Eugene Masonic Cemetery Condition Assessment and Treatment of the Historic Grave Markers and Mausoleum Eugene, Oregon October 2013- May 2014 Prepared By David Espinosa - Master of Science in Historic Preservation Candidate University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon May 2014 Acknowledgements I would like to thank the individuals and groups that made this project possible through their time, effort, and appreciation of the historic resource that ls the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. A special thanks to Dennis HeUesvig, History Architect for the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association, for introducing me to the rich history that the Eugene Masonic Cemetery has to offer. 'Denny' took immediate interest in my studies and was the catalyst that transformed a project focused on a single grave marker to one encompassing over thirty markers and the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. As a guide, project committee member, neighbor and friend, you have been nothing but gracious and giving. Dr. Lauren Allsopp, a constant mentor in my studies and a driving force behind my venture into the realm of conservation. Thank you for the invaluable guidance, patience, and for being a role model in the field of preservation. Thank you to the members of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association. For trusting your cherished historic resources with me. Your support and encouragement was felt from the outset of my project and never relented . In particular EMCA President EMCA President, and Cemetery Director Sally Dietrich, thank you for your leadership, for sharing your knowledge and your passion. David Espinosa TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Project Overview ... ..... ···· ·· ·· ·········· ·············· ····· ···· ········· ····· ··· ·· ······· ····· ···· ·· ··· ········ ······ ····· ·····6 1.1 Problem Statement .. . ............................... .. ... ...... ... ...... 6 1.2 Project Goals .. . . ·········· ···· ···· ···· ·· ··· ····· ···· ·· ··· ·· ···6 1.3 Brief Historica l Background ... .. ........................................... .. ... .. ..... ... .. .. 6 2 Condition Assessment of the Masonic Cemetery Grave Markers. ........................................................... ..... .. .. 9 2.1 Materials & Types .... ......................................................................... ... ..... .. .9 2.2 Invasive Biological Materia ls .................................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Weathering and pollution ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.4 Vandalism and public traffic ... ... ...... ..... ........... ............... ..... .... .. ... ......... .... .. ... .. .. .. .... .. ............ .... ........ 12 2.S Improper Ma intenance & Restoration ... ........ .. .... .... .. ........ .............. ...... .... .. ... .. .. ..... ..... .... ..................... 12 3 Treatment Methodology ... .. ...... ..... .... .. ... ..... .... .. ... .. .. .. ... .. ... .. ... . 13 General Gu idelines ....... .......... ...... .................... ................................................................................ .. .. ... ... .. .. ... 13 3.1 Documentation .. .... ..... ..... .. .......... .... .. ..... .............. . ............................................................................... 14 3.2 Horticul!ural context .. ...... ..... ........... ..... .. ... .. .... .... ... ... .. ... .. .... .... ..... .. .. .. ... .. .... ..... .. ... ........ .. .................... 14 3.3 Treatment Grading ... . ........... .............. .. ... .. ... ..... .. ... ... .. .. ... .. ... ..... .. ... ..... . ............. 14 3.4 Treatment Map. .. . .. .................................................................. .... ..... .... 17 4 Condit ion Assessment of The Hope Abbey Mausoleum ........... .. ... .. ........ .. .......... ... .. .. .......... .. .... ................. 18 4.1 General Description ........................................................................................................ .. ......... .... ..... .. . 18 4.2 Setting ..... .. .... .. ... ... ... .. .... ...... .... ..... .. .... ..... ...... ..... .. .... .......... .. .... ..... . ....... .. ........................................... 19 4.3 Cond ition Assessment ... .. ... .. ... .. .... ... ... .. ... .. ... .. .... .. ... .. ... ... ... .. ... ..... .... .. .... ..... .......................................... 19 4.4 Deterioration Map ....................................................................................... .. ... ..... .. ... ..... .. ... ...... .. ...... 21 5 Hope Abbey Mausoleum Treatment Suggestions ............................................. .... .... .. ... .. .. ....... ... .. ... .. ........ .. . 23 S.l General cleaning ... .. .... ..... .. .... ..... .. ... .. ... .. .... ..... .. .... ..... .. .................................................... ..... .. ... .. ... ..... .. 23 5.2 Graffiti Treatments ... ························ .... .... .. ... ..... ....... 23 5.3 General Description of a Poultice ... .. 23 5.4 Copper (cuprous) Sta in Treatment ..................................................................................................... 24 5.S Iron (ferric) Stain Treatments ... .. ..... 24 S.6 Efflorescence Removal .... .. ... .. ... .......................................... ... .. ............................................................ 24 5.7 Repainting ..... .. .......... 25 5.8 Cracking monitoring .. .. ....... 26 6 Proprietary Products .. ... 26 6.1 Orvus WA Paste ... . ······ ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ·· ··· ··· ·· ·· ·· ··· ···· ······ ······· ··············· 26 6.2 D2 Biological Solution . ... ...... .. ...... ..... .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .... .. .. ....... ................................................................. 27 6.3 Akemi Akepoll 5010 Knife Grade Epolly Adhesive ... .. ... .. ... .... .... 27 6.4 200 lime-Solv ....... .. ..... .... ....... .... .... .......... ... ... .. ... .. .. ........ ... .. ... ... .. .. ....... ...... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .... .. .... .. .. .. .. 29 7 Mortar ............. ................. .. ........ .... .. .. ........... .. .. ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....... .. .. ... ... ........... ..................................... 29 7.1 Resetting & Repair ...... .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. ... . .. .. ... ................................................................................ 30 7.2 Necessary Tools .......... .. ...... ..... .... .......... ... .... ....... .... ... .. ................. ......... ........ ..... ... .... .... .. .. ... .... .. .. .. ... . 30 7 .3 Recessed Slot... .. .. .. .. ..... .. .. ... .... ........ .... .... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . 30 7.4 Stacked ............. .................. .... .... .. ........ ......... .. .. .. .. .. .. ... ... .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. ... .. .... . .. .. . .. .......................... 31 7.5 Void Patching ... ··· ··· ···· ··········· ·· ·· ·· ···· ·· ·· ··· · ···· ·· ···· ··· ··· ·· ··· ·························································· 31 8 Repainting .... ...... .. .. ...... .... .. .. .. ....... .... .. ....... .. .. .. .... .. ... . .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ............................................................... 31 8.1 Current state.. .. .. .. ....... .. .. .. 31 8.2 Repainting Methodology ... . ..... .. .. .. ... . 32 9 Maintenance .. . .. ............. .... 32 10 Advocacy .. . . .. . ··· ·· ·· ·· ·· ··· ········· ·· ·· ··· ·· ·· ··· · 33 11 Condition and Treatment Recordation Forms ... . ............... .. 34 12 References ... .. .......... .. ... .... .............. .. ... .. .. 194 13 Appendix A - Maps of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery ............................................................................ 195 14 Appendix B - Blank Survey and Treatment Forms .. ... .... ........................................................................... 198 15 Appendix C - Material Safety Data Sheets ...... .......................................................................................... 214 1 PROJECT OVERVI EW 1.1 PROBLEM STATEMENT Grave markers as a historic resource occupy a very unique context since the setting of these artifacts is typically open to the elements and highly accessible to the public. Due to deferred maintenance, vandalism, inappropriate repairs, and the relentless weather, the historic grave markers of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery (EMC) are under threat of deterioration and eventual loss. The grave markers not only impart the historic significance that defines the Eugene Masonic Cemetery, but also serve as the tangible legacy of those whom they represent, including many of the original settlers of Eugene. Historic cemeteries often struggle to acquire the resources necessary to create and execute a consistent and comprehensive maintenance plan. This was temporarily abated when it became a study within the Historic Preservation program of the School of Architecture and Allied Arts at the University of Oregon with the support of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association (EMCA). The tested treatments cited in this report can be applied to future maintenance and restoration programs in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery as well as other historic cemeteries of similar context. Future treatments, however, should be undertaken solely by a professional, who fully understands the treatment plans and products in this report. 1.2 PROJECT GOALS It is the aim of this project to document historic grave markers, apply historically conscious conservation treatments and inform EMCA as to their efficacy. Necessary tools, chemicals and equipment wilt be listed and the cost of individual proprietary products will be documented. This document can be consulted for future projects undertaken by the Eugene Masonic cemetery. In the course of treatment testing the project produced grave markers that have been carefully cleaned and restored. As a result, these markers serve as examples of the positive impact of an active preservation plan. 1.3 BRIEF H ISTORICAL BACKGROUND The land upon which the Eugene Masonic Cemetery is locat ed was part of a 320-acre Donation Land Claim owned by Fielding McMurray. The Eugene Masonic Cemetery was established in 18SO by McMurray and the first burials are believed to have taken place shortly after. The first recorded burial, however, was not until 1854 for a 22-year old Elizabeth H. Parsons. The Free Masons fraternal organization did not invest in the cemetery until April 2, 18S9. Masonic Lodge No. 11, established in 1856, deemed the McMurray property ideal for a cemetery in 1857. The Masonic Lodge originally purchased 6 acres from McMurray at a cost of $200 and the provision for a McMurray Family plot. That same month, the purchased acreage was surveyed and laid out in 20' x 20' lots with 8-foot wide alleys. Four of the six acres were designated for Masons and the other two were to be sold to the general public. Lots were sold at a cost of $15 per unit with Masons getting first priority. One hundred plots were sold with four reserved for transient and/or poor Masons. The public lots were offered to Eugene citizens starting April 30, 1859. October of that year saw the purchase of an additional four acres. The Eugene Masonic Cemetery is historically rich in the context of the establishment of the city of Eugene and the greater area. A clay pit, located at the northeast corner of the property, provided bricks that would be used in the construction of Deady Hall (1876) and Villard Hall (1885), the first two buildings of the University of Oregon and both National Historic Landmarks. Many of the areas pioneers, founders, legislators, merchants and businessmen of prominence now rest in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. The design of the cemetery, while plotted in a grid, very much reflected the Rural Cemetery movement of the mid to late 19th century. Graves set in a romantic landscape was a rebuttal to overcrowded and deteriorating cemeteries of the country's metropolitan areas. Meandering paths, ornamental plantings and an overall naturalistic feel characterize Eugene Masonic Cemetery and other rural cemeteries of the era. On November 12, 1912, the Eugene Masonic Lodge contracted the Portland Mausoleum Company to build a mausoleum and sell crypts starting at $200. Ellis Fuller Lawrence, an architect of local prominence, was responsible for the design of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. Lawrence served as the first dean of the University of Oregon's School of Architecture and Allied Arts from 1914-1917. The Hope Abbey Mausoleum is a rare example of Egyptian Revival architecture in a region in which a more classically inspired architectural aesthetic is more Construction of the mausoleum commenced on the western edge of the cemetery property in September of 1913. Work was finished and the building dedicated June 4, 1914. The Eugene Masonic Lodge deeded the Eugene Masonic Cemetery and the Hope Abbey Mausoleum to the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association in February of 1995. By this time, the cemetery was in a poor state of repair and required the concerted efforts of the EMCA, the University of Oregon Historic Preservation Program, the City of Eugene, the Lane County Historical Society, and Lane Community College. Since the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association has accepted responsibility for the cemetery's maintenance there has been a notable improvement in the condition of the historic landscape, markers, and mausoleum. Ml/SONIC - CEMETERY '" s"" 5 r,11 .5 ll.J. W L/iN[ COllNTf, OHeuoN 2 CONDITION ASSESSM ENT OF THE MASONIC CEMETERYG RAVE MARKERS 2.1 MATERIALS & TYPES The grave markers of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery represent a variety of materials undergoing various deterioration issues that require individual treatment considerations. The most prevalent material in the cemetery is marble, although there are a multitude of markers comprised of granite, sandstone, precast and cast-in- place concrete, bronze, and zinc. CJ\STBRONZE Grave markers found in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery exhibiting elements of bronze are typically bevel markers. Cast Zinc The cast zinc markers within the Eugene Masonic Cemetery are products of the Monumental Bronze Co. and occupy a production range from 1874 to 1939. Zinc as a material is very resistant to weathering deterioration. Whereas cast iron, copper, and bronze in a cemetery setting often corrode when unattended, cast zinc can remain corrosion-free for decades. The primary deterioration issue faced by the cast zinc markers and monuments in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery is vandalism as evidenced by missing inscription panels. ·""'·,,• , •. , ...~ .,..,.,/fl..L~~~' ' ·- ' 'b~•- ' '1.f~7i! -- ~::_ .... Granite is an igneous rock, granular in teKture, and consisting mainly of quartz, mica, and feldspar. EKamples of granite in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery range in color and grain size. :~;_-I:~·:d·. ;. .~.... ~_.. __. :.(·.= _;;.;~ .·, . ~. Those markers comprised of granite are usually more recent additions to the cemetery given the stone's difficult tooling II' . . that would have made historic production eKpensive and less . . __ , - popular. Granite markers are weathering much more gently ', ' than other stones in the cemetery, a beneficial characteristic of _ ., . , the naturally resilient stone. '· ~:f ., -, MARBLE Marble is a non-foliated metamorphic stone comprised of recrystallized carbonate minerals, mostly calcite or dolomite. Variations in crystalline structure results in grave markers that vary in aesthetic and weathering patterns. By far the most prevalent stone in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery, marble was the most treated material in this 2013-2014 restoration project. SANDSTONE Sandstone is a sedimentary rock formed by the compression of accumulated layers of sediment. Sandstone, as found in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery, is used as bases for the various grave markers. Being in contact with the ground they are in most cases plagued by invasive plant material and moisture related deterioration issues. There is a particular type of sandstone in the cemetery that is very soft and is rapidly deteriorating. Invasive root systems of moss and sma!I plant life are able to penetrate the stone, prompting exfoliation and often causing large layers of stone material to fall away from the base. This, in turn, weakens the assembly as a whole . .-~-,-\S.i!.- ~?,l'c!'i.'. •. ,r;-:~,-;;----.-, Forms present include tablets, obelisks, bevel markers, flush markers, ledgers, and monuments. The form, design, and ornamentation of these markers are integral in the interpretation of the respective individual's or family's socioeconomic status, as well as overarching historic trends. Regardless of form or material, the entirety of Eugene Masonic :_-, ,. ., .~-.= Cemetery's grave markers is suffering from invasive biological material, vandalism, weathering, improper maintenance or a combination of these issues. 2.2 INVASIVE BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS As a pioneer era cemetery the Eugene Masonic Cemetery maintains a minimally controlled landscape. This has less to do with negligence or deferred maintenance and more to do with retaining a specific aesthetic. While a character defining feature of the cemetery, the p!ant life, when left unchecked can greatly expedite the deterioration of the historic grave markers. Larger plants such as bushes, grasses, and trees can pose multiple threats to historic markers. Root systems from plants, trees in particular, can tilt, dislodge, and topple grave markers and their enclosures. Markers upset by root systems often experience greater amounts of stress both internally and externally. A tilted marker will bear weight differently, placing stresses on elements of a masonry assembly not intended to support such loads. These stresses can contribute to mortar joint failure, cracking, and fragmentation of the stone. Roots and fallen branches can place pressure on points of a stone, resulting in cracking, fragmentation or collapse. 10 Dense foliage can also obscure markers, making them harder to locate and maintain. Extensive flora also keeps many markers perpetually shaded and damp. This creates an environment ideal for the growth of lichen, moss, and smaller biological growth. lichen, moss, and biological growth, while not immediately detrimental to stone assemblies, can contribute greatly to the deterioration of grave markers over time. Such growth often keeps moisture in contact with the stone including, in some cases, biological acids which over time can etch the stone and dull polished surfaces. Accumulation of moss also contributes to material and mortar loss as the root systems seek sources of moisture. Tenacious roots will grow into and loosen mortar joints. Many markers throughout the cemetery have elements inhabited, if not covered by moss and lichen. There are multiple bases throughout the cemetery crafted from sedimentary stones that have experienced significant material loss due to biological growth. The sandstone bases that are so common in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery have been subject to delamination and spalling as invasive root systems creep through the sedimentary layers of the stone. Smaller biological growth inhabits the porous surfaces of stones often expressing itself in the discoloration and staining of the grave markers. 2.3 WEATHERING AND POLLUTION Wind, rain and freeze-thaw cycles all play a role in advancing the deterioration of stone and joints. Rain water can penetrate pores, cracks, and joints then expand when frozen thus leading to spalling, further cracking, fragmentation, and joint failure. Luckily, temperatures seldom drop below freezing in the Willamette Valley, so freeze-thaw cycles are not a key concern, yet they must still be considered. Given the high annual rainfall in Eugene the Masonic Cemetery is most at risk from water and the associated deterioration issues. Airborne pollution can also play a role in the deterioration of stone in cemeteries. Acidic airborne gases are a product of the combustion of solid fuels and oils. This type of soiling results in a tar-like build-up on a stone surface which will create a prominent stain. The most aggressive form of airborne gases is sulphur dioxide (502) which is water soluble (HiO·S03). The accumulation of this acidic gas on a marble surface will eventually form a layer of gypsum. When exposed to rain this layer will wash away, removing any polish the marble once had. In the case of this cemetery, there little risk of damage via airborne pollution given the cemetery's suburban environment and dense tree cover. 11 2.4 VANDALISM AND PUBLIC TRAFFIC The most immediate and destructive form of damage visible in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery is vandalism. There have been periods of heightened vandalism in recent history that has seen many grave markers toppled, broken, and obscured with graffiti. Theft has also caused some grave markers to be dispersed across the neighboring counties. In some cases these markers have been returned, but unfortunately stolen markers are more often permanently lost. Recent efforts by the Eugene Masonic Cemetery have deterred vandalism. Heightened neighborhood interest in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery has increased foot-traffic through the grounds as well as a sense of local pride for the historic resource. Public presence and pride in the cemetery has further deterred vandalism. White public use of the grounds is desired, it also brings more people into contact with the historic grave markers and Hope Abbey Mausoleum, leading to potential and additional damage. Markers along walkways have seen more damage than those set further back, be it from vandals, oils deposited from human touch, or salt deposition from canine urine. Smaller markers, and those that have been oriented along the ground are often stepped upon further damaging their surfaces. This has forced relocation of multiple markers to safer distances from the public walkways, an unfortunate but often necessary departure from their historic setting and context. 2.5 IMPROPER MAINTENANCE & RESTORATION Throughout the Eugene Masonic Cemetery's recent history, it has been subject to improper maintenance and restoration attempts. These treatments, although surely well-intentioned, in the best cases impede proper treatment and in the worst, contribute or accelerate deterioration. The creation of this document is meant, in part, to inform those conducting future restoration and maintenance undertakings as to proper, and effective practices. Multiple episodes of improper or sloppy restoration projects are visible in all areas of the cemetery. During this 2013-14 restoration project, any evidence of prior restoration has been documented and assessed for performance. 12 Improper mortar mixes, poorly handled epoxies, and commercial grade caulk have been noted in multiple resetting and repainting attempts throughout the cemetery. Many markers that have been reset have previously been carelessly worked upon, producing canted or off-center settings, bases splattered with mortar, and joints that cannot properly function. Unfortunately, many of these procedures are not reversible without causing further damage to the historic material. There are several phases of epoxy applications that have varied in performance, but the majority have not been matched for color and often overflow from the repair area onto previously sound material. While improper maintenance can greatly accelerate deterioration, deferred maintenance is the most common, and in some ways, the most detrimental deterioration issue that historic cemeteries face. With scarce funding grave marker maintenance is often one of the first duties abandoned by cemetery maintenance personnel. While understandable, such deferment is extremely detrimental to the resources that define a historic cemetery. A well maintained grave marker can serve as very tangible example of the benefits of charitable donations. It is the goal of this restoration project to produce grave markers that can serve as examples of proper maintenance. In turn, additional markers that can be cleaned and repaired with the aid of local donors. It must be emphasized that each grave marker behaves uniquely in its setting and response to treatments. Therefore it is essential that, irrespective of one marker's similarity to another, each marker be approached, analyzed, and treated individually. 3 TREATMENT METHODOLOGY GENERAL GUIDELINES The goal of this project is to restore the historic grave markers and conserve their historic material by the gentlest means possible. With only one person researching, testing and executing the treatment program the procedures were simple and conservative in scope by necessity. All treatments administered were designed to comply with the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation. Chemicals and tools were carefully chosen with consideration for the ambient environment and long-term welfare of the historic materials. Any action taken on an individual marker was aimed to be in line with its historic design, reversible when possible, and fully documented. When considering a conservation method that may alter the condition of a grave marker, the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association was consulted so as to more closely adhere to their set preservation and landscaping plan. 13 3.1 DOCUMENTATION Each grave marker slated for treatment was documented before, during, and after treatment. This ensures a record of the treatments performed and the efficacy of those treatments for consideration in future maintenance. A survey form was adapted from the National Center for Preservation Technology and Training for the purpose of recording the condition of each grave marker, the treatments they underwent, the effectiveness of said treatments, as well as recommendations and considerations for further maintenance and restoration. Photography and written descript ions are essential for the accurate documentation of any such preservation undertaking. 3.2 HORTICULTURAL CONTEXT While the Hope Abbey Mausoleum and the grave markers that occupy its grounds are significant to its historical value, the Eugene Masonic Cemetery is also characterized by its lush and diverse plant life. So in the preservation of the cemetery's grave markers the surrounding horticultural landscape must be addressed. Retention of the flora was integral in the selection of treatments and chemicals to be employed in the restoration project. When using chemicals that pose a threat to the plant life they were adequately diluted, properly disposed of, and avoided when possible. 3.3 TREATMENT GRADING For the sake of the 2013-2014 restoration project grave markers selected for treatment have been categorized into three tiers of treatment based on condition with Tier 1 being the least invasive and Tier 3 being the most invasive. Treatment grading allows for organization of work days so necessary chemicals, mortars, treatments and man-hours can be more efficiently allocated. TIER 1 : (LEANING This treatment tier represents a treatment regimen that can be replicated as a regular maintenance procedure. It includes the mechanica l removal of invasive plant materials, cleansing with Orvus WA Paste, and stain removal with D2 Biological Solution. This treatment tier can be repeated by individuals of low skill with minimal risk to the historic resources as long as the treatments are carried out according to chemical specifications and recommendations presented in this document. Oivus WA Paste is used in this project to address heavy soiling. When treating a marker that has undergone regular cleaning a detergent can be avoided in favor of clean water. 14 NECESSARY TOOLS Brushes- Nylon or natural bristle brushes are used for clearing stones of soiling and applying an Orvus solution. Smaller brushes or toothbrushes are used to clean finer detailing such as inscriptions or relief carvings. Gallon buckets - Two S gallon buckets, one filled with clean water and the other with approximately½ cup of Orvus WA Paste in 3-4 gallons of water were used for cleaning. The clean water was used to wet the stone as well as clean brushes before being resaturated with the Orvus mixture, this kept the Orvus mixture from becoming too soiled, ensuring its use for multiple markers. Hoses- Two 100 foot hoses were useful in transporting water to the work site as well as for wetting and rinsing resources. Pressure control nozzle - A brass pressure nozzle attached to the hoses allowed for control of water flow as well as the pressure of water. Note: Pressurized water must be carefully controlled; pressure washer use is not advised for historic grave markers as the pressure is often too strong and can accelerate stone deterioration. The second treatment tier represents procedures that require a higher level of skill and are necessitated by the historic resource's highly deteriorated condition. Procedures in this tier classification include leveling of a tilted marker, assembly of a toppled resource, raking and repainting of compromised masonry joints, and graffiti removal when necessary. This tier of treatment should not be approached by anyone lacking conservation or masonry experience and requires multiple people working together to ensure safety of the marker and personnel involved. Note: Leveling a tilted marker is a very labor-intensive process and should only be approached by those in good health capable of lifting heavy loads utilizing proper lifting posture and braces when necessary. NECESSARY TOOLS Industrial pry-bars - Large-scale pry bars are essential if larger stone assemblies are to be righted. It is important to cushion the contact between stone and pry-bar with a piece of lumber (small lengths of 2x4 suffice). Where pressure is applied to the stone is also key as one can easily crack or fracture a stone if a corner undergoes too much localized pressure. Such pry-bars can be rented from construction equipment purveyors. Gravel- Uniform gravel is necessary and must be packed beneath a grave marker so as to facilitate water drainage and avoid soil shifting. 15 Lumber - Pieces of 2x4 lumber are used to shim the stone in question, cushion the contact between stone and pry-bar, act as a fulcrum for the pry bar and to pack the gravel beneath the stone base. Sledge Hammer -A sledge hammer is useful in gently positioning shims beneath a marker, as well as tamping the soil and gravel. Tamping was accomplished by striking a piece of lumber that was laid flat along the ground. By repeating this action, the gravel was uniformly flattened and compacted. Bubble Level or Plumb Bob-This tool, used to determine a grave marker's position relative to plumb, is essential if one is to accurately right a tilted marker. Shovel - Shovels allow the removal of soil around a marker so leveling can take place. Mortar tools- Specified under the 'Mortar' Section of this document. TIER 3: REASSEMBLY This most demanding treatment tier is applied to those historic resources requiring reassembly or material consolidation. Individuals involved in this tier of treatment should be required to have a working knowledge of the chemicals and treatments needed. The condition of resources classified as needing Tier 3 treatment is often very poor and requires great care in handling. Reassembiy of fragmented markers in this project was accomplished with Akemi Akepox 5010. NECESSARY TOOLS Disposable Gloves- Latex gloves are necessary to protect oneself from contact with epoxy. Epoxy poses several health hazards and must be handled with care. Clamps - When bonding two pieces of stone it is important to support them with pieces of lumber held in place by clamps. This pressure to make a tight fit. Masking Tape -Applied around a joint to be bonded so as to catch any excess epoxy overilow. Disposable Cups- Used for mixing the epoxy components Scrapers or Razor Blades - Used for removing excess epoxy 16 3.4 TREATMENT MAP The map below is adapted from the 1962 amended plat map to show treatment locations. 17 4 CONDITION AsSESSMENT OF THE HOPE A BBEY M AUSOLEUM Since the Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association took responsibility for maintenance of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery and the Hope Abbey Mausoleum in 1995, much work has been done to restore the decrepit mausoleum to its original splendor. In order to better inform the EMCA in future maintenance and conservation treatments of the mausoleum visible deterioration issues were noted, and photographed. Assessment was carried out on the central entrance pylon by David Espinosa and Julia Larson, Historic Preservation Master of Science candidate. Removal of efflorescence was carried out by David Espinosa and suggestions for further cleaning and treatments of individual deterioration issues have been submitted by Julia Larson and David Espinosa. In relation to the 2013-2014 restoration project, the assessment and Treatment of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum was executed under the same treatment methodology. 4.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The Hope Abbey Mausoleum is part of Eugene Masonic Cemetery at 25th Ave & University Street in Eugene, OR built in the 2nd phase of Egyptian Revival Style from 1913-1914. The architect was Lawrence & Holford, Associates with the chief designer being E. F. Lawrence. It has a rectangular plan with a concrete foundation and the main supporting walls are poured in concrete with horizontal wood molds. The primary window type is a steel fixed sash. The center of the west elevation includes a central pylon in cast stone with a cast stone parapet wall. The pylon includes a central doorway including three sets of reeds within the doorway. Decorative bands are evenly placed going up the wait and culminates with an Egyptian revival eagle's wings motif at the top. A flared cornice is a prominent feature around the top of the entire building. An ADA accessible entrance ramp and stair is a newer addition. The building sits at the edge of the hilltop with some mature trees, new growth and mature and new vegetation around the building. The Hope Abbey Mausoleum and Masonic Cemetery was listed in the National Register of Historic Places and as a Eugene Historic Landmark in 1980. The Mausoleum was Ellis Lawrence's first building in Eugene, and one of the first two of five mausoleums, which he built in Oregon. It is also Oregon's oldest example of "Egyptian" style architecture. 18 ~ l - lliilllf:lj==-=--=i:=1- , . - . 4.2 SITTING The Hope Abbey Mausoleum is located at the western edge of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery with the cemetery hill to the rear (East) of the mausoleum and the South University neighborhood to the front (West). The Mausoleum sits on a negative slope of moderate grade. A service road runs along the west, north, and east facades of the building and plantings are present along the west and north. Ornamental Egyptian Revival urns flank the entrance. These are constructed of cast stone. Petal elements have been recently replaced, a repair made apparent by variations in color and texture between the original and new elements. The original steps leading to the entrance have been replaced with ADA accessible concrete ramps designed by the current Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Historic Architect, Dennis Hellesvig. 4.3 CONDITION AssESSMENT EFFLORESCENCE lime efflorescence ;s visible throughout the central pylon assembly with large tails of white efflorescence emanating from joints at multiple locations. The northern face of the pylon is experiencing heavy efflorescence above the parapet wall. Cupric staining is visible below the flashing and is evidence of the original copper flashing. This greenish~blue staining cavetto cornice's fluting. This is not an ongoing problem but rather the remnants of staining from the no-longer extant copper flashing. Possible ferrous staining is visible below the wing and disk ornament. Closer inspection is needed. If proven to be ferrous staining the source could be deteriorating cramps, or rebar. It is also possible that this red staining is red biological growth. BIOLOGICAL G ROWTH Orange-red biological growth is present in various locations of the central pylon, most notable on the north facing surfaces, likely due to those surfaces experiencing less sunlight. Many small cracks exist throughout the masonry and have been noted in previous condition assessments. These are likely a result of the building settling and do not appear to affect the stability of the structure as a whole. JOINT FAILURE There are several distinct mortars used in the cast stone assembly indicated by variations in color, sand grain size, and performance. Joint deterioration and failure is present in several areas of the pylon, most notably along the southern edge of the entrance moulding. ROOF The original copper flashing has been replaced with painted steel flashing. The new flashing is performing well and will not contribute to the cupric staining left behind from the original flashing. A vinyl impermeable layer has been installed over the entirety of the roof. There is no apparent tears or breaches in the layer, but a more extensive analysis is required. 20 4.4 DETERIORATION MAP \ J 21 (!:!}Mon¥•aiil11f'1' lliiil "'°""'""' §cupncs.._.. 22 5 HOPE ABBEY MAUSOLEUM TREATMENT SUGGESTIONS The following treatment recommendations will not only improve the entrance pylon of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum aesthetically, but should contribute to a more water-tight envelope and longer lifespan of the historic resource. 5.1 GENERALCLEANING A gentle cleaning program is recommended to remove soiling, biological growth and diminish graffiti presence on the central pylon of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. A mild anionic detergent, such as Orvus WA Paste is recommended. Clean water and detergent should be gently applied to the stone via a natural bristle or nylon bristle scrubbing brush. After cleaning the entire assembly should be thoroughly rinsed with clean water. Pressure washing is not recommended as excessive pressure will likely remove historic material and contribute to deterioration. 5.2 GRAFFITI TREATMENTS As noted above, graffiti is exhibited on both the side reed panels within the doorway. The medium used to make the markings include felt markers, pencils, pens, and other unknown mediums. The markings are of various letters and shapes. It is recommended that a poultice be used to remove the markings as it is the most gentle means of removing the markings and most versatile to respond to the specific marking. If needed a poultice also allows a paint stripper to remain in contact with the defaced stone for long periods of time. Mixtures of a water-soluble paint stripper and powder-inert clays applied to the graffiti and sealed with a plastic film have had varying levels of success with historic stone and should be tested on site to account for the age of the graffiti, as well as the condition of the stone. 5.3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF A POULTICE A poultice consists of an absorbent material, powder-inert clay, or cellulose product, combined with a cleaning solution to form a paste or slurry. The purpose of a poultice is twofold: it enables a cleaning solution to be kept in contact with the stained area as long as possible, while allowing the cleaning solution to pull the staining material out of the substrate via the poultice without redepositing it in, or restaining, the stone. The term poultice, originally derived from the medical practice of applying a medicine pack to the body to fight infection, covers a range of cleaning techniques more accurately broken down into 'true' or 'plain' poultices and 'chemical' or 'active' poultices. A 'true' or 'plain' poultice is typically used for desalination, the removal of soluble salt deposits from the stone substrate. This is achieved with a simple mixture of clay and water. The salt is drawn out from the stone into the poultice through capillary action with the moisture as the mixture is allowed to dry. An 'active' or 'chemical' poultice is created through the modification of a plain poultice in order to remove a specific type of soiling or contaminant that would otherwise be insoluble in water. Active poultices can be engineered for specific purposes. These targeted applications can remove a range of contaminants, from graffiti to metal stains. 23 When dealing with a particularly stubborn stain or soiling it is recommended to cover the applied poultice (plain or active) with plastic. A plastic f ilm w ill slow the drying process of the poultice thereby allowing it to draw more ofthe contaminant from the targeted stone. 5.4 COPPER (CUPROUS) STAIN TREATMENT The cupric stains on the Mausoleum are located on the parapet wall and coping on the cornice of the central pylon. This staining is due to the deterioration of the original copper flashing. The original copper flashing has since been replaced with metal sheeting. A poultice can be used to address the existing cupric stain. For copper stains on marble a mixture of 1 part dry ammonium chloride and 4 parts powdered talc or attapulgite or sepiolite clay with a 10% solution of ammonia water can be used. This mixture should be reliable on cast stone, but should be tested on site before extensive use. The mixture can be applied to the stain pre-wet with clean water then left to dry. Once dry, remove the paste with a non-metallic scraper or spatula and rinse the treatment area thoroughly with water. Repeat as necessary. 5.5 IRON (FERRIC) STAIN TREATMENTS Possible Ferric stains or stains caused by the deterioration of iron are located on the parapet wall and cornice of the central pylon of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum, most notably under the Egyptian revival eagle wing and disk motif. Historic masonry stained by iron usually responds well to a poultice containing a solution of 1 part sodium citrate and 6 parts water to an equal volume of glycerin. M ix this solution with attapulgite clay and apply to the stained area and leave until the paste is dry. Once dry the poultice can be removed with a wood or plastic scraper or spatula and the process repeated as necessary. In the face of a stubborn stain the surface can be pre-wetted with a solution of 1 part sodium citrate and 6 parts water. Next an attapulgite poultice containing sodium dithionite should be applied. Once dried and removed the treatment area must be thoroughly cleaned with water. 5.6 EFFLORESCENCE REMOVAL While mostly an aesthetic problem, removal of efflorescence is recommended. Heavy deposits of efflorescence can lead to deterioration of the stone as well as diminish the posterity of a National Register resource. The efflorescence emanating from the joints of the cast stone pylon can be removed with the application of a lime solvent. Proper application involves an ample source of clean water, personal protection equipment, and adherence to product specifications. Ume-Solv, an efflorescence solvent, was tested on the efflorescence of the entrance pylon. A test patch was chosen on Dav,d E!ipmos.a ienmg t,me-Solv on effloreuence the north side of the assembly behind an ornamental urn. The surface of the stone was thoroughly wetted before Ume-Solv was applied with a chip brush. Protective 24 eyewear, gloves, and mask were worn during application as the product can cause irritation and burns upon contact with eyes, skin, and mucosa. Once applied to efflorescence a light foaming action occurs. The product was allowed to dwell upon the efflorescence for 1-3 minutes per product specifications. The area was then rinsed with clean water ensuring that the product, and any contaminated water were washed to the ground and diluted to environmentally acceptable levels. The test area showed successful removal of lime efflorescence and no visible damage to the historic stone. After testing proved successful the application process was repeated on the west face of the entrance with success. Heavy deposits of efflorescence required repeated application in conjunction with mechanical removal of efflorescence using a plastic or wooden scraper. While lime solvent application will remove the efflorescence, it will not remove the catalyst of efflorescence. The roof envelope should be thoroughly evaluated for leaks as moisture penetration is the primary cause of efflorescence development. Along with repainting, a water-tight roof will deter further efflorescence growth. The current efflorescence has accumulated over many years. Thanks to a new impermeable layer installed on the roof the efflorescence may no longer be accumulating. Ef/lore:.unce pre-treotmrnt 5.7 REPOINTING Several phases of mortar repair are visible on the central pylon of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. Variations in color, grain size, and f/fk,re5,cence ?Mt-treatment performance are evidence of different phases and masons. Before repainting can be undertaken all mortar joints should be assessed for performance. Once assessment is complete those joints that are failing should be raked to a depth approximately twice the height of the joint then thoroughly cleaned with clean water. Once raked and cleaned repainting can take place. A historically conscious mortar should be implemented in the repainting process. A mortar mixture consisting of Hydrated Lime and clean sand is the most historically appropriate and should be applied by an experienced mason. 25 Repointing will make the masonry assembly water-tight, aesthetically consistent, and will deter the growth of invasive plant materials. 5.8 (RACKING MONITORING The cracking noted on the west face of the central pylon masonry assembly does not appear to be actively advancing and is likely a product of the building settling. These cracks have been noted and should be monitored. If new cracks form or the current cracks grow in size the masonry assembly should be reassessed and a mitigation procedure created. 6 PROPRIETARY PRODUCTS 6.1 0RVUS WA PASTE Orvus WA Paste is a near-neutral pH, anionic synthetic surfactant and wetting agent produced by Procter and Gamble. The primary component of Orvus is sodium lauryt sulfate, an organic compound widely used in cleaning agents. Salt deposition form use of Orvus WA Paste is not of concern when the treated surface is thoroughly rinsed with clean water. The stone most widely encountered in the cemetery is marble which has a low porosity rendering the problem of salt deposition with Orvus negligible. Runoff containing detergent should be directed away from any historic material and diluted with clean water. This product is applied in a solution with clean water as a cleansing agent. Applied with a nylon or natural- bristled scrubbing brush the solution is gentle and effective in cleaning the surface of stone markers, removing accumulated soiling, and eradicating foreign biological material. A clean 5-gallon bucket filled with 3 to 4 gallons of clean water and approximately 1/2 cup of Orvus WA Paste was sufficient for the cleaning of multiple markers depending on the level of soiling. This solution should be diluted and disposed of according to the manufacturer's specifications once the solution becomes opaque. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The use of Orvus WA Paste was very successful in every application. Materials in the Masonic Cemetery treated with Orvus from October of 2013 to May of 2014 all currently exhibit stable surfaces, largely clear of soiling. One 7.5 lb. container of Orvus WA Paste serviced over 30 markers with approximately 4 lbs. of paste remaining. As a gentle, reliable, and cost-effective tool it is recommended that this be used in fu t ure maintenance programs as specified in this document. Cost: $20-$40 per 7.5 lb. container {depending on supplier) 26 6.2 D2 BIOLOGICAL SOLUTION D2 Biological Solution is a biodegradable, non-mutagenic, pH neutral quaternary ammonium solution. D2 Biological Solution is effective in the removal of stains caused by mold, algae, mildew, lichens, and air pollutants. It can be effectively applied to a wide variety of architectural materials including those compr ising the grave markers of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. D2 is considered non-toxic if swallowed and requires no special ventilation or personal protection during use. It is also very gentle on vegetation and can be applied undiluted or in solution. There are two methods of application, one producing more immediate results and the other requiring less physical labor while producing results within one week to one month. IMMEDIATE RESULT METHOD Apply 02 Biological Solution to a pre-wetted surface with a brush, roller, or low pressure sprayer. Allow D2 Biological Solution to dwell on surface for 10-15 minutes. Apply additional D2 Biological Solution as necessary to maintain a wet surface. Scrub surface with a soft nylon or natural bristle brush. Mist the surface with water and continue scrubbing. Rinse thoroughly with dean water. No SCRUB/No RINSE METHOD Wet entire surface with 02 Biological Solution via low-pressure sprayer. Allow to air dry. *The treatment executed by David Espinosa during the 2013-2014 restoration project utilized the 'Immediate Result Method' of D2 application. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION 02 Biological Solution was instrumental in the removal of stains and biological growth across the range of stone materials in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. Effectiveness varied based on the level of staining and the tenacity of application. With multiple applications stains can be effectively muted if not virtually removed. One gallon of D2 Biological Solution serviced over 30 markers effectively with approximately¼ gallon remaining. Cost: $40 per 1 gallon container (depending on supplier) 6.3 AKEMI AKEPOX 5010 KNIFE GRADE EPOXY ADHESIVE Akemi epoxy products were selected at the recommendation of Christine Djuric, a Conservator for the New York City Arts & Antiquities Department, and after consultation with a representative from Akemi Group. Akepox 5010 is a gel-like, two-component adhesive epoxy resin with a cycloaliphatic hardener. It is solvent free, subject to minimal shrinkage and minimal yellowing. It is designed for outdoor application and experiences little fatigue over t ime. When mixed in a 2:1 ratio, the components have a very 27 neutral color that can be altered with a coloring kit to accurately match the targeted stone. With minimal shrinkage during curing tension forces at the joint are avoided. It is suitable for a load-bearing joint and once cured, poses no health threats upon contact. Prior to curing, Akemi Akepox 5010 can cause skin and eye irritation. A ventilated or open-air workspace is recommended to avoid fume inhalation. It is also toxic to aquatic life and must be disposed of appropriately. It is a very viscous material that can be easily controlled upon application and performs well with a very thin coating. The mixture remains workable for 20-30 minutes at an ambient temperature of 20 degrees Celsius. After approximately 6-8 hours of curing at 20 degrees Celsius, 68 degrees Fahrenheit, the bonded parts can be transported and after 12-16, hours they can bear loads and be further tooled. Maximum strength is reached after 7 days. During this project mixing was done in disposable containers wearing protective gloves with plenty of disposable shop towels at hand. Once mixed and matched for color, it was applied in a thin layer upon both surfaces that were to be bonded. When extensive material loss created voids or gaps that could not be bridged by layering, a plastic bag was filled with the Akepox mixture and piped into location in a manner similar to how one would use a pastry bag. Masking tape was placed around the joint to catch any drips that would be carefully removed with a scraper or razor blade. Once the broken pieces were bonded, they were braced with 2x4 lumber supports held in place by clamps. For in situ bonding procedures, caution tape was erected surrounding the treatment area. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The use of Akemi Akepox 5010 allowed for reconstruction of very large and heavy israve markers with confidence. Only individuals with proper training in epoxy application should undertake work involving Akemi Akepox products. When prepared and applied in an equipped and controlled setting, Akepox 5010 was very easy to use and control to create clean joints of low-visibility. This product is highly recommended for future marker reconstruction in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. Cost: MSRP $139.95 for 2 containers (component A=lSOO grams, 8=750 grams) 28 6.4 200 LIME-SOLV 200 Lime-Solv is a blend of organic and inorganic acids, wetting agents, and inhibitors combined to clean and remove residual mortar, lime efflorescence and soluble salt efflorescence. This product was selected for use on the Hope Abbey Mausoleum, in particular the central entrance pylon constructed of cast stone. For application on this material, the product was diluted to 1 part Lime-Solve to 10 parts clean water. The surface to be treated must be pre-wetted with clean water and proper personal protective equipment is necessary. This product was selected to treat the large efflorescence accumulations on the cast stone elements of the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. A test patch was treated on the side of the masonry assembly. Treatment was carried out with a diluted mixture applied with a nat ural bristle chip brush. After an application, the product was allowed to dwell on the treated surface for approximately 3 minutes before being thoroughly washed away with dean water. The surrounding stone was also wetted and washed in order to effectively transport the applied product away from all stone surfaces. Once applied, the digestive action of the product is visible in the form of a foaming action. After testing was deemed successful, large deposit s of lime efflorescence were effectively removed. The process of application is slow and delicate in nature. Care forthe historic material was of the most concern, therefore, thorough rinsing with clean water was carried out rigorously throughout the treatment process. Lime-Solv was only applied to the mausoleum as the setting did not contain much plant life and any run-off could be properly contained and diluted to environmentally acceptable levels. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION After testing proved successful large deposits of lime efflorescence were effectively removed. Given the health risks involved with Lime-Solv application it is imperative that experienced personnel with proper protective gear carry out efflorescence removal with this product. This product is recommended for future treatments but with safety to personnel and historic materials in mind. Note: The removal of lime efflorescence is an aesthetic treatment. While extensive efflorescence build-up can lead to material demineralization, the cause of efflorescence accumulation is water penetration. Until water penetration issues are mitigated efflorescence with continue to accumulate. Cost: $72 .SO for one S gallon drum 7 MORTAR A variety of mortar mixes have been encountered throughout the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. For the 2013-14 restoration project 2 variations of a lime mortar mix were employed. Historically, grave markers and monuments were assembled using a hydrated lime mortar or lime and sand mortar mix. Some original setting 29 and pointing mixes remain in the cemetery as evidence hydrated lime's historicity. The mixtures selected for use in the cemetery came at the recommendation of Sally Donovan, a conservator that has consulted the Eugene Masonic Cemetery in the past. Current hydrated lime mortar mixes now include portions of Portland cement for greater durability but still rely on hydrated lime for softness, flexibility, and permeability. 7.1 RESffilNG & REPAJR There are many markers in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery that require resetting on their base. They may have been subject to vandalism, toppling as a result of the shifting hillside, or deterioration of the base. Mortar application should be performed during temperate weather with ambient temperatures neither too hot nor too cold. Rain will wash away mortar so weather must be considered before resetting, repainting, or void patching. 7.2 NECESSARVTOOL5 Several tools are necessary for proper mortar work. These can range in price but are generally inexpensive, and when properly cared for can service their mason for years. Trowel - Trowels come in several shapes and sizes and are great for laying large amounts of mortar. Jointer- Jointers are used for packing and finishing a mortar joint with a clean consistent surface. These tools often have two varied thicknesses to tool multiple joints. Joint filler/striking toot- Useful for packing mortar into a joint as well as finishing the joint, these come in several thicknesses. Chisels - Essential for the removal of old mortar chisels can be purchased in multiple sizes. Chisel use must be done with care so as not to remove the historic stone material. Sponge -A sponge is useful for pre-wetting a joint or surface to accept mortar as well as cleaning the finished joint. Brush-A natural or nylon bristled brush is useful for removing waste mortar and ensuring excess mortar does not adhere to stone outside the joint. A small chip brush was used to this effect during the 2013-2014 project. Buckets - One gallon buckets are useful for mixing mortar and holding clean water necessary for mortar mixing and joint preparation. 7.3 RECESSED SLOT Grave markers that are to be set into an above ground base that has a recessed slot should utilize this mortar mix after the slot has been properly cleaned and the base made level. 1 part white Portland cement (ASTM C-1S0, Type I) 4 Parts hydrated lime (ASTCM C-207, Type S) 8 Parts clean sand Clean water The final mixture should be made with clean water, using only enough to allow the mix to hang off a trowel when held upside down. A base layer of approximately ½" should be laid evenly across the bottom of the slot. 30 The marker is then placed in the slot with the assistance of wood braces or shims; afterwards, mortar is packed to fill the recessed slot. Care should be taken to ensure that the mortar is beaded or slightly angled so water will not be trapped against the stone. 7.4 STACKED Those grave markers that are comprised of multiple stacked elements utilize a lime mortar mix excluding sand. Stacked markers that still retain their historic mortar exhibited a very thin layer of lime mortar, often with a joint less than a¼ inch in height. The mortar used in this project attempted to match the color, texture and size, while preserving flexibility and water permeability. 1 Part white Portland cement {ASTM C-150, Type I) 3 Parts hydrated lime {ASTM C-207, Type S) Clean water When mixed the mortar should be able to hang from a trowel when held upside down. The two surfaces that are to be bonded should be cleaned and lightly wetted before mortar application to ensure a strong bond. 7.5 VOID PATCHING limited supplies of matching stone fragments rendered void patching during the 2013-14 project impossible. lmprooer void patching is visible throughout the cemetery and should proper materials be inaccessible void patching should not be attempted. When fragments are available, the void patch mix should match the color of the original stone. 2 Parts white Portland cement (ASTM C-150, Type I) 4 Parts hydrated lime (ASTM C-207, Type 5) 7 Parts matching stone dust and grit Clean water 8 REPOINTING 8.1 CURRENTSTATE As of 2014 many stacked markers exhibit joint deterioration, failure, and improper repointing. Several repointing phases are present using materials that are not historically appropriate or are carelessly applied. Portland cement, epoxy resins, and bathroom caulking are examples of inappropriate materials used for repointing in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. While epoxy resins are inappropriate for re pointing they are useful and appropriate the reassembly of broken markers as specified in this document. In addition to inappropriate materials, much of the repointing has been sloppily done, resulting in mortar spattered around the joint. This would not be much of an issue if the mortar used were appropriate. The inappropriate mortar mix often omits lime, thereby creating a mortar that is harder than the stone used in the grave marker putting that historic material in danger of damage if the mortar is removed . 31 8.2 REPOINTING METHODOLOGY For the repainting treatments executed during the 2013-2014 restoration project, a mortar mix containing hydrated lime and white Portland cement was used. This mortar mixture is more consistent in color and texture with mortars used historically in the Eugene Masonic Cemetery. Being softer than a mix consisting primarily of Portland cement, it is also more easily removed should reversibility be necessary. The addition of Portland cement makes the mix harder, a necessary feature in a cemetery that cannot afford regular maintenance and repainting. The mix is identical to that listed above for use in setting stacked markers. 1 Part white Portland cement 3 Parts hydrated lime Clean water Note: proprietary pre-mixed mortars, such as Jahn mortars, are available to those qualified to use them and are appropriate for use in historic cemetery contexts. 9 M AINTENANCE For the continued welfare of the numerous grave markers it is recommended that the Eugene Masonic Cemetery adopt a regular maintenance program. A maintenance regime consistent with the treatment program set forth for Tier 1 treatment would be the simplest, and most cost effective means of preservation. In the process of maintenance, a full survey of the cemetery resources using the attached survey form should be completed for a full record of cleaning and repairs over time. While maintenance of the entire grounds can be daunting, the grave markers can be grouped by plot numbers for a rotating maintenance program, focusing on a specific quadrant of the cemetery annually or biannually. Landscape maintenance procedures must be approached with a great amount of care given to any work around grave markers. Equipment such as weed-whackers, lawn mowers, and shovels can greatly damage markers and their bases ifthey are carelessly wielded in the vicinity of historic resources. 32 10ADVOCACY Advocacy for the resources of the Eugene Masonic Cemetery can be greatly enhanced by showcasing those markers that have undergone beneficial change as a result of the 2013-2014 restoration project. By showing potential donors the tangible benefits that their donation can produce the cemetery will receive more interest and funding for the continued preservation of its valuable resources. lt is recommended that the Eugene Masonic Cemetery develop a stronger relationship with the University of Oregon's School of Architecture and Allied Arts. Both parties could mutually benefit from student lead projects within the cemetery. Students can gain experience in resource surveys, HABS, HAER and HALS, Historic Structure Reports, and material conservation. The Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association would not only gain the documents and research produced by students but also a heightened interest in the historic resources of the Eugene masonic Cemetery. 33 11 CONDITION AND TREATMENT RECORDATION FORMS 34 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECO RDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25 111 Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa I Weather (circle all that apply): hot wann cool cold dry humid sunny rain/snow/fog overcast windy ID ENTIFICATION: Plot identification : C. Boren plot desi nation: 236 Name(s) of interred: Roena Elvira Boren Inscription Legibilit)': Rank from O (illegible) 10 3 (easily legible) Prima ' inscri tion 0 I 2 ~ Secondar inscri tion 0 I 2 ~ Inscription: ROENA ELVIRA WIFEOF CHAS. W.BOREN DIED In Eugene Monday Dec. 31 , 1888 AGED 75 Y, 9M, 2D Mother is gone, But not forgotten Stone carver (if known): NIA IL ocation of mark: N/A 35 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker fami ly name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): ~ footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 5'4" IWidlh: 1'4" IDeplh (or L): l '4" Dimensions (base) Height: 1' 0" IWidlh: I ' l l " IDeplh (or L): I ' I I " Dimensions (other): Height: !Width: IDeplh (or L): Orientation (circle one): North South East i\Vest unknown Interment status (circle one): active inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): ~ ing ruin fragment relocated altered rep lica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): lndividual family undetenninable Pedestal (circle one) : yes po !Base (circle one): f eS no sculpture cross plaque relief decoratior 1~~s:~::~~;i~: all t"::::~t~~al v~: none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles none Landscape (circle all that app!J~: brick asphalt concrete soil grass vegetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence bone Grade slope (circle one): positive pegative cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one): O(low) I 2 3 (high) Plot identification: 236 cold .ll!rr cross plaque relief decoratiot incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immonelles none Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt concre1e soil grass vegetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence pone Grade slope (circle one): positive negative cross-slope pone Degree of grad e (circle one): p(low) I 2 3 (h;gh) MATERIALS: Check appropriate fields Type of material r rimary structure Base Surface Finish Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone Granite Brick Concrete Metal Sandstone X Modern Coating Limewash Cement wash Primary structure Base Surface Finish Ornament Roof History of Repairs NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA rondition of Repairs CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base S urface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggreeation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Ex foliation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 58 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion g I 2 3 p I 2 3 ll I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 10 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ·oints Soiling 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti 0 I 2 3 ll I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I ii 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Sharp contrast in color due to soilim? Rank conditionsfi'om O (poor) to 3 (high) Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Overall Condition 0 I 2 B 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 09>oor 3=high) Overall Integrity 0 I 2 6 0 I 2 !! 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 09>oor 3=high) Treatment date: 2/25/14 Plot identification: 493 wann cool cold ~ humid sunny windy Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (ve,y effective) Tier: I Treatment description Effectiveness Treatment I Mechanical removal of li chen and moss with plastic scraper 0 I 2 i Treatment 2 Scrubbing with Orvus WA Paste in clean water applied with 0 I 2 ~ a nylon scrub brush. Treatment 3 Application of D2 Biological Solution. D2 Biological 0 I ~ 3 Solution was applied in darker areas to diminish stark contrast in color causes by soil ing and rain Comments: The Holliday marker is one of the larger monuments visible upon entering the cemetery from the Northwest. It was chosen for treatment due to its prominent pos ition in the cemetery as well as its very vis ible discoloration. A large blotch of lighter stone runs from the top down the center of the west (front) fm;ade approximate ly 3/4 of the way down the primary marble element In order to diminish the contrast in color between this blotch and the rest of the stone undiluted D2 Biological Solution was applied to the darker areas of the marker and left to set fo r 59 approximately 20 minutes. The stone was rinsed with water then retreated with 02 Biological Solution over its entirety. The two appli cations were successfu l in significantly lightening the stone overall and muting the contrast between the lighter and darker areas of the primary marble element. Recommendations: Regular cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended for the Holliday marker as well as the other markers at this point of entry. It is hoped that the cleaned markers wi ll serve as an example of the benefits of regular maintenance and inspire more donations to the cemetery association. Being located in this high-traffic area, 1he now cleaned Holliday marker should now draw attention in contrast to surrounding un-treated markers. It is recommended that the sandstone base be monitored and periodically cleared of lichen and moss. The sandstone is at risk of deterioration through the accumulation of biological growth and vegetation. Simply scraping the base with a plastic scraper and a scrubbing with water and a non-ionic detergent will greatly extend the lifetime of the sandstone. West face of the Holliday morker pre-treotment 60 61 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25th Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone, (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa ISun •ey Date: 10/20/2013 1~ her (~irc/e all that apply): hot warm cool cold clry humid SWl!!J. ram/snow/fog overcast windy I DENTIFICATION: Plot identification: Hubble plot designation : 247 Na me{s) of interred : Emma A., Lee Roy, Harrison, Monroe S. Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) Prima inscri tion 0 I Seconda inscri tion 0 I Inscription: (South Far;ade) (West Fa<;ade) LEE ROY EMMA A. HUBBLE BORN BORN SEPT. 27, 1886 AUG. 25 , 1856 DIED DIED JUNE 30, 1889 JUNE 30, I 889 Harrison Died by drounding BORN JULY 17, 1888 (North Fa~ade) DIED MONROES. JUNE 30, 1889 HUBBLE BORN SONSOFM.S.& DEC. 30, 1859 EMMA A. HUBBLE DIED SEP. 16, 1908 Died by dro ,mding Stone carver {if known): N/A ILocalion of mark: N/A 62 DESCRIPTI ON: Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker TAmiJv name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all 1ha1 app~y) : ~ adstone footstone ground 1able1 basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funera l home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 3'6" !Width: l'0" !Depth (or L): l '0" Dimensions (base) Height : O' IO" IWidth: 2'0" !Depth (or L): 2'0" Dimensions (other): Height: 0'8" !Width: \'4" !Depth (or L): \ '4" Orientation (circle one): North South East iw"est unknown Interment status (circle one): active inacti ve abandoned State of interment (circle all that appl;~: standing ruin fragment reloca1ed altered replica tilled sunken Type of interment (circle one): individual family undetenninable Pedestal (circle one) : yes DO IBase (circle one): res no Ornament (circle all that app~y): urn sculpture cross plaque re lief decoratior incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all !hat apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immorte\ les none Landscape (circle all that appl; ): brick asphalt concrete soil grass vegetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence none, G rade slope {circle one): positive negati ve cross-slope none Degree of gr ade {circle one): 0(low) I 2 3 (high) MATERIALS · Check appropriate fields trype of materia l tl>rima ry structure Base Surfa ce Finish !ornam ent Roof Marble X Limestone lcranife Brick !concrete Metal !sandstone X !Modern C oating Limewash !cement wash Primary structure Base !Surface Finish !Orn a ment Roof History of Repairs NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA ondition of NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Repairs 63 CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Ex foliation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 Efflorescence 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 J 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing Q I 2 3 Q I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Uoints Soiling 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O {poor) to 3 (high) Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Overall Condition 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 B Jpcpoor 3=h;gh) :>verall lntegrif) 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 ii 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 a o I 2 ~ Jpcpoor 3=h;gh) Treatment Date: 11 /25/2013 Plot identification: 247 hot warm cold ~ humid overcast windy Treatment effectiveness : Rankfrom O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) Tier: I Treatment description Effectiveness 64 T reatment 1 Moss and lichen removal wilh plastic scraper 0 I 2 ~ T reatment 2 Cleansing with Orvus WA Paste in solution applied with 0 I 2 ~ nylon scrub brush T reatment 3 Application of D2 Biological Solution on wet surface. 0 I 2 ~ Rewetting and agitation of solution after 20 minutes. Allowed to dwell another 20 minutes. Rinsed with clean water. Comments: The Hubble fami ly marker is accompanied by smaller tablets that mark the individual graves of each fami ly member. The smaller markers, while intact, have been toppled or tilted due to a collaps ing curb enclosure and growing vegetation. A large tree grows adjacent to the fami ly marker but does not appear to be impacting the marker save for obscuring it from view. The finer detailing of the incised ornament on the family marker was slightly obscured by biological growth but was easily cleared after a simple cleaning treatment with Orvus WA Paste and D2 Biological Solution. The base is in good condition and unaffected by the root system of the nearby tree. The enti re assembly is relatively plumb in contrast to neighboring markers which are tilting as the hillside erodes to the west. The concrete curb enclosure is succumbing to the shifting hill and has fractured at several points. This has contributed to the instability of the smaller tab lets. The tablets are easily reset in the soil as they have no base. Recommenda tions: 65 Regular clean ing with clean water and Orvus WA Paste is recommended. The plantings of the enclosure shou ld be assessed as well should future marker instability issues arise. The concrete curb enclosure needs repair along the west edge of the plo_t. .___. ..,,_ West and 5outh faces pre-rrearmem south/ace inscription detail West face post-treatment south face post-treatment 66 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECOROATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25th Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane [State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact : Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone: (54 1) 684-0949 Sur\'Cyor: David Espinosa ISun'ey Date: 11/20/2013 Weather (circle all that ~ hot wann cool cold !!ry humid sunny rain/snow/fog overcast windy IDE:NTIF"ICATION: Plot identification: C.W. Letson plot designation: 237 Name(s) of interred: James Letson, Scharlotte Letson Insc ription LegibiJity: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) Primary inscri tion Seconda ' inscri tion Inscription: (West Fafade) (East Fa~ade) JAMES LETSON SCHARLOTTE LETSON BORN BORN Apc.5, 1830 Jan. 19, 1828 DIED DIED Aug. 31, 1892 Aug. 18, 1892 Slone carver (if kn own): N/A !Location of mark: N/A 67 D ESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb maoo:, family name marker Type of tomb {circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all 1ha1 apply): ~ footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 2•g·• IWidth: o·s·• !Depth (or L): 0'8" Dimensions (base) Height : I "8" !Width: 2'6" !Depth (or L) : 2'6" Dimensions (other) : Height : 0'6" !Width: l'0" !Depth (or L): 1 '0" Orientation (circle one): North South East ;w.,, unknown Interment status {circle one): active inacti ve abandoned State of interment {circle all 1ha1 apply): tandin ruin fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment {circle one): individual family undeterminable Pedestal (circle one) : yes po IB ase (circle one): yes no Ornament {circle all that appl;): um sculpture cross plaque 'relief decoratior incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaq ue immonelles none Landscape (c ircle all that apply): brick asphah concrete soil grasl! ~egetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence none Grade slope {circle one): positive negative cross•slope none Degree of grade (circle one): 0 (low) I ~ 3 (high) Consen 1ator: David Espinosa Treatment Date: Plot identification: Weather {circle all that apply): hot warm cool cold humid ~ rain/snow/fog overcast windy MATERIALS· Check appropriate fields Type of material Primary structure Base ISurface Finish !Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone Granite !Brick !concrete Metal ~ andstone X lModern Coatin g Limewash lcement wash Primary structure Base urfacc Finish rn ament Roof 68 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A CONDIT IONS: Rank condirionsfrom O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornamenl Roof stru ctu re Finish Collapse A I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fra2.mentation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggrega tion ij I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Ex folia tion 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Effioresccncc g I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detac hment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 1 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Veeetation 0 [ 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing b I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ·oints Soiling 0 I g 3 0 I ~ J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J Graffi ti 0 j 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic sta ining 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J Other ~ I 2 3 ,9 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) ro 3 (high) Pr-imary Base Surface !Ornament Roof structu re Finish !Overa ll Condition 0 I 2 ~ p I 2 ~ p I 2 3 p I 2 3 p I 2 J O=poor l=h;gh) !Overall ln tegri(] 0 I 2 ~ p I 2 i P I 2 3 p I 2 3 p I 2 3 O=poor l=h;gh) Treatment effecth'eness: Rank from O (inejfectfre) to 3 (very effective) Tier: I Treatment description Effectiveness Treatment I Moss and lichen removal with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 ii 69 Trearmen1 2 Cleansing wi1h Orvus WA Paste in solution applied with nylon scrub brush. Treatment 3 Application ofO2 Biological Solution on wet surface. 0 I Rewetting and agitation of solution after 20 minutes. Rinsed with clean water. Commen ts : The Letson marker is comprised of a dark marble with white veining. This was obscured by a layer of soiling and lichen. The joint between the marble elements is deteriorating and will require repointing soon. The base is sandstone and in good condition. The entire assembly was washed with Orvus WA Paste and clean water. 02 Biological Solmion was applied to the marker along the ' Instant Results' method then rinsed wi1h clean water. After treatment the marble was significantly lightened and the natural vein ing was much clearer. Incised detai l was made clearer by the remova l of lichen that clings 10 the unpolished, tooled surfaces. Recommendations: Regular clean ing with Orvus WA Paste and clean water will deter biological growth and soiling. The joint must be monitored and eventually repainted . Wesr face pre-trearmeni South/ace pre-treatment 70 North/oce pre-treotmeflt Eost/oce pre-rreorment West /oce pon-treotmenr Sovth /oce post-rreoimenr 71 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECOROATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25 th Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Date: 2/27/2014 Weather (circle all that ~: hot warm I cold !ID'. humid sunny rain/snow/fog overcast windy ID ENTIFICATION : Plot identification: Lithgow Family Plot lot desi nation: 400 Name(s) of interred: Harry Lithgow, Orlando Lithgow Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) Prima inscri tion 0 I ~ 3 Seconda inscri tion o I 2 3 Inscription: HARRY J. ORLANDO A. LITHGOW LITHGOW BORN BORN SEP. 18, 1886 OCT. 19, 1854 DIED DLED MAR. 3, 1888 SE P. I 9, I 890 Sleep on in thy beauty, MEMBE R OF Thou sweet angel child, Du Bois Lodge No. 475 By sorrow unblighted, K. of P. Penn By sin undefiled Stone carver (if known): N/A [Location of mark: N/A 72 DESCRIPTI ON: T ype of interment (circle one): tomb marker lramily name marker. Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all rhar apply): -~ footstone ground tab let basal ruin cross pedestal obeli sk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone} Height: 3' 10 ½'' IWidth, \'4" ID epth (or L), \ '4" Dimensions (base} Height: l ' l'' !Width: I ' 5 ¼" ID epth (or L), l '5 ¼" Dimensions (other): Height: IWidth, ID epth (or L), Orientation (circle one): Nonh South East West unknown Interment status (circle one): 11ctive inac1ive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): ~ ruin fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): individua l tami ly undeterminable Pedestal (circle one): yes no IB ase (circle one): res no Ornament (circle all that appl;): um sculpture cross plaque relief decoratio1 incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles none Landscape (circle all rhat apply): brick asphalt concrete _soil grass :vegetation other Enclosu re (circle all that apply): curb wall fence none Grade slope (circle one): posi tive negative cross~sloix:: none Degree of grade (circle one): 0(low) ' 2 3 (high) Surveyor: Da,,id Espinosa Date: Plot identification: Wea th er (circle all that apply_ : hot wann ~ cold humid sunny rain/snow/fog vercast windy MATERIALS· Check appropriate fields l'fype of material Primary structure Base Surface Finish !Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone !Granite Brick !Concrete Meta l !Sandstone X Modern Coa ting Limewash Cement wash Primary structure Base urface Finish rnament Roof 73 History of Repairs Reselting on lower NIA NIA NIA NIA marble element !condition of Good - off center Repairs CONDITIONS: Rank conditio11sfrom O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fraementation 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 II 2 3 0 ii 2 3 0 II 2 3 0 I a 3 Crackin g 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfo liation 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efnorescencc p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I a 3 0 I a 3 VCJ?,etation 0 I 2 3 0 ' 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I 2 3 IQ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 9 I 2 3 ·oints Soiling 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 Graffiti 0 I 2 3 d I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 b I 2 3 Metallic sta ining 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ,9 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) to 3 (high) Treatment effecth1eness: Rank from O (ineffective) 10 3 (very effective) 74 Tier: I Treatment description Effectiveness Treatment I Mechanical removal of lichen and moss with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 [I Treatment 2 Scrubbed surface with Orvus WA Paste in water w i1h s1iff 0 I 2 [I plastic-bris1 led brush. Treatment J Applicalion of D2 Biological Solution. 2 applications, with 0 I 2 ~ a dwelling rime of20 minutes each. Comments: The Lithgow marker, located at the Southeast entrance of the cemelery, was obscured by heavy biological growth and soiling. Rigorous scrubbing wi1h Orvus WA Pas1e and water removed the majori1y of soi ling and D2 Biological Solution application greatly lightened the areas discolored by the biological growth. Treatment was very successfu l ia increasing legibility of the inscriptions. The sandstone base, although covered in moss, was found to be in good cond ition after removal of the moss. It appears that the uppermost marble element was reset upon the lower elemelll and done so off center slight ly to the South. Recommendations: The Lithgow marker holds an important lot in the cemetery as it is the first marker encountered upon entering from the Southeast. Directly adjacent an informational posting board it draws more anention. Regular cleaning is recommended not only to preserve the stone but 10 South face pre-treatment West face pre-treatment 75 present an image of upkeep and respect for the deceased to the general public. No glaring issues, other than tbe extent of soiling and growth on the marker, are immedia1ely visible. We5t face /n5cript10n detail West face posMreatment South/are past•treatment 76 CONDITIONS & Treatment Recordation FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25th Avenue and Uni versi ty Street City: Eugene !County: Lane 1s1ate: OreRon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Associa1ion IP hone: (541) 684- 0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa 1survcy Date: 10/ 17/2013 Weather (circle all 1ha1 ap~ot wann £90I cold IIDi humid sunny rain/snow/fog v windy IDENTIFICATION: Plot identification: Lombard Famil Plot lot desi nation: 275 Name(s) of iPterred: James L. Lombard, Sara 8. First burial date: June 1922 Last burial date: June 1922 Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) 10 3 (easily legible) Primarv inscri tion Secondar inscri tion Inscription : East Fa i;ade: North Fa9ade: JAMES L. In loving remembrance of LOMBARD SARA B. DIED WLFE OF JUNE 25, 1922 J.L. LOMBARD AGED DIED 65 YEARS OCT. 18, 1897 LOMBARD AGED 35 YEARS Love is 1hefufjillme111 of1helord Stone can·er (if known): N/A IL ocation of mark: N/A 77 DESCRIPTION: Type of intermenl (circle one): 1omb marker fami ly name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that appl;f beadstooe footstone ground 1ablc1 basal ruin cross pedes1al obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque beds1ead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 2'0" !Width: 0' IO" !Depth (or L): 0'IO" Dimensions (base) Height : 0'6'' jWidlh: l '0" !Depth (or L): I '0" Dimensions (other): Height : IWidlh: !Depth (or L): Orientation {circle one): North South East West unknown Interment status (circle one}: active inactive abandoned Stale of interment (circle all that apply): ~ ruin fragment relocated altered replica ~ sunken Type of interment (circle one): individual family undetenninable Pedestal (circle one) : yes µq [Base (circle one): yes no Ornament (circle all that apply): um sculprure cross plaque relief decoratioc incised decoration omamenial vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles pone Landscape {circle all tha1 apply): brick asphalt concrete soil grass vegeiation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence oone Grade slope (circle one): positive negative cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one): 0(low) I ~ 3 (high) MATERIALS: Check appropriate fields ype of material Primary structure Base ~ urface Finish !ornament Roof Marble X X imestone Granite Brick oncrete !Metal tucco [Modern Coating Limewas h ~ement wash Pri ma ry structure Base Surface Finish !Ornament Roof History of Repairs NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Condition of NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA Repairs 78 CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Pr imary Base Surface O rn ament Roof structu re Finish Collapse ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~. I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation p I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 JI, 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0, I 2 3 p I 2 3 Erosion ij I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Crackin g Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ID I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoliation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence g I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 g I 2 3 Finish detac hment IQ I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 n I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 J 2 3 0 I 2 3 IQ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 m 2 3 Vegetation D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 10 I 2 3 p I 2 3 Alterations fi I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 p I 2 3 p I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I 2 3 0 l 2 3 IU I 2 3 ID I 2 3 lioin ts Soiling 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 ~ I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 Graffiti D I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 10 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other g I 2 3 Q I 2 3 Q I 2 3 IQ I 2 3 g I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) to 3 (high) Base Roof I 2 I 2 Consen •ator: David Espinosa Weather (circle all that apply): warm cool rain/snow/fog overcast windy Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) Treatment description Treatment I Application of Orvus WA Paste in clean water and gentle scrubbing with plastic-bristled brush. 79 Treatment 2 Application of D2 Biological Solution along 'Instant Results ' i method. Rinsed with clean water. Treatment 3 NIA O I Comments: After app lying the treatments the soi ling of the stone was severely lightened and the lichen growth was removed . An ornamental element is missing from the lop of the monument, likely a casually of vandalism. There is a large light spot on the north fayade, the spot does not diminish legibility of the inscription but is in stark contrast to the surrounding s tone that has ex perienced more consistent soi ling. Reco mmendations : The monument is not experiencing any substantia l threat at this point. Regular cleaning with a mild detergent and water is recommended 10 deter biological growth and maintain inscri ption legibility. The monument is leaning downhill. but is not in immediate danger of toppling. The joint between the base and primary stone should be monitored, but as of yet repainting is not necessary. Accretions are visible on the ornament fragment and the roof of the. These are products of an interaction between natural inclusions in the stone and the ambient atmosphere. These accretions should not be tampered with as their removal would likely contribute to loss of the historic marble. 80 Detail af broken finial Narthface pre-treotment (nate d,scalored blarch) We5t face pre-treatment Narth and Westface5 post-treatment 81 CONDIT ION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address : 25th Avenue and University Street Cit)': Eugene JCounty: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyo r: David Espinosa !Survey Date: 11/14/2013 Weather (circle all that ~ hot wann ~ cold i!!Y humid sunny rai n/snow/fog overcas windy I DENTIFICATION: Plot identification: McAlister Famil y Plot lot designation: 29 Name(s) of inter red: Samantha A., A. A., Lily Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) lo 3 (easily legible) Primarv inscr i lion Secondar inscri tion Inscr iption: (Northeast fayade) (Northwes1 fayade) SAMANTHA A. A.A. McALISTER Wife of BORN REV. E. A. Nov. 8, 1869 McALISTER DEPARTED THIS LIFE BORN June 9, 1879 Oct. 23, 1839 DEPARTED THIS LlFE LILY McALISTER July 18, 1896 BORN Feb. 4 1881 DEPARTED THIS LIFE Feb. 4 , 188 1 McALISTER Stone carver (if known): N/A IL ocation of mark: N/A 83 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker 'familv name markc:, Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): headstone footslone ground tab let basal ruin cross ==talobelisli Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 3 'O'' IWidlh: 1'0" !Depth (or L): I 'O" Dimensions (base) Height: 0'8" !Width: 1'6" ID epth (or L): 1' 6" Dimensions (other) : Height : IWidth: ID epth (or L): Orientation (c ircle one): North South East West unknown Interment status (circle one): .active inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): ~& ruin fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): individual fami ly undeterminable Pedestal (circle one} : yes po IBase (ci rcle one): ¥Ci no Ornament {circle all that appt;r um sculpture cross plaque reli ef decoratio, incised decorauoo: ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all rhar apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles pone Landsca pe (circle all that apply): brick aspha lt concrete 'soil grass i\'egetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wa ll fence pone G rade slope {circle one): positive negative cross-slopq none Degree of grade (circle one): O(low) I ~ 3 (high) MATERIALS: Check appropriate fields Type of materi al Primary structure Base Surface Fini sh !Ornament Roof Marble X X Limestone ...,ranite Brick !Concrete !Metal I.Sandstone Modern Coating Limcwash ICcmcnl wash Primary structure Base Surface Finish Ornamenl Roof History of Repairs The primary N/A N/A N/A N/A element has been reset with an epoxy 84 ondition of The bond is st ill Repairs stable and the joint clean. CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) 10 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse b I 2 3 g I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I i 3 Fragmentation i) I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 n I 2 3 p I 2 3 Disaggregation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 l 2 3 Cracking I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoli ation I 2 3 D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 g I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion D I 2 3 q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 D I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 3 0 I II 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 ~ 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 II 2 3 Alterations i) I 2 3 A I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 A I 2 3 Open/missing g I 2 3 u I 2 3 ID I 2 3 Q I 2 3 li oints Soiling 0 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti a •I 2 3 I I 2 3 0 I 2 3 P. I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staininf! n I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ID I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 a (describe): The entire The 'base ' is Scratched Scratched element is scratched scratched Rank conditions from O (po01) IO 3 (high) Roof Condition J=high) verall lntegrit) O=poor J=high) Conservator: David Espinosa Weather (circle all 1ha1 apply_ : rain/snow/fog Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O {ineffective) to 3 (ve,y effective) 85 Tier I I Treatment description Effectiveness Grade Treatment t Lichen and moss was mechanically removed with a plastic 0 I 2 ~ scraper. Treatment 2 Surface scrubbed with Orvus WA Paste in clean water with 0 I 2 ~ a nylon bristle brush. Treatment 3 02 Biological Solution applied in 'lnstant Results' method. 0 I Q 3 Comments: The McAlister marker has experienced significant travel after having been lost by the Masonic Cemetery and only recovered several years ago. The entire marker is gouged, likely a result of tumbling and being struck by other stones or metal tools. It is also suspected that the original base was lost as it is uncommon for another marble element to serve as a base and be in contact with the !,>TOund. The 'base' and primary element have been bonded by an epoxy. The bond shows no signs of deterioration. While the joint is functioning it is not historicall y accurate and should have been made with a lime mortar mixture. In an atte-mpt to lessen the contrast between the gouged stone and the surviving surface an aggressive D2 Biological Solution treatment was applied. This did lighten the surrounding stone and reveal a more nuanced natural veining but was largely unsuccessful in muting the gouging. There are natural accretions on the roofofthe obelisk along inclusions in the natural stone. While appearing foreign, they are consistent with natural exposure and should be left in place. Recommendations: Regular cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended to conserve the historic material. The 'base ' must receive regular maintenance as marble will deteriorate relatively quickly if left in contact with the soil. Reconstruction of a base consistent with other markers of the period is recommended in order to ensure longevity of the marble's integrity. 86 McAJi5ter baJe pre-trf'Otmen1 McAJiJter marker pre-treatment 87 Souih corner of marker pre-treatment. Nore material loss Detai/afgauging,andnaturalaccretian5 andcanservat,andag (Left)McAl,stermarkerpast-treatme/11 88 COl\'DITION & TREAT 1ENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25\h Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Ceme1ery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Ceme1ery Association [Phone: (54 1) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Survey Date: 11 /15/2013 warm tool cold i!!)< humid ;::~her ~::~o~fr~;a, ~ ho:indy IDENTIFICATION: Plot iden tification : McFall Family Plot plot designation: 15 Name(s) of interred: S.T. McFall Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (U/egib/e) to 3 (easily legible) Prima inscri tion Seconda inscri lion 2 3 Inscription: FATHER S. T. McFALL 1835 1907 Stone can•er (if known): N/A !Location of mark: N/A DESCRJPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb inartr.er family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): ~ footstone ground tablet basal rum cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height : 0'8" IWid1h: ro·• IDeplh (or L): 0'8" Dimensions (base) Height: O' IO" IWidlh: 2"0" IDeplh (or L): 0'8" Dimensions (other): Height : IWidlh: IDeplh (or L): Orienta tion (circle one): Nonh South East ,~est unknown Interment sta tus (circle one): active inactive abandoned Stale of interm ent (circle aJl 1ha1 apply): &landing ruin fragment relocated altered repli ca tilted sunken Type of interm ent (circle one): JDn markus post- Pry-barinuse11sgrove/infillisinserted trecitmt>nt 99 CONDITION & TREATME IT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery St reet Address: 25th Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone: (54 1) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa ISun'ey Date: 10/24/2013 Weather (circle all that apply): hot warm cool cold !!rY humid swiiiv rain/snow/fog overcast windy LDENTl flCATION: Plot identification: Robert Campbell (1905 plot identification) plot designation: 98 Name(s) of interred: Herny C. oble Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) Prima inscri tion 0 I 2 Seconda inscri tion 0 I 2 3 Inscription: HENRY C. Son of D& ENoble DIED Aug. 17, 1862 Aged 16 Yrs. 7 Mos. I Day Stone carver (if kn own): N/A !Location of mark: N/A 100 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb lnarker family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all rhar app ly): beadston foo1stone ground table! basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height : 3' 11 " !Width : 1•4·• !Depth (or L): 2" Dimensions (base) Height : 8" !Width: 2' !Depth (or L): 1' 6" Dimensions (other): Height: NIA !Width: NIA !Depth (or L): NIA Orientation (circle one): North South East West unknown Interment status (circle one): active inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): standing ruin ~ relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): ~ndividual family undeterminable Pedestal (circle one) : yes pq IBase (circle one): res no Ornament (circle all that appl;~: um sculpture cross plaque ldicf decoraliot incised decoration omamemal vase none Furniture (circle all thaf apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immon elles none Landsca pe (circle all rhar apply): brick asphalt concrete soil ~ ~e2etatioq other Enclosure (circle all that apply): curb wall fence hnn, G rade slope (circle one): positi ve pcgativc cross•slope none Degree of grad e (circle one): O(low) n 2 3 (high) M ATERIALS: Check appropriate fields Type of material Primary structure Base Surface Finish !Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone X Granite Brick oncrete Meta l Sandstone Modern Coating Limewash ICement was h Primary structure Base ~ urface Finish !Ornament Roof History of Repairs NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA !Condition of Repairs 101 CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Co nditio ns Primary Base Surface Orn ament Roof structure Finish Co llapse p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Eros ion D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 C racking p I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoli ation n I 2 3 0 I 2 3 10 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence ,0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detac hment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 q I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-erowth 0 I i 3 0 II 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 2 3 0 I 2 3 Veeeta tion 0 I 2 3 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 •m 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations ll I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I 2 i 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Li oi nts Soiling 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 Grafnti p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Meta llic stain ing ll I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O( poor) to 3 (high) Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Overa ll Condition 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 O=poor 3=high) ::>verall ln tegri t) 0 I a 3 0 I a 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 O=poor 3=high) Conservator: David Espinosa Treatment Da te: 4/4/2014, irlot identification: 98 4/ 18/2014 Weather (circle all that apply): ho1 cool cold !!ni humid sunn~ rain/snow/fog overcast ~y Trea tment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffec1ive) 10 3 {l'ety effective) T ier 3 Treatment desc ription Effectiveness Grade 102 T reatment I Fragments of the marble element are scrubbed with Orvus 0 I 2 G WA Paste solution using nylon bristle brushes. Treatment 2 D2 Biological Solution is applied in 'instant results ' 0 I 2 ~ method. Treatment 3 The fragments are bonded with Akemi Akepox 5010 and 0 I 2 ~ held in place with lumber braces and c-clamps. The bonds are left to cure for 48 hours. T reatment 4 The limestone base is relocated away from the adjacent tree 0 I 2 ~ after consulting the landscaping staff and the EMCA architectural historian. It is reset upon a bed of gravel and leveled. T reatment 5 The recessed slo1 is retooled 10 better accept mortar and the 0 I 2 ~ marble element. T reatment 6 The marble element is set into the recessed slot using a mix 0 I 2 a of hydrated lime, Portland cement, and clean sand. Once plumb the assembly is supported by lumber braces and left to cure for 48 hours. Comments : The Noble marker was found in three pieces dislodged from its base and leaning against an adjacent tree. The base had been tilled due 10 1he growth of the tree's root system. Although broken the marble element was in good condition. The marble fragments were removed from the site for cleaning and bonding off-site. The upper and middle fragments were bonded before the lower fragment. The lower fragment was to be set in the base before bonding as it is easier and safer to handle and set smaller fragments. This process also made leveling the lowest fragment easier allowing for a more secure and plumb bonding of all the fragments. The base was relocated after consulting the landscaping crew and the historic architect of the EMCA. A hole approximately four inches deep was dug adjacent to the original location of the base. A bubble level was used to ensure a flat and level surface. Gravel was laid in the hole and tamped with a piece oflumber struck repeatedly by a sledge hammer. The base was then positioned and adjusted to be level. The bottom of the base had deteriorated and presented an uneven surface that required more gravel 10 be packed beneath it. Excess soil was taken away from the area to be used by the landscaping crew for other projects. The base had experienced significant weatheri ng 1hat had roughened the surfaces and made re100\ing of the recessed slot necessary in order to properly accept mortar and the reassembled marble element. Retool ing was accomplished with a wide blade chisel and hammer. Once tooled and cleaned the recessed slot was wetted with clean water then covered with a unifonn layer of mortar mix. The mortar used was a mix of 1 part white Portland cement, 4 parts hydrated lime, 8 parts clean sand, and water. Once situated to be plumb, mortar was packed into the voids between the marble and the base. Using a striking tool the mortar was packed and smoothed. A sponge was then used to clear away excess mortar. The lower marble fragment was then supported by wood braces. The braces were constructed of 2x4s cut and fastened to fonn right angles. The assembly was surrounded by caution tape and left to cure fo r several days. 103 Once cured the upper fragments were bonded to the now-set lower marble fragment with Akemi Akepox 50 IO and left to cure for 48 hours. Recommendations : The Noble marker is a tablet that is relatively tall and thin standing almost five feet in height with the base and measuring only t\\'O inches thick. It is therefore necessary that the marker be routinely monitored to ensure it remains level. Should the marker tilt it will be at risk of uneven loads and likely break. Regular cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended 10 retain the natural color of the stone as well as preserve the relief sculpture of a willow above the incised text. Base before rt'locatiOll Marbk fragmt'rlts off·site prt'-trt'atment 104 Lowermorblefrogmenrse/inrecessedslor Recessed slot with mortor bed prepared 105 ,.hl-' 'I' "l\lc.-- j -- • ~ '. ,'. r~1:}. · ...'.''.:~ 1 ~ h t-- ~;r "¥;;,_ · }.; "_; . ~· .-~ I ' Mortorbt!ddetoil Noblepost-treotrMnt 106 CONDITION & T REATM ENT RECOROATION FORM Site : Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 251h Avenue and Un iversity Street C ity: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon Owner : Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Co ntact : Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone: (541 ) 684-0949 Surveyo r : David Espinosa !Survey Date: 11/24/20 13 Wea th er (c ircle all that apply): ho1 wann cool cold ~ humid 1 ~ rain/snow/fog overcast windy IDENTIFICATION: Plot identifica ti on : W.T. Osborne lol desi nation: 177 Name(s) of inter red: Sarah Osburn Inscripti on Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) Primar inscri li on Secondar inscri tion Insc ription: IN MEMORY OF SA RA H WlFE OF W.T.OSBURN BORN NOV.5, 183 1 OIED MAY 12, 1883 AG ED 5 1Ys. 6Ms. 7Ds. Stone carver (if kn own): N/A IL ocation of mark : N/A 107 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): IOmb marke, famil y name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): headstone footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height : 3 '8" !Width: 1'6'' !Depth (or L): 0'3" Dimensions (base) Height : 2'3" IWidth: 2'4" !Depth (or L): I ·o., Dimensions (other): Height : 0 '6" !Width: 2'0" !Depth (or L): 0"8" Orienta tion (circle one): Norui South East ~est unknown Interment status (circle one): active inacti ve abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): ~g ruin fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): µMiividual famil y undeterminable Pedestal (circle one} : yes DO IBase (circle one): res no Ornament (circle all that apply): um sculpture cross plaque relief dccoratior incised decoration ornamental vase none furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaqu-e immortelles none Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt concrete soil ~egeration other Enclosure (circle all that apply): -~ wall fence none Grade slope (circle one): positive pegativc cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one): 0(low) I 2 3 (high) MATERIALS' Check appropriarefields rype of material Primary st ructure Base Surface finish Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone !Granite Brick leoncrete Metal Sandstone X Modern Coating Limewash !Cement wash Primary structure Base Surface Ornament Roof F inish History of Repairs Reset on middle Joint between NIA NIA NIA marble element base and middle with eooxv. 108 Fragments bonded element reset wi1h epoxy. with epoxy !Condition of Structural ly sound, Structural ly Repairs but sloppy use of sound, but improper bonding sloppy use of material improper bonding material CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) 10 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation 0 I ~ 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation 0 I 2 3 A I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion g I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoliation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence n I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I z 3 0 I z 3 0 I 2 3 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 () I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing g I 2 3 19 I 2 3 IQ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 lioints Soiling 0 I i 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 G raffiti D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 () I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) 10 3 (high) Primary Base Surface !Ornament Roof structure Finish 0\'erall Condition 0 I 2 l o I 2 ~ ~ I 2 3 ~ I 2 ~ ~ I 2 3 O=poor 3=high} Overall lntegrit) 0 I ~ 3 0 I z 3 p I 2 3 p I 2 ~ p I 2 3 O=poor 3=high) Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effec1ive) 109 Conservator: David Espinosa !Treatment Date: 11/25/2013 !Plot identification: 177 Weat her (circle all that apply): hot wann .l<.l!tail a/yellow epoxy and white mortar 129 Bor,dmr, ofth t middlt or,d lo_, fror,mer,t~ UmdeMl/itd tablet post-lrtotmtm 130 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25111 Avenue and University Street C it)•: Eugene !Coun ty: Lane !State: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association !Phone, (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Survey Date: I J/14/2013 Weather (circle all 1hat °;l!J!!ll.: hot wann tool cold i!!Y humid sunny rain/snow/fog pvercast windy IDENTIFICATION: Plot identification: Eugene Skinner plot desi nation: 220 Name(s) or interred: Captain N.L Packard Inscription Legibilit)': Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) 0 I Inscription: (West Face) (Nonh Face) CAPTAIN Always faithful to convict- N. L. PACKARD tions of right and justice BORN AT CAMDEN MAINE JULY 4, 18 18 DIED AT EUGENE OREGON FEB. 22, 1892 PACKARD Ston e carver (if known): NIA I Location or mark: N/A 131 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb lnaricer family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle ail that apply): headstone footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obel isk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funera l home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 4'1" !Width, 1' T' !Depth (o r L), 1' 7" Dimensions (base) Height : I 'O" !Width, 2'1" !Depth (or L), 2' 1" Dimensions (other): Height: !Width, !Depth (or L) , Orientation (circle one): Nonh South East M'est unknown Interment status (circle one): .active inacti ve abandoned State of interment (circle all rhat apply): standing ruin fragment relocated altered replica )ilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): Individual family undeterminable Pedestal (circle one) : yes po IB ase (circle one): !'OS no Ornament (circle all tha1 apply): um sculpture cross plaque relief decoratior incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immonell es DOilCi Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt concrete Soil grass vegetation other Enclosure (circle all 1ha1 apply): curb wall fence pone Grnde slope (circle one): positive pegative cross-slope none Degree of grade {circle one): 0(low) j 2 3 (high) MATERIALS· Check appropriate fields r ype of material Primary structure Base ~urface Finish !Ornament Roof Marble X X Limestone Granite Brick Concrete Metal Sandstone X Modern Coatine. Limewash ement wash Primary structure Base Surface !Ornament Roof Finish IHistory of Repairs Reset upon middle Middle marble NIA NIA NIA element with element reset upon Ponland cemem 132 base wi1h Portland cement ondition of Fair Fair Repairs CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Coll apse 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 ~ 2 3 0 2 3 A I 2 3 0 l 2 3 Fragmentation 0 m 2 3 0 •I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 d I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 1 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 Cracking g I 2 3 10 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 g I 2 3 D I 2 3 Exfoliation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 Efflorescence 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I ~ 3 Vegetation 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 m 2 3 0 m 2 3 Alterations 0 m 2 3 0 l 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 ~ 2 3 0 l 2 3 ,P I 2 3 ~ I 2 3 [joints Soiling 0 I 2 3 A I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 ~ Graffiti 0, I 2 3 0 I 2 3 R I 2 3 d I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 q I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) 10 3 (high) Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) 133 Tier I 2 Treatment description EfTecli\'eness Grade Treatment I Remova l of moss and lichen with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 ~ Treatment 2 Cleaning with Orvus WA Paste in clean water applied with 0 I 2 ~ a nylon bristled scrub brush. Trea tment 3 Appl ication ofD2 Biological Solution along 'Instant 0 I 2 ~ Resu lts' method guidelines. Treatment 4 Level ing of marker with industrial pry-bar. 0 I 2 ~ Comments: The Captain Packard marker occupies a pos ition in front of the Skinner family concrete pad. It was leaning to the southwest and has experienced previous repairs. The marble clement shave been reset with Port land cement. The setting is misaligned and sloppy, with excess cement spi lled on the base and lower marble clement Removal of this cement would damage the historic materials so must be left in place. A patch of iron oxide is present on the north face of the marker below the inscription. This like ly remains from an iron fencing that would have been attached or adjacent to the marker. The lower corners of the primary marb le element have experienced materia l loss consistent with toppling as a result of vandalism. Tier I treatment was performed to clean the marker of soi ling and staining. When drier weather permitted, Tier 2 treatment was executed. The soil around the southwest comer of the base was removed. Gravel was tamped into the void and using lumber pieces as a fulcrum the assembly was leveled with a heavy-duty pry-bar. The soil was replaced, tamped and raked to minimize visual footprint of the treatment. Excess soil was set aside for use by the landscaping crew. Recommendations: Regu lar clean ing wi1h Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended as the marker occupies a prominent position in a high-traffic area. Monitoring is necessary to note any soil shi fti ng and rilling of the marker. 134 Poe/cord morlrer prt·treotment, west orid 5ovrh fores Northor,deo5t/ocespre-treotment Lellf:'lmgofthePoclcordmorlrer Coptom N. L Poe/cord morlcer post-treoirner,t 135 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery St reet Address: 25th Avenue and University Street City: Eugene !Count)': Lane IState: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Survey Date: I J/14/2014 Weather (circle all 1ha1 ~ hot warm cool cold (Icy humid sunny rain/snow/fog overcast windy IDENTIFICATION: Plot identification: Eugene Skinner plot designation: 220 Namc(s) of interred: Mary Packard Insc ription Legibilit)•: Rank from O (illegible) 10 3 (easily legible) Primar inscri tion Secondar inscri tion Insc ription: MARY Wife of N. L. PACKARD DIED June I, 1881 AGED 60 Years OUR MOTHER PACKARD Stone carver (if known): N/A !Location of mark: N/A 136 D ESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb inarke, family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker {circle all that apply): ~ footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedes1al column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height : 3' 8'' IW;dth , 2'0" !Depth (or L) , 0'3"' Dimensions (base) Height : NIA IW;dth ,NIA !Depth (or L) , NIA Dimensions (other) : Height : 0' 5" IW;dth , 2'6 !Depth (or L), 0 '3" Orientation {circle one) : North South East i\Vesf unknown Interment sta tus {circle one) : p;ctive inactive abandoned State of interment {circle afl that apply): f ~ding ruin fragment relocated ~ter.£' replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): individual famd~ undeterminable Pedestal (circle one) : yes bo IBase (circle one): fe~ no Ornament (circle all that apply): urn sculpture cross plaque relief cb:oratior, incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply) : sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles none Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt ~ ncrete soi l grass ~egetation other Enclosure (circle all that apply) : curti wall fence none Grade slope {circle one): positi ve negative CfOSS•Slope none Degree of grade (circle one): 0 (low) I 2 3 (h ;gh) MATERIALS: Check appropriate fields lfype of mater ial Prima ry structure Base Surface Finish Ornament Roof Marble X Limestone Granite Brick Concrete X Metal Sandstone Modern Coating Limewash ement wash Primary structure Base Surface Ornament Roof Finish History of Repairs Reset in concrete Original base no NIA NIA NIA pad longer extant, 137 new concrete pad poured Good Good CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fra1?.mentation 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation Ii I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion p I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracl,ing 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfolia tion Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Effiorescence D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 ID I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 B 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 Vceetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 G o I 2 3 0 I Q 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I g 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing g I 2 3 ,2 I 2 3 ig I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Uoints Soiling 0 I 2 a 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 a o I 2 3 Graffiti ~ I 2 3 !l I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staininl!. Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank co11ditio11s f rom O (poor) to 3 (high) Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish O,•cra ll Condition 0 I 2 i 0 I 2 a 0 I 2 3 0 I Q 3 0 I 2 3 O=poor J: high) Overall lntcgri!) 0 I a 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ ~ I 2 3 0:poor 3: high) Conservator: David Espinosa Treatment Date: 11/15/2014 Plol ide ntification: 220 Weather (circle all that applY, : warm ~ cold humid sunny rain.lsnow/fog windy Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) 138 Tier I Trealmenl description Effectiveness Grade I Treatment 1 Removal of lichen and moss with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 a Treatment 2 Cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water with a 0 I 2 2 nylon scrub brush. Treatment 3 Appl ication ofD2 Biological solution along 'instant resu lts· 0 I 2 ~ method. Comments: The Mary Packard marker has been removed from its original context and set into a large concrete pad alongside her first husband Eugene Skinner and two of their children. The marble elements of her marker have been cleared of mortar and set with the primary face in a skyward orientation. This orientation subjects the most detailed and important face of the marker to heavier weathering. Being located on the ground the marker is subject to damage and soi ling from people walking around and over it. The primary marble element appears 10 have been broken just be low the primary inscription . No repairs along this fracture are visible. A large amount of moss covered the concrete pad and the grave marker. This was removed as moss will keep moisture in contact wi th the stone as well as obscure it from view. Cleaning was very successful in removing soiling and lightening the stone. Recommendations: Given the deceased 's prominence in local hi story annual cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended. This will protect the stone as well as allow visitors to appreciate tbe beautifully carved marker and better understand Mary's part in the history of Eugene, Oregon. 139 ~IJIC~a~ CONDITION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 251h Avenue and Universi ty Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !State: Oregon UTM Coordinates: Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa I 1~ her (~ircle alf that apply): hot ~ cool cold ~ humid ~ ram/snow/fog overcast windy ID ENTIFI CATION: Plot identification: Thomas Condon Plot lot desi nation: 209 Name(s) of interred: Fanny Cornelia Condon First burial date: NIA Last burial date: N/A Inscription Legibility: Rank from O (iliegible) to 3 (easily legible) Primar inscri tion I 2 Sccondar inscri tion I 2 3 Inscription: (// signifies damage that renders the inscription illegible) ROBE// Son of JOHN & R. RH EA DIED Feb. 7, 1899 Aged 21 Ys. I !Ms. 7Ds Stone carver (if known): N/A !Location of mark: N/A 141 D ESCRI PTION : Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): headstone footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions {primary stone) Height: IWidth: !Depth (or L) : Dimensions {base) Height: !Width: !Depth (or L): Dimensions {other): Height: !Width: !Depth (or L) : Orientation (circle one): Nonh South East M'est unknown Interment status (circle one): ~ctive inactive abandoned Sta te of interment (circle all that apply): standing ruin fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): jndividual fami ly undeterminable Pedestal (circle one) : yes no IBase (circle one): yes no Ornament (circle all that apply): !!!:!! sculpture cross plaque relief decoratior: incised decoration ornamental vase none Furnitu re (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles none Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt concrete soil grass ¥egetation other Enclosure (circle all thal apply): curb wall fence none Grade slope (circle one): positive µegative cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one): O(Jow) ~ 2 3 (high) Surveyor: David Espinosa Date: Plot identification: 329 Weather (circle all that apply): hot cool cold ~J}; humid swm)l rain/snow/fog overcast windy MATERJALS: Check appropriate fields rJ'ype of material Primary structure Base Surface Finish O rnament Roof tMarble X X Limestone !Granite Brick Concrete \.1etal andstone Modern Coating imewash ement wash Primary str ucture Base urface Finish rn ament Roof 142 History of Repairs Primary element Base is no NIA NIA NIA rwas reconstructed longer !with threaded nylon extant 1:>in and yellow ~poxy rimary element reset with Portland ement and yellow eooxv. Condition of Failed: Epox y has Repairs failed and pin was off-cen1er CON DITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse I) I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss I) I 2 3 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 [I 2 3 Disaggregation o I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 Erosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 ~ 2 3 0 m 2 3 Cracking p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 JI 2 3 Exfoliation ,0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Effiorescence 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 Q I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion ~ I 2 3 n I 2 3 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations I) I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I i 3 0 I a 3 2 I 2 3 g I 2 3 [joints Soiling 0 I i 3 0 I ii 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 Graffiti 0 l 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 I) I 2 3 Metallic sta ining p I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 o I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other Q I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 g I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) ta 3 (high) Roof 143 \'Cra ll ln tcgrit O I 2 ~ I 2 3 I 2 3 I 2 O=poor 3~high) T r eat ment effectiveness · Rankfrom O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) Tier: 3 Treatment description Effectiveness T reatment I Moss and lichen removal with plastic scraper 0 I 2 G T r eatment 2 Removal of failed epoxy and nylon pin at break. 0 I 2 G T rea tment 3 Cleansing with Orvus WA Paste in clean water applied with 0 I 2 ~ nylon scrub brush T reatment 4 Application of 02 Biological Solution on wet surface. 0 I 2 ~ Rewetting and agitation of solution after 20 minutes. Rinsed with clean water. Treatment 5 Raking and repainting of joints with mortar mix comprised 0 I 2 ~ of I part White Portland Cement 3 parts Hydra1ed Lime. Treatment 6 Bonding of fragments with Akemi Akepox 5010. Color was 0 I 2 ~ matched 10 natural stone and bonds were supported with lumber braces and c-clamps. Area surrounded with caution tape. Comments: The Robert Rhea marker has experienced previous repairs in two locations; an epoxy bond mid-way through the primary marble element, and a bond between the marble elements with both an epoxy and a grey mortar mixture. Both repair locations employed a threaded nylon joining the separate elements and fragments. 801h repair locations had failed all owing for 1he fragments and elements to be easily separated by hand. The nylon pin joining the fragments of the primary marble element had been improperl y set producing an off-set bond. This visual break prompted in itial investigation which discovered the fai lures of previous repairs. The epox y and grey mortar bonding the upper and lower marb le elements was removed with a chisel revealing a surface that had been texture wi1h a chisel to promote a stronger bond. Once clear of mortar the lower marble element was cleaned with Orvus WA Paste and 02 Biological Solution. The nylon pin was left in place as it did nm affect stability and was properly aligned. A new mortar mix of I part white Portland cement, 3 parts hydrated lime was applied to a wetted surface producing a joint of 1/4 inch. The joint was struck and cleaned 1hen allowed to cure for 48 hours. The bond between the fragments of the upper element was done with a yellow epoxy applied around the threaded nylon pin. The epoxy flaked off easil y without the use of tools. Misalignment of 1he fragments prompted removal of the nylon pin and application ofa new epoxy bond. Akemi Akepox 50 10 was colored to match the stone and applied in a thin layer to both fragments to be bonded. A ½ inch stri p of stone around the edge of the broken fragments 144 was left in anticipation of the epoxy spreading. Upon setting the upper fragment upon the lower the epoxy created suction 1hat allowed for a very tight fi1 and near-perfect alignment. The upper fragment was gently shaken to eliminate bubbles with the epoxy and achieve a tighter fit. The assembly was then supported with lumber braces and c-clamps. The epoxy was allowed to cure for 72 hours. The ornamental finial was later discovered in s1orage at the Hope Abbey Mausoleum. This was later cleaned and bonded 10 the marker wi1h Akemi Akepox 5010. The marker rests on a concrete pad along with several other markers. It is apparent by the tilt of 1he marker that a base similar to the nearby markers once existed but is as of now unaccoun1ed for. Recommendations: Reconstruction of a base is recommended to properly level the marker and raise the lower marble element off the concrete pad. Regular cleaning with Orvus WA Paste in clean water is recommended to maintain the stone's natural color and retain the integrity of the incised and carved ornament. Moss and vegetation should be removed from the joint and bonded fractures when encountered to ensure stability of these repairs. This marker is along a high traffic area and is an excellent example of what proper repairs and cleaning can accomplish especially when compared to the untreated markers within its shared plot. It should be uti lized for cemetery advocacy. 145 . IJIE- ~ Roben Rhfti marker pre-rrearmenr RemOIIOI a/ epoxy ot fracture ~tail a/ ef)(J}(lf, manor and pm at/ailed jamt 146 (Above) Prrmoryelement pre-cleonmr,, o!f-51re (Above} Curing of mortor jomt (Left} S11ppons in ploce d11rmQ epoxy c11rillr, 147 (left) Rober! Rheo morker po5t-treo1menr (Below) Roben Rheo marker ond ne,ghbormg markers 148 CONDIT ION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Sile: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25th Avenue and Univers ity Street City: Eugene !County: Lane !Sta le: Oregon Owner: Eugene Mason ic Cemetery Association Conl acl: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (54 1) 684-0949 Surveyo r : David Espinosa !Survey Dale : 10/17/20 13 Weather (circle all that apply): hot warm tool cold drj humid siiiiny rai n/snow/fog overcast wind y I DENTIFICATION: Plot identification : Rhea lot desi nat ion : 300 Na me(s) of interred : Eliza Catharine Rhea, Robert Henderson lnscriplion Legibili ty: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) 2 3 I 2 3 Insc ription: (II signifies a frac ture that renders tex t illegible) ELIZA CATHARJ 'E ROBERT HENDERSON Wife of Son of E.W. RHEA. E.W. & E. C. Rhea Bom. Sept. 3, 1826; Died Jan 4, 1857 Aged 3 Yrs. Died/I [J]an. 15, 1860 4 ms.4ds. [A]gcd 33ys. 4ms. JOds. Stone carver (if known): N/A !Location of mark: NIA 149 DESCRIPTION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb ~ family name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): . ~ footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obel isk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 4'0'' IWidth: 1'8" ID epth (or L): 0'2" Dimensions (base) Height: O'O" !Width: 2'4" !Depth (or L): I '4" Dimensions (other): Height: IWidth: !Depth (or L): Orientation (circle one): Nonh Somh East West unknown Interment status (circle one): active inacti ve abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): standing ruin J!!gnl___.S!!I ~ altered replica tilted sunken Type of interment (circle one): individual family undeterminable Pedestal (circle one): yes ii<> IBase (ci rcle one): res no Ornament (circle all that apply): urn sculpture cross plaque relief decoratio, incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles none Landscape (circle all that apply): brick asphalt concre1e soil grass vegetation other Enclosure (circle all 1ha1 apply): curb wall fence none Grade slope (circle one): positive Pegative cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one): 0(low) 1 2 3 (high) MATERIALS· Check appropriate fields Type of material Primary structure Base Surface Finish !Ornament Roof Marble X X Limestone ICranite Brick !Concrete X Metal Sandstone Modern Coating ILimewash !Cement wash Primary structure Base Roof History of Repairs Multiple repairs Original base NIA NIA with yellow epoxy lost, new 150 and unknown concrete base binder poured !Condition of Failure of yellow Stable Repairs epoxy CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) IO 3 (high presence) Condi lions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 l 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 J 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation 0 I 2 i 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation n I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 1 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking ~ I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoliation n I 2 3 Q I 2 3 A I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterations 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 IQ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 joints Soiling 0 I 2 3 0 ' 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti g I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank condi1ions from O (poor) 10 3 (high) Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish IO\!erall Condition 0 I 2 3 p I 2 ~ p I 2 3 0 I l 3 0 I 2 3 O=poor 3=high) !Overall lntegrit) 0 I a 3 g I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 O=poor 3=high) !Conservator: David Espinosa !Treatment Date: 4/2/2014 IPlot identification: 300 I l~ her (circle all 1ha1 apply): bot I.\'.!!!!! cool cold !ki humid ~ rain/snow/fog overcast windy Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) 151 Tier I 3 Treatment description Effectiveness Grade Treatment l Removal oflichen and moss with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 2 Treatment 2 Removal of fai led epox y with 5-in-l , chisel and hammer. 0 I 2 ~ Treatment 3 Cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water applied 0 I 2 ~ with nylon scrub brush to remove soiling. Treatment 4 Application ofD2 Biological Solution along ' Instant 0 I 2 ~ Results' method Treatment S Bonding of fragments with Akemi Akepox 5010 supported 0 I 2 a by lumber braces and c-clamps over multiple day curing period. Comments: The Eliza Catharine Rhea tablet has been subject to multiple episodes of vandalism. This prompted several auempts at repair as well as reconstruction of a base with concrete. There are two distinct binders noted: a yellow epoxy applied in quarter-sized dollops, and a darker unidentified mastic binder. The yellow epoxy has failed while the unidentified binder remains stable. The tablet was broken into three fragments, each experiencing different patterns of weathering. There is material loss along the breaks in stone, yet legibility and ornamental carving has survived relatively well. After removal of the failed epoxy the fragments were cleaned with Orvus WA Paste in clean water and treated with D2 Biological Solution to mute staining. Once ambient temperatures were at an appropriate level bonding of the fragments was carried out with Akemi Akepox 5010. Significant voids due to material loss were present along the fractures. Akepox 5010 was placed into a plastic bag, forced to a comer which was then cut. This formed a makeshift pastry bag that allowed epoxy to be piped into the voids. This ensured no voids could be occupied with invasive plant life or moisture. The tablet was bonded in two phases to ensure proper curing and stability. Each curing phase lasted 72 hours and was supported by lumber braces held in place with c-clamps. The area was properly marked with caution tape during curing. The neighboring marker were documented and cleaned along a tier I program. Recommendations: Regu lar cleaning with Orvus WA Paste in clean water is recommended to maintain natural stone color and deter biological growth. Being in a high -traffi c area this marker must be monitored and maintained to deter further vanda lism. 152 Documentin9 the upper Jro9ment 153 Curingofrhelowerondmiddlefrogment5 Curmg of the upper and middle fragments Rhea morker po5t-treatment 154 C ONDITION & T REATMENT RECORDATION FORM Sile: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address : 25111 Avenue and University Street C ity: Eugene [County: Lane IStal e: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Co ntact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (541) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa IS urvey Dale: 2/25/20 14 Weather (circle all that apply): hot wann £!!!!! cold ~ry humid !~ rain/snow/fog overcast wi ndy IDENTIFICATION! Plot identification : Rugh plot des ignation : 461 Na me(s) of interred: Eugene W. Rugh Insc ription Legibility : Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) 2 3 Inscription : EUGENE W. RUG H FEB. 8, 1920 APR. 26, 1820 Stone car ver (if known): N/A IL ocation of mark: N/A 155 DESCRI PTION: T ype of inte rment (circle one): tomb marker fam ily name marker Type or tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type or ma rker (circle al/ Jhar apply): -~ footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedes1al column funeral home plaque bedstead Dimensions (pr imary stone) Height: l ' 0" IWidlh: l'0" IDeplh (or L): 0'3" Dimensions (base) Height : 0 '6'. IW!dlh: 1'5" IDeplh (o r L): 0'9" Dimensions (other): Height : IWidth: IDeplh (o r L): Orientation (circle one): North South East West unknown Interment sta tus (circle one): ~ tive inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all thar apply): stand ing b!i!i fragment relocated altered replica tilted sunken Type or interment (circle one): individual family undetenn inable Pedesta l (circle one) : yes po !Base (circle one): fCS no O rn ament (circle all rhat apply): um scu lpture cross plaque reli ef decoratim incised decoration ornamental vase oonc Furniture (circle all rhar apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortelles i,one La ndscape (circle all thar apply): brick asphalt concrete soil gras~ vegetation other Enclosure (circle all rhar apply): curb wall fence none Grade slope (circle one): positive negative cross~slope Degree of grade (circle one): 0 (low) I 2 3 (h;gh) - MATERIALS: Check appropriarefie/ds Type of materi al Primary st ru cture Base Surface Fin is h O rnament Roof Ma rble X Limestone Gran ite Brick !Concrete Mela! Sandslone X Modern Coating Limewash ~ement wash Primary struclure Base S urface Fini sh Orn ament Roof Hislory of Repairs Reset in base with N/A N/A N/A N/A nylon pin and Portland cement 156 ~ ond_ition of Failed Repairs CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Collapse 0 I 2 G b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Loss 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Fragmentation p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Disaggrega tion D I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 I 2 3 0 ll 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 C rac kin g 0 I 2 3 Q I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoliation 0 I 2 3 0 I ~ 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence 0 I 2 3 19 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corros ion 9 I 2 3 p I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Bio-growth 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 G, 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Vet! eta tion n I 2 3 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Alterati ons 0 I 2 3 0 ll 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I 2 a 0 I 2 1 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Lioints Soiling 0 I 2 3 0 I i 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti ff I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic stai ning ~ I 2 3 b I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) to 3 (high) Roof Condilion 0 I 2 3~high) Integrity I 2 3~high) Consen ·ator: David Esp inosa Weather (circle all that apply_ : rain/snow/fog Treatment effectiveness: Rank from O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) T ier 2 Treatment description Effectiveness Grade 157 Trealmenl 1 Removal of moss with plastic scraper. 0 I 2 ~ Treatment 2 Remova l of failed mortar wi1h ch isel and hammer. 0 I 2 ~ Treatment 3 Clean ing of primary element and base with Orvus \VA Paste 0 I 2 ~ in clean water to remove soil ing. Treatment 4 Application ofD2 Biological Solution to remove or mute 0 I 2 ~ biological staining. Treatment 5 Resetting of primary clement in mortar bed within recessed 0 I 2 ~ slot . Comments: The Eugene Rugh marker is a small grave marker located at the northwest entrance of the cemetery grounds. It was selected for treatment due to its highl y vis ible location and the presence of prior repairs that have since fai led. Yellow epoxy and Portland cement based mortar have fai led at the connection between the marble element and the base. Invasive plant life has contributed to advanced deterioration of the sandstone base. Moss root systems had pene1ra1ed the layers of sandstone causing ex foliation and compromised the stabi lity of the mortar within the base's recessed slot. Previous repairs utilized a threaded nylon pin and a Portland cement based mortar mix thal was much harder 1han the surrounding sandstone. The pin was left in the base as it was not detrimental to the joint and removal would incur unnecessary loss of more historic ma1erial. Once the recessed slo1 was cleared of failed mortar it was cleaned and a bed of lime-based mortar was laid. The mortar used was a pre-mixed grey- pigmented s-type mortar. This came at the recommenda1ion ofa local masonry supply shop. This was the only instance in which pre-mixed mortar was used for this project. Further mortar use was reevalua1ed for the remainder of markers needing mortar work. The recessed slot and marble element were pre-wetted wi th clean water before mortar was laid to facilitate a stronger bond between the elements. Once filled the join1 was struck and excess mortar cleaned away. The recessed slot had become shallow as the sandstone deteriorated and mortar was tooled to fill the voids of the base surrounding the mortar bed. Caution tape was erected around the area and the si1e was cleaned of debris. The mortar cured over the course of the followi ng days and has since remained stable. Recomm endations : Regular cleaning with Orvus WA Paste and clean water is recommended. Removal of moss is necessary in order to retain the stabi lity of the sandstone base. The mortar should be monitored and compared in perfonnance to custom-mixed mortars throughout the cemetery. 158 EugeneRughmark:erpre-rreatment Detailafnylanpin,/alledepaJIYandmortar Detail a/ exfaliatian and mvasive roat plant matenal Recesseds/otc/earafmartarandcleaned 159 CONDITION & TREATMENT RECORDATION FORM Site: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Address: 25th Avenue and University S1reet City: Eugene !County: Lane JState: Oregon Owner: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Contacl: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (54 I) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Survey Date: 265 Wea1her (circle all that a(~ hot warm ~ cold I!!>: humid sunny rain/snow/fog vercast windy I DENT IFICATION: Plot identificalion: E. Scott Shelton lot desi •nation: Na me(s) of interred: Ma Shelton lnscriplion Legibility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) 2 3 2 3 Inscription: MARY WIFE OF THOMAS E. SHELTON BORN OEC. 18, 1845 DIED FEB. 6, 1921 Stone carver (if known): N/A !Location of mark: N/A 161 Df-SCRIPT ION: Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker famil y name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum Type of marker (circle all that apply): ~ tone foots tone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funera l home plaque bedstead Dimensions (pr imary stone) Height : 3' I" IWidlh: 1'4" Depth (or L): 0'3" Dimensions (base) Height: 2'0'' IWidlh: 2'0" Depth (or L): I ' I " Dimensions (other): Height : IWidlh: Deplh (or L): O rienta tion (circle one): North South East West unknown Interment sta tu s (circle one): ~ctive inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): standing I!!!!! fragment relocated altered replica tilted ~ Type of in terment (circle one): mdividual fami ly undetenninable Pedestal (circle one) : yes DO !Base (ci rcle one): ;yes no Ornament {circle all that apply): urn sculpture cross plaque relief decoratio1 incised decoration ornamental vase none Furniture (circle all that apply): sculpture container/vase plaque immortcl les none Landscape {circle all that apply): brick asphalt !'ODCrel~ soil ~s ~egetatioo other Enclos ure (circle aJJ 1ha1 apply): ~urb wall fence none Grade slope {circle one): positi ve pegative cross-slope none Degree of grade (circle one}: 0(low) I ¢ 3 (high) MATERIALS: Check appropriale fields tr ype of materia l Pri mary st ructure Base ~ urface Finish !ornament Roof Ma rble X Limestone X !Granite Brick lr-oncrete Metal andstone Modern Coating Limewasb !cement wash Primary structure Base ~ urface Finish !Ornament Roof Histo ry of Repairs NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA !condition of lff.epairs 162 CONDITIONS: Rank conditions from O (low presence) to 3 (high presence) Conditions Primary Base Surface Ornament Roof structure Finish Coll apse 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J Loss 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J Fragmentation 0 I ~ J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 Disaggregation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Erosion 0 m 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Cracking 0 l 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Exfoliation 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 Efflorescence D I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J Finish detachment 0 I 2 3 Corrosion 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J Bio-growth 0 I ~ 3 0 ~ 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Vegetation 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J Alterations ~ I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Open/missing 0 I 2 i 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 ioints Soiling 0 I 2 ~ 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Graffiti 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Metallic staining n I 2 3 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 J 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 Other 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 0 I 2 3 (describe): Rank conditions from O (poor) to 3 (high) Primary rnament Roof structure I 2 I 2 I 2 I 2 Treatment Date: 4/13/20 14 hot cool cold overcast windy TreatmenIt effectiveness: Rrmkfrom O (ineffective) to 3 (very effective) Tier 3 Treatment description Effectiveness Grade Treatment 1 Removal of lichen and plant material with plastic scraper. 0 I 163 T reatment 2 Cleaning of marble fragments with O1VUs solution and 0 I 2 2 nylon brush. Application of D2 Biological solution in 'Instant Results' method. T reatment 3 Removal of failed mortar from recessed slot. Prepared slot 0 I 2 ~ to accept mortar and primary element. T reatment 4 Lowest marble fragment set in recessed slot with lime 0 I 2 ~ mortar mix. Mortar mix consisting of I part white Portland cement, 4 parts hydrated lime, 8 parts clean sand, and water. Allowed to cure for 48 hours. Treatment 5 Middle marble fragment bonded to lower element with 0 I 2 2 Akemi Akepox 5010. Braced wi1h lumber supports and c• clamps for 48 hours. Upper element bonded once middle bond cured. Comments : The marble fragments of the Mary Shelton marker were excavated from behind the base. Heavy soiling and staining required rigorous cleaning and D2 treatment. The base has experienced material loss around the recessed slot, likely as a result of the marble element falling from the slot. The remaining mortar was removed with a chisel before the base was cleaned and prepared for mortar work. The recessed slot was wetted with clean water then a ½ inch layer of mortar was laid across the slot. The lowest marble element was then placed in the slot and positioned with a bubble level until plumb. Mortar was packed in the voids of the slot then struck and cleaned. The marble element was supported with lumber braces for 48 hours wh ile the mortar cured. Once deemed fil the middle fragment was bonded 10 the lower with Akemi Akepox 5010. The bond was braced and allowed to cure before the final fragment was bonded. The treatment was very successful and the marker is very stable. Recommendations : Regular cleaning with O1VUS WA Paste in clean water is recommended to retain the stone 's natural color and inscription legibility. The sile should be monitored for soil shifting and mitigated if tilting of 1he marker is noticed. 164 RemOIIOI of the morblr fropmenu /01 off-s,1r treorment Bose ofter mortor removal 165 Monarcunn9 Marble frogmen ts cur,n9 {Below} Mary Shelton mar icer post-rreotmenr 166 CONDITION & T REATMENT RECORDA TION FORM Sile: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Street Add ress: 25th Avenue and Univers ity Street C ity: Eugene ]County: Lane !State: Oregon O wner : Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association Co ntact: Eugene Masonic Cemetery Association IP hone: (54 1) 684-0949 Surveyor: David Espinosa !Survey Date: 10/20/20 13 Wea lher (circle aJ/ 1ha, a~· hot wann ~ cold i!d. humid sunny rain/snow/fog vercast windy IDENTIFICATIO,'' ; Plot identifica tion: E. Scolt Shelton lot desi nation: 267 Na me(s) of inter red: Thomas E. Shelton Insc ription Legi bility: Rank from O (illegible) to 3 (easily legible) 0 1 3 0 2 3 Inscr iption:(// signifi es a break tha1 renders inscription ill egible) THOMASE SHELTON BORN Sept. 6, 1834 Died May 28, 1882 As a husband loyal As a father affectionate rA s al// kind and true. Stone carver (if known): N/A !Location of ma rk : NIA 167 ?.i J:.IIC.- ell - -, DESCRIPTI ON: Type of interment (circle one): tomb marker fami ly name marker Type of tomb (circle one): mausoleum T ype of marker (circle all that apply): headstone footstone ground tablet basal ruin cross pedestal obelisk Woodmen of the World pedestal column funera l home plaque bedstead Dimensions (primary stone) Height: 2'2" !Width: 1'8" !Depth (or L): 0'4" Dimensions (base) Height : 2' 1" IWidth: 2' 1" ID epth (or L): 1' I'' Dimensions (other) : Height: !Width: !Depth (or L): O rientation (circle one): North South East iWest unknown Interment sta tus (circle one): ,active inactive abandoned State of interment (circle all that apply): standing ruin ji2.0 gfkg body weight Dermal L05(1: Not csiimated Eye Irritation: With or withou1 rinsing with water. 1hc irTita1ion scores in rabbits at 24 hours did not exceed 17 (mild irTitanl) on a scale of 110 (extremely irTitating): all scores were normal at seven days. Denna! Irritation: In a standard test on rabbits. mild irTitation was found at 72 hours; well-defined reddening was observed al 7 and 14 days after exposure. Denna! Sensitization: No allergic reactions occurred in guinea pigs treated with D/2 Biological Solution. Carcinogenicity: D/2 Biological Solution contains no carcinogenic compounds as defined by the National Toxicology Program (NTP). the international Agency for Research on Carcinogens (IARC). or the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA). KffiMNFMiilJl♦IriliilMHJtMDll■S Biodegradability: All components are inherently biodegradable. Ecotoxicity: Not Tested. iibMNiMO~iRU.-iililf3.ilii8tMll•AA Unused Product: • Dilute with water 1:10 (\ part D/2 Biological Solution to 10 pans water) and dispose by sanitruy sewer. •used produe1 may be hazardous depending on 1he cleaning application and resulting contaminants. Empty Containers: •Triple-rinse with water and offer for recycling ifa\"ailable. Otherwise, dispose as non-hazardous was1e. •Dispose of used or unused produCl, and empty containers in accordance with the local, State, Provincial. and Federal regulations for your location. Never dispose of used degreasing rinsates into lakes. streams, and open bodies of water or storm drains. lffiMNiM ■ ffuikll;iih-ii♦l;iiiill'i IA TA Proper Shipping Name: Detergent solution Hazard Class: Non hazardous ½§§it,i,itiMtiid■ iillltdh-ii♦lfiiiill■S • Reportable components: None. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that propylene glycol ethers are not included within the listed category "glycol ethers" under either EPCRA §313 Toxic Release Inventory or Clean Air Act § I 12 Hazardous Air Pollutants (both lists include only ethylene glycol ethers). Nor arc propylene glycol ethers included in the various EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, and Clean Water Act lists, nor the California Proposition 65 lists. All components are listed on: EINECS and TSCA lnventory Clean Air Act Section 112 Not a hazardous waste. CERCLA Status: No components listed Not required / Not listed CA PROP. 65 Status: No components listed For Safet y Information, Sales Applications a nd Availability contact: CATHEDRAL STONE'- PRODUCTS, INC. 7266 Park Circle Drive, Hanover, MD 21076 Telephone: 410-782-9150 Fax: 410-782-91 55 DI SC LAIMER: All information appearing herein is based upon data obtained by 1hc manufacturer and recognized technical sources. Judgments as to the suitability of information herein for purchaser's purposes arc necessarily purehaser·s responsibility. Therefore, although reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of this information, Sunshine Makers, Inc. or its distributors extends no warranties. makes no representations and assumes no responsibility as to the suitability of such information for application to purchaser's intended purposes or for consequences of its use. 200 LIME SOLV NEW MASONRY DETERGENT CLEANER SECTiON I · PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION MANUFACTURER 'S NAME: DIEDRICH TECHNOLOGIES INC. EMERGENY TELEPHONE NUMBER: AND ADDRESS: A Hohmann & Barnard Company 8 :00 AM - S:00 PM EST Monday - Friday: 800-283· 3888 310 Wayto Road, Schenectady, NY 12303 NON-BUSINESS HOURS (CHEMTREC) : 800--424· 9300 PRODUCT NAME: 200 LIME SOLV NEW MASONRY DETERGENT CLEANER 11/2011 SECTION 11 • HAZARDOUS INGREDIENTS NOTE: Hazardous acidic ingredients in this product are in a water diluted form; not in the pure concentrated acidic form. This product contains less than 20% Hydrochloric Acid (HCL) reduced of a 4S% by more than 70% water and buffered by a surfactant w etting agent. CHEMICAL NAME CASNO. NFPA CODE TLV PEL Hydrochloric Acid 7647--01-1 3/0/0/- 5 ppm 5 ppm SPECIFIC CHEMICAL IDENTITY AND PERCENTAGE CONTENT OF INGREDIENTS WITHHELD AS TRADE SECRET PURSUANT TO MASSACHUSETTS REGULATIONS. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 313 TITLE Ill OF THE SUPERFUND AMENDMENTS AND REAUTHORIZATION ACT OF 1986 AND 10 CFR PART 373 APPLY. SECTION Ill - PHYSICAL DATA BOILING POINT (EF) 212EF SPECIFIC GRAVITY (H20=l): 1.10 VAPOR PRESSURE (mmHg) : 25 % VOLATILE (by weight): 35% VAPOR DENSITY (Air=l): 1.64 EVAPORATION RATE (Ether=l): -1 SOLUBILITY IN WATER: APPEARANCE AND ODOR: Clear to light imber liquid, sharp acid smell. )VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPONENTS: N/A pH = 1 SECTION IV- FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARD DATA FLASH POINT: Non-flammable FLAMMABLE LIMITS: LEL = N/A UH= N/A EXTINGUISHING MEDIA: Dry chemical or carbon dioxide. SPECIAL FIRE FIGHTING PROCEDURES: Hydrogen chloride gas may be released from vented or ruptured containers. Heat is generated when water is added with the possibility of spattering. Use water to keep containers exposed to fire cool until fire is extinguished . Water and foam may cause a violent reaction if sprayed on melting, burning containers, endangering fire fighters. Full protective equipment and SCBA is recommended UNUSUAL FIRE AND EXPLOSION HAZARDS: Possible formation of hydrogen gas caused by contact with metals which can when mixed with air be explosive. SECTION V- HEALTH HAZARD DATA PRIMARY ROUTES OF EXPOSURE: Inhalation, skin, eyes, ingestion. CARCINOGENIC INFORMATION: Not listed (OSHA, IARC, NTP). MEDICAL CONDITIONS AGGRAVATED BY OVEREXPOSURE: No applicable information found. EFFECTS OF OVEREXPOSURE: Chronic nose, throat or sinus conditions. Lung conditions such as asthma, bronchitis, emphysema, etc. Prolong high exposure can cause weight loss corresponding to exposure levels. Erosion of the teeth has been associated with long term overexposure. CHRONIC EFFECTS: Liquid, vapors and mists can cause severe burns to eyes, skin, respiratory and gastrointestinal tracks. Contact to the eye can quickly lead to blindness. Skin contact will result in burns and deep skin ulcers. Swallowing will cause severe burns to mucous membranes and deep tissue, and possible death if vital areas are penetrated. EYE CONTACT: Product's vapor, liquid and mists are extremely corrosive to the eyes. Minor or brief contact with vapors will cause severe irritation. Brief contact with liquid or mist will cause severe damage to the eyes. Prolonged contact can cause permanent injury to the eye and even blindness. SKIN CONTACT: Product's vapor, liquid and mists are extremely corrosive to skin. Contact with vapors will cause severe irritation to the skin. Contact with liquid and mists will cause severe burns to the skin. Prolonged contact with liquid will cause burns and destroy surrounding tissue. Burns that extend over large percentage of the body can result in death. INHALATION: Product's vapor, liquid and mist are extremely corrosive to nose, throat, and mucous membranes . Bronchitis, pulmonary edema, and chemical pneumonitis may result. Brief exposure may result in difficulty breathing, irritation, coughing and chest pains. Severe irritation and tissue damage can result from extended periods of exposure. Death can occur from breathing high concentrations. INGESTION: Product's vapor, mist and liquid are extremely corrosive to mouth and throat. If swallowed the liquid will cause burns to tissue and extreme abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and collapse. If large quantities are swallowed, death can result. EMERGENCY ANO FIRST AID PROCEDURES: EYE CONTACT: Flush eyes immediately with plenty of water for a minimum of 30 minutes. Lift both upper and lower eyelids periodically. Seek immediate medical attention. SKIN CONTACT: Flush immediately with cold water for minimum of 15 minutes and remove contaminated clothing. If hands are contaminated, particular attention must be paid to skin under fingernails. Launder contaminated clothing before reuse. Discard contaminated shoes. Seek immediate medical attention. INHALATION: Remove to fresh air immediately. If breathing difficulty is experienced give oxygen. If not breathing give artificial respiration, preferably mouth-to-mouth. Seek medical attention immediately. INGESTION: DO NOT INDUCE VOMITING. Immediately give large quantities of water or milk. Seek immediate medical attention. Never give an unconscious person anything by mouth. SECTION VI - REACTIVITY DATA STABILITY: Stable CONDITIONS TO AVOID: Contact with highly alkaline materials can cause a violent reaction which can generate large amounts of heat. HAZARDOUS/THERMAL DECOMPOSITION PRODUCTS: Contact with metals can cause evolution of explosive hydrogen gas. Hydrogen chloride, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. Poisonous, flammable hydrogen sulfide can be generated from contact with sulfides. SECTION VII · SPILL OR LEAK PROCEDURES SPILL, LEAK AND WASTE DISPOSAL PROCEDURES: Immediately evacuate area where concentrated fumes are found. Allow only cleanup personnel wearing the appropriate protective equipment and clothing into the areas. Dike with absorbent material and carefully neutralize with alkali, soda ash, lime or limestone. Adequate ventilation must be provided due to release of carbon dioxide gas. Prevent un-neutralized material from entering drains, sewers, waterways or soil. Applicable government regulations regarding spill reporting, handling and waste disposal must be complied with. WASTE DISPOSAL METHODS: Contaminated product and materials used in cleanup must be placed in approved containers and disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local regulations. SECTION VIII - SPECIAL PROTECTION INFORMATION RESPIRATORY PROTECTION: Use NIOSH/MSHA approved dust/mist filter respirator for routine work purposes when exposure exceed the permissible exposure limits. The respirator use limitations made by NIOSH/MSHA or the manufacturer must be observed. VENTILATION: Local Exhaust Sufficient to maintain exposure to levels below permissible exposure limits. If mechanical exhaust is required it should be of the steel or plastic fan type. PROTECTIVE CLOTHING: Protect all body parts from contact by using full acid resistant suit with tight fitting cuffs and collar, rubber boots and head protection. PROTECTIVE GLOVES: Neoprene - butyl rubber - PVC - polyethylene. EYE PROTECTION: Close fitting safety chemical goggles and full face shield . OTHER PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT: Apply Diedrich recommended skin barrier cream for additional protection. Solvent resistant boots and hardhat. Safety shower and eyewash or fresh running water dose at hand. SECTION IX • SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS PRECAUTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN HANDLING AND STORAGE: Keep away from heat, sparks, and open flames. Use with adequate ventilation. Store away from oxidizing materials. Avoid prolonged or repeated contact with skin. Aher this container has been emptied it may contain explosive and/or harmful vapors and residue. OTHER PRECAUTIONS: Do not store in or pipe through anything metallic, use only poly-lined steel or approved plastic. Keep containers tightly sealed. Do not cut puncture or weld on or near this container. Do not re-use container for any purpose until it has been commercially deaned. Keep container dosed when not in use. SECTION X - SHIPPING INFORMATION Proper Shipping Name: Corrosive liquids n.o.s. (Contains hydrochloric acid) Class: LEGENDS: 0 = LEAST 1 = SLIGHT 2 = MODERATE 3 = HIGH 4 = EXTREME N.D. = NOT DETERMINED N.A. = NOT AVAILABLE N/ A NOT APPLICABLE While this company believes that the data contained herein are factual and the opinions expressed are based on tests and data believed to be reliable, it is the user's responsibility to determine the safety, toxicity and suitability for his own use of the product described herein. Since the actual use by others is beyond our control, no guarantee, expressed or implied, is made by this company as to the effects of such use, the results to be obtained, or the safety and toxicity of the product, nor does this company assume any liability arising out of use, by others, of the product referred to herein. Nor is this information herein to be construed as absolutely complete since additional information may be necessary or desirable when particular or exceptional cond itions or circumstances exist or because of applicable laws or governmental regulations. REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRACT TERMS: Failure to obtain a property owner's written acceptance of the enclosed Required Supplemental Terms and Conditions for Restoration Contract shall release any and all of the manufacturer's express or implied warranties (including, without limitation merchantability and fitness for particular purpose) and user shall indemnify and hold manufacturer harmless from alt liability cost and expenses arising in any way from use of or contact with this product. All claims of any kind against manufacturer arising from or related to this product in any way shall be decided by binding arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. ~ HOHMANN & BARNARD, INC. ~-f""D A .., .. .. • BERKSHIRE KATKAWAV COWANV Co= 201 Df (>: 93.9 oq Evaporation rate Not available. Vapor pressure Not available. Specific gravity 1.04 Solubility (water) Complete Partition coefficient (n- Not available octanol / water) voe 0% estimated Percent volatile O % estimated estimated 24 10. Chemical Stability & Reactivity Information Chemical stability This is a stable material. Conditions to avoid Temperatures above 140 F (60 C). Maintain pH above 7.0 to prevent decomposition. Contact witti acids. Hazardous decomposition SUifuric acid. Sodium oxides. Hydrogen sulfide. products Hazardous polymerization Will not occur. 25 11. Toxicological Information Sensitization Not available. Chronic effects Not available. Skin con-osion/irritation Not available. 26 12. Ecological Information Environmental effects Based on ecotoxicity and fate data for the individual ingredients in tllis specific formulation, and for related consumer household deaning products formulations, ttiis product is not conSidered hannful to aquatic organisms or to cause loog-term adverse effects in the envirooment at relevant environmental concentrations. This product is intended for dispersive use and should not be disposed of directly into ttie environment. 27 13. Disposal Considerations Disposal instructions This product, in its present state, when discarded or disposed of, is not a hazardous waste according to Federal regulations (40 CFR 261.-1 (b}(4)). Under RCRA, it is the responsibility of the user of the product to determine, at the time of disposal, whether the product meets RCRA criteria for hazardous waste. Dispose in accordance with all applieable regulations. 28 14. Transport Information DOT Not regulated as dangerous goods. IMOG Not regulated as dangerous goods. IATA Not regulated as dangerous goods. 29 15. Regulatory Information US federal regulations This product is not known to be a ~Hazardous O\emic.al• as defined by the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 29 CFR 1910.1200. CERCLA (Superfund) reportable quantity Nooe Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (SARA) Hazard categories Immediate Hazard - Yes Delayed Hazard - No Fire Hazard - No Pressure Hazard - No Reactivity Hazard - No Section 302 extremely No hazardous substance Section 311 hazardous Yes chemical State regulations ILLRTK Contains no Illinois Right To Know toxic substances. US - Massachusetts RTK - Substance: Listed substance SODIUM SULPHATE (CAS 7757-82-6) LISTED US - New Jersey RTK - Special Hazard: listed substance Contains no New Jersey Right To Know special hazards. US - New Jersey RTK - Substances: Listed substance Contains no New Jersey Right To Know Substances US• Pennsylvania RTK - Hazardous Substances: Listed substance Contains no Pennsylvania Right To Know hazardous substances US - Rhode Island RTK - Hazardous Substances: Listed substance Contains no Rhode Island Right To Know hazardous substances. canadian regulations All ingredlent:s are CEPA approved for import to canada by Procter & Gamble. This product has been classified in accordance with hazard criteria of the Controlled Products Regulations and the MSDS contains all the information required by the Controlled Products Regulations. Inventory Status Country(s) or region Inventory name On inventory (yes/no)* United States & Puerto Rico Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) I nventory Yes •A "Yes" indicates that all components of this product comply with the inventOI")' requirements cldministefed by the governing country(s) 30 16. Other Information HMIS@ ratings Health: 1 Flammability: 1 Physical hazard: O NFPA ratings Health: 1 Flammability: 1 Instability: 0 Disclaimer This MSDS is intended to provide a brief summary of our knowledge and guidance regarding the use of this material. The information contained here has been compiled from sources considered by Procter & Gamble to be dependable and is accurate to the best of the Company's knowledge. It is rlOt meant to be an all-inclusive document on worldwide hazard communication regulations. This information is offered in good faith. Each user of this material needs to evaluate the conditions of use and design the appropriate protective mechanisms to prevent employee exposures, property damage or release to the environment. Procter & Gamble assumes no responsibility for injury to the recipient or third persons, or for any damage to any property resulting from misuse of the product. l 1 \ r ,t 1.l1 l 20!~ ., r,hJw,1- Cv:nm,tl! Mi:m · p le