Capital Improvement Program A Community Reinvestment Plan 2008?2012 FISCAL YEARS 2008-2012 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN City of Springfield, Oregon Mayor: Sidney W. Leiken Councilors: Anne Ballew Christine Lundberg Joe Pishioneri David Ralston John Woodrow Hillary Wylie Prepared by: Public Works Department March 2007 Bob Straub Parkway (County Project) ? This project is a Lane County project to connect Main Street to Jasper Road through the Natron area. This Project is scheduled to go to construction later this year. The current construction estimate for this project is approximately $5.7 million. South 42nd Street Improvement, Main Street to Jasper Road ? Bids for phase 2 of this project (Main Street to Mt. Vernon) were recently opened and the award of the construction contract will be brought before the Council on March 19th. This represents the final chapter of a priority project for the Council. Upon completion later this year, safety issues will have been addressed along the full length of this corridor from Main Street to Jasper road. Based upon the bids, phase 2 will be constructed with Portland Cement Concrete pavement, greatly reducing future maintenance costs on this heavily used arterial/truck route. South 69th Street Reconstruction, ?B? Street to Thurston Road ? The funding for this project is a combination of Surface Transportation Program (STP) Funding and City Funds and is currently being designed by a consultant. The road will be reconstructed with new pavement, base rock, sidewalk, and bike lanes. Safety issues along the open drainage channel will also be addressed with this project. This project is scheduled to go to bid in October with an estimated project cost of $1.4 million. Harlow Pump Station Expansion - The Harlow Pump Station serves the Gateway area and will receive flows from the new Martin Luther King Parkway trunk sewer, including the Riverbend development area. Expansion of capacity of the pump station will be necessary prior to receiving new flows from Riverbend and is therefore scheduled for construction this year. In addition to the above major projects, several other projects are also already budgeted and are either scheduled or in the process of being completed, including: 1) several smaller drainage projects; 2) the overlay of Pioneer Parkway; 3) construction of the Vera and 19th Street Pump Station; and 4) several master plan updates such as our Stormwater Master Plan and Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. In the 2008-2012 outlook, we continue to program sewer and drainage capital funds and sewer SDC funds to enable a number of projects. We continue to produce an annual program of both Sanitary Sewer Repair (sheet IV-1) and Drainage Repair (sheet IV-4) throughout the City. Progress continues on the Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement (sheet IV-2) and MS4 Permit Requirements (sheet IV-6). These projects help deliver the City?s obligations to address stormwater quality, permitting and threatened fish impacts. Funding continues to be programmed for the future construction of the Jasper Road Sewer Extension (sheet I-7). And, the Bob Straub Intergovernmental Agreement with Lane County (sheet I-9) item, if the agreement is approved by Council later this year, will address additional drainage and transportation facilities associated with future development in the Jasper/Natron area. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. SECTION 1. TABLES Capital Improvements Review Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i Definitions of Project Categories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii Glossary of Funding Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii SECTION 2. SCHEDULES Summary of Proposed Expenditures by Project Category . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Summary of Proposed Revenues and Expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2007-08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2008-09 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2009-10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2010-11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix Proposed Projects and Funding for FY 2011-12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x SECTION 3. PROJECTS PROPOSED FOR FUNDING Development Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1 Justice Center Facility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1 Neighborhood Improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1 Preservation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1 Transportation Safety & Enhancement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V-1 SECTION 4. INDEX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI i TABLE I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT REVIEW CRITERIA All of the following factors are used to evaluate and rank projects for listing in the CIP. In order to prioritize the use of scarce funds, these criteria are used to make sure the projects in the CIP meet the City?s goals and priorities. ? Consistency with the Metro Plan and all other phases of City planning. ? Compliance with State or Federal laws or regulations. ? Maximize current City investment in existing capital facilities. ? Facilitate infill development within the existing City limits. ? Minimize or balance the initial cost, life cycle cost and the long-term impacts on the City's Operating Budget. ? Eliminate or reduce the potential for health hazards or increase the safety and general welfare of the City. ? Take advantage of economies of scale. ? Leverage local money to secure outside funding sources. ? Address higher Council priorities for capital improvement and maintenance. ? Address special Council targets. ii TABLE II DEFINITIONS OF PROJECT CATEGORIES The following list of categories is the means by which the CIP has been organized for review. The titles are meant to be descriptive of the primary purpose of the projects in that category. Projects may serve functions of more than one category. For example, a NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT project may also include work described under TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT or PRESERVATION PROJECTS, but will only be listed in the primary category. Additionally, projects in any category may include projects that are growth related and eligible for funding with Systems Development Charge (SDC) funds. DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS ? includes projects that primarily serve specific developing commercial and industrial lands, which the City has designated for future growth in the Metro Plan, or projects that generally promote economic activity in the City. Also, they may include capacity enhancement projects such as collector or arterial street improvements or a new Fire Station. Schedule I shows this category divided into project work and debt service of previously constructed projects, financed with bonds other than general obligation bonds. JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY ? consists of design and construction of the justice center facility approved by voters in 2004, under measure 20-91. The project will be financed with general obligation bonds and will house police, court and municipal jail facilities. Operations will be funded per measure 20-112, so jail facilities will be constructed. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS ? includes the small projects primarily improving individual neighborhoods. These projects may be funded by local assessment districts, if they are projects proposed by property owners for improvement of City street facilities. PRESERVATION PROJECTS ? includes projects whose primary purpose is to extend the useful life or expand the capacity of existing facilities. Usually these facilities have exceeded their life expectancies or design capacities and are in need of various extents of preservation or rehabilitation. This category also includes projects that add to or modify existing facilities and do not fit into the other categories. TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND ENHANCEMENT ? includes projects intended primarily to improve traffic safety, relieve traffic congestion, provide additional traffic capacity, and improve traffic circulation. iii TABLE III GLOSSARY OF FUNDING SOURCES ASSESSMENTS Assessments on benefitting properties. CURRENT REVENUES 427-SDC (OLD) System Development Charge (SDC) funds collected under SDC laws in effect prior to 1991 which have different restrictions on use than current SDCs. 447-SDC (TRANS, Improvement) SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the transportation system. 446-SDC (TRANS, Reimbursement) SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing transportation system capacity used by the development. 443-SDC (SAN, Improvement) SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system. 442-SDC (SAN, Reimbursement) SDC funds collected from development to reimburse for existing capacity of the sanitary sewer collection system used by the development. 440-SDC (STORM, Improvement) SDC funds collected from development to increase capacity of the storm drainage collection system. 409-Local Wastewater Capital Sewer user fees for sanitary sewer expansion, extension, and repair. 425-Drainage Capital Sewer user fees for drainage system expansion, extension, and repair. 434-STREET Capital Funds received from State and local fuel taxes, from Lane County (urban transition), and other sources to be used for road purposes. BOOTH KELLY RESERVE Funds received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center. GRANTS AND DONATIONS CDBG Community Development Block Grant STP1 Federal Surface Transportation Program EDA Federal Economic Development Assistance UNDETER As yet unidentified Federal Grant ODOT1 Oregon Department of Transportation LC1 Lane County Road Fund OTHER REVENUE BOND Long-term obligation secured by ongoing revenues such as Sewer User fees CAPITAL BOND General Obligation Debt issued with approval of the voters DEVELOPER Direct contributions from developers OTHER Undefined funding source 1 These funds may not pass through the City budget. SCHEDULE I2008 TO 2012CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMSUMMARY OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORYCATEGORY2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-2012TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTSPROJECTS 3,219,8001,032,3501,472,0001,235,000653,0007,612,150 DEBT SERVICES 718,000718,000718,000718,000718,0003,590,000 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY 100,00025,000125,000 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS 75,00050,000390,000280,00010,000805,000 PRESERVATION 3,696,9822,400,0002,170,0002,067,9982,432,00012,766,980 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT 650,000700,000675,000902,000340,0003,267,000 TOTAL 8,459,7824,925,3505,425,0005,202,9984,153,00028,166,130 Page iv SCHEDULE II2008 TO 2012SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES REVENUEFUNDBEGINNING2007-082008-092009-102010-112011-12TOTALBALANCESOURCE#BALANCEREVENUEEXPENDREVENUEEXPENDREVENUEEXPENDREVENUEEXPENDREVENUEEXPENDREVENUEEXPEND ASSESSMENTS00000000000000CURRENT REVENUES SDC (OLD)420103,095240,611253,7824,49640,0002,72140,00085717,99800351,780351,7800 SDC (TRANS IMPROV)447245,100750,000944,800750,000777,700700,000535,000600,000787,000600,000600,0003,645,1003,644,500600 SDC (TRANS REIMBUR)446329,975200,000375,025200,000150,975150,000237,325100,000207,325100,000109,3251,079,9751,079,9750 SDC (SANITARY IMPROV)443213,00050,000208,00050,00098,00025,00032,00025,0005,00025,00045,000388,000388,0000 SDC (SANITARY REIMBUR)442154,675150,000244,325150,000209,325150,00092,325150,000162,325100,000146,325854,675854,62550 SDC (STORM)440944,650450,000654,350450,000346,350450,000872,350495,000814,350200,000301,3502,989,6502,988,750900 DRAINAGE CAPITAL425407,000340,000746,500620,000545,000620,000673,000620,000623,000620,000639,0003,227,0003,226,500500 WASTEWATER CAPITAL4092,7292,106,0002,108,0002,106,0001,808,0002,106,0002,343,0002,106,0002,161,0002,106,0002,112,00010,532,72910,532,000729 STREET CAPITAL434225,000625,000650,000500,000675,000400,000400,000250,000250,000175,000200,0002,175,0002,175,0000 BOOTH-KELLY RESERVE6181,219,855704,00065,000050,0000000001,923,855115,0001,808,855Sub-totals:3,845,0795,615,6116,249,7824,830,4964,700,3504,603,7215,225,0004,346,8575,027,9983,926,0004,153,00027,167,76425,356,1301,811,634GRANTS & DONATIONS CDBG**210 LANE COUNTY*420 ODOT*420 FEDERAL GRANT*420100,000100,000100,000100,0000 WILLAMALANE4200Sub-totals:0100,000100,00000000000100,000100,0000OTHER CAPITAL BOND428100,000100,00025,00025,00000125,000125,0000 OTHER4201,810,0001,810,0000001,810,0001,810,0000 DEVELOPER420200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000175,000175,00000775,000775,0000Sub-totals:02,110,0002,110,000225,000225,000200,000200,000175,000175,000002,710,0002,710,0000Grand Totals:3,845,0797,825,6118,459,7825,055,4964,925,3504,803,7215,425,0004,521,8575,202,9983,926,0004,153,00029,977,76428,166,1301,811,634 *These funds may not pass through the City's budget.**Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included. Page v SCHEDULE III - APROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08PAGEPROJECTSSDCSDC TRANSPORTATIONSDC SANITARYSDCDRAINAGEWASTEWATERSTREETOTHERPROJECTNo.OLDIMPROVMTREIMBURSIMPROVMTREIMBURSSTORMCAPITALCAPITALCAPITALTOTALDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total3,937,800I-1Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure12,32539,32530,35082,000I-2Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor98,000538,000636,000I-3City Participation, Private Projects50,00075,00050,00025,00050,00025,00025,000300,000I-4Franklin Blvd Plan25,00025,000I-6Gray-Jaqua Agreement50,00071,50053,500130,000305,000I-7Jasper Road Sewer Extension60,000130,000210,000400,000I-8Federal Office BuildingBank Loan1,810,0001,810,000I-9Bob Straub IGA344,80035,000379,800JUSTICE CENTER FACILITYCategory Total100,000II-1Justice Center FacilityBond100,000100,000NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTSCategory Total75,000III-1Transportation Demand Project50,00050,000III-2Major Sidewalk Construction and Preservation25,00025,000PRESERVATIONCategory Total3,696,982IV-1Sanitary Sewer Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-2Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement1,055,0001,055,000IV-3Metro Waterways Study100,000100,000IV-4Drainage Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-5Channel Improvement60,00060,000IV-6MS4 Permit Requirements25,00025,000IV-7Riparian Land Managmt/Acquisitions37,00013,00050,000IV-8Millrace Water Control Structure280,500Exist City Fds.100,000380,500IV-9City Building Maintenance173,782173,782IV-10Booth Kelly Drainage Master Plan IIBooth Kelly Fund50,00050,000IV-11Street Light In-Fill/Pole Replacement50,00050,000IV-12Street Seal/Overlay87,700150,000237,700IV-135th Street Overlay200,000400,000600,000IV-14Woodstave Removal50,00050,000IV-15Firehouse Washrack120,000120,000IV-16BK Building RemovalBooth Kelly Fund15,00015,000IV-17Minor City Facilities80,000 80,000IV-19Vehicle Wash Rack250,000 250,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENTCategory Total650,000V-1Traffic Control Projects100,000100,000V-2Gateway Traffic Improvements250,000250,000V-3Intelligent Transport System50,00050,000V-4Beltline/Gateway IntersectionDeveloper200,000200,000V-6Pioneer Parkway Lighting25,00025,00050,000SCHEDULE III - A TOTAL253,782944,800375,025208,000244,325654,350746,5002,108,000650,0002,275,0008,459,782 Page vi SCHEDULE III - BPROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008-09PAGEPROJECTSSDCSDC TRANSPORTATIONSDC SANITARYSDCDRAINAGEWATEWATERSTREETOTHERPROJECTNo.OLDIMPROVMTREIMBURSIMPROVMTREIMBURSSTORMCAPITALCAPITALCAPITALTOTALDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total1,750,350I-1Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure12,32539,32530,35082,000I-2Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor98,000538,000636,000I-3City Participation, Private Projects50,00038,65050,00075,00050,00025,000288,650I-4Franklin Blvd Plan25,00025,000I-5Future Growth Projects54,00072,000126,000I-6Gray-Jaqua Agreement50,00070,000125,000245,000I-7Jasper Road Sewer Extension195,000 195,000I-9Bob Straub IGA152,700152,700JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY25,000II-1Justice Center FacilityBond25,00025,000NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTSCategory Total50,000III-1Transportation Demand Project50,00050,000PRESERVATIONCategory Total2,400,000IV-1Sanitary Sewer Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-2Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement900,000900,000IV-3Metro Waterways Study100,000100,000IV-4Drainage Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-5Channel Improvement60,00060,000IV-6MS4 Permit Requirements25,00025,000IV-7Riparian Land Managmt/Acquisitions37,00013,00050,000IV-9City Building Maintenance40,00040,000IV-11Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement25,00025,000IV-12Street Seal/Overlay100,000600,000700,000IV-14Woodstave Removal50,00050,000IV-16BK Building RemovalBooth Kelly Fund50,00050,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENTCategory Total700,000V-1Traffic Control Projects100,000100,000V-2Gateway Traffic Improvements250,000250,000V-3Intelligent Transport System50,00050,000V-4Beltline/Gateway IntersectionDeveloper200,000200,000V-6Pioneer Parkway Lighting50,00050,000100,000SCHEDULE III - B TOTAL40,000777,700150,97598,000209,325346,350545,0001,808,000675,000275,0004,925,350 Page vii SCHEDULE III - CPROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10PAGEPROJECTSSDCSDC TRANSPORTATIONSDC SANITARYSDCDRAINAGEWATEWATERSTREETOTHERPROJECTNo.OLDIMPROVMTREIMBURSIMPROVMTREIMBURSSTORMCAPITALCAPITALCAPITALTOTALDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total2,190,000I-1Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure12,32539,32530,35082,000I-2Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor636,000636,000I-3City Participation, Private Projects50,00050,00020,00050,00075,00050,00025,000320,000I-5Future Growth Projects200,000200,000400,000I-6Gray-Jaqua Agreement50,000125,000300,000475,000I-7Jasper Road Sewer Extension12,000265,000 277,000NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTSCategory Total390,000III-1Transportation Demand Project10,00010,000III-354th and J Drainage300,000300,000III-4S&T St Drainage80,00080,000PRESERVATIONCategory Total2,170,000IV-1Sanitary Sewer Repair3,000197,000200,000IV-2Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement920,000920,000IV-3Metro Waterways Study100,000100,000IV-4Drainage Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-5Channel Improvement60,00060,000IV-6MS4 Permit Requirements25,00025,000IV-7Riparian Land Managmt/Acquisitions37,00013,00050,000IV-9City Building Maintenance40,00040,000IV-11Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement25,00025,000IV-12Street Seal/Overlay175,000325,000500,000IV-14Woodstave Removal50,00050,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENTCategory Total675,000V-1Traffic Control Projects75,00075,000V-2Gateway Traffic Improvements250,000250,000V-3Intelligent Transport System50,00050,000V-4Beltline/Gateway IntersectionDeveloper200,000200,000V-6Pioneer Parkway Lighting50,00050,000100,000SCHEDULE III - C TOTAL40,000535,000237,32532,00092,325872,350673,0002,343,000400,000200,0005,425,000 Page viii SCHEDULE III - DPROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2010-11PAGEPROJECTSSDCSDC TRANSPORTATIONSDC SANITARYSDCDRAINAGEWATEWATERSTREETOTHERPROJECTNo.OLDIMPROVMTREIMBURSIMPROVMTREIMBURSSTORMCAPITALCAPITALCAPITALTOTALDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total1,953,000I-1Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure12,32539,32530,35082,000I-2Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor636,000636,000I-3City Participation, Private Projects50,0005,00050,00075,00050,00025,000255,000I-5Future Growth Projects252,000275,000527,000I-7Jasper Road Sewer Extension453,000 453,000NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTSCategory Total280,000III-1Transportation Demand Project10,00010,000III-4S&T St Drainage270,000270,000PRESERVATIONCategory Total2,067,998IV-1Sanitary Sewer Repair3,000197,000200,000IV-2Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement70,000850,000920,000IV-3Metro Waterways Study100,000100,000IV-4Drainage Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-5Channel Improvement60,00060,000IV-6MS4 Permit Requirements25,00025,000IV-7Riparian Land Managmt/Acquisitions37,00013,00050,000IV-9City Building Maintenance17,99817,998IV-11Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement45,00045,000IV-12Street Seal/Overlay195,000105,000300,000IV-14Woodstave Removal50,00050,000IV-1821st Street Reconstruction100,000 100,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENTCategory Total902,000V-1Traffic Control Projects75,00075,000V-2Gateway Traffic Improvements242,000242,000V-3Intelligent Transport System50,00050,000V-5S 48th St Connection Main to Daisy360,000Developer175,000535,000SCHEDULE III - D TOTAL17,998787,000207,3255,000162,325814,350623,0002,161,000250,000175,0005,202,998 Page ix SCHEDULE III - EPROPOSED PROJECTS FOR FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR 2011-12PAGEPROJECTSSDCSDC TRANSPORTATIONSDC SANITARYSDCDRAINAGEWATEWATERSTREETOTHERPROJECTNo.OLDIMPROVMTREIMBURSIMPROVMTREIMBURSSTORMCAPITALCAPITALCAPITALTOTALDEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS Category Total1,371,000I-1Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure12,32539,32530,35082,000I-2Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor636,000636,000I-3City Participation, Private Projects50,00050,00075,00050,00025,000250,000I-5Future Growth Projects09,000291,000300,000I-7Jasper Road Sewer Extension45,000 54,000$ 4,000 103,000NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTSCategory Total10,000III-1Transportation Demand Project10,00010,000PRESERVATIONCategory Total2,432,000IV-1Sanitary Sewer Repair3,000197,000200,000IV-2Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement1,250,0001,250,000IV-3Metro Waterways Study100,000100,000IV-4Drainage Repair50,000150,000200,000IV-5Channel Improvement60,00060,000IV-6MS4 Permit Requirements25,00025,000IV-7Riparian Land Managmt/Acquisitions37,00013,00050,000IV-11Street Light In-fill/Pole Replacement40,00040,000IV-12Street Seal/Overlay97,000160,000257,000IV-14Woodstave Removal50,00050,000IV-1821st Street Reconstruction200,000 200,000 TRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENTCategory Total340,000V-1Traffic Control Projects75,00075,000V-2Gateway Traffic Improvements215,000215,000V-3Intelligent Transport System50,00050,000SCHEDULE III - E TOTAL0600,000109,32545,000146,325301,350639,0002,112,000200,00004,153,000 Page x DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENTS CapitalImprovementProjectsSheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 410,000$ -$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 410,000$ 39,325$ 39,325$ 39,325$ 39,325$ 39,325$ 196,625$ 30,350$ 30,350$ 30,350$ 30,350$ 30,350$ 151,750$ 12,325$ 12,325$ 12,325$ 12,325$ 12,325$ 61,625$ -$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 82,000$ 410,000$ Project Description:Oregon Special Public Works payment on a loan for a portion of the public improvements in the McKenzie/Gateway Corporate Park. The total loan amount is$952,309 and is to be paid over a 20 year period. Last payment will be in 2014.Justification:The loan and repayment of the loan was approved by Council in 1994.Maintenance Impacts:No maintenance impact related to the debt service.Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure$410,000Street & Sewer Capital ProjectsN/ACity EngineerSDC Sanitary, ReimbursementFunding Source(s)Development ImprovementSDC Trans, ReimbursementTOTALLand and Right-of-WayConstructionDesign and EngineeringOther (Debt)SDC StormTOTAL Project TitleProject NumberProject ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram Costs Page I - 1 CapitalImprovementProjectsSheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 3,180,000$ -$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 3,180,000$ 98,000$ 98,000$ -$ -$ -$ 196,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 538,000$ 538,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 2,984,000$ -$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 636,000$ 3,180,000$ Project Description:Last Payment Date:Annual payment of 20 year revenue bonds and State Revolving Fund loan to fund the South Springfield Interceptor.Phase I2/1/2014Phase II12/1/2015A portion of the South Springfield Interceptor sewer was funded with loans and bonds amortized over a 20 year period.Phase III7/1/2011The SRF loan of $1,075,000 for Phase 1 resulted in an annual payment of $75,000. In Phase II, the$3.3 million revenue bond sold in 1995 resulted in an annual payment of $285,000. The payment on the $2,900,000DEQ Revolving Loan for Phase III in FY 1997/98 equals $300,000 per year.Relation to Plans:Consideration of the bond repayment was anticipated when setting the current sewer user rates. All loans and bonds were approved by Council.Maintenance Impacts:No maintenance impact related to the debt service.Funding Source(s)TOTALWastewater UserDrainage User Project Number $3,180,000.00Other (Debt) Total Cost CostsLand and Right-of-WayDebt Service - Sewer InterceptorN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category City EngineerDevelopment ImprovementSewer Capital ProjectsConstructionDesign and EngineeringSDC Sanitary, Improvement Budget Subprogram TOTAL Page I - 2 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$1,413,650Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 288,650$ 320,000$ 255,000$ 250,000$ 1,413,650$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ 288,650$ 320,000$ 255,000$ 250,000$ 1,413,650$ 75,000$ 38,650$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 163,650$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 225,000$ 50,000$ -$ 20,000$ 5,000$ -$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 350,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 225,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ -$ 300,000$ 288,650$ 320,000$ 255,000$ 250,000$ 1,413,650$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:City participation in private developments is guided by Resolution #90-35 and Resolution #70-45.Maintenance Impacts:Maintenance impacts are dependent on the individual projects funded. Often this funding is used to upsize a sewer or storm drainage line and sometimes to improve a street's structure and length and the maintenance impacts are minimal.CostsLand and Right-of-WayConstructionSDC San, ReimbursementDesign and EngineeringSDC San, Improvement Project Number Wastewater CapitalTOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ReimbursementSDC Trans, ImprovementDrainage CapitalSDC StormCity Participation, Private ProjectsN/A Project Title OtherIn many cases, it is necessary for a development to oversize or deepen sewers, drainage and/or streets beyond a size necessary to serve the development in order to serve adjacent neighborhoods. Such increases in capacity are paid by the City under Council adopted participation policies. City cost participation in public improvements constructed in private developments under the City's Construction Permit process. Currently $25,000 of Transportation reimbursement funds are programed in 2006-2007 for the City's obligation in the Weichert annexation agreement. Currently other programmed funds are not yet tied to specific projectsCity EngineerDevelopment ImprovementCapital Projects Project ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram Page I - 3 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$350,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 75,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 75,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ STP-U175,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ LTD25,000$ 250,000$ 75,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:TransPlan future project list for urban standards and intersection improvements. Council top priority.The segment of Franklin Boulevard in Glenwood does not meet modern design standards for sidewalks, bike lanes, access, and intersections. This project follows the Glenwood Riverfront Area planning and anticipates redevelopment by the Springfield Economic Development Agency. Complete a planning study to determine future improvements to Franklin Boulevard and the Mcvay/Franklin intersection to support Glenwood redevelopment and regional traffic.This is an ODOT Highway and if the road stays in State ownership the impact of improvement on City maintenance could be minimal. If the State does not take responsibility for street amenities outside the curbs, then improvements to landscaping, sidewalks, etc. may need to be maintained by the City. The proposed funding is for planning and has no direct maintenance impact. Maintenance considerations need to be included in the planning process. Transportation ManagerDevelopment ImprovementTransportation Planning & Oper Budget Subprogram ConstructionFranklin Blvd PlannningN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category SDC-Trans, ReimbursementTOTAL Total Cost SDC-Trans, ImprovementFunding Source(s)TOTAL Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayDesign and Engineering Page I - 4 CapitalImprovementProjects$1,353,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007 - 20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 126,000$ 400,000$ 527,000$ 300,000$ 1,353,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 126,000$ 400,000$ 527,000$ 300,000$ 1,353,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 54,000$ 200,000$ 252,000$ 9,000$ 515,000$ -$ 72,000$ 200,000$ 275,000$ 291,000$ 838,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 126,000$ 400,000$ 527,000$ 300,000$ 1,353,000$ Project Description:Justification:State law regulates the way cities can expend SDC funds and requires that the funds be expended only on projects listed on the SDC-eligible project list.Relation to Plans:This funding is not programmed, but can be used for growth-related projects identified in the Council adopted System Development Charge project list. The projects can be programmed as development pressures increase infrastructure needs in various areas of the City or to jump-start development in selected opportunity areas.Maintenance Impacts:The projects to be funded with this unprogrammed revenue have not been selected. Typically, this funding is to provide new infrastructure to support growthand new infrastructure always has a maintenance impact.The amounts of funding listed each year represent the unprogrammed funds based on revenue projections over the 5 year CIP perio d. These funds will be programmed to specific projects as they are identified and as project budgets are refined. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALSDC Trans, ImprovementSDCTrans, ReimbursementSDC StormWastewater CapitalStreet CapitalDrainage CapitalFuture Growth ProjectsN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category City EngineerDevelopment ImprovementStreet & Sewer Capital Project Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s) Page I - 5 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$1,150,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 305,000$ 245,000$ 475,000$ -$ -$ 1,025,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 305,000$ 245,000$ 475,000$ -$ -$ 1,025,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 125,000$ 53,500$ 125,000$ 125,000$ -$ -$ 303,500$ 71,500$ 71,500$ -$ 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ 130,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 430,000$ 125,000$ 305,000$ 245,000$ 475,000$ -$ -$ 1,025,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Sewer and drainage improvements would be maintained by the City. Since Main Street is an ODOT facility, the impact of the street improvements on City maintenance costs should be minimal.Pending agreement with Developer. Per the Agreement, the City's share of the funding would be fully programmed by FY2009/2010.TOTALCity cost participation in public improvements constructed pursuant to the Pre-Development Agreement for the Gray-Jaqua Property located at S. 75th and Main Streets.An agreement with Heritage Park, LLC was made in 2005 for development of 215 acres. The agreement would establish the City's participation at a total of $1,150,000 for off-site and/or contiguous sewer and drainage improvements, and 1/6th of the cost of transportation improvements in Main Street. Street, Sewer, Drainage Capital ProjectsProject Category SDC Transprotation ImprovLand and Right-of-WayTOTALWastewater Capital Project NumberTotal Cost OtherGray Jaqua AgreementN/A Project TitleProject Manager Development ImprovementFunding Source(s)City EngineerDrainage CapitalSDC Sanitary ReimbursementSDC Storm Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringCosts Page I - 6 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$4,800,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 2,728,000$ -$ 195,000$ 277,000$ 453,000$ 103,000$ 1,028,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,228,000$ 400,000$ 195,000$ 277,000$ 453,000$ 103,000$ 1,428,000$ 130,000$ -$ -$ -$ 54,000$ 184,000$ 60,000$ -$ 12,000$ -$ 45,000$ 117,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 611,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 217,000$ 210,000$ 195,000$ 265,000$ 453,000$ 4,000$ 1,127,000$ 2,400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3,228,000$ 400,000$ 195,000$ 277,000$ 453,000$ 103,000$ 1,428,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Sewer system expansion will cause additional maintenance impact. Decommissioning the 2 pump stations will reduce maintenance and power costs.Design and EngineeringSDC Storm OtherCity EngineerSDC Sanitary ImprovementSDC Sanitary ReimbursementWastewater CapitalOtherThe Jasper sewer extension project will provide sewer service to areas of the urban fringe which are currently not serviced. The Jasper Road Extension project from 57th and Main Street to Brand S Road and proposals for residential and industrial development in this area will stimulate the need for sewers. 50% of project costs are proposed to be funded with City funds, with the balance to be funded through grants, developer contributions, or assessments. Decommissioning of two existing pump stations is included in this project.Springfield Sanitary Sewer Master Plan (update is expected to be complete by the end of FY07). Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development.Construction Project Number Costs Total CostBudget Subprogram Sewer Extension, Jasper RoadP20353 Project TitleProject Manager Development ImprovementSewer Capital Projects Project Category Land and Right-of-WayTOTALDeveloper TOTALFunding Source(s)Installation of 18,000 feet of 27- to 10-inch diameter sewer along Jasper Road from 42nd Street to Natron and the urban growth boundary. We are building reserve for the City's portion of the project funding, the remaining funding will be collected through a developer's contributions and SDC fees. Page I - 7 CapitalImprovementProjectsSheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ 590,000$ -$ -$ 3,500,000$ 1,810,000$ -$ 1,810,000$ -$ 4,090,000$ 1,810,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,810,000$ 4,090,000$ 1,810,000$ -$ 1,810,000$ -$ -$ -$ 4,090,000$ 1,810,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,810,000$ Project Description:Justification:These agencies are hoping to consolidate office facilities to increase operating efficiency. City of Springfield has agreed to facilitate construction within Citylimits.Relation to Plans:This building addresses the facility plans of these agencies and conforms to Springfield Land Use Plans.Maintenance Impacts:Maintenance of this facility will be conducted through contract services completely paid for by rents collected from the agencies occupying the facility.This project will assist in the construction of a consolidated office facility for Bureau of Land Management in cooperation with the US Forest Service and Oregon Department of the Military (National Guard). The City will execute a bank loan for the entire project cost, with the debt service secured by the collection of lease revenue from a 10-year lease to the BLM. The building will be located on land owned by the Department of the Military and the a tenancy-in-common agreement held with the City for the site of the BLM facility. Finance DirectorDevelopment ImprovementN/AFederal Office BuildingN/A Project Title 1,810,000$ Project ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s) Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALOther Page I - 8 CapitalImprovementProjectsSheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 379,800$ 152,700$ 532,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 379,800$ 152,700$ -$ -$ -$ 532,500$ 344,800$ 152,700$ 497,500$ 35,000$ 35,000$ -$ 379,800$ 152,700$ -$ -$ -$ 532,500$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Furthers the Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the high priority target of Jasper Natron development.Maintenance Impacts:This work should have minimal impacts on future maintenace, but should allow for growth without major reconfigurations. Project Number TOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ImprovementSDC StormThe addition of this work to that already scheduled by Lane County will better facilitate future growth in the Jasper/Natron area while avoiding major reconfigurations later.Bob Straub IGA w/ Lane CountyN/A Project Title Other$532,500CostsLand and Right-of-WayThis funding is set aside as part of an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Lane County to upsize some of the storm drainage structures and install additional conduit for future transportation needs. It also allows for some extra paving to accomodate future intersections. The IGA is being finalized with Lane County and will be brought to the City Council for approval later this year.City EngineerDevlopment ImprovementStreet, Drainage Capital Projects Project ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and Engineering Page I - 9 JUSTICE CENTER FACILITY CapitalImprovemen t Projects$28,249,650Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 24,065,136$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,283,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,348,136$ 100,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 25,348,136$ 100,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ 25,348,136$ 100,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ 125,000$ Pro j ect Descri p tion:Justification:Relation to Plans:Conforms to Council initiated bond measure 20-91, in November 2004.Maintenance Im p acts:When completed, the facility will be maintained by the City. During the design process, decisions will made inconsideration of both initial construction cost and ongoing maintenance costs.This project includes the construction of a replacement facility for the Police Department, Municipal Court and City Prosecutor's Office. Construction is expected to start in the in Spring 2007.TOTALThis facility will provide updated space for Police Department patrol, investigation, dispatch, record keeping and administration. It will also house municipal court, prosecutor and jail functions, and provide a public meeting space. The current facilities are outdated and do not meet current needs.TOTALBond Measure 20-91Funding Source(s)Land and Right-of-WayDesign and EngineeringConstructionOther Budget SubprogramProject Number CostsAssistant City ManagerJustice Center FacilityJustice Center Facility Project ManagerProject CategoryProject Title N/AP50434 Total Cost Page II - 1 NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS CapitalImprovementProjects$240,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ -$ -$ -$ 10,000$ 55,000$ 35,000$ 35,000$ -$ -$ -$ 70,000$ 50,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 50,000$ 110,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 130,000$ 110,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 130,000$ 110,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 130,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:TDM Goal, policies and projects in TransPlan.Maintenance Impacts:Reduces road maintenance costs by reducing vehicle miles traveled. Some maintenance costs associated with the construction of separate multi-use paths Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ImprovementTransportation Demand ProjectN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category This project covers the Commuter Solutions Program local match, and partnering on transportation options projects in the Gateway area to address congestion. The project also includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non-auto travel links in the community like the E. 14th multi-use path in Glenwood and park and ride facilities coordinated with transit stations.TransPlan was adopted with a set of Transportation Demand Management (TDM), or ?transportation options? policies and projects as required by State rules. This project contributes to funding project costs necessary to meet those requirements.Transportation ManagerNeighborhood ImprovementsTransportation Planning & Oper. Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and Engineering Page III - 1 CapitalImprovementProjects$25,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Projects are either requested by citizens or identified by City staff.Maintenance Impacts:OtherLand and Right-of-WayTOTALWill add maintenance costs to provide upkeep for the selected installation, which has not yet been selected. May reduce ongoing reduce ongoing maintenace costs when deteriorated segments of sidewalk are repaired.Major Sidewalk ConstructionMajor sidewalk construction and preservation projects as identified by citizens or based on needs as identified by City staff. This may include installation of new sidewalk sections to provide in-fill between existing sidewalk segments, replacement of damaged sidewalks or installation of ADA ramps.There is a need for sidewalk installation to provide interconnects between existing segments of sidewalk. This is especially true in many of the older neighborhoods and the downtown core. There are also several areas where extensive sections of existing sidewalk are in need of major rehabilitaion and upgrading to current standards. Project Number And PreservationN/A Project Title Costs Project ManagerProject Category Transportation ManagerNeighborhood ImprovementsTransportation Planning & Oper.TOTALFunding Source(s) Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringStreet Capital Page III - 2 CapitalImprovementProjects$300,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ 270,000$ -$ -$ 270,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ 300,000$ -$ -$ 300,000$ Project Description:Construction of a channel and storm sewer along the north side of Highway 126 between 52nd and 54th Streets.Justification:This project will provide drainage service consistent with current storm water quality standards to an incorporated section of the City bounded by Highbanks Road, 52nd Street, and Highway 126.Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Construction of this new facility will add a minor amount of maintenance effort and cost.Provides trunk drainage service to developed and undeveloped areas which will encourage in-fill development. The update Stormwater Facilities Master Plan is expected by the end of FY07 Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way54th & J DrainageP20266 Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category City EngineerNeighborhood ImprovementsTOTALFunding Source(s)Drainage Capital Projects Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALSDC Storm Page III - 3 CapitalImprovementProjects$350,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 56,000$ -$ 56,000$ -$ -$ 24,000$ 270,000$ -$ 294,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 270,000$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 270,000$ -$ 350,000$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 270,000$ -$ 350,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:This drainage system was identified as undersized in the SCS Channel No. 6 report.Maintenance Impacts:S & T Street DrainageSDC StormBetween 10th & DebraNeighborhood ImprovementsDrainage Capital Projects Project NumberProject ManagerTotal Cost ConstructionCity EngineerOtherCostsTOTALConstruction of a combination of channels and pipe drainage system along T and S Streets between 10th and Debra Streets.Will expand capacity and relieve local flooding and ponding in the S Street area.Construction of this facility will add some maintenance effort and cost, but should reduce some expenditures related to existing localized flooding. Budget Subprogram TOTALFunding Source(s)Land and Right-of-Way Project Category Design and EngineeringN/A Project Title Page III - 4 PRESERVATION PROJECTS CapitalImprovementProjects$1,340,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$ 340,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 340,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 245,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 197,000$ 197,000$ 197,000$ 891,000$ 95,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 3,000$ 3,000$ 3,000$ 109,000$ 340,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ Project Description:Justification:The project will repair and/or replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life or is otherwise causing problems within the collection system.Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:The projects selected will be chosen not only to remove infiltration and inflow, but to replace aging lines which cause maintenance or other problems.The amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Wet Weather Flow Management program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact.SDC San, ReimbursementThis project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers other than those being rehabilitated under the formal Wet Weather Flow Management Plan being done in cooperation with MWMC (see sheet IV-2). Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALWastewater CapitalCity Engineer Total Cost Sanitary Sewer RepairN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category PreservationSewer Capital Projects Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s) Page IV - 1 CapitalImprovementProjects$5,645,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 70,000$ 90,000$ 380,000$ 600,000$ 975,000$ 830,000$ 850,000$ 850,000$ 1,160,000$ 4,665,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 1,055,000$ 900,000$ 920,000$ 920,000$ 1,250,000$ 5,045,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 70,000$ -$ 70,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 1,055,000$ 900,000$ 920,000$ 850,000$ 1,250,000$ 4,975,000$ 600,000$ 1,055,000$ 900,000$ 920,000$ 920,000$ 1,250,000$ 5,045,000$ Project Description:The cities of Eugene and Springfield are currently cooperating in a Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) dealing with excess infiltration and inflowof rain and ground water into the sanitary sewer system. The plan is in the sixth year of the planned ten year implementation schedule.Justification:The project will deal with capacity problems in the sanitary sewer system and treatment facilities in the most cost-effective manner identified by the plan.Relation to Plans:The WWFM plan will guide the use of these funds. Maintenance Impacts:Design and Engineering Project CategoryProject ManagerTotal CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionThe amount of funding available for repair and replacement of sanitary sewers in this program and within the Sanitary Sewer Repair program will keep the system in a steady state of repair. However, we have an aging sewer system infrastructure and the overall condition of the system is not expected to improve significantly with this level of funding. Therefore, these programs help keep maintenance needs for the existing system static, while expansion of the system causes an added maintenance impact.Drainage CapitalTOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC San, ReimbursementSewer Wet WeatherCity EngineerPreservationSewer Capital ProjectsPeak Flow AbatementN/A Project TitleProject Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayWastewater Capital Page IV - 2 CapitalImprovementProjects$700,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102009 - 20102010 - 20115 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 500,000$ Project Description:Justification:This planning study will assist the City in future years to gain access to federal funding (similar to the Mill Race funding) for capital improvement projects thataddress drainage capacity, water quality, and flood control.Relation to Plans:This project relates to many plans affecting land use and public facilities throughout the Metro Area. Examples in Springfield include the StormwaterManagement Plan, under development to meet Clean Water Act requirements, and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.Maintenance Impacts:This is a planning project and has no direct maintenance impact until projects are selected.Springfield is participating along with Eugene and Lane County in an Army Corps of Engineers General Investigation Study authorized under the Water Resources Development Act. Springfield?s share (25%) of this approximately $3,500,000 project is $875,000. The current project is a feasibility study necessary to identify future water quality projects within the Eugene/Springfield metropolitan watershed. The Cedar Creek Drainage Basin has been identified as Springfield?s highest priority study area. The $100,000 slated annually for five years beginning FY 03/04 is about 45% of the City?s required match. Other CIP projects, such as Channel Improvements, Floodplain Mapping and McKenzie Oxbow will qualify as in-kind match and satisfy the balance of the local obligation. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALFunding Source(s)TOTALMetro Waterways StudyP50388 Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Maintenance DivisionPreservationDrainage Capital Projects Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and Engineering Total Cost SDC Storm Page IV - 3 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$1,120,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 100,000$ 120,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 180,000$ 900,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ 120,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 750,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 120,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 1,000,000$ Project Description:Justification:The program will repair and replace pipe which has reached the end of its useful life, reducing maintenance and operating costs of the drainage system.Relation to Plans:Facilitates goals of the Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.Maintenance Impacts:This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage system to repair or replace older pipe in the system and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe. Projects include: Construct headwall on 69th St. Canal at Thurston Rd.; Repair West B St. storm outfall to Willamette River; Restore capacity in culverts on 69th St., Channel 6th, 72nd St and 48th St. canals; Repair damaged gutter bars causing localized flodding at 2138 9th St., 1105 S St., 2555 F St. 904 6th St., 345 22nd St., 1500 B St and Olympic St., F St. - 9th to 10th.; Repair catch basins at various locations; Replace catch basin at 717 71st St. with combination catch basin/curb inlet; Replace storm line segments at Centennial Blvd at 10th St. intersection, 23rd St. - A to Main St., A St. at 26th St. intersection, Centennial Blvd at 12th St. to Mohawk Blvd; Install storm line catch basin from intersection of 17th and S St. to storm system at 17th and T St.; Remove abandoned catch basin vault at 1482 T St.; Pipe the backyard drainage ditch between 46th - 47th St. and Bluebell - Aster St..Drainage CapitalCity EngineerPreservationDrainage Capital ProjectsDrainage RepairN/A Project TitleProject ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALSDC StormTOTALFunding Source(s)This is a minimal program for system repair and replacement and, while sufficient at this time it does not represent an amount of repair and replacement which will provide sustainable replacement of an aging system. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way Page IV - 4 CapitalImprovementProjects$360,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 12,000$ 60,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 48,000$ 240,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 300,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 300,000$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 300,000$ Project Description:This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to correct previous channel modifications thathave caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality and fish habitat functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and channel restoration. Justification:Relation to Plans:This project helps implement and is associated with the federally-funded Mill Race Restoration project, the City's Stormwater Management Plan, the DEQStormwater discharge permit, and the Metro Waterways project.Maintenance Impacts:While this is a maintenance-type project, some of the drainage way improvements will likely increase maintenance responsibility as the drainage ways take on more of a function for stormwater quality management, not just stormwater conveyance. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALFunding Source(s)Channel ImprovementN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Drainage CapitalThis project addresses the "Take Guidance" provided by the National Marine Fisheries Service in their issuance of the Environmental Species Act Section 4(d) rules to conserve and protect remaining Spring Chinook Salmon. This project also enables the City to meet Clean Water Act requirements by improving water quality through channel restoration improvements.City EngineerPreservationDrainage Capital Projects Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTAL Page IV - 5 CapitalImprovementProjects$150,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ -$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 125,000$ Project Description:Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements.Justification:Relation to Plans:This project will assist with federal and state regulatory compliance as demonstrated through implementation of the City's Stormwater Management Plan and Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, and facilitates City growth and development consistent with the Municipal and Development Codes.Maintenance Impacts:Maintenance impacts will be considered and identified as projects are selected.Drainage CapitalImplementEnvironmental Services ManagerPreservationDrainage Capital ProjectsMS4 Permit RequirementsN/A Project TitleProject Manager TOTAL Total CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s)In 2003, the City applied for an MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which will authorize the City to lawfully discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The permit requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health and aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas. In January of 2007 the City received the permit and this will become an ongoing program to maintain the permit. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way Page IV - 6 CapitalImprovementProjects$300,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Totalon-going program50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ 37,000$ 185,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 65,000$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ Project Description:This project provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them, and for purchase of riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City and regulatory objectives for stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection.Justification:This project facilitates community growth and property development consistent with City Development Code requirements and federal regulations protecting water quality and salmon habitat. Currently, Springfield waterways routinely do not meet federal and state water quality safety standards for human andaquatic life. In addition to Federal Clean Water Act requirements to improve stormwater quality, the City Council has established a ten-year target goal for atleast 75% of Springfield's waterways to meet water quality standards. Protected riparian areas are necessary to achieve this objective and some riparianprotection has been established in the Development Code. In cases where riparian area protection poses disproportionate constraints on private land owners,this funding will enable the City to identify priority areas for protection and to compensate property owners.Relation to Plans:This project supports implementation of the City Development Code, the Stormwater Management Plan, the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan, along with compliance with the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act.Maintenance Impacts:Any City stormwater management facilities located within the acquired riparian areas will require increased maintenance. Any on-going land management responsibilities will also require increased maintenance. Projects have not yet been selected. Cooperation with Willamalane and with environmentalorganizations, such as is being planned on the Oxbow property, may mitigate City responsibilities and costs.Riparian Land Project Number Other Total CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALSDC StormDrainage CapitalManagement/AcquisitionsN/A Project TitleProject Manager TOTALFunding Source(s)Envir. Services Mgr/City EngineerPreservationDrainage Capital Projects Page IV - 7 C ap it a l Improvemen t P ro j ec t s $ 6,371,49 4 Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total633,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 340,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,017,294$ 380,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,990,994$ 380,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,500$ 4,080,270$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 526,724$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 400,000$ 280,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 280,500$ 350,300$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 633,700$ 100,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 5,990,99 4 $ 380,500$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 380,500$ Project Description:Design and construct a new inlet from the Middle Fork of the Willamette to the Mill Race and modify hydrauliccharacteristics of the Mill Race and Mill Pond in order to improve water quality and stabilize year round flows.Obtain federal and state agency's approval as required.Justification:Restoration of the aquatic ecosystem of the Springfield Mill race from Clearwater Park to 7th Street (the Booth-Kelly crane shed) bridge is the primary objective of this project. Additional project benefits include maintainingthe groundwater level in the Springfield Utility Board's S. 28th Street well field; prevention of flooding along theMill Race; and maintenance of adequate water supply for use by Springfield Forest Products. Due to potential adverse impact on anadromous fish, federal and state regulatory agencies have limited our use of equipment in the river to maintain Millrace flows; these agencies are requiring construction of permanent flow managementfacilities. The estimated value of the existing City property and in-kind services form a portion of City match forthis project.Relation to Plans:Addresses a Council top priority target of Millrace development, inlet to outlet.Maintenance Impacts:Maintenance costs are expected to increase by about $28,000 per year after the construction of the new facility. That cost increase is mostly related to maintainingthe additional planted area, public walkways, and other amenities which will be provided with the project. There have been discussions with Willamalane which willcontinue, regarding their interest in taking on some of these obligations after project completion. Project Category PreservationSurface Drainage Maintenanc e Budget SubprogramProject Number Millrace Water Control StructureP10667 Project Title Existing City AssetsTOTALCapital BondLand and Right-of-Way(Vinyard)Maintenance Manage r Project Manager Funding Source(s)CostsTOTALSDC StormDrainage CapitalFederal GrantConstructionDesign and EngineeringOther Total Cost Page IV - 8 CapitalImprovementProjects$311,780Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 173,782$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 17,998$ -$ 271,780$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 40,000$ 173,782$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 17,998$ -$ 271,780$ 40,000$ 173,782$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 17,998$ -$ 271,780$ 40,000$ 173,782$ 40,000$ 40,000$ 17,998$ -$ 271,780$ Project Description:Major maintenance contracted activities and unanticipated emergency facility equipment replacement. There is a fund balance maintained in the event of amajor unforseen expenditure.Justification:This item will maintain a fund to provide unanticipated major repairs or replacement of major pieces of equipment for the City facilities.Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:No impacts.Building Maintenance SupervisorPreservationBuilding MaintenanceCity Building MaintenanceN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject CategoryProject NumberTotal Cost Costs Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s)Land and Right-of-WaySDC (Old)TOTALOther Page IV - 9 CapitalImprovementProjects150,000$ Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ Project Description:Drainage master plan implementation for the Booth-Kelly site.Justification:Storm water runoff from the City-owned Booth-Kelly property is discharged to the Mill Race. The sitecurrently does not have a drainage system adequate to avoid localized flooding during the wet weatherseason or provide pretreatment of runoff prior to discharge to the Mill Race. A site drainage master planhas been completed to address this issue in order to support ongoing operation of the Booth-Kellyindustrial center and to comply with Clean Water Act storm water requirements and address ESA concerns. This project involves the implementation of the drainage master plan.Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Dependent on final system constructed. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALBooth Kelly ReserveTOTALFunding Source(s) Total CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringThis drainage master plan will become a localized refinement of the City's Stormwater Facilities master plan. This plan also supports BK development consistent with the BK Conceptual Development Plan and correlates with the Mill Race restoration project.BK Drainage Master PlanBuilding OfficialPreservationBooth-Kelly Capital Projects& Phase I ImplementationN/A Project TitleProject Manager Page IV - 10 CapitalImprovementProjects$260,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,500$ 10,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 40,000$ 67,500$ 40,000$ 20,000$ 20,000$ 35,000$ 30,000$ 145,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 40,000$ 185,000$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 40,000$ 185,000$ 75,000$ 50,000$ 25,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 40,000$ 185,000$ Project Description:Installation of new street lights according to City-wide priority. Locations are typically requested by the public through the CIP process and throughout the year. Replace low pressure sodium (LPS) lights in concentrated areas. Test light poles at 7-10 year intervals and replace rotting poles and broken conduits of City-owned street light system.Justification:Citizens request new lighting and safety studies justify new lighting. Pole testing reveals condition of all City owned poles. The proposed project replaces polesidentified as at the end of useful life.Relation to Plans:Lighting will be installed consistent with Street Lighting Program approved by the City Council in April 2004. Furthers the Council goal of continuing tomake Springfield a safe and attractive community.Maintenance Impacts:Historically, the new street lighting program has added 5-10 new street lights per year. Estimated maintenance and operation cost for each LPS light added is$75 per year, and about $70 per year for HPS, and $71 per year for MH, so each year of the program would add $350 to $700 in annual O&M cost. Replacing LPS lights will reduce O&M in the long term. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALStreet CapitalStreet Light In-fill & Pole ReplaceN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Traffic EngineerPreservationTransportation Power and Light Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s) Page IV - 11 CapitalImprovementProjects$2,548,400Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 30,000$ 65,000$ 50,000$ 30,000$ 25,000$ 200,000$ 553,700$ 207,700$ 635,000$ 450,000$ 270,000$ 232,000$ 1,794,700$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 553,700$ 237,700$ 700,000$ 500,000$ 300,000$ 257,000$ 1,994,700$ 97,700$ 87,700$ 100,000$ 175,000$ 195,000$ 97,000$ 654,700$ 456,000$ 150,000$ 600,000$ 325,000$ 105,000$ 160,000$ 1,340,000$ 553,700$ 237,700$ 700,000$ 500,000$ 300,000$ 257,000$ 1,994,700$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Projects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure.Maintenance Impacts:Public Works has estimated that an annual budget of $1,000,000 per year for street capital maintenance is necessary to adequately keep the existing streetsystem in its present condition. Therefore the present funding available is insufficient and will, in the long run, result in a deterioration of the streets andgreater future maintenance cost.A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement slurry seal and/or overlay performed by contract. Following is a partial list with of the highest priority Overlays/Reconstructions: E. 17th Ave. (945 ft, $190,000), Laura St. (1,600 ft., $235,000), "I" St. (525 ft., $105,000), Daisy St. (7,495 ft., $750,000), "E" St. (5,435 ft.,$543,500), S. 49th Pl. (1,810 ft., $181,000), Gateway St. (6,280 ft., $750,000), Harlow Rd. (3,500 ft., $420,000), N. 42nd St. (2,900 ft., $350,000), 28th St., (5,000 ft., $ 500,000).City EngineerPreservationStreet Capital ProjectsStreet Seal/OverlayN/A Project TitleProject ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALStreet CapitalTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans. ReimbursThis activity repairs and extends the life of the streets. Sealing streets before excessive deterioration occurs is a relatively low-cost method of prolonging the street life. Overlays are effective where street surface failures have advanced beyond the point that is effectively treated by sealing, and prevent expensive structural base failure. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way Page IV - 12 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$600,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ 60,000$ 480,000$ 480,000$ 60,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 60,000$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:CostsLand and Right-of-WayConstructionStreet CapitalTOTAL5th Street OverlayThis project is one of the major items identified by Public Works under the Street Seal/Overlay Category. This project is seen as a priority to keep the status of the City's collector and arterial roadways in a managable state. By overlaying the remainder of 5th Street now, we can lengthen the life of the street and avoid a costly reconstruction project. TOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, Reimbursement"B" Street to Centennial P20512 Project Title Other Project Number Design and EngineeringProjects are identified by the Infrastructure Management System which tracks maintenance and improvements to the City's capital infrastructure.The pavement surface has aged and is in need of an overlay and some localized base rock repair. This is the last major segment of 5th Street that is in need of preservation work as the segment from Centennial Boulevard to Hayden Bridge Way was overlayed during the summer of 2005. Overlay 5th Street from "B" Street to Centennial Boulevard. Some locations may require more extensive base repair due to the dilapidated condition.City EngineerPreservationStreet Capital Projects Project ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram Page I V - 13 CapitalImprovementProjectsSheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ 30,000$ -$ -$ 30,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 20,000$ -$ -$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:This project will conform to recommendations of the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.Maintenance Impacts:Woodstave Removal 10th to 14thP50174 Project TitleProject Manager $250,000City EngineerPreservationSewer Capital Projects Total CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s) Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALDrainage CapitalProject to take the last active portion of the woodstave storm line out of service. Portions of this line lie under buildings and across properties in areas without easements. Excavated material may be hazardous waste with special disposal requirements.This is a remnant system across private property with reverse slopes and potential maintenance problems and costs.This section of line is a significant pending maintenance concern. Because of the line coating, any maintenance on the line must be done with special procedures and precautions. Removal and replacement of the line will avoid larger future maintenance costs. Page IV - 14 CapitalImprovementProjects$185,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ 65,000$ 105,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 105,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ 65,000$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 120,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 120,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Drainage CapitalMinimal. The proposed simple wash systems will include valving installed on a standard catchbasin to redirect flows as appropriate. The basin will capture sediments, etc. as they presently do, while routing contaminated wash water to sanitary. No additional maintenance, other than normal cleanout, should be needed.Firehouse Vehicle Wash FacilitiesN/A Project Title TOTALESD ManagerPreservationDrainage Capital Projects Project ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget SubprogramProject Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTALFunding Source(s)Wastewater CapitalWashing of emergency and fire vehicles, as presently done, discharges washwater into the storm drain system, including detergents, etc., and is a violation of both state and federal water quality regulations and local ordinances. As proposed, the new wash facilities will re-route washwater to the sanitary sewer system, and stormwater to the storm system. Where appropriate, low-impact washwater infiltration areas will be installed instead of piped systems.This project creates basic vehicle wash facilities at each fire house to ensure that vehicle washwater does not enter the storm system. Presently, each station washes vehicles daily, discharging detergents and cleansers to the storm drain. Its not feasible to centralize the washing process, as the vehicles must remain available. Proposed facilities will be minimal and provide basic protection to the drainage system. Station #2 was completed in 2005.This project will assist with regulatory compliance with provisions of the Clean Water Act's NPDES program, and Springfield's adopted Stormwater Management Plan. It will also bring the City into compliance with our own municipal code, which prohibits discharges of deleterious materials, such as wash water, to the storm system. Page IV - 15 CapitalImprovementProjects$100,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 35,000$ 15,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 35,000$ 15,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 35,000$ 15,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ 35,000$ 15,000$ 50,000$ -$ -$ -$ 65,000$ Project Description:Removal of building, wood pilings and Millrace bank restoration.Justification:Relation to Plan:This project supports Booth-Kelly development consistent with the Booth-Kelly Development Plan.Maintenance Impacts:Removes maintenance demands of the existing building.ConstructionDesign and EngineeringIn conjunction with the Army Corp of Engineers Millrace project, the City is responsible for the removal of the building constructed over the Millrace west of the spillway dam. If the Millrace project is delayed, the removal of the building and all ancillary work will not occur.Booth-Kelly Building RemovalN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Building OfficialPreservationBooth-Kelly Capital ProjectsTOTALBooth Kelly ReserveTOTALFunding Source(s) Project NumberTotal Cost OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way Budget Subprogram Page IV - 16 CapitalImprovementProjects$160,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ Project Description:Perform various planned preservation projects on City-owned buildings, including painting, roof replacement, HVAC maintenance and replacement, lighting and alarm system replacement and upgrade, etc.Justification:Projects are necessary to maintain and preserve the City's physical assets.Relation to Plans: Carries out Council Priority - Building PreservationMaintenance Impacts:Project management and support will require 0.10 - 0.15 FTE per yearBuilding Maintenance SupervisorBuilding Maintenance Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALSDC (Old)TOTALFunding Source(s) Project NumberTotal Cost OtherMinor City Facilities ProjectsN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Preservation Page IV - 17 CapitalImprovementProjects$300,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ 20,000$ -$ 20,000$ -$ -$ -$ 80,000$ -$ 80,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 300,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ -$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 200,000$ 300,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Adopted in the Central Lane TMA Metropolitan Transportation Improvement Plan.Maintenance Impacts:Due to the street's current condition, this project will reduce the on-going maintenance effort and cost.21st Street Reconstruction Project NumberTotal Cost OtherD Street to Main StreetN/A Project TitleProject Manager Land and Right-of-WayTOTALStreet CapitalTOTALFunding Source(s)During the summer 2006 the J Street to D Street section of 21st Street was reconstructed. In 2005, Olympic Street to Centennial Boulevard was overlayed. The D Street to Main Street section represents the final segment of 21st Street to be repaired. This section is is serious structural decline and current maintenance levels cannot keep up with the current rate of decline. The intersection at Main Street will also be addressed with this project.Major rehabilitation/reconstruction of 21st Street from D Street to Main Street. The project will include new sidewalks, bike lanes and pavement. The total project cost is estimated to be $900,000.SDC Trans, ImprovementCity EngineerStreet Capital Projects Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringCosts Project Category Preservation Page IV - 18 CapitalImprovementProjects$400,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 15,000$ -$ -$ 15,000$ 150,000$ 235,000$ -$ -$ 235,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 150,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 150,000$ -$ 150,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Provides a facility that will meet Federal, State, and Local disharge standards for onsite storm and sanitary sewers. Maintenance Impacts:CostsLand and Right-of-WayConstructionDesign and Engineering Project Number Wastewater CapitalTOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)Drainage Capital Budget Subprogram SDC StormMaint. Shop Vehicle Wash RackP50272 Project Title OtherReplacement of existing vehicle/equipment wash facilities at City Maint. shops to comply with Federal, State, and local sanitary and stormwater regulations. The present facility does not meet State and Federal requirements and operates outside of MWMC?s current policies and procedures. Proposed tasks include construction of a steel building to cover the facility, a storage building to house pressure pumps and cleaning equipment, elevated catwalk to allow efficient equipment washing and load tarping, and asphalt paving to meet current City code. The Public Works Maintenance Division is charged with the responsibility of maintaining and preserving the public infrastructure. This project is designed to meet the 25 year facility needs. Completion of the facility will help maintain compliance with State and Federal Clean Water Act requirements, and supports City Council?s stormwater goals, as well as enhancing the functionality and efficiency of the Maintenance facility. This entire project is part of the ongoing modernization of the City?s Maintenance shops to meet provisions of the City?s adopted Stormwater Management Plan.Maintenance ManagerPreservationStreet/Sanitary/Drainage Project ManagerProject Category Page I V - 19 IMPROVEMENTSTRANSPORTATION SAFETY & ENHANCEMENT CapitalImprovementProjects$525,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 50,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 7,000$ 7,000$ 7,000$ 41,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 80,000$ 58,000$ 58,000$ 58,000$ 334,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 425,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 425,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 75,000$ 425,000$ Project Description:Justification:As traffic increases, additional traffic intersections will not operate in an acceptable manner with stop sign control. The intersections will meet roundabout orsignal warrants. New signals or roundabouts will need to be installed. The modification of existing signals is needed to maintain adequate traffic safety and toenhance traffic flow.Relation to Plans:This project is consistent with the Metro Area Transportation Plan for improving traffic flow, traffic safety, and reducing vehicular accidents.Maintenance Impacts:Traffic signals will increase costs for power, lamp replacement, and timing modifications. Roundabouts will increase costs for irrigation and landscapemaintenance. Annual cost for roundabouts is about half the cost of traffic signals, with annual per signal cost being about $6,500 and annual roundaboutmaintenance cost being about $3,300. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ImprovementTraffic Control ProjectsN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at various intersections in town. Potential candidate intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd & Marcola Road, 28th & Main, 21st & Main, 40th & Daisy St. and 28th & Centennial. The modification of signals may include change to permissive left turn at some existing signalized intersections. School speed zones beacons and miscellaneous striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the Traffic Control Projects.Traffic EngineerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtTransportation Planning & Oper. Total CostBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringTOTAL Page V - 1 CapitalImprovementProjects$1,407,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082009-20102009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ -$ 200,000$ 150,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 192,000$ 215,000$ 1,007,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 242,000$ 215,000$ 1,207,000$ 200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 242,000$ 215,000$ 1,207,000$ 200,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 250,000$ 242,000$ 215,000$ 1,207,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity and relieve congestion.Improvements to the street network are needed to reduce traffic congestion, air pollution, and reduce fuel use and to allow for continued economic development in the area. A study of the area several years ago resulted in a list of priority projects. Furthers Council goal of expanding the Springfield economy and the top priority target of Gateway Development. Conforms to Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis recommendations.TOTALAny improvements which expand the infrastructure in the area will result in added maintenance costs.Gateway Area Traffic ImprovementsN/A Project TitleProject Manager Transportation ManagerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtTransportation Planning & Oper. Total CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringSDC Trans, ImprovementTOTALFunding Source(s) Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-Way Page V - 2 CapitalImprovementProjects$300,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year TotalOngoing Program-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 25,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 45,000$ 225,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 250,000$ Project Description:Installation of various traffic control, information and data collection systems such as signal interconnect equipment, detection and count loops, incidentmanagement and traffic conditions signing, traffic responsive signal systems and software, and traveler information systems.Justification:To provide centralized data collection, control of traffic signals and signs in outlaying areas which enhance the ability to communicate driver information,control traffic flow, and coordinate signals with each other.Relation to Plans:Oregon Department of Transportation Eugene-Springfield ITS Plan.Maintenance Impacts:Dependent on the type of systems installed.Transportation ManagerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtTransportation Planning & Oper.Intelligent Transport SystemsN/A Project TitleProject ManagerTotal CostProject CategoryBudget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringSDC Trans, ImprovementTOTALFunding Source(s) Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTAL Page V - 3 CapitalImprovemen t Projects$7,845,505Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total3,245,505$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 4,000,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 600,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 7,245,505$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 600,000$ 6,597,195$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 600,000$ STP ODOT-STP573,160$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 25,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,150$ 7,245,505$ 200,000$ 200,000$ 200,000$ -$ -$ 600,000$ Project Description:Intersection improvements at Gateway/Beltline and surrounding intersections, including construction of a coupletand purchase of right-of-way.Justification: Needed for improving level of service at the intersection and maintaining proper function of the intersection inrelationship to the I-5/Beltline Interchange.Relation to Plans:This improvement is required as part of the I-5/Beltline Interchange improvements as described in the EnvironmentalAssessment of the I-5/Beltline project.Maintenance Impacts:There will be additional lanes, landscaping and intersections to maintain.Transportation ManagerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtTransportation Planning & Oper. Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and Engineering Total Cost DeveloperBeltline/Gateway IntersectionN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject CategoryProject Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayFunding Source(s)TOTALODOT ROWLTDTOTAL Page V - 4 CapitalImprovementProjects$710,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 535,000$ -$ 535,000$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ 535,000$ -$ 535,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 360,000$ -$ 360,000$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ 175,000$ -$ 175,000$ 175,000$ -$ -$ -$ 535,000$ -$ 535,000$ Project Description:Justification: Relation to Plans:Maintenance Impacts:This project will add roadway, sidewalks and facilities to maintenance effort. Project Number OtherCostsLand and Right-of-WayTOTALSouth 48th Street ConnectionN/A Project TitleProject ManagerProject Category Main Street to Daisy StreetCity EngineerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtStreet Capital Projects Budget Subprogram ConstructionDesign and EngineeringDeveloper Total Cost TOTALThe project is listed in the Systems Development charge projects and is adopted in the Central Lane TMA Regional Transportation Plan.SDCTrans, ReimbursmentFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ImprovementsConstruct South 48th Street from Main to Daisy Street. Install traffic signal at Main Street/South 48th Street Intersection.Construct new street to urban standards and signalized intersection at Main Street to support planned land development Project #901 IN RTP and TransPlan. Page V - 5 CapitalImprovementProjects$250,000Sheet PRIOR APPROPRIATIONS 2007-20082008-20092009-20102010-20112011-20125 Year Total-$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 250,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ -$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 125,000$ 25,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ 125,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 50,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ -$ -$ 250,000$ Project Description:Justification:Relation to Plans:No street lighting planning document exists. Projects are identified by staff and citizens as needs arise.Maintenance Impacts:Pioneer Parkway LighingCostsLand and Right-of-WayConstructionDesign and EngineeringStreet Capital Project Number TOTALTOTALFunding Source(s)SDC Trans, ReimbursementSDC Trans, Improvement Budget Subprogram "Q" Street to Hayden Bridge Way Project Title OtherIncreases in payments made to Springfield Utility Board for energy, operations and maintenance are expected to amount to approximately $4,600 per year.Traffic volumes and truck usage of Pioneer Parkway is increasing with the opening of Martin Luther King, Jr. Parkway. The road will continue to experience increases in use as the RiverBend area develops. Street illumination improves traffic safety and user comfort by increasing driver perception of the road users and environment around them.Install new street illumination poles, fixtures, services, and raceways to illuminate Pioneer Parkway East and Pioneer Parkway West to current standards. Illumination of Pioneer Path is not included in the scope of this project and is expected to be completed by LTD's EmX project due to the proximity of the path to the transit ways.Traffic EngineerTransportation Safety & EnhancmtStreet Capital Projects Project ManagerTotal CostProject Category Page V - 6 I N D E X INDEX Street/Traffic Signal Projects 21st Street Reconstruction D to Main Street..................IV-18 5th Street Overlay ?B? Street to Centennial Blvd.............IV-13 Beltline/Gateway Intersection..................................V-4 Bob Straub IGA With Lane County................................I-9 Debt Service - SLI Infrastructure..............................I-1 Franklin Boulevard Planning....................................I-4 Gateway Area Traffic Improvements..............................V-2 Intelligent Transport Systems..................................V-3 S. 48th Street Connection Main to Daisy........................V-5 Street Light In-fill and Pole Replacement....................IV-11 Street Seal/Overlay..........................................IV-12 Traffic Control Projects.......................................V-1 Transportation Demand Project................................III-1 Major Sidewalk Construction and Preservation.................III-2 Sanitary Sewer Project Debt Service - Sewer Interceptor...............................I-2 Jasper Road Sewer Extension....................................I-7 Sanitary Sewer Repair.........................................IV-1 Sewer Wet Weather Peak Flow Abatement.........................IV-2 Maintenance Shop Vehicle Wash Rack...........................IV-19 Storm Sewer Projects 54th and J Drainage..........................................III-3 Channel Improvement...........................................IV-5 Drainage Repair...............................................IV-4 Firehouse Vehicle Wash Facilities............................IV-15 Implement MS4 Permit Requirements.............................IV-6 Metro Waterways Study.........................................IV-3 Millrace Water Control Structure..............................IV-8 Riparian Land Management Acquisitions.........................IV-7 S & T Street Drainage between 10th & Debra...................III-4 Woodstave Removal 10th to 14th ..............................IV-14 Miscellaneous Projects Booth-Kelly Building Removal.................................IV-16 Booth-Kelly Drainage.........................................IV-10 City Building Maintenance.....................................IV-9 City Participation, Private Projects...........................I-3 Federal Office Building........................................I-8 Future Growth Projects.........................................I-5 Gray-Jaqua Agreement...........................................I-6 Justice Center Facility.......................................II-1 Minor City Facilities........................................IV-17