .................................................................................................... 73 Table 7-6 Planned Roadway Improvements in Gilliam County ............................................................................. 77 Table 7-7 Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements in Gilliam County ........................................................ 82 Table 8-1 Grant Opportunities ............................................................................................................................... 91 Table 8-2 Local Taxes and User Fee Options ......................................................................................................... 93 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Table of Contents Gilliam County, Oregon vii List of Appendices APPENDIX, VOLUME 1 Appendix A Public Involvement Process for TSP Development Appendix B Cost Estimate Calculations and Assumptions Appendix C Transportation Improvement Project Prospectus Sheets Appendix D Table of All Modal Plans Appendix E Gilliam County Implementing Ordinances Appendix F City of Arlington Implementing Ordinances Appendix G City of Condon Implementing Ordinances TECHNICAL APPENDIX, VOLUME 2 (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policies Review Technical Memorandum #2: Goals and Objectives Technical Memorandum #3: Existing Transportation Conditions Technical Memorandum #4: Future Conditions Analysis Technical Memorandum #5: Alternatives Analysis Technical Memorandum #6: Preferred Transportation Plan October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Preface Gilliam County, Oregon viii Preface The progress of this plan was guided by the Project Management Team (PMT) and the Project Advisory Committee (PAC). The PMT and PAC members are identified below, along with members of the consultant team. The PAC members devoted a substantial amount of time and effort to the development of Gilliam County Transportation System Plan (TSP), and their participation was instrumental in the development of this document. The Consultant Team and PMT believe that Gilliam County’s future transportation system will be better because of their commitment. Project Management Team (PMT) Michelle Colby Gilliam County Planning Director Susie Anderson Gilliam County Planning Director Michael Duncan ODOT Project Advisory Committee (PAC) Marla Davies Gilliam County Transportation Services Tim Wetherell City of Arlington Public Works Chris Fatland Gilliam County Bike Enthusiast Peter Mitchell Port of Arlington Gary Bettencourt Gilliam County Sheriff Jay Kosik Condon School District Kathryn Greiner City of Condon Chris Fitzsimmons Gilliam County Emergency Management Pam Rosenbaum City of Arlington Dewey Kennedy Gilliam County Roadmaster Shannon Coppock Gilliam County Fire Services Coordinator Leah Watkins Commercial Trucking Company & Wheat Farm Operator Grant Young DLCD Northeast Regional Representative Marta Mikkalo Gilliam County Planning Commission Tod Lantz Iberdrola Renewables / Pebble Springs Wind Larry Durfey City of Condon Public Works Pat Pilz Shepherds Flat Wind Farm Mike Weimar Gilliam County Court Josh Bartlet Waste Management Disposal Services of Oregon Jeff Bufton City of Arlington Mayor Consultant Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Casey Bergh, PE Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE Ashleigh Griffin Tenneson Engineering Corporation Dan Meader Ben Beseda Browne Consulting, LLC Peggy Browne Sara Haynes Section 1 Introduction October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Introduction Gilliam County, Oregon 2 Introduction BACKGROUND The Gilliam County Transportation System Plan (TSP) documents the County, Cities, and ODOT’s priority projects, policies, and programs that are carried forward for funding from state and federal agencies over the next 20 years. The TSP builds consensus among Cities, the County, and ODOT on the transportation needs and priority projects for the communities, and is based on input from local citizens, stakeholders, and appointed officials. The TSP is intended to be flexible to respond to changing community needs and revenue sources over the next 20 years and will be updated approximately every 10 years. The previous TSP was developed in 1999. Since 1999, time, growth, and development patterns altered Gilliam County’s forward vision. The following information provides context and illustrates the challenges, opportunities, and needs tied to the County’s evolving transportation system:  The Cities of Arlington and Condon nearly exhausted the project lists identified in the 1999 TSP. In addition, revised zoning ordinances are not reflected in the 1999 TSP.  The County has prioritized building livable, connected communities. This TSP Update includes strategies that promote accessibility and connectivity and preserve the local character of the cities of Arlington, Lonerock, and Condon, including: o Networks that provide safe and more comfortable access for pedestrians and bicyclists to and from schools, downtown, grocery stores, government buildings, healthcare facilities, and residential areas. o Balancing mobility with safety and livability to provide vibrant communities throughout the County.  Since the adoption of the 1999 TSP, land use patterns have changed within the County that requires planned transportation system projects, policies, and programs to support the emerging trends. Since the 1999 TSP was adopted, nearly 500 acres of industrial lands were added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and city limits of the City of Arlington. The County has also become home to a growing wind turbine industry. The ability to transport turbines for both installation and servicing is central to the development of this industry. This TSP update includes elements from the Port of Arlington Strategic Plan and the Gilliam County Strategic Plan to better October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Introduction Gilliam County, Oregon 3 integrate the County’s industrial areas with future transportation system improvements.  The three Cities are widely dispersed and rely on a sizable and remote system of roadways for safe and effective travel. A number of these roadways are aging and could benefit from widened roadbeds, reduced grades, straightened curves, snow fencing, offset intersection/junction realignment or bridge upgrades. These improvements address basic transportation needs of these communities and their industries. Enhancement and preservation projects such as these also bolster the system of emergency routes available in the event of a natural disaster and school bus routes transporting the students. TSP PROCESS The Gilliam County TSP was developed through a process that identified transportation needs, developed and analyzed potential alternative approaches for addressing those needs, and developed an improvement and financing plan that best address Gilliam County’s forecasted needs. The following steps were involved in this process:  Reviewing state, regional, and local transportation plans and policies that the Gilliam County TSP must either comply with or be consistent with.  Providing public open houses to provide project information to, and gather feedback from, the public at key points during the TSP development process, establishing project advisory committees, and developing transportation plan goals and objectives.  Identifying a detailed inventory of existing transportation facilities and services.  Evaluating current transportation operations and deficiencies.  Evaluating transportation needs in the year 2035 if growth occurs as expected and without any additional transportation improvements beyond those already funded.  Identifying and evaluating improvement alternatives intended to address Gilliam County’s future transportation needs.  Developing a prioritized set of improvements and strategies that meet the plan goals and objectives.  Estimating the revenue available for transportation projects through the year 2035 assuming reduced, consistent, and increased transportation funding.  Compiling the results of this work into this TSP document,  Review and adoption of the TSP by Gilliam County Planning Commission and County Court, as well as the Arlington and Condon City Councils. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Introduction Gilliam County, Oregon 4 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The planning process was guided by a Project Advisory Committee (PAC), which was comprised of key stakeholder agencies and other community representatives. These included Gilliam County Planning Department, Gilliam County Roadmaster, the City of Arlington, the City of Condon, the Oregon Department of Transportation, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, Emergency Services, the Port of Arlington, the Sheriff Department, School Districts, the Port of Arlington, and major employers in the County. The PAC was responsible for reviewing the technical aspects of the TSP. The PAC reviewed several memoranda and convened at a total of four TAC meetings during the process of developing the TSP. The PAC meetings focused on all aspects of the TSP development including existing deficiencies and forecast needs; presentation and review of alternatives; presentation and review of a preferred transportation and funding plan; and, presentation and review of recommended ordinance amendments. In addition to the established advisory committees, two public meetings were held at key junctures in the process to obtain public comment regarding transportation concerns, future transportation improvement projects, and priorities. These meetings were held in the City of Condon and the City of Arlington. All comments were addressed in the alternatives analysis and final plan development. Finally, the draft plans were discussed with the Planning Commission and County Court at public hearings. PLAN STUDY AREA Gilliam County is located in north-central Oregon and includes an area of 1,223 square miles. Figure 1-1 shows a map of Gilliam County, including the city boundaries of each incorporated city within the County. The study area for the Gilliam County TSP consists of all areas of the county, including the incorporated cities. Based on the requirements of the Transportation Planning Rule, the study of County roadways and intersections is generally limited to those with the highest classifications – collectors and arterials – as well as state highways. However, local street issues such as street connectivity, design standards, and safety are also discussed where appropriate. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d JohnDa y River Co lumbi a River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 5 6 A B CDE F Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure1-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \1-1 Stu dy A rea .mx d - agr iffin - 5 :21 PM 9/1 5/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Study AreaGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Ch erry S t Railroad Ave 4 3 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t 1 2 G ¯ 48-Hour Segment Count Locations Study Intersections Railroads City Boundary # X October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Introduction Gilliam County, Oregon 6 TSP ORGANIZATION AND METHODOLOGY The development of Gilliam County’s TSP began with a review of the local and statewide plans and policies that guide land use and transportation planning in the County. The plan and policy review is presented in Section 2 of this plan. Goals and objectives for the TSP, as developed in collaboration with the Project Advisory Committee (PAC) are presented in Section 3. An inventory of the existing transportation system documented all major transportation-related facilities and services within the County. The transportation system inventory allowed for an objective assessment of the current system’s operational performance, safety, and general function, which is summarized in Section 4. Long-term (year 2035) transportation system forecasts were developed based on ODOT future volume estimates. Section 5 of this report details the development of anticipated long-term (year 2035) future transportation needs. A preferred plan was developed that reflected a consensus on which elements should be incorporated into the County’s long-term transportation system. The preferred plan was based on transportation needs summarized in Section 6. Transportation needs were identified by the PAC, comments received from the County staff, Gilliam County residents, and ODOT representatives. Having identified a preferred set of alternatives, the next phase of the planning process involved presenting and refining the individual elements of the TSP through a series of decisions and recommendations leading to the preferred plan. The preferred plan identified in Section 7, Transportation System Plan, includes a roadway plan and a pedestrian and bicycle plan, as well as plans for other transportation modes serving Gilliam County. Section 8, Transportation Finance Element, provides an analysis and summary of the alternative funding sources to finance the identified transportation system improvements. Section 9 documents how the document complies with County and State plans and requirements. Sections 1 through 9 comprise Volume 1 of the TSP and provide the main substance of the plan. These are supplemented by Technical Appendices in Volume 2 which contains the technical memoranda documenting the existing conditions analysis, forecast needs, and alternatives analysis. Section 2 Plans, Policies, and Standards Review October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Plans, Policies, and Standards Review Gilliam County, Oregon 8 Plans, Policies, and Standards Review One of the project objectives of the TSP Update is to provide consistency between the County’s TSP and local and state transportation policies and standards. To meet these objectives, a review and evaluation of existing plans, policies, standards, and laws that are relevant to the TSP update was conducted. Detailed information from this review, including a complete list of the documents reviewed, can be found in Technical Memorandum #1 located in Volume 2 of the Technical Appendix. The summary of federal, state, regional, and local documents as they relate to transportation planning in Gilliam County, provided the policy framework for the TSP planning process. State documents and requirements were summarized as they applied to the Gilliam County TSP, as were applicable local city policies and regulations that had potential impacts on the County transportation system. Given the prominence of the Cities of Arlington and Condon in the County, a number of local documents were also reviewed for policies that could have impacts to the Gilliam County TSP. Reviewed documents include the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan (2003), the City of Arlington Transportation System Plan (1999), the City of Condon Comprehensive Plan (2011 update), the City of Condon Transportation System Plan (1999), the Condon State Airport Layout Plan (2002), and the City of Condon Buildable Lands Inventory (2001). This review of plans and policies identified the following key elements of the 1999 TSP that were updated to remain consistent with current State, County, and City plans and policies.  Identified improvements completed since the 1999 TSP and future improvements to the street network needed in order to improve freight mobility, consistent with the Oregon Freight Plan.  Documented public transportation services available to residents of Gilliam County, Oregon that support the goals of the Public Transportation Plan.  Documented pedestrian and bicycle facilities available to residents of Gilliam County, Oregon that support the goals of the Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.  Accounted for revisions to the Oregon State Rail Plan.  Included analysis that supports the Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) Emphasis Areas, and identify performance goals consistent with the Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan. Section 3 Goals and Objectives October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 10 Goals and Objectives The goals and objectives presented in this section guided the development of the transportation system in Gilliam County. The goals relate to: Mobility and Connectivity; Multimodal Users; Safety; Environment; and, Planning and Funding. Objectives for each goal are also provided, which identify the course of action intended to achieve each goal. GOAL 1: MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY Promote a transportation system within the County that links all three cities and serves existing and future needs for transporting goods and people throughout the County and within each City. Objectives  Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county.  Promote transportation linkages between the widely dispersed cities of Arlington, Condon, and Lone Rock by promoting an integrated system of principal highways that move people and goods throughout the County and connect to other adjoining Counties; a County road system that facilitates transportation between various areas of the County and between principal highways; and a local road system that serves as access to commercial and residential areas while preserving the function, operation, capacity, level of service, and safety of State highways and local roads in a manner consistent with adopted state and local plans.  Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation and local cities to identify priority roadway improvements and maintenance needs.  Improve traffic circulation within the three cities, the Port of Arlington, and I-84 interchanges within the County, while maintaining the local character of each community.  Promote and plan for future industrial, commercial, and residential growth areas.  Update roadway performance standards to ensure the efficient movement of people, goods, and commercial waste.  Update policies and standards that address street connectivity, spacing, and access management.  Balance local community and state goals for the state highways that run through the cities. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 11 GOAL 2: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Provide a transportation system that supports existing industry and encourages economic development in the County. Objectives  Develop and promote a multi-modal transportation network that supports the existing agriculture, waste management, and wind turbine industries and supports economic diversification in the future.  Promote railroad and waterway freight service when possible and upgrade highways in nexus areas that lack this option.  Prioritize improving and maintaining the key freight routes of OR 19 between Arlington and Condon, and OR 206 and OR 74 throughout the County.  Maintain and enhance the 10-mile rail segment between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycle Center to serve existing and emerging industrial and commercial uses.  Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county.  Ensure that the transportation system plan supports planned river port terminal facilities in the Columbia River gorge.  Coordinate with the Port of Arlington Strategic Plan and the Gilliam County Strategic Plan to better integrate the County’s industrial areas with these future transportation system improvements.  Ensure that the Arlington and Condon Airports are adequately served by the transportation system and that the transportation system supports the development of supporting land uses around the airports.  Encourage bicycle tourism by promoting and upgrading recreational routes through the County.  Promote a transportation system that balances the needs of downtown businesses with the need to preserve through traffic on State Highways by evaluating alternative solutions. GOAL 3: SAFETY Provide a transportation system that promotes the safety of current and future travel modes for all users. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 12 Objectives  Promote a transportation system that facilitates the use of state highways for safe and efficient travel and also provides safe, livable, and vibrant multimodal corridors in the downtown neighborhoods and central business districts.  Ensure that roadways are designed, constructed, and maintained to an appropriate standard for their expected use, vehicle speeds, and vehicle traffic.  Reduce incidence and severity of motor vehicle crashes.  Evaluate and respond to crash trends across the County, including overrepresented crash types and crash characteristics.  Evaluate and respond to crash trends associated with an aging population.  Provide a transportation system that allows for adequate emergency vehicle access to all land uses.  Promote railway and highway safety at and near railway/highway intersections.  Update County access management standards for all county roads. GOAL 4: MULTIMODAL USERS Provide a multimodal transportation system that permits the safe and efficient transport of people and goods through active modes. Objectives  Promote alternative modes, transit/dial-a-ride service, and rideshare/carpool programs through community awareness and education.  Support the development of regional public transit opportunities.  Promote an interconnected network of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities throughout the County.  Consider bicycle and pedestrian facility needs during construction of new roads and during upgrades of existing roads.  Promote a transportation system that includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the cities to promote active transportation to and from schools, downtown areas, grocery stores, government buildings, and healthcare facilities.  Develop plan elements that guide pedestrian and bicycle pathways and facilities to achieve maximum connectivity between bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and vehicle routes and facilities, securing an intermodal network of safety and access for all types of users. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 13 GOAL 5: ENVIRONMENT Provide a transportation system that balances transportation services with the need to protect the environment. Objectives  Develop a multi-modal transportation system that avoids reliance upon one form of transportation as well as minimizes energy consumptions and air quality impacts.  Encourage development patterns that decrease reliance on motor vehicles within cities.  Promote design standards that support acquiring only the minimum roadway width necessary for the roadway, including facilities for all users for the roadway classification, and maintenance to reduce weed infestation and conserve agricultural land. GOAL 6: PLANNING AND FUNDING Maintain the safety, physical integrity, and function of the County’s multi-modal transportation network. Objectives  Maintain long-term funding stability for transportation maintenance projects.  Identify new innovative funding sources for transportation improvements.  Ensure that the existing transportation network is conserved and enhanced through maintenance and preservation.  Identify interim, short-term, and long-term transportation solutions that will encourage development within the existing Urban Growth Boundaries.  Identify areas where refinement plans or interim measures would increase the life of a facility or delay the need for improvements.  Develop a TSP that complies with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), the Oregon Transportation Plan (OTP), and the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP).  Continue and enhance relationships and improve coordination among Gilliam County, ODOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Port of Arlington, and local jurisdictions. o Cooperate with ODOT in the implementation of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); o Encourage the improvement of state highways; October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 14 o Work with local jurisdictions in establishing cooperative road improvement programs, funding alternatives, and schedules; o Work with the local jurisdictions in establishing the right-of-way needed for new roads identified in the TSP; o Leverage federal and state highway funding programs. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Goals and Objectives Gilliam County, Oregon 15 Section 4 Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 16 Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County’s transportation system provides facilities serving many different modes of transportation. This section documents the existing system, including the following modes:  Road System (auto/truck)  Pedestrian and Bicycle  Public Transit  Rail  Marine  Air  Pipeline and Transmission System STREET SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Gilliam County is served by three state highways and a network of highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets maintained by the County. Primary roadway facilities, their characteristics, and existing operational performance are summarized below. Street System Overview Roadways within Gilliam County fall under the jurisdiction of the state (ODOT), the County, or local cities. The following sections describe the characteristics of the roadways under each jurisdiction. State Roadways The state facilities within Gilliam County provide interstate, statewide, and regional connectivity. These facilities include Interstate 84 (I-84), Oregon Highway 19 (OR 19), Oregon Highway 206 (OR 206), and Oregon Highway 74 (OR 74). The state facilities serve two of the three cities in Gilliam County. I-84 and OR 19 provide connections to the City of Arlington, and OR 19 and OR 206 provide connections to the City of Condon. County Roadways Eighty-five roadways, totaling an estimated 406 miles, are under the County’s jurisdiction. Sixteen percent of the roadway miles are paved, 14 percent are chip sealed, and 70 percent are gravel roads. The County roads provide connections to the state highway system and serve rural areas and the city of Lonerock. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 17 City Roadways The City of Condon is comprised of streets in a grid pattern, with Main Street running north- south through the center of the City. OR 19 and OR 206 meet and share the alignment with Main Street through the downtown area. Blocks in the downtown area are generally 300 feet wide (east-west) and 500 feet long (north-south). The City of Arlington is located at the interchange of I-84 and OR 19. OR 19 runs north-south through Arlington, crossing the railroad as it enters town, and provides access to the commercial areas of the City on the north end. The remaining streets are primarily residential streets, with the exception of Airport Road which serves as access to the Industrial lands on the bluff above the City. The City of Lonerock’s roadways are maintained by Gilliam County. The city’s seven roads form a small grid pattern. Street System Characteristics The State, County, and City roadways are categorized based on functional classification, which is based on the road’s purpose and use characteristics. Volume 2 of the Technical Appendix summarizes the existing functional classification, roadway design standards, and access management standards based on the 1999 TSP. Section 7 of this document summarizes the current functional classification, roadway design standards, and access management standards for each facility. Street System Traffic Analysis The focus of this section is to report the existing traffic operations for study intersections and roadway segments identified for the TSP update, as shown in Figure 1-1. The sub-sections below present information on the traffic count data used in the evaluation, the analysis methodology applied, the operational standards used to assess the results, and the traffic operations results for the study intersections. Technical Memorandum #3 located in Volume 2 of the Technical Appendix contains the traffic count data obtained from ODOT and used in the analysis, the Methodology Memorandum documenting the analysis method applied, and the existing conditions traffic operations and queuing analysis worksheets. Analysis Methodology and Performance Standards All operations analysis were performed in accordance with the procedures in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. Per the Methodology Memorandum (included in Technical Memorandum #3, in Technical Appendix Volume 2) and the ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual (APM), intersection operational evaluations were conducted based on the peak 15-minute flow rate observed during the weekday peak hour. Using the peak 15-minute flow rate ensures this analysis is based on a reasonable worst-case scenario. For this reason, the analysis reflects conditions that are likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average weekday peak hour. The transportation system will October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 18 likely operate under conditions better than those described in this report during other typical time periods. The operational results for study intersections and segments were compared with their corresponding mobility targets, summarized in Table 4-1 and Table 4-2, to assess performance and identify potential areas for improvement. Gilliam County does not have operational standards for roadway facilities. ODOT operational targets are identified in the Oregon Highway Plan and are summarized below for the state highways within the County. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 19 TABLE 4-1 VOLUME TO CAPACITY RATIO TARGETS FOR PEAK HOUR OPERATION CONDITIONS Route Name Facility Extents Facility Designation Inside UGB Outside UGB Posted speed <= 35 mph Posted speed > 35 mph but <45 mph Posted speed limit >= 45 mph Unincorporated Communities Rural Lands Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate N/A N/A 0.80 0.70 0.70 OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 East of Condon District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 Within Condon City Limits Regional Highway 0.90 0.85 0.85 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits District Highway 0.95 0.90 0.90 N/A N/A OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits, Outside of Cities Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 Within Arlington City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 20 TABLE 4-2 INTERSECTION PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Intersection Name Location Jurisdiction Type of Intersection Control* Performance Standard (v/c ratio)** Walnut Street/Main Street Condon ODOT TWSC 0.90 for all approaches E Bayard Street/Main Street Condon ODOT TWSC 0.90 for Main Street approaches; 0.95 for E Bayard Street approaches I-84/Beech Street Arlington ODOT TWSC 0.80 for interstate ramp approaches; 0.90 for Beech Street approaches I-84/Locust Street Arlington ODOT TWSC 0.80 for interstate ramp approaches; 0.90 for Locust Street approach I-84/OR 74 (Eastbound Ramps) County ODOT TWSC 0.70 for all movements Cedar Springs Lane/OR 19 County ODOT TWSC 0.75 for Cedar Springs Lane approach movements; 0.70 for OR 19 approach movements *TWSC = Two-way stop-controlled intersection ** v/c = volume-to-capacity ratio October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 21 Roadway Segment Analysis Seven study segments were identified throughout the County. Traffic volumes were collected for 48 hours between Tuesday, July 29, 2014 and Thursday, July 31, 2014. These traffic volumes were used to conduct capacity analysis to determine how the facility operates under peak hour conditions. Based on the 48-hour counts, the hour with the highest traffic volume was identified as the peak hour for that facility. Two-lane highway capacity analysis was conducted for each roadway segment based on the peak hour traffic volumes. Table 4-3 summarizes the peak hour, traffic volumes, and volume-to-capacity ratio for each study segment. Although the County does not have operational targets for County facilities, the peak hour analysis reveals that all of the roadways currently operate well below capacity. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 22 TABLE 4-3 ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS ANALYSIS ID Roadway ADT from 2014 Traffic Counts (veh/day) Peak Hour Time Period Seasonally -Adjusted Peak Hour Count (pc/h) PHF * Two- Way Demand Flow (pc/h) Critical Flow Rate (pc/h) Calculated V/C Ratio A Lonerock Road, South of OR 19 173 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. 19 0.68 29 3,200 0.009 B Baseline Road, east of OR 19 240 9:30-10:30 am, 1:30-2:30 pm 26 0.93 29 3,200 0.009 C Fourmile Road, SE of OR 19 192 1:45 - 2:45 pm 28 0.65 45 3,200 0.014 D Blalock Canyon Road, South of I- 84 142 5:15 - 6:15 pm 19 0.86 23 3,200 0.007 E Quinton Canyon Road, South of I- 84 67 8:45 - 9:45 am 10 0.59 18 3,200 0.005 F Mikkalo Lane west of OR 19 145 11:45 am - 12:45 pm 16 0.78 22 3,200 0.006 G East Bayard Street, East of OR 19 576 10:45 - 11:45 am 55 0.68 85 3,200 0.026 *PHF = peak hour factor October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 23 Intersection Analysis Six study intersections were identified throughout the County and Cities. Traffic counts at the six study intersections were completed on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Each intersection count was seasonally adjusted based on ODOT’s methodology to obtain 30th highest hour volumes (additional detail regarding these adjustments can be found in Technical Appendix Volume Two). The existing conditions traffic operational analysis was conducted based on the 30th highest hour traffic volumes at each study intersection. Exhibit 4-1 shows the existing intersection traffic control and lane configurations. Exhibit 4-2 summarizes the 2014 30th highest hour traffic volumes, and Table 4-4 summarizes the 2014 operational analysis results at the study intersections. As shown in Table 4-4, all intersections were found to operate at level-of-service “A” and with volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios of less than 0.10. The 95th percentile queue lengths reflect the maximum expected during the peak 15 minutes. As shown in the table, the 95th percentile queue lengths do not exceed two vehicles at all study intersections. Exhibit 4-1. Study Intersection Traffic Control and Lane Configurations October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 24 Exhibit 4-2. 2014 30th Highest Hour Traffic Volumes TABLE 4-4 INTERSECTION OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS RESULTS ID Name Critical Movement V/C Ratio LOS Delay (sec) 95th % Queue (# vehicles) Performance Standard (v/c ratio) 1 Walnut St/ Main St WB 0.09 A 9.5 1 0.90 2 E Bayard St/ Main St EBL 0.03 A 4.2 2 0.95 3 I-84 Ramp/ Beech St SBT 0.02 A 4.8 1 0.90 4 I-84 Ramp/ Locust St EBT 0.01 A 3.0 1 0.90 5 I-84 EB Ramp/ OR 74 WBL 0.00 A 2.1 1 0.70 6 Cedar Springs Ln/ OR 19 EBL 0.06 A 5.9 2 0.75 v/c = volume-to-capacity ROAD SAFETY Crash data from the latest five years (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013) was obtained from ODOT for all roadways within Gilliam County. Figure 4-1 illustrates reported crash October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 25 locations throughout the county. As shown in Figure 4-1, the majority of reported crashes are located along state highways. County Historic Crash Analysis Crash data from the latest five years (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013) was obtained from ODOT for all roadways within Sherman County. Figure 4-1 illustrates reported crash locations throughout the County. As shown in Figure 4-1, the majority of the reported crashes are located along state highways, particularly the OR 19 and I-84 corridors. Crash data is provided in Technical Memorandum #3 in Volume 2 of the Technical Appendix. !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! % Columbia River JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure4-1 H:\p rojf ile\1 767 9 - Gill iam Co unt y T SP \gis \4-5 Cr ash His tory .mx d - ope nbn d - 5:4 0 P M 9 /15 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Reported Crash History (2009-2013)Gilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 ArlingtonPor t Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemlock W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4th St S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave ! ! ! ! ! vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W TrimbleSt W1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Ma in S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Crash Severity % Fatal ! Incapacitating Injury ! Non-Incapacitating Injury ! Possible Injury ! Property Damage Only Railroads City Boundary October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 27 County Crash Patterns A total of 228 crashes were reported in Gilliam County between 2009 and 2013. The majority of reported crashes (147 crashes, 65%) occurred on I-84. Table 4-5 summarizes the reported crashes by severity. Almost half of the reported crashes involved an injury, and one crash involved a fatality. The fatal crash was reported as a fixed object, overturned crash on a curve on Lonerock Road, approximately nine miles north of the City of Lonerock. The crash report indicates speed was a contributing factor. The weather and light conditions at the time of the crash were not reported. Of the 13 reported severe injury crashes, several trends were noted:  Seven involved a vehicle collision with a fixed object.  Excessive speed was reported in at least six.  Alcohol was indicated as a factor in two.  Eleven occurred during daylight and on dry road surface. The severe injury crashes were located throughout the County on the interstate, state highways, and County and local roads. TABLE 4-5 REPORTED CRASHES BY SEVERITY IN GILLIAM COUNTY (2009 – 2013) Crash Severity Fatal Injury A Injury B Injury C PDO Total Number of Reported Crashes 1 13 56 38 120 228 Percentage of Total Crashes <1% 6% 24% 17% 53% 100% Exhibit 4-3 shows the number of crashes reported by month. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 28 Exhibit 4-3. Reported Crashes by Month (2009-2013) As shown in Exhibit 4-3 the highest crash frequency occurred during winter months, from November through January. Winter months in Gilliam County can include inclement weather conditions producing wet, icy, and/or snowy conditions. Further review of crashes in November, December, and January (99 crashes) indicate that 80% (79 crashes) occurred on roadway surfaces that were wet, icy, or snow-covered. Just over 50% (51 crashes) occurred in dark, dawn, or dusk lighting conditions. Over the study period, almost 70% of crashes (156 crashes) were reported as fixed object or non- collision crashes. Over 41% (94 crashes) occurred on roadway surfaces that were wet, icy, or snow-covered. The same number (94 crashes) occurred in dark, dawn, or dusk lighting conditions. One reported crash on I-84 involved a pedestrian in the western end of the County during icy roadway conditions. Of the 81 crashes that occurred on non-interstate facilities, 47 crashes (58%) occurred on rural minor arterials, 14 crashes (17%) occurred on rural major collectors, 2 crashes (3%) occurred on rural minor collectors, and 18 crashes (22%) occurred on rural local streets or roads. Intersection and Segment Crash Analysis Study intersections and segments were analyzed individually and compared to statewide averages for similar facilities, when possible. Technical Memorandum 3 in Volume 2 of the Technical Appendices summarizes the analysis. Based on the results of the crash analysis at study intersections and study segments, two segments (Quinton Canyon Road and E Bayard Street) exceed the statewide average. However, these are both short segments with only one crash reported during the most recent five years. The high crash rate was likely skewed by the short segment distance. 31 10 16 12 11 13 17 23 20 7 30 38 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Ja n u ar y Fe b ru ar y M ar ch A p ri l M ay Ju n e Ju ly A u gu st Se p te m b e r O ct o b e r N o ve m b e r D e ce m b er N u m b e r o f R e p o rt e d C ra sh e s October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 29 Statewide Priority Index System (SPIS) ODOT developed the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) to identify and prioritize sites where countermeasures could be implemented to potentially reduce the number of crashes. No segments or intersections within Gilliam County were identified in the top ten percent of the 2012 and 2013 SPIS lists (which use crash data from 2009 to 2011, and 2010 to 2012, respectively). The 2011 SPIS list includes one site on I-84, east of the interchange with OR 74, in the 90th – 95th percentile list. Based on the 2009 to 2013 crash data, eight crashes were reported on I-84 along the approximately one-mile long segment between the interchange with OR 74 and the eastern County border. Four of the crashes occurred in the eastbound direction, and four crashes occurred in the westbound direction. The road character for three of the crashes in the eastbound direction was reported as a vertical curve. Six of the crashes were reported as fixed object crashes, one was a rear-end crash, and one was an animal crash. One crash occurred on a wet roadway, one occurred in snow conditions, and the remaining six crashes occurred on dry pavement in clear weather. The crash reports indicated that driver fatigue contributed to three crashes, inattention and improper driving contributed to two crashes, speed too fast for conditions contributed to one crash, tire failure contributed to one crash, and following too closely contributed to one crash. Five crashes were logged at milepost 148.0, including a fatal crash that involved drugs. These five crashes likely contributed to the location making the SPIS list; ODOT proposed to monitor the site in the future. Observed Safety Issues The following locations were identified by the Project Advisory Committee (PAC) as having existing safety issues:  Walnut Street/Main Street intersection in Condon: The four-way intersection is 3-way stop-controlled. Confusion among drivers has been observed by residents; drivers at the intersection do not always realize one leg of the intersection is not stop-controlled.  Sight distance is a concern at three intersections in the County: Main Street/Walnut Street in Condon (northbound approach), Main Street/Gilliam Street in Condon, and Quinn Road/OR 19 in Mayville.  Drivers have been observed entering the I-84 westbound on-ramp when they intend to go eastbound, leaving Arlington as they enter I-84; the signage will be reviewed at this location.  Railroad crossings in Arlington cause traffic to back-up on the interstate ramps and within Arlington. The trains have been observed stopping on the tracks for relatively long periods of time. During this time, emergency vehicles cannot access I-84.  The intersection of Lone Rock Road/OR 206 is located on a curve and at an angle, which has caused concern that there is limited sight distance. The PAC advised that drivers may drive on the wrong side of the road at times to increase sight distance around the curve. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 30  Snow drifting is a concern on OR 206 near milepost 22, where vehicles have been trapped in snow drifts in the past. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST SYSTEM The pedestrian and bicycle modes serve a variety of needs including relatively short trips to major attractors, recreational trips, and circulation within parklands. Bicycle travel can be a viable commuting option, particularly in areas where bicycle lanes, paved shoulders and other amenities (such as: secure bicycle parking, work-place showers, and bus-mounted bicycle racks) are provided. Walking is also a viable choice for commute trips in areas with residential neighborhoods adjacent to employments centers; pedestrians are common in the downtown areas of Arlington and Condon. In rural areas of the County, walking and bicycling mainly serves as a form of recreation or exercise, rather than to serve as a viable mode of transportation for commerce due to the relatively long distances between originations and destinations. The pedestrian and bicyclist system for Gilliam County are summarized in Figure 4-2 and Figure 4-3, respectively. The inventory was completed based on ODOT’s data for state facilities and a review of the downtown areas using Google Earth aerial imagery. No sidewalks or bicycle facilities are located within the City of Lonerock. The pedestrian facilities inventory map in Figure 4-2 shows the location of existing sidewalks and crosswalks within the downtown areas of Condon and Arlington. As shown in the figure, sidewalks are located along the downtown commercial cores of both cities, but the sidewalks are discontinuous beyond the downtown cores. Schools in both cities are connected to the downtown commercial cores by continuous sidewalks and crosswalks. In Condon, the elementary school and high school locations are also connected by sidewalks and crosswalks. Residential areas are not connected to schools and commercial areas by continuous sidewalks. The bicyclist facilities shown in Figure 4-3 were obtained from ODOT’s inventory of bicycle facilities. In Arlington, these facilities are primarily striped shoulders that can be used by bicyclists. In Condon, the roadways are wide and provide adequate space for bicyclists, although no marked bicycle lanes are present. Within the downtown areas, no bicyclist facilities are provided on non-state facilities. The local streets are typically not marked for bicyclists, consistent with recommendations in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide, that urban and suburban roadways with posted speeds below approximately 20 miles per hour (mph) operate as shared facilities in which bicyclists share the road with vehicles. Gilliam County is also a popular recreational bicycling location for bicyclists from around the state who are attracted by the scenery and low traffic roads. The John Day River Territory is a popular attraction. Many of the roadways are low volume, gravel roadways and scenic roadways. Popular recreational routes include OR 19 south of Condon to Fossil, OR 206 west of Condon to Wasco, and OR 206 east of Condon to Heppner. The majority of these routes have minimal shoulders and rough pavement conditions. In addition, there are no commercial or public locations on these routes for bicyclists to stop and hydrate, with the exception of the new Cottonwood State Park located off of OR 206. Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure4-2 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \4-6 Pe des tria n S yste m I nve nto ry.m xd - ag riffin - 5 :42 PM 9/1 5/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Pedestrian System InventoryGilliam County, Oregon 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m s õôó Î "Z à Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington PortRd E 2nd St Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d W 1st StW 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St Hulde n Ln E 3rd S tCottonwoodSt Grape St W 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlo ck St Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m9:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m9:m 8 !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ19 vÍÎ206 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Bayard St SB St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St NE Mai nS t W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St W Summit St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St S W ash ing ton St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln St SA St NA St N Lin col n S t S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Activity Centers "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington Pedestrian Facilities 89:m Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure4-3 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \4-7 Bic ycle Sy stem Inv ent ory .mx d - agr iffin - 5 :45 PM 9/1 5/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Bicycle System InventoryGilliam County, Oregon Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington PortRd E 2nd St Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d W 1st StW 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St Hulde n Ln E 3rd S tCottonwoodSt Grape St W 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlo ck St Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St NE Mai n S t W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S Ward St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St S W ash ing ton St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln St S A St NA St N Lin col n S t S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Bicycle Facilities Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 33 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County Special Transportation (GCST) operates dial-a-ride transit service for the County. The service provides approximately 10,000 trips each year. No fixed route service exists within the County. GCST operates eight vehicles, with five in Condon and three in Arlington. Service was recently expanded to include a vehicle in Lonerock. The County sold one ADA bus due to expensive repairs and needs to replace the bus with a smaller vehicle that includes an easy-to-operate wheelchair device that does not require the assistance of volunteers, who are often elders. Two of the remaining vehicles are accessible, and all vehicles are driven by a team of 21 volunteers. Two additional volunteers live in Lonerock and provide rides between Lonerock and Condon, where residents can catch another vehicle going to their final destination. When drivers are unavailable, the GCST director is sometimes required to drive the vehicles. There are no part- time dispatch staff currently available to cover these occasions when the director, who also functions as the dispatcher, must leave. The County has expressed interest in a carport at the Lonerock community center to protect the vehicle year-round and an expanded garage or similar facility in Condon to keep vehicles clear year-round. The dial-a-ride service may be used by the general public for any purpose. About 80 percent of the trips serve seniors or people with disabilities. Residents are asked to call 36 hours in advance to schedule their trip. Rides are available Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., although some longer distance medical trips extend beyond these hours. Most trips are for medical purposes (90 percent), shopping, social, or business purposes. There is often a need for volunteer caregivers to ride along with passengers to provide assistance to the passengers traveling to medical appointments. The nearest medical facilities are located in either The Dalles or Hermiston. Frequent trips are also made to Portland for OHSU. GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs. GCST has expressed the need for more maintenance money to cover tires, snow tires, brake repairs, etc. There is currently no funding for training for the defensive driving passenger assistance training required for volunteers by the transportation brokerage. The Gilliam County Transportation Services Director is interested in becoming certified to provide this training to volunteers from Gilliam County and other nearby counties. Riders are not charged a fee, but suggested donations are recommended and vary from $2 to $30 depending on the length of the trip, purpose of the trip, and type of vehicle used. Veterans often must travel longer distances for their services and are not asked to provide donations for their ride. The County lacks existing funding for drivers to take veterans to hospitals and wait until the following day to bring veterans back from procedures. TRUCK FREIGHT ROUTES I-84 is the only state facility in Gilliam County designated as a state truck freight route, as shown in Figure 4-4. National and regional truck freight movements are intended to occur via I- 84, which is part of the National Highway System. Although not designated as a state truck October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 34 freight route, OR 19 also carries local and regional truck traffic, particularly between the landfill and I-84 in Arlington. Other roadways within the County that were noted as carrying high truck traffic included Ridge Road and Fourmile Canyon Road. A project was implemented to straighten sections of OR 19 between Condon and Arlington so that trucks carrying large loads such as wind turbines could traverse the corridor, but the project stopped short of completing the section between approximately milepost 16 and milepost 19. Therefore, there remains a two-to-three mile section of OR 19 immediately south of Upper Rock Creek Road that requires roadway closure for large agriculture and wind turbine loads to pass through it. RAIL SYSTEM Union Pacific (UP) provides freight rail service through Gilliam County. There is currently no passenger rail service in the County. UP Rail lines follow I-84 and the Columbia River and provide access to Portland and the Hinkle Railyard in Hermiston. Rail service is also available between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center, located approximately 10 miles south of the primary Columbia River line in Arlington. The landfill receives solid waste by rail from major metropolitan areas up and down the west coast, and that traffic keeps operations over the remnant of the line healthy. All trains on the branch are operated by Watco through their Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad. The Watco line is a Class III or short-line railroad which has an annual operated revenue of less than 20 million dollars (1991 dollars). Class III railroads are typically local short-line railroads serving a small number of towns and industries or hauling cars for one or more larger railroads. The only materials shipped by rail currently are solid waste from metro areas. Six unit trains run on this branch per week. The train speed from I-84 to the end of the line at the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center is 25 mph. The track is in good condition with regular maintenance conducted. There are two crossings within the City of Arlington that are associated with issues. When the trains cross the roadways, there are times when the train is stopped or traveling at slow speeds, prohibiting emergency vehicles from accessing OR 19 and I-84. Additionally, traffic entering Arlington westbound can back up on the I-84 exit to the interstate. Additional rail connections were abandoned in 1993. The 44-mile railroad between Arlington and Condon was completed in 1905 from a junction with the mainline at Arlington south to the agricultural town of Condon. The Columbia River & Oregon Central Railroad built the line with the financial backing of the Union Pacific, who assumed ownership of the line after it was completed. Traffic over the line was primarily agricultural until 1928, when the Condon Kinzua & Southern completed its line from Condon south to Kinzua, OR. Forest products off of the CK&S became the primary source of traffic handled until 1978, when the big sawmill in Kinzua closed and the short line was abandoned. The decline of carloadings received from the CK&S prompted UP to close the Condon depot in 1975. Columbia River JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure4-4 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \4-8 Fre ight Ro ute s.m xd - ag riffi n - 7:1 3 P M 9 /15 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Freight RoutesGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 ArlingtonPort Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemlock E3rd St CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ckSt Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W5thAve EWalnut St E Court St W6thAve Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St ETrimbleSt E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St WTrimbleSt W1stSt S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ ODOT Freight Routes Railroads City Boundary October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 36 Agricultural traffic, primarily grain, kept the trains running to Condon through the late 1980’s. By the early 1990’s operations over the line were non-existent, and UP applied to abandon the line. The only remaining shipper on the line, Condon Grain Growers, argued against the abandonment, stating that UP’s inability to guarantee a certain number of cars during the past two years prevented it from loading any cars. The ICC rejected this argument with the comment that a problematic car supply did not explain why nothing had been shipped over the railroad in 18 months. UP’s last run to Condon took place in late summer 1992, when some light engines made the long run up the branch to retrieve a cut of grain hoppers ordered but never loaded by Condon Grain Growers. The ICC granted permission to abandon the line in September 1992, and the rails were removed in 1993. A little over eleven miles of the branch remains in place today, from Arlington to Columbia Ridge Landfill. The 33 miles of abandoned railroad may be reviewed and considered for rails-to-trail opportunities to create shared-use paths for pedestrian and bicyclist travel in the County, if connections can be created for the 11-mile section to Arlington that is still served by active rail. The County prioritizes maintaining the 10-mile connection to the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center. If the railroad that allows unit-trains to haul solid waste to Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycle Center were to be discontinued, the adverse impacts to I-84, OR 19 and Cedar Springs Road would be substantial. The average intermodal rail container carrying solid waste from Seattle to CRLRC has a large tonnage capacity. With six unit trains currently operated per week, many trucks would be added to the road system with the potential for increased wear and tear on the roadways, increased air pollution, and increased risk for crashes involving trucks. AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County has two general aviation airports. One airport is located in Arlington, and the other is in Condon. Arlington Airport Arlington Municipal Airport (FAA LID: 1S8) is a non-towered public airport located one mile northeast of the central business district of Arlington. It is owned by the City of Arlington and was activated in December 1943. Arlington Municipal Airport covers an area of 80 acres (32 ha), including one runway with a gravel and dirt/turf surface measuring 5,000 x 50 feet (1,524 x 15 m). The gravel runway is difficult to maintain for the City. The runway was reported in poor condition in 2013, due to bunchgrass growth. In the longer term (20 years or more), the airport is likely to need a paved runway. The elevation at the Arlington Airport is 890 feet/271.3 meters. There are no general aviation services at the Arlington Municipal Airport with the exception of parking tie downs for aircraft. The Arlington Municipal Airport has municipal water and sewer available on adjacent Arlington Mesa Industrial Park along with Fiber Optic Conduit. Aircraft operations averaged 76 per month for a 12 month period ending May 20, 2014 and consisted of 55% local general aviation, 44% transient general aviation, and 1% air taxi. Insitu uses the airport as a testing location for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and has a dedicated October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 37 structure on Airport property. According to the 2007 Oregon Aviation Plan, the Arlington Municipal Airport is considered a Category V – Remote Access/Emergency Service Airport. The Arlington Municipal Airport is located in the Enterprise Zone within the City Limits of Arlington and is Zoned M1 and M2 (industrial) with an Airport Development (AD) overlay zone (AD). The Airport is adjacent to the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. The surrounding uses in the immediate area are agricultural and industrial nature with residential uses in the City of Arlington and I-84 within one mile but separated by steep terrain. Condon Airport Condon State Airport (Pauling Field) is located approximately one-mile northeast of the City of Condon. Regionally, the Airport is located approximately 150 miles east of Portland and 140 miles north of Bend. OR 19 provides access to the Airport and also provides a critical ground transportation link to eastern Oregon and to the rest of the state. Condon State Airport was constructed by the Board of Aeronautics in 1953. The Airport is owned and operated by the State of Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) and is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), making this airport eligible for federal funding. Condon State – Pauling Field, designated by the airport code 3S9, occupies approximately 103 acres of land. According to the 2007 Oregon Aviation Plan, the Condon Airport-Pauling Field is considered a Category IV – Local General Aviation Airport. The airport is located at an elevation of 2,911 feet/887.3 meters. The Condon State Airport plays a supportive role in the current system, providing geographic coverage and access to the state's airport system. The airport also serves as a base for agricultural spraying operations. Aircraft operations averaged 76 per week in the 12 month period ending February 05, 2013. Of these, 76% were transient general aviation, 22% were local general aviation, and 2% were air taxi. The airfield consists of many components that are required to accommodate safe aircraft operations. This consists of runways, taxiways, and an apron network; the visual and electronic navigational aids associated with runways; runway protection zones; and general aviation facilities. With assistance from the FAA in 1986, the Aeronautics Division rebuilt the airport with improved runway alignment. The airport has a single paved runway, Runway 07-25. The runway is 3,500 feet long and 60 feet wide with a concrete surface. The Airport currently has an Airport Reference Code (ARC) of B-I. The existing taxiway system at the Airport consists of two connecting taxiways from the hangar and apron areas to the runway. Aircraft turnarounds are located on both runway ends. There is one apron used for aircraft parking. The apron has 10 small aircraft tie down spaces. The apron is constructed of asphalt. There are no general aviation services nor fueling facilities at the Airport. Hangar space at the Airport is comprised of limited T-Hangars located adjacent to the apron area. There are 13 hangar facilities at the Airport. Vehicle parking is located adjacent to the apron area. There are October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 38 approximately 10 parking spaces in this location. In addition, there are vehicle parking spaces available next to each hangar. The County and City have been would like to bring the airport into the City’s Urban Growth Boundary and serve it with water and sewer access. The Airport’s lighting and navigational systems extend the Airport’s usefulness into night and/or poor visibility. Pavement edge lighting consists of light fixtures located near the edge of the runway/taxiway to define the lateral limits of the pavement. This lighting is essential for the safe and efficient movement of aircraft during periods of darkness or poor visibility. Runway 07-25 is equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). A four-light precision approach path indicator (PAPI) is installed on both runway ends. A PAPI is a system of either two or four identical light units that provide pilots with either red, white, or a combination of red/white lights which indicate whether a pilot is below, above, or on the glide path to the runway. Runway end identifier lights (REILs) consist of two synchronized flashing lights located near the runway threshold which provide rapid and positive identification of the approach end of a runway. REILs help pilots identify the end of a runway especially when other light sources obscure other runway lighting. REILs are installed on both runway ends. INTERMODAL CONNECTIONS Intermodal connections for passenger service exist in the form of transit, pedestrian and bicycle, and automobile connections. Intermodal connections for freight exist in the form of rail, truck, air, and water transport connections. Freight Transportation Industrial activities are important economic catalysts in Gilliam County, with energy, waste management, and agriculture being key industries in the County. Therefore, the intermodal connections for freight are important for the County. The Port of Arlington supports economic development and intermodal transportation connections that include rail, highway, and marine transportation. The Port owns 30 acres located at the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park and provides a Barge Facility for river access. The Port of Arlington does not have capability to transfer containers to/from barges, and the Port would like more efficient grain handling from truck to barge. The industrial park at Willow Creek (Heppner Junction) had a barge dock, and its use is transitioning. With the expected increase in activity at the Arlington Mesa Industrial park around the airport, the roadways that provide access to the airport may need upgrades. Currently there are no shoulders on the roads and some steep drop-offs just beyond the edge of the roadway. The landfill site and several industrial sites south of Arlington are connected to the rail line that runs between Arlington and the landfill. In addition, OR 19 serves these industrial sites south of the City. OR 19 and the rail service connect up to the Port of Arlington. Shutler Station (located at the intersection of OR 19/Cedar Spring Lane) needs rail crossovers that would make movement of rail cars within the park easier. Additionally, the City has developed an industrial zoned area around the airport to encourage supporting land uses in this area. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 39 In Condon, rail service no longer exists. However, the City’s industrial lands are primarily located in the northeast area of the City, in close proximity to OR 19 for freight transportation and the Condon airport. Passenger Transportation The ODOT Region 4 Park and Ride Plan reviewed existing park and ride lots throughout the Region and recommended priority locations for new lots and/or upgrades to existing lots. There are no formal park and ride lots in the County, but there are several informal lots located in the County:  Earl Snell Park, Arlington: The lot is used for some carpooling for commuters and for medical or shopping trips. There is unpaved, unused area on the west side of the park that could be developed as a park and ride lot. This area is also adjacent to the downtown core of Arlington, which contains connected sidewalks for pedestrians.  Gravel pull-out lot at Clem-Mikkalo Road and OR 19: This lot serves people traveling from Condon to Arlington and The Dalles.  Bus Barn in Condon  St. Johns Catholic Church in Condon  United Church of Christ in Condon  Bank of Eastern Oregon in Arlington The demand for park and ride lots was determined to be medium to low based on stakeholder interviews conducted as part of the plan. The lower priority designation is due to the fact that the area is relatively rural and there is abundant parking available to be used informally as a park and ride lot. The interviews revealed that the highest demand for park and ride lots in the County is for travel to the Arlington area by employees of Waste Management and the Shepherds Flat Wind Farm. The interviewees indicated that the west end of Earl Snell Park in Arlington had the greatest potential for becoming a park and ride lot. Beyond upgrading existing informal park and ride lots, the interviewees indicated there is no need for additional park and ride lots. Carpooling, vanpooling, and transit can also be used to serve the demand. Upgrades to existing informal lots should consider pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to support bike tourism in the County. BRIDGE CONDITIONS ODOT maintains an inventory of bridge conditions for State, County, and City owned facilities within the County. One bridge on Lonerock Road currently has a load restriction posted, and one bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road is currently closed to all traffic, causing an estimated 18- mile detour. Previous work estimated the cost of repairing or replacing that bridge to be $2 million. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 40 Sufficiency rating is a measure between 0 and 100 calculated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), based on factors such as condition, materials, load capacity, and geometry (i.e., dimensions). FHWA uses the rating as a tool to prioritize the allocation of funds for bridge repairs. In general, bridges with a sufficiency rating of less than 50 are given priority. The sufficiency rating is used to identify deficiencies, which may include structural issues or functional issues. For example, older bridges may be narrow and not designed to the same width or height clearance of today’s standards. Therefore, a sufficiency rating does not necessarily indicate a structural issue. There are two bridges with sufficiency ratings below 50 within Gilliam County: the Cayuse Canyon Road bridge over Rock Creek, which is currently closed to traffic, and the I-84 Eastbound bridge over Willow Creek at milepost 148.6. Although the Lonerock Road bridge is posted for load, it has a sufficiency rating of 57. The I-84 bridge is a state owned facility, while the Cayuse Canyon Road bridge is a County facility. The I-84 bridge is too narrow to accommodate the adjacent highway facilities, which is why the bridge is given a low sufficiency rating. However, the bridge is structurally sufficient. The closed County bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road is structurally deficient and may need repairs or replacement before it could be reopened. In addition to ODOT’s records, the County Roadmaster indicated another bridge, located on Eightmile Canyon Road, needs replacement. MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County is located on the Columbia River, a major water transportation route. The Port of Arlington manages river cargo and marina operations. The Port has a Barge Facility available for river access and a grain silo. Farmers in the region use the Port to export grain, which is an important economic activity for the County. From the Columbia River, the grain can travel to Portland and be exported internationally. The marina also serves as access to the river for recreational purposes, although it lacks a good beach or location for recreational users such as kite boarders and wind surfers to access the water. The marina is in the process of adding a fuel dock to its amenities. PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Pipeline transportation within the Gilliam County area includes numerous substations and transmission lines, which are currently being upgraded. These transmission lines are maintained by Pacific Gas Transmission provide access to the main power grid at multiple locations. EXISTING CONDITIONS SUMMARY This section summarizes the key findings from the existing conditions inventory and analysis.  All study intersections and study segments operate below capacity and within their performance targets. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 41  A total of 228 crashes were reported in Gilliam County between 2009 and 2013. The highest crash frequency occurred during winter months. Almost 70 percent of the reported crashes were fixed-object or non-collision crashes.  A number of intersections in the County were identified by the PAC due to safety concerns associated with sight distance and driver expectation. These intersections were evaluated during the TSP Update process.  Both Condon and Arlington have existing sidewalks in the downtown areas but lack connected systems of sidewalks and crossings to connect residential areas, schools, and other destinations with the downtown areas.  Existing shoulders on the state facilities within the downtown areas of Arlington and Condon can be used as bicycle facilities. The local, low-volume and low-speed residential streets in the cities operate as shared-facilities.  Dial-a-ride service is available for residents between Monday and Friday.  I-84 is the only truck freight route in the County. However, OR 19 also carries local and regional truck traffic, particularly between the Columbia Ridge Landfill and I-84 in Arlington.  Rail service is provided by Union Pacific (UP) along the Columbia River in Gilliam County. A spur line connects the Columbia Ridge Landfill with the UP line in Arlington. Two at-grade crossings exist in Arlington. When trains block these crossings, emergency vehicle access through the City is restricted.  Four bridges were identified for further evaluation in the TSP Update: Lonerock Road, Cayuse Canyon Road bridge over Rock Creek, and I-84 Eastbound bridge over Willow Creek.  Two airports serve Gilliam County: the Condon State Airport and the Arlington Municipal Airport. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Existing 2015 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 42 Section 5 Future 2035 Transportation Conditions October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 43 Future 2035 Transportation Conditions This section provides a summary of 2035 future transportation conditions and identifies trans- portation needs and subsequent impact on the transportation system based on future land uses, and projected population and employment demo- graphics. Transportation needs were identified for multimodal elements of the transportation system including: auto/truck, pedestrian, bicycle, transit, rail, marine, air, and pipeline/transmission modes. POPULATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS Reporting on population and employment projections is important in understanding the demand and impact that projected growth may have on transportation facilities over the next 20 years. The Gilliam County 2010 population of 1,871 is forecast to grow by more than 25% to a future population of 2,378 in 2035 according to the Portland State University Center for Population Research. Thirty-four percent of the population is located in unincorporated areas of the County, 39 percent in the City of Condon, 26 percent in the City of Arlington, and one percent in the City of Lonerock. Based on the State of Oregon Employment Department’s Labor Trends summary report from November 2014, Gilliam County lost a total of 111 jobs in 2013, some of which can be attributed to the completion of wind farm construction projects. The only industry that experienced an increase in jobs in 2013 was the Natural Resources and Mining industry, which grew by nine jobs. Gilliam County is working to increase economic activity by developing new industrial parks. The growth in traffic volumes reflects this potential for economic growth and the need for transportation infrastructure to support industrial growth in the County. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND NEEDS An analysis of the forecast 2035 transportation system capacity of study intersections and segments was conducted to identify improvements needed to meet State and County operational standards for each respective functional class in 2035. Year 2035 Forecast Traffic Volumes Annual growth rates were applied to existing 2014 volumes to estimate 2035 traffic volumes. Future (2035) traffic volumes were developed using Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT’s) historical trends method, which relies on historic traffic volumes to develop an annual growth rate. ODOT maintains Future Volumes Tables that summarize current and October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 44 future year traffic volumes for state roadways. Based on guidance from ODOT’s Analysis Procedure Manual (APM), the projected average annual growth is 1.25 percent for all Gilliam County roadways (see Technical Memorandum #4 in Volume 2 of the TSP for more information). No historic volume data was available for County roadways. Therefore, the same growth rate was used on state and county roadways. The projected 1.25 percent annual growth rate was applied to existing 2014 volumes to estimate forecast year 2035 traffic volumes. Exhibit 5-1 shows the added traffic at the study intersections and segments. Exhibit 5-1. Forecasted 2014 – 2035 Study Intersection Volume Growth Year 2035 Forecast Intersection Operations Forecast 2035 transportation system capacity analysis was conducted based on forecast traffic volumes. The operational results indicate that no operational improvements are anticipated to meet State, County, or City operational standards for each respective facility in 2035. The future conditions operational analysis was conducted based on the peak 15-minute period of traffic flow at each study intersection. Exhibit 5-2 illustrates the lane configurations and traffic control devices used in the future conditions analysis. No changes to the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices were incorporated in this analysis because there are no planned improvements at the intersections. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 45 Exhibit 5-2. 2035 Study Intersection Lane Configurations Exhibit 5-3 summarizes the 2035 30th highest hour traffic volumes and the resulting intersection operations. All study intersections are expected to operate with volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of less than 0.10 and level-of-service “B” or better. All intersections are expected to meet their performance standard in 2035. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Gilliam County, Oregon 46 Exhibit 5-3. Forecasted 2035 Intersection Traffic Volumes and Operations Year 2035 Forecast Roadway Segment Operations Using the forecast volumes, the seven study roadway segments were analyzed to determine how they are expected to perform in 2035. Table 5-1 summarizes the forecasted 2035 traffic volumes and resulting operations. None of the roadway segments are expected to experience traffic growth that would result in over capacity conditions. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon TABLE 5-1 2035 ROADWAY SEGMENT OPERATIONS ID Roadway ADT* for 2035 Peak Hour Time Period Seasonally- Adjusted Peak Hour Count PHF^ Two- Way Demand Flow Critical Flow Rate (pc/h) Calculated V/C Ratio A Lonerock Road, south of OR 19 225 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. 25 0.85 31 3,200 0.01 B Baseline Road, east of OR 19 312 9:30-10:30 am, 1:30-2:30 pm 34 0.90 40 3,200 0.01 C Fourmile Road, SE of OR 19 249 1:45 - 2:45 pm 36 0.90 43 3,200 0.01 D Blalock Canyon Road, south of I- 84 184 5:15 - 6:15 pm 25 0.90 29 3,200 0.01 E Quinton Canyon Road, south of I- 84 87 8:45 - 9:45 am 13 0.85 17 3,200 0.01 F Mikkalo Lane, west of OR 19 188 11:45 am - 12:45 pm 21 0.90 25 3,200 0.01 G East Bayard Street, east of OR 19 748 10:45 - 11:45 am 71 0.95 80 3,200 0.03 *ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume ^PHF = Peak Hour Factor, a ratio of the total hourly traffic volumes to the peak 15-minute traffic flow pc/h = passenger cars per hour V/C = volume-to-capacity October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Conditions Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Section 6 Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives This section identifies the future multimodal transportation needs in Gilliam County. As noted in the 2035 Future Conditions summary, there are no forecast capacity deficiencies identified for any of the major highway or roadway facilities serving the County. As such, the identification of future transportation needs and alternatives primarily focused on improving roadway and intersection operations from a safety, maintenance, and modernization perspective. From these needs, a list of projects was developed, refined, and finalized as part of the formal TSP (see Section 7). Roadway Needs Although the study roadways and intersections in Gilliam County are anticipated to operate acceptably, the County expects growth in industrial areas, in Arlington, in Condon, and in areas surrounding the Port of Arlington. To accommodate this new growth, these industrial areas need adequate connectivity to key highways. The lane width, curve radii, shoulder width, and shoulder type along these key industrial routes should be designed to accommodate freight traffic. Known connectivity needs include:  Pave shoulders and strengthen roadbed on Airport Road and Rhea Lane in Arlington to accommodate larger trucks accessing Arlington Mesa Industrial Park;  Reclassify Ridge Road, Fourmile Road, and Lonerock Road to Major Collectors and upgrade roadway to match Major Collector design standards to accommodate agriculture truck traffic;  Reclassify Quinton Canyon Road, Rattlesnake Road, Eightmile Canyon Road, Cemetery Road, and Heritage Lane from local streets to Minor Collectors and upgrade roadway to Minor Collector design standards to accommodate existing and forecast volume.  Reclassify Devils Butte Road, Mikkalo Lane, and Hay Canyon Road to Minor or Major Collectors and upgrade roadway to match Major Collector design standards. These roads provide access to Cottonwood Canyon State Park.  Reclassify Wolf Hollow Road and Upper Rock Creek Road from Major Collectors to Minor Collectors due to the decline in usage of these roads associated with changing agriculture uses.  Reclassify Buttermilk Canyon Road and Trail Fork Road from Minor Collectors to Local Roads due to the decline in use of the roads.  Improve Lower Rock Creek Road by widening the roadway, adding shoulders, and adding curve signage to serve the recreational traffic using the road for river access. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Transportation Safety Needs Although no locations with safety deficiencies were identified from the historical crash analysis documented in Section 4, there are several locations within the County where countermeasures could reduce crash potential. Input from the Project Advisory Committee and the existing crash trend analysis identified the following needs:  Weather-related crashes o A high percentage of crashes on I-84 were associated with adverse weather and roadway conditions. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) treatments could be considered to address weather-related crashes. o Observations from local residents indicate the need for treatments to prevent snow drifts that frequently occur on OR 206 near milepost 22.  Single-vehicle and speed-related crashes o A high percentage of crashes in the County were single-vehicle run-off-road crashes and crashes associated with speed. Options for reducing these crash types using systemic countermeasures such as shoulder widening, rumble strips, and additional curve warning signage will be considered. Priority locations for systemic treatments include: OR 19 between milepost (MP) 40 and 42, OR 206 between MP 33.4 and 35.2, OR 206 between MP 17.6 and 20.2, Baseline Road between MP 8.9 and 9.3, OR 19 between MP 15.9 and 22.2, and OR 206 between MP 30.68 and 31.25.  Intersection geometry/traffic control deficiencies o Safety concerns were identified at several intersections due to sight distance concerns, intersection design, and traffic control, including: Walnut/Main Street; E Bayard Street/Main Street (Exhibit 6-1); Lonerock Road/OR 206 (Exhibit 6-2); OR 19/Cedar Springs Road; Blalock Canyon Road/Cedar Springs Road; Blalock Canyon Road/Heritage Lane; OR 19/Eightmile Road; OR 19/Baseline Road. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 6-1. Restricted Sight Distance at E Bayard Street/Main Street in Condon Exhibit 6-2. Restricted Sight Distance at OR 206/Lonerock Road  Directional signage o Drivers have been observed entering the I-84 ramps in the wrong direction in Arlington. Options to modify directional signage at the I-84 ramps in Arlington to reduce the number of wrong-way vehicles on ramps included larger signs, pavement markings, and relocation of signs.  Railroad crossings o There is concern about emergency vehicle access in Arlington during periods when trains block the railroad crossings and prevent vehicles from accessing the interstate. Strategies to allow emergency vehicle access during these times included coordination with the Union Pacific and Watco to minimize train length and increase train power for traveling uphill through this area, continued communication between the City and Union Pacific, coordination of train schedules with special events, and alternate emergency vehicle access using opposite direction ramps during emergencies if needed. Systemic Safety Program ODOT allocates Oregon’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds through the ARTS program. The program currently splits funding between hot-spot and systemic safety projects. Hot spot safety projects are individual locations where a unique countermeasure could be applied to reduce the frequency and severity of crashes. Systemic safety projects include multiple locations where many low-cost countermeasures can be applied. ARTS project funding will be allocated through the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project locations are selected based on reported history of fatal and severe injury crashes. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Systemic Safety Prioritization Methodology Although no safety projects in Gilliam County are included in the draft 2017-2021 STIP lists, a set of objective criteria were established to generate a prioritized list of projects that could be considered for future updates to the STIP.  A list of projects was generated based on a review of crash trends and locations with history of crashes in the County, including:  Projects developed by the consultant team to address safety concerns identified by the Project Advisory Committee;  Projects identified in ODOT’s Roadway Departure, Intersection, and Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Implementation Plans; Projects identified for locations with geometric and traffic control characteristics where low-cost, systemic countermeasures could reduce risk of roadway departure or intersection crash types. Gilliam County has a high percentage of run-off-the-road crashes. Systemic countermeasures that may be applied for the Roadway Departure projects include centerline rumble strips, edgeline rumble strips, shoulder widening, guardrail, and curve warning signs, as summarized in Table 6-1. Intersection treatments may include additional signage, pavement marking, right-turn deceleration lanes, left-turn lanes, and mountable raised medians, as shown by the concepts in Table 6-2. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon TABLE 6-1 SYSTEMIC SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE TOOLBOX FOR RURAL ROADWAYS Systemic Safety Countermeasure Description Documented Effectiveness Milled Rumble Strip – Centerline Photo: ODOT Rumble strips are grooves in the roadway placed on the roadway in such a manner that, as the tires of a vehicle contact them, they produce sound (noise) and vibration. The noise and vibration produced by rumble strips is intended to alert inattentive drivers that they have departed from their lane. They can be placed on the shoulder (if adequate paved shoulder is available) or on the centerline. 38 to 50 percent reduction in injury crashes resulting from head-on and opposite direction sideswipe crashes on rural two-lane roads. (Source: NCHRP Report 641) Milled Rumble Strip – Shoulder or Edgeline 26 to 46 percent reduction in single-vehicle run- off-road injury crashes on two- lane rural roads (Source: NCHRP Report 641) Horizontal Curve Signage Photo: Speed Concepts: Informational Guide, FHWA Provide Static Combination Horizontal Alignment/Advisory Curve Warning Sign, Install RECOMMENDED Chevron Signs on Rural Horizontal Curves 13 to 16 percent reduction in run- off-road injury crashes rural two- lane roads. Source: Manual for Selecting Safety Improvements on High Risk Rural Roads (FHWA-SA-14-075) Shoulder Widening Photo: Low Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety (http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept /horicurves/fhwasa07002/ch6.cfm) Widen the paved roadway shoulder to provide additional space for vehicles to recover if they exit the travel lane. 3 to 6 percent reduction in crashes per one foot of shoulder widening. (Source: CMF Clearinghouse and ODOT’s List of Approved CRFs) Safety Edge Photo: Selecting Speed Treatments, FHWA (http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/hrrr/manual/sec45.cfm) Install Safety Edge treatment on the pavement edge drop-off to provide a more gradual drop-off and increase the likelihood of vehicle recovery if the vehicle exits the roadway. This may be done in conjunction with shoulder widening or pavement maintenance activities. 5 to 15 percent reduction in rural roadway crashes. (Source: CMF Clearinghouse and ODOT’s List of Approved CRFs) Guardrail Photo: FHWA Horizontal Curve Safety (Source: http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/roadway_dept/horicurves/cmho ricurves/) Install guardrail to prevent vehicles from entering areas that are not recoverable. When guardrail is located close to the roadway, vehicles are more likely to hit it. However, these crashes are typically less severe than roadway departure crashes in locations without guardrail. Guardrail is often used in situations where there is limited recovery area for vehicles and steep drop offs or fixed objects are present. 38 percent reduction to 23 percent increase in run off the road crashes. Source: CMF Clearinghouse (CMF ID: 39). Note: This item is not included in ODOT’s list of approved systemic countermeasures. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon TABLE 6-2 SYSTEMIC SAFETY COUNTERMEASURE TOOLBOX FOR RURAL INTERSECTIONS Systemic Safety Countermeasure Description Documented Effectiveness Basic Set of Sign and Marking Improvements Photo: Low-Cost Safety Enhancements for Stop-Controlled and Signalized Intersections, FHWA Install basic set of signs/markings from the ODOT Intersection Safety Implementation Plan, including: double up oversize warning signs, double STOP signs, mountable curb on stop approach (if feasible), street name signs, and stop bars. 40 percent reduction in intersection crashes at rural two-way stop controlled intersections. Source: Low-Cost Safety Enhancements for Stop-Controlled and Signalized Intersections (FHWA-SA-09-020) Reduce Intersection Skew by Realignment (Example of skewed approach prior to realignment.) Realign the intersection to create a 90-degree intersection, removing any skewed approaches. The effectiveness of this treatment varies depending on the skew angle of the intersection prior to realignment. Improve Intersection Sight Distance (Example of restricted sight distance that could be mitigated by tree removal.) Improve intersection sight distance to meet minimum AASHTO guidance based on the posted speed limit of the major roadway. 44 to 89 percent reduction in crashes at rural unsignalized intersections. (Source: ODOT’s List of Approved CRFs) October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Objective criteria outlined in Table 6-3 were applied to prioritized projects. TABLE 6-3 OBJECTIVE CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING SYSTEMIC SAFETY PROJECTS Roadway Departure Projects Intersection Projects Criteria for Identifying Locations for Systemic Projects  ≥1 Fatal or Injury A Crash  ≥2 Injury B or C Crashes  ≥3 PDO Crashes  Presence of Roadway Departure Crashes  Presence of a Horizontal Curve  Higher ADT (or Functional Classification)  ≥1 Fatal or Injury A Crash  ≥2 Injury B or C Crashes  ≥3 PDO Crashes  Restricted intersection sight distance  Skewed intersection approach  Presence of a high- speed uncontrolled approach  Higher Minor Street ADT (or Functional Classification if ADT is unavailable) Systemic Safety Projects Lists of Systemic Safety Roadway Departure projects and intersection projects are provided in Table 6-4 and Table 6-5. Section 7 includes the Systemic Safety Plan figure showing the location of each of the projects. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon TABLE 6-4 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ROADWAY DEPARTURE PROJECTS Project ID Road Start MP End MP Number of Reported Crashes (2009-2013) Number of Roadway Departure Crashes Presence of a horizontal curve? ADT* / Functional Class Potential Countermeasures Fatal Inj A Inj B Inj C PDO Inlaid Raised Pavement Markers Widen Shoulder & Install Safety Edge (where feasible) Install Centerline and Shoulder Rumble Strips Curve Warning Signs Chevrons at Curves Guardrail S-11 OR 19 40 42 0 1 2 0 1 4 Yes 570 / Arterial X X X X X S-12 OR 206 33.4 35.2 0 0 1 3 1 5 Yes 360 / Arterial X X X X X S-13 OR 206 17.6 20.2 0 0 1 2 0 2 Yes 490 / Arterial X X X X X S-14 Baseline Road 8.9 9.3 0 0 1 1 0 2 Yes 240 / Major Collector X X X X X S-15 OR 19 (Olex Grade) 15.5 22.2 0 0 1 0 1 1 Yes 170 / Arterial X X X X X X S-16 OR 206 30.68 31.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 360 / Arterial X X *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon TABLE 6-5 SYSTEMIC SAFETY INTERSECTION PROJECTS Project ID Major Road Minor Road Number of Reported Crashes (2009-2013) Restricted intersection sight distance? Does the intersection have skewed approach? High speed uncontrolled approach? ADT / Functional Class Potential Countermeasures Fatal Inj A Inj B Inj C PDO Major Road* Minor Road Rural Intersection Signing and Marking Improvements Improve sight distance Reduce intersection skew S-17 OR 19 (Main St) OR 206 (Walnut St) 0 0 0 0 1 Yes (NB) No No 1600 / Arterial 690 / Arterial X S-18 OR 19 Eightmile Rd 0 0 0 0 1 No No Yes 860 / Arterial 192 / Major Collector X S-19 OR 19 Baseline Rd 0 0 0 0 1 No No Yes 250 / Arterial 240 / Major Collector X S-20 Blalock Canyon Rd Heritage Ln 0 0 0 0 1 No Yes Yes 142 / Major Collector Minor Collector X X X S-21 OR 206 Lonerock Rd 0 0 0 0 0 Yes (NB) Yes Yes 190 / Arterial 173 / Major Collector X X X S-22 OR 19 Cedar Springs Rd 0 0 0 0 0 No No Yes 660 / Arterial Major Collector X S-10 Blalock Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd 0 0 0 0 0 Yes (EB) No Yes 142 / Major Collector Major Collector X *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Pedestrian Needs Although the cities of Arlington and Condon have an existing limited network of connected sidewalks, both cities have gaps and deficiencies in their respective pedestrian systems. Prioritizing these pedestrian routes will inform funding decisions. In Arlington, no sidewalks exist along Ivy Street, between W 3rd Street and Main Street. This route connects the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center to the sidewalk along Main Street. Other priority gaps in the system include Cottonwood Street, Shane Drive, and W 1st Street, all of which lack sidewalks. In Condon, residential areas in both cities are not connected to schools and commercial areas by continuous sidewalks. The sidewalks on the east side of Main Street between W 2nd Street and Walnut Street are in poor condition and need improvement. Within this section, the sidewalks on the east side of Main Street between Walnut Street and Well Street are higher priority for improvement due to their existing condition. OR 19 lacks sidewalks from Main Street east to the edge of the City limits. OR 19, between Main Street and S East Street, should be highest priority for installing new sidewalks along this stretch of road due to the businesses located along this section of roadway, and to create a connected network of sidewalks by connecting to the existing sidewalk on S East Street. Additionally, pedestrians have been observed crossing OR 19 in Condon at S Ward Street, although the marked crossing exists at S East Street. On the south side of Condon, there are no sidewalk connections to the baseball fields on the corner of E Spring Street and Jefferson Street. Constructing sidewalks on E Spring Street between S East Street and Jefferson Street would provide a connected pedestrian system to the baseball fields from the schools and Main Street. There is also a gap in sidewalk connections on the east side of OR 206 between OR 19 and E Court Street, as shown in Exhibit 6-3, which connects the high school with the downtown Main Street corridor. Exhibit 6-3. Sidewalk gap on OR 206 at Main Street in Condon October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon In Condon, residents have expressed a desire for more continuous sidewalk or paths for recreational purposes. Currently, residents use the school track to walk due to the limited sidewalks, but they would prefer a route around the City. One potential route (the inner loop) follows W Bayard Street west of downtown, turns north on Potter Street, and connects back to Main Street on OR 206. Another potential route (the outer loop) would follow W Bayard Street to the west of the City, connect north just outside of the City and along the edge of the golf course, and connect with Cottonwood Lane to the north to provide a longer loop. Bicycle Needs There are no marked bicycle facilities in Gilliam County. Some of the state highways have shoulders that can accommodate bicyclists. On local/residential streets, bicyclists share the roadway with the slower vehicles. This practice is consistent with recommendations in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide, that urban and suburban roadways with posted speeds below approximately 20 miles per hour (mph) operate as shared facilities in which bicyclists share the road with vehicles. The Design Guide also recommends that urban and suburban roadways with average daily traffic volumes below approximately 1,500 vehicles per day have shared facilities rather than separated bicycle lanes regardless of the posted speed limit. County roads in Gilliam County currently carry less than 1,500 vehicles per day. Exhibit 6-4 illustrates an example of a shared roadway marking in Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Exhibit 6-4. Example of shared roadway in Cottonwood Canyon State Park Several recreational routes attract bicyclists from around the state. Popular recreational routes include OR 19 south of Condon to Fossil, OR 206 west of Condon to Wasco, and OR 206 east of Condon to Heppner. Bicyclists are not frequently observed riding OR 19 between Condon and Arlington. The majority of these routes have minimal shoulders and rough pavement conditions. In addition, there are no commercial or public rest areas on these routes for bicyclists to stop and hydrate on the ride. As recreational riding increases, strategic locations for these rest areas will be useful. The downtown areas of Condon and Arlington also lack bicycle parking for cyclists that would like to stop in town. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Transit Needs There are several needs to improve the County’s dial-a-ride system in the future, including additional staff, vehicles, and funding. These needs are further explained below:  When drivers are unavailable, the GCST director is sometimes required to drive the vehicles. There are no part-time dispatch staff currently available to cover these occasions when the director, who also functions as the dispatcher, must leave. The County is interested in additional staff.  The County has expressed interest in a carport at the Lonerock community center to protect the vehicle year-round and an expanded garage or similar facility in Condon to keep vehicles clean year-round.  Most trips (90 percent) are for medical purposes. Shopping, social, or business trips are other common reasons for trips. There is often a need for volunteer caregivers to ride along with passengers to provide assistance to the passengers traveling to medical appointments. The nearest medical facilities are located in either The Dalles or Hermiston. Frequent trips are also made to Portland area hospitals.  GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs. GCST has expressed the need for more maintenance money to cover tires, snow tires, brake repairs, etc. GCST also lacks funding for the defensive driving passenger assistance training, which is required for volunteer drivers. The Gilliam County Transportation Services Director is interested in becoming certified to provide this training to volunteers from Gilliam County and other nearby counties. Riders are not charged a fee for rides, but suggested donations are recommended and vary from $2 to $30 depending on the length of the trip, purpose of the trip, and type of vehicle used. Veterans often must travel longer distances for their services and are not asked to provide donations for their ride. The County lacks existing funding for drivers to take veterans to hospitals and wait until the following day to bring veterans back from procedures. Downtown Parking Needs During the large events held in Arlington in summer months there is inadequate parking available with the limited on-street parking and parking lots in the commercial areas, which has led to illegal parking throughout the City. Few members of the PAC indicated a desire to address this deficiency given the limited time periods when these events occur. If the City desires, they could require traffic control and parking management plans for special events to alleviate the issues. Freight Needs Although I-84 is the only facility in the County that is designated as a state truck freight route, several County and State roads are heavily relied on for transporting agricultural or other industrial goods to I-84 and the Port of Arlington. Some of these routes are local roads that need upgrades to accommodate larger freight loads. The routes that carry freight traffic or are expected to carry freight traffic and may be considered for upgrade include: October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Future 2035 Transportation Needs & Alternatives Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  OR 19 between I-84 and Condon, as illustrated in Exhibit 6-5;  Cedar Springs Road between OR 19 and the Columbia Ridge Landfill;  Ridge Road between Baseline Road and Flett Road;  Fourmile Canyon Road;  Airport Road and Rhea Lane, connecting the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park to OR 19. Exhibit 6-5. Truck turning from OR 19 onto Cedar Springs Road Aviation Needs The two airports and port also serve an important role in freight transportation. The Arlington airport currently has an unpaved runway. As the surrounding industrial park grows, the runway will need to be paved. Rail Needs Rail service between the Columbia Ridge landfill and Arlington serves an important role for transporting waste and should be maintained. At Shutler Station, there is a need for rail crossovers for more efficient movement of railcars within the station. Bridge Needs The bridge conditions inventory, summarized in Section 4, identified one County bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road at Rock Creek (MP 4.0) that is closed due to structural reasons. This requires an 18-mile detour to get around the closure. The road is passable during summer months without a bridge. Another County bridge, on Lonerock Road at Lonerock Creek, is posted with load restrictions. The Lonerock Road bridge serves the primary access into the City of Lonerock. In addition, the I-84 eastbound bridge over Willow Creek at MP 148.6 has a low sufficiency rating due to the width of the structure, which is narrower than current standards require. Section 7 Transportation System Plan October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 63 Transportation System Plan This section outlines the draft preferred transportation system plan for Gilliam County, which includes TSP elements consistent with OAR 660-12-020 and goals of OAR 660-12-025. The preferred plan includes recommendations for the County’s transportation system, including:  Roadway System Plan  Access Management Plan  Pedestrian and Bicycle System Plan  Public Transportation System Plan  Air/Marine/Rail/Pipeline/Transmission System Plan The transportation components presented in this section were developed in accordance with the requirements of Oregon’s Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). Each modal plan has been developed concurrent with the findings presented in the existing and future forecast conditions analysis. The plan also conveys the interests of the citizens, business owners, and governmental agencies within Gilliam County, as expressed by the Project Advisory Committee (PAC). The preferred plan applies to the entire county, including areas within the incorporated cities of Condon and Arlington and the unincorporated community of Lonerock. ROADWAY SYSTEM PLAN The Gilliam County roadway system plan reflects the anticipated operations and circulation needs through the year 2035 and provides guidance on how to facilitate vehicular and freight traffic over the next 20 years. The plan focuses on the City and County owned and maintained roadway system. All state highways residing within the County are identified for coordination purposes. Functional Classifications Functional classification of a roadway characterizes the intended purpose, amount and type of vehicular traffic it is expected to carry, provisions for non-auto travel, and the roadway’s design standards. The classification considers access to adjacent land uses and the transportation modes to be accommodated. The preferred functional classification system in Gilliam County includes: Minor Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Local Road. Table 7-1 provides a detailed description of each classification. Figure 7-1 presents the preferred functional classifications for all existing and planned County roadways. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 64 TABLE 7-1 GILLIAM COUNTY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION DESCRIPTIONS Functional Classification Description Interstate Primary function is mobility and to serve long-distance travel. These roadways are high-speed, divided roadways with limited access. Interstates link urban areas across the United States. Minor Arterial Primary function is to carry high levels of regional vehicular traffic at high speeds. These roads connect the collector road system to freeways, provide access to other cities and communities, and serve major traffic movements. Access is limited but can be accommodated with at-grade intersections. Major Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and move them to arterials. These roads provide some degree of access to adjacent properties, while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Major Collectors carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than arterials. Major Collectors are often longer in length and have lower driveway density, higher speed limits, higher traffic volumes, and may have more travel lanes than Minor Collectors. Major Collectors can be located in urban or rural environments. In rural environments, Collectors generally serve intra-county travel. In rural areas, traffic volumes and spacing may be the most significant designation factors between Major and Minor Collectors. In urban areas, these roads serve both access and traffic circulation in higher dense residential, commercial, and industrial areas. They typically have higher speeds and more signalized intersections. Minor Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and connect traffic to arterials. These roads can be urban or rural. In urban areas, they serve both access and traffic circulation but in lower density areas than Major Collectors. They also penetrate neighborhoods, but often for a shorter distance than Major Collectors. They typically have lower speeds and fewer signalized intersections. In rural areas, they serve to bring traffic from local roads to developed areas or connections to those areas. They provide service to smaller communities not served by a higher class facility and link locally important traffic generators with rural areas. Local Road Local roads account for the largest percentage of all roadways in terms of mileage. Their primary function is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses. They are characterized by short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low volumes. Local roads offer a high level of accessibility, serves passenger cars, pedestrians, and bicycles, but not through trucks. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d JohnDa y River Co lumbi a River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure7-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \7-1 Pro pos ed Fun ctio nal Cla ssif icat ion. mx d - agr iffin - 4 :37 PM 9/1 5/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Functional Classification MapGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Interstate Minor Arterial Major Collector Proposed Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Minor Collector Local County Road Proposed Local Road Railroads City Boundary October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 66 Design Standards Roadway design standards were established for rural and urban conditions. The design standards take into consideration roadway function and operational characteristics, including traffic volume, capacity, operating speed, and safety. The design standards are necessary to ensure that as the road system develops, it will be capable of safely and efficiently serving the traveling public, while also accommodating orderly development of adjacent lands. While not specifically outlined in this plan, improvements on state highways must meet ODOT design and operating standards provided in the ODOT Highway Design Manual. Rural Design Standards Rural roadway design standards for all County-owned and maintained facilities are shown in Exhibit 7-1, Exhibit 7-2, and Exhibit 7-3. Deviations from these design standards should be pursued through the managing agency. Sidewalks have not been included in the roadway design standards because the majority of County roadways are rural in nature and sidewalks are not typically provided. Bicyclists are expected to share the travel lane with vehicles in rural areas, consistent with guidance provided in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide. Exhibit 7-1. Rural Arterial Street Cross-Section October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 67 Exhibit 7-2. Rural Major and Minor Collector Street Cross-Section Exhibit 7-3. Rural Local Street Cross-Section City of Arlington Design Standards Design standards for City roadways within Arlington are provided in Exhibit 7-4, Exhibit 7-5, and Exhibit 7-6. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 68 Exhibit 7-4. Urban Arterial Street Cross-Section Exhibit 7-5. Urban Major and Minor Collector Street Cross-Section October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 69 Exhibit 7-6. Urban Local Street Cross-Section City of Condon Design Standards Design standards for City roadways within Condon are provided in the Condon Public Works Standards Technical Specifications and Drawings, Figures R-1 through R-4. Access Management Policy Managing access to the County’s road system is necessary to preserve capacity and maintain safety of the County’s arterial and collector system. Capacity is preserved by minimizing the number of points where traffic flow may be disrupted by traffic entering and exiting the roadway. Access management also enhances safety along roadways by minimizing the number of potential conflict points. Access spacing standards for all driveways and private roads accessing County collector and arterial roadways are provided in Table 7-2 (rural) and Table 7-3 (urban). Access to state facilities is governed by ODOT’s access management standards provided in the most current version of the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan and in Oregon Administrative Rule 734- 051. ODOT’s standards also apply to access spacing on County facilities located within the management area of a freeway or expressway interchange, as defined by OAR 734-051. The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) defines access management as a set of measures regulating access to streets, roads, and highways, from public roads and private driveways. The TPR requires that new connections to arterials and state highways be consistent with designated access management categories. This TSP includes an access management policy that maintains and enhances the integrity (i.e., capacity, safety, and level of service) of Gilliam County’s roadways. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 70 TABLE 7-2 ACCESS MANAGEMENT SPACING STANDARDS FOR RURAL GILLIAM COUNTY ROADWAYS Functional Classification Public Road Spacing Private Drive Spacing Collector ¼ mile 1,200 ft Local Street 200-400 ft Vary TABLE 7-3 ACCESS MANAGEMENT SPACING STANDARDS FOR URBAN ROADWAYS These standards apply to new development or redevelopment; existing accesses are allowed to remain as long as the land use does not change. As a result, access management is a long-term process in which the desired access spacing to a street slowly evolves over time as redevelopment occurs. Traffic Operations Standards Gilliam County has an obligation to maintain a safe, convenient, and economical transportation system. A maximum volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.85 during a typical weekday peak hour should be maintained for all City- and County-owned or maintained intersections. At intersections with an ODOT facility, ODOT standards shall apply. For unsignalized intersections, the v/c ratio should be based on the intersection’s critical movement. For signalized intersections, the ratio is based on the overall intersection operation. Systemic Safety Plan The Systemic Safety Plan identifies relatively low-cost safety projects that can be implemented systemically at locations with similar characteristics throughout the County. The methodology used to develop this Plan is summarized in Section 6. Lists of prioritized Roadway Departure projects and Intersection projects, based on the set of objective criteria, are shown in Figure 7-2 and described in Table 7-4 and Table 7-5. Functional Classification Public Road Spacing Private Drive Spacing Collector 300 ft 150 ft Local Street 300 ft Each Lot Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d Co lumbi a River JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 S-16 S-14 S-12 S-11 S-13 S-15 S-10 S-21 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-22 Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure7-2 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \7-2 Pro pos ed Sys tem ic S afe ty P roje cts. mx d - agr iffin - 3 :39 PM 9/1 4/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Systemic Safety PlanGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S-17 ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road Railroads City Boundary Project Category Intersection Projects Category Roadway Departure Projects October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 72 TABLE 7-4 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ROADWAY DEPARTURE PROJECTS Project ID Road Start MP End MP Potential Countermeasures Inlaid Raised Pavement Markers Widen Shoulder & Install Safety Edge (where feasible) Install Centerline and Shoulder Rumble Strips Curve Warning Signs Chevrons at Curves Guardrail S-11 OR 19 40 42 X X X X X S-12 OR 206 33.4 35.2 X X X X X S-13 OR 206 17.6 20.2 X X X X X S-14 Baseline Road 8.9 9.3 X X X X X S-15 OR 19 (Olex Grade) 15.5 22.2 X X X X X X S-16 OR 206 30.7 31.3 X X *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 73 TABLE 7-5 SYSTEMIC SAFETY INTERSECTION PROJECTS Project ID Major Road Minor Road Potential Countermeasures Rural Intersection Signing and Marking Improvements Improve sight distance Reduce intersection skew S-17 OR 19 (Main St) OR 206 (Walnut St) X S-18 OR 19 Eightmile Rd X S-19 OR 19 Baseline Rd X S-20 Blalock Canyon Rd Heritage Ln X X X S-21 OR 206 Lonerock Rd X X S-22 OR 19 Cedar Springs Rd X S-10 Blalock Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd X *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 74 ROADWAY SYSTEM PLAN This section outlines specific transportation system improvement projects, policies, programs, pilot projects, and studies of the Plan as well as overall prioritization: near-term and long-term. The prioritization presented reflects the relative time period in which it may be foreseeable for the County and Cities to implement the project; it is not intended to limit the selection of a project or the order in which projects will be implemented. The County will need to periodically update its TSP and will review the need and timing of improvements during those updates. Long-term projects may or may not be feasible within the twenty-year planning horizon, for reasons of both need and resources. However, they represent a vision for an efficient transportation system in the future, and they have been identified to support the preservation of the opportunities as future conditions may warrant them. The construction of roads, water, sewer, and electrical facilities in conjunction with local development activity should be coordinated if the County is to develop in an orderly and efficient way. Consequently, the planned improvements identified should be considered in light of developing infrastructure sequencing plans, and may need to be modified accordingly. The planned transportation improvement alternatives in Gilliam County include those identified to address various types of transportation issues, which generally include:  Operations: These projects provide the roadway capacity needed to accommodate future traffic flows and reduce delay.  Safety: These projects consider opportunities to improve existing facilities to reduce probability and severity of crashes. These projects include those identified as part of the Systemic Safety Plan for the County.  Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements: These projects improve existing facilities or create new facilities that provide greater connectivity and increase access to pedestrian and bicycle routes.  Heavy Maintenance: These projects address the needs identified by the County that relate to roadway, roadside, or drainage and cannot be conducted as part of regular maintenance activities.  Full Reconstruction: These projects include reconstruction of the roadway including removal of existing roadway and placement of aggregate base and asphalt pavement.  Feasibility Studies: These projects have identified the need for some level of long-term improvements to different roadway segments or intersections. Given the size and complexity, a more detailed evaluation of potential improvements has been identified that is beyond the scope of the TSP.  Pilot Projects: Pilot projects are innovative projects that can be done on an interim basis and can be reversed if needed.  Programs/Policies: The programs and policies reflect changes to County or City operations or code that has an impact on the transportation system. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 75 While site-specific projects, such as adding turn lanes at an existing intersection, have been included to improve conditions at individual locations, the alternatives collectively reflect a broader goal which is to develop an efficient transportation network that will reduce reliance on the state highways and limit potential for motor vehicle crashes while encouraging economic activity. Roadway Transportation Plan Elements The near- and long-term transportation improvements within unincorporated areas of Gilliam County are shown in Figure 7-3 and described in Table 7-6. The table includes a project identification letter and number for reference to the project location illustrated in Figure 7-3. Additionally, the table includes preliminary cost estimates with 40-percent contingency for the projects, excluding right-of-way. Potential non-binding funding sources were also identified for each project and are subject to negotiation at the time of project execution. Projects that were identified but not expected to receive funding within the TSP horizon were identified as Vision Projects. Cost estimate calculations and assumptions are provided in Appendix B. Project prospectus sheets for each alternative are provided in Appendix C. The implementation plan incorporates the preferred financing plan that indicates a limited amount of money will be available to fund projects. As a result, only improvements that are planned for implementation and are expected to have funding are shown in the near-term time frame. The long-term project timeline reflects the fact that some projects are not needed immediately and that it will take time to accumulate the funds to build those projects. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d S - 7- 7 M - 8 M - 8 M - 1 0- 1 0 M - 4 M - 4 M - 3 M - 3 M - 1 2- 1 2 M - 5- M - 1 1 M - 6 M - 1 3- M - 1 5 M - 2 4 M- 2 7 M - 2 7 M - 2 5- 2 5 M - 2 8 M - 2 8 ID Name Description Category Source Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike PAC $147,000 X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from 3rd Street to OR 206/Walnut Street Ped/Bike PAC / City of Condon Pedestrian Grant Application $83,000 X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike PAC $25,000 X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project PAC $5,000 X X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike PAC $3,500 X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike PAC / City of Condon Pedestrian Grant Application $300,000 X X B-2 I-84 EB Bridge Widen the I-84 eastbound bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current standards. Bridge ODOT Bridge Inventory Analysis $160,000 X B-4 I-84: John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay Bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering scheduled for 2016, and construction scheduled for 2018. Bridge 2015-2018 STIP $2,482,000 X M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2" of asphalt and add 2' gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the industrial base. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane. Feasibility Study TAC $109,200 X X X X M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Inudstrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road. Heavy Maintenance TAC $837,330 X X X X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two-ft gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance TAC $1,177,735 X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction TAC $1,015,820 X M-7 Rattlesnake Road Reclassify roadway to Minor Collector to support the increased ADT using the road due to new wind farms recently completed. Road improvements have already been completed to the Minor Collector cross-section guidelines. Policy TAC $0 X M-14 Buttermilk Canyon Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road from City of Lonerock to East County Limit. This route is just a back route into the Lonerock community from Morrow County. Policy TAC $0 M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wherli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance TAC $100,000 X M-16 Trail Fork Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road because the land is all in CRP now (set aside for wildlife grazing) and serves limited residences. Policy TAC $0 M-17 Upper Rock Creek Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from Wolf Hollow Road to OR 19. The road does not serve the traffic levels associated with a Major Collector as hay is produced and used locally to feed cattle rather than being shipped out. Policy TAC $0 M-18 Wolf Hollow Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from OR 19 to Ridge Road as it only serves as an Policy TAC $0 M - 2 6- 2 6 S - 9 S - 6 Co lumbi a River JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure7-3 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \7-3 Pro pos ed Roa dwa y P roje cts_ Prio rity _09 141 5.m xd - ag riffi n - 5:2 5 P M 9 /14 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Roadway System PlanGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles M - 2-M - 2- M - 1 M-29 M-29 Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave S - 1 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S - 4 S - 5 ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road Railroads City Boundary Timeline Medium/Long-Term Vision Timeline Near-Term Medium/Long-Term October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 77 TABLE 7-6 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2 inches of asphalt and add 2-foot gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the Arlington Mesa industrial park. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane (M-2). Heavy Maintenance $109,200 X X X X M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road (M-1). Heavy Maintenance $837,330 X X X X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two foot gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,177,735 X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2-foot gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction $1,015,820 X M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wehrli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance $100,000 X S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Operations $3,000 X S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Feasibility Study $15,000 X M-25 Olex Grade Realignment Complete OR 19 realignment between approximately MP 16 and 17. Feasibility $10,000 X Long-Term Projects M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Heavy Maintenance $1,000,000 X X M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Heavy Maintenance $325,000 X M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,015,846 X M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Heavy Maintenance $156,000 X X X October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 78 ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Heavy Maintenance $61,100 X X M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Full Reconstruction $2,752,422 X X M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Heavy Maintenance $500,000 X X M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Operations $400,000 X S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection to improve sight distance for westbound approach. Safety / Operations $106,000 X X S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22 Study $1,000 X X M-29 Columbia View Drive Extension Extend Columbia View Drive to Main Street to provide alternate access to residents in this area. Operations $700,000 X X M-26 OR 19 Realignment Projects Evaluate the feasibility and develop cost estimates for the following projects on OR 19: soften corner on OR 19 near MP 27 at Pennington Corner; realign S- curves at MP 8; soften curve and slopes to improve line of sight on OR 19 near MP 21 at Wilkins Corner. Feasibility Study $10,000 X Vision Projects S-4 Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection to provide a traffic control scenario that does not violate driver expectancy. Project $10,000 X X S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 to a stop perpendicular to Lonerock Road to increase sight distance at this intersection. Project $150,000 X X 1 Cost estimate is planning level only. Does not include right-of-way costs. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 79 The total cost of projects, policies, programs, and feasibility studies shown in Table 7-6 that are expected to be implemented in the near-term is approximately $3,500,000. In addition, several low-cost systemic safety projects are included in the near-term projects, including edgeline rumble strips on state highways and enhanced signing and striping to improve safety, as identified by the criteria in the Systemic Safety Plan. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN The future population growth in the incorporated areas of Arlington and Condon will increase the need to expand the existing sidewalks in the Cities and to provide new paths in and around the incorporated areas to encourage residents and visitors to ride bicycles for transportation. Providing a connected network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities is important for:  Serving shorter trips from neighborhoods to area activity centers, such as schools, churches, and neighborhood commercial uses;  Providing access to regional park and ride lots to enhance intermodal connections; and  Meeting residents’ and visitors’ recreational needs, further promoting economic activity in the County. Figure 7-4 and Table 7-7 summarize the planned pedestrian and bicycle projects for the next twenty years. In rural Gilliam County, bicycle and pedestrian design standards provide paved shoulders on arterials and minimum two-foot paved or unpaved shoulders on all other, lower volume roads to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel. Table 7-7 includes a feasibility study and pilot project to identify opportunities for bike rest areas at strategic locations along OR 206 where cyclists can rest, get water, and have access to bicycle tools. These bicycle rest areas may also provide opportunities for local businesses to advertise and provide wayfinding signage to direct tourists to local businesses. Exhibit 7-7 provides an example of a bicycle rest area. The cities of Arlington and Condon should also add bicycle parking within their downtown areas. Exhibit 7-8 shows an example of a decorative bicycle rack that can be used in the downtown areas and add to the main street character. Within the cities, the standards for arterials include a bike lane to provide space for bicyclists to ride separate from vehicles. Bicyclists are expected to share the road with vehicles on the other local roads in the cities due to the low speeds and low volumes. Arterials, collectors, and local streets should include sidewalks as they are developed within the city limits. A complete connected sidewalk network will encourage walking as a mode of transportation within the City. Sidewalk construction projects that fill gaps in the existing sidewalk infrastructure and repair existing sidewalk are identified in Figure 7-4 and included in Table 7-7. Cottonwood Canyon State Park is located on the John Day River between Gilliam and Sherman Counties. The park is long-term plans to develop hiking trails on the Gilliam County side of the park. Although the alignment of these trails is not confirmed, the County supports the development of these trails and will look for opportunities to provide recreational connections between existing County roads when possible. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 80 Exhibit 7-7. Example of bicycle rest area Exhibit 7-8. Example of decorative bicycle parking Gilliam County TSP October 2015 Figure7-4 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \fin al T SP - se ctio n 7 \7-4 Pla nne d P ede stri an Sys tem .mx d - agr iffin - 5 :34 PM 9/1 4/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Pedestrian System Implementation PlanGilliam County, Oregon 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m9:m 89:m s õôó Î ÃArlington vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Krameria St Arlington Por t Rd E 2nd St W 1st St W 2nd St Ivy St Shane Dr W3rd St SeanSt Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St Sunrise Ln E3rd St Grape St CottonwoodStW 5 th S t Rat tles nake Rd Hemloc k St W 4th St S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Main St Col um bia St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Wri ght Rd Airport Rd Che rry S t Railroad AveA-2 A-3 A-17 A-1 A-8 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m89:m !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ19 vÍÎ206 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Bayard St S B St East E Well St NE Mai nS t W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St W Summit St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St SW a rd St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St S W ash ing ton St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln S t SA St NA St N Lin col n S t S J effe rso n S t S J ew St A-12 A-5 A-14 A-11 A-15 A-4 A-13 A-6 A-6 A-7 A-6 A-7 ¯ Pedestrian Facilities 89:m Existing Pedestrian Crossings Future Sidewalks Future Shared Use Path Existing Sidewalks Railroads City Boundary Activity Centers "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 Feet ¯ October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 82 TABLE 7-7 PLANNED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike $147,000 X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from E Well Street to OR 206/Walnut Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $50,000 X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike $25,000 X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project $5,000 X X X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike $3,500 X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to N East Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $100,000 X X A-16 Shared-use Path from Condon to Mountain Identifier Conduct a feasibility study to determine the cost of constructing a shared-use path from Condon to the mountain identifier on OR 206. Feasibility Study/ Ped/Bike $10,000 X X X Long-Term Projects A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Ped/Bike $508,000 X A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street Ped/Bike $414,000 X A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 Ped/Bike $87,750 X X A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street Ped/Bike $109,200 X X A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street Ped/Bike $277,000 X A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street Ped/Bike $10,000 X X A-13 OR 19 Sidewalks (East) Add sidewalks from N East Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike $200,000 X X A-14 E Bayard Street Sidewalks Add sidewalks to complete gap on east side of E Bayard Street between E Court Street and Main Street. Ped/Bike $25,000 X X A-15 Sidewalks on east side of Main Street (north) Complete sidewalk gaps on the east side of Main Street between E Well Street and W 2nd Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $30,000 X A-17 Beech Street Streetscape in Arlington Improve the streetscape of Beech Street in Arlington to make the environment more pedestrian/bicycle friendly with wider sidewalks, raised crossings, landscaped buffers, and pedestrian-scale lighting. Ped/Bike $176,000 X X X October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 83 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Gilliam County Special Transportation (GCST) operates a dial-a-ride transit service for the County. The service provides approximately 10,000 trips each year and can be used by the general public for any use. About 80 percent of the trips serve seniors or people with disabilities. Residents call in advance to schedule their rides any time Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Currently, all rides are provided by volunteer drivers. GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs but currently has a need for additional funding to cover driver salaries, vehicle maintenance and capital costs, and training programs. Gilliam County is an Oregon Special Transportation Fund Agency and is therefore responsible for developing a Human Services – Public Transportation Coordinated Plan (“Coordinated Plan”) that must be updated every five years. This plan identifies transit projects, focusing on addressing the needs for three target populations: older adults, people with disabilities, and people with low incomes. It is intended to help focus regional resources on strategies with the greatest benefit to the target populations and transportation service providers. Gilliam County will be updating its Coordinated Plan with a grant from ODOT in 2015 and 2016. AIR SERVICE Two airports serve Gilliam County. The Condon State Airport is located just outside the City of Condon. It is owned and operated by the State of Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) and is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), making it eligible for federal funding. The airport plays a supportive role in the current transportation system, providing geo- graphic coverage and access to the state’s airport system. The airport also serves as a base for agricultural spraying operations. To encourage future airport development, the City of Condon is planning to provide water service to the airport. A study is recommended to determine if upgrades are needed for any of the airport facilities to serve the future growth and activity. The Arlington Municipal Airport is located adjacent to the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park, in the Enterprise Zone within the City Limits of Arlington. The airport’s runway is a gravel and dirt/turf surface that was reported in poor condition in 2013. The Arlington Municipal Airport has municipal water and sewer available on the adjacent Arlington Mesa Industrial Park along with Fiber Optic Conduit. Based on the opportunities available for industrial uses and the existing industrial uses at the airport, a feasibility study is recommended to determine the cost to pave and maintain the runway at the Arlington Airport. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 84 MARINE SYSTEM PLAN Gilliam County is located on the Columbia River, a major water transportation route. The Port of Arlington manages river cargo and marina operations. The Port has a Barge Facility available for river access and a grain silo. Farmers in the region use the Port to export grain, which is an important economic activity for the County. From the Columbia River, the grain can travel to Portland and be exported internationally. The marina also provides access to the river for recreational purposes and is in the process of adding a fuel dock to its amenities. RAIL SERVICE Union Pacific (UP) provides freight rail service through Gilliam County. There is currently no passenger rail service in the County. UP Rail lines follow I-84 and the Columbia River and provide access to Portland and the Hinkle Railyard in Hermiston. Rail service is also available between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center, located approximately 10 miles south of the primary Columbia River line in Arlington, as shown in Exhibit 7-9. The landfill receives solid waste by rail from major metropolitan areas up and down the west coast. All trains on the branch are operated by Watco Companies through their Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad. The Watco line is a Class III or short-line railroad with annual operated revenue of less than 20 million dollars (1991 dollars). Class III railroads are typically local short-line railroads serving a small number of towns and industries or hauling cars for one or more larger railroads. Six unit trains run on this branch per week. The train speed from I-84 to the end of the line at the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center is 25 mph. The track is in good condition and is regularly maintained. One rail project was identified as high priority during the TSP Update:  New rail crossovers are needed in the near-term at Shutler Station to support rail operations. There are two crossings of the Watco line within the City of Arlington and two along Cedar Springs Road. The City, County, and Waste Management should maintain coordination with UP and Watco to minimize delay and maintain emergency vehicle access. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 85 Exhibit 7-9. Existing Watco Rail Line and Shutler Station PIPELINE AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLAN Pipeline transportation within the Gilliam County area includes numerous substations and transmission lines, which are currently being upgraded. These transmission lines are maintained by Pacific Gas Transmission and provide access to the main power grid at multiple locations. Future extension of a high-speed broadband service is planned from Idaho along the Columbia River. Gilliam County may be able to provide broadband services to its citizens through this line. A broadband internet connection could allow for implementation of Intelligent Transportation Solutions along I-84 that could have a positive effect on transportation safety and mobility. Other benefits of this added service could spur economic development. BRIDGE PLAN Three bridge projects were identified in Gilliam County to update bridges to current standards or replace the bridge for structural reasons. These bridges include:  I-84 Eastbound Bridge: The bridge will be widened at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current design standards. The estimated cost of this project is $1.1 million.  I-84 John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay: ODOT has planned a bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering is scheduled for 2016, and construction is scheduled for 2018. The estimated cost of this project is $2,482,000. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 86  Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement: The County plans to replace the Lonerock Road bridge. The road serves as the primary route in and out of Lonerock and is therefore a high priority for the County. However, the replacement is estimated to cost $2,000,000. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon 87 Section 8 Transportation Finance Element October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 88 Transportation Finance Element Funding for transportation projects is increasingly in short supply as existing infrastructure ages and transportation demands increase. This section provides a means for evaluating the likelihood that projects can be funded within the timelines identified in the TSP and defines priorities based on available funding opportunities. The TPR requires that the Gilliam County TSP address transportation funding, including the following elements:  A list of planned transportation facilities and major improvements;  A general estimate of the timing for planned transportation facilities and major improvements;  Determination of rough cost estimates for the transportation facilities and major investments identified in the TSP; and,  A discussion of existing and potential financing sources for each transportation facility and major improvement (which can be described in terms of guidelines or local policies). Current Gilliam County Transportation Funding Revenues Gilliam County’s annual revenue has been approximately $1.3 million per year over the past ten years. As shown in Exhibit 8-1, this funding comes from a variety of sources. The largest portions come from the property tax assessments, the Special County Allotment, and the State Highway Fund Apportionment. Exhibit 8-2 shows that the County has spent the majority of its revenue each year over the past four years, with the expenditures exceeding the revenue in fiscal years 2011 and 2012. As shown in Exhibit 8-3, the majority of the transportation expenditures were used for maintenance activities, leaving little funding left over to complete capital improvement projects. The County Roadmaster indicated that he typically includes at least one improvement project per year in his budget and work schedule, such as paving a new road. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 89 Exhibit 8-1. Gilliam County Transportation Revenue Sources (2005 – 2014) Exhibit 8-2. Gilliam County Transportation Revenue Compared to Transportation Expenditures (2005 – 2014) $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Revenue Sources per Fiscal Year (Year ending June 30th) Special Assessments - Property Tax Motor Vehicle Registration Fees Surplus Land & Equipment Sales State Highway Fund Apportionment Interest Income Special County Allotment State Highway Fund Exchange Program ODOT Issued Permit Fees Other State Highway Fund Grants BLM Mineral Leases Other Federal Funds Receipts Non-Jurisdiction Road Work U.S. Taylor Grazing Apportionment $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Revenue and Expenditures per Fiscal Year (Year ending June 30th) Annual Transportation Revenue Annual Transportation Expenditures October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 90 Exhibit 8-3. Gilliam County Transportation Expenditures (2005 – 2014) Transportation Funding Options Gilliam County faces two inter-related financing issues: how to finance operations and maintenance and how to finance capital projects. Presently, all public works funding is devoted to operations and maintenance; there is no funding for capital projects. The total funding needed to accomplish all of the near-term alternatives, including state funded bridge projects, summarized in this plan approaches $7,600,000. Potential strategies for addressing these needs in Gilliam County may generally be grouped into three categories: secure more external funding, identify public/private sponsorship opportunities, and raise local revenue through user fees and taxes. Observations on the use of these strategies are discussed below. They are not all mutually exclusive. Identify Additional Grant Opportunities ODOT offers multiple grant opportunities to support transportation projects. The County and Cities should identify grants from those summarized in Table 8-1 that are applicable to their projects. Some of these programs require a local match. The County and Cities should begin identifying these programs early in order to allocate funding necessary to satisfy a local match. Using local dollars as a match for a grant opportunity is a strategy to stretch the local funding even farther. $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Expenditures per Fiscal Year (Year ending June 30th) Administration and General Engineering Snow and Ice Removal Safety and Traffic Maintenance General Maintenance of Condition October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 91 TABLE 8-1 GRANT OPPORTUNITIES Source ID Source Title Award Cycle Intended Use Applicable Project Types Administration Agency Deadline Local Match Website 1 Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program Annual Technical assistance for recreation and conservation projects. Shared-use paths National Park Service August None http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/ rtca/contactus/cu_apply.html 2 Highway Safety Improvement Program Annual Address safety issues on highways and High Risk Rural Roads All ODOT Varies 10% www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/TRAFF IC-ROADWAY/highway _safety_program.shtml 3 Oregon Parks and Recreation Local Government Grants Annual Primary use is recreation; transportation allowed. Construction limited to outside road right-of-way, only in public parks or designated recreation areas Shared-use paths OPRD Varies 20% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRAN TS/local.shtml 4 Recreational Trails Program Annual Recreational trail-related projects, such as hiking, running, bicycling, off-road motorcycling, and all-terrain vehicle riding. Shared-use paths OPRD Varies 20% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRAN TS/trails.shtml 5 Land and Water Conservation Fund Annual Acquire land for public outdoor recreation or develop basic outdoor recreation facilities Shared-use paths, bikeways, sidewalks OPRD Varies 50% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRAN TS/lwcf.shtml 6 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Biennial Multi-year, statewide, intermodal program of transportation projects Sidewalk, bikeways, crossing improvements ODOT Varies Varies http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ STIP/ 7 ATV Grant Program Annual Operation and maintenance, law enforcement, emergency medical services, land acquisition, leases, planning, development, and safety education in Oregon's OHV (off-highway vehicle) recreation areas Shared-use paths OPRD February / April 20% http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/ATV/p ages/grants.aspx 8 Immediate Opportunity Funds Biennial Support primary economic development through the construction and improvement of street and roads. All ODOT On-going 50% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/E A/reports/IOF_PolicyGuidelines2015 %20doc.pdf 9 Enhance (STIP) Biennial Activities that enhance, expand, or improve the transportation system. Projects that improve or enhance the state's multimodal transportation system. All ODOT August 10% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/S TIP/Pages/WhatsChanged.aspx 10 ConnectOregon Biennial Non-highway transportation projects that promote economic development in Oregon. Non-highway modes ODOT November 20% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/T P/pages/connector.aspx 11 All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Biennial Address safety needs on all public roads in Oregon; reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. All hot spot and systemic safety projects ODOT Varies 8% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/ TRAFFIC- ROADWAY/Pages/ARTS.aspx October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 92 Public/Private Sponsorship Opportunities Public/Private sponsorships involve a private entity such as a local business owner working with the public agency to fund a project. In return for their investment in the community, these business owners often have recognition for their role, providing a marketing venue for the business. In Gilliam County, one potential opportunity for this type of partnership is the pilot project for bicycle rest areas. Private organizations that sponsor a rest area should have the opportunity to provide an advertisement and map at these locations directing cyclists to their community and business. Local Taxes and User Fees Many types of user fees and taxes may be collected to finance road construction and operations. On that premise, it is assumed that the County will need to develop local revenue sources to supplement or replace federal resources if it hopes to maintain current levels of service and assuming that changes in state of federal financing, coupled with efficiency measures are not enough to close the funding gap. Table 8-2 lists options that the County and Cities may wish to consider for funding local roads. The sources include a mix of fees and taxes, some of which if implemented would have implications for other aspects of the County and City budgets. Some of these fees could also be used to provide a local match to obtain greater federal or state funding, further stretching local dollars. Development Code Updates In order to fund sidewalk projects, a change to the development code may be beneficial to local jurisdictions. The development code identifies the requirements that a developer must meet before obtaining permission to build. Local jurisdictions may choose to require developers to complete sidewalks in locations where they are identified in the TSP and enforce the completion through the development code. The jurisdiction may also choose to collect a payment in lieu of sidewalk construction from the developers and then use the money to construct complete sections of sidewalk when enough is collected to create efficiencies. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Finance Element Gilliam County, Oregon 93 TABLE 8-2 LOCAL TAXES AND USER FEE OPTIONS Source Description Comments General Fund Property taxes from the county’s permanent tax rate. Diverting general fund revenue to the Road Fund would have significant consequences for other county services. Supplemental 5- year Serial Levy Voter approved property tax levied in addition to the county’s permanent tax rate. A road fund serial levy would have to be approved by voters every five years. A one-time approval would buy time for the county to develop other options. This method could fund operations and capital programs, some of which might reduce future maintenance requirements. Road Utility Fee Monthly user fee with revenue dedicated to road operations. May be enacted legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. This type of fee is becoming more common in cities but would require substantial investment in rate studies, administrative staffing, software and computer systems to enable the county to collect the revenue. This source is generally better suited to funding operations than for capital improvements, but it may free up existing resources for capital projects. Vehicle Registration Fee An extra fee on all registered motor vehicles in the county. May be authorized legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. State must be willing to act as a collection agent for the county, otherwise would be easy to implement. This source could fund operations or capital programs. Motor Vehicle Title Fee Require that all motor vehicles registered in the county also have their title recorded as personal property with the County. This would generate two sources of revenue: from the fee itself and from personal property taxes levied on motor vehicles. This could be problematic for renters and would increase taxable property that the Assessor must account for. County Gas Tax May be enacted legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. A local-option fuel tax would be easy to collect because the infrastructure is already in place. Would generate revenue for the county from motorists passing through the county. This method could fund operations and capital programs. Section 9 Transportation Planning Rule Findings October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 95 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings BACKGROUND The 2015 Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update is designed to guide the management and implementation of transportation facilities, policies, and programs within Gilliam County over the next 20 years. The document consists of background information, goals and objectives, recommended projects, and implementation measures. Recommended projects address all transportation modes and for purposes of implementation have been organized into short- and long-term projects. Gilliam County, the City of Arlington, and the City of Condon Comprehensive Plan changes are summarized below. 1. Goal 12: Transportation. The Comprehensive Plan amendment revises the Comprehensive Plans for each jurisdiction to remove reference to the 1999 TSP and make reference to the 2015 TSP. This includes revising the goals and objectives for the TSP to reflect those developed during the 2015 TSP Update process. FINDINGS OF FACT Consistency with Statewide Planning Goals As documented below, with the proposed amendments to the Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan, the 2015 Gilliam County TSP meets all statewide planning goals, as outlined in Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 660, Division 015. As required, the Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the statewide planning goals. Where appropriate, specific reference to Comprehensive Plan Policies has been made to document consistency between the updated TSP and the County’s Comprehensive Plan. Goal 1 Citizen Involvement To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. The proposed amendments are the result of the Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update process, which involved a number of public participation opportunities including: four Public Advisory Committee (PAC) meetings, two public workshops, two virtual workshops, a joint work session, a Planning Commission hearing and a City Council hearing. A variety of methods were used to notify community members of these meetings, including the local new paper and on the public project website. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 96 The proposed amendments are consistent with Policy (1) which is to provide for widespread citizen involvement by having TAC/PAC meetings and public meetings in both Arlington and Condon during the TSP development process. Policies (2) and (3) were provided for by having multiple TSP development meetings, open houses, virtual open houses, and mechanisms (e.g., www.gilliamcountytsp.com) for submitting comments including digitally, hand written, and verbally communicated to TSP development team members. Goal 2 Land Use Planning To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decision and action related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and actions. Because the TSP is a sub-element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the application to adopt the TSP was processed pursuant to the prescribed legislative process. In addition to the County’s Comprehensive Plan, a review of other existing state, regional, and local plans, policies, standards, and laws that are relevant to local transportation planning was conducted at the beginning of the TSP update process, and is documented in Section 2: Plans, Policies, and Standards Review of the TSP. The tables of prioritized projects identified within the TSP were developed in coordination with ODOT, Gilliam County, City of Condon, and City of Arlington. Condon and Arlington will conduct a formal TSP adoption process in parallel to the County. Goal 3 Agricultural Lands To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. The updated TSP identifies and prioritizes multiple projects to preserve and enhance transportation of agricultural goods and services throughout the county. Specifically, upgrading the functional classification of specific roadways will ensure that critical routes are built to accommodate the existing and future demands of the agricultural community. The sustainability of agriculture is apparent in Gilliam County seeing that it is one of the top three largest industries in the County. The proposed amendments are consistent with Goal 3, Policy 9 which in part is to encourage diversified economic development through transportation opportunities by rail in the County. Goal 4 Forest Lands To conserve forest land base and to protect the state’s forest economy by making possible economically efficient forest practices that assure the continuous growing and harvesting of forest tree species as the leading use on forest land consistent with sound management of sol, air, water, and fish and wildlife resources and to provide for recreational opportunities and agriculture. There are no inventoried forest lands in Gilliam County. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 97 Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. The updated TSP identifies and prioritizes projects to preserve and enhance facilities that serve scenic and historic areas. Specifically, the functional classification of specific roadways will ensure that critical routes are built to accommodate the existing and future demands of the natural resources and mining industries, the only two industries to grow jobs in Gilliam County in 2013. The TSP addresses the need to preserve the rural nature of the county and the encouragement of recreational landscapes for bicycle and pedestrian paths. The proposed amendments identify projects related to the new Cottonwood Canyon State Park. The proposed amendments “encourage the development of alternative sources of energy” by identifying energy as an important industrial activity for which intermodal connections must be maintained. Goal 6 Air, Water, and Land Resources Quality To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water, and land resources of the state. The proposed amendments support “efforts directed towards the preservation and improvement of the environment,” by identifying and prioritizing projects that could promote use of alternative modes (e.g., walking, bicycling) to minimize air quality impacts. Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Hazards To protect people and property from natural hazards. The proposed projects will bolster the emergency routes available in the event of a natural disaster. Goal 8 Recreational Needs To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the states and visitors and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including destination resorts. The County boasts numerous recreational opportunities including but not limited to state parks, fishing along both the Columbia and John Day Rivers, boating and bicycling. The list of prioritized projects allows for the continued safe and convenient access to these sites as well as includes expansion and/or implementation of numerous bicycling enhancements. The proposed amendments are consistent with Goal 7, Policy 4 which in part “encourages the development of bicycle…facilities” through the inclusion of identified projects in Table 7-10 of the TSP. Goal 9 Economic Development October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 98 To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. The proposed amendments are the result of the Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update process, they include economic development. The economic development addressed in the Updated TSP is determined through the incorporation of the economic development section of the plan. This section addresses the incorporation of industry and other economic stimulation in the County. Goal 10 Housing To provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state. Housing needs for the residents of the County are aided by the Transportation System Plan through residential streets, sidewalks, bicycle paths and walking trails. These assets allow for easy access to employment, local businesses and schools. Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. The proposed amendments in the TSP include roadway systems, pedestrian and bicycle systems, public transportation systems, and air/marine/rail/pipeline/transmission systems. The existing and planned public service provided under the TSP known as dial-a-ride and provide rides to citizens around Gilliam County for any reason and for anyone who wishes to use it. Goal 12 Transportation To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. The proposed amendments include a transportation safety element and many other projects that promote convenient routes throughout the County and support economic development. Proposed amendments to Comprehensive Plan policies support recommendations in the TSP that principal highways in the county serve to provide for the mobility, connectivity, and economic development of the county and cities within. Findings and recommendations within the 2015 TSP support the expected development at and surrounding the Arlington and Condon airports. Goal 13 Energy Conservation To conserve energy. The proposed amendments are the result of the Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update process, they include energy conservation. The conservation of energy will be October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 99 incorporated into the multi-modal transportation system by avoiding reliance upon one form of transportation and encouraging a reduction in motor vehicle reliance within city limits. Goal 14 Urbanization To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide livable communities. It is through planning and funding that the Transportation System Plan sets a goal to maintain the safety, physical integrity, and function of the counties multimodal transportation network. The encouragement of this goal within the existing urban growth boundaries of Condon, Arlington, and Lone Rock is a short-term and long-term objective of the Transportation System Plan. Goal 15 through Goal 19 are not applicable to the Gilliam County TSP Update. Consistency with OAR 660 Division 12 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) implements Statewide Planning Goal 12. The purpose of the TPR is to “direct transportation planning in coordination with land use planning” to ensure that planned land uses are supported by and consistent with planned transportation facilities and improvements. The TPR’s purpose statement includes promoting the development of transportation systems that serve the mobility needs of the transportation disadvantaged, provide a variety of transportation choices, and provide safe and convenient access and circulation for vehicles, transit, pedestrians and bicycles. The TPR also directs jurisdictions to “provide for the construction and implementation of transportation facilities, improvements and services necessary to support acknowledged comprehensive plans” and that there is “coordination among affected local governments and transportation service providers and consistency between state, regional and local transportation plans.” The proposed TSP and associated code amendments are consistent with OAR 660 Division 12, as described below. Section 660-012-0005 through 660-012-0055 These sections of the TPR contain policies for preparing and implementing a transportation system plan. The updated TSP was prepared in compliance with TPR Section -0015 and was coordinated with affected state and federal agencies, and local governments through Project Advisory Committee Meetings. The TSP update includes elements required by the TPR Section -0020 such as modal inventories, modal plans, and financial plans. The TSP documents an assessment of existing and future transportation needs and an evaluation of various alternatives to satisfy those needs, per Sections -0030 and -0035. The implementation of the updated TSP is being conducted in compliance with TPR Section -0045. The proposed TSP and associated code amendments are consistent with TPR Sections -0005 to -0045. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Findings Gilliam County, Oregon 100 Section 660-012-0060 This section of the TPR contains policies for preparing Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. The proposed amendments to the Plan and Development Codes require findings of compliance with applicable Statewide Land Use Planning Goals and related administrative rules, including TPR Section -0060. No procedures need to be amended to ensure consistency with TPR Section - 0060. CONCLUSION The proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments are consistent with and supportive of statewide planning goals, County plans and policies, and other community objectives. October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Gilliam County, Oregon List of Appendices APPENDIX, VOLUME 1 Appendix A Public Involvement Process for TSP Development Appendix B Cost Estimate Calculations and Assumptions Appendix C Transportation Improvement Project Prospectus Sheets Appendix D Table of All Modal Plans Appendix E Gilliam County Implementing Ordinances Appendix F City of Arlington Implementing Ordinances Appendix G City of Condon Implementing Ordinances Appendix A Public Involvement Process for TSP Development October 2015 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Appendix A - Public Involvement Process Gilliam County, Oregon A-1 Appendix A - Public Involvement Process The Gilliam County Transportation System Plan benefited from an effective public process, facilitating the identification of transportation system deficiencies as well as potential solutions. The following table summarizes the public involvement meetings and open houses, and the dates on which they occurred. TABLE A-1 PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT MEETINGS AND OPEN HOUSE SUMMARY Event Location Date PAC Meeting #1 Condon, OR December 3, 2014 Public Presentation #1 Condon, OR December 3, 2014 PAC Meeting #2 Arlington, OR March 18, 2015 Public Presentation #2 Arlington, OR March 18, 2015 PAC Meeting #3 Condon, OR May 7, 2015 PAC Meeting #4 Concurrent Meetings in Arlington, OR and Condon, OR July 8, 2015 As shown in Table A-1, a total of four meetings were held with the PAC members over an 8- month period beginning in December 2014. Two open houses were held, one in Arlington, one in Condon. The open house locations were chosen in order to provide more convenient locations for residents that live in or around the two largest cities in the County. Appendix B Cost Estimate Calculations and Assumptions B-1 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ROADWAY DEPARTURE PROJECTS Project ID Road Start MP End MP Potential Countermeasures Cost Estimate^ Inlaid Raised Pavement Markers Widen Shoulder & Install Safety Edge (where feasible) Install Centerline and Shoulder Rumble Strips Curve Warning Signs Chevrons at Curves Guardrail S-11 OR 19 40 42 X X X X X $901,000 S-12 OR 206 33.4 35.2 X X X X X $812,000 S-13 OR 206 17.6 20.2 X X X X X $1,171,000 S-14 Baseline Road 8.9 9.3 X X X X X $183,000 S-15 OR 19 (Olex Grade) 15.5 22.2 X X X X X X $4,334,000 S-16 OR 206 30.7 31.3 X X $267,000 Total $7,668,000 *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. ^Cost estimates are based on the following unit costs: $4.20 per raised pavement marker; $15 per sq ft of shoulder widening; $3,000 per mile of centerline rumble strips; $850 per mile of shoulder rumble strips; $500 per additional large signs; $250 per additional small sign; $26 per ln ft of guardrail; $25,000 per guardrail anchor. Cost estimates include 40 percent contingency in addition to calculated estimates from the unit costs. SYSTEMIC SAFETY INTERSECTION PROJECTS Project ID Major Road Minor Road Potential Countermeasures Cost Estimate^ Rural Intersection Signing and Marking Improvements Improve sight distance Reduce intersection skew S-17 OR 19 (Main St) OR 206 (Walnut St) X $3,000 S-18 OR 19 Eightmile Rd X $3,000 S-19 OR 19 Baseline Rd X $7,000 S-20 Blalock Canyon Rd Heritage Ln X X X $35,000 S-21 OR 206 Lonerock Rd X X $10,000 S-22 OR 19 Cedar Springs Rd X $3,000 S-10 Blalock Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd X $3,000 Total $64,000 *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. ^Cost estimates are based on the following unit costs: $5,000 for improving sight distance; $15 per sq ft of new pavement to realign intersection and reduce skew; $2,000 for rural intersection signing and marking improvements. Cost estimates include 40 percent contingency in addition to calculated estimates from the unit costs. B-2 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source Cost Estimate Source or Assumptions^ ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2 inches of asphalt and add 2-foot gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the Arlington Mesa industrial park. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane (M-2). Heavy Maintenance $109,200 X X X X County M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road (M-1). Heavy Maintenance $837,330 X X X X County M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two foot gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,177,735 X County M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2-foot gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction $1,015,820 X County M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wehrli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance $100,000 X County S-1 I-84 Westbound On- Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Operations $3,000 X Assumes Signing and Striping only S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Feasibility Study $15,000 X Study M-25 Olex Grade Realignment Complete OR 19 realignment between approximately MP 16 and 17. Feasibility $10,000 X Study Total $3,269,000 Long-Term Projects M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Heavy Maintenance $1,000,000 X X County M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Heavy Maintenance $325,000 X County M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,015,846 X County M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Heavy Maintenance $156,000 X X X County M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Heavy Maintenance $61,100 X X County M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Full Reconstruction $2,752,422 X X County B-3 ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source Cost Estimate Source or Assumptions^ ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Heavy Maintenance $500,000 X X County M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Operations $400,000 X County S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection to improve sight distance for westbound approach. Safety / Operations $106,000 X X See “TEC” Calculations S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22 Study $1,000 X X Study M-29 Columbia View Drive Extension Extend Columbia View Drive to Main Street to provide alternate access to residents in this area. Operations $700,000 X X Calculated based on unit cost for similar project. M-26 OR 19 Realignment Projects Evaluate the feasibility and develop cost estimates for the following projects on OR 19: soften corner on OR 19 near MP 27 at Pennington Corner; realign S- curves at MP 8; soften curve and slopes to improve line of sight on OR 19 near MP 21 at Wilkins Corner. Feasibility Study $10,000 X Study Total $7,028,000 Vision Projects S-4 Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection to provide a traffic control scenario that does not violate driver expectancy. Project $10,000 X X Assumes signing and striping only. S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 to a stop perpendicular to Lonerock Road to increase sight distance at this intersection. Project $150,000 X X Based on cost of new pavement. Total $160,000 1 Cost estimate is planning level only. Does not include right-of-way costs. ^Cost estimate sources that indicate County were provided by the County Roadmaster. Calculations are included following the project tables when available. “TEC” estimates were prepared by Tenneson Engineering Corporation and are provided on the pages following these tables. Feasibility studies were assumed to cost $10,000 unless otherwise indicated. B-4 PLANNED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source Cost Estimates Source^ ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike $147,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from E Well Street to OR 206/Walnut Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $50,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike $25,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project $5,000 X X X Study A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike $3,500 X -- A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to N East Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $100,000 X X Based on unit cost from other estimates A-16 Shared-use Path from Condon to Mountain Identifier Conduct a feasibility study to determine the cost of constructing a shared-use path from Condon to the mountain identifier on OR 206. Feasibility Study/ Ped/Bike $10,000 X X X Study Total $341,000 Long-Term Projects A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Ped/Bike $508,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street Ped/Bike $414,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 Ped/Bike $87,750 X X Based on unit cost from other project estimates A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street Ped/Bike $109,200 X X Based on unit cost from other project estimates A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street Ped/Bike $277,000 X See “TEC” Calculations A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street Ped/Bike $10,000 X X Assumes enhanced crossing with signage and potential RRFB A-13 OR 19 Sidewalks (East) Add sidewalks from N East Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike $200,000 X X Based on unit cost from other project estimates B-5 ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source Cost Estimates Source^ ODOT/ State County Cities Private A-14 E Bayard Street Sidewalks Add sidewalks to complete gap on east side of E Bayard Street between E Court Street and Main Street. Ped/Bike $25,000 X X Based on unit cost from other project estimates A-15 Sidewalks on east side of Main Street (north) Complete sidewalk gaps on the east side of Main Street between E Well Street and W 2nd Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $30,000 X Based on unit cost from other project estimates A-17 Beech Street Streetscape in Arlington Improve the streetscape of Beech Street in Arlington to make the environment more pedestrian/bicycle friendly with wider sidewalks, raised crossings, landscaped buffers, and pedestrian-scale lighting. Ped/Bike $176,000 X X X Based on unit costs of $430 per street tree; $5,000 per street light; $40 per ln ft sidewalk; and $35 per ln ft curb. Total $1,837,000 ^ “TEC” estimates were prepared by Tenneson Engineering Corporation and are provided on the pages following these tables. Feasibility studies were assumed to cost $10,000 unless otherwise indicated. OTHER PROJECTS Name Description Category Cost Timeline Cost Estimate Source^ Coordinated Plan Gilliam County will be updating its Coordinated Plan with a grant from ODOT in 2015 and 2016. Transit -- Near-term -- Condon Airport Complete feasibility study to determine if upgrades are needed for any of the airport facilities to serve future growth and activity. The City of Condon is planning to provide water service to the airport to increase future airport development and activity. Air $10,000 Long-term Study Arlington Airport Based on the opportunities available for industrial uses and the existing industrial uses at the airport, a feasibility study is recommended to determine the cost to pave and maintain the runway at the Arlington Airport. Air $10,000 Long-term Study Shutler Station Rail Crossovers New rail crossovers are needed at Shutler Station to support rail operations. Rail $300,000 Near-term Port of Arlington At-grade railroad crossings in the City of Arlington The City, County, and Waste Management should maintain coordination with UP and Watco to minimize delay and maintain emergency vehicle access. Rail -- Near-term -- I-84 Eastbound Bridge The bridge will be widened at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current design standards. Bridge $1.1 million Near-term Calculated from unit cost provided by ODOT I-84 John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay ODOT has planned a bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering is scheduled for 2016, and construction is scheduled for 2018. Bridge $2.482 million Near-term ODOT Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement The County plans to replace the Lonerock Road bridge. The road serves as the primary route in and out of Lonerock and is therefore a high priority for the County. Bridge $2 million Long-term County Total $5,902,000 ^Cost estimate sources that indicate County were provided by the County Roadmaster. U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 7,424 SQ FT 37,120 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 357,584.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 507,769.28$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 16.00$ 118,784.00$ 11,200.00$ 11,200.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 185,600.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 78,668.48$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 71,516.80$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 5,752 SQ FT 28,760 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 291,436.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 413,839.12$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 9,600.00$ 9,600.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 18.00$ 103,536.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 143,800.00$ Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 64,115.92$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 58,287.20$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 1,614 SQ FT 8,070 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 103,342.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 146,745.64$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 37,122.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 48,420.00$ Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 22,735.24$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 20,668.40$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,415 SQ FT 5,300 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 58,222.50$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 82,675.95$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONTINGENCY 20% 11,644.50$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 7.00$ 37,100.00$ 5 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 1.50$ 9,622.50$ Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 12,808.95$ 7 U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 1,042 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 17,478.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 24,818.76$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 9.00$ 9,378.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 3,845.16$ 7 CONTINGENCY 20% 3,495.60$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 3,000 SQ FT 18,000 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 194,800.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 276,616.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 69,000.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 108,000.00$ Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 42,856.00$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 38,960.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 3,500.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 4,970.00$ Plus $5,000 per sign for flashing stop sign Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 500.00$ 500.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 770.00$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 700.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 2,000 LS 1 TON 42 TON 12 TON 20 LF 150 SF 1,400 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 32,660.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 46,377.20$ Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 7,185.20$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 6,532.00$ 11 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 12 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 500.00$ 500.00$ 9 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 3,750.00$ 10 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,200.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 540.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 2,200.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 1,470.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 500.00$ 500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 4,000.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 3,400 EA 2 LF 200 LS 1 TON 63 TON 18 TON 15 LF 290 SF 1,450 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 74,515.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 105,811.30$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 6,700.00$ 6,700.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 6,800.00$ 5 F&P STORM CATCH BASIN 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 6 F&P STORM SEWER 40.00$ 8,000.00$ 7 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 8 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 2,205.00$ 9 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 810.00$ 10 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 1,650.00$ 11 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 7,250.00$ 12 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,600.00$ 13 F&P PAINT STRIPING 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 14 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,393.30$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,903.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,300 LS 1 TON 290 TON 85 TON 150 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 73,075.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 103,766.50$ Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,076.50$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,615.00$ 9 F&P PAINT STRIPING 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 3,825.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 16,500.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 10,150.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 12,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL t • 1 ' • • • I/ ( ' ! .-: .. ! · ' t . .. . ,, . ' • . ·! I ' • .. .. ··! ': .. : : ; .I ... ' ' . . :;JP •• ' I • :· I ~. I ' \·,"\(" '(", .'('] t 1! I' ' . .. " ..... ~ ...... ' '!'ht 'Jf l. ., i I ' r·1 · ; ..;:. :4 ~.- ~ · \. I . , . : ~ . t •• # .. "=• I .. , · . • ,.,.J • • • IO{X) / ( '.( ~:) ·":, 1 .~ 1 1'\ ,, __ (;.]~-!/! ·y:~) .J( I\ ' I·., I I 1 J , ... , ·r '>-:. •• , • ; ... 1 ·. ' ,,. .,.,._r_~_...-::.__ ___ j__l _..,.1_·..;.:.o""".-2_..;.;-_. _· _ ._. _., __ _ -~ - . - .... ~ . . .. ,, . - . -".·.f.,.(· c .... ,, ... ~n. J "'\(-; lll ·Vt .. l-.o~a_ )1.00 20() ).700 1 }.y- -7 {()A . .. ~i _(). . ......; .. l.) 1 ':t} 000 3 l00 "'I goo ))5C/) J55D J 'M.'\)Mvf .SUO lA . {h\? !' ( ' /J ~ @ ·J n i!/ .. , . t .r. ' I t i.J" .... ... p(;~<'::·"f •• ,(• I , ·, ! \ .:- -t ·~', , !~ 1 . .. '7006 C.V\ ~95 -';}) 1 L:(". ,.. :' •.· ['< (~· Ci.J-·""' .. t ,.' / \I I ;_ ~""'Q· 'fJ 1"' ' 1-' ~ ... ~)() "'- ( 1'-\ 1 \ ; .. ., ·~. ;, . ·r.~ :Ji. : '1 .·· :.)·;~ '·, .... . '~ '7 J.:,J~ : . ~ ) .·} _..,. .. - / ) ) ') . . (. ,_.., ~-,. . .. , oo .. I~; I • I . ·. ; . .- 0 ' ---~-- - --· 0 .. . _ M~ / · ) . I . ' \... f : ('! ;: ': t ~) (>; \ ~·;,~r: t:' ., ~ •\,: : ;-;',, • } ;-. ~ I :.,... -·· . ,;._ ~· ." \ i_ • ~ ' J I • . , ll " 1 i 1" _,. ,~·,<'! \ , ·' t.. · ' ... \ '\ )( i . If' '· · r(. :•,' . . t 4' l \ 1flAV[L ~ {,()(') .. · . ' ( ; 1'Jbo CAA.. '{ '{') 5 l?-06 8vt.l1 o.s 4SDO )b6Q ..,,.. 0 ;_. "1 .0J . 1 2.1 bbO /0 5l::>O 14b/2ot,) :z 85 )'[XX) L; •I \;, ". ) ,.s. ' · \ ., • .-) . I <:;' ;J \ ) • . -. . ~ · ' ~:. . t . (., - ' •-' ... . . . . '' \ ' "' . ,$. \ . '1., • ) .!'' ·'\')'I .. ~ l t -! bfoooo SJ t,fl./p< ·Sf ' :r 2.Z.Gafl1~- <---~?...:::o~'6,...~' s.:::..· ------------------J~S::.'I.!<,o~ro~---- _., -------------------------~~T<~8=L ___________________________ J~OJooo I · -- ---- - ------ --·- -- ------ -----------·-·---· .. i . .. . ~6~0(X>c-u "t Ph /;15 5C'(Lf\~r> ... · ... ,b ~).., · 6 AA~tl .. ~ loc...otr~... ,•-., .. ~/ . '>..! ~b fl l'l @~ q t.;t.q; ~~ 'i"3 /~. o;..t.>?" I~QlLf fl ,! I C/ ) . rs-c u. 'f \J~; ~.., ;>s (ii l(();:-;. .. J ~ow c.~.-" L1 ps 1l ns-t Roc~t. @ b~7 . .•. ~DOD C\\ YYS Ro(\o f{oo~:@ R~-· )" /11-U, 17UlC.-IL •• ~lil:.L r • t ' }Jt.sl;.t,. 1"'ltU.C.lL . . c~~Q>.\)~'(1. r I .. . . •• o# \ 110 '\){, 't ~ ~ 13\. . \")': ... • :. ·.: . ·'}' .~~ t ·'io :· :\t Appendix C Transportation Improvement Project Prospectus Sheets Systemic Safety Plan C-2 ID: S-11 OR 19 from MP 40 to 42 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible), install centerline and shoulder rumble strips, curve warning signs, and chevrons at curves Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-3 ID: S-12 OR 206 from MP 33.4 to 35.2 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible), install centerline and shoulder rumble strips, curve warning signs and chevrons at curves Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-4 ID: S-13 OR 206 from MP 17.6 to 20.2 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible), install centerline and shoulder rumble strips, curve warning signs and chevrons at curves Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-5 ID: S-14 Baseline Road from MP 8.9 to 9.3 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible), install centerline and shoulder rumble strips, curve warning signs and chevrons at curves Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Long-term Potential Funding Partners: County; ODOT Project Location/Images: C-6 ID: S-15 OR 19 (Olex Grade) from MP 15.5 to 22.2 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible), install centerline and shoulder rumble strips, curve warning signs, chevrons at curves and guardrails. Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Long-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-7 ID: S-16 OR 206 from MP 30.7 to 31.3 Description: Potential countermeasures include: Inlaid raised pavement markers, and widen shoulders and install safety edges (where feasible) Category: Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Priority: Long-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-8 ID: S-17 OR 19 (Main Street) and OR 206 (Walnut Street) Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-9 ID: S-18 OR 19 and Eightmile Road Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT; County Project Location/Images: C-10 ID: S-19 OR 19 and Baseline Road Description: Potential countermeasures include: Improve sight distance Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: ODOT; County Project Location/Images: C-11 ID: S-20 Blalock Canyon Road and Heritage Lane Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements, improve sight distance and reduce intersection skew Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: County; ODOT Project Location/Images: C-12 ID: S-21 OR 206 and Lonerock Road Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements and improve sight distance Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Near-term Potential Funding Partners: County; ODOT Project Location/Images: C-13 ID: S-22 OR 19 and Cedar Springs Road Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Long-term Potential Funding Partners: County; ODOT Project Location/Images: C-14 ID: S-10 Blalock Canyon Road and Cedar Springs Road Description: Potential countermeasures include: Rural intersection signing and marking improvements Category: Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Priority: Long-term Potential Funding Partners: County; ODOT Project Location/Images: C-15 Roadway Implementation Plan C-16 ID: M-1 Airport Road Description: Overlay Airport Road with 2 inches of asphalt and add 2-foot gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the Arlington Mesa industrial park. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane (M-2). Purpose: Roadway serves truck traffic associated with Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. Roadway has little base rock and lacks shoulders. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Short-term Cost: $109,200 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, County, Cities and private Project Location/Images: C-17 ID: M-2 Rhea Lane Description: Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road (M-1). Purpose: Roadway serves truck traffic associated with Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Short-term Cost: $837,330 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, County, Cities and private Project Location/Images: C-18 ID: M-3 Ridge Road Description: Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two foot gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Purpose: Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Short-term Cost: $1,177,735 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-19 ID: M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Description: Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2-foot gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Purpose: Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. (Note: some of this section loops through Morrow County) Category: Full Reconstruction Priority: Short-term Cost: $1,015,820 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-20 ID: M-15 Cemetery Road Description: Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wehrli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Purpose: Road serves agricultural traffic and should be upgraded in functional classification. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Short-term Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-21 ID: S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Description: Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Purpose: Drivers have been observed entering the westbound on-ramps when they want to go eastbound. Category: Operations Priority: Short-term Cost: $3,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State Project Location/Images: C-22 ID: S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Description: Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Purpose: Crash history shows a high percentage of snow and ice related crashes on I-84 in Gilliam County. Category: Feasibility Study Priority: Short-term Cost: $15,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State Project Location/Images: C-23 ID: M-25 Olex Grade Realignment Description: Complete OR 19 realignment between approximately MP 16 and 17. Purpose: An ODOT project to smooth curves ended before this section was completed. The community has observed crashes in this area, although not all of the crashes observed are reported. The curves also restrict large truck traffic, such as those carrying wind turbines, and require them to use both travel lanes to pass through. Category: Feasibility Priority: Short-term Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State Project Location/Images: C-24 ID: M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Description: Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Purpose: Roadway needs to be upgraded in functional classification because it serves as popular connection to I-84 and serves wind farms and agricultural land. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $1,000,000 Potential Funding Partners: County and private Project Location/Images: C-25 ID: M-6 Heritage Lane Description: Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Purpose: Roadway needs to be upgraded in functional classification because it serves as popular connection to I-84 and serves wind farms and agricultural land. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $325,000 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-26 ID: M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Description: Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible. Purpose: Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $1,015,846 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-27 ID: M-10 Devils Butte Road Description: Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Purpose: Roadway was not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $156,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, County and private Project Location/Images: C-28 ID: M-11 Mikkalo Lane Description: Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Purpose: Roadway was not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $61,100 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and County Project Location/Images: C-29 ID: M-12 Hay Canyon Road Description: Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Purpose: Roadway was not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. Category: Full Reconstruction Priority: Long-term Cost: $2,752,422 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and County Project Location/Images: C-30 ID: M-13 Lonerock Road Description: Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Purpose: Roadway serves high traffic volumes as it is the primary access to the Lonerock community; it should be upgraded in functional classification. Category: Heavy Maintenance Priority: Long-term Cost: $500,000 Potential Funding Partners: County, Cities Project Location/Images: C-31 ID: M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Description: Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Purpose: Roadway is heavily traveled by rafters & river users but was not designed to carry river traffic. Category: Operations Priority: Long-term Cost: $400,000 Potential Funding Partners: County Project Location/Images: C-32 ID: S-5 E Bayard Street and Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Description: Reconfigure intersection so that westbound approach is perpendicular with OR 19 to reduce skew and improve sight distance to the south. Purpose: Sight distance concern at skewed intersection. Category: Safety / Operations Priority: Long-term Cost: $106,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and Cities Project Location/Images: C-33 ID: S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Description: Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22. Purpose: Snow drifts frequently at this location. Category: Study Priority: Long-term Cost: $1,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and County Project Location/Images: C-34 ID: M-29 Columbia View Drive Extension Description: Extend Columbia View Drive to Main Street to provide alternate access to residents in this area. Purpose: The residential area served by Columbia View Drive lacks alternate access. In addition, the grade is steep on the entrance to the area, making emergency vehicle access challenging during winter conditions. Category: Operations Priority: Long-term Cost: $700,000 Potential Funding Partners: County and Cities Project Location/Images: C-35 ID: M-26 OR 19 Realignment Projects Description: Evaluate the feasibility and develop cost estimates for the following projects on OR 19: soften corner on OR 19 near MP 27 at Pennington Corner; realign S-curves at MP 8; soften curve and slopes to improve line of sight on OR 19 near MP 21 at Wilkins Corner. Purpose: The public has concerns with safety at these key curves in the County and has observed crashes occurring at these locations. Category: Feasibility Study Priority: Long-term Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State Project Location/Images: C-36 ID: S-4 Main Street and Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Description: Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection to provide a traffic control scenario that does not violate driver expectancy. Purpose: Safety concern due to sight distance and driver expectation. Category: Project Priority: Vision Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and Cities Project Location/Images: C-37 ID: S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Description: Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 to a stop perpendicular to Lonerock Road to increase sight distance at this intersection. Purpose: Restricted sight distance; intersection located on curve. Category: Project Priority: Vision Cost: $150,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and County Project Location/Images: C-38 Pedestrian and Bicycle Implementation Plan C-39 ID: A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Description: Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center. Purpose: Lacking connected sidewalks; Connects to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $147,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-40 ID: A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Description: Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from E Well Street to OR 206/Walnut Street in Condon. Purpose: Sidewalks in poor condition. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $50,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-41 ID: A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Description: Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Purpose: No sidewalks connecting to baseball field. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $25,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-42 ID: A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Description: Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Purpose: Popular cycling route with no rest area locations for cyclists. Category: Feasibility Study / Pilot Project Priority: Short-term Cost: $5,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, County and privates Project Location/Images: C-43 ID: A-10 Bicycle Parking Description: Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington. The bicycle parking racks should be aesthetically pleasing and add to the downtown character of the areas. Purpose: Lack of bicycle parking in downtown areas. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $3,500 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: Example of decorative bicycle parking C-44 ID: A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Description: Add sidewalks from Main Street to N East Street in Condon. Purpose: Lack of sidewalks. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $100,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and County Project Location/Images: C-45 ID: A-16 Shared-use Path from Condon to Mountain Identifier Description: Conduct a feasibility study to determine the cost of constructing a shared-use path from Condon to the mountain identifier on OR 206. Purpose: Recreational cycling is popular in the County, and there is currently no bicycle lanes on OR 206 connecting the mountain identifier to Condon. Category: Feasibility Study and Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Short-term Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, County and Cities Project Location/Images: C-46 ID: A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Description: Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Purpose: Lacking connected sidewalks. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $508,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-47 ID: A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Description: Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street. Purpose: Lacking connected sidewalks. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $414,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-48 ID: A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Description: Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206. Purpose: Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $87,750 Potential Funding Partners: County and Cities Project Location/Images: C-49 ID: A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Description: Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street. Purpose: Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $109,000 Potential Funding Partners: County and Cities Project Location/Images: C-50 ID: A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Description: Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street. Purpose: Lack of connected sidewalks. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $277,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-51 ID: A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Description: Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street. Purpose: Pedestrians are observed to cross in this location frequently. Adding a marked crosswalk with appropriate signage will help raise driver awareness of potential pedestrians in this area. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $10,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and Cities Project Location/Images: C-52 ID: A-13 OR 19 Sidewalks (East) Description: Add sidewalks from N East Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Purpose: Lack of sidewalks between the downtown area and the Fairgrounds. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $200,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and Cities Project Location/Images: C-53 ID: A-14 E Bayard Street Sidewalks Description: Add sidewalks to complete gap on east side of E Bayard Street between E Court Street and Main Street. Purpose: There is a gap in the connected sidewalks. These sidewalks provide complete connections from the high school to downtown Condon. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $25,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State and Cities Project Location/Images: C-54 ID: A-15 Sidewalks on east side of Main Street (north) Description: Complete sidewalk gaps on the east side of Main Street between E Well Street and W 2nd Street in Condon. Purpose: There are gaps in the sidewalk. The existing sidewalk is in poor shape in some locations and needs to be redone. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $30,000 Potential Funding Partners: Cities Project Location/Images: C-55 ID: A-17 Beech Street Streetscape in Arlington Description: Improve the streetscape of Beech Street in Arlington to make the environment more pedestrian/bicycle friendly with wider sidewalks, raised crossings, landscaped buffers, and pedestrian-scale lighting. Purpose: This road carries high traffic volumes and truck traffic, but it also serves as a connection between the park and commercial areas. There is a need to better balance these functions. Category: Pedestrian/Bike Priority: Long-term Cost: $176,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT/ State, Cities and private Project Location/Images: C-56 Rail Plan C-57 ID: M-22 Shutler Station Rail Crossovers Description: Install rail crossovers at Shutler Station. Purpose: Need for rail crossovers to make movements within the park easier. Category: Rail Priority: Near-term Cost: $300,000 Potential Funding Partners: ODOT, private Project Location/Images: Shutler Station C-58 Bridge Plan C-59 ID: B-2 I-84 Eastbound Bridge Description: Widen bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current design standards. Purpose: The bridge width does not meet current design standards. Category: Bridge Priority: Near-term Cost: $1.1 million Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: C-60 ID: B-3 Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement Description: The County plans to replace the Lonerock Road bridge, which serves the primary route in and out of Lonerock and is therefore a high priority for the County. Purpose: The bridge needs repair or replacement. Category: Bridge Priority: Long-term Cost: $2 million Potential Funding Partners: ODOT, County Project Location/Images: C-61 ID: B-4 I-84 John Day River Bridge Overlay Description: ODOT has planned a bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering is scheduled for 2016, and construction is scheduled for 2018. Purpose: The bridge is in need of a pavement overlay. Category: Bridge Priority: Near-term Cost: $2.5 million Potential Funding Partners: ODOT Project Location/Images: Appendix D Table of All Modal Plans D-1 SYSTEMIC SAFETY ROADWAY DEPARTURE PROJECTS Project ID Road Start MP End MP Potential Countermeasures Cost Estimate Inlaid Raised Pavement Markers Widen Shoulder & Install Safety Edge (where feasible) Install Centerline and Shoulder Rumble Strips Curve Warning Signs Chevrons at Curves Guardrail S-11 OR 19 40 42 X X X X X $901,000 S-12 OR 206 33.4 35.2 X X X X X $812,000 S-13 OR 206 17.6 20.2 X X X X X $1,171,000 S-14 Baseline Road 8.9 9.3 X X X X X $183,000 S-15 OR 19 (Olex Grade) 15.5 22.2 X X X X X X $4,334,000 S-16 OR 206 30.7 31.3 X X $267,000 Total $7,668,000 *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. SYSTEMIC SAFETY INTERSECTION PROJECTS Project ID Major Road Minor Road Potential Countermeasures Cost Estimate Rural Intersection Signing and Marking Improvements Improve sight distance Reduce intersection skew S-17 OR 19 (Main St) OR 206 (Walnut St) X $3,000 S-18 OR 19 Eightmile Rd X $3,000 S-19 OR 19 Baseline Rd X $7,000 S-20 Blalock Canyon Rd Heritage Ln X X X $35,000 S-21 OR 206 Lonerock Rd X X $10,000 S-22 OR 19 Cedar Springs Rd X $3,000 S-10 Blalock Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd X $3,000 Total $64,000 *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. D-2 PLANNED ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2 inches of asphalt and add 2-foot gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the Arlington Mesa industrial park. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane (M-2). Heavy Maintenance $109,200 X X X X M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road (M-1). Heavy Maintenance $837,330 X X X X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two foot gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,177,735 X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2-foot gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction $1,015,820 X M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wehrli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance $100,000 X S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Operations $3,000 X S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Feasibility Study $15,000 X M-25 Olex Grade Realignment Complete OR 19 realignment between approximately MP 16 and 17. Feasibility $10,000 X Total $3,269,000 Long-Term Projects M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Heavy Maintenance $1,000,000 X X M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Heavy Maintenance $325,000 X M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area Heavy Maintenance $1,015,846 X D-3 ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible. M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Heavy Maintenance $156,000 X X X M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Heavy Maintenance $61,100 X X M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Full Reconstruction $2,752,422 X X M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Heavy Maintenance $500,000 X X M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Operations $400,000 X S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection to improve sight distance for westbound approach. Safety / Operations $106,000 X X S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22 Study $1,000 X X M-29 Columbia View Drive Extension Extend Columbia View Drive to Main Street to provide alternate access to residents in this area. Operations $700,000 X X M-26 OR 19 Realignment Projects Evaluate the feasibility and develop cost estimates for the following projects on OR 19: soften corner on OR 19 near MP 27 at Pennington Corner; realign S-curves at MP 8; soften curve and slopes to improve line of sight on OR 19 near MP 21 at Wilkins Corner. Feasibility Study $10,000 X Total $7,028,000 Vision Projects S-4 Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection to provide a traffic control scenario that does not violate driver expectancy. Project $10,000 X X S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 to a stop perpendicular to Lonerock Road to increase sight distance at this intersection. Project $150,000 X X Total $160,000 1 Cost estimate is planning level only. Does not include right-of-way costs. D-4 PLANNED PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS IN GILLIAM COUNTY ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike $147,000 X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from E Well Street to OR 206/Walnut Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $50,000 X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike $25,000 X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project $5,000 X X X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike $3,500 X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to N East Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $100,000 X X A-16 Shared-use Path from Condon to Mountain Identifier Conduct a feasibility study to determine the cost of constructing a shared-use path from Condon to the mountain identifier on OR 206. Feasibility Study/ Ped/Bike $10,000 X X X Total $341,000 Long-Term Projects A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Ped/Bike $508,000 X A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street Ped/Bike $414,000 X A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 Ped/Bike $87,750 X X A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street Ped/Bike $109,200 X X A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street Ped/Bike $277,000 X A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street Ped/Bike $10,000 X X A-13 OR 19 Sidewalks (East) Add sidewalks from N East Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike $200,000 X X A-14 E Bayard Street Sidewalks Add sidewalks to complete gap on east side of E Bayard Street between E Court Street and Main Street. Ped/Bike $25,000 X X A-15 Sidewalks on east side of Main Street (north) Complete sidewalk gaps on the east side of Main Street between E Well Street and W 2nd Street in Condon. Ped/Bike $30,000 X A-17 Beech Street Streetscape in Arlington Improve the streetscape of Beech Street in Arlington to make the environment more pedestrian/bicycle friendly with wider sidewalks, raised crossings, landscaped buffers, and pedestrian-scale lighting. Ped/Bike $176,000 X X X Total $1,837,000 D-5 OTHER PROJECTS Name Description Category Cost Timeline Coordinated Plan Gilliam County will be updating its Coordinated Plan with a grant from ODOT in 2015 and 2016. Transit -- Near-term Condon Airport Complete feasibility study to determine if upgrades are needed for any of the airport facilities to serve future growth and activity. The City of Condon is planning to provide water service to the airport to increase future airport development and activity. Air $10,000 Long-term Arlington Airport Based on the opportunities available for industrial uses and the existing industrial uses at the airport, a feasibility study is recommended to determine the cost to pave and maintain the runway at the Arlington Airport. Air $10,000 Long-term Shutler Station Rail Crossovers New rail crossovers are needed at Shutler Station to support rail operations. Rail $300,000 Near-term At-grade railroad crossings in the City of Arlington The City, County, and Waste Management should maintain coordination with UP and Watco to minimize delay and maintain emergency vehicle access. Rail Near-term I-84 Eastbound Bridge The bridge will be widened at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current design standards. Bridge $1.1 million Near-term I-84 John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay ODOT has planned a bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering is scheduled for 2016, and construction is scheduled for 2018. Bridge $2.482 million Near-term Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement The County plans to replace the Lonerock Road bridge. The road serves as the primary route in and out of Lonerock and is therefore a high priority for the County. Bridge $2 million Long-term Total $5,902,000 Appendix E Gilliam County Implementing Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 2015-02 GILLIAM COUNTY, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDED BY ORDINANCE #2011-04, REPEALING AND DELETING THE 1999 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION PLAN, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County' s Transportation System Plan . The 1999 Plan, prepared by David Evans and Associates, has become outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project in the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qual ified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given a officia l notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Gilliam County and the three incorporated Cities of Arlington, Condon, and Lonerock; and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regula r intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committee with a number of publ ic forums to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18, 2015, the third on May 7, 2015, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of the pending adoption of the 2015 Transportation System Plan by a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment Notice on July 17, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Gilliam County Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 8, 2015, and at the close of the public hearing, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the updated Transportation System Plan to the Gilliam County Court; and Page 1 of2 WHEREAS, the Gilliam County Court conducted a public hearing, on October 21, 2015. At the close of the public hearing, the County Court moved unanimously to repeal the 1999 Plan and adopt the 2015 Transportation System Plan, NOW, THEREFORE, the Gilliam County Court hereby ordains: SECTION 1. The 1999 Transportation System Plan, prepared by David Evans and Associates, is hereby repealed and deleted from the County's Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2. The 2015 Transportation System Plan, prepared by Kittelson & Associates and attached as Exhibit 1, is hereby adopted as a stand-alone document serving as Goal 12 of the County's Comprehensive Plan. The 2015 Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies may be reprinted under the Goal12 section of the County's Comprehensive Plan . EMERGENCY CLAUSE Inasmuch as the safety, health, and welfare of the citizens of Gilliam County are impacted, it is important to have current plans in effect as quickly as possible. An emergency is deemed to exist and this ordinance shall begin full force and in effect upon approval and signed by the County Court. SIGNATURES :\- APPROVED by the Gilliam County Court on the ~\~ day of October 2015. ATTEST: GILLIAM COUNTY COURT ~~ - Judge ,7_e ~er Commissioner Dennis Granquist Page 2 of2 Appendix F City of Arlington Implementing Ordinances Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 416 CITY OF ARLINGTON, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ORDINANCE 394, REPEALING AND DELETING THE REFERENCE TO THE 1999 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN, AND ADOPTING THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN WHEREAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County’s Transportation System Plan. The plan at that time had been prepared in 1999 by David Evans and Associates and was becoming outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project in the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qualified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given an official notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Gilliam County and the three incorporated Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock, and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regular intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committees with a number of workshops to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18, 2015, the third on May 7, 2015, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment on July 23, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Arlington City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 24, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the updated Transportation System Plan to the Arlington City Council; and WHEREAS, the Arlington City Council conducted a public hearing on October 7, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the County Court moved unanimously to repeal the 1999 Plan and adopt the 2015 Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Arlington hereby ordains: SECTION 1. The 1999 Transportation System Plan, prepared by David Evans and Associates, is hereby repealed and deleted from the County’s Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2. The 2015 Transportation System Plan, attached as Exhibit 1, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, is hereby adopted as a stand-alone document serving as Goal 12 of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The 2015 Transportation System Plan Goals and Policies may be reprinted under Goal 12 of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Approved by the Common Council and signed by the Mayor this 4th day of November, 2015. ____________________________________ Jeff Bufton, Mayor ATTEST ________________________________________ Pam Rosenbalm, City Recorder Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 417 CITY OF ARLINGTON, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE #255 AS AMENDED, TO IMPLEMENT THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN, AND ESTABLISH UPDATED STREET DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROADS AND STREETS IN THE CITY WHEREAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County’s Transportation System Plan. The plan at that time had been prepared in 1999 by David Evans and Associates and was becoming outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project in the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qualified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given an official notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Gilliam County and the three incorporated Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock, and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regular intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committees with a number of workshops to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops Page 2 of 3 conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18, 2015, the third on May 7, 2015, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment on July 23, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Arlington City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 24, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the amendments to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance to the Arlington City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on October 7, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the City Council moved unanimously to amend the City’s Subdivision Ordinance to update the Street Design Standards for future street development in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Arlington hereby ordains: The following Sections of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance are amended as follows: SECTION 1. Section 10-2-6 is revised in its entirety to read. STREET WIDTHS: Future street Right of Way and Improved Roadway Widths shall be governed by the Design Standards in the 2015 Transportation System Plan. Page 3 of 3 SECTION 2. Section 10-8-1(E) is revised to read. FUTURE STREETS AND ROADS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN. Approved by the common Council and signed by the Mayor this 4th day of November, 2015. ____________________________________ Jeff Bufton, Mayor ATTEST ________________________________________ Pam Rosenbalm, City Recorder Page 1 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 418 CITY OF ARLINGTON, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY’S ZONING ORDINANCE, ORDINANCE #383, AS AMENDED, TO IMPLEMENT THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN, AND ESTABLISH UPDATED STREET DESIGN STANDARDS FOR ROADS AND STREETS IN THE CITY WHEREAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County’s Transportation System Plan. The plan at that time had been prepared in 1999 by David Evans and Associates and was becoming outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project in the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qualified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given an official notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Gilliam County and the three incorporated Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock, and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regular intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committees with a number of workshops to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18, 2015, the third on May 7, 2015, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and Page 2 of 2 WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment on July 23, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Arlington City Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on September 24, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the update implementing Ordinance amendments to reflect the new Transportation System Plan in the City’s Zoning Ordinance to the Arlington City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on October 7, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the City Council moved unanimously to amend the City’s Zoning Ordinance to update the Street Design Standards for future street development in the City. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Arlington hereby ordains: SECTION 1. Section 4.19(1) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance is revised to read. FUTURE STREETS AND ROADS SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN. Approved by the Common Council and signed by the Mayor this 4th day of November, 2015. ____________________________________ Jeff Bufton, Mayor ATTEST ________________________________________ Pam Rosenbalm, City Recorder Appendix G City of Condon Implementing Ordinances ORDINANCE NO. 2016-02_ CJTY OF CONDON, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE, #1012-01, TO IMPLEI\fi:NT THE 2015 TRA.NSPORTATION l'LAN, AND ESTABLISH ROADACCESS MANAGEMENTSTANDARDSFORROADSAND STREETS IN THE CITY, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County's Transportation System Plan. The plan at that time had been prepared in 1999 by David F.vans and Associates and was becoming outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project m the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qualified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given an official notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Oilliam County and the tlu'ee incorporated Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock, and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regular intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committees with a number of workshops to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops P~~&< l ofJ conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18. 2015, the third on May 7, 20 I 5, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment on July 28, 20 15; and WHEREAS, the Condon City Plan:t1 ing Commission conducted a public hearing on September 22, 201 5, at the close of the public hearing, the Commission moved unanimously to recommend the updated Transportation System Plan to the Condon City Council; and WHEREAS, the Condon City Council conducted a public hearing on Octobef 7, 2015, 8t the close of the public hearing, the City Council moved unanimously to repeal the 1999 Plan and adopt the 2015 Plan, along with the Statement of Compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Condon hereby ordains: SECIION l. The attached Access Management Standards, Exhibit I, are hereby adopted and placed in the City's Zoning Ordinance in the Supplementary Provisions, Section 152.415. EMERGENCY CLAUSE Inasmuch as the safety, health, and welliue of the citizens of the City are impacted, it is important to have current plans in effect as quickly as possible. An emergency is deemed to exist and this ordinance shall begin full force and in e ffect upon approval by the City CoUJlcil and signed by the Mayor. Page 3 ofl EXHIBIT 1 I. ACCESS MANAGEMENT. A. GeneraL The intent of this section is to manage access to land development to preserve the tomspaces if peak demands do not occur at the same time periods. 4. Pursuant to this section, property owners shall: a. Record an easement with the deed allowing cross access to and from other properties served by the joint use driveways and cross access or service drive; b. Record an agreement with the deed that remaining access rights along the roadway will be dedicated to the City and pre-ex.isting driveways will be closed and eliminated after construction of the joint-use driveway; c. Record a joiot maintenance agreement with the deed defining maintenance responsibilities of property owners. 5. The City may reduce required separation distance of access points where they prove impractical, provided all of the following requirements are met: a Joint access driveways and cross access easements are provided in accordance with this section. b. The site plan incmporates a unified access and circulation system in accordance \vith this section. c. The property owner enters into a written agreement with the City, recorded with the deed. that pre-existing connections on the site will be closed and eliminated after construction of each side of the joint use driveway. 6. The City may modify or waive the requirements of this :;ection where the characteristics or layout of abutting properties would make a development of a unified or shared access and circulation system impractical. 2 (D) Access Connection and Driveway Design. I . Driveways shall meet the following standards: a. If the driveway is a one way in or one way out drive, then the driveway shall be a minimum width of 10 feet and a maximum width of 12 feet and shall have appropriate signage designating the driveway as a one way connection. b. For two-way access, each lane shall have a minimum width of I 0 feet and a maximum width of 12 feet. 2 . Driveway approaches must be designed and located to provide an exiting vehicle with an unobstructed view. Construction of driveways along acceleration or deceleration lanes and tapers shall be avoided due to the potential for vehicular weaving conflicts. 3. The length of driveways shall be designed in accordance with the anticipated storage length for entering and exiting vehicles to prevent vehicles from backing into the flow of traffic on the public road or causing unsafe conflicts with on-site circulation. (E) Req uirements for Phased Development Plans. I . In the interest of promoting unified access and circulation systems, development sites under the same ownership or consolidated for the purposes of development and comprised of more than one building site shall be reviewed as single properties in relation to the access standards of this ordinance. The number of access points permitted shall be the minimum n\Wlber necessary to provide reasonable access to these properties, not the maxim\Wl available for that frotrtage. All necessary easements, agreements, and stipulations shall be met. This shall also apply to phased development plans. The owner and all lessees within the affected area are responsible for compliance with the requirements of this ordinance and both shall be cited for any violation. 2. All access must be internalized using the shared circulation system of the principal development or retail center. Driveways shall be designed to avoid queuing across surrounding parking and driving aisles. (F) Reverse Fron(age. 1. Lots that front on more than one road shall be required to locate motor vehicle accesses on the road with the lower functional classil.kation. 2. When a residential subdivision is proposed that would abut an arterial, it shall be desigru:d to provide through lots along the arterial with access from a frontage road or interior local road. Access rights of these lots to the arterial shall be dedicated to the City of Condon and recorded with the deed. A berm or buffer yard may be required at the rear of through lots to buffer residences from traffic on the arterial. The berm or buffer yaro shall not be located with the public right- of-way. (G) Shared Access. I. Subdivisions with frontage on the state highway system shall be designed into shared access points to and from the highway. Normally a maximum of two accesses shall be allowed regardless of the number of lots or businesses served. If access off of a secondary road is possible, then access should not be allower.l onto the state highway. If access off of a secondary road becomes available, then conversion to that access is encouraged, along with closing the state highway access. (H) Lot Width-to-Depth Ratios. I. To provide for proper site design and prevent the creation of irregularly shaped parcels, the depth of any lot or parcel shall not exceed 3 times its width (or 4 times its width in nuaJ areas) unless there is a topographical or envirournental constraint or an eltisting man-made feature. (I) Connectivity. 1. The road system of proposed subdivisions shall be designed to connect with existing, proposed, and planned roads outside of the subdivision as provided in this section. 2. Wherever a proposed development abuts unplatted land or a 1\.Jture development phase of the same development, road stubs shall be provided to provide access to abutting properties or to logically extend the road system into the surrounding area. All road stubs shall be provided with a temporary turn-around unless specifically exempted by the Public Works Director, and the restoration and extension of the road shall be the responsibility of any future developer of the abutting land. 3. Minor collector and local residential access roads shall connect with surrounding roads to permit the convenient movement of traffic between residential neighborhoods or facilitate em~rgency access and evacuation. Connections shall be designed to avoid or minimize through traffic on local roads. Appropriate design and traffic control such as four-way stops and traffic-calming measures are the preferred means of discouraging through traffic. 4. Culs-de-sac or permanent dead-end roads may be used as part of a development plan. However, through roads are encouraged except where topographical, environmental, or existing adjacent land use constraints make connecting roads infeasible. Where culs-de-sac are planned, accessways shall be provided connecting the ends of culs-de-sac to eaeh other, to other roads, or to neighborhood activity centers. 4 (J) Variances to Access Management Standards. 1. The granting of the variance shall meet the purpose and intent of these regulations and shall not be considered until every feasible option for meeting access standards is explored. 2. Applicants for a variance from these standards must provide proof of unique or special conditions that make strict application of the provisions impractical. Applicants shall include proof that: a. lndirect or restricted access cannot be obtained; b. No engineering or construction solutions can be applied to mitigate the condition; and c. No alternative access is available from a road with a lower functional classification than the primary roadway. 3. No variance shall be granted where such hardship is self-created. (K) Nonconforming Access Featu~. l. Legal access connections in place as of (date of adoption) that do not conform with the standards herein are considered nonconforming features and shall be brought into compliance v.•ith applicable standards under the following conditions: a. When new access connection permits are requested; b. Change in use or enlargements or improvements that will increase trip generation. 5 ORDlNANCE NO. 2016-01_ CITY OF CONDON, OREGON AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ClTY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, ORDINANCE #2012-01, REPEALING AND DELETING THE REFE RENCE TO THE 1999 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN, AND ADOPTlNG THE 2015 TRANSPORTATION PLAN, ALONG WITH A STATEMENT OF COMJ>LIANCE WITH THE TRANSPOR.TATlON PLANNING RULE, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHll:REAS, in late 2013 the County applied to the Oregon Department of Transportation for a grant to assist in updating the County's Transportation System Plan. The plan at that time had been prepared in 1999 by David Evans and Associates and was becoming outdated; and WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Transportation funded the project in the beginning of 2014 and began a selection process to select a qualified consultant to assist the County in preparing the updated Transportation System Plan; and WHEREAS, Kittelson & Associates of Bend, Oregon, was selected and was given an official notice to proceed on September 8, 2014; and WHEREAS, the scope of the work is to provide an updated Transportation System Plan which serves Gilliam County and the three incorporated Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock, and WHEREAS, the consultants began work preparing the updated Transportation System Plan and, at regular intervals, provided the Public Advisory Committees with a number of workshops to review the Plan material as it was available. There were four workshops Pasct on conducted beginning on December 3, 2014, with the second on March 18, 2015, the third on May 7, 2015, and joint work sessions in both Arlington and Condon on July 8, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Department of Land Conservation and Development was notified of a Post Acknowledgment Plan Amendment on July 28, 2015; and WHEREAS, the Condon City Planning Conunission conducted a public hearing on September 22, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the Conunission moved unanimously to recommend the updated Transportation System Plan to the Condon City Counci l; and WHEREAS, the Condon City Council conductt!d a public hearing on October 7, 2015, at the close of the public hearing, the City Council moved unanimously to repeal the 1999 Plan and adopt the 2015 Plan, along with the Statement of Compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule. NOW, THEREFORE, the Common Council of the City of Condon hereby otdains: SECTION 1. Tbe 1999 Transportation System Plan, prepared by David Evans and Associates, is hereby repealed and deleted from the County's Comprehensive Plan. SECTION 2. The 2015 Transportation System Plan, attached as Exhibit 1, prepared by Kittelson & Associates, is hereby adopted as a stand-alone document serving as Goal 12 o f the City's Comprehcn. 35 mph but <45 mph Posted Speed limit >= 45 mph Unincorporated Communities Rural Lands Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate N/A N/A 0.70 0.70 0.70 OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 East of Condon District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 Within Condon City Limits Regional Highway 0.85 0.80 0.75 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits District Highway 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits, Outside of Cities Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 Within Arlington City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 *N/A = Not applicable within Gilliam County. Source: OHP, Table 6, modified for relevance Policy 1G, Major Improvements requires maintaining performance and improving safety by improving efficiency and management before adding capacity. ODOT coordinates with regional and local governments to address highway performance and safety. OHP Goal 2: System Management  Policy 2A, Partnerships establishes the need for cooperative partnerships between ODOT and state and federal agencies, regional governments, cities, counties, tribal governments, and the private sector.  Policy 2B, Off-System Improvements helps local jurisdictions adopt land use and access management policies. 2 Any OHP Amendments are contingent on Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) approval. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-9 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Policy 2E, Intelligent Transportation Systems puts emphasis on considering a broad range of Intelligent Transportation Systems services to improve system efficiency and safety in a cost-effective manner. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Esau Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure1-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \1-1 Sta te H igh way Cla ssif icat ion .mx d - agr iffin - 2 :19 PM 11 /26 /20 14 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census State Highway ClassificationGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ State Highway Classification System (2013) Interstate Statewide Regional District County Roads Railroads City Boundary # Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Policy 2F, Traffic Safety establishes the need to continually improve safety for all highway system users with solutions involving engineering, education, enforcement and emergency medical services. OHP Goal 3: Access Management  Policy 3A, Classification and Spacing Standards defines access spacing standards for the location, spacing and type of road and street intersections and approach roads on state highways. The adopted spacing standards consider highway classification, posted speed, safety, and operational needs. Revisions to the OHP were adopted by the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) on March 21, 2012 to address Senate Bill 264 (2011). The revisions included reductions in spacing standards outside of interchange areas and established unique standards based on highway volume. Access management spacing standards for highway segments with AADT of 5,000 vehicles or less are shown in Table 1-4. Table 1-4 Access Management Spacing Standards for Highway Segments Route Name Description Functional Classification 2012 AADT Posted Speed (mph) Access Spacing Standard (feet) Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate >5000 65 10,560 OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway <5000 55 650 East of Condon District Highway <5000 55 650 Within Condon City Limits Regional/District Highway <5000 40/30/20 360/250/150 OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits, Outside of Cities Regional Highway <5000 55 650 Within Arlington City Limits <5000 55/45/25 650/360/150 Within Condon City Limits <5000 40/30/20 360/250/150 OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway <5000 55 650  Policy 3D, Deviations establishes general policies and procedures for deviations from adopted access management standards and policies. OHP Goal 4: Travel Alternatives  Policy 4A, Efficiency of Freight Movement establishes the need to maintain and improve the efficiency of freight movement on the state highway system and access to intermodal connections. The State seeks to balance the needs of long distance and through freight movements with local transportation needs on highway facilities in both urban areas and rural communities.  Policy 4B, Alternative Passenger Modes establishes the need to advance and support alternative passenger transportation systems where travel demand, land use and other Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon factors indicate the potential for successful and effective development of alternative passenger modes. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the OHP The Oregon Highway Plan was and will continue to be relevant in the assessment of ODOT facilities in the current and updated TSPs. The 1999 TSP includes a Streets and Highways Element that defines the street functional classification, and specifies classifications within the Gilliam County roadway network. State mobility targets for the existing and no-build conditions will be developed based on the facility designations and the adopted mobility targets contained within the OHP. Oregon Aviation Plan The Oregon Aviation Plan (OAP) is a comprehensive evaluation of Oregon’s aviation system, thus providing a systematic approach to meeting improvements and development strategies recommended within the Plan. The plan looks beyond the traditional state aviation system planning elements by assessing the following three areas:  Existing aviation infrastructure;  The economic benefit of the aviation industry; and,  National importance and state significance of each airport. There are two airports in Gilliam County, the Condon State Airport – Pauling Field, and the Arlington Municipal Airport. The Condon State Airport is classified as a Local General Aviation Airport by the OAP. The Arlington Municipal Airport is a Remote Access/Emergency Service Airport in the OAP. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the OAP The 1999 TSP includes an Air Service Element, which recognizes that the Condon State Airport is a part of the OAP. In addition, there is a 2002 Airport Layout Plan which considers and addresses OAP recommendations for the Condon State Airport. An Airport Layout Plan is recommended to be developed from the existing conditions map of the Arlington Municipal Airport to reflect the OAP. Oregon Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan The Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is divided into two parts, the Policy and Action Plan and the Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide. The first part was adopted in 1995, while the second part was updated in 2011. The Plan outlines key characteristics that should be considered related to accommodating bicycles and pedestrians when planning and designing state facilities. The Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan does not require specific standards for non-ODOT facilities. However, the plan recommends that land use patterns, transportation system layout, public transportation system design, and other planning related issues consider the impact to bicycle and pedestrian users and to the bicycle and pedestrian system as a whole. To this end, the plan provides specific design recommendations to support bicycle and pedestrian travel. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-13 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan recognizes the role that safe, attractive, convenient, and easy to use bicycle and pedestrian facilities play in the provision of the state and local transportation systems. The plan includes seven chapters that guide the planning and design of on-road bikeways, restriping, bicycle parking, walkways, street crossings, intersections, and shared use paths. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan The existing TSP contains a Bikeway Plan element and a Pedestrian System element that address bicycle and pedestrian system needs, goals and policies, respectively. The TSP update will include revised inventory information, incorporate Safe Routes to School program recommendations, seek to better connect attractions such as community services, downtown areas, parks and trails with County residents using sidewalk improvements and/or shared use paths, and include specific technical analyses relative to the bicycle and pedestrian plan recognizing the important role that these modes play in the provision of a sustainable, safe, and efficient transportation system. Oregon Freight Plan The Oregon Freight Plan was adopted in June 2011 and provides a 25-year planning vision. The purpose of the Oregon Freight Plan (OFP) is to “improve freight connections to local, state, regional, national and global markets in order to increase trade-related jobs and income for Oregon workers and businesses.” The OFP addresses challenges facing the freight system, including system operation and development, safety, communications, environmental considerations and funding. While the freight plan serves as a modal element of the Oregon Transportation Plan, the OFP includes elements of several modes including marine, aviation, rail, pipeline, and truck transport. Key routes and transfer sites are presented and summarized within the plan. Strategic freight corridors identified by the Central Oregon Area Commission on Transportation (ACT) include: The Columbia River Corridor, I-84 and Marine M-84. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the OFP The 1999 TSP does not include a Freight Mobility Element which identifies improvements to the local street network to increase the efficient movement of freight and to decrease traffic impacts to local streets. The TSP Update should identify improvements to the street network in order to improve freight mobility. The TSP update will include railroad, airports, pipelines, Highway 19, and intermodal connections as they pertain to the local freight system. Oregon Public Transportation Plan As a modal element of the OTP, the Oregon Public Transportation Plan provides a long range vision for the public transportation system in Oregon. This system incorporates public and private transportation providers and is comprised of ridesharing and volunteer programs, taxi and minibus service, and intercity and intracity bus and passenger rail services. The Public Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-14 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Transportation Plan outlines three primary goals and associated policies and strategies that guide public transportation through the year 2015. In recognition of limited resources, the Plan prioritizes elements that deliver service to “those Oregonians most dependent on the public transportation system (seniors, disabled, low-income, and youth).” 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the Public Transportation Plan The 1999 TSP includes an inventory of public transportation facilities in the cities. The TSP update should document public transportation services available to residents, including trips within the County and the region. Gilliam County does not have any urban areas containing a population of more than 25,000 and is not required to evaluate the feasibility of public transit systems in those cities. However, Gilliam County operates a dial-a-ride transit system available for all residents. Oregon Rail Plan The Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) officially adopted the Oregon State Rail Plan at their September 18, 2014 meeting. The TSP update should take into account this revised planning document during the update. The Oregon Rail Plan meets mandatory federal and state planning requirements related to the management and maintenance of the railway system, and provides general management goals for State rail facilities. Chapter 2 is particularly relevant to Gilliam County given the existing rail infrastructure. The Oregon Rail Plan provides the following benefits associated with railways serving industrial lands. Because of the continuing dependence of many producers upon rail services, communities in their land use planning should attempt to ensure that a sufficient quantity of land with convenient access to rail service is planned and zoned for industrial development. There are several reasons why industrial parks and other industrially zoned property should have rail access: 1. Railroads tend to be more energy efficient than trucks and, therefore, can make better use of available energy resources. 2. Some commodities and products, especially those that are large, bulky, low valued, oversized, or not transportable over highways can be transported only by, or most efficiently by, railroad. 3. Access to rail service enable shippers to have a wider choice of transportation options, thus having a better bargaining position when negotiating rates with rail and truck carriers. While the initial occupant or occupants of a particular site or industrial park may not require rail service, subsequent occupants may. 4. Rail service enables delivery of goods in periods of emergency, strike or inclement weather when trucks cannot operate. 5. A railroad right-of-way may take less space than roads, and a railroad spur track may handle more volume in less space than could be done with trucks. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The Oregon Rail Plan further describes the implications of rail service with respect to zoning, noting that industrial lands served by rail are more valuable than those without; whereas residential lands near railways are less valuable. The plan also notes that communities with access to short lines have an advantage in attracting business that need frequent switching or rail car movements. Exhibit 1-2. State of Oregon Railroads. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the Oregon Rail Plan The Gilliam County 1999 TSP has an element addressing Rail Service in the County, including a small spur line servicing the Shutler Flats Industrial Park, Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycle Center and Chemical Waste Management of the Northwest. Transportation Safety Action Plan The Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) serves as the state of Oregon’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), and satisfies federal requirements. The current TSAP was adopted in 2011 and an update is planned to be complete in 2015 to reflect requirements of the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21). The TSAP lays out a set of actions to reduce crashes. The set of actions are prioritized based on those factors that contribute to the greatest number of transportation-related deaths and injuries. The TSAP identifies impaired driving, not using safety Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon constraints, vehicle speed, and inexperience drivers as Emphasis Areas that should be the focus of statewide safety projects. Beyond identifying actions to decrease the overall number of fatalities and injuries related to transportation, the TSAP also serves as a guide to prioritize investments. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the TSAP The 1999 TSP does not address the Transportation Safety Action Plan. The updated TSP should include analysis that supports the TSAP Emphasis Areas, and reference national performance goals for Federal highway programs. OAR Chapter 734-051 (Division 51) Commonly referred to as Division 51, ODOT has adopted OAR 734-051 to establish procedures and criteria to govern highway approaches, access control, spacing standards, medians and restriction of turning movements in compliance with statewide planning goals, in a manner compatible with acknowledged comprehensive plans and consistent with state law and the OTP. Any new street or driveway connections, as well as any changes to existing street or driveway connections, to state roads within the TSP study boundary must be in compliance with these rules. OAR 734-051 policies address the following:  How to bring existing and future approaches into compliance with access spacing standards, and ensure the safe and efficient operation of the highway;  The purpose and components of an access management plan; and,  Requirements regarding mitigation, modification and closure of existing approaches as part of project development. Access management standards adopted by ODOT and applicable to the County’s TSP are summarized in Table 1-4. OHP Policies 3A and 3C establish access management objectives for state highways and interchange areas based on facility type and set standards for spacing of approaches. These standards have also been adopted as part of OAR 734-051, which provides the regulatory basis for implementation. Senate Bill 408 changes Oregon law concerning management of access (private driveways) onto state highways. Its provisions streamline the management of access onto state highways for a large number of private driveways. The bill also provides local government, property owners and other stakeholders a place at the table during planning, development and design process for highway projects. The bill deals with the access management process in three priority areas: 1. Private driveways that do not have a permit issued by ODOT 2. Access management decisions made as part of highway planning projects 3. Access management decisions made as part of highway construction projects Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon A summary of the Senate Bill 408 changes is provided in Appendix A. Senate Bill 264 was passed in June 2011, and amended temporary rules that took effect in May 2012. The bill directs ODOT to develop proposed legislation to “codify, clarify and bring consistency to issuance of access based on objective standards for highway segments where the annual amount of daily traffic is 5,000 vehicles or fewer.” The temporary rules are reflected in the OHP amendment to the 2011 Access Management Standards. 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the OAR 734-051 The 1999 TSP outlines the guiding principles used in the adoption of new access management standards consistent with OAR 734-051 and the 1999 OHP. Table 7-1 in the 1999 TSP summarizes the street design guidelines and includes access management standards based on the guiding principles. The TSP Update shall incorporate the amendments to OAR 734-051 through the adoption of Senate Bill 264 and Senate Bill 408 when establishing revised street design guidelines. ODOT Highway Design Manual An update to the Highway Design Manual (HDM) was released in 2012, and includes ODOT standards and procedures for the location and design of new construction, major reconstruction, and resurfacing, restoration or rehabilitation (3R) projects. The HDM is used for all projects that are located on state highways. The following matrix in Table 1-5 shows which design standards are applicable for certain projects based on project type, and whether the project pertains to a state route. Table 1-5 Design Standards Selection Matrix Project Type Roadway Jurisdiction State Highways Local Agency Roads Modernization/ Bridge New/Replacement ODOT 4R^/ New Urban AASHTO* Preservation/ Bridge Rehabilitation ODOT 3R^ Urban AASHTO Preventive Maintenance 1R (Preservation) N/A Safety- Operations- Miscellaneous/ Special Programs ODOT Urban AASHTO ^4R = Reconstruction; 3R = Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation *AASHTO: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Source: 2012 HDM, Table 1-1 In addition, the HDM identifies more stringent capacity standards than those within the Oregon Highway Plan when developing new highway facilities, to further leverage the investment in infrastructure. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-18 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 1999 TSP Assessment Relative to the Highway Design Manual The design standards in the HDM will be integrated into the detailed design and engineering that will occur for projects once they are incorporated into the TSP Update and are programmed as part of the County’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for transportation. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2018) The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is Oregon’s four-year transportation capital improvement program that identifies the funding for, and scheduling of, transportation projects and programs. It includes projects on the federal, state, county and city transportation systems, multimodal projects (highway, passenger rail, freight, public transit, bicycle and pedestrian) and projects in the National Parks, National Forests and Indian tribal lands. Oregon’s STIP covers a four-year construction period, but is updated every two years in accordance with federal requirements. Two projects are included in the approved 2012-2015 STIP; both were completed in 2014. The 2015-2018 STIP was reviewed for projects to consider during the development of Gilliam TSP Update for complementary or conflicting traffic impacts. The 2015-2018 Draft STIP identifies one project within Gilliam County, as summarized in Table 1-6. Table 1-6 2015-2018 Draft STIP Projects within Gilliam County Section Total Cost Description Status Year (FFY) I-84: John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay $2,482,000 Deck overlap; Joints Construction Scheduled 2018 House Bill 3379 Administrative Rule House Bill (HB) 3379, which passed during the 2009 legislative session, directed the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) to adopt an administrative rule to establish an application process that local governments can use for economic development projects if they are not able to meet the funding or timing requirements of the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) related to state highways. The administrative rule describes how a local jurisdiction may work with the OTC and ODOT to do one of the following:  Apply for a time extension to meet TPR requirements;  Submit a plan proposing alternative methods of funding that will meet the standards adopted by the OTC;  Apply to adjust traffic performance measures during an interim period prior to completion of construction of the proposed development; or,  Apply to allow various types of traffic performance measures other than volume to capacity ratios (v/c). Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The OTC adopted the Administrative Rule in December 2010 and provisions pertaining to the above can be found in OAR 731-017-005 through -0055. REGIONAL PLANS ODOT Region 4 Park and Ride Lot Plan The Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council and its partners – the Mid Columbia Economic Development District and Klamath County Planning Department – developed a Park & Ride Lot Plan for ODOT Region 4, which straddles the Highway 97 corridor from California to the Columbia. The Plan identifies there are currently no formally-designated Park and Ride lots or rideshare programs in Region 4 outside of the Central Oregon Area (Jefferson, Crook and Deschutes counties). ODOT Region 4 has funded an analysis of rideshare feasibility in the Lower John Day (Wasco, Sherman, Gilliam, and Wheeler Counties) and South Central Oregon (Klamath and Lake Counties) areas and preliminary findings from this work suggest that there is interest and demand for an expanded rideshare program in these areas. The Plan identifies a need to facilitate partnerships between the Port of Arlington and the City of Arlington to develop the lot at Earl Snell Park. COUNTY PLANS AND POLICIES Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan (Last Amended 2011) The Comprehensive Plan is a statement of public policy for the guidance of growth, development, and conservation of resources within the County. There is basic information in the Comprehensive Plan related to the transportation system within the County, listed under Goal 12 Transportation. There are a number of policies that directly relate to transportation system planning. These policies are provided in Appendix B. The Comprehensive Plan describes the dynamic tension between rural and urban land uses and the County’s role in providing a planning framework that both preserves agricultural land and provides for the smooth transition of rural to urban use. The policy framework set out in Chapter 14 is related to the urban growth boundary (UGB) and urbanization. These policies relate to the timing, location, and funding of public facilities. Pertinent to the TSP Update process, particularly within the areas of the UGB outside of city limits, policies specifically address the role of public facilities in supporting or restricting growth. Gilliam County Zoning Ordinance (Last updated 2011) The Gilliam County Zoning and Land Development Ordinance were updated in 2010 and adopted in 2011. Access management standards are contained in Article 5, Section 2.280(A-O). The intent of this section is to manage access to land development to preserve the transportation system in terms of safety, capacity, and function. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Gilliam County TSP (1999) The 1999 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan (County TSP) addresses the County’s anticipated transportation needs through the year 2020. The long-range plan is intended to serve as a guide for managing existing County transportation facilities and developing transportation facilities to meet existing and future needs. Transportation Goals and Policies are found in Chapter 2. The following projects for the 20 year planning period were listed in table 7.7 of the 1999 TSP. Many of these have been completed. CITY PLANS AND POLICIES City of Condon Comprehensive Plan (2011 update) The City of Condon serves as the Gilliam County Seat. The City’s Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2011, and notes the City serves as a regional service center for the surrounding Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-21 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon farming community. The City has an existing population of just under 700, according to the 2010 census data. The Comprehensive Plan, begins with a brief description of the community and local history. The Plan then follows the Statewide Planning Goals, addressing each one individually to provide basic information. The Comprehensive Plan’s discussions of Goal 10: Housing, Goal 12: Transportation, and Goal 14: Urbanization are of particular interest in this update of the County (and City’s) TSP. The City joined with Gilliam County to prepare the 1999 Transportation System Plan. That plan is adopted by reference into this Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the City has adopted the recommended street standards in the City’s Public Works Standards. Those street design standards are carried over into the City’s Subdivision Ordinance and are implemented as development occurs in the City. City of Condon Buildable Lands Inventory (2001) In 2001, the City undertook a Buildable Lands Inventory. The purpose of a Buildable Lands Inventory is primarily to determine if there is enough available land remaining within the City and Urban Growth Boundary to meet the projected population needs for the next twenty years. The secondary purpose is to ascertain where most of the development is occurring and determine the probability for needed urban services as the City continues to grow. The Buildable Lands Inventory, once completed, is generally outdated at the issuance of the next building permit and absolute accuracy is not required unless an Urban Growth Boundary Expansion is being contemplated. The 2010 Census Data indicated the population of the City is just 682; however, City staff believes it is closer to 800. The Census found that that there are 357 occupied homes in the City to yield an average household size of 1.91 persons per home. This is particularly useful when determining future land needs in the City with any potential expansion of the Urban Growth Boundary. A review of the Buildable Lands Inventory Map of 2001 indicates a sufficient amount of land for future residential development. There are a considerable number of platted residential lots and there is a 30 acre tract that is currently undeveloped in the southwest corner of the City. There is approximately 97 acres within the Urban Growth Boundary, on the east side of the City, which is currently undeveloped. These two areas could support approximately 590 homes, or approximately 1,100 new residents, based on the current household size, without expanding the existing Urban Growth Boundary. There is adequate land available barring some unforeseen economic activity to boost the residential housing needs of the community. The City has directed its Planning Staff to begin the Planning Process to bring the Condon State Airport into the City’s Urban Growth Boundary. The purpose of which is to allow the extension of domestic water service to the airport and to the hangar area. The airport lays almost immediately adjacent to the City’s existing UGB. There is but one intervening property. If the process is successful, it should be completed by the end of 2014. Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-22 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Condon Transportation System Plan (1999) The 1999 City of Condon TSP provides a guide for the City of Condon to meet its transportation goals and objectives. The following goals and objectives were developed from information supplied by the Transportation Advisory Committee, the Local Working Group, city staff, and public response. Throughout the planning process, each element of the plan was evaluated against these parameters. The City’s goals reflect a desire to maintain a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system that enhances the livability of Condon and accommodates growth and development through careful planning and management of existing and future transportation facilities. Among other goals that reflect state policies, a few of the City’s goals reflect its unique characteristics and indicate a desire to:  Accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the local community;  Encourage and support the use of alternative modes of transportation (walking, bicycling, and specialty transit) through improved access, safety, and service; and,  Improve coordination among Condon, Gilliam County, and ODOT. The City’s 20-year Transportation Project List is provided in Table 7-5 of the TSP. Condon State Airport Layout Plan (2002) The Condon State Airport Layout Plan was developed in 2002 for the Oregon Department of Aviation, which owns the facility. The Plan developed using a complete public process and copies of the plan were furnished to the City and the County with a recommendation for adoption. The airport has been continuously operated by the State of Oregon since it was constructed in 1951. The airport accommodates general aviation and agricultural users serving the local community and the surrounding region. Condon State Airport has a land area of approximately 104 acres and is partially zoned Airport Development (A-D) by Gilliam County. The outer periphery of the airport is predominantly zoned Exclusive Farm Use (A-E). The airport is located entirely outside the City's urban growth boundary (UGB). City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan (2003) The City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2003. The Comprehensive Plan begins with a brief description of the community and local history. The Plan then follows the Statewide Planning Goals, addressing each one individually to provide basic information. The Comprehensive Plan’s discussions of Goal 10: Housing, Goal 12: Transportation, and Goal 14: Urbanization are of particular interest in this update of the County (and City’s) TSP. The Buildable Lands Map was completed in the Fall of 2002 via a windshield survey by the City’s staff. It noted a number of residential lots available, both in the upper areas of the City and in the Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon southern area of the City where a new subdivision (the first subdivision in the City in over a quarter of a century) has been completed. The buildable lands analysis by staff indicates over 120 vacant lots readily available for development in various portions of the City. There are other vacant lots available that would be difficult to build because of topography, including the area of the early subdivisions in the City where the lots are actually 25’x 100’. In addition, there is a considerable amount of undeveloped residential land on either side of the City that would be available over time. The Transportation System Plan is an element of the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan. It identifies the general location of transportation improvements. Changes in the specific alignment of proposed public road and highway projects shall be permitted without plan amendment if the new alignment falls within a transportation corridor identified in the Transportation System Plan. City of Arlington Transportation System Plan 1999 The 1999 City of Arlington TSP provides a guide for the City to meet its transportation goals and objectives. The following goals and objectives were developed from information supplied by the Transportation Advisory Committee, the Local Working Group, city staff, and public response. Throughout the planning process, each element of the plan was evaluated against these parameters. The City’s goals reflect a desire to maintain a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system that enhances the livability of Condon and accommodates growth and development through careful planning and management of existing and future transportation facilities. Among other goals that reflect state policies, a few of the City’s goals reflect its unique characteristics and indicate a desire to:  Examine the need for specific pedestrian crossing locations in Arlington.  Encourage and support the development of port and rail freight activities.  Preserve and enhance Arlington's municipal airport and support airport master planning efforts.  Improve coordination among Arlington, Gilliam County, ODOT, the Port of Arlington, and Union Pacific Railroad.  Encourage and support the Port of Arlington’s development as a source of freight transport. The City’s 20-year Transportation Project List is provided in Table 7-4 of the TSP. City of Lonerock The City of Lonerock lies to the southeast of the City of Condon, approximately 21 road miles. It is a legally incorporated Oregon Municipality. It has a 2013 certified population of 20. There are approximately 16 homes, sited on platted lots with a municipal water system. Gilliam County Technical Memorandum #1: Plans and Policy Review Project #: 17679.0 December 22, 2014 Page B-24 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon performs most of the administrative work for the community, particularly land use planning. The County has the community planned and zoned as a rural service center. There are no apparent commercial activities or goods and services. The Gilliam County 1999 Transportation System Plan listed the paving of the streets of Lonerock at an estimated cost of $50,000. Most of that work, if not all, has been completed as of October 2014. The Lonerock Bridge has not been replaced. SUMMARY OF TSP UPDATE ACTIONS This review of plans and policies identified the following key elements of the 1999 TSP that need to be updated to remain consistent with current State, County, and City plans and policies.  Identify improvements to the street network in order to improve freight mobility, consistent with the Oregon Freight Plan.  Document public transportation services available to residents of Gilliam County, Oregon that support the goals of the Public Transportation Plan.  Account for revisions to the Oregon State Rail Plan.  Include analysis that supports the TSAP Emphasis Areas, and identify performance goals consistent with the Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan. Appendix A Summary of Senate Bill 408 Amendments to OAR 734-051 1. Private driveways that do not have a permit issued by ODOT SB 408 clarifies how to manage the large number of existing private driveways to state highways that exist today, but do not have a written permit issued by ODOT. The bill changes statute to create the presumption that these driveways have written permission from the department as required by ORS 374. The bill places the burden on the department to show where available documentation does not support this presumption. This enables the department, and the adjacent property owners, to treat existing driveways that do not have a written permit as if they are permitted. · Examples of private driveways covered by SB 408 include driveways onto a state highway that: · Existed prior to 1949 when the statute managing access onto state highways and county roads became law · Were built before April 1, 2000 when the department established statewide standards for issuing permits for driveways onto state highways · Were built by the department as part of highway improvement projects and the department failed to issue a permit 2. Access management decisions made as part of highway planning projects. SB 408 clarifies the process by which ODOT will engage local governments and abutting property owners to address how decisions affecting access to state highways would occur as part of facility plans (interchange area management plans, corridor plans, transportation refinement plans and access management plans). Facility plans document the agreement between ODOT and local government concerning the location of county roads and city streets that connect to the state highway for which the plan is prepared. The department must develop key principles to evaluate how properties abutting the state highway will retain or obtain access to the highway. The key principles must balance the state’s investment in the highway facility with local government plans, approved land uses, and the economic development objectives of the affected property owners. When a facility plan identifies the need to modify, relocate or close an existing private driveway, the key principles must have sufficient detail so that affected property owners are informed of the changes. 3. Access management decisions made as part of highway construction projects. SB 408 clarifies the process by which ODOT will engage local governments and abutting property owners. The bill requires ODOT to develop an access management strategy for a highway improvement and highway modernization project. In developing an access management strategy, the department must engage affected property owners when accesses are proposed for modification, relocation, or closure, or when the department proposes to purchase all rights of access to a segment of state highway. In addition, SB 408 includes provisions to address opportunities for the applicant to resolve disputes as part of planning or construction projects that identify the need to modify, relocate, or close existing private driveways on a state highway. SB 408 is the third of a series of bills beginning with the 2010 session that address management of access onto state highways. The bill was developed by the Access Management Oversight Task Force Senate Bill 408 changes Oregon law concerning management of access (private driveways) onto state highways. Its provisions streamline the management of access onto state highways for a large number of private driveways. The bill also provides local government, property owners and other stakeholders a place at the table during planning, development and design process for highway projects. The bill deals with the access management process in three priority areas. SB 408 Appendix B Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan Policies Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan (Last Amended 2011) The Comprehensive Plan is a statement of public policy for the guidance of growth, development, and conservation of resources within the County. There is basic information in the Comprehensive Plan related to the transportation system within the County, listed under Goal 12 Transportation. There are a number of policies that directly relate to transportation system planning, as outlined below. 1. Major attention by the Oregon State Highway Division should be directed toward improvement of: A) Oregon Route 19 between Arlington and Condon; B) Oregon Route 206 in its entirety In that order, both of these major routes are in need of improvement, including straightening of the basic alignment and widening of the roadway. In several areas, re- engineering and improvement of super elevations should be undertaken. Relative to the State Highway facilities within the County, it shall be the policy of the County to continue to work with, support, and coordinate with the State Highway Six-Year Planning programs. Further, it is not the intent of any county implementing ordinance provisions to preclude or limit any highway improvement project, which merely requires an expansion of an existing right-of-way for completion. Highway projects shall only be regulated when an existing right-of-way realignment is involved where the new alignment crosses productive agricultural lands. Further, should EFU statutes be amended regarding such projects, the County will proceed to consider the inclusion of such amendments into local ordinance provisions. 2. The County's transportation system is at present adequate to handle the needs of the area. Because Union Pacific Railroad has abandoned the line from Arlington to Condon, it will be the policy of Gilliam County to seek the help of appropriate State and Federal agencies for the immediate improvement of the road network so that farm products can continue to move to major market areas in an efficient manner. 3. Current county policy involves periodic maintenance of county roads on a regular schedule. County roads have been prioritized according to use based on the movement of agricultural products, commercial use, and traffic volume with a maintenance schedule adopted. County policy requires that a five-year plan for construction and maintenance of these roads be updated annually. The County hereby reaffirms these policies as being in the general public interest. 4. Although the County, within limitations of available time and manpower, has provided some limited maintenance assistance on private roads on a cost-reimbursable basis, the County is not in a position to guarantee maintenance of private roads or of any road not designed and constructed to predetermined County standards. 5. It has been and will continue to be the policy of Gilliam County not to build or totally fund major improvements of existing roads to serve isolated non-agricultural areas or developments. The requirements for new roads or major improvements for such areas and/or developments shall, therefore, be the responsibility of those areas or developments needing and requesting such facilities and/or improvements. The County will continue to concentrate its maintenance and construction efforts on County Roads of major significance to the overall economy of the County and to those roads, which have been constructed to and "accepted" as County Roads for full maintenance responsibility. 6. If the Condon Radar Base is converted to housing for such a needed purpose, the County will encourage commuter transportation service from said Base to the point(s) of destination, and/or may fully implement those provisions set forth by Policy No. 5 set forth herein before. 7. In order to reduce weed infestation and to conserve agricultural land, it will be the policy of Gilliam County to acquire new rights-of-way no wider than necessary to satisfy construction and maintenance requirements. 8. It is the policy of Gilliam County to look to the Port of Arlington Commission to provide leadership in the development of identified river port sites and facilities, and to encourage the Port Commission to develop its plans in a manner consistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. Further, it is the policy of the county governing body to encourage all county offices and agencies to cooperate with the Port District in this development, consistent with available County resources and provided that sufficient benefits to the overall economy of the County will accrue there. 9. Gilliam County recognizes the importance, existing and potential, of the two public use airports in the county. The county's policy will be to protect these airports from hazards to navigation and to otherwise encourage the development of adjacent lands and facilities in a manner that will be conducive to increased utilization of these fields. The county's policy on the Condon Airport is to support its retention as a state-owned facility. 10. Operation, maintenance, repair and preservation of existing transportation facilities shall be allowed without land use review, except where specifically regulated. 11. Dedication of right-of-way, authorization of construction and the construction of facilities and improvements that follow roadway classification and approved road standards shall be allowed without land use review for improvements designated in the Transportation System Plan. 12. For State projects that require an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA), the draft EIS or EA shall serve as the documentation for local land use review, if local review is required. 13. Gilliam County shall coordinate with the Department of Transportation to implement the highway improvements listed in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) that is consistent with the Transportation System Plan and Gilliam County Comprehensive Plan. 14. Gilliam County shall provide notice to ODOT of land use applications and development permits for properties that have frontage or access onto a state highway. 15. Gilliam County shall consider the findings of ODOT’s draft Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Assessments as integral parts of the land use decision- making procedures. Other actions required, such as a goal exception or plan amendment, will be combined with review of the draft EA or EIS and land use approval process. 16. Gilliam County shall protect the function of existing and planned roadways as identified in the Transportation System Plan. 17. Gilliam County shall include a consideration of a proposal's impact on existing or planned transportation facilities in all land use decisions. 18. Gilliam County shall protect the function of existing or planned roadways or roadway corridors through the application of appropriate land use regulations. 19. Gilliam County shall consider the potential to establish or maintain access ways, paths, or trails prior to the vacation of any public easement of right -of-way. 20. Gilliam County shall preserve right-of-way for planned transportation facilities through acquisitions, dedications, or setbacks. 21. The function of airports shall be protected through the application of appropriate land use designations to assure future land uses are compatible with continued operation of the airport. 22. Airport Inventory Updates: There are no new airports in Gilliam County and the updated plan for the Condon Airport is hereby adopted by reference, but is not found to conflict with any existing Plan policies or implementing Ordinance provisions. The airport at Arlington is classified as a municipal airport. 23. Highway Inventory Updates (Four-Year Statewide Transportation Improvement Program dated 2008-2011): There are no improvement projects identified as applicable to Gilliam County. H:\PROJFILE\17679 - GILLIAM COUNTY TSP\MEMOS\#2_GOALS-OBJECTIVES\FINAL\17679_MEMO2_GOALS FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Plan Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria Date: December 22, 2014 Project #: 17679 To: Susie Anderson, Gilliam County Michael Duncan, ODOT Region 4 From: Casey Bergh, PE, Ashleigh Griffin, and Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE This memorandum documents the guiding principles, goals, objectives, and evaluation criteria for the Gilliam County Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. The goals and objectives will guide the TSP update process to ensure key issues are addressed within this process. This document is organized into three sections:  Background – An overview of the goals and objectives from the 1999 TSP. Key transportation issues and changes in Gilliam County since the adoption of the current TSP.  Goals and Objectives - Desired project outcomes and transportation needs that support the land use and growth vision for Gilliam County. Plan goals for the Updated TSP were developed based on the prior TSP, the County’s 2011 Comprehensive Plan, and County and ODOT input. Objectives outline the discrete elements that, taken as a whole, support and promote the goals.  Evaluation Criteria - Establishes a method for evaluating future alternatives and policies that move in the direction of achieving the identified plan goals and objectives. This document was developed with input from the County, State, and Project Advisory Committee members representing the cities and other local interests. BACKGROUND Transportation System Plans provide the County, Cities, and ODOT with guidance for operating and improving a multimodal transportation system. The TSP focuses on priority projects, policies, and programs for the next 20 years but also provides a vision for longer term projects that could be implemented should funding become available. The TSP is intended to be flexible to respond to changing community needs and revenue sources over the next 20 years and will be updated approximately every 10 years. The TSP builds consensus among Cities, the County, and ODOT on the transportation needs and priority projects for the communities, allowing the local citizens to inform projects that are carried forward for funding from state and federal agencies. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The existing 1999 Gilliam County TSP is almost 15 years old. The goals from the existing TSP are summarized below; the complete goals and objectives of the existing plan are provided as Attachment A.  Goal 1: Preserve the function, capacity, level of service, and safety of the state highways.  Goal 2: Improve and enhance safety and traffic circulation and minimize delay on local streets.  Goal 3: Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county.  Goal 4: Increase the use of alternative modes of transportation (walking, bicycling, rideshare/carpooling, and dial-a-ride transit) through improved access, safety, and service.  Goal 5: Ensure that the road system within the county is adequate to meet public needs, including the transportation disadvantaged.  Goal 6: Improve coordination among Gilliam County, ODOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Port of Arlington, and the local jurisdictions.  Goal 7: Support efforts to maintain the airport facilities for general aircraft and charter services. Since 1999, Gilliam County’s forward vision has substantially changed. The following information provides context and illustrates the challenges, opportunities, and needs tied to the County’s evolving transportation system:  The Cities of Arlington and Condon are out of compliance with state rules and regulations, and have exhausted the project lists identified in the 1999 TSP. In addition, the current TSP does not properly reflect any revised zoning ordinances nor fully align with the County’s Comprehensive Plan.  The County has prioritized building livable, connected communities. The TSP Update will need to include strategies that promote accessibility and connectivity to preserve the local character of the cities of Arlington, Lonerock, and Condon, including: o Develop networks that provide safe and more comfortable access to and from schools, and bicycle/pedestrian connections to downtown. These connections are important for youth, aging populations, and the overall community. None of the cities have continuous sidewalks and/or bike facilities connecting schools, grocery stores, government buildings, and healthcare facilities. Several State Highways run through Condon. The updated TSP will need to promote mobility throughout the County, but not at the expense of providing safe, livable, and vibrant communities. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Since the 1999 TSP, land use patterns have changed. Over the last decade nearly 500 acres of industrial lands were added to the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and city limits of the City of Arlington. The County has also become home to a growing wind turbine industry. The ability to transport turbines for both installation and servicing is central to the development of this industry. The County recognizes that the transportation system improvements are required to support this and other recent emerging industrial uses. The TSP update will consider elements of the Port of Arlington Strategic Plan and the Gilliam County Strategic Plan to better integrate the County’s industrial areas with future transportation system improvements.  The three Cities are widely dispersed and rely on a sizable and remote system of roadways for safe and effective travel. A number of these roadways are aging and could benefit from widened roadbeds, minimized grades, straightened curves, snow fencing, offset intersection/junction realignment or bridge upgrades. These improvements address the basic transportation needs of these communities and their industries. Enhancement and preservation projects such as these would also bolster the system of the emergency routes available in the event of a natural disaster and school bus routes transporting the students. GUIDING PRINCIPLE AND PLAN GOALS The overall guiding principle of the plan is to update it to provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. To achieve this guiding principle, the following plan goals have been developed: GOAL 1: MOBILITY AND CONNECTIVITY Promote a transportation system within the County that links all three cities, and serves existing and future needs for transporting goods and people throughout the County and within each City. Objectives  Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county.  Promote transportation linkages between the widely dispersed cities of Arlington, Condon, and Lone Rock by promoting an integrated system of principal highways that move people and goods throughout the County and connects to other adjoining Counties, a County road system that facilitates transportation between various areas of the County and between principal highways, and a local road system that serves as access to commercial and residential areas. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation and local cities to identify priority roadway improvements and maintenance needs.  Improve traffic circulation within the three cities, the Port of Arlington, and I-84 ingress/egress, while maintaining the local character of each community.  Promote and plan for future industrial, commercial, and residential growth areas.  Update roadway performance standards to ensure the efficient movement of people, goods, commodities, and commercial waste.  Update policies and standards that address street connectivity, spacing, and access management.  Balance local community and state goals for the state highways that run through the Cities. GOAL 2: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Provide a transportation system that supports existing industry and encourages economic development in the County. Objectives  Develop and promote a multi-modal transportation network that supports the existing agriculture, waste management, and wind turbine industries and supports economic diversification in the future.  Promote railroad and waterway freight service when possible, and upgrade highways in nexus areas that lack this option.  Prioritize improving and maintaining the key freight routes of OR 19 between Arlington and Condon, and OR 206 and OR 74 throughout the County.  Maintain and enhance the 10-mile rail segment between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycle Center to serve existing and emerging industrial and commercial uses.  Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county.  Ensure that the transportation system plan supports planned river port terminal facilities in the Columbia River gorge.  Coordinate with the Port of Arlington Strategic Plan and the Gilliam County Strategic Plan to better integrate the County’s industrial areas with these future transportation system improvements. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Ensure that the Arlington and Condon Airports are adequately served by the transportation system and that the transportation system supports the development of supporting land uses around the airports.  Encourage bicycle tourism by promoting and upgrading recreational routes through the County. GOAL 3: SAFETY Provide a transportation system that promotes the safety of current and future travel modes for all users. Objectives  Promote a transportation system that facilitates the use of state highways for safe and efficient travel but also provides safe, livable, and vibrant multimodal corridors in the downtown neighborhoods and central business districts.  Ensure that roadways are designed, constructed, and maintained to an appropriate standard for their expected use, vehicle speeds, and vehicle traffic.  Reduce incidence and severity of motor vehicle crashes.  Evaluate crash trends associated with an aging population.  Provide a transportation system that allows for adequate emergency vehicle access to all land uses.  Promote railway and highway safety at and near railway intersections.  Update County access management standards for all county roads. GOAL 4: MULTIMODAL USERS Provide a multimodal transportation system that permits the safe and efficient transport of people and goods through active modes. Objectives  Promote alternative modes, transit/dial-a-ride service, and rideshare/carpool programs through community awareness and education.  Support the development of regional public transit opportunities.  Promote an interconnected network of bicycle, pedestrian, and transit facilities throughout the County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Consider bicycle and pedestrian facility needs during construction of new roads and during upgrades of existing roads.  Promote a transportation system that includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the cities to promote active transportation to and from schools, downtown areas, grocery stores, government buildings, and healthcare facilities.  Develop plan elements that guide pedestrian and bicycle pathways and facilities to achieve maximum connectivity between bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and vehicle routes and facilities, securing an intermodal network of safety and access for all types of users. GOAL 5: ENVIRONMENT Provide a transportation system that balances transportation services with the need to protect the environment. Objectives  Develop a multi-modal transportation system that avoids reliance upon one form of transportation as well as minimizes energy consumptions and air quality impacts.  Encourage development patterns that decrease reliance on motor vehicles within cities.  Promote design standards that support acquiring only the minimum roadway width necessary for the roadway, including facilities for all users for the roadway classification, and maintenance to reduce weed infestation and conserve agricultural land. GOAL 6: PLANNING AND FUNDING Maintain the safety, physical integrity, and function of the County’s multi-modal transportation network. Objectives  Maintain long-term funding stability for transportation maintenance projects.  Evaluate new innovative funding sources for transportation improvements.  Ensure that the existing transportation network is conserved and enhanced through maintenance and preservation.  Identify interim, short-term, and long-term transportation solutions that will encourage development within the existing Urban Growth Boundaries.  Identify areas where refinement plans or interim measures would increase the life of a facility or delay the need for improvements. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Continue and enhance relationships and improve coordination among Gilliam County, ODOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Port of Arlington, and local jurisdictions. o Cooperate with ODOT in the implementation of the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); o Encourage the improvement of state highways; o Work with local jurisdictions in establishing cooperative road improvement programs, funding alternatives, and schedules; o Work with the local jurisdictions in establishing the right-of-way needed for new roads identified in the TSP; o Leverage federal and state highway funding programs. EVALUATION CRITERIA A qualitative process using the six goals and corresponding objectives above will be used to evaluate the policies and alternatives developed during the TSP update process. The policies and alternatives will be qualitatively scored for each criteria based on the following scale:  Most Desirable: The concept addresses the criterion and/or makes substantial improvements in this criteria category.  Moderately Desirable: The concept partially addresses the criterion and/or makes some improvements in this criteria category.  No Effect: The criterion does not apply to the concept or the concept has no influence on the criteria.  Least Desirable: This concept does not support the intent of and/or negatively impacts the criteria category. At this level of screening, the qualitative comparison will be used to inform discussions about the benefits and tradeoffs of each alternative. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: 1999 Gilliam County TSP Goals and Objectives ATTACHMENT A: 1999 GILLIAM COUNTY TSP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES April 1999 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan CHAPTER 2: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The purpose of the TSP is to provide a guide for Gilliam County to meet its transportation goals and objectives. The following goals and objectives were developed from information contained in the county’s comprehensive plan and public concerns as expressed during public meetings. An overall goal was drawn from the plan, along with more specific goals and objectives. Throughout the planning process, each element of the plan was evaluated against these parameters. OVERALL TRANSPORTATION GOAL To provide and encourage a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system. Policies 1. Maintain and upgrade the overall transportation system within the county to meet present and future needs. 2. Develop and upgrade highway facilities in such a manner that valuable soil, timber, water, scenic, historic, or cultural resources are not damaged or impaired. 3. Provide adequate signage along major and minor county roads for the purpose of easy identification. 4. Design new roads and highways to preserve and enhance natural and scenic resources, i.e., new roads should not be constructed in areas identified as sensitive wildlife areas. 5. Retain countywide school bus service. 6. Retain rail freight service along OR 19 in the vicinity of Arlington. 7. Actively encourage development of the Port of Arlington enterprises and commerce. 8. Actively encourage continued operation and support of waste management facilities. 9. Protect the county’s municipal airports from the encroachment of incompatible land uses to ensure efficient aviation operations and to minimize the noise and safety problems for the general public. 10. Comply with all applicable state and federal noise, air, water, and land quality regulations. 11. The general policy of the Planning Commission will be not to create a traffic hazard in the granting of variances, conditional uses permits, and zone amendments. 12. Encourage active pedestrian and bicycle use within urban areas and along state highways. Goal 1 Preserve the function, capacity, level of service, and safety of the state highways. Objectives A. Develop access management standards that will meet the requirements of the TPR and also consider the needs of the affected communities. B. Promote alternative modes of transportation (e.g., walking, biking). David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2-1 April 1999 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan C. Promote transportation demand management programs (e.g., dial-a-ride transit, carpooling). D. Develop passing lanes as warranted. E. Examine the need for specific pedestrian crossing locations in urban areas. F. Develop procedures to minimize impacts to and protect transportation facilities, corridors, or sites during the development review process. Goal 2 Improve and enhance safety and traffic circulation and preserve the level of service on local street systems. Objectives A. Develop an efficient road network that would maintain a level of service D or better. B. Improve and maintain existing roadways (e.g., pavement condition, bike lanes, crosswalks). C. Ensure planning coordination between the local jurisdictions, the county and the state. D. Identify truck routes to focus truck traffic to a limited number of roads in urban areas. E. Encourage citizen involvement in identifying and solving local problem spots. F. Encourage development of connective sidewalk systems in urban areas. Goal 3 Identify the 20-year roadway system needs to accommodate developing or undeveloped areas without undermining the rural nature of the county. Objectives A. Continue to develop the road system as the principal mode of transportation both for access to the county and within the county. B. Adopt policies and standards that address street connectivity, spacing, and access management. C. Improve access into and out of the county for goods and services. D. Improve the access on, to and off of arterial roadways to encourage growth. Goal 4 Increase the use of alternative modes of transportation (walking, bicycling, rideshare/carpooling, and dial-a-ride transit) through improved access, safety, and service. Objectives A. Provide adequate shoulders on rural collector and arterial roads to support biking and walking. B. Develop a county bicycle plan. 2-2 David Evans and Associates, Inc. April 1999 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan C. Identify needs for bike lanes and sidewalks in urban areas and develop programs to fulfill needs. D. Promote alternative modes and rideshare/carpool programs through community awareness and education. E. Encourage development to occur near existing community centers where services are presently available so as to reduce the dependence on automotive transportation. F. Plan for provision of transportation services to transportation disadvantaged. G. Seek Transportation and Growth Management (TGM) and other funding for projects evaluating and improving the environment for alternative modes of transportation. H. Promote railroad and waterway freight service. Goal 5 Ensure that the road system within the county is adequate to meet public needs, including the transportation disadvantaged. Objectives A. Meet identified maintenance and level of service standards on the county roads. B. Direct commercial development and use access onto major arterials by means of improved county roads. C. Ensure that roads created in land division and development be designed to tie into existing and anticipated road circulation patterns. D. Review and revise, if necessary, street cross section standards for local, collector, and arterial streets to enhance safety and mobility. E. Develop an access management strategy for OR 19, 74 and 206 for rural and urban areas. F. Analyze the safety of traveling speeds and consider modifying posted speeds as necessary. G. Continue to monitor the needs of the transportation disadvantaged (e.g., children under the driving age, people with limited physical mobility) people and provide support as required. Goal 6 Improve coordination among Gilliam County, ODOT, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), the Port of Arlington, and the local jurisdictions. Objectives A. Cooperate with ODOT in the implementation of the STIP. B. Encourage improvement of state highways. C. Work with the local jurisdictions in establishing cooperative road improvement programs, funding alternatives, and schedules. David Evans and Associates, Inc. 2-3 April 1999 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan D. Work with the local jurisdictions in establishing the right-of-way needed for new roads identified in the TSP. E. Take advantage of federal and state highway funding programs. F. Encourage development of the Port of Arlington and improved waterway commerce. Goal 7 Support efforts to maintain the airport facilities for small aircraft and charter services. Objectives A. Encourage the state and local municipalities to improve and maintain airport facilities. B. Support airport master planning efforts. 2-4 David Evans and Associates, Inc. FILENAME: C:\USERS\AGRIFFIN\DESKTOP\17679_MEMO3_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #3 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Existing Conditions Inventory & Analysis Date: December 22, 2014 Project #: 17679 To: Michael Duncan, ODOT Susie Anderson, Gilliam County From: Casey Bergh, PE, Ashleigh Griffin, and Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE cc: Project Advisory Committee This memorandum inventories and evaluates the existing conditions of the Gilliam County transportation system to establish a baseline for the planning efforts to be conducted as part of the Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. The information was obtained and assembled using Geographic Information System (GIS) files, data provided by Gilliam County, inventory conducted using Google Earth aerial images, site visits, and studies provided or produced by Gilliam County and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). The information contained in this memorandum is organized into a series of sections, listed below. Study Area ................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Land Use and Population ............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Street System and Traffic Analysis .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Historic Crash Analysis............................................................................................................................................................... 27 Pedestrian and Bicyclist System ................................................................................................................................................ 34 Public Transportation System.................................................................................................................................................... 38 Truck Freight Routes ................................................................................................................................................................. 38 Rail System ................................................................................................................................................................................ 41 Air Transportation System ......................................................................................................................................................... 42 InterModal Connections ............................................................................................................................................................ 44 Bridge Conditions ...................................................................................................................................................................... 45 Marine Transportation System .................................................................................................................................................. 48 Pipeline transportation system ................................................................................................................................................. 48 Funding Inventory & Analysis .................................................................................................................................................... 48 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................................................. 50 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The majority of the inventory and analysis results are presented in figures and tabular form with supplemental text provided, as needed, to explain the illustrated information. This memorandum will identify existing transportation needs based on currently adopted performance measures that will be addressed in the Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update through policies, projects, programs, pilot projects and refinement studies to improve the system. STUDY AREA The Transportation System Plan (TSP) focuses on the entire county, including the cities of Arlington, Condon, and Lone Rock, as shown in Figure 3-1. Six intersections and seven roadway segments will be evaluated operationally during the study. These study intersections and segments are shown in Figure 3-1 and summarized in Table 3-1. Table 3-1. Study Intersections and Segments Intersection/ Segment Number Intersection/Segment Name Location 1 Walnut Street/Main Street Condon 2 E Bayard Street/Main Street Condon 3 I-84/Beech Street Arlington 4 I-84/Locust Street Arlington 5 I-84/OR 74 (Eastbound Ramps) County 6 Cedar Springs Lane/OR 19 County A Lonerock Road 0.5 mi from OR 206 intersection B Baseline Road 0.25 mi from OR 19 intersection C Fourmile Road 0.25 mi. from OR 206 intersection D Blalock Canyon Road 0.25 mi. from I-84 intersection E Quinton Canyon Road 0.25 mi. from I-84 intersection F Mikkalo Lane 0.25 mi. from OR 19 intersection G E Bayard Street At Condon High School LAND USE AND POPULATION The land use and population inventory identifies existing, planned, and potential land uses. The land use and population inventory will inform existing and future conditions analyses, particularly as the project team works with the community to develop future alternative scenarios that capture the County’s vision. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Esau Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Columbia Rive r JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 6 5 A F B E D C Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure3-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-1 Stu dy A rea .mx d - agr iffin - 1 1:1 2 A M 1 1/2 6/2 014 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Study AreaGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Ch erry S t Railroad Ave 34 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t 1 2 G ¯ 48-Hour Segment Count Locations Study Intersections Railroads City Boundary # X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon As shown in Figure 3-2, key activity centers and destinations within the County include:  Arlington and Condon Schools  Condon City Park  Earl Snell Memorial Park in Arlington  Cottonwood Canyon State Park  Arlington and Condon Golf Courses  Port of Arlington  Gilliam County Courthouse  Arlington and Condon Airports  Columbia Ridge Landfill  Wind Turbine farms  Agricultural farms  City of Lonerock In addition to these key activity centers in the County, OR 74 is designated as a scenic byway and may attract visitors from other regions of the state. The cities of Arlington and Condon also have downtown commercial centers that generate regional trips for shopping, dining, and other purposes. Appendix 1 contains exhibits illustrating the buildable lands inventory map for the communities of Arlington, Condon, and Lonerock. These exhibits show existing land uses and areas where future growth is possible within the respective Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) areas. The following three sections describe the buildable lands within each of the three cities. City of Arlington As shown in the exhibit in Appendix 1, the central business district of Arlington is located primarily within the triangle area formed by Cottonwood Street and OR 19, south of the I-84 interchange ramps. The central business district extends south down OR 19 as well. The majority of the residential lands are located in the central and south areas of the City, around the public school lands. The Arlington Buildable Lands Map shown in Appendix 1 was completed around 2003 for the City of Arlington. Since this inventory was completed, six new homes have been completed within the City, and two existing houses and one church have burned down. The buildable lands inventory indicates opportunity for infill residential development throughout the City, and potential for larger development in the eastern area of the City (near the airport). The Port of Arlington is actively promoting industrial development at the three industrial parks that are zoned for industrial land use: the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park, the Columbia Plateau Industrial Park (the former radar base), and the Shutler Station Industrial Park (located near the intersection of OR 19/Cedar Springs Lane.) The Airport is adjacent to the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park, where 30 acres zoned M1 and M2 (industrial) are available for airport development, as shown in Exhibit 3-1. The Airport is located in the Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Enterprise Zone within the City Limits of Arlington and maintains an Airport Development (AD) overlay zone. Exhibit 3-1. Arlington Mesa Industrial Park Plan City of Condon The City of Condon buildable lands map is also shown in Appendix 1. Since this map was updated in 2011, five new homes have been built and one commercial structure has been remodeled. As shown in the exhibit, the majority of the commercial land is located along Main Street, with the majority of the industrial land located along the former railroad track alignment in the northeast quadrant of the City. Residential land surrounds the commercial core area, and public land for schools and parks is located in the southeast, northeast, and northwest quadrants of the City. The majority of the buildable lands are located on the east and west sides of the City, with many residential parcels available throughout. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon City of Lonerock Appendix 1 also includes the buildable lands inventory map for Lonerock. Lonerock does not have any commercial land use within the City. The City is primarily residential with several supporting public land uses including a community hall. The buildable lands inventory for Lonerock indicates that residential parcels are available throughout the City, with the most availability located in the far quadrants of the City. Priority Development Areas Based on these inventories, areas prioritized for growth within the Cities and County include:  Industrial development within the industrial lands in Arlington and the County o Columbia Plateau Industrial Park (former radar base) o Shutler Station o Arlington Mesa Industrial Park o Columbia Ridge Landfill  Commercial development within the cities  Dense residential development within the cities "Z Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Esau Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Base Line Rd JohnDa y River Co lumbi a River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure3-2 H:\p rojf ile\1 767 9 - Gill iam Co unt y T SP \gis \3-2 Ac tivit y C ent ers .mx d - jsom me rvill e - 11: 59 AM 11/ 21/ 201 4 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Activity CentersGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles s à õôó "Z Î Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Key Destinations "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington Scenic Byways Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Population Inventory By Oregon Revised Statute 195.034, the Counties are directed to formulate and adopt coordinated population projections among the County and its incorporated Cities. Further, the Statute requires population projections for Counties be prepared by the Portland State University Center for Population Research. The latest 2015-2040 projections were prepared in 2013 for Gilliam County, as shown in Table 3-2. The total population for the County is shown in the left column of Table 3-2. The other four columns represent the unincorporated area of the County and the Cities of Condon, Arlington, and Lonerock. The basis for the City population projections is historical proportion of the County’s total population over time. Condon has generally maintained 39% of the County’s population, Arlington has accounted for 26%, and the City of Lonerock has accounted for 1%. Those proportions were projected from 2015 to 2040. This population projection will be adopted as part of the TSP and will be the County’s official population projections until the next update is complete. Table 3-2. Gilliam County Population Projections Year Population Projections Gilliam County (Total) Unincorporated Area (34%) Condon (39%) Arlington (26%) Lonerock (1%) 2010* 1871 582 682 586 21 2015 1958 655 764 509 20 2020 2062 701 804 536 21 2025 2172 739 847 564 22 2030 2280 776 889 592 23 2035 2378 809 927 618 24 2040 2472 840 964 643 25 *2010 population totals are based on the 2010 census data. As shown in Table 2, the County’s population is estimated to grow by over 400 persons in the TSP horizon year of 2035. STREET SYSTEM AND TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Three state highways and a network of highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets maintained by the County serve Gilliam County. Primary roadway facilities, their characteristics, and existing operational performance are summarized below. Street System Overview Roadways within Gilliam County fall under the jurisdiction of the state (ODOT), the County, or local cities. The following sections describe the jurisdiction and characteristics of the roadways. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 9 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon State Roadways The state facilities within Gilliam County provide interstate, statewide, and regional connectivity. These facilities include Interstate 84 (I-84), Oregon Highway 19 (OR 19), Oregon Highway 206 (OR 206), and Oregon Highway 74 (OR 74). The state facilities serve two of the three cities in Gilliam County. I-84 and OR 19 provide connections to the City of Arlington, and OR 19 and OR 206 provide connections to the City of Condon. County Roadways Eighty-five roadways, totaling an estimated 406 miles, are under the County’s jurisdiction. Sixteen percent of the roadway miles are paved, 14 percent are chip sealed, and 70 percent are gravel roads. The County roads provide connections to the state highway system and serve rural areas and the city of Lonerock. City Roadways The City of Condon is comprised of streets in a grid pattern, with Main Street running north-south down the middle of the City. OR 19 and OR 206 meet and share the alignment with Main Street through the downtown area. Blocks in the downtown area are generally 300 feet wide (east-west) and 500 feet long (north-south). The City of Arlington is comprised of roadways that are either state, county, or city operated facilities. Most of the roadways are located west of OR 19 and the railroad tracks. The City of Lonerock’s roadways are maintained by Gilliam County. The city’s seven roads form a small grid pattern. Street System Characteristics The following set of figures and tables illustrate and summarize the current street characteristics within the County including roadway classifications, roadway standards, and intersection characteristics. Functional classification levels for roadways are used to establish a hierarchy of roadways based on their primary function (moving people across regions or providing access to local destinations). These classification levels are identified by ODOT for state facilities, the County for County facilities, and local agencies for their own classification levels within their community. The classification levels also determine the recommended roadway cross-section for different facilities. The functional classification of roadways that local agencies typically establish is based on the following hierarchy:  Arterials represent the highest class of roadway (other than Interstates). These roadways are intended to provide mobility by serving high volumes of traffic, particularly through Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 10 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon traffic, at higher speeds. They also serve truck movements and should emphasize traffic movement over local land access. In some cases, arterial streets are further designated as “major/principal” or “minor.” Major/principal arterials have higher design speed, fewer accesses per mile, and usually do not permit direct private driveway access. Minor arterial provide slightly lower travel speeds and have a few more accesses than major/principal arterials.  Collectors represent the intermediate roadway class. As their name suggests, these roadways collect traffic from the local street system and distribute it to the arterial street system. These roadways provide a balance between traffic movement and land access and should provide extended continuous stretches of roadway to facilitate traffic circulation through the county. Collector streets are sometimes divided into two categories – urban collector/rural major collector and minor collector. Urban collector/rural major collector have the same basic roadway design but are differentiated by urban features like bike lanes and sidewalk as well as adjacent land use (i.e., the land is inside or outside the Urban Growth Boundary). Minor collectors serve lower volume of traffic and have lower design speeds than the urban collector/rural major collector.  Local roads and streets are the lowest roadway class. Their primary purpose is to provide local land access and to carry locally generated traffic at relatively low speeds to the collector street system. Local streets should provide connectivity through neighborhoods but should be designed to discourage cut-through vehicular traffic. State Facilities Figure 3-3 shows the ODOT functional classification for state facilities in the County. Table 3-3 summarizes the roadway characteristics of each of these facilities, including posted speed limit and number of lanes. Because Arlington and Condon are bisected by state highways that are classified as minor arterials, the highways must balance carrying through traffic and accommodating access to local destinations. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-3. State Functional Classifications Route Name Facility Extents ODOT Facility Designation ODOT Functional Classification Posted Speed Limit Number of Lanes Pavement Condition (2012) Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate Interstate 65 4 Good - Very Good OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway Minor Arterial 55 2 Good East of Condon District Highway Major Collector 55* 2 Good OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits Regional Highway Minor Arterial 55* 2 Good – Very Good OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway Minor Arterial 55 2 Good *Within the cities of Condon and Arlington, the posted speed limit varies between 20 and 45 miles per hour (mph) along OR 206 and OR 19. Exhibit 3-2 summarizes the characteristics of the study intersections. Each of the study intersections is under ODOT’s jurisdiction. All of the study intersections are unsignalized; no signalized intersections are present within Gilliam County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 3-2. Study Intersection Existing Lane Configurations and Control County Facilities Gilliam County follow’s ODOT’s roadway functional classification system by dividing county roads into three levels: urban collector/rural major collector, minor collector, and local roads. The existing functional classification system, as recommended in the 1999 TSP, is summarized in Figure 3-3. Changes in development patterns and transportation trends (increased truck traffic, seasonal influences of the Cottonwood Canyon State Park, etc.) since 1999 will be reflected in proposed changes to functional classification during this TSP Update. City Facilities The local cities do not have a separate functional classification system. The majority of the roads within the Cities, other than the state highways, generally have the characteristics of local streets. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Esau Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Base Line Rd JohnDa y River Co lumbi a River Arlington Condon Lonerock 197 26 97 30 19 281 173 35 282 206 216 74 84 Gilliam County TSP December 2014 Figure3-3 H:\p rojf ile\1 767 9 - Gill iam Co unt y T SP \gis \3-3 Fu nct iona l Cl ass ifica tion .mx d - jsom me rvill e - 11 :52 AM 12 /19 /20 14 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Functional ClassificationGilliam County, Oregon 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver 19 84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr W 1st St Rhea Ln W 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S1 stS tHemlo ck St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave 206 19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St E Well StN E M ain St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln StSA St NA St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t Interstate Principal Arterial Major_Collector Minor_Collector Local_County_Road Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 14 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Roadway Cross-Section Standards Roadway functional classifications typically reflect the roadway’s function and influence the recommended roadway cross-section design. The cross-section standards typically inform new roadways or roadway modification projects. Older roadways are only required to be upgraded to current standards if modified or reconstructed. County Facilities The County’s current TSP identifies rural roadway design standards, as summarized in Table 3-4. The County also has recommended roadway widths that are intended to serve the forecast future traffic demands in the County, as summarized in Table 3-5. Rural roadways in the County are not currently required to have bike lanes or marked bicyclist facilities. The roadway design standards indicate that bicyclists shall be accommodated on the shoulder, when appropriate, based on the facility’s traffic volumes. Rural roadways are not required to have separate pedestrian facilities, which reflects the rural nature of the roadway. Table 3-4. Gilliam County Rural Roadway Design Standards Classification Right-of- Way Width (ft) Roadway Shoulder Width (ft) Surface Width (ft) Surface Arterial Street 60-120 32-40 Paved 4-8 Paved Collector Street 60-80 24-32 Paved/gravel 2-4 Paved/gravel Local Street 60 24-28 Paved/gravel 2-4 Paved/gravel Radius for cul-de-sac turn-around 50 40 - - - Table 3-5. Recommended Shoulder Widths on Rural Roads Road Use Local Streets Major and Minor Collectors Arterial Streets ADT under 400 2 ft 2 ft 4 ft ADT over 400 and DHV& under 100 2 ft 4 ft 6 ft DHV 100 – 200 4 ft 6 ft 6 ft DHV 200—400 6 ft 8 ft 8 ft DHV over 400 8 ft 8 ft 8 ft *DHV (Design Hour Volume) is the expected two-way traffic in the peak design hour (usually commuter times), usually 13 to 25% ADT. Note: ADT = Average Daily Traffic, vehicles/day Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Local Facilities The City of Condon does not street design standards. The majority of the non-state highway streets have a 60-foot right-of-way, with pavement width between 15 and 25 feet comprised of two travel lanes and narrows shoulders. Most streets are chip-sealed. Main Street has sidewalks of at least 10- feet in width, while other streets within the City have occasional, disconnected sidewalks varying between three and five feet in width. The City of Arlington has recommended street design standards, as summarized in Table 3-6. Table 3-6. Recommended Street Design Standards for the City of Arlington Classification Pavement Width Right-of-Way Width Number/Width Planting, Utility, Sidewalks Travel Lanes Parking Lanes Bike Lanes Arterial – Option 1 36 ft 70 ft 2/12 ft None 2/6 ft 12 ft Arterial – Option 2 52 ft 80 ft 2/12 ft 2/8 ft 2/6 ft 14 ft Arterial – Option 2 48 ft 70-80 ft 3/12 ft None 2/6 ft 11-16 ft Collector 36 ft 60 ft 2/10 ft 2/8 ft none 13 ft Minor – Option 1 24 ft 50 ft 2/10 ft None none 15 ft Minor – Option 2 34 ft 50 ft 2/12 ft 2/7 ft none 13 ft Alley 20 ft 20 ft 2/10 ft none none none The City of Lonerock has a rural character and therefore follows the County’s rural roadway standards. Lonerock has collector and local streets. Access Spacing and Access Management Providing adequate access to other public roadways, land uses, and destinations is a critical part of an effective transportation system. However, it is necessary to balance access with the need for mobility and safety on the system. Providing access via other public streets and driveways to land uses creates friction from a traffic operations perspective thereby reducing mobility and introducing conflict points that increase the potential for crashes. Access management strategies and implementation require careful consideration to balance access and mobility in a safe and efficient manner. In general, access management is generally more stringent on higher classified roads where mobility is the highest priority. Figure 3-4 illustrates the relationship between access and mobility relative to the street classifications in the Gilliam County area. OR 19 and OR 206 bisect the cities of Arlington and Condon and run through the downtown commercial areas of both cities. Therefore, these facilities must balance carrying through traffic and providing access within the downtown cores. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Figure 3-4. Relationship between Access, Mobility, and Functional Classification State Facilities ODOT specifies access management spacing standards for the state facilities in the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP, Reference 1). The corresponding access management spacing standards for state facilities within Gilliam County are summarized in Table 3-7. These standards are based on the 2012 AADT (Annual Average Daily Traffic volume), posted speed limit, proximity to urban areas, and functional classification. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-7. Access Management Spacing Standards for Highway Segments Route Name Description Functional Classification 2012 AADT Posted Speed (MPH) Access Spacing Standard (Feet) Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate >5,000 65 10,560 OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway <5,000 55 650 East of Condon District Highway <5,000 55 650 Within Condon City Limits Regional/ District Highway <5,000 40/30/20 360/250/150 OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits, Outside of Cities Regional Highway <5,000 55 650 Within Arlington City Limits <5,000 55/45/25 650/360/150 Within Condon City Limits <5,000 40/30/20 360/250/150 OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway <5,000 55 650 AADT = Average Annual Daily Traffic MPH = miles per hour Figure 3-5 shows the location of access points along state facilities in the two cities. As shown in Figure 3-5, the location of access points within the city limits does not meet the access spacing standards where the state highways also function as main streets in the communities. Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure3-5 H:\p rojf ile\1 767 9 - Gill iam Co unt y T SP \gis \3-5 Ac ces s P oin ts.m xd - js om me rvill e - 11: 59 AM 11 /21 /20 14 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Access PointsGilliam County, Oregon Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington PortRd E 2nd St Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d W 1st StW 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St Hulde n Ln E 3rd S tCottonwoodSt Grape St W 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlo ck St Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Walnut St N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St SB St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St NE Mai n S t W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Frazer St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam StW Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S Ward St N O reg on St N C hur ch St S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St S W ash ing ton St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S L inc oln St S A St NA St N Lin col n S t S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Access Points on State Facilities Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon County Facilities The County has access spacing standards for their roadways. These standards are intended to be applied as new development occurs, rather than to be used to eliminate existing driveways. The access spacing standards for County facilities are summarized in Table 3-8. Table 3-8. Access Management Spacing Standards for Rural Gilliam County Segments Functional Classification Intersection Public Road Private Drive Type Spacing Type Spacing Collector At grade ¼ mile Lt/Rt Turns 1,200 ft Local Street At grade 200-400 ft Lt/Rt Turns Vary City Facilities The majority of streets, other than state highways, within the City of Condon function as local streets, which are intended to provide access to local destinations and serve relatively low traffic volumes. The City of Condon does not have access management standards for these streets, but the streets are generally intended to serve multiple access locations in close proximity. The City of Arlington has minimum connection spacing for its roadways, depending on functional classification, as summarized in Table 3-9. Table 3-9. Minimum Spacing Requirements for the City of Arlington Functional Classification Public Road Spacing Private Drive Spacing Arterial: I-84 2-3 mi. NA OR 19: I-84 – Dahlia St 300 ft 150 ft Other Urban Areas ¼ mi. 500 ft Other arterials in UGB 600 ft 300 ft Collector 300 ft 150 ft Minor Street 300 ft Each Lot The City of Lonerock follows the County’s TSP and therefore does not have its own spacing standards. On-Street Parking Inventory Figure 3-6 shows the inventory of on-street parking in the downtown areas of Arlington and Condon. Arlington accommodates all of its downtown parking with off-street lots within the commercial area and across the street, adjacent to Earl Snell Memorial Park. Although Condon does not have marked on-street parking spaces, the roadway cross-section accommodates on-street parking along Main Street in downtown, alongside streets that abut Main Street, and around the Courthouse. There is Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon also parking available next to the Courthouse in parallel on-street spaces and an off-street lot on Church Street. Based on observations, parking demand does not generally exceed available capacity in Condon or Arlington during typical use. However, Arlington hosts several large events during the summer months. During these events, there is inadequate parking which leads to people parking illegally throughout the City. Gilliam County TSP December 2014 Figure3-6 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-6 Pa rkin g In ven tory .mx d - agr iffin - 3 :08 PM 12 /2/2 014 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census On-Street Parking InventoryGilliam County, Oregon Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d E 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir StW 1st St E 3rd S tGrape St CottonwoodStW 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlock S t Hulde n Ln Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S Ward St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t S W ash ing ton St W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Parking Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 22 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Street System Traffic Analysis The focus of this section is to report the existing traffic operations for study intersections and roadway segments identified for the TSP update. The sub-sections below present information on the traffic count data used in the evaluation, the analysis methodology applied, the operational standards used to assess the results, and the traffic operations results for the study intersections. Appendix 1 contains the traffic count data obtained from ODOT and used in the analysis. Appendix 3 contains the Methodology Memorandum documenting the analysis method applied. Appendix 5 contains the existing conditions traffic operations and queuing analysis worksheets. Analysis Methodology and Performance Standards All operations analysis described in this report were performed in accordance with the procedures in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (Reference 2). Per the Methodology Memorandum (see Appendix 3) and the ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual (APM) (Reference 3), intersection operational evaluations were conducted based on the peak 15- minute flow rate observed during the weekday peak hour. Using the peak 15-minute flow rate ensures this analysis is based on a reasonable worst-case scenario. For this reason, the analysis reflects conditions that are likely to occur for 15 minutes out of each average weekday peak hour. The transportation system will likely operate under conditions better than those described in this report during other typical time periods. The operational results for study intersections and segments were compared with their corresponding mobility targets, summarized in Table 3-10 and Table 3-11, to assess performance and identify potential areas for improvement. Gilliam County does not have operational standards for roadway facilities. ODOT operational targets are identified in the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP, Reference 1) and are summarized below for the state highways within the County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-10. Volume to Capacity Ratio Targets for Peak Hour Operation Conditions Route Name Facility Extents Facility Designation Inside UGB Outside UGB Posted speed <= 35 mph Speed > 35 mph but <45 mph Speed limit >= 45 mph Unincorporated Communities Rural Lands Interstate 84 Entire Section within County Limits Interstate N/A N/A 0.70 0.70 0.70 OR 206 West of Condon Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 East of Condon District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 Within Condon City Limits Regional Highway 0.85 0.80 0.75 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits District Highway 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A OR 19 Entire Section within County Limits, Outside of Cities Regional Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.75 0.70 Within Arlington City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A Within Condon City Limits 0.90 0.85 0.80 N/A N/A OR 74 Entire Section within County Limits District Highway N/A N/A N/A 0.80 0.75 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 24 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-11. Intersection Performance Standards Intersection Name Location Jurisdiction Type of Intersection Control* Performance Standard (v/c ratio)** Walnut Street/Main Street Condon ODOT TWSC 0.90 for all approaches E Bayard Street/Main Street Condon ODOT TWSC 0.90 for Main Street approaches; 0.95 for E Bayard Street approaches I-84/Beech Street Arlington ODOT TWSC 0.80 for interstate ramp approaches; 0.90 for Beech Street approaches I-84/Locust Street Arlington ODOT TWSC 0.80 for interstate ramp approaches; 0.90 for Locust Street approach I-84/OR 74 (Eastbound Ramps) County ODOT TWSC 0.70 for all movements Cedar Springs Lane/OR 19 County ODOT TWSC 0.75 for Cedar Springs Lane approach movements; 0.70 for OR 19 approach movements *TWSC = Two-way stop-controlled intersection ** v/c = volume-to-capacity ratio Traffic Volumes The following sub-sections discuss the weekday peak hour traffic volume development and the seasonal adjustment factor used to adjust the 2014 traffic counts. Roadway Segment Hourly Traffic Profiles Seven study segments were identified throughout the County. Traffic volumes were collected for 48 hours between Tuesday July 29, 2014 and Thursday, July 31, 2014. These traffic volumes were used to conduct capacity analysis to determine how the facility operates under peak hour conditions. In addition, they were used to illustrate the demand profile of the roadway by the time of day. Appendix 4 summarizes the hourly traffic volume profiles for the seven roadway segments studied. Based on these counts, the hour with the highest traffic volume was identified as the peak hour for that facility. Two-lane highway capacity analysis was conducted for each roadway segment based on the peak hour traffic volumes. Table 3-12 summarizes the peak hour, traffic volumes, and volume-to-capacity ratio for each study segment. Although the County does not have operational targets for County facilities, the peak hour analysis reveals that all of the roadways currently operate below the roadway’s capacity. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 25 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-12. Roadway Segment Operations Analysis ID Roadway ADT from 2014 Traffic Counts Peak Hour Time Period Seasonally- Adjusted Peak Hour Count PHF* Two- Way Demand Flow Critical Flow Rate Units Calculated V/C Ratio A Lonerock Road, South of OR 19 173 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. 19 0.68 29 3200 pc/h 0.0092 B Baseline Road, east of OR 19 240 9:30- 10:30 am, 1:30- 2:30 pm 26 0.93 29 3200 pc/h 0.0092 C Fourmile Road, SE of OR 19 192 1:45 - 2:45 pm 28 0.65 45 3200 pc/h 0.0142 D Blalock Canyon Road, South of I- 84 142 5:15 - 6:15 pm 19 0.86 23 3200 pc/h 0.0073 E Quinton Canyon Road, South of I- 84 67 8:45 - 9:45 am 10 0.59 18 3200 pc/h 0.0056 F Mikkalo Lane west of OR 19 145 11:45 am - 12:45 pm 16 0.78 22 3200 pc/h 0.0067 G East Bayard Street, East of OR 19 576 10:45 - 11:45 am 55 0.68 85 3200 pc/h 0.0266 *PHF = peak hour factor Weekday Peak Hour Development for Intersections Traffic counts at the six study intersections were completed on Wednesday, November 19, 2014 between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Traffic volumes typically peak during the evening commute period, between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m. However, traffic counts at the study intersections revealed that the peak hours for some of the study intersections occurred midday or during the afternoon, due to the rural nature of the County. Based on these counts, the peak hour and peak 15- minute period within each peak hour were identified for each intersection. An intersection peak hour was used for analysis rather than a system-wide peak hour due to the long distances between study intersections throughout the County. As summarized in the Methodology Memo (see Appendix 3), traffic volumes were adjusted to reflect seasonal fluctuation in traffic patterns. Exhibit 3-3 shows the existing intersection traffic control and lane configurations. Exhibit 3-4 summarizes the existing peak hour traffic volumes after seasonal adjustments were applied and the peak hour time period for each intersection. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 3-3. Study Intersection Traffic Control and Lane Configurations Exhibit 3-4. Existing Traffic Volumes and Peak Hours Intersection Traffic Operations Analysis Results Level-of-service (LOS), volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios, average delay, and 95th percentile queue lengths were calculated for each of the study intersections identified for the Gilliam County TSP Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 27 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon update. Queue lengths were calculated using ODOT’s Two-Way Stop-Controlled method, and the remaining analysis were conducted using 2010 HCM methods with Vistro and Sidra software. Table 3- 13 summarizes the results of this analysis as well as the corresponding operational targets for the study intersections. As shown in the table, all six study intersections currently operate acceptably. The 95th percentile queue lengths reflect the maximum queue length expected during the peak 15 minutes. As shown in the table, the 95th percentile queue lengths do not exceed two vehicles in length at all study intersections. Table 3-13. Intersection Operational Analysis Results ID Name Critical Movement V/C Ratio LOS Delay (sec) 95 th % Queue (# vehicles) Performance Standard (v/c ratio) 1 Walnut St/Main St WB 0.09 A 9.5 1 0.90 2 E Bayard St/Main St EBL 0.03 A 4.2 2 0.95 3 I-84 Ramp/Beech St SBT 0.02 A 4.8 1 0.90 4 I-84 Ramp/Locust St EBT 0.01 A 3.0 1 0.90 5 I-84 EB Ramp/OR 74 WBL 0.00 A 2.1 1 0.70 6 Cedar Springs Ln/OR 19 EBL 0.06 A 5.9 2 0.75 v/c = volume-to-capacity Summary of Existing Traffic Conditions Below is a summary of the major findings of the existing conditions operational analysis.  The demand volume at the seven study segments is well below capacity.  The six study intersections currently operate within their performance targets.  The longest expected 95th percentile queue length was found at Cedar Springs Lane/OR 19 for the eastbound approach. This queue is expected to reach two vehicles during the peak hour. HISTORIC CRASH ANALYSIS Crash data from the latest five years (January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2013) was obtained from ODOT for all roadways within Gilliam County. Figure 3-7 illustrates reported crash locations throughout the state. As shown in Figure 3-7, the majority of reported crashes are located along state highways. Crash data is provided in Appendix 6. County Crash Patterns A total of 228 crashes were reported in Gilliam County between 2009 and 2013. The majority of reported crashes (147 crashes, 65%) occurred on I-84. Table 3-14 summarizes the reported crashes by severity. Almost half of the reported crashes involved an injury, and one crash involved a fatality. The Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 28 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon fatal crash was reported as a fixed object, overturned crash on a curve on Lonerock Road, approximately nine miles north of the City of Lone Rock. The crash report indicates speed was a contributing factor. The weather and light conditions at the time of the crash were not reported. Of the 13 reported severe injury crashes, several trends were noted:  The most-frequently reported severe-injury crash type is fixed object crashes. Seven crashes involved a vehicle collision with a fixed object.  Excessive speed was reported in at least six reported crashes.  Alcohol was indicated as a factor in two reported crashes.  Eleven occurred during daylight, and  11 were reported on dry roadway conditions. The severe injury crashes were located throughout the County on the interstate, state highways, and County and local roads. Table 3-14. Reported Crashes by Severity in Gilliam County (2009 – 2013) Crash Severity Fatal Injury A Injury B Injury C PDO Total Number of Reported Crashes 1 13 56 38 120 228 Percentage of Total Crashes <1% 6% 24% 17% 53% 100% !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! % Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Esau Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP December 2014 Figure3-7 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-7 Cra sh His tory .mx d - agr iffin - 1 0:2 3 A M 1 2/2 /20 14 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Reported Crash HistoryGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave ! ! ! ! ! vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Crash Severity % Fatal ! Incapacitating Injury ! Non-Incapacitating Injury ! Possible Injury ! Property Damage Only Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 30 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 3-5 shows the number of crashes reported by month. Exhibit 3-5. Reported Crashes by Month (2009-2013) As shown in Exhibit 3-5, the highest crash frequency occurred during winter months, from November through January. Winter months in Gilliam County can include inclement weather conditions producing wet, icy, and/or snowy conditions. Further review of crashes in November, December, and January (99 crashes) indicate that 80% (79 crashes) occurred on roadway surfaces that were wet, icy, or snow-covered. Just over 50% (51 crashes) occurred in dark, dawn, or dusk lighting conditions. Over the study period, almost 70% of crashes (156 crashes) were reported as fixed object or non- collision crashes. Over 41% (94 crashes) occurred on roadway surfaces that were wet, icy, or snow- covered. The same number (94 crashes) occurred in dark, dawn, or dusk lighting conditions. One reported crash on I-84 involved a pedestrian in the western end of the County during icy roadway conditions. Of the 81 crashes that occurred on non-interstate facilities, 47 crashes (58%) occurred on rural minor arterials, 14 crashes (17%) occurred on rural major collectors, 2 crashes (3%) occurred on rural minor collectors, and 18 crashes (22%) occurred on rural local streets or roads. Intersection and Segment Crash Analysis Study intersections and segments were analyzed individually and compared to statewide averages for similar facilities, when possible. Reported crashes at study intersections are summarized in Table 3-16. Several of the study locations did not experience any crashes during the five-year study period. Intersection exposure was measured in terms of total entering vehicles (TEV), derived from the peak hour volumes used in the 31 10 16 12 11 13 17 23 20 7 30 38 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Ja n u ar y Fe b ru ar y M ar ch A p ri l M ay Ju n e Ju ly A u gu st Se p te m b e r O ct o b e r N o ve m b e r D e ce m b er N u m b e r o f R e p o rt e d C ra sh e s Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon intersection operational analysis. The peak hour was assumed to be ten percent of the daily volume. ODOT identifies 90th percentile crash rates in the Analysis Procedures Manual, Exhibit 4-1 (Reference 3). These crash rates are presented in Table 3-16. The ODOT APM indicates that intersections that exceed the 90th percentile should be further analyzed. None of the study intersections in Gilliam County exceed their corresponding 90th percentile crash rates. Table 3-16. Reported Crashes at Study Intersections Intersection Name # of Crashes TEV Crash Rate 90 th Percentile Crash Rates Crash Type Severity A n gl e R e ar -E n d Tu rn in g Fi xe d - O b je ct O th e r P D O In ju ry Fa ta lit y Walnut Street/Main Street 1 230 0.238 0.408 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 E Bayard Street/Main Street 0 135 0 0.293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-84/Beech Street 0 118 0 0.408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-84/Locust Street 0 125 0 0.293 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I-84/OR 74 (Eastbound Ramps) 0 28 0 0.475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cedar Springs Lane/OR 19 0 86 0 0.475 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1TEV = Total entering vehicles 2PDO = Property damage only 3Crash Rate = Crashes per million entering vehicles Reported crashes along study roadway segments are summarized in Table 3-17. Exposure on the segments was measured based on ADT calculated from 2014 24-hour volume counts. ODOT publishes statewide average roadway segment crash rates for the past five years for urban and rural areas, by functional classification. The statewide average roadway segment crash rates for rural minor collectors are provided in Table 3-17 for comparison to calculated crash rates for highways in Gilliam County. Although two segments (Quinton Canyon Road and E Bayard Street) exceed the statewide average, these are both short segments with only one crash reported during the most recent five years. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 32 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-17. Reported Crashes at Study Roadway Segments ID Segment Name Segment Boundaries Segment Length (miles) Number of Crashes ADT Crash Rate (2009 – 2013 average) State Average Crash Type Severity Fi xe d - O b je ct O th e r P D O In ju ry Fa ta lit y A Lonerock Road Between OR 206 and Lone Rock 14.5 2 173 0.437 1.586 1 1 (Non- Collision) 0 1 1 B Baseline Road (including Lone Road) Upper Fourmile Road 10.5 6 240 1.305 1.586 4 2 (Non- Collision) 4 2 0 C Fourmile Road Between OR 19 and Eightmile Canyon Road 4.7 1 192 0.607 1.586 0 1 (Non- Collision) 0 1 0 D Blalock Canyon Road I-84 to Heritage Lane 2.5 1 142 1.544 1.586 1 0 1 0 0 E Quinton Canyon Road I-84 to Heritage Lane 1.25 1 67 6.543 1.586 0 1 (Non- Collision) 0 1 0 F Mikkalo Lane OR 19 to Mikkalo 2.0 0 145 0.000 1.586 0 0 0 0 0 G E Bayard Street OR 19 to East City Limit 0.5 miles 1 576 1.903 1.586 0 1 (Head- On) 0 1 0 Findings from the crash analysis indicate the following:  Baseline Road, which becomes Ione Road several miles east of OR 19, has the highest crash frequency among the study segments.  Over 70% of reported crashes in the County occurred on the interstate.  Over 41% of reported crashes in the County occurred on a wet, icy, or snowy roadway.  Many of the crashes indicated speed too fast for conditions as a contributing cause.  Among the severe injury crashes, the majority were single-vehicle crashes. Speed was a contributing factor in approximately half of the reported severe injury crashes. Roadway conditions and lighting were not prevalent factors among the reported severe injury crashes.  Although individual locations were not identified as issue areas, the prevalence of single- vehicle, speed-related, and weather-related crashes may indicate potential opportunities for low-cost systemic safety improvements throughout the County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  ODOT identified several sections of the John Day Highway (OR 19) and Wasco-Heppner Highway (OR 206) in Gilliam County in their Roadway Departures Plan. The Plan recommends edgeline rumble strips, where possible with the shoulder width, at those identified locations, and centerline rumble strips for every state highway in the County. The locations where edgeline rumble strips were recommended include: o OR 19: MP 15.91 – 16. 48 o OR 19: MP 17.05 – 17.61 o OR 19: MP 17.61 – 18.18 o OR 19: MP 21.59 – 22.16 o OR 206: MP 17.61 – 18.18 o OR 206: MP 30.68 – 31.25 o OR 206: MP 35.23-35.80 Statewide Priority Index System (SPIS) ODOT developed the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) to identify and prioritize sites where countermeasures could be implemented to potentially reduce the number of crashes. No segments or intersections within Gilliam County were identified in the top ten percent of the 2013 and 2012 SPIS lists (which use crash data from 2009 to 2011, and 2010 to 2012, respectively). The 2011 SPIS list includes one site on I-84, east of the interchange with OR 74, in the 90th – 95th percentile list. Based on the 2009 to 2013 crash data, eight crashes were reported on I-84 along the approximately one-mile long segment between the interchange with OR 74 and the eastern County border. Four of the crashes occurred in the eastbound direction, and four crashes occurred in the westbound direction. The road character for three of the crashes in the eastbound direction was reported as a vertical curve. Six of the crashes were reported as fixed object crashes, one was a rear-end crash, and one was an animal crash. One crash occurred on a wet roadway, one occurred in snow conditions, and the remaining six crashes occurred on dry pavement in clear weather. The crash reports indicated that driver fatigue contributed to three crashes, inattention and improper driving contributed to two crashes, speed too fast for conditions contributed to one crash, tire failure contributed to one crash, and following too closely contributed to one crash. Five crashes were logged at milepost 148.0, including a fatal crash that involved drugs. These five crashes likely contributed to the location making the SPIS list; ODOT proposed to monitor the site in the future. Observed Safety Issues The following locations were identified by the Project Advisory Committee as having safety issues that will be reviewed as part of the TSP Update: Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 34 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Walnut Street/Main Street intersection in Condon: The four-way intersection is 3-way stop- controlled. Confusion among drivers has been observed by residents; drivers at the intersection do not always realize one leg of the intersection is not stop-controlled.  Sight distance may be limited at three intersections in the County: Main Street/Walnut Street in Condon (northbound approach), Main Street/Gilliam Street in Condon, and Quinn Road/OR 19 in Mayville.  Drivers have been observed entering the I-84 westbound on-ramp when they intend to go eastbound, leaving Arlington as they enter I-5; the signage will be reviewed at this location.  Railroad crossings in Arlington cause traffic to back-up on the interstate ramps and within Arlington. The trains have been observed stopping on the tracks for relatively long periods of time. During this time, emergency vehicles cannot access the interstate.  The intersection of Lone Rock Road/OR 206 is located on a curve and at an angle, which may limit sight distance. The PAC advised that drivers may drive on the wrong side of the road at times to increase sight distance around the curve.  Snow drifting may be an issue on OR 206 near milepost 22, where vehicles have been trapped in snow drifts in the past. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST SYSTEM The pedestrian and bicyclist system for Gilliam County are summarized in Figure 3-8 and Figure 3-9, respectively. The inventory was completed based on ODOT’s data for state facilities and a review of the downtown areas using Google Earth aerial imagery. No sidewalks or bicycle facilities are located within the City of Lonerock. The pedestrian facilities inventory map in Figure 3-8 shows the location of existing sidewalks and crosswalks within the downtown areas of Condon and Arlington. As shown in the figure, sidewalks are located along the downtown commercial cores of both cities, but the sidewalks are discontinuous beyond the downtown cores. Schools in both cities are connected to the downtown commercial cores by continuous sidewalks and crosswalks. In Condon, the elementary school and high school locations are also connected by sidewalks and crosswalks. Residential areas are not connected to schools and commercial areas by continuous sidewalks. The bicyclist facilities shown in Figure 3-9 were obtained from ODOT’s inventory of bicycle facilities. In Arlington, these facilities are primarily striped shoulders that can be used by bicyclists. In Condon, the roadways are wide and provide adequate space for bicyclists although no marked bicycle lanes are present. Within the downtown areas, no bicyclist facilities are provided on non-state facilities. The local, lower speed and lower volume residential streets are typically not marked for bicyclists as the bicyclists can share the roadway with the slower vehicles. Gilliam County is also a popular recreational bicycling location for bicyclists from around the state who are attracted by the scenery and low traffic roads. The John Day River Territory is a popular attraction. Many of the roadways are low volume, gravel roadways and scenic roadways. Popular Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 35 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon recreational routes include OR 19 south of Condon to Fossil, OR 206 west of Condon to Wasco, and OR 206 east of Condon to Heppner. Bicyclists are not as common between Condon and Arlington. The majority of these routes have minimal shoulders and rough pavement conditions. In addition, there are no commercial or public locations on these routes, with the exception of the new Cottonwood State Park located off of OR 206 on the ride to Wasco, for bicyclists to stop and hydrate on the ride. Gilliam County TSP December 2014 Figure3-8 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-8 Pe des tria n S yste m I nve nto ry.m xd - ag riffi n - 10 :36 AM 12 /2/2 014 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Pedestrian System InventoryGilliam County, Oregon 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m s õôó Î "Z à Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d E 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir StW 1st St E 3rd S tGrape St CottonwoodStW 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlock S t Hulde n Ln Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m9:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m9:m 8 !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ19 vÍÎ206 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Bayard St S B St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Summit St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t S W ash ing ton St W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Activity Centers "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington Pedestrian Facilities 89:m Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure3-9 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-1 0 B icyc le S yste m I nve nto ry.m xd - ag riffin - 1 1:0 1 A M 1 1/2 6/2 014 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Bicycle System InventoryGilliam County, Oregon Arlington Columbia River vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rat tles nak e R d E 2nd St Ivy St W 3rd St Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir StW 1st St E 3rd S tGrape St CottonwoodStW 5 th S t W 4t hSt S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Hemlock S t Hulde n Ln Rhea Ln Airport Rd Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St East Condon Airport Rd E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S Ward St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t S W ash ing ton St W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S J ew St ¯ Bicycle Facilities Railroads City Boundary 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 38 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County Special Transportation (GCST) operates dial-a-ride transit service for the County. The service provides approximately 10,000 trips each year. No fixed route service exists within the County. GCST operates eight vehicles, with five in Condon and three in Arlington. Service was recently expanded to include a vehicle in Lonerock. The County sold one ADA bus due to expensive repairs and needs to replace the bus with a smaller vehicle that includes an easy-to-operate wheelchair device that does not require the assistance of volunteers, who are often elders. Two of the remaining vehicles are accessible, and all vehicles are driven by a team of 21 volunteers. Two additional volunteers live in Lonerock and provide rides between Lonerock and Condon, where residents can catch another vehicle going to their final destination. When drivers are unavailable, the GCST director is sometimes required to drive the vehicles. There are no part-time dispatch staff currently available to cover these occasions when the director, who also functions as the dispatcher, must leave. The County has expressed interest in a carport at the Lonerock community center to protect the vehicle year-round and an expanded garage or similar facility in Condon to keep vehicles clear year-round. The dial-a-ride service may be used by the general public for any purpose. About 80 percent of the trips serve seniors or people with disabilities. Residents are asked to call 36 hours in advance to schedule their trip. Rides are available Monday through Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., although some longer distance medical trips extend beyond these hours. Most trips are for medical purposes (90 percent), shopping, social, or business purposes. There is often a need for volunteer caregivers to ride along with passengers to provide assistance to the passengers traveling to medical appointments. The nearest medical facilities are located in either The Dalles or Hermiston. Frequent trips are also made to Portland for OHSU. GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs. GCST has expressed the need for more maintenance money to cover tires, snow tires, brake repairs, etc. There is currently no funding for training for the defensive driving passenger assistance training required for volunteers by the transportation brokerage. The Gilliam County Transportation Services Director is interested in becoming certified to provide this training to volunteers from Gilliam County and other nearby counties. Riders are not charged a fee, but suggested donations are recommended and vary from $2 to $30 depending on the length of the trip, purpose of the trip, and type of vehicle used. Veterans often must travel longer distances for their services and are not asked to provide donations for their ride. The County lacks existing funding for drivers to take veterans to hospitals and wait until the following day to bring veterans back from procedures. TRUCK FREIGHT ROUTES I-84 is the only state facility in Gilliam County designated as a state truck freight route, as shown in Figure 3-10. National and regional truck freight movements are intended to occur via I-84, which is Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 39 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon part of the National Highway System. Although not designated as a state truck freight route, OR 19 also carries local and regional truck traffic, particularly between the landfill and I-84 in Arlington. Other roadways within the County that were noted as carrying high truck traffic included Ridge Road and Fourmile Canyon Road. A project was implemented to straighten sections of OR 19 between Condon and Arlington so that trucks carrying large loads such as wind turbines could traverse the corridor, but funding required that the project stop before the remaining few miles could be completed. Therefore, there remains a two-to-three mile section of OR 19 immediately south of Upper Rock Creek Road that requires roadway closure for large agriculture and wind turbine loads to pass through it. Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP November 2014 Figure3-10 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \3-1 1 F reig ht R out es. mx d - agr iffin - 1 1:0 3 A M 1 1/2 6/2 014 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Freight RoutesGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 ArlingtonPort Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemlock W 1st St E3rd St CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St ETrimbleSt E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St EWalnut St W Gilliam St WTrimbleSt W1stSt S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ ODOT Freight Routes Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 41 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon RAIL SYSTEM Union Pacific (UP) provides freight rail service through Gilliam County. There is currently no passenger rail service in the County. UP Rail lines follow I-84 and the Columbia River and provide access to Portland and the Hinkle Railyard in Hermiston. Rail service is also available between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center, located approximately 10 miles south of the primary Columbia River line in Arlington. The landfill receives solid waste by rail from major metropolitan areas up and down the west coast, and that traffic keeps operations over the remnant of the line healthy. All trains on the branch are operated by Watco through their Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad. The Watco line is a Class III or short-line railroad which has an annual operated revenue of less than 20 million dollars (1991 dollars). Class III railroads are typically local short-line railroads serving a small number of towns and industries or hauling cars for one or more larger railroads. The only materials shipped by rail currently are solid waste from metro areas. Six unit trains run on this branch per week. The train speed from I-84 to the end of the line at the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center is 25 mph. The track is in good condition with regular maintenance conducted. There are two crossings within the City of Arlington that are associated with issues. When the trains cross the roadways, there are times when the train is stopped or traveling at slow speeds, prohibiting emergency vehicles from accessing OR 19 and I-84. Additionally, traffic entering Arlington westbound can back up on the I-84 exit to the interstate. Additional rail connections were abandoned in 1993. The 44-mile railroad between Arlington and Condon was completed in 1905 from a junction with the mainline at Arlington south to the agricultural town of Condon. The Columbia River & Oregon Central Railroad built the line with the financial backing of the Union Pacific, who assumed ownership of the line after it was completed. Traffic over the line was primarily agricultural until 1928, when the Condon Kinzua & Southern completed its line from Condon south to Kinzua, OR. Forest products off of the CK&S became the primary source of traffic handled until 1978, when the big sawmill in Kinzua closed and the short line was abandoned. The decline of carloadings received from the CK&S prompted UP to close the Condon depot in 1975. Agricultural traffic, primarily grain, kept the trains running to Condon through the late 1980’s. By the early 1990’s operations over the line were non-existent, and UP applied to abandon the line. The only remaining shipper on the line, Condon Grain Growers, argued against the abandonment, stating that UP’s inability to guarantee a certain number of cars during the past two years prevented it from loading any cars. The ICC rejected this argument with the comment that a problematic car supply did not explain why nothing had been shipped over the railroad in 18 months. UP’s last run to Condon took place in late summer 1992, when some light engines made the long run up the branch to retrieve a cut of grain hoppers ordered but never loaded by Condon Grain Growers. The ICC granted permission to abandon the line in September 1992, and the rails were removed in 1993. A little over eleven miles of the branch remains in place today, from Arlington to Columbia Ridge Landfill. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 42 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon The 33 miles of abandoned railroad may be reviewed and considered for rails-to-trail opportunities to create shared-use paths for pedestrian and bicyclist travel in the County, if connections can be created for the 11-mile section to Arlington that is still served by active rail. The County prioritizes maintaining the 10-mile connection to the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center. If the railroad that allows unit-trains to haul solid waste to Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycle Center were to be discontinued, the adverse impacts I-84, OR 19 and Cedar Springs Road would be substantial. The average intermodal rail container carrying solid waste from Seattle to CRLRC has a large tonnage capacity. With six unit trains currently operated per week, many trucks would be added to the road system with the potential for increased wear and tear on the roadways, increased air pollution, and increased risk for crashes involving trucks. AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County has two general aviation airports. One airport is located in Arlington, and the other is in Condon. This section describes the two existing airports. Arlington Airport Arlington Municipal Airport (FAA LID: 1S8) is a non-towered public airport located one mile northeast of the central business district of Arlington. It is owned by the City of Arlington and was activated in December 1943. Arlington Municipal Airport covers an area of 80 acres (32 ha), including one runway with a gravel and dirt/turf surface measuring 5,000 x 50 feet (1,524 x 15 m). The gravel runway is difficult to maintain for the City. The runway was reported in poor condition in 2013, due to bunchgrass growth. In the longer term (20 years or more), the airport is likely to need a paved runway. The elevation at the Arlington Airport is 890 feet/271.3 meters. There are no general aviation services at the Arlington Municipal Airport with the exception of parking tie downs for aircraft. The Arlington Municipal Airport has municipal water and sewer available on adjacent Arlington Mesa Industrial Park along with Fiber Optic Conduit. Aircraft operations averaged 76 per month for a 12 month period ending May 20, 2014 and consisted of 55% local general aviation, 44% transient general aviation, and 1% air taxi. Insitu uses the airport as a testing location for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and has a dedicated structure on Airport property. According to the 2007 Oregon Aviation Plan, the Arlington Municipal Airport is considered a Category V – Remote Access/Emergency Service Airport. The Arlington Municipal Airport is located in the Enterprise Zone within the City Limits of Arlington and is Zoned M1 and M2 (industrial) with an Airport Development (AD) overlay zone (AD). The Airport is adjacent to the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. The surrounding uses in the immediate area are agricultural and industrial nature with residential uses in the City of Arlington and I-84 within one mile but separated by steep terrain. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 43 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Condon Airport Condon State Airport (Pauling Field) is located approximately one-mile northeast of the City of Condon. Regionally, the Airport is located approximately 150 miles east of Portland and 140 miles north of Bend. OR 19 provides access to the Airport and also provides a critical ground transportation link to eastern Oregon and to the rest of the state. Condon State Airport was constructed by the Board of Aeronautics in 1953. The Airport is owned and operated by the State of Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) and is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), making this airport eligible for federal funding. Condon State – Pauling Field, designated by the airport code 3S9, occupies approximately 103 acres of land. According to the 2007 Oregon Aviation Plan, the Condon Airport-Pauling Field is considered a Category IV – Local General Aviation Airport. The airport is located at an elevation of 2,911 feet/887.3 meters. The Condon State Airport plays a supportive role in the current system, providing geographic coverage and access to the state's airport system. The airport also serves as a base for agricultural spraying operations. Aircraft operations averaged 76 per week in the 12 month period ending February 05, 2013. Of these, 76% were transient general aviation, 22% were local general aviation, and 2% were air taxi. The airfield consists of many components that are required to accommodate safe aircraft operations. This consists of runways, taxiways, and an apron network; the visual and electronic navigational aids associated with runways; runway protection zones; and general aviation facilities. With assistance from the FAA in 1986, the Aeronautics Division rebuilt the airport with improved runway alignment. The airport has a single paved runway, Runway 07-25. The runway is 3,500 feet long and 60 feet wide with a concrete surface. The Airport currently has an Airport Reference Code (ARC) of B-I. The existing taxiway system at the Airport consists of two connecting taxiways from the hangar and apron areas to the runway. Aircraft turnarounds are located on both runway ends. There is one apron used for aircraft parking. The apron has 10 small aircraft tie down spaces. The apron is constructed of asphalt. There are no general aviation services nor fueling facilities at the Airport. Hangar space at the Airport is comprised of limited T-Hangars located adjacent to the apron area. There are 13 hangar facilities at the Airport. Vehicle parking is located adjacent to the apron area. There are approximately 10 parking spaces in this location. In addition, there are vehicle parking spaces available next to each hangar. The County and City have been would like to bring the airport into the City’s Urban Growth Boundary and serve it with water and sewer access. The Airport’s lighting and navigational systems extend the Airport’s usefulness into night and/or poor visibility. Pavement edge lighting consists of light fixtures located near the edge of the runway/taxiway to define the lateral limits of the pavement. This lighting is essential for the safe and Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 44 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon efficient movement of aircraft during periods of darkness or poor visibility. Runway 07-25 is equipped with medium intensity runway lighting (MIRL). A four-light precision approach path indicator (PAPI) is installed on both runway ends. A PAPI is a system of either two or four identical light units that provide pilots with either red, white, or a combination of red/white lights which indicate whether a pilot is below, above, or on the glide path to the runway. Runway end identifier lights (REILs) consist of two synchronized flashing lights located near the runway threshold which provide rapid and positive identification of the approach end of a runway. REILs help pilots identify the end of a runway especially when other light sources obscure other runway lighting. REILs are installed on both runway ends. INTERMODAL CONNECTIONS Intermodal connections for passenger service exist in the form of transit, pedestrian and bicycle, and automobile connections. Intermodal connections for freight exist in the form of rail, truck, air, and water transport connections. This section describes those connections. Freight Transportation Industrial activities are important economic catalysts in Gilliam County, with energy, waste management, and agriculture being key industries in the County. Therefore, the intermodal connections for freight are important for the County. The Port of Arlington supports economic development and intermodal transportation connections that include rail, highway, and marine transportation. The Port owns 30 acres located at the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park and provides a Barge Facility for river access. The Port of Arlington does not have capability to transfer contains to/from barges, and the Port would like more efficient grain handling from truck to barge. The industrial park at Willow Creek (Heppner Junction) had a barge dock, and its use is transitioning. With the expected increase in activity at the Arlington Mesa Industrial park around the airport, the roadways that provide access to the airport may need upgrades. Currently there are no shoulders on the roads and some steep drop-offs just beyond the edge of the roadway. The landfill site and several industrial sites south of Arlington are connected to the rail line that runs between Arlington and the landfill. In addition, OR 19 serves these industrial sites south of the City. OR 19 and the rail service connect up to the Port of Arlington. Shutler Station (located at the intersection of OR 19/Cedar Spring Lane) needs rail crossovers that would make movement of rail cars within the park easier. Additionally, the City has developed an industrial zoned area around the airport to encourage supporting land uses in this area. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 45 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon In Condon, rail service no longer exists. However, the City’s industrial lands are primarily located in the northeast area of the City, in close proximity to OR 19 for freight transportation and the Condon airport. Passenger Transportation The ODOT Region 4 Park and Ride Plan reviewed existing park and ride lots throughout the Region and recommended priority locations for new lots and/or upgrades to existing lots. There are no formal park and ride lots in the County, but there are several informal lots located in the County:  Earl Snell Park, Arlington: The lot is used for some carpooling for commuting and for medical or shopping trips. There is unpaved, unused area on the west side of the park that could be developed as a park and ride lot. This area is also adjacent to the downtown core of Arlington, which contains connected sidewalks for pedestrians.  Gravel pull-out lot at Clem-Mikkalo Road and OR 19: This lot serves people traveling from Condon to Arlington and The Dalles.  Bus Barn in Condon  St. Johns Catholic Church in Condon  United Church of Christ in Condon  Bank of Eastern Oregon in Arlington The demand for park and ride lots was determined to be medium to low based on stakeholder interviews conducted as part of the plan. The lower priority designation is due to the fact that the area is relatively rural and there is abundant parking available to be used informally as a park and ride lot. The interviews revealed that the highest demand for park and ride lots in the County is for travel to the Arlington area by employees of Waste Management and the Shepherds Flat Wind Farm. The interviewees indicated that the west end of Earl Snell Park in Arlington had the greatest potential for becoming a park and ride lot. Beyond upgrading existing informal park and ride lots, the interviewees indicated there is no need for additional park and ride lots. Carpooling, vanpooling, and transit can also be used to serve the demand. Upgrades to existing informal lots should consider pedestrian and bicycle connectivity to support bike tourism in the County. BRIDGE CONDITIONS ODOT maintains an inventory of bridge conditions within the County, as summarized in Table 3-18. Table 3-18 includes State, County, and City owned facilities. One bridge on Lonerock Road currently has a load restriction posted, and one bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road is currently closed to all traffic, causing an estimated 18-mile detour. Previous work estimated the cost of repairing or replacing that bridge to be $2 million. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 46 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Sufficiency rating is a measure between 0 and 100 calculated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), based on factors such as condition, materials, load capacity, and geometry (i.e., dimensions). FHWA uses the rating as a tool to prioritize the allocation of funds for bridge repairs. In general, bridges with a sufficiency rating of less than 50 are given priority. The sufficiency rating is used to identify deficiencies, which may include structural issues or functional issues. For example, older bridges may be narrow and not designed to the same width or height clearance of today’s standards. Therefore, a sufficiency rating does not necessarily indicate a structural issue. There are two bridges with sufficiency ratings below 50 within Gilliam County: the Cayuse Canyon Road bridge over Rock Creek, which is currently closed to traffic, and the I-84 Eastbound bridge over Willow Creek at milepost 148.6. Although the Lonerock Road bridge is posted for load, it has a sufficiency rating of 57. The I-84 bridge is a state owned facility, while the Cayuse Canyon Road bridge is a County facility. The I-84 bridge is too narrow to accommodate the adjacent highway facilities, which is why the bridge is given a low sufficiency rating. However, the bridge is structurally sufficient. The closed County bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road is structurally deficient and may need repairs or replacement before it could be reopened. In addition to ODOT’s records, the County Roadmaster indicated another bridge, located on Eightmile Canyon Road, needs replacement. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 47 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-18. Gilliam County Bridge Inventory Bridge ID Owner Year Built Length (ft) Carries Crosses MP Sufficiency Rating Posting Operating Load Inventory Rating (tons) 00108B ODOT 1963 1540 I-84 (HWY 002) JOHN DAY RIVER 114.6 76.5 A Open, no restriction 60 36 00795A ODOT 1982 42 OR 19 (HWY 005) JUNIPER CANYON 19.25 91.8 A Open, no restriction 71 43 00906A ODOT 1979 163 OR 74 (HWY 052) WILLOW CREEK 3.94 88.9 A Open, no restriction 34.3 26.5 01103A ODOT 1972 475 OR 19 (HWY 005) THIRTYMILE CR 43.92 83.7 A Open, no restriction 98 24 01792 ODOT 1934 99 OR 206 (HWY 300) ROCK CREEK 51.67 84.8 A Open, no restriction 48 35 03456 ODOT 1995 25 OR 19 (HWY 005) CHINA CREEK 4.03 93.6 A Open, no restriction 60 36 07520A ODOT 1954 292 I-84 (HWY 002) WB WILLOW CREEK WEST 148.57 51.3 A Open, no restriction 21.2 16.4 08820 ODOT 1964 1463 I-84 (HWY 002) ARLINGTON VIADUCT 137.91 78 A Open, no restriction 60 36 08944 ODOT 1964 188 PHILLIPI CANYON RD I-84 (HWY 002) 123.31 79.5 A Open, no restriction 43 26 08945 ODOT 1964 157 I-84 (HWY 002) BLALOCK CANYON RD 129.43 84.1 A Open, no restriction 30.7 23.7 09126 ODOT 1964 204 OR 74 (HWY 052) UPRR 3.21 95.4 A Open, no restriction 44.8 34.6 09168 ODOT 1964 69 OR 19 (HWY 005) CHINA CREEK 0.58 88.6 A Open, no restriction 45 27 09170 ODOT 1964 30 OR 19 (HWY 005) CO CHINA CREEK 0.73 93.9 A Open, no restriction 53 32 09197 ODOT 1965 340 I-84 (HWY 002) EB WILLOW CREEK EB 148.6 33.3 A Open, no restriction 16.8 13 09198 ODOT 1964 258 OR 74 (HWY 052) I-84 (HWY 002) 0.31 70 A Open, no restriction 24.5 18.9 13567 ODOT 1972 22 OR 19 (HWY 005) CONDON CANYON CR 43.23 90.1 A Open, no restriction 60 36 13568 ODOT 1972 22 OR 19 (HWY 005) CONDON CANYON CR 43.36 98 A Open, no restriction 60 36 13569 ODOT 1972 22 OR 19 (HWY 005) CONDON CANYON CR 43.62 98.1 A Open, no restriction 60 36 19893 ODOT 2005 135 OR 19 (HWY 005) ROCK CREEK (OLEX) 17.03 81.9 A Open, no restriction 30.8 23.8 21C01 Gilliam Co. 1987 71 RHEA ROAD WILLOW CREEK EB 0.05 98 A Open, no restriction 98 59 21C02 Gilliam Co. 1991 72 MORRIS ROAD ROCK CREEK 0.01 99 A Open, no restriction 70 42 21C03 Gilliam Co. 1987 27 FRENCH CHARLE ROAD ROCK CREEK 4.5 98 A Open, no restriction 98 56 21C04 Gilliam Co. 1965 82 CAYUSE CANYON ROAD ROCK CREEK 4 31.9 K Closed to all traffic 14 8 21C05 Gilliam Co. 1958 69 FOURMILE ROAD EIGHTMILE CREEK 4.93 95.9 A Open, no restriction 68 41 21C06 Gilliam Co. 1960 40 BASELINE RD EIGHTMILE CREEK 9.47 85.9 A Open, no restriction 43 28 21C07 Gilliam Co. 1957 63 BARNETT RD ROCK CREEK 8.38 88.4 A Open, no restriction 44 26 21C08 Gilliam Co. 1962 81 UPPER ROCK CR ROAD ROCK CREEK 3 94.8 A Open, no restriction 53 32 21C09 Gilliam Co. 1967 111 WOLF HOLLOW LANE ROCK CREEK 5 96.2 A Open, no restriction 57 34 21C10 Gilliam Co. 1958 71 LONE ROCK ROAD LONE ROCK CREEK 0 57 P Posted for load 38 23 21C12 Gilliam Co. 1960 100 ROCK CREEK ROAD ROCK CREEK 9.3 94 A Open, no restriction 52 31 21C13 Gilliam Co. 1964 81 MIKKALO LANE HAY CREEK 0 90.9 A Open, no restriction 68 41 21C14 Gilliam Co. 1957 63 TRAIL FORK ROAD THIRTYMILE CREEK 2.5 89.9 A Open, no restriction 47 28 21C15 Gilliam Co. 1973 34 MIKKALO LANE SCOTT CANYON CREEK 2.5 96 A Open, no restriction 77 46 21C16 Gilliam Co. 1973 34 ROCK CREEK ROAD JUNIPER CANYON CREEK 0.1 96.9 A Open, no restriction 79 48 22190 Gilliam Co. 2013 28 ALVILLE LANE FERRY CANYON CREEK 1 78 A Open, no restriction 75 45 21521 City of Arlington 1954 35 Port Access Road CHINA CREEK 0 91.5 A Open, no restriction 90 54 01100A ODOT 1972 8 OR 19 (HWY 005) DRY GULCH 42.12 87.1 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 01101A ODOT 1979 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) SB CONDON CANYON CREEK 39.04 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 01883A ODOT 1979 16 OR 206 (HWY 300) SIX MILE CREEK 49.61 99.8 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 01884A ODOT 1977 13 OR 206 (HWY 300) DRY WASH 49.24 99.8 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03466A ODOT 1974 17 OR 19 (HWY 005) CHINA CREEK 4.47 100 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03467 ODOT 1922 6 OR 19 (HWY 005) SHUTLER CREEK 7.52 98.6 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03468 ODOT 1922 6 OR 19 (HWY 005) W FK SHUTLER CREEK 8.39 96.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03470 ODOT 1949 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) CATTLEPASS 16.2 99.5 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03471A ODOT 1977 14 OR 19 (HWY 005) CATTLEPASS 23.2 99.2 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03472 ODOT 1951 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) CATTLEPASS 35.75 94.6 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03476A ODOT 1979 8 OR 19 (HWY 005) CATTLEPASS & DRAINAGE 40.91 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03477 ODOT 1951 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) CATTLEPASS 45.03 78.9 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03484 ODOT 1951 7 OR 74 (HWY 052) CATTLEPASS 4.55 89 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 03491 ODOT 1954 7 OR 206 (HWY 300) CATTLEPASS 50.39 99.8 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 08359 ODOT 1957 12 OR 206 (HWY 300)EB COTTONWOOD CANYON 15.27 94.9 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 08361 ODOT 1957 10 OR 206 (HWY 300)EB COTTONWOOD CANYON 16.35 96.9 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 09171 ODOT 1964 13 I-84 (HWY 002) WB WOELPERN INT CONN 131.03 66 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P301 ODOT 1964 17 I-84 (HWY 002) WILDCAT CREEK 123.93 65 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P302 ODOT 1964 18 I-84 (HWY 002) BLALOCK CREEK 129.48 70 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P303 ODOT 1964 7 I-84 (HWY 002) LANG CANYON 133.35 70 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P304 ODOT 1964 10 I-84 (HWY 002) CATTLEPASS 133.43 70 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P305 ODOT 1964 9 I-84 (HWY 002) JONES CANYON 135.86 70 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P309 ODOT 1964 14 OR 19 (HWY 005) PATILL CANYON 46.45 98.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P310 ODOT 1964 14 OR 19 (HWY 005) PATILL CANYON 46.79 98.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P311 ODOT 1964 6 OR 19 (HWY 005) RAMSEY CANYON 47.76 98.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P312 ODOT 1964 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) PATILL CANYON 48.24 98.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P313 ODOT 1964 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) DYER CREEK 48.98 98.3 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P439 ODOT 1977 14 ON FARM APPROACH JUNIPER CANYON 23.22 100 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P442 ODOT 1979 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) SB CONDON CANYON CREEK 39.27 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P443 ODOT 2000 12 OR 19 (HWY 005) SB CONDON CANYON CREEK 39.48 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P444 ODOT 1979 14 OR 19 (HWY 005) CONDON CANYON CREEK 41.48 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 0P457 ODOT 1979 7 OR 19 (HWY 005) SB CODER CREEK 40.26 98 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A 13572 ODOT 1972 13 OR 19 (HWY 005) SB CONDON CANYON CREEK 41.8 95.8 A Open, no restriction N/A N/A Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 48 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon MARINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Gilliam County is located on the Columbia River, a major water transportation route. The Port of Arlington manages river cargo and marina operations. The Port has a Barge Facility available for river access and a grain silo. Farmers in the region use the Port to export grain, which is an important economic activity for the County. From the Columbia River, the grain can travel to Portland and be exported internationally. The marina also provides access to the river for recreational purposes. The marina is in the process of adding a fuel dock to its amenities. The marina needs a better location where recreational users (kite surfers and wind surfers) can access the water. PIPELINE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM Pipeline transportation within the Gilliam County area includes numerous substations and transmission lines, which are currently being upgraded. These transmission lines are maintained by Pacific Gas Transmission provide access to the main power grid at multiple locations. FUNDING INVENTORY & ANALYSIS Roadways within Gilliam County fall under the jurisdiction of the Cities, County, and ODOT. This section discusses the County’s existing funding revenue sources for transportation capital improvement projects as well as operations and maintenance activities. As summarized in Table 3-19, Gilliam County has had an annual revenue of approximately $1.3 million per year over the past ten years. This funding covers all transportation related projects, including maintenance and capital improvements projects. Approximately half of the County’s transportation revenue each year comes from property taxes. The remaining amounts are obtained from a variety of sources, including ODOT, as shown in Table 3-19 and vary by year. ODOT has historically been able to fund the County’s transportation operations and maintenance activities for state facilities. Table 3-20 summarizes the County’s transportation expenditures over the past ten years. As shown in the table, the majority of the County’s transportation expenditures are used to cover maintenance and snow removal throughout the County. According to the County, there has been situations in which the County made a safety improvement on a roadway but had to reinstall the roadway in gravel rather than pavement due to lack of sufficient funds to finish the pavement. The County has trouble affording projects even after receiving grants when consultant fees are too high. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 49 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 3-19. Ten Year Gilliam County Transportation Revenue Budget Budget Year Special Assessments- Property Tax Motor Vehicle Registration Fees Surplus Land & Equipment Sales Interest Income State Highway Fund Apportionment Special County Allotment State Highway Fund Exchange Program ODOT Issued Permit Fees Other State Highway Fund Grants BLM Mineral Leases Other Federal Funds Receipts Non- Jurisdiction Road work U.S. Taylor Grazing Apportionment TOTALS FY end June 30, 2014 $ 845,901 $ - $ - $ 3,454 $ 114,014 $ 289,828 $ 204,268 $ - $ - $ 42,938 $ - $ - $ 1,058 $ 1,501,461 FY end June 30, 2013 $ 874,995 $ - $ - $ 1,615 $ 116,628 $ 96,623 $ 178,751 $ - $ - $ 1,634 $ - $ - $ 864 $ 1,271,113 FY end June 30, 2012 $ 1,119,219 $ - $ - $ 4,880 $ - $ 78,539 $ 186,378 $ - $ - $ 7,276 $ - $ - $ 968 $ 1,397,260 FY end June 30, 2011 $ 931,010 $ - $ - $ 6,132 $ 345,955 $ 121,963 $ - $ 159,963 $ - $ 7,209 $ - $ - $ 3,084 $ 1,574,875 FY end June 30 2010 $ 717,073 $ 131,243 $ - $ 7,666 $ - $ 117,002 $ - $ - $ - $ 8,688 $237,810 $ - $ 1,048 $ 1,220,530 FY end June 30, 2009 $ 432,430 $ 119,982 $ 47,132 $ 13,958 $ - $ 163,001 $ 186,208 $ - $ 751,404 $ 4,290 $ - $ - $ 967 $ 1,715,382 FY end June 30, 2008 $ 450,495 $ - $ - $ 20,462 $ - $ 456,183 $ - $ 131,666 $ - $ 248,524 $ - $ 37,493 $ 931 $ 1,345,754 FY end June 30, 2007 $ 404,642 $ - $ - $ 16,626 $ - $ 463,554 $ - $ 150,861 $ - $ 62 $ - $ 34,820 $ 1,256 $ 1,071,821 FY end June 30, 2006 $ 385,041 $ - $ - $ 4,491 $ 154,533 $ 349,134 $ 266,997 $ - $ - $ 31 $ 24,014 $ - $ 1,284 $ 1,185,529 FY end June 30 2005 $ 314,706 $ - $ - $ 2,017 $ 153,376 $ 468,825 $ - $ - $ - $ 61 $ - $ - $ 1,440 $ 940,428 Table 3-20. Ten Year Gilliam County Transportation Expenditures Budget Budget Year General Maintenance of Condition Safety and Traffic Maintenance Snow and Ice Removal Administration and General Engineering Total FY end June 30, 2014 $ 1,158,320 $ 30,178 $ 56,659 $ 216,713 $ 1,461,870 FY end June 30, 2013 $ 839,223 $ 49,860 $ 19,604 $ 199,496 $ 1,108,183 FY end June 30, 2012 $ 1,214,850 $ 51,116 $ 23,783 $ 177,565 $ 1,467,314 FY end June 30, 2011 $ 1,633,896 $ 42,724 $ 44,646 $ 185,514 $ 1,906,780 FY end June 30 2010 $ 946,253 $ 34,233 $ 19,737 $ 184,001 $ 1,184,224 FY end June 30, 2009 $ 577,582 $ 27,063 $ 12,002 $ 172,904 $ 789,551 FY end June 30, 2008 $ 704,814 $ 26,739 $ 69,276 $ 172,087 $ 972,916 FY end June 30, 2007 $ 650,868 $ 21,750 $ 8,041 $ 159,277 $ 839,936 FY end June 30, 2006 $ 359,925 $ 22,081 $ 17,816 $ 134,451 $ 534,273 FY end June 30 2005 $ 364,962 $ 23,623 $ 13,925 $ 129,976 $ 532,486 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 50 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon CONCLUSION The assessment of the current land use and transportation system conditions identified the following:  Multiple jurisdictions own and manage the public roadway system within Gilliam County, including the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), Gilliam County, and the incorporated cities of Arlington and Condon. Gilliam County, the City of Arlington, and the City of Condon each has their own current TSP, last updated in 1999. This update will combine those into one TSP.  Gilliam County is connected to the national and statewide highway network via one Interstate Highway (I-84), two Regional Highways, and one District Highway.  Existing traffic volume does not exceed capacity at the six study intersections.  County two-lane roads are not subject to ODOT standards; however, all County roadways operate well below ODOT standards in terms of delay.  Although no individual intersections or segment locations were identified with safety issues based on crash history, general County-wide trends indicate that some low-cost systemic treatments such as shoulder widening and installation of centerline and shoulder rumble strips may be effective on County facilities. In addition, treatments that inform drivers of roadway conditions may also be effective at reducing weather-related crashes. These options should be evaluated.  Several intersections were identified by the PAC as locations where safety improvements could reduce crash risk: o Walnut Street/Main Street in Condon; o Lone Rock Road/OR 206; o I-84 Ramps/Arlington Port Road in Arlington.  The downtown Main Street corridor in Condon contains continuous sidewalks. However, the remainder of Condon and Arlington lack continuous sidewalks providing pedestrians with access to destinations in the cities.  Bicycles typically ride in the travel lane throughout the County due to the lack of wide shoulders on the state highways. OR 206 and OR 19, south of Condon, are popular recreational bicycling routes. Although traffic volumes are low, conflicts between vehicles and bicyclists may arise when large groups of cyclists are traveling these routes.  There is no fixed route transit service in the County. The County operates a dial-a-ride service, available to all residents, with volunteer drivers. These services are primarily used for medical purposes and often involve long trips to take residents to hospitals in The Dalles or Portland.  Arlington and Condon both have general aviation airports.  The County’s largest industries are agriculture, waste management, and wind energy. There are several large industrial lands located in the County and in Arlington that are available for future development.  Freight traffic travel occurs by truck, rail, and boat. A rail line spur connects the Columbia Ridge Landfill with the railroad that travels east-west along the Columbia River. The Port of Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 51 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Arlington provides access to the Columbia River for freight movement. OR 19 provides connections to I-84 for the trucking industry.  Historically, the County and ODOT have funded the general maintenance and upkeep of the Gilliam County roadways. No additional funds are available for large capital projects. These conclusions will be used to inform the alternatives considered for the TSP. REFERENCES 1. Oregon Highway Plan 2. 2010 Highway Capacity Manual 3. ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual APPENDICES Appendix 1 Buildable Lands Inventory for Cities Appendix 2 Traffic Count Data Appendix 3 Methodology Memorandum Appendix 4 Roadway Segment Traffic Volume Profiles Appendix 5 Existing Conditions Traffic Operations Analysis Worksheets & Queue Length Calculations Appendix 6 ODOT Crash Data Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 52 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Appendix 1 Buildable Lands Inventory for Cities SCALE IN FEET 5 @ 6 7 8 •ic •"' 5 6 • K:\ACAD\CITY\LONE_Rock.dwg ... 1&.1 1&.1 a: ... en 519,600 0 0 ~ -m I[) ~ "' 500 4 3 2 1 () • • I • ' I , , I ' ' I ' ' I ' • I , ' I , ' I ' • I (1 GILLIAM SE GOV'T LOT 2 AX LOT 5 o 200 5 5 4 - -I I "" "" "' "' 6 3 6 g c; 3 ® 0 ~ § fil 1-' 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delay is not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:58:52 PM SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com Project: H:\projfile\17679 - Gilliam County TSP\analysis\existing conditions\1_main_walnut.sip6 8001045, 6019192, KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES INC, PLUS / Floating Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 11/25/2014Report File: H:\...\existingconditions_report.pdf Scenario: Base ScenarioVistro File: H:\...\existing conditions.vistro Gilliam County TSP V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A5.90.058EBLHCM2010Two-way stopOR 19 / Cedar Springs Lane6 A2.10.000WBLHCM2010Two-way stop OR 74 / I-84 Eastbound Ramps 5 A3.00.001EBTHCM2010Two-way stopI-84 Ramps / Beech Street4 A4.80.018SBTHCM2010Two-way stop Cottonwood Street / Beech Street 3 A4.20.026EBLHCM2010Two-way stopMain Street/E Bayard Street2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with 0.026Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 4.2Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Main Street/E Bayard Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade 30.0030.0025.0025.00Speed 100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1Pocket Length 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach AccessE Bayard StreetMain StreetMain StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 241141201433296333Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 600105387281Total 15-Minute Volume [vehicles] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Other Adjustment Factor 0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.Peak Hour Factor 191131161126235262Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 51276Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor 191131161126235262Base Volume Input [veh/h] AccessE Bayard StreetMain StreetMain StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with AIntersection LOS 4.17d_I, Intersection Delay [s / veh] AAAAApproach LOS 8.699.712.820.52d_A, Approach Delay [s / veh] AAAAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 8.698.698.699.719.719.710.000.007.380.000.007.35d_M, Delay for Movement [s / veh] 0.020.000.000.000.000.030.000.000.020.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with 0.018Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 4.8Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #3: Cottonwood Street / Beech Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade 45.0025.0025.0025.00Speed 100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1Pocket Length 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach I-84 RampsBeech StreetArlington Port RoadCottonwood StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 416132533101613122313Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 143683430513Total 15-Minute Volume [vehicles] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Other Adjustment Factor 0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.0.6900/0.Peak Hour Factor 31191723711911529Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 16111822Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor 31191723711911529Base Volume Input [veh/h] I-84 RampsBeech StreetArlington Port RoadCottonwood StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with AIntersection LOS 4.76d_I, Intersection Delay [s / veh] AAAAApproach LOS 2.951.089.349.32d_A, Approach Delay [s / veh] AAAAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 0.000.007.490.000.007.359.349.349.349.329.329.32d_M, Delay for Movement [s / veh] 0.000.000.010.000.000.010.020.020.000.020.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results FreeFreeStopStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with 0.001Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 3.0Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #4: I-84 Ramps / Beech Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade 25.0020.0045.0025.00Speed 100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1Pocket Length 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Beech StreetAccessI-84 RampsLocust StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 181181111381114511Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 4040000933130Total 15-Minute Volume [vehicles] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Other Adjustment Factor 0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.0.8000/0.Peak Hour Factor 14114111130911411Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 1362627Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor 14114111130911411Base Volume Input [veh/h] Beech StreetAccessI-84 RampsLocust StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with AIntersection LOS 2.95d_I, Intersection Delay [s / veh] AAAAApproach LOS 9.239.271.670.11d_A, Approach Delay [s / veh] AAAAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 9.239.239.239.279.279.270.000.007.600.000.007.53d_M, Delay for Movement [s / veh] 0.020.000.020.000.000.000.000.000.010.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with 0.000Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 2.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #5: OR 74 / I-84 Eastbound Ramps Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade 45.0045.0055.0055.00Speed 100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1100.00/1Pocket Length 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach I-84 Entrance RampI-84 Exit RampOR 74OR 74Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0005110811160Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 000100020320Total 15-Minute Volume [vehicles] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Other Adjustment Factor 0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.1.0000/1.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.0.7900/0.1.0000/1.Peak Hour Factor 000411061950Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 22226Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.1.0000/1.Base Volume Adjustment Factor 000411061950Base Volume Input [veh/h] I-84 Entrance RampI-84 Exit RampOR 74OR 74Name Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with AIntersection LOS 2.07d_I, Intersection Delay [s / veh] AAAAApproach LOS 8.728.720.810.00d_A, Approach Delay [s / veh] AAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 8.728.728.728.728.728.720.000.007.250.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s / veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with 0.058Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 5.9Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #6: OR 19 / Cedar Springs Lane Intersection Level Of Service Report nononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade 45.0055.0055.00Speed 100.00100.00175.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length 001000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Cedar Springs LaneOR 19OR 19Name Intersection Setup 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 75291691Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2132420Total 15-Minute Volume [vehicles] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.91000.91000.91000.91000.91000.9100Peak Hour Factor 64781581Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Right-Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 401710Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 64781581Base Volume Input [veh/h] Cedar Springs LaneOR 19OR 19Name Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with AIntersection LOS 5.88d_I, Intersection Delay [s / veh] AAAApproach LOS 9.250.000.73d_A, Approach Delay [s / veh] AAAAAAMovement LOS 9.259.250.000.000.007.34d_M, Delay for Movement [s / veh] 0.010.060.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with Turning Movement Volume: Summary 11/25/2014Report File: H:\...\existingconditions_report.pdf Scenario: Base ScenarioVistro File: H:\...\existing conditions.vistro Gilliam County TSP 85 Total Volume 6 Right 47 Left Eastbound 8 Right 15 Thru Southbound 8 Thru 1 Left Northbound OR 19 / Cedar Springs Lane6 Intersection NameID 27 Total Volume 0 Right 0 Thru 0 Left Westbound 4 Right 1 Thru 1 Left Eastbound 6 Thru 1 Left Southbound 9 Right 5 Thru Northbound OR 74 / I-84 Eastbound Ramps5 Intersection NameID 125 Total Volume 14 Right 1 Thru 14 Left Westbound 1 Right 1 Thru 1 Left Eastbound 1 Right 30 Thru 9 Left Southbound 11 Right 41 Thru 1 Left Northbound I-84 Ramps / Beech Street4 Intersection NameID 117 Total Volume 3 Right 11 Thru 9 Left Westbound 17 Right 23 Thru 7 Left Eastbound 11 Right 9 Thru 1 Left Southbound 15 Right 2 Thru 9 Left Northbound Cottonwood Street / Beech Street 3 Intersection NameID 134 Total Volume 19 Right 1 Thru 1 Left Westbound 3 Right 1 Thru 16 Left Eastbound 11 Right 26 Thru 23 Left Southbound 5 Right 26 Thru 2 Left Northbound Main Street/E Bayard Street2 Intersection NameID Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with Lane Configuration and Traffic Control Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with Traffic Volume - Base Volume Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 11/25/2014Gilliam County TSP Version 1.00-11 Generated with Traffic Conditions Project Information Analyst: AJG Agency/Co.: Gilliam Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Project ID: 17679 Date Performed: 11/25/2014 Analysis Year: 2014 Analysis Time Period: 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Intersection: 2 East/West Street: E Bayard Street North/South Street: Main Street Results Approach Lane Group, Volume, % Heavy Conflicting Signal Queue Length Code veh/hr Vehicles Volume,veh/hr (0 or 1) Feet EB MNLTR 21 5.0% 93 0 0 18 WB MNLTR 20 12.0% 93 0 0 19 Queue Length Estimation at Two-Way STOP Controlled Intersection Input Left Turn Lane (0 or 1) Project Information Analyst: AJG Agency/Co.: Gilliam Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Project ID: 17679 Date Performed: 11/25/2014 Analysis Year: 2014 Analysis Time Period: 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Intersection: 3 East/West Street: I-84 Ramps/Beech Street North/South Street: Cottonwood Street/Arlington Port Road Results Approach Lane Group, Volume, % Heavy Conflicting Signal Queue Length Code veh/hr Vehicles Volume,veh/hr (0 or 1) Feet NB MNLTR 27 22.0% 70 0 0 21 SB MNLTR 21 18.0% 70 0 0 19 Queue Length Estimation at Two-Way STOP Controlled Intersection Input Left Turn Lane (0 or 1) Project Information Analyst: AJG Agency/Co.: Gilliam Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Project ID: 17679 Date Performed: 11/25/2014 Analysis Year: 2014 Analysis Time Period: 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Intersection: 4 East/West Street: Beech Street North/South Street: I-84 Ramps/Locust Street Results Approach Lane Group, Volume, % Heavy Conflicting Signal Queue Length Code veh/hr Vehicles Volume,veh/hr (0 or 1) Feet EB MNLTR 29 13.0% 93 0 0 22 WB MNLTR 3 20.0% 93 0 0 15 Queue Length Estimation at Two-Way STOP Controlled Intersection Input Left Turn Lane (0 or 1) Project Information Analyst: AJG Agency/Co.: Gilliam Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Project ID: 17679 Date Performed: 11/25/2014 Analysis Year: 2014 Analysis Time Period: 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Intersection: 5 East/West Street: I-84 Eastbound Ramps North/South Street: OR 74 Results Approach Lane Group, Volume, % Heavy Conflicting Signal Queue Length Code veh/hr Vehicles Volume,veh/hr (0 or 1) Feet EB MNLTR 7 22.0% 21 0 0 15 Queue Length Estimation at Two-Way STOP Controlled Intersection Input Left Turn Lane (0 or 1) Project Information Analyst: AJG Agency/Co.: Gilliam Jurisdiction: Gilliam County Project ID: 17679 Date Performed: 11/25/2014 Analysis Year: 2014 Analysis Time Period: 12:00 - 1:00 p.m. Intersection: 6 East/West Street: Cedar Springs Lane North/South Street: OR 19 Results Approach Lane Group, Volume, % Heavy Conflicting Signal Queue Length Code veh/hr Vehicles Volume,veh/hr (0 or 1) Feet EB MNLTR 53 40.0% 33 0 0 32 Queue Length Estimation at Two-Way STOP Controlled Intersection Input Left Turn Lane (0 or 1) Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 December 22, 2014 Page 57 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Appendix 6 ODOT Crash Data Crash ID Crash Month Crash Day Crash Year Week Day Code Crash Hour (Hour Starting) County City Functional Class Code Highway Number Milepoint Posted Speed Limit Road Character Crash Type Collision Type Crash Severity Weather Condition Road Surface Condition Light Condition Traffic Control Device (TCD) Crash Level Event 1 Code Crash Level Event 2 Code Crash Level Cause 1 Code Work Zone Indicator Alcohol-Involved Flag Drugs Involved Flag Excessive Speed Involved Flag 1315658 January 16 2009 Friday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 114.74 65 Bridge structure (overpass and underpass included) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315659 January 25 2009 Sunday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 115.33 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315662 January 26 2009 Monday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116.5 65 Straight roadway Pedestrian Pedestrian Non-fatal injury crash Clear Ice Daylight Median barrier Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315664 January 26 2009 Monday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116.63 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Ice Daylight Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315668 January 4 2009 Sunday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 121.1 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Wet Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Vehicle forced by impact into another vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1315669 January 25 2009 Sunday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129.7 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Ice Dusk (Twilight) Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315671 January 18 2009 Sunday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.1 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Sleet Ice Daylight One way street Chuckhole in road, low or high shoulder at pavement edge Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315672 January 25 2009 Sunday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 65 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Snow Daylight One way street Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315675 January 25 2009 Sunday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 135.56 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Daylight One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315676 January 1 2009 Thursday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 137.31 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Fog Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315678 January 25 2009 Sunday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Daylight One way street Followed too closely No No No No 1315679 January 19 2009 Monday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 0.9 40 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1315685 January 17 2009 Saturday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 34.23 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1316249 January 19 2009 Monday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 999.99 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1318243 March 6 2009 Friday Unknown TimeGilliam Rural Minor Collector 6 55 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Fatal crash Unknown Unknown Unknown No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No Yes No Yes 1320099 February 3 2009 Tuesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 24.5 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1320101 February 10 2009 Tuesday 6:00 PM Gilliam Condon Rural Major Collector Wasco-Heppner 41.07 20 roadway and considered "located" From opposite direction – both going straight Head-On Non-fatal injury crash Snow Snow Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1320102 March 6 2009 Friday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 118.13 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1320103 March 6 2009 Friday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129.41 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1320108 March 14 2009 Saturday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 10.38 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1322674 April 21 2009 Tuesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Collector 10.05 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1322677 May 15 2009 Friday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 124.45 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Improper change of traffic lanes No No No 1322680 June 19 2009 Friday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 137.46 65 Grade (vertical curve) Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Struck by other moving or flying object Temporary sign or barricade in road, etc. Other (not improper driving) Yes No No No 1322684 June 28 2009 Sunday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 141.18 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1322686 April 19 2009 Sunday 4:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 149 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Wild animal, game (includes birds; not deer or elk) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1335885 June 8 2009 Monday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 121.48 55 Straight roadway Other non-collision Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Dusk (Twilight) Median barrier Foreign obstruction / debris in road (not gravel) Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1335886 July 9 2009 Thursday 3:00 PM Gilliam Arlington Rural Local Street or Road 25 Street/road or highway intersection Entering at angle – all others Turning Movement Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Stop sign Vegetation obscured view Did not yield right-of-way No No No No 1335890 July 27 2009 Monday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 6.19 55 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Stock: cow, calf, bull, steer, sheep, etc. Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1335893 July 13 2009 Monday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 4.07 Straight roadway From same direction – one turn, one straight Turning Movement Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Made improper turn No No No 1335895 July 5 2009 Sunday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.56 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Followed too closely No No No No 1335953 June 15 2009 Monday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 147.79 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Unknown type of fixed object Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No 1342531 November 14 2009 Saturday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 1.01 55 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1342533 September 27 2009 Sunday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 9.21 55 roadway and considered "located" Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Overturned after first harmful event Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1342534 August 3 2009 Monday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 125.56 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Improper change of traffic lanes No No No 1342535 August 1 2009 Saturday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 127.56 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Tire failure Tire failure No No No No 1342536 August 3 2009 Monday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.5 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Jackknife: trailer or towed vehicle struck towing vehicle Other improper driving No No No No 1342537 September 17 2009 Thursday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129.24 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1342538 September 3 2009 Thursday 4:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 144.42 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Overturned after first harmful event Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No Yes No No 1342539 September 18 2009 Friday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136.55 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Inattention No No No No 1342541 September 25 2009 Friday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 147.71 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Tire failure Tire failure No No No No 1342542 October 3 2009 Saturday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 131.56 65 Grade (vertical curve) From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Rain Wet Daylight Median barrier Mechanical defect No No No No 1342543 December 30 2009 Wednesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 137 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight Median barrier Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1342601 August 10 2009 Monday 6:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 20.16 Driveway or alley access From same direction – one turn, one straight Turning Movement Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Improper overtaking No No No 1342608 September 24 2009 Thursday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 12.76 55 Grade (vertical curve) Animal Miscellaneous Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Cut slope or ditch embankment Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1343465 December 4 2009 Friday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 118 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Cut slope or ditch embankment Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1343469 December 28 2009 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132.56 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Daylight One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343471 December 29 2009 Tuesday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Snow bank Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343473 December 30 2009 Wednesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126.56 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight Median barrier Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343489 December 27 2009 Sunday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 122.56 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Retaining wall or tunnel wall Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343492 December 30 2009 Wednesday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126.56 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343493 December 30 2009 Wednesday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 125.55 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343494 December 30 2009 Wednesday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 127.22 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1343495 December 30 2009 Wednesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136.59 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight One way street Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1352317 December 31 2009 Thursday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 122 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Median barrier (raised or metal) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1356259 January 30 2010 Saturday 9:00 PM Gilliam Condon Rural Local Street or Road Street/road or highway intersection Entering at angle – all others Turning Movement Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Wet Darkness – with street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Made improper turn No No No No 1358128 January 31 2010 Sunday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 135.4 65 Straight roadway Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Wet Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1358139 January 13 2010 Wednesday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.8 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Wet Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1358188 February 28 2010 Sunday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Heppner 5.7 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No Yes No No 1358238 February 1 2010 Monday 6:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 33.5 55 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1358239 February 2 2010 Tuesday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 48.5 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Wet Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1359209 January 24 2010 Sunday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.79 Bridge structure (overpass and underpass included) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Daylight One way street Bridge railing (on bridge and approach) Foreign obstruction / debris in road (not gravel) Other improper driving No No No 1363895 April 2 2010 Friday 5:00 PM Gilliam Condon Rural Local Street or Road Driveway or alley access From opposite direction – one stopped Backing Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Did not yield right-of-way No No No No 1363902 April 5 2010 Monday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 999.99 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Stock: cow, calf, bull, steer, sheep, etc. Other (not improper driving) No No No 1363906 April 14 2010 Wednesday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 999.99 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1363908 April 16 2010 Friday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 17.04 55 roadway and considered "located" From opposite direction – both going straight Sideswipe-meeting Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Drove left of center on two-way road No No No Yes 1363912 March 4 2010 Thursday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Dusk (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No Yes 1364059 March 19 2010 Friday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 137 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1364060 March 25 2010 Thursday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 127 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Tire failure Median barrier (raised or metal) Tire failure No No No No 1374425 May 3 2010 Monday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cell phone (on PAR or driver in use) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Inattention No No No No 1374428 May 31 2010 Monday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 145 65 Grade (vertical curve) Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Other or unknown object, not fixed Lost load, load moved or shifted Other (not improper driving) No No No 1374430 May 8 2010 Saturday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 140 65 Grade (vertical curve) Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1374432 June 24 2010 Thursday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 139 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1374435 June 6 2010 Sunday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 17 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Lost load, load moved or shifted Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1374439 June 25 2010 Friday 1:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 130 65 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1374479 June 7 2010 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 35.5 Driveway or alley access Entering at angle – all others Angle Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Did not yield right-of-way No No No No 1375708 July 26 2010 Monday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 33 55 Grade (vertical curve) Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1375720 July 22 2010 Thursday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 30 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No 1375722 July 8 2010 Thursday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136 65 Straight roadway Other non-collision Miscellaneous Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Trailer or towed vehicle overturned Overturned after first harmful event Other improper driving No No No No 1377057 July 12 2010 Monday 9:00 AM Gilliam Arlington Rural Minor Arterial John Day 0.23 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Miscellaneous Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1378089 August 2 2010 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Smoke Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Vehicle forced by impact into another vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian Followed too closely No No No No 1378097 August 16 2010 Monday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 128.01 65 Straight roadway Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Unknown type of fixed object Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1379240 August 2 2010 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Smoke Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Followed too closely No No No No 1379453 August 2 2010 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Smoke Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Vehicle forced by impact into another vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian Followed too closely No No No No 1381719 September 9 2010 Thursday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 999.99 roadway and considered "located" From opposite direction – both going straight Head-On Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Drove left of center on two-way road No No No No 1381721 September 12 2010 Sunday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 40.8 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Deer or elk, wapiti Drove left of center on two-way road No No No No 1381723 September 4 2010 Saturday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 145 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Reckless Driving No No No Yes 1381724 August 17 2010 Tuesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 147 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Improper overtaking No No No 1383293 June 26 2010 Saturday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 999.99 roadway and considered "located" From opposite direction – both going straight Head-On Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Drove left of center on two-way road No No No No 1386025 October 27 2010 Wednesday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Median barrier (raised or metal) Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1388476 September 4 2010 Saturday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 145 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Reckless Driving No No No Yes 1388483 November 9 2010 Tuesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 142.6 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Rain Wet Daylight Unknown or not defined Wheel came off Cut slope or ditch embankment Tire failure No No No No 1388487 November 22 2010 Monday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 125 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Snow Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Followed too closely No No No No 1388490 November 22 2010 Monday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 142 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Jackknife: trailer or towed vehicle struck towing vehicle Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388504 November 23 2010 Tuesday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Snow Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Did not yield right-of-way No No No No 1388506 November 23 2010 Tuesday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 999.99 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Snow Daylight Unknown or not defined Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Other improper driving No No No No 1388514 November 24 2010 Wednesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 128 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Snow Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388518 November 24 2010 Wednesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 128 65 Straight roadway Parked motor vehicle Sideswipe-meeting Non-fatal injury crash Snow Snow Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Improper overtaking No No No No 1388525 November 24 2010 Wednesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388529 November 24 2010 Wednesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.8 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388555 November 24 2010 Wednesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388557 November 24 2010 Wednesday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 144.5 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388569 November 24 2010 Wednesday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Straight roadway Parked motor vehicle Sideswipe-meeting Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Snow Daylight Unknown or not defined Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Improper overtaking No No No No 1388573 November 24 2010 Wednesday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Straight roadway From same direction – one stopped Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Followed too closely No No No No 1388578 November 25 2010 Thursday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 149.4 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388579 November 25 2010 Thursday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1388583 November 26 2010 Friday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 128 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388586 November 24 2010 Wednesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 123 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Median barrier (raised or metal) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1388590 November 24 2010 Wednesday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 999.99 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Clear Snow Daylight Unknown or not defined Followed too closely No No No No 1390291 December 3 2010 Friday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 34 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – with street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1390300 December 4 2010 Saturday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 29 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1390309 December 18 2010 Saturday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Snow Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1390317 December 19 2010 Sunday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1390988 December 19 2010 Sunday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 120 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – with street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1390991 December 19 2010 Sunday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 123 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – with street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1391023 December 19 2010 Sunday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 129 65 Bridge structure (overpass and underpass included) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Bridge railing (on bridge and approach) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1391026 November 24 2010 Wednesday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 123 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1391029 December 24 2010 Friday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 29 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1398060 December 10 2010 Friday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 0 Street/road or highway intersection Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Wet Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1398065 October 10 2010 Sunday 3:00 AM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 9 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Rain Wet Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Tire failure Cut slope or ditch embankment Tire failure No No Yes 1405391 January 10 2011 Monday 2:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 135 55 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Jackknife: trailer or towed vehicle struck towing vehicle Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1405396 January 22 2011 Saturday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 41 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Retaining wall or tunnel wall Drove left of center on two-way road No No No Yes 1405397 January 22 2011 Saturday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 34 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1406453 March 8 2011 Tuesday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 146.01 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Dusk (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Other improper driving No No No No 1406454 March 3 2011 Thursday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 45 55 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Sleet Snow Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1406456 April 8 2011 Friday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 149 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Tire failure Cut slope or ditch embankment Tire failure No No No No 1415595 April 21 2011 Thursday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 135 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Careless Driving No No No No 1415627 April 28 2011 Thursday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 34 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Sleet Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1415636 May 5 2011 Thursday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 31 55 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Dawn (Twilight) No control (as stated on Police Report) Deer or elk, wapiti Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1415658 May 28 2011 Saturday 2:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 119 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Wheel came off Cut slope or ditch embankment Tire failure No No No No 1415762 July 23 2011 Saturday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 124 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1415767 July 31 2011 Sunday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.5 Straight roadway Other non-collision Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Other (phantom) non-contact vehicle (on PAR or report) Followed too closely No No No No 1415773 May 29 2011 Sunday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.59 65 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Deer or elk, wapiti No No No No 1415802 July 4 2011 Monday 6:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 137 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Did not yield right-of-way No No No No 1424976 September 23 2011 Friday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 1 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1432019 December 10 2011 Saturday 11:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 15.41 Street/road or highway intersection Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Unknown type of fixed object Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1432020 December 4 2011 Sunday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 141.82 65 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432021 October 13 2011 Thursday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126.43 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Vehicle towed or had been towing another vehicle Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1432023 December 15 2011 Thursday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116.13 55 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Snow Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432024 December 15 2011 Thursday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 114.7 55 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Vehicle forced by impact into another vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432026 September 9 2011 Friday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 146.12 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1432027 August 1 2011 Monday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.79 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Occupant fell jumped, was ejected from moving vehicle Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432028 August 19 2011 Friday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 130.79 55 Grade (vertical curve) From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Inattention No No No No 1432030 August 27 2011 Saturday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 127.43 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1432031 December 15 2011 Thursday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 134.36 55 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Trailer or towed vehicle overturned Lost load, load moved or shifted Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432032 December 16 2011 Friday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 19.35 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes General Crash Information: Reported Crashes within Gilliam County (2009-2013) (Additional Information Available Upon Request) 1432033 September 8 2011 Thursday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 33.7 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432034 August 17 2011 Wednesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Heppner 2 55 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1432036 August 27 2011 Saturday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Heppner 4.4 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Fence or building, etc. Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1432038 October 25 2011 Tuesday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 3.44 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Unknown Daylight Unknown or not defined Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1432043 December 22 2011 Thursday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 8.55 roadway and considered "located" From opposite direction – both going straight Sideswipe-meeting Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Drove left of center on two-way road No No No 1432050 December 8 2011 Thursday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 5.75 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Dusk (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No 1432055 September 27 2011 Tuesday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 7.31 55 roadway and considered "located" & Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Lost load, load moved or shifted Vehicle lost load or load shifted No No No Yes 1432058 September 25 2011 Sunday 1:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 9.24 Straight roadway & Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Other improper driving No No No 1433099 December 13 2011 Tuesday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 125.09 55 Straight roadway From same direction – one stopped Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Fog Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No Yes No Yes 1439984 September 13 2011 Tuesday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 147.9 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451903 February 6 2012 Monday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 6.09 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Fog Ice Dawn (Twilight) No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451905 January 18 2012 Wednesday 6:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126.09 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Median barrier (raised or metal) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1451907 January 19 2012 Thursday 4:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116 55 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Crash related to another separate crash Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1451908 January 19 2012 Thursday 4:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116 55 Straight roadway Parked motor vehicle Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Vehicle forced by impact into another vehicle, cyclist or pedestrian Crash related to another separate crash Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451909 January 18 2012 Wednesday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 122.41 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Daylight Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Median barrier (raised or metal) Careless Driving No No No Yes 1451910 January 21 2012 Saturday 10:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 149.35 65 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Daylight One way street Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451911 January 23 2012 Monday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 123.57 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451912 January 23 2012 Monday 4:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.56 65 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451914 January 29 2012 Sunday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 146.79 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Careless Driving No No No No 1451916 March 29 2012 Thursday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 122.2 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1451918 April 15 2012 Sunday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 130.43 65 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Trailer connection broke Trailer or towed vehicle overturned Other improper driving No No No Yes 1451921 April 18 2012 Wednesday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.87 65 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No Yes No Yes 1451922 February 10 2012 Friday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 6.07 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Careless Driving No No No 1451923 February 14 2012 Tuesday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 26.43 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Ice Daylight Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1451924 March 22 2012 Thursday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 13.36 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Snow Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1451929 March 31 2012 Saturday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 35.18 55 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Rain Wet Dusk (Twilight) No control (as stated on Police Report) Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1452231 April 7 2012 Saturday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 23.21 45 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No Yes No Yes 1461610 May 28 2012 Monday 11:00 AM Gilliam Condon Rural Minor Arterial John Day 37.5 55 Street/road or highway intersection Entering at angle – all others Angle Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Stop sign Vegetation obscured view Did not yield right-of-way No No No 1461611 July 3 2012 Tuesday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 124.43 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Inattention No No No 1461613 June 15 2012 Friday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 125.48 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Wet Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Other (not improper driving) No No No 1461615 June 21 2012 Thursday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 127.56 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – with street lights Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1461616 May 5 2012 Saturday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 1.1 55 Grade (vertical curve) Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Deer or elk, wapiti Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1464825 July 13 2012 Friday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 0.06 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Phantom / non-contact vehicle No No No No 1482906 August 16 2012 Thursday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 115.26 65 roadway and considered "located" From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Followed too closely Yes No No No 1482909 July 19 2012 Thursday 9:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 124.93 55 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Improper overtaking No No No 1482911 December 16 2012 Sunday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 123.56 55 roadway and considered "located" Parked motor vehicle Angle Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Vehicle improperly parked No No No No 1482912 December 30 2012 Sunday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 124.45 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Ice Dawn (Twilight) Median barrier Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482913 September 21 2012 Friday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 126.93 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482915 October 26 2012 Friday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 132 65 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No 1482917 November 9 2012 Friday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 133.56 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1482919 November 5 2012 Monday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 138.82 65 Grade (vertical curve) From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Careless Driving No No No Yes 1482921 August 1 2012 Wednesday 6:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 141.59 65 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Inattention No No No No 1482922 December 26 2012 Wednesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 142.82 65 Straight roadway Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Wet Daylight One way street Reckless Driving No No No Yes 1482923 November 24 2012 Saturday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 146.35 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1482926 November 29 2012 Thursday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.85 55 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Wet Darkness – no street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Cell phone (on PAR or driver in use) Inattention No No No No 1482929 August 9 2012 Thursday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 41.64 55 roadway and considered "located" Other non-collision Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Tire failure Occupant fell jumped, was ejected from moving vehicle Tire failure No No No No 1482930 August 24 2012 Friday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 45.29 55 Street/road or highway intersection Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Stop sign Cut slope or ditch embankment Berm (earthen or gravel mound) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482931 August 10 2012 Friday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 23.12 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Other sign, including street signs Inattention No No No No 1482933 December 15 2012 Saturday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 18.9 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Ice Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Sliding or swerving due to wet, icy, slippery or loose surface Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482935 September 1 2012 Saturday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 0.09 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482938 November 5 2012 Monday 12:00 PM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 7.6 55 roadway and considered "located" & Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1482951 July 13 2012 Friday 5:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 10 55 roadway and considered "located" & Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Phantom / non-contact vehicle No No No No 1503685 March 17 2013 Sunday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 122.93 65 Straight roadway Other non-collision Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Wheel came off Fire or Explosion Tire failure No No No 1503688 January 5 2013 Saturday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Snow Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1503689 March 29 2013 Friday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136.3 65 Grade (vertical curve) From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight One way street Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1503690 February 25 2013 Monday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 146.35 65 Grade (vertical curve) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Wind gust Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1503691 March 29 2013 Friday 7:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Heppner 5.45 55 Grade (vertical curve) Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Daylight Unknown or not defined Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1504585 January 19 2013 Saturday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 6.75 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Fence or building, etc. Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No Yes 1508827 June 13 2013 Thursday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 4.59 55 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Dawn (Twilight) Unknown or not defined Overturned after first harmful event Fence or building, etc. Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1508828 May 13 2013 Monday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 8.98 55 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Non-collision Property damage only crash (PDO) Rain Wet Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Deer or elk, wapiti Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1508829 May 9 2013 Thursday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 39.09 55 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Inattention No No No 1508834 June 20 2013 Thursday 6:00 AM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 4 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1512711 August 2 2013 Friday 9:00 PM Gilliam Rural Major Collector 1 0 Straight roadway Animal Miscellaneous Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1512713 July 22 2013 Monday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Local Street or Road 0.8 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Delineator or marker (reflector posts) Reckless Driving No No No No 1512717 August 28 2013 Wednesday 1:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 114.91 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Followed too closely No No Yes 1512718 August 16 2013 Friday 10:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 121.48 65 Straight roadway From opposite direction – both going straight Head-On Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Reckless Driving No Yes No No 1512722 July 17 2013 Wednesday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 134.56 65 Straight roadway Other object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Tire failure Foreign obstruction / debris in road (not gravel) Other (not improper driving) No No No Yes 1512723 August 11 2013 Sunday 3:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.23 65 Bridge structure (overpass and underpass included) Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – with street lights One way street Guard rail (not metal median barrier) Bridge pillar or column (even if struck protective guard rail first) Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No Yes 1524128 November 26 2013 Tuesday 3:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 115.03 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight Median barrier Median barrier (raised or metal) Cut slope or ditch embankment Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1524129 September 26 2013 Thursday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 116.1 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Jackknife: trailer or towed vehicle struck towing vehicle Lost load, load moved or shifted Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1524131 November 16 2013 Saturday 2:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 120.09 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Property damage only crash (PDO) Cloudy Dry Daylight Median barrier Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No No 1524132 September 17 2013 Tuesday 7:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 139.82 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Dusk (Twilight) One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1524133 November 2 2013 Saturday 8:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 147.85 65 Grade (vertical curve) Animal Miscellaneous Non-fatal injury crash Rain Wet Dawn (Twilight) One way street Deer or elk, wapiti Other (not improper driving) No No No No 1524137 October 29 2013 Tuesday 2:00 PM Gilliam Condon Rural Minor Arterial John Day 38.07 20 Street/road or highway intersection Entering at angle – all others Angle Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Daylight Stop sign Did not yield right-of-way No No No 1524138 November 23 2013 Saturday 12:00 AM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 40.14 55 roadway and considered "located" Overturned Non-collision Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Occupant fell jumped, was ejected from moving vehicle Reckless Driving No Yes No No 1527106 November 1 2013 Friday 11:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 148.44 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Sideswipe-overtaking Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No 1534462 February 8 2013 Friday 3:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136.8 0 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Darkness – no street lights One way street Slides, rocks off or on road, falling rocks Pet: cat, dog and similar Careless Driving No No No No 1534463 March 20 2013 Wednesday 4:00 PM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 136.5 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Dry Daylight One way street Other sign, including street signs Fence or building, etc. Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No Yes No No 1534507 December 20 2013 Friday 5:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 119 65 Straight roadway From same direction – both going straight Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Snow Wet Darkness – no street lights Median barrier Followed too closely No No No 1534509 December 17 2013 Tuesday 1:00 AM Gilliam Rural Principal Arterial – Interstate Columbia River 134.19 65 Straight roadway Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Non-fatal injury crash Clear Ice Darkness – no street lights One way street Cut slope or ditch embankment Driver drowsy / fatigued / sleepy No No No Yes 1534510 December 9 2013 Monday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial John Day 17.59 55 roadway and considered "located" Fixed object Fixed-Object or Other-Object Property damage only crash (PDO) Clear Ice Darkness – no street lights No control (as stated on Police Report) Cut slope or ditch embankment Overturned after first harmful event Driving in excess of posted speed No No No Yes 1534515 December 24 2013 Tuesday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 37.63 55 Straight roadway Parked motor vehicle Rear-End Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Crash related to another separate crash Speed too fast for conditions (not exceeding limit) No No No Yes 1534517 December 24 2013 Tuesday 8:00 PM Gilliam Rural Minor Arterial Wasco-Heppner 37.63 55 Grade (vertical curve) Animal & Non-fatal injury crash Cloudy Dry Darkness – no street lights Unknown or not defined Horse, mule, or donkey Crash related to another separate crash Other (not improper driving) No No No Yes FILENAME: H:\PROJFILE\17679 - GILLIAM COUNTY TSP\MEMOS\#4_FUTURE-CONDITIONS\FINAL\17679_TM4_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Future Conditions Analysis Date: April 6, 2015 Project #: 17679 To: Michael Duncan, ODOT Michelle Colby, Gilliam County From: Casey Bergh, PE, Ashleigh Griffin, and Marc Butorac, PE cc: Project Advisory Committee This memorandum estimates year 2035 future transportation system conditions and identifies transportation system needs based on projected population and employment demographics of Gilliam County. Transportation needs were also identified for multi-modal elements of the transportation system. DEVELOPMENT OF YEAR 2035 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Population and Employment Projections Existing and forecast year 2035 population estimates were developed and summarized in Technical Memorandum #3: Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis. In summary, County population is forecast to grow, but employment declined in 2013. It will be important for the TSP to identify transportation improvements that can support economic development and help reverse the employment trends. The Gilliam County 2010 population of 1,871 is forecast to grow by more than 25% to a future population of 2,378 in 2035. Thirty-four percent of the population is located in unincorporated areas of the County, 39 percent in the City of Condon, 26 percent in the City of Arlington, and one percent in the City of Lonerock. Based on the State of Oregon Employment Department’s Labor Trends summary report from November 2014, Gilliam County lost a total of 111 jobs in 2013, some of which can be attributed to the completion of wind farm construction projects. The only industry that experienced an increase in jobs in 2013 was the Natural Resources and Mining industry, which grew by nine jobs. Gilliam County is working to increase economic activity by developing new industrial parks. The growth in traffic volumes reflects this potential for economic growth and the need for transportation infrastructure to support industrial growth in the County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Traffic Forecast Projections Future (2035) traffic volumes were developed using Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT’s) historical trends method, which relies on historic traffic volumes to develop an annual growth rate. ODOT maintains Future Volumes Tables that summarize current and future year traffic volumes for state roadways. Based on guidance from ODOT’s Analysis Procedure Manual (APM), the projected average annual growth is 1.25 percent for all Gilliam County roadways (Reference 1). No historic volume data was available for County roadways. Therefore, the same growth rate was used on state and county roadways. Appendix A provides the traffic volumes and projections for the locations that were used to develop the growth rate. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS AND NEEDS The forecast 2035 traffic operations are summarized in the following sections. The technical analysis of the forecast 2035 transportation system is based on ADT for roadway segments and 30th highest hour traffic volume forecasts for intersections. Figure 4-1 shows the locations of the study intersections and study segments. Year 2035 Forecast Traffic Volumes The projected 1.25 percent annual growth rate was applied to existing 2014 volumes to estimate forecast year 2035 traffic volumes. Figure 4-2 shows the added traffic at the study intersections and segments. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 5 6 A B CDE F Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure4-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 4 - fut ure ne eds \4-1 Stu dy A rea .mx d - agr iffin - 1 :27 PM 4/3 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Study Intersections and Segment Count LocationsGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Ch erry S t Railroad Ave 4 3 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t 1 2 G ¯ 48-Hour Segment Count Locations Study Intersections Railroads City Boundary # X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Figure 4-2. Forecasted 2014 – 2035 Study Intersection Volume Growth Year 2035 Forecast Intersection Operations Forecast 2035 transportation system capacity analysis was conducted based on forecast traffic volumes. The operational results indicate that no operational improvements are anticipated to meet State, County, or City operational standards for each respective facility in 2035. The future conditions operational analysis was conducted based on the peak 15-minute period of traffic flow at each study intersection. Figure 4-3 illustrates the lane configurations and traffic control devices used in the future conditions analysis. No changes to the existing lane configurations and traffic control devices (as summarized in Technical Memorandum #3) were incorporated in this analysis because there are no planned improvements at the intersections. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Figure 4-3. 2035 Study Intersection Lane Configurations Figure 4-4 summarizes the 2035 30th highest hour traffic volumes and the resulting intersection operations. All study intersections are expected to operate with volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of less than 0.1 and level-of-service “B” or better. All intersections are expected to meet their performance standard in 2035. Performance standards for intersections were summarized in Technical Memorandum #3. Appendix B includes the operational analysis worksheets for all study intersections. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Figure 4-4. Forecasted 2035 Intersection Traffic Volumes and Operations Year 2035 Forecast Roadway Segment Operations Using the forecast volumes, the seven study roadway segments were analyzed to determine how they are expected to perform in 2035. Table 4-1 summarizes the forecasted 2035 traffic volumes and resulting operations. None of the roadway segments are expected to experience traffic growth that would result in over capacity conditions. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 4-1. 2035 Roadway Segment Operations ID Roadway ADT* for 2035 Peak Hour Time Period Seasonally- Adjusted Peak Hour Count PHF^ Two-Way Demand Flow Critical Flow Rate (pc/h) Calculated V/C Ratio A Lonerock Road, south of OR 19 225 5:00 - 6:00 p.m. 25 0.85 31 3,200 0.01 B Baseline Road, east of OR 19 312 9:30-10:30 am, 1:30-2:30 pm 34 0.90 40 3,200 0.01 C Fourmile Road, SE of OR 19 249 1:45 - 2:45 pm 36 0.90 43 3,200 0.01 D Blalock Canyon Road, south of I-84 184 5:15 - 6:15 pm 25 0.90 29 3,200 0.01 E Quinton Canyon Road, south of I-84 87 8:45 - 9:45 am 13 0.85 17 3,200 0.01 F Mikkalo Lane, west of OR 19 188 11:45 am - 12:45 pm 21 0.90 25 3,200 0.01 G East Bayard Street, east of OR 19 748 10:45 - 11:45 am 71 0.95 80 3,200 0.03 *ADT = Average Daily Traffic volume ^PHF = Peak Hour Factor, a ratio of the total hourly traffic volumes to the peak 15-minute traffic flow pc/h = passenger cars per hour V/C = volume-to-capacity Roadway Needs Although the study roadways and intersections in Gilliam County are anticipated to operate acceptably, the County expects growth in industrial areas, in Arlington, in Condon, and in areas surrounding the Port of Arlington. To accommodate this new growth, these industrial areas need adequate connectivity to key highways. The lane width, curve radii, shoulder width, and shoulder type along these key industrial routes should be designed to accommodate freight traffic. Known connectivity needs as shown in Figure 4-5, include:  Pave shoulders and strengthen roadbed on Airport Road (M-1 in the figure) in Arlington to accommodate larger trucks accessing Arlington Mesa Industrial Park;  Improve Rhea Lane with shoulders to accommodate industrial truck traffic associated with Arlington Mesa Industrial Park (M-2); Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Reclassify Ridge Road (M-3) and Fourmile Road (M-4) to Major Collectors and upgrade roadway to match Major Collector design standards to accommodate agriculture truck traffic;  Reclassify Quinton Canyon Road (M-5), Heritage Lane (M-6), Rattlesnake Road (M-7), Eightmile Canyon Road (M-8), and Cemetery Lane (M-15) from local streets to Minor Collectors and upgrade roadway to Minor Collector design standards to accommodate existing and forecast volume.  Reclassify Lonerock Road (M-13) from a Minor Collector to a Major Collector to serve the traffic associated with the Lonerock community.  Reclassify Upper Rock Creek Road (M-17) from a Major Collector to a Minor Collector due to the decrease in traffic using this road;  Reclassify Devils Butte Road, Mikkalo Lane, and Hay Canyon Road (M-10, M-11, and M-12) to Minor Collectors and upgrade roadway to match Minor Collector design standards. These roads provide access to Cottonwood Canyon State Park;  Improve Lower Road Creek Road (M-24) to serve the recreational traffic that uses this road to access the river;  Reclassify Trail Fork Road (M-16), Buttermilk Canyon Road (M-14), and Wolf Hollow Road (M- 18) from Minor or Major Collectors to Local Streets due to the change in land use activities the County has experienced and decrease in traffic using these roads. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d M - 2 4 M - 1 6- 1 6 M - 1 4 M - 1 4 M - 8 M - 8 M - 4- 4 M - 7- M - 1 8- M - 6- M - 5- 5 M - 3- 3M - 1 7- 1 7 M - 1 3- M - 1 5 M - 1 0 M - 1 0 M - 1 1 M - 1 2- 1 2 Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure4-5 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 4 - fut ure ne eds \4-5 Ro adw ay Nee ds. mx d - agr iffin - 9 :00 AM 4/6 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Roadway NeedsGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major_Collector Minor_Collector Local_County_Road Railroads City Boundary Roadway Needs Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave M - 2-M - 2- M - 1 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 10 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Transportation Safety Needs Although no locations with safety deficiencies were identified from the historical crash analysis documented in Technical Memorandum #3, there are several locations within the County where countermeasures could reduce crash potential. Additional analysis is needed to assess and identify countermeasures; input from the Project Advisory Committee identified the following needs, which are summarized in Figure 4-6:  Weather-related Crashes: o A high percentage of crashes on I-84 were associated with adverse weather and roadway conditions (S-7 in the figure). Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) treatments will be considered as one potential countermeasure. o Observations from local residents indicate that snow drifts frequently occur on OR 206 near milepost 22 (S-9 in the figure). This location will be further reviewed to determine if treatments are available to minimize snow drifts and/or their impact to vehicles.  Single-vehicle and speed-related crashes: o A high percentage of crashes in the County were single-vehicle run-off-road crashes and crashes associated with speed. Options for reducing these crash types using countermeasures such as rumble strips will be considered. Priority locations may include those identified in ODOT’s Roadway Departure Plan and summarized in Technical Memorandum #3.  Intersection Geometric/Traffic Control Deficiencies: o Safety concerns were identified at several intersections due to intersection design and traffic control (e.g., Walnut/Main Street (S-4); E Bayard Street/Main Street (S-5)) or sight distance (e.g., Lonerock Road at OR 206 (S-6); Cedar Springs Road/Blalock Canyon Road (S-10); and Barnett Road (S-12)). These intersections will be reviewed to determine if modifications in design may reduce safety risk.  Directional Signage: o Drivers have been observed entering the I-84 ramps in the wrong direction in Arlington. Options to modify directional signage at the I-84 ramps in Arlington to reduce the number of wrong-way vehicles on ramps will be considered (S-1).  Railroad Crossings: o There is concern about emergency vehicle access in Arlington during periods when trains block the railroad crossings and prevent vehicles from accessing the interstate (S-2 and S-3). This issue also occurs on Cedar Springs Lane at the railroad crossings. Strategies to allow emergency vehicle access during these times will be considered. !( !( !( !( Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R dColumbia Rive r JohnDa y River Lonerock Condon Arlington ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 S - 7- S - 6 S - 9 S - 1 0 S - 1 2 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure4-6 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 4 - fut ure ne eds \4-6 Sa fety Ne eds .mx d - agr iffin - 9 :08 AM 4/6 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Safety NeedsGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major_Collector Minor_Collector Local_County_Road Railroads City Boundary Category !( Safety Needs Roadway Safety Needs !( !( !( Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Railroad Ave S - 1 S - 3 S - 2 !( !( vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S - 4 S - 5 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Pedestrian Needs Although the cities of Arlington and Condon have a limited network of connected sidewalks, both cities have gaps and deficiencies in their respective pedestrian systems. In Arlington, sidewalks exist around the commercial area formed by Beech Street, Cottonwood Street, and Locust Street. Sidewalks also connect this area to the school on Main Street. However, no sidewalks exist along Ivy Street, between W 3rd Street and Main Street. This route connects the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center to the sidewalk along Main Street. Other priority gaps in the system include Cottonwood Street, Shane Drive, and W 1st Street, all of which lack sidewalks. In Condon, sidewalks provide connections north and south along Main Street as well as to the two local schools. Residential areas in both cities are not connected to schools and commercial areas by continuous sidewalks. The sidewalks on the east side of Main Street between W 3rd Street and Walnut Street are in poor condition and need improvement. There are no sidewalk connections to the baseball fields on the corner of E Spring Street and Jefferson Street. Installing sidewalks on E Spring Street between S East Street and Jefferson Street would provide a connected pedestrian system to the baseball fields from the schools and Main Street. In addition, OR 19 lacks complete sidewalks between Main Street and the Fairgrounds driveway. In Condon, residents have expressed a desire for more continuous sidewalk or paths for recreational purposes. Currently, residents use the school track to walk due to the limited sidewalks, but they would prefer a route around the City. One potential route (the inner loop) follows W Bayard Street west of downtown, turns north on Potter Street, and connects back to Main Street on OR 206. Another potential route (the outer loop) would follow W Bayard Street to the west of the City, connect north just outside of the City and along the edge of the golf course, and connect with Cottonwood Lane to the north to provide a longer loop. Figure 4-7 illustrates the existing pedestrian system and identifies priority connections identified to increase accessibility to key attractions. These connections are also summarized in Table 4-2. Prioritizing these pedestrian routes will inform funding decisions. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 13 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 4-2. Priority Pedestrian Needs # Location Start Point End Point City Description of Need A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks Shane Dr OR 19 Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks Main St Cottonwood St Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks W 3rd St Main St Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks; Connects to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street W 3rd St OR 206/Walnut St Condon Sidewalks in poor condition A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Main St S Jefferson St Condon No sidewalks connecting to baseball field. A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon W Bayard St/Potter Street OR 206 Condon Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon W Bayard St/East of Condon Cottonwood St/Main St Condon Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. A-8 W 1 st Street Cedar Street Ivy Street Arlington Lack of connected sidewalks. A-11 OR 19 Main Street Fairgrounds Road Condon Lack of connected sidewalks. Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure4-7 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 4 - fut ure ne eds \4-7 Pe des tria n S yste m I nve nto ry a nd Nee ds. mxd - a grif fin - 9 :13 AM 4/6 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Pedestrian System NeedsGilliam County, Oregon 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m9:m 89:m s õôó Î Ã Arlington vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Krameria St Arlington Por t Rd E 2nd St Ivy St W3rd St SeanSt Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St W 1st St Sunrise Ln E3rd St Grape St W 5 th S t Rat tles nake Rd W 4th St S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Shane Dr Hemlock S t CottonwoodSt Col um bia St Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Wri ght Rd Airport Rd Che rry S t Railroad Ave A - 2- A - 3 A - 1- A - 8 A - 8 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m89:m !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ19 vÍÎ206 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Bayard St S B St East E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Summit St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S B rya n S t S E ast St N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t S W ash ing ton St W Court St Cottonwood Ln SA St NA St S L inc oln S t N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S J ew St A - 6 A - 5 A - 6 A- 7 A- 7 A- 4 A- 4 A - 6 A- 11 A- 11 A - 7 A - 7 ¯ Pedestrian Facilities 89:m Existing Pedestrian Crossings Proposed Sidewalks Proposed Multiuse Path/Sidewalks Existing Sidewalks Railroads City Boundary Activity Centers "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Bicycle Needs There are no marked bicycle facilities in Gilliam County. Some of the state highways have shoulders that can accommodate bicyclists. On local/residential streets, bicyclists share the roadway with the slower vehicles. This practice is consistent with recommendations in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide, that urban and suburban roadways with posted speeds below approximately 20 miles per hour (mph) operate as shared facilities in which bicyclists share the road with vehicles. The Design Guide also recommends that urban and suburban roadways with average daily traffic volumes below approximately 1,500 vehicles per day have shared facilities rather than separated bicycle lanes regardless of the posted speed limit (Reference 2). County roads in Gilliam County currently carry less than 1,500 vehicles per day. Several recreational routes attract bicyclists from around the state. Popular recreational routes include OR 19 south of Condon to Fossil, OR 206 west of Condon to Wasco, and OR 206 east of Condon to Heppner. Bicyclists are not frequently observed riding OR 19 between Condon and Arlington. The majority of these routes have minimal shoulders and rough pavement conditions. In addition, there are no commercial or public rest areas on these routes for bicyclists to stop and hydrate on the ride. As recreational riding increases, strategic locations for these rest areas will be useful. Transit Needs Gilliam County currently has a dial-a-ride system, operated by Gilliam County Special Transportation (GCST), as summarized in Technical Memorandum #3. The dial-a-ride system effectively serves as the County’s transit system, and there is not expected to be enough growth to warrant a fixed route system within the TSP horizon. There are several needs including additional staff, vehicles, and funding to improve the dial-a-ride system in the future. These needs are further explained below:  When drivers are unavailable, the GCST director is sometimes required to drive the vehicles. There are no part-time dispatch staff currently available to cover these occasions when the director, who also functions as the dispatcher, must leave. The County is interested in additional staff.  The County has expressed interest in a carport at the Lonerock community center to protect the vehicle year-round and an expanded garage or similar facility in Condon to keep vehicles clean year-round.  Most trips (90 percent) are for medical purposes. Shopping, social, or business trips are other common reasons for trips. There is often a need for volunteer caregivers to ride along with passengers to provide assistance to the passengers traveling to medical appointments. The nearest medical facilities are located in either The Dalles or Hermiston. Frequent trips are also made to Portland area hospitals.  GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs. GCST has expressed the need for more maintenance money to cover tires, snow tires, brake Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon repairs, etc. GCST also lacks funding for the defensive driving passenger assistance training, which is required for volunteer drivers. The Gilliam County Transportation Services Director is interested in becoming certified to provide this training to volunteers from Gilliam County and other nearby counties. Riders are not charged a fee for rides, but suggested donations are recommended and vary from $2 to $30 depending on the length of the trip, purpose of the trip, and type of vehicle used. Veterans often must travel longer distances for their services and are not asked to provide donations for their ride. The County lacks existing funding for drivers to take veterans to hospitals and wait until the following day to bring veterans back from procedures. Downtown Parking Needs Parking in the downtown areas of Condon and Arlington is primarily on-street parking. Arlington does have off-street parking lots adjacent to Earl Snell Memorial Park and behind the commercial areas across the street from the Park. Based on observations, parking demand does not generally exceed available capacity in Condon or Arlington during typical use. However, Arlington hosts several large events during the summer months. During these events, there is inadequate parking which leads to people parking illegally throughout the City. Requiring traffic control and parking management plans for special events may assist with these issues. Freight Needs Although I-84 is the only facility in the County that is designated as a state truck freight route, several County and State roads are heavily relied on for transporting agricultural or other industrial goods to I-84 and the Port of Arlington. Some of these routes are local roads that need upgrades to accommodate larger freight loads. The routes that carry freight traffic or are expected to carry freight traffic and may be considered for upgrade include:  OR 19 between I-84 and Condon;  Cedar Springs Road between OR 19 and the Columbia Ridge Landfill;  Ridge Road between Baseline Road and Flett Road;  Fourmile Canyon Road;  Airport Road and Rhea Lane, connecting the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park to OR 19. Aviation Needs The two airports and port also serve an important role in freight transportation. The Arlington airport currently has an unpaved runway. As the surrounding industrial park grows, the runway will need to be paved. The Condon State Airport is expected to receive water service in the next few years. When this occurs, the airport may need improvements to serve additional air traffic and development. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Rail Needs Rail service between the Columbia Ridge landfill and Arlington serves an important role for transporting waste and should be maintained. At Shutler Station, there is a need for rail crossovers for more efficient movement of railcars within the station. Bridge Needs The bridge conditions inventory, summarized in Technical Memorandum #3, identified one County bridge on Cayuse Canyon Road at Rock Creek (MP 4.0) that is closed due to structural reasons. This requires an 18-mile detour to get around the closure. Another County bridge, on Lonerock Road at Lonerock Creek, is posted with load restrictions. In addition, the I-84 eastbound bridge over Willow Creek at MP 148.6 has a low sufficiency rating due to the width of the structure, which is narrower than current standards require. TRANSPORTATION PLANNED FUNDING SOURCES Historic Funding Sources Capital projects as well as operations and maintenance of roadways within Gilliam County are funded through the Gilliam County Transportation Budget, which relies on a variety of sources as summarized in the ten year budget history, summarized in Technical Memorandum #3. The total Transportation revenue budget for fiscal year (FY) 2014 was approximately $1.5 million. Technical Memorandum #3 also summarizes the 10-year history of transportation expenditures for the County. The majority of the funds were spent on maintenance and snow/ice removal historically, with the total transportation expenditures in FY 2014 at approximately $1.46 million. Therefore, Gilliam County will need to look for additional revenue sources and funding partners to complete future transportation improvements beyond the traditional maintenance projects. The 2014 County Road Needs Study, prepared by the Association of Oregon Counties, evaluated the funding needed to manage county road system for the next five years (2014-2018). The Study found that Counties prioritize maintaining existing roads, aware that the roads would cost more to rebuild if they failed to maintain them. However, the study found that anticipated revenue will not provide enough funding for roadway maintenance, projecting a 63 percent gap in funding for pavement maintenance and a 24 percent gap in funding for maintenance, repairs, and operations, resulting in a total funding need of $505 million for maintenance activities alone. An additional funding need of over $450 million is necessary to complete capital construction projects (Reference 3). Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 18 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Potential Funding Sources The majority of the County’s current funding revenue comes from property taxes and the state highway fund. Potential new funding sources that could help close the gap between transportation revenue and the cost to maintain and improve infrastructure are summarized in Table 4-3 below. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 4-3. Potential Funding Sources Funding Source Description Benefits User Fee Fees tacked onto a monthly utility bill or tied to the annual registration of a vehicle to pay for improvements, expansion, and maintenance to the street system. This may be a more equitable assessment given the varying fuel efficiency of vehicles. Regardless of fuel efficiency, passenger vehicles do equal damage to the street system. The cost of implementing such a system could be prohibitive given the need to track the number of vehicle miles traveled in every vehicle. Additionally, a user fee specific to a single jurisdiction does not account for the street use from vehicles registered in other jurisdictions. Primarily Street Improvements Street Utility Fees/Road Maintenance Fee The fee is based on the number of trips a particular land use generates and is usually collected through a regular utility bill. For the communities in Oregon that have adopted this approach, it provides a stable source of revenue to pay for street maintenance allowing for safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and services. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails Local Fuel Tax A local tax assessed on fuel purchased within the jurisdiction that has assessed the tax. Some would argue that this tax is unfair given the increased fuel efficiency of today’s vehicles. On the other hand, the tax could potentially generate revenue while encouraging fuel efficiency and lessening impacts to the environment. Primarily Street Improvements Systems Development Charges (SDCs) SDCs are fees assessed on development for their impacts on public infrastructure. Funds must be used for capacity enhancing improvements as defined in ORS 223.304. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails  Transit Stormwater SDCs, Grants, and Loans SDCs, Grants, and Loans obtained for the purposes of making improvements to stormwater management facilities. Some jurisdictions in Oregon have used these tools to finance the construction and maintenance of Green Streets. Stormwater SDCs also need to fund capacity enhancing improvements as defined in ORS 223.304. Primarily Street Improvements Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Funding Source Description Benefits Local Sales Tax A tax assessed on the purchase of goods and services within a specific location. A sales tax could be assessed only on auto-related goods and services to generate revenue for transportation-related improvements. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails  Transit Optional Tax A tax that is paid at the option of the taxpayer to fund improvements. Usually not a legislative requirement to pay the tax and paid at the time other taxes are collected, optional taxes are usually less controversial and easily collected since they require the taxpayer to decide whether or not to pay the additional tax. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails  Transit Sponsorship Financial backing of a public-interest program or project by a firm, as a means of enhancing its corporate image. This has been used by local transit providers to help offset the cost of providing transit services and maintaining transit related improvements. Transit Facilities Public/Private Partnerships Public/private partnerships are agreements between public and private partners that can benefit from the same improvements. They have been used in several places around the country to provide public transportation amenities within the public right- of-way in exchange for operational revenue from the facilities. These partnerships could be used to provide services such as charging stations, public parking lots, or bicycle lockers. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails  Transit Tax Increment Financing (TIF) A tool cities use to create special districts (tax increment areas) and to make public improvements within those districts that will generate private-sector development. During a defined period, the tax base is frozen at the predevelopment level. Property taxes for that period can be waived or continue to be paid, but taxes derived from increases in assessed values (the tax increment) resulting from new development either go into a special fund created to retire bonds issued to originate the development or leverage future improvements. A number of small-to-medium sized communities in Oregon have implemented, or are considering implementing, urban renewal districts that will result in a TIF revenue stream. System-wide transportation facilities including:  Streets  Sidewalks  Bike lanes  Trails  Transit Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 21 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 4-3 is not an all-inclusive list of alternative funding sources. Each of these financing tools requires focused research to ensure that it is the right fit for the community, and can be closely match with achieving the objectives of the TSP update. SUMMARY AND NEXT STEPS The assessment of future land use and transportation system conditions identified the following:  Annual growth rates were applied to existing 2014 volumes to estimate forecast 2035 traffic volumes. The annual growth rate of 1.25 percent was calculated using ODOT’s historical volumes method.  All study intersections were forecast to operate with v/c ratios of less than 0.1 and level-of- service “B” or better.  The forecast v/c ratios on all two-lane state and county highways within Gilliam County are forecast to be less than 0.05.  Several intersections or locations in the County were identified due to observed geometric and/or traffic control related safety concerns, including: o Main Street/Walnut Street in Condon; o Lonerock Road/OR 206; o E Bayard Street/Main Street in Condon; o Railroad Crossings in Arlington; o I-84 Ramps in Arlington.  Several roadways carry higher traffic volumes and/or truck volumes than they have historically due to changes in land use around the County. These roadways should be reclassified and may need to be upgraded to meet County design standards. The roadways include: o Roadways connecting Gilliam County to Cottonwood Canyon State Park; o Ridge Road and Fourmile Canyon Road; o Airport Road in Arlington; o Quinton Canyon Road; o Heritage Lane; o Rattlesnake Road; o Fourmile Road; o Eightmile Canyon Road; o Cemetery Road; o Lonerock Road.  There is not expected to be sufficient growth to warrant a fixed route transit system. However, some improvements in staffing, funding, and vehicles will improve the existing dial- a-ride transit system in the County. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 22 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon  Gilliam County will need to find additional funding sources to complete any projects beyond the traditional maintenance projects. Historically, the County has only funded general maintenance or safety projects as well as snow and ice removal. Table 4-4 provides a description of each of the future needs identified in this memo, and Figure 4-8 illustrates the location of each of these needs throughout the County. These needs will be considered by the Project Management and Advisory Committees and will inform the development of Alternatives in Technical Memorandum #5. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 4-4. Summary of Future Needs Number Category Location Start Point End Point City Description of Need S-1 Safety I-84 Ramps - Westbound On-Ramp n/a n/a Arlington Drivers are entering the WB on-ramps when they want to go EB S-2 Safety Railroad crossing of OR 19/Locust Street n/a n/a Arlington Emergency vehicle access concern when train on tracks S-3 Safety Railroad crossing of I-84 Ramps/Beech Street n/a n/a Arlington Emergency vehicle access concern when train on tracks S-4 Safety Main Street/Walnut Street n/a n/a Condon Safety concern due to sight distance and driver expectation S-5 Safety E Bayard Street/Main Street n/a n/a Condon Safety concern S-6 Safety Lonerock Road at OR 206 n/a n/a County Restricted sight distance; intersection located on curve S-7 Safety I-84 throughout County West CL East CL County High percentage of weather related crashes. S-8 Safety Programmatic n/a n/a County High percentages of single-vehicle, run-off the road, and speed-related crashes. S-9 Safety OR 206, Near MP 22 n/a n/a County Snow drifts frequently at this location S-10 Safety Cedar Springs Road/Blalock Canyon Road n/a n/a County Restricted sight distance due to hill. S-11 Safety Travel Speeds in Arlington n/a n/a Arlington Residents of Arlington feel travel speeds are high. There is also no posted speed limit sign for drivers who enter Arlington from the east off of I-84 along Beech Street. S-12 Safety Barnett Road Blind Corners n/a n/a County There is a blind corner on Barnett Road approximately half way between Mikkalo Lane and Lower Rock Creek Road. S-13 Safety Programmatic n/a n/a County Concern about crashes associated with aging drivers. S-14 Safety Programmatic n/a n/a County Lack of funding for driver education in schools. B-1 Bridge Cayuse Canyon Road Bridge MP 4 / Rock Creek n/a County Bridge sufficiency rating of 31.9; currently closed to all traffic B-2 Bridge I-84 EB Bridge MP 148.6/Willow Creek n/a County Bridge sufficiency rating of 33.3, due to outdated design B-3 Bridge Lonerock Road Lonerock Creek n/a County Bridge sufficiency rating of 57, currently posted for load A-1 Active Transportation Cottonwood Street Sidewalks Shane Dr OR 19 Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks A-2 Active Transportation Shane Drive Sidewalks Main St Cottonwood St Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks A-3 Active Transportation Ivy Street Sidewalks W 3rd St Main St Arlington Lacking connected sidewalks; Connects to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center A-4 Active Transportation Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street W 3rd St OR 206/Walnut St Condon Sidewalks in poor condition A-5 Active Transportation Sidewalks on E Spring Street Main St S Jefferson St Condon No sidewalks connecting to baseball field. A-6 Active Transportation Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon W Bayard St/Potter Street OR 206 Condon Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. A-7 Active Transportation Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon W Bayard St/East of Condon Cottonwood St/Main St Condon Need for recreational walking route. Residents currently use track. A-8 Active Transportation W 1 st Street Cedar Street Ivy Street Arlington Lack of connected sidewalks. A-9 Active Transportation OR 206 West County Limits (CL) East CL County Popular cycing route with no rest area locations for cyclists A-10 Active Transportation Bicycle Parking n/a n/a Cities Lack of bicycle parking in downtown areas. A-11 Active Transportation OR 19 Sidewalks Main Street Fairgrounds Driveway Condon Lack of sidewalks. M-1 Modernization Airport Road Rhea Road End of Road Arlington Roadway serves truck traffic associated with Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. Roadway has little base rock and lacks shoulders. M-2 Modernization Rhea Lane OR 19 Airport Road Arlington Roadway serves truck traffic associated with Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. M-3 Modernization Ridge Road Baseline Rd/Ione Rd Flett Rd County Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. M-4 Modernization Fourmile Canyon Road Fairview Ln East CL County Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. (Note: some of this section loops through Morrow County) M-5 Modernization Quinton Canyon Road/Heritage Lane I-84 Heritage Lane County Roadway serves higher volume of truck traffic than intended based on classification. M-6 Modernization Heritage Lane Quinton Canyon Road Blalock Canyon Road County Roadway serves higher volume of truck traffic than intended based on classification. M-7 Modernization Rattlesnake Road OR 19 End of Road (West) County Roadway serves higher volume of truck traffic than intended based on classification. M-8 Modernization Eightmile Canyon Road Old Tree Ln Fourmile Canyon Road County Roadway serves higher volume of agricultural truck traffic than intended based on classification. M-9 Modernization OR 19 Upper Rock Creek Rd 2-3 Miles South of Start County This is the only section of the roadway that cannot accommodate oversized freight in 1-lane. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 24 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Number Category Location Start Point End Point City Description of Need M-10 Modernization Devils Butte Rd OR 206 Hay Canyon Road County Roadway was not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. M-11 Modernization Mikkalo Ln OR 19 Hay Canyon Road County Roadway was not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. M-12 Modernization Hay Canyon Rd Devils Butte Rd John Day River County Roadway not intended to serve Cottonwood Canyon State Park traffic, but may in future. M-13 Modernization Lonerock Road OR 206 City of Lonerock County Roadway serves high traffic volumes as it is the primary access to the Lonerock community; it should be upgraded in functional classification. M-14 Modernization Buttermilk Canyon Road City of Lonerock East County Limits County Road does not serve much traffic because it is only the back way into Lonerock from Morrow County; it should be downgraded in functional classification. M-15 Modernization Cemetery Lane OR 19 Wherli Canyon Ln County Road serves agricultural traffic and should be upgraded in functional classification. M-16 Modernization Trail Fork Road OR 19 End of Road County Road no longer serves agricultural lands and should be downgraded in functional classification. M-17 Modernization Upper Rock Creek Road OR 19 Flett Road County This is an alternate route rather than a primary route and should be downgraded in functional classification. M-18 Modernization Wolf Hollow Road OR 19 Ridge Road County This is an alternate route rather than a primary route and should be downgraded in functional classification. M-19 Parking Programmatic n/a n/a Arlington Parking overflow onto streets and downtown area during special summertime events M-20 Modernization Arlington Airport n/a n/a Arlington Currently has unpaved runway M-21 Modernization Shutler Station n/a n/a County Need for rail crossovers to make movements within the park easier. M-22 Modernization On-Street Parking on Spaces on Main Street n/a n/a Condon There are no on-street designated ADA spaces on Main Street. M-23 Transit Programmatic n/a n/a County Lack of funding for additional transit drivers, training, vehicle maintenance, and carports. M-24 Modernization Lower Rock Creek Road End of road/John Day River Barnett Road County Roadway is heavily traveled by rafters & river users but was not designed to carry river traffic. M-25 Modernization Condon State Airport n/a n/a Condon Airport needs upgrades once water service is provided. !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d M - 9- A - 9- M- 8 M- 8 M - 1 0 M - 1 0 M - 4- 4 A - 9- 9 M - 3 M - 3 M - 1 2- 1 2 M - 1 5 M - 1 6- M - 1 3- M - 2 4 M - 1 8- M - 1 4 M - 1 4 M - 7 M - 6 B - 2 M - 5- 5 S - 7 S - 1 0 S - 1 2 M - 1 4- 1 4 M - 2 1 S - 6 B - 3 B - 1 S - 9 Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure4-8 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 4 - fut ure ne eds \4-8 Fu ture Ne eds .mx d - agr iffin - 1 0:0 9 A M 4 /6/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Future NeedsGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles !( !( M - 2-M - 2- M - 1 Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St W 1st St E3rd S t W 5 th S t S 1 st S t Shane Dr Hemlo ck St CottonwoodSt Airport Rd Main St Che rry S t Railroad Ave M - 2 0 S - 1 S - 3 S - 2 A - 2- A - 3 A - 1- 1 A - 8 A - 8 !( !( !( vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S - 4 S - 5 A - 6 A - 5 A - 6- 6 A- 7 A- 7 A- 4 A- 4 M- 22 M- 22 A - 6 A -11A- 11 A - 7 A - 7 ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major_Collector Minor_Collector Local_County_Road Railroads City Boundary Project Category !( Bridge !( Modernization !( Safety Active Transportation Modernization Safety Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon REFERENCES 1. ODOT Analysis and Procedures Manual 2. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide 3. 2014 County Road Needs Study APPENDICES Appendix A ODOT Future Volume Tables Appendix B 2035 Future Conditions Operational Analysis Worksheets Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 27 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Appendix A ODOT Future Volume Tables & Growth Rate Calculations Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 28 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ODOT FUTURE VOLUME TABLES & GROWTH RATE CALCULATIONS Future (2035) traffic volumes were developed using Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT’s) historical trends method, which relies on traffic volumes from previous years to develop a growth pattern for use in projecting future volumes. ODOT maintains Future Volumes Tables that summarize current and future year traffic volumes for state roadways throughout the State. To calculate the growth rate for Gilliam County, all Gilliam County locations were selected from the Future Volumes Tables. Based on guidance from ODOT’s Analysis Procedure Manual (APM), data with a RSQ value of less than 0.75 was not used. The growth rates of the remaining locations were averaged to develop the 1.25 percent annual growth rate, which was used to project future traffic volumes at all study intersections and segments. ODOT Future Volume Table (Gilliam County Locations with RSQ > 0.75) MP Description of Location Traffic Volumes RSQ* Highway Location Calculated Growth Rate 2011 2012 2033 146.16 8.34 miles east of Arlington Interchange 10400 13500 0.8093 I-84 1.35% 147.78 Heppner Jct. Automatic Traffic Recorder, Sta. 11- 009, 0.43 mile east of Heppner Highway No. 52 (OR74) 10800 11700 0.8805 I-84 0.38% 39.54 0.02 mile south of Shannon Road 590 730 0.8013 OR 19 - Rural 1.13% 43.81 0.20 mile south of Trail Fork Road 570 710 0.7724 OR 19 - Rural 1.17% 45.39 0.10 mile south of Wehrli Canyon Loop 510 630 0.7551 OR 19 - Rural 1.12% 50.41 0.60 mile north of Carter Hill Road 510 670 0.9400 OR 19 - Rural 1.49% 41.74 Condon Automatic Traffic Recorder, Sta. 11-004, 0.86 mile east of John Day Highway No. 5 (OR19) 190 200 0.8635 OR 206 - Condon 0.25% *RSQ = R-squared value, which describes the fit of the data to a line. Calculations: (1.35% + 1.13% + 1.17% + 1.12% + 1.49%)/5 = 1.25% Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 6, 2015 Page 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Appendix B 2035 Future Conditions Operational Analysis Worksheets MOVEMENT SUMMARY Site: Main St/E Walnut St Gilliam County Stop (Two-Way) Movement Performance - Vehicles Demand Flows 95% Back of QueueMov ID OD Mov Deg. Satn Average Delay Level of Service Prop. Queued Effective Stop Rate Average Speed Total HV Vehicles Distance veh/h % v/c sec veh ft per veh mph South: S Main Street 3 L2 30 4.0 0.086 1.2 LOS A 0.3 8.9 0.25 0.12 33.2 8 T1 46 2.0 0.086 1.2 LOS A 0.3 8.9 0.25 0.12 33.4 18 R2 35 6.0 0.023 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 34.7 Approach 111 3.8 0.086 0.8 LOS A 0.3 8.9 0.17 0.08 33.7 East: E Walnut Street 1 L2 32 10.0 0.038 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 35.4 6 T1 18 1.0 0.038 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 37.2 16 R2 15 4.0 0.038 0.0 LOS A 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 35.7 Approach 65 6.1 0.038 0.0 NA 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00 36.0 North: N Main Street 7 L2 5 3.0 0.044 0.8 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.15 0.07 33.3 4 T1 27 4.0 0.044 0.8 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.15 0.07 33.3 14 R2 6 19.0 0.044 0.8 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.15 0.07 32.9 Approach 38 6.4 0.044 0.8 LOS A 0.2 4.2 0.15 0.07 33.3 West: W Walnut Street 5 L2 6 26.0 0.089 9.5 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.21 0.10 28.7 2 T1 35 8.0 0.089 9.5 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.21 0.10 29.4 12 R2 37 2.0 0.089 9.5 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.21 0.10 29.6 Approach 78 6.6 0.089 9.5 LOS A 0.4 9.3 0.21 0.10 29.4 All Vehicles 292 5.4 0.089 2.9 NA 0.4 9.3 0.14 0.07 32.8 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Minor Road Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). NA: Intersection LOS and Major Road Approach LOS values are Not Applicable for two-way sign control since the average delay is not a good LOS measure due to zero delays associated with major road movements. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap-Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 3:58:52 PM SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd www.sidrasolutions.com Project: H:\projfile\17679 - Gilliam County TSP\analysis\future no build\1_main_walnut.sip6 8001045, 6019192, KITTELSON AND ASSOCIATES INC, PLUS / Floating Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with Intersection Analysis Summary 1/8/2015Report File: K:\...\futurenobuild_report.pdf Scenario: Base ScenarioVistro File: K:\...\Future no build.vistro Gilliam County TSP V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value; for all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. A9.50.081EBLHCM2010Two-way stopOR 19 / Cedar Springs Lane6 A9.40.002EBTHCM2010Two-way stop OR 74 / I-84 Eastbound Ramps 5 B10.10.001WBTHCM2010Two-way stopI-84 Ramps / Beech Street4 B10.10.004NBTHCM2010Two-way stop Cottonwood Street / Beech Street 3 B10.30.001EBTHCM2010Two-way stopMain Street/E Bayard Street2 LOSDelay (s/veh)V/CWorst MvmtMethodControl TypeIntersection NameID Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with 0.001Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.3Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #2: Main Street/E Bayard Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 30.0030.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach AccessE Bayard StreetMain StreetMain StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 282251251636316363Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 711106498291Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.8500.8500.8500.8500.8500.8500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.950Peak Hour Factor 242241211534296343Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 5.005.005.0012.0012.0012.007.007.007.006.006.006.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 242241211534296343Base Volume Input [veh/h] AccessE Bayard StreetMain StreetMain StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with BIntersection LOS 4.39d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 8.809.862.760.49d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 2.532.532.533.143.143.144.284.284.282.272.272.2795th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.100.100.100.130.130.130.170.170.170.090.090.0995th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAABBAAAAAAMovement LOS 8.6410.199.708.8010.3110.060.000.007.390.000.007.36d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.030.000.000.010.000.030.000.000.020.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with 0.004Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #3: Cottonwood Street / Beech Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 45.0025.0025.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach I-84 RampsBeech StreetArlington Port RoadCottonwood StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 41513223291513220313Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 143682431513Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.950Peak Hour Factor 41412213091412219312Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 16.0016.0016.0011.0011.0011.0018.0018.0018.0022.0022.0022.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 41412213091412219312Base Volume Input [veh/h] I-84 RampsBeech StreetArlington Port RoadCottonwood StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with BIntersection LOS 4.84d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 3.041.059.349.30d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 1.671.671.673.203.203.202.712.712.713.223.223.2295th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.070.070.070.130.130.130.110.110.110.130.130.1395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAAAABAABAMovement LOS 0.000.007.480.000.007.358.6910.059.678.8810.069.78d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.010.000.000.010.010.020.000.020.000.02V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane FreeFreeStopStopPriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with 0.001Volume to Capacity (v/c): BLevel Of Service: 10.1Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #4: I-84 Ramps / Beech Street Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 25.0020.0045.0025.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Beech StreetAccessI-84 RampsLocust StreetName Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 191192122411315562Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50510111034141Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.950Peak Hour Factor 181182122391214532Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 13.0013.0013.006.006.006.0026.0026.0026.0027.0027.0027.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 181182122391214532Base Volume Input [veh/h] Beech StreetAccessI-84 RampsLocust StreetName Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with BIntersection LOS 3.03d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 9.329.241.770.21d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 3.503.503.500.440.440.443.153.153.154.064.064.0695th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.140.140.140.020.020.020.130.130.130.160.160.1695th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] ABAAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 8.9010.159.698.569.949.580.000.007.610.000.007.54d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.020.000.020.000.000.000.000.000.010.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with 0.002Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.4Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #5: OR 74 / I-84 Eastbound Ramps Intersection Level Of Service Report nonononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.000.00Grade [%] 45.0045.0055.0055.00Speed [mph] 100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0100.0Pocket Length [ft] 000000000000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftRightThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration WestboundEastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach I-84 Entrance RampI-84 Exit RampOR 74OR 74Name Intersection Setup 0000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0005220821360Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 000111021320Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Other Adjustment Factor 0.9500.9500.9500.9500.9500.9501.0000.9500.9500.9500.9501.000Peak Hour Factor 0005220821260Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 2.002.002.0022.0022.0022.002.002.002.006.006.006.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.0001.000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 0005220821260Base Volume Input [veh/h] I-84 Entrance RampI-84 Exit RampOR 74OR 74Name Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with AIntersection LOS 2.47d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAAApproach LOS 8.748.831.450.00d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.720.720.720.000.470.470.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.000.000.000.030.030.030.000.020.020.000.000.0095th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAAAAAAAMovement LOS 8.379.158.708.579.418.880.000.007.260.000.000.00d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 0000Number of Storage Spaces in Median nonoTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 0000Storage Area [veh] nonoFlared Lane StopStopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with 0.081Volume to Capacity (v/c): ALevel Of Service: 9.5Delay (sec / veh): 15 minutesAnalysis Period: HCM2010Analysis Method: Two-way stopControl Type: #6: OR 19 / Cedar Springs Lane Intersection Level Of Service Report nononoCrosswalk 0.000.000.00Grade [%] 45.0055.0055.00Speed [mph] 100.00100.00175.00100.00100.00100.00Pocket Length [ft] 001000No. of Lanes in Pocket 12.0012.0012.0012.0012.0012.00Lane Width [ft] RightLeftRightThruThruLeftTurning Movement Lane Configuration EastboundSouthboundNorthboundApproach Cedar Springs LaneOR 19OR 19Name Intersection Setup 000Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 000Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 9721221122Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 2183531Total 15-Minute Volume [veh/h] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Other Adjustment Factor 0.85000.85000.95000.95000.95000.9500Peak Hour Factor 8611120112Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 000000Other Volume [veh/h] 000000Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 000000Pass-by Trips [veh/h] 000000Diverted Trips [veh/h] 000000Site-Generated Trips [veh/h] 000000In-Process Volume [veh/h] 1.001.001.001.001.001.00Growth Rate 40.0040.0017.0017.0010.0010.00Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 1.00001.00001.00001.00001.00001.0000Base Volume Adjustment Factor 8611120112Base Volume Input [veh/h] Cedar Springs LaneOR 19OR 19Name Volumes Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 1/8/2015Gilliam County TSP Version 2.00-05 Generated with AIntersection LOS 6.08d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] AAAApproach LOS 9.430.001.05d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 7.467.460.000.000.690.6995th-Percentile Queue Length [ft] 0.300.300.000.000.030.0395th-Percentile Queue Length [veh] AAAAAAMovement LOS 9.169.470.000.000.007.36d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 0.010.080.000.000.000.00V/C, Movement V/C Ratio Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results 000Number of Storage Spaces in Median noTwo-Stage Gap Acceptance 000Storage Area [veh] noFlared Lane StopFreeFreePriority Scheme Intersection Settings FILENAME: H:\PROJFILE\17679 - GILLIAM COUNTY TSP\MEMOS\#5_ALTERNATIVES-ANALYSIS\FINAL\17679_TM5_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #5 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Alternatives Analysis Date: April 15, 2015 Project #: 17679 To: Michael Duncan, ODOT Michelle Colby, Gilliam County From: Casey Bergh, PE; Ashleigh Griffin; and Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE cc: Project Advisory Committee This memorandum provides a framework for the implementation of future transportation improvements. The framework includes an updated functional classification system for Gilliam County and roadway design standards that will guide future improvement projects. Specific improvement projects are summarized, which include projects to address all needs identified in Memorandum #4 (Future Needs) as identified by the public, the Project Advisory Committee, Gilliam County staff, and ODOT staff. The memorandum is organized in three main sections based on these elements; proposed functional classification, roadway design standards, and transportation alternatives. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Functional classification of a roadway characterizes the intended purpose, amount and type of vehicular traffic it is expected to carry, provisions for non-auto travel, and the roadway’s design standards. The classification considers the adjacent land uses and transportation modes that should be accommodated. Proposed classifications identified for Gilliam County include: Interstate, Principal Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Local Road. Table 5-1 provides a detailed description of each classification. Figure 5-1 presents the proposed functional classifications for all existing County roadways. The recommended functional classifications shown are based on the existing Federal Functional Classifications. The functional classifications apply in both urban and rural environments. The previous Technical Memorandum (Future Needs) documented the reason why roads were selected for upgrades from local County roads to Major or Minor Collectors. Generally, the reasons for these changes were an increase in traffic and heavy vehicles associated with industrial or agricultural land use and traffic patterns. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 5-1. Gilliam County Functional Classification Descriptions Functional Classification Description Interstate Primary function is mobility and to serve long-distance travel. These roadways are high-speed, divided roadways with limited access. Interstates link urban areas across the United States. Principal Arterial Primary function is to carry high levels of regional vehicular traffic at high speeds. These roads connect the collector road system to freeways, provide access to other cities and communities, and serve major traffic movements. Access is limited but can be accommodated with at-grade intersections. Major Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and move them to arterials. These roads provide some degree of access to adjacent properties, while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Major Collectors carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than arterials. Major Collectors are often longer in length and have lower driveway density, higher speed limits, higher traffic volumes, and may have more travel lanes than Minor Collectors. Major Collectors can be located in urban or rural environments. In rural environments, Collectors generally serve intra-county travel. In rural areas, traffic volumes and spacing may be the most significant designation factors between Major and Minor Collectors. In urban areas, these roads serve both access and traffic circulation in higher dense residential, commercial, and industrial areas. They typically have higher speeds and more signalized intersections. Minor Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and connect traffic to arterials. These roads can be urban or rural. In urban areas, they serve both access and traffic circulation but in lower density areas than Major Collectors. They also penetrate neighborhoods, but often for a shorter distance than Major Collectors. They typically have lower speeds and fewer signalized intersections. In rural areas, they serve to bring traffic from local roads to developed areas or connections to those areas. They provide service to smaller communities not served by a higher class facility and link locally important traffic generators with rural areas. Local Road Local roads account for the largest percentage of all roadways in terms of mileage. Their primary function is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses. They are characterized by short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low volumes. Local roads offer a high level of accessibility, serves passenger cars, pedestrians, and bicycles, but not through trucks. Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/processes/statewide/related/highway_functional_classifications/section03.cfm#Toc336872980 Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure5-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 5\5 -1 P rop ose d F unc tion al C lass ifica tion .mx d - agr iffin - 1 2:0 1 P M 4 /6/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Proposed Functional ClassificationGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major Collector Proposed Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Minor Collector Local County Road Proposed Local Road Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon PROPOSED COUNTY ROADWAY DESIGN GUIDELINES The proposed roadway design guidelines are based on discussions with County staff, former County and City guidelines, and guidance in the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Green Book. The guidelines take into consideration roadway functional and operational characteristics, including traffic volume, capacity, operating speed, and safety. As the County road system develops, the guidelines will support safe and efficient movement of people and goods while also accommodating the orderly development of adjacent lands. Separate design guidelines are presented for rural and urban roadways given the different purpose and function of each. Rural standards apply to roadways outside of City limits, and urban standards apply to facilities within City limits. The City of Lonerock has a rural character and has historically followed rural County guidelines. Rural Roadway Design Guidelines Exhibit 5-1 through Exhibit 5-3 summarize the proposed cross-sections for rural roadways. Table 5-2 presents the dimensions of the design guidelines. County arterial roadway surfaces should be paved, but other lower-order roadway surfaces could be gravel or paved, depending on the level of use of the roads and the ability of the local jurisdiction to maintain them. Major and minor collectors that serve industrial traffic should be paved when feasible. Exhibit 5-1. Proposed Rural Arterial Cross-Section Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-2. Proposed Rural Collector Cross-Section Exhibit 5-3. Recommended Rural Local Street Cross-Section Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 5-2. Summary of Proposed Rural Design Guidelines by Functional Classification Functional Classification Right-of- Way Width (ft) Roadway Shoulder Width (ft) Surface Width (ft) Surface Arterial Street 60-120 32-40 Paved 4-8 Paved Major Collector Street 60-80 24-32 Paved/gravel 2-4 Paved/gravel Minor Collector Street 60-80 24-32 Paved/gravel 2-4 Paved/gravel Local Street 60 24-28 Paved/gravel 2-4 Paved/gravel Radius for cul-de-sac turn-around 50 40 - - - Urban Roadway Design Guidance The cities of Condon and Arlington had individual street design guidelines in their respective 1999 TSPs. These guidelines were similar and have been consolidated to form one set of alternatives for urban design guidelines which will apply to all streets within City limits. Multiple cross-section options are presented for some urban roadway classifications. The options are intended to provide the County and Cities with flexibility to select roadway design guidelines that take into account environmental factors and the context of the roadways. A preferred alternative will be selected based on input from the public, County, and Cities. Exhibit 5-4 through Exhibit 5-10 illustrate the alternatives for the proposed roadway design guidelines for urban areas. Table 5-3 summarizes the urban roadway design dimensions for the proposed alternatives. Three alternatives are presented for urban arterial design guidelines. The first one, shown in Exhibit 5-4, includes two 12-foot travel lanes and bike lanes. The second option, shown in Exhibit 5-5, includes three travel lanes and bike lanes, . The third option, shown in Exhibit 5-6, includes two travel lanes, bike lanes, and on-street parking. Based on the existing roadways in the Cities, the first option shown in Exhibit 5-4 appears to be the most appropriate. The proposed design guidance for urban collector roadways is shown in Exhibit 5-7. Only one option for urban collectors is presented based on the previous design guidelines. The urban collector includes two travel lanes, each 10’ in width, and on-street parking. Because these streets have lower speeds and lower volumes, it is assumed that bicycles will share the roadway. The two alternatives for roadway design guidelines for urban local streets are shown in Exhibit 5-8 and Exhibit 5-9. The first one contains two 12’ travel lanes, and the second option contains two travel lanes in addition to on-street parking. Based on the existing local streets in the cities of Arlington and Condon, option 2, shown in Exhibit 5-9, appears to be the most appropriate. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-10 shows the proposed design guidelines for urban alleys. These guidelines are the same as those from the 1999 TSP and include a total width of 20’ to be used for two-way traffic. Although many of the existing local roads do not include connected sidewalks, adopting design guidelines that match the local vision for the area is a tool that will help the City achieve goals such as connected sidewalks in the future. Developers will have the option to obtain an exception in situations where sidewalks are not appropriate. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-4. Urban Arterial Cross-Section – Option 1 Exhibit 5-5. Urban Arterial Cross-Section – Option 2 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 9 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-6. Urban Arterial Cross-Section – Option 3 (Downtown Arterial) Exhibit 5-7. Urban Collector Cross-Section Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 10 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-8. Urban Local Street Cross-Section - Option 1 Exhibit 5-9. Urban Local Street Cross-Section - Option 2 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Exhibit 5-10. Urban Alley Cross-Section Table 5-3. Sherman County Urban Design Guidelines Classification Pavement Width Right-of-Way Width Number/Width Planting, Utility, Sidewalks Travel Lanes Parking Lanes Bike Lanes Urban Arterial – Option 1 36 ft 70 ft 2/12 ft None 2/6 ft 12 ft Urban Arterial – Option 2 48 ft 70-80 ft 3/12 ft None 2/6 ft 11-16 ft Downtown Arterial 52 ft 80 ft 2/12 ft 2/8 ft 2/6 ft 14 ft Urban Major/Minor Collector 36 ft 60 ft 2/10 ft 2/8 ft none 12 ft Urban Local Street – Option 1 24 ft 54 ft 2/10 ft None none 15 ft Urban Local Street – Option 2 38 ft 64 ft 2/12 ft 2/7 ft none 13 ft Urban Alley 20 ft 20 ft 2/10 ft none none none TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES Transportation alternatives for Gilliam County were developed and evaluated to address transportation needs based on the current and future forecast traffic conditions. The future transportation needs of the County were determined based on: comments received from the public, Gilliam County, ODOT, members of the Project Advisory Committee; a field review conducted by Kittelson and Associates, Inc. (KAI) in 2014; technical analysis of traffic operations; and, a review and analysis of crash history reports. Alternatives include a combination of projects, policies, programs, Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon pilot projects, and studies. Table 5-4 shows the financially unconstrained transportation alternatives identified to address the future transportation needs. The projects identified in Table 5-4 address various transportation issues, which generally include: modernization, safety issues, pedestrian/bicycle enhancements, and bridge replacement/ preservation needs. These issues are briefly described below:  Modernization: These projects include upgrades to address operational issues or upgrades to roadways that are serving higher traffic volumes than they were originally intended to serve. These projects cannot be conducted as part of regular maintenance activities and may include activities such as shoulder widening or full reconstruction of a roadway.  Safety: These projects consider opportunities to improve existing facilities to reduce probability and severity of crashes.  Active Transportation: These projects improve existing facilities or create new facilities that provide greater connectivity and increase access to pedestrian and bicycle routes within Cities and between communities. Table 5-4 includes an identification number for reference to the project locations shown Figure 5-2. The preliminary cost estimates in Table 5-4 include contingency and exclude right-of-way costs. Potential non-binding funding sources were also identified for each project. In addition to the projects identified in the table, several policies, programs, projects, and studies were also identified and are included in the alternatives table to address transit, safety, and parking concerns. Some of these items include:  Installing shoulder rumble strips on State and County roads, when possible, to help reduce single-vehicle, run-off-the-road crashes. These systemic projects should be included in roadway upgrade projects when possible. National research has found that shoulder rumble strips reduce roadway departure crashes on rural two-lane roads by approximately 26%, when adequate pavement is available on the shoulder.  Additional transit funding is needed to pay salaries for drivers, training for drivers, vehicle maintenance, and carports for the vehicles.  The County and Cities permitting requirements may be updated to require parking management plans for some special events to minimize parking overflow onto local and downtown streets during special events. The next Technical Memorandum will contain detailed prospectus sheets that summarize the details of individual projects, including the location and conceptual sketches of proposed cross-sections or intersection realignments. Appendix A summarizes the cost estimates and relevant assumptions used to develop costs shown in Table 5-4. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 13 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 5-4. Transportation Alternatives ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private S-1 Safety I-84 Westbound On- Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers $3,000 Medium X S-2 Safety Railroad crossing of OR 19/Locust Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. Unknown High X S-3 Safety Railroad crossing of I- 84 Ramps/Beech Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. Unknown High X S-4, A Safety Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option A Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection $46,000 Low X X S-4, B Safety Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option B Reconfigure intersection to all-way stop-controlled intersection with flashing warning signs on all approaches $25,000 High X X S-4, C Safety Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option C Install additional “3-way stop” signage and pavement striping at intersection under its existing configuration. $5,000 High X X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 14 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private S-5 Safety E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection $106,000 Low X X S-6 Safety Lonerock Road at OR 206, Option A Reconfigure intersection to bring the westbound approach of OR 206 to a perpendicular stop with Lonerock Road. $104,000 Low X X S-6 Safety Lonerock Road at OR 206, Option B Install curve warning signs and intersection ahead signs to increase awareness of the intersection and promote speed reduction. $5,000 Medium X X S-7 Safety I-84 throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. N/A Low X S-8 Safety Systemic Safety Improvements Install shoulder rumble strips on State and County roads when possible to help reduce single- vehicle, run-off the road crashes. Included in upgrade projects. High X X S-9 Safety OR 206, Near MP 22 Evaluate snow drifts at this location to determine if treatments are feasible. N/A Low X S-10 Safety Cedar Springs Road/Blalock Canyon Road Improve sight distance at intersection. N/A Low X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private S-11 Safety Travel Speeds in Arlington Install posted speed limit sign on Beech Street for westbound traffic. Identify opportunities to slow traffic through environment changes in Arlington. N/A Low X X S-12 Safety Barnett Road Improve sight distance at blind corners on Barnett Road N/A Low X S-13 Safety Increased Sign Sizes Install large signs when possible to improve visibility for aging driver population. N/A Low X X X S-14 Safety Driver Education Identify funding for driver education programs in schools. N/A Low X X X X A-1 Active Transportation Cottonwood Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 $508,000 Low X A-2 Active Transportation Shane Drive Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street $414,000 Low X A-3 Active Transportation Ivy Street Sidewalks - Arlington Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center $147,000 High X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private A-4 Active Transportation Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street - Condon Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from 3rd Street to OR 206/Walnut Street $83,000 Medium X A-5 Active Transportation Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street $25,000 Medium X A-6 Active Transportation Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational dirt walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 $87,750 Low X X A-7 Active Transportation Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational dirt walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street $109,200 Low X X A-8 Active Transportation W 1st Street Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street $277,000 Low X A-9 Active Transportation OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County N/A Medium X X A-10 Active Transportation Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington N/A High X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private A-11 Active Transportation OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. N/A Low X X B-1 Bridge Cayuse Canyon Road Bridge Replace bridge at MP 4 (Rock Creek) $2,000,000 Low X B-2 Bridge I-84 EB Bridge Update bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) $160,000 Medium X B-3, A Bridge Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement - Option A Option A: Replace Lonerock Road bridge $2,000,000 Medium X B-3, B Bridge Lonerock Road Bridge Repair - Option B Option B: Repair Lonerock Road bridge Waiting on Estimate for Repair Medium X M-1 Modernization Airport Road Reconstruct roadway from Rhea Road to the end of the road with rock base and minimum of 4' shoulders to accommodate industrial traffic associated with the industrial park $109,200 High X X X X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 18 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-2 Modernization Rhea Lane Upgrade roadway to include 4' shoulders on both sides from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve industrial traffic associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. $837,330 High X X X X M-3 Modernization Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Baseline/Ion Road to Flett Road. $1,177,735 High X M-4 Modernization Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Fairview Lane to the eastern County Limits. $1,015,820 Medium X M-5 Modernization Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Blalock Canyon Road to I-84 interchange. $95,550 Low X M-6 Modernization Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Blalock Canyon Road to I-84 interchange. $95,550 Low X M-7 Modernization Rattlesnake Road Reclassify roadway to Minor Collector. Road has already been upgraded to Minor Collector cross- section. None High X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-8 Modernization Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway from 18' wide road to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Old Tree Lane to Fourmile Canyon Road $1,015,846 Low X M-9 Modernization OR 19 Reconstruct roadway from MP 16 to 19 to straighten curves to allow long trucks carrying agriculture equipment or wind turbines access without using both lanes. N/A Low X M-10 Modernization Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway from approximately 20' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. $156,000 Low X X X M-11 Modernization Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway from approximately 20' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. $61,100 Low X X M-12 Modernization Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway from approximately 15' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. $2,752,422 Low X X M-13 Modernization Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock $500,000 Medium Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-14 Modernization Buttermilk Canyon Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road from City of Lonerock to East County Limit None High M-15 Modernization Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector $100,000 Low M-16 Modernization Trail Fork Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road None High M-17 Modernization Upper Rock Creek Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from Wolf Hollow Road to OR 19 None High M-18 Modernization Wolf Hollow Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from OR 19 to Ridge Road None High M-19 Parking/ Special Events Parking Management Plans Update permitting procedures to require parking management plans for special events to minimize parking overflow onto local and downtown streets during special events. N/A Low X X M-20 Modernization Arlington Airport Runway Pave the Arlington Airport runway, which is currently dirt. N/A Low X M-21 Modernization Shutler Station Add rail crossovers $300,000 Medium X X M-22 Modernization On-Street Parking Spaces on Main Street Upgrade parking spaces on Main Street in Condon to provide ADA spaces at key destinations. $3,000 High X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 21 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Category Name Description Cost Estimate Priority Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-23 Transit Transit Improvements Obtain additional funding for additional drivers, training, vehicle maintenance, and carports for the County's dial-a-ride system. N/A Medium X X M-24 Modernization Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. N/A Low X M-25 Modernization Condon State Airport Improve airport (runway, facilities, access, etc.) to support development when water is provided to the airport. N/A Low X X X X !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d M - 9 M - 9 A - 9- S - 7- 7 M - 8 M - 8 M - 1 0- 1 0 M - 4 M - 4 A - 9- 9 M - 7- M - 3 M - 3 M - 1 2- 1 2 M - 5- M - 1 1 M - 6 M - 1 3- M - 1 4 M - 1 4 M - 1 5 M - 1 6- M - 1 7- 1 7 M - 1 8- M - 2 4 S - 1 0 S - 1 2 B - 2 M - 2 1 S - 6 B - 3 B - 1 S - 9 Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure5-2 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 5\5 -2 P rop ose d P roje cts- v3. mx d - agr iffin - 1 1:5 9 A M 4 /6/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Proposed Transportation AlternativesGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles !( !( !( !( M - 2-M - 2- M - 1 Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St W 1st St E3rd S t W 5 th S t S 1 st S t Shane Dr Hemlo ck St CottonwoodSt Airport Rd Main St Railroad Ave M - 2 0 S - 1 S - 3 S - 2 A - 2- A - 3 A - 1- 1 A - 8 A - 8 !( !( !( vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S - 4 S - 5 A - 6 A - 5 A - 6- 6 A- 7 A- 7 A- 4 A- 4 A - 6 A -11A- 11 A - 7 A - 7 M - 2 2 ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road Railroads City Boundary Project Category !( Bridge !( Modernization !( Safety Active Transportation Modernization Safety Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon PROJECT TIMING The projects were categorized into short-term and medium/long-term projects. Short-term projects include those that could be addressed within the next five years. Some medium/long-term projects may be addressed within the next five to ten years; others will be considered during planning projects, but will not likely be addressed for 10 to 20 years. Each project was categorized based on known transportation needs, forecast travel demand, crash history, and input from the County and ODOT staff. The amount of funding available per year is expected to have the greatest impact on the timing of these projects. Table 5-5 summarizes the anticipated timeframe in which each project is classified. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 24 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon Table 5-5. Anticipated Gilliam County Unconstrained Alternatives Timing ID Name Description Timing Short Medium/Long S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers X S-2 Railroad crossing of OR 19/Locust Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. X S-3 Railroad crossing of I-84 Ramps/Beech Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. X S-4, A Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option A Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop- controlled intersection X S-4, B Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option B Reconfigure intersection to all-way stop- controlled intersection with flashing warning signs on all approaches X S-4, C Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration, Option C Install additional “3-way stop” signage and pavement striping at intersection under its existing configuration. X S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop- controlled intersection X S-6, A Lonerock Road at OR 206, Option A Install curve warning signs and intersection ahead signs to bring awareness to the intersection and slow vehicles. X S-6, B Lonerock Road at OR 206, Option B Reconfigure intersection to bring the westbound approach of OR 206 to a perpendicular stop with Lonerock Road. X S-7 I-84 throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. X S-8 Systemic Safety Improvements Install shoulder rumble strips on State and County roads when possible to help reduce single-vehicle, run-off the road crashes. X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 25 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Name Description Timing Short Medium/Long S-9 OR 206, Near MP 22 Evaluate snow drifts at this location to determine if treatments are feasible. X S-10 Cedar Springs Road/Blalock Canyon Road Improve sight distance at intersection. X S-11 Travel Speeds in Arlington Install posted speed limit sign on Beech Street for westbound traffic. Identify opportunities to slow traffic through environment changes in Arlington. X S-12 Barnett Road Improve sight distance at blind corners on Barnett Road X S-13 Increased Sign Sizes Install large signs when possible to improve visibility for aging driver population. X S-14 Driver Education Identify funding for driver education programs in schools. X A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 X A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street X A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks - Arlington Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street - Condon Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from 3rd Street to OR 206/Walnut Street X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street X A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational dirt walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 X A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational dirt walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street X A-8 W 1st Street Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks on OR 19 from Main Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Name Description Timing Short Medium/Long B-1 Cayuse Canyon Road Bridge Replace bridge at MP 4 (Rock Creek) X B-2 I-84 EB Bridge Update bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) X B-3, A Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement - Option A Option A: Replace Lonerock Road bridge X B-3, B Lonerock Road Bridge Repair - Option B Option B: Repair Lonerock Road bridge X M-1 Airport Road Reconstruct roadway from Rhea Road to the end of the road with rock base and minimum of 4' shoulders to accommodate industrial traffic associated with the industrial park X M-2 Rhea Lane Upgrade roadway to include 4' shoulders on both sides from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve industrial traffic associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Baseline/Ion Road to Flett Road. X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Fairview Lane to the eastern County Limits. X M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Blalock Canyon Road to I-84 interchange. X M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Blalock Canyon Road to I-84 interchange. X M-7 Rattlesnake Road Reclassify roadway to Minor Collector. Road has already been upgraded to Minor Collector cross- section. X M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway from 18' wide road to Minor Collector standards (two 12' travel lanes and 2' shoulders on both sides) from Old Tree Lane to Fourmile Canyon Road X M-9 OR 19 Reconstruct roadway from MP 16 to 19 to straighten curves to allow long trucks carrying agriculture equipment or wind turbines access without using both lanes. X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 27 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon ID Name Description Timing Short Medium/Long M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway from approximately 20' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. X M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway from approximately 20' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. X M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway from approximately 15' wide dirt road to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. X M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock X M-14 Buttermilk Canyon Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road from City of Lonerock to East County Limit X M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector X M-16 Trail Fork Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road X M-17 Upper Rock Creek Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from Wolf Hollow Road to OR 19 X M-18 Wolf Hollow Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from OR 19 to Ridge Road X M-19 Parking Management Plans Update permitting procedures to require parking management plans for special events to minimize parking overflow onto local and downtown streets during special events. X M-20 Arlington Airport Runway Pave the Arlington Airport runway, which is currently dirt. X M-21 Shutler Station Add rail crossovers X M-22 On-Street Parking Spaces on Main Street Upgrade parking spaces on Main Street in Condon to provide ADA spaces at key destinations. X M-23 Transit Improvements Obtain additional funding for additional drivers, training, vehicle maintenance, and carports for the County's dial-a-ride system. X M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve Lower Rock Creek Road (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. X M-25 Condon State Airport Improve Condon State airport (runway, facilities, access, etc.) to support development when water is provided to the airport. X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update: Alternatives Analysis Project #: 17679 April 15, 2015 Page 28 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon CONCLUSION This memorandum summarizes future transportation projects proposed for Gilliam County. The projects were developed and evaluated to address current and future transportation needs based on the current and 20-year project forecasts. The projects do not take into consideration available or potential future revenue sources to implement the projects. The Project Advisory Committee will review these projects and the project prioritization. The next step will be to develop a financially-constrained list of projects based on future potential revenue sources for the projects. Technical Memorandum #6 will summarize the financially-constrained project list. APPENDICES Appendix A: Project Alternative Cost Estimate Calculations Appendix A Project Alternative Cost Estimate Calculations U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 7,424 SQ FT 37,120 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 357,584.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 507,769.28$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 16.00$ 118,784.00$ 11,200.00$ 11,200.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 185,600.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 78,668.48$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 71,516.80$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 5,752 SQ FT 28,760 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 291,436.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 413,839.12$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 9,600.00$ 9,600.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 18.00$ 103,536.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 143,800.00$ Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 64,115.92$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 58,287.20$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 1,614 SQ FT 8,070 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 103,342.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 146,745.64$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 37,122.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 48,420.00$ Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 22,735.24$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 20,668.40$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,415 SQ FT 5,300 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 58,222.50$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 82,675.95$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONTINGENCY 20% 11,644.50$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 7.00$ 37,100.00$ 5 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 1.50$ 9,622.50$ Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 12,808.95$ 7 U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 1,042 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 17,478.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 24,818.76$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 9.00$ 9,378.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 3,845.16$ 7 CONTINGENCY 20% 3,495.60$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 3,000 SQ FT 18,000 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 194,800.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 276,616.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 69,000.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 108,000.00$ Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 42,856.00$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 38,960.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 3,500.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 4,970.00$ Plus $5,000 per sign for flashing stop sign Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 500.00$ 500.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 770.00$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 700.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 2,000 LS 1 TON 42 TON 12 TON 20 LF 150 SF 1,400 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 32,660.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 46,377.20$ Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 7,185.20$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 6,532.00$ 11 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 12 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 500.00$ 500.00$ 9 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 3,750.00$ 10 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,200.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 540.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 2,200.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 1,470.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 500.00$ 500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 4,000.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 3,400 EA 2 LF 200 LS 1 TON 63 TON 18 TON 15 LF 290 SF 1,450 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 74,515.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 105,811.30$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 6,700.00$ 6,700.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 6,800.00$ 5 F&P STORM CATCH BASIN 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 6 F&P STORM SEWER 40.00$ 8,000.00$ 7 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 8 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 2,205.00$ 9 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 810.00$ 10 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 1,650.00$ 11 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 7,250.00$ 12 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,600.00$ 13 F&P PAINT STRIPING 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 14 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,393.30$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,903.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,300 LS 1 TON 290 TON 85 TON 150 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 73,075.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 103,766.50$ Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,076.50$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,615.00$ 9 F&P PAINT STRIPING 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 3,825.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 16,500.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 10,150.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 12,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL ., , . ' .. I ' .- I ( ( ' i ' . - ..! •.. : ' · ' · I \ I_,;,; • , ..... ~ • PAtX .s IWil.\,\) l"P~- 7~\ '\ tt· j·· .. : .. .. ::.) !._\..A .i 'rO 4c.(' ... .. = \ ... : :: ) ... <"fr · · • J (.·,., ... ~· >~ .. - I t'{r . : •! I • • . . . . , • • r c.'\ ·. I ! .. ·~ I •., .,• ... . , . . . . J ... j ) . i ' ·- \ ,. I . . ._ f .... • i 4o . . \ ·. • -t J • /O{X) -':.- .).)J ) ( '•( ~.) 5t)i) i:J .::.\.')j • ... 1 .""'/ l ( ~ ., I'. .J Ji ,,, . I '! . H. . ,/' ( I I •• i I .;~- "_...;• ·~..~.. • .;..:\..:...;........!.......__:.__:.._,1 ________ , _________ _ I ! J.J.1 : : . ·r .,-;. , . \ l 'f;\') ~ , . ., .r ~ ., - '" . f r '' ,;:-.._•; · '\ ' \ ~"-''• ...:,.l___:;Y;.... .. :.;__' .:_.' ·-·-· --- ·----~· _;' -- ·--------!1! ljii )' •• l'~ I 1., ~ 0 1 , , .. : c.; o Q_oo_;:;___ ~ 1 , .t~ • • tj( ooo ------------~· ' --·-----------------------------------------~~~~---- 2 soo svoo 5 h u 0~ l)'\ "l ~: ·;24 ro (!.\.It l.fo ~S'.e....-~_ ..... ________ 1---Tl, )_'1.0 ____ _ j2£A, \f'\ Q ·r c~ . { '·=· :: • "s· ·, ~ tv 1 1 ' · • 1 -. ; : ' I ------ -- ------------ ------------ -- ------- ------ ·--------- ··-------- t.o .Dt~) 7').06 _.-.,. • L> ; _; "- ,... •,.:-/ . i ,:, ( : ~- ;:.tF. ~~~--~~------------------------------------ . .-) ... ', (., ._\ ' ' ·; .. j - ' ,• o ,. I ' ' .. . . ·· I , ·' ' \~ '') '• . J • ~· I ' ... ~ ·' -'11 : -.. I_~ I • I I I .. , i ________ _..':, }"(• : !,; .: ) (t. , ~ :'"'~ ~ .. . - ------------· --- ---- ---------- -- --··--·~------- -- ------- -- --- ---- ·----.. ----------------------- -------- ___ __ _.;5;:;._"M-'--~2-@.5Mf_1 ------------~~)~~·~_fr._~·~------------------------------------------------~~~~~~-- j()(X) ~., 1}1/'"' - --·· ··_!;,_,. __ ;-.. ,~ f.! jj ----------------~~ ~. *• "' '· ( ' I ~ ..... -. :') ,.._ ' • • • ·. ·-·. } ·) , } -'-1.!/.l •:J.) -------------------------------------------------------------------------~~~~~·-·---- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------· -·--- ---- ------- - -·-- •; ' ,'} ,,., ';.,. .·: . ,. lr .f •• , n 1v:. .. ~ ... ' ...J, ( 3. L/· ~"' .:. <. rs ~ 75()0 tv.. \.\'IJ~ 't"\~.~ ~ bC'f\ '. ~\)tf£rl... J '1(i(/!I'C>J.;K J0LL~.(l } .. Jr· '1lf.P "\ .t' 1 r. ~·:. \)~(, '\'1\§l-L J .OA\1'\: n_ /·1 1-- '-' ,;. (:? .. ) ..... , /. JJ -J. ft I ' If ~ '• 1,_'l I• ( !600 au L.f OS ~1/CUL.~ ~ck. "B~ G~~f,\L Wj.SiKJI/t.v: :_. l '"'nci .: (111' LJ, 'S)~Q '"'t' t.:: ltl ·vt . l-.o~a_ )2.00 20() ;). 700 tj~-7~ - ()A .. ¢I (l ·-I • lj ) ~}000 3lOD '-1 g~t; ))5{;/) 1550 "' 1) KJ..O~r r,/1(\( ; J ri\'\)M'Vf ..$ i' /() lA . (h.'{)~ ( ' / J ·: (SJ · l C) ,Q_., · r .r, ' 1 ~ i uc ..... • p(;-1-:': .! " .~· I ; ' • I ~ '- ; , :.. c..,. - , • f' ( • \ i \: 1 ·~.', , • J • L/006 C.(..\ ~9..5 ?. 656c '-' · '·if'~. >p, .•~ ·~~· ,. / ·'•· r. ~ , ... J { ' !,.. \ , ') ) ) ') .. t, ':- ., ... , . \. ( .. . .._ ..... ~ l'. ',,) ,. t· . ) .. ~-. j-.i ~ . I \, • . t . ~ .. ; . ·---~--- -- ..... _ ..... ( I • · • \ 1 " ~ i l ' • , , • 0 ..ot r~;.. l.XClHIP-1.]..~ ,'if . ' .~;-' .._ .:J /8:-J {'ft-• . c;,.. (!_ ]35 iN>6 J 2bti/fffl @ q '-}[.,~; II._ ~ ... _, :_:A. : t-· iJf'i"O(L ·~ J b£ t1 (I_ ~"~ hJ/. J{.~:_ \G.U(it. ~ '/0' - ·, f· t \ ,.d'~~· 1·'-\ ~ 1 t;" i{ \·. \ .... , . \ 1..!. 16 ""' /~ o1tr I(Qt 1..rtl .,! I V ), JS[U'1 VI/YL1 ~S (if Itt{/ . J ~ow c..,_,\. L1ps T~f\Sf Rock @ b,;? · • ~DOD O\ Y:iS Rof\D f{oct!@ f(~-­ #'!lt..u, 1-rUlC...IL t , Hlru.~,- -rttU£u · . C~t.~u~ll i I I t I . ' .. 1 : 110 '\)it'f $ ::t.. ucJr I 16411et'0 ,.. ~·"' Z l./ t1Jooo·Y 62..Jflai~' ... y 4~J~oo 4_/iffY.).~ 2~J g. , J{)o/'' I ~b;OYJ,..: 72JOCJO~;,· '!QOOO ,..,,., J b/Xflo/ I o'-00 ocx:/ :r ) 0 J5 6&() j j JOJ S6k (It? t )I_ 1~/t 7. {) UMJ?:. Ml lJ?s1 c;6r:r .. .t ·;- J N1(1 f/.r ,, ~ -ntv<:rLoJ ~ )'N'-. \/fW·J[ i--.. ft'J( ' t! :;;: ... ~·:·,... ' 't •· • . \. ... \~ i ; .' .·< .... i. . . .. .. , , ,, , , .. ... _. · .. : . ·')t:'t TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #6 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Preferred Alternative Date: April 30, 2015 Project #: 17679 To: Michael Duncan, ODOT Michelle Colby, Gilliam County From: Casey Bergh, PE; Ashleigh Griffin; and Marc Butorac, PE, PTOE cc: Project Advisory Committee This memorandum outlines the draft preferred transportation system plan for Gilliam County, which includes TSP elements consistent with OAR 660-12-020 and goals of OAR 660-12-025. The preferred plan includes recommendations for the County’s transportation system, including:  Roadway System Plan  Access Management Plan  Pedestrian and Bicycle System Plan  Public Transportation System Plan  Air/Marine/Rail/Pipeline/Transmission System Plan The transportation components presented in this section were developed in accordance with the requirements of Oregon’s Transportation Planning Rule (TPR). Each modal plan has been developed concurrent with the findings presented in the existing and future forecast conditions analysis. The plan also conveys the interests of the citizens, business owners, and governmental agencies within Gilliam County, as expressed by the Public Advisory Committee (PAC). The preferred plan applies to the entire county, including areas within the incorporated cities of Condon and Arlington and the unincorporated community of Lonerock. ROADWAY SYSTEM PLAN The Gilliam County roadway system plan reflects the anticipated operations and circulation needs through the year 2035 and provides guidance on how to facilitate vehicular and freight traffic over the next 20 years. The plan focuses on the City and County owned and maintained roadway system. All state highways residing within the County are identified for coordination purposes. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 2 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Functional Classifications Functional classification of a roadway characterizes the intended purpose, amount and type of vehicular traffic it is expected to carry, provisions for non-auto travel, and the roadway’s design standards. The classification considers access to adjacent land uses and the transportation modes to be accommodated. The preferred functional classification system in Gilliam County includes: Minor Arterial, Major Collector, Minor Collector, and Local Road. Table 6-1 provides a detailed description of each classification. Figure 6-1 presents the preferred functional classifications for all existing and planned County roadways. Table 6-1. Gilliam County Functional Classification Descriptions Functional Classification Description Interstate Primary function is mobility and to serve long-distance travel. These roadways are high-speed, divided roadways with limited access. Interstates link urban areas across the United States. Minor Arterial Primary function is to carry high levels of regional vehicular traffic at high speeds. These roads connect the collector road system to freeways, provide access to other cities and communities, and serve major traffic movements. Access is limited but can be accommodated with at-grade intersections. Major Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and move them to arterials. These roads provide some degree of access to adjacent properties, while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Major Collectors carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than arterials. Major Collectors are often longer in length and have lower driveway density, higher speed limits, higher traffic volumes, and may have more travel lanes than Minor Collectors. Major Collectors can be located in urban or rural environments. In rural environments, Collectors generally serve intra-county travel. In rural areas, traffic volumes and spacing may be the most significant designation factors between Major and Minor Collectors. In urban areas, these roads serve both access and traffic circulation in higher dense residential, commercial, and industrial areas. They typically have higher speeds and more signalized intersections. Minor Collector Primary function is to serve traffic from local roads and connect traffic to arterials. These roads can be urban or rural. In urban areas, they serve both access and traffic circulation but in lower density areas than Major Collectors. They also penetrate neighborhoods, but often for a shorter distance than Major Collectors. They typically have lower speeds and fewer signalized intersections. In rural areas, they serve to bring traffic from local roads to developed areas or connections to those areas. They provide service to smaller communities not served by a higher class facility and link locally important traffic generators with rural areas. Local Road Local roads account for the largest percentage of all roadways in terms of mileage. Their primary function is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses. They are characterized by short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low volumes. Local roads offer a high level of accessibility, serves passenger cars, pedestrians, and bicycles, but not through trucks. Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP May 2015 Figure6-1 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 6\6 -1 P rop ose d F unc tion al C lass ifica tion .mx d - agr iffin - 3 :15 PM 4/3 0/2 015 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Functional Classification MapGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t ¯ Interstate Minor Arterial Major Collector Proposed Major Collector Minor Collector Proposed Minor Collector Local County Road Proposed Local Road Railroads City Boundary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 4 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Design Standards Roadway design standards were established for rural and urban conditions. The design standards take into consideration roadway function and operational characteristics, including traffic volume, capacity, operating speed, and safety. The design standards are necessary to ensure that as the road system develops, it will be capable of safely and efficiently serving the traveling public, while also accommodating orderly development of adjacent lands. While not specifically outlined in this plan, improvements on state highways must meet ODOT design and operating standards provided in the ODOT Highway Design Manual. Rural Design Standards Rural roadway design standards for all County-owned and maintained facilities are shown in Exhibit 6-1, Exhibit 6-2, and Exhibit 6-3. Deviations from these design standards should be pursued through the managing agency. Sidewalks have not been included in the roadway design standards because the majority of County roadways are rural in nature and sidewalks are not typically provided. Bicyclists are expected to share the travel lane with vehicles in rural areas, consistent with guidance provided in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Design Guide. Exhibit 6-1. Rural Arterial Street Cross-Section Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 5 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-2. Rural Major and Minor Collector Street Cross-Section Exhibit 6-3. Rural Local Street Cross-Section Urban Design Standards Design standards for City roadways within urban areas (incorporated cities) are provided in Exhibit 6-4, Exhibit 6-5, and Exhibit 6-6. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 6 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-4. Urban Arterial Street Cross-Section Exhibit 6-5. Urban Major and Minor Collector Street Cross-Section Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 7 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-6. Urban Local Street Cross-Section Access Management Policy Managing access to the County’s road system is necessary to preserve capacity and maintain safety of the County’s arterial and collector system. Capacity is preserved by minimizing the number of points where traffic flow may be disrupted by traffic entering and exiting the roadway. Access management also enhances safety along roadways by minimizing the number of potential conflict points. Access spacing standards for all driveways and private roads accessing County collector and arterial roadways are provided in Table 6-2 (rural) and 0 (urban). Access to state facilities is governed by ODOT’s access management standards provided in the most current version of the 1999 Oregon Highway Plan and in Oregon Administrative Rule 734-051. ODOT’s standards also apply to access spacing on County facilities located within the management area of a freeway or expressway interchange, as defined by OAR 734-051. The Oregon Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) defines access management as a set of measures regulating access to streets, roads, and highways, from public roads and private driveways. The TPR requires that new connections to arterials and state highways be consistent with designated access management categories. This TSP includes an access management policy that maintains and enhances the integrity (i.e., capacity, safety, and level of service) of Gilliam County’s roadways. Table 6-2. Access Management Spacing Standards for Rural Gilliam County Roadways Functional Classification Public Road Spacing Private Drive Spacing Collector ¼ mile 1,200 ft Local Street 200-400 ft Vary Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 8 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-3. Access Management Spacing Standards for Urban Roadways These standards apply to new development or redevelopment; existing accesses are allowed to remain as long as the land use does not change. As a result, access management is a long-term process in which the desired access spacing to a street slowly evolves over time as redevelopment occurs. Traffic Operations Standards Gilliam County has an obligation to maintain a safe, convenient, and economical transportation system. A maximum volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratio of 0.85 during a typical weekday peak hour should be maintained for all City- and County-owned or maintained intersections. At intersections with an ODOT facility, ODOT standards shall apply. For unsignalized intersections, the v/c ratio should be based on the intersection’s critical movement. For signalized intersections, the ratio is based on the overall intersection operation. Systemic Safety Plan Several projects were identified in Technical Memorandum #5 to address safety concerns and reduce potential for crashes in Gilliam County. The projects have been categorized as hot spot or systemic projects, consistent with the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program project classifications. Background ODOT allocates Oregon’s Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds through the ARTS program. The program currently splits funding between hot-spot and systemic safety projects. Hot spot safety projects are individual locations where a unique countermeasure could be applied to reduce the frequency and severity of crashes. Systemic safety projects include multiple locations where many low- cost countermeasures can be applied. ARTS project funding will be allocated through the 2017-2021 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The project locations are selected based on reported history of fatal and severe injury crashes. The draft 300-percent list for ODOT Region 4 2017-2021 Hotspot Safety projects does not include any projects in Gilliam County. Similarly, the draft 150-percent list of 2017-2021 Systemic Safety projects in Region 4 does not include any projects in Gilliam County. Functional Classification Public Road Spacing Private Drive Spacing Collector 300 ft 150 ft Local Street 300 ft Each Lot Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 9 9 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. County Systemic Safety Prioritization Methodology Although no safety projects in Gilliam County are included in the draft 2017-2021 STIP lists, a set of objective criteria were established to generate a prioritized list of projects that could be considered for future updates to the STIP. A list of projects was generated based on a review of crash trends and locations with history of crashes in the County, including:  Projects developed by the consultant team to address safety concerns identified by the PAC;  Projects identified in ODOT’s Roadway Departure, Intersection, and Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety Implementation Plans;  Projects identified for locations with geometric and traffic control characteristics where low- cost, systemic countermeasures could reduce risk of roadway departure or intersection crash types. Draft lists of prioritized Roadway Departure projects and Intersection projects, based on a set of objective criteria outlined in Table 6-4, are provided in Table 6-5 and Table 6-6. The projects are ordered from highest to lowest priority based on the criteria each location satisfies. No systemic pedestrian and bicycle safety projects were identified. Systemic countermeasures that may be applied for the Roadway Departure projects include centerline rumble strips, edgeline rumble strips, and curve warning signs, as summarized in Table 6-7. Intersection treatments may include additional signage, pavement markings, and mountable raised medians, as shown by the concept in Table 6-8. Table 6-4. Objective Criteria for Identifying and Prioritizing Systemic Safety Projects Roadway Departure Projects Intersection Projects Criteria for Identifying Locations for Systemic Projects  ≥1 Fatal or Injury A Crash  ≥2 Injury B or C Crashes  ≥3 PDO Crashes  Presence of Roadway Departure Crashes  Presence of a Horizontal Curve  Higher ADT (or Functional Classification)  ≥1 Fatal or Injury A Crash  ≥2 Injury B or C Crashes  ≥3 PDO Crashes  Restricted intersection sight distance  Skewed intersection approach  Presence of a high-speed uncontrolled approach  Higher Minor Street ADT (or Functional Classification if ADT is unavailable) Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 10 10 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-5. Systemic Safety Roadway Departure Projects Road Start MP End MP Number of Reported Crashes (2009- 2013) Number of Roadway Departure Crashes Presence of a horizontal curve? ADT* / Functional Class Fatal Inj A Inj B Inj C PDO OR 19 40 42 0 1 2 0 1 4 Yes 570 / Arterial OR 206 33.4 35.2 0 0 1 3 1 5 Yes 360 / Arterial OR 206 17.6 20.2 0 0 1 2 0 2 Yes 490 / Arterial Baseline Road 8.9 9.3 0 0 1 1 0 2 Yes 240 / Major Collector OR 19 15.9 22.2 0 0 1 0 1 1 Yes 170 / Arterial OR 206 30.68 31.25 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 360 / Arterial *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 11 11 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-6. Systemic Safety Intersection Projects Major Road Minor Road Number of Reported Crashes (2009- 2013) Restricted intersection sight distance? Does the intersection have skewed approach? High speed uncontrolled approach? ADT / Functional Class Fatal Inj A Inj B Inj C PDO Major Road* Minor Road OR 19 (Main St) OR 206 (Walnut St) 0 0 0 0 1 Yes (NB) No No 1600 / Arterial 690 / Arterial OR 19 Eightmile Rd 0 0 0 0 1 No No Yes 860 / Arterial 192 / Major Collector OR 19 Baseline Rd 0 0 0 0 1 No No Yes 250 / Arterial 240 / Major Collector Blalock Canyon Rd Heritage Ln 0 0 0 0 1 No Yes Yes 142 / Major Collector Minor Collector OR 206 Lonerock Rd 0 0 0 0 0 Yes (NB) Yes Yes 190 / Arterial 173 / Major Collector OR 19 Cedar Springs Rd 0 0 0 0 0 No No Yes 660 / Arterial Major Collector Blalock Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd 0 0 0 0 0 Yes (EB) No Yes 142 / Major Collector Major Collector *2013 AADT Obtained from ODOT’s Traffic Volume Tables. ADT for County roads was obtained from 24-hour counts conducted in 2014 when possible. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 12 12 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-7. Systemic Safety Countermeasure Toolbox for Rural Roadways Systemic Safety Countermeasure Description Documented Effectiveness Milled Rumble Strip – Centerline Photo: ODOT Rumble strips are grooves in the roadway placed on the roadway in such a manner that, as the tires of a vehicle contact them, they produce sound (noise) and vibration. The noise and vibration produced by rumble strips is intended to alert inattentive drivers that they have departed from their lane. They can be placed on the shoulder (if adequate paved shoulder is available) or on the centerline. 38 to 50 percent reduction in injury crashes resulting from head-on and opposite direction sideswipe crashes on rural two-lane roads. (Source: NCHRP Report 641) Milled Rumble Strip – Shoulder or Edgeline 26 to 46 percent reduction in single- vehicle run-off-road injury crashes on two-lane rural roads (Source: NCHRP Report 641) Horizontal Curve Signage Photo: Speed Concepts: Informational Guide, FHWA Provide Static Combination Horizontal Alignment/Advisory Curve Warning Sign, Install RECOMMENDED Chevron Signs on Rural Horizontal Curves 13 to 16 percent reduction in run- off-road injury crashes rural two- lane roads. Source: Manual for Selecting Safety Improvements on High Risk Rural Roads (FHWA-SA-14-075) Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 13 13 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-8. Systemic Safety Countermeasure Toolbox for Rural Intersections Systemic Safety Countermeasure Description Documented Effectiveness Basic Set of Sign and Marking Improvements Photo: Low-Cost Safety Enhancements for Stop-Controlled and Signalized Intersections, FHWA Install basic set of signs/markings from the ODOT Intersection Safety Implementation Plan, including: double up oversize warning signs, double STOP signs, mountable curb on stop approach (if feasible), street name signs, and stop bars. 40 percent reduction in intersection crashes at rural two-way stop controlled intersections. Source: Low-Cost Safety Enhancements for Stop-Controlled and Signalized Intersections (FHWA-SA-09-020) Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 14 14 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section outlines specific transportation system improvement projects as well as a categorization of the identified improvements into two groups: near-term and long-term. The categorization presented reflects the relative time period in which it may be foreseeable for the County and Cities to implement the project; it is not intended to limit the selection of a project or the order in which projects will be implemented. The County will need to periodically update its TSP and will review the need and timing for improvements at those times. Long-term projects may or may not be feasible within the twenty-year planning horizon, for reasons of both need and resources. However, they represent a vision for an efficient transportation system in the future, and they have been identified to support the preservation of the opportunities as future conditions may warrant them. The construction of roads, water, sewer, and electrical facilities in conjunction with local development activity should be coordinated if the County is to develop in an orderly and efficient way. Consequently, the planned improvements identified should be considered in light of developing infrastructure sequencing plans, and may need to be modified accordingly. The planned transportation improvement alternatives in Gilliam County include those identified to address various types of transportation issues, which generally include:  Operations: These projects provide the roadway capacity needed to accommodate future traffic flows and reduce delay.  Safety: These projects consider opportunities to improve existing facilities to reduce probability and severity of crashes. These projects include those identified as part of the Systemic Safety Plan for the County.  Pedestrian and Bicycle Enhancements: These projects improve existing facilities or create new facilities that provide greater connectivity and increase access to pedestrian and bicycle routes.  Heavy Maintenance: These projects address the needs identified by the County that relate to roadway, roadside, or drainage and cannot be conducted as part of regular maintenance activities.  Full Reconstruction: These projects include reconstruction of the roadway including removal of existing roadway and placement of aggregate base and asphalt pavement.  Feasibility Studies: These projects have identified the need for some level of long-term improvements to different roadway segments or intersections. Given the size and complexity, a more detailed evaluation of potential improvements has been identified that is beyond the scope of the TSP.  Pilot Projects: Pilot projects are innovative projects that can be done on an interim basis and can be reversed if needed.  Programs/Policies: The programs and policies reflect changes to County or City operations or code that has an impact on the transportation system. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 15 15 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. While site-specific projects, such as adding turn lanes at an existing intersection, have been included to improve conditions at particular locations, the alternatives collectively reflect a broader goal which is to develop an efficient transportation network that will reduce reliance on the state highways and limit potential for motor vehicle crashes while encouraging economic activity. Roadway Transportation Improvements The preferred near- and long-term transportation improvements within unincorporated areas of Gilliam County are listed in Table 6-9. The table includes a project letter for reference to the project location illustrated in Figure 6-2. Additionally, the table includes preliminary cost estimates with 30-percent contingency for the projects, excluding right-of-way. Potential non-binding funding sources were also identified for each project and are subject to negotiation at the time of project execution. Projects that were identified but not expected to receive funding within the TSP horizon were identified as Vision Projects. Cost estimate calculations and assumptions are provided in Attachment A. The implementation plan incorporates the preferred financing plan, which identifies that a limited amount of money will be available to fund projects. As a result, only improvements that are planned for implementation and are expected to have funding are shown in the near-term time frame. The long- term project timeline reflects the fact that some projects are not needed immediately and that it will take time to accumulate the funds to build those projects. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 16 16 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-9. Planned Transportation Improvements in Gilliam County ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects B-2 I-84 EB Bridge Widen the I-84 eastbound bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current standards. Bridge $160,000 X B-4 I-84: John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay Bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering scheduled for 2016, and construction scheduled for 2018. Bridge $2,482,000 X M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2" of asphalt and add 2' gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the Arlington Mesa industrial base. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane. Feasibility Study $109,200 X X X X M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road. Heavy Maintenance $837,330 X X X X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two foot gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance $1,177,735 X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction $1,015,820 X M-7 Rattlesnake Road Reclassify roadway to Minor Collector to support the increased ADT using the road due to new wind farms recently completed. Road improvements have already been completed to the Minor Collector cross-section guidelines. Policy $0 X M-14 Buttermilk Canyon Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road from City of Lonerock to East County Limit. This route is just a back route into the Lonerock community from Morrow County. Policy $0 M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wehrli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance $100,000 X M-16 Trail Fork Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road because the land is all in CRP now (set aside for wildlife grazing) and serves limited residences. Policy $0 M-17 Upper Rock Creek Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from Wolf Hollow Road to OR 19. The road does not serve the traffic levels associated with a Major Collector as hay is produced and used locally to feed cattle rather than being shipped out. Policy $0 M-18 Wolf Hollow Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from OR 19 to Ridge Road as it only serves as an alternate route. Policy $0 S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Operations $3,000 X S-8 Systemic Safety Projects Install systemic safety treatments at the locations identified in the Systemic Safety Plan to reduce roadway departure crashes and intersection crashes. Safety $10,000 X X X S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Feasibility Study $15,000 X Medium and Long-Term Projects B-3 Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement Replace Lonerock Road bridge if it cannot be repaired. Bridge $2,000,000 X M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Heavy Maintenance $1,000,000 X X M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Heavy Maintenance $325,000 X M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel Heavy Maintenance $1,015,846 X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 17 17 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private shoulders where possible. M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Heavy Maintenance $156,000 X X X M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Heavy Maintenance $61,100 X X M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Full Reconstruction $2,752,422 X X M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Heavy Maintenance $500,000 M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Operations $400,000 X S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection to improve sight distance for westbound approach. Safety / Operations $106,000 X X S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22 Study $1,000 X X Vision Projects S-4 Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Project $10,000 X X S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 to a stop perpendicular to Lonerock Road to provide adequate sight distance at this intersection. Project $150,000 X X 1 Cost estimate is planning level only. Does not include right-of-way costs. !( !( !( !( Lonerock Rd Eightmile Rd Dev ils B utte Rd Mikkalo Ln Heritage Ln Blalock Canyon Rd Rattle snake RdQuinton Canyon Rd Cedar Springs Rd Ridge Rd Upper Rock Creek Rd Wolf H ollow R d Trail Fork Rd Hay Canyon Rd Cemetery Ln But term ilk C any on Rd Fourmile Canyon Rd Base Line Rd Rhea Rd Eigh tmil e Ca nyo n R d M - 9 M - 9 S - 7- 7 M - 8 M - 8 M - 1 0- 1 0 M - 4 M - 4 M - 7- M - 3 M - 3 M - 1 2- 1 2 M - 5- M - 1 1 M - 6 M - 1 3- M - 1 4 M - 1 4 M - 1 5 M - 1 6- M - 1 7- 1 7 M - 1 8- M - 2 4 B - 2 B - 3 S - 9 B - 4 Columbia River JohnDa y River Arlington Condon Lonerock ß/197 ß/26 ß/97 ß/30 vÍÎ19 vÍÎ281 vÍÎ173 vÍÎ35 vÍÎ282 vÍÎ206 vÍÎ216 vÍÎ74 §¨¦84 Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure6-2 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 6\6 -2 P rop ose d R oad way Pro ject s.m xd - ag riffi n - 6:4 2 P M 4 /23 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Roadway Implementation PlanGilliam County, Oregon ¯ 0 5 10 Miles !( M - 2-M - 2- M - 1 Arlington ColumbiaRiver vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Arlington Port Rd Shane Dr Rhea Ln Ivy St W 3rd St E Hemloc k W 1st St E3rd S t CottonwoodSt W 5 th S t W 4thSt S 1 st S tH emlock St Airport Rd Main St The Mall Che rry S t Railroad Ave S - 1 !( !( vÍÎ206 vÍÎ19 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Summit St W Bayard St S B St E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S E ast St S B rya n S t N P otte r St S C hur ch St S M cKi nle y S t W Court St Cottonwood Ln S A St NA St S L inc oln St N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S - 5 ¯ Interstate Principal Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local Road Railroads City Boundary Project Category !( Bridge !( Safety / Operations Modernization Study Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 19 19 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. The total cost of projects, policies, programs, and feasibility studies shown in Table 6-9 that are expected to be implemented in the near-term is approximately $6,000,000. This includes a $2.5 million bridge deck overlay project that will be completed by ODOT and the upgrade of multiple County roadways to meet standards by widening and adding paved shoulders. In addition, several low-cost systemic safety projects are included in the near-term projects, including edgeline rumble strips on state highways and enhanced signing and striping to improve safety at key intersections as identified by the criteria in the Systemic Safety Plan. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SYSTEM PLAN The future population growth in the incorporated areas of Arlington and Condon will increase the need to expand the existing sidewalks in the Cities and to provide new paths in and around the incorporated areas to encourage residents and visitors to ride bicycles for transportation. Providing a connected network of pedestrian and bicycle facilities is important for:  Serving shorter trips from neighborhoods to area activity centers, such as schools, churches, and neighborhood commercial uses;  Providing access to regional park and ride lots to enhance intermodal connections; and  Meeting residents’ and visitors’ recreational needs, further promoting economic activity in the County. In rural Gilliam County, bicycle and pedestrian design standards provide paved shoulders on arterials and minimum two-foot paved or unpaved shoulders on all other, lower volume roads to facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel. Table 6-10 includes a feasibility study and pilot project of bike rest areas at strategic locations along OR 206 where cyclists can rest, get water, and fix their bikes. These bike rest areas may also provide opportunities for local businesses to advertise and provide wayfinding signage to direct tourists to local businesses. Table 6-7 provides an example of a bicycle rest area. The cities of Arlington and Condon should also add bicycle parking within their downtown areas. Exhibit 6- 8 shows an example of a decorative bicycle rack that can be used in the downtown areas and add to the main street character. Within the cities, the standards for arterials include a bike lane to provide space for bicyclists to ride separate from vehicles. Bicyclists are expected to share the road with vehicles on the other local roads in the cities due to the low speeds and low volumes. Arterials, collectors, and local streets should include sidewalks as they are developed within the city limits. A complete connected sidewalk network will encourage walking as a mode of transportation within the City. Key gaps in the existing sidewalk infrastructure as well as locations with sidewalks in need of repair are identified in Figure 6-3 and included in Table 6-10. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 20 20 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-7. Example of bicycle rest area Exhibit 6-8. Example of decorative bicycle parking Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 21 21 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-10. Planned Pedestrian and Bicycle Improvements in Gilliam County ID Name Description Category Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike $147,000 X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from 3rd Street to OR 206/Walnut Street Ped/Bike $83,000 X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike $25,000 X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project $5,000 X X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike $3,500 X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike $300,000 X X Medium- & Long-Term Projects A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Ped/Bike $508,000 X A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street Ped/Bike $414,000 X A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 Ped/Bike $87,750 X X A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street Ped/Bike $109,200 X X A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street Ped/Bike $277,000 X A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street Ped/Bike $10,000 X X Gilliam County TSP April 2015 Figure6-3 K:\H _Po rtla nd\ pro jfile \17 679 - G illia m C oun ty T SP \gis \me mo 6\6 -3 P lann ed Ped est rian Sy ste m.m xd - ag riffi n - 6:5 1 P M 4 /23 /20 15 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Oregon Department of Transportation, US Census Pedestrian System Implementation PlanGilliam County, Oregon 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m9:m 89:m s õôó Î Ã Arlington vÍÎ19 §¨¦84 Beech St Krameria St Arlington Por t Rd E 2nd St Ivy St W3rd St SeanSt Columbia View Dr E Hemlock Fir St W 1st St Sunrise Ln E3rd St Grape St W 5 th S t Rat tles nake Rd W 4th St S 1 st S t Chi lde rs R d Shane Dr Hemlock S t CottonwoodSt Col um bia St Main St Pro cto r Rd The Mall Wri ght Rd Airport Rd Che rry S t Railroad Ave A - 2- A - 3 A - 1- A - 8 A - 8 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m 89:m89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m89:m 89:m 89:m89:m !r à õôó s ñ¯ à vÍÎ19 vÍÎ206 Condon S P otte r St W 5th Ave N 4th E Court St W 6th Ave Condon Airport Rd W Fall St W Bayard St S B St East E Well St W Spring St W 3rd St W 2nd St Stre et E Trimble St E Spring St S O reg on St E Summit St W Well St Frazer St E Gilliam St E Walnut St W Summit St W Gilliam St W Trimble St W 1st St S W ard St N E ast St N O reg on St N C hur ch St NE Mai n S t S B rya n S t S E ast St N P otte r St S C hur ch St Summit St Old Co ndo n R d S M cKi nle y S t S W ash ing ton St W Court St Cottonwood Ln SA St NA St S L inc oln S t N L inc oln St S J effe rso n S t S J ew St A - 6 A - 5 A - 6 A- 7 A- 7 A- 4 A- 4 A - 6 A- 11 A- 11 A - 7 A - 7 ¯ Pedestrian Facilities 89:m Existing Pedestrian Crossings Future Sidewalks Future Shared Use Path Existing Sidewalks Railroads City Boundary Activity Centers "Z Airport à School õôó Park s Golf Course Columbia Ridge Landfill !r Park and Pool ñ¯ Gilliam County Court Î Port of Arlington 0 1,000 2,000 Feet0 1,000 2,000 Feet ¯ Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 23 23 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN Gilliam County Special Transportation (GCST) operates a dial-a-ride transit service for the County. The service provides approximately 10,000 trips each year and can be used by the general public for any use. About 80 percent of the trips serve seniors or people with disabilities. Residents call in advance to schedule their rides any time Monday through Friday from 7:00 am to 6:00 pm. Currently, all rides are provided by volunteer drivers. GCST is funded through grants, donations, and medical mileage reimbursement programs but currently has a need for additional funding to cover driver salaries, vehicle maintenance and capital costs, and training programs. Gilliam County is an Oregon Special Transportation Fund Agency and is therefore responsible for developing a Human Services – Public Transportation Coordinated Plan (“Coordinated Plan”) that must be updated every five years. This plan identifies transit projects, focusing on addressing the needs for three target populations: older adults, people with disabilities, and people with low incomes. It is intended to help focus regional resources on strategies with the greatest benefit to the target populations and transportation service providers. Gilliam County will be updating its Coordinated Plan with a grant from ODOT in 2015 and 2016. AIR SERVICE Two airports serve Gilliam County. The Condon State Airport is located just outside the City of Condon. It is owned and operated by the State of Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) and is included in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS), making it eligible for federal funding. The airport plays a supportive role in the current transportation system, providing geographic coverage and access to the state’s airport system. The airport also serves as a base for agricultural spraying operations. To encourage future airport development, the City of Condon is planning to provide water service to the airport. A study is recommended to determine if upgrades are needed for any of the airport facilities to serve the future growth and activity. The Arlington Municipal Airport is located adjacent to the Arlington Mesa Industrial Park, in the Enterprise Zone within the City Limits of Arlington. The airport’s runway is a gravel and dirt/turf surface that was reported in poor condition in 2013. The Arlington Municipal Airport has municipal water and sewer available on the adjacent Arlington Mesa Industrial Park along with Fiber Optic Conduit. Based on the opportunities available for industrial uses and the existing industrial uses at the airport, a feasibility study is recommended to determine the cost to pave and maintain the runway at the Arlington Airport. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 24 24 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. MARINE SYSTEM PLAN Gilliam County is located on the Columbia River, a major water transportation route. The Port of Arlington manages river cargo and marina operations. The Port has a Barge Facility available for river access and a grain silo. Farmers in the region use the Port to export grain, which is an important economic activity for the County. From the Columbia River, the grain can travel to Portland and be exported internationally. The marina also provides access to the river for recreational purposes and is in the process of adding a fuel dock to its amenities. RAIL SERVICE Union Pacific (UP) provides freight rail service through Gilliam County. There is currently no passenger rail service in the County. UP Rail lines follow I-84 and the Columbia River and provide access to Portland and the Hinkle Railyard in Hermiston. Rail service is also available between Arlington and the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center, located approximately 10 miles south of the primary Columbia River line in Arlington, as shown in Exhibit 6-9. The landfill receives solid waste by rail from major metropolitan areas up and down the west coast. All trains on the branch are operated by Watco Companies through their Palouse River and Coulee City Railroad. The Watco line is a Class III or short-line railroad with annual operated revenue of less than 20 million dollars (1991 dollars). Class III railroads are typically local short-line railroads serving a small number of towns and industries or hauling cars for one or more larger railroads. Six unit trains run on this branch per week. The train speed from I-84 to the end of the line at the Columbia Ridge Landfill and Recycling Center is 25 mph. The track is in good condition and is regularly maintained. New rail crossovers should be added in the near-term at Shutler Station to support rail operations. There are two crossings of the Watco line within the City of Arlington and two along Cedar Springs Road. The City, County, and Waste Management should maintain coordination with UP and Watco to minimize delay and maintain emergency vehicle access. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 25 25 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-9. Existing Watco Rail Line and Shutler Station PIPELINE AND TRANSMISSION SYSTEM PLAN Pipeline transportation within the Gilliam County area includes numerous substations and transmission lines, which are currently being upgraded. These transmission lines are maintained by Pacific Gas Transmission and provide access to the main power grid at multiple locations. Future extension of a high-speed broadband service is planned from Idaho along the Columbia River. Gilliam County may be able to provide broadband services to its citizens through this line. A broadband internet connection could allow for implementation of Intelligent Transportation Solutions along I-84 that could have a positive effect on transportation safety and mobility. Other benefits of this added service could spur economic development. TRANSPORTATION FINANCE ELEMENT Funding for transportation projects is increasingly in short supply as existing infrastructure ages and transportation demands increase. This section provides a means for evaluating the likelihood that projects can be funded within the timelines identified in the TSP and defines priorities based on available funding opportunities. The TPR requires that the Gilliam County TSP address transportation funding, including the following elements: Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 26 26 Kittelson & Associates, Inc.  A list of planned transportation facilities and major improvements;  A general estimate of the timing for planned transportation facilities and major improvements;  Determination of rough cost estimates for the transportation facilities and major investments identified in the TSP; and,  A discussion of existing and potential financing sources for each transportation facility and major improvement (which can be described in terms of guidelines or local policies). Current Gilliam County Transportation Funding Revenues Gilliam County has had an annual revenue of approximately $1.3 million per year over the past ten years. As shown in Exhibit 6-10, this funding comes from a variety of sources. The largest portions come from the property tax assessments, the Special County Allotment, and the State Highway Fund Apportionment. Exhibit 6-11 shows that the County has spent the majority of its revenue each year over the past four years, with the expenditures exceeding the revenue in fiscal years 2011 and 2012. As shown in Exhibit 6-12, the majority of the transportation expenditures were used for maintenance activities, leaving little funding left over to complete capital improvement projects. The County Roadmaster indicated that he typically includes at least one improvement, such as paving a new road, project per year in his budget and work schedule. Exhibit 6-10. Gilliam County Transportation Revenue Sources (2005 – 2014) $0 $200,000 $400,000 $600,000 $800,000 $1,000,000 $1,200,000 $1,400,000 $1,600,000 $1,800,000 $2,000,000 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 2 0 0 5 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 2 0 1 0 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 7 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 1 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 Special Assessments - Property Tax Motor Vehicle Registration Fees Surplus Land & Equipment Sales State Highway Fund Apportionment Interest Income Special County Allotment State Highway Fund Exchange Program ODOT Issued Permit Fees Other State Highway Fund Grants BLM Mineral Leases Other Federal Funds Receipts Non-Jurisdiction Road Work U.S. Taylor Grazing Apportionment Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 27 27 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Exhibit 6-11. Gilliam County Transportation Revenue Compared to Transportation Expenditures (2005 – 2014) Exhibit 6-12. Gilliam County Transportation Expenditures (2005 – 2014) Transportation Funding Options Gilliam County faces two inter-related financing issues: how to finance operations and maintenance and how to finance capital projects. Presently, all public works funding is devoted to operations and maintenance; there is no funding for capital projects. The total funding needed to accomplish all of $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 FY end June 30 2005 FY end June 30 2010 FY end June 30, 2006 FY end June 30, 2007 FY end June 30, 2008 FY end June 30, 2009 FY end June 30, 2011 FY end June 30, 2012 FY end June 30, 2013 FY end June 30, 2014 Annual Transportation Revenue Annual Transportation Expenditures $0 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 2 0 0 5 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 2 0 1 0 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 6 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 7 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 8 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 1 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 2 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 3 FY e n d J u n e 3 0 , 2 0 1 4 Administration and General Engineering Snow and Ice Removal Safety and Traffic Maintenance General Maintenance of Condition Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 28 28 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. the near-term alternatives summarized in this plan would approach $7,000,000. A comprehensive table summarizing all modal alternatives and their cost estimate is provided in Attachment B. Potential strategies for addressing these needs in Gilliam County may generally be grouped into three categories: secure more external funding, identify public/private sponsorship opportunities, and raise local revenue through user fees and taxes. Observations on the use of these strategies are discussed below. They are not all mutually exclusive. Identify Additional Grant Opportunities ODOT offers multiple grant opportunities to support transportation projects. The County and Cities should identified grants from those summarized in Table 6-11 that are applicable to their projects. Some of these programs require a local match. The County and Cities should begin identifying these programs early in order to plan for the funding necessary to satisfy a local match. Using local dollars as a match for a grant opportunity is a strategy to stretch the local funding even farther. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 29 29 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-11. Grant Opportunities Source ID Source Title Award Cycle Intended Use Applicable Project Types Administration Agency Deadline Local Match Website 1 Rivers, Trails, and Conservation Assistance Program Annual Technical assistance for recreation and conservation projects. Shared-use paths National Park Service August None http://www.nps.gov/ncrc/programs/rtca/contactus/cu_apply.html 2 Highway Safety Improvement Program Annual Address safety issues on highways and High Risk Rural Roads All ODOT Varies 10% www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/TRAFFIC-ROADWAY/highway _safety_program.shtml 3 Oregon Parks and Recreation Local Government Grants Annual Primary use is recreation; transportation allowed. Construction limited to outside road right-of-way, only in public parks or designated recreation areas Shared-use paths OPRD Varies 20% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRANTS/local.shtml 4 Recreational Trails Program Annual Recreational trail-related projects, such as hiking, running, bicycling, off-road motorcycling, and all-terrain vehicle riding. Shared-use paths OPRD Varies 20% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRANTS/trails.shtml 5 Land and Water Conservation Fund Annual Acquire land for public outdoor recreation or develop basic outdoor recreation facilities Shared-use paths, bikeways, sidewalks OPRD Varies 50% http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/GRANTS/lwcf.shtml 6 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Biennial Multi-year, statewide, intermodal program of transportation projects Sidewalk, bikeways, crossing improvements ODOT Varies Varies http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/STIP/ 7 ATV Grant Program Annual Operation and maintenance, law enforcement, emergency medical services, land acquisition, leases, planning, development, and safety education in Oregon's OHV (off-highway vehicle) recreation areas Shared-use paths OPRD February / April 20% http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/ATV/pages/grants.aspx 8 Immediate Opportunity Funds Biennial Support primary economic development through the construction and improvement of street and roads. All ODOT On-going 50% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/EA/reports/IOF_PolicyGuidelines2015%20doc.pdf 9 Enhance (STIP) Biennial Activities that enhance, expand, or improve the transportation system. Projects that improve or enhance the state's multimodal transportation system. All ODOT August 10% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/STIP/Pages/WhatsChanged.aspx 10 ConnectOregon Biennial Non-highway transportation projects that promote economic development in Oregon. Non-highway modes ODOT November 20% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/pages/connector.aspx 11 All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Biennial Address safety needs on all public roads in Oregon; reduce fatal and serious injury crashes. All hot spot and systemic safety projects ODOT Varies 8% http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/TRAFFIC-ROADWAY/Pages/ARTS.aspx Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 30 30 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Public/Private Sponsorship Opportunities Public/Private sponsorships involve a private entity such as a local business owner working with the public agency to fund a project. In return for their investment in the community, these business owners often have recognition for their role, providing a marketing venue for the business. In Gilliam County, one potential opportunity for this type of partnership is the pilot project for bicycle rest areas. Private organizations that sponsor a rest area should have the opportunity to provide an advertisement and map at these locations directing cyclists to their community and business. Local Taxes and User Fees Many types of user fees and taxes may be collected to finance road construction and operations. On that premise, it is assumed that the County will need to develop local revenue sources to supplement or replace federal resources if it hopes to maintain current levels of service and assuming that changes in state of federal financing, coupled with efficiency measures are not enough to close the funding gap. Table 6-12 lists options that the County and Cities may wish to consider for funding local roads. The sources include a mix of fees and taxes, some of which if implemented would have implications for other aspects of the County and City budgets. Some of these fees could also be used to provide a local match to obtain greater federal or state funding, further stretching local dollars. Development Code Updates In order to fund sidewalk projects, a change to the development code may be beneficial to local jurisdictions. The development code identifies the requirements that a developer must meet before obtaining permission to build. Local jurisdictions may choose to require developers to complete sidewalks in locations where they are identified in the TSP and enforce the completion through the development code. The jurisdiction may also choose to collect a payment in lieu of sidewalk construction from the developers and then use the money to construct complete sections of sidewalk when enough is collected to create efficiencies. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 31 31 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Table 6-12. Local Taxes and User Fee Options Source Description Comments General Fund Property taxes from the county’s permanent tax rate. Diverting general fund revenue to the Road Fund would have significant consequences for other county services. Supplemental 5-year Serial Levy Voter approved property tax levied in addition to the county’s permanent tax rate. A road fund serial levy would have to be approved by voters every five years. A one- time approval would buy time for the county to develop other options. This method could fund operations and capital programs, some of which might reduce future maintenance requirements. Road Utility Fee Monthly user fee with revenue dedicated to road operations. May be enacted legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. This type of fee is becoming more common in cities but would require substantial investment in rate studies, administrative staffing, software and computer systems to enable the county to collect the revenue. This source is generally better suited to funding operations than for capital improvements, but it may free up existing resources for capital projects. Vehicle Registration Fee An extra fee on all registered motor vehicles in the county. May be authorized legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. State must be willing to act as a collection agent for the county, otherwise would be easy to implement. This source could fund operations or capital programs. Motor Vehicle Title Fee Require that all motor vehicles registered in the county also have their title recorded as personal property with the County. This would generate two sources of revenue: from the fee itself and from personal property taxes levied on motor vehicles. This could be problematic for renters and would increase taxable property that the Assessor must account for. County Gas Tax May be enacted legislatively but could be challenged and brought to a vote. A local-option fuel tax would be easy to collect because the infrastructure is already in place. Would generate revenue for the county from motorists passing through the county. This method could fund operations and capital programs. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A. Cost Estimate Calculations Attachment B. Planned TSP Alternatives Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 32 32 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Attachment A. Cost Estimate Calculations U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 7,424 SQ FT 37,120 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 357,584.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 507,769.28$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 30,000.00$ 30,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 16.00$ 118,784.00$ 11,200.00$ 11,200.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 185,600.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-1: Cottonwood St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 78,668.48$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 71,516.80$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 5,752 SQ FT 28,760 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 291,436.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 413,839.12$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 25,000.00$ 25,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 9,600.00$ 9,600.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 18.00$ 103,536.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 5.00$ 143,800.00$ Project A-2: Shane Dr. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 64,115.92$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 58,287.20$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 1,614 SQ FT 8,070 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 103,342.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 146,745.64$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 37,122.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 48,420.00$ Project A-3: Ivy St. Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 22,735.24$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 20,668.40$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,415 SQ FT 5,300 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 58,222.50$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 82,675.95$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ CONTINGENCY 20% 11,644.50$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 7.00$ 37,100.00$ 5 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 1.50$ 9,622.50$ Project A-4: Main St. Sidewalk 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 12,808.95$ 7 U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 1,042 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 17,478.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 24,818.76$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1,600.00$ 1,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 4,000.00$ 4,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE WALK 9.00$ 9,378.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION Project A-5: Spring St. Sidewalks 6 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 3,845.16$ 7 CONTINGENCY 20% 3,495.60$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LF 3,000 SQ FT 18,000 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE= 194,800.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE= 276,616.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 9,000.00$ 9,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE CLEARING & SUBGRADE PREPERATION 2,800.00$ 2,800.00$ 5 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 23.00$ 69,000.00$ 6 F&P CONCRETE WALK 6.00$ 108,000.00$ Project A-8: W 1st Street Sidewalks 7 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 42,856.00$ 8 CONTINGENCY 20% 38,960.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 3,500.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 4,970.00$ Plus $5,000 per sign for flashing stop sign Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 500.00$ 500.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 3 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 4 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ Project S-4, Option A: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection All-Way Stop 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 770.00$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 700.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 2,000 LS 1 TON 42 TON 12 TON 20 LF 150 SF 1,400 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 32,660.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 46,377.20$ Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 7,185.20$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 6,532.00$ 11 F&P PAINT STRIPING 1,000.00$ 1,000.00$ 12 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 500.00$ 500.00$ 9 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 3,750.00$ 10 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,200.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 540.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 2,200.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 1,470.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 500.00$ 500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 4,000.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 2,500.00$ 2,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-4, Option B: Walnut St. and Main St. Intersection Modification ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 3,400 EA 2 LF 200 LS 1 TON 63 TON 18 TON 15 LF 290 SF 1,450 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 74,515.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 105,811.30$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 6,700.00$ 6,700.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 10,000.00$ 10,000.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 6,800.00$ 5 F&P STORM CATCH BASIN 1,500.00$ 3,000.00$ 6 F&P STORM SEWER 40.00$ 8,000.00$ 7 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 2,000.00$ 2,000.00$ 8 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 2,205.00$ 9 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 810.00$ 10 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 1,650.00$ 11 F&P CONCRETE CURBS 25.00$ 7,250.00$ 12 F&P CONCRETE WALK 8.00$ 11,600.00$ 13 F&P PAINT STRIPING 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ 14 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ Project S-5: E. Bayard St. and Main St. Intersection Realignment 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,393.30$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,903.00$ U/M QTY LS 1 LS 1 LS 1 SQ FT 6,300 LS 1 TON 290 TON 85 TON 150 LS 1 LS 1 CONSTRUCTION QUOTE = 73,075.00$ LS 1 LS 1 TOTAL QUOTE = 103,766.50$ Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction 1 ENGINEERING, SURVEYING, MANAGEMENT 22% 16,076.50$ 2 CONTINGENCY 20% 14,615.00$ 9 F&P PAINT STRIPING 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 10 F&P ALL NECESSARY SIGNAGE 3,000.00$ 3,000.00$ 7 F&P 3/4" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 45.00$ 3,825.00$ 8 F&P 1/2" DENSE ODOTLEVEL 2 MHMAC PAVING 110.00$ 16,500.00$ 5 PROVIDE SUBGRADE PREPARATION 5,000.00$ 5,000.00$ 6 F&P 1-1/2" MINUS AGGREGATE BASE 35.00$ 10,150.00$ 3 F&P EROSION CONTROL MEASURES 1,500.00$ 1,500.00$ 4 PROVIDE DEMOLITION & PAVEMENT REMOVAL 2.00$ 12,600.00$ 1 MOBILIZATION, PROJ MGT, TEMP. FACILITIES, ETC. 8,000.00$ 8,000.00$ 2 PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONTROL 7,500.00$ 7,500.00$ Gilliam County Transportation System T.E.C. Engineers Estimate Project S-6: OR 206 and Lonerock Road Intersection Reconstruction ITEM # DESCRIPTION UNIT COST TOTAL ;)II . . ~ t • :· I t. ~ ~ . 1 • •• , • • ' • J ! " . /. r I . • t,·~ ... • .• - , . . ' .. : .. { ; i .-· .. ! • \ t: . ,.- . ·~ , ... ~ · .. ·,, ... . . .. . . r .. . . . . .. ,· • . '~ ~. !.. J J ,. l ' ·;: 1 J .. ~ • ... , . ..1 ( • r ' .· 1.' , ... . ! ,. I . . .. ( . •• i . · .. .-;, . I ' '\ •, • .. J .... /O{X) -'.:.- ..) .)J ''· 1 .~ l _ _ , ___ (:..1.:'=t.L1 r t). ' c t 1 \ • ·. j 1 '~_) (2 ~ •. ) rt\~IC. t~····· J , ., . j ... j : : ·-· \ ) '1 / 1,') ~ • . '·' . , 1 ,.. •• t ~-~ t ...... ___________ 1~: .. ~'·-·-·_·: ._. ·_. _ __________________________________ YO~oo~--- q(.) ooo 2 SOo .. ( .': , \ ~ .. ·:, S VC)O 5 lt'u l) l.,l)'l 'fl ': '2..4 w e\.4. Y'O ~a"'-~-·., _ _ ______ ?-.--t-l I )_"ll _ _ _ j2U..V'\ 0 1' Cl=.{ '·:;_' ·:;:...:~ ·_.__ ______ __________ J:...(?,=O~,D=-L:=~ ) _ _ _ l )~s··, ·· ~- - - . , '\.. t , • • "" : • I 7').06 : ' (j A (. ~ • •. ~ . '') ..... ~' t-•'. 't ' ------ ---- -·----------- -- ---·------------ ------- - -- - ·---------------- - --- ·- ---------- (J A.t\ Wt'\ l~ .?( l ' / ' i/J ') ------------------------------~lt)~~v'~M~~~~- r--~\~~!·-·~-~~·~ ----------------------------- ._") ... ·, (,. ._\ '. -"'1 ! ~ : . l_i ~ .. ! • ~ .. " ~ · c,·,·. ·, .~.t:t~ _f.;,_ tp.-·- ~~~C_rr _~_r~;~~-;~~ -r. _______________________________________ -------- ' \ . • ', . . j_' ' ~ • I .· . , ... - . ,.~ I f ; t I ' .. '· . .. ·' · ~ • ,, J f ' . ') ~~ . , J , ~. I,. i . ,... , r' .t • _, ~ .. ~ • • r · ,, )'YS ·~ ~ .... ~ .~ : ·~ ..o.. .t :...:.u ____________ _j ~~~~·~--~~------------------------------------------~-----~~~---------- ----------------------------------·----------- ---------------------- ·------ ·- - - .. --. ---------- - -----~- __ .. ______ _ "·--·----- ------ ------------------·····----·-·-- _/· --------"=5::_:"M_;.~~<..>-_@_ :6LJ_ ' _ _..!/~'l.Jf5{)()_c{t:., ttO; ~r.J:. r~I'Dtt (~ ~~ --:. ------==£,:;;._::..;..:...;;..,.;.1)_0~:':} .5:> .·X~:)_ ~ ~ -· ,.... ~ ------------~r~-r~:· ~-~-·~---------------------------------------------------~~-- )0"..).0 ~~~t .. ;-, ;., ··; r: ,J ;>-, ·~· ~~ :-.. ( ' ., .. , ----------------~v--~~~--~-----~----------------------------------------·----------~·~·· - --- ~-4 ____ _ ~. ~ . .... , '· (• # ( · I ..... -. f} ,-, . .. , .), ) _________ p ___________________ - - - --· ---- ------------------- '} ' .') ,t·t ';.,. .-: .. ,- t 1 .. , n 1 v·:,.,. .. ~- , .....,-, ~ 3.Lf· ~ ... , _~ . (\S 75()0 c 1A \.\ rv s 't"\~ -:A.. ~ bcJn•. ~\) V f n... ..snx/?!'f>~K J}It; UL..~ ~ck.. 13>~ a N\~C iL W / ..S.Nt; 1/t. l- .~ •·- . \h nc i . : rv'i.' l..J ~ \:) IIVt'\ Q "'t <:: l ll . v ( .. J.o~Q )1.00 20() ).700 ' } <;.: -7 (() A .. '. 1 0 . ....,~ .. l./ ) ~}DOC 3100 '-1 g~t) ))5C/) 1550 ~' ,!./1(\ (_ J l'¥\yM"Vf ..$HCHA . 0\Q ~ ( ' / J·: ·~_, / : ~ (., 1 ,' J 'i"'Q @ Rf:~I\)(:L :-'AJ'i. )( ::..N "· ® 'l () ,Q .• , • (.t I :; t j LJ" .... t..;>(;-f.<'Y! ~ ' . ._ - • '- ,• !. ..... ....,.. • I ·, ~ .. \ '-/006 Cf..\ 'i9.) J;J1J .C:)'\ c . ' ' . "< (. C;._)....... • . . 'tl •. • / \I f ~ ~"'Q· . lJ·,., .,_ .c. \ .. } ) ) ') .. t, . :- ' ..•. '\ { . ·. . .. : ··' · ,) ') ~! ,· j :...,i) ~ . J 'i. . ' ·. I . ,- ., '"1 ·).:: c .. );-. f" .... t :..,.. -·· }\•, <'; /\'~ i I ·' ,. /,I ! \ . ' l. · '·· ·, I ... t ·. \ ( A::_, :.._ L ' r ! ( r.t~ ; .. , . • ir rf __ \Jr;.tc<· \ . ~ ~ t. / •( ': ( ( 1fl.Avrc . ... --~--- --~ . ···- ~· -, bb•'~ .., . l ).- ·· · . I'; .. t ., 1'7bo C;U.. Y. '(} 5 )~06 Gu. l-{ 0 S 4560 ),()_()0 3S_,O:JO 45tt:> _.-. .. l/ bt)() /0 SbO 5t-i:OCX) "' ] t I C::lj\} • . '.,t~'l" ... . (. (.,~ ···:. "' . . ; . 0 ~'(.0( :·· r ,.~ ~' kr. , ) ,," i \ ') 'I .. lo ,, ~ 7 r.· ' /? .,. / . ... •. ,. \ . r.rl'\-.·'f'...D1Jf hlf'X O " .~_ . .._!·-'·'"""· ----------------·-·.;..· ~J=-J..::...'J ___ _ _______ ..J.= . _rr-Qnr\,,,.,. ~n ~ ··e: . .<',;, (. e1 ' ? __ --=-::._.~:-··-.:....·'...:...~-·!_,1;...,. _, ________ ,_bf;....:O'""~",..:::()(X):.=::...------ S.J ~1\1.-: .-:,~-- 12.J;p~fPZ:...~.-..... 1'.;:;.o~~,..-'' s:;__ ______________ ___;;_5-.J',~o:..:ro=--·--- ~ ------------------------~~~~~~·L=---------------------------J~00ooo I • -- -·- ------- -~-----·---·---- _________ ., ________ . .. •• /. '15 "":ur~ ~6~oroc.u "'P~. /,I!.J ~c~~r .... ~4, • 6AA~U!.-~ loc..\Jt rr... lKCAV(:l.l.]..::J (l/ • '"" h .- .~; ... • L .J /8:-l t-!r· . . e JS.Scf;n J 2bfi/f;l'l.. @~ {.)'-)~ i1._ ,~\ cf/ 1· Ull,"('l\.(> j(t;A( 1(~ ·.~ 90 t! I~ ':-:J... :I· i.J{- 700..... ~,..; t.JI 7'f.i:.... TG.ut. il, ~ '/0 ~ \ '• r· , ~ u~.(f~~ · /.J:: '1 t;" \( .• \' ...... ' ' \;. (Q f.-.1, .... /~ oJ·tr -Pltf 110.. . _.. 1 t.1 .J- !Sc n 'f \lt.N VL'l ;>s {il ltn~/ . J ~OW e."\. L 1 ps \1 f\Sf. Roc~ @ b~?. .• ~DOD C\\ Y:iS Ro{\o f(occ:@ R~-· )/ /li.U,. 1YUlc.AL ~ ' Tfi.Aiil:L r • ~. }Jitl;.t,. 1"'ttU.C.U . . Cott~u~tl , . . . ,, /KJ Wr'f$ ~ /j~C/ C:/ I&>;~"~· 72JOCJO~:/ ,..~..., '10 000 ... ) 0 15 6'dJ .) ) JOJ 56~ fv1tJL1~1t7 .. D MVl!f:. Ml IJ£s? &Qt:r_. .r ,:- J ru;(l ;. /fo t, ~ -n,rv< :'(J . ~f ~ )'N"\ \!O..;J.J[ i--.. r (' )~- .' r ! ~-]~:; .~. ~ ,. ) ,.' \ ') ': I rj(l(., ~-, . .l .: I ., .· . I c , , .. .··. ~; . ·')'·~) ·. Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 33 33 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Attachment B. Planned TSP Alternatives Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 34 34 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ID Name Description Category Source Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private Short-Term Projects A-3 Ivy Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from 3rd Street to Main Street in Arlington, connecting to the Columbia Hills Manor Independent Living Center Ped/Bike PAC $147,000 X A-4 Sidewalks on East Side of Main Street (Condon) Replace sidewalks on the east side of Main Street from 3rd Street to OR 206/Walnut Street Ped/Bike PAC / City of Condon Pedestrian Grant Application $83,000 X A-5 Sidewalks on E Spring Street Install sidewalks from S East Street to S Jefferson Street, connecting to ball fields Ped/Bike PAC $25,000 X A-9 OR 206 Cyclist Rest Areas Evaluate feasibility and cost of providing bicyclist rest areas with water stations and bike tools at strategic locations along OR 206 in the County. Implement as pilot project. Feasibility Study / Pilot Project PAC $5,000 X X A-10 Bicycle Parking Add bicycle parking in downtown areas of Condon and Arlington Ped/Bike PAC $3,500 X A-11 OR 19 Sidewalks Add sidewalks from Main Street to the Fairgrounds driveway in Condon. Ped/Bike PAC / City of Condon Pedestrian Grant Application $300,000 X X B-2 I-84 EB Bridge Widen the I-84 eastbound bridge at MP 148.6 (Willow Creek) to meet current standards. Bridge ODOT Bridge Inventory Analysis $160,000 X B-4 I-84: John Day River Bridge Deck Overlay Bridge deck overlay on I-84 from MP 114.45 to 114.75. Preliminary engineering scheduled for 2016, and construction scheduled for 2018. Bridge 2015-2018 STIP $2,482,000 X M-1 Airport Road Overlay Airport Road with 2" of asphalt and add 2' gravel shoulders from the intersection of Rhea Road to the end of the industrial base. Airport Road was previously widened several years ago. This project will be completed in conjunction with Rhea Lane. Feasibility Study TAC $109,200 X X X X M-2 Rhea Lane Overlay with 5 inches of recycled asphalt and the addition of 2-ft gravel shoulders from OR 19 to Airport Road to serve the higher truck volumes associated with the Arlington Mesa Inudstrial Park. This project will be done in conjunction with Airport Road. Heavy Maintenance TAC $837,330 X X X X M-3 Ridge Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Baseline Road to County limits to support the freight traffic that uses this route to transport hay, cattle, and wheat from Gilliam and SW Morrow County to I-84. The project includes 2 inches of overlay on existing asphalt and paving the currently unpaved section. Two-ft gravel shoulders will be added where possible. Heavy Maintenance TAC $1,177,735 X M-4 Fourmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Major Collector standards from Fairview Lane to Baseline Road by paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible to support the truck traffic that carries wheat out of Morrow and Gilliam County. Full Reconstruction TAC $1,015,820 X M-7 Rattlesnake Road Reclassify roadway to Minor Collector to support the increased ADT using the road due to new wind farms recently completed. Road improvements have already been completed to the Minor Collector cross-section guidelines. Policy TAC $0 X M-14 Buttermilk Canyon Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road from City of Lonerock to East County Limit. This route is just a back route into the Lonerock community from Morrow County. Policy TAC $0 M-15 Cemetery Road Upgrade Road to Minor Collector to serve the wheat area as part of Wherli Canyon loop. Project includes paving the surface. Widening has already been completed. Heavy Maintenance TAC $100,000 X M-16 Trail Fork Road Downgrade from Minor Collector to Local Road because the land is all in CRP now (set aside for wildlife grazing) and serves limited residences. Policy TAC $0 Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 35 35 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ID Name Description Category Source Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private M-17 Upper Rock Creek Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from Wolf Hollow Road to OR 19. The road does not serve the traffic levels associated with a Major Collector as hay is produced and used locally to feed cattle rather than being shipped out. Policy TAC $0 M-18 Wolf Hollow Road Downgrade from Major Collector to Minor Collector from OR 19 to Ridge Road as it only serves as an alternate route. Policy TAC $0 M-19 Parking Management Plans Update permitting procedures to require parking management plans for special events to minimize parking overflow onto local and downtown streets during special events. Policy PAC $2,000 X X M-21 Shutler Station Add rail crossovers to support operations at Shutler Station. Operations TAC $300,000 X X S-1 I-84 Westbound On-Ramp in Arlington Replace existing sign with larger sign and add pavement markings to indicate correct direction for drivers. Operations TAC $3,000 X S-2 Railroad crossing of OR 19/Locust Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM and Union Pacific (UP) to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. Document the issue and any progress annually with UP. Program TAC $0 X S-3 Railroad crossing of I-84 Ramps/Beech Street Minimize times that the crossing is blocked by trains by working with WM and Union Pacific (UP) to ensure additional power to move trains up hill and prevent trains from getting stuck. Document the issue and any progress annually with UP. Program TAC $0 X S-7 I-84 ITS Warning System throughout County Evaluate effectiveness and feasibility of ITS treatments to provide warnings to drivers when roadway conditions are icy. Feasibility Study PAC $15,000 X S-8 Systemic Safety Projects Install systemic safety treatments at the locations identified in the Systemic Safety Plan to reduce roadway departure crashes and intersection crashes. Safety ODOT Roadway Departure Plan; PAC $10,000 X X X S-14 Driver Education Identify funding for driver education programs in schools. Program PAC $10,000 X X X X Medium- & Long-Term Projects A-1 Cottonwood Street Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Shane Drive to OR 19 Ped/Bike PAC $508,000 X A-2 Shane Drive Sidewalks (Arlington) Install sidewalks from Main Street to Cottonwood Street Ped/Bike PAC $414,000 X A-6 Inner Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street/Potter Street to OR 206 Ped/Bike PAC $87,750 X X A-7 Outer Pedestrian Recreational Route West of Condon Create recreational unpaved walking path east of Condon for residents from W Bayard Street to Cottonwood Street/Main Street Ped/Bike PAC $109,200 X X A-8 W 1st Street Sidewalks Install sidewalks from Cedar Street to Ivy Street Ped/Bike PAC $277,000 X A-12 Pedestrian crossings in Condon Provide an enhanced pedestrian crossing of OR 19 as it enters town, east of Main Street Ped/Bike City of Condon Pedestrian Grant Application $10,000 X X B-3 Lonerock Road Bridge Replacement Replace Lonerock Road bridge if it cannot be repaired. Bridge TAC $2,000,000 X M-5 Quinton Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Heritage Lane to I-84 interchange to serve the wind farms on the bluff and agricultural land. Project includes widening from the current 18' roadway width to 20' and paving the second from I-84 to the top of the hill. Widening requires significant cost due to rock bluff. Heavy Maintenance TAC $1,000,000 X X M-6 Heritage Lane Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards from Blalock Canyon Road to Quinton Canyon Road to serve Heavy TAC $325,000 X Gilliam County Transportation System Plan Update Project #: 17679 April 30, 2015 Page 36 36 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. ID Name Description Category Source Cost Estimate 1 Potential Funding Source ODOT/ State County Cities Private wind farms and agricultural land. Project includes removing S-curves and paving the west end of the road. Maintenance M-8 Eightmile Canyon Road Upgrade roadway to Minor Collector standards to support the increased truck traffic using this route due to the new irrigated farming in the area and the traffic associated with homes. Project includes paving the road and adding 2' gravel shoulders where possible. Heavy Maintenance TAC $1,015,846 X M-10 Devils Butte Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 206. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and improving sight lines for trucks and vehicles pulling boat trailers. Heavy Maintenance TAC $156,000 X X X M-11 Mikkalo Ln Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Hay Canyon Road to OR 19. Project includes culvert extensions, widening shoulders, and sight improvements. Heavy Maintenance TAC $61,100 X X M-12 Hay Canyon Rd Upgrade roadway to a Minor Collector to serve State Park traffic from Devils Butte Road to the Cottonwood Canyon State Park. Project includes road realignment and reconstruction to avoid eroding road adjacent to river. Full Reconstruction TAC $2,752,422 X X M-13 Lonerock Road Upgrade from Minor Collector to Major Collector from OR 206 to City of Lonerock to support the cattle and hay operations and serve the Lonerock community. Project includes some grade improvements on the east side of the Ericson grade. Heavy Maintenance TAC $500,000 M-20 Arlington Airport Runway Evaluate the feasibility and cost of paving the Arlington Airport runway. Feasibility Study PAC $10,000 X M-24 Lower Rock Creek Road Improve roadway (widen, add shoulders, curve signage, etc.) due to high recreational traffic associated with river access. Operations PAC $400,000 X M-25 Condon State Airport Conduct a feasibility study to determine what airport improvements are needed (runway, facilities, access, etc.) to support development when water is provided to the airport. Feasibility Study PAC $10,000 X X X X S-5 E Bayard Street/Main Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure intersection to two-way stop-controlled intersection to improve sight distance for westbound approach. Safety / Operations TAC; Systemic Safety $106,000 X X S-9 Snow Drifts on OR 206 Evaluate the occurrence of snow drifts on OR 206 near milepost 22 Feasibility Study PAC $1,000 X X Vision Projects S-4 Main Street/Walnut Street Intersection Reconfiguration Reconfigure the intersection to a two-way stop-controlled intersection. Project PAC $10,000 X X S-6 Lonerock Road/OR 206 Intersection Reconfigure the intersection to bring the eastern leg of OR 206 perpendicular to Lonerock Road to provide adequate sight distance at this intersection. Project PAC $150,000 X X