Oregon 
Theodore R KjibngDski, Governor 
NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 
Department of Land Conservation and Development 
635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 
Salem, OR 97301-2540 
(503) 373-0050 
Fax (503) 378-5518 
w w w . lc d. s ta t e. or. us 
Mis. 
4/22/2010 
TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan 
or Land Use Regulation Amendments 
FROM: Plan Amendment Program Specialist 
SUBJECT: Jefferson County Plan Amendment 
DLCD File Number 013-09 
The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of adoption. 
Due to the size of amended material submitted, a complete copy has not been attached. A Copy of the 
adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in Salem and the local government 
office. 
Appeal Procedures* 
DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 
This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review prior to adoption pursuant to ORS 197.830(2)(b) 
only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendment 
are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). 
If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. If 
you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of the 
notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received written notice 
of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be served and filed in 
the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). Please call LUBA at 
503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. 
*NOTE: The Acknowledgment or Appeal Deadline is based upon the date the decision was mailed by local 
government. A decision may have been mailed to you on a different date than it was mailed to 
DLCD. As a result, your appeal deadline may be earlier than the above date specified. NO LUBA 
Notification to the jurisdiction of an appeal by the deadline, this Plan Amendment is acknowledged. 
Cc: Nick Snead, Jefferson County 
Jon Jinings, DLCD Community Services Specialist 
Gloria Gardiner, DLCD 
Mark Radabaugh, DLCD 
Jon Jinings, DLCD Regional Representative 
Angela Lazarean, DLCD Regional Representative 
Bill Hoistrom, DLCD 
Constance Beaumont, DLCD 
<paa> Y 
DLCD 
Notice of Adoption 
This F o r m 2 must be mailed to D L C D within 5-VVorking Days after the Final 
Ordinance is signed by the public Off ic ia l Designated by the jur isdic t ion 
and all o ther requ i rements o f O R S 197.615 and O A R 6 6 0 - 0 1 8 - 0 0 0 
In person electronic mailed 
DEPT OF 
APR 1 5 2010 
LAND CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
l ar Office Use OnK 
Jurisdiction: Jefferson County /Madras Local file number: 10-PA-01 
Date of Adoption: 4-14-10 Date Mailed: 3-14-10 
Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? [3 Yes • No Date: 12-14-09 
[X] Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment [>3 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
D Land Use Regulation Amendment £><] Zoning Map Amendment 
• New Land Use Regulation • Other: 
Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". 
An amendment to the City of Madras & Jefferson County Comprehensive Plans and Zoning maps to expand 
the Madras UGB by approx. 36.91 acres for residential, public and semi-public purposes. Madras has also 
added a zoning compatibility table (Table 3-1) that lists Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations 
and corresponding City and County zones that are deemed compatible. The table is needed because the Madras 
Comprehensive Land Use Plan map, which applies to incorporated and unincorporated properties, and the 
city's zoning map are one in the same. 
Does the Adoption differ from proposal? Yes 
Slightly, in that when the original notice was sent to DLCD (12-14-09) the City proposed to justify the UGB 
expansion based on the Jefferson County School Facility Plan (SFP). It was the opinion of the local DLCD 
Field Representative that the SFP didn't fully comply with ORS 195.110. As such, the City choose to change 
the manner in which the 36.91 acre UGB expansion would be justified from the SFP need to the identified 20-
year residential land need identified in the acknowledged Madras Urban Reserve Area Report. 
Plan Map Changed from: Only UGB expanded 
Zone Map Changed from: Only UGB expanded 
to: Only UGB expanded 
to: Only UGB expanded 
Location: East of existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Rd. See Findings Pg. 6 Acres 
Involved: ~ 36.91 
Specify Density: Previous: N/A 
Applicable statewide planning goals: 
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 
New: N/A 
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
D L C D File No. 013-09 (18001)[ 16090] Also see Madras 002-09 (18000) [16091] 
Was an Exception Adopted? • YES NO 
Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... 
45-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? £<] Yes • No 
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? • Yes • No 
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? • Yes • No 
DLCD file No. 
Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: 
Jefferson County & Oregon Department of Transportation 
Local Contact: Jon Skidmore 
Address: 85 SE "D" St. 
City: Madras Zip: 97741 
,Ion.Skidmore(a)co.jeffcr.soii.or.us 
Phone: (541) 475-4462 Extension: 
Fax Number: 541-325-5004 
E-mail Address: 
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This Form 2 must be received bv DLCD no later than 5 days after the ordinance has been signed by the public 
official designated by the jurisdiction to sign the approved ordinance(s) 
per ORS 197.615 and OAR Chapter 660. Division 18 
1. This Form 2 must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant). 
2. When submitting, please print this Form 2 on light green paper if available. 
3. Send this I'orm 2 and One (1) Complete Paper Copy and One (1) Electronic Digital CD (documents and 
maps) of the Adopted Amendment to the address in number 6: 
4. Electronic Submittals: Form 2 - Notice of Adoption will not be accepted via email or any 
electronic or digital format at this time. 
5. The Adopted Materials must include the final decision signed by the official designated by the jurisdiction. 
The Final Decision must include approved signed ordinance(s), finding(s). exhibit(s), and any map(s). 
6. DLCD Notice of Adoption must be submitted in One (1) Complete Paper Copy and One (1) 
Electronic Digital CD via United States Postal Service, Common Carrier or Hand Carried to 
the DLCD Salem Office and stamped with the incoming dale stamp, (for submittal instructions, 
also see # 5)] MAIL the PAPER COPY and CD of the Adopted Amendment to: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
7. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the signed ordinance(s), finding(s), exhibit(s) and any other 
supplementary information (see ORS 197.615 ). 
LANDCONSERVATI 
Vfiy 
I UNITED STATES POST&L SERVICE 
1021 
97301 
ni r 
^wu rm ic. 
U.S. POSTAGE PAID MADRAS,OR 
97741 APR H.'IO AMOUNT 
$9.65 , 
00026557-02 
United States Postal Service tm 
DELIVERY CONFIRMATION 
IIBII. fi7Q^ 
QBOfi n a D l - H & 5 b -
JSQErj, 
3S7ZfSOcf 
Aim?^-. 
f * * * < m t m n 
CITY OF MADRAS 
^^ffiata^QRr^rAmiSOS v. 
(541) 475-2344 
To: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPEC 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
1 
Community Development Department 
71 S.E. D Street, Madras, OR, 97741 
541-475-3388 
April 14, 2010 
Plan Amendment Specialist 
Department of Land Conservation and Development 
635 CAPITOL Street NE, Suite 150 
Salem, OR, 97301-2540 
DEPTOF 
APR 1 5 2010 
AJAND CONSERVATION 
£ } F N D DEVELOPMENT 
6 M 
LAfNiJ OON&£HVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
Re: City of Madras Notice of Adoption of Comprehensive Plan Amendment to expand the 
City of Madras UBG by approximately 36.91 acres. 
Enclosed is the Notice of Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan map, the City of Madras and Jefferson County Zoning Maps, and 
text amendment to the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
On April 13, 2010 the Madras City Council adopted Ordinance 832 amending the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning map. Later on April 14, 2010 the Jefferson County Board of 
Commissioners adopted Final Order #0-039-10 which amended the Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan map and Zoning map. Per ORS 197.615 this Notice of Adoption is being 
sent to DLCD as required. 
If you should have any questions please contact me at 54-323-2916. 
Respectfully, 
Nicholas Snead 
Community Development Director 
Cc: Jefferson County Community Development Director, Jefferson County Administrator, 
Jefferson County Legal Counsel, City of Madras Administrator, City of Madras Attorney. 
Enclosure: Notice of Adoption (JC File #01PA-10) 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 1 of 1 
DLCD 
Notice of Adoption 
DLCD File # Madras-002-09 
City of Madras 
Adopting Ordinance 
ORDINANCE NO. 823 
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING FINDINGS FOR AN URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY 
EXPANSION OF APPROXIMATELY 36.91 ACRES [JC FILE #10-PA-01], AMENDING 
THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PLAN MAP, AND DECLARING AN 
EMERGENCY. 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved in July 2009 by 
the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development; and 
WHEREAS, land in the Urban Reserve Area is first priority land for inclusion in the 
Urban Growth Boundary pursuant to ORS 197.298; and 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urbanization Study (April 2007) and the Madras 
Urbanization Study Addendum (August 2007) identified the need for residentially zoned 
land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB; and 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras has initiated the Urban Growth Boundary 
amendment process to try to meet this need; and 
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the transition of rural zoning to urban zoning in the 
urban growth area, text amendments are proposed for Section IV (Land Use Element) 
of the Madras Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones allowed on land that is 
designated for future urban use on the Comprehensive Plan Map; and 
WHEREAS, it is also being proposed that the Madras Comprehensive Plan be 
amended to include a table that presents the City zones and County zones that 
correspond, and are allowed under City Comprehensive Plan designations; and 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map are being 
amended to expand the Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); and 
WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the City of Madras Planning Commission and 
Jefferson County Planning Commission was held on February 11, 2010 to consider 
findings, and accept any written and oral testimony from the public on the proposed 
36.91 acre Urban Growth Boundary Expansion; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and written and oral testimony 
from the public, both the City Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning 
Commission took formal action to recommend to the City Council and Jefferson County 
Board of Commissioners that the proposed Urban Growth Boundary Expansion be 
approved; and 
Page 1 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 823 
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Urban 
Growth Boundary Expansion was forwarded to the Madras City Council during a joint 
public hearing with the Jefferson County Board of Directors on March 29, 2010; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and all written and oral 
testimony from the public, the Madras City Council took formal action to approve the 
Urban Growth Boundary Expansion [JC File #10-PA-01], and forward a 
recommendation to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners that the 
Commissioners approve the Urban Growth Boundary Expansion as proposed. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Madras ordains as follows: 
SECTION 1: FINDINGS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION 
The "Findings of Fact" and its attachments, as submitted to the City 
Planning Commission and Madras City Council for consideration, 
are hereby adopted as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this 
ordinance. 
SECTION 2: AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 
AND PLAN MAP 
The proposed text amendments to Section IV (Land Use Element) 
of the Madras Comprehensive Plan that identifies county zones 
allowed on land that is designated for future urban use on the 
Comprehensive Plan Map shall hereby be adopted. 
The Madras Comprehensive Plan shall be amended to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond and 
are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
The City Comprehensive Plan and Zone Map shall be amended to 
reflect the expansion of the Madras Urban Growth Boundary to 
include 36.91 acres from the Madras Urban Reserve Area 
(Attached Exhibit "B"). 
SECTION 3: SEVERABILITY CLAUSE 
A determination of invalidity or unconstitutionality by a court of 
competent jurisdiction of any clause, sentence, paragraph, section 
or part, of this Ordinance shall not affect the validity of the 
remaining parts of this Ordinance. 
Page 2 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 823 
SECTION 4: CORRECTIONS 
This Ordinance may be corrected by order of the City Council to 
cure editorial and clerical errors. 
SAVINGS CLAUSE 
A prosecution which is pending on the effective date of this 
Ordinance and which arose from a violation of an ordinance 
repealed by this Ordinance, or a prosecution which is started within 
one year after the effective date of this Ordinance arising from a 
violation of an ordinance repealed by this Ordinance, shall be tried 
and determined exactly as if the ordinance had not been repealed. 
EMERGENCY CLAUSE 
The City Council of the City of Madras, having reviewed the 
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Madras, and the need for 
enactment of ordinances to regulate land use within the City does 
hereby determine that this ordinance is necessary for the 
immediate preservation of the public peace, health, and safety of 
the citizens of the City of Madras and an emergency is hereby 
declared to exist, and this Ordinance shall become in full force and 
effect from and after the date it is enacted and signed by the Mayor. 
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Madras and signed by the Mayor 
this \3- fo day of . f t p u f l , 20 \Q 
Ayes: 
Nays: I 
Abstentions: Q 
Absent: Si 
Vacancies: Q 
Melanie Widmer, Mayor 
ATTEST: 
Mmstu^' C A s m i m ) 
Karen J. Coleman, City Recorder 
Page 3 of 4 ORDINANCE NO. 823 
SECTION 5: 
SECTION 6: 
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF OREGON 
FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE JEFFERSON ) 
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP TO ) 
EXPAND THE MADRAS URBAN GROWTH ) 
BOUNDARY BY APPROXIMATELY 37 ACRES ) 
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (10-PA-01) ) 
WHEREAS, Jefferson County worked with the City of Madras and other stakeholders to 
establish a 50-year Urban Reserve Area surrounding the City of Madras; and 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was acknowledged in February 2010 by 
the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development; and 
WHEREAS, land in the Urban Reserve Area is first priority land for inclusion in the Urban 
Growth Boundary (UGB) pursuant to ORS 197.298 and the land proposed for UGB expansion is 
within the URA; and 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urbanization Study (April 2007) and the Madras Urbanization Study 
Addendum (August 2007) identified the need for residentially zoned land for housing and 
public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB; and 
WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the City of Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson 
County Planning Commission was held on February 11, 2010 to consider findings and accept 
any written and oral testimony from the public on the proposed approximate 37 acre Urban 
Growth Boundary Expansion; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and written and oral testimony from the 
public, both the Jefferson County Planning Commission and the City of Madras Planning 
Commission took formal action to recommend to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
and the Madras City Council that the proposed UGB expansion be approved; and 
WHEREAS, the County Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Urban Growth 
Boundary Expansion was forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners during a joint public 
hearing with the Madras City Council on March 29, 2010; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and all written and oral testimony from the 
public, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners voted 2 - 0 to approve the proposed 
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment and City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary expansion. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners hereby ORDAINS as 
follows: 
0-039-10 
Ordinance No. 
1-039-10 
1. Adoption of Findings 
The Findings of Fact and Conclusions in the attached Findings Document and Staff 
Report are hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference as the basis for the 
decisions to adopt the amendments to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map. 
2. Amendment to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map 
The amendment to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map contained in the 
attached Exhibit A is hereby adopted and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully 
set forth. 
3. Severability 
The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, 
clause or phrase of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto is, for any reason, held to be 
invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining 
portions of this ordinance or exhibits thereto. 
4. Effective Date 
These amendments being necessary for immediate implementation, an emergency is 
declared to exist, and the specified amendments shall therefore take place and be 
effective on April 14, 2010. 
DATED this 14th day of April, 2010. 
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: 
Mike Ahern, Commissioner 
Attest: 
EXHIBIT "A" 
City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive 
Plan, Madras and Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning 
Map 
FINDINGS 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Prepared for: 
Jefferson County 
66 S.E. t rD" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
Prepared by: 
& 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
February 2010 
1 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
2 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Shelly Tack Chair 
Lynn Kowaleski Vice-Chair 
Alan Hurley Commissioner 
Kasey Cousens Commissioner 
Richard Ladeby Commissioner 
Joe Krenowicz Commissioner 
City of Madras City Council 
Melanie Widmer Mayor 
Tom Brown Councilor 
Walt Chamberlain Councilor 
Royce Embanks Jr. Councilor 
Benjamin Keeton Councilor 
Bob McConnell Councilor 
Kevin O'Meara Councilor 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Don Martin Chair 
Evan Thomas Vice Chair 
Dick Dodson Commissioner 
Bob Powers Commissioner 
Roy Hyder Commissioner 
Kay Moon Commissioner 
Jim Martin Commissioner 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
John Hatfield Commission Chair 
Mike Ahern Commissioner 
Wayne Fording Commissioner 
Project Support and Consulting Team 
Angelo Planning Group 
Kittelson Associates 
Jefferson County 
City of Madras 
Jefferson County School District 509-J 
Land use planning, project management 
Transportation analysis 
Planning 
Planning, technical support 
Planning, technical support 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 25 
February 2010 
29 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
3 
Table of Contents 
I. Proposal Summary 1 
II. Introduction 3 
III. City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 4 
IV. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning 
Map Amendments 6 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement 7 
Goal 2 Land Use Planning 8 
Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 12 
Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 13 
Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 14 
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards 14 
Goal 10 Housing 15 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 16 
Goal 12 Transportation 20 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 23 
Goal 14 Urbanization 24 
VI. Conformance with State Statutes 
ORS 197.298 26 
ORS 197.610 27 
ORS 197.626 28 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) 
30 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 32 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Section III, Goal 14 - Urbanization 34 
X. Conformance with the City of Madras Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 7.2-7.4 - Annexation 41 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 8.2 - Zone/Plan Map Amendments.. 44 
List of Figures 
Figure 4-1: Proposed UGB Amendment and Annexation Area 6 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive PJan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madias Zoning Map 
February 2010 
3 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
List of Tables 
Table 3-1: Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City o f Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 4 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 10 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 11 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 12 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 27 
List of Appendices 
• Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
• Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey Map (20-acre parcel) 
• Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
• Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
• Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
• Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis (Kittelson & Associates, January 
2010) 
• Appendix G: O D O T Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely Determination for US 97/J 
Street Improvements 
• Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
4 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
s 
I. Proposal Summary 
File No.: 081-004 
Legislative Sponsor: Nick Snead, Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-3388 
(541) 475-7061 Fax 
nsnead(2>.ci.madras.or.us 
Planning 
Consultant: 
DJ Heffeman 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
(503) 227-3664 
(503) 227-3679 Fax 
dheffernan(2!angeloplanning.com 
Proposal: • To amend die Madras Comprehensive Plan - to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond 
and are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
(Table 3-1) 
• To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps - to expand the 
Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); to annex 20 acres 
of City-owned land ("east site," Figure 4-1) to the City of 
Madras and apply City R-2, Multiple Family Residential zoning; 
to annex 16.22 acres of privately owned land plus 0.69 acres of 
land for County right-of-way ("west site," Figure 4-1) to the 
City and retain existing County RL, Range Land, zoning. 
Location: « West site: tax map of 16.91-acre west site (outlined), direcdy 
east of the existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road 
(Appendix A) 
• East site: survey map of 20-acre east site, east of the existing 
Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road (Appendix B) 
Legal Description: West site: 11S 14E 7 Lots 101 (12.28 acres), 102 (0.69 acres for 
right-of-way), and 200 (3.94 acres), entire lots 
East site: 11S 1 4 E 7 L o t 100 (20 acres), parcel of lot 
Legal description of Lot 100 parcel (east site): 
A portion of Panel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 asfiled in the Jefferson 
County Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE 'A) of Section 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 1 
February 2010 
5 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson 
County Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 
Northwest comer of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 inch 
diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast comer of said Section 7 bears 
South 89°39'40"East a distance of2640.53feet; thence South 89°39'40" 
East along the North line of said Section 7 a distance of599.997feet; thence i 
South 0°17'36" West a distance of40.00feet to the Northwest corner of said 
Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; thence continuing South 0°17'36" 
West along the West line of said Panel 2 a distance of40.00feet to the South 
right-of-way line ofEastAshwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 0°17'36" East along said 
West line a distance of935.13feet to the Southeast comer of Parcel 1 ofsaid 
Partition Plat No. 2002-17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39'40" 
East a distance of931.70feet; thence North 0°17'36" West a distance of 
935.12feet; to a point on the South right-of-way line ofEastAshwood Road; 
thence North 89°39'40" West along said right-of-way line a distance of 
931.70feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Contains 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. (Appendix B) 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
6 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
7 
II. Introduction 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved by DLCD in July 2009, and was sized 
to provide urbanizable land for the next 50 years. Land from the URA is the first priority 
for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The City of Madras is not currendy in 
periodic review or evaluating its existing UGB for a 20-year land supply. The City, however, 
has initiated this UGB amendment and annexation process in order to begin to meet the 
land need identified by the Madras Urbanisation Study (April 2007) and the Madras Urbanisation 
Study Addendum (August 2007), prepared by ECONorthwest. The studies found a need for 
residentdally zoned land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB. 
There are two parts to the proposed Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) annexation: the east 
site and the west site. The City of Madras owns the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits and for re-zoning as City Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2), a designation that will allow for a multi-family and single-family housing as 
well as public/semi-public uses typically sited on residentially zoned land. The 20-acre 
parcel is within die Yarrow Master Plan area. 
In addition to the east site, there are another 16.91 acres of land in the proposed UGB and 
City annexation, referred to as the west site. The west site is comprised of three lots that 
provide County right-of-way, better connect the east site to the existing UGB, and 
contribute toward meeting the long-term need for residentially zoned land. The west site is 
privately owned and is not proposed for re-zoning at this time. Owners may apply for re-
zoning when they are prepared to file land development applications in the future. It is 
expected that the west-site land also will provide the same range of needed housing types 
and public/semi-public uses as the east site when re-zoning is approved. Both the east and 
west sites will be designated Residential on the Plan Maps if this proposal is approved. 
Proposed Text Amendments 
In order to facilitate the transition of rural zoning to urban zoning in the urban growth area, 
text amendments are proposed for Section TV (Land Use Element) of the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones allowed on land that is designated for future 
urban use on the Comprehensive Plan map. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
8 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
Table 3-1 lists Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations and corresponding 
City and County zones that are deemed compatible. The table is needed because the 
Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan map, which applies to incorporated and 
unincorporated properties, and the city's zoning map are one in the same. The table 
clarifies that unincorporated property may retain its county zoning when it is annexed 
into the UGB if the land is not immediately annexed into the city. Such properties may 
retain any of the listed County zones and be regulated under the County's land 
development ordinance consistent with adopted growth management policies and 
procedures that apply to all land inside the Madras UGB. When such land is ready for 
urban development, the owner may request city annexation and zoning that is consistent 
with the land use plan designation for their property. Practically speaking, the table 
simply allows rural zoning districts to be applied in the Madras urban growth area on an 
interim basis, even when the rural zone differs from the intended long range urban use 
for a subject property. The table does not alter anything in practice. County zoned 
properties that are inside the Madras UGB remain under county jurisdiction in all 
respects although they are subject to urban growth management policies and regulatory 
review procedures that have been jointly adopted by Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras. In this context, the conformity table serves as a zoning bridge between a 
property's planned urban future and its current unincorporated rural zoning. 
Table 3-1 Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home 
subdivisions, and for duplexes 
R-1 EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family 
Residential 
Land for multi-family housing to be close 
to businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential 
development that allows site design 
flexibility to promote creativity and 
protection of scenic and natural 
resources 
R-3 EFU A-1.EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
' 8 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
9 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
C-3 Community 
Commercial 
Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
1 
O/S 
Industrial 
Open Space 
Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise 
publicly owned 
1 
OS/PF 
EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, 
ERD 
EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM 
A/D Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for 
future commercial and industrial uses, 
particularly those that rely on air 
transportation 
A/D EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFUA-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 25 
February 2010 
29 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
10 
C o 
£ & 
Q) - > 
TJ 
C 
CO 
W 
CO 
•O _ co 9-
s A 
£ O) 
I S c 
Q. "E 
Q O 
> N 
• M 
(A (/> 
C CO A) 
Jc -o 
Q CO 
1= 
E l CO o O 
(/> 
CO 
•D 
CD 
(/> 
Q. 
(0 
C 
CD 
£ Q. 
J3 c 
0) 
E 
•D 
C 
0) 
E < 
•D 
O 
(A 
O 
Q. 
O 
<1> > 
"55 c 
o 
JC 
2> 
Q. 
E o 
o 
c 
3 
O 
o 
10 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
11 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement 
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be 
involved in all phases of the planning process. 
Response: The proposed amendments have been reviewed during a series of public 
meetings and hearings in order to allow for consideration by public officials and public 
feedback. 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or "District") Board ("Board") was 
generally briefed by the Superintendent about the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan at the 
December 14, 2009 School Board meeting where the need for the updated plan was 
discussed. The draft plan was brought to them first for formal review at a Board meeting on 
January 11, 2010. After the School Board reviewed the enrollment forecast, location and 
conditions of existing schools, and future potential school locations, they adopted the plan 
on January 25,2010. 
The proposed Madras Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan amendment and 
amendments to the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Maps and 
Zoning Maps were presented and reviewed in a series of meetings in early 2010. 
A public hearing was scheduled before the Madras and Jefferson County Planning 
Commissions (joint) on February 11, 2010. Notice of the hearing was published in the 
January 13, 2010 Madras Pioneer. The public notice published in the newspaper was also 
posted at the Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the 
Jefferson County Library 20 days prior to the February 11, 2010 Planning Commission 
meeting. 
Additionally, property owners within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB were notified of the proposed land use action. Adjacent property owners 
were notified that the file was available for review at the Jefferson County Community 
Development Department at 85 SE "D" Street and that copies of any information would be 
provided at a cost of .25/page. The agenda for the Planning Commission was posted at 
Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the Jefferson 
County Library 7 days prior to the February 11,2010 joint Planning Commission meeting. 
As discussed above the City proposes to include four (4) properties that total 36.91 acres 
into the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary. This constitutes a potential "land use 
change" that would typically require notice to affected property owners. ORS 227.186 
(Measure 56 notice) requires property owners to be notified of legislative acts relating to 
comprehensive plan, land use planning or zoning proposed by the City. Additionally, the 
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is limited to the four properties identified on 
page 1. As such, a city-wide notice is not needed rather notice to the individual properties 
is required. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
' 11 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
12 
The City owns property, has a signed Consent to Annex agreement or a letter from a 
property owner acknowledging the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment that verify 
that property owners are aware of the proposed land use action and a Measure 56 notice is 
not needed. Specifically, the City holds tide and owns Tax Lot 100 and therefore is aware 
and consents to the proposed re-zone to a portion of the property it owns that represents a 
"land use change" that may limit use. Additionally, the City of Madras has signed consent 
forms from the property owners of tax lots 101 and 200. Jefferson County owns tax lot 102 
and has provided a letter acknowledging and supporting the proposed land use action. As 
such, a formal notice as required by ORS 227.186 is not necessary as the affected property 
owners are aware of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment More over, the ensuing 
annexation and re-zoning of 20 acres of tax lot 100 is limited to City owned property. 
45-day notice to D L C D was sent to DLCD staff on December 14, 2009. On January 13, 
2010 DLCD Field Representative, Mark Radabaugh, notified the City of Madras that the 
contents of the 45-day notice was incomplete. Later that day, City staff submitted the 
requested information to DLCD making the notice complete. The materials submitted on 
January 14, 2010 are noted as the Addendum to the notice. 
The UGB expansion area is drawn from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA), which was 
developed through an intensive participatory process. A Technical Advisory Committee 
(TAC) and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) were formed to provide guidance for the 
project. The TAC was comprised of staff from project team members, including Jefferson 
County, the City of Madras, ECONorthwest, Kittelson & Associates, David Evans & 
Associates, Ball Janik, LLP, and Angelo Planning Group. The PAC included representatives 
of the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Jefferson County School District 509-J, local 
farmers, housing advocates, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, and 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). 
Findings: 
• According to both their Comprehensive Plans and code, the City of Madras and 
Jefferson County Planning Commissions serve as their official citizen planning 
committees. 
• Adoption of the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) complied with Goal 1. 
• Materials were made available to the public at Madras City Hall and the Jefferson 
County Community Development Department 
• Measure 56 notice was not issued as the proposed post-acknowledgment plan 
amendments are property specific and do not propose additional regulations to the 
properties proposed to be annexed and, in the case of the east site, re-zoned to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). 
• 45-day notice of proposed plan amendments was sent to the Department of Land 
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on December 14, 2009 prior to the start of 
hearings held by County and City Planning Commissions and legislative bodies. On 
January 13, 2010 the City of Madras provided supplemental information to DLCD 
vial email. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
February 2010 
19 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
13 
• Notices of the public meetings were published in the City's local newspaper, 
including contact information for the City and County. 
Conclusion: The proposed text and map amendments comply with State requirements for 
citizen involvement per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 1. 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all 
decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
Response: 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras City Council adopted the Madras Urban URA and related provisions in October 
2008 and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD 
acknowledged and approved the URA and related amendments in July 2009, with 
stipulations that some of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County development 
code be modified. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a 
UGB is land designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the 
first priority for UGB expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 
years, as was found by the Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
Land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet long-term land 
needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing UGB 
and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 50 
years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the Madras URA - east and southeast of the city — 
consistendy ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation. Land in the URA is subject to joint management under 
the terms of the City's and County's Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
(UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. Response and findings related to the 
UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Local criteria are relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be included in the UGB. 
Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan 
(AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient public facilities, financing 
prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard areas for the proposed 
UGB amendment area. Policyl4J requires the following. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
February 2010 
19 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
14 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by Information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities required by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary to 
serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements outlined in 
adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements that augment 
adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements of 
OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in the 
Madras Transportation System Plan (JSP) have capacity to meet transportation 
needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental transportation 
improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
These criteria are addressed later in the report section on the Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Goal 14. 
The Madras Urbanisation Study (ECONorthwest, April 2007) and Madras Urbanisation Study 
Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007) identify a shortage of residentially zoned land to 
meet single-family and multi- family housing needs and public/semi-public use needs in the 
next roughly 20 years The needed number of housing units and acreage for residential uses is 
summarized in Table 4-18 of the August 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (Table 5-
1). 
These needs are compared to the available land supply in the existing UGB in Table 6-4 in 
the study (Table 5-2) in order to determine whether there is a surplus or deficit of land for 
residential, public and semi-public, and employment uses. The table documents a shortage of 
land zoned R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) and land zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) 
inside the existing UGB as well as a need for roughly 350 acres of public and semi-public 
uses over the course of the next 15-20 years. These public/semi-public uses tend to be 
related to residential uses and are typically allowed and sited on residentially zoned land. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
15 
The proposed UGB amendment addresses part of the residential and public use land need 
presented above. Annexing 20 acres of the proposed amendment that are owned by the City 
(the east site) and rezoning it R-2 allows the City to fulfill its agreement with Jefferson 
County School District (JCSD) and provide land for a potential school site, which could 
address the need for a new school or replacement school as identified in the JCSD 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan. The remainder of the land need identified in the urbanization 
studies will be addressed during the City's next cycle of periodic review. 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 4-16. Forecast of needed housing units and residential land, 
Madras, 2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Density Net to Grose Density 
(DU/net Net Res Gross Res. (DUfgross 
Housing Type NewDU Percent resac) Acres Factor Acres res ac) 
Needed Units. 2007.2027 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 1,791 61% 4.8 373.1 25% 497.5 3.6 
Manufacture:! 206 7% 5.5 37.4 25% 49.6 4.1 
Condo/Townhomas 206 7% 9.0 22.8 15% 26.9 7.7 
Subtotal 2,202 75% 5.4 410.5 574.2 3.8 
Multi-family 
MuWamily 734 25% 14.0 52.4 15% 61.7 11.9 
Subtotal 734 25% 14.0 52.4 61.7 11.9 
Total 2,936 100% 6.3 462.9 635.8 4.6 
Needed Units, 2007-2057 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 5,516 61« 4.8 1.149.1 25% 1,532.1 3.6 
Manufactured 633 7% 5.5 115.1 20% 143.8 4.4 
Cendo/Townhomes 633 7% 9.0 70.3 15% 82.7 7.7 
Subtotal 6.781 75% 5.4 1.334.5 1,758.7 3.9 
Multi-family 
MulSramHy 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 10% 179.4 12.6 
Subtotal 2,260 25% 14 0 161.5 179.4 12.6 
Total 9.042 100% 6.3 1.495.9 1,938.1 4.7 
Source: ECONortlMrat Itoca: Gr&M acres coJcdsted by dtvxjing net acres by H-net to gross factor) For exampfe ftr sngte-famuy 0etecl>«d, 477.V[1-.75) - 536.1. Conversely. 836 I x .75 » 477 1 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
16 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply end demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (dencit) 
Plan Desionalion 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,355.7 398 1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 136.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 143 0 444.0 242.3 94.8 (201.2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32 7 32.7 32.7 
RR1Q 0.0 0.0 47 5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38 7 38.7 33.7 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 353.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail 8 Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 802 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 9D.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 0 32 6 32.6 32 6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Notes: all public and stirn-pubTtc and needs were allocated to residential zones 
Proposed Text Amendments 
As discussed above, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation is based on the 
buildable lands inventory and needs analysis performed by ECONorthwest in 2007 and for 
the Madras URA. The proposed table of corresponding City land use designations and City 
and County zones (Table 3-1) is proposed to facilitate the transition of land from rural to 
urban and the annexation of land in the URA to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is drawn from land in the adopted 
Madras URA, which is the first priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to 
state statute. 
• The east site and west site are currendy zoned Range Land by the County. Range 
land was included in the Madras URA because of sewer service advantages it had 
over other land surrounding the UGB and because including only exception land in 
the URA would not have provided enough land for the projected growth needs of 
the next approximately 50 years. 
• The proposed annexation area meets some of the need for residentially zoned land 
outside the existing UGB over the next 20 years, as established in the 2007 Madras 
Urbanisation Study and addendum. The studies found the need for more than 200 
acres of land for housing and related public/semi-public uses. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
land use planning per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 2. 
12 
17 
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands 
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 
Response: The entire Madras URA includes land zoned for rural residential, range land, 
and agricultural uses, as shown in Table 5-3. 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 
Land Type Zones Acres 
Exception Land RR2, RR5, RR10 (Rural Residential) 1,709 
Nan-prime Resource Land RL (Range Land) 2,038 
Prime Resource Land A1 (Agricultural) 68 
Total 3,815 
Prime agricultural land makes up less than 2% of the total URA. When prime agricultural 
land is included, it is only when it is adjacent to the existing UGB, surrounded by exception 
land or non-prime resource land, and/or will be more easily served with public facilities — 
sewer service, in particular. The rest of the URA is comprised of rural residential and range 
land. Rangeland was included in the URA because of serviceability advantages it has over 
other land surrounding the Madras UGB and because all the exception (rural residential) 
land adjacent to the Madras UGB would not fulfill the city's estimated land needs for the 
next 50 years. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currendy zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
As explained above, land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet 
land needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing 
UGB and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 
50 years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the URA consistendy ranked highest in sewer 
serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Pursuant to ORS 197.298(a), the first priority of land to be included in the UGB is land in a 
URA. Beyond that, local criteria can be relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be 
included in the UGB. Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan 
or Area Master Plan (AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient 
public facilities, financing prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard 
areas for the proposed UGB amendment area. These policies are addressed in more detail in 
the response and findings for Madras Comprehensive Plan Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
18 
Land in the URA is subject to joint management under the terms of the City's and County's 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. 
Response and findings related to the UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is land from the Madras URA, 
top priority land for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298(a). 
• Some of the non-prime resource land (zoned Range Land) is easier to serve with 
sewer than other areas around the existing Madras UGB, based on public facility 
analysis done during the development of the URA. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of 
the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in 
the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for 
agricultural lands per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 3. 
Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. 
Response: The land being proposed for inclusion in the Madras UGB is currendy located 
within the Madras URA, joindy managed by Jefferson County and the City of Madras 
pursuant to the terms of the Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA), 
adopted in January 2009 (Appendix C). Pursuant to the URAMA, the County processes 
land use decisions in the URA. In addition, conversion plans must be submitted to the City 
for land divisions in the URA. 
Madras Comprehensive Plan policy language regarding protection of open space, scenic, 
wildlife, and cultural resources was adopted as part of amendments to Goal 14 
(Urbanization) concurrent with the adoption of the Madras URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
The land in the proposal does not include floodways, floodplains, significant habitat, or 
cultural resources that are identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 
inventory, or Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) files. The only 
resources cited in Policy 14 J (8) that may apply to the site are open spaces. Open space will 
be a required part of school or multi-family residential development that occurs in the UGB 
amendment area. However, this proposal itself is not a development or entidement proposal 
and, therefore, is not required to specify precisely where such open space wili be designated. 
12 
19 
Findings: 
• Recently adopted amendments to Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan require 
identification of protective measures for significant open space, scenic, historic, 
cultural and natural resources in proposed UGB expansion areas. The Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan and Goal 5 inventory does not identify natural, scenic, 
or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• Open space designations will be made as part of development entidement for the 
proposed U G B amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for open 
space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 
5. 
Goal 6: Air, Water and Land Resource Quality 
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. 
Response: According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon 
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) there ate no federally designated air quality 
management areas or federally designated hazardous waste sites in the Madras URA. Of 
Environmental Cleanup Sites reported on ODEQ's website, there are no sites identified in 
the URA.1 Further, R-2 zoning is proposed for the UGB amendment area to be brought in 
to the city, allowing residential uses and other compatible uses. These uses tend to produce 
less noise, air, land, and water pollution than commercial and industrial uses, which typically 
manufacture goods, produce by-products, and generate more vehicle traffic. 
Findings: 
• There are not federal- or state-registered environmental quality sites within the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• The amendment and annexation area is needed and planned for residential and 
related uses, which tend to have fewer adverse air, water, and land quality impacts 
than commercial or industrial uses. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for air, water 
and land resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6. 
Goal 7: Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 
To protect people and property from natural hazards. 
Response: Primary potential natural hazards in Madras include steep slopes, fioodway and 
floodplain, and wildfire. Statewide Goal 7 is reinforced in Madras Comprehensive Plan 
1 Air quality management areas, hazardous waste sites, and environmental cleanup sites can be searched on the 
U.S EPA's and ODEQ's websites at: http.7/www.deq.state.or.us/aq/planning/index.htm, 
http: / /www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/sitemfo.htm. and 
http://www.deq.state.or.us/lq/ecsi/ecsi.htm. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
February 2010 
19 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
20 
policies (Goal 14) by requiring protection from natural hazards be demonstrated for 
proposed UGB amendments. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in the 
proposed annexation area. Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided 
by Jefferson County Fire Protection District # 1 , and will continue to be provided by that 
district if the land is annexed to the city. Area in the district is subject to a Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration 
with the fire district and federal agencies. 
Findings: 
• There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in 
the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. 
• Jefferson County Fire Protection District # 1 provides fire protection service to the 
proposed amendment and annexation area. The area is subject to the Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) developed and adopted by the County, the fire 
district, and federal agencies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for areas 
subject to natural hazards per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 7. 
Goal 10: Housing 
To encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price 
ranges and rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon 
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. 
Response: This proposal provides land for housing and related public and semi-public 
uses. The Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (August 2007) shows that there is a shortage 
of residentially zoned land inside the existing UGB for growth over the next 20 years (Table 
5-2). 
The proposed annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits addresses this need by 
including 36.91 acres of land from the URA for residential and public/semi-public uses. It is 
proposed that the east site be re-zoned from County RL (Range Land) zoning to City R-2 
(Multi-Family Residential) zoning. 
These proposed amendments are not part of a periodic review work program and the next 
periodic review process will ensure that the UGB does include enough land to meet all the 
land needs that are projected for the next 20 years as shown in Table 5-2. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madias Zoning Map 
February 2010 
3 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
21 
Findings: 
• The Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum found a need for residentially zoned 
land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB for 
growth expected over the next 20 years. 
• The remainder of land needs determined by the urbanization studies will be 
addressed during the next City of Madras periodic review. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for housing 
per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and 
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
Goal Requirements 
Urban Facilities and Services - Refers to key facilities and to appropriate types and 
levels of at least the following: police protection; sanitary facilities; storm drainage 
facilities; planning, zoning and subdivision control; health services; recreation facilities 
and services; energy and communication services; and community governmental 
services. 
A. Goal 11 Planning Guidelines 
5. A public facility or service should not be provided in an urbanizable area unless there 
is provision for the coordinated development of all the other urban facilities and services 
appropriate to that area. 
Response: According to terms of the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras, the City will be the primary service provider for land within its UGB, in particular 
coordinating police, sewer, stormwater, land use, recreation, energy, and governmental 
services. City urbanization regulations amended with the adoption of the Madras URA 
require either a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan (AMP) for 
UGB amendments in Madras for areas over five acres (Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 
14 I). Both MPC plans and AMPs must show "appropriate locations for transportation 
improvements, public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and 
natural resource areas" and how proposed land uses will integrate with existing development. 
Transportation facilities are addressed in more detail in the response and findings for 
Statewide Goal 12 next in this report 
The adopted Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation both to the Madras UGB and city limits. It is also proposed that the east site be 
re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide land for uses such as urban levels of 
housing and related public/semi-public uses. These uses are similar to and compatible with 
surrounding development of residential and public uses. The east site is tangent to the 
existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. Sufficient water 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
February 2010 
19 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
22 
and sewer service can be provided to the east site given existing and planned systems, and 
this is documented in the service provider letters from Deschutes Valley Water District and 
the City of Madras Public Works (Appendix D). 
Pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 14 I: "An AMP shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified urban land need, 
appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, protection for 
significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource areas." It is proposed to annex 
the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits. While it is also proposed that the site retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development, the site is surrounded by land designated for residential and public/semi-
public uses, and its future designation as residential allows housing and compatible 
public/semi-public uses that can be: "integrated with the existing urban development 
pattern." (Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141 (2)) Further, the proposed 
addition of a table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use 
designations to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), 
will facilitate the transition of existing County zoning for the west site to appropriate City 
zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots - Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. As with the east 
site, sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to the west site given existing and 
planned systems, as stated in service provider letters (Appendix D). 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
Finally both MPC plans and AMPs must have documented approval from a majority of 
landowners pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 14 I (3). Specifically, the City of 
Madras owns Tax Lot 100 and as the applicant, consents to the proposed UGB expansion to 
include 20 acres of Tax Lot 100 and the re-zoning of the property from Range Land (RL) to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). Tax Lot 102 is dedicated to Jefferson County for Ashwood 
right-of-way and consent for UGB expansion and re-zoning is not needed as inclusion in the 
UGB and re-zoning will not change how the right-of-way can be used. Consent from other 
landowners is provided in Appendix E. 
8. Goal 11 Implementation Guidelines 
5. Additional methods and devices for achieving desired types and levels of public 
facilities and services should include but not be limited to the following: (1) tax incentives 
and disincentives; (2) land use controls and ordinances; (3) multiple use and joint 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
development practices; (4) fee and less-than-fee acquisition techniques; and (5) 
enforcement of local health and safety codes. 
Response: The proposed land use designations and zoning for the annexation area — the 
east site and the west site - is appropriate for the type and level of public facilities and 
services that can be extended to the area. It is proposed to bring the west site into the 
Madras U G B and city limits but to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until 
landowners are ready to propose development. The site is surrounded by land planned for 
or developed as predominantly residential development. It is well situated for extension of 
urban facilities and services when they are needed. The proposed addition of a land use and 
zoning designation table to Section IV (Land Use Element) of the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan (Table 3-1) establishes the City and County zoning designations that correspond to City 
land use designations, and will guide the transition from County zoning to appropriate City 
zoning once a land use action is proposed. 
It is proposed that die east site be re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide 
land for uses such as urban levels of housing and related public/semi-public uses. These 
uses are similar to and compatible with surrounding development. The east site is tangent to 
the existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends 
itself to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. In that vein, 
service providers have determined that sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to 
the east and west sites given existing and planned systems (Appendix D). 
The east site is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan, a plan that envisions a variety of 
housing and then an internal circulation system, open space, public uses (including a school), 
and a small-scale commercial area to serve the primary residential uses. 
Once the properties are annexed into the city limits and developed, wastewater and domestic 
water services will need to be extended to each developed property. The property owner will 
fund the extension of wastewater and domestic water services to their properties. Extension 
of these facilities will be completed as required in the City of Madras Wastewater Master 
Plan and the Deschutes Valley Water District Master Plan. 
As previously discussed, this proposal is not a development proposal that offers entitlements 
for construction. Subsequent to this land use action, the property owner will be required to 
obtain development approvals (e.g. Site Plan Review, Conditional Use, or Subdivision). Any 
development approval will require public facilities to be extended to the subject property at 
the expense of the applicant. 
OAR 660-011-0010 
The Public Facility Plan 
(1) The public facility plan shall contain the following items: 
(a) An inventory and general assessment of the condition of all the significant public 
facility systems which support the land uses designated in the acknowledged 
comprehensive plan; 
19 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
23 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
24 
(b) A list of the significant public facility projects which are to support the land uses 
designated in the acknowledged comprehensive plan. Public facility project descriptions 
or specifications of these projects as necessary; 
(c) Rough cost estimates of each public facility project; 
(d) A map or written description of each public facility project's general location or 
service area; 
(e) Policy statement(s) or urban growth management agreement identifying the provider 
of each public facility system. If there is more than one provider with the authority to 
provide the system within the area covered by the public facility plan, then the provider 
of each project shall be designated; 
(f) An estimate of when each facility project will be needed; and 
(g) A discussion of the provider's existing funding mechanisms and the ability of these 
and possible new mechanisms to fund the development of each public facility project or 
system. 
(2) Those public facilities to be addressed in the plan shall include, but need not be 
limited to those specified in OAR 660-011-0005(5). Facilities included in the public 
facility plan other than those included in OAR 660-011-0005(5) will not be reviewed for 
compliance with this rule. 
(3) It is not the purpose of this division to cause duplication of or to supplant existing 
applicable facility plans and programs. Where all or part of an acknowledged 
comprehensive plan, facility master plan either of the local jurisdiction or appropriate 
special district, capital improvement program, regional functional plan, similar plan or 
any combination of such plans meets all or some of the requirements of this division, 
those plans, or programs may be incorporated by reference into the public facility plan 
required by this division. Only those referenced portions of such documents shall be 
considered to be a part of the public facility plan and shall be subject to the 
administrative procedures of this division and ORS Chapter 197. 
OAR 660-011-0015 
Responsibility for Public Facility Plan Preparation 
(1) Responsibility for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan 
shall be specified within the urban growth management agreement. If the urban growth 
management agreement does not make provision for this responsibility, the agreement 
shall be amended to do so prior to the preparation of the public facility plan. 
(2) The jurisdiction responsible for the preparation of the public facility plan shall provide 
for the coordination of such preparation with the city, county, special districts and, as 
necessary, state and federal agencies and private providers of public facilities. 
Response: The Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) that implements Goal 11 is OAR 660-
011. The rule establishes requirements for the planning and provision of public facilities in 
Oregon. Pursuant to OAR 660-011-0005(5), a public facility "includes water, sewer, and 
transportation facilities, but does not include buildings, structures or equipment incidental to 
the direct operation of those facilities." Transportation facilities are addressed in detail in 
the response and findings for Goal 12 in this report. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
25 
The City of Madras is responsible for the planning and provision of sewer service in the 
proposed annexation area, and Deschutes Valley Water District (DVWD) for the planning 
and provision of sewer service in the area. The City and D V W D master plans for sewer and 
water provide an inventory and assessment of existing facilities, a list and map of planned 
projects, a timeline for their implementation, and a discussion of costs and financing 
mechanisms. 
The City Public Works Director has submitted a letter that is included with this report 
(Appendix D) that affirms there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned sewer 
infrastructure to serve the east and west sites in the proposed annexation area. Similarly, the 
D V W D General Manager has prepared a statement that there is sufficient capacity in 
existing and planned water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• Implementation of public facilities and services in Madras is primarily regulated by 
land use plans and ordinances and public facility master plans, which are elements of 
the City Comprehensive Plan. 
• The City of Madras will be the primary provider of urban facilities and services in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. The City will be able to coordinate 
service to the area with facilities and services already provided to adjacent land within 
the existing UGB. 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site and shows an internal 
transportation network and sites for housing and a school. 
• The City o f Madras Public Works Director and D V W D General Manager have 
provided letters that verify that there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned 
sewer and water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area. 
• When development occurs on the properties to be included in the Madras UGB, the 
property owner will be responsible for cost to extend sewer and domestic water 
facilities to development. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with Goal 11 for public 
facilities and services subject to OAR 660, Division 11. 
Goal 12 Transportation 
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. 
660-012-0060 
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 
(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or 
a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of 
this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the Identified function, 
capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) 
of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a 
transportation facility if it would: 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
26 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation 
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted 
transportation system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels 
of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility 
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that 
is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
(2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, 
compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the 
planned function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent 
with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan 
or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the 
transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce 
demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance 
standards of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a 
development agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system 
management measures, demand management or minor transportation 
improvements. Local governments shall as part of the amendment specify when 
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: Reflecting Statewide Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule, UGB 
amendment applications must provide the following pursuant to Madras Goal 14 policies: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned Improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need: 
(Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy J-4) 
City R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning is proposed for the east site of the UGB 
amendment and annexation area. The zone allows multi-family and single-family housing 
outright and then allows associated uses such as schools, libraries, and community centers 
conditionally. The minimum lot size for single-family housing is 7,500 square feet and for 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
27 
multi-family 10,000 square feet for the first two units and 2,000 square feet per each 
additional unit 
The east site is adjacent to Ashwood Road, an existing road built to County standards as a 
collector road. Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary access 
and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road 
serves Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west 
transitions into B Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recendy 
constructed extension of City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City 
limits, and Bean Drive connects toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 
summaries key characteristics of the existing roadway facilities (Appendix F). 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
28 
The transportation analysis for annexing and re-zoning the east site to R-2 was based on the 
assumptions below. Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, 
two scenarios were developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved 
both housing and a school. The difference in the scenarios represents the typical range of 
an elementary school site, 5-10 acres.2 The enrollment assumption roughly approximates the 
average elementary school enrollment in Jefferson County School District 509-J. A 
maximum housing density of 11.6 units/acre was derived from standards for lot and 
building size, parking, setbacks, and infrastructure for multi-family residential uses in the R-2 
zone. 
1. 5-acre school site — 174 multi-family units on 15 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
2. 10-acre school site - 116 multi-family units on 10 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
The analysis found that all the study intersections operate acceptably in the planning 
horizon3 with and without the proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the 
intersections of US 97 and J Street. These intersections exceed volume-to-capacity (v/c) 
standards in 2025 with or without the proposed annexation and re-zoning. Because the 
proposal increases traffic at these intersections, even if minimally, the proposal is deemed to 
have a "significant effect"; it would further degrade the performance of the failing 
intersections. 
Improvements for the US 97/J Street intersection have been included in an amendment to 
the Madras TSP and in the O D O T 2010-2013 Draft STEP. The improvements involve 
realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the new 
J Street intersections, and would allow the US 97/J Street intersections to operate within 
adopted v / c standards. O D O T has deemed these improvements to be "reasonably likely" in 
the planning horizon and, thus, no significant would occur with the proposed annexation 
and re-zoning (Appendix G). 
Findings: 
• Transportation analysis for the east site o f the proposed UGB amendment and 
annexation area assumed that the area would be developed with a combination of 
housing and a school. This was because there is the potential for a school to be 
located on the site and schools generate more traffic, thus creating a "worse case" set 
of scenarios for the analysis. 
• Transportation analysis showed that all the study intersections would perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the intersections of US 97 
and J Street These intersections exceed adopted standards and the proposed 
annexation and re-zoning produce a "significant effect" on the intersections. 
1 An elementary school is the type of school needed in Madras according to the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan. 
3 Consistent with individual TSPs and a 15-year minimum pursuant to the Oregon Highway Plan, the planning 
horizon for City facilities is 2020, for County facilities is 2027, and for State facilities is 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
14 February 2010 
Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
29 
However, improvements for the intersections that are included in the Madras TSP 
and the 2010-2013 Draft STIP have been deemed "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon, thus mitigating the proposal's significant effect. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with Goal 12 and OAR 660-015-
0060. 
Goat 13 Energy Conservation 
To conserve energy. 
Response: The east site of the UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the Yarrow 
Master Plan area. The master plan includes a range of land uses so that residents can meet 
many daily needs within the neighborhood. The plan designates land predominandy for 
housing, but for parks and open space, a school, other community services, and commercial 
services as well. This mix of uses will provide for these daily needs and reduce the need to 
drive outside the neighborhood to access these uses. 
All public improvements within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required to be constructed 
to City of Madras standards, which includes the provision of sidewalks. The Master Plan also 
includes planned open space which will be accessed by a multi-use trail system that will 
connect to existing multi-use trails in the City of Madras. This supports the use of non-
motorized transportation and the conservation of fuel resources. This proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation does not provide all of the land needed to implement the master 
plan but provides part of i t 
The west site is not part of the Yarrow Master Plan but will be subject to internal circulation 
and multi-modal standards when a land division or planned unit development is proposed. 
Like the east site, the west site is adjacent to Ashwood Road. 
While water service was projected to be of similar cost to provide to all the study areas that 
comprise the Madras URA, there were differences in relative cost for providing sewer 
service given the need for pumping in some of the study areas. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area is part of a study area and a drainage area where no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required for sewer service. This minimizes the 
amount of energy needed to provide that service. 
All residential development within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required be built to 
Earth Advantage/Energy Star standards and receive certification as stated in the Codes, 
Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) recorded for the development. Such requirement 
reduces energy consumption of each dwelling constructed in the Master Plan area and 
thereby conserves energy consumption which in part satisfies the Goal 13 requirements. 
Findings: 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the east site of the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area proposes a variety of uses that will allow residents 
to take care of day-to-day needs without always having to drive out of the 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 25 
February 2010 
29 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
30 
neighborhood to do so. The plan also indicates multi-use paths and a continuous 
network of sidewalks to promote walking and bicycling. This supports fuel and 
energy conservation. 
• Providing sewer service to the proposal area requires less pumping and, therefore, 
infrastructure, energy, and cost than other parts of the URA and other areas around 
the existing UGB. 
• The CC&R's recorded for the Yarrow Master Plan area require energy conservation 
by requiring future development to meet or exceed Earth Advantage/Energy Star 
standards. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for energy 
conservation per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 13. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to 
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, 
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
Response: The proposed map amendments respond to the need for more residentially 
zoned land as determined in the adopted Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. The 
studies analyzed the potential for development inside the existing UGB and found that in 
addition to development that the existing UGB can accommodate, approximately 220 acres 
of land is needed outside the UGB for residential and related public/semi-public uses over 
the years until 2027. These studies provided the basis for the Madras URA and URAs are 
enabled by statewide rules that address orderly and efficient land use as well as an orderly 
and efficient process for amending UGBs when needed. 
This proposed map amendment draws stricdy from land in the URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298 and Madras plan policies. 
The proposed text amendments (Section III) contribute to orderly and efficient transition 
from rural to urban land use by clearly establishing the ways that Jefferson County and City 
of Madras zones correspond to Madras Comprehensive Plan designations. 
Transportation, water, and sewer services are among the critical public facilities that must be 
provided for the proposed UGB amendment area. As discussed in the narrative and 
findings for Goals 11 and 12 above, these services can be provided to the UGB amendment 
area relying on planned capital improvements. 
Transportation - Transportation analysis shows that all study intersections perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon, with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except for the intersections at US 97 and 
J Street. An analysis shows the performance of those intersections, as they are currently 
designed, exceed mobility standards with and without the proposed annexation and re-
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
31 
zoning. Unless the intersections can be improved, the proposed annexation and re-zoning 
produce a "significant effect" on them by making worse an already failing condition. 
Proposed improvements to the "J" Street and US 97 intersections are included in the Madras 
TSP. Those improvements also are listed in the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, in effect 
programming the necessary state resources for them. On that basis, O D O T has determined 
the "J" Street/US 97 intersection improvements are "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon (Appendix G). With those planned improvements in place, the affect of 
the proposed annexation is mitigated and the proposal will not have a significant effect. 
Water - During the development of the Madras URA, Deschutes Valley Water District 
(DVWD) reported that there would be no supply constraint for urban development in the 
URA. Significant expansion of the District's distribution system would be necessary to serve 
urban demand in each part of the URA, and the water service study found that the marginal 
cost differences between the URA study areas were insignificant. Existing and planned 
facilities will provide sufficient water service to the area, as confirmed by Deschutes Valley 
Water District in a service provided letter (Appendix D). 
Sewer — Public facility analysis conducted in developing the Madras URA showed that sewer 
service to the eastern study areas in the URA would be more cost-efficient because no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required as compared to areas to the north, south, 
and west. For the proposed UGB amendment area, existing and planned sewer facilities will 
provide sufficient service to the area according to City of Madras Public Works (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• The proposed map amendments address the residential land need established in the 
Madras urbanization studies. It draws from the Madras URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB when land need is demonstrated. 
• The text amendments facilitate the transition between County zoning and City land 
use designations and zoning. 
• Water service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing and planned 
water facilities that are identified in the Deschutes Valley Water District's water 
master plan. Providing water service was not found to be significandy different in 
cost between different parts of the URA in studies done in developing the Madras 
URA. 
• Studies conducted for the URA found that drainage areas in the eastern and 
southeastern parts of the URA were easier to serve in that they needed no pumping 
or minimal pumping of sewage when compared to other parts of the URA. Sewer 
service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing City of Madras sewer 
master plan. 
• Sufficient transportation facilities and service can be provided to the proposed UGB 
amendment area given "reasonably likely" construction of improvements to the 
intersections of US 97/J Street before 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
February 2010 
19 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
32 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
orderly and economic urbanization and provision of public facilities and services per 
Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madias Zoning Map 
February 2010 
3 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
33 
VI. Conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORSs) 
ORS 197 
197.298 Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary. (1) In 
addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land may not 
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities: 
(a) First priority is land that is designated urban reserve land under ORS 195.145, 
rule or metropolitan service district action plan. 
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the 
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to an urban growth boundary 
that is identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as an exception area or 
nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land that is completely 
surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is high-value farmland as 
described in ORS 215.710. 
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as marginal 
land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition). 
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in an 
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both. 
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the 
capability classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate for 
the current use. 
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section may be included in an 
urban growth boundary if land of higher priority is found to be inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or 
more of the following reasons: 
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on 
higher priority lands; 
(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be provided to the higher priority 
lands due to topographical or other physical constraints; or 
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary 
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services to 
higher priority lands. [1995c.547 §5; 1999c.59§56] 
Response: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is solely comprised of 
land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority of land to be included within the UGB 
pursuant to ORS 197.298(l)(a). There is sufficient land in the Madras URA to provide for 
the land needs estimated for the next 20 years in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) and presented below. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation provides land to meet a portion of the need 
for residentially zoned land over the next roughly 20 years (Table 6-1). The City's next 
periodic review process will ensure that the Madras UGB includes enough land to meet the 
remaining land needs projected to 2027. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 15 
19 February 2010 
Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB. 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2Q07 2007-2077 2007.1057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1.355.7 393.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 143.0 444.0 242.8 94.8 (201.2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47 5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 38.7 3S.T 
P iittle/Seml-pubh'c usss on res land 353.3 770.7 0.0 (353.3) (770 7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2.708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1.925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.5 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677 9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (854) 
CC 0 a 32.6 32.6 32 6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
1 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Notes: oil public am aijnj-pcj'ic land needs were aBocated to residential zones 
197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; 
exceptions; report to commission. (1) A proposal to amend a local government 
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use 
regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The 
proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local 
government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. 
The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall 
notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. 
(2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular 
proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is 
not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new 
regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there 
are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: 
(a) The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided 
in ORS 197.615 (1) and(2); and 
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other 
person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. 
(3) When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a 
local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed 
amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use 
regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: 
(a) Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and 
(b) Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to 
address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve 
compliance with the goals. 
(4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission 
on whether the director: 
(a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and 
(b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 30 
February 2010 
34 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
35 
§7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c. 761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] 
Response: Notice of the proposed map and text amendments was sent to the Department 
of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before the first 
evidential^ hearing on the proposal. Notice was sent to DLCD on December 14, 2009, 
which was more than 45 days before the first advisory hearing before the Jefferson 
County and City of Madras Planning Commissions on February 11, 2010. A notice 
addendum was submitted to DLCD on January 14, 2010. Further hearing dates have yet 
to be determined but DLCD provided comments on the proposal on January 29, 2010, 
more than 15 days prior to the final adoption hearing date. 
DLCD comments address the map amendments. They call for a boundary locational 
analysis pursuant to OAR 660-024-0060 and a "reasonably likely" determination from 
OODT for the proposed 20-acre rezoning. The locational analysis is not necessarily 
applicable because the proposed map amendment draws from an adopted and 
acknowledged URA. Part of the idea behind URAs is to create a 20- to 50-year reserve 
of land for urbanization all at once so that the process for subsequent UGB amendments 
can be streamlined. For cities or regions that do not have URAs, it is understood that the 
locational analysis established in -0060 would definitely be applicable and needed. 
As to the "reasonably likely" determination, ODOT rendered an affirmative 
determination on February 2, 1010. DLCD comments acknowledge that the set of 
needed improvements at the intersections of US 97/J Street is in the current draft STIP. 
Including them in the final STIP signifies a financial commitment to the improvements 
and thus makes a clear finding for "reasonably likely." 
197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary or designating urban or rural 
reserves subject to periodic review. A metropolitan service district that amends its 
urban growth boundary to include more than 100 acres, or that amends the district's 
regional framework plan or /and use regulations implementing the plan to establish 
urban reserves designated under ORS 195.145 (1)(b), a city with a population of 2,500 
or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to 
include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve under ORS 195.145, or a 
county that amends the county's comprehensive plan or land use regulations 
implementing the plan to establish rural reserves designated under ORS 195.141, shall 
submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development 
Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. 
[1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10; 2003 c. 793 §4; 2007 c.723 §7] 
Response: The City of Madras has coordinated with Jefferson County regarding the 
proposed map and text amendments. The amendments to the City and County 
Comprehensive Plans are post-acknowledgement plan amendments. However, the adoption 
process for the amendments will follow periodic review procedures pursuant to ORS 197. 
As part of periodic review procedures, the proposed amendments are subject to review by 
DLCD and approval by LCDC. DLCD and LCDC will conduct their review process upon 
adoption of the proposed amendments by the Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Board of Commissioners. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
36 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is entirely comprised of land 
from the Madras URA, the first priority of land to be included in the UGB pursuant 
to ORS 197.298(l)(a). 
• There are 36.91 acres in the proposed U G B amendment and annexation. This meets 
some of the estimated need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB 
projected to 2027 by urbanization studies. The proposed R-2 zoning for the 20-acre 
parcel (east site) allows housing and public/semi-public uses such as parks and 
schools. Other land needs for the next 20 years will be addressed during the next 
periodic review cycle. 
• Notice of the first advisory hearing on February 11, 2010 was sent to DLCD on 
December 14, 2009, more than 45 days before the advisory and evidentiary hearings. 
A notice addendum was filed on January 13,2010. 
• The City of Madras and Jefferson County have coordinated this proposed set of 
amendments. 
• This proposal is a post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) but will follow 
procedures for periodic review. D L C D review and LCDC approval of the 
amendment will be necessary for the proposal if it is adopted by both the Madras 
City Council and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with applicable State 
requirements for urban reserve area planning, plan amendments, and UGB amendments 
pursuant to ORS 197. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madias Zoning Map 
February 2010 
3 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
37 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making 
authority regarding all land use application within the UGB except applications for 
amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of land in the UGB. Lands 
outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to 
include the territory to be annexed. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
1.1 Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
1.2 An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community 
Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan 
amendment fees. The City shall fonvard a copy of the application to the County 
Community Development Department, together with the County's plan 
amendment fee, within five working days of the date the application is filed. 
1.3 The City and County Planning Commission shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may 
hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
1.4 The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be 
forwarded to City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the 
proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be 
forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
1.5 The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final 
decision on whether the UGB should be amended. 
1.6 If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint hearing of 
the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to 
resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution 
process to resolve the differences. 
1.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be 
no change to the UGB. 
Response: The Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (Appendix H) 
was adopted by the City of Madras and Jefferson County on April 5, 2006. Pursuant to 
UGAMA terms for UGB amendments, the City is an eligible applicant for a UGB 
amendment application (Section 6.1). The U G B amendment application and appropriate 
fees were forwarded to the Jefferson County Community Development Department within 
five working days of being initially filed (Section 6.2). 
Hearings by the Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission 
were first held joindy on February 11,2010. The Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 10 
February 2010 
14 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
38 
Board of Commissioners held a joint public hearing on March 29, 2010 to review their 
recommendations from their respective Planning Commissions. On March 29, 2010, the 
Madras City Council approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and 
forwarded it's recommendation that evening to the Jefferson County Board of 
Commissioners who then approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. All of 
the public hearings before the Planning Commissions, Madras City Council, and Jefferson 
County Board of Commissioners were conducted in a manner consistent with the provisions 
of the UGAMA. 
It is proposed to annex both the east site and west site to the Madras UGB and city limits, 
and it is proposed to re-zone only the east site at this time. Regardless, if both sites are 
brought into the UGB and city limits, Madras will assume land use administration and 
decision making authority for the sites pursuant to Section 4.1 of the UGAMA. 
Findings: 
• The City is an eligible applicant for a UGB amendment application. 
• Appropriate UGB amendment application materials and fees were forwarded to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department in the prescribed amount 
of time. 
• The proposal will be heard joindy by the County and City Planning Commissions 
and then separately by the County Board of Commissioners and City Council 
• Madras assumes administrative responsibility for any land annexed to its UGB and 
city limits. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable local requirements 
for UGB amendments per the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of Madras, 
adopted April 5, 2006. 
12 
39 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson County Comprehensive 
Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 
Policy 1: Changes to urban growth boundaries, the establishment of new urban growth 
boundaries or urban reserve areas, incorporation of a new city, or annexation 
of land into a city which is not in an established urban growth boundary 
requires an amendment to this Plan and the Zoning Map. The following 
factors should be used in considering such proposals: 
A. Demonstrated need to accommodate long-range urban population 
consistent with a 20- to 50-year population forecast coordinated with the 
cities; 
B. Demonstrated need for housing, employment opportunities, livability or 
uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks or open 
space; 
C. Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and sen/ices; 
D. Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing 
urban area. 
E. Comparative environmental, energy, economic and social consequences; 
F. Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural 
activities on land outside the UGB; and 
G. Priority of land as required by ORS 197.298. Non-irrigated parcels may 
be added to the UGB before irrigated parcels that are in the same 
statutory priority. 
Response: The proposed change to the UGB fulfills some of the need foi residentially 
zoned land outside the existing UGB as identified in the Madras Urbanisation Study and 
Addendum. The urbanization studies found the need for approximately 220 acres of 
residentially zoned land — for residential and public/semi-public uses - over the next 15-20 
years. This is land that was found to be needed outside the existing UGB once all residential 
land inside the existing UGB is built out. Although the studies found a land need primarily 
for residential uses, employment and public/semi-public uses also were also determined to 
need land inside and outside the existing UGB in the next 20-50 years. 
The studies were the basis for adopting the Madras URA, which the County adopted in 
November 2008 and DLCD acknowledged in July 2009. The proposed UGB and map 
amendments draw strictly from land designated as URA, which is the first priority land to 
include in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The proposed residential zoning and 
expected primarily residential uses are compatible with residential development on the edges 
within the existing UGB, and provide a similar buffer to resource land outside the UGB. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 35 
February 2010 
39 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
43 
The URA is comprised of land that is classified as "exception" land as well as land zoned by 
the County as Range Land (RL). Range land was included in the URA because: exception 
land could not meet all the land needs of the next 20-50 years on its own; range land is lower 
value resource land; and range land surrounding the existing UGB — particularly to the east 
and southeast — would be more easily served with sewer than other land surrounding the 
existing UGB. 
The ability to serve land on the east and southeast of the existing UGB and to urbanize land 
that is not parcelized like the exception land in the URA, as well as the lower resource value 
of the land, offer more land use efficiency and cost-effectiveness and fewer impacts on 
prime resource land than initially bringing other land in the URA into the UGB. This gives 
land on the east comparative advantages in economic, energy, environmental, and social 
terms. 
Policy 2: The County shall cooperate with each city to determine where and when an 
urban growth boundary should be expanded. 
2.1 Expansion of an existing urban growth boundary shall be in accordance 
with state requirements, including the priority of land to be included 
within the urban growth boundary. Non-irrigated land should have a 
higher priority for inclusion in the boundary than irrigated land. 
Response: Jefferson County and City of Madras staff have closely coordinated the 
proposed map amendments, and the first evidentiary hearing for the proposal will be a joint 
meeting of the County and City Planning Commissions. The two jurisdictions also worked 
closely together to adopt the Madras URA in 2008. 
The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, statutes, 
and administrative rules as demonstrated in previous sections of this report. The proposed 
UGB amendment is comprised of land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority for 
inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The land is not irrigated. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB and map amendments provide some of the residendally zoned land 
that is needed outside the existing UGB in the next 15-20 years as found in Madras 
urbanization studies. 
• The amendments draw only from non-irrigated land in the Madras URA, which is the 
first priority land to include in the UGB pursuant to state statute. 
• Residential and related public/non-public uses will be compatible with residential 
development adjacent and inside the existing UGB, as it will with resource land outside 
the UGB that already borders residential uses just inside the UGB. 
• The ability of the land in the proposed amendment area to be more easily served with 
sewer than other land in the URA or other land surrounding the existing UGB and to 
build more densely than developed exception land provides land use, energy, and 
investment efficiencies. Developing more efficiently and on low resource land instead of 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 39 
February 2010 
40 Exhibit (o Ordinance No. 823 
41 
high resource land also present social and environmental benefits when compared to 
other land surrounding the existing UGB. 
• Jefferson County and City of Madras have collaborated on the proposed map 
amendments. 
• The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, 
statutes, and administrative rules. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable policies from the 
Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 37 
February 2010 
41 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
GOAL 14 - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, and 
to provide for livable communities. 
[Paragraph amended by Ordinance No. 781, Passed by Council on December 12, 2006] 
POLICIES 
A. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
B. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall mutually agree to a management 
plan for the Urban Growth Boundary area. 
C. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary revision process to be utilized in a proposed change of the Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
D. The Citv, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall support adoption of an Urban 
Reserve Area boundary that when taken together with land supplies in the Urban 
Growth Boundary, may contain up to a 50-year supply of land for the Citv of Madras to 
support housing, economic development, public facility, recreation needs and other 
urban land needs. 
E. The Citv. in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall give priority to land in designated 
urban reserve areas over other land when considering urban growth boundary 
amendments. 
Response: The Madias City Council approved the Madras URA in October 2008 and the 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD and LCDC received 
the URA proposal for review in January 2009, and approved the proposal — but remanded 
sections of proposed County Zoning Ordinance amendments having to do with use 
restrictions in the URA - in July 2009. The land in the proposed UGB amendment that is 
the subject of this application is land entirely drawn from the Madras URA, land estimated 
to be needed for urbanization over the next 50 years. 
F. The Citv shall favor UGB amendments that involve land in locations that are suitable 
to address identified urban land needs in order to minimize buildable land supply 
shortages and address identified needs. Factors that will be considered when evaluating 
UGB additions include: 
1. Existing and planned capacity of the transportation system 
2. Existing and planned capacity of the citv waste water treatment plant 
3. Existing and planned capacity of the city sanitary sewer conveyance system 
4. Existing and planned capacity of the Deschutes Valley Water District supply 
system 
5. Impacts on schools, parks, and public safety service providers 
6. Impacts on future operating costs for public facilities and services 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 38 
February 2010 
42 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
43 
G. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall undertake an evaluation of the 
urban growth boundary land supply once every five years or more frequently if certified 
population growth rates exceed 3.2% in three consecutive years. In the event certified 
population growth rates fall below 3.2% for three consecutive years, the City and County 
may agree to postpone the evaluation of UGB land supply for uo to three years. 
H. Purina years when a comprehensive UGB land supply evaluation is not scheduled, 
individual applications for adding property to the UGB shall be limited to reguests of less 
than 40 acres. UGB amendment applications must demonstrate consistency with 
applicable Oregon statutes and administrative rules and be accompanied by information 
that addresses Policy 14-J below. Applications that involve more than 5 acres also must 
comply with provisions of Policy 14-1. 
D [. The Citv. in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall encourage the development of 
complete, livable communities that include characteristics such as: a variety of lot sizes, 
dwelling unit types and ownership types, open spaces and other recreational amenities, 
a mix of land uses, school and community facilities, connected streets, proximity to 
downtown and other employment centers, and development that is scaled to the 
pedestrian and creates a sense of place. New growth areas of more than 5 acres that 
are added to the UGB shall ebeufd be planned and developed in accordance either with 
a master planned community development plan approved under the city Master Planned 
Community Overlay zone, or an Area Master Plan. The Citv encourages Master 
Planned Communities as a means to meet citv housing needs as explained in other 
comprehensive plan documents. It may be appropriate, however, for the city to add new 
growth areas to the UGB that are planned and developed in accordance with an 
approved Area Master Plan. A majority of property owners subject to a Master Planned 
Community, or to an Area Master Plan, must consent to be included in the Plan. 
1. A Master Planned Community (MPC) Overlay may apply to large multi-phased 
development projects where the master plan is intended to guide future 
development patterns and serves to regulate the site-development approval 
process. A MPC requires generous open space and amenities, and encourages 
efficient use of land and public facilities and services, a variety of housing types, 
innovative designs and complete pedestrian-friendly communities. A MPC shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land consistent with an identified urban land need, 
show appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, and 
the protection of significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas. A MPC must show how planned land uses will be integrated with the 
existing urban development pattern. Physical barriers, such as highways, tend to 
disrupt complete communities and livability because they disconnect areas from 
downtown and result in an auto-oriented environment of sprawl along highway 
corridors. 
2. An Area Master Plan (AMP) is appropriate for land added to the UGB where the 
approval of future urban development is expected to rely on conventional urban 
zoning and the application of codified development standards and review 
procedures. An AMP may be prepared for contiguous properties added to the 
UGB that are greater than 5 acres and are not subject to a MPC overlay. An 
AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified 
urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public 
facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 39 
February 2010 
43 Exhibit (o Ordinance No. 823 
51 
resource areas. An AMP must show how planned land uses will be integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern. 
3. An approved Master Planned Community Plan or an Area Master Plan must 
include documentation that a majority of property owners support the conversion 
of land to the planned urban uses and also consent to annexation by the citv of 
Madras using a voluntary annexation process that is outlined in the plan. 
Response: The total area under consideration is 36.4 acres, which is less than the 40 acre 
maximum established for interim UGB annexation requests. The east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan area. The 
plan designates land for predominantly residential land uses, which is compatible with 
adjacent development in the UGB, while also designating land for open space and park uses, 
community services including schools, and limited neighborhood commercial services. The 
conceptual plan also shows an internal transportation system that includes sidewalks and 
multi-use paths. 
The east site is being proposed for both annexation to the UGB and Madras city boundaries. 
The site can be adequately served with water and sewer facilities given existing and planned 
facilities, according to the service providers (Appendix D). The site is not projected to have 
a significant adverse effect on surrounding transportation facilities given planned 
improvements for the intersections of US 97/J Street (Appendices F and G). Its proposed 
designation as Multi-family Residential is consistent with land needs identified in the 2007 
urbanization studies and with residential zoning in the area. 
Pursuant to Policy 1-1: "An AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent 
with an identified urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, 
public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas." It is proposed to annex the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits but to retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development. The site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future land use and zoning designation must allow for residential and compatible 
public/semi-public uses in order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern." (Policy 1-2) The proposed addition of a table 
showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use designations to the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate the 
transition of existing County zoning to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots - Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which eases 
extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits to the west site. Water 
and sewer service providers have attested that existing and planned facilities will be sufficient 
to serve the west site (Appendix D). 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 47 
February 2010 
44 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
45 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied bv information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need: 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties: 
3. Evidence that public facilities reouired bv OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary 
to serve the expansion area can be served either bv system improvements 
outlined in adopted public facility master plans or bv supplemental improvements 
that augment adopted public facility master plans: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either bv demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need: 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services: 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning 
horizon: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected 
from these hazards: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
Response: 
Zoning and Land Use Designations (Policy Jl) 
The east site is proposed to be re-zoned to a City R-2 designation. This meets some of the 
need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB that is projected for the next 15-
20 years. Residentially zoned land will provide for housing and public/semi-public uses. 
This land need is documented in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 
August 2007). (See Table 5-2) 
The west site is proposed to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) designation until the 
time when further land use action and development is proposed. Existing zoning will allow 
only limited development, and appropriate future designations for the site will be City 
residential designations given that City open space and residential zoning currently surround 
the site. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 41 
February 2010 
45 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
46 
When rezoning is proposed for the west site and for other land being converted from rural 
to urban, the proposed text amendments (Table 3-1) will assist and regulate the rezoning that 
will occur when changing County zoning to City land use designations and zoning. 
Annexation Program (Policy J2) 
The City is the applicant for this proposal, and annexation program pursuant to Article 7 of 
its Zoning Ordinance is described later in this report. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities (Policy J3) and Transportation Planning Rule (Policy J4) 
Kittelson & Associates has performed the transportation analysis needed to deem whether 
the proposed UGB amendment constitutes a significant effect on the transportation system. 
Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, two scenarios were 
developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved both housing and a 
school. Using these scenarios in a TPR analysis, it was found that the increase in traffic did 
constitute a significant effect on the US 97/J Street intersections. However, given 
improvements included in the City's amended TSP and Draft 2010-2013 STIP, the effect can 
be mitigated and removed. 
Public facility analysis for establishing the Madras URA ranked drainage catchment areas 
around the existing UGB for sewer service costs and serviceability. Of the six study areas 
that comprised the preliminary and then final URA, Study Areas 3 and 4 on the east and 
southeast consistently ranked higher than other areas. This can, in part, be attributed to 
proximity to the new South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) and being upslope of 
the plant. In particular, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation are is located in 
Catchment Area 180 and bordering on Catchment Area 179. These areas ranked 8th and 12th 
out of 60 catchment areas, making them among the more cost-effective and serviceable areas 
of the URA. 
As was also determined during the URA public facility analysis, Deschutes Valley Water 
District (DVWD) found that there would be insignificant differences in providing water 
service to the different parts of the URA. Water supply in the region is adequate to ample. 
Similarly, existing and planned sewer facilities provided by the City will be sufficient to serve 
the proposal area. (See service provider letters in Appendix D) 
Other Public Facilities (Policy J5) 
The east site has access to substantial park and recreation resources. Juniper Hills Park 
(County) and Bean Park (City) are nearby, as well as Jefferson County Middle School and its 
fields. The Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the site and surrounding land also designates 
open space and parks throughout the plan area. 
The City reports that Mountain View Hospital and City public safety and emergency services 
are sufficient to provide services for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
The sites are served by the Jefferson County School District 509-J. 
Financing for Improvements (Policy J6) 
Financing for constructing the needed public improvements will be placed upon property 
owners. As demonstrated by the letters submitted by the City of Madras Public Works 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 42 
February 2010 
46 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
47 
Director and Deschutes Valley Water District General Manager, each respective utility has 
capacity to service the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB To extend 
wastewater and domestic water services to the properties to be included in the UGB, each 
property owner will be responsible for extending services lines to their property, not with 
standing the requirements for annexing their property into the Madras city limits. 
Similarly, the Oregon Department of Transportation has determined the proposed UGB 
expansion will significantly affect the US 97/J Street intersection but that the design concept 
is established, the City has implemented System Development Charges to partially fund the 
improvements for this particular intersection and in the Draft State Transportation 
Improvement Plan (STIP) is funding for the intersection. With the design concept 
established and both funding sources identified, O D O T has determined that the US 97/ J 
Street intersection improvements are Reasonably Likely to Occur and therefore, impacts of 
the proposed UGB expansion are mitigated. 
Protection from Natural Hazards (PolicyJ7) 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. In fact, the proposed amendment and 
annexation are driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway 
and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. Hie area is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 
that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and federal 
agencies. 
Protection of Goat 5 Resources (PolicyJ8) 
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files do not identify floodways, floodplains, 
significant habitat, or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation 
area. The only resources cited above that may apply to the site are open spaces. While open 
space will be a required part of public use or residential development that occurs in this area, 
this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal and, therefore, does not 
specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Findings: 
• Amendments to zoning and land use designations are planned and proposed. The 
proposed City land use designation is residential and City zoning designation R-2 
(Multiple Family Residential). A need for about 22 acres of land outside the existing 
UGB zoned R-2 was determined in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum. 
• Proposed text amendments facilitate the transition from urban to rural zoning, from 
County 2oning to City land use designations and zoning. 
• Existing and planned transportation facilities - including improvements for the US 
97/J Street intersections in the Madras TSP and the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, which 
O D O T has deemed reasonably likely — will allow the study intersections to operate 
43 
48 
within adopted standards both in the case of the proposal area being annexed and re-
zoned and not. 
• Existing and planned water and sewer facilities will be sufficient to serve the 
proposal area. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area has access to nearby parks, a 
middle school, and a high school. Rezoning the 20-acre east site to R-2 will allow for 
residential and public/semi-public uses there. 
• Financing of wastewater and domestic water services will be placed upon property 
owners once the properties are annexed and developed in a manner that is consistent 
with the service providers facility plans. 
• In terms of natural hazards, there are not slopes greater than 25%, floodway, or 
floodplain in the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. The proposed 
amendments and annexation are based, in part, on the need to provide a school that 
is outside the floodway and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. Fire 
protection service for the proposal area is and will be provided by Jefferson County 
Fire Protection District #1. 
• There are not floodways, floodplains, habitat, or cultural resources that are identified 
in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files in the proposal area. Open space will be 
provided pursuant to Madras zoning ordinance (MZO) in which 30% of a Master 
Planned Community must be open space (MZO Section 3.12(D)(4)). 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant policies of 
the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 44 
February 2010 
48 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
49 
X. Conformance with the 
Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance 
City of Madras Community 
ARTICLE 7: ANNEXATION 
SECTION 7.1: PURPOSE - The purpose of this section is to: 
A. Implement the policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan; 
B. Provide for City review of all annexation requests for a determination of the availability 
of facilities and services as related to the proposal; 
C. Provide for dissemination of public Information and for sufficient time for public 
review; 
D. Provide for City and County coordination of a request for an annexation; and 
E. Provide for an expedited process by establishing procedures whereby the annexation 
and zoning, if applicable, may be considered concurrently. 
SECTION 7.2: APPLICATION PROCEDURE. Annexation is a land use decision and is 
subject to applicable provisions of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan, Oregon 
Revised Statutes, and Oregon Administrative Rules. In addition, the procedures below 
shall be followed: 
A. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing after notification of all 
property owners with two hundred fifty feet (250') outside of the boundary(ies) of the 
proposed annexation. The Planning Commission shall review the proposal for 
compliance with the annexation policies contained in this Ordinance and make a 
recommendation to the City Council, based on: 
1. The annexation proposal which meets the application requirements; and 
2. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to determine a 
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the annexation proposal based on the 
criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below; and 
3. The Planning Commission shall state its recommendation and the reasons therefore 
in writing to the City Council. 
B. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall 
conduct a public hearing and consider an Ordinance declaring the requested lands to be 
annexed to the City of Madras. 
1. The City Council shall review the record of the Planning Commission hearing their 
recommendation and shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions or 
modificattons, or disapprove the feasibility of the proposed annexation in accordance 
with the criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below. 
2. The City Council may conduct additional public hearings to assist their making a 
determination. 
3. The City Council shall state its determination and the reasons therefore in writing. 
Response: The City of Madras sent public hearing notice to the surrounding property 
owners on February 1, 2010. The City and County Planning Commissions held their first 
public heating on February 11, 2010. The City Planning Commission decided upon a 
recommendation to approve the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment (10-PA-01) at 
its hearing on February 11, 2010 and forwarded it to the Madras City Council. The City 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 45 
February 2010 
49 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
so 
Council is held a public hearing jointly with the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
on March 29, 2010. The City of Madras has not provided notice to affected property and 
adjacent property owners, or noticed the public hearings for the annexation of 20 acres of 
the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to expand the Madras UGB by 
approximately 36.91 acres. 
SECTION 7.3: ANNEXA TION APPLICA TION. The petitioner for annexation shall 
complete an application form provided by the Community Development Department. The 
application fee, established by Resolution of the City of Madras City Council, shall be 
submitted with the application. The application shall include: 
A. A map demonstrating that the proposed annexation is contiguous to the City Limits; 
B. Specific information on each parcel within the proposed annexation area: 
1. Current assessed valuation shown on Jefferson County Assessor's tax rolls. 
2. Acreage of both public and private property to be annexed. 
3. Map and tax lot(s) number. 
C. Names and ages of all residents and list of registered voters in the proposed 
annexation area. 
D. Addresses of all parcels within the proposed annexation area. 
E. Consent to Annexation forms, provided by the City of Madras, with notarized 
signatures of all property owners and electors within the proposed annexation area. 
F. Written findings, which address the following: 
1. Existing land uses within annexation area. 
2. Existing zoning within the annexation area. 
3. Existing improvements: 
a. water system 
b. streets 
c. sanitary sewer 
d. storm drainage 
4. Special Districts within the area: 
a. water districts 
b. irrigation districts 
c. fire district 
d. school district 
e. other 
5. Urban services, the present availability of urban service systems to the proposed 
annexation area, their capacity and cost of extension and/or improvement to urban 
standards: 
a. sanitary sewers - streets - parks 
b. storm drainage - water 
c. fire - power 
d. schools - police 
G. Compliance with all applicable policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Response: The City is initiating and applying for the proposed annexation. Maps of the 
west site and east site in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area are included in 
this report as Figure 4-1. Parcel size and other parcel information is presented in Section I, 
Proposal Summary. The City owns the taxlot where the east site is located. The 20-acre 
parcel that is being created from the taxlot has been surveyed. The west site is comprised of 
three taxlots, two taxlots that are privately owned and one small taxlot (0.69 acres) that is 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 46 
February 2010 
50 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
51 
County right-of-way. Re-zoning is not proposed for this site at this time as there are no 
immediate development plans. However, this site does better connect the east site to the 
existing UGB and will be suitable for residential uses and compatible public/semi-public 
uses, for which Madras urbanization studies have found a long-term need. 
The property proposed to be included in the UGB amendment and annexed currendy is 
vacant and not in active use. It is land under Jefferson County jurisdiction and zoned Range 
Land (RL). There are not water, sewer, or storm water facilities and services extended to the 
site yet, but they can be extended using existing City facility master plans. The Deschutes 
Valley Water District (DVWD) provides water service to the area and can provide facilities 
and service to the site, to be financed primarily by development applicants. The same is true 
for sewer and storm water facilities and service, for which the City of Madras is the service 
provider. As part of its agreement with JCSD, the City will extend water and sewer to the 
edge of the east site. There is an irrigation district in the region — the Central Oregon 
Irrigation District - but the proposal area is not irrigated nor is it proposed to be. 
There is a County collector toad — Ashwood Road — along the northern border of the area 
that will not need improvements according to transportation analysis conducted for this 
proposal. (See Appendix F) 
Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 currently provides service for the area and will 
continue to do so. Public safety responsibility for the area will be transferred from the 
County to the City. In terms of parks and recreation, there are two parks and a middle 
school close to the site, and the Yarrow Master Plan, which includes and surrounds the east 
site, includes the 30% of parks and open space required by local code (MZO Section 
3.12(D)(4)). 
As addressed in the previous section of this report, the application complies with the 
applicable policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
SECTION 7.4: ANNEXA TION CRITERIA. Lands may be annexed only if the City 
Council finds that the following criteria are met: 
A. The property is contiguous to the City limits. 
B. The property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. 
C. The annexation meets at least one of the following purposes: 
1. To serve lands needing City water or sewer to alleviate a present or potential 
health hazard; or 
2. To provide land to accommodate future urban development; or 
3. To provide land for provision of needed transportation or utility facilities; or 
4. To ensure that lands adjacent to the City are developed in a manner consistent 
with City standards. 
D. The petitioner has adequately addressed infrastructure supply and demand issues. 
The annexation is considered timely in that an adequate level of urban services and 
infrastructure can be provided upon annexation or a plan is in place for the provision of 
such services or infrastructure in a reasonable period of time. 
E. The proposed annexation complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the 
Comprehensive Plan does not control the annexation, or substantial changes in 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 47 
February 2010 
51 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
52 
conditions have occurred which render the Comprehensive Plan inapplicable to the 
annexation, the proposed annexation complies with current Statewide Planning Goals. 
F. The City is capable of extending City services to the area proposed for annexation 
without negatively impacting existing systems and the City's ability to adequately serve 
all areas within the existing City limits. 
G. The proposed annexation is compatible with the existing topography, potential for 
future land division, natural hazards and other related considerations. 
Response: The proposal area is adjacent to the Madras city limits and is simultaneously 
seeking to be annexed to the Madras UGB and to the city. The proposed UGB amendment 
and annexation area provides land for future urban development, specifically for a needed 
school and housing as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). The east site of the proposal area is part of the Yarrow Master Plan 
area that the City has approved and found to be consistent with City development goals and 
standards. 
The proposal area can be served by water and sewer using existing water and sewer master 
plans and being financed by the City and developers of the sites. Ashwood Road on the 
north side of the proposal area is a County collector toad and does not need improvements 
in order to serve the area. Planned improvements for US 97/J Street are the only 
improvements needed in the vicinity in order to mitigate any potential significant effects 
associated with this proposal (Appendix F). Internal circulation and transportation facilities 
will need to be shown in future development applications. 
SECTION 8.2: ZONE/PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS 
A. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map 
1. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map may be initiated by the Planning 
Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Land Use 
Periodic Review, or by application of the property owner. 
2. If the application is for a change of a quasi-judicial or legislative nature: 
a the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the 
proposed amendment at its earliest practical meeting date after the 
proposal is submitted and shall follow the adopted rules for quasi-
judicial hearings; 
3. & the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the 
City Council based on findings-of-fact; 
4r a The City Council shall hold a public hearing and review the 
recommendation of the Planning Commission, along with any public 
testimony on the issue. The City Council must take final action on an 
amendment request and amendments shall be made by ordinance. 
3. An application for a zone change for land annexed to the citv that is 
subject to an approved Master Planned Community Plan or an approved 
Area Master Plan may be considered as an administrative action per 
Article 9.3. 
B. Criteria for Amendments: The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The 
applicant shall show the proposed change is: 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 48 
February 2010 
52 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
15 
1. In conformity with all applicable state statutes. 
2. In conformity with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; and 
3. In conformity with the Madras Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land 
Use Ordinance, and policies; md 
4. In conformity with an approved Master Planned Community Plan or Area 
Master Plan, if applicable to the underlying properties; and 
5. That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the 
amendment or mistake in the original zoning. 
Response: This application is being initiated by the City Community Development 
Department/Director. Also pursuant to the terms of the UGAMA between the County and 
the City, the City forwarded the UGB amendment application and appropriate fees to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department within five working days of being 
initially filed. 
This application is being processed pursuant to legislative procedures and will receive full 
review by the public, the City Planning Commission, and the City Council. Heatings by the 
Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission will be held first 
jointly on February 11, 2010. The Madras City Council will review the City Planning 
Commission's recommendation at a hearing on February 11, 2010, and will forward its 
decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing on March 29, 2010. 
As demonstrated by the previous findings, the proposed comprehensive plan, 
comprehensive plan map, and zoning map amendments comply with applicable Statewide 
Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Findings: 
• The City has followed procedures for providing notice and holding public heatings 
for the proposal. Notice to adjacent property owners was mailed On February 1, 
2010 to all properties within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB. A joint City and County Planning Commission hearing was held 
on February 11, 2010 and then a joint hearing before the Madras City Council and 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners was held on March 29, 2010. The City 
Council and County Board of Commissioners heard the proposal on March 29, 2010 
and approved the proposal on March 29, 2010. 
• The City of Madras has initiated this proposal. It owns the east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area and has an agreement with Jefferson County 
School District 509-J to exchange this land for land downtown upon annexation and 
re-zoning. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area provides land needed for 
residential and public/semi-public uses, specifically for a needed school and housing 
as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 2007). 
• All service providers - the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Deschutes Valley Water 
District, Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, Jefferson County School 
District 509-J — have capacity to serve the proposal area given implementation of 
existing water and sewer master plans, planned improvements to US 97/J Street 
intersections, and financing from future proposed development 
43 
54 
• The east site of the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the 
approved Yarrow Master Plan area, and the west site fulfills the requirements for an 
Area Master Plan. The set of proposed map and text amendments in this application 
comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras 
Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant provisions 
of the Madras Zoning Ordinance. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 50 
February 2010 
54 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey 
Map (20-acre parcel) 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
P f f a m a t t . ^ 
~ 7 m V " ^ -
Ttc. 
63885 N. Hwy. 97 A Bend, OR 97701 A (541) 382-4192 
December 16, 2009 
City of Madras 
Job# 09077 
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR A 20.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND FOR 
SCHOOL DISTRICT 509-J 
A portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 as filed in the Jefferson County 
Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (Nfi lA) of Section 7, Township 11 
South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, more 
particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 
inch diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears South 
89°39'40" East a distance of 2640.53 feet; thence South 89°39'40" East along the North 
line of said Section 7 a distance of 599.97 feet; thence South 00°17'36" West a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; 
thence continuing South 00° 17'36" West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the South right-of-way line of East Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 00° 17'36" East along said West line a 
distance of 935.13 feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said Partition Plat No. 2002-
17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39'40" East a distance of 931.70 feet; thence 
North 00°17'36" West a distance of 935.12 feet to apoint on the South right-of-way line 
of East Ashwood Road; thence North 89°39'40" West along said right-of-way line a 
distance of 931.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Containing 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. 
v y 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
09077 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Page 1 of 1 
59_ 
> 1 
fcli 
* fi 1 y ' 
C^ v 5 
ik } ^ s H ^ 
a**? 
N i k i ^ ^ 
R ^ ^ & ^ ^ 
S ^ l t j 
I 
I 
g 
V 
% tsi 
I 
£ 
-xl 
I 
I 8 fe ft || 
I Q 
I ^ ^ <3 
o "Z. 
K* 
1 
I 
, 3/ ~G£6 ffl„9£JI,00 M 
K 
<0 
I 
Vii 
cL 
8 
53 
,£/ ~S£6 
*< <Ji 
£ 
9) Hi C£-
<0 "a. 
£/'G/Of loOO S 
x o 
fe I * 
diSj® O l-CJ ** fc K . o 
3 
I 
10 
3 
§2 
s 
S 
K 
K 
1 
3 
£ ^ 
i 
1 
5 
N 
& 
1 Uj § 5! 
tt % 1 1 § 
$ 
N. O 0) £ 
O) 
5 Q 
ft Uj 
I § 
Hi s jo 5 
i 
•V. 
5 
£ & 
I 
59 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management 
Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
61 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
M-014-09 
Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madras, an incorporated municipality of 
the State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political 
subdivision of the State of Oregon, hereby referred as "County". 
A. RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson County are authorized pursuant to 
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter ] 90 to enter into an Intergovernmental 
Management Agreement for the performance of functions which either governmental 
entity has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS the City and County have previously entered into an 
intergovernmental agreement on April 5, 2006 setting forth their respective rights and 
responsibilities with respect to the Urban Growth Bounardy (UGB); and 
WHEREAS, the Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative 
agreement under ORS Chapter 195; and 
• WHEREAS the City and Couuty consider it mutually advantageous to establish 
this Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) for the purpose of 
facilitating the future conversion of lands in the Urban Reserve Area (URA) from rural 
to urban land uses. 
B. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1. To establish standards and procedures for review and action on proposed land 
use actions and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to 
implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations 
as adopted by the City and County for the Urban Reserve Area (URA); and 
2. To affirm Jefferson County's jurisdictional authority for current planning 
activities, land use decisions, building permitting, public improvements, and 
code enforcement within the URA ; and 
3. To provide assistance to property owners in the URA by laying out a clear and 
cooperative process designed to make decisions on land use applications in a 
timely and consistent manner; and 
4. To clarify planning and zoning intents and to satisfy the requirements of OAR 
Chapter 660, Division 21 relating to Urban Reserve Areas. 
1 
62 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
M - 0 1 4 
C. DEFINITIONS 
1. City: City of Madras. 
2. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
4. County: Jefferson County. 
5. Land Use Decision: A Land Use Decision is defined by ORS 197.015 
6. Urban Reserve Area: has the same meaning as set forth in OAR 660-021-
0010(1), and means land outside of an Urban Growth Boundary identified as 
highest priority of inclusion in the Urban Growth Boundary when urbanizable 
land is needed in accordance with the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 
14. 
7. Urban Growth Boundary: The boundary line which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the 
surrounding rural lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
8. Conversion Plan: has the same meaning as set forth in JCZO Section 105. 
D. AGREEMENT 
Compliance with OAR Chapter 660. Division 21. In accordance with the applicable 
requirements of Chapter 660, Division 21, City and Comity agree as follows: 
1. As required by OAR 660-02!-0040(2)(e): 
(a) The County shall ensure that conversion plans are required and 
processed as part of tentative land division decisions in the URA as 
ouUined in tbe Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance (JCZO) Section 
703.2(0). 
(b) The County shall prohibit certain uses in the URA, including plan or 
zoning map amendments that allow a minimum lot size less than ten 
acres as outlined in JCZO Section 323.3. 
2. As required by OAR 660-021-0050(1): 
(a.) Jefferson County shall have authority and jurisdictional responsibility for 
current planning activities, land use decisions, building permitting, and 
code enforcement within the URA. 
2 
63 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
70 
ff - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
(b.) Upon inclusion of property from the URA within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, the property shall be subject to the Urban Growth 
Management Area Agreement. 
3 Designation of service responsibility, as required by OAR 660-021 -0050(2) is as 
follows: 
Service Existing Service Provider 
Future Urban Service 
Provider 
Sanitary Trash Disposal No Public Service Provider No Public Service Provider 
Sanitary Sewer No Public Service Provider City of Madras 
Water Deschutes Valley Water District 
Deschutes Valley Water 
District 
Fire Protection Jefferson County Fire District #1 
Jefferson County Fire 
District #1 
Parks Jefferson County City of Madras 
Recreation 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Transportation Jefferson County City of Madras 
Storm Water Jefferson County City of Madras 
(a.) The local government or special district responsible for services 
(including sanitary trash disposal, sanitary sewer, water, fire protection, 
parks, transportation, storm water) for areas within the URA are 
designated and shown on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated 
herein as Exhibit "1A". 
4. As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(3), the terms and conditions under which 
service responsibility will be transferred or expanded, for areas where the 
provider of service is expected to changc over time, is described in Exhibit "IB" 
attached hereto and incorporated herein. 
5, As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(4), procedures for notification and review 
of land use actions to ensure involvement by all affected local governments and 
special districts: 
(a) Within the URA, the County shall process all land use applications for 
comprehensive plan amendments, zone changes, and other applications 
affecting land use (including conditional uses, Planned Unit 
Developments (PUDs), subdivisions and partitions) in a manner that is 
consistent with the procedures set forth in the Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the respective land use 
actions. 
(b) Prior to acceptance of a land division application within the URA, the 
County shall require the applicant to submit a conversion plan to the City 
of Madras as outlined in JCZO Section 703.2(0). 
64 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
65 
( I f - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
The i ntent of the conversion plan is that it: 
1. Is not an engineered plan. 
2. May be amended from time to time by property owners submitting a 
new conversion plan to the City and County. 
3. Does not constitute a separate land use decision, as it is part of a 
land division decision. 
4. Must be recorded with the County Clerk so that future buyers of 
newly-created parcels in the URA will become aware, prior to 
purchase, that roads and utility easements will be required when the 
property is further developed after annexation. 
5. Serves a guide to placement of structures in the building permitting 
process. 
The City shall review the conversion plan and work with the property 
owner to ensure that the locations of planned roads and rights-of-way; 
and the locations of future easements for water, sewer, and storm water 
facilities that will adequately serve the site when developed at an urban 
density; are protected. The City may recommend that the conversion 
plan be approved, denied, or be approved with conditions. 
Within 15 days of receiving a conversion plan for review, the City will 
forward its comments to both the applicant and the County, and the 
applicant is required to include the conversion plan and City comments 
with their tentative land division application to the County. 
The County shall review the conversion plan as part of the tentative land 
division application, and approve, deny, or approve with conditions. A 
condition of approval for the land division decision shall be that the 
property owner record the conversion plan with the final plat at the 
County Clerk's Office. 
The County agrees to consult conversion plans prior to building permit 
approval of structures in the URA, where applicable. 
The City or County may charge a separate fee for review of conversion 
plans. 
(c) Notice of all land use applications within the URA shall be sent to the 
City of Madras Community Development Department and to any other 
affected City agencies and other applicable special service districts for 
review and comment prior to a decision by the County. Such agencies 
shall be given ten business days in which to provide comments on the 
land use application. 
65 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
66 
N - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
(d) In making its decision, the County shall consider all comments received 
under Section (c) above. 
(e) The City, and agency, or any other special service district that provides 
comments on land use applications shall be mailed written notice of the 
land use decision and shall have standing to appeal the County's 
decision. 
E. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both 
parties, after public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the 
Board of Commissioners. 
2. Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and 
County Comprehensive Plans, the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
for the City of Madras and the statewide planning goals. 
3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following 
procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the other 
party at least forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the 
publication of public heating notices in order to provide ample time for 
resolution of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the party considering termination. The 
party considering termination shall give the other party at least 20 days prior 
notice of the scheduled hearing date. The 20 day period shall be used by 
both parties to seek resolution of differences. Both parties shall also request 
a collaborative conflict resolution process to resolve differences that remain. 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and 
local ordinances. 
d. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide 
planning Goals 2 and 14. Unless the Urban Reserve Area is no longer an 
overlay zone in the County, this agreement may not be termined without 
adoption of a new agreement. 
F. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
5 
66 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
M - 0 1 4 -
This agreement shaJl not become effective until properly executed by both the City and 
the County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Reserve 
Area Management Agreements. 
G. SEVERABILITY 
The Provisiions within this agreement are serverable. If any section, sentence, clause or 
phrase of this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, 
said invalidity shall not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the 
agreement. 
m 
ADOPTED t l u s ^ T o f January, 2009 
CITY OF MADRAS, OREGON JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON 
Mellanic Widmer, Mayor 
Date: 1-
ATTEST: 
Q J L ' 
Jp$i Hatfield, Chair 
Mike Ahern, Commissioner 
Wayne Fording, CommuSaoner 
^ t e : ^AMjUaauJ J$. Jaol 
67 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
6 
- t f 
I 
O 
\ 0 
m n s H C i ; ^ 
Urban Reserve Aiya (URA] • Exhibit 1A Je^trson County. 
ftrfrtbw >«v<6» ProvMw Future Uitcn gffvtea PmMit 
—FCT^w. fWdo, • 
Moki^S^.PmC- iWUrintt 
iWiuMcvyUyWirOKIite- Pee<hutoav»^ iy Water OtSteT 
•Mtewn County B»Oi»t(dfi JitenaiCcwtyHfDblriaW 
'" CayolMMrw 
Madias Aqi»HoOom»fB«Md MtttreAouMlcCicCOtowa" 
SwiHary Trajh PitpoST 
BroProtwdari 
I^ mumIHIM 
"Hmtb Wkliif 
URA - 3816 acras 
' Madras UGB 
JjfMlo* C«Mf iMOtatilati mtfreH M U hahrn Uilm r* ptfrta ff*tm \I run GU itU. JMOan Com* rmy NbM if ruqMu « MM U k t« i«*IMV« 
« (H ItAMlH JcfWun CWrf IM Ml brtfl MM ktf «*r«m hi t* C14MU TWJ r«WH wwc<ii*<u 
curnUdwi. «nn On ftttteM ad p» <*{& fciJ NkHnl^ MMmy^  t» M JttvwM «au*»u m hpri w^Mfcfcy to f*i Jntwc. ®0. 
68 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
EXHIBIT IB 
URBAN SERVICE TRANSITION POLICIES 
Terms and Conditions under which Service Responsibility will be transferred or expanded, 
A. Special Districts. The City shall agree to the formation of any special district within the 
Urban Reserve Area prior to the approval of the formation of the district by Jefferson 
County. This provision shall not apply to County-wide service districts formed under ORS 
Chapter 451. 
B. Service Expansion Plans. Service expansion plans shall be consistent with the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan. As the future provider of, sanitary sewer, storm water and potable 
water services, the City shall prepare, and from time to time, update utility expansion plans. 
These plans shall provide a basis for the extension of services within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, and as such shall be referred to Jefferson County for information and comment. 
C. Transition Policies Relating to Service Responsibility 
1. Sanitary Sewer Service . There will be no public provider of sanitary sewer service until 
City services are available, except in the case of a state mandate due to a health hazard. 
At the time of annexation, the City will require hook-up to City sanitary sewer services. 
There shall be no special sanitary sewer districts created in the Urban Reserve Area. 
Nothing in this provision shall limit the ability of individuals to provide septic services 
(i.e. septic sewer systems) on their own private property within the Urban Reserve Area. 
2. Potable Water Service. The City of Madras and Deschutcs Valley Water District shall be 
the public providers of water in this area, unless new districts are expanded or created 
through mutual agreement by the City and the County. Nothing in this provision shall 
limit the ability of individuals to provide services on their own private property within the 
Urban Reserve Area. 
3. Fire Protection. The Jefferson County Fire District #1 provides fire protection services to 
property within the Urban Reserve Area, the Urban Growth Boundary, and the City 
limits. 
4. Parks. Jefferson County provides parks services within the Urban Reserve Area. The City 
of Madras provides parks services within the city limits and the Urban Growth Boundary. 
The City of Madras will provide these services as park properties as they are included 
within the city's limits unless agreed otherwise. 
5. Recreation. The Madras Aquatic Center is separate recreation district that serves 
Jefferson County.. The Madras Aquatic Center District will continue to provide aquatic 
recreational services when property is included in the City of Madras Urban Growth 
Boundary and city limits. 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
70 
f f - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
6. Transportation and Street Improvements. Jefferson County provides transportation 
services on county roads within the Urban Reserve Area. Upon annexation from the 
UGA, the City of Madras will accept all paved Jefferson Comity roads that have a 
pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the county may 
structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70 at which time the City shall be 
obligated to accept jurisdiction of such road. Jefferson County policies for road design 
and construction standards to be used in the Urban Growth Boundary and Urban Reserve 
Area are outlined in the Jefferson County Code, Sections 12,18.070 and 12.18.080. Per 
Jefferson County ordinances, the Jefferson County Public Works Director may require 
roads to be constructed to City of Madras standards. 
The Oregon Department of Transportation provides transportation services on state 
highways within the Urban Reserve area. The Oregon Department of Transportation 
retains jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities on all state highways after 
incorporation into the UGB and annexation except in special cases where jurisdiction is 
transferred to the City or County by a specific agreement. 
7. Storm Water Management. Jefferson County provides public storm water management 
services to property where required within the Urban Reserve Area. The City will 
provide storm water management services to property within the city limits. Transition of 
public storm water management services will follow transition of road maintenance 
responsibilities. 
Jefferson County Code Section 12.18.070 : 
12.18.070 Roads within an urban growth boundary. 
Roads within an urban growth boundary (UGB) or urban reserve shall, at the discretion of the 
Jefferson County director of public works, conform to the design and construction specifications 
of the city contained within the UGB boundary and shall be subject to review and approval of 
that city's director of public works and the Jefferson County director of public works. (Ord. O-
69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007: Ord. O-l 10-02 § 2 Exh. B (part), 2002) 
12.18.080 Roads within one mile of an urban growth boundary. 
At the discretion of the Jefferson County director of public works, design and construction 
standards and specifications for roads within one mile of a UGB may be modified to 
accommodate future reconstruction to city standards. Roads in zones contiguous to the UGB of 
Madras, Culver or Metolius may be required to be constructed in accordance with Section 
12.18,070 of this chapter if, in the opinion of the director of public works, such roads would 
become connected to the city road system. (Ord. 0-69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007: Ord. O-l 10-
02 § 2 Exh. B (part), 2002) 
70 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
S.E. D Street, Madras, OR, 97741 - 541-475-3388 
M E M O R A N D U M 
Date: January 26, 2010 
To: Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Madras Planning Commission 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Community Development Director 
Cc: Nick Snead, City of Madras Community Development Director 
From: Gus Burril, City of Madras Public Works Director 
Overview: 
The City of Madras (City) has filed a post-acknowledgement plan amendment application with 
Jefferson County to expand the current Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) by 
approximately 37 acres and re-zone 20 of the 37 acres from Range Land (RL) to Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2) as shown in the attached map. To complete this land use action the City is 
required demonstrate that public facilities (i.e. wastewater, domestic water, stormwater, and 
transportation) can be extended to serve the area proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
The City provides wastewater and stormwater service and the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB are located within the planning boundaries of the City of Madras 
Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans. 
Wastewater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Wastewater Master Plan. Figure 5-2B (attached) identifies a planned 8 inch 
wastewater service line to be constructed in the Ashwood right-of-way that would service the 
properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. Additionally, the City constructed a 10 
inch wastewater service line to Oregon Department of Corrections Deer Ridge Correctional 
facility in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB 
(see attached drawing). 
When the proposed properties are developed, the City will require the property owner to extend 
wastewater service in accordance with City standards. Based on the planned improvements in 
the Madras Wastewater Master Plan, the existing wastewater facilities in Ashwood Road, the 
City of Madras has capacity to provide wastewater service to the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB at the time of development. 
Stormwater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Stormwater Master Plan. Figure IV-5 (attached) identifies a planned 12 inch 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 1 of 2 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
stormwater service line to be constructed in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed 
to be included in the Madras UGB. Furthermore, Design Criteria (1) in the City of Madras 
Stormwater Master Plan in Section IV, requires" 
"Any property development or redevelopment shall include stormwater facilities 
designed to handle runoff from all tributary areas for the 24-hour, 25-uear design 
storm event. The facilities shall limit the peak discharge from the development in a 
24-hour, 25-year design storm to the estimated pre-development peak flow rate in 
a 24-hour, 10-year design storm." 
Considering the planned stormwater facilities identified in the City of Madras Stormwater Master 
Plan and the existing stormwater design standards for development, the City has capacity to 
provide stormwater service to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
Conclusion: 
The City of Madras has capacity to serve the properties proposed to be included in the Madras 
UGB with wastewater and stormwater service. Should there by any questions, please contact 
me at 541-475-2622. 
Sincerely, 
Gus Burril, P.E. 
City of Madras 
Public Works Director 
71 SE "D" Street 
Madras, OR, 97741 
541-475-2622 
Attachments: Figure 5-2B Wastewater Collection System 
Phase 1B Segment 2 Wastewater Improvements 
Figure IV-5 Stormwater System Improvements 
Art Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 2 of 2 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 

88 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 

77 Page 1 o f2 
Nick Snead 
From: Edson at DVWD [edson@dvwd.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:15 AM 
To: Nick Snead 
Subject: RE: Domestic water service availability 
Hi Nick-
DVWD should be able to serve that property. Naturally, the mainline upgrades and/or extensions would have to 
be paid for by the developer. When there is an engineered plan for the required infrastructure, I will be happy to 
do an estimate for the waterworks portion to be installed by DVWD. 
Feel free to call if you need more information. 
Edson Pugh, P.E. 
General Manager 
Deschutes Valley Water District 
881 SW Culver Hwy. 
Madras, OR 97741 
Ph. # (541) 475-3849 
From: Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 8:45 AM 
To: Ed Pugh 
Subject: Domestic water service availability 
Importance: High 
Ed, 
3/30/2010 77 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 Page 2 o f2 
Good morning! You may have heard the City Is proposing to expand the Urban Growth Boundary by 
approximately 37 acres and annex 20 acres into the City for the Jefferson County School District. The property 
proposed to be annexed Is south of Ashwood Road. I have attached a map to quickly orient your to the property. I 
am wondering if DVWD domestic water service is available or if not, what facility improvements would future 
development be responsible for constructing? This email is a formal request and I would like to put your response 
in the record to demonstrate (hopefully) that water service is available and/or the facility improvements needed to 
serve the area proposed to be in the Madras UGB. 
Let me know if you have any questions. Call me at 541-323-2916 if needed. 
Take care. 
"One may walk over the highest mountain one step at a time" -John Wanamaker-
Nicholas S. Snead 
Director 
Community Development Department 
City of Madras 
(541) 475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
No virus found in this incoming message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.432 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2644 - Release Date: 01/25/10 07:36:00 
3/30/2010 
78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
79 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
r 80 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
The undersigned property owners) hereby consents to the annexation < 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
Jtf-'--RSO\ • !>• jNTY I 
COMIto •-"•'•-U.PMENTI 
JA.f bfi pi i 
REpeiv.cp 
(Legal description of property): 
w«P * 1 1 - 1 4 - 7 . tax Lot #101 
(See Attached Exh ib i t "B"> 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation 
of the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, 
further or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws 
of the State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the property described. The undersigned 
and City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the 
undersigned and the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the right to 
consent to its annexation. 
Address: „ Sprlngyiew Farms. IXC 
2519 E. Ashwood Road 
Madras. Oregon 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this l O ^ 1 davof 20 fl3 the above named 
Albert: I—, Zemke (Lisl name of indivtdual(s) having signature notarized) 
2003-5431 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
KAKN.JCOLBMII 
NOTARY PUBU&OREBON 
COMMISSION N0338485 
|tQN EXPIRES SEPT. 14.20tM 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
• j t o n t n i Q . P ^ n m n m ) 
Notary Public fbr Oregon _ _ 
My Commission Expires. I M - Auf)1-] 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
00016169200300054310030036 
2003-005431 
$41.00 
10/13/2003 04:08:44 PM 
D-ANXCON cni"1 sm»2 KATE 
80 Exhibit to Orrtinanr.fi A " 0 0 
81 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consent to 
Annexation" for the following described property and acknowledge that the consent shall remain in effect 
indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
"See Attached Exhibit "B" 
Typed Name: Albert L. Zemke 
Signature: ^ 
STATE OF OREGON 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this I f i f f i day of ff P ' t^ f fy , 20 Q 3 the above named 
Albert L. Zemke 
(List name of individual(s) having signature notarized) 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act . 
j t o u m j W i n n o f f Q 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission Expires:. 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. MD" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
KAREN J COLEMAN 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 338495 
.14.2004 
2003-5431 
81 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
82 ( 
EXHIBIT "B" 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #101 
ALBERT L. ZEMKE 
PARCEL I: Northeast quarter, Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, North 
half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter, Southeast 
quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, 
Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian 
Jefferson County Oregon, and the Southwest quarter of the Northwest 
quarter of the Southeast quarter. 
2003-5431 82 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Jaffsrscr, Counts^ ficial Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 2008-002279 
$56.00 
00061426200800022790060062 
D-ANXCON Cnt=1 Stn=2 KATE 
$30.00 $11.00 $10.00 $9.00 
08/17/2008 04:16:27 PM 
RECORDED DOCUMENT 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 
DO NOT REMOVE THIS CERTIFICATE 
(This certificate constitutes a part of the original instrument in accordance with ORS 
205.180(2). Removal of this certificate may invalidate this certificate and affect the 
admissibility of the original instrument into evidence in any legal proceeding.) 
KATHLEENB. MARSTON 
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK 
83 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
The undersigned property owner(s) hereby consents to the annexation of the following described 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
(Legal description of property): 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #200, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 
OH ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation of 
the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, further 
or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws of the 
State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the properly described. The undersigned and 
City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the undersigned and 
the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the right to 
consent to its annexation. 
DATED this k - H day of 
T 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Address: 2465 E . ASHBOOD ROAD 
MADRAS, OREGOH 97741 
STATE OF OREGON 
County of Jefferson 
) 
)ss. 
) 
20 the above. Personally appeared before me this '2.'?' day of '"f% 
named Df)vn4-U ^ ThoMr tS . acknowledged the foregoing 
(List name-tff individuals) having signature notarized) j Q . ftfo 
instrument to be a voluntary act. 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
Notary - State of Oregon . 
My Commission Expires: p ^ f O^ QOCR 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
RUTH E BABRJNQHn 
NOTARY PUBUC-OflEQON 
COMMISSION NO. 398406 
l ^ l g ^ E S A U O ^ o S 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
85 
EXHIBIT "A' 
63885 N. Hwy. 97 A Bend, OR 97701 • (541) 382-4192 
City of Madras 
May 13, 2008 
Job #08029B 
Taxlot: 11-14=7-200 
CITY OF MADRAS ANNEXATION #2008-02 
A Tract of land located in the Northeast One-Quarter of the Northwest One-Quarter (NE 1/4 -
NW 1/4) and the Northwest One-Quarter of the Northeast One-Quarter (NW 1/4 - NE 1/4) of 
Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, 
Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
Beginning at a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears South 
00°17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 7; 
thence leaving said North-South Section centerline and along the South right-of-way line of 
Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson 
County official records South 89°39'39" East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-
of-way line South 00°17'35" East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 89°42'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet to a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 
7, being a point on the boundaiy of Parcel 1 of Partition PlatNo. 2004-15 (recorded as MF# 
2004-4735); thence along the boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 
354.87 feet; thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right with 
a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a distance of 117.35 feet; 
thence North 00°17'35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; thence 123.03 feet along the arc of a 
tangent curve to the right with a radius of 240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" 
East for a distance of 121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left 
with a radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14D12'33" East for a distance of 
184.75 feet to a point on said South right-of-way line; thence along said South right-of-way line 
the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South 88°42'59" East a distance of 170.57 feet; 
18.12 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 feet, the chord of 
which bears South 89°11'19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet; South 89°39'39" East a distance of 
104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the terminus of this description. 
End of Description 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
08029B 
Page l of 1 
85 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
86 I 
86 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consentto Annexation" 
for the following described property and acknowledge that Sis consent shall remain in effect indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
Map # 11-14-7 Tax Lot # 200 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Address: 
DOROTHY THOMAS 
17 ^ 
lAJ. HryQM *\S 
2465 E. ASHWOOD ROAD 
ftATfflAS- ORKGQW 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
)ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
I before me this r dav of f ^ } 1 ^ 20 A ^ the above 
named DoRorHk£". "ThoMfiS ^ M l V i i T t i i f T ^ ^ and acknowledged the foregoing 
(LisTname of indlvidual(s) having signature notarized) } TKoAf^j f fy^f/utM-) 
4o-r- ^ a). 7ke/wfltS 
instrument to be a voluntary act. 
Notary-State of Oregon n / i r ^ r \ r \ r > 
After Retarding Return to: My Commission Expires: J -HC J Q Q ^ f 
City of Madras 7 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
M 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
HUTHEBAIWJWaH 
NOTARY PUBUC-CREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 388408 
SION EXPIRES AUG. 24.2609 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
88 
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION BY CONSENT 
PURSUANT TO ORS 222.170 
I/We, [AJ. ThoMfii^L 4 - 0° hereby respectfully petition the City 
Council of the City of Madras to annex contiguous property to the City pursuant to 
ORS 222.170 (1)(a). 
(Metes and Bounds Legal Description and Map Required) 
(These can be attached to the Consent to Annexation Form) 
Map # n-14 -7 Tax Lot # 200 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Attached hereto is the consent of the owner(s) of the property, and is incorporated 
herein as Exhibit "A". Petitioner hereby certifies that they are the owner(s) of said 
property as ownership is described in ORS 222.120(7). Petitioner further certifies to the 
City that they are the legal owner(s) of record and are the sole owners of the property. 
Dated this I K day of / M r t j , 20 €>% . 
Signature: 
Typed or Printed Name: 
£ 
:^ 
Signature: C - - J W * ^ . 
Typed o r Printed Name: \ki, " 7 % O A-l 
Petition for Annexation by Consent 
3/30/2010 78 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
89 ( I 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:07:49 pm 
Account # 
Map f 
Code - Tax 9 
Legal Descr 
13274 
111407-00-00101 
See Record 
LINCICOME MADRAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
63227 SERVICE RD 
BEND, OR 97701 
Prop Class 550 MA 
RMV Class 500 05 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
ASSESSABLE 
CANCELLED 
NORMAL 
See Record 
See Record 
SA 
60 
NH 
000 
Unit 
-9922-0 
Situs Addreas(s) Situs City 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR% 
0020 Land 
Impr. 
219 
0 
4,400 
0 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 210 4,400 0 
Grand Total 219 4,400 0 
Code" 
Area H » RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone Value Source 
Land Breakdown 
TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class IrrSlie 
0020 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Grand Total 4.00 0.00 
Code Yr 
Area id$ Built 
Stat 
Class Description 
Improvement Breakdown Total 
TD% Sq. FL Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
Grand Total 0 0 
Cods 
Area Type 
Exemptions/Special Assessments/Potential Liability 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
Comments: SPLfT CODE WITH #13134 Combined with account #13134 
Page 1 of 1 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
90 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25,2010 2:07:27 pm 
Account 9 
Maps 
Code - Tax 9 
Legal Descr 
13134 
111407-00-00101 
0020-13274 
0110-13134 
See Record 
JOHN, HEINZ A. 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
3879 LADERA VISTA RD 
FALLBROOK, CA 92028 
Prop Class 551 HA SA NH Unit 
RMV Class 501 05 60 000 9922-1 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
2009-741 
03-02-2009 / $350,000.00 
COX. DON 
Situs Addresses) Situs City 
ID? 1 2519 E ASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR% 
0020 Land 
Impr. 
225 
0 
4,460 
0 
Land o 
Impr. o 
Code Area Total 225 4,460 0 
0110 Land -
Impr. 
6.016 
166,480 
79.020 
218,540 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 172,496 297,560 0 
Grand Total 172,721 302,020 0 
Code 
Area ID* RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone Value Source 
Land Breakdown 
TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0020 3 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Code Area Total 4.00 0.00 
0110 2 R RL Farm Site 100 A 1.00 MHS 
0110 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 7.28 TD2 
Code Area Total 8.28 0.00 
Grand Total 12.28 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
ID# BuOt 
Stat 
Class Description 
Improvement Breakdown Total 
TD% Sq.FL Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 1 1S62 142 One story with basement 100 3,718 185,200 
0110 2 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 2,400 30,390 
0110 3 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 128 850 
0110 4 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 400 2,100 
Grand Total 6,646 218,540 
Code Exemptions/Special Assessments/Potential Liability 
Area Type 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
0110 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
Comments: SPLIT CODE WITH #13274 
Page 1 of 1 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
91 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
92 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25,2010 2:06:46 pm 
2602 
111407-00-00200 
0110-2602 
Metes & Bounds - See legal report for full description. 
THOMAS, EVAN W& DOROTHY E 
Account# 
Map* 
Code - Tax * 
Legal Descr 
Hailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
2465 E ASHWOOD R 
MADRAS, OR 97741 
Prop Class 401 MA 
RMV Class 401 05 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
Deed Reference & See Record 
Sales Date/Price See Record 
Appraiser COX, DON 
SA 
52 
NH 
000 
Unit 
1857-1 
Situs Addressfs) Situs City 
IDS 2465 E ASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0110 Land 
Impr. 
81,960 
131,050 
130.790 
211,530 
Land 
Impr. 
Code Area Total 213,010 342,320 
Grand Total 213,010 342,320 
Code 
Area ID* RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone 
Land Breakdown 
Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0110 1 R RL Market 100 A 3.94 
Grand Total 3.94 0.00 
Code 
Area ID# 
Yr 
Built 
Stat 
Class 
Improvement Breakdown 
Description TD% 
TotSl 
Sq.FL £x% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 
0110 
1 
2 
1956 142 
300 
One story with basement 
Farm Bldg/Res Gp 
100 
100 
4,173 
224 
210,280 
1,250 
Grand Total 4,397 211,530 
Page 1 of 1 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
93 
Send tax statements to: 
cu t s 
71 Sfi" 
of-
O. S-h-
After recording return to: 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras OR 97741 
Jefferson Cour^< Official Records 
Kathleen i . ML <on, County Clerk 
00028548200? 00002620020028 
2005-00026 
$36.01 
0 1 / 1 8 / 2 0 0 6 0 2 : 3 1 : 0 6 Pit 
D-WD Cnt=1 8tn=2 KATE 
$10.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
WARRANTY DEED 
(Statutory Form) 
(ORS 93.850) 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, Grantor, conveys and warrants 
to the CITY OF MADRAS, an Oregon municipality, Grantee, the following described real 
property, situate in Jefferson County, Oregon, free from encumbrances except as specifically set 
forth: 
Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2004-06, recorded April 15, 2004, as 
Instrument No. 2004-1610, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
SUBJECT TO: 
1. 2004-2005 taxes, a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet payable. 
2. As disclosed by tax roll the premises herein described have been zoned or classified for 
farm use. At any time that said land is disqualified for such use, the property may be 
subject to additional taxes or penalties and interest. 
3. The property lies within the boundaries of Deschutes Valley Water District and is subject 
to any charges or assessments levied by said District, and pipeline easements in connection 
therewith. 
4. Rights of the public in and to that portion of the herein described premises lying within the 
boundaries of roads or highways. 
5. Right of way, if any, of Public Usage Road No. 3053 as shown on tax assessor map but 
which the Grantor declares may be closed or vacated by prior Federal or County 
governmental action. 
6. Mineral reservation by the United States of America as disclosed in Deed recorded April 
28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
7. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
The true consideration for this conveyance is an exchange of real property between the 
Grantee and Grantor. 
-1- WARRANTY DEED\\Serverl\Kathy\Morrow\Morrow Properties - Warranty Deed.wjd ity Ded.wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REEDER, LLP 
A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW 
93 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 833J5 S.E. Fifth Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
Fax: (541) 475-3944 
94 
8. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
9. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for electrical transmission lines 
granted to Central Electric Cooperative, Inc., recorded April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147456. 
10. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for communication lines, granted 
to Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, recorded April 28,1983, Fee No. 147458. 
11. Easements as shown on Partition Plat 2004-06, for utility and access. 
THIS INSTRUMENT WELL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN 
THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND 
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE 
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED 
USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR 
FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. 
Dated this _ _ day of J f / j b ^ ^ t t f i ^ ^ f , 3 6 0 4 e ^ ^ ^ y 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC: 
ANDREW J. MOKROW, President 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared ANDREW J. MORROW, who being duly sworn, did say that he is the 
President of MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, and that the seal affixed to 
the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation by authority of its Board of 
Directors, and he-acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed, before me this 
day of M W m ^ 20Q£. 
- 9LF,C,ALSEAI „ SANDRA KRUEGER 
NOTARV PUBLIC-OREGON 
_ COMMISSION NO 37^74 
^gW^fO^XPIRESMAH. 28 20 
Dtary Public for Oregon 
My commission expires: 3 - 0 8 
-2- WARRANTY DEED\\Serverl\Kathy\Morrow\Morrow Properties - Warranty Deed.wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REFDER, LLP 
ATTORNEYSATLAW 
94 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 82J05 S.E. Fifth Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
Fax: (541)475-3944 
95 
11 u 
rwr. Bog, e. age. 1/4 \h* 
M A P N U M B E R 
100 
TAX LOT 
NUMBER INT. IN HKAL PflO* 
A C C O U N T N U M B E R 
C O D E 
A R E A 
N U M B E R 
OFFIC IAL R E C O R D O F DESCRIPTIONS 
O F REAL PROPERTY * * 
J E F F E R S O N COUNTY A S S E S S O R ' S OFFICE 
" N 
F O R M E R L Y P A R T O F T . L . N O . 
INDENT EACH HEW 
COURSE TO THta POINT 
i ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION AND p£f l£ 1 
Q<0 ? RECOBt, OF CHANGE r f l l j g 1 
DATS OF ENTRY 
.ONTHIS CARD 
PESO BgCOflD ACItgg REMAINING 
J 
T I I S R14E m 
Sec 7, mil HB&Elfe SE^NW^SE^j 
N -^NVf^ Ei Exchange D 2 6 540 
Exci 
Co Rd 809 1.82 
Zemke, Bnaa d t h cer t 
Annexation to DVW 
Annexation Resolution 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Zemke to Zemke, TR B&S Dd 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Zemke, AC 
**Also: TL 600- 10 Ac. (The SW fcNWfc 
SEfc Sec. 7, T.11S, R. 14E, ff.M. 
All in Code 13 
Morrow Prop, Inc. to Zemke, AL 
Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust 
DC 
WD 
Boundary Adjust. t BA 97=14 
Code Totals 
#2836- Code 13= 10 AC. 
#2833- Code 11= 228.18 AC. 
Total 238.18 AC 
Zemke, AL Succ Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust to 
Springview Farms, LLC BS 
2 h 77 
02/08/88 
02/68/38 
02/15/85 
02/13/85 
12/01/89 
03/16/92 
V01/95 
5-22-97 
230.00 
228.18 
10-15-9 ' 91 
4-15-98 
5-7-01 
#88; 
# 8 8 ; 
#892 
921 
#95 £ 
9711)66 
981 
293 
294 
748 
244 
029 
4254 
538 
200: .18U 
238.18 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
96 
11 14 
rwp. b. wag, g. gee. /4 /l. 
M A P N U M B E R 
100 
TAX LOT 
NUMBER 
INT IN 
FtAUFROF 
A C C O U N T N U H B E f t 
\r> 
C O D E 
AREA 
N U M B E R 
OFFIC IAL RECORD O F DESCRIPTIONS 
O F REAL PROPERTY 
J E F F E R S O N COUNTY A S S E S S O R ' S OFFICE 
FORMERLY PART OF T .L, NO. . 
INDENT EACH NEW 
COURSE TO THIS POINT 
a d d i t i o n a l d e s c r i p t i o n a n d 
BCCORP Of CHANGE 
DATS Q* ENTRY 
ON T W t i CARD 
PBgD RECORD ' ACRES 
WIMAININO 
Exc. 0,45 Survey Adj. 
Exc. 10 ' Road Ded. 
Exc. 13.43 AC. Parcel 1 of PP 2002-12 
New Desc. for this TL 
Parcel 2 of PP 2002-12 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
Code Totals 
Code 110 = 213.7 AC. 
Code 130 = 10.0 AC. 
Total 223.7 AC. 
Springview Farms, LLC to City of Madras 
Code change 58.56 acres annexed into City of 
Madras, Ordinance #711 
Code 10=- = . 8.44 Acres 
Code 20 = 58.56 Acres 
Code 110 = 155.14 Acres 
Code 130 = 1.56 Acres 
PP 
WD 
)l-13-04 
12-30-02 
12-5-03 
2002 5926 
20033589 
1-2-03 200:1002;: 
223.7 
223.7 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
97 
£ 
LU 
0 
a 
LU 
UJ 
1 z 
CO 
£ o 
(0 
(0 
LU 
CO 
(0 < 
3 o 
u 
z o 
<0 
a 
LU 
o o o <N i c <0 —3 
CM eg 
A a ® 
A CO 
o o o 
c <0 -J I 
CM 
CM 
A 
a 
V) UJ 
cc p 
£ a Ui a <n 
z o 
1 1 "D 11  
1 s 
8 fc o: a-
o o o 
CM 
c A 
CM _ 
CM Q 
•3 
A a 
I4 2 c 
UJ 
Q 
3 ° 
2 1 
is 
s; ° 
CO ~ o g 
CO o 
g 
e o s u 
A 
UJ r 
z o 
UJ W 
UJ O 
o o 
CM 
o o o 
CM I c A -J i 
CM 
CM 
A _ 
2 3 s P 
w 
£ UJ 
z 
2 
s w 
1 1 55 a. w CO 
0) 
to & 
I u 
I i 
s o 
3 
00 T— 
o % 
a 
« 
a CO 
CM O 
8 i o a) O t oo 
a O ® 
•o k. o o a 
tc. 
CM O O 
CM i o d> Q oo 
H 
a 
t 
c 
UJ 
o 
CO o 
c o 
A (0 
c 
E H 
o o 
« s 
CM O 
o 
® 
Q I 
00 " s 
K 
UI 
X o 
s 
A 0 « 
£ 
1 UJ 
!2ui 
WO 
H o f o o 
lO 
o 0 
CM i o. 01 w uS 
A Q 
® 
A CO 
LO O o 
CM i Q. a) 
S 
A a 
•o e» 
"E o u a> AC 
in o o 
a. a> 
in 
A Q 
c UJ 
O) in 
c o 3 O 
A <0 
C 
e 
5 
< 
o 0 
01 
tn o o 
a. a) <0 i in 
£ 
a a § 
I 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m 
S 
u 
to 
§4 
•p 
CO 
ro 
CM 
0 H 
0 M •rl 01 
« A Q 
£ 
A (0 
f-o o 
CM 
O 0 1 
CM 
CM 
« 
18 Q 
•o « 
•o k o o 
r-o o 
CM J. O 
O i 
CM 
CM 
a 
A Q 
c UI 
a o 
P 
z e 
s UI 0. o 
3 O co 
a £ 
o 
o> 5 co Q o> co oo 
CO 
A UI 
2 t o ss u A s 
i 
CD in 
in 
0 <0 
1 S =» O 
s 
& § >• 
o o i 
e CO CM 
a> DC 
I £ D U 
® O | > 
a UI CO UJ 
98 
o 
o 
0 •M 
0 
I a ® 
75 CO 
•o o u 
o •M 
0 > 
5 
•P 0 
0 •p 
00 o o 
c 13 "? 
trj 
CM 
5 
CO Ul Q£ Ul 
< o 
UJ CL CO 
o 
f- fe o ° UJ (A 
Ul o . 2 2 
2 
CL 
E CO 
o H-
u < 
Tf 
3 1 
3 § 
ID Q 
4 
S I 
0 M •H 
CO 
® 
•M (4 
0 •M 
to . in 
CD IT) 
CO 0 9> 
£ O 
0 
N 
•rl 
CO 
•M 
w 
•si1 <—I 
IT) in iH 
o fct 
o 
N 
•rl w 
CO 
a 
•a o> 
E o u O oc 
CO o o 
CM 
O 
ra 
a & 
c Ui 
CD 
m r--O) 
CO 
c o 
53 O «s 0) 
c 
E 
5 < 
CO T— 6> 00 o o 
CM 
00 
CM 
re O 
« 
> 33 U r-
Z 0 
1 ui B. o 
3 O 
CO 
Q & 
s Q 
5 
Q 
Ul 
CL 
Ul g 
3 O </> 
ui £ 3 O g 
tt 
>-
a Ul x 
u 3 o > 
s 
CO 
rr< i 
41 
a! Q 
n) ID 
0 (J 
N 
-rl 
CO 
O O 
0 +1 
m 
. iH 
CM I 
-8 o O 
01 c RJ 
A (J 
N 
•rl 
CO 
•P 
fell tr 
CO 
m m 
CM in 
iH 
o 
iH 
iH o 
3 o » 
ffl N 
•rl CO 
I 
9 
•a 
I 
3 < 
98 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
99 
CO 
UJ K 
UJ 
< 
o UI a. 
CO 
3 § 
Si 
S o 
O 
P N-
o ° 
UJ 
0) 
UJ 
i 
2 
a. 
I 
2 : 
o 
£ •S is bfl 
S i * 
3 S 
8 S o> 
v s £ -5 _ . . M u 
«g s •a ° ^ o 2 -
I u 5 
_o 
a 
i W 
rn rr 
° Er cu 
8 ? ^ 
» I S £ 
S 
V3 TO — 
£ g ! 
^ f * 8- o » 
£ «-a 
- o o 
£ 8 s Q a. 
® a> ta n (0 0) 
s 
UI 
o 
) UI 
IW 
E 
a O S > O l 
a 
99 
o © o o o o I-M « (-M o o o o o o o o o o o ® t^  t; ° e s 
o o o o o o CO a> cn ca 
£L 
M CO W (U 0 O W H N M U O •H O O ft. CO < < 
1 CO CO m 
+ m • 
> t CO rH CO in 
o o o n H (M rH O O o o o 
o o o o o o o o 
o o o o 
en >a> u> cn in ^ tn 
CNJ r-{ CO CO m in 
o o o o 
r l (O ri N rH rH O O o o o o 
ibft to Ordinance No. 823 
100 
11 14 
TWP. ROE. SEC. I I H 1/16 
MAP NUMBER 
101 
PARCEL 
NUMBER 
T A X LOT NUMBER 
Type Sp«c. In t . In 
REAL PROP. 
4 4 
EE OFFICIAL RECORD OF DESCRIPTIONS 
OF REAL PROPERTY 
CODE 
AREA 
NUMBER 
COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
- O R M E R L Y PART O F . 11 14 7 100 
Ref#or Indent MCti n«w I I ' l l 2 Z , 
c o u m to this point [ [ J 1 -J 
DESCRIPTION A N D 
RECORD OF C H A N C E Date Recorded vol. pa. 
Acras 
Remaining 
\10S\i\ 
T11S R14E Sec. 7 
PartiitSLon Plat 2002-12 
Parcel 1 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
Code change 4.0 acres annexed into City 
of Madras Ordinance #711 
Code 20 = 4 . 0 acres 
Code 110 =9.43 acres 
Springview Farms, LLC to Zemke, AL 
Zemke, AL to Lincicome Madras Development, 
LLC 
PP 
BS 
L2-30-02 
2-5-03 
01-13-04 
02-28-05 
20025926 
[20030589 
13.43 
13.43 
WD i-1-05 
20050974 
20052823 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
101 
o ; 
UJ 
0 
a 
UJ 
UJ 
1 z 
<0 
o 
<0 
<n 
UJ 
CO 
(O < 
w o 0 
-D 0) 
LL I m 
cm 
1 Q a n <o 
w o 0 CM I J3 0) LL i 10 
CM 
1 O 
S 2 
"E 8! 
0 o 
1 fc at 
co 
ui o: ui 
< 
o Ul a CO 
m o o 
<V x> 0) LL • 
in 
CM 
« a 
O x £ 
O 
o 
( 0 
a : 
UJ 
UL 
u . 
UJ 
z o 
p Is-
o ° 
Ui CO 
Ul 
I s 
f « 
C O 
Ui 
CM ^ oo Q 
CO 
9 K 
= i= 
o 
2 
u 
a » 
c s 
o o 
CM 
lO o 
0 
CM i XI 
a> u_ i in 
CM 
1 
a 
e 
.2 
£ 
a; Lil 
a 
a ut 
2 ui 
N 
0 
B o 
CO 
in o o 
CM 
i , <n 
n 
a 
e 
a CO 
u> 
o o 
CM i Sk 
(0 
£ a 
a 
IS 
"O i-o 
o & 
in o o 
CM 
m 
<o • 
js a to 
a 
c ui 
CO 
00 
CO 
-a-
£ 
Ui 
5 S c o 
n » 
c & 
l-
< o o csi 
lO o o 
>1 
CD 2 
UJ 
co 2 K 
UJ X u 3 O > 
«B Q 
© 
o 
Ui 
o 
01 § 
a 
in o o 
£ d> 
I u> 
i 
a o re 
CO 
to o o 
CM i a. a> £0 
LO o o 
CL V W i m 
n 
a 
c g UJ 
•n Q o 
c o 
u « 
s 
2 
5 < 
a o 
m a o ^ 
a. a> W • 
in 
01 Exhibit to Ordinance 
s 
s o 
e > 
t^8230 
UJ CO 
W 
4 
CO o o 
C -C-
3 CM 
7 
CO 05 
CM CO 
i i 
Q 0. 
n « 
CO » 
o 
CM 
6 
CM 
« o 
"D 0 •s 0 
1 
8 O 
CM 
m 
CM 
« 
a 
c Ul 
CM O) o 
CO 
LO 
CM 
e 
o 
u 
a 
& H 
5 
a. 
co 
-t <N 
8 o 
a. <u 
o> 
S n 
a 
© 
£ 
£ Ui 
a> a> 
co 
CL 
102 
<n IIJ 
tc UJ 
< o 
UJ 0. CO 
g 
o p 
o ° UI 
co 
UJ o _ z J 
g 
o r-o T 
a. 
o fflcs 
* 2 
S h -i o " J 
g H o n 
" h 
u < 
0\ T- V0 
cn © 
"* 00 
"tS 3 
0 u 
0 •p 
0 
1 
+J o 0 * 
0 +J 
0) 
1 
f .c o 
r-o o ^ 
c 3 
i Q 
Jg *« 
CO 
r--o o 
c 3 
s It) O 
•o ai 
•S o o 
2 
o o 
CN 
c 
—} 
I 
CM T— 
o 
m Q & 
* * c UJ 
VO 
r-- a OO 
s 
vr 
c? 
O Ui a. r-
c (-co a 
o 
a 
w Ul 
c o 
e C£ K- o 
S < 
O) 
ai f-o o 
CD 
«f 
CO 0 
1 a 
I 
a 
£ 
UI 
O H 
u 
tn a> a> N M •H o W < 
1 V 
+ rH 
O 
LU o z 
s o UI tM w 
s « 
t- CN % 
e 
t- m 
CO T— 2 <"> co * H 
O 
U 
CM < 
o" O 
CN 
a. rr 
O H 
Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
O 
s fl 
0) N 
•rl W 
(0 a) 0 n H u •rl fiC Cfl 
1 o N CO 
+ • 0 1 
° 2 P 
CM <U CD CO a 
103 
I -
co 
UJ 
DC 
UJ 
g 
< 
o 
UJ & 
co 
H 
O 
2 
CL 
X 
CO 
2 § 
CD 
c ° (9 0 0 s CM 
0 GO < 
z 
o p ^ 
o ° 
UJ 
CO 
UJ 
i s 
u 
o o 
u 
d H § 
IS ' cl, 
3 w > 
w 
a 
•p fe, D1
co 
oo o o <M 
< 
n 
CM 
5 U « -E 
o a. 
6 ® 
A IB 
CO CO 
00 o o 
ca 
S I ca 
I o 
•s 
o o 
a 
a: 
00 o o 
>1 
CO s I 
CM 
n 
Q 
c 
UJ 
CM 
103 Exhibit tofirdinancfj 
Ul 
§ o o r-C3 
e 
o g co o co u uj H co y 
CO < 
w Q O 
e H cs G J 
CL, 
CO 
w 
3 ffl § 2 ^ O U 
fe823 
<n 
a <u 
H M 
•rl 0 
co < 
i 
o 
+ o 
O) o o 
(5 g 
5 -, o cm in o co 
s S <0 *c • 0. 
£ ® n n 
co co 
O) o o CM 
•P 
tr co 
0 3 O 
CvJ O 
O O 
o o 
o o 
CM 
iH O 
O O 
0 
1 
D •o 
a 
•E 
o o 
s. 
o> o o ^ 
- 1B TO 
in o 
a 
• 
C Ul 
CM 
CD O 
CO 
u 
IB » 
c 
E I-
5 < 
T— 
o cri o> o o 
CM 
I Q 
1 <M U 
£ Ul 
a < 
S 
S 0 
an u. 
1 
O 
P 
2 Ul a. O 
e 3 
e 
CO 
o ST 
UJ <3 
Z 
8. (0 
CL 
* a 
ui o K 3 O 
CO 
3 
V o • 
a > 
x 0 CO 1 ¥ a 
uj 
s 
CO 
104 
CO 
UJ DC 
UJ 
ui 
8 KCC UJ UI 
< 
o UI 
CL 
CO 
S I 
<o 
o o 
o 
F r*-
o ° 
UJ 
CO 
UJ 
f b 
2 
(L 
X 
CO 
z : 
! 
H 
Z 
UI 2 
Q. 
3 
UJ 
£ o OT g 
Q . 4 < 
2 Isj 
U1Z 
5 LU 
IB O I 
So," 
J o ? 
CO 
B o < 
JS 
w 
to 
I 
i 
S 
55 
o o 
o o 
oo o 
IN O 
o o 
CM 
rH O 
O O 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
105 
C O N 
T I T I E C O M P A N Y 
Jsffarson County Official Records „„„„ . 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clark 2009-000741 
$36.00 
03/04/2009 03:26:23 P M 
EMro Cnfat Sln«2 KATE 
110,00111.00 J10.00 $5.00 
After recording return to: 
FIRST ORBGOM TITLE COMPANY 
116 SB D Street, Ste A 
MADRAS. OR 97741 
Until a change is requested all 
tax statements shall be sent t o 
the following address: 
Heinz A . John 
3B79 Ladera Vista Road 
Pa11brook, CA 92028 
Escrow H o . 
Title N o . 
0011105TD 
11105 
WARRANTY DEED 
I 
E 
8 
e 
c 
o 
Linciccma Madras Developasnt, L L C , 
Grantor(s) hereby grant, bargain, sell, warrant and convey to: 
Heini A. John 
Grantee(b) and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns the following described 
real property, free of encumbrances except as specifically BBt forth herein in 
the County of J8T7KBS0R and S t a t e of Oregon, to wits 
SEE EXHIBIT A WHICH IS K A D S A PAST EBB807 BY THIS REFKSKHCS 
AcctS 13134/13274 Sfep# 11-14-7 101 
SUBJECT TO: all those items o f record and those apparent upon the land, if 
any, as of the date of this deed and those shown below, if any: 
ana the grantor will warrant and forever defend the said premises and every 
part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands o f all persons 
whomsoever, except those claiming under the above described encumbrances. 
The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is $ 350,000.00. 
BBFORB SIGNING OR ACCEPTIM3 T H I S INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE 
SHOULD INOUIRB ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF A M Y , UNDER SECTIONS 2 , 3 A N D 5 TO 
22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON L A N S 2007 (MEASURE 49 (2007)) . THIS INSTRUMENT DOES 
NOT ALLOW US B OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF 
APPLICABLE LAND USE LAHS A M D REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS 
INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON A C Q U I R I N G FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY S H O U L D CHECK WITH 
THE APPROPRIATE CITY O R COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT T O VERIFY T H A T T H E UNIT OF 
LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, A S DEFINED IN 
ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, T O V E R I F Y THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO 
DETERMINE A N Y LIMITS ON LAWSUITS A G A I N S T FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES A S DEFINED 
IN ORS 30.930 A N D T O INQUIRE A B O U T T H E RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, 
IF A N Y , UNDER SECTIONS 2, 3 A N D 5 TO 22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAHS 2007 
(MBASURB 49 <^0£7) > • 
Dated this day of M a r c h , 2009-
This instrument was ^eteo^ledged before m e an March X , 2009 b y Hitch Cole. 
_ ^uoTic^tor uregonj 
M y commission Bxpires_ 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
DAKHMSBfiK NOTARY PU8UC-ORSOON 
- „ C O M M I S S I N O 4 0 n a 
MY CO<aBS8IOK EXPimsJUNE 
f 
105 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
106 
Order Ho. 0008661 
Page 5 
EXHIBIT "A" 
Legal Demotion: 
A parcel of land containing 12.28 acres, more or less, being a portion of Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2002.12 
located in the Northeast One-quarter of Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette 
Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 7 which beara South 00°17'3Sn East a 
distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Seotion 7, thence leaving said north-south 
section centerline and along the south right-of-way line of Ashwood road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded as instrument No. 2005-005605 ofJeffer&m County official records South 89°39'39" East a distance 
of 61.23 feet to the true Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing along said right-of-way line 
South 89839'39" East a distance of 538.68 feet to a point o n t o east boundary of said Parcel 1; thence along 
said east boundary South 00°17'35" Bast a distance of935.15 feet to the Southeast comer of said Parcel 1; 
thence along the south boundary of said Parcel 1 North 89°40'13" West a distance of599.90 feet to the 
southwest comer of said Parcel 1, being a point on said north-south section cateiine; thence along said north-
south section centerline North 00°17'35" West a distahce of5l0.26feettoa point which bean South 
00°17'35" East a distance of505.00 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Section 7; thence leaving 
said north-south seotion centerline North 89a42'25n Bastadislance of 61.22 feet thencc North 00°17'35" West 
a distance of424.32 feet to the point of beginning. 
106 Exhibit to Ordinance No. §23 
107 
A. 
( 
J H F E R S O N C O U N T Y A S S E S S O R 
REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT REPORT 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
Jan 13,2010 
ACCOUNT# 15964 
MAP 1114070000102 
CODE-TAX # 0010-15964 
M A I L I N G N A M E OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 
AGENT 
I N C A R E O F ATrN; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MGR 
MAILING ADDRESS 
1793 13TH ST SE 
SALEM, OR 97302 
TAX STATUS 
ACCNTSTATUS 
SUBTYPE 
DEED REFERENCE # 
SALES DATE/PRICE 
N O N A S S E S S A B L E 
A C T I V E 
N O R M A L 
2006-4457 (SOURCE ID:) 
06-23-2006/ $39,021.00 
PROP CLASS 960 MA SA NH UNIT 
RMV CLASS 400 05 52 000 68912-1 
SITU8 ADDRESS(S) SITUS CITY 
ID # 
VALUE SUMMARY 
CODE AREA AV RMV RMV EXCEPTION CPR % 
0010 LAND 0 64,550 LAND 
IMPR. 0 0 IMPR. 
TOTAL 0 64,550 TOTAL 0 
GRAND TOTAL 0 64,550 GRAND TOTAL 0 
CODE AREA ID# RFD PLN2N 
LAND BREAKDOWN 
VALUE SOURCE TD% LS SIZE LND CLS IRR CLASS IRR SIZE 
0010 R 1 RL Market 100 A 0.69 
TOTAL 0.69 TOTAL 0.00 
107 Exhibit tolSrclinance No. 823 
108 
l U 
O 
Q 
U l 
- 1 
U J 
C O 
k. 
O 
t o 
t o 
U J 
10 
8 
o 
O 
z o 
S3 
U J 
L L 
L L 
U J 
- 3 
CD 
o 
o 
CM i 
C v-
3 CM " ? « 
CO C5 
CM 00 
S o 
« k 
Q a 
o o 
« "S 
0} co 
co 
§ 
CM 
I -
to 
ui 
DC p 
z 
- I 
< 
o 
Ul 
a. 
co 
O g 
2 s 
co 
0 
CM 
1 
a 
V 
a 
• e 
o 
u 
at 
DC 
s 
o 
CM 
LO 
CM 
£ 
(0 a 
€ 
UJ 
z o 
Ul 
co 
u i 
2 ? 
£ 
X 
to 
z . 
i 
s 
a. 
<o 
csi 
co 
o 
o 
CM i 
a . 
a) 
W 
i 
cn 
n 
a 
I 
I 
u i 
3 
cc 
0 
CD 
1 
* s ! C£ O 
£ 
a 
u 
a) 
0 
S a oc 
£< m 111 
z z 
2 5 s g o o 
1 
S H 
I 
1< o 0\ CO \JD 
in 
OJ 
H 
o a CTl 
< « ID 
u » 
0 O 
en < 
vo 
o 
O 0 O 
o U o 
I 
a & 
a 
CO 
8 
0 
1 a> (/} 
i 
o 
CM 
a 
a 
TJ 
e 
E 
o 
o 
a 
DC 
(D 
O 
O 
CM 
A. 
<s> 
co • 
o 
CM 
a 
O 
u i 
CO 
cn 
CO 
o> 
a i 
CM 
o •s i) 
«s 
5 
CL 
O in 
CO s 
o 
a 
® 
CO 1 
0 
CN 
1 
a 
I 
o 
a: 
§ UI 
a. 
O 
3 
O 
CO 
a 
CL 
e 
s 
a 
ui 
a. 
UJ 
8 
O 
CO 
£ 
ui Z 
3 
8 
a 
tz 
UJ 
x 
o 
3 
O > 
1 0 8 Exhibit to Ordif f lnce I 
Ul I 
109 
Jefferson County Official Record! 
Kathissfl B. Marstcn, County Clark 
D-WD crnt «n»2 KATE 
118.00 >11.011 >1 q O O 15.00 
2006-004457 
$41.00 
07/20/2006 02:32:09 PM 
Space above this line for Recording Office Use 
After recording, return to: Send Tax statements to: 
Oregon Department of Corrections (same) 
Attn: Community Development Manager 
1793 13th Street SE 
Salem, OR 97302-2595 
WARRANTY DEED 
- ^  (ORS 93.850) 
Lincicome Madras Development. LLC, an Oregon limited liability company . 
Grantor, conveys and warrants to STATE OF OREGON, by and through its 
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Grantee, its successors and assigns, the real 
property described in Exhibit A (the "Property") free of encumbrances, except for 
easements, conditions, and restrictions contained in the public record, and except 
as specifically set forth herein (none). 
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF 
ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE 
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE 
LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS 
INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD 
CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO 
VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST 
FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE 
ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 
197.352. 
The tnie consideration for this conveyance is $39,021.00. 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
109 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Page 1 of 3 
110 
Dated this day of _,2006. 
by James 
Lincii 
, Grantor 
Cole, Managing Member of 
adras Development, LLC 
STATE OF OREGON 
) ss. 
County of ^ 
This instrument was acknowledged and executed before me 011 this day of 
by James Mitch Cole, Managing Member of Lincicome Madras Development, LLC. 
iSntoSKSof f * I Noji " P u b l i f O r e g o n 
COMMISSION NO. 390978 
W C W O C S 8 H W EXWjt8JWyj1 
2006, 
ommission 
ACCEPTED BY: 
The State of Oregon, acting by and through 
its Department of Corrections 
By: 
As: j y r ^C&Yrejdhms. • 
) 
) ss. 
J 
STATE OF OREGON 
County of U a j r i a * ^ 
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this S&P* day of c J L^urx* > 
by BoB&f as the farnmu^iHy fftasnG^t. 
2006, 
and 
authorized representative of the Oregon Department of Corrections, acting under authority 
granted to him/her by the State of Oregon. 
OFFICIAL S E A L 
C A R O L Y N R P A T T O N 
VQ NOTARY PUBLlC-OftEflON 
^ C O M M W S t O N NO. 388422 
MY mUMISSTON EXPIRES JAN. 1 1 , 2 W 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission expires: 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
P a g e 1 o f 3 
109 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
111 
EXHIBIT A 
Legal Description for Warranty Deed 
ASHWOOD ROAD 
Section 7 (East Property) 
A 60.00-foot wide strip of land, lying 60.00 on the south side of the following described centerline, over land 
located in the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 7 of Township 11 South and Range 14 East of the 
Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, described in the Warranty Deed recorded at 2005-002823 of the 
Jefferson County Official Records: 
Beginning at Engineer's Centerline Station 5+00, on the section line between Sections 6 and 7 of Township 11 
South and Range 14 -East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, which bears North 89°39'17" 
West 1481.20 feet from the 1/4 comer between said Sections 6 and 7; thence South 89°39'17" East 138.33 feet, 
along the section line between said Sections 6 and 7; thence leaving said section line, 17.02 feet along the arc of a 
1039.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 89°11 '08" East 17.01 feet); thence South 
88°43'00" East 1205.50 feet; thence 17.13 feet along the arc of a 1039.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of 
which bears South 89°11*20" East 17.13 feet); thence South 89°39'40" East 2394.42 feet; thence 633.14 feet along " 
the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 62°10'44" East 609.14 feet); 
thence South 34°41 '49" East 774.75 feet; thence 1709.82 feet along the arc of a 1000.00 foot radius curve left (the 
long chord of which bears South 83°40'47" East 1509.02 feet); thence North 47°20'15" East 542.88 feet; thence 
2560.21 feet along the arc of a 1400.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 80°16'24" 
East 2218.09 feet); thence South 27°53'03" East 943.15 feet; thence 1158.98 feet along the arc of an 850.00 foot 
radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 66°56'44" East 1071.26 feet); thence North 73°59'34" East 
585.08 feet; thence 368.57 feet along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears 
South 74°57'06" East 350.79 feet);thence South 43°53'47" East 305.17 feet; thence 254.87 feet along the arc of a 
340.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 65°22'17" East 248.94 feet); thence South 
86°50'46" East 596.74 feet; thence 122.81 feet along the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of 
which bears South 81°30'56" East 122.63 feet); thence South 76°11 "06" East 271.44 feet to engineer's centerline 
station 151+00, the terminus for this description, from which the 1/4 comer between Sections 9 and 10 bears North 
89° 14'59" East 2049.79 feet 
The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 30,016 square feet, more or less. 
This description may include areas that are preexisting public right-of-way or easements, which are retained, and 
included herein to provide a clearer record of title in the future. 
f REGISTERED N 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
OREGON 
JULY 18, 1980 
JERRY C. POWELL 
\ s 19 1 9 J 
RENEWS 1 2 - 3 1 - 2 0 0 6 
Warranty Deed Legal Description - East Property 
Lincicome Madras Development, LLC 111 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Page 1 of 1 
^trt 
11 U 
1/4 
H A P N U M B E R 
i t 
200 
TAX LOT NUMB1A 
ACCOUNT NUMfclR 
• PRC. 
INT.IN 
11 M 
OFFICIAL. RECORD O F DESCRIPTIONS 
* 4 . 5 6 8 
C O O I 
A R E A NUMBER 
O F REAL PROPERTY 
JBFFBRSON COUNTY A S S E S S O R 
FORMERLY PART OF T.L. NO. . 
INDENT EACH NEW 
I COURSE TO THI» fOIHT 0.60X ADDITIONAL DESCRIPTION AND hbcowo or chano* OATB OF KNTRT ON THIS CAWP P H D HECOHO ACRB4 REMAINING 
T11S KL4E WM 
Sec 7, The N 475 ft of the E 400 ft of the 
HE-ifiWfc. 
WD 
WD 
Exc: 
Co Rd No 809 0.27 
Code Change Rural Madras Sanitary Di&t 
Dissolution of Rural Madras Sanitary District 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Easement inside 11 14 7 TL 302 for this tax 
lot (Granted to Thomas, E & D) Included in a 
Warranty Deed worked on 11 14 7 TL 302. W ) 
21 
25 
389 
530 
9 5 78 
9 - 2 - 8 1 
02/13/85 
12/01/89 
1 /04 /95 
07-28-05 
8 1 
.9 i 
# 8 8 3 
# 8 9 2 ! 
#95C 
20054126 
4 . 6 3 
4.36 
78 
-81 
294 
748 
029 
113 
UJ 
(5 a 
UJ 
LU 
1 Z 
CO 
t£ 
O 
CO 
CO 
UJ 
CO 
CO < 
o 
CO 
£ 
UJ 
L L 
L L 
UJ 
H 0) UJ 
oc UJ H Z 
< 
5 UJ 0. 
tn 
2 3 § o x g 
o < ° 
to 
tZ o 
S o 
z 
O 
o ° 
UJ W 
UJ 
i: 
2 
a. 
X CO . 
z . 
§ 
H 
in 
o 
o 
CM i Q. a) w 
« 
a 
o « 
to 
in 
o 
o 
^ 
CL 
a) 
in 
1 a 
•2 0 
1 
in o 
o 
X 
a> 
in 
s «a 
a 
-s UJ 
CO 
to 
m 
T-
o> 
g 
c o 
s 10 « 
o o 
(N 
in 
o 
o 
^ 
CL a> w 
n 
a 
S 
i 
UI 
UJ 
I 
tn 
a> 
M 
o a 10 
® ro 
u « 
T 
vo < 
n 
o> O) O) 
0 rt 
1 1 
(B « 
CO O O 
CM 
I a 
"S 
•E o u « 
a: 
8 
o 
CM 
i 
7 
00 
CM 
<0 a 
e 
ui 
CO o> f^ 
o 
CD 
CM 
e o 
s « 
w c 
E H 
CO o 
co 
o 
o 
CM 
O) 3 
CM 0 
1 a 
I 
Ui 
113 E^ giibit 
IU 
9 w 
I 
o 
co 
co 
o o 
CM 
_L O 
3 O 
7 9 . 
f-» 00 
CM 
a> g 
S - c a a. 
£ 5 
a a 
to to 
8 o * 
o> 
00 o 
£ 
3 HE •2 o o e 
QZ 
f i n a n c e No. 823 
<o o o 
TO 
CO 0 
1 a 
£• 
UJ 
o 
00 
CO 
co 
CM 
c % 
a w c 
C 
S < 
in in 
co 
8 o 
CL a> 
0 
CM 
s « 
a 
1 
I 
UI 
o 
S o o 
© t— o •t 
s 
•8 0 u 
5 
1 
+i 
o 
s 
£ 
•a o +» 
o 
<s 0 
o u 
« 
N •H 
en 
a +> 
d a H 
0 1 
a 0 & 
9 
0 N 
' r l 
01 
114 
<n 
ui 
oz 
ui 
< o 
Ul 
Q. 
Ui 
H cm 
«0 
r: o 
z 
o 
H 
O 
UJ 
Ui 
r-o 
Ul 
o 
X 
V ) _ 
z ^ 
5 o 
O 
o 
CM 
<L 
CO 2 i 
co o 
3 
a 
a « 
Ui 
o 
o 
<0 2 
i 
CO 
o 
n 
a 
"8 
•p 
O 
J. 
<0 
o 
CB 
a 
c 
Ul 
to 
00 
CO 
c 
o 
o 
n 
u 
CL < 
s 
s 8 § 
o 
E 
Ul 
o 
ui 
a. 
o 
i-
0. 
9 O CO 
O) M-
O O 
O) 
3 
co 0 
1 
a 
a 
2 
£ 
UI 
8 
O 
CO I-
z 
Ui 
S 3 O 0 
a 
1 
>-
o: 
ui z 
a 3 
o > 
a 
UI 
Ul 
& a M 
TJ 0 o 
0 +1 ® 
> 
1 
+1 
o 0 < 
ffl 
1 
+» 0 
H 0 a 
4 
•8 
<D 
N 
•H 
CO 
a 
5 
4 
. CM 
O 
I 
0 
N 
•rl 
CO 
41 
C 
CO 
ro 
UJ 
i 
o 
ffl 
N 
•H 
CO 
O 
i * 
SI 
o : 
01 o SS ru >£ CO 
41 
Hii 
CO 
ro 
0 
H 
0 
N 
•rt 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
o 
o 
* 
c 
3 
7 
I 
O 
o 
a 
(0 
o 
o 
c 
3 
£ 
CO 
a 
•o 
o 
o 
o 
o 
a: 
O 
o 
c 3 —J 1 CM 
3 
CO 
a 
I 
ui 
10 
S O 
TT 
O 
•o 
a » 
c 
.2 
s 
< 
o> 
M-
6> 
t^. 
o 
o 
O ) 
3 
s 
0 
f 
Q 
1 
Ul 
I 
Ul 
a. 
o 
t-
(L 
3 
O 
co 
Ui 
o 
CM 
O 
•o 
S! 
Ui 
a. 
O 
O 
- o 
< 
8 
tc m 
o t 
* 
H 
o © 
CM 
s 
K r-
O o 
* J . 
a r: 
ui 
-1 • 
o a 
§ 
& w 
u 
< 
o 
vo 
1 ° ' so 
Q < 
o 
ui 
CO 
GO 
115 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
116 
CO 
UJ « 
UJ 
£ 
O 
UJ 
Q . 
CO 
3 8 
S CM 
<e 
z g 
H 
O 
UJ 
CO 
N-o 
UJ 
a 
I 
o £ 
UJ H 1 
•i H 
§ W W 
•P 
fei 
0 1 
U 
fi( o o 
O • 
CM 
O 
« HI 
£ o 
3 "C a a. 
o £ 
n n 
CO CO 
f-o o 
CM 
O * 
co 
2 
10 a 
T> 
4) 
•E 
o 
o 
o 
« 
ts. o o 
CM 
9 
£ 
(3 
D 
e 
UJ 
E Q 
v 
co 
£ u 
3 = 
a a. © ® 
"5 « 
co co 
r-. o o 
CM 
s 
I a 
•a 
e 
"S 
o 
o « 
a: 
r--
s ? 
C^ J CP\ 
in 
i -
o o 
CM g 
l£> 
0 
o> a 
1 
r-o 
S i 
Q 
uj 2 
o 
o 
s 
Pi 
CO Lfl <T> S 
CO O 
SS * 
w u 
S E 
S 
a! 
< 
p* 
i « 
<n H o Z 
CM 
f-o o 
CM 
£ 
§ 
00 
a >< 
S 
O 
5 
w 
116 Exhibit to Ordinal^ No. 82gj 
UJ 10 
o 
© 
O) 
<0 
Ql 
a 
a 
H 
3 
w 
3 
o 
EH 
N 
•H 
CO 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk .007-003807 
$33.00 
07/KI/XIW7 10:29:17 AM 
D-BJ5D Cnt»1 ®n»2 KATE 
lio.oo si i.oo »io.co*s.oo 
-Space bokriV for Recorder's use only-
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas, as 
husband and wife, Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of ZERO and 00/100 Dollars 
to it paid by the grantee herein, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Evan W Thomas 
and Dorothy Thomas, as husband and wife, Grantee(s), the described tract of land in County of 
Jefferson and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
See Attached Legal Description as Tract 'B' 
¥ 
a s 
a 
8 
1 
T O HAVE AND T O HOLD the granted premises unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. 
WITNESS their Hand and Seal this 36-M' day of 
This instrument wis nol allow ubb of the property 
described in this Instrument in violation of applicable 
land use laws and regulations. Before signing or 
accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title 
to the property should check with the appropriate city 
or county planning department to verify approved uses By: Dorothy Tj 
and to determine any limits on lawsuits against 
Farming or Forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. 
2007. 
By: Evan W Xfromas 0 
<£i 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY OF-DEaCHUTEG IkraityfTtiflwwts, riff«M/-}w-"fttHw" 
I, certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Evan W Thomas and Dorothy 
Thomas and is the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that 
he/she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the 
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 
Dated: io IcM) j0*7 
Until a change is requested all tax statements 
Should be sent to the following address: 
Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas 
PubJIc'fortWjf State d f O R E G O N 
M y Commission Expires: \9--0l-ft 
After Recording Please Return to: 
<r 
Ol Same as above 
S 
I 
a 
117 Exhibit to Ordinanc§W6°B2Vo. 
2007-3807 
TRACT B 
A parcel of land containing 3.94 acres, more or less, located in a portion of the 
Northwest One-quarter (NW1/4) and a portion of the Northeast One-Quarter 
(NE1/4) of Section 07, Township 11 South, Range 14 East, Willamette Meridian, 
City of Madras, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as 
follows: 
Beginning at a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 which bears 
South 00o17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter corner 
of said Section 07; thence leaving said north-south section centerline and along 
the south right-of-way line of Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson County official records South 
89c,39'39" East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way line 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 89042'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 
which bears South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-
quarter corner of said Section 07, being a point on the boundary of Parcel 1 of 
- Partition Plat No. 2004-15 (recorded as MF#2004-4735); thence along the 
boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 354.87 feet; 
thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right 
with a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a 
distance of 117.35 feet; thence North 00°17,35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; 
thence 123.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 
240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" East for a distance of 
121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left with a 
radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°12'33" East for a 
distance of 184.75 feet to a point on said south right-of-way line; thence along 
said south right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South 88"42'59" East a distance of 170.57 feet 
18.12 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 
feet, the chord of which bears South 89°11'19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet-
South 89°30'39" East a distance of 104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the 
terminus of this description. 
Subject to: All easements, restrictions and right-of-ways of record and those 
common and apparent on the land. 
RES STEREO 
PROFESSIONAL 
PETER A. MANLEY 
RENEWAL 0ATE 12/31/08 
April 11, 2007 
S:\Land Projects\051213-Cole subd in Madras\docs\TRACT B(2).doc 
Thomas to Thomas 
2007-3807 118 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
119 
Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
(Kitteison & Associates, January 2010) 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
120 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 SW Upper Terrace Drive Suite 101, Bend. Oregon 9 7 7 0 2 541 312 B300 541 312 4585 
From: c h ^ Brehmer, P.E. & Joe Bessman, P.E. & Matt Be 
Pro jec t : Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
Sub jec t : Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
To: 
MEMORANDUM 
January 22, 2010 
Nick Snead, City of Madras 
EXPIRES: 12/31/ 
I 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document compliance with the Transportation Planning 
Rule for the proposed rezone of 20 acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) 
zoning to Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This memorandum was prepared to address 
the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-12-0060 
(Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for a zone change 
analysis. The intent of the TPR is to ensure the transportation system can accommodate the 
change of uses to the adopted system plan and that any resultant significant affects are mitigated. 
The land Included in the proposed rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of 
Jefferson County Middle School, and south of the existing Juniper Hills County Park near Bean 
Drive. The property is within the Yarrow development and its rezone to accommodate a school 
was identified as part of the original Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is 
generally shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the 20-acre future school property on the 
Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development plans or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
This study determined that, with the exception of the US 97 f] Street intersections, all of the study 
area intersections operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon 
analysis period. The US 97 f] Street intersections exceed ODOT mobility standards with or without 
the proposed rezone. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental impact 
on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. The City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) 
Amendment previously identified a mitigation plan for this intersection and, with the planned 
improvements in place, the transportation system will operate acceptably with the existing 
zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the proposed rezone. Assuming that the 
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is able to make a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements in the TSP, no unmitigated significant effects will 
occur with the proposed rezone. The study methodology, findings, and recommendations are 
detailed herein. 
FILENAME: H:\PROJFILE\1002S - MADRAS ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS\REPORT\FINAL\10O28REPFINAL.DOC 
120 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
121 
cr 
-i < 
o 
w o z 
HQ NV38 
I S 3QVXNIM 
I S QOOMHStf 
i S HiOl 
81 
5 1 
n 
SB Z K 
0 5 to E 
ui £ 
i? 
5 2 
ioSjj;<jbiino/fri flaou -weztm-aioe'ezi^r B*p-z6ue?oousBms6»tnsioou3Setppin pue Ajeiusu&usiwpejv-ezooneiuloxtWBa' 
121 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
122 
eoBu :qa± tnoAsi i/aquj - uretp-Ol - 010» fapgeyB200l\s6nsB»eiSlocuic>s eptiMPua boiustueis snjpain • BiOOi\sivlot*J>WB~HY)l 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
111, 
cC 
v . I 1 ^ 
S 3 I S < 
W J 
LJ 0-
jig 
OS u 
(/) O 
< z 
ii 
o < £ 
-J o 
hi 0. 
123 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
BACKGROUND 
The City of Madras, in partnership with the Jefferson County School District is proposing the 
UGB amendment and rezone to accommodate a potential future elementary school site. Jefferson 
County School District currently operates two elementary schools within the Madras City limits 
that served approximately 1,060 kindergarten through fifth grade students during the 2008 school 
year. The recent closure of the Westside Elementary School due to budget shortfalls has split 
Madras kindergarten through fifth grade students between Madras Elementary School 
(kindergarten through 2nd grade) and Buff Elementary School (3rd through 5,h grades). 
Future building needs and the current location of Buff Elementary School within a 100-year 
floodplain has created a need for the School District to look at alternative future sites. The 
location of the proposed land within the Yarrow neighborhood is expected to help accommodate 
future growth along Madras' east side, and the adjacent Jefferson County Middle School and 
Juniper Hills Park ball fields are expected to be complementary uses. A new school is not 
proposed for construction or entitlements at this time; the purpose of the zone change is to 
accommodate the long-term educational infrastructure needs in the City. 
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 
The existing transportation infrastructure assessment is provided herein to assist the City of 
Madras with the planning and prioritization of maintenance and infrastructure improvements 
within the study area. The existing conditions analysis is intended to identify operational and 
geometric conditions surrounding the site to ensure the necessary right-of-way will be available 
to accommodate needed system interconnectivity and accessibility, and to ensure existing 
transportation safety needs are addressed. 
Roadway Facilities 
As illustrated in Figure 2, Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary 
access and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road erves 
Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west transitions into B 
Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recently constructed extension of 
City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City limits, and Bean Drive connects 
toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 summarizes key characteristics of the existing 
roadway facilities. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Bend, Oregon 
124 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
T a b l e 1 
Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 12 
Roadway 
Functional 
Class tfieatlon 
Major Collector 
Number of 
Lanes 
Posted 
Speed Sidewalks 
Bicycle 
Lanes 
On-Street 
Pa rid no 
Ashwood - B Street 2-Lanes 25-45 mph Partial2 Yes Partial1 
City View Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
Bean Drive Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph No No No 
Kinkade Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
Ashwood - C Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
10th Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes No Yes 
J Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
1 On-street parking Is provided along sections of roadway within the City limits. 
2• Sidewalks are located on one side of the street only. 
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 
Sidewalks are currently provided along the south side of Ashwood Road primarily where 
frontage improvements have been completed. As shown in Table 1, sidewalks are generally 
provided along a majority of the roadways within the site vicinity, with theexception of Bean 
Drive, where pedestrians may rely on the multi-use path within Juniper Hills Park. 
Bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of Ashwood Road and extend west to the City center. 
Bicycle lanes are also provided on both sides of City View Road, which connect to J Street and the 
City center to the south. 
Review of the project vicinity identified that pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway 
crossing treatments should be considered to connect the existing Jefferson County Middle School 
with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow neighborhood should also be 
provided concurrent with development, including appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments 
along Ashwood Road. These connections could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the 
complementary uses and increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transit Facilities 
Limited transit service is available throughout the site vicinity through services provided by the 
Cascades East Transit (Reference 1). Cascades East provides community connections from 
Madras to Redmond, Culver, and the Metolius City Hall on two trips in the morning and two 
trips during the afternoon period. Fares on the intercommunity connections are $5.00 per day. 
Curb to curb on-call transit service is also available through Cascades East Transit Mondays 
through Friday with reservations. These services are available within a five-mile radius of the 
town center, and the fare for on-demand service is currently $1.25 per trip. In addition, the 
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) also provides bus rides to Medicaid eligible 
clients within a nine-county area throughout Central Oregon. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
124 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
125 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
Existing Traffic Counts 
Historical traffic counts were obtained at City of Madras intersections from May 2007. Review of 
the manual turning movement counts showed that during the critical evening peak hour B Street 
near its intersection with 10lh Street carries approximately 145 vehicles in the eastbound direction 
and approximately 275 vehicles in the westbound direction during the evening peak hour. It was 
also noted that of the westbound vehicles approximately 20 percent were expected to travel south 
on City View with the remainder continuing westbound along Ashwood Road - B Street. 
Figure 3 provides a summary of the historical year 2007 existing weekday p.m. peak hour 
turning-movement counts, which are rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour. No historical 
traffic count data was available for the Ashwood Road/Bean Drive intersection, so new counts 
were conducted in January of 2010. The new traffic count showed similar but slightly lower 
through volumes along Ashwood Road as compared to the historical 2007 counts. Accordingly, it 
is expected that the 2006/2007 counts continue to reflect the existing roadway conditions. A 
summary of the existing traffic volumes throughout the study area is shown in Figure 3. 
Attachment "1" contains the traffic count worksheets used in this study as provided by City staff. 
Current Levels of Service and Performance Standards 
Intersection performance thresholds vary throughout the study area based on the roadway 
jurisdiction. Jefferson County traffic study requirements included within the County's TSP 
(Reference 2) identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should be maintained at all County 
intersections. The City of Madras TSP (Reference 3) identifies a target Level of Service (LOS) "D" 
for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections (or LOS F with a volume-to-
capacity ratio below 0.95). ODOT mobility standards included within the Oregon Highway Plan 
(add subsequent updates, Reference 4) require a volume-to-capacity ratio of less than 0.90 on the 
stop-controlled minor street approaches at the J Street intersections and a volume-to-capacity 
ratio of 0.80 at the signalized B Street intersections and future signalized J Street intersections.1 
Intersection operations were reviewed to identify current capacity and safety constraints on the 
roadway network. Field review of the study area identified that all of the intersections are 
uncontrolled in the east-west direction along B Street - Ashwood Road and are stop-sign 
controlled along the north-south minor-street approaches. Relevant intersection performance 
standards for the study area intersections are summarized below in Table 2. 
1 Per the Oregon Highway Plan, US 26/US 97 are classified as Statewide Highways, Freight Routes, and 
part of the National Highway System and contain a posted speed of 30 miles per hour through the study 
area. Unsignalized highway mobility standards are based on a District/Local Interest Road in a non-
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) outside of Special Transportation Areas where the non-
freeway posted speed is less than 35 mph. Signalized highway mobility standards are based on a Freight 
Route along a Statewide Highway in a non-MPO outside of STAs where the posted speed is less than 35 
mph. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
126 
CoS'j wotei soqw • umt£:i j - 0103 'zztmr 6*tp'eB!J8XX)t\sti!I\5&'P\siooL&S eippwpue fJmuewBB soipew • se00WHl0"*fiuae~HVil 
126 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
127 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Table 2 Summary of Intersection Performance Standards 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 12 
Intersect ion Jurisdiction 
Traff ic 
Control1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive 
Jefferson 
County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Kinkade Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOSE/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
10th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
V/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
US 97 Northbound ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
B Street/ 
US 97 Southbound ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
J Street/ 
US 97 Northbound ODOT TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 
3 Street/ 
US 97 Southbound ODOT TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 
'TWSC: Two-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) 
Results of the existing conditions intersection operations during the weekday p.m. peak hour are 
illustrated in Figure 3. As shown in the figure, all of the study area intersections currently operate 
acceptably. It was noted that the J Street intersection with Southbound US 97 (4lh Street) meets 
mobility standards but operates with high delays (Level of Service "E") along the stop-controlled 
east-west approaches. Existing conditions level-of-service worksheets are included in Attachment "2". 
Existing Conditions Summary 
The following transportation system improvement needs were identified based on review of the 
existing system conditions. Since mitigation of these existing deficiencies is not applicable to or 
caused by the proposed zone change, it is recommended that these safety and performance 
improvements be provided by the City of Madras as part of the City's regular maintenance or 
incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Plans. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
• All of the study area intersections operate acceptably, although the Southbound US 97 (4th 
Street)/J Street intersection operates with high minor-street delay at a Level of Service "E". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
124 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
128 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 12 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
The applicable criteria for zone change analyses are found within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060, also known as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR, Reference 5). The TPR 
is intended to require that any changes to the adopted and recognized Transportation System 
Plan show consistency and compliance with the stated goals of the plan, the development and 
regular updates of which are a mandated requirement for cities. The overall purpose of a city's 
TSP is to 1) provide a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system that encourages and 
supports the availability, safety, convenience, and efficiency of a variety of transportation choices 
for moving people that balance vehicular use with other transportation modes, including 
walking, bicycling, and transit in order to avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of 
transportation; and 2) to protect existing and planned facilities for their identified functions. 
The City's applicable Transportation System Plan was completed in 2001, with updates 
completed for the J Street connection with the US 97 in 2005 (Reference 6). The initial plan 
provides an assessment of roadway classifications throughout the City and potential intersection 
treatments at a sampling of collector and arterial intersections along with associated planning 
level improvement costs, and is the applicable planning document related to the City's Ashwood 
- B Street intersections. The J Street amendment reviewed improvement options specific to the US 
97 intersections and is considered the relevant planning document for the J Street intersections. 
The City's adopted TSP does not include a specific assessment of the long-term intersection needs 
at any of the City intersections along B Street-Ashwood, as the TSP focused on the more critical 
intersections along the US 97/US 26 corridor through downtown Madras. The intent of this zone 
change analysis is to provide an assessment of the long-term system needs that should be 
considered for inclusion within the City's TSP (as summarized within the Existing Zoning section). 
In addition, to support the proposed zone change this report also includes an assessment of 
additional impacts that could occur with future development resulting from this zone change (as 
included within the Proposed Zoning section). 
All analyses assess year 2020 conditions on City facilities and year 2027 conditions on County 
facilities for consistency with the adopted TSP horizon years. ODOT's US 97 intersections with J 
Street are assessed under year 2025 conditions, consistent with the TSP Update and meeting the 
minimum 15-year planning horizon required for consistency with the Oregon Highway Plan 
(Section 1F.2). ODOT's intersections with B Street are also assessed under year 2025 conditions for 
consistency with the 15-year minimum planning horizon identified in the State's TSP, the Oregon 
Highway Plan (the City TSP assesses only 2020 conditions at B Street). 
Reasonably Likely Transportation Improvements 
Transportation Planning Rule analyses allow the inclusion of planned improvements in the 
horizon analysis period for which a funding mechanism has been identified. The funding 
mechanism could be an established local Capital Improvement Project, local projects contained 
within a City's Systems Development Charge (SDC) list, or funded ODOT Statewide 
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) projects. No funded improvements affect the study 
area intersections. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
124 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
129 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
The US 97f] Street improvements are identified in the City's TSP Amendment as a needed facility 
improvement and included within the ODOT 2010-2013 Draft STIP list. Improvement plans 
include realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the 
new J Street intersections. A request for a "Reasonably Likely" determination for the planned 
improvements has been sent to ODOT and is pending approval. Attachment "3" includes an 
illustration of the planned ] Street Improvements. 
Existing Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
An analysis was conducted for the horizon years as identified in the applicable City, County, and 
State TSPs. The existing zoning assessment was prepared to identify how the study area's 
transportation system operates in the horizon year with build-out of the subject parcel as 
currently zoned (without the impact of the proposed rezone). This analysis will supplement the 
City's TSP efforts along this segment of Ashwood Road and will provide a basis for comparison 
to potential future conditions with the proposed zone change. 
Review of the City's TSP (TSP Technical Memorandum #3, Reference 7) shows that future horizon 
volumes were developed through the application of an annual three percent growth rate for all 
turning and through movements to and from City facilities. ODOT facilities were assessed using 
a two percent annual growth rate for through movements along US 97/US 26. County facilities 
were assessed with a 3.2 percent growth rate through 2011 and 2.5 percent annual growth from 
2012 through 2027. 
To identify the existing trip generation potential of the subject property, review of the County 
zoning, allowable land uses, and site constraints was conducted. The existing Range Land zoning 
is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within Jefferson County. The RL 
zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural lands for livestock 
grazing, and the RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum of 40 acres. A 
variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these uses require 
more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low intensity uses. 
Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely limited, and for 
analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Intersect ion Level-of-Servlce Analysis 
Figure 4 illustrates the weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes inclusive of regional growth and 
potential site build-out with the existing zoning. These volumes were used to conduct an 
operational analysis at each of the study intersections to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of 
service with exception of the US 97f] Street intersections, which exceed ODOT mobility standards. 
With the planned J Street improvements in place both the US 97 Northbound and Southbound 
intersections with J Street are forecast to operate acceptably. Attachment "4" contains the horizon 
period existing zoning level-of-service worksheets. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
130 
Mjfia :Qe± inoAe-i gaqui • -lllOJ'ffiWf BMp-E$mzooi\sB)i\sB»p\siooitss eippry/ pue Ajeimwei3 seipByi -BeO0t)eialaK>lpu9B~H\:>l 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
131 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 12 
Proposed Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
Future horizon year conditions were developed based on the same methodology used to assess 
the existing zoning conditions. The proposed zoning conditions also include the incremental 
increase in trips that could be generated with the Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning, as 
described below. 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, including apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723 (Reference 8), were 
reviewed to identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses 
are typically not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the 
rezone is to ultimately allow for a new school this specific conditional use was reviewed to ensure 
that a reasonable development scenario considers the potential impact of a school. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses in the R-2 
zoning: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use category from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building 
space, parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included in Attachment "5". 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise ten 
acres of the overall land, with a minimum of five acres dedicated to the elementary school. Any 
additional lands would be retained for residential uses. The most likely school type would be an 
elementary school given the regional needs and recent closure of the Westside Elementary site. A 
new elementary school could be expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students 
(historical records from the closed Westside Elementary School showed an enrollment of 325 
students). 
Accordingly, in addition to consideration of build-out of the 20-acres with residential uses, this 
provides two additional R-2 development scenarios to consider: 
1. 116 attached residential units on ten acres (11.6 units/acre * 10 acres = 116 units) and a 350-
student elementary school 
2. 174 attached residential units on fifteen acres (11.6 units/acre * 15 acres = 174 units) and a 
350-student elementary school on the remaining five acres. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
124 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
132 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
While a ten acre school site is more typical, the minimum five-acre site provides a reasonable 
worst-case development scenario resulting in a more conservative analysis. The two scenarios 
forwarded for consideration include build-out of the parcel with residential and build-out of 15-
acres with residential and 5-acres with a new school. 
R - 2 Z o n i n g T r i p G e n e r a t i o n P o t e n t i a l 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within ITE's standard reference Trip Generation, 
8"1 Edition, using the Apartment land use category (Land Use Code 220, Reference 9). 
Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared using surveys of schools 
within the City of Bend to better approximate local elementary school trends. The surveys of the 
Bend locations contain slightly lower trip generation rates than national surveys of elementary 
schools (0.13 trips/student versus 0.15 trips/student), but are expected to better reflect local 
characteristics of Central-Oregon schools than the national data due to similarities in-weather 
characteristics, mode splits, and after school activities. 
All of the elementary school surveys were conducted in early fall at each of the five school sites 
and include an account of after school activities and public use of the adjacent ballfields. Because 
the evening commute period analysis of the school primarily reflects faculty trips (student trips 
typically occur in the afternoon), the increased student walking ratios during fair weather 
conditions are not expected to impact the results. The study found that the increased public use of 
the ballfields due to the fair weather likely results in a higher than typical trip rate. While the 
Bend Elementary School surveys were conducted at locations within developed residential 
neighborhoods, it is assumed that the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary area will be fully 
developed by the horizon year providing similar characteristics at the proposed location. It was 
also noted that the surrounding neighborhoods have already been master planned, with portions 
of the roadway infrastructure for the first development phases already in place. Attachment "6" 
contains the Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement with the adjacent middle school, recreational facility, and benefit 
from the adjacent Juniper Hills Park ballfields, additional trip discounts were not applied to the 
trip rates obtained from the Bend-La Pine School District facilities. Mixed-use incentives provided 
in Section 6 of the TPR were also omitted from the analysis, though the densities and integrated 
uses planned within the Yarrow development are expected to comply with the applicable 
definitions of a mixed-use pedestrian friendly neighborhood. Table 3 summarizes the trip 
generation potential of the two potential land use scenarios. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
133 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
T a b l e 3 R-2 Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Land Use ITE Code Size Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments (20 acres) 220 232 Units 145 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Plus Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments (15 acres) 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School (5 acres) N/A 350 Students 46 25 21 
Total Trips 159 99 60 
As shown in Table 3, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out of residential uses alone and was used to assess the incremental system 
impacts associated with the proposed rezone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the UGB 
amendment was determined through review of existing traffic patterns, likely school 
faculty/employee housing, and residential destinations. The trip distribution patterns were 
separated by residential and school trips, with the resultant trip distribution pattern illustrated in 
Figure 5. As shown, the pattern highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west 
toward the City center and US 97 corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute 
onto the available parallel routes (Loucks, City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel 
destination. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 4) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour was assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing. These incremental trips were added to the existing zoning 
traffic volumes, with the resultant volumes illustrated in Figure 7. 
Study Area Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning, the following 
intersections of collector and arterial roadways were identified as study intersections due to their 
potential for being significantly affected by the proposed zone change. Scoping materials and 
conversations with the affected jurisdiction staff provided concurrence on the study area. The City 
of Madras roadway classification map is included in Attachment "7" and the scoping letter is included as 
Attachment "8". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
134 
goBu:qex (renfer geqw-wdzo-gi-otoe'dzwr RMp-gBi[ezooi\88y\!fiMP[Biooqos opptyj pue foeiuowoi3 mipew -edOOl)GiyfoKt[PU9B~ti\:x 
134 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
135 
go6y:tfU Ji»An twui • wdeozt • Otoeut>r 6Mp e6u9e00l\$6<A<£MP\sloouos etwwpuB AjsiuaweiB ssjpsn • SSOOrmlottApjeB'm:>l 
$7 Exhibit to Ordinance NU 823m UJ 
136 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project 10028.0 
Page 17 
• Ashwood Road/Bean Drive (could be impacted by up to 137 additional weekday p.m. 
peak hour trips, a 46 percent increase from existing volume) 
• Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by up to 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 34 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by up to 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 22 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by up to 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, an 18 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/10lh Street (could be impacted by up to 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 12 percent increase from existing volume) 
• US 97 Northbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Southbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Northbound (Fifth Street)/] Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Southbound (Fourth Street)/J Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required in the future as part of the entitlements process when a 
specific site plan is available. However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to 
provide consistency with the adopted Transportation System Plan only the weekday p.m. peak 
hour operations (design hour) are summarized herein for TPR purposes. 
I n t e r s e c t i o n L e v e l o f S e r v i c e A n a l y s i s 
The weekday p.m. peak hour turning-movement volumes shown in Figure 5 were used to 
conduct an operational analysis at each study intersection to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, with the application of regional growth and the incremental trip generation 
potential of the proposed R-2 zoning all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at 
acceptable levels of service during the weekday p.m. peak hour with exception of the US 97/J 
Street intersections. With the planned J Street improvements in place, both the US 97 northbound 
and southbound intersections with J Street are shown to operate acceptably. Attachment "9" 
contains the horizon year level-of-service tvorksheets. 
OAR Section 660-12-0060 sets forth the relative criteria for evaluating plan and land use 
regulation amendments. Table 4 summarizes the TPR criteria and their applicability to the 
proposed rezone application. 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
136 Exhibit lo Ordinance No. 823 
137 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
T a b l e 4 Summary of Criteria In OAR 660 -012 -0060 
Section Criteria Applicable? 
1 Describes how to determine if a proposed land use action results In a significantly affects transportation facilities. 
Yes 
See response below 
2 Describes measures for complying with Criteria # 1 where a significant effect is identified. 
Yes 
See response below 
3 
Describes measures for complying with Criteria # 1 and #2 
without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with 
the function, capacity and performance standards of the facility 
No 
4 Determinations under Criteria #1, #2, and #3 are coordinated with other local agencies. 
Yes 
See response below 
5 Indicates that the presence of a transportation facility shall not be the basis for an exception to allow development on rural lands. 
No 
(Lands are part of a 
master plan area) 
6 Indicates that local agencies should credit developments that provide a reduction in trips. 
No 
(No concurrent site I 
plan) | 
7 Outlines requirements for a local street plan, access management plan, or future street plan for commercial areas. 
No 1 
(Commercial lands are | 
not proposed) | 
8 Defines a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood 
No 
(No concurrent site 
plan) 
As shown, there are eight criteria that apply to Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. Of 
these, Criteria #1, #2, and #4 are applicable to the proposed land use action. Applicable sections of 
these criteria are provided below in italics with a corresponding response shown in standard font. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (1) Where an amendment to a Junctional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive 
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to 
assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance 
standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use 
regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility 
<exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing afunctional classification system; or 
(c) /Is measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation 
system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels of 
travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
138 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
Response: Based on the incremental traffic increase from RL to R-2 zoning, the functional 
classification of all the adjacent roadways will not be affected with the proposed zone 
change. 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below 
the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
Response: The intersections of US 97/] Street performs below the minimum acceptable 
performance standard in the City of Madras TSP and the OHP with the existing zoning. 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is 
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
Response: The performance of the US 97/J Street intersections are degraded with the 
incremental trips from the proposed rezone, and therefore a Significant Effect occurring 
with the proposed rezone. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant 
effect, compliance with section (I) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the planned 
function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the 
requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan or mechanism 
consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so 
that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the planning 
period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce demand for 
automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance standards 
of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development 
agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system management 
measures, demand management or minor transportation improvements. Local governments 
shall as part of the amendment specify when measures or improvements provided pursuant 
to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: The J Street intersections are significantly affected. An amendment to the City's 
Transportation System Plan identifies the long-term needs at these intersections, but at the 
time the TSP amendment was approved a funding mechanism was not simultaneously 
adopted. However, because the J Street improvements are located on US 97 and under the 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
123 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 21 
140 
jurisdiction of ODOT additional steps are required to provide a Reasonably Likely 
determination. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (4) Determinations under sections (I)-(3) of this rule shall be coordinated with 
affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. 
(a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or planned 
transportation facility under subsection (l)(c) of this rule, local governments shall rely on 
existing transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities, 
improvements and services set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below. 
(b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered plannedfacilities, 
improvements and services: 
(D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in 
a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when ODOT 
provides a written statement that the improvements are reasonably likely to be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to paragraphs 
(b)(D), (b)(E) or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or transportation facility 
provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining whether a transportation 
facility, improvement or service is a planned transportation facility, improvement or 
service. In the absence of a written statement, a local government can only rely upon 
planned transportation facilities, improvements and services identified in paragraphs 
(b)(A)-(C) to determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the 
remedies in section (2). 
Response: A formal request has been provided to ODOT for a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements. The J Street improvements are included in 
the City of Madras TSP Amendment, conceptual design and cost estimates have been 
completed, and the project is included on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP, expected for approval 
in October 2010. Pending the anticipated receipt of the Reasonably Likely letter from the 
ODOT Region Manager the ability to assume completion of the J Street improvements as 
part of the horizon year transportation system will be conclusive. 
PROJECT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
Existing Transportation System Findings and Recommendations 
Findings of the existing transportation system review and analysis are summarized below. 
• All of the study area intersections currently operate acceptably. The Southbound US 97 (4th 
Street)/J Street intersection meets City and ODOT operational standards but operates with 
high peak hour delays on the stop-controlled east-west approaches. 
• No marked pedestrian crossings or continuous sidewalks are provided between the 
Jefferson County Middle School/Yarrow and Juniper Hills Park. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
139 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
140 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 21 
Recommendations from the existing conditions assessment are provided below. The City of 
Madras should incorporate these recommendations into their scheduled maintenance plans or 
assess the priority of the improvements based on the potential system safety and performance 
benefit. The identified improvements are currently needed regardless of the proposed zone 
change. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transportation Planning Rule Findings and Recommendations 
Key findings from the Transportation Planning Rule Analysis are summarized below. 
• The proposed 20-acre rezone from the County's Rangeland zoning to the City's Multiple 
Family Residential zoning could generate an additional 159 weekday pviti. peak hour trips. 
• With exception of the US 97/J Street intersections, all of the study area intersections 
operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon analysis period. 
• With or without the proposed rezone the US 97/J Street intersections exceed ODOT 
mobility standards. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental 
impact on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. 
• The City's Transportation System Plan Amendment was prepared to identify the system 
improvement needs to address the J Street needs. Identified improvements include a 
realignment of Northbound US 97 {5th Street) east onto Adams Drive and two new 
signalized intersections along J Street for both northbound and southbound highway 
traffic. With the planned improvements in place the transportation system will operate 
acceptably with the existing zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the 
proposed rezone. 
• A request for a Reasonably Likely determination has been provided to ODOT. With a 
Reasonably Likely determination for the J Street improvements, no unmitigated significant 
effects will occur with the proposed rezone. 
• Interconnectivity should be reviewed with subsequent Yarrow development (including 
within the subject parcel) to provide direct and convenient multimodal access to the 
potential school site. Additionally, pedestrian treatments should be considered between 
Yarrow, Juniper Hills Park, the adjacent recreational facility, and Jefferson County Middle 
School. 
Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this zone change analysis at (541) 312-
8300. 
Klttelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
140 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
140 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
ATTACHMENTS: 
1. Historical Turning Movement Count Data 
2. Existing Conditions Level of Service Worksheets 
3. J Street Concept Map 
4. Horizon Year (Existing RL Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
5. R-2 Residential Density Development 
6. Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
7. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
8. Project Scoping Letter 
9. Horizon Year (Proposed R-2 Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
REFERENCES: 1. Cascades East Transit, http://www.cascadeseasttransit.com. January 2010. 
2. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan. 
2001. 
3. Jefferson County & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Jefferson County Transportation System Plan. 
2005. 
4. Oregon Department of Transportation. 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. March 1999. 
5. Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-
0060, http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/barmers/rules.htm. 
6. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan 
Update. 2006. 
7. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Technical Memorandum tt3: Year 2020 Operations Analysis. May 
2001. 
8. City of Madras. Ordinance 723, http://ci.madras.or.us/agendas/agendas ordinances.shtml. 
February 2005. 
9. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 8th Edition. 2008. 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 21 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
141 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Bend, Oregon 
A t t a c h m e n t " 1 " 
Manual Turning 
Movement Counts 
142 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
mmmm 
143 
' 4 
/ l i T 
( J i l t=ss\ *—•• \ 
I t f ) 
( J i 
"it J 
H / FT / 
/ i f 
( M, ,z K V 
w / 
( n / 
I 
fSHlEI 
•ISSIOI 
" W 
o •3 
O 
13 £ 
1 J 
o ^ <-> . 
u 
e 
a> & 
6 «=• 
X CO . -v^  <U a <n aj D 
Ct- o 
CT to 
187 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Pro]Oct Tide: 
Project No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT0000-0408 
OR 
Hwy 97/5th Street 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Rate: 
I Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 
NA 
NA 
PU 
Weather: 
Road Surface; 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Stop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
15-MIN HOURLY 
TIME EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:00 16:15 2 13 0 0 52 20 5 141 23 0 0 0 2 5 6 984 0 00 
16:15 16:30 4 11 0 0 44 6 12 133 26 0 0 0 2 3 6 1014 Ottl 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 2 5 8 1038 l & t t 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 2 3 4 1013 D^O 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 2 8 8 884 0:00 
17:15 17.30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 678 0.00 
17:30 17:45 1 12 0 0 40 12 5 142 24 0 0 0 238 421 o-oo 
17:45 18:00 2 1 0 0 19 11 6 133 13 0 0 0 185 
1848 
185 coo 
Actual PM peak hour fiefiasL Is from: 16:30 to 17:30 
ACTU AL PEAK HOUR VOLUME 
TIME EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL S8T S8R 
15-Mln 
Total 
Hourly 
Total 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 288 
17:15 1730 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 38 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1035 
Mvmnl PHF 064 0 75 •DIV/01 ODIV/OI 0 70 088 0.88 094 0 61 «OIV/OI BOIV/OI SOIV/OI InL 
Approach PHF 079 0.73 095 »DIV/0l PHF-» 0.90 
The PM peak hour uted I from: 16:30 to 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
16-Mln Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SSL SBT SBR Tola) Total 
16530 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 
17:15 1730 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 36 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1033 
Mvmnt PHF 064 0 75 0 DIV/0! BDIW01 0 70 0 83 0 83 0 94 0 81 IDIV/0! •DIV/01 M3IV/0I Int 
Approach PHF 076 0.73 095 «M//0l PHF » 0.90 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES 
1830 to 1730 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB W6 SB WB B EB 
16:30 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 25 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 46 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 17:30 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 679 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
LINK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
1630 to 1730 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
SB SB MS SB WB EB WB EH 
1630 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 26 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 48 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 1730 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 879 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
COMMENTS: 
144 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Pro|ect Title: 
Pro|ect No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT0000-0408 
on 
Hwy 97/4th Stieet 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Rate: 
t Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 
NA 
NA 
PM 
Weather 
Road Surface: 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect, type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Stop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBH NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR 
15-MIN 
Total 
HOURLY 
Total 
16:00 16:15 0 9 5 50 6 0 0 0 0 4 170 5 251 953 Mo 
16:15 16:30 0 10 4 49 6 0 0 0 0 9 141 6 225 888 0:00 
1630 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 974 l i j o 
16:45 1700 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 930 M0 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 869 ».W 
17:15 1730 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 603 MO 
17:30 17:45 0 2 4 40 5 0 0 0 0 9 130 4 194 372 o-oe 
17:45 18:00 0 1 4 21 5 0 0 0 0 4 141 2 178 178 0:00 
IBM 
Actual PM peak hour period la from: 16:30 to 17:30 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME 
15-Mln Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SETT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 238 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 a 28 678 21 974 
Mvmni PHF IOIV/OI 0 87 0 65 086 0.63 •OlV/Ot KDIV/0
1 tDIV/OI MW/OI 0 78 094 058 Int. 
Approach PHF 0.71 0.65 noiv/oi 094 PHF-> 0.92 
The PM peaV hour from: 16:30 to 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR S8L SBT SBR Total Tola 
16:30 16:46 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 284 
17:15 1730 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 0 28 678 21 974 
Mvmnt PHF rOiVOi 0 67 0 85 0 86 063 •OlV.Ot »0IV/0! tOMO! •DIV'OI 078 0 94 0 58 Inl 
Approach PHF 0 71 0.65 HOIV/OI 0 94 PHF-» 0.92 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES 
TIME 
1630 
16:45 
17:00 
17:15 
NORTH OF INT. 
"5B-hJB 
16:45 0 176 
17:00 0 182 
17:15 0 183 
17:30 0 176 
TOTAL 0 727 
18* lo 
SOUTH OF INT. 
FJE 5T 
0 217 
0 214 
0 235 
0 210 
0 876 
173© 
WEST OF INT 
•m—Pfr 
13 
4 
7 
19 
11 9 
9 11 
46 37 
EAST OF INT. 
•vTB 05" 
53 
62 
46 
210 
14 
6 
18 
14 
52 
UNK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
1830 to 1730 
TIME NORTH OF INT, SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF (NT. EAST OF INT. 
NB sa NB SB WB ea ' W6 
1630 16:45 0 176 O 217 7 13 49 14 
16:45 17:00 0 162 0 214 19 4 53 6 
17.00 17:15 0 193 0 235 11 e 62 18 
17:15 1730 0 176 0 210 9 11 46 14 
TOTAL 0 727 0 878 46 37 210 62 
COMMENTS: 
145 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Type of peak hour being repor ted: User-Def ined Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume 
L O C A T I O N : 4 t h S t - B S t 
C I T Y / S T A T E : M a d r a s , O R 
Q C J O B V: 1 0 2 7 4 0 0 1 
DATE: 8/7/2007 
26 831 28 
P e a k - H o u r : 4 : 1 5 P M - 6 : 1 6 P M 
P e a k 1 6 - M t n : 4 : 5 0 P M - 6 : 0 6 P M 
0.74 38 * 0.98 * 42 082 
86 * 20 > n « r 
0 0 0 
• I—I • 
1052 0.00 o 
r 201 • a 
7.4 * 0 . 0 J 
68 * 
5.4 + 5.0 > 
11.2 00 • • 
0.0 11.8 3 8 
v ao• 37 
• 11.9 
f 2 0 * 47 
Quality Counts 
: iJPOnTiTlOfJ DAT CO)l£CTlCN SESVICFi 
«» • r | 
o.o o.o ao 
• • I 
m j u 
5-Mln Count 
Period 
Beginning At 
4:84 PW 
4:05 PM 
4-10 PM 
4ttiSt 
(Northbound) 
4ttl St 
(Southbound) 
B St 
(Easttiound) 
B 8 t 
(Westbound) 
Total Hourly Totals Left Thru Rloht Left Thru Right Left Thru Rloht Left Thru Right 
b 0 3 
0 0 0 
0 0 0 
" V TJ • H 
5 81 2 
1 02 4 
6 s ¥ 
0 0 3 
0 3 0 
W i T) 
1 1 2 0 
13 1 0 
W 
104 
64 
4 : l 6 > M 
4:10 PM 
4:26 PM 
4:30,PM 
4:36 PM 
4:40 PM 
. 4M PM 
o o 0 
0 ,0 0 
o 0 0 
o o o 
o m i 
0 i0 . RCa 
3 .85«- H ] 
4 M 1 
2 I 44 H I 
3 81 1 2 71 3 
2 88 .1 "1 \ 
1 71 ., 1 
i I m m 
i M 1 
, 11 I 2 
o am o 
29 1 0 
12 2 0 
1? rim • o 20 2 0 tl 7 0 
Era ? 2 o 
18 4 0 
1S8 
86 
I 
; s 4 . 1 
• 
. 4:S5"PKT ' 
I 4:55 PM 
! 6i>0 PM 
" 6 ' o 6 
0 0 0 
o } o 
4 >4 1 
6 72 0 
0 94 3 
fl 1 4 2 
0 2 3 
0 , ff , 1 
16 •" 1 6 
12 5 0 
P 3 0 
16S 
se 
111 
••6®6 PM 
FIFID PM 
0 0 0 „ _ _ 
0 0 '0 
1 _ 72 6 
- V S 85 2 
0 6 3 
o 3 0 m m i 101 . 10S,.„ ¥ 1166 1 1 M 
6:16 PM 
5:20 PM 
6:26 PM 
5:30 PM 
5:35 PM 
6:40 PM 
5:45 PM 
5:50 PM 
5:55 PM 
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
 
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
 
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
 
0 86 3 
4 57 2 
1 73 2 
0 81 1 
1 BO 0 
3 49 4 
3 57 3 
3 66 4 
1 57 2 o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
 
M
io
x
n
io
-*
 
^
^
o
 
U
U
O
O
O
A
M
U
^
 
O
 f
r
 W
 (D
 «
 0
iu
>
1
0
 
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
 
B1 
78 
93 
87 
92 
75 
73 
82 
73 
1137 
1130 
114B 
1139 
1121 
1106 
1084 
1061 
1035 
Peak 18-MIn 
F k m f t t M 
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 
Left Ttirv Rtaht Lrf l Thru Rtaht Left Thru Rloht 
X I Vehicles 
Heavy Trucka 
Pedestrians 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped Buses 
0 0 1 
0 0 0 
4 
18 Wfl TC 
4 88 0 
0 
O 44 a 
0 0 0 
0 
5BI W ll 
0 4 0 
0 
86 
4 
Comments: 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM S O U R C E : Quali ty Counts , LLC (http:/ /www.qualt tycounts.net) 
146 Exhib i t to O r d i n a n c e No. 823 
187 
Typs of peak hour being reported: User-Defined Method for determining peak hour. Total Entering Volume 
LOCATION: 5th S t - B St 
CITY/STATE: Madras. OR 
QC JOB *: 10274002 
DATE: 8/7)2007 
0 0 00 M1 
• I 1 * 0 0 0 
Peak-Hour: 4:16 PM - 6:16 PM 
Peak 16-Mln: 4:25 PM - 4:40 PM 
247 * 23 J i. 43 • 239 
00 85 • • 
0.0 0 0 0 0 
V • V 
0.77 42 * 0.92 * 196 07B 
85 • O •» 
1 » f 
51 875 92 a 
3.6 i j 
2.4 * 
4.6 * 0.0 "» 
Quality Counts 
THANlPOHMTlON DATA COIUCTION $(«VICE5 
1 • f 
SO 8.9 3.3 » * 
00 81 
^ Z3 * 2 9 
• 11 
e oo • 30 
J l i _ 
. . L 
•» * f i 
S44bi Count 
Period 
BeglnnlnoAt 
4:05 PM 
4:10 PM 
6th 8t 
(Northbound) 
J ^ L ^ 
8th St 
(Southbound) 
y Rl3 
B St 
(Eaalbound) 
Thai piyt left 
0 
0 
B St 
(Westbound) 
Thru 
T T 
10 
18 
Total 
—TT 
80 
SB 
Hourly 
Totals 
55 
59 
0 
0 
0 
0 
J L 
r 
4 0 
4 0 
0 
0 
0 
J L . 
"3" 
#0 13 
~o 
2 
3 
~r 
i2 4J0-PM 
4 
3 
"ST 
47 
0 
_.0 1 
T -"WPM" 
4;30 PM 
-135 PM 
48 
_za_ 
14 4 
22 7 
22 B_ 
4:40 F?  
4:45 PM 
4:50 PM 
4:55 PM 
5:00 PM' 
5:05 I'M 
' fr.HPM : 
5:15 PM 
5:20 PM 
5:25 PM 
5:30 PM 
5:35 PM 
5X0 PM 
5:45 PM 
6:50 PM 
5:55 PM 
PesktsJarn 
FtovnTstM 
2 
' 4 
a 
B H 
6' 
•4-1 
- 4 . 
50 
72 • 
51 
BO 
43 
J a i 
45 
49 
59 
69 
86 
54 
47 
50 
54 
8 
7 
S 
10 1 
_1£ 
o o 
0 0 
0 0 
o 0 
o o 
o ,o 
0 
8 
3 
9 
10 
3 
2 
6 
7 
4 
• J L 
,'Vp-
o 
0 
:-»:To'' 
0 
° ' "0-
•o 
' i j I 
2 
i 
3 
l i s 
« > 8 £ 
0 
3 
8 
6 
2 
-Jl 
0 
4 
2 
0 
2 
2 
4 
0 
2 
Eastbound 
0 
0 
ft. 
0' ; 
m 
0 
JL 
0 13 
0 19 
0 12 
0 18 ; : i 
3 
2 
• IN 
3 
.1110 
12 
12 
9 
5 
6 
3 
8 
Westbound 
t T 
72 
71 
87 
89 
91 
88 
70 
88 
78 
129 
1124 
11JR H 
1098 
1094 
1092 
1079 
1065 
1037 
1017 
979 
981 
NortM>oun3~ 
¥ W T 
Southbound 
Thru 
— T " 
Right Left 
Tb 
0 
0 
aht Total 
" W XII Vehicles 
Heavy Trucks 
Pedestrians 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped Buses 
12 
0 
100 
0 
Comments: 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycountB.net) 
147 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
YEAR 2020 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WEEKDAY PM PEAK 
"WITH IMPROVEMENT" SCENARIO 
K Y 
CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE 
FIGURE 
3 MAY 2001 
148 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 413mDWGS\TECH MEMO MV4139F003 
I s \ f > 
RiGH r OF WAY IMPACT 
Klttclaon & Associates, Ir.C-
'h.V\«30< Willi / 
POTENTIAL J STREET ALTERNATIVE C 
US &7/US 26 NORTHBOUND APPROACH REALIGNMENT 
MADRAS, OREGON 
149 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
Attachment112" 
Existing Conditions Level 
of Service Worksheets 
150 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
151 
X3 0-> » re J £ ST 
>. VI . u V) ni ro 
I -i m . m qj . o > r-
CQ -H .C <11 
Q r~ 
ft J 
5 
ir. 
2 
- } 
£ i i 
ax: i-> •H *J 3 W ID O t- a, tc 
•U 4J 4J H H H 
O JJ •HP C 4J H O • » ID -H -H ® W • < <U 0) J-> ID >, U. C W tj • ^ n •• 3 i u iJ U Q >• <o O1 • 01 Vi <v —< i e A3 a ax: j j ^ i o a—i '^ iJ s c > 41 £ ^ tj ns o Q > 13 H t- h a U 
151 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
T> Oj 
u fa u s s 
u M n C "O 0) u 
ro "O 
vH O C O O O O £ U cr) O W Ui V < -h 
U <H rt] ro C JJ U O C H M V H E t? m <u c *J »-1 U U u 
HI 0) m a a 4) o iH a p 
s: > 0) CJ OX 4) -H > O w li O IQ 0) o CO t V 
o. > a o < s; : c c c L3 5 £ 
ts a j o j f O O /v o 3 0 
IX •• ' C JZ •• ^ i J : 
g 3 
t l ^61 S v CLT) ; i-i > 01 a >1 o) " «0 •• C U [- CL 1 J ^ (I -Hi/) m o "o j j ' 10 S (5 U 11) JI 14 I vj ^ re 3 vj c : U of O o- a) < U t 
<d a 
5 -X 
x x X x x * >1. o o o 0 ; x x x :< x :e o o a o x y. X K x X x x - • • x :•: x x x x x x ' a-, x >: x x >: x x 
j o ^ o o «•' • o r- o o r-
— ,.1 —« S; o rH o <-> o 
o 0 o o o c. --n x o « n o o a i C O O O O O cr> X D ON O O <T> 
x o o o o o x o o o o o ,V X X .< X * 5s x t j x tc x x x :< x x • X X X X X X X X .-1 
o o o o o o o o o c n o m m o m o o o o o o o a i o o u s 
1 x « y. x :< x x x o o o o o 1 x x x x x x x x o o o o o I X X X X X X X X • • • • • 1 X X X X X X x X .-1 f-1 --H : y, x x x x x x x 
1 x >; x x x x x : r x w x >: x x x ; x x x x x x x -X X X X X XX X rH .H .-I rH ,-H 
i x x X X x >; x o o o o o X X X X X X X x o o o o o 1 x x x x x x x x • • * • • I X X X X X X X X «-H rH .H rH 
j_l tJ U iJ fl} flj fi} <0 "P "O -H W V) w t/i 
;C M 1—t 
x D S c 
X > ra n % o u c o i j (o a ti 1 x J x a a. en ft; i 
u o 
/ < • 
v v o 
•• v v » • D ~ v V . 
•O v v o o s: v © 
U v V o c I.r v V O CJ fl V I. O 
v v o u O c v v * 
> "O <D •• I 41 Q, Vi -I P > 4-> 1 10 t- w 
> "O 10 . f0 U C cC r-« O t7> r-
g | -
- eo o « U -H ma u u -H It] H •HOC 0 0 0 o -c u co o « OT U dj -H 
fl <13 C 1> h O c E-V} < 
u 
ft) O 
U -C H u > <u 
3: a) W (1) 
W -H ro X U u 
r^ - cti to 
1o r-
•o 07 O 
trt a* I 
t» •W c 3 I 01 01 •U ZJ 
n 4> 
ro XI < 
fliHOO 
a 0 0 
o 
—t V) -H 
V « 4-> >> o a u J o 
4-> ft 4) 4) O E <U U CI u a > 
T O T O n i m o u i c a in 0 0 0 0 < A « - < r-l O O rH fM • C J • - 1M I N * « O i 
0 0 0 0 i r > i - < 0 r 4 0 0 r 4 • N O N O tfv N N O O N 
in r- o r - o i n c n o o k o o m h n o r , o in n n o o n 
o o o o o i / j 0 0 0 0 0 0 u o o tfi 0 0 
o r i o s - t o i n t f j o m o o m or)Or* jOO">r- r~OOr~ fvj CO • CD < - CD CD • • CO 
r~ i-> rH o 
U rH rH o 
o >« 4) »• »• 4) tJ 'j-> to 4) ^ O E o - ' T J c n - ' e o > 3 
£ H < 1—1 •• a > »• O r-t "O r > d "0 ' n n o <P>X O iJ 4) "D "O > E w -H 3 i l 3 U 3 3 <8 r—i tno-H4)UjiuT5"Ouiu- a o <a ^ c n i i c i n U J ' H 
0 cm r* co m «-• r* • • eg o o 
o in in tn w fico r- - . in rH o o 
4) o o o o —H U"> O O 3 f- - • T> •-• rH O o S O o o o m o o 5 r- • . o ^ o 
•H 4» 6) ro M C E Ui A} ra 4-> •• k H V) I0H D N 3 o m U n S C fl) <U "O IB -H Ifl tO < -3 U. 
t r - r - o o o u « > + v M 1/1 • O • • + ' » r- • r- .» O + O O N H fvj t 
IH r » r - o o o ( _ > u ) t 
r o (n o ai u h < f i H • O « | . • O • O 4 O O f J rt N i 
o o o o o < o ^ o a • o • 4 • « o • o 4 o O «H I 
m r o o o a) o ] in in • o • «H i • » m • * o o «H .-1 < 
in r- o o < lo m » o • > in - i o o *-«<-< 
3 o 
•8° £ O 
o o o o o c C o C o o • o . • 
o o o o o o . o o ' o - H 
u —i 1 j to 
4) •• flj ^ (fl »H 0.--TJ-C > , D U H £ 4 03 O O • > IJ OJ -H > £ CT-, O U ^ > 01 's. > + 
C g >1 0i £ -t U 4) 3 ITS U O •H CJ-H-H 
152 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
•o Cu u ro O S S 
*J 0' 
I Ul c - (Q O m o -H 
M -H IUHT1 •rt o c o o o o -c u 
A3 C l-l ^ O C E-10 ft ,-H tt D> (U 0) C 
M ill U •H W Stf W "i (U X u u 
s o u O -H H 
5 x > u u x HI •o M 01 o n3 —torn -H o 
»J c ra <u o & w <u a > a o a." X 
o o c o . o o c • • - . • o o o o o 
ae r- m C ir> f> • t a:- • • 
' » • o to o o o 
i o «-i o o o .-« c>j o • o o o • • . .-I - - . O r-l «•« O O r-l 
o O O O O o o • o o o • . • o - • • o o .-t o o o 
o o o o n o • o a o • • • CD « • • t-i O O O 
L D f ^ O O l O O O ^ r - l m o • o o o 
O f-1 m O O r-j 
u-i o tr> o o o n r-m o • o o o 
O f-H O O r- «""" 
O O o o o CD O o • o o o • • . o • • • o o r-. O O O 
o r " > o o o o o o o o o • o o o • • . o ' • • o o o o o o 
o O O O O O O O o O • O O O • • . o • • - o o c «-« • o o 
X 2U 
ai • tj ra m U in} ai a) rf > U. 1. l l > jc, | CP M u r-4 CM i O • • M O U • • i Mr- a a n r» u ; a c o o uj a x 
o o (SJ • - o 
l-l -O Cf i-l fZ 'J 
° c*> A.' 
*-» s o u 
o o U3 • • o 
o o VP • • o 
c. C^J u X iA (J 
o o I ' * - o 
~ VD 
o o 
• o 
x; ru 
o u 
r-
• ca i—< w 
o a r <J .1-1 m m 
.X £ CM u 3: i/l o 
o o r-• o 
fsf fvl 
•£> Ci 
o a 4 J .c 0 P tf) CD 
• . m r ^ o u 3 o r » o o o M O M i r > o x ,x o O n f H o o c u c m o o o t f ' / i r t N O x o r-< f*- r-fM . . . . . • X X < • • • ' OOU"> r -« , - .TTOOO^O.- " X X rH rH o O O 
4« U ki ZJ CD O O C-i I o « o in j< < m ic i u c 
x x m :< x x x x . . . x x x x x x x x x u) y. y, x t. y. x x x x x nj x x x ^ 
x : < x x > : x x x x x x k x x x x x 
x x x x 
x x x x . . , . x x y. x :< x x x x x x . . x x x x x x x x x X X X N X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
tt X X >! K X X X X V. X v. X X x x x x x x :< 
a x '< x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ;< x x x " " X X X 
x x x x x x x x x 
X X r 
X X X X X x x x x :< 
x x x y. « x y. x f< x x x x y. x x x x x X X .X X X X .X X X X -X X X X X X X X X 
v.; x x x x -x x >! X X X X x x x x x x x x 
a C Tj 
<11 £ a> 
X X X X X X ; x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x w x x x * x x x x y. x x x v. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x ;•: x x >'. x x x x x x x Y. X X X X x x ^ : x x > ; x x x s >: x x x 
x x y, U x x v. x x x * x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
i ^ » 
o c O Q O O -C u w o vi vi o < H >.«« 13 U 
nj C Jj u O c H V) <v H E a> ® c 4J <H -r4 u W AJ 
Q. O l-l 111 'H H CB Jj < /o C u (| o <D g - n a s o ' ^ u u flj o u< 
£ O 3 v I z o l-l i f - U ft) * U a: i c u) I 4> c 
c c 41 
c o 
X. C u u ai U oi oj 
Q. (J |J tu C. >» 0 »H et.Uet.Vl 
I J J 111 
i 0) o> c c • p- C l-l u "i -rt 3 : JJ oi » H 
t U O 41 I i a> o. c i j U Qiffllu 
*M <4-1 cno O TJ C 41 l l U J V} 41) 41 V) o jQja -a g E'<-» as aij o z =5 < 
U /o «) W f> Ct C C J H U s O 3 » o h t - 0)H •H U-4J O «*-< >, 0» 
<HV< O O O O D. a 
C C V) O a o c 
4-1 i-l 3 O 
H ^ h ^ o o « a a u 3 0 O 'M -«-> U U B T3 01 J < 
; v O^  w o 
t C X l-l » d -H H 0 
11 o -u C -H rtj 1-3 (C o rt (0 1-f LJ >> i. i vi <n si f-u tz a , «n 
Lu Cb 
c? cr E C C -H 
D] 10 O O IJ a a <a a a o o o J 
ai a> I H 3 i : H VJ U Ifl i . H H ) O H t 7 i o n o 
4 a a O G O 
14 V, -C W 14 t-! U fl) S C O E- a> i •H J= 4J A C > 3 CI W O •j o u cr UJ 
JJ TJ 0 W < flj o r 
ft • c t-c E U XJ V* 3 0J £— «y S3 
• -H C (S) 
CP c c c, U -H H CP W D» o vi a, <4-i W Q.IM U o M 
£ n-f ^ 
? n o c o -H 'H c Ou«-» • Q. -u o» o o I Cl 1 In X O tJ «« Its fij Id £ A. 
S4 4) C 15 C 
•S ? 3 
l-l X Ul flJ O 3 "H a o tu O w e U £ t f- W 
*J -D tu ( ) < 
S 15 c 
>-3 ' 
P 41 H e -n •H CP J C C « •H -H fll EOl fJ 
153 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
r* GO Of* o o 
X O X O X 
« O X r-l O 
X X X x x X X X X X • 
o -O V) rH Q rZ = ki M ® O rf O O /•- O 3 O 
A /• O C A A 
t-> I O >1 
a c "c e> t £ a> -o * . c o 4' c § , H < I/) 
- m o V) o -H SI D u 
•HOC o o o O £ L) 
re C JJ 
c c H v) a 
RE (V £ w D. : moz 
> O .u Vj O £0 0) o U) <M 
o o o o o o x ^ > o v c o o o o o o o o o a a o oj o o ffl 
x x >: x x x x o o c o o x x :< x x x x o e o o o x x x y, x x x • - • • • x x x x x x y, •-> ^ •-> •-> X X V X X X X 
x x x x x x x o o o o o x x x x x x x o o o o o X X X X X X X • • • • • X X X X X X X-HW^-H-— 
X X X X X X x o o o o o X X X X X X X O O O O O X X X X X X X - - • • • X X X X X X X •—< i-H i-H 
s 1 _ 1 1 _ 1 1 _ ._oo . -HO. - 'Oc 
• > o o o o c D t n o o o m \ 0 \ o c . o c d \ c n o c n o f f i f f l 
l o o o o o i f f i o m o o i t p 
•u o o o V < 
V V 
< 
/ v , 
I V o 
•• .- V o <o - -H V V 3 C TJ V V O o 
E / v ' 
l l V V O < JJ V V o 
re V <.' 
Q. T> a o 
< 2: y 3 . 
M h x c *J : i i ai v ci u i v n Q-Q P (X >. 4) -H • • c u P D, w • 4) —L W 3 I 'O i ! fQ •—I £-< ; IQ u II) (|< U U i f U t Z3 ^ C X i O D. p cC t j U # 
7 OI II, -C •• • • QI U A JJ IJ ) : iJ fC r.-i-i^: in fg iB nj • a» to "o 'o 'H co to to w T3 — D! < ILL CD ' fD M tt IP "O 1 W IK H I L ^ U S ^ ^ H L L ' U » | J C 
« "0 O n <s a 
re £-• u 
rH o CP -
ill O H ( 
Q U W O 
M X O «• o n « . < re ro * II 4) TJ IX JJ re uss 
T«-> I o M JJ D 111 C T) 4> M £ T3 4) • G ® 
' I -
a> re c. U u O C t-W 4) -H £ CT> 41 41 C JJ I -H iJW u •H N VI -H re x k ui 
TJ RE 
0 0 r » c m O in i n 0 >n O O m 0 a? CD r - in r - 0 u r -
a 0 •a- 0 O CTt T O O in 0 w i-n 0 
T/ T3 m CO CO 
fvj i n m C 41 4> 0 r-l 0 O 0 0 0 CM 
r - 3 i 4J 
U1 O j J n O 
03 .—1 0 0 0 O m y£> 0 O O U) O cc- N in 4 "H 0 u r -
o ' 4-1 
t -
M 
O 
c 1 -
0 o\ 0 01 O <rs O 
r-j 
0 O O 0 
<M 
in 
r -
cn a j O * CO 
0 
CO 5 
W d> t-i 0 1-4 1-4 0 0 * 0 O <M <M t -
a i IX 0 p^ 
i J % 0 0 0 0 0 O LO 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 tf. 0 0 
4 ' 0 O iTl O O m 0 O 0 0 O 0 a, 
4) j 0 r - O 0 
d O 0 0 O 
<u aJ z 
> U> Q 
O 0 0 c - 0 O m 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 0 O O 0 0 tX, 0 W 
4-1 4) XL as 0 0 O cr> O O in 0 O 0 0 O 0 
(0 « > U •o TJ £ r - O 0 
EJ C m c 4) 41 1-4 0 0 O 
U o i T3 0 (X t -
V a 4> o aJ 3 n w 4) m -H O 0 m <M 0 C\J O LO 0 O O 0 vo in VD in m en 0 ON u «-H ^ 
a 
u j - O 0 0 O O O O i n CD kO r - 0 r » rH 0 
•H u C r - cji 0 
>1 > V) CD i n iH O 1-4 r-l 1-4 O O 0 0 0 (M iH rg 4J 
a> re t a . 
£ o «-i w O 0 O O fO O m 0 t r O O 0 UD in i n cr. O en u 41 O > 1 ! 10 4-1 <VJ O c\j 0 c . rw o j O O M in 00 n 0 O C 4> •H Q 0 r - m re cn 
o •M i n 0 rH O 0 0 0 0 w CM c > a> 4J o 0 
O cr> u V 
41 C 0 ** 0 O O O i n O 0 O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 t 0 4> •rt 
0) u EC 0 O O <T> O O i n O O 0 0 0 O a re •H 01 TJ V r - 0 0 
CO & c n 4) V 
r -
1—1 0 rH iH 0 0 ' 0 0 rH sr> 
u < •J a 
0 
1 re si "C 3 0 M re U O 
T3 ra a. <H O 0 0 0 O 0 O i n 0 0 O O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 P) 
o p D 0 0 O O £T1 O O i n O 0 O 0 0 O 
x : j j C <N r - 0 0 < 
4) 0 1 w 0 cn r-. O ^ 
r- iH 0 0 0 0 r-l 0 c 
X u U U 0) o 10 a Ol O 0 3 cC 0 O O O O O m <7* 0 0 O O O O O O 0 m O O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 < 0 14 4) c •H tt V, 41 J 0 r - 0 0 * ^ rH 
c U r - iH rH 0 1—1 iH rH 1—1 O O 0 0 rH c i 
o xz 4-1 3 0 
•H 4J ft C a 
4J U-> O 0 « rg O N O m r— 0 r - O O r - 0 VO M r - <71 1-4 r - O O C. ca CD 
Q *«s ec 0 w a i O O <n m en O O cji £X> CM r j CM t o O 4) a,-
V4 u ca "O 4) r - ro x: 0 
4> a c ui 4) 0 t-i O 1—1 1—i O O . . O 0 0 4-1 0 
(X 63 o CO o i (9 T5 4> r i 
o o o JZ 3 f j 1—1 0) 4 J 1—1 a ) a n 0 0 c i n O m O i n 0 1—i O O O •sC \o iTi 3 a\ rH r - 0 O O 
s : 10 t-« O 0 3 O r - CTl O O —1 i n CU »c r - TJ rg VO O y 
y 4-1 G O UD r - r - r - 3 r - O • TJ 
a ) n i ^ iH u ^ •"* 0 r-l r-l l " O CM £ 0 0 0 r-4 t-« 41 4J i n 
O o a O 0 A O r-t O i n 0 O O S O VO (M r - tt en r - O O O m CD 
o z w /x m O m O <j\ »n m O O m w. CO iH cu •H <M r ^ O 0 
o M j O "s r - if) . 1-4 a 0 
CM « 
C 
o 
U 
01 
i i 
ai 
4> 
-
r-l 
41 
1—1 0 IH r-l 
4) 
O r-l 0 O > , O 
- H^ 
re 
c 
* O 
. . 0 
0 r-l 
•O 
rH 
4) 
a 
41 
0 
CQ 
-H o >- £ C TJ « 4J H O £ 4-1 < M - 1 D- TJ XL > a 
J J i> g u n 41 0 T3 03 £ P > 3 O •• c 4J 4) O (0 SL < 0) O C* 4) X o ifi e Z 4J 4) X < D > H -H 37 4! re >1 •• > > . 0 d> rH > £ CP 3 -H o i—i u C •« J-l O T5 T3 m O 4-J C e 10 a 4_) O U \ > 41 > a 
V) t - 4J re 4) c n O 4> ?» x: <0 < "D O u 4> TJ > re re a •h re X v- a> a >1 
V-l <U <v E a 01 e 4J < > \j O < < 'H V4 J VI OT <-t u co c £ >1 B Xi ra 4) V) •H 4) K CD u x: • 41 n 4) 3 ZJ 3 re 3 *«s 3 41 re re 4-> 41 3 re M r-l 41 M 
aJ n i-i a > c en c (X C W O q> Cu (u TJ TJ b l lu c U 4_) •n c a - H -H «U <-t o> •r~> IS) S j j 
C > , o CL i o 0 •H -H + $ 0 re 14 c <n V 4) i d J -H re re T3 re •H re 0 O 0) V} TJ 3 U O U -3 O to u s : >- > ro U M 0 j a . a: K X u, CO w < kJ b i u > U UJ > a z> <t X Z 
154 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
155 
CD o o r j X 
o in ^ 
D Cli IJ ro 
O S S 
• c : o 4' 
I , 
• H O C 
o o o o j= u n u 
i? 1/5 h 
o o c u b O c H tt 4) H E O1 ft) 41 c u -t —i 4J U -w •H Oi « »V -H <0 X u u: 
O CI iJ X ^ 
4-1 H o 4) u a.5: m i> c a sri U c o c o m 
u 4i e 
3 a 3 a o e o o E > o o x o 
- I o ffl • H O ro ro 
O B u 1) 
a > Q. O 
o >3 o o O ifl o • o c o . • - if, - • • O — Cr O 
^ f o o v o o o o o i i n 
o - o o o • ' . LO . • • O «£> » .-« o o <-« 
: © C O O O O O j o • o o c. - • . o « • • o o 
•> ,-• o a a 
O O O O o o o o • o o c- - • - c • • • ~ O ~ o o o 
I O T O O t-
o o o o o a o 
o • o o o • » • a • • - o o o o o 
o r o o o o o o o o cs o > o o o • . c . . • o o o o o o 
o o o o o o o o o C I O O O • ' . o - • • o o o «-< O O O 
T-I O f f > O O O I M O VC O - O O O • • . \c • • ' o r-r j —« o n r i 
rwr»}0<?<OO©a>Ci} 
VD c- . o o o • • . kC • • - o r-o ^ o o <-« 
— o cn o o o c^  co O - O O O • • 
« . \£» « - • o r-o -- o o 
. a U O XJ XJ 4I 
i >, 0 > < < a '.(- u e e u o i —i u n u M 3 . N O <U 4) < O : > u. M u >, I .RL 0> U U D C»J i h o •• n w h •• 25 l lH u 0. Q. ro <N O i < a 0 3 d u o x 
\B i «=• o •r- i m r -> o <s> i cr. i o • r • o (S) 1 • 
! "" ! 1 fM —i 
00 r- ! <e cn 1 (NJ m 1 O «c 1 ON 1 f" . 
o JN 1 • Ul r— 1 '-* «-« 1 •-< 1 {Nj «-• 
o o 1 O o o o 1 o o t o o r j 1 vO CD r r- • o o o o 1 • o 
L ^ 1 CM 
o o { o o o o 1 O o i o o (••J 1 \£> CD i o o o 1 - o 
^ | ^ J -M i OJ 
O I a\ > f- 1 IT) c l cn co CM i in 1 £> i in • CO f l o I • r^ i •-I I ' «-< 1 (NJ 1 1*4 
o 1 OS r- lO I m o 1 CI CD CM 1 U*l 1 U"l • CVJ f j r i 
— ^ 1 OJ 
o o 1 o o o o 1 o o l o o CM 1 sD CD 1 I-1 l r~ • O cr- o o 1 • o 
— J — 1 .w 1 <M 
o o 1 O o o o 1 o o 1 o O (M 1 vO CD I r~ o o o o 1 • o 1 "1 r- 1 OJ 1 CM 
O o 1 o c O o 1 o o I o o 1 VD fa 
o o o o J • o 
—< 1 <-« —: 1 (>} t f>J 
CO 1 PI o o 1 1 W, -JJ i in io 1 CD 1 <M ' n 1 • 1— 
! 1-1 r- ^ 1 r-* t fM 
ro P-J 1 <n o 1 <T. i m m i in m 1 ID 1 CM ' ON n 1 • r~ r l I r-* •H 1 1 CJ 
CO 1 ro cn r- o 1 CM f i in uf 1 u*i <x> 1 CD cr» to l • 
— i . i-
 W 1 fM 
lH 1 i-i u 1 'H i u .. o C 1 O O o I o o 1 o o x: 1 M .c & r tJ i iJ sr. 
u u 1 o ul u U I -O j j 1 o «-» ro o I nj •Jl D O—L—ffi vo 1 itl CJ ii. r~ 1 (>< a. £T. i (>< as i u. cr. 
x: 1 C c (S) I c. f^ j J C. CVJ u s 5*. S 1 ^ IL o u y D U U r cii u r- X \ -x- X ty, 2: 1 IT. X i •y. x 
o - , o W a r l ig m 
T3 O ro o s: x 
* f-1 tJ • H O C u o o O -C o 
n u w in o 
< "H 
UJ Ul 'U 
rt .Tj 
C U 'H O C F-0) 4) •H E D O 5J C 
^ 01 -H <0 X u u 
C H H 
O 4) e •H O. 3 
u X > 3 U a x <u 
x x x x >: x x 
X X X X X X X X X « X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N x X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X 
3 3 P. X X X X X X X X X X x x X X X X X Y, X x X 
l3 r i i 
• i o o r - r > i o o o w > o > * r « r o o x >; o o o> Ifl u 
I N O U U I O C O B I I O ' P I N O O X XCOOOAJOO . . . M . . . . . . . . . X X . . . . ' O O O X X ^ R - I O O O 
c. x x x x :< .. . -p x x x x x x x 3 X X X X X X X O X X X X X X x in x x x X X x x X X X X X X X 
X N X X X X 
a a 
. . X X 'A X X X X :< X x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x X i J X X X X X X 
x x x x x x x x x x ^ x X X V x X X X X x x x x x x x x 
X v C X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X. x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x ?: x X X X X X X X X X X X >. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X V. X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x 
£ $ •A X 
X X X X X x x x x x X X X X X >; x. x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
^ o 
a ^ 3 ej 
O c E O D I 
* a > o 
i ft. n ro h io c 
1 z 0 iJ c C 
£1/ O C C O u U 
o o^  c c tJ D 
U IJ O O I 
at o . o it a 
u ro 4) ctf H A: OJ J » 1—1 5 4> O «• O C 'H S H O P -H Cu J i>; i ; 0 & 01 > c rt U C 41 c JZ ai o 11 
j a c l VJ Q. ID ( 
Ih ffi 
ft rw W O 4> ft 0 ^ rH 3 O ftO+JW a >< o «m <t u < w 
a e e O. 3 3 o z 2 
I c c J o o ) tJ -H -H cj iJ iJ I iJ H h ii e> o 0 3 a a •n O O tJ 14 tj; Cj £u 
ID o lu ^ c i-i T3 CP cr e 
o cr o -CL U - Q. 3 rt 0 O > H •rH U >1 1-1 ij ID Jl "W u x <u n *D H 4) 41 H 3 ^ (I •H 0) O H 4J 3 O -H C C>H r 
r •* -H C 'H 3 I - l H D" 
I u I W - J H O K . ID C VI M C>lb i i 4J nl 3 
41 3 c 
u T> O v> < ro 
n O. u u Q, (0 ro O U 4J -H O It U u 
CP A 3 11 0 C O c c h c c c e 
O H M -H 
E- JJ H H E-tn Bi w tJ 3 O o 4J -ri CL Q. » 4) u Q. 0. O 
J o o ^ 
I JJ 1-1 ^ 01 o 
' 0 0 ' O 3 . 
us o w w 
nj K u 
S a* J 
a o p C M C W -H O. t- to 
C C < U •H -H 4J a: w -J 
155 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 8 2 3 
187 
- i x >; x x x x x •t X X X X T 3 X X X 
w x x x x o x y. x x 5: - x x • x w x x x x JJ x x x c ai O G \ 0 0 < J \ Q - 0 0 0 IJ ID J r, ID M o .N 
*D 4) • c & <J 01 
. m o 01 O -H 0) n »-> U H H T) •HOC 000 O X L) to u M in L1 
ft, >, >4-1 •jj u fO 10 C »J V o c H to <u rH £ c* 4) « C 
O -O •w O •p J= » it u > 
E 13 C D O Vl o N 41 
• O H -4) U < M C • H O' 4> ro -H e U tfl 3 
4) c —1 O O O 
X ' 
O U 4) —I X w 
O G o o a • in 1 o AJ O zs 
C. 'OOOO 4' O C 
a 0 
» o o o 0 o .c o • u o o ro • u ra 
• 0 0 0 0 * 
> O O O O O O C O O > 0 0 0 0 J O O O o 
o o o o o 
O o O 3 « . • i0 o o o u 
O O O O O 
x x x x y. y. x x o x x x x x ^ x x X • X X • 
0 0 O O X X X X x X o» * x x c x 
o x i x x x x ^ x x x 
) m o m e o o 0 ) O <3 O II "7 O "J1 s i l o i i > r- o r-
- O U [» O h i t-i o i-t o*i> 1 Jl O m JJ 0 «J> 
> 3 ( u l i n o u i w r o ' . i-i r-i 0 r-i r- 0 r in in . iri Li \r 
g fN O M tt O m ? ID O %D >1 cp O co -ii-iOi-« Jj CO O CD 
• r- o r- DLHOH > 0 0 0 in o ) 1/1 O 1/1 U ' O v 
3 •• 0> "D H .. c •• 0 to x U 111 £ H a 3 -rt Jj u E TJ o IJ x> <u o c _c u r. j j 11 a n 4? 4> ff> » n > "D V> 4' 4» Q> 4J A.' - n U B c e fl c O O C ^ U h u i j U i , -H 0. ,< >- r^  it i j ^ , I Q M W U H W r t H J , 
.0 0 fv •• l/l • • XZ ro — h n .. , a i_> • D' cr O'» H o <0 • • 1 CT a c . re a ti [L ' 
13 •• -H 
r- r* o {*• o cr» COOOO ItfMOfM o in • in o lo «in 
• J O ^ O H T J O w 3 J D 3 > 0 < > 3 a s a - i > E « j a 
o a o c « w 4 ) ' H o 
at> a m < o u e u 
tJ 4J 4) •H r> r: a o H p a 
• 0 0 0 O IT O X 1 X X X x 1 X x + X X X + TJ 0 0 O CI5 X X 1 y. X X y. 1 X x e- X X X TJ 4> X >x < X X >: x 1 >• x «: X X X 1 C 1 Ql O X 2 1 X X x 1 X X X X X f» 3 -t -O 0 X X 1 X X X j X X t X X X O + 0 O 3 1 1 O 4) {3 U nH cn 0 cn O in m 0 m X X 1 X X X x 1 X x « ai X X X •» x * Oi t- 4J U 0 m 0 m O CD 0 0 X * i X X X y. 1 X 6-1 X x X X <0 4J C C rg tvi • ro fO X X 1 X X M 1 X X J X X X 
& m W 0 0 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X tr-1 0 1 1 u? < X Ot c r- 0 r- O i/> 0 0 0 rg 1 CT. 0 i-i 1 0 u? cC « 0 O c 41« 41 0 O CD CM CM ' 1 \o <N O 1 X K 0 0 • 4» 0 • 1 0 r- x tr r* o> 4) -H + u O 1 O 1 ;< 4> U > > + 4-1 — — :2 
CD O O oJ 0> * tn CM 0 CM O in -a-0 X X 1 X X V, x T x x + X X x * to (N X <0 to • tf *o 0 0 O CO t—1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X Ch X X X O C 4J TJ 0) X X 1 X X X X 1 X X oi X X X U O in .V lH U-i > O c r-i 4) K O X X 1 X X X V! X X X X H 
RH it It 41 a • 3 1 1 "O F-H X X 1 X X X X x 1 X X X 41 l-> u O 0 3 0 1 1 x + as QI ^ 1—f ffl H -H 0 fM 0 tvi O tn in 0 in X X 1 X X >: X 1 x X X x « X 4 M •4J 0 < 0 • CH 4J U O 0 0 O O as in in X X 1 X X X X 1 X x c- X X X X 0 li C C u> • RH X X 1 X X X X 1 X x »J X X X X O a> OR O 4> O 0 W O X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X XJ O or. g <^ 1« ro I 0 O 0 1 1 1 X O >1 3 u c Jj 0 0 O O in 0 0 0 X * 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X 41 TJ 
JJ C -H 0 » D 0 O CO X X 1 y. X X X 1 X X H J< X X c 0» 
CI C TJ O O 01 -* r-5 O 0 X X J X X X 1 y. X <-3 X X X m V) 4) M -H r> m -» 0 0 X X I X X X X 1 X X X X X •H c 1 E O j j u ^ X X — X X X tU H *o 4> 14 4> V4 u c Jj U1 t j ^ 0 0 O O m 0 0 0 X X X X X ) X X V X X O 41 3 <7J £0 4 ai O V 0 O 05 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X CH X X X a J 0 c e 0. CD V • "O V M X 1 X y. X X 1 X x ec X X X Itl e — O f RR C 41 0 X > : 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X (0 0 C 0 ^ * 3 1 CP "O  r-> X >*. 1 X X X X x 1 X X X kl 0 CM CO O U T> 0 •H 3 O 1 1 ro 0 tn u 0 CU to -1 O 0 0 O O in 0 0 0 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X * « X X X -* X 4 u 01 4) jJ a- -C 4J H U O (N 0 O CO X X 1 X X X y, \ x X f-» X X X tr, j j •H O Xi Ci XI a C X X 1 X X X X 1 X X ^ X X X X < CM <0 «H X I -»H 4J 0) 0 n >. 0 X w 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X 0 0 c P> s M 1 O ro 1 1 1 X CJ1 c u Q 0 LI j j +J 0 10 jt. 0 0 O O in 0 0 0 X X 1 X X X I X X • X X X - X M c >Q 0 xz u 4) "U to CD 4 4) to 0 O CD X X 1 X X X X 1 X X f-» X X 4) •w TJ M u CO O 4> J O r- X X J X X X X 1 X X H) X X X ^ H 01 O N X O -» M RH RH RH O X X 1 X y. X X 1 X x X N X b. 3 
•H < •H tM . H 4J j j X v. — X X X 3 0 O r-i 0 19 
X 
C 0 
(U vt 1-1 <M It 4) 0 O tn O in in 0 m rg 0 1 CM CO co CM 1 X + X .X X » It 1 C V . 1X. O *J O O CD RH ' 1 in CO CD 0 1 X X X X 41 CO C 4J 41 cn Jj ffl •c $ vO M 1 CO CD ' 1 X x ui X X X XZ O 0 c E - > -H 4) c C l») O 0 1 0 1 X X X X X u 0 m 4) a> ifl <9 3 1 0>tJ O 1 1 •• X X 1 X X X m M E J c Li 0 Ti 3 u 1 1 V x + ai ^ m 4) 41 c 4J + ffl to —1 c 0 O 0 O in 0 0 0 m 0 ! r- RH LTI 0 1 X <H 0 -H 4J M •H IO 4) •> 1 - O rH 3 O O DO . i 0 t- u) 0 1 3 X X H cn O Jj CO s & I XI a c O .. KO in • 1 •o X X w 0 0 0 TJ -H M 0 V . + •4J O »H u 0 4) 1 0 1 0 X X RH RH 4) 
B5 •H P O + U 1 4J O M 1 1 £ ~ 1 4J in (0 X 4) -* O 10 A cr. O a* O tn r-i 0 •H 3 *J" tn \ r- m m CM 1 X X 4 X X X + M U u 0 W • 2 /•. O O "O • » > .. 0 C-l r-i 0 1 4) X X £ - X .X X 0 r-*o 0 no J O 0 <x> n { 4) tn m m U X X X X a 0 it 0 RH RH 0 1 0 1 ' H X X X X 4) E >• - 41 3 > X X X u 0 
C ID * CL . . • • 1 TJ 1 
O H 4 4» 3 4' 4) FFL U . E 0 ""H • • 1 -H 4J 4) •H •• •H V I 4) CD 4> E TJ tn 4) —1 c U Q - W 3C O d a 1 to 4) & a 3 QJ til fij Q 3 •4J O ^ fO 0 *© CO £ 0 3 1 - 1 > iQ ro 1 a O O - ro 4> 0 0 0 3 4) X 0 4) z -C M cC • • 3 > <-t A 1 U a. u 1 <M XI u 3 C XZ JZ 3 •H 4) + 0 c rH .. 0 TJ 0 It to 1 W 4J ro 1 O iJ H C O 0 u u c <M W 4J it 41 0 to 4) > JZ ro < •0 0 u > 0 u 3 1 •H U u 0) 1 m O >t 4) •0 13 O TJ re ro <M 14 U * ® O E M 4J b i 4J •H < > U - H - H Cr 1 u c E 1 U X> E 4) 4) a 0 0 ro Q> 4> Vj 0> u j ; 0 U u 3 ro u u 1 n ^ Q> 0) 3 \ 0 U V u U •p u ^ 'H <u V4 i-> V-l a. > c: cr c M n 0 •H 01 UJ UJ c •H -H *H 1 a«H U > M t > ro c to > flj ro H it CL Q. JJ 
s c Li 0. 0 0 -H it 0 /o V-l C to 4) •H u V-l 0 1 m c O 0 0 l IU 0 0 0 .c a a 0 Cb M < * to < s U « > m »-< 3 O- Cu ec UJ u u lu ) u u ftr 5 : > 1 r-i y f l S M i f r i / i w a K 2 
•a 
a 
T> is a 
156 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
157 
O « O l/l -X.' 
«-• re re 
•o ct" u re o s s <i» u. -r> i 
0 >« U> 4-> ft a. c "C u 
• e ^ 
• c ss u ai 
3 4 n 
• CQ O « O 01 tD 4-> 
O U n O g w u 
Z re re C 4-> ^ a c to a> H E CP <1) 4) C 4-> rH -1 
10 *H 
re x M Cd 
3 S O, re e -o c o a> M O N I 
-H -U •O ""J ai re a: 
u « p <u c 
O 3 0 
O L) CI 
•h x n > 5 n o co <y o w o 
a > a o < £ 
O O ( o o o • 
l o o o c o o o o o . ui O » 
O O 23 O O o o o o . .UJ C O o o o • • o o 
:- Cr © o o o c O -C O O V • u o • 
o o o o o o o o c © O • o 
o o o o o 
d o o o 
o o o o o 
ij) ID C UJ 
O u X X x X O X X X O 0 'A >'• x X O X X X O&XXXXMXXX X X « X SI x . X o D x >: x x c x x x \ IJJ o i x x x x x x y. O 'J X X X X & X X X O O X X X X C X X x • rH x X « X "J x - x O - D X X X X U S C X X 
c 3 O O O O O O 1£- o «£ o n o m x; • u ip • tf 
a-. <n cr- <?i g 1/5 o m n m o m > CD O CD 
VJ TR> o cu U •—t O i O lO 
1 W Q O CD •, n o w r i< in • yi 
p in in o m 
o M N O (N 
o o o >10 o o <j> o cr-
a i - o r re rg o r-i u Ifl o ITI 
- c O <0 X » XI u m i , 'H <41 ' 3 -H W E "O •-o u "o c? re c •• £ .. i u H a a H i 01 d) \ VI 2c ^ > TJ W li 11 iJ ^ i t> H \3T} c e » C ' D l l S) 11 n m ClrH X O o. O. H D -3 t 
rH 4-> 
< >. C 
u > : 
u u o < 
W < tf ! 
F-« OJ •• , O' O' C" , a* a- cn -i i q - • § o ' j Xi U tu HJ 5 > > i 
.. re M .. -R* .-I re -- -r-i ' o U c H B o CL *O A i.o 3 o < > 3 <i < re . • j a ^ > E -u o. u e u f iE^JrHf iJOfeu ' re 
CXOCTHOI-HOOOIU • S l ) U C l i d l.1 O. M C E LI'J 4-1 <J 0> O » r-. to C * -H tt "o-. c *oo .o -» c a o O,, NECAUT -> R^  OI 
u re o s: x 
A * « 
c - m o n u -H ai 
n to o 
13 M 'M re re C iJ tJ O C H 07 01 
O «-> •H 01 > X 
o * 
-H + <l> + 
I t ? T J o I -r( 3 I U) — 
J 16 •z r. u i O C !•—«•• 
u re a> i o v, •• oi o £ I M aJ ai •-! a> i XJ .c a) M d > J c cr- c U a o I OH re U) ft "SL I U (C >J 
1-1 
rH o 
K» O m o m o <r> O m o CO f> n 
^ ^ o 
m O m o If) r- o p-C 1 O M o CO CM rg 
l-H o 
r- O r- o If) CQ o CO O o CO m 
«-• o 
O O o o in o o o O o CO 
r-l l-H o 
o O o o m o o o O o CD 
^ rH o 
O o o o m o o o o o CO 
l-i* o 
O O o o m o o o o o m 
- - O* 
r- o r- o m o o o 
—' o o n « (Si 
^ o 
O o o o iO o o o 
o c CD 
rH rH o 
T o * r o If) a . o oo 
f-0 o r«j o CO M CM 
rH o 
•n a* V) QJ <D •C 03 £ 0 3 a. •n 3 > 
o "O O > x : re 4. TJ O <J > > o 0) 3 u kl 3 re OT O ••H o u. £w •d c re M c V. X X a> •H CQ e» 3 Ck a, cc. u. 
^ X I 
m is tfn 
ID N M O 
rH •«? T • 
x *x x x 
IS S 
X X 'A X 
X X X X X X X X 
r-l o O W 
m o o o 
rH CT* • 
H r f i o CM CM W O 
H f i H i n 
»» eg en CD o J) r^ in i/l . 
—I rH H. I 
m re o i O o » I •rl -H O I i l J w I •h -H I M W O I (J D lu I 
sm O a U xJ xJ fD 
•h o j J u a> 
o c £ 
re ^ ai ai 3 at-i U > rH 
re c O o O 
u u a - s : > 
X X X « 
E- X X X ct X X X 
X X X 
X X X 
ct X X X * X * 
E- X X X X J X X X X 
X X X X X 
< X \p < ,x 
E- X 
X o r 
X 
X X X * 
H X X X 
CC X X X 
X X X 
X X X 
PS ;< X X * X * 
H X X X 
J X X X X 
X X X X X 
X X X * X 
E- X X X 
•J X X X 
X X 
X X 
X X X * 
H X X X 
a: X X X 
X X X 
X X X 
+ IX X X v 5 * EH X X X J X X X X 
X X X X 
X 
X X X * X 
E- X X X 
X X X 
X X 
X X 
X X * * E- X X 
X X X 
X X X 
X X X 
a: l-H CN r- ca r <0 
E- CO j o o o 
^ •—1 
X X X + 
E- X X X 
J X X 
X X X 
X X 
d) ® —-i " <—i 
> Q. 3 QJ CO fi) Q 
o re 0) A Q Q >3 
£ o u 3 c i a JC JC c Cf 0 L4 o > <5 -C-0) 
U T J re re A c A 01 0 0 O M U T l H M W > re re re a a 
Q o r. JS £. -C a a . S 10 U) CO < EF 
157 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
158 
i—» m nJ 3r t-i 4) -Q Ol u> fa a s s iD O, r-t I 0 >• u nj O, C t> 
1 i V TJ J? 
O O O O -C D tn o W LD U cr, -h 
u) In H-t (0 n c iJ w o c tn a> H E CJ1 0) fl« c 
e n c o a» w UNO) •h -u 
•O rH r-J 4J m 
iH C 
•H 17 11 
MO ID K o M O 
O. i> a o 
< s 
OOOC3 O O O O l o ^ o o o o : . u o • • • • 
o re - O O O ' U T) ' 
3 O o o C_s O CJ O c- O o o c o o - o - o o o o o © o 
o c c o o o J J o o o o o 
O 0) X X X X O o- X X X X -
O x X X X O U X X X X Q O X X X X . -h X X • X -O XI X X X X 
Ju r-< 1-1 O • ' o cn « o '-< J O CD 
3 V a oicn m tn 
O rr .J vD O OCT U -<J O M-O m fl) i/i o m 
1 O f"! to O O O 
iGOl C- O C-> » tn n in . in 
•ri m »o u m m U H H 
O <J~I <J3 O O 
o in >icn o ci o i-< u c o c m 
o o O Vi 3 
i o N o. r~ o r 
» C cn fo 'r O -> o m o m o i 
N (N O N < c os cn o cn c m O cn co • en o iD 
4) -x 01 ^ > T) It V t1 11 > <C "O 'O C g 
41 M fl) 41 ro -H X O cu Oj J E-. 
u .u w c a-rl n J I 
i £ qi <n 41 1 a*D E c I e c -H D • 
'T j 15 a > 
) O C H iJ i a> «.» 
I O. -rt >i C 
I W W U H I 
. nj. i iq u o«J O -o O iJ Q." 
D 2 O > O < > 3 iT> K 
i j . d o . - i > f i i J a u i = '/I E VI H ^ U £ y ' o a o c « « a ) - i H O O c u ^ L> O c ^ h u a i O u v iJ i 
f + rH 01 A} -» o •. w c . •O £ iJ tL >M > > 
4> M 
^ 3 CO O O OJ X o * o w x H nj u 9t L| II ^ CL. (IJ U S E a> A* 
o 3 
a> i e a) 
TJ 4) 
• C 3 U 4) 
to c .to o «1 L5 H 4) C3 o 
o r U (4 U W VI u 
C iJ w O c H 0) 4) —1 6 C7> 
4> 4) C •—1 -H W +J 
U JJ 
-H 41 J> X. 
s r l 
-h + > • 
c -O -H c a I 
u * 
ro h 
_ t-
J 
4 I 
" J 
e O + <!)"•• 
^ Z £ XJ 
4) -» U C Cn* JJ IT} Q» 
ffi • 4) O £ 
M » 4> 'H 4) 4) 4 U CL > > a w ao <0 < £ 
o rH o m O X X X X X X 1 X X X X X o o CD X X y. X X X 1 X X H X X X X M X X X J X Qj M X X o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X x x 1 X X X X X 
VO O vo o in O r-T X X X X X X 1 X + Pi X X X X • • m o cn o CO cn cn y, X X X X X 1 X X t- X X X X fNJ CM x X X X X 1 X X X X X V, «- r^ o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X 
o rH o in rH O i-f CM 03 -J. •C" O 1 © m X X X * o o m cn O 1 E- X X X V CM TT o c- X y. X o o i x X X X X 
o o in in o in X X x X X X 1 >: y. X X X t. o o CO X X X X X X 1 X X tH X X X X X X X X X t X <X X X X o X X X X X :< i X X X X X X X X X i X X X X X 
o o o o i/i cn o m X X X X X X 1 X X ft X X X X + m o n o CO tn m X X X X X X I X X P X X X X r-f X X X X X X 1 X X J X X X X •-t o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X 
o o m O i—i rH cN CM CD CO o r o r- < X X x + X 4> o o (O cn O 1 EH X X X c f CM CN tn cn o r- X X X rd o rH O 1 X X X i-H X X 
r-f o o in O i-H CM cn cn ro o 1 X X X X X + $ o o co n o t X X fcn X X X a CO 03 03 >: a, X X X o O | X X X X to 1 X X x 5* X u 
o rH o in O rH m o ^ vC in O 1 X X aZ fO o rH t& o o o cn O 1 X iH C\ cn tn in X X in o lM 
>-> o O 1 X X 1- o 
o o VI m o »n ul n O t- X X X X X o o CO r- VO p 1 X •A X X X 4) r- m n in in X y. ^ X X X XJ rH f-t o O 1 X X N X 6 
— X X >J 3 c 
O rH o in ^ O r-i CM n in to l£> O 1 X X X X X o o CO m cn <n O 1 X X X X 4> U3 m CD CO X X cC X X X o O 1 X X X X X 4J i 'A X X X 
CM o <N o CM O CM in o OJ c \£> O 1 •-H X X PC CM o ft <a cm ca •H o o CO Ch O 1 3 X X H <r» .. lO cn m in T) X y. >3 m o •o Ct 4) O 1 o x rH 4J —1 1 +J o o in in o in 3 m CM rH CD X A X V, X o o 00 TJ • .. tn t- VD O 1 a> x X H X X X o o r~ tn 4) fn in in u X X J X X Ci. o 3: rH O 1 •r| X X X X X 4> - 3 i> X X X w a •• TJ •• i j-I 4' 10 • ' ill m fx E O «—l <y rH 4> (U I-H 
rH tfl 4) 
4) E u o •H X p Q, Q. 1 S! > Q. 3 V tn ^ 3 CQ g O 3 > •Q tu 1 o a O fl} 4) Q Q O J a> cE D > rH I-H D, > o a o » V4 £ a: tJ o 3 c p M X 3 o rH •o •n O <0 rj r> 4J iJ 1 o «-» rH c o o D U o 
:> .c <u a: TJ O o > u u •H U .u o 0} • in O 4) f "O o •o CO ID Jj 'H ^ > U «-H -H O a -n c £ 1 H cn U e 4> 0) 0) O o 
01 J JJ o to 4J O rH HJ rH 4) ai 3 1 QJ >, 4-> 4> u 'ft 4> o •H <D u* u, Tt C •H -lH H^ a *J t» •H 1 > c VI t> ro Li rd a. a 4J 
« u C CO X X 4J ,o tQ q O 0 O 1 4) 3 O Q O a o- o 03 A: u o u o a. £ > 1 .J CN u £ VI VJ w w < < z 
158 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
•o a-4-i rn O £ S 
ti <j re a. c TJ 
•HOC o o o O JC U ui O (0 10 u a: -H > ftj 
rt} re C Ul u o c t-10 4> 
o TJ •H o J -T 
O 0) (J N U —I u TJ -L RI <D (0 < RH C •H A1 OJ 
u o ai ijj o to o 
. o o o Q' o o : J O O o 
- c o o c o o cr o o 
o o o "O *w 
• • C OW X ' U FD -C H 0) 1 a -i u u £ TJ -o «4 -g at ro c -_C - X IJ O- OH 01 0) 91 3F WI > x w a' a' OJ i-» ' > TCTJT3CSWCI H ^ 1) II iH H CU-H 
01 c -a> rr t a : •J1 CO I. 
X X X X 
>: X X 
T> X' X X X 4) :< ?' y X Q X X X X 2S re X X >5 T> < x o X X J 
>: X -I X n X X L4 ^ c 4) Ol o 31. a. n o ri u in J"V o in o c 0 f—4 O O 01 o o X X X X c X X X tn o 41 X X X X o X X X a. X X X X X Lil X X o TJ X X X c X X H o o o o o N V o o o JX * X X X X o o o o 'J X X X X cr X X o o X X X c X >: X & o CI X y. X X O Si X X X X u X X o o o o c 3 o o o l£> 4) o o o o o m JZ vc C u 4) re ai O w V o E fN o r^ -H o o o o a> o J o CO 
c O 
£ to M O 'O UJ o 4J o rv i/l o O LT. o in u o o o to -H o 41 m o m < u (0 c cx. 2 a> o 3 c r-l o :o to OJ o CD iJ Lu (Q VP O ift o o o c u in in 4t O r-i o 
> C. n u •H o CT* o <j\ U o >iO o o CD c O o i) o o o o o i—l o t—< f] u re re C o 0. m o m o re o u a. 6 C2 •4- o o i/i 
^ ^ m 
m in o r- o r* c c o c f- o r- o o o O xfj m o o <-> re re ^ re tn u o JJ o T) O 4-J (i •q d 3 £> 3 o d; i> 3 (0 re Cf. 3 a. > t; a u E u •A V. e re o re O Q. o c 4) •H O o 4) •-> c u L) u u o. M c re g o 4> t4 e 5 •H « c i-> H o CJ •o c £ a o c a O 
> a » Q. a. L) • Zi Ch 
"O U A3 U H E 0) CM •(—• I 0 U «J AJ CU C TS 
1 £ a 
re H 73 •HOC 
u o o o r y » o (A U O rf -H 
>1 >3 Li lu 
re re c u o c H N QJ .-t £ C 0) c." c P •—i -H ^ U 4J •H W SD K -H 
« £ • 3 * c «H , 0 o -•w > + 
re © * m * 3 re + a co * 
o I 
dJ £ -U U t •w 41 . 
;> £ + 
CJ W 4 J c , 3 + 
t o o n o y / ^ r o ' f- o f - o o o f— • >H • - tM 
• r I o I N O » • 
C 4> a> TJ o •H 3 
z .c u o c *J fO fi) 4> 0 £ aj M at u a > «-> a o w < £ 
c c o w re o DC J 
TJ T*i v> v ' O •• TJ £0 •• E ' 3: ^ a. •!->•• 3 i 0 h "D - n n > _c re a TJ o -£ +J -H < > 
3 a> 3 iJ , r-4 Vl o "H ID U< 1*4 ' O 19 H C U1XX 
O X X, 1 X X X X x » X X X X X 1 y. X X X X f- X X X X X 1 x X X X X X a X X X X X 1 x X >: X X X X X X X 1 X X X X X 1 X X X 
X X i X X X X x • oc X X X * X •» o X y. i x X X X X X f- X X X X fM X X 1 x X X >,* X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X X X 
r* f-l <N 1 cr. r> cl CO VD < :< X X •< m m rn o E-" X X X r\j 1 1 •v o r- a X X X o X X X X X 
in X X 1 X X X X X X T X X + X X 1 X X X X X X F> X X X X x 3 1 X X 5 X X X X X 
X a: X 
X X X X X X X X 1 X X X X X f X X X 
X X 1 X X >; X X X • « X X X t X * X x r X X X X X X £-• X X X X X 1 X X X X X X J X X X X X 1 X X X X x X X X X X 
o x X 1 X X X X ;< X • , X X X * X X X 1 X X >. X X X H X X X X 1 X X X X X X J X X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X X X — X X X 
o X X 1 X X X X X X r X X x X X 1 X X X X X b X X X X X 1 X X X X X x a: X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X X X X 1 X X X X X 1 X 'X X 
o X X 1 X :< X X X x » a X X x X + x X 1 X X x X X X 6- X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X J X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
o x X 1 X X X X X X » X X X * X X X 1 X X X X X X I". X X x X 1 X X X X X 
X X J X X X 
x X 1 X X X X X X X X X v: — X X X 
rg n l „ t7l Oi X X + X x X m o o o X X H X X X M> n i cr. CT* X X C3L X X X i o X X X X X l •• X X 1 X X X 
o in o 1 rH fV vo o rH X 5 • P6 <M m in ffl m m T cr> o 3 X X H IN u> m T> X X J o o o 
V i o O X X rH 
OD 3 m i _ t— C7 tft X x • X 'A X TJ r- vo o 4) X x b X X X O m i 4) m in CJ X X X X s 1 rH o •H X X X X X 3 - > X X X a T3 •• u rH 10 i re a. £ i O rH o 41 41 —I ID o i-i i £ O a a o> •• 41 > a 3 4) CO 3 6- J > re IT! C* Q o *• re 4) a Q O 3 rH a i >> u a o in r. £ +J u 3 c rH iX J5 O re n CI 1 *-} 4-1 re S O u rH C a O L* U > o o a t •H O JJ o at in O > 4J 73 73 L> TJ re re rH H O 1 U -H c e •H ON U £> E V 4) 4> o O re u iJ rH 1 re 4) (V 3 4) > 4-1 0) IH TJ IH M *H c -H H 1 Q. iJ > > TO C tn > ra re M <0 a a H u M O 1 re c O o O 4> 3 O Q O X X X JC a Q. c u U lu 1 u u OJ £ J rv U •H £ CO IQ W W <5 
159 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
O. CD 
v co o tn o li D u 
• i o c O O O O x u V) O VI to '_» « 
^ W w Q fO C XJ Ul o c e-v) a> 
Q. a e "o c 0 4)^ 
—I CP 0" O -H E sJ M 3 
a, , :5 -u u © -H X W > fO u o a 0 o to o 
o. :» G. o tS. ^ 
X X X X 
X A X X Ul X X X 
a> c — o o a. vo o vs c- m e n l • "O VP • U 
ro a O O O O O U ' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Uj O C5 O O o o o o o • o . O . . • ttJ O O O O O o o S- O to • C; O O 0 « • » • * 
o o o o o o o o w O O O O O 3 • U o - • ' n) o (C - o o o 0 to o a> CJ 
rtj T> 
c o o o o 
o N O at 
O CU 
C 
-v a» O o u a o o "3 
x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x • x • 
D 'fl vd C yJ 1 
f- l-H O r-r £ CM iV • (N J 
U ai f l «-i C2 i—• tJi M W O M 
3 CO O CD 3 O C O 1 m O Lf; 
3 CO O CO > O O O 1 If) • KTi 
O O O "O W 3 
• • c •• 0 w x in £ i 0100,1 s-Muue'a'-Hei O ^ t l 41 A C •-( - f 
C CD o o U "*» 
<*• O CO O O O 1 m c if) t 
e e o >. => 
>-v.V)3 ^ - t5 Q H > IJ > • 1ft fl' ) T3 TJ I I V (I .. — . . , I C i « C W I H N •• a* o" cf Cr CP cr 
O • .C t » a * •• H & K. O 0 • 
01 >-
O X X X O X X X •H X X X £> X • X C X X X 
X X X cp y. x x c x x x 
X x li y. K X 
E o in H N O N > <C- O CO 
W rt O T-t 
U r- o r» 01 «» O «T 
tn cn o cn (N O (N h in • m o 
m o m >icn o m j j ® o a> 
m i / i o i f l yj o c <••! r»g o r\i c u) o 0 ci in - in O f • 
I £ M r t, O C . U (J 
ui Ui 3 co o o 
i E o •a 01 • C 3 u a» 
s CD O to ID ai 3 aJ 
•HOC O O O 0 -C L> to o to 10 O < -H >1 V-l L5 Ui V-f O Q C iJ u 0 c e-co at rH £ a* 01 0) c 
ic en -H 15 x Ui u 
* o O m r-i o 1 X X X X X X 1 X X X X X ec T1 o o O i X X y. X .X y. i X y. X X X 
"O 4) i X X ii X X 1 X X aL :< X X 
r - H 4" o < X X X X X x \ X X X X X 
3 •H T) i X X x X X i X X X x X 
cn o 0 3 i i Q 
CD o O m in o m i X X X X X t X X a: X X X * 35 
e-< AJ O o CO o ay O CO X X X X X x r x H X X X y 
u c c r j <V 1 X X X X X X 1 X X j X X X 
se (0 0 i N; X X X X x r •A X X X X X H 
0) i o o r i y. cc 
4> c o o o O lf> o o o i X X X X X X 1 x X X X *< Q 
01 > o O CO i X* X X X X X 1 •A X H X X X 
u •H j o i X >; X X X X 1 X x X X >: 
41 •H U o t X X X X X X 1 X X X X 
> > t a — X X - — X X X vr. 
u £ •V c o o o o m o O O 1 X X X X X :< I X X I X X X S 
rg to ro cc TJ o 6 o o CO 1 X X X X X 1 X X E- X X X 
c IU TJ a> 1 X X X X X 1 X X cc X X X U u m c •H 41 d o 1 x X X X X !< 1 X X X X E-
a> * O 3 1 rH T) o r X X X X X 1 X X X w X H 
^ * ca Ul rH 
o 
o CvJ o CM o in m o m i X X x x X X 1 * X ec •< X X :< * ^ 
0 < o E- W O rH U3 o <£> o CO r - i X X X X X X 1 'A X tH X X X X 
a > w c C in i X X X X X 1 X X X X X X O 
a) a> a> V) 0 ^ r-t o i X X X X y, X 1 X X :< ^ X X »J 
<« e r-1 Q • O o 0 1 1 X 
3 Ul c u m O n o in cn o a i i CN u> m u? CO 1 n cn X X X X 41 *© 
c rH o O cn o CO O o f ip a i E- w X X c 41 
o 0 to o rH I M rsf m n • t © c- wl X X X n 
•H > (TJ o r-» O 1 O 1 X X X rH •c 
-U -» u — — X X fli 
*J W * * o O o o in in o m i r j co VD CV T 1 X X ¥ X X X 
3 <0 v> oC o V m O n o CO m c*> 1 rH M CM O 1 X X H X X X a 
a m Ul TJ V 1 VD est co CO • 1 X X Oi X X X 
E o c C 4) d 1 O 1 •A X X X to 
0 9: 3 1 o o 1 V X X X 'A X U| o 
u *o 0 -H 3 rH 1 1 
a : to 
nj o 
o [ • lO rH o o o o o in o O O 1 m o CO m o r X X r - r - < O CO 
0) x e- O N o o CO 1 o r> co o 1 X X 
o u a> X. a c i to in y X e-i o CJ\ en < 
•H a* > o e o i o 1 X X O 
> X •H 3 » o Q \ i cn 
Li Ul 0 w ^ (N o N o CN O CM | m CO cn yO o 1 X X X X X Ul c 
41 T3 n CO a to o o co 1 o rv <n o i X X £- X X 4> •H 
to a> 4> o 1 p-» m m X X. X X X X) 
M c w M f—i T-t o 1 o I X .X X X X E 3 
•H ro XJ X X 3 O 
o 4> 10 C a 
ro ro 4) o o o o in o O O 1 X X X X X X 1 X X * X X 
H c o o o co 1 X X X X X 1 X X f - X X 4) 
Hi CP JJ ffi TJ •0 1 X X X X X 1 X X CL X 'A X £ o 
> •H V 
ai 
c C 4) Q rH o 1 X X X X X X 1 X X X X X •U o 
OJ « 3 1 a»TJ o 1 X X X X X 1 •• X X X X X OJ 
,-J c Ul O •H 3 iJ 1 1 4) to 
o JJ £ ca tn rH C o O o o Ul o O O 1 X X X x X X 1 rH X X cC X .X X x » •H 
tn 0) t - u o O o CO 1 X X X X X 1 3 X X H X X X x o 
E > JZ a c o 1 « ' X X X X y. i -c X X ^ X X X X TJ 
CJ XJ O >-< u rH o 1 4) X X X X X X 1 O X X X X X X O 
a : a M 1 JJ o 1 i s , X in 
o in A o o o o in o O O 1 3 X X X X X y. \ X •A X X X X 
o 2 O o CO 1 •o X X •• X X y. X i a? X X X X O c-
o r - o t o x V X X X X 1 o X X hJ X X tu o 
o o 1 X x X rH X X X X 1 •H X X X X X <0 
r-j >, - Q> X X -- 3 > X X X Ul o 
c nj rH a •• •a •• i Ul 
o 41 3 a> . . 4J 1 ro Q. e O <H 4> 4» 41 •H W CJ CB 
•H V £ 10 4) rH £ t 13 O •rl s : o a a i CO •• 4) :» a 3 41 to 4» Q 3 
iJ o O O V £0 E 0 3 1 H > rtj 10 1 a a O 4} a Q Q 3 4) 
o 2 £ 4J X rH < 3 > rH | CL >» u a u i UH j : 2B JJ U 3 c J j r j r 3 •H 
-1> 
01 
O C o TJ O 1 •0 ro r j i j w ro ^ i o AJ c c * o o o C« 
4J rtj 4) 0 to <B X io a. •Q o 4J > « o o 3 •H O u u 01 1 in O >1 41 TJ 73 U TJ ro 19 
kl HI 4) o E Ul XJ » E XJ •H > O r-( 1 •H H O O -H c £ t a . Ul E 4> 41 a) O O V Ul 4) Ul 4) J-) -C o 3 a> J IJ 3 t0 t U J j <0 »H 4) 4) 3 1 © > XJ a> Vt Ul "p M Ul !J © U u 4> Ui a > G cr c rH to o •H 4] iu u. T3 C 1 •H H 4-1 > rH 1 > 10 c til £» ro nj a a U t " c > JJ a o O *H O t j U| C I!) X zc a) -H i Ui u o «J C O o O 1 4> 3s O Q 0 X. £ X X a a O 
-» tO < E U 04 t4 > 01 Ci => CL a . a : t o u (b U U Qi s : > i ™ u to to CO a. < z 
160 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
• a, n o fl rn o .""> TJ ri - m 
L* m o LO O od O cn —i ui O v"> 
U J-> fQ n. c V 4) I £ 4> 
re TJ •H O c U O O O -C U M O WW u 
O TJ o u .c o> re u > u ll-H n 3: j a. re g "0 c 5 a> u U M 0) •H Jj 
o> s IJ U © 'H X V) 
n m o f . O CD CP O D i 0 o I 
n> U JC re u JOC-O 0) O O O O 0OOO G - H O O O O « - H O O C . ( JO • • • £0 c o o o • o o o . • . o o c o o o 
; o O H o ' > o <£> O V 
. <N r - - r 
CPXXXX^XXX 
o o o <w< O O O © -H o ai o o o o «-> • 3 O . • * U O - O O O CJ 3 o w 
o o o o o o o o o • c; o o o o 
o o © 
o o o o o 
a a» 
O O O "O W A 
^ o nj 
j TJ TJ i o» 0) I a. a. 
c nj •J f-
i _ x •• •• ' I/J x W 4> 4> • i <y i> O. "D E E 1 i e TJ E C H 3 • I <13 C -H - H -H i I <D r-l £ <-H o ' t-i — T3 re iy > i I II ^ y HI c n u : CL C M 81 C U 'H I »H -H Q.-H >1 il i s j o tfiw y « i 
TJ c x x' (v 0 X X u 4) •H X X X X E X X X (0 c U O TJ •w 3 X V. X X »J X X X w O nj O X X >: a X X (0 rl U X X X X 4J X X X rf. u W X :< X X 41 tfj 2 X X X X A X X cr CU c O 3 c Lt rH 0 0 0 0 m r- 0 r- •H U U <T. 0 cn rH c c M in LO 4) c 0 rH Q 
> c <M a to 0 •H X X A X X X X 0 U X X X X >. X X X CD c 0 O X X X X u X X 0 0 •H X X X X 0 0 0 y. X X X u X X X rg u <jJ re D 0 C X X X •X a X X X rH 0 0 X X X X re X X Xr u a. 0 0 X X X X X X X 0 X X X X 0 X X X X X n in rH 0 0 O 0 vfi 0 VO r-c c O c 0 r> O 0 0 O •H r| O IJ U nj A5 rH rH re CO u 0 0 rH "C 0 U CLTJ a 3 O. a 3 a S 0 1 > u 3 re 0.0 1 fD 0 X •rl 10 E H re 0 E u re O a 0 H O a 4J M u s u 0 c u r-H O Q» IJ c re u u u U 41 iH 0 V) c •H 171 H "O c T3 a 0 C a 0 a • £3 0 * 0 a. 
x x X X X X 
x x x x X X X X x x x x x x x x xxx 
r> i lA r 
t n n ® 
r- m »-i • 
X X X + H X X X Q£ X X X xxx I X X X 
cc x x x , < H X X X X X x r xxx I CD r>j U t-1 «£> • > •J rH CN m 
u 3: 
M u , 
c a> C D r. —I 3 (/) rH u o a c o 
( N O i N O i / m o n CJ <n 
m <n 
LO O 
vo in in n CO CD CO C v in in « 
o H ifl UJ 
I i 01 TJ 0) • c 3 (.1 <u 
- CO o k> O -w DOU 
oru 
» V; t/J D 
O c (o a> H e pi 41 4' C 
C r-t H o o < H > < 
TJ S c 3 I 
a 
X X X X V. X -
X X X X X X X X 
a , rc • • * z x; 4J 4) u c CT>4J (TJ 41 <0 t 4) O E u ^ ti u ai 4> « M a. > > * u a o «£.</>< s: 
JJ (J O 
c d o 
O to •• M jj w 4J JT e» d c rc O -H «) O e: J 
g) r-J ^ 
» J: nj < T3 o 4-» > U) M > U rH J 3 4J J-» 3 nj 
O X X r-i 3 X X T3 X X O X X XXX XX-
S-ie 10 13 rH H H H O. fa rj C3 U U 3 •H -W O u U H rl -r( H U M o u u ^ 
x x x x x x x x x x x x xxx 
x x x x 
o r- r- OD w w o m m * 
X X X X 
x x x x 
ai x x x x 
2: o a •• a > nj • rt) >. u ao JJ U flj H U U o 4> u H C E nj »-H 4) 41 3 D,l*H U > rH 
(0 C O O O u o a- s > 
cc x x x xxx r x x v4 
x x x 
) rH 41 J 4) W ) .. dj > fl- 3 a> l/l c* Q O u 4! Q Q 3 C f l ) iJ H C OO tn o >• 4) ~o TJ o TJ 
I 0i h A E 1> V 4) } >, u) 4) Li U TJ U 
SS O Q O £ £ £ j : 
S3 
a o <D nj 
a a 
161 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
I 10 
E "O o o ! O N 4) ••H *•» TJHH u <u < rH C •H vj> 
w u n in u < -H >, »M 4 UILI re re C xJ u O C H <0 4> r l E Dl 0) 11) c U f-H -H 
J U 4J •h n « CO H re x •m u 
Ll O CD v o (0 o 
a o £ 11 h l ' J1 0 -4 I (J HQ. J H 
• f O) 0 tn 0 in CN 0 rJ 1 rg m 1 r-f CT X X 4 r- 0 r- CO fK 1 O in 0 in 0 vo VO | <N CV 0 X H Ch rH T> r 1 •0 m 1 CO r- r- X x a 1 * e r c 41 0 1 I 0 X X ev 3 r cp TJ 1 l X X 1 0 i -H 3 1 I CO V) 0 0 0 0 in cn 0 ro | in 0 i ro 0 r- X X * tc X X X * r- cq 0) u O •J5 0 '£> O cr, vo 10 1 u> CD CO X X f- X X X o> 4-1 1 a c f VO ro n X J X X X re tf . CO 1 0 r - O l 1 0 X X X X CJ 0J 1 4-> O I 1 Ss 1 CO 0 O 0 0 in CJ 0 0 | x X 1 X X X X X x • X X X c 4) • 4) 1 O 0 01 1 X x 1 X X X X X H X X X o 0 * 4) 1 O X X 1 X X x X X J X X X cr 4) •H . M 1 0 X x 1 X X x X X X X X A< Li > * 4J X' x — X X X u 3 -H Li WJ tXi Cs O 4) « R 0 O 0 0 in 0 0 1 X x 1 X X >; X X X X X IN X re to * JZ a: 1 O O 0 «N 1 x 1 X X X X X X (- X X X o c 4J XI 1 1 X x 1 X X X X X X DC X X X o 10 M L| Ud * in c 1 c 41 l X. x 1 X X X V. X X X X re re 4) O • 3 1 O>TJ 0 1 X x 1 X X X X X 1 X X X H 4) «J oJ O 1 -H 3 1 1 -a Ck, Li rH rH T CD 1 C/J O T O m 1—1 0 l-H I m 0 1 CD r- ro m in Co u cc X X X VO Ijr re O < 41 * 1 0 f 1 O rg 0 cr. r-i m l r- r- r- n X X X U X X a > 4 U 1 a c l—l 1 u> V 1 YO f i m r-l ^ X X r-0) CL. 4) 0 a> -r CO 1 0 M 0 1 1 0 X X X CJ C£ 6 J I re 1 a O 1 1 eg !o > 3 u 1 to so 0 w 0 in CJ r-« I m 1 0 r- SJ\ r- VO CO X X X 4J n u re c rH 4) « 1 CO O m 0 <7. 0\ Ci 1 r- cr. X X X C r- & c T3 0 O 10 * 1 rH 1 r- n 1 ro 0 X X X re 41 H > re + 1 0 1 1 0 X X X I-J 
( 6 0 JJ 0 * X X H "O A re 4) u C 3 JJ CO i j n j 0 O 0 0 «n O 0 O 1 X x 1 X X X X X X * X X X OJ o 4J 3 re <0 + 1 XI O O 0 OS i X x 1 X X X X x e- X X X a o E a co n * •0 1 4) 1 X X I X X X X X X tc X X X rH < V) e 0 * c 4) 0 1 X X 1 X X X X X X X X X <0 O c 0 s -» 3 1 rH T> O 1 X x 1 X X X X X 1 X X X M rg CO 0 u "0 O 1 O 3 1 r aj w o H O CD 1 W 0 O 0 0 in O 0 O 1 X x 1 X X X X X x , en X X X X + y v D 4J 4> J=. t- 1 -P 0 0 O 0 tn I X x 1 X X X X x * ^ X X X eg u •H U jj 4J + X 1 e c 1 X x 1 X X X X X X J X X X X «M rg re •O H 4> 4) T 4-1 1 0 0 1 X x 1 X X X X X X X X X 0 •rl o c > 4) 3 1 0 O 1 1 X c U O 0 LI VJ -u 0 J £ 0 O 0 0 m O 0 O 1 X x 1 X X X X X X * X X X X IH re 0 jr. u 4) T> JJ CD * 4) (0 1 O O 0 Oi 1 X x 1 X X X X X X f- X X 4} w n o to 4} to d> J 1 O I X x 1 X X X X X "J X X 'A to 0 N m , VJ 1 1—1 rH 0 1 X x 1 X X X X X X X X X •H < —i in J: ' Jj X x — X X «H > UH O 4J to Lu •e IH VH re LO 1 CO O TO 0 m cn 0 ffi 1 X X 1 X X X X X X k X X X X re re •H c ¥ cc 1 "0 O CI O rg 0 rv CN 1 X X X X X X t- X 4? c j j 4> cn + u n TJ 1 4) 1 X X 1 X X X X X •X oc X X X £ o c £ > •rl 0) C c 1 rH 4) rH 0 1 x X f X X X X X X X X X 4J 0) CI 4> n 4) 3 TJ 1 X X 1 X X X «- X X 1 X X 
£ cr •J c IH 0 1 0 3 1 J X 4) w o a) c JJ -C V 01 1 VJ <D O CO O in 0 o*« 1 X X I X X X rH X X + EC X X X x -r JJ •H to 4) * 1 *-> U O CO O CO 0 OS l-l 1 X X 1 X X X X 3 X X It- X X X jj iii U 3: > n. JZ 1 c c in m • VO vo 1 X X 1 X X X X T5 X 'S. X X >> X TJ (0 u u 1 0 —1 0 1 V X X 1 X X X X O X X X X X 4J (0 •H X u * u 1 0 rH 1 J £ X re X 4) * 0 1 c O 0 in m 0 in 1 3 fO 1 0 CD CO T-H O CO < X 0 < X LI U1 0 CO * z 1 O rH 0 CN n • r- r- 0 4) • t- X O 
"0 0 •* <f\ — + 1 O 1 0 v eg I 4) m m O O J X 0 Ui re 0 at » H rH O 1 3: 1 rH rH rH 0 •H X 4> 5: CN >» + - 4) 3 - > L> C re « 1 rH a. ~ TJ •• O •H + 41 1 3 41 QJ 1 m a. e r O ^ a rH O QJ rH CO a> 4> T £ 1 *o Ti V) 4J rH £ 1 to •H 1 JC O d a. to - 4) > a 3 4) w fi Q 3 u Q * re .. ) 0 •• CO E O 3 1 l - 1 > re re c/ a 0 •• re 0 0 Q 0 3 4J 0 2 JJ -H rt 3 > t | r-l —J CL 1 CJ a u 2: 0 3 e p X 3 <0 4) T 0 C 1 rH 0 rH TJ l-H O 1 41 ill » 1 iJ Jj re 0 rH C a 0 0 u c* « C- * ^ re <y 1 O (0 0 > a re eC TJ O > 1 O O 3 ( H O 4J 0 O m O 4) TJ 13 u TJ re re M re * 4} c 6 1 VJ +J cn £ j j -H cC > O —1 | •H .rl O 1 O -H c rH Wi xj e 4J OJ 4) 0 0 4) L< * 4) VJ a> 1 JJ £ a 3 4) 4J U 3 41 1 +J Jj rH 1 re rH QJ a 3 4) >1 U 4> L< T; n M LI 4} 4-1 4> * w a > I c c rH W 0 -H 4) Lu U. T> C 1 -H H rH 1 JJ > *H ^ re c 10 > re M re a a jJ 
£ c > i J-I a 0 1 0 «H 0 re w C 7} X X 01 •H 1 V4 L» O 1 m c a a 0 QJ 3 0 n 0 jr J: A St a a O a -» tO e£ 3: l U (K J > CQ V) M a* cu fK Lli I U U UI 1 U U a* 3: > ra nj U J S •A CO to m tX. tz S. 
162 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Attachment "3" 
J Street Conceptual 
Improvement Illustration 
163 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Oregon 
Department 
of Transportation 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Alternative Concepts of US97 Realignment Shown 
164 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Oregon 
Department 
of Transportation 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Conceptual Drawing of Signalized Intersections @ J Street US97 Option B Realignment Shown 
165 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Attachment "4" 
Existing RL Zoning LOS 
Worksheets 
166 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
O O O 
c o iC K9 31 tn o sp a> 
a 
L) m fa o O) (Jl r-O a> vo ul O o O o r 
CO o 0 X U o o O o o 
O o 
O .4 o iZ m ro Oi j OJ o <o a. £) 01 4? a > OJ c- c i n 
* u TJ 
fL w 
i*M <M o K) o u iO E X a. 3 U u CO ca ffi CO 03 a. 01 m >, 0 u <o "D u U3 ^ CO ^ TO o if a. A; O n CD tn CO CO OJ S. 41 
' J 
u> in o O o o r 
> E T) o 0) W o o o o o o o T' ^ 
o C Ot r\ n >0 --•J rH jZ m Ul (N Ok r-> ^ CM o c E n a <U 3 c -H 41 a > OJ o OJ r l o as o •M VI I/) >• IT. 
01 > o n 
ra <u a -H 03 o 3 U u CO a CO m 0} Lu u. OJ u •o C CM ra M —j 0 c 0 < -4 41 c O 0 u U > <0 O U © -i 0> t/J o 1/1 u •H £L H < U-l E M > tu U C 
c o 
n t-> u H u <y 
ij ai 
IJ 0) V o ai 3 
a> > u 41 u 4) 
ai i TJ 
0) V u Jj 0) M 4) M at u 
u j j w 0 •o > a <J <J 
ij •H a P o» 
ill m 
Jj 
o 3 M C u' c 
t/1 
£ 
w 
n Ul 
u 4J o to -H 'i 4) a) JJ JJ o in et !_) m 
m 
a 
^ 
•o fO 
xJ 4> 
o ® <J 4) d> kJ tt» 
iJ d> ai 4> 
ai (V 0) <D fl) 4) 4' 43 c o •H U o 
u 
u 
Ul L0 
Li 
.1 
tf) 
J-J 
:/> 
ij v« Cr> •S' 
M U 
<11 ca CO io ST' CD o O 
1/1 = e -
s 
U 4) rn r-i "n .n <T> Cr. 
o n D im ro >11 at u Qj 
•H O i 'J O t O £ M U 
a £ u •H 4-» 3 /tj o H Oj l£ 
a o 
0) tJ u *-» -. (JJ fl) Jj <D >,tu era u . 'H 0) i u u n D •• n a^  i oj U tt 4) i e m a u kj i o a. -h 4-» 3 c I ® £ M U <0 O O . Vj iJ H f- Of CC U 
167 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
c Li 41 3 u o 
OP O X 
O -o to re .-H re J. * U cu 
u re a: u E o-o> 
0 re lj 4J a. c A.' « o 1 E or 
v CO H W (3 41 D 
U O L» o .c PI u u (0 W -H 
c u £•» 
Q C CO CJ TJ 
•U m 
s 
cn n 4* 3 Uf O CD o x 
« M & -o re 33 
c.1 01 -
C E 01 M < C o . CO -H no 41 3 -H •U T5 re rH c -H O O u o o 
O X lo o u to CO H < tM >1 WH L? Li rtJ re VJ C i J H o c 
0i V 3 tJr t O 
•U W n 
-h cr M « re o l i re TJ CD 
^ H 4 o < • 
C rH o o •H > 
a -U < e a 4 O U* 4 
> JJ < H 4> H 4) X i 
i o o o o O o o o o •n o o o o o o O o o O 1 o o O a o o a. O Qi i o o o m o o m o o 1 o o O o TJ 1 TJ r- 1 o o V2J i 1 L) c I ai 4) o rH o 1 o o O m • 3 I *-> •o o 1 VO CJ 0 1 u 3 1 0 CN 01 1 -H rH o o t£> o M> o Q vo o m o CJ o o o rH fn 1 o r ^ o~» o fft CO O 35 o H ! E 1 41 
O o CO o CO CD o m cn cr. o o cn in r-j in i cn * lO VO ci +J Co c rH ^ o ^ rH i- o o r» i i o * O o 10 u> rH i -0) IX 1 a: Jj 3e o o CO o CD o O CD o m o o c. o o cn in I vo U? f Ti o O- ID at o 41 1 CM O CJ CM o cn o o r- vo I (O m VO o a, a; -A 1 o m m m n m ft r- CI I vo KB u I M rH o o o i o o o rH w z co o 
• • X 1 o o m o m o o m o r- o o r~ o vo CJ 1 r- VO CN) m o m CO CM ~ 4) x 1 o ro C m m o cr> m m o o m ai n VO I o o J X > 4J "O 1 "D r- IT) 1 o O CJ 
— c 1 4J 4> rH o rH o o 1 o o o l -U 3 J 4J 13 t a © 0 1 J-> 1 re to a* ai 1 »H rH o o O cn o cr« o m o f> o o m o 19 SO cn i vD CM rn o m co CN ^ u —' o H ! E U o •lO O so vo o cn r- r- o o r- m es vo O 1 o m o •H c r- rH 1 O o o 
> (0 1 O o o o rH 1 O o o rH •H IJ rH re L4 re 1 o O rH 4) u 1 o o ct> O o o o o a m o a o o o o ct> o o O 1 o o o O o o a, O TJ > aj CO 1 O o o o iO o o 1 o o o o 41 a 1 o r- 1 O o to rH VI 1 o o 1 o o o —i C re a) o 41 U CP U •h re rH 1 o o O o o CT> o m PI o o o CO o r-j Ol 1 m vo o o O L) O -W jJ Lj 41 1 o vo o vo o t- o o r- CO CJ rH 1 CVJ VO o H Q1 P •o 1 0) r- n l CD CD w » 4) c 1 CO 4) o o o l o o o CVJ CN U JJ 3 o i re ( X •o 3 I l cj o CO \ i—1 o o CD o CD o o CD o m vc o VP o o vo o r- r> I m VP o o O U O to H 1 a o CJ o C-l CJ o Gi u"> o o ir» m o vo CM n vo o to •U 1 4J c in in in in r- i Cv> CD <C 4) •U n rH o rH rH o IN 1 O o o ry CN OJ 3 1 rH 1 C3i M U O i a o o in c m o o in o m r- o r-o o c o rH CJ 1 m * vo O o O U O C Jj 41 V) 1 10 n o rv o (T« ri CI o o cn CO rH vo 1 CJ m \£> o i—1 •H CO 01 Li •J ( 1 o r-f ^ o rH r- o O rH 1 1 o • o O CO CJ rH CD CJ rH x; 4J O co C t o o c o o o o o o o o O o o o o o O O 1 o o O o o O < o 1 o o D cr» o o m o 1 o o G o CD •U CD CO t TJ c 1 4) 1 10 CD rH ^ o rH ,_,* C- ^ o 1 1 .. o o O o rH O c o CD O CD 3 > re •o o 1 4) <N u O o 1 x 3 1 Jj CO t a* rH o o a O o o o o o vn o o O o o o 4J O o o O 1 3 O o O o o o a. 
o 
o to x. t- i i JJ o ^ o o o <T> o o rH m 3 r- o o J 1 TJ o O • o o o o O 1 -rl H o "8" o 1 X O o o rH 01 V-i o 1 m o z i a 1 CO o o o o o o o o o o o n o o o O o o o o o X O u*< o o o o O 1 1 (0 o -H O o o o o o o o o a. a p-i o 3 f- 1 W • o o o 
O i o O r-i o I O o a 4J ffi - 4J rH o c • • (0 rH i rH 1 re o a 4? i 3 sJ 4J rH CP s .. a> •n .. Q) CO •H u X E 1 c •o -n « co 3 4) o E *J CO rH a TJ x > u ai a» L) re i 4) o •* (0 » iu E o > 3 o •• U ( OJ o re x a. 4) O o x o « e z X •P tt E - i < o o 3 > •H O re I > >. L) 4J rH > X cn •H 4) u C J rH O > o •o (-> rH TJ •n O 4J C c W) I 4-> u O CJ > 4J > <0 H re re dJ 1 c- CO tf 41 > X re 0 re <C T; o L? 4J T5 TJ > re re 4J i •H re X 4J O >. UH In 4) 41 c e ( M Jj to e XJ nrH •o < > O U < < w J CO to rH | O CO c e re 4) —i to •H 41 Li 4> 1 J-> X 9 3 OJ 3 4J 41 *J 3 3 ro 3 "v 3 QJ re 1 re ^ 4-1 4» ro L4 CJ -U U « JJ w a > 1 C tJ> C cc c O •H TJ •H 4) u, TI- TJ TJ u u, c Jj u C C 1 Q, rH rH rH 0J •nW I c 5 - 3 O. j j a o 1 O -H -rl 3 o re Lr c TJ c c <0 X re <y 0 o ^ •H ro re TJ 3 •H 1 re o L| Ll o CO S3 y l-l o W X 1 U a X > > CQOH < I-1 S> a-CU a: Q* iu CO < Cu 1 CJ > U O > ra 
168 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
169 
<o x u s e . 
- ffl H W 15 U 
41 3 •'< U TJ ro C -H O O OOO O SZ WOO n w H «t UJ > 
uj M n; 
E TJ U 
x c u u u tn a) O c XJ a o ai H < a: j j ro 4> c u e 
o o . o o -© If TJ IN 
- o o a in c ' 
x x x y. :< x x x x x x x x x x x x x x u x v. x x x x x x x x x X >: x x ^ x x x W X X X X X X X N X X X X X X X J C / C X - " fl ;c X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X Id X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
X x x x X X N X x x X X x X X :< x x 
V X X V. X X X X x v. x x x x x x x x x x x 
X X x X X X X X 
.. X X X X X X X X >* X X X X X X x 
3 X X X X X 
X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x :< x x «. v v v v v v >.• v •/ v y * v v y ^ 
o x x x x x x x. x 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x >: x X X x X X X x N X X X 
X X X X X X- X X x x x x X X X X X X X X x X X X X •• x x x x x x x x y. x :< x 
.. , ~ X X X X X X X X X >: x X y X X X X X X X X X P x X X X X X K X X X X X X X - X X X X X X X X Z X x X X X X X X X X X X X X. X X X X X X X X X X V. X X X X M X X X X X X X X X X • x x r. X X X X X X. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X V X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
_c :< x x x i j x >: x  i-, y. x x xO X X X •• "21 X X X X X X X X X 
3 « o a Ui o 
o at n x 
u c e o 3 f ill f i Z O u 1 <n J 6- Ui ro • i to cc rf u c in n a; u 3 i 
. ai a c o • u ro fl -H : i U h i J i u i 
z j j vi n t-[> o O 4» t u 4) O. C xJ j m a t ^ j ^ O J n LU -3 
• *J M a _> ro Of X * & ai .. VI 
jc ai C > U J -H fl r-H u o ill ID U 
%JH 3 1' D, U u ^ a >. u -i < u < ui 
c C « O O £• H -H U 
J « OiJ . o c h ^ i rH <0 - nJ I U, J ro OS > 
I CC VI -ri CT> u ro U i c 4) C -C Ul •H tu O CL fl} I W C' i O 3 *-> U -h i a o n a> -H Q.rH Cu 4J O Uv tit . j ; 4> 3 •O 
-- cz O -H ui w « cr o c a ^ . a 3 o o 
3 u C ~H 3 u o C -C 4-l • n h U 
XJ M -H C t-« 1 
_ tn Vi b <J <4 3 C T> 
e w UT3 O tn <C re 
'0 M _ 1 O -H I IT, a U i Li Q- ro 
at a> 3 .tf d) ® o —i 3 O -H 
•H u U U u) o) to O 13 ,0 3 
a. 3 3 *a 1 o Z 2 « 
. c . a " 
315 Q. C- O "AJ 1 < O O -J w 
-C c c •H Ui U 
•j) e> o> o Q.H-* w Q,ii-t 'u OIJW 
O, iJ AJ O O I ex. u X o n ra iJ <U 
5: a. 
4J ro C> •M ? 3 I' 4> -H O 1 rA 3 w : CTJ= t Iw CJ t-o 
C ro C o o <0 •ri t f j XJ jC 
U 01 ai O 3 a o o» O UI C Ui SZ. --H Co H to 
«M 0) < 
ai a J c 
CP u c c: • -H 5: w 
0 (0 Ui U XI CL C Ji 
ai a> 1 E 01 •a a • c U 4) •» c E n H ft C o N CQ H w o JJ CIS rl M -CJ OH C •H O O o o u O JC « o o W W -H « 
U M U ro w C JJ (1 o c ft! 0» T5 rH E C 0) 0) 3 |J r-< o 4J tiJ U 
10 o ui 10 *d cn 
•rl -O w 
w O > fl £ -H IJ Li i l 3 <11 ro a s c 
§ Ui O U C 4J O r-j "O -H < OJ AJ 
H ro 01 -H m e flj 0) 3 U a rH 0) o o o > z m u ci o x n •rl 3 > O JJ M O 3 OJ O Ul tn cn 
1 x 0 u: 1 0 X T) 1 c 1 X 3 1 1 0 O r m 1 0 (-• JJ v> 1 a> 1 1 Sc 1 1 f-1 1 0 J 
1 t- -C  1 0 tc •O 1 c 1 3 1 1 O 1 ca 1 f- 1 0 H JJ 1 fiC «i 1 ro 1 1 0 Ul 1 X 0 rJ 1 0 X 1 X 
I CC CM 
Ct 1 0 J-TJ 1 rJ c 1 3 1 t O I 4» (L CM CD » f- i 3 O f-xJ ^ 1 "O J jJ t O 3 1 1 "Z rH O 1 fiC tM u> 1 c f-Ul A t 0 0 
\ -H X JJ ro I i-l X 0 ec 1 •H O X T) 1 X c 1 X 3 1 t xJ O O 1 jJ a> 1 X 0 Ul i- 1 0] 0 X JZ 1 c X XJ 1 (0 X £0 JH ( 1 0 0 1 X CS z 1 V X l 4) O X at- 1 4.1 X tn 1 3 1 O. Ul •H 1 •O xJ < 3 a x: u 1 O Ul 0 c 1 V) M O fl 41 1 a O c O £ 1 0 « n Ul 41 1 a> 01 0) a > 1 X c a c a 0 1 U fl m ^ x 1 X J # 
a> T> • 3 O 
a -D C JC M •• h •D it 01 
a s <0 O 3 ? a> v> 0) X c vi x O <0 i j X J u <* 
. . . . w H Ul Ul .. X CC *j 
s x u s m y ^ v^ a *a > xj v> a. >101 -h w .. c u h ^ w Q. OJ 'H 07 3 "O 10 JJ H H ro M » 0J u 05 U ro 3 c X o a- 03 eC U U3 
— <u — • rH X 
-o 'X 
oj y. 
01 X rd X O K PH X -o X 
E rH u — JC '+H 
X X X X X X X X X X x X x x x 
X X X X X X X X X rH rH r 
IP- H X O <-r O ' 
I f-t X O 0 rH ' 
< O X o rH rH © 
o o o o o o v o XOVOOOVO O O O O O O <Ti X O Tl o O . . . . . . . X rH rH I-1 rH rH 1—I O X H O r f H O 
XX X X X X X X O O O Q O X XX X X X X X O O O O O X x X X x X X X X X XX X X XXrHrHf—IrH rH 
* O rH O O 
1—lO^HrHr-li—lOOr 
• I-H O O rH o r 
. . X X X X' x X 3 X X X X X X " O X X X X X X X X • • » • OX X X X XX XXrHrHrHrH. 2 E X X X X X X X X 
l-y X X "G x X ^ X X X X c O X X •H X X W X X nj X X 
1 q 9 : 3 x 
X X X X 
X X i-H rH rH r 
X X X X 
X x xooooo X X xooooo X X X 
X X r l r t H H H 
• r i ' m r n T-> •C TJ TJ TJ TJ % < < 
H I U U Li u 1 y 4 ID 14 fl •H U W W W 
ro ui 01 ill D S ^ I 
Ui rt}3 M H t" II O fl > 
A A o A A o 
A A O 
"l A o A /• o 
A A rH 
A o o A A • 
A A 
A A o o 
A A 
A A O 
A *0 o 41 • JJ o O r  2 3 w o u o V < » 
V V • rH 
Vo V V O 
«• V V rH 4J rH ^ V 3 O •a v v o o E v v o 
u • V o o *J V V o o fl) V V 0 V V o 
¥1 TJ 41 «' 3 4» Q. ui n 4J >, 4J t i ID H ,U 
>iTJ to "O 
ID Jl C < rH O 01 t-l ^ o "H <L» o u o • 
169 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
170 
O ~ H O 10 u rH fl} <r-
•c as 
U 1' . C I <0 
"X § 
(Q W O 4J 0) O -H IJ T2 g d c •H O 0 u o u G X 
va u re flj u C U h 0 c w « n - e c 01 0) 3 4-1 -1 O 4JU U --1 c*> i : 10 re u 
4» TJ u o —I -C > 4-1 >•• a> o) S to 
a> GJ •j a O 
U U U > o a 
u ^ o 
L> 3 -H '— -J G 6 O - O 
o o 
-tf o 
v a> 4j -c o tJ 3 •H <—I o O £ u - o 
01 i-i 
w 0) rtJ TJ X 3 
(0 0) rj TJ 3 
CL, O O CO O 
^ sx ••'<}) c cr c a: c O H -H 4- TO u a: s > •J 
iM O .'«.» © O O W; O «-« O O r O 1(1 -C O ff CO 3J O O 5 f) . ft rrI . . r*> m • • f 
rH O O 
O UI r— V 
. . -H a> u« Ui TJ *o t c c n i s a- « I 
ilf O r- (M H m (0 m o 3 r- • • o 
0 •• c »j 
•h QJ <U nj C E <o rn |j •• M •J W <0 -H D S 3 11 ffl U 4J -n C C o to TJ re -W to CO J Itr 
C3 © r~> T 
r- 00 *£> O U> C1 -1 
o o 
r O O O CD r-. 
© © © © O < < o o • o • . . o • o 
© © — 
3 O T! fV O • Z O 
•H re O to re a M re p u > 
O O N U N 
QJ • • n •• O CO rH CL •• TJ X > '• 01 O a o o > >1 U 4» rH > £ & o U ^ > 41 s > 
j j 4J 
S U r| cr. >, CJ .O Ai re n 
© o o o o o o r o © O < © © © • » I tN • . © . . . o o i • © rH C O O | rH 
o o i o o CO • I rH • • O | " O 
\Cr">OCMOO£Ti\ii««0 I CD r 
in o • ui > « • • i rH • 'CO • » -oo% i • o O rH O O O I rH rH I \o o n co m ui co o i cor-in o • m r- • » I rH . « co • • • o <r> t » o rH © O © 1 rH rH 
o ^ cw • • o> 
CP o x I 3 I co I ui iv 
* M 11 I o TJ I cn 4J re s: i S u s: a. i u o i x •n I >, I — T3 
: E co « 5 c 
m © « 3 - o o o i - i v D I oc7\ © • o © o • • I N » • r-l . • • O rH I 'rH O rH O © rH ( rH 
o o o o o o o o i o o © o . o O O • • J CN . . O • • « O O I • o O rH O O O I rH 
vo o f-i o o o vo r* i a? in 
tO © • O O O • * I r—i • • CO • • • l-H CT» I • rH O r-*-i O O I rH ^ 
© © VO • • O 
f>CD I ION 
o o i o o 
l i © m o vo * oo • < to I • TO 
re -h c •H O Q u o u O X. 11 u u W CO "4 
« L! re 
re v, i 
re M I re CN C U P I o o C I 4J ei ai T3 i a - i E c i 4i ai 3 i ai 
o o o o o o o o i o o O O • O O O • • {NJ • . o ' • • o o . © O '—I O O O rl 
on-, o o o o o o © o o o o • o o o • • OJ • • O • • • O o • © O rH O O O I l—l I O O O O O O O O | O O O O • O © O « • I N • . o • • • © O I • © O r-*-i O O O I rH 
Q. 2> 
5 
rv I X CM as i E n n a a < c f s u i © u o , c « 3 3 u j o x i r - x 
O O VO . • o 
u u re tn U. oo <#> X oi 4-1 S m U 
00 x 
lOO I lOO VO . I TO • - VO I >00 l-H rl I rH rH 
m o c m o O • I © « 'V? I • OJ 
o o o o » ' I r l • - O I • o rH CN 
© O J o © 
O O I o o ffl • I H ' • o I • o rH I (N 
.» I •» 
U .. J 1-4 O CJ I O CI 4J £ i j j J: O l-l I U 4J ro O 1 rtj m 1L> tfi i (u cn I £ tv I £ N +J X J-> T. o u i i f t u m i I m t 
© © r- » • o 
O Ot +J X u u 
re co Cj-> ci tP x JZ PI -IJ z co o CT> x 
170 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
O -O (fl ro - I CD <U K U Q. 
-H O O uoo o c. in u V 
\C M ft (D C l-» H o c 
v> <u "O 
e c fl) 4» • U r-i Q U U iJ -H O i i (0 ^ <D U U lO TJ CC 
•H *0 O 
|J O 5> nj J: -w i-» u r* o <o 
a s c e K O « 4' 
u c u 
TJ -H 
> O H O ? CI O Ui to rv 
a a o 
o CD 
o o TJ o S, O 
O o 
<X rg TJ I -4" O >J 
S §-S o ^ 
in U ID a •• e> c o w •-05 4) V) s c c c U ID <0 iJ I J J * ' 
J f f l O t f OO A O DO 
ft -M < a 3 o 4T X C u fij x -a i 
5 .. •• M 6-1 I • - U u - X <X -U : _C X X <L' •-» 0» L> : CI ^ O-Tj^i* l > C-ft-Vftt-Fi U 1 .. C |J H « O' : > 11' H W --- 3 t fl) T -V j-» - ••* (r* i /o u vj 01 iu u az i u <v a m c x > If -J} Dj to < U U^  Of 
, _ _ O X rH o ' 
S ' X X X X X X x o o o o o 
X X X X X x x x o o o o o 
x x x x x x x x • • • « • 
X X X. X X X X X »-••—<#-< i—< —H 
X X X S x X X x o o o o o 
x :< x x :•: x x x o o o o o X X X X X X X 
x y. x x x x x :< ,--« ,-t .-« .-« 
x x x x x x 
1 O i-h <-> o 
X X X X x : 
X X X X X : 
x x x x x . 
X v X X X 
X X X X X : 
x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x o o o o o 
x x ' x x x x x x o o o o o 
x x x x >: x x • • • ' • 
X X X X X X X X <-H <-H 
^Or- ' r - . r - . r - .OOr 
<Z -r\ T3 ~ T> ti w U < -n ' t < «• «£ TJ /-. 
& JZ «C CP "Q *• O. TJ 4> c u 4 o n P> ® -H Ui T> 3r TJ ^ <0 rt £ > ID i-1 (fl 4> O C O M I D 3 5 H H X J X l 3 Q . f f l U . t t 
O rH o o 
1 O <-. O O 
-/-I -n -I"> 
STJ TJ T> TJ tC 
.. Jl j j u |J u -V qj rtj 10 rfl TJ H W W M W 
*C CO TJ s: u hi h r-< » u ui J c J Q. X 2 S lu 
*i A O 
A A r-c 
|J O O O V < • 
V V o 
.. v v o 
—I V V 
Ul T> 4) .. 3 <v a ^ <-i4J >• l-> T> -o e~ u 
>» TJ <0 "D 
<0 H c : <4. rH O CP 
U u TJ Oi c x 41 <U I £ a) TJ » - c O 4) -c e n § 
V CQ 'H 
W CD 0) O -H 
ID ^ cuh 
O c _ M 41 TJ <~t E C 4) 4' 3 U n O iJ Ul u -H CP U: ffi .x 
171 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
» QJ H in o u 4i D H •J "C re - i c H O O U o u 
o x woo b> w -H 
** u re 
o c to <y x> •—• £ C 4) 4J 3 PH « i-J to c 
^ JJ tJ o a> re as = 
ao o e > o £ u u o a: M -0 => ai o •»•> 
r-i o 3 
ID CM 
C I o 
cr © O © -<J r"i o • o o o • • . <r • • • --< rt r-. O O " rt 
: c <r. O c O f O • O G o - • . T- . . . •—I O O r-
o o rs © o o o o • o o c. • • • c • • • o o •—i CI o o 
ooooooo o • o o o • • . o • • - c o o © o 
ooooooo o • o o o • • • o • - • © © 
O Pi o o o o o o o I o o • o o o • • . o » • • o o I O r-l O O o 
I O —' 
I U"> Or 
; I cn o I • c I o rt I 
I l/i r l O r 
OOOOOOO O • O O O • « • r~> . . . o O O O O 
I 4) •• .... I (J >> o 
x I >. B- JJ IJ C I U U ID <P I "V. RT) ID o e i c > tu M 41 I fl» .rt (Jl a > i 0) u o • a o i u u m < S I *D < CL C 
nj u 4. a, u >, 
O o AJ -• o 
cd cn 
. a. 
O Ci 
' PJ 
m r*-} 
o o CO • » o 
a a |J X 
o o 
• o 
CD CD CD • • UI 
a o tJ ,/r. V 
Ci. cr> 
X 
o r-
o o r- • • o 
o o 
• o 
o a Jj X V jj re ® u cr. 
x: oj Jj S ai U 
x x x y, x x x x I X X X X X X X X j x x x x x x x x J X X X >} X X x x : x X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x 
 x x x x x x x x x y. x x w x x x x x \ x x x x x x x x x x >: x x X x x X X X X X X V. X X X X X. X x X y. X x X X x X X X X X X X X X X* >5 X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX " x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x .. 2 „ x x y. 
O CD ai CD r iJ O i - rt H W rt . . . id r- r- r-( j ai m in 
! r - < o r - r - r - o o ' a - r - > o o - o o x x , - < o m u - i u - > 
• -irO.—.L.1TOO.—i-srcNiooo X X TT O O I" . . . ui . . . . . . . . . x x . . . « O O rt tfJ^^COOfVOSOrJXMCar-lOOO rt rt rt <n 5< x 
o - .x o « d .-I ra qj * U Oj 
zrxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx jJXXXXXXXXNXXXX^i DXXXXXXXXXXXXXX o x x x x :< x x x x x x :< x x lf> X X X X X X X X X X x x X X X X :< X X X X X x X X X X X 
X X X X X X X >'. .X X. X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x w .x x x x x x x x x x s: .x x x  X X *X X X X X X X X XX X X WXXXX 
•<-1 0 rt) u u -t? a c oj aj 1 £ a> •a * • c U 4| -
X. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X .. X X X X X X X 
x x x x x x x x x >: x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x > i « x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A .X A x X X X X x X X X x X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x XX XXXXXXXXXXXXX: 
u .. o CL, (J 
A) qi •U M (J (J 
CL u cr Z H 11 
W s e o 3 a> in -h z o u c c 
ui u t: « - . J 01 2 C C • ai c c o M n 
i ij u a u «> tt> Ctf H QJ 
•H <l) O- C C JJ JJ mh > CH UlH<M •• g -H 'rl 3 QJ 41 O-HCUrtWH k^J 
^ C C o o T3 -r-C -H 4) (J XJ AJ M M 0 4 1 I D U I A 4 J 4 1 M 0 0 - - - " * 3 a a r-» O O "O JJ H <t a. £i> 
•• C V-£ fl) U U J 
M /H 3 CJ O -Q J3 a u d a >• o «t u < 
i T H flj U » /H to J re 41 O C£ <T> >, cr- u re 
(J C tu C £ H Cw O CL u tn o 4) O 3 «-> l-i cl (u. o re 4> CL »H r-t CL WO'**®4 c _ M U Cr> cn E 3 QJ C C b iJ Tl -rl h n m » U 3 o O *-> lui -r-t Q. a VI 4i Q. a o tx. O O 
•H l i > Vi re a u cc 
~ «. i tn y- 3 D* u u cn re 
• x U P AJ 3 c t- •• y u cL V) 
f 4J 3 wa H "O -r 3 L ; >M {r u o H C X U 0 « >H H U > c > re J. H 'H 1 3 H C > 4J U C 10 to O JJ o -H n Q.4J o u am rt 10 o 
-H 4» D* 5 id e VJ XJ •n, JJ n o ,re 
•H 4) U -4J 3 O " C O M , a 3 w o c 
c c c Ll -H M Cl If) u 
C Q. JJ 3 
O1 O O I £L4J 
f- 41 I 13 ! -1 x: cq : j-> rc D> t v. t» 3 c a u j a u 3 v XJX h *M Cd . C< -M VJ 4J 4-1 C rt) C 41 C U m f-3 •H 1 iJ • 
U C {p o O O »H g ' a. o CR-.H - o m c c 
in X 'H Hi H 1/1 2 3 5 
172 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
tj> tf 
0) 3 
u o 
OJ o -
0) 0) E 0» t j r® 
. ID -H «l u « fll C3 .H 
sat 
3 «J » O. 3 * f? tti » O • 
S £ tJ u c u' fl 4> o» o e a) ^ a> 
u p, > 
P a o V) < X 
o o a c O "H 
o «-» o. c O "H 
JJ W J £ Ql c CP c 
O O O O O O O u 
r* o r o o r 
I CN O O vM c 
f o o o o o c 
O O O O O O < 
o o o o o o «. 
O O O O O O < 
o o o o a o t 
- w •• '-n r, i ffl -H l'-o 0) -1 > O < : « c u t 1 -H "O ^ 
: l ' (j ci< i-> l H 'C « • e TJ c c r r- zC ~ 
.. .. a' 
ai — & g o *-» 
D Ui U. TJ C 
c. re n OJ -.-i 3 P-, a.. CO L-. 
is .X X X X X x 
X X 
X ?! X X X X X X X X 
rJ c> 
-a ^ O cn 
i J +•» rH r-J U M C ' O U u. 
x x x x 
X X x X X X x X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X x x x x X X X x 
X X X X X X X X 
x x ;< x X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X 
•A X x x X X X 
a< V£> <X> (M o o i n c M 13 CO • 
m r- OJ oo 
at >n ts- a- . 
0, V-l U > r-» 
a c o 0 0 
U U a- X > 
x X * X X X I 
r- CC <3", 'A OP el* • • x- X • -o r * -J x o r* 
f. i x x 
x x , ai y. x : 
I X X X 
xxx i X X X H 1-1 X x X •J X X X X X X 
r.*A 
X X X ! 
f - x y. X X X X 
oi oi t r i t H vo . . Ul O (N 
• <J1 / ^ - .1 Ul » - ^ 3 ® JJ1 <U Q C D 0 •• rz <U Q 3 
J P H C <30 OO LTI O R>I <I> TJ TJ U TJ -O A H cn Vr £ fl> 0> (UOO 1> >. jJ Ql K '-J TJ H lH H » FLCL/)>TOFL,-'UO.DU i>3 OQ O -C -C .C X CS.fl. j N U H i w w w w t f a ; 
vi ra fl © Vr cn TJ _ Jj « 3C o 3C a. 
l > 0 to u jJ T? Oj c ^ 
E Q) TJ a c o 0) * c k s o D3 -H e; O ^ 0) a -H JJ T5 fl rH c 
•H O 0 o 0 U o V) u o 
» </l -H 
>1 <*H 
« M fl fl W c JJ t-o c « 0) T5 R-H E C ® 4» 3 
fl u lH fl TJ 01 
Qu 4) 0i E CC 3 
3 M 
£ £ 
3 « 
» -H TJ O I 0 3 1 lH '—{ i *j v o 
jJ 13 O C rH 3 
s- i JJ o o 
I • - CU I CP. "C o I 'H 3 I Ul rH I O O ' &. C 
1 o • 
3 1 I SJ>TJ O 
J-> fl a» i o 
H a > I Jj £L o I (0a:z I 
_ w •« 
lH jJ U> 11 c o»c 
s o o o o i n - « r o * x 3 in o CD OJ oj 
l o c n o i f t i / i o i n 
) O O t O H rH 4 ,-» . . (SJ r»J 
s o o o o m o o o 
o CO 
® 2 W O 
1 •• PI 3 4)H G ) H V) (M " £ O 3 O 4> 3 > rH < > O >~t -q ; r H Q j 
< "D VJ -H ( £ > O r l j Ci & u h 3 fl 
) T3 I -ri 01 U fc. vJ C 
:*o e c W I X V ^ H ( ^ M M S Q i D l l t l u 
— X X 
fl CL E 13 O -ri H 
H H (X SJ <0 o O O 3 •iH .rJ O JJ U H 
X X X X y. x x x X X X X 
x x x x 
x x x x x x x x 
x x x x 
X x X X X X X >! X X X X x x x x 
111 OHJJ (N H H O 
ci ca CD • 
m «> cn o o oi o ai r* T m ' 
TJ •• •» o «H • s o a •• Q. > ro • fl >. U CtU j j iJ ro -H 0 Jj U 4? O -H C E 13 H (I IP 3 Q U iJ > H m c o o o 
U L> & X > 
X X X , H X X -A oJ X X X X X X I X X X 
H X X X >J >>' X x X X X 
X X X 
f - X X X 1-1 X X X X X X 
CC X x X X X X i x x x 
xxx I x x x H H x X X X X X xxx 
X X 
X X X , Et x x >: oJ X X X 
: ca cn a? £D co CD 
5 Ul o !-• rH 
a> x O X •H X 
in •• a» > <y a o •• <H sz x JJ o ^ ^ c (.1 o >i o rH a. i j jQ E a> > u o> t> nj C to > 
' 4) r 4 (/> a 3 a u> a> Q rc ui • q e 3 U 3 c 3 x: 
C O o o *c T3 U XI fl <0 (DO 0) o o j-( j-( "O ^ w IJ fl fl W fl a. a £ £ ££ CL a til 05 if, IS) O, < 
173 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
174 
i C o c c- o o o >»•> C3 O o f X X 1 X X X x 1 X X X X tX 1 o o o O CD 1 X I X X X x 1 X H X. X *o 1 4' - • 1 X X 1 X X x 1 X X >X X >; c J rH r-t c- 1 X X 1 X X 1 X X X 
o 3 1 1 rH "0 o 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X X X rH 1 O 3 1 I 1 a (D 1 !-> rH o o o o o c ^ M o r i i X X 1 X X x 1 X y. X X X • 
4) 1 U O rH o D CD Ct 00 1 X X 1 X X X X i X V X X X X C* 1 C C OJ OJ - . <N IV 1 X x » V X x x 1 X X X X X X BJ n 1 O -H rH C 1 X X 1 x 1 X X X X X P O. <D 1 i o o 1 1 1 X CL 1 c. VO o o o o m vO o '-d i IN 1 rH 0 Ci m I CD ec X X X O c 4J 5 1 Ll o if) m o CD VO lO 1 v-J v£) v£) 0 1 X X o at O 4J j • • r <N 1 CM sn 0 X X X o > —t 1 r-i O \ 1 0 1 X X 41 3 •H > > X X Z M o c O X 0« 1 CO c CO O O K> O %r> r-l O r-. 1 X X 1 X X X x 1 X X X X X X 0J f"' C UI as 1 TJ rH rH o O CD rJ C^  1 a X 1 X X 1 X 1-1 X X O •ii TJ 1 4< • • 1 X X 1 X X X x 1 X ai X X X u 
© n (0 C 5M L) 1 rH fll r-. o 1 :< X X X x 1 y. X X X f-GJ 4' u o 3 1 1 TJ O i X X 1 X X X \ x X X >: X £ 
TJ -H a 1 M O o o o o o o in o o o l X X \ X X y. x 1 X X a: X X y. X » Js 4_> "J o 4) E- 1 4-f U rH P- o n- O CD O O 1 X X 1 X X x 1 X X H X X X X o S a P. (V > 1 C c « • rM IN 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X O X X X 0 4J vli £ 4J 0) J o — O 1 X 1 X X X X 1 y. X X X X 0 r» n: 3 J re i I O O 1 1 1 X OJ* in o CD UI 1 c o o o o o o o in o o o i X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X T> IH 4J C O 4J o o oo l X 1 X X X 1 X X H X X X c 4> ,-ii c .V 0 > W KJ 1 o • • 1 X X 1 X x 1 X X X X X re R 4J ai I rH O 1 X X 1 •A X X x 1 X X X y. X r-f C J G 4) u a> U X X X 4) U TJ I* nj tj C 4J 3 *J ( c o o o cr o o in o o o 1 X X 1 y. X X x 1 X X X X 41 t> 0) 3 i-< 10 QC I O o Ct> CO J X 1 X X X X < X X H X X X a i-3 o C a a iH TJ 1 X X t X X X 1 X X oi X X' X c £ U> o c 1 C 4J rH O 1 X X 1 •A X X X t X X X X «o o 0 O — 25 3 1 i cr-o o 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X U rn CO u O 1 —c 3 J 1 1 X re O tn 15 Jj TJ to 1 to —' o o o o O O O U"> O O O 1 X X 1 X X X J X C. X X X * 0 CD 3 •H 1' 0 t- J o o o O CD i X 1 X X X X 1 X X H X X X X W fM 4J TJ U X X i a c . . 1 X X 1 X x X 1 X X X X X X < CM (0 r-l c • H 4-1 1 o rH O 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X 0 o o > 41 4) 3 1 1 4-1 O 1 I 1 X X c u o t» U X 4) 4-1 0 1 to o o o o o o O UI O O O | X X 1 X X X X I X X X X X 14 c <0 o X CJ 01 1 o O CD 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X V 11 u o 10 T3 4J J 1 o • • 1 X 1 X X X X 1 X :<; J X X X £ 1/) to -H CJ > OJ M 1 rH O i X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X x £ -1 rt; M M 4J X x — X X X 3 3 O ^ r} 01 C 0 u> k JO u lO o vo O O \£> o m o v i CN p"> 1 o 10 vo VO 1 X X X X ID V4 rH rq s CC 1 o o G ID iH i/l | o 0 1 X X H X X X 4J 00 C 4J f- ai c i j m TJ • • i KD 1*1 ] CN CO to X X « X X JT 0 o > 4) c 1 C 41 rn O 1 1 0 1 X X X X X O 0 ll> ai TJ OJ H ai 3 1 1 D"TJ O 1 1 1 •• X X X X X CN 
41 £ 4J 3 c J JJ X m 1 01 W o o o o o o o m o o o i UI O 1 0 0 0 1 -H X X or. fM in <3v IB <3v CD r| _ rH o w 4J H 1 U t-i o O CQ 1 ai 0 1 3 X x H rH O td lg r> JZ t a c ' • 1 .. V£> vo !*1 TJ X J vo 0 TJ 
x 1 0 — rH O 1 a 1 0 1 0 X X « Vi M 0 a o tJ 1 1 4J O 1 J ui re o X CD o 1 01 1*1 o tn o o m o m i n o o i i 3 in I CO a\ 1 X x X X rH M v> z 1 r j o n (n o co n 1 TJ • m 0 1 41 X X H X X X 0 r* x> 02 o J 1 o . ' 1 O vr1 m i 41 10 'J X >i X X X a 0 T) o at 1 l-H O 1 X 1 rH 0 \ •H X X X X 0 
£ o - 4J 3 > X 0 c CD 1 I Q. •« TJ .. i In Q 4J I 3 41 " 4-1 • • 4J 1 nj G, 6 1 0 rt 4J rH 4) 4J rH rH 0J 01 to •H 0/ e 1 TJ n 3 gi »"» 5 + 0-15 E 0 a a 1 l/J 41 > a. 3 41 LO 4J Q 3 4-1 Q ro 1 0 *• T> CP rH « tf e o 3 i E- I > re re 1 CQ 0 re v a Q a p 01 O 4J z £ U 1 •• X W o 0) •r». .. 3 > H ^ a i <j a u 1 VH .C E 1J {_> 3 c J £ X 3 U C 1 rH .. t) rH TJ -n rH -O—1- iJ u re 1 O iJ c O 0 0 0 C* m Iji re a) i o m •• 4J > Ki O CD TJ O V > I ( J U 3 l •H. O u u OJ 1 tn O > 41 V TJ u TJ re re •w M It 4J 0 E 1 M 4J (0 H TJ IH H <t. > O 'T r •H H O ( 0 —1 c e 1 cr. H JD £ 4J 41 41 0 0 re 4J U 4) u 41 1 U X HI 3 «< s at u r. 3 to | rH I re r-1 4> a' 3 1 4' a» (4 TJ IH M M 41 IH U IH a > 1 C C 'H « o "H 1 "1 a, u. r«- T3 e i rH 1 a«w > —1 1 > re C L0 > ID re re a a H C > U a o 1 O -rt tn 0 ID u c c = ui x a: th I M O 1 re c O 0 0 1 4) 'Jf O Q 0 £ X X a a O Q. UJ < r 1 U cC A > cn ti: >H 1-1 a. o- oc i u u U. | u u a. > 1 K! CM u J 3: LO LO in Ui cU < 2. 
o » .x o w n h ig U 
ar M G. TJ •u re s: U £ 
M 4J TJ (ll C X <11 (D 
m c 
- 4 0 0 o o u O £ w o o V) 01 -H < V 
o c m 4J TJ - s e c (D 41 3 J-J i—< o u u •H CP 
ss 19 U M (0 •Q CO 
3 ^ 
a 3 <= u-
ai o U -C •rl JJ 
•3 ' 
£ fB «• .. A x JJ 
u a o tn < E 
o » " M j j n 4J X CJ c o> c O -rl JB 
(_> as J 
4 o o rH o m . 
1 O fH o o rH o tn . 
j v o o o v o o m r - o r-
«OOrtOU"irHOrH 
l£>OlOOO' -COi r thO( o a oo 
*(-> 01 VJ 3 T? 01 rH Ifl U •• < 0 O rH > O rH TJ > X re 0 re 4-1 rH T3 U -H (U J J_» 4J OJ U 1^ 
l/l O T5 1 -rl 41 ID In c TJ C C » 02 O rt fC RH »-( 
" 3 > - I • r i r l O 
So u > > O W 
oj m 
>£> n 
CM 1*1 
lO O 
a •• •• nj a £ ID L3 -H 
X X X X I x x x x i 
X X X X I 
M«)<X)0 I 
:<j x x x I 
8 ! 
5 >; 
X X X X I 
rH O O O I 
rg m m c, i M CN CN » I 
i-t m m o i N N N O I m r» r~ • I o I 
) CO CO o I " N N O I J CD CD >1 
J X X X 
: x x x 4 H X X X RJ X X X 
x x + X X x x X X X « 
cr: x x x 
I -- X X 
P O I 3 X X 
O I iH X X 
rH rH CO CQ CO 03 t- • • -V O 1--J 
X X X A T- X X X J X X X •X X X 
a: <N r i CP (D cc» 03 H f • • J V O N fM 
•a •• O rH X o a - a i 
ro • iTJ I U O.U t 
. . „ • 4> ' -. 
5 fi) P> a 3 (1) o 41 Q CQ 0 re OQQQf-5 
A X S i J U 3 )4J-H C 0»0 O " Ifl O S O ' C t l U T ) 15 i oi u i i c 1,1 m <11 /*> il > u > re c 01 
1 V) 
) c e i < 4I A> 3 I 4 J-> > -H I 
: 41 OJ w - v i M M H M M M • itf a a v -v- a a t. w 'U IU « U- M-o q o x x x x a a 
174 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
175 
1 i l £ t j & • c O f f -
> U -j 
fl ' 
TJ 
•H O O o o u O JC UI u o cn in 
(S, «H >.«M 
ro ^ c W h o c in a> *C rH e c a> 4> 3 U rH o u t j u D> 
» fl o ui nt •c to 
U 3 3 »-' C. 3 
3 I JJ O CD VI 
2 £ iJ o c u m u H O E a> u ai u» o. > a o <n < x 
> O irt o o c 
O -m 
— o 
i O <T O Cn 
i n o ui o o i n ; 
O O O O O O I 
in o m c t r* o r-i/l • lO 
o o o o < IfiOVO OJ ' fN 
i o in o o co ' O OnO ul > . . io va 
l O i f l w o ^ 
) o (T» r - r -j • • (c CH 
o o o o o cp o l o cr> 
•—* o 
o o o o o o c 
o o o o o c 
c TJ (U rH S rH < O 
O rH > 4> x: a E i-> -H T3 3 4> 5 4J a> rH VI O "H T3 o fl ^ c t? > ro u h u: 
•• Jj cn r. 01 Cf 
I T3 T= . „ a m > 
{ et > O -f-J u 3 fl l 4> •«-• U< 'O C : a n 4i -H 
m o 
vo 
x x x x X X X X x x x 
x x x x 
o r - r - r -CTl .-H tn in n n C 
4> x x x x 
x o a • > <0 >, U i 
fX >4-1 J_l > W fl c o o o u u o- s: > 
X x X x X X 
ff5 X X X X X T .-< u, .-J X V. X r-i X X X f— 
Si X X X 4 a* H X X X c X X X fl X y. X X X rH 
X x X • &> H X X a 
it X X X x X « X X X A X X. X Hi x • tj H X X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 X X u X 4) 1J X X O r- | 
x x os x x x X X x x x x I X X X 
4> X X U X X •h x :< 
1 U* • m i—l •• r i vi 
) > a 3 Ql W 4> Q l o - r a a i i o o J £ .u (J 3 C J ^ r h c o o o u > > 0 " 0 u u i ) ra <0 J .Q £ ® 4> 4> o o ) <11 U lH tJ Ul Ul : cn > fl a ui a o. a. )Q o J: £ £ £ • j j w w u i u i a " . < 
fNj O « M O 10 A rH fl 4) ft U (k 
V -Pi O S Cu 4> •r-i « >> 0 fl Ul JJ T» 04 C U 4> 1 £ 4> TJ 3 • C o ai . C £ «1 
w 3, c 
fl rH C •H O O O O O O X 
o c tn 4i t ; rH E c 4> 4f 3 
U rH , 
u < * o • a 4> -L 4> e + IX 3 i 
fl Ul + tJ 3 -» 
3 J-» -F a 3 + E ^ t O '— • 
1} o • O £ 1 -H * 
w ; 
V 4) * 
U C JJ fl ft» 4) O e 4> U 01 ui a > j j a o 
C 41 tT>TJ O •H 3 WH -
O o a. c o -H 
n o n o o f o o i n i n o i n ill O <7> CT'OCD"* ^ oj . m oi • - co rn 
o i o o i o o w o i / i i n o i n 
-a- o t o ® r - r -rH . rH rH • • I—I rH 
J .,41 .. j j 
1 -n Ul •• W 3 OJ 1 ""D fflH •• £ : rH < o 4> -rn — 3 O H > U H D ' D H } > j = f l o fl < XJ £} • j J -n TJ Ui -h tx, > J 4) 3 jJ 4) Cu j-> Ui 
I M C'-WO I « fc t J f l W C T J C C W K X > Or Cu t 
X X 1 X X x i X * + A X X X X 1 X X X X « N X 6-1 X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X X 0: X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X X 1 X X X « X X 1 X x X 
X X 1 ^ X X X t X x a: X X X X V X X 1 X X X X 1 X •A E- X X X .X X X 1 X X X X 1 X :< rJ 5; X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X :< + >! x X X X X 1 X X X X » X X X X x X X X X » X X X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X i< X X X X X — X X X 
X X \ X X X X 1 X x > >: X X X X 1 X X X 1 X X x x X X X i X X X X 1 X X ft! X X X X 1 X X X X > X X X X X X X 1 X X X 1 y. X X X X 
X X 1 X X X 'x 1 X X » y. X X X 
x X t X X x X 1 V, X X X X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X X X 1 X X X >: t X X N' X X X 
^ r-l 1 Ci m m a. X X X „ X 4> IN OJ i-H 1 X X X c rsi I CM (N 0 CD t-3 X X X fl 
1 rH 0 i X X X X X Ui 
r%i f> 1 rsj OJ IX) 1 x X • X X X 0 0 0 1 X x H X X X a 10 l «•> r- X X a: X X 
I 0 1 X X X X X 61 1 J X X x x X Ul 
in O l m in 0 0 1 X X 4 a: <7 m rH aJ rH CO 8 rH rH r- 0 1 X X f-« ul 
V0 GO m X X V£> 0 r-J 
1 0 1 X X rH 
in 1 f l <v» X x « X X X Ui 
i-H in rH 0 1 ^ X H X X a 
\o m 1 CD m m X X ^ X X X A 1 0 1 X X x X £ X X X 3 
X X 1 X X x X 1 x * * X X X x 1 X X X X > X X E-« X X X 4) X X 1 X X X X 1 X X QJ X X X X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X Jj X X 1 X y. X 1 • • X X X X SJ w 
X X 1 X X X X 1 W X X + X X X + X •«H X X 1 X X X 1 3 ^ X H X X X X X I X X k X 1 TJ X X •J X X X X TJ 
4> X X » X X X r. 1 0 X X X X X X 4) rH J E X Jj 3 X X 1 x X X X 1 X X * X X X X -c X X 1 >• X X X x 1 4) X X H X X X 0 0 x X J Q) X X X 1 0 X X J X X D. 
s x X 1 rH X X X X 1 -H X X X X X 4> X X — 3 > X X X Ul a TJ < Ui VJ A a e 1 O rH 41 •-H 4) <v rH rH 0 0 •H 1 3: 0 a t i 1 in " fl) > Q. 3 to 4) Q 3 
I-> 1 > (0 fl 1 O a 0 fl 41 Q Q 0 •J 4) rH rH Or 1 u CLU 1 r. 2E jJ 0 3 c SI JZ. 3 fl 10 3 1 4J Jj fl O P rH c cn 0 u u 0 O O 3 1 •H 0 JJ u <y 1 m O > 4> T5 TJ U TJ fl fl • H •H 0 1 O *r| c H » rH cr> Ui .0 E 41 a> 4) 0 0 4J 4J w 1 fl rH 4' QJ 3 1 41 >IJJ Ul Ul TJ Ul Ui Ui 4> 
•H •H rH 1 G.IM > > fl c cn > fl fl Ul CL CL p Ul Ui 0 1 <0 e O O 0 1 qj 3 O Q O -C C. -C £ a a 0 u u & ! u u CU X > « (N u 3 £ M w w < < z 
175 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
O 
O 
o 
01 o> re a* 
u o T> 
• O o o o o O O J ) o VD 04 n i ID in i X X * m ® Ol U. CM 
oc o o rH O O l r t lO VO to fM I X X CM i J 
l-H 
I IN * 
TJ 
c c a> 
^ rH ^ ^ rH O 
l-H VO CO 1 
i 
VO •w 
O 1 
X 
X 
X 
X 
a? CM 
c-
3 
a 
co 3 1 O' TJ 1 1 X X *J 
r - • 0 •H 3 l 1 
1 
3 
tt' J. tn I// m O U) o o i n o i n o cn m o 1 i n CO fM 1 X X 41 a i X X X -. cn Lh o 
4> CN •* H U o O r - r - o c i r - r~ ro fM VO ( X X X X X X 
CP * •IJ a c vo X X •J X X X •<H re V) 0 r i o 1 o i X X X X X OH 
a . 01 1 u o 1 1 cc '4-1 
•• w o o o o o o o m c o o X 1 X X X X 1 X •'< + X x • s. c a> • a> o o cn X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X Li 
o o o - v i-4 o X V. 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X H 
D» l-g > •H i Li •-H O X 1 X X X 1 X '.< X X X 
a> 3 > f i-i X X — X X X 2 X u o i j M 4 tn G •<H 
CD o X re V •» o o o o o © © m o o o X 1 X X X x T X X * X • MH 
rM c Ui 4 x a : o o o cn X X 1 X X X 1 X X H X i J tM 
o !£. u *J ~o X X I X X X X 1 X X e i X X X UJ re 
o to re 
a> 
v •w I m c a) rt o X t X X X X 1 X X >: X X H M re i j o 5 i CT>*D O X X 1 X X 1 X X X X X H u 
Ll a> 0 • H 3 1 1 
TJ 
re 
< CO w o o o o o © O 1/1 CD o oo i n o 1 CO ro m i <*-l ££ X y X , <M In M ff) 
4-1 
s 
0 01 4- H 0 m o i n m o cn m i n VO CM CM CM { H X X rH 
0 T. a ® > + 4J a c vo •r 1 <7 o r i X X X r - C o 
A) A> e V « 0 rt o 1 rH X X X a J u 0 
CD >> cc 3 r-3 + re i i j o 1 { (N X 
m o re i-l u O) m o i n o a m o i n m o m t-> m 1 P I G» rH CO 1 en r- t « :< X X 4 & •c u 
u •J -n c 0 a> * m o m i n O CJl vo u> CJl T 1 H X X c 4) to 
w Or c X o > w 4 •-I O 1 P I V£R r-3 - x X re n 
1 
<u 
e 
-H 
tJ 0) * 
RE « 
U * 
r-l rt o 1 rt M 
ro 
X X 
X X 
E 
CI 
« rH 
? 2* rO It M u T J t J 3 *J + o o o o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X , X X X A 4< •<H T J 
o <p 3 u (0 • a f TJ o o © m X J X X X X 1 X X H X X X a p •rl 
o c n a 3 V * T3 a> X X 1 X X X X 1 y, X Oi x X X s : 
c € Lu o * c rH v rH O X X I X X X 1 X X X X X tfi 
o 0 c » T 3 1 rH T> o X 1 X X 1 X X X X u L) TJ 
fSI CD •H u o 0 3 1 1 flj c c 
to O i J "0 0 } Ll rH o o o o o o © m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X ^ (X X X * 1 X y 10 re 
ai o ai 0 H u U o o o X 1 X X X X I y. X H X X X x <n 
fM 1 j u JZ i J c c X X I X X X X 1 X X X X X X «H < >. 
fM re 
•H o 
C 
o 
•<H > *J o * 
01 
ai * 
J j 
3 J 
0 
o o 
rt rH O X X 1 
1 
X X X X 1 
J 
X X X X X X 
X 
0 JJ, re 
C O o u W x M i J 0 o o o o © © o i n © o o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X * X M c re 0 X D u CM * a) i/i o O CJl X X 1 X X X 1 X 
s 
H X X X •H c 
«"> <n o o t/) TJ 01 o X X J X X X X 1 X J X X X £t 4) 
<n in -<H v VO ' Ll rH O X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X E e 
-<H < «M M X m , 4-1 X X — X X X 3 0 4J 
> o «<H u U) c a 
Uv 14 Li re m m o m o o m O U I CD o CD X X 1 X X X X 1 X x • X X .X » u re LJ rH re cc •D o UD o V£> o cn vo vr» X X 1 X X X 1 X X H X X X V CD 
C 4-> H a< c u r» 'O a> X X 1 X X X X 1 X Oi X X X c. O (0 
o c > a a> c w V rH O X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X i J O re 
0) a) TJ a) •H FIJ 3 1 rH TJ rH X X 1 X X X 1 •• x X X X X CM It 
-H e c V) M O 8 
3 i 1 4J « T> 
a> a> c i j x , CO o o o a o o o m r , o rn X X l X X X 1 rH X X * cC X X X « X * •H re 
i j rH o o to a) * H o o CTi o cn OV o o i i n m X X 1 X X I 3 X X H X X X X u s : 
u w Li i 4 -C C . . r - j n j X X 1 x X X 1 TJ X X J X X X X 
-<H a> £ t s -» 4 J 0 O rt o) x X 1 X X X X 1 o x X X X X y. 0) i 
w J J U ^ u •» M 1 u rH 1 I s : X 4-1 i n re o X a> •» O c c o © o o o o 3 CM CO 1 © as CO tn i I-I X cC X Li CO 
u re to « •z o r - o r - r^ o dr. r - r » TJ • r- O 1 ® • H X 0 r- Of 
to o cn J o o ^ IN | 0> m i n U o r- x a r - a . o o 
<9 o 3fc * r-H o 3E 1 r-l O 1 •<H X 4> o 
o 
CM * c re . © a •• 3 "9 " i > Li Li o 0 o> 3 V <D a a e i 0 rH 41 rH 4> u> V CO "aj 
- 1 a> X £ T> n > 3 V l—t £ • rl 1 T, 0 a C. 1 4) > a a 4> OJ S3 3 4J a , n) O - 3 Oj (0 CL. e 0 3 t - 1 > re re i c o o re a) a o 4> •<H 0 • X 4-1 •• T rH 0 a> •O 3 > W rH a i >1 u C u O I <*H X 2 4-1 u 3 C J x x 3 -r| 
<n o c c > u TJ •(-•—f o re re i i J AJ a "S. 1 O C a o o o a 
CD +J re 4' o tn <JJ > X re 0 re < T J O i J > o o 3 1 -r| U P u 4) 1 m O > 4) "O TJ U - 0 re re t^ .1 
Ll re * a> o £ M u cn E 4 J •H * c Ll •H < > CJ w •H -rl O 1 O -r| c E I M JD e 41 4) 4> O 0 re Ll 
a) VJ , V 4> i J si d> s a> u a o . 4-1 H 3 re 4J re rH 4 ' 4> 3 1 41 J J M Li - o u M LI 4> Li a 
4-> at -* Li a > c c rH w o •r| TJ •<H b . T3 c •H .-1 <-H 1 Q . ' H 4 J > r-i | > re C 0 ) t* lU re Ll n) a a p H 
£ c a 0 o •H 
3 
o m Li c TJ c c W X X <v •w M M O J re c 0 0 O 1 41 s 
< 3 3 
0 X X X JC a a . o 
CU < * M < ^ u c i > co rt < rt rt 3 a . a . Cu U U ^ 1 ' J u a . X > 1 rg £ w <A l/l w < < z , X 
176 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Attachment "5" 
R-2 Residential Density 
Development 
177 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 2010 Page A5-1 
Derivation of Potential Residential Density (based on provisions within City Ordinance 723) 
5 acres * 43,560 SF/acre - 217,800 SF 
217,800 SF - 25% roads, offsets, easements = 163,350 SF Usable 
• Assuming 18 units per typical apartment structure 
First two units 
- 10,000 SF (first two units) + (2 units * 200 SF lawn/unit) + (2 units * 300 SF parking/unit) 
= 11,000 SF 
16 Additional units 
= 16 units * 200 lawn +16 units * 300 parking +16 units * 2,000 SF/unit 
= 40,000 SF 
18 Unit Apartment Building 
=11,000 SF +40,000 SF 
= 51,000 SF 
Total Buildings • 
=163,350 / 51,000 = 3 Buildings 
• Assuming final building has more than 18 units to utilize remaining land 
=163,350 SF - 51,000 SF/Building * 3 Buildings 
10,350 SF = (x units * 200 SF lawn/unit + x * 300 parking/unit + x * 2,000 SF/unit) 
x = 4 units 
Total Residential Units 
= 3 Buildings * 18 units per building + 4 units 
= 58 units multifamily units, or 11.6 units per acre per five acres 
» 232 apartment units on 20 acres or 174 units on 15 acres 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
178 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Bend, Oregon 
Attachment "6" 
Bend-La Pine Trip 
Generation Study 
179 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 SW Upper Terrace Drive, Suite 101. Bend O r e g o n 9 7 7 0 2 5 4 1 3 1 2 8300 5 4 1 3 1 2 4 5 8 5 
MEMORANDUM 
D a t e : October 14, 2008 Project»: 9140 
T o : John M. Rexford 
Bend-La Pine Schools 
520 NW Wall Street 
Bend, Oregon 97701-2699 
F r o m : 
S u b j e c t : 
Joe Bessman, P.E. 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
PURPOSE 
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize measured trip generation rates for elementary 
schools in Bend during the weekday p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Standard reference 
manuals contain trip generation data fdr~erementary schools during the weekday a.m. peak hour 
(7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and during the afternoon school peak hour (2:00 to 4:00 p.m.), but no data is 
available for the evening commute period. This time period is commonly used to assess off-site 
impacts of schools to the transportation system. 
This study identifies elementary school trip generation data during the weekday p.m. peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic, and was prepared based on surveys of four elementary schools located 
within Bend. The study methodology and resultant trip generation rates are summarized herein. 
AVAILABLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA 
As defined within Trip Generation, 7th Edition, elementary schools serve grades kindergarten 
through fifth or sixth grade, are typically centrally located within residential communities to 
facilitate access, and provide bus service to students within specific geographic boundaries. The 
ITE land use category for elementary schools includes both public and private elementary schools 
within the dataset, although data for this study was collected exclusively at public schools. 
As identified within the Trip Generation manual, school bus utilization may vary significantly 
between elementary schools, and may result in varying trip rates between school sites. Potential 
factors for school bus utilization could include the proximity of bus service, service boundaries, 
transportation infrastructure, crime, income, or other factors. School bus utilization data was not 
collected as the purpose of this trip generation study is to identify characteristics specific to the 
Bend-La Pine School District, and specifically to elementary schools within the City of Bend. 
Available data contained within the standard reference materials includes elementary school 
surveys during the weekday p.m. peak hour of the generator only. This coincides with the end of 
FILENAME: C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\1BESSMAN\DESKTOP\PROJECTFILES\9140\FINAL\TR1PGENMEMO.DOC 
180 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study Project 9140 
October 14, 2008 Page 2 
the school day, which typically occurs between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. However, the critical off-
site transportation analysis period typically coincides with the evening commute period (4:00 to 
6:00 p.m.), which does not occur simultaneously with elementary school peak trip generation. No 
standard data is available within the ITE manual related to elementary school trip characteristics 
during the weekday evening commute period, when limited after-school activities or staff trips 
represent the primary uses. 
As part of new elementary school projects for the City of Hillsboro School District/ trip generation 
studies were conducted at several locations during the critical weekday p.m. commute period 
(4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). These studies showed that the schools' trip generation rates during the 
evening commute period were approximately 30 percent of the peak school trip rates that 
occurred in the afternoon. Given the unique characteristics of Bend (population, service 
boundaries, and bus ridership), a trip generation study was conducted to assess trip generation 
rates applicable to local conditions. 
TRIP GENERATION STUDY 
Four school sites were selected for analysis throughout the City of Bend. School sites selected 
were those that were in operation for at least two years, were centrally located within residential 
communities, include typical school hours and amenities, contain defined attendance boundaries, 
and include configurations that would allow the separation of trips from those associated with 
surrounding uses. The school sites selected for the survey, data collection dates, street address, 
and year 2008/2009 enrollment data are identified in Table 1. The attachments include the school 
attendance boundary map illustrating the location of the elementary schools and the areas served. 
Table l 
E lementary School Characterist ics 
School Name Data Collection Dates 
School 
Enrollment Street Address 
Pine Ridge Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 540 
19840 SW Hollygrape St 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
R E Jewell Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 557 
20550 Murphy Rd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Juniper Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 509 
1300 NE Norton Ave 
Bend, Oregon 97701 
Elk Meadow Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 568 
60880 Brookswood Blvd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Each of the ingress/egress points at the school sites were videotaped on September 16, 2008, two 
weeks after the start of school to ensure that school attendance patterns had normalized. It should 
be noted that many of the schools are situated adjacent to public parks, and trips associated with 
the ball fields or adjacent parks could not be entirely separated. During the surveys, the weather 
was sunny with a high temperature of 90 degrees. Accordingly, it is expected that the trip 
generation studies are conservatively high given the higher usage of the adjacent ball fields than 
during the majority of the school year. As trips during the evening commute period likely reflect 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
181 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study Project #.' 9140 
October 14, 2008 Page 3 
low levels of student trips to and from the school, the potential impact of weather on student 
mode choice is not expected to have a significant impact on the measured trip generation rates. 
Intersection traffic counts were simultaneously conducted at nearby collector and arterial 
intersections to identify the time period with peak traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway 
system. Given the relatively low school volumes, this hour represents the time period when the 
combination of site-generated traffic and roadway volumes are expected to peak. The peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic identified in the study typically occurred just prior to the 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 
period, with exception of counts collected near Juniper Elementary which identified an earlier 
peak hour between 4:25 and 5:25 p.m. 
TRIP GENERATION RESULTS 
Videotapes collected at the school ingress/egress points were manually reviewed in five-minute 
increments coinciding with the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Trip rates on a per-student 
basis were calculated at each of the four school sites, and a weighted average was applied to 
generate a local elementary school trip generation rate on a per-student basis. A summary of the 
trip generation data for each school is provided in Table 2 and Figure 1, and worksheets from the 
data collection efforts are included in the attachments. ;. 
Table 2 
Measured Tr ip Generat ion Rates (Weekday PM P e a k H o u r ) 
School Name 
Student 
Enrollment 
Weekday PM Peak Hour of 
Adjacent Street Traffic 
Trips Per 
Student 
Ve 
Trips In 
% 
Trips Out 
Pine Ridge Elementary 540 4:50 to 5:50 p.m. 0.16 40 60 
R E Jewell Elementary 557 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.09 68 32 
Juniper Elementary 509 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.15 52 48 
Elk Meadow Elementary 568 4:55 to 5:55 p.m. 0.12 58 42 
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate 0.131 55% 45% 
'The weighted average Is calculated by dividing the sum of all trips or trip ends by the sum of all independent variable 
units (total school trips / total student enrollment). 
Based on the resultant trip generation rates, trip generation rates for elementary schools within 
the Bend La Pine School District were identified as 0.13 trips per student during the weekday 
p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, with 55 percent of the trips inbound and 45 percent of the 
trips outbound. This local trip rate is approximately half of the national trip rate of 0.28 trips per 
student during the weekday peak hour of generator (2:00 to 4:00 p.m. time period). 
We trust that the information contain herein adequately summarizes the trip generation 
characteristics of elementary schools within the City of Bend. Please let us know if you have any 
questions or need any additional information to review the analysis findings. 
Attachments: Traffic count worksheets 
School Attendance Area Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
182 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
Elementary School 
(520) 
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students 
On a: Weekday, 
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, 
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 
Number of Studies: 4 
Average Number of Students: 544 
Directional Distribution: 55% entering, 45% exiting 
Trip Generation per Student 
Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 
0 .13 0 . 0 9 - 0 . 1 6 0.03 
Data Plot and Equation 
•o c 
UJ 
Q. 
I— Q) 
O 
® 
O) 
£5 w 
II 
t-
100 
80-
6 0 -
500 
X 
520 
X Actual Data Points 
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 
: 
X 
I 
540 
X = Number of Students 
I 
560 580 
Average Rate 
RJ = 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
183 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
184 
Is r 
r r re r 
t 
l i J I 
H I « 
ililj 
P 9 
r r 
; ! 
ansr 
is|f I 
Hit 
iiSSii I 
r r 
9! 
i 
Sjjl 
1 aBczjsttasssf l jssjseassaa 
} 
££ O O O B 0 O BOOQQOFL O F L O & O D O D O B O 
t o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
5 
S 1 
I „ . . . . „ „ . . . . . . . ^ „ . . . . . . „ . . . . . . . 
*........................ 
A 
S 
l"" 
t" I 
!!j 81 l « 
I l i l t l U l l t l l l H l H U l I S l 5 BssfnnRnvraaa8£?RAnqe*a3 n i ! ! ! ! i i l ! i l i ! H l l ! ! I I I 
I* ii 
184 Exhibit to Ordinance No, 823 
187 
185 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
O ' O O O r i - t l l " ' * ' 
i 1 
s 
| UJ 1 m 
1"" 
1 i 
i § 3 Z S 
§ 
•B ° 
2 UJ 1 
Ul 
1 yo 
1 1 
s & u 
Ul w r o 
S 
E 
a 
V UJ 
o z J 
z 
i o i o 
r 
i o 
« 
K 
f ° 6 
1 
o 
I 
o 
a f a> UJ 
o r o o o o o o o o o o o o 
s o o o e o o o e o c 
ooooo**^*r 0 0 " -
, , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
o o o o o e 3 o o o o e o o o o o e c 
e s g 
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 
5 I 
a I 
^OOOOOOOOOOOO o o o o o o o o o o o o 
£ S 
s i c o o o o o o e o o e e o 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 
I I 09 CD 
OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO 
1 s a> M o 9 I CO 1/1 
3 
3©000«-0c o o o o o o o o o o o o 
^ o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
M 
t\ 
I? 
S33SJ1 « a a & a j fl 8 B 6 I v m * « a 
laifi 
a i t s S 
I iS33 SSi 
S S ^  ^  S 
g i 
a. a. a. a. a. a. 
S 
i ct 
I I 
o o o o o o o o o o o o 
% 
m w 2 
SOOOO o o o o c 
s o a o o o o o o o 
>000000000 OOOOOOOOOOOO 
3 O O O O0OOOOOOOC OOOOOOOOOOOO 
A -3 
S l i l i 
' l i t J 
uZ XZ n z 
3 flRsssasgsssB » KS3S3aB88s?ss 3 ^fisssssaess 
5 i 5 l l I I 
t l 
186 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
187 
187 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
188 
' sislIJsBIHIJ 
peeestessaasaisfegssiiflsati 
! S I I 
r r r r r r r r 
r f i s i s 
la n-
235 
fa | s 
I" 
A 
H 
3 
B"" 
5 1 
i i e E 
aoooooooc 
o coo —oor«oo»-ooooo 
s e 
if |sj o K o o o o o o o o o o o o 
I o o 
LU LU 5 ? co n (0 0 ui uj ui ui eO Co o coooooooooooo 
I 'S I 2 S i 5 ^ 
aoaooonooooo 
r a 3 
5 S £ O O SO OOO — OOOOOOOO ^O ooo oooooooc 
e E 
I 1 I 
oooooooooooo oooooooooooc 
3 I CO g
^oooooooooooo oooooeoooooc 
g « « -» 
s S EOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOONOOOOC 
t £ 3 s qi m W UI OO OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOC 
OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO 
o o 
.^OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO OOONOrNOOnOO 
° I a I- B S 8 I ^OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO OOCrOOOftOOOOa 
S s 5 i 5 i I s 
! a 
I i l l s § s 
OOOOOOOOOOOO OONrOPOOOf I 
f l ! I i I I I 
OOO OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO OO— f oooooooo 
i t g l i 3 ° S ~ 9C 
i l s i l m r i <js i t »i 
8 « 8 S £ » OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO 
, s 3s j i gg „ i p „J 
I . - S i l l 1 J J J i S f f i l i f ? I 22222*228122 | 222222222222 g! 5oS° 3 ? 3 I 1 » 5na8ssBss8»s« g BasssssssKss |J ggfcg g S o ^ g 3 g * , 
Ss g ... j, S5I1 § * I l&«li Ss §3 
is I | i 5 s I s s i i i i 1 i i l f f l S3 | j l i Di inluoou niLaai n a. a & > < i f <th i f - ai-
2/5/2010 189 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
2/5/2010 190 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
191 
i m i i i ... i imi ini^i i i i ISitiiififitHimitnii! ? * EflgrRfi8fi?»SR8S»afljjffvjas g 
fJ u 
U l l l l l l l l U l l U l l l l l U l 
191 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
I 
g? 
I 
1 
to 
in 
§ 
6 
3 
I 
| 3 
s ' 3 
~ o o o o o 
3 O O O O O O 
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
Ifo 
1 
» o o © © © 
30000000C 
aooooooeoooc 
>oooee 
aooooooeoooo 
3 O © O o o c OOOOOOOO'-OOO 
9 o a o o o € 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 
3QOOOOOO 
a o o o o o o o o o a 
a o o o o o a o o o o a 
a o © e o o c 
5 
UJ 
1° a 
A to 
I 
<Q 
1 
s o e o a o o o o e a e 
o o f t o n - © - < SOOOOOOOOOOQ 
II 
l l l l l 
SIJB5 
J i ' i I j i k l nS o o a o 
l i l i 
n i l 
% a 
s 
e 5 
s 
Si 
oooooooooooo 
3QOOOBOC 
s s s s a s s s s s s s 
l l l J j 
s i j i f 
>oooeooeee 
SSSSSSSSSS3S 
SSK8S92 > 
o 
l i 
II 
oooooooooooo 
$ 3 23222222322 S &Hau£lLQ.Q.mO. 
5 i' V to ft n u> oi <*> tri w 
« £ 
2/5/2010 192 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
?o 
I 
(t o o o o o o o o o o o o 
& O O O O O O O O • O O O 
oooooooc 
. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000 
g O O 00 c 
OOOOOOOOOOOO 
5 I 
OOOOOOOOOOOO „0° QOOOOOOOOC 
300000000000 
30000000000 3 O O O O O O 
eoeooeoao 00c 
5 
Vt 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 
>000000 
ooeoooooooc 
J 3 
s s 
i. I 
OOOOOOOOOOOO 
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 
OOOOOOOOOOOO 
OOOOOOOOOOOO 
OOOOOOOOOOC 
»2 
il 
SI 0 fl 
l lggf 
s l i sS 
i j i l i ! u) £ o o o g 
! ! i ! 3 * •» — r« * iK <ri « 
ifiEs 
i^ ui ^  I 
i 1 
£ 1® 3 ifi 
J UI -J 9 df gl 
COOOOOOOOOOOO 
£ 
£ 
S o 
2 
e s so oooooooe 
3000000000C 
30000 OOOOOOOOOOOO 
30000000000C 
>000 OOOOOOOO 
3 O O 0 0 0 9 
OOOOOOOOOOOO 
3 O OOOOOOOOOC 
OOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOO 
7222 3 522222 3 3 233223553332 § 253223332322 
3 ssggsessasss 5 SSSSBSSSBSHS 3 ssssssssrhsss ^ * iK ui ih vi W irt ift 10 j g ¥ itf tri ui ui iii vim <f> in 
y P ? 
| i i l | i 
3l£ f ! If If If a > 3 x £ <f= x P ae 
P < 1 > 
2/5/2010 193 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
2/5/2010 194 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
195 
hi! 
ihif] 
lilts sg»«° J 
B 
ls| | I 
HHl i 
i i 
i I 
f c 
1 } 6 5 
i" f 
r r 
; i 
II li 
i n n 
i 5 1 5 ! f ( S ; 3 3 S ; 3 S 
5 
j 
i t o . . . . . . . . . . . < • . » . » . < > . 
r 
f . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
j 
f 50 . . . 0 .00 .00 . . . . . 0 . . . . 00 . 
s 
a 
9 
a 
a* l« a? I iiiiiiiiiiiiiiitiiiniii | iiiisiiiiHiiimHitm 1 i i i i iaiiuiii i i i i i i i i i i 
1 IJ 
11 
195 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Bend Area Elementary School Boundaries 
2/5/2010 196 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Attachment "7" 
City of Madras Roadway 
Classification Map 
197 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
I LE3EK0 
I EMSTWO CTTY QHYGS 
CUV eXPHESBWAY 
ARTERIAL 
UAJOfl COLLECTOR M»ORCOCU!CTOH 
STATOWQ8 KI3HWAV SEGMEMT CUSSG ICAHOH3 RURAL EXPftaSVMY 
URBAN OTHTA 
SPECIAL TTWNSPORTATIOW AHEA UB8AWeuaHg»3AMA 
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP 
K T CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PIAN AND mntnssBazmmt G5 
Attachment "8" 
Project Scoping Letter 
199 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
200 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 SW Upper Terrace Drive, Suite 101, Bend, Oregon 97702 541 312 8300 541 312 4585 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: December 10, 2009 Project #: 10028.0 
To: Nick Snead, City of Madras 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County 
Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 
From: Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
Cc: DJ Heffernan, Angelo Planning Group 
Project: 
Subject: 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
Transportation Planning Rule Scoping 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document transportation analysis scoping to rezone 20 
acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) to include this land within the 
City's Urban Growth Boundary as Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This scoping-was 
prepared for consistency with the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060 (Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for 
a zone change analysis. The purpose of the TPR analysis is to ensure the transportation system 
can accommodate the allowable land uses and that any significant affects are mitigated. 
The land included in the rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of the Jefferson 
County Middle School, and south of the existing ballfields near Bean Drive. The property is 
within the Yarrow Master Planned Community and its rezone to accommodate a school is 
consistent with the approved Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is generally 
shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the approximately 20-acre future school property on 
the Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
Note that while specific parcel boundaries have not yet been identified, the general location of the 
property south of Ashwood and east of Bean Drive within the future school boundary location 
shown on the Yarrow Concept Plan provides adequate information to accurately assess the 
transportation system impacts. Specific definition of the property will be provided as part of the 
zone change application pending further area refinement with City and County staff. 
LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 
Two reasonable development scenarios were identified to assess the potential transportation 
impact of rezoriing 20-acres from Range Land to Multiple Family Residential Zoning. The two 
scenarios reflect County and City zoning provisions and are presented below. 
FILENAME: 10028SCOPINGLTR.DOC 
200 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
WrtutW. 
N6 Po»*S/ 
WEtfcuckj R<) 
M i M l a m ^Z! /V t 
NE CKtammSi 
KC ASI HoiMtt'tfiid HoijUuitDtWto 
aK'BWP 
OW.:. 
Madras 
9 Ms Id) 
B itidri'SihuDt 
6£Bu(ra 
ImAQffy obtained from maps^ jooglfccom 
w 
ImAvCtoM WjyTSll&jn 
SITE VICINITY MAP 
MADRAS, OREGON 
| 0 P j K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i o t e s , Inc. 
| S K i ) TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
201 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December2009 
December2009 
YARROW MASTER PLAN M 
^ MADRAS, OREGON 
208 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
l ^ i K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
lESJ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
202 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
209 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
Range Land (RL) Development Potential 
The Range Land zoning is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within 
Jefferson County. The RL zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural 
lands for livestock grazing. The RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum 
of 40 acres. A variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these 
uses require more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low 
intensity uses. Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely 
limited, and for analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Multiple Family Residential (R-2) Development Potential 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, to include apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723, were reviewed to 
identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses are typically 
not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the rezone is to 
ultimately allow for a new elementary school, this specific conditional use was reviewed to 
ensure that a reasonable development scenario considers the impacts of this intended future use. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building space, 
parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included as an attachment. 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise five 
acres of the overall land, with the remainder retained for residential uses. The most likely school 
type would be an elementary school given the regional needs. A new elementary school could be 
expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students. This would result in a second 
potential development scenario that would include 174 attached residential units (11.6 units/acre 
* 15 acres = 174 units) and a 350-student elementary school (remaining five acres).. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
203 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
209 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
TPR ANALYSIS SCOPING 
Trip Generation 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within the Institute of Transportation 
Engineer's (ITE's) standard reference Trip Generation, 8th Edition, using the Apartment land use 
category (Land Use Code 220). Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared 
using surveys of schools within the City of Bend, which contain slightly lower trip generation 
rates than national surveys of elementary schools (0.13 trips per student versus 0.15 trips per 
student) but are expected to better represent local characteristics. The attachments contain the Bend-
La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement the adjacent middle school, and benefit from the adjacent ballfields,^ 
additional trip discounts were not applied to the trip rates obtained from the Bend-LaPine school 
district facilities. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation potential of the two scenarios. 
Table 1 R-2 Development Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Land Use XTE Code Size Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments 220 232 Units 145 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning; Residential Plus Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School N/A 350 Students 4 6 25 2 1 
Total Trips 159 99 60 ( 
*Trlp rate reflects data collected at elementary schools in central Oregon 
As shown in Table 1, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out with residential uses alone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the 
proposed UGB amendment and rezone was determined through review of existing traffic 
patterns, the locations of other elementary schools, residential destinations, and review of existing 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
204 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
209 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
school attendance boundary maps. The resultant trip distribution patterns were separated by 
residential and school trips, and are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. As shown, the pattern 
highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west toward the City center and US 97 
corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute onto the paraiiel routes (Loucks, 
City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel destination. Both trip distribution patterns 
reflect a regional draw as the school trips are primarily associated with faculty and staff during 
the evening commute period. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 1) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing, as illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5 includes a sum of the total 
additional vehicles that could occur at nearby collector and arterial intersections. 
Study Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning (as shown in Figure 
5), the following five intersections of collector and arterial roadways are proposed for inclusion in 
the traffic study. • 
1. Ashwood/Bean Drive (could be impacted by 137 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
2. Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
3. B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
4. B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
5. B Street/lO"1 Street (could be impacted by 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
These intersections are those that could experience more than 50 additional weekday p.m. peak 
hour trips with the rezone/UGB amendment, or those that could experience a significant increase 
in total volume with the amendment1. The City of Madras roadway classification map is included in the 
attachments. 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required at the time of site plan application/land use entitlements. 
However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to provide consistency with the 
adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP), only the weekday p.m. peak hour operations are 
applicable to the TPR analysis. 
1 The City of Madras Technical Memorandum S2B contains traffic study guidelines that identify study area 
intersections as those that experience a 10 percent volume increase as a result of a proposed land use 
action. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
205 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
r 
208 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December2009 
fcALE) 
Imageiy obtained (ram maiw.gooflle.com 
ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
l ^ i K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
lESJ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
206 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
208 
r 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December2009 
(NQS^ ALE) 
f " .. . . 
B E ft . 
$ r f „ ^ T W M . 
' 3 OS g ««> » u i 
t » 
«„. » ® „ \ 
®S 
I •"•> 
X 
ft 
imagery obtained from maps-google.com 
ESTIMATED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
l ^ i K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
lESJ TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
207 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
208 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December2009 
1 
S % 
II TEVMTOTAL E N T E R I N G V O L U M E I 
11 TOTAL ADDITIONAL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP P O T E N T I A L f f l H 
MADRAS, OREGON 
l ^ i K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
l E S J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
208 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
209 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
Jefferson County traffic study requirements identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should 
be maintained at all County intersections. The City of Madras TSP identifies a target Level of 
Service (LOS) "D" for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections (or LOS F 
with a volume-to-capacity ratio below 0.95). 
Study Periods 
The purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to ensure that the proposed zone change will 
continue to be consistent with the system planning required under OAR 660-12. To assess 
consistency, the horizon analysis period is selected based on the horizon period of the adopted 
Transportation System Plan. The Jefferson County TSP considers a horizon year of 2027 and the 
City's TSP assesses year 2020 conditions. Accordingly, the applicable horizon period will vary 
throughout the study area based on roadway jurisdiction. All traffic volume forecasts will be 
obtained from the applicable TSP or based on continued application of the approved growth rates 
where otherwise unavailable. Table 2 summarizes the study intersections, roadway jurisdiction, 
applicable performance standards, and horizon analysis year required for compliance with the 
TPR.2 
Table 2 Summary of Intersection Performance Standards 
Intersection Jurisdiction 
Traffic 
Control1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive Jefferson County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/C < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Klnkade Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
10th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOSE/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
1TWSC: Two-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) 
Recent or Upcoming Roadway Improvements 
There are three identified public improvement projects within the vicinity of the property. 
• The J Street improvements will include traffic signal upgrades at the US 97 northbound 
and southbound couplet, realignment of the southern couplet terminus, and roadway 
widening. The J Street project is identified on the Draft 2010-2013 State Transportation 
Improvement Program (STIP) and is likely to be funded by the horizon period (note that 
1 Additional discussion on applicable horizon periods can be found within Section 3.2.01 of ODOTs 
publication Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Reviews: Guidelines for Implementing OAR 660-12-0060, which 
can be found at the following link http://www.oregon.gov/QlX?T/TD/IP/docs/TPK/tprGuidelines.pdf. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
209 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
209 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
while the improvement is likely to occur, a reasonably likely determination has not been 
provided by ODOT). 
• The Fairground Road extension is identified as a new east-west route within the City of 
Madras on the Transportation System Plan. Similarly, the roadway extension is likely to 
be provided within the planning horizon. 
• The City View to J Street connection has been recently completed. This new connection 
provides convenient and direct access from the proposed lands to US 97. 
The recent construction of the City View connection will provide convenient access to the south. 
The future funding and reasonably likely determinations for the J Street 
realignment/improvements and the Fairgrounds extension are not critical to the proposed UGB 
amendment as it will not affect the selection of study intersections, assumed intersection 
configurations, or result in modifications to the demand-based regional trip distribution patterns 
included herein. As a result, to be conservative, neither the J Street realignment/improvements 
nor the Fairgrounds extension will be assumed in the traffic analysis. 
N E X T - O T P S ^Etr 
Please provide written comments or concurrence on the proposed analysis scope at your earliest 
convenience. If you have any questions on these materials please call us at (541) 312-8300. 
Attachments 
1. Residential Density Development 
2. Bend - La Pine School District Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
3. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
210 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Bend, Oregon 
Attachment "9" 
Proposed R-2 Zoning 
LOS Worksheets 
211 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
0 £ (>-01 
R-I I X 
- ffi n w 13 C a> o o 
5 H £ f-[u (1 01 -
Q > (N 
T> C C 
a ll ^ 
•Q <11 *-» ra ai U S O . ® _ 
R-A I X 
0 O-M JJ CU C >, 01 f0 
1 g T> U M 
• C 01 U 01 H 
(0 r-i U 
•H O -H O O "C O JZ c OT U O W t/J U « 
HC M >H 
ra <M 
« a> H -t E H a) <u 
(Q O..C J-J 
a, -H J-> 3 5 l* n o 
H ^ PC U .U -tJ 4J 
•—I «H >—I 3 3 3 3 nj reran tM «H m 
>. txj c n M • M a> -H " 3 I tJ 4J 15 Q •• B D1 : © O U7 <U -H ! £ ns a a xi -u (M I O Q- 'rt "rt 3 C I © E ^ H SJ O O ' tj H H H Cu C U 
2/5/2010 212 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
213 
O « X rW fO a* U U. 
»f0 W H O C at o 
•HOW U O TJ o x: c moo <7) w u 
* >.0 >« k ^ oj C U<u o c ra Ifl 01 k* -H E H 4) <U U H H JJ 10 to 
4) fO e -o tj a 
« CO tf) w o e 4) o o 4-S -H (Drt fi •W O -H u o -d o -c c « u o n t/i U 
^ >,0 <3 l l ^ nj m C JJ <U o c «J n o u h E ^ ® <D IJ H H 4J U ro •H t£. in o fO E-
C rf. H 
H > u 
a 4J ^ e p 
a> "o + o o -» •H £ + > j-> * 
r* r- u 
ID f\J 
u •« 4> 4) n r-i ~ w 0 
I CS 4J 1 Q D. I M O 
0) E m •• 
u c +» n> <u a> o E 4> U D w a > j-I a o w ft x 
Q1 0) jJ "o < 4J 3 H -I O O E u • < u c v ttl >M (X 
•H i—I O O £ O • C C c 
w ra tJ JZ 3 Cl. O O 
>H w <H a o o 
w <D ro "o < 
CL <H © O 
CL O O 
o n ID U -U .u x: • •» c cr« c az 
O O O O O O O I 
o a o c {N O PJ > in t o o o -v i cn u> m o o io 
o o o o o o o l 
co o oa o < WON lO « lO 
C. O O O O O O I 
O O O O O o O I 
O O O O c O O I 
3 .. O m JJ .» .. •o >r-» O •*<«•» 3 1> «H O ^ n " E ° OH f-» •• 3 > o rl > ^ H 'D "T1.H at > .c ro it < c o tJ p .U -H "O "O -H < > U 3<U2JJa>4>>J^ 3 VI 0-HTJ"D-H 4ltwU<"D Of0UC"O*DCMXXQ» 7> <0 O H < <C »-i ^ OS 
T> U I a> u * cc a- : 
•o > 
o ® o h in VD OP 
rtdo 
o ^ "O" m o n i o r* • • </) rH O O 
i—' o o 
OMNr -
O O f 
r- o o o m o\ Ui VD • O • • • r- • r-o o •—i «—< «—I 
r- <n o o o 03 <t> m vx» • o < • • r- • r-O O !-(•-»«-" 
t- fN O) O (N o n in i . o • • . o • o O O r-1 >-l rl 
c- r-j oj o oj CQ r J 
o o cn —i r>j 
O O r-i 
v o o o o o o a t - . . t H H O 
^ o o o o in o o 
o z u 'H <U Q> Q iJ C 6 W m in ij •• ^ ^ n o h 
3 o *D O O » 2C o 
4) w a. •• V x: > 
? >i U 4>rH>S CP o u ^ > <D > 
3: © V D H >,eC C E >. 4J 0> 3 ro {5 M •H ft) «H »-l 4> -t-> W X 
213 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
w o V,-> in x> - m O <c- o o cs OS
 
o o o o o c o CO r- O CO l-i. o X X X o O C*J o CTt yL-<Ti m X a> o O o c rn o o o in CU X X t^  O O 3 uT J"i iT- m X X X 
t» •b cC a H K <5 X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X a. ra X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X in ffl X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A X K (0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X £ c u X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 u K X X X X X X X X X N X X X X X x X X X X X X X X 
H 2* o do o l* p X X >; X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ,x X X X yi 3 <M u VI X X y. X X X X X :< X X i: X X X X X X X X X X O 0 a> 3 X •A v: X X X- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X CJ C- in :c O X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X N X X X X y. X X w >: x X X 5 X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X H U T3 •o a1 y. X x X X * X X X X X X X X X X X X V. 
x X X X X X X srl P ra © ij u s a. a O 0> X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X u o f~i s: E T> •1) XJ N X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X « X X CS" D fi. U o > M X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X Ti M u OJ -H O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .X X X X X X X X X X a) o CU c > a* AJ 4J z X' >! X X X X X X X X X X X ;c X X X X X X X X X X cn o ® ro X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X c 1 *a s c 41 l-l "O A." Vi 0 
•-1 6 c o 0) o> u cn O c 0) j o C E 3 a o n o r-t e l-l < 0J H < M r c. IM a a: u a. u c o <N 03 ic (C U) 3 a ft -H o 01 19 c C M e OH {71 0.1 1—1 e t-l « 4) n O 0 G> 3 CP a 'j M a* c a> o M w 4J •H D./H 4J 3 rH o in re x> ia M 4J jj a O a> 0 JT 0 o o> 3 0* N ^ c •H 0 •>H ra > «JI a > M ra to c> C U o *a .u 3E u 3 O c x: u TJ a 0 u. c 
rf> o .c c 3 O o> u O o (u u o u a* a' c w to u O CL rc ^  w a M a> 2 rH a> 3 3 c H k <y u 4-> 4-> rH P? o £ 3 3 a c a b -H a Q< u —i a 01 <D c s rtf o © 4J 0 a O 3 M M-i JZ IB u. IM s VJ o u c £ 4J u a< <i> a O >, 4J 0" iJ 3 w 5> £ Ui m U -4 o f3 c f= o 3 if O •o r-t -4 4J a ra V-< "O OJ ra "H z O 4J c c 0) o (I) Oi H 3 u c rH 3 c n u CO c 4» 4J q J M <D -H -H Jj M a c <4-1 CP J-f o -H <V C 0) 3 o o O c ra 4) O a: ci /D a) OL o c .C aJ DJ £ l-v U o V) ft! w o> ro u C (0 O <f. 02 d> i-i 01 <0 H 0 91 •W "O <J C*J r—1 E H <D (4 ^ to 0 0) a> 3 c C ^  •H o O' R c ? (0 g V] U oi n: ro 0> 0> 4J jj CL ffl c 0 M S 0) o aJ VJ •H cr> tu a ro 3 4j ^  -H s IT) M M <u p 3 o c •H a a U c P c O c u I-' «3 a> 4) LJ f- H a> 4J flj Q o u M •H c H 0) -g M 4J -H 4-1 Cl E Cu (0 <i) > i-f >0 (0 o 1—1 £ 3 c 01 ra c V a cr> c c 4-1 4J o a (0 •H XJ g. -H 4-1 <13 t- 0> m H o o H > C n M VJ Q M CC -Q VI aJ 3 c £ •H e •H 3 d) U c Cl c Q2 QJ Kl a. fQ 0 M u r-•a r-t u c 4J w n ( - J M a. o a ra T5 ^  fll o M 3 VJ 3 VM ta o <D U ^ f- a> o O <i> M y) o O © u 3 tr JC 3 G> a> "D a c 4J u 0) o 5 Jj M a> M a CO t- T-l o V] c .c c (4 o. m M O O CL, a D ra O •H <U o d o rc o 4J "U o •W Hi o o j 4> a H a. a 3 o •H c VI u 0) CM 4) < <D --4 o U f-J c c « Qlu (g c £2 •H c c fD c c o J c u a? VI 0 0 C a) 3 3 01 o c o u o ra c X O i o ik D> D o •o •H U T1 CT £ CP O —4 rl /J j u -4 - CJ o •H C 4-> u 3 a) C c •H c c c C a 4-i 3 E 3 -w u M 4J M f- u H M —4 M M Q. t-l cn Cl di E— •u > o <y 10 U w a» a> « O o O (0 M & (0 CP 0« o 0 0 3 £ A3 -!llr: - in -H 3 0 n X3 a a 4J 3 o o «J o a u o CT> xJ U •4 Li a. P a f5 0 o T-l a a 01 Vl a tw X o p c C H c a >• a a 3 3 T) n U 5 V a a 3 h-l a d-t ra u a> •H •H a Cl. l-l u eZ U o z z t t a d> a. o o w o U Id X a. Cu E- w 
0" e tj 
v m w 
11 U C CJ D O 
MOO W W U 
I] M-H nj vi C J-i w O C to MOP rH e H <y « 
IJ H H U W rt> 
rH (0 «> •HUE (9 U 3 
±J a. —i 03 o o Q > 
£ 0J U G> <J X H -H 3 > O -U W © 3 
w rn 
1 X O f'l A 1 X l X X X X X X X X O 0 0 0 O 1 A A + O oc 1 o X r-f A 1 X I y. X X y. X X X X 0 0 0 0 O 1 A O < •a 1 '.< 1 X 1 X X >! X X X X X • • 1 c 1 X A 1 X 1 X X X X X X X X rH rH rH 1 A A O * 3 1 o (U 1 1 y. X X X X X X X 1 o I A *o 1 1 1 A A -» 0 cd 1 CN CD O 0 O O 3 O 1 in 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 X m 0 av O O cn 1 O E- 1 o H r-l 0 2 A 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 X s£> O O O | A f O u 1 O 1 1 X m 1 A c 1 1 rH rH X O rH O rH rH O 1 A / » « * ' • * £-ai 1 M 1 1 1 a: s 1 A 1 m 1 O 0 O 0 0 0 X cr. 0 ai O O cn 1 A O 0 1 e- 1 I O 0 O 0 0 a X V0 O UD O O u> I O ^ Cb t o j f 1 1 X A • 1 1 1 rH O rH 0 rH rH 0 l A — — — A A •z 
1 /> 1 X 1 O 0 O 0 0 0 vo X 0 O O «x> 1 A O • 1 o £ rH I X 1 O 0 O 0 0 0 01 X 0 Oi O O CT, 1 O ^ J TJ I A 1 X ( X • • 1 A Cil C 1 1 y. 1 0 X -H 0 rH -H O 1 rH « C-3 1 A O 1 ! X 1 A r. • t" o 1 •a I 1 1 M 
{£> 1 CM CD O <#> O O A O 3 O 1 X 1 O 0 O 0 0 0 l£> X 0 K£> O O VD 1 A A O * X t- 1 o t- i-l 0 »-l 1 X 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 CT. X 0 a. O O 01 1 O 4 4J 1 a: A O 1 X 1 X • • I A O to 1 C 1 X 1 O X rH 0 rH rH O 1 JJ 1 o A w 1 1 1 A u 1 x O <M 1 X 1 X X X X X X X X 0 0 O O O 1 ra * •O 1 1 X 1 X X X X X X y, 0 0 O O O I A •O 0 7 V i-3 1 o U 1 X 1 X y, •A X X X X H • 1 4> • J V) 1 x 0> 1 X 1 X X X X X X X •A rH u O ^ c JC O « -r a) 4-1 3 + 0 1 a: r-j r-j O 1 M 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO Cl 0 CO 0 in n 1 4J O + a 1 o H rH 1 i/J 1 0 (n 0 0 0 0 01 C> 0 CO O Oi CD I 0 0 , "O 1 j V 1 I . 1 V < * + c 1 1 1 rH O O O rH 0 T-H d O 1 3 rH V a; 1 1 1 V O o 1 4) 1 1 1 + O a 1 cc # O O V O 3 O 1 M 1 O O 0 0 0 0 CD (Jl O CD O m m 1 V 0 » K t 3 O E- 0 Z rH 1 in 1 O <r> 0 0 0 0 m o o <0 O cn ro 1 0 + 01 4J x: 1 T> J v O 1 1 V V ' t SJ; 1 O c 1 1 rH 0 rH O O rH 0 rH 0 0 1 3 1 X d) v 1 1 1 V + cn o I a: IN -i rvj 1 n 1 O 0 0 0 0 0 CD cn 0 <x> O ui n 1 O T c 4J V) 1 C S- 3 .-» V 1 in 1 cn 0 0 O 0 moi 0 CD O <Tt CO 1 V V © * •rt w • O O J TJ 1 1 • l •H t -4 0 V 1 1 0 r-l rH r-t 0 O rH 0 rH O O 1 .. V V r-t •» 3 X — 4J - £ 0) 5 J — nj 4> — to rH •/ V * a 1 N X o •rifv 1 rH X | <-H X X X X X X X X O 0 0 0 O 1 3 O + •x 1 "H O X T3 rH V 1 3 >: 1 3 X ;< X X X X 0 a 0 0 0 •G V V 0 * CO a T> 1 M X 1 n x 1 •0 X X' X X X X X X • « I O a c X V 1 0 X 1 O X y. X X X X X I-H rH rH rH rH 1 S N/ V O f 0 3 1 4-1 o C IS 1 £ 1 £ X X X X X X X w O 1 — 0 V •0 1 1 1 i. J V + a ffi 1 X o -H (SI a? 0 ap O O O 3 O 1 0 x 1 T-k X X X X X X X K O O O O O 1 O 0 « w H 1 ai o X 0 z V 1 w x 1 •O X X X X X X 0 O O O O 1 ^ v V 0 * O JZ 1 c X <13 U 1 fl) x 1 «C X X* X X X X Y. X • • 1 0 u 1 nj X u V C O X 1 X X X X X X X X rH rH r« rH 1 ra v v o l ffi u 1 J o 3 1 c » th in o I X o jJ tN V 1 •m x i 0 x X X X X X X X O O O O O 1 V V 0 f •z. 1 TJ X flj rH 1 •a x 1 -t X x X X X y. X X 0 O O O O 1 4-1 0 * f J i a> o X W V 1 KJ: x 1 U x X X X X • 1 c v V • • 0 1 4J X 1 X 1 m X >: X X X X X r-t rH f •—1 rH 1 a; 0 » — 05 - 4J (4 s 0 c 1 3 3 1 4-1 | 3 1 a .. a •• V H rH •• J •f—i •n -r-i •r^ I » TJ © " \ 0 •H i -a Q. 01 C JC •H •• M M 31 tC *-> 1 — a> 1 ra -n •g T3 "O T> •O J a a) Q. M JJ i ft 3 a M 4J X X ai CJ u 1 » 1 I/J TJ < a. < < ' •n -P >,4J t >: U JZ w i o M *o a a> •x Q.TJ > 4-> 1 n 1 < *a 1 "O nj t- O t •H u c 1 (0 M o 7) -H -t > CP 0. <U W 1 «J U l V) ty a*o .. Q; u U 4-1 P 1 < C Cu « Vl (0 <r 1 CL 19 c as nj c CO OJ I a 1 a*a dl c 4J •r~t ra (0 ro ro 1 o £ 1 o Vi 
° a 
3 > i V) 3 1 0 — 1 0 > a* •H OI T3 "Q -H w V) w V) i >. T5 fO "Q • n (D 1 9 0) w w 0 tJ ro jJ /H 1 a 1 & V M ra < 03 1 fl} M C < f >H aJ a > 1 £ c c c £ C <n x ra M ft a1 O cC l Z rH I T. M m ai -a £ M th rH 1 rH O D1*-! * a O 1 o rfl <3 o 13 u LI (9 3 M c X l 0 — 1 O c 4) M <D 3 M H H <13 0 10 C 1 01 O •H 13 + W 1 X •4 •4 * u d? w cu m u U3 l re u 1 IE J 1: 0 CL. £0 < p2 a X O X 1 a O w o ; 
2/5/2010 214 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
215 
0) rC e d T> A1 
- QJ W W LJ C 111 D O iJ (TJ ^ XJ •rH O -H (J o *o O JZ C in U O w co o 
to o> u M g t-dJ 4) 
<0 41 u i-3 a Q. £ a o U-o -
> u 
3 a o 
U f-l 4' 
> moi o w ' 
<0 4» o o c" -H fl} .-H U li ® •H 0) 3 t-t > 0 u < ^ 
/^ -i vi -U j > 0 0. O J o 
e n z x: j u iJ nj 
U Q. > a. o CO tC 2 
o © u X u 3 
at 4) »J "0 < jJ 3 •<H 1 O O e o • < Li C -=f 
v) a> 10 TP < XT 3 0* ^ o o 
M O tC -o .c 3 a- w o o 
£.3 
r- o c- -J- r-i C: m o O o Cj o <r o \o (N CS r- (T CD o o cr r \n 
- 1 - 1 c ,-i 
0 O 
cy o r4 c cn o o -JT o o a* c. o c- o TO m •uJ e r o a\ CD TO o o CD r- O o w n 0 
O o o o o o 0 m O o o o o o o 0 O 0 o C\ o o in O 
- o r-i -H O 
o o o o o o o lO o o o O o O O 0 o o a- o o \D O O r~ 
" o r-i n O 
CD o CD o rg o in lA o lA o o </> o in r. ri m UJ o Oi •-D o in r- VD 0 r- CD r- o •"H r-i 0 O 
cr o O o o O o in cv o Oj o o o u*. OS r-o o <T, o o r-r- \T) r-i o rH d O 
o O o o o o in o o o o o O o 0 O 0 o O a> C3 o in 0 O 
o ,H O 
a- c O o o o o u> o o O o o o o 0 O 0 o o cr> o o tn 0 O 
f- c-< o 1-1 O 
o o o o o o o m o o o o o o o 0 O O o o ai o o in 0 O r-
^ o r-i O 
r-o r- o LTl rg o in cn o o o a> o a? CN c OJ o o o CO r-
- 1 r-i o ^ 0 O 
IT; o m o o in o in m o in o o in 1> O •sr n CD o CD CD o <j> O o o o o w m CO fj m m en 3 r- er» •t i-i o r-i tJ rl 0 r-i 
eg o OJ o o C4 o in in o in o o in 5T O <r CD n (X. o in lO o a> to in o o iO in CD y? Z r- CJ o O — O O 
U. 4) •w *J M fl) tn 3 <g o TJ tQ —i fO (>. o D O • c o 3 —i •H cr 01" (TJ O > E- M 'O •r •» "0 -f-l o c. > JZ fO ro rt -o o u o XJ T> -ja.'JiL u •H "D T3 < > u '-> < rj; W <1» 2 u 6i 4' u 3 3 <••) G' fB (n o W Ti T3 0) u< Ui 111 Ui c t.l l C. n u c t> -o c n X at 0) o nj rt £ ca o n < cC w O a. a. Cf, cC a. CJ. (••) UJ < Us 
r- o o o .il N »r. is - o • • • 1/1 .1/1 O C1 1-1 1-1 H 
i/5 !—• • O • . . O • O O O .-H r-t fl 
m o r- o r- u ow • o • • • r- « r-O O (M ri rg 
13 cj O » s. o 
W 1-1 H -H OJ -tft • 1 a -
c .. d> - -f-l •• 4) < « —I a "O £1 > ooo^^ooo" > >iU a —I > S CP o u s i 1 > -t-i n i" \ « s Q rl >1 cT o co ce>> -u -Q v rj tJ (D 3 id li 3 t aw h d> •—i »H u r J O h u O o i c T D o c 
v) «3 *j flj a> u i a 
P u Oi c > o o 
co v> m a c 0)D 0 
DOB o si c (ft u o n to o 
« Li M 
C 0 -M O C flj tr, ® w e h at <y 
lJ £ •. U iJ iJ o at ra ax r <D I a: W O C 4J c o o h «J 
*J 13 « u w e J 41 3 3 a - i a o o e > o 2: O O G> X M 
> U <0 
o o o o o o o 1 0 0 l o • O O O » • I <M " I • o * • • O O I . 0 1 .-« O O O I r-» 1 
• n o i n o r i / i a n I » o > vo f^  » - i . cd • - . a cr. 1 > r-i 0 0 0 1 
O ift O c- in CD M o iW f • • 
r-l 0 0 0 
m . » 
i-t '"H 
m . 
• f'-i 
1 uO I O € - O O O • • I (N 1 , . . © M I ' r O O M I rl 
O O O O O O O I O - O O O • • I . 0 » « • 0 o i O O O I 
) cw o 0 o r- o\ ) . O O O • • .Of - - • Htn 1 O O 1-1 
CDOOOOOO I a - 0 0 0 • « 1 . 0 » • • o o I .-l 0 0 0 1 
0 0 1 0 0 
r-i o in • - m 
O O I O O (N • I <X> . « O I . 0 
Off O O O O O O O I OO I 0 0 o o • O O O • • I CM - I V0 . . O • « • O O I . 0 1 • o o »-• OOO \ w-t I »-t 
o O O O O O O O I O O I O O O O ' O O O • • I N • I U3 • . o • • • 0 o I • o 1 • c-o <-1 OOO I i-H I f~< 
D "D ' 
I f n 0 
ai 1 001 o O 3 J JC I 4J JC 
(0 0 0 e u at c. > 01 o < X 
_ . . O 4-J . to J ,15 I t© tf nj 111 u/ O I r- 1 — w In Ij > w I If  1 ^ J p j tJ H M I X' Pi I £ N 
J O " 81 (I II •• S 1 4J E 1 JJ I J U r-< tt Q, m <N L> I OO 1 mo [fconSbioi 1 r-x 1 cd a: 
o o CD • » o 
o O Jj JZ 0 Jj to o t«. Ol & X 
5S O <J <r> x 
o 0 1 o o rl • I ' . 0 1 • o <n 1 n 
<u 1 tn r-1 (D ' t H • ' r- » • o H H I N N 
r» I er» <0 (D • I n • • r- I - O 
ifl N I ff1 O o • 1 m • • m l • «r <N 1 OJ 
o o 1 o o H • I f* • O I rj 
in ["i I p- in O • I n • . CD \ • I-I w I (N N I I i/i n 1 r» ifl co • 1 •-< ' • CO I * t-t rl r- J CJ <N I in n 1 r- in OD • I t—« • • CO I • " r-f I <N <N 
O C I O O 
O O I O O rH • I r- • . 0 1 . 0 m I «"J I OOIOO r-i . 1 r- • • 0 1 • 0 
u - f u 0 o t o 0 y £ 1 JJ £ U AJ I O iJ d in t o cd Lu <J\ I Cu <Ti tfp Jtf J «P A5 ^ N I 32 P +J Z \n O " - '" a\ x 1 a? <j 
215 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
- ro w w 13 c 4) 3 O 
ro r-t *•> •H o -H U O TJ O -C c n o o OM LI 
* >,o IJ ll 'H 
C i-' "-f 
o c o Ui 4) M 
H E h <D 0) J H H jj U3 ro 
•a i> u ro Oi 
S 4) U 4> o a; -H > O -U o D 41 O CM UI W 
1 C* 
r' O 0 0 0 c 0 X O VC c \o O oi O tsL A X O <3 CI 0 0 0 T X O 0 0 J- / O •p c A J ri O X O r-i ^  0 A A a X 0 "C CO 1 ev CO 0 0 0 O O O O c 0 0 X CP 0 \D O O H 2: A « O O O 0 0 0 cr X O <J\ 0 CJ\ A A Jj tr y M A c 0 X .-i O O A A ^ 0 c 1 fsl A X X X V. X Y, X N O O <3 0 O ^ A O y X X X X O O O 0 O O 0 X A X X X X X X X X A A • X" X X X 'A >: X X O 
— — A — A A 
x 0 1 a / . K X >; X X X X X X O O O 0 O / O ai O X X X X X X X X O O O 0 O O •c X W X X X X X X X A « tt :< X X X X y. X O 3 O A X X X X \ X A A 0 "D co I CM CD O of 0 0 A O O ui 0 0 0 0 0 X m 0 in O 0 in O t- O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X r- O r- 0 O u r-1 A U X A n c X 0 c- 0 A A Cr) 1 cv 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 X m O m O 0 m O E- 0 0 0 0 0 0 X r- O r- O 0 r- *o O O U X iu • 4* rH X 0 0 4-1 r-t JZ O ro 4J 2 3 X 0 1 (M O y. A X X X X X X 'A O 0 0 0 4J O C£ 0 X X X X X X X X X O 0 O 0 0 U O x V X X X X X V < * c X X •A X X X X X X X rH rH O 3 O \ 4) X X X X X X x X 
CO S A X 0 1 eg ai 0 of 0 0 V O 3 c- X x X X X X x X V. O 0 O 0 0 V O 1 3 O X 1 0 X X X X X X X X O 0 O 0 0 O .c 1 T3 >1 V L' y. N X X X X X X X V v • JJ » O c x y, X X X X X X rH 0 1 3: 0 1 ffi V V V O X 0 1 rH C-I X x X X X X O 0 O O 0 0 O) 1 C V, 1 3 r-i V X X X X X X X' X X O 0 O 0 V v 0 1 O 0 1 "O X y. X X X X X 1 -H X 1 0 V X X X X X X X X rH V v 0 U — X 4) — (TJ v - & - 0) V V 1 N aL 1 T-l OI -1 M 0 m 0 0 0 0 O ro O m 3 0 a: t --i O t- 1 "C -i V 3 3 O <)\ 0 0 0 O CO O CO "O V v 0 TJ 1 -H vJ 1 < TJ "O • O C 1 --4 V O O «-H 0 rH 0 d O O 0 X \ a 1 4J 1 c QJ £ E O r ZD 1 0 V 13 M V V m a: CI Of 0 0 O 3 0 ffi M <*•> 0 O 0 0 u> en O CD O i_n O 0 H i 4> 0 f* 1 J-l rl 0 z V 9) m •g 0 m 0 O 0 0 <5> Oi O CO cv CO u V v 0 1 c 1 ro (j ra < • 1 ro V u 0 rH 0 0 rH O rH 0 0 ro V V rH u 1 r-3 c lu 0 cc rN 1 Jj (M V M Q <3 n O O 0 0 u> O TO  in V V 0 1 *o f-' 1 ro r-t *o m •rH 0 en O O O 0 01 Oi O CD O a? 4-1 O r-3 t a> O .J I crt V n: U ' C V V 1 ro ih 0 rH O O O 0 4) — Cf) — u - M £ < 3 1 3 U' 3 U 1 a «• T3 H rH •n •r m V> -a V -1 T> D. w 1 c .c M t-l X CC Jj Of ID T t TJ •a X) -c- T> 'D "D 3 41 0. U 1 3 0. a i: X X 4? 41 0 V> 10 ~ < < < JJ >, U jC 4J O 1 13 A: 0> a -a > Jj tD flj r ro P c 1 '/i V) ID 1 W > c U. >1 4) •H u 10 u W a. 'J •C- <1> iJ jj_JJ -j. c 1 a U 1 a 3 RJ c .iJ tfl a. d. 01 c •iJ ia: •O (T- m ro •H "l I™* "0 £ 1 0 'ft 1 0 5 ? 0) V) 3 0 0 > <0 to "0 13 to 10 to w "O O "D u 41 a) in 1 0) to a T> M ro 4_> )J "0 ro a: a". l» si ro lH C < c. i> 1 E C c c i X c to X M » 4* U CL, 2: H £ > ro w <v -a W O CT rH Q. O 1 i.; ro ro vJ 1 u ro s •X 3 U c y. u u ^ a> ro 3 t- H Of u to c 0] D "i 4) cf £ I X rl rJ 1 X rJ U ff 0 CD < u U ft* £ X J X O a- <33 -1 Cli X si II. a U W O 
K <J r« C >. 4) ro I E T» T> .X . c 4) 'J <U t) 
-CQ V) m 15 c 0) o jj 
ro rH •»-> —i o U OT5 o JZ c « u o » w u 
* >.u 
to H -H fO <M C iJW b d ro ta a) M -H E f-© 4> J H H j-> u ro 
2/5/2010 216 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
2 1 7 
o o o o o o o <-  - o o o . • . o • ' • o o rH OOO 
' I 
O o ' O o 
• o 
O o o o o o o o -OOO • • . o - ' « c o o o o 
O O 1 o o <N • I i£> • ' O J * o 
on; i tr. t CI Ifl • - f, 
O (O I Cl • <T. Ch 
• n 
u ro 4? ro n s *J 01 " 
ranu H o -H <J O O o x e w 0 o io to u 
4 1.1 -H 
C 4J <*-( O c ro CO 01 i-t -H E H 4) oi J_> u u ro 
o o o o o o o o - o o o • • . cl- • • . o o r—< OOO 
o m o o o o o o o o o - o o o . o - • • o o o «-< o o o 
o o o o o o o o o o - o o o • • . o • • • o o o •-* o o o 
OOIOO eg » i \© • • o I - c. r-t | -H 
OOIOO OI < I v£> . - O I • C-
OOIOO r-j • i <-o • - O 1 • C3 
co co I (sj m r-i - i at • . o t • 
o o r- • . o 
O o r- • • o 
r- m CD • • ID rl rH 
3 g 
Li a :> a o << z 
•eH? ro ro Li OI 4J < u n s 
l-l .. I L, O O I O O UX I O 4J I O 4J ro o i ro u-) In r- i Unii rfp M | U r fv I - M u E i u s: o U I m U r- X I a> X 
•O or 4J X U 4J ro o tu o\ <* -X X ot X o u cn x 
o i-> « m tu dP x 
a T in O a-, x 
w — O D» 4 i X U 4-> >0 CD 
•a x x >} :< x x x x x x -x x JJ X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
W X X X V. X X X X X X 0) X X X X XX XX " 
X X X X X X x x x x x x x • - X X x •' 
X X X X X X X X 
x i< x x x x x x >: x xxxxxxxxx - 1 - 1 X X X X X X X N X 
X X X X X >! x 1 
x >: . . x x x Y. X -< X 
ieMa*or-c\i-ioochmNr-oo x t o if i" m 4 »frt0n0a)000vin<l>00 x x*»oor-r-» 
r a> o rJ co o • Y r-j rH O O O * xx + X X + 
X X X X X X X X n 
ttxxxxxxxxx X X X X X X X X X X 
x x x >: x x x 
•n I 5.' 0 LJ Jj ft- C >1 ai ro 1 E "a -a -x 
o 1 c oi oi 
-rl e *o <u m o > 4» X rl a, 4J p — a.' ro X c Jj H ifl ai o c JJ a o h 4> -H a. 
X X X X X N X X N X X X X X X X X X X X X X N X X X X X . , 
t ! l !8fH?SlfS5838S35583BS51JB38SSfe3 
s 3S 3 3 5 3 583 3 3 3 33 8 5 5 3 3 3 53 5 3 | %p X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X h 
H ^ 
•H O *H O O "O 0£ C to o o n to u < 
M) -rl ro U4 C -U o n it v> <v u -H E H CJ <u 4-i I—i r-i 4-1 (J 0) 
ro : 4J x SU CI CL X U B 3 O O -U UO D O Uj "O CM <V 
- C u £ 4IU O J 
a u u a >i u rt u c 
j c e o p q> ro -ri z o t-> i ) rl E-> u ro - O or. j u C 91 I j 4) 4) 4) 01 3 I C4 4J C C O I « li a ro ^h : j ® O J -J u. I 
i c j j n k i-1 > > 01 U • O I oi oi a c i-> -: i> u-i q. ro < > u o -J aj t iJ i i 4> lu lu i > O O "0 •• •H C OJ J J-l -r| U M I U W 0) 0) 01 i 0) O JQ A O 1 a e e •!->1 a 3 3 T3 u o z z < < 
3 01 WJ • 3 tl' 
^ tJ> Li (1) ) c ® •h a< o ' to o jo % x> u • CL O A3 ® a n IX ) O ^ ^ •rl ^ 15 D> C B U 3 0) c c -H M JJ H rl I-o v) m aj ,a*J 3 o o o ^ >n a a « m © -a o. Q. o S. J f t O O r l 
U4 U W « o 0* o c a ^ «h - Q. p ro o o jj 
> -H •H JJ >. i-> Li <0 X> Li tf Ql ro "o h a> oi H3i' J> •H O O H JJ 3 O C OH £ Si 3 
" 3 U & U 0 c X 4J •H h l) 
> ro •H pi" U C li-H C ro n o 
B5 8. -U tHQ.ro ro o w o 3 
jj c i c JJ oi o . 
r-i .H JJ j C 3 C I — n o* a) : III £ \ Vi % JJ • C n Li 0) < u jj ro 3 3 c 0 -n • E- a' I *c H X ft u cc cr> ( 
> 3 C 
•J 3 ^ 3 0> -
cn c c c iH rH M CT> W oi CT> o U-I Q,lu u W Q.'H IH Id o to UJ 
Q. 4-1 3 a u 4J O O I a V x o u-i it M tl S ft J 
U 0) C flj C 41 O U^J 
rl x e >-• CP 01 3 0 3 r-i e ao CI-H O M C C Li X -rl -H a H » S 
roc* M > 3 -
& 6- -r 
217 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
h M 
"D <0 u It d) o X o. 
O O QJ 
S I 3 
<0 —i u •M O - 1 O OT3 
O X c 
« u o ww u 
• > , u 
3 £ * 
c . c 
e - o ^ 
o> 3; cu 
u o ^ •d 31 3 > 
U o 3 (J) O u» 
V) o 
o x y. n 
x x x x 
o c: o o o 
o o o o 
O O O O ' J O O O O 
o o o o o o o o o . . . UJ o o o o • o o o o • • • -
o o o o o 
43 
O O O O O C 
o o o o o 
O W X X X 
o a> x x 
O C^ x X X 
x X . 
O T> X X X fl. 
O -X X X X X 
O O X X X X 
o o >: x x x 
. rH X X • X 
O A x X X X 
c D O O C- O 
> O O T J 3 43 o 
1 I ( N £ 
a •.S3* , H . . X . . . . . . , 
-• c •• o w v; n £ ai oi c i 
U I C A J ' H 4) 4> Ck,!? E E O , 
3 . h *J w e —< e C - j d h i 
O 4- 13 0) <15 C "H — ' h H r i i J ' 
: .. I i J H u . Cl « E H Q ID I j ai v c/ ^ u w t j io oi > u : 
> 'O « 4» 41 (U -U O C H AJ 3 • 
- - - - (.1 -»l 4J ! 
.. > , c m : i lo o i-i i n f 
v.1 u/ vi' vi* iJ ^ • flJUTlCEOCftw 
j in a; i ' to ' H - h C i -
L? ro to 
. . •• C (0 — «-» (N •• » CL 4.1 a1 cr . i-J oi fo »• " 1 u» c cj> - ro xi u u. t-
X X3 X - x 
Q U ! O V 3 
m o n 
+J vc * 
> VP o o 
•H ST 0 
<N 0 
•O 3 O O O 0 0 r> 0*. 
O a r~ t - c 0 n 0 n m 
v i f - r - 0 r - 41 f> 0 01 < 
U VT 
Qi 3 r-i cn D. O P c 
O t r i n cc 0 CD •H iJ tu r* r - O r - 0 
C r - r* t - M ro cn 3 
43 rH 0 O 
> e UH O 03 •H ^ O ^ 0 0 O jj m in O m >1 cr, 0 01 ay 
C O N N c r-j jj r- 0 r- 0 
O M •H 0 
0 rH U 1-4 
U "P 
n c M r»i 0 O) ar> O T^ 
O so 0 <a m O 0 
a U r* r* 0 r- U f l O M 
m 
r> 
0 0 0 0 in O m r» 
C vfl <JD 0 v£> C fM O <•1 0 
O 0 i - r t - 0 i n cn 
-H 0 JJ •« « t0 rH »- rH m • n 03 JJ O JJ O -i XI 0 . •a CL 
3 SI 3 > O ^ 3 fl A, ra X 
a t u D. (J g 0 -•H 
-a fl> CJ E (0 (<-i -43 •••-f O O 4> •M 
" u " O u c M O a- c ra — -W u t-l 4-1 jj 0) u 
0 , -H - n 1 10 c O 4J H 
V • C "O CB 0 * c a 0 1, a , c cC u + M 3 a. 
o « x rH fl) 3t U J4 •O nj 4J ra 03 • 2: £1. 
a? 
1 3 : 
0 a . 
u vJ 
ft. C >1 
4> HJ 
1 e -o 
•D 
• C 41 
(J 43 43 
v CD W 
ra >-» •H O 'H 
o o n o c c woo cn to U < 
> , u 
« P -»H ra 
c u t j 
c c m » 41 in 
•-H £ H ai as L) H H u ra 
Si 
U H « 
H < + 
o a 43 
ft' £ + e: 3 
03 C + 4-> 
W * 
c> • 
O * 
•H + > * 
41 + > + 
m 1 
w 
s : 
s : 
CTv-O o 
-H 3 
a. c 
11 
£ 
«} •• •• 2 £ U O C jj ra O V) 43 0 e jj » ffi 'H 01 i-> £ 0) u Q. > c rf, c jj a 0 S3 ra tn < x J 
O 0 0 0 Cl ro 0 m v 0 X X X X X X 0 O iD X y, X X X X X •A X X X rH O X X X :< X X X X X X X 
O 0 0 0 Wi m 0 Irt n 0 (—1 X X X X X X VO 0 u r- O CO v X X X X X X n fO 'O X X X X 
«-« rH O X X X X X X 
•rr 0 0 to 0 m c 1 0 CN rH r-J C<i (N 0 CM O CD f» <n \D O M" CVJ CN ro CO 1-4 rH O ^ O 
0 r> 0 0 r> 0 in 0 0 0 X X " X X X X 0 0 CD n X x' X X X X X X X X X 1-4 rH O X X X X X X x X X X Y. 
n O fO 0 r- 0 in ** 0 x X X X X X (O O CD (M 0 0 CD v X X X X rH eg . . (VJ (N X X X X 
«-« rH O X X X X X X 
0 O O 0 O 0 o m o 0 O X X X X X X O O CD X X X X X X X X X X X X rH O X X X X X X •Y X 
0 O O 0 O 0 o m o 0 O X X X X X X O O CD X X X X X X X X X X i- 0 X X X X X X X X X X X 
0 O O 0 O 0 0 kA O 0 O X X X x X O 0 cn X X X X X X X X X rH r-t O X X X X N: X 
0 O O 0 m in O Ul If 0 l£ rH in Cf r-J fM O 0 to r- 0 O r- ro r- ro ro rH O O 
CD O CD 0 m ro 0 in r 0 r- CN m 0 O 'O O o g o c j r-i m CT> O VD CO rg r» r-4 r-i O O 
0 O O 0 c. O 0 in O 0 O m 0 w r- C7l O O O CD 10 ru O ., r» ^ ro r-t O 41 O H m O n 0 0 ro 0 in u) 0 in 3 »-t m 0 m <T> m O rH OUr-' T) • fV) 0 
£ ^ ro 01 f^  ro fO rH O X -H 0 41 - 3 -H a. •• 13 •• 3 03 •4-1 jJ g ra a e O -H TJ •n » in 3 4» e -iH X 0 6. a O T) ffi 10 Cu E 0 3 i- > (Ti ra 
£ fit 0 u •n 3 > r-i rH a >. u a u 0 > t-l rH •n Xr-t • <0 10 n 4J JJ ra •v. 41 > £ 10 < TJ O > 0 u 3 -H O L> a-
£ jJ •H •0 •H < > u 0 O -H C E 3 4J CL> 0) u u 3 O U rH ra rH a> 43 3 (0 O -H V •D --H 43 UJ lu c -iH -rl rH O. 4-1 4J > O 10 VI c c 51 X X 4» —» O ra c 0 O 0 
> 0 n < < D P- CLr OS U. U O O P- £ > 
X X x H t« X x 
oi >: v, x XXX 
I X X X 
n (D r( X X : 
* « t - X u. or- j x " 5 5 
PS .x x x 
y x x 
1 x x x 
es >! v, x h 
t - 'A X X 
.X X X 
X X X « X 
E - >: :< x 
r-3 -A X X 
x x x 
Y, Y. hJ X X X xx xxx 
1 
x x * x x x -
ec X x U XXX (XXX 
kO m V9 (Q VS (Q fl rH • • •J m o 
0 ». ® > a 3 41 w o a o - n o i o o 
< ^ S u U 3 C J 
> JJ -H C 0 0 in o >> © 'O "D o "o 1 cr, u ja £ 41 43 41 ; >, -H 4)tiiH"OiH 
> H J C W > i U i f l ^ f l J J 3 OO O £ £ £ £ 
1 N U ^ £ !/) I/) (A U) 
S3 
2/5/2010 218 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
219 
C. 4> O e tj 
; i s 
• H O W O O TJ O J= C 
oat! u M u 
T3 H 5 <y ro H C tl o>e ro "i 3 
U O 3 a» o u. 
(A O 
JOD '-< 
:< x x y 
X X X 
XX • X -«-i X X X X U X X X 1) (vj re o N 1 f i O C; r- r- o r- o o o •. <N . f I 'O r-| • 
O M X X X. X o a x x x x 
O O O C O V ti. _ U-00 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ^ v> o o o o o o o o o • o . i / o • - • "•« o o o o o o o : m • o o o o • Q, o o o o o o o o o r o o o o c n o o o o o > .C O O O O 3 o • o o - - • ro o o 3 ro • o o o U tj o to o 
; a, x .. .. X X • J TJ XXX X J3 X -X 
O o CJ TJ 3 
m ro jr -h SWUM O M "O OJ I JC. •• X <J -n I 0 ro «- n st > T> w v a> OJ j > ro -a TJ c £ < 
! m j: <u ti oi c a j OJ Q. "G E £ o > J rH £ C W 3 -H H 
' TJ ro <1» > M : 
O -X X X X X o o x x x x x >: x ; X C X ?v • x "i x • >: : x u >.' x x 
> O O t O VD > m o d U VO • V-C , C rH rH rH fl> > <-J £ N CM ^ cr. oj in o ui > OJ > r~ O r~ 
3 CTl <7i o O r- r- o VD VD o 
h r- r o Ui r- t- o VD vo • 
•w ro o o 
AJ xn l/> O OlNNO 
c o o o o u> VD o (J VD VD O 
CTi jj O v£> r~ u r- o r-m> <y m o m 
r- w a o r- \o o vd io u n • m 
C*V rH O rH LTI >CP. O O^  fsj u r- o f— 
O Q.VO o vs> ro oo o vo OtOOW 
JJ O t' P 'H TJ O 
0) Q> .. _ _ .„ . . . -W Q. ijaiLJE-SJOI/l 
CT> O H H >i C 
3 -H .. J H U i ro u . w < o j 
10 -
10 ro .T.i u u 
> > 
-u 
ro • iJ tl. u J 5 il' o. I 
a-« e Q, o jr 
w 2 C w-. u c jj u 
c "C 
^ m Vk c a o o u 
ro •• -r-i -ij a*o Ch 3 ro er, ro au £ u Euro o o O -tJ u M <5 »-t »J dJ * V3 u * c a o 
t M • Ci. 
Ti ro jj ro a> o X a-
-n ( s: o o-w 
a, c >. 
, •o Ji • c a) o a) v 
»• to w w c c « a o 
u o T3 o j= c w u o u 
* ».o 
u M-H ro C iJU O C Q n tl M H £ f -<u a" JJ —4 rH u uj ro 
ro m 4J s 3 U a 3 6 u. o — u 
2 £ U O C jj ro u a o E a) M a> M a > jj a o in < il 
O o 
M H -o — CL C 
C 1TC o -h ro u a >J 
( to O Ifl fl o N 
» 3 4J J O > M C I (J M 
Uw jj .. .. CD .. Vi D e ro tu .. g o s o M •• 3 p- <-l T)'n-I P ro < tj o u > TJ "O -H «(> OH a) a> u u 3 ro TJ "O -H ft) In U 73 c TJ T) C K ™ J 0J -H 
in o 
., \fj tr-
fl. .. <•» a E o o 
fr* 
x x x x x x x x X X X X x' x x x xxx 
x x x x 
X' x X X 
x x x x x x x x xxx x 
x x x vt x x :< x x x x x x x x x 
O "sD CD O VD CO VD O VD CI C") ' 
O r-t VD CJl .. Vfl rt H o 4) Vi V V • 
s o a *• a 
ro rH 0' 0J 3 CL U > —( roc o o o 'J U ft £ > 
•x X X > H tf X X « x x x U X X i \ y. 'A 
0i X X X -» H X X X j >j ;< x 
ni x ;< : f- x x : hJ x x : 
X x x x x x 
a. x x X > X i 
3 x x TJ X X 0 XX S , X X oj y. x 0 x x •h x x 
X X i 
i 5 
t<; vi co c 
J i/l O N 
X X X 1 X X X xxx x x x 
° i i ' H en u j oi >. > ro c c (lis o; 
> > a 3 o) » o ro a) o x jj u 3 c 
o u h TJ > ro ro M o r. x .c E w in w 
H W W1 0) Q SO 3 j= J= U U •a ro ro ® o o M M M ro a a c. a a CO < < 
3 
til 
219 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
o tn x 
rH flj B U i 
iJ m Q I- o o O lM o (J O • <w O o o O £ O. 4J m O N c JA o o o o • 4) o -o » (M A o 0. o o o o rs) •r-1 > s •H 0 1) ro 1 01 {M O s JJ .c z> CU c o c? c c o O S3 U U ro M —( o X o o © C 3 O CL c >, V <J •A 'J o • ra m s? ro 3 JC 10 o o o O IJ 1 £ 73 Q. Ul o a> T> £ TJ CO c 4) 0 4> oi •J u a 01 L' Ct n O SJ » • H •o —i a J •o c kj X S 41 ro * 3 I jj i9 u <N cn c 4) O 41 6) o to o C- •H CJ» E W c*> 0) —( 0) s o 10 •H a (0 * H c o O «H U m M JJ •H CD 0 * (NJ sy c 0 <£ + i-3 O o c <H 0 •H a o > 3 1 Qi 0 c o 0 T> CJ * O w -1 (0 O .C c a 41 "O * cn ul w o o u a M 10 • e) +J 3 IJ 01 w L> •H X 3 .x * 4) 01 oi •H « > a c + 4» 3 ft} >i U U o 3 •H * a u u* U> H •H 4) o lu * * 01 10 CO o N t a: O Li *J C Jj (NJ V O 0 c O c ro UH fl) * c UJ M 0} 4> M o 41 + 3 1 iJ r-t £ f-< H * o 0) 4> a 4) 4) xJ «. CO tK 4' u E £ JJ «-H 4) CD « E- o o O •o (M 3 -H •H U IJ (U > X. 41 O r1 t" xJ oi +J 41 (N us o o CO r M ) O W in 55 OJ « "0 in * rJ C C ro 3T o ra 0 o 3: <0 c C C a> *J Jj Cr * •a •H 41 10 10 ••i .*> c 0 to X 0) 4) i 4) c a u xJ Vi <0 JC •H a] 0) a -a £ o >• 3 O I 3 —I xJ (1 G -c E c •H 3 •H a Cl o T5 4> n c N JJ i C? —re— X +J -H O. 41 g O ro ra 0 c •• 4) i-i « O E cu 41 ^ fl 3 M Tf ra 4) > M > u O ra - M tt > -o ifl fl" 4» 41 JJ 41 C AJ 3 •H ra — u - CL t> > n) •o •o C E c w a CT> O -1 o <N - 7 a u T. C 4 a 0 01 M 4! 4) ^ a •H •H a -k n> U £5* cr cr t -h <» ra CL, n • eZ 2 X L0 n. a. H O U) l/} u M to tf 4 ci CJ1 CP . >0 .Q ±J 
ro •• -H 
. 8 S'l 
0--T—W u +) OJ 
tj * c - c a O t c a o a. ^  H o u • — 
» M J< ro tJ id a) o S a* ai •n I 5: o a* M u Pi C >i oi <o 
' • c 45 O 4) 0) 
-H O >H u OH O X c « o o w w o 
* >,o Li -H ra lm £ jj O C Q n 4i u -h e H 41 4> -U —< —< JJ II) fl} •H U ^ r, o ra H 
a 4; • ai £ • as d + 
c u » o > ; 
3 iJ , 
p — * 
1 tn + c * 3 t 
) o o OJ m o in v O X X X X X X 1 V, X X ^ X 4 n> 1 "O 1 4> o o O CO 1 X X X X X X 1 X X E-.X X X •o 1 ^ X X X >: j X Qi X X X o c 1 -H 01 rH O 1 X X X' X X X 1 X X X X X 3 I -( T3 o 1 X X X X X i X X X X X 0 t 0 3 1 i CO 1 M -H CM o (NJ o vi> CO O u-1 t-O X X X X X X 1 X X Oi 'X X X + l- I xj O r- o CM ai oaio in i X X X X X X 1 X X H X X X X 
M JJ 1 C C (NJ PJ rg . . m r> 1 X .•4 x X X 1 X X X X VI 1 O n r-> o l X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X { -X) 4) i a o 1 1 X a rtl 3 1 c o o rH C-J OWlM O rj i N "M M tn O 1 o CD y. x X -» 0 41 Cr 1 o o o co J f~ o o O 1 Cm X X X cC U tc 1 o I (M C4 m o r- ^ X X X •H 1 rH rH O I O 1 X X X 
> 41 X x z M t) 0 4) 10 1 u> O u> o o ot f i r O r» I y X X X X X 1 X X >{ X X • in W a: 1 T> o O o ® I n X X X X X 1 X X X X X >4 c "O 1 4> i X X X X X X 1 X X as .X X X CJ <4-1 •H c 1 rH 41 rH O I X X :< x X X 1 X X X X X H o 3 1 TJ o I X X X X X i *x X X X' (•• 0 1 o 3 I i M cn 1 M rH o o o m m O m I X X X X X 1 X X X X X 4 + X oi 1 +J O CO o CO w O ® V£) 1 X X' X X X X 1 V, X {-< X X X X 
> 1 C C CM • « OJ M 1 X X X X X X 1 X X •J X X X X O 41 w 1 0 ^ rH o 1 X X X X X 1 X X X X X >: U •J <0 1 O o 1 1 u t c o o o O in r-t O H 1 \D VO O 1 o o X X X * X a •O 4) 1 o O CD 1 m «-H O 1 tr X X X c 4) V) a 1 o 1 rg CA o CD X X X ro V) rO 1 rH O 1 O I X X X -H C V — .X X 01 
jJ 1 o o o O m r-i O N n SD O 1 X X X X X • •H O a 1 o o O CD 1 m o\ 0-1 O 1 X X t- X X X a u T) 1 1 u? m m \D in y, X (C X X X O c I c e> rH O 1 O I X X X X X CO 3 1 o 1 r x X X X X w u 0 1 -H P 1 i ro 0 CO 1 W «-( o rH o o O U*l rH O Ul o rH ,»! o O [ X X rC O CQ O CD u m m 1 u o o to 1 cn o o O | X X ^ o _c I a c 1 \o \£> V X X *r o lM a! <«i Jj 1 c rH C- 1 O 1 X X 0 3 1 u o 1 i 01 -u 0 1 (A u> o \D o eg CO o m ai O Cf 1 m rH r- IN 1 X X * X X V + M c U 4> (0 1 o O CO 1 cn cn cn O 1 X X X X 41 •H ro 41 1 o 1 f~ M <x> cn m X X X X Si -H o SJ 1 rH O 1 o i x X X X X E c -M X X X 3 O —i CO C a ji s 1 o o •in o tn oj O CJ 1 rv n co m m o » y. X * X X X » 1 o o O CO 1 r-r- O 1 X X ft X X X 0) CD CO •D r \D ru r- X X as X X X Xi 0 a) c 1 C 41 rH o o i X X X X JJ 0 S 3 1 o I I .. X X X X >1 rg M 0 1 -«H 3 1 I 4) V) JJ ID 1 [/} rH m o m o c. Ci O ul * O 1 in o t7» rsj o rH X X t as ID m co in CQ -H V> 4) 1 u T-l o C CO » r>j o o o I 3 X X H rt U 
> X. i a c 1 .. kO (£> -a- -a x X d CO ro "S. JJ i o w rH O t a O 1 £ * X rH 4) CO 0 ki I o 1 1 S jj m X 01 o 1 10 o w o o OiT, r O r^  l 3 rH in cn co rg 1 X X X X X • ki z i o o co 1 •• rg cTi ai O 1 oi X. X X X g r^  m i o 1 o r-n aj id n m 0 X X X X >; 0 i ^ o I £ rH O I •rt X X X X X 4) >. - 3 > X X X ki O c ro i -H a •• T> - .. 1 0 M 41 i 3 a« <M jJ W 1 ro cl E 0 ^ • 4) 4> 4) rH •• rH in 4) CO •H 4) e -o to 3 a <-H £ 1 u o up a a i CD > a 3 4) IA 01 Q 3 JJ a ro 5 •• "0 ca rH ro lu E 0 a t { - 5> ro ro 1 a p Q ro 4) a q 0 iS 4) X o z £ s < 0 r-1 •• 3 > a >i U CLCJ 1 <*-t X. S +J o 3 c 3 -H oi a o c 1 -H •• 0 > rH T) -nH 0 I ro ro n ra 1 o •»J -H c O 0 U V O I+J cn -M ra a» 1 o to 41 > £ ro ro < *c o JJ > J 'J o 3 •H o >J O a> i in 0 >, 4> •o -a o TJ ro ro U-l M (0 4) 0 1 W *J (0 £ -M -H TJ •o < > V rH 1 •H -H 0 L' —H C € 1 -H 0< X3 e 4) 01 Q) 0 0 ra 4> yj 4> kJ 0) 1 AJ SI 41 3 41 3 u 41 41 *j M 3 fl » »J iJ r-i m H ai 413 1 4) >• JJ 0) u Vi •0 * U M 4) )J JJ 4> M a > \ C CP c to 0 •H V T> •H a u- u, "a C 1 •«H -A rH O. Uj jj > rH 1 > ro c W > ro ro u ro a a jJ H e > JJ a o 1 0 H >0 O n) M c V "D c to x x 4* •A 1 0 ro c o O O 1 4J 3 o Q Cl JZ x x: £ a a O < to a. s [ O cn rJ > m o * ~ CU Cl C£ Ik 1 U O UJ O U 0u E > 1 (N L> 5 Iff w w w < < Z 
2/5/2010 220 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
221 
x x v x x x 
; x x 
1 U3 O 
X U X X X ai vB Q, ffl O W n- o oh TJ rv • (N 
.u m «y O JE 
U ® OJ C ^ S 
- « ) « w u c OJ D 0 
O T3 •rl O C x > 
E TJ H o o> 0" U N U 
V ro H C O •rt O1 E ffl r) 3 
Oi •> o c. o o i ' o o o o o o o o o c t o o o o o o ^ o o o o O O O O O • o - m o o c o o Cj O o « • o o o o • a o 
O G O C O O O C Kl O X O O O O 3 • UO « • • Q c & - o o o o fOO OJ £0 
o o o o o < 
o o o o o 
O 0J X X X X O ft X X X X • XX - X . O "0 * X X X oj : o -X X X X X o y x x x x O o x X X x • <-H X X «x O JO X X X icow m o n U VO . VO C -« rH rH 
N u h o r-io (j in o n r- aJ ro O ro 
U O "O O X c WOO 5 t/i L» 
155 > 0 >i LJ H 
C (J O 1= ro V) 0) L. H E f -0J <v 
W O : 0J O I CO O 
> in W <o o co . cn o o o . r- u ro • n 
•H in ij in o CJ 
m o m o cm o 
in co o oj m >i cd o co <n .u r- o 
i D. o vo 
I rH O rH vo o vo • O C CO O CD r- • r- o f^  • n 
x a u c .-IS- 0) 
6 C -H 3 -H E-
. c - o w x n i r a i a ' n c a 4 n c H © o j o . - o e e o ^ 1 ,H JJ ll " ~ . ^ - . . ) ^ n ai 
: j h a V) :s i a> d> OJ J T> c e 
u rtJ •• w 
• D fJ D VI W U 
I O U I ! ro M • * l/i rt.' I • • O O O O. 
uO«->0rH-oo«-> Q.T5 Q. 3.Qp:=> o < > 3 m < <o a. CJ, —(>fc-t->Q,UEU 6-yuP-u aj y E -u "J _ -o..cco—n. sj «n .•» o o oj u O -- O O C J.HUO- ^ c -£--.. U O 4J «H 4J U CI • " O » -H « c » —< « U • , t C TJ a O • c a o 1 * O. • H rt D U t I- 3 ft 
•r» I £ 0 ft 
ft C >1 0J ro 1 e v •a x . C OJ U 0J u 
.co m to O c 41 D O 
-H O 'JOB 0 X C V) O © n W U ^ 
J M -H ro m CUM o c ro m 4J u rl £ H 0) 01 U H H -u cj ro 
ro u O 3 3 U a 3 E O - ' L> 
3 I XI o oj in 
) o o o r O j . rsf 
iXi O O V£> WflOCOH rH 
o o o o c 
o o o o c 
o o o o c 
o o o o < 
2 £ JJ O C ro V O £ 01 U CJ u a > u a o w a: x 
c T C o -H ro u d J 
• x ro u -i TJ I 5 P 41 
ibi )J .. .. 0J • S-i 3 0J rH e i ro U> •• £ O 3 ) U T-> •• 3 > <-< I h H TJ 'n H O ro £ T) o u > -0 H u < > ow 
-H $ Cu U ^ C TJ C OJ X X 4) -H M O Oi H a 11 
"O « • 
C vo fn 
£ 
a q a e o o -rt f-H H ft ro fij o O U 3 •H -H O JJ U F-t •rl —< •—I ll ll o U U u. 
XXX x x x X X X 
X X X n 
x x x x X X X X X X X .N X X X X 
X X rf x' X X 
x vi v. x X X X X x x x x X X JC x 
lO CD CO 1 m co co <• cj r-
E o a " D, > ro • ro >» a a o 4J to •A u a u <o O -h c £ ro r-i o< oj 3 CLU4 > -H ro c o o o l> u ft E 
x x x , E-i X X X n5 X X X 
Ctl X X X + X H 
e- x x x 1-3 x x x x x x X X 
» ^ 
X X X + x x x < •< 
si X 
H X 3 X TJ X O x 
c* o tM x 0 "-1 —I m o rH Ch M 01 >i -u > ro c 
X X X - X 
x >: x x x x 
a I-H to cr. c E_ CD • • j i n o M 
© , 01 rH > a a ai o •• ro oj a £ u u 3 c c o o >, 41 *o tj o .Q g 41 41 4J U U TJ w > ro ro m SO X X X swww 
«• -I w W 4> Q 
a s ! o u tj ro ro 4) O O M M M ro a a x a a w *c KC 
221 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
BS U U o <0 w ro c> U X a. 
• to ll) n u c il D O u -w <0 «H •H o -H U O -O o x c woo o w o 
rt >,« M H (0 C «w O c TO trt IS 
O -O w o <u <J X > (J U -H .M 01 ^ D E fl a c e T3 u O 4> 0) L> W •*-» 
CTE re m 3 U K H 
M O 3 oi o Ui to o 
X >: X x x x x x X X X X 
XXX X x • x • x x x x 
o o o o C< U) o u> mom •£> • vo 
o o o o o •11 O o o o z i o o o o o o o o i v< o o o o o o o o o JJO • • - L-iOOOCl-C. < to - o o o o - • • • a o o o c o o 
o m x x x x o ai x x x o a, x x x x X X • X o u x x x ci : o -m x x x x 
n a o o o o o o o o w O X O O O O D • o o - • - ro o ro • o o o o w o a> m 
o o o o o o x >: x x y ; 
E •H f-
w r i n o n o o o o (t> <r T C 
3 r* f o r-o m m o m (Ti Oi O Jl 
•h r- o r-u, in in o in <Ti Ol • <Jl 
'H V ") O *J o o o o U IN NO N 
C N oi O IN OUIUIOU) u OMJi O ffi 
ai 
•H H 
X oi oi oi c a-o e e o e c -h 3  • • — H t" H . 
«h o ro ro tj ro 0) > u > < a c H ^ 3 -H » 0) C U -M -U M (J H a~-i >i c ro m | W Ifl U H w < Ll i 
i-t m -• • a -u •• cr cr o'» -h o) ro •• cl tn tn o1 • IB xi .u lu i 
io *• •>« E •TE • C O O I ' > > > 4 
a 3 a ^ . e « e £ o a o c m hu-^ t c U -- U'U C Ui't-v c e j j h i j ^ .. n - --H ->^1 si c 1 c tj a o -t * a. o u * 
—I X X X 
C X X X 
ENOIN oi to o in > \o o VP 
4J o o o 0 o v? 01 w o rj 
L0 CD O 00 00 O CO Ui rM • CJ 
N O iN >T=r o «r U CC O CO 
a a.' o o> ro m o m U d o r j 
in m o tr, oiocr. C CD CD O CD c <n o cm O cr» cr> . a O N • O J 
_ O xJ C «H "O O • 3 i) 3> £>«?>_ 
at E.: 
i e tj 
• C 0) U OI OI 
<. m « in CJ c hid o 
w o O O TJ O X C woo co co u d. 
k -H ro M-t C »M 0 c ro w 0) M <H 6 H 01 ai UfHH jj UJ ro 
sri 
0) TJ CD C 3 I 
momomcooincD o co en o cn t n o cd (ft cr. cj • oj m • • rn ri r-l rH o 
^ O t h O v t t O l O T ( m o Oi r- r» o oo o ^ . . IN 
CC 3 •H -» ro u 1 O 1 c O 1 1 cr> ra ch O o Of o in m o m I I rH i <N 1 m rH rn m i m i us < X X >i •x X 41 c O 0J 1 o 1 rr O o co r- r- 1 O U) VO i-H 1 fc-4 X X c o > <A 1 t-f 1 «H • rH • rH rH 1 OJ t rH • i o CO rJ X X ro -rH ro 1 1 rH o 1 1 r-l O 1 X X X -U 0) u — — — X X u 
u 3 JJ 1 1 mom O o to o IT| \o o va 1 tv rn | m IN CV o, 1 X X _ X X as tt> 3 4J tn u 1 O | o *r o OO IO m 1 o in m O 1 X X ' f- y. X X a a 3 u "0 1 1 1 \o rn 1 VO \o . 1 X X tsL X X X 
£ UJ o c 1 c 41 1 rH r-H o 1 O 1 X X X X >. o O ? 3 1 CPU O 1 1 1 X X t X X X u u 0 1 -H 3 1 1 1 1 d ro T3 RJ 1 W rH OOO o o o O m o o o 1 iff O 1 r- O o O 1 X X * cc w in 00 CD £0 u 01 o O •H I o O CO 1 ifliDOlO 1 X X 00 o x: 01 X j a c 1 1 vo a» IN <M . 1 g X J o" m n •rH 4J > 4J 1 o 1 o 1 1 O 1 X X w C 
> 01 •H 3 1 JJ O 1 1 1 1 i u £ U 4J O i w 1 mom o rH O m vc-o 1 m i r- oo m VD 1 X X X X X M 01 a cr. ^ CD CO I 1 o rH O CP M 1 m co in o i X X t- X X X 0J If) TJ 01 i O 1 1 VO pi i CTl IN IN X X X X Si 01 II c IN M i 1 rH o 1 i O 1 X X X X X e l-l ro 4J X X * 3 o -H o> tf) C 
—( A i 1 OOO o o o o m o o o 1 x X 1 X X X X 1 X X + X X ro a. i O 1 O o CO 1 X X 1 X X 1 X X H X X X 01 OJ c 4J 4 CD *o i 1 1 X X I X X X X 1 X a. X X X X 
> CF» CI > c 1 c OJ I o 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 x X X y. 4J 01 •H o 3 1 CD O 1 1 X X 1 X X *.< i X X I X X X J CD u o 1 -H 3 1 1 I i 41 c tJ X CO i co «H 1 o o o o o o o m o o o 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 rH X X -r « X X X X •H SJ Ui 01 t-< i O O 1 o o 1 X X 1 X y, X 1 3 X X H X X X X 
> x i a C i X X 1 X X X I TJ X X X X X TJ T. 1 o i rH o I a X X 1 X X X X 1 © X X X X X X 41 u m u M I j-i O 1 \ H 1 1 X 1 X |J X OJ O 1 V) i o o o o o o o m o o o 1 3 X X J y X X X 1 X X X X X Ll CO 2 i O o 1 -0 X X 1 " X X X X 1 41 X X E- X X X Q o i— J r o 1 1 0 X X 1 4J X « X 1 O X X X X >: a o i i o t 2; X X 1 W X X X | 'rt X X X X 'A 41 o 5s 41 X ~ 3 t> X X x Ll IN o ro J 4! i i i i 3 •• 41 4-1 AJ a) I a i ro Q. e i 1 »• 1 0) RA 41 41 w —J w 41 0J £ i i TJ -n »M 3 oj £ • V o -rl I s o a a i V ) 41 t> a 3 41 w 41 Q 3 o ro I i O •• V CO ro Cu e o 3 f In 1 > ro ro i o a O •• ro 41 O Q O ^  0J o CD xi 4J i 0 u 3 > rH T H r-l a i >1 u a L> i h-i X 3C -U u 3 C X X 3 01 u C 1 } 0 «H > t« W T3 •n rH C t ro ro r> i ro 1 o «H c a o o o a 0) ty * 4J ro 01 1 o 9) ro > x ro iDrf T5 O > 1 o V s > •H O O O 1 m © >1 41 TJ "O U "O ro roM ro 0J O £ 1 U JJ in i e jj -H TJ TJ < > o 1 M •rH O 1 O "H c £ I «H CTl t-i £I £ 41 <D 41 o o 01 u 41 u 41 1 JC O 1 3 H J JJ 41 4J 4J VI 3 13 ( 4J 4J «H | ro rH 41 41 3 1 41 >14J 41 u Ll TJ W IH Ll 41 U OJ M a > 1 c C I •h <n o -h TJ TJ •rt 41 TJ C i -i r| «H J a*u > -J 1 & ro C 0) > ro ro M ro a a c > 4J a o { O -H ro i o ro M c V "0 c ft a: sc 4> v\ 1 M U O 1 ro c O 0 0 1 OJ © Q £> X x x x a a O M U) a. s I u Qi j t > CD i5 H < <t M 3 a. a< a: tii 1 u a Ui I u u £ > 1 J <M L) in U) 0) rt a. 2 
X X X X X X 
x x x x t X X X X I x x x x i x x x x i 
X X X X 1 x x x x i X X X X I x x y, x i i X X X X I x x x x i x x x x t x x x >; i 
x x x x I x x x x I X X X X I X X X X I 
« X x X I X X X X 1 X X X X X 
ai X X x ^ 
2/5/2010 222 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
223 
I 5 o> J £ CL 
, S 3 
S CO Irt ! ) t P C 0) p o jj A —» ^ -H O -H U O "C 0 £ C woo W 05 O < 
IS) G) U H E f-01 0* 
a s m a c E tj u 0 a> o u N AJ 
TJ H 3 01 <0 C Q —I E7» E ro -H 3 U tl H a> c o 
A => > 
a* s; a> o U w 
IJO 3 0) O ti« to o 
JU. C 
o o o o 
J M O (N >• ) O C O B ' i ro o m O » ra • r-j R 
• o r» i' cn c " i-i o —' one i (?, C Ol "1 M ( 
> to O co cn < i ® o oi a-co c J <M O CN C C 
x >i x > x x x 
o o o o a 
o o o o 
w o o o U o • • . o o < o o ij o o o < o o o c o a - • ai • o o c • o 
o 0 o o o -c o o • <D o o 
CJ o o o o o o o o o 
o o o o 
> O O O C 
o o o o o 
O H I o *o • o o i 
ro o ro „ " 
•Q -H X Of • • C O t>'.' X V) JZ ai 01 C Q. U ID£-H fl) fl) Q.TJ E 6 O >> 3 -H <-» U E "O ^ £ c -H 3 H a j m c - r t - M H i j j H £ .. i g - i fc Hi h e o ro ro i> a> *». m » n tj ro o» > > < > TJ w o> oi a» iJ -i-' u 01 C i-l iJ 3 -H •• ;> ro"OOCg o c « o i y u - H t J i J t ) . o vjo a> ro -h g,-<h -h q,'H >. c row*v. j O f l . Q . J h D J O W W U H l f l d . O ' 
. „ a u r t r-i oi K l» * i0 J3 jj c 6 o ' 
X x X X fl) X X X U iJ « X X » x n X • X 4* SO 3 x X X x -Q X X X 
o—|ooooior~< 
U O -H X X XX X X X O J J X X X X > x n x c o o x x x x u x x x o • -H X X . X —I X . x o o ^ x x x x o x x x 
rooexxxxaxxx • H O O X X X X I Q X X X O. O O x X X X O X X w x x • x x • x .. O X X X X •• X X X 
o o o o 
ij o jj o -i 3 £I 3 > O < a 3 t w > • e s IQ.E.-'H rd.ta o a Ortl-'W flj —Tmru P-U u 
m >J> C 
j < ro ) e u 
u O O 6) 
ro «h j-> -w 0 -H o o r-o x c 03 o o 
fl« u 
>. o 4 Vt -H <0 UH C U «*H 
o c ro vi oi u H E h Of 0" Jj H ^ jj td ro •h u 5e tr, o 
c o o > •H <J ai 
13 £ 3 a 3 E 
St X • X T 
4J T> v C 3 I 
M * ^ + o * 
a t 0) to 
S : 2 • 
m a > jj a o 
IF) 
1 o o o o o o o m o o o r X X 1 X X X X 1 o 1 o o av i X >: I X X X 1 j X 1 X X X >: i o i X X 1 X X X X 1 O 1 i X y, i y. X X i 
to «—1 \ in o m o o m o m 0% o cn i a-j O 1 CM i/l r- fi i o o r <j> o CU CO o 0\ cu CU 1 CU m <M CO 1 o. c r J VP n rO l I O •-> 1 tA r-l o I i CM 
to 1 i in o in o fl cr> o in o 
r» i 1-1 m 1 TT cn O X 1 m o m U) o Oi r- i m o X ' O 1 r- n i .X 1 I • H o i l r-> X 1 
i «n 0 in o o m o m o C 1 .N m I r- rg CM T O ( o o a\ Cl rO ru 1 1 i 10 m j C-. CO C 01 1 l-i o r a i Oi "O t-l | i i i 10 1 o o O o o o o m r- o r~ i in O 1 CD CT1 o ui i cy O O 1 o o cr> \o o\ m Q, C 1 r-i •—i i r-r 
o •"-« 1 r-H o i I tw * * U o 1 10 1 1 o o O o o o o U"i o o a i X X 1 X X X X o o cr. ( X X [ X X X X i X X' 1 X X X X 
° ! o i X x \ X X X X — X X — — 
1 o o O o o o o m a» o a> I X X 1 X X X X 1 O 1 io o KO o U3 | y. i X X X X 1 r—' | X X 1 X X X X 1 0) 1 o 1 X x » X •A X X 1 HT)H 1 X X 1 X X X 1 1 0 3 1 U c-t | in o in o GO Cl o in vc o U3 I X X 1 x X X x t U O O 1 r- o cc o a\ U3 V 1 X » X X X X 1 C C I m m m \o V3 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 0 t r-t o r* X X 1 X X X X ( 
o o o o o c o m o "ff 1 eg 11 1 <3 r- i 3 1 VO o IP V0 o cn r- i cr cn rH 1 O 1 CM fM CM rv I <N 1 in m ' 1 1 o i i o » 
— — 
1 o o o o o o o «n o o O 1 X X 1 X X r. X I "O O 1 o o cn 1 X X t X X r. X 1 1 X X 1 X X X X J o f X X 1 X X X X I H-OO 1 l X X 1 X X X O 3 1 14 •—1 1 o o o o Cl o o m o o I O 1 X ( X I X x X x r <-tj o o i o c cn t X X 1 X X X X 1 3 1 •• X V. 1 X X X 1 "O 0 >-• 1 i-l O 1 O X X i X X x x r o O O | t rH 1 x 1 X o o O o o o Ci in o o O | 3 x X 1 X X X 1 o o CTi 1 •c X X 1 •• X X X x I a, O 1 1 c x X 1 a x X x i o 1 o t I X X 1 —1 X X X X 1 -H X x — 3 — > 1 Q. o «• 1 >H 1 3 C >H 4J Q I « a B i O *H f a> 1 •o M 4-f 3 a> rH £ I & C5 X O CL a i in 1 o *• *n •3 rH ro Cu e o 3 1 i ^ > ro ro i a: < o 3 > rH | ^ rH a. i >> CJ a. u i "j o > 1- TJ •r* *~H 0 1 ro ro O 1 Jj Jj ro l o 0 M •• 1 o > JZ ro to < V o u > 1 0 u 3 l •H o jj O a) i U Jj M I e -rl T» "D -H tXL > (J rH | -H M o » o c E 1 "H jJ JZ 1 3 0* 3 4J 0) 01 JJ iJ 3 ro i U Jj rH 1 R5 rH t a* 3 i ai C <71 C t W V) o -rH *o "0 CL) tu L. XI C 1 -1 -rt rH 1 a<w 4-> > rH i ;> O -H <Q 1 O ro i-i c TJ •0 C w X X 2 U U O 1 ro c 0 o O 1 0) U££ J 1 > co (5 < a. n D cu II- 1 IJ V U. | u u CL z ;> r ^ 
X X 1 X x x x X X 
OS X X X H I- .X X X x x xxx 
oi to t-« n • o os cm o t-i ro i 
a j-.' x x + • x x x J X X x « >: x x < 
X W f < 
oc x x x 
x x X h t- x x x iJ X X X X X X 
V r i IN I > O, 3 0) to Of Q io--roa)OaQ>J I 4 J U 3 h c a o o u > >» fl) "O *d o *d ro ro J £3 E OI A> " " " J flj U M *D ! ;to>roronroCLO. >q o J=. x: JZ JZ a TT. )*3stot/)t//to<< 
223 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
o - o 
o 01 x 
RL (U ff VJ i 
» CU W 
in ID c 013 O 
•H O 1-1 O O TJ o SI c w o o UI CO Li1 
4 VJ -H 
0 C ro 1/1 4) M 
~ £ £-OJ <1> 
e tj o OJ 01 U M «J 
O U M 
M O _ CJ O lu Ui © 
0' * 3 I 
U FZ-_ -A-
O B U 01—t 
£ 1 
CL O 
.. c •• o U 10 JZ. M U U 0 u TJ 01 -fl" T- -H U. 0> 0> W 2e » d> 1> Ol J> ro TJ C fi 01 Ll <y QJ ro -H I o a a ,.1 f-
O o O o o O o in ui O rn 1 o in X X r- CTl ro Ik cc o o o cn ro m m OJ X H O 
1 TJ C 0) r-l *"• ^ O ^ Id rn J 1 VD """ o w X X X CC r-j CO cs CTV 3 1 D»T3 1 X X O -H 3 1 D ro CD VJ r-l m o m o rn CO o in O to in O 1 N o ro m X X + C4 X X X • s 0) H u o r* o a^  o cr» cn ITI VD n IM .X X £- x X X tr> ro tr 4J a c VD X X y. y. X OJ ,4 R o ^ o i rH o X X X X X H a 0) 1 u o i rH o: » to o o o o o o o m o O O ,«< X 1 X X X X X X X X x » o c 0) o o Cl X X 1 X X X X X X X X 2C o 0) o 01 Kl o X X 1 X X X X X X -J x X X o» > •H M o X X 1 X X X X X X X X 0' •w £r 4J X x — X X X u ( J JJ Ui o 
® O ^ ro OJ o o o o o o o in o O O X 1 X X X X X X y. X X < to OJ 3 c tO SI ai o o o CTV X X 1 X X X v. X X £- y. X + j o • 0 Ll J-> TJ X X 1 X X x X X oc x X s OJ o vi X ro 01 m C C 4» rH o X J :< X X X X y. X f-rH J J o 3 1 CD o X X 1 X X X •A X X X X H U .X u <H O •H 3 i OJ tu 3 •a ro u CD CO *H o (3 o o o o o in CO O CO m O 1 IM vo vo CO at IX X X x » 
*J ro 0) 0 OJ H O M O M M o CTl in M o CN ro r- ^ X X X U E OJ A . 0J > U a c i—i rH rH \£> *r 1 m rH o ni X X * rH o 0) o> £ OJ W o >-H H O i i—i 1—1 X X m J J ro •n • X cc J^ ro 1 J J o 1 OJ M O E u if) in O m a o m O ri O n m i CO f) m X X -k 0) + TJ Ll u c o 01 m O m Wt o ffi U) 10 OJ <Tt CO o H >! ;< X c * 0> o CL, c >> o > U) J^ rH rH rH r* r> | CO OJ CN ^ J X X X ^ - 10 
M 1 OJ ro E V - H V 0) ro U rH ^ O J " R -M X X X X rH 4 c 0) rH T5 A! ro Lt ^ 7 o C 0) M 3 4J o O o o o o o m O O o X X J X X X X X X •r X X X + U 0> OJ 3 u <n oc TJ o O o X X X X X X y. X O. • rJ o c E 3 a 3 Ll TJ ai X ,>! J X X X X X cC X X X 
< 6 u> o C rH 0« rH rH o X X J X X X X X X X >: 0] « o 5 ? V o X 1 X X X X X X X u * U CM to n o o O 3 1 ro f o IA o c TJ a Ll o O o o o o o m O o o X X 1 X >; X X X X PC X X X r x + u * U) <0 D o a o £- 4-> O o O o PI X I X X X X X X H X X X cn w a -H o x: IJ si c c X X 1 X X X X X X J X X X X w-t 7 < rsi ro >H ^  o O rt > u 0> a) o> 4J 3 1 O ^ U o rH o X X 1 i X X X X X X X X X X X o * c O 0 TJ M £ M JJ o d o O o o o o o m O o o X x J X X X X X X X X X • X M Z c ro 0 x: c 0> Jj 00 0) to O o a> X X 1 X X X X X 5 e- X X X -rl CO u o CO •o (0 0) J^ o :< X 1 X X X X •J X X X n CO o 0) f>J M H o X X 1 X X X X X X X X X E • 3 -H < <<-i ri x: 00 4J X X — X X X 3 * O o o •H u Ui e « o tu Ll H in m O in o r- o m OJ o CJ X X J X X X X X a X X X « ro ^ -H ro cC 13 o 16 O <£J OJ a> o <T> CTi a* X X 1 X X x X X H X X X 01 « CO c >J UH 0' c V TJ o X X J X X X X X X IX X X X JC + O o c ro > CP o> c r-i 0' o X X 1 X X X X X X X X X •J + O u 0) w 9) »H 0) 3 1 rH TJ rH X X 1 X X •« X X X X >J cv rH e ^ n Ll O 0 3 1 a* 9J -r 0) 0J c u SI CD JJ *-f o O O o in in o m a> o CO X X 1 X X X X rH X X + X X X • X •H * u <H <H o to o> H 4J O O <Tt O <r> rH o o U) *£> X X 1 X X X 3 X X X 5! X tj u LJ ro > _c C C rH f.i OJ CM •• X X 1 X X X X •a x X X X X •O i »H 4J E 4J O Kf O rH oi x X 1 X X y. X O X X X X N X 4» • V) o 0 o M 1 O rH ri 1 £ i_i + m ro E-» X 0) O C c O o o O o c m o 3 r-i m i o CO CD m H V < X •W < Ll * M U) 2 r- o r- o Oi o- T5 * r- o 01 • H X o • r-TJ o Ol •J O O v rv 1 0) m m (JOP* J^ X o a + o ro o rH o £ 1 rH rH o -H X o> • X o OJ c o ro ^ ai 
- 01 rH 3 oi V-J 4J a &i •• O (X E 1 
3 TJ •• O rH 
- > Ll 0) Ol -H tO 
U 4 
01 * 
o 
CO -H 01 £ TJ 3 cu rH £ •J e> 'H 1 s: o a a to 0> > d 3 OJ co S 3 3 + tJ o ro O •• Xf CO ^ ro U. e 0 3 £- 1 > ro ro Ci CJ o ro Oi S 3 <1> + y. O 2 _c 4J X -i a: o Li 3 > rH ri "H a • > U a u U-i _c X iJ u 3 jr .c 3 + -r-i 0> o> u c <H •• O > t- rH •o -i 0 ro ro J *i u ro O ->J C O u u C* IM W A * u ro a> 0 c/j 01 > SI ro ro *C TJ a J-> > u u 3 J •H U 4J u 01 »n o >, 0> T> TJ O "0 ro ro <1-1 Ll ro o> o € Ll 4J M E Jj •H T» TJ •H < > u l-f •rl «rt O J O -H c £ i-H cr> Li E 01 01 OJ o 0 ro 0) H OJ Ll o> 4-1 JC 0) 3 0> 4J 0> a? Ll 
CT, CT, 
3 tJ 1 ro rH A> 4> 0J >. U 0> U M T1 U Ll M o + Ll 4J o> u a > C cn C <—( <n o M TJ TJ fi 0J T5 -H -H rH J aw-t 4J > r—1 > AJ c to > ro ro u ro a a -I-1 f H s c s- 4J a o 0 H 3 o ro Ll c •o TJ c n X X 0> -H Ll Ll 0 J ro c 0 0 o O » CJ o 3 o r. si jC JC a a. o « A- < W < X o CC > <D o >"H < ft, a a, OJ CC u u LJ 1 L> U OJ X > u X w to CO CO < < z 
2/5/2010 224 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Vi Q. x> jj nj >» 
C E fl H < D> •H - O) «J V> U> H (DOS 
•H O 0 O « o r e tfl O O W O! -H 
^ u T} A) C 
C o D C U 
(fl « rH e o 01 (V H Jj rH 
>i*H U "O f3 C 
CLX •<H JJ 3 14 IS O F ft ft 
CM ^ • tj 0J -H •« 3 j tJ JJ O Q •• « P s 0» Cl K fl) I E ID Pi a x JJ <M i o o. -h jj 3 c ) qj £ n nj O O . O H H H f t a U 
2/5/2010 225 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
O « O. o « 
=* i-i a . 
O HI u 
.H | S 
w o 
10 cn • < . . u TJ 
ro C 
i - l O O 
1 O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 i n 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 O 0 <5 O * 
DC 1 0 O 0 cr. 0 0 i n 0 0 1 0 0 0 • 0 t 
*0 1 X» r - 1 • O - 0 r 
1 r - CD c 1 4> 4) 0 rH rH 0 1 0 0 O i - i -r 
m m • 3 1 |J "D 0 1 
r - u") O 1 JJ 1 • 
o m 1 -H rH O O m O m 0 0 0 i n Ci 0 Oi O 0 0*1 0 O 0 0 1 m w tf 0 « 3 O N T 
0 c - u rH 00 O CO a> 0 CD CO O 0 CO i n O 0 i n 1 0 CM vN • O • + 
0) j j 1 C c r - r - i * rg • cv • 
a 10 1 4 l d rH r - l 0 0 f -
<r 1 r ^ O i a: 
u s 1 O O i n O m 0 cn ® 0 i n r - 0 r - O O r - 0 rH O t o 1 10 rg i p 0 0 cn O m I O 
c 3 4> 1 O m <H \ o 0 C\ r - r - O O r - Ul tO O r - 1 OJ r» • 0 « + £L 
o o 4> l - l I O 1 . c\ - o\ 
cr X 1 l - l 0 rH r - l O 0 0 O t r r-i -cr ^ 
4* U 
M ^ •H if) O 
CD o ro 
4) 
J j • • JZ 1 O O m O m 0 O <n 0 i n r - 0 r - O O r» 0 rg cn O 1 V0 CM CD (D 0 ® u n • 
eg ro — 4) JZ oc I O O 0 Oi O i n cn T CD 1 0 CM <M • O • + J 
O Ci. X i IJ T> 1 T> r - r - 1 • c j « rg * Ul 
O w — N c 1 4) 41 0 rH O O 1 0 O o n H n + h-ro 0 3 1 JJ x» rH 1 H 
t j £ JJ a 4i O 1 »J 3 1 
T3 J-I <-H ro vi 4> 03 1 -H rH O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 r>- 0 r - O O r - 0 rg VD t CM a i f f l O O J y n « JC 
JJ ro >. O «£ u — O 1 £ O O T 0 C7» O O m Oi i n OJ 1 0 CM CM • O • + 
U 2C ro a ^s. •H U 1 u C rH rH <f 1 • CM » (Si + Q 
0) T» 4> 41 - > S- tn 1 4) n 0 rH O C l 1 0 O o n r> (O ^ U 
o Oi h ro l-i ro l P- O 1 
o dl O rH 4> b l O O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 m O 0 O O a 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 O C3 O O O « t O t *0 
u u 4) c rH > 4) W 1 O 0 cr. O 0 m O O 1 0 O O ' O • , 4) 
rH o< c 3c o T5 Q 1 O r - 1 • 0 « 0 + CO 
m 4> -H > CD rH IM l - l 0 l - l rH rH O 1 0 O O r " + e 
1 E IJ xJ ro 41 0 + 4> U -Q T? ro 4) ro 0 D» rH JJ cr •H ro rH I O O • O 0 0 O O 0 i n 00 0 CD O O cr> O O 0 m 1 CM O r - I-H 0 I-H q ; rg » •H 
u 4> JJ 3 3 -H u fc 4> aL 1 RH O vD IP 0 I f O O m CO 0 0 1 r» rH - O • -F J 
O 6 ro a J J j j •H 4) > T> 1 41 rH rH r - • i n • m + 
rH c r £ -M M > 41 c 1 n 41 O rH rH 0 rl 1 O 0 O r- l + 
o 'H O Cu X O < 3 1 A) V O 1 U 
rg m JJ J O 1 JC 3 1 O 
10 a 1 CO 1 cu rH 0 a m O i n 0 av PI 0 i n Sfr 0 IO O O 0 O 0 O m 1 f ) 0 a c 0 0 Q r ^ » 10 
0) r j s 0) 75 E i 1 O rg r - c r>- Ct' 0 Ci \ o \D O O m Oi 0 cn 1 i n r> f - . O • rH + 
eg 4J o j j JZ 1 JJ C m i n i n U? r - rt 
<N ro »H 1 -H JZ 4) t-> 1 -H H «H 0 r-t |H rH O r- l m 1 0 O O r-> r- rH * 
-H o > 4> 3 1 rH O 1 3> 
e u o (0 M J-i j J 0 1 a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m 0 O O 0 O O m 1 0 0 0? r - 0 r - < c i ^ c 
m o . c c 4> 3E P 4> w 1 in 0 M) O a» r - r - O O r - m CO O 0 1 rg r» CM • O • * 
10 o o Oi W 41 1 T eg CM f4 rg CM r - • i n ' i f l ^ H 
V} to •H (A b 1 0 O rH 0 0 O rH + 3 
•IH ( t j J JZ tJ O 
o xi IA 
O O O O O T 
a 
l u TJ O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O m 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 1 0 0 ro c rH s a : 1 0 0 O cn O O m O O i 0 0 O • O • + CO 
c j j o © j j - c 1 fi> r>- 1 • O • O 0 
0 c u > 4) c 1 « 4> 0 r - l rH O 1 0 0 O rH -r 0 
10 4) 4) 4> O "X> r» 3 1 ffl 13 0 1 4) r-» 
£ a a O tT/ 0 1 J = 3 1 rH 
O O O O O +-4) 4) -H o J J r-t £Q 1 a . rH O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O m 0 0 0 O O 0 41 O O O 0 1 3 0 0 
j J 'H IM Oi e- 1 O 0 0 O CTI O O rH U") O O 1 •O 0 0 O - O - 1 0 
JJ U) L-l 32 X 1 JJ C 3 r - 1 0 • ' c • 0 ^ 
-H ro ( J j J 1 -H l - l 0 rH T» r - i O 1 S 0 0 O rH T 
W J-I 3T >p Li 1 rH O O 1 i n ro H O \ a O O 0 0 O 0 0 0 O m 0 0 O O O 0 S O O O 0 1 (0 0 0 O O O O <c O « rH 
M O 2 1 w 0 O a i O O iT, O O i TH O 0 O • O • r r» 
•o rH O CO 1 0 5 r - 1 w • • O • O + a ro ro O 3e V 1 0 rH O rH O 1 > , 0 0 O rH , 
z JJ eg 4) - © ~ H -H 0 
o C . . v) 1 rH (u 1 ro 
f - O 0 4) \ 4) •+i j j rH 4' c 4) CO 
-H O >1 E 1 e T> n s »H O £ c JJ < V) a •• X» JZ > •• -» 
J J a> 4> u ro 1 41 O " • 3 CO rH « tu £ O > 3 0 - c JJ 1 4) O ro J= «C 4) 0 C X 
u n e 2 •J 1 CO X rH < O M n 3 > rH 4) 01 10 1 > •• > >.£_) 0 *H > JC t r - -H 
o <— -A -H O c 1 rH O rH > Ei •D • O -H TJ • O O JJ C £ Ul 1 JJ JJ 0 U v . > a -v. « •u 
(0 EH ro ro 4) 1 O CO O 4) > ro ro < •C 0 JJ S *C T> > ro ro U 1 • r l ro T 41 ^ O rH > . < 
M 4> 41 o £ 1 M IJ co £ JJ •H T> X» •H • i > O a tC < RH u ^ 10 « u w C £ > O £ 1 • ro 
4) H « 4) IM V 1 (J 4) 3 41 JJ 4) IJ 3 3 ro 3 s 3 a> ro 1 ro -v. JJ 41 3 ro J-4 £ j CM 4 
JJ 0 (0 4J Li a J> 1 C O1 c o£ G - 4 10 O H T> •H O •Q b) Lu c JJ »J e c 1 a -H "4 4 ) H H 01 - n W S » T. e >1 Q a JJ a 0 1 O •'i -H + ro 0 ro c c "0 c a X a> > y •H ro ro •g ro -H 1 ro 0 u 0 4) O U 4 
a 0 if) 5T £ 1 u cr. > i r J > fO a < D Oi tc oc ft £ IM t n w < vJ Cu 1 u > 0 
2/5/2010 226 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
227 
o w 
n jo S 
TJ 4-> ro >i Dim 
OJ TJ •n. I ia 
•D TJ • c <D U 01 U C i ro 
M < W 
. ffi 4J OT O w 
D a s 
u o w o x c w o o 
n w -H < JJ 
> i w v> M TJ ro C C *•» O o c u 
<n 0) 
E o 
0) 0) W Ll rl ^ 
M W 
£ TJ 0> 
C O > il) X M 
i i n ® 
O C J-L 
£1 O H 
0) W rij 
CC 4J ro o> 
c u g o o> 3 
•H Q. •—I 4J O w ro > JJ X 3D 11 ax ^ 
E 3 
O O J j U o 3 
A CM TJ fM 
A> 
looorocot— X x m o fl X iD -ooor-Tj-rg X xr-cm x «-• v 
f o o o « x N o • 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x- X X 4J x x X X X X X X X X X X >i X X X X X n x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x -ro x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x w x x x x x x X X x x x x :< x x X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X x 
X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X x x x x x c n x x x x x x x x X X X X X X x X 
x x y. x x x x x x x x x x x x >: x x x >: x x x x x x x x x x x x x XXXXXXXXNXX x >: r. x >: x x x >: x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x 
JJ x >: x x x x x x U X X X X X X X X X o x x x x x x x x x Z X X X X X N x x x x x * 
X X X X X X X X X x x >: x x x x x X X X X X X X X X . . x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x •A X X X X x x X X x 
X X X X X X X X x « x x x :«! x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X x x x x x :< x x x x x x x x x x 
X x x x x x. x :< x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x. x x v. 
x x x x .x x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X 
x x x x x 
C 3 
O O tr sn 
O» 
l-l . x co o ro 
«N OJ 
O «. 
G W r-i ro X 
W 5 
U CD «J c E ro 
M RF U> 
U O i/> o r e co u o 
w w w 
RT J J >, w LB 1-1 "O ro c C 4J o O c u 0) 0> 
RH E (J ai oi w 
G H 
J J U «H 
w -o -
JJ O > ro J S w 
J J J J 
3 OJ ro ax 
O CJ ? 
JJ an 
G O / 
£ 0» O kf 
U X M 
W 
> O — 
IH O 3 
0) rJ 
mrOd> O o 
J : <J u c ro OJ o £ OJ oi in £ c c c u ro ro 
E J J l f 
.... U f •• Vi l-» .. X cc Jj : x x u s o) 0 
) V . V . Q . TJ > J J 
. PI OL >. A> -/-I • ' c u fr-> CU V) Ou > 0J -ri (/) 3 
J TJ -X RO JJ rH £-• 
; ro m w 4) ^-i u ix ij ro 3 n c x 
» C3 Cn ifi <f u w <*> 
S rH 
x x x :< x x 
•A X O O O O O X X o o o o o 
X X 
< O rH rH O 
x o o o o o 
" O O O O O 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x * 
x x x x x x x x • • • • • XX X XXXXXl-HrHrHl-Ht-H 
owoooom x o o o o o o cn o o o o a> jjooaooo 
I-H O >—• i-• >-H i—i O XrHOrHrHO X 
O TP O X XO X XO«rOlOO omo x xo x x o o tr. o* . - . X X . X X • ' • • • rHOrH X XrHX X rH O .-H O O ov-o X XO XlOOOOOO C ffiO X XO X CD O CP o O CO 
rH x X X X X 3 X X X X X TJ X X X X X 
S x x x x 
y, X XOOOOO x x x o o o o o 
 X X • • • • ' 
. X X X r H i - H r H i - l r H x x x 
x x y. x x x o o o o o x xx :<x x o o o o o X X X X X X • • • « ' X X X X X XrtHHHri 
x xx x x x o o o o o x x x x x x o o o o o x x ^ x x x • • • • • XXX X X H H rl n H 
• er> o. TJ •• •• o +iu u u c u m-n'nM ro ro « ro J-^ W "O TJ M W W W VI J ro < eC CD 
I J H C D O ) TJ M UJ H irooMe-EHftiuwJc 
A A A A O 
A A O 
A A ^ 
A A O 
A A • 
A A O 
A t 
A A A A O 
A 
A A 
A A O 
A 
A 
A TJ 5 
AI • •U o 
jj o u o V < 
V V 
V V 
v v o 
- V V I • 0 ) • •/ V 
3 O TJ V v o 
S V V O 
iJ V V 
O — *-> v v o 
U ro v v o 
v v o u o c v v » 
OJ "O 01 a ro a JH JJ >i JJ •o ro £- p 
< C UJ 
•H T~t 
>> TJro "D ro »H c a, 
rH O U>r 
227 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
228 
a O t 
cm a 
o - a . 
I . 
•O T5 
:.S & 
» ro u 
!B2 
U O £0 ox c 
11 o o 
S. 
u "O 
(0 C 
C *J O 
O C U 
Ifl 01 
rH £ o 
HI FFI M 
i ) H m 
XJ tij UJ 
"H 
a - u • 
o 
1' x> -u o < 
-H X s 
4' ro < > H + ai 
U 01 I >. o I 'kJ J < 
Q» dl 
»-» 3 
ai ai 
JJ 3 g r-i O O 
(U ' 
« <y 
X 3 Oi rH o c 0 
Jj c • rl M 
vi at ro T) x 3 
o o o o o i 
o o o o o * 
> CD O <M • . . V~. I O l-l r-l 
o o o o 
m o o 
r - • • 
o o o o o I 
o o o o o < 
o o o o o < 
uiomon^omNONOON O O « (N ffl O Cl 0\ O O CT> 
o CM co . c 
• • CM o com-
CM CN • < 
• CM O o ro » 
•c 
O •» 
CD > . 
.. © 
"o cd 
O H -r> 
> t - ^ -o • 
ro < • • o w 41 u ' > U U < i -t TJ "O . 
J 4) JJ m ^ 
4 T> *0 -H 4J Ui lu 'Q "O U t 
- " 0 7 3 C « X X 4» 0> L> • 
o o o o o < o 
o o • o -• • o • o O O f-H 
Cl r l O ^ O M5 U f 
O 1 S T - O • * • ro • ro O O O fl rH m 
u>« n oi ro o co a m 
rH * (N (£> . O • • • • ro -co O -» O O rH TJ-
o o o o o a; o 
o o • o • • • o • o 
o O rH 
0J o u> r - crt H if) CO h T 
3 r * • < ID 
J O I O O ' 
I f t t o H I 'S r- • • p 
O rH O O 
M HI 1) I 
JJ C c I 
ro >t «J • • 
L 4 l J O ( l ) r 
3 X 3 4' > 
4J JJ •/-! C 
«j ro "O ro •• Ul d! 1 
X o 
W CD H 
•H V H 
O • + >i O * O O 
JJ JJ •H ro o to 
•• 41 «• -ri •• ai n <H a •• X> x > oi u ro x ft a) o < ' > i U 0 ) H > ' • > oi *s 
ai - ~ • • — 
o u -
rooMM04>w"0< U>UU>D3«C-
1 O o o o o o O o 1 o O 1 o O 1 o O l o a o O DZ 1 O o o o o 1 CN 1 ID i cr> r-co I j 73 c 1 o rH o o o o O o 1 • 1 rH o 1 • 1 rH O I • o 1 CM o • CM o 
+ 3 O 1 i 1 1 1 J 1 I Cl 01 GO 1 CM n o o r- r-o CN 1 CT> VO 1 CO V I so fl U7 Ul cr ro -o f- 1 CM o CM cr> 1 rH I m 1 r- O « Ul o 4J CN O CM CM I • l n t • m a. X M 1 O rH o O o 1 rH 1 rH 1 rH CN CM f-XJ a 1 1 1 t CL Li 01 St 1 M o <X> r-r~ o 03 1 cr, V 1 m 1 o m I V IP Q c 3 s 1 CM O CM ai CO 1 rH i m » r» Oi m Si o O O m 1 V£> i 03 1 Oi 1 O - CN Ul X 4' 1 O o o o 1 rH t rH 1 -H rH rH C>l a< 3 K u .li 01 o a ro 3 1 CM o o o o ^ CD I cn fl 1 r-n i m CD 1 \D rH cn w CM 4) o K 1 CM o o o o 1 rH 1 m I r- O Ul O a. 73 CM o CN I CO I I • 1 Ul • SCf U O CO O c 1 o o o 1 rH 1 rH 1 rH M CM ro z O 3 1 1 1 1 Y-
* t-i O o 1 1 1 1 Isd •c CM m 1 CN o o o o CO t cn CO 1 r-CO i m CD 1 U> cn 4J ro f- 1 CM o o o o 1 «-H 1 m i r- O O SL ro u JJ CM o CM 1 • to I • Ul v0 O 4> 73 ac w 1 o rH o o 1 rH 1 r-t C4 CM xJ o ri — 13 ro 1 1 1 t O 4) o u I o o o o o o O o t O O 1 o O 1 o o 1 O O o o V Li 4) +J X 1 o o o o o 1 CN t to i e rH r- <3 m P< e M Jj 4J 73 o o o 1 o l • o \ o 1 O • o 9) Ul cu O 4> ro 4> I o o o o 1 -1 1 rH \ rH CM CN c 1 £ as jJ 41 rH -Q 73 4> ro O rH C Oi ft' (0 CT> l o O <£> o m r- I- 1 © o 1 CD r- i r-O 1 Ul TX CO CO •rl U <U 4J c 4J •H Cd i r- o r-IX> 1 CN I m l i- O m J O c £ ro c o rH +J 73 o 1 CN I • CM I • CO . rH 4! O H -H C i o o o o 1 rH 1 rH 1 rH CN CN O O •rt •H X t 1 1 1 CM a +J -U ro 4) o i 1 1 1 O W ro u 1 cn 1 o M o in o m CN V£> o i r-CD 1 f-o I r- ro o r-Ul n 01 3: jJ 4) 1 r- o l£> in 1 rH 1 V 1 m r- C7» Cl CM Jj 3 a r-i +J X Ul r- 1 Oi 1 m 1 • CO 1 OI • CO < CM ro —t i CL o 01 JJ t o o o o 1 •H 1 r-l CN 1 rH fl 1 CM «—i fl 0 £ > 01 3 1 r 1 1 1 c o o 01 O £ M o r o o cn o ui r-CM o l cn 1 r-r» 1 CN 1 rH O G1 in c ro o X c U U 9 *J 01 t r- o r- l£> 1 rH 1 Ul 1 r- O "H cn u o 01 CM o CO 1 « m 1 • l < in i vx> • r- •-i n to •H 73 l o o o o 1 r-l 1 f—1 J rH CM CN z •H ft JJ 01 O iJ X O > •<H rH o 3 +J c. lu u •a •H O U. *r 1 o o o o o o o o 1 O o 1 o o 1 o O 1 O O O o ro c ro cm tn 1 o o o Ci 1 CM I 1 GO r- CD C JJ o 4J 4J •a o o o 1 • o I o 1 • O 1 O • o o o u o 01 c 1 o o o o 1 rH 1 rH 1 rH CM CM o V) 01 a 01 3 t r 1 j CN i-H £ o LJ O i 1 1 j 41 4> 4) -U m 1 o CO o o o o o o o 1 O o 1 O o [ o O 1 O o O o XJ V4 0 to f- 1 o o o o o 1 CM 1 1 <x r- O jJ Cd U-J X a o o 1 • o 1 o 1 • O 1 o • o •H ro > +J 1 o -H o o o 1 r-i 1 rH J rH CN c i W Li u o Li I r 1 J Ul ro t- O 1 c o o o o o o o 1 O o 1 O o 1 O O 1 O o O o u to Z 1 o o o o o I IN 1 U3 i <a r- r* 
T3 1—1 on d d o 1 o 1 • o 1 • O 1 o . o o ro ro •M 1 o o o o 1 »-« 1 rH I rH r-i r-j X o o c + T t •• 1 - 1 " • • o f- o i a» 1 rH 4> 1 Li J Li 1 ^ u rl CD a a u ""5 •g IV 1 o O 1 o o 1 c a i o o o O > XJ 1 O > o > < a 1 4J X I w X F JJ X 1 +J .c -p X a 0 X XJ 1 >- f- £ Li 01 1 o 1 o Jj 1 u xJ 1 u XJ u XJ •rl a> o c 1 u u ro a i ro  i ro Ul 1 10 O 1 ro in ro 03 01 ro 0) ro ro 01 0) •a; o 1 CM r I u. CO 1 tu cn i u. Oi Cu cn H-l u o £ 1 G > b. M Li >, w 1 w i * 1 # l OP M ro 01 M 4> 1 01 a> V CN 1 X PI 1 X <M 1 X cv I X CM X CN 1H V a > i a> JH o V) » Li £ 1 4J 2E 1 XJ £ ( JJ X 1 xJ X +J X t-2 c a o 1 u JH M CL a ro CM U 1 o U 1 Ul U 1 o U 1 m u CD u a. < s i o «t a* 03 3 hi or X r r-X 1 CO X 1 cn X 1 cn X OI X 
228 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
O tfl 
rn /a S 
k b a 
I £ * 
•a r -• c a» 
O 4 H J 
51 S. 
•«H - CO 4J U (J -ri II D £ 
O £ C 
( O O O W 10 >H < >-> 
> . H u ll 13 
ro c c u o o c o 
w a> 
RH E O 
i-i O 
ro JC • . IJ JJ Ll 
3 ai ro 
•O -H < ai u 
rH ro o 
•h >J -ro a 
O O-rH 
X ll u <1  O X • 
•H ? O 4J 
w o n 
4 I O l u 
CO FN 
CJ OL O >S O o > O 3 O 
i—i O S M 
J 36 JC •, m a> 
< rH > 
l i M X x x oi ^ 
a» o . ai c jj t- a. 
i a> <u M 
1 Z CL C C i o ro ro J 
| X t-3 
S C 
I j ro 
X A 
in OJ u ^ ro 4-i ' 
x ro w q' wj I m ti ro a u c : cj <» o ^ ® ^ u t 
O O O O O O C J X o F\' C UI r OOOOOOO* X O C\ o -jl -s 
H r.' r-i r^  f. rH o X r-s O O O :c 
o a o c O C N x o ™ o m o o o o o o c i v; o ci o J. co 
J w r i r i H W c X ' ^ O r - O O 
X X X X x X X x o o o o o X X X X J-.' XX x o o o o o 
X X X X X X X • • • • • 
X X X X X Y. X X — ' r J r H r ^ — « 
X X X X X X X x o o o o o xx xx s f x x o o o o o 
X X X X X X X i< • • » • ' 
X X X X X X X X r i r H r H r - l r H x :< x x „v: xxx 
o o o o o o x x o o o o o OOOOOO X x o o o o o 
r H i - i r H r H r H r i X ^ « H H H 
o o o x xo x o o o o o o o o o X XO XVOOVDOOXC 
i I-H o . • X • • -; X rH y, O r-l o . 
X X X XX XX x o o o o o XX XXX X* x o o o o o x x x x x x x • • • • • 
X X X X X X X X r - l r H r H , H » H X X V x X X '.< X 
X M X X X X x x o o o o o XXX XX XX x o o o o o X X X X X X X X • • • * • x xx xx xx Y. H H H H (H 
X X X X X X X 
X t f X X X X X X r i r 
A A 
,• A O 
< 1-e rH rH o O r 
0) o 
> U 
w U 
n Oi 
, O r-l O O O o O cr» O O O O avcr. CTl cn o o o in OOlOOi1 
rH O rH rH rH rH o o r l O rH o 1 
O fN O O O O O Cl O O O O cn a-< N O O O ^ l 
r i O r i H r i H o o 
• • -r-v Ti -r-i •n "Q •• "O TJ < -r> t£ " d TJ f-< 
& a." O1 Q."0 
a s f s 
fl- 4J U 4J a "o a* c -i-i <£ . . o h > <y h co -O*Q 
3 TJ -X ro < < 
S > ro ^ w ai 
"O tu -4 
m u w J c 
Q< X P E UI 
4-1 O o o 
V < 
- r-H V V 
D <_ TJ V V O 0 3: a v ' 
w v v 
O I £ V V < tS v' v ' V V o 4-1 O 
c v v • 
-t 4-1 •• •• w H ai •• 3 ii au •r-v L) >. 4-1 
TJ ro H O-
<t c. r >>TJ n-w 
o n C «t 
—i o 
a> 0 •«•< W a a 10 Q 
o> 
•o 
s 
2/5/2010 229 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
* 1 r-l c a-O 0 0 in n 1 O 0 f- OJ CD 0 r- t-(C 1 rv 0 O 0 0 • 1 r-c r- 0 n 1 f rv - • 0 n 1 m • in \D c 1 0 O O r-. 1 — r-. 01 OJ 3 1 1 O 1 0 0} OJ (•-J 0 r-l O O O 1 cn 0 m ID OJ in 7. T! H 1 iN 0 O a 0 • 1 r-l 0 in ^ ro O . • 0 O-l in %£> C VJ 1 O t-% O O r-f 1 1-1 rH OJ OJ tr* Cd •M a"1 1 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 O 2 c a E 1 O O 0 0 • 1 <N lD CD 0 0 C * • 0 0 1 0 O • O 0 O 0 £ a1 O 0 0 1 rH rn OJ Ol 
fl» a "Z 4» 0 CO 0 <0 l O 0 O O O O J3 0 1 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 O V5 O flC 1 O 0 O 0 0 • 1 OJ \D CO t-0 TJ O • • 0 0 0 0 • O 0 O U O tfj C C l O O 0 0 1 r- Ol T4 1—1 ro O 3 1 f-a* O O 1 t-H TJ oj O) 1 n m 0 1-CO 0 1 Cft CD VD r: C\ CO ai m I-i_) ro >. H r <N 0 ISI CT» •*]> - m r- ir» 0 2: ro a u fi • • 0 1 • VD O QJ T3 X e> 1 0 O 0 0 1 l-H r-t OJ u •r\ 1 TJ V ro 1 1 TJ O 41 O > u 1 M 0 <N CD f- 0 \D co 1 Ol r* VD rH OJ 01 M 41 JJ j= •ri r eg 0 cvj cr. m . J rH 01 n QJ OJ C i_) U T> j • • 0 1 • m t- fTv CO m (1) 0 GJ ro 4> 1 0 O 0 0 1 rH rH OJ 1—1 c 1 e a i c 4) TJ T3 4) M ro O c 4) a: CD a; o» 1 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 1 O 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 4' i_) C M •H Ci 1 0 0 O 0 0 • 1 OJ CO r-O ro c O TJ C3 • • 0 0 1 0 c- O 0 O ty 0 •H < c 1 0 O 0 0 1 >"H «-1 01 0 -ri —1 jj 3: 3 1 1 O Oj CD XJ 4J ro QJ O 1 O rt 13 «H ro E 1 m 1 0 n 0 O O 0 0 0 O 1 O O O 0 0 O 0 O 0 O CO 0) O £ u 41 3 t- 1 c 0 OOO • 1 OJ VD CD UJ N 3 an ^ O - « 0 0 1 0 0 • O 0 O < OJ ro <--• I a o O 4J jj 1 0 0 0 0 1 r| OJ OJ CP •H O E > 41 3 1 1 c u 0 CD O 3: Li 0 1 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 0 c ro O c U 0 JJ to 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 1 M y£> CO r- H r-5 V) O 0 3: Q w •J O • • 0 O 1 0 0 O 0 O •-•1 « t/? -H TJ 3 1 0 rH 0 0 0 1H IM r>j 3 •«H 4J <U 0 J: O M >- -.-( rH 0 3 .u O lu WJ Ll TJ •rf 0 Ui in r tfi O 0 O O rH 1 ^ cn xr cn O f- in tn OJ ro c ro <N N cc 1 O 0 O O - 1 l-H m r- 0 a. CD c JJ 0 u jj T) (N • • OJ 1 \o r-t . M in O 0 c u 4) 41 C 1 0 0 O rH 1 rH rH Ol IM CV OJ OJ O (0 OJ a QJ 3 1 J Ol r~t E 0 U O t 4> 4) •H 4> jj co 1 a: in 0 n 0 O O rH 1 r* CO tv ai O ^ in ri OJ •U rH V4 u FH 1 u: 0 0 O O • 1 rH ui r- O 0 .D u •H x (N . . OJ VD rv m Ci •rl ro > JJ 1 0 0 O >-< 1—1 rH CJ OJ eg « tr, L| VI '3 W 1 1 m ro H V 0 1 cn 0 m 0 O O rH 1 r-CO CTi CT. 0 vn in r-i L| 10 2 I 0 0 O O • 1 rH O r- 0 r-TJ cvj . . OJ 1 vo rH to m Ol 0 ro ro VH * 1 O 0 O rH rH 1 r-c CM (V l-H OJ IN N 
£ jj O O c 1 •• E-. 0 1 4> 0) .. •r-l t~i 1 LJ lH L| hi CO 4» •H a u u •q *D 4> 1 O 0 O O O o< 0 O 0 a 
> 1 O >> 0 > < 3 1 4-> JZ 4J JZ •U £ 4J sz 4J JC 4' O -C 4J 1 >• E- -U -S u a> 1 O O *J 0 u O i_) 0 JJ 4> u c 1 U rH u ro ro vj 1 ro 0 ro ro 0 ro in CD <4-  VI ro 4) ro ro 0 1 UJ r- Ll. CD u. 01 u. cn Uj <y Lr 0 E > Ui 1 Of K n> * At <ff —f0-Q> W QJ 1 a> -r-l CP rH 0.' 1 -C sz C<i sz 01 JZ eg JZ CV Ll u a > • 41 Tr-rfft W u £ 1 Jj X u « tJ JC jj £ ^ T. _ : -.7— . .-<-4 !C c a 0 1 LJ Li Ll CL D. ro oj Ll 1 0 u m O O u 0 CD O Oj -» 1 < a. C* P w O x 1 r-X CO X C\ X cn X 0 X 
M 2JL CD O TJ QJ 
AJ lU ^ o 2: ro a) *t> •n M 0 QJ U Ll 01 n- c 3 0) 1 E -73 T> , c o qj -u 
M U *H 4" » S 
ro • 1 
o o w o £ c m (J O m t/j < 
t® U TJ ro c c *j o g c o rt a) ^ E o 0) QJ vH Ll <H +J W *M —I TO 
X X X X y X X X X X X X X X V X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X O P. x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y, y. X X y. X X X 41 X X X X X X X X X X :< X X X X X X X X >: X X X X 3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >5 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X X X X X 
0 m Lft Vi") CN ^ rn 0 x n CD Cl O 0 0 r- 0 ^ * m 0 rH X CD 0 0 u 0 in •n in vo 0 X m 0 CD 0 0 0 r- CO X X r-0 ID X V£> VD ffj iH X CM X X X ro CM C-l OJ X OJ 0 0 0 rn X X 0 X 0 0 O u f j rj OJ X OJ X X X X X y. X 
y. X X y. :< X X X X X X :< X X y .'C X X X X X y X X y. X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X •c X X X X X X X x X O X X X X X X X X X X X X >1 •c X X X X X X X X X y. (/J X X X X X X X X x X K X X X X X X K X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
X V. X X X X X X X X X :< X X X 'C X X J,. X X X X X X X :< TJ &> X X ^ X X X X X X V. X X y. X X X X X X X X X X y. X X O Li X X * X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 'A X X 
_C •rl O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X :< X X X X X X X x X JJ Jj T) a> X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X X y. •A X X X X X x X X 41 ro X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X X X S c jj Ll ro 
tf> c 0 4J •j Xi 0 H E •H rH 0 'Ll c JC a +J I Cu iJ tr (J c ro 0) r-1 3 a OJ •H Li e 1 '• 04 CP •14 4' rH E QJ 3 CP 0. Ll 01 c 4J O CL iJ 3 if tr, O O O 0 3 0 0 cn 3 >r .-3 u £ 4) 0 A Li 0 > Li a it) « 14 ro S Ll 3 u> rH c X u TJ +J O Cu u 4J 0 0 u Cu u OJ 01 CJ c X Ll W •4 Ll tJ> z rH 4J 4J 3 3 c H Li 4) u *J Zi 0 3 « > c a. 0 rH 4> Ll •r1 C  CO ro rH ro c rH O 1_> £ 0 ro a > 0 1. 3 Q1 Li U-i JC ro Ui OJ •M O 3 u 4J 4) 0. 0 >. 3 10 > E O Cu in a C E 0 3 4) u rH TJ -H *J jJ Ol N ro z 0 Jj c c OJ 0 41 tr 3 L4 c rH 3 a CO Ll +J 41 E- Li ro •H •rl +J Li a rH c <+J C7> Li O •H 4J cr OJ 3 O 4J c 0 cc u ro a> au 0 •rl C JC jj u e •R> JJ 41 Ll c n CO N T- cC. & •m Ll » CO •H F< u CO *J TJ u U J 4J 4> 41 4) c c rZ) r-t O ET 0 c t> ro C 10 LI CO < ro 
JJ a, 0 c 0 Ll Ll 1 41 0 JJ CL u •H C-l U4 Ll (J ro 3 B. to w Ll ro ^ rH 3 3 Q c —1 a 3 c 3 c 0 •|-> c 4J OJ V3 •4 rH U. H £H 4) r-l ro 4J ro 0 O Ll c F- a« Li a. e rH U. a ro 4> > -rl O VI 0 rH sz < 3 r-5 •H 0J CT c c +J JJ O cc » •H JJ +J 0 •H W nJ CP E-4J 
© F- > C Ll V4 •M >, Ll ro u ro A Ij- a a > 3 c E E •H 3 4! OJ (J c OJ c JC Lt a; 0) Ll CL ro -H O Li jj JJ <7» u •H C 'U « to F- J J -rl £b 0 a. ro TJ rH Q 0 Li 3 Ll 3 <4-1 Oi E-0) »J O 0J Li M 0 0J <0 a 3 cr xi H 0) 0 41 4J O. C •M A> 0 'i +J Ll rH 3 4> lH JJ KH CO tr* J 
C J5 c Ll a ro 4-1 0 O & a 0 ro p •H OJ O rH o> 0 ro 0 TJ O 4> CJ •M 0 PJ 4J D. rH rH a, 4J 3 0 -rl c « Li OJ •H QJ < 4) U J c C UJ O II. OJ c C» sz c c ro e 4J C +J c Ll QJ iu 4-1 0 O C $ 3 A 3 0 0 c 0 a ro R3 C O X 0) > ry- 0 0 TJ 4J Ll T> O> IT E a- 0 -H L| -i Ll 4) O j -H c JJ 3 41 c C •rl c c c C a 3 JG E O w ro rH JJ u Li +J vl Li t- -H h" u -rH Ll u CL Ll JJ u OJ 3 QJ H Ll 0 4J ro O to 4J 41 (0 0 O n (0 (0 CP co Cn tJ> 0 0 0 3 T-) E 4) Ll 1—1 3 4) 0 A 0 3 a a JJ 3 O 0 XJ O p. a a. 0 c* 'H O» a. 0 *J a E E 0 O *r> a. D. n (M CL VI W 0 0 c C C (U c a 5s 0 m a 3 3 •O Ll Ll 4» 0, a 0 lu< a <4-1 a Li U sz -rl 0) V-| < 0 a. U 0 Z z A Cu tf 0 O vJ u 0 U) CiJ 2: a. •5 A w X w J 
2/5/2010 230 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely 
Determination for US 97/J Street Improvements 
2/5/2010 231 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Oregon 
I M Kukngpski, Gorenrc 
Department of Transportation 
Region 4 Manager 
63055 N. H\vy 97 
Bend, OR 97701 
(541)388-6180 
Robert W. Bryant 
FAX: (541)388-6231 
FILE CODE: 
February 2,2010 
Nick Snead 
Community Development Director 
71 SE "D" St 
Madras, OR 97740 
Subject: Madras UGB Expansion TPR Analysis; Reasonably Likely Determination 
Dear Mr. Snead, 
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) appreciates the opportunity to review and 
comment on the transportation study prepared for Madras UGB Expansion and related TPR 
Analysis. We received this study from Kittelson and Associates on January 22,2010. Our 
planning staff also reviewed the City's plan amendment application and DLCD's recent 
response. 
As part of the UGB expansion, the City of Madras is considering a 20-acre rezone of Range 
Land to R-2 Residential uses, including a new elementary school. The proposed amendment is 
located at the outskirts of town,'near the intersection of Ashwood Road and Bean Drive. Neither 
roads are state facilities; however, the traffic study concluded that the proposed rezone has a 
significant effect on the US97/"J" Street intersections (degraded operation with incremental trips 
within the planning horizon). This is an important state facility where ODOT and the City are 
planning significant improvements in the near future. 
On January 21,2010, pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060(4)(b), the City has written ODOT 
requesting a determination as to whether planned state highway improvements at US97/ "J" 
Street are not only included in the City's TSP, but also: 
• Funded for construction in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); 
• Part of a regional transportation system plan; or 
• If neither of the above, the planned improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by 
the end of the TSP planning period. 
ODOT offers the following comments in response: 
1. US97 is a Statewide level highway facility and a freight route. 
2. The City of Madias completed a TSP Amendment in 2005 to address the anticipated 
failure of the US 97/"J" Street intersections. 
3. A preferred concept was identified by the City and ODOT as shown on the project 
website http://ci.madras.or.us/public works/pw hwv97southY.shtml. The concept 
includes cost estimates, right-of-way needs, and a double-line sketch of the preferred 
roadway alignment. 
2/5/2010 232 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Mr. Nick Snead 
February 2, 2010 
Page 2 o f 2 
4. Funding for the construction of the US97/"J" Street improvements is included in the 
Draft 2010-2013 STIP, which is expected to be approved in October 2010. The "J" 
Street improvements are not on the current 2008-11 STIP list. At this time, there is a gap 
between funding identified in the Draft STIP and cost estimates submitted by tl?e project 
team. However, the City has been collecting transportation System Development 
Charges slated specifically for US97/"J" Street improvements. 
Based on ODOT's review of the circumstances associated with future improvements to US97/"J" 
Street intersections, it is our opinion that the necessary improvements are reasonably likely to 
occur by the end of the planning period. ODOT has reached this conclusion based on the 
following factors: 
1. The planned improvements are listed on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP and will likely be 
approved. 
2. The planned improvements are located on a statewide freight route, an important facility 
that will likely receive future funding. 
3. The City of Madras has land use regulations that al low the City to impose conditions on 
future development if such conditions are needed to avoid or remedy a significant effect. 
These include ordinances enabling transportation System Development Charges for ... 
US97/"J" Street improvements and City approval of the proposed intersection redesign, 
4. ODOT lias a positive working relationship with the City of Madras and collaboratively 
funded other projects in the area. We are confident that the City, ODOT and other 
partners will be able to fund the needed US97/"J" Street improvements. 
This reasonably likely determination does not constitute a commitment on the part of ODOT to 
fund the planned improvements at US97/"J" Street. Further, this written statement applies only 
to the subject property and only to this specific proposed amendment. It does not apply to any 
future amendments that may rely upon the same project. Instead, future proposed amendments 
will require a new written statement from ODOT. (see 
http://www.oregon.aov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TPR/tprGuidelines.pdf. Section 3.2.09) 
ODOT appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this written statement. If you have any 
questions, or need more information, please contact Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 Planning 
office, at (541) 388-6046 or email ana.iovanovic@.odot.slate.or.us. 
gh, DLCD; Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Assoc, Inc.; DJ Heffernan, 
Angelo Planning Group; Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Planning Director; Matt Garrett, 
ODOT Director; Jerri Bohard, ODOT TDD Manager; Pat Creedican, ODOT District 10 Manager 
2/5/2010 233 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
rage 1 oi ^ 
235 
Nick Snead 
From: JOVANOVIC Ana [Ana.JOVANOVIC@odot.state.or.us] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:34 PM 
To: Nick Snead 
Cc: RADABAUGH Mark; Joe Bessman; DJ Heffernan; Jon Skidmore 
Subject: RE: Madras UBG expansion & TRP Analysis 
— > 
Nick, 
Here is ODOT's Reasonably Likely Determination letter for Madras UGB Expansion and TPR Analysis, Please 
contact me if you have any questions. 
Thank you, 
Ana 
Ana Jovanovlc 
ODOT Region 4 Program and Planning 
541 388.6046 • 
ana.jovanovic@odot.state.or us 
From: Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
Sent : Monday, February 01, 2010 8:49 AM 
To: JOVANOVIC Ana 
Subject : Madras UBG expansion & TRP Analysis 
Ana, 
Good morning! I hope you had a good weekend as well. I am writing to determine the status of ODOT's review of 
our TPR study submitted by Kittleson & Associates related to the 37 acre UGB expansion proposal. Can you give 
me an update? 
"There are no short cuts to any place worth going1 
-Beverly Sills-
Nicholas S. Snead 
2/5/2010 234 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
235 
Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
{541)475-3388 
Email: nsnea_d@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
2/5/2010 235 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
236 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
237 B - 41 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
For the City of Madras 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madias, an incorporated municipality in the State 
of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political subdivision of the 
State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "County". 
RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson County are authorized pursuant to Oregon 
Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 190 to enter into an Intergovernmental Management Agreement 
for performance of functions which either governmental unit has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS, this Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative agreement under 
ORS Chapter 195; and 
WHEREAS, Goal 14 [Urbanisation] requires that the City and the County establish an 
urban growth boundary to identify and separate urbanizable land from rural and that the 
establishment and change of urban growth boundaries shall be through a cooperative process 
between the City and County; and •• 
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions in Goal 2 [Land Use Planning], the City and County 
are required to have coordinated and consistent comprehensive plans which establish an Urban 
Growth Boundary (UGB) and a plan for the Urban Growth Area (UGA) within the boundary; 
and, 
WHEREAS, die City and County share a common concern regarding the accommodation 
of population growth and utilization of lands within the UGB; and 
WHEREAS, die City and County consider it mutually advantageous to establish this 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) for the purpose of facilitating the 
orderly transition from rural to urban land uses and to enable the City to plan for and provide 
urban services such as sewer, water and street facilities in a timely, orderly and cost effective 
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF MADRAS AND JEFFERSON COUNTY 
MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 
1. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1.1. To establish standards and procedures for review ami action on proposed land use actions 
and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to lands within the UGA; 
1.2. To transfer authority and jurisdiction over current planning activities, land use decisions, 
provision of urban services and code enforcement within the UGA from the County to the 
City; 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
237 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
1 
238 M- 41 
1.3. To benefit the public through reduction of governmental processes; and, 
1.4. To establish procedures for City and County consideration of expansions to die UGA. 
2. DEFINITIONS 
For die purpose of this agreement, the following definitions shall apply: 
2.1. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
2.2. City: the City of Madras. 
2.3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
2.4 County: Jefferson County. 
2.5. Land Use Decision: A final decision or determination concerning the adoption, 
amendment or application of statewide planning goals, a comprehensive plan provision or 
a land use regulation. 
2.6. Public Facilities Plan: A document or documents describing the water, sewer and 
transportation facilities which are to support the land uses designated in the appropriate 
acknowledged comprehensive plans. 
2.7. Urban Growth Area (UGA): The area between die Madras City Limits and the Madras 
Urban Growth Boundary, as designated on the City's and the County's Comprehensive 
Plan Maps. 
2.8. Urban Growth Boundary (UGB): The boundary line which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the surrounding rural 
lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
2.9. Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA): This Intergovernmental 
Agreement between the City and County that coordinates the management of land use 
and development within the City of Madias UGA. 
2.10. Urbanizable Lands: Lands inside the Urban Growth Area that are designated for future 
urban development when public facilities and services can be provided by the City. 
3. URBANIZATION PROCESS 
3.1 The UGA shall be managed to maintain the potential for future urban development until 
such time as the land is annexed into the City and is converted to urban land. 
3.2. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban development can occur when public facilities 
and services are available and adequate to serve urban levels of development, or the land 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 2 
238 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
239 H- 41 
is annexed into the City aad zoned for mfcas development 
3.3. Rural levels of development within the UGA shall be sited in such a way as to not interfere with urban levels of development and services when conversion from urbanizable land to urban lands occurs. 
3.4. Extension of City services within the UGA may be permitted when approved by the City. Establishment or extension of sewn systems outside the UGB is prohibited except to mitigate a public health hazard in accordance with the provisions of OAR 660-011-0060. 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making authority regarding all land use applications within the UGA except applications for amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of lands in the UGA. Lands outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to include the territory to be annexed. 
5. PROCESS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE UGA 
5.1. Land Use applications shall be processed through the City Community Development Department 
5.2. Notice of all land use applications within the UGA doll be sent to the County Community Development Department and to any other affected County agencies and other applicable special service districts for review and comment prior to any decision by the City. Such agencies or districts shall be given ten business days in which to provide comments on the application. 
5.3. In making its decision, the City shall consider all comments received under § 5.2. 
5.4. The County, any agency or special service district that provides comments on the application shall be mailed a copy of the land use decision and shall have standing to appeal the City's decision. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
6.1. Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property owner(s). 
62. An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan amendment fees. The City shall forward a copy of the application to the County Community Development Department, together with the County's plan amendment fee, within five working days of 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
239 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
3 
the date the application is filed. 
6.3. The City and County Planning Commissions shall each conduct a public hearing regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
6.4. The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be forwarded to the City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
6.5. The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final decision on 
whether the UGB should be amended. 
6.6. If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint meeting of the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution process to resolve the differences. 
6.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be no 
change to the UGB. -----
7. OTHER LAND USE ACTIVITIES 
7.1. The City and County agree to mutually review any proposed action on public improvement projects and similar programs, projects or proposals that apply to the UGA. 
7.2. The City shall be responsible for public facilities planning within the UGA. The City shall coordinate with airy affected County agency in the development of a public facilities plan for the UGA. 
7.3. The County shall be responsible for administering the state Building Code and issuing building permits for all construction within the UGA, until such time as the City has its own state-approved building code program. 
8. ROADS 
8.1. Public rights-of-way within the UGA shall be accepted by the City upon annexation of adjacent lands. 
8.2. The City shall accept jurisdiction over County roads within the UGA that have a pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the County may structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70, at which time the City shall accept jurisdiction over the road. Nothing contained in this subsection shall restrict the City from accepting jurisdiction over a road or public right-of-way within the UGA that does not meet such minimum standards. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
239 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
4 
241 M- 41 
8.3 When a parcel in the UGA is initially partitioned or subdivided and creation of a street Is required, development shall proceed initially with streets to City road standards 
8.4 Streets in subdivisions and PUDs shall be developed to the City's improvement standards 
8.5. All unpaved county roads, excluding public usage roads, within the UGA shall be graded biannually by the County until the City has accepted jurisdiction over the road. 
9. FEES 
9.1. Applications for land use permits, including all land use appeals within the UGA, shall be accompanied by a fee set by the City. 
9.2. Applications for UGB Amendments shall be accompanied by fees set by the County in addition to any City fees. 
9.3. System Development Charges for lands within the UGA will be collected by the County, prior to the issuance of building permits. 
10. ENFORCEMENT 
The City shall be responsible for enforcement of land use regulations within the UGA. 
11. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
11.1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both parties, after public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the Board of Commissioners. 
11.2 Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and County Comprehensive Plans and the statewide planning goals. 
11.3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the otter party at least forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the publication of public hearing notices in order to provide ample time for resolution of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the party considering termination. That party shall give the other party at least 20 days prior notice of the scheduled hearing date. The 20 day period shall be used by both parties to seek resolution of differences. Both parties shall also request a collaborative conflict resolution process to resolve differences that remain, 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and local ordinances. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 
239 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 
5 
242 I - 4 1 - 0 6 
e. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide planning Goals 2 and 14. If this agreement is terminated without adoption of a new agreement, jurisdiction and authority over all planning activities and land use decisions within the UGA shall revert to the County. Therefore, this agreement may not be terminated without adoption of a new agreement. 12. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
This agreement shall not become effective until properly executed by both the City and the County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Growth Area Management Agreements. 
13. SEVERABILITY 
The Provisions within this agreement are severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, said invalidity shall not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the agreement 
ADOPTED this S — day o i / l ^ J j L . 2006, 
ATTEST: 
D a t e : / ^ >u' g , £. SL&bU 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 7 T 1A1 [Zvhihif Hrrlininnn M 242 Exhibit to Ordinance No. 823 6 

Jefferson County 
Final Order 
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF OREGON 
FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE JEFFERSON ) 
COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP TO ) 
EXPAND THE MADRAS URBAN GROWTH ) 
BOUNDARY BY APPROXIMATELY 37 ACRES ) 
AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY (10-PA-01) ) 
WHEREAS, Jefferson County worked with the City of Madras and other stakeholders to 
establish a 50-year Urban Reserve Area surrounding the City of Madras; and 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was acknowledged in February 2010 by 
the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development; and 
WHEREAS, land in the Urban Reserve Area is first priority land for inclusion in the Urban 
Growth Boundary (UGB) pursuant to ORS 197.298 and the land proposed for UGB expansion is 
within the URA; and 
WHEREAS, the Madras Urbanization Study (April 2007) and the Madras Urbanization Study 
Addendum (August 2007) identified the need for residentially zoned land for housing and 
public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB; and 
WHEREAS, a joint public hearing of the City of Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson 
County Planning Commission was held on February 11, 2010 to consider findings and accept 
any written and oral testimony from the public on the proposed approximate 37 acre Urban 
Growth Boundary Expansion; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and written and oral testimony from the 
public, both the Jefferson County Planning Commission and the City of Madras Planning 
Commission took formal action to recommend to the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
and the Madras City Council that the proposed UGB expansion be approved; and 
WHEREAS, the County Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Urban Growth 
Boundary Expansion was forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners during a joint public 
hearing with the Madras City Council on March 29, 2010; and 
WHEREAS, after considering the Findings of Fact, and all written and oral testimony from the 
public, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners voted 2 - 0 to approve the proposed 
Comprehensive Plan Map amendment and City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary expansion. 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners hereby ORDAINS as 
follows: 
0-039-10 
Ordinance No. 
1-039-10 
1. Adoption of Findings 
The Findings of Fact and Conclusions in the attached Findings Document and Staff 
Report are hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference as the basis for the 
decisions to adopt the amendments to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map. 
2. Amendment to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map 
The amendment to the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map contained in the 
attached Exhibit A is hereby adopted and by this reference incorporated herein as if fully 
set forth. 
3. Severability 
The provisions of this ordinance are severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, 
clause or phrase of this ordinance or any exhibit thereto is, for any reason, held to be 
invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining 
portions of this ordinance or exhibits thereto. 
4. Effective Date 
These amendments being necessary for immediate implementation, an emergency is 
declared to exist, and the specified amendments shall therefore take place and be 
effective on April 14, 2010. 
DATED this 14th day of April, 2010. 
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS: 
Mike Ahern, Commissioner 
Attest: 
3-039-10 
J E F F E R S O N COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 
TO: Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
FROM: Jon Skidmore, AICP, Planning Director/CDD Manager 
SUBJECT: Madras UGB Expansion (10-PA-01) 
DATE: 03/22/10 
This staff report provides background and findings in support of the proposed City of Madras 
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) expansion as proposed by the City. The applicant (City of Madras) 
is proposing to amend the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Map. The map will be amended 
to modify the UGB. 
The City seeks approval to expand the UGB by approximately 37 acres to include the following 
properties: 
• 11-14-07, Tax lot 100 (not all of this parcel will be included). 
• 11-14-07, Tax lot 101 
• 11-14-07, Tax lot 102 
• 11-14-07, Tax lot 200 
The application to amend the UGB is subject to compliance with the following documents: 
• Urban Growth Area Management Agreement for the City of Madras (UGAMA). 
• Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan (Goal 14 Section and Part 5). 
UGAMA Compliance: 
The UGAMA sets forth the differing responsibilities for each jurisdiction for these types of 
proposals. The applicant's submitted draft findings outline these responsibilities beginning on page 
32 of the draft findings document submitted by the City. As required by section 6 the UGAMA the 
City submitted an application to the County. A joint planning commission was scheduled for 
February 11, 2010. The Jefferson County Planning Commission recommended approval of the 
UGB expansion to the Board of Commissioners by a vote of 4 to 0. The Planning Commission and 
County Staff both recommend that the Board of Commissioners approve the UGB expansion. The 
review of the proposal has followed and will continue to follow the UGB expansion process 
outlined in the UGAMA. 
Comprehensive Plan Compliance: 
The request is subject to Part 5 of the Comprehensive Plan and the Goal 14 section of the Plan. 
The application is a quasi-judicial application as this request will involve the administration of land 
use regulations to a small number of contiguous parcels. As such the application must comply with 
the following requirements of Part 5 of the Comprehensive Plan: 
0-039-10 
1. Comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, Oregon Revised Statutes and 
Administrative Rules, or comply with requirements for an exception to the goal(s); 
2. Comply with all applicable Comprehensive Plan goals and policies; and 
3. Be necessary due to changes in physical, economic or social conditions, population 
growth, or development patterns which require an adjustment in the land uses 
designations in the area where the amendment is proposed. 
In terms of compliance with Statewide Planning Goals, Oregon Revised Statutes and Administrative 
Rules, the applicant's draft findings address these issues in Section V (compliance with Statewide 
Planning Goals) and Section VI (compliance with State Statutes) of the draft findings. 
The primary Goals relating to this proposal are Goals 2 and 14: 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all decisions and 
actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for such decisions and 
actions. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to accommodate 
urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, to ensure efficient use 
of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
In order to expand the UGB the City must justify the need for the expansion. The City of Madras 
and Jefferson County worked with DLCD to establish the Urban Reserve Area (URA) over the past 
3+ years. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a UGB is land 
designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the first priority for UGB 
expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 years, as was found by the 
Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. These studies found a need for approximately 220 acres of 
land for residential, public and semi-public land over the next 20 years. Therefore, the applicant's 
proposal provides acreage for the City's residential, public and semi-public needs as demonstrated 
through the URA planning process. The URA has been acknowledged by DLCD of which the 
urbanization study is a part. Further, the land the City is bringing into the UGB for this purpose is 
first priority as explained above and has the necessary access to urban services. 
In terms of compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals and policies, the applicant's draft 
findings address this starting on page 34. The Comprehensive Plan provides specific factors to be 
considered in changing UGBs. These factors include consideration of a demonstrated need for 
additional acreage for housing, public facilities, schools, orderly provision of urban services, 
maximum efficiency of land uses within the existing urban area and the priority of lands included in 
the expansion as outlined in ORS 198.298 among other considerations. The applicant explains that 
there is a demonstrated need as acknowledged through the URA planning process. Further, the 
applicant explains that this location can be served by public services in an efficient & cost effective 
manner, allows for compatibility of uses in the area, and urban development in this location will 
have few impacts on prime resource land. 
The Comprehensive Plan also requires that the expansion of the UGB be done in accordance with 
state requirements and that the statutory priorities in ORS 197.298 be followed. This requires that 
expansions of UGBs include URA land first. The applicant's proposal complies with this 
requirement. 
The applicant must also demonstrate that the expansion is necessary due to changes in physical, 
economic or social conditions, population growth, or development patterns which require an 
adjustment in the land uses designations in the area where the amendment is proposed. The 
application has been submitted to allow for an expansion of the UGB to provide for the long term 
housing needs of the City. It also has been proposed to accommodate a necessary public facility 
(school). The acreage needs for schools and housing are documented in the City's acknowledged 
Urban Reserve Area approval which was based on the urbanization study. Therefore, the proposed 
UGB expansion will provide for housing and educational needs of the City of Madras over the next 
20 years and beyond. 
Summary: 
The applicant has demonstrated that this UGB expansion complies with the UGAMA and the 
County regulations pertaining to UGB expansions. The Planning Commission recommended 
approval of this approximate 37 acre expansion to the Board of County Commissioners by a vote of 
4 to 0. 
This proposed Comprehensive Plan Map amendment will change the UGB as it is reflected on the 
County's Comprehensive Plan map. Technically the applicant is changing the County Zoning Map 
as well. However, as the adjustment of the UGB will shift the lands in question to the City's 
jurisdiction and they will change/implement zoning from here forward (if approved) there is no 
separate Zone Map Change amendment request based on the direction of the County Planning 
Director. 
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval. 
City Limits 
Comp Plan 
Range Land 
Rural Land 
| | Urban and Urbanizable Land 
Jefferson County uses GIS data in support of iis internal business 
functions and the public services it provides. These GIS data, which 
Jefferson County distributes, may not be suitable for other purposes 
or uses. It is the requestor's responsibility 10 verify any information 
derived from the GIS data before making any decisions or taking any 
actions based on the information. Jefferson County shall not be held 
liable for any errors in the GIS data. This includes enors of omission, 
commission, errors concerning the content'of the data, and relative 
and positional accuracy of the data. Jefferson County assumes no 
legal responsibility for this information. 
Jefferson County GIS • April 2Q10 
Exhibit A U ~ U J . U UGB Adoption Ordinanct 
Comp Plan Change from 
Range Land to Urban on 
Taxlot 11.14.7 100, 101 & 200 
Urban Growth Boundary Expanded 
to include Subject Properties 
u - U 2 7 - i 
City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive 
Plan, Madras and Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning 
Map 
FINDINGS 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Prepared for: 
Jefferson County 
66 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of 
MadzM. 
Prepared by: 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Pordand, Oregon 97205 
February 2010 
0-039-10 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Shelly Tack Chair 
Lynn Kowaleski Vice-Chair 
Alan Hurley Commissioner 
Kasey Cousens Commissioner 
Richard Ladeby Commissioner 
Joe Krenowicz Commissioner 
City of Madras City Council 
Melanie 
Tom 
Walt 
Royce 
Benjamin 
Bob 
Kevin 
Widmer 
Brown 
Chamberlain 
Embanks Jr. 
Keeton 
McConnell 
O'Meara 
Mayor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Don Martin Chair 
Evan Thomas Vice Chair 
Dick Dodson Commissioner 
Bob Powers Commissioner 
Roy Hyder Commissioner 
Kay Moon Commissioner 
Jim Martin Commissioner 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
John Hatfield Commission Chair 
Mike Ahern Commissioner 
Wayne Fording Commissioner 
Project Support and Consulting Team 
Angelo Planning Group 
Kittelson Associates 
Jefferson County 
City of Madras 
Jefferson County School District 509-J 
Land use planning, project management 
Transportation analysis 
Planning 
Planning, technical support 
Planning, technical support 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madias and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
0-039-10 
Table of Contents 
I. Proposal Summary 1 
II. Introduction 3 
III. City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 4 
IV. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning 
Map Amendments 6 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement 7 
Goal 2 Land Use Planning 8 
Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 12 
Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 13 
Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 14 
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards 14 
Goal 10 Housing 15 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 16 
Goal 12 Transportation 20 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 23 
Goal 14 Urbanization 24 
VI. Conformance with State Statutes 
ORS 197.298 26 
ORS 197.610 27 
ORS 197.626 : 28 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) 
30 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 32 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Section III, Goal 14 - Urbanization 34 
X. Conformance with the City of Madras Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 7.2-7.4 — Annexation 41 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 8.2 - Zone/Plan Map Amendments ..44 
List of Figures 
Figure 4-1: Proposed UGB Amendment and Annexation Area 6 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madias and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
0-039-10 
List of Tables 
Table 3-1: Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 4 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 10 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 11 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras LIRA 12 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 27 
List of Appendices 
• Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
• Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey Map (20-acre parcel) 
• Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
• Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
• Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
• Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis (Kittelson & Associates, January 
2010) 
• Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely Determination for US 97/J 
Street Improvements 
• Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madias and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
0-039-10 
l« Proposal Summary 
File No.: 081-004 
Legislative Sponsor: Nick Snead, Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-3388 
(541) 475-7061 Fax 
nsnead(a),ci.madras.or.us 
Planning 
Consultant: 
DJ Heffernan 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
(503) 227-3664 
(503) 227-3679 Fax 
dheffernan(S),angeloplannine\com 
Proposal: • To amend the Madras Comprehensive Plan — to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond 
and are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
(Table 3-1) 
• To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps — to expand the 
Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); to annex 20 acres 
of City-owned land ("east site," Figure 4-1) to the City of 
Madras and apply City R-2, Multiple Family Residential zoning; 
to annex 16.22 acres of privately owned land plus 0.69 acres of 
land for County right-of-way ("west site," Figure 4-1) to the 
City and retain existing County RL, Range Land, zoning. 
Location: • West site: tax map of 16.91-acre west site (outlined), directly 
east of the existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road 
(Appendix A) 
• East site: survey map of 20-acre east site, east of the existing 
Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road (Appendix B) 
Legal Description: West site: US 14E 7 Lots 101 (12.28 acres), 102 (0.69 acres for 
right-of-way), and 200 (3.94 acres), entire lots 
East site: US 14E 7 Lot 100 (20 acres), parcel of lot 
Legal description of Lot 100 parcel (east site): 
portion of Parcel 2 ofPatiition Plat No. 2002-12 as filed in the Jefferson 
County Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1A) of Section 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
1 
0-039-10 
7, Township 11 South, Range 14Eastofthe Willamette Meridian, Jefferson 
County Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 
Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 inch 
diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears 
South 89°39'40"East a distance of2640.53feet; thence South 89°39'40" 
East along the North line of said Section 7 a distance of599.997feet; thence 
South 0°17'36" West a distance of40.00feet to the Northwest corner of said 
Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; thence continuing South 0°17'36" 
Wist along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance of40.00feet to the South 
right-of-way line ofEastAshwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 0°17 '36" East along said 
West line a distance of935.13feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said 
Partition Plat No. 2002-17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39 '40 " 
East a distance of931.70feet; thence North 0°17'36" West a distance of 
935.12feet; to a point on the South right-of-way line ofEastAshwood Road; 
thence North 89°39 '40 " West along said right-of-way line a distance of 
931.70feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Contains 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. (Appendix B) 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
2 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
I!. Introduction 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved by DLCD in July 2009, and was sized 
to provide urbanizable land for the next 50 years. Land from the URA is the first priority 
for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The City of Madras is not currently in 
periodic review or evaluating its existing UGB for a 20-year land supply. The City, however, 
has initiated this UGB amendment and annexation process in order to begin to meet the 
land need identified by the Madras Urbanisation Study (April 2007) and the Madras Urbanisation 
Study Addendum (August 2007), prepared by ECONorthwest. The studies found a need for 
residentially zoned land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB. 
There are two parts to the proposed Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) annexation: the east 
site and the west site. The City of Madras owns the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits and for re-zoning as City Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2), a designation that will allow for a multi-family and single-family housing as 
well as public/semi-public uses typically sited on residentially zoned land. The 20-acre 
parcel is within the Yarrow Master Plan area. 
In addition to the east site, there are another 16.91 acres of land in the proposed UGB and 
City annexation, referred to as the west site. The west site is comprised of three lots that 
provide County right-of-way, better connect the east site to the existing UGB, and 
contribute toward meeting the long-term need for residentially zoned land. The west site is 
privately owned and is not proposed for re-zoning at this time. Owners may apply for re-
zoning when they are prepared to file land development applications in the future. It is 
expected that the west-site land also will provide the same range of needed housing types 
and public/semi-public uses as the east site when re-zoning is approved. Both the east and 
west sites will be designated Residential on the Plan Maps if this proposal is approved. 
Proposed Text Amendments 
In order to facilitate the transition of rural zoning to urban zoning in the urban growth area, 
text amendments are proposed for Section IV (Land Use Element) of the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones allowed on land that is designated for future 
urban use on the Comprehensive Plan map. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
3 
0-039-10 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
Table 3-1 lists Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations and corresponding 
City and County zones that are deemed compatible. The table is needed because the 
Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan map, which applies to incorporated and 
unincorporated properties, and the city's zoning map are one in the same. The table 
clarifies that unincorporated property may retain its county zoning when it is annexed 
into the UGB if the land is not immediately annexed into the city. Such properties may 
retain any of the listed County zones and be regulated under the County's land 
development ordinance consistent with adopted growth management policies and 
procedures that apply to all land inside the Madras UGB. When such land is ready for 
urban development, the owner may request city annexation and zoning that is consistent 
with the land use plan designation for their property. Practically speaking, the table 
simply allows rural zoning districts to be applied in the Madras urban growth area on an 
interim basis, even when the rural zone differs from the intended long range urban use 
for a subject property. The table does not alter anything in practice. County zoned 
properties that are inside the Madras UGB remain under county jurisdiction in all 
respects although they are subject to urban growth management policies and regulatory 
review procedures that have been jointly adopted by Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras. In this context, the conformity table serves as a zoning bridge between a 
property's planned urban future and its current unincorporated rural zoning. 
Table 3-1 Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home 
subdivisions, and for duplexes 
R-1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family 
Residential 
Land for multi-family housing to be close 
to businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential 
development that allows site design 
flexibility to promote creativity and 
protection of scenic and natural 
resources 
R-3 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
4 
0-039-10 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones county zones 
C-3 Community 
Commercial 
Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
1 Industrial Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, 
ERD 
OIS Open Space Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise 
publicly owned 
OS/PF EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM 
AID Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for 
future commercial and industrial uses, 
particularly those that rely on air 
transportation 
AID EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFU A-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
5 
as m o 
£ 
O £ £ 
0) 
~5 
T5 
C 
<0 
<0 L. 
T3 
<0 Q. 
re 
O) 
— c 
a. "E 
o o 
> N 
w t/> 
c <o 
a) 4= 
JZ ^ 
0) to 
o o 
«J 
"D 
<0 
"O 
c 
re 
to 
Q. 
<0 
C 
(Q 
5 5 : 
JS 9> 
o "w 
c C 
£ 0) £ 
£ 
Q. 
C a) 
Z; o 32 o a) 
V) o 
Q. 
>> c 
a. o 
3 f<] 
1 « P-i rt 
V 0 .fe 
a ^ B u 
<u S 
i - s 
U a , 
8 o u 
s s B I £ U 
S g 
| § 
s « ^ a ^ s 
qj £ ? 3 ° Q p 
2 J - S P-i g, fc 
0-039-10 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement 
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be 
involved in all phases of the planning process. 
Response: The proposed amendments have been reviewed during a series of public 
meetings and hearings in order to allow for consideration by public officials and public 
feedback. 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or "District") Board ("Board") was 
generally briefed by the Superintendent about the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan at the 
December 14, 2009 School Board meeting where the need for the updated plan was 
discussed. The draft plan was brought to them first for formal review at a Board meeting on 
January 11, 2010. After the School Board reviewed the enrollment forecast, location and 
conditions of existing schools, and future potential school locations, they adopted the plan 
on January 25, 2010. 
The proposed Madras Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan amendment and 
amendments to the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Maps and 
Zoning Maps were presented and reviewed in a series of meetings in early 2010. 
A public hearing was scheduled before the Madras and Jefferson County Planning 
Commissions (joint) on February 11, 2010. Notice of the hearing was published in the 
January 13, 2010 Madras Pioneer. The public notice published in the newspaper was also 
posted at the Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the 
Jefferson County Library 20 days prior to the February 11, 2010 Planning Commission 
meeting. 
Additionally, property owners within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB were notified of the proposed land use action. Adjacent property owners 
were notified that the file was available for review at the Jefferson County Community 
Development Department at 85 SE "D" Street and that copies of any information would be 
provided at a cost of .25/page. The agenda for the Planning Commission was posted at 
Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the Jefferson 
County Library 7 days prior to the February 11, 2010 joint Planning Commission meeting. 
As discussed above the City proposes to include four (4) properties that total 36.91 acres 
into the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary. This constitutes a potential "land use 
change" that would typically require notice to affected property owners. ORS 227.186 
(Measure 56 notice) requires property owners to be notified of legislative acts relating to 
comprehensive plan, land use planning or zoning proposed by the City. Additionally, the 
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is limited to the four properties identified on 
page 1. As such, a city-wide notice is not needed rather notice to the individual properties 
is required. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
7 
0-039-10 
The City owns property, has a signed Consent to Annex agreement or a letter from a 
property owner acknowledging the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment that verify 
that property owners are aware of the proposed land use action and a Measure 56 notice is 
not needed. Specifically, the City holds title and owns Tax Lot 100 and therefore is aware 
and consents to the proposed re-zone to a portion of the property it owns that represents a 
"land use change" that may limit use. Additionally, the City of Madras has signed consent 
forms from the property owners of tax lots 101 and 200. Jefferson County owns tax lot 102 
and has provided a letter acknowledging and supporting the proposed land use action. As 
such, a formal notice as required by ORS 227.186 is not necessary as the affected property 
owners are aware of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. More over, the ensuing 
annexation and re-zoning of 20 acres of tax lot 100 is limited to City owned property. 
45-day notice to DLCD was sent to DLCD staff on December 14, 2009. On January 13, 
2010 DLCD Field Representative, Mark Radabaugh, notified the City of Madras that the 
contents of the 45-day notice was incomplete. Later that day, City staff submitted the 
requested information to DLCD making the notice complete. The materials submitted on 
January 14, 2010 are noted as the Addendum to the notice. 
The UGB expansion area is drawn from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA), which was 
developed through an intensive participatory process. A Technical Advisory Committee 
(TAC) and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) were formed to provide guidance for the 
project. The TAC was comprised of staff from project team members, including Jefferson 
County, the City of Madras, ECONorthwest, Kittelson & Associates, David Evans & 
Associates, Ball Janik, LLP, and Angelo Planning Group. The PAC included representatives 
of the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Jefferson County School District 509-J, local 
farmers, housing advocates, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, and 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). 
Findings: 
• According to both their Comprehensive Plans and code, the City of Madras and 
Jefferson County Planning Commissions serve as their official citizen planning 
committees. 
• Adoption of the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) complied with Goal 1. 
• Materials were made available to the public at Madras City Hall and the Jefferson 
County Community Development Department. 
• Measure 56 notice was not issued as the proposed post-acknowledgment plan 
amendments are property specific and do not propose additional regulations to the 
properties proposed to be annexed and, in the case of the east site, re-zoned to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). 
• 45-day notice of proposed plan amendments was sent to the Department of Land 
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on December 14, 2009 prior to the start of 
hearings held by County and City Planning Commissions and legislative bodies. On 
January 13, 2010 the City of Madras provided supplemental information to DLCD 
vial email. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
8 
0-039-10 
• Notices of the public meetings were published in the City's local newspaper, 
including contact information for the City and County. 
Conclusion: The proposed text and map amendments comply with State requirements for 
citizen involvement per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 1. 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all 
decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
Response: 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras City Council adopted the Madras Urban LTRA and related provisions in October 
2008 and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD 
acknowledged and approved the URA and related amendments in July 2009, with 
stipulations that some of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County development 
code be modified. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a 
UGB is land designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the 
first priority for UGB expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 
years, as was found by the Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
Land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet long-term land 
needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing UGB 
and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 50 
years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the Madras URA - east and southeast of the city — 
consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation. Land in the URA is subject to joint management under 
the terms of the City's and County's Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
(UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. Response and findings related to the 
UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Local criteria are relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be included in the UGB. 
Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan 
(AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient public facilities, financing 
prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard areas for the proposed 
UGB amendment area. Policyl4J requires the following. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
9 
0-039-10 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities required by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary to 
serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements outlined in 
adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements that augment 
adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements of 
OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in the 
Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet transportation 
needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental transportation 
improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
These criteria are addressed later in the report section on the Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Goal 14. 
The Madras Urbanisation Study (ECONorthwest, April 2007) and Madras Urbanisation Study 
Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007) identify a shortage of residentially zoned land to 
meet single-family and multi-family housing needs and public/semi-public use needs in the 
next roughly 20 years The needed number of housing units and acreage for residential uses is 
summarized in Table 4-18 of the August 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (Table 5-
!)• 
These needs are compared to the available land supply in the existing UGB in Table 6-4 in 
the study (Table 5-2) in order to determine whether there is a surplus or deficit of land for 
residential, public and semi-public, and employment uses. The table documents a shortage of 
land zoned R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) and land zoned R-l (Single Family Residential) 
inside the existing UGB as well as a need for roughly 350 acres of public and semi-public 
uses over the course of the next 15-20 years. These public/semi-public uses tend to be 
related to residential uses and are typically allowed and sited on residentially zoned land. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
10 
0-039-10 
The proposed UGB amendment addresses part of the residential and public use land need 
presented above. Annexing 20 acres of the proposed amendment that are owned by the City 
(the east site) and rezoning it R-2 allows the City to fulfill its agreement with Jefferson 
County School District (JCSD) and provide land for a potential school site, which could 
address the need for a new school or replacement school as identified in the JCSD 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan. The remainder of the land need identified in the urbanization 
studies will be addressed during the City's next cycle of periodic review. 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 4-18. Forecast of needed housing units and residential land, 
Madras, 2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Density Net to Gross Density 
(OU/net Net Res. Gross Res. (DUfgross 
Housing Type NewDU Percent res ac) Acres Factor Acres res ac) 
Needed Units, 2007-2027 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 1,791 61% 4.8 373.1 25% 497.5 3.6 
Manufactured 205 7% 5.5 37.4 25% 49.8 4.1 
Condo/Townhomes 205 7% 9.0 22.8 15% 26.9 7.7 
Subtotal 2,202 75% 5.4 410.5 574 2 3.3 
Multi-family 
MulfflamBy 734 25% 14.0 52.4 15% 61.7 11.9 
Subtotal 734 25% 14.0 52.4 61.7 11.9 
Total 2,936 100% 6.3 462.9 635.8 4.6 
Needed Units, 2007-2057 
Single-family lypes 
Single-family detached 5,516 61% 4.8 1,140.1 25% 1,532.1 3.6 
Manufactured 633 7% 5.5 115.1 20% 143.3 4.4 
Condo/Townhomes 633 7% 9.0 70.3 15% 8Z7 7.7 
Subtotal 6,7ai 75% 5.4 1,334.5 1,758.7 3.9 
Multi-family 
Mullifamily 2,290 25% 14.0 161.5 10% 179.4 12.6 
Subtotal 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 179.4 12.6 
Total 9.042 100% 6.3 1,495.9 1,938.1 4.7 
Source: ECOHortljwest Note: Gross acres calculated by circling net acres by (1-net to grass factor). For example, for single-family •cfeatjied, 477.«(l--75) = 638.1. Conversely, 636.1 x .75 = 477.1. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
11 
0-039-10 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2067 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,356.7 398.1 (53.3) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 148.0 444.0 242.8 34.8 (201.2) 
RR5 Q.Q 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 38.7 38.7 
Public/Semi-puMic uses on res land 358.3 770.7 O.O (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential! 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1; 230.6 758.1 8Q.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 Q 32.8 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 743.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Holes: all public and semi-public fend needs ware allocated to residential zones 
Proposed Text Amendments 
As discussed above, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation is based on the 
buildable lands inventory and needs analysis performed by ECONorthwest in 2007 and for 
the Madras URA. The proposed table of corresponding City land use designations and City 
and County zones (Table 3-1) is proposed to facilitate the transition of land from rural to 
urban and the annexation of land in the URA to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is drawn from land in the adopted 
Madras URA, which is the first priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to 
state statute. 
• The east site and west site are currently zoned Range Land by the County. Range 
land was included in the Madras URA because of sewer service advantages it had 
over other land surrounding the UGB and because including only exception land in 
the URA would not have provided enough land for the projected growth needs of 
the next approximately 50 years. 
e The proposed annexation area meets some of the need for residentially zoned land 
outside the existing UGB over the next 20 years, as established in the 2007 Madras 
Urbanisation Study and addendum. The studies found the need for more than 200 
acres of land for housing and related public/semi-public uses. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
land use planning per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 2. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
12 
0-039-10 
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands 
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 
Response: The entire Madras URA includes land zoned for rural residential, range land, 
and agricultural uses, as shown in Table 5-3. 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 
Land Type Zones Acres 
Exception Land RR2, RR5, RR10 (Rural Residential) 1,709 
Non-prime Resource Land RL (Range Land) 2,038 
Prime Resource Land A1 (Agricultural) 68 
Total 3,815 
Prime agricultural land makes up less than 2% of the total URA. When prime agricultural 
land is included, it is only when it is adjacent to the existing UGB, surrounded by exception 
land or non-prime resource land, and/or will be more easily served with public facilities — 
sewer service, in particular. The rest of the URA is comprised of rural residential and range 
land. Rangeland was included in the URA because of serviceability advantages it has over 
other land surrounding the Madras UGB and because all the exception (rural residential) 
land adjacent to the Madras UGB would not fulfill the city's estimated land needs for the 
next 50 years. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
As explained above, land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet 
land needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing 
UGB and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 
50 years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer 
serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Pursuant to ORS 197.298(a), the first priority of land to be included in the UGB is land in a 
LTRA. Beyond that, local criteria can be relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be 
included in the UGB. Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan 
or Area Master Plan (AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient 
public facilities, financing prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard 
areas for the proposed UGB amendment area. These policies are addressed in more detail in 
the response and findings for Madras Comprehensive Plan Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
13 
0-039-10 
Land in the URA is subject to joint management under the terms of the City's and County's 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. 
Response and findings related to the UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is land from the Madras URA, 
top priority land for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298(a). 
• Some of the non-prime resource land (zoned Range Land) is easier to serve with 
sewer than other areas around the existing Madras UGB, based on public facility 
analysis done during the development of the URA. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of 
the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in 
the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for 
agricultural lands per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 3. 
Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. 
Response: The land being proposed for inclusion in the Madras UGB is currently located 
within the Madras URA, jointly managed by Jefferson County and the City of Madras 
pursuant to the terms of the Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA), 
adopted in January 2009 (Appendix C). Pursuant to the URAMA, the County processes 
land use decisions in the URA. In addition, conversion plans must be submitted to the City 
for land divisions in the URA. 
Madras Comprehensive Plan policy language regarding protection of open space, scenic, 
wildlife, and cultural resources was adopted as part of amendments to Goal 14 
(Urbanization) concurrent with the adoption of the Madras URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
The land in the proposal does not include floodways, floodplains, significant habitat, or 
cultural resources that are identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 
inventory, or Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) files. The only 
resources cited in Policy 14 J (8) that may apply to the site are open spaces. Open space will 
be a required part of school or multi-family residential development that occurs in the UGB 
amendment area. However, this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal 
and, therefore, is not required to specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
14 
0-039-10 
Findings: 
e Recently adopted amendments to Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan require 
identification of protective measures for significant open space, scenic, historic, 
cultural and natural resources in proposed UGB expansion areas. The Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan and Goal 5 inventory does not identify natural, scenic, 
or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• Open space designations will be made as part of development entitlement for the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for open 
space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 
5. 
Goal 6: Air, Water and Land Resource Quality 
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. 
Response: According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon 
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) there are no federally designated air quality 
management areas or federally designated hazardous waste sites in the Madras URA. Of 
Environmental Cleanup Sites reported on ODEQ's website, there are no sites identified in 
the URA.1 Further, R-2 zoning is proposed for the UGB amendment area to be brought in 
to the city, allowing residential uses and other compatible uses. These uses tend to produce 
less noise, air, land, and water pollution than commercial and industrial uses, which typically 
manufacture goods, produce by-products, and generate more vehicle traffic. 
Findings: 
• There are not federal- or state-registered environmental quality sites within the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• The amendment and annexation area is needed and planned for residential and 
related uses, which tend to have fewer adverse air, water, and land quality impacts 
than commercial or industrial uses. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for air, water 
and land resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6. 
Goal 7 ; Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 
To protect people and property from natural hazards. 
Response: Primary potential natural hazards in Madras include steep slopes, floodway and 
floodplain, and wildfire. Statewide Goal 7 is reinforced in Madras Comprehensive Plan 
1 Air quality management areas, hazardous waste sites, and environmental cleanup sites can be searched on the 
U.S EPA's and ODEQ's websites at: http:/Avww.deq.state-or.us/aq/planning/index.htm. 
http:/Avww.epa.gov/superfuiid/sites/siteinfo.htm. and 
http:/Avww.deq.state.or.us/lq/ecsi/ecsi.litm. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
15 
0-039-10 
policies (Goal 14) by requiting protection from natural hazards be demonstrated for 
proposed UGB amendments. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in the 
proposed annexation area. Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided 
by Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that 
district if the land is annexed to the city. Area in the district is subject to a Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration 
with the fire district and federal agencies. 
Findings: 
• There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in 
the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. 
• Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 provides fire protection service to the 
proposed amendment and annexation area. The area is subject to the Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) developed and adopted by the County, the fire 
district, and federal agencies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for areas 
subject to natural hazards per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 7. 
Coal 10: Housing 
To encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price 
ranges and rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon 
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. 
Response: This proposal provides land for housing and related public and semi-public 
uses. The Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (August 2007) shows that there is a shortage 
of residentially zoned land inside the existing UGB for growth over the next 20 years (Table 
5-2). 
The proposed annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits addresses this need by 
including 36.91 acres of land from the LIRA for residential and public/semi-public uses. It is 
proposed that the east site be re-zoned from County RL (Range Land) zoning to City R-2 
(Multi-Family Residential) zoning. 
These proposed amendments are not part of a periodic review work program and the next 
periodic review process will ensure that the UGB does include enough land to meet all the 
land needs that are projected for the next 20 years as shown in Table 5-2. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
16 
0-039-10 
Findings: 
• The Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum found a need for residentially zoned 
land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB for 
growth expected over the next 20 years. 
• The remainder of land needs determined by the urbanization studies will be 
addressed during the next City of Madras periodic review. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for housing 
per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and 
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
Goal Requirements 
Urban Facilities and Services - Refers to key facilities and to appropriate types and 
levels of at least the following: police protection; sanitary facilities; storm drainage 
facilities; planning, zoning and subdivision control; health services; recreation facilities 
and services; energy and communication services; and community governmental 
services. 
A. Goal 11 Planning Guidelines 
5. A public facility or service should not be provided in an urbanizable area unless there 
is provision for the coordinated development of all the other urban facilities and services 
appropriate to that area. 
Response: According to terms of the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras, the City will be the primary service provider for land within its UGB, in particular 
coordinating police, sewer, stormwater, land use, recreation, energy, and governmental 
services. City urbanization regulations amended with the adoption of the Madras URA 
require either a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan (AMP) for 
UGB amendments in Madras for areas over five acres (Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 
14 I). Both MPC plans and AMPs must show "appropriate locations for transportation 
improvements, public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and 
natural resource areas" and how proposed land uses will integrate with existing development. 
Transportation facilities are addressed in more detail in the response and findings for 
Statewide Goal 12 next in this report. 
The adopted Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation both to the Madras UGB and city limits. It is also proposed that the east site be 
re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide land for uses such as urban levels of 
housing and related public/semi-public uses. These uses are similar to and compatible with 
surrounding development of residential and public uses. The east site is tangent to the 
existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. Sufficient water 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
17 
0-039-10 
and sewer service can be provided to the east site given existing and planned systems, and 
this is documented in the service provider letters from Deschutes Valley Water District and 
the City of Madras Public Works (Appendix D). 
Pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 14 I: "An AMP shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified urban land need, 
appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, protection for 
significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource areas." It is proposed to annex 
the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits. While it is also proposed that the site retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development, the site is surrounded by land designated for residential and public/semi-
public • uses, and its future designation as residential allows housing and compatible 
public/semi-public uses that can be: "integrated with the existing urban development 
pattern." (Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 14 I (2)) Further, the proposed 
addition of a table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use 
designations to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), 
will facilitate the transition of existing County zoning for the west site to appropriate City 
zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. As with the east 
site, sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to the west site given existing and 
planned systems, as stated in service provider letters (Appendix D). 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
Finally both MPC plans and AMPs must have documented approval from a majority of 
landowners pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 141 (3). Specifically, the City of 
Madras owns Tax Lot 100 and as the applicant, consents to the proposed UGB expansion to 
include 20 acres of Tax Lot 100 and the re-zoning of the property from Range Land (RL) to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). Tax Lot 102 is dedicated to Jefferson County for Ashwood 
right-of-way and consent for UGB expansion and re-zoning is not needed as inclusion in the 
UGB and re-zoning will not change how the right-of-way can be used. Consent from other 
landowners is provided in Appendix E. 
B. Goal 11 Implementation Guidelines 
5. Additional methods and devices for achieving desired types and levels of public 
facilities and services should include but not be limited to the following: (1) tax incentives 
and disincentives; (2) land use controls and ordinances; (3) multiple use and joint 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
18 
0-039-10 
development practices; (4) fee and less-than-fee acquisition techniques; and (5) 
enforcement of local health and safety codes. 
Response: The proposed land use designations and zoning for the annexation area — the 
east site and the west site — is appropriate for the type and level of public facilities and 
services that can be extended to the area. It is proposed to bring the west site into the 
Madras UGB and city limits but to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until 
landowners are ready to propose development. The site is surrounded by land planned for 
or developed as predominandy residential development. It is well situated for extension of 
urban facilities and services when they are needed. The proposed addition of a land use and 
zoning designation table to Section IV (Land Use Element) of the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan (Table 3-1) establishes the City and County zoning designations that correspond to City 
land use designations, and will guide the transition from County zoning to appropriate City 
zoning once a land use action is proposed. 
It is proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide 
land for uses such as urban levels of housing and related public/semi-public uses. These 
uses are similar to and compatible with surrounding development. The east site is tangent to 
the existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends 
itself to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. In that vein, 
service providers have determined that sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to 
the east and west sites given existing and planned systems (Appendix D). 
The east site is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan, a plan that envisions a variety of 
housing and then an internal circulation system, open space, public uses (including a school), 
and a small-scale commercial area to serve the primary residential uses. 
Once the properties are annexed into the city limits and developed, wastewater and domestic 
water services will need to be extended to each developed property. The property owner will 
fund the extension of wastewater and domestic water services to their properties. Extension 
of these facilities will be completed as required in the City of Madras Wastewater Master 
Plan and the Deschutes Valley Water District Master Plan. 
As previously discussed, this proposal is not a development proposal that offers entitlements 
for construction. Subsequent to this land use action, the property owner will be required to 
obtain development approvals (e.g. Site Plan Review, Conditional Use, or Subdivision). Any 
development approval will require public facilities to be extended to the subject property at 
the expense of the applicant. 
OAR 660-011-0010 
The Public Facility Plan 
(1) The public facility plan shall contain the following items: 
(a) An inventory and general assessment of the condition of all the significant public 
facility systems which support the land uses designated in the acknowledged 
comprehensive plan; 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
19 
0-039-10 
(b) A list of the significant public facility projects which are to support the land uses 
designated in the acknowledged comprehensive plan. Public facility project descriptions 
or specifications of these projects as necessary; 
(c) Rough cost estimates of each public facility project; 
(d) A map or written description of each public facility project's general location or 
service area; 
(e) Policy statement(s) or urban growth management agreement identifying the provider 
of each public facility system. If there is more than one provider with the authority to 
provide the system within the area covered by the public facility plan, then the provider 
of each project shall be designated; 
(f) An estimate of when each facility project will be needed; and 
(g) A discussion of the provider's existing funding mechanisms and the ability of these 
and possible new mechanisms to fund the development of each public facility project or 
system. 
(2) Those public facilities to be addressed in the plan shall include, but need not be 
limited to those specified in OAR 660-011-0005(5). Facilities included in the public 
facility plan other than those included in OAR 660-011-0005(5) will not be reviewed for 
compliance with this rule. 
(3) It is not the purpose of this division to cause duplication of or to supplant existing 
applicable facility plans and programs. Where all or part of an acknowledged 
comprehensive plan, facility master plan either of the local jurisdiction or appropriate 
special district, capital improvement program, regional functional plan, similar plan or 
any combination of such plans meets all or some of the requirements of this division, 
those plans, or programs may be incorporated by reference into the public facility plan 
required by this division. Only those referenced portions of such documents shall be 
considered to be a part of the public facility plan and shall be subject to the 
administrative procedures of this division and ORS Chapter 197. 
OAR 660-011-0015 
Responsibility for Public Facility Plan Preparation 
(1) Responsibility for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan 
shall be specified within the urban growth management agreement. If the urban growth 
management agreement does not make provision for this responsibility, the agreement 
shall be amended to do so prior to the preparation of the public facility plan. 
(2) The jurisdiction responsible for the preparation of the public facility plan shall provide 
for the coordination of such preparation with the city, county, special districts and, as 
necessary, state and federal agencies and private providers of public facilities. 
Response: The Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) that implements Goal 11 is OAR 660-
011. The rule establishes requirements for the planning and provision of public facilities in 
Oregon. Pursuant to OAR 660-011-0005(5), a public facility "includes water, sewer, and 
transportation facilities, but does not include buildings, structures or equipment incidental to 
the direct operation of those facilities." Transportation facilities are addressed in detail in 
the response and findings for Goal 12 in this report. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
20 
0-039-10 
The City of Madras is responsible for the planning and provision of sewer service in the 
proposed annexation area, and Deschutes Valley Water District (DVWD) for the planning 
and provision of sewer service in the area. The City and DVWD master plans for sewer and 
water provide an inventory and assessment of existing facilities, a list and map of planned 
projects, a timeline for their implementation, and a discussion of costs and financing 
mechanisms. 
The City Public Works Director has submitted a letter that is included with this report 
(Appendix D) that affirms there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned sewer 
infrastructure to serve the east and west sites in the proposed annexation area. Similarly, the 
DVWD General Manager has prepared a statement that there is sufficient capacity in 
existing and planned water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• Implementation of public facilities and services in Madras is primarily regulated by 
land use plans and ordinances and public facility master plans, which are elements of 
the City Comprehensive Plan. 
• The City of Madras will be the primary provider of urban facilities and services in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. The City will be able to coordinate 
service to the area with facilities and services already provided to adjacent land within 
the existing UGB. 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site and shows an internal 
transportation network and sites for housing and a school. 
• The City of Madras Public Works Director and DVWD General Manager have 
provided letters that verify that there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned 
sewer and water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area. 
• When development occurs on the properties to be included in the Madras UGB, the 
property owner will be responsible for cost to extend sewer and domestic water 
facilities to development. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with Goal 11 for public 
facilities and services subject to OAR 660, Division 11. 
Goal 12 Transportation 
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. 
660-012-0060 
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 
(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or 
a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of 
this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, 
capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) 
of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a 
transportation facility if it would: 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
21 
0-039-10 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation 
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted 
transportation system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels 
of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility 
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that 
is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
(2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, 
compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the 
planned function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent 
with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan 
or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the 
transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce 
demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance 
standards of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a 
development agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system 
management measures, demand management or minor transportation 
improvements. Local governments shall as part of the amendment specify when 
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: Reflecting Statewide Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule, UGB 
amendment applications must provide the following pursuant to Madras Goal 14 policies: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need: 
(Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy J-4) 
City R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning is proposed for the east site of the UGB 
amendment and annexation area. The zone allows multi-family and single-family housing 
outright and then allows associated uses such as schools, libraries, and community centers 
conditionally. The minimum lot size for single-family housing is 7,500 square feet and for 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
22 
0-039-10 
multi-family 10,000 square feet for the first two units and 2,000 square feet per each 
additional unit. 
The east site is adjacent to Ashwood Road, an existing road built to County standards as a 
collector road. Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary access 
and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road 
serves Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west 
transitions into B Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recently 
constructed extension of City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City 
limits, and Bean Drive connects toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 
summarizes key characteristics of the existing roadway facilities (Appendix F). 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
23 
0-039-10 
The transportation analysis for annexing and re-zoning the east site to R-2 was based on the 
assumptions below. Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, 
two scenarios were developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved 
both housing and a school. The difference in the scenarios represents the typical range of 
an elementary school site, 5-10 acres.2 The enrollment assumption roughly approximates the 
average elementary school enrollment in Jefferson County School District 509-J. A 
maximum housing density of 11.6 units/acre was derived from standards for lot and 
building size, parking, setbacks, and infrastructure for multi-family residential uses in the R-2 
zone. 
1. 5-acre school site — 174 multi-family units on 15 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
2. 10-acre school site — 116 multi-family units on 10 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
The analysis found that all the study intersections operate acceptably in the planning 
horizon3 with and without the proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the 
intersections of US 97 and J Street These intersections exceed volume-to-capacity (v/c) 
standards in 2025 with or without the proposed annexation and re-zoning. Because the 
proposal increases traffic at these intersections, even if minimally, the proposal is deemed to 
have a "significant effect"; it would further degrade the performance of the failing 
intersections. 
Improvements for the US 97/J Street intersection have been included in an amendment to 
the Madras TSP and in the ODOT 2010-2013 Draft STIP. The improvements involve 
realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the new 
J Street intersections, and would allow the US 97/J Street intersections to operate within 
adopted v/c standards. ODOT has deemed these improvements to be "reasonably likely" in 
the planning horizon and, thus, no significant would occur with the proposed annexation 
and re-zoning (Appendix G). 
Findings: 
• Transportation analysis for the east site of the proposed UGB amendment and 
annexation area assumed that the area would be developed with a combination of 
housing and a school. This was because there is the potential for a school to be 
located on the site and schools generate more traffic, thus creating a "worse case" set 
of scenarios for the analysis. 
• Transportation analysis showed that all the study intersections would perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the intersections of US 97 
and J Street. These intersections exceed adopted standards and the proposed 
annexation and re-zoning produce a "significant effect" on the intersections. 
2 An elementary school is the type of school needed in Madras according to the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan. 
3 Consistent with individual TSPs and a 15-year minimum pursuant to the Oregon Highway Plan, the planning 
horizon for City facilities is 2020, for County facilities is 2027, and for State facilities is 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
24 
0-039-10 
However, improvements for the intersections that are included in the Madras TSP 
and the 2010-2013 Draft STIP have been deemed "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon, thus mitigating the proposal's significant effect. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with Goal 12 and OAR 660-015-
0060. 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 
To conserve energy. 
Response: The east site of the UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the Yarrow 
Master Plan area. The master plan includes a range of land uses so that residents can meet 
many daily needs within the neighborhood. The plan designates land predominantly for 
housing, but for parks and open space, a school, other community services, and commercial 
services as well. This mix of uses will provide for these daily needs and reduce the need to 
drive outside the neighborhood to access these uses. 
All public improvements within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required to be constructed 
to City of Madras standards, which includes the provision of sidewalks. The Master Plan also 
includes planned open space which will be accessed by a multi-use trail system that will 
connect to existing multi-use trails in the City of Madras. This supports the use of non-
motorized transportation and the conservation of fuel resources. This proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation does not provide all of the land needed to implement the master 
plan but provides part of it. 
The west site is not part of the Yarrow Master Plan but will be subject to internal circulation 
and multi-modal standards when a land division or planned unit development is proposed. 
Like the east site, the west site is adjacent to Ashwood Road. 
While water service was projected to be of similar cost to provide to all the study areas that 
comprise the Madras URA, there were differences in relative cost for providing sewer 
service given the need for pumping in some of the study areas. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area is part of a study area and a drainage area where no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required for sewer service. This minimizes the 
amount of energy needed to provide that service. 
All residential development within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required be built to 
Earth Advantage/Energy Star standards and receive certification as stated in the Codes, 
Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) recorded for the development. Such requirement 
reduces energy consumption of each dwelling constructed in the Master Plan area and 
thereby conserves energy consumption which in part satisfies the Goal 13 requirements. 
Findings: 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the east site of the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area proposes a variety of uses that will allow residents 
to take care of day-to-day needs without always having to drive out of the 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
25 
0-039-10 
neighborhood to do so. The plan also indicates multi-use paths and a continuous 
network of sidewalks to promote walking and bicycling. This supports fuel and 
energy conservation. 
• Providing sewer service to the proposal area requires less pumping and, therefore, 
infrastructure, energy, and cost than other parts of the URA and other areas around 
the existing UGB. 
• The CC&R's recorded for the Yarrow Master Plan area require energy conservation 
by requiring future development to meet or exceed Earth Advantage/Energy Star 
standards. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for energy 
conservation per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 13. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to 
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, 
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
Response: The proposed map amendments respond to the need for more residentially 
zoned land as determined in the adopted Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. The 
studies analyzed the potential for development inside the existing UGB and found that in 
addition to development that the existing UGB can accommodate, approximately 220 acres 
of land is needed outside the UGB for residential and related public/semi-public uses over 
the years until 2027. These studies provided the basis for the Madras URA and URAs are 
enabled by statewide rules that address orderly and efficient land use as well as an orderly 
and efficient process for amending UGBs when needed. 
This proposed map amendment draws strictly from land in the URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298 and Madras plan policies. 
The proposed text amendments (Section III) contribute to orderly and efficient transition 
from rural to urban land use by clearly establishing the ways that Jefferson County and City 
of Madras zones correspond to Madras Comprehensive Plan designations. 
Transportation, water, and sewer services are among the critical public facilities that must be 
provided for the proposed UGB amendment area. As discussed in the narrative and 
findings for Goals 11 and 12 above, these services can be provided to the UGB amendment 
area relying on planned capital improvements. 
Transportation — Transportation analysis shows that all study intersections perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon, with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except for the intersections at US 97 and 
J Street. An analysis shows the performance of those intersections, as they are currently 
designed, exceed mobility standards with and without the proposed annexation and re-
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
26 
0-039-10 
zoning. Unless the intersections can be improved, the proposed annexation and re-zoning 
produce a "significant effect" on them by making worse an already failing condition. 
Proposed improvements to the "J" Street and US 97 intersections are included in the Madras 
TSP. Those improvements also are listed in the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, in effect 
programming the necessary state resources for them. On that basis, ODOT has determined 
the "J" Street/US 97 intersection improvements are "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon (Appendix G). With those planned improvements in place, the affect of 
the proposed annexation is mitigated and the proposal will not have a significant effect. 
Water — During the development of the Madras URA, Deschutes Valley Water District 
(DVWD) reported that there would be no supply constraint for urban development in the 
URA. Significant expansion of the District's distribution system would be necessary to serve 
urban demand in each part of the URA, and the water service study found that the marginal 
cost differences between the URA study areas were insignificant. Existing and planned 
facilities will provide sufficient water service to the area, as confirmed by Deschutes Valley 
Water District in a service provided letter (Appendix D). 
Sewer — Public facility analysis conducted in developing the Madras URA showed that sewer 
service to the eastern study areas in the URA would be more cost-efficient because no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required as compared to areas to the north, south, 
and west. For the proposed UGB amendment area, existing and planned sewer facilities will 
provide sufficient service to the area according to City of Madras Public Works (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• The proposed map amendments address the residential land need established in the 
Madras urbanization studies. It draws from the Madras URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB when land need is demonstrated. 
• The text amendments facilitate the transition between County zoning and City land 
use designations and zoning. 
• Water service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing and planned 
water facilities that are identified in the Deschutes Valley Water District's water 
master plan. Providing water service was not found to be significantly different in 
cost between different parts of the URA in studies done in developing the Madras 
URA. 
• Studies conducted for the URA found that drainage areas in the eastern and 
southeastern parts of the URA were easier to serve in that they needed no pumping 
or minimal pumping of sewage when compared to other parts of the URA. Sewer 
service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing City of Madras sewer 
master plan. 
• Sufficient transportation facilities and service can be provided to the proposed UGB 
amendment area given "reasonably likely" construction of improvements to the 
intersections of US 97/J Street before 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
27 
0-039-10 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
orderly and economic urbanization and provision of public facilities and services per 
Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
28 
0-039-10 
VI. Conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORSs) 
QRS 197 
197.298 Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary. (1) In 
addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land may not 
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities: 
(a) First priority is land that is designated urban reserve land under ORS 195.145, 
rule or metropolitan service district action plan. 
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the 
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to an urban growth boundary 
that is identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as an exception area or 
nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land that is completely 
surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is high-value farmland as 
described in ORS 215.710. 
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as marginal 
land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition). 
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in an 
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both. 
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the 
capability classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate for 
the current use. 
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section may be included in an 
urban growth boundary if land of higher priority is found to be inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or 
more of the following reasons: 
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on 
higher priority lands; 
(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be provided to the higher priority 
lands due to topographical or other physical constraints; or 
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary 
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services to 
higher priority lands. [1995 c.547 §5; 1999 c.59 §56] 
Response: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is solely comprised of 
land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority of land to be included within the UGB 
pursuant to ORS 197.298(l)(a). There is sufficient land in the Madras URA to provide for 
the land needs estimated for the next 20 years in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) and presented below. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation provides land to meet a portion of the need 
for residentially zoned land over the next roughly 20 years (Table 6-1). The City's next 
periodic review process will ensure that the Madras UGB includes enough land to meet the 
remaining land needs projected to 2027. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
29 
0-039-10 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4, Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB. 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 148.0 444.0 242.8 94.8 (201-2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 38.7 38.7 
PuMc/Sfiffli-pub1ic uses on res land 358.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail S Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 30.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 23.6 90.4 4.8 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6. 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117,7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 298.8 45.5 (452.9) 
Motes: all public and semi-ptralic land needs were allocated to restdeniiaJ tones 
197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; 
exceptions; report to commission. (1) A proposal to amend a local government 
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use 
regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The 
proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local 
government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. 
The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall 
notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. 
(2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular 
proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is 
not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new 
regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there 
are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: 
(a) The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided 
in ORS 197.615 (1) and (2); and 
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other 
person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. 
(3) When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a 
local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed 
amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use 
regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: 
(a) Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and 
(b) Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to 
address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve 
compliance with the goals. 
(4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission 
on whether the director: 
(a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and 
(b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
30 
0-039-10 
§7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c.761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] 
Response: Notice of the proposed map and text amendments was sent to the Department 
of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before the first 
evidentiary hearing on the proposal. Notice was sent to DLCD on December 14, 2009, 
which was more than 45 days before the first advisory hearing before the Jefferson 
County and City of Madras Planning Commissions on February 11, 2010. A notice 
addendum was submitted to DLCD on January 14, 2010. Further hearing dates have yet 
to be determined but DLCD provided comments on the proposal on January 29, 2010, 
more than 15 days prior to the final adoption hearing date. 
DLCD comments address the map amendments. They call for a boundary locational 
analysis pursuant to OAR 660-024-0060 and a "reasonably likely" determination from 
OODT for the proposed 20-acre rezoning. The locational analysis is not necessarily 
applicable because the proposed map amendment draws from an adopted and 
acknowledged URA. Part of the idea behind URAs is to create a 20- to 50-year reserve 
of land for urbanization all at once so that the process for subsequent UGB amendments 
can be streamlined. For cities or regions that do not have URAs, it is understood that the 
locational analysis established in -0060 would definitely be applicable and needed. 
As to the "reasonably likely" determination, ODOT rendered an affirmative 
determination on February 2, 1010. DLCD comments acknowledge that the set of 
needed improvements at the intersections of US 97/J Street is in the current draft STIP. 
Including them in the final STIP signifies a financial commitment to the improvements 
and thus makes a clear finding for "reasonably likely." 
197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary or designating urban or rural 
reserves subject to periodic review. A metropolitan service district that amends its 
urban growth boundary to include more than 100 acres, or that amends the district's 
regional framework plan or land use regulations implementing the plan to establish 
urban reserves designated under ORS 195.145 (1)(b), a city with a population of 2,500 
or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to 
include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve under ORS 195.145, or a 
county that amends the county's comprehensive plan or land use regulations 
implementing the plan to establish rural reserves designated under ORS 195.141, shall 
submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development 
Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. 
[1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10; 2003 c.793 §4; 2007 c.723 §7] 
Response: The City of Madras has coordinated with Jefferson County regarding the 
proposed map and text amendments. The amendments to the City and County 
Comprehensive Plans are post-acknowledgement plan amendments. However, the adoption 
process for the amendments will follow periodic review procedures pursuant to ORS 197. 
As part of periodic review procedures, the proposed amendments are subject to review by 
DLCD and approval by LCDC. DLCD and LCDC will conduct their review process upon 
adoption of the proposed amendments by the Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Board of Commissioners. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
31 
0-039-10 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is entirely comprised of land 
from the Madras URA, the first priority of land to be included in the UGB pursuant 
to ORS 197.298(1)(a). 
• There are 36.91 acres in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. This meets 
some of the estimated need for residendally zoned land outside the existing UGB 
projected to 2027 by urbanization studies. The proposed R-2 zoning for the 20-acre 
parcel (east site) allows housing and public/semi-public uses such as parks and 
schools. Other land needs for the next 20 years will be addressed during the next 
periodic review cycle. 
• Notice of the first advisory hearing on February 11, 2010 was sent to DLCD on 
December 14, 2009, more than 45 days before the advisory and evidentiary hearings. 
A notice addendum was filed on January 13, 2010. 
• The City of Madras and Jefferson County have coordinated this proposed set of 
amendments. 
• This proposal is a post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) but will follow 
procedures for periodic review. DLCD review and LCDC approval of the 
amendment will be necessary for the proposal if it is adopted by both the Madras 
City Council and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with applicable State 
requirements for urban reserve area planning, plan amendments, and UGB amendments 
pursuant to ORS 197. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
32 
0-039-10 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making 
authority regarding all land use application within the UGB except applications for 
amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of land in the UGB. Lands 
outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to 
include the territory to be annexed. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
1.1 Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
1.2 An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community 
Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan 
amendment fees. The City shall forward a copy of the application to the County 
Community Development Department, together with the County's plan 
amendment fee, within five working days of the date the application is filed. 
1.3 The City and County Planning Commission shall each conduct a public heahng 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may 
hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
1.4 The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be 
forwarded to City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the 
proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be 
forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
1.5 The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final 
decision on whether the UGB should be amended. 
1.6 If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint hearing of 
the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to 
resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution 
process to resolve the differences. 
1.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be 
no change to the UGB. 
Response: The Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (Appendix H) 
was adopted by the City of Madras and Jefferson County on April 5, 2006. Pursuant to 
UGAMA terms for UGB amendments, the City is an eligible applicant for a UGB 
amendment application (Section 6.1). The UGB amendment application and appropriate 
fees were forwarded to the Jefferson County Community Development Department within 
five working days of being initially filed (Section 6.2). 
Hearings by the Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission 
were first held jointly on February 11, 2010. The Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
33 
0-039-10 
Board of Commissioners held a joint public hearing on March 29, 2010 to review their 
recommendations from their respective Planning Commissions. On March 29, 2010, the 
Madras City Council approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and 
forwarded it's recommendation that evening to the Jefferson County Board of 
Commissioners who then approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. All of 
the public hearings before the Planning Commissions, Madras City Council, and Jefferson 
County Board of Commissioners were conducted in a manner consistent with the provisions 
of the UGAMA. 
It is proposed to annex both the east site and west site to the Madras UGB and city limits, 
and it is proposed to re-zone only the east site at this time. Regardless, if both sites are 
brought into the UGB and city limits, Madras will assume land use administration and 
decision making authority for the sites pursuant to Section 4.1 of the UGAMA. 
Findings: 
• The City is an eligible applicant for a UGB amendment application. 
• Appropriate UGB amendment application materials and fees were forwarded to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department in the prescribed amount 
of time. 
• The proposal will be heard jointly by the County and City Planning Commissions 
and then separately by the County Board of Commissioners and City Council. 
• Madras assumes administrative responsibility for any land annexed to its UGB and 
city limits. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable local requirements 
for UGB amendments per the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of Madras, 
adopted April 5, 2006. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
34 
0-039-10 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson Countv Comprehensive 
Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 
Policy 1: Changes to urban growth boundaries, the establishment of new urban growth 
boundaries or urban reserve areas, incorporation of a new city, or annexation 
of land into a city which is not in an established urban growth boundary 
requires an amendment to this Plan and the Zoning Map, The following 
factors should be used in considering such proposals; 
A. Demonstrated need to accommodate long-range urban population 
consistent with a 20- to 50-year population forecast coordinated with the 
cities; 
B. Demonstrated need for housing, employment opportunities, livability or 
uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks or open 
space; 
C. Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
D. Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing 
urban area. 
E. Comparative environmental, energy, economic and social consequences; 
F. Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural 
activities on land outside the UGB; and 
G. Priority of land as required by ORS 197.298. Non-irrigated parcels may 
be added to the UGB before irrigated parcels that are in the same 
statutory priority. 
Response: The proposed change to the UGB fulfills some of the need for residentially 
zoned land outside the existing UGB as identified in the Madras Urbanisation Study and 
A-ddendum. The urbanization studies found the need for approximately 220 acres of 
residentially zoned land — for residential and public/semi-public uses — over the next 15-20 
years. This is land that was found to be needed outside the existing UGB once all residential 
land inside the existing UGB is built out. Although the studies found a land need primarily 
for residential uses, employment and public/semi-public uses also were also determined to 
need land inside and outside the existing UGB in the next 20-50 years. 
The studies were the basis for adopting the Madras URA, which the County adopted in 
November 2008 and DLCD acknowledged in July 2009. The proposed UGB and map 
amendments draw strictly from land designated as URA, which is the first priority land to 
include in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The proposed residential zoning and 
expected primarily residential uses are compatible with residential development on the edges 
within the existing UGB, and provide a similar buffer to resource land outside the UGB. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
35 
0-039-10 
The URA is comprised of land that is classified as "exception" land as well as land zoned by 
the County as Range Land (RL). Range land was included in the URA because: exception 
land could not meet all the land needs of the next 20-50 years on its own; range land is lower 
value resource land; and range land surrounding the existing UGB — particularly to the east 
and southeast — would be more easily served with sewer than other land surrounding the 
existing UGB. 
The ability to serve land on the east and southeast of the existing UGB and to urbanize land 
that is not parcelized like the exception land in the URA, as well as the lower resource value 
of the land, offer more land use efficiency and cost-effectiveness and fewer impacts on 
prime resource land than initially bringing other land in the URA into the UGB. This gives 
land on the east comparative advantages in economic, energy, environmental, and social 
terms. 
Policy 2: The County shall cooperate with each city to determine where and when an 
urban growth boundary should be expanded. 
2.1 Expansion of an existing urban growth boundary shall be in accordance 
with state requirements, including the priority of land to be included 
within the urban growth boundary. Non-irrigated land should have a 
higher priority for inclusion in the boundary than irrigated land. 
Response: Jefferson County and City of Madras staff have closely coordinated the 
proposed map amendments, and the first evidentiary hearing for the proposal will be a joint 
meeting of the County and City Planning Commissions. The two jurisdictions also worked 
closely together to adopt the Madras URA in 2008. 
The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, statutes, 
and administrative rules as demonstrated in previous sections of this report. The proposed 
UGB amendment is comprised of land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority for 
inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The land is not irrigated. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB and map amendments provide some of the residentially zoned land 
that is needed outside the existing UGB in the next 15-20 years as found in Madras 
urbanization studies. 
• The amendments draw only from non-irrigated land in the Madras URA, which is the 
first priority land to include in the UGB pursuant to state statute. 
• Residential and related public/non-public uses will be compatible with residential 
development adjacent and inside the existing UGB, as it will with resource land outside 
the UGB that already borders residential uses just inside the UGB. 
• The ability of the land in the proposed amendment area to be more easily served with 
sewer than other land in the URA or other land surrounding the existing UGB and to 
build more densely than developed exception land provides land use, energy, and 
investment efficiencies. Developing more efficiently and on low resource land instead of 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
36 
0-039-10 
high resource land also present social and environmental benefits when compared to 
other land surrounding the existing UGB. 
9 Jefferson County and City of Madras have collaborated on the proposed map 
amendments. 
• The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, 
statutes, and administrative rules. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable policies from the 
Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
37 
0-039-10 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
GOAL 14 - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, and 
to provide for livable communities. 
[Paragraph amended by Ordinance No. 781, Passed by Council on December 12, 2006] 
POLICIES 
A. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
B. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall mutually agree to a management 
plan for the Urban Growth Boundary area. 
C. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary revision process to be utilized in a proposed change of the Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
D. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall support adoption of an Urban 
Reserve Area boundary that, when taken together with land supplies in the Urban 
Growth Boundary, may contain up to a 50-year supply of land for the City of Madras to 
support housing, economic development, public facility, recreation needs and other 
urban land needs. 
E. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall give priority to land in designated 
urban reserve areas over other land when considering urban growth boundary 
amendments. 
Response: The Madras City Council approved the Madras URA in October 2008 and the 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD and LCDC received 
the URA proposal for review in January 2009, and approved the proposal — but remanded 
sections of proposed County Zoning Ordinance amendments having to do with use 
restrictions in the URA — in July 2009. The land in the proposed UGB amendment that is 
the subject of this application is land entirely drawn from the Madras URA, land estimated 
to be needed for urbanization over the next 50 years. 
F. The City shall favor UGB amendments that involve land in locations that are suitable 
to address identified urban land needs in order to minimize buildable land supply 
shortages and address identified needs. Factors that will be considered when evaluating 
UGB additions include: 
1. Existing and planned capacity of the transportation system 
2. Existing and planned capacity of the city waste water treatment plant 
3. Existing and planned capacity of the city sanitary sewer conveyance system 
4. Existing and planned capacity of the Deschutes Valley Water District supply 
system 
5. Impacts on schools, parks, and public safety service providers 
6. Impacts on future operating costs for public facilities and services 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
38 
0-039-10 
G. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall undertake an evaluation of the 
urban growth boundary land supply once every five years or more frequently if certified 
population growth rates exceed 3.2% in three consecutive years. In the event certified 
population growth rates fall below 3.2% for three consecutive years, the City and County 
may agree to postpone the evaluation of UGB land supply for up to three years. 
H. During years when a comprehensive UGB land supply evaluation is not scheduled, 
individual applications for adding property to the UGB shall be limited to requests of less 
than 40 acres. UGB amendment applications must demonstrate consistency with 
applicable Oregon statutes and administrative rules and be accompanied by information 
that addresses Policy 14-J below. Applications that involve more than 5 acres also must 
comply with provisions of Policy 14-1. 
D /. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall encourage the development of 
complete, livable communities that include characteristics such as: a variety of lot sizes, 
dwelling unit types and ownership types, open spaces and other recreational amenities, 
a mix of land uses, school and community facilities, connected streets, proximity to 
downtown and other employment centers, and development that is scaled to the 
pedestrian and creates a sense of place. New growth areas of more than 5 acres that 
are added to the UGB shall should be planned and developed in accordance either with 
a master planned community development plan approved under the city Master Planned 
Community Overlay zone, or an Area Master Plan. The City encourages Master 
Planned Communities as a means to meet city housing needs as explained in other 
comprehensive plan documents. It may be appropriate, however, for the city to add new 
growth areas to the UGB that are planned and developed in accordance with an 
approved Area Master Plan. A majority of property owners subject to a Master Planned 
Community, or to an Area Master Plan, must consent to be included in the plan. 
1. A Master Planned Community (MPC) Overlay may apply to large multi-phased 
development projects where the master plan is intended to guide future 
development patterns and serves to regulate the site-development approval 
process. A MPC requires generous open space and amenities, and encourages 
efficient use of land and public facilities and services, a variety of housing types, 
innovative designs and complete pedestrian-friendly communities. A MPC shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land consistent with an identified urban land need, 
show appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, and 
the protection of significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas. A MPC must show how planned land uses will be integrated with the 
existing urban development pattern. Physical barriers, such as highways, tend to 
disrupt complete communities and livability because they disconnect areas from 
downtown and result in an auto-oriented environment of sprawl along highway 
corridors. 
2. An Area Master Plan (AMP) is appropriate for land added to the UGB where the 
approval of future urban development is expected to rely on conventional urban 
zoning and the application of codified development standards and review 
procedures. An AMP may be prepared for contiguous properties added to the 
UGB that are greater than 5 acres and are not subject to a MPC overlay. An 
AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified 
urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public 
facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
39 
0-039-10 
resource areas. An AMP must show how planned land uses will be integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern. 
3. An approved Master Planned Community Plan or an Area Master Plan must 
include documentation that a majority of property owners support the conversion 
of land to the planned urban uses and also consent to annexation by the city of 
Madras using a voluntary annexation process that is outlined in the plan. 
Response: The total area under consideration is 36.4 acres, which is less than the 40 acre 
maximum established for interim UGB annexation requests. The east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan area. The 
plan designates land for predominantly residential land uses, which is compatible with 
adjacent development in the UGB, while also designating land for open space and park uses, 
community services including schools, and limited neighborhood commercial services. The 
conceptual plan also shows an internal transportation system that includes sidewalks and 
multi-use paths. 
The east site is being proposed for both annexation to the UGB and Madras city boundaries. 
The site can be adequately served with water and sewer facilities given existing and planned 
facilities, according to the service providers (Appendix D). The site is not projected to have 
a significant adverse effect on surrounding transportation facilities given planned 
improvements for the intersections of US 97/J Street (Appendices F and G). Its proposed 
designation as Multi-family Residential is consistent with land needs identified in the 2007 
urbanization studies and with residential zoning in the area. 
Pursuant to Policy 1-1: "An AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent 
with an identified urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, 
public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas." It is proposed to annex the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits but to retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development. The site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future land use and zoning designation must allow for residential and compatible 
public/semi-public uses in order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern." (Policy 1-2) The proposed addition of a table 
showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use designations to the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate the 
transition of existing County zoning to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras U G B and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which eases 
extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits to the west site. Water 
and sewer service providers have attested that existing and planned facilities will be sufficient 
to serve the west site (Appendix D). 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
40 
0-039-10 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need: 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties: 
3. Evidence that public facilities reguired by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary 
to serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements 
outlined in adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements 
that augment adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with reguirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need: 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services: 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning 
horizon: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected 
from these hazards: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
Response: 
Zoning and Land Use Designations (Policy J l ) 
The east site is proposed to be re-zoned to a City R-2 designation. This meets some of the 
need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB that is projected for the next 15-
20 years. Residentially zoned land will provide for housing and public/semi-public uses. 
This land need is documented in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 
August 2007). (See Table 5-2) 
The west site is proposed to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) designation until the 
time when further land use action and development is proposed. Existing zoning will allow 
only limited development, and appropriate future designations for the site will be City 
residential designations given that City open space and residential zoning currently surround 
the site. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
41 
0-039-10 
When rezoning is proposed for the west site and for other land being converted from rural 
to urban, the proposed text amendments (Table 3-1) will assist and regulate the rezoning that 
will occur when changing County zoning to City land use designations and zoning. 
Annexation Ptogtam (PolicyJ2) 
The City is the applicant for this proposal, and annexation program pursuant to Article 7 of 
its Zoning Ordinance is described later in this report. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities (Policy J3) and Ttanspottation Planning Rule (Policy J4) 
Kittelson & Associates has performed the transportation analysis needed to deem whether 
the proposed UGB amendment constitutes a significant effect on the transportation system. 
Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, two scenarios were 
developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved both housing and a 
school. Using these scenarios in a TPR analysis, it was found that the increase in traffic did 
constitute a significant effect on the US 97/J Street intersections. However, given 
improvements included in the City's amended TSP and Draft 2010-2013 STIP, the effect can 
be mitigated and removed. 
Public facility analysis for establishing the Madras URA ranked drainage catchment areas 
around the existing UGB for sewer service costs and serviceability. Of the six study areas 
that comprised the preliminary and then final URA, Study Areas 3 and 4 on the east and 
southeast consistently ranked higher than other areas. This can, in part, be attributed to 
proximity to the new South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) and being upslope of 
the plant. In particular, the proposed UGB amendment arid annexation are is located in 
Catchment Area 180 and bordering on Catchment Area 179. These areas ranked 8th and 12th 
out of 60 catchment areas, making them among the more cost-effective and serviceable areas 
of the URA. 
As was also determined during the URA public facility analysis, Deschutes Valley Water 
District (DVWD) found that there would be insignificant differences in providing water 
service to the different parts of the URA. Water supply in the region is adequate to ample. 
Similarly, existing and planned sewer facilities provided by the City will be sufficient to serve 
the proposal area. (See service provider letters in Appendix D) 
Other Public Facilities (Policy J5) 
The east site has access to substantial park and recreation resources. Juniper Hills Park 
(County) and Bean Park (City) are nearby, as well as Jefferson County Middle School and its 
fields. The Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the site and surrounding land also designates 
open space and parks throughout the plan area. 
The City reports that Mountain View Hospital and City public safety and emergency services 
are sufficient to provide services for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
The sites are served by the Jefferson County School District 509-J. 
Financing for Improvements (PolicyJ6) 
Financing for constructing the needed public improvements will be placed upon property 
owners. As demonstrated by the letters submitted by the City of Madras Public Works 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
42 
O-039-10 
Director and Deschutes Valley Water District General Manager, each respective utility has 
capacity to service the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB To extend 
wastewater and domestic water services to the properties to be included in the UGB, each 
property owner will be responsible for extending services lines to their property, not with 
standing the requirements for annexing their property into the Madras city limits. 
Similarly, the Oregon Department of Transportation has determined the proposed UGB 
expansion will significantly affect the US 97/J Street intersection but that the design concept 
is established, the City has implemented System Development Charges to partially fund the 
improvements for this particular intersection and in the Draft State Transportation 
Improvement Plan (STIP) is funding for the intersection. With the design concept 
established and both funding sources identified, O D O T has determined that the US 97/ J 
Street intersection improvements are Reasonably Likely to Occur and therefore, impacts of 
the proposed UGB expansion are mitigated. 
Protection from Natural Hazards (PolicyJ7) 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed U G B expansion and annexation area. In fact, the proposed amendment and 
annexation are driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway 
and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1 , and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. The area is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 
that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and federal 
agencies. 
Protection of Goal 5 Resources (PolicyJ8) 
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files do not identify floodways, floodplains, 
significant habitat, or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation 
area. The only resources cited above that may apply to the site are open spaces. While open 
space will be a required part of public use or residential development that occurs in this area, 
this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal and, therefore, does not 
specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Findings: 
• Amendments to zoning and land use designations are planned and proposed. The 
proposed City land use designation is residential and City zoning designation R-2 
(Multiple Family Residential). A need for about 22 acres of land outside the existing 
UGB zoned R-2 was determined in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum. 
• Proposed text amendments facilitate the transition from urban to rural zoning, from 
County zoning to City land use designations and zoning. 
• Existing and planned transportation facilities — including improvements for the US 
97/J Street intersections in the Madras TSP and the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, which 
O D O T has deemed reasonably likely — will allow the study intersections to operate 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
43 
0-039-10 
within adopted standards both in the case of the proposal area being annexed and re-
zoned and not. 
• Existing and planned water and sewer facilities will be sufficient to serve the 
proposal area. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area has access to nearby parks, a 
middle school, and a high school. Rezoning the 20-acre east site to R-2 will allow for 
residential and public/semi-public uses there. 
• Financing of wastewater and domestic water services will be placed upon property 
owners once the properties are annexed and developed in a manner that is consistent 
with the service providers facility plans. 
• In terms of natural hazards, there are not slopes greater than 25%, floodway, or 
floodplain in the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. The proposed 
amendments and annexation are based, in part, on the need to provide a school that 
is outside the floodway and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. Fire 
protection service for the proposal area is and will be provided by Jefferson County 
Fire Protection District #1. 
• There are not floodways, floodplains, habitat, or cultural resources that are identified 
in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files in the proposal area. Open space will be 
provided pursuant to Madras zoning ordinance (MZO) in which 30% of a Master 
Planned Community must be open space (MZO Section 3.12(D)(4)). 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant policies of 
the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
44 
0-039-10 
X. Conformance with the City of Madras Community 
Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance 
ARTICLE 7: ANNEXATION 
SECTION 7.1: PURPOSE - The purpose of this section is to: 
A. Implement the policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan; 
B. Provide for City review of all annexation requests for a determination of the availability 
of facilities and services as related to the proposal; 
C. Provide for dissemination of public information and for sufficient time for public 
review; 
D. Provide for City and County coordination of a request for an annexation; and 
E. Provide for an expedited process by establishing procedures whereby the annexation 
and zoning, if applicable, may be considered concurrently. 
SECTION 7.2: APPLICATION PROCEDURE. Annexation is a land use decision and is 
subject to applicable provisions of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan, Oregon 
Revised Statutes, and Oregon Administrative Rules. In addition, the procedures below 
shall be followed: 
A. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing after notification of all 
property owners with two hundred fifty feet (250') outside of the boundary(ies) of the 
proposed annexation. The Planning Commission shall review the proposal for 
compliance with the annexation policies contained in this Ordinance and make a 
recommendation to the City Council, based on: 
1. The annexation proposal which meets the application requirements; and 
2. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to determine a 
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the annexation proposal based on the 
criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below; and 
3. The Planning Commission shall state its recommendation and the reasons therefore 
in writing to the City Council. 
B. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall 
conduct a public hearing and consider an Ordinance declaring the requested lands to be 
annexed to the City of Madras. 
1. The City Council shall review the record of the Planning Commission hearing their 
recommendation and shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the proposed annexation in accordance 
with the criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below. 
2. The City Council may conduct additional public hearings to assist their making a 
determination. 
3. The City Council shall state its determination and the reasons therefore in writing. 
Response: The City of Madras sent public hearing notice to the surrounding property 
owners on February 1, 2010. The City and County Planning Commissions held their first 
public hearing on February 11, 2010. The City Planning Commission decided upon a 
recommendation to approve the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment (10-PA-01) at 
its hearing on February 11, 2010 and forwarded it to the Madras City Council. The City 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
45 
0-039-10 
Council is held a public hearing jointly with the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
on March 29, 2010. The City of Madras has not provided notice to affected property and 
adjacent property owners, or noticed the public hearings for the annexation of 20 acres of 
the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to expand the Madras UGB by 
approximately 36.91 acres. 
SECTION 7.3: ANNEXATION APPLICATION. The petitioner for annexation shall 
complete an application form provided by the Community Development Department. The 
application fee, established by Resolution of the City of Madras City Council, shall be 
submitted with the application. The application shall include: 
A. A map demonstrating that the proposed annexation is contiguous to the City Limits; 
B. Specific information on each parcel within the proposed annexation area: 
1. Current assessed valuation shown on Jefferson County Assessor's tax rolls. 
2. Acreage of both public and private property to be annexed. 
3. Map and tax lot(s) number. 
C. Names and ages of all residents and list of registered voters in the proposed 
annexation area. 
D. Addresses of all parcels within the proposed annexation area. 
E. Consent to Annexation forms, provided by the City of Madras, with notarized 
signatures of all property owners and electors within the proposed annexation area. 
F. Written findings, which address the following: 
1. Existing land uses within annexation area. 
2. Existing zoning within the annexation area. 
3. Existing improvements: 
a. water system 
ib. streets 
c. sanitary sewer 
d. storm drainage 
4. Special Districts within the area: 
a. water districts 
b. irrigation districts 
c. fire district 
d. school district 
e. other 
5. Urban services, the present availability of urban service systems to the proposed 
annexation area, their capacity and cost of extension and/or improvement to urban 
standards: 
a. sanitary sewers - streets - parks 
b. storm drainage - water 
c. fire - power 
d. schools - police 
G. Compliance with all applicable policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Response: The City is initiating and applying for the proposed annexation. Maps of the 
west site and east site in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area are included in 
this report as Figure 4-1. Parcel size and other parcel information is presented in Section I, 
Proposal Summary. The City owns the taxlot where the east site is located. The 20-acre 
parcel that is being created from the taxlot has been surveyed. The west site is comprised of 
three taxlots, two taxlots that are privately owned and one small taxlot (0.69 acres) that is 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
46 
0-039-10 
County right-of-way. Re-zoning is not proposed for this site at this time as there are no 
immediate development plans. However, this site does better connect the east site to the 
existing UGB and will be suitable for residential uses and compatible public/semi-public 
uses, for which Madras urbanization studies have found a long-term need. 
The property proposed to be included in the UGB amendment and annexed currently is 
vacant and not in active use. It is land under Jefferson County jurisdiction and zoned Range 
Land (RL). There are not water, sewer, or storm water facilities and services extended to the 
site yet, but they can be extended using existing City facility master plans. The Deschutes 
Valley Water District (DVWD) provides water service to the area and can provide facilities 
and service to the site, to be financed primarily by development applicants. The same is true 
for sewer and storm water facilities and service, for which the City of Madras is the service 
provider. As part of its agreement with JCSD, the City will extend water and sewer to the 
edge of the east site. There is an irrigation district in the region — the Central Oregon 
Irrigation District — but the proposal area is not irrigated nor is it proposed to be. 
There is a County collector road — Ashwood Road — along the northern border of the area 
that will not need improvements according to transportation analysis conducted for this 
proposal. (See Appendix F) 
Jefferson County Fire Protection District # 1 currently provides service for the area and will 
continue to do so. Public safety responsibility for the area will be transferred from the 
County to the City. In terms of parks and recreation, there are two parks and a middle 
school close to the site, and the Yarrow Master Plan, which includes and surrounds the east 
site, includes the 30% of parks and open space required by local code (MZO Section 
3.12(D)(4)). 
As addressed in the previous section of this report, the application complies with the 
applicable policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
SECTION 7.4: ANNEXATION CRITERIA. Lands may be annexed only if the City 
Council finds that the following criteria are met: 
A. The property is contiguous to the City limits. 
B. The property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. 
C. The annexation meets at least one of the following purposes: 
1. To serve lands needing City water or sewer to alleviate a present or potential 
health hazard; or 
2. To provide land to accommodate future urban development; or 
3. To provide land for provision of needed transportation or utility facilities; or 
4. To ensure that lands adjacent to the City are developed in a manner consistent 
with City standards. 
D. The petitioner has adequately addressed infrastructure supply and demand issues. 
The annexation is considered timely in that an adequate level of urban services and 
infrastructure can be provided upon annexation or a plan is in place for the provision of 
such services or infrastructure in a reasonable period of time. 
E. The proposed annexation complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the 
Comprehensive Plan does not control the annexation, or substantial changes in 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
47 
0-039-10 
conditions have occurred which render the Comprehensive Plan inapplicable to the 
annexation, the proposed annexation complies with current Statewide Planning Goals. 
F. The City is capable of extending City services to the area proposed for annexation 
without negatively impacting existing systems and the City's ability to adequately serve 
all areas within the existing City limits. 
G. The proposed annexation is compatible with the existing topography, potential for 
future land division, natural hazards and other related considerations. 
Response: The proposal area is adjacent to the Madras city limits and is simultaneously 
seeking to be annexed to the Madras UGB and to the city. The proposed UGB amendment 
and annexation area provides land for future urban development, specifically for a needed 
school and housing as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study .Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). The east site of the proposal area is part of the Yarrow Master Plan 
area that the City has approved and found to be consistent with City development goals and 
standards. 
The proposal area can be served by water and sewer using existing water and sewer master 
plans and being financed by the City and developers of the sites. Ashwood Road on the 
north side of the proposal area is a County collector road and does not need improvements 
in order to serve the area. Planned improvements for US 97/J Street are the only 
improvements needed in the vicinity in order to mitigate any potential significant effects 
associated with this proposal (Appendix F). Internal circulation and transportation facilities 
will need to be shown in future development applications. 
SECTION 8.2: ZONE/PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS 
A. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map 
1. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map may be initiated by the Planning 
Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Land Use 
Periodic Review, or by application of the property owner. 
2. If the application is for a change of a quasi-judicial or legislative nature: 
a the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the 
proposed amendment at its earliest practical meeting date after the 
proposal is submitted and shall follow the adopted rules for quasi-
judicial hearings; 
•3. k the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the 
City Council based on findings-of-fact; 
4r a The City Council shall hold a public hearing and review the 
recommendation of the Planning Commission, along with any public 
testimony on the issue. The City Council must take final action on an 
amendment request and amendments shall be made by ordinance. 
3. An application for a zone change for land annexed to the city that is 
subject to an approved Master Planned Community Plan or an approved 
Area Master Plan may be considered as an administrative action per 
Article 9.3. 
B. Criteria for Amendments: The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The 
applicant shall show the proposed change is: 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
48 
0-039-10 
1. In conformity with all applicable state statutes. 
2. In conformity with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; and 
3. In conformity with the Madras Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land 
Use Ordinance, and policies; ami 
4. In conformity with an approved Master Planned Community Plan or Area 
Master Plan, if applicable to the underlying properties; and 
!x That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the 
amendment or mistake in the original zoning. 
Response: This application is being initiated by the City Community Development 
Department/Director. Also pursuant to the terms of the UGAMA between the County and 
the City, the City forwarded the UGB amendment application and appropriate fees to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department within five working days of being 
initially filed. 
This application is being processed pursuant to legislative procedures and will receive full 
review by the public, the City Planning Commission, and the City Council. Hearings by the 
Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission will be held first 
jointly on February 11, 2010. The Madras City Council will review the City Planning 
Commission's recommendation at a hearing on February 11, 2010, and will forward its 
decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing on March 29, 2010. 
As demonstrated by the previous findings, the proposed comprehensive plan, 
comprehensive plan map, and zoning map amendments comply with applicable Statewide 
Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Findings: 
• The City has followed procedures for providing notice and holding public hearings 
for the proposal. Notice to adjacent property owners was mailed On February 1, 
2010 to all properties within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB. A joint City and County Planning Commission hearing was held 
on February 11, 2010 and then a joint hearing before the Madras City Council and 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners was held on March 29, 2010. The City 
Council and County Board of Commissioners heard the proposal on March 29, 2010 
and approved the proposal on March 29, 2010. 
• The City of Madras has initiated this proposal. It owns the east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area and has an agreement with Jefferson County 
School District 509-J to exchange this land for land downtown upon annexation and 
re-zoning. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area provides land needed for 
residential and public/semi-public uses, specifically for a needed school and housing 
as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 2007). 
• All service providers — the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Deschutes Valley Water 
District, Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, Jefferson County School 
District 509-J — have capacity to serve the proposal area given implementation of 
existing water and sewer master plans, planned improvements to US 97/J Street 
intersections, and financing from future proposed development. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
49 
0-039-10 
• The east site of the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the 
approved Yarrow Master Plan area, and the west site fulfills the requirements for an 
Area Master Plan. The set of proposed map and text amendments in this application 
comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras 
Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant provisions 
of the Madras Zoning Ordinance. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
50 
0-039-10 
Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
0-039-10 
0-039-10 
Appendix B: East Site Legai Description and Survey 
Map (20-acre parcel) 
land givey*, <Z . no. 
0-039-10 
63885 N. Hwy. 97 A Bend, OR 97701 A (541)382-4192 
December 16, 2009 
City of Madras 
Job# 09077 
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR A 20.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND FOR 
SCHOOL DISTRICT 509-J 
A portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 as filed in the Jefferson County 
Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE %) of Section 7, Township 11 
South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, more 
particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 
inch diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears South 
89°39'40" East a distance of 2640.53 feet; thence South 89°39'40" East along the North 
line of said Section 7 a distance of 599.97 feet; thence South 00°17'36" West a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the Northwest corner of said Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; 
thence continuing South 00°17'36" West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the South right-of-way line of East Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 00°17'36" East along said West line a 
distance of 935.13 feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said Partition Plat No. 2002-
17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39'40" East a distance of 931.70 feet; thence 
North 00°17'36" West a distance of 935.12 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line 
of East Ashwood Road; thence North 89°39'40" West along said right-of-way line a 
distance of 931.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Containing 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. 
V . j 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
09077 Page 1 of 1 

0-039-10 
0-039-10 
Appendix Q: Urban Reserve Area Management 
Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
0-039-10 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madias, an incorporated municipality of 
the State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political 
subdivision of the State of Oregon, hereby referred as "County", 
A. RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson. County are authorized pursuant to 
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 190 to enter into an Intergovernmental 
Management Agreement for the performance of functions which either governmental 
entity has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS the City and County have previously entered into an 
intergovernmental agreement on April 5,2006 setting forth their respecti ve rights and 
responsibilities with respect to the Urban Growth Bounardy (UGB); and 
WHEREAS, the Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative 
agreement under ORS Chapter 195; and 
- WHEREAS the City and Comity consider it mutually advantageous to establish 
this Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA.) for the purpose of 
facilitating the future conversion of lands in the Urban Reserve Area (URA) from rural 
to urban land uses. 
B. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1. To establish standards and procedures for review and action on proposed land 
use actions and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to 
implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations 
as adopted by the City and County for the Urban Reserve Area (URA); and 
2. To affirm Jefferson County's jurisdictional authority for current planning 
activities, land use decisions, building peimiLling, public improvements, and 
code enforcement within the URA ; and 
3. To provide assistance to property owners in the URA by laying out a clear and 
cooperative process designed to make decisions on land use applications in a 
timely and consistent manner; and 
4. To clarify p] aiming and zoning intents and to satisfy the requirements of OAR 
Chapter 660, Division 21 relating to Urban Reserve Areas, 
0-039-10 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
C. DEFINITIONS 
1. City: City of Madras, 
2. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners, 
3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
4. County: Jefferson County. 
5. Land Use Decision: A Land Use Decision is defined by O.RS 197.015 
6. Urban Reserve Area: has the same meaning as set forth in OAR 660-021-
0010(1), and means land outside of an Urban Growth Boundary identified as 
highest priority of inclusion in the Urban Growth Boundary when urban izable 
land is needed in accordance with the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 
14. 
7. Urban Growth Boundary: The boundary litre which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the 
surrounding rural lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
8. Conversion Plan: has the same meaning as set forth in JCZO Section 105. 
D. AGREEMENT 
Compliance with OAR Chapter 660. Division 21. In accordance with the applicable 
requirements of Chapter 660, Division 21, City and County agree as follows: 
1. As required by OAR 660-021 -0040(2)(e): 
(a) The County shall ensure that conversion plans are required and 
processed as part of tentative land division decisions in the URA as 
outlined in the Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance (JCZO) Section 
703.2(0). 
(b) The County shall prohibit certain uses in the URA, including plan or 
zoning map amendments that allow a mimimum lot size less than ten 
acres as outlined in JCZO Section 323.3. 
2. As required by OAR 660-021-0050(1): 
(a.) Jefferson Coxtnty shall have authority and jurisdictional responsibility for 
current planning activities, land use decisions, building permitting, and 
code enforcement within the URA. 
2 
M - W O 9 
(b.) Upon inclusion of property from the URA within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, the property shall be subject to the Urban Growth 
Management Area Agreement. 
3. Designation of service responsibility, as required by OAR 660-021-0050(2) is as 
follows: 
Service Existing Service Provider 
Future Urban Service 
Provider 
Sanitary Trash Disposal No Public Service Provider No Public Service Provider 
Sanitary Sewer No Public Service Provider City of Madras 
Water Deschutes Valley Water District 
Deschutes Valley Water 
District 
Fire Protection Jefferson County Fire District #1 
Jefferson County Fire 
District #1 
Parks Jefferson County City of Madras 
Recreation 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Transportation Jefferson County City of Madras 
Storm Water Jefferson County City of Madras 
(a.) The local government or special district responsible for services 
(including sanitary trash disposal, sanitary sewer, water, fire protection, 
parks, transportation, storm water) for areas within the URA are 
designated and shown on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated 
herein as Exhibit" 1 A". 
4, As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(3), the terms and conditions under which 
service responsibility will be transferred or expanded, for areas where the 
provider of service is expected to changc over time, is described in Exhibit "IB" 
attached hereto and incorporated herein. 
5. As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(4), procedures for notification and review 
of land use actions to ensure involvement by all affected local governments and 
special districts: 
(a) Within the URA, the County shall process all land use applications for 
comprehensive plan amendments, zone changes, and other applications 
affecting land use (including conditional uses, Planned Unit 
Developments (PUDs), subdivisions and partitions) in a manner that is 
consistent with the procedures set forth in the Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the respective land "use 
actions. 
(b) Prior to acceptance of a land division application within the .URA, the 
County shall require the applicant to submit a conversion plan to the City 
of Madras as outlined in JCZO Section 703.2(0). 
j 
0-039-10 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
The intent of the conversion plan is that it: 
1. Is not an engineered plan. 
2. May be amended from time to time by property owners submitting a 
new conversion plan to the City and County. 
3. Does not constitute a separate land use decision, as it is part of a 
land division decision. 
4. Must be recorded with the County Clerk so that future buyers of 
newly-created parcels in the URA will become aware, prior to 
purchase, that roads and utility easements will be required when the 
property is further developed after annexation. 
5. Serves a guide to placement of structures in the building permitting 
process. 
The City shall review the conversion plan and work with the property 
owner to ensure that the locations of planned roads and rights-of-way; 
and the locations of future easements for water, sewer, and storm water 
facilities that will adequately serve the site when developed at an urban 
density; are protected. The City may recommend that the conversion 
plan be approved, denied, or be approved with conditions. 
Within 15 days of receiving a conversion plan for review, the City will 
forward its comments to both the applicant and the County, and the 
applicant is required to include the conversion plan and City comments 
with their tentative land division application to the County. 
The County shall review the conversion plan as part of the tentative land 
division application, and approve, deny, or approve with conditions. A 
condition of approval for the land division decision shall be that the 
property owner record the conversion plan with the final plat at the 
County Clerk's Office. 
The County agrees to consult conversion plans prior to building permit 
appro val of structures in the URA, where applicable. 
The City or County may charge a separate fee for review of conversion 
plans. 
(c) Notice of all land use applications within the URA shall be sent to the 
City of Madras Community Development Department and to any other 
affected City agencies and other applicable special service districts for 
review and comment prior to a decision by the County. Such agencies 
shall be given ten business days in which to provide comments on the 
land use application. 
4 
0-039-10 
(d) In making its decision, the County shall consider all comments received 
under Section (c) above. 
(e) The City, and agency, or any other special service district, that provides 
comments on land use applications shall be mailed written notice of the 
land use decision and shall have standing to appeal the County's 
decision. 
E. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both 
parties, after public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the 
Board of Commissioners. 
2. Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and 
County Comprehensive Plans, the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
for the Cily of Madras and the statewide planning goals. 
3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following 
procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the other 
party at least, forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the 
publication of public hearing notices in order to provide ample time for 
resolution of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the party considering termination. The 
party considering termination shall give the other party at least 20 days prior 
notice of the scheduled hearing date. The 20 day period shall be used by 
both parties to seek resolution of differences. Both parties shall also request 
a collaborative conflict resolution process to resolve differences that remain. 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and 
local ordinances. 
d. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide 
planning Goals 2 and 14, Unless the Urban Reserve Area is no longer an 
overlay zone in the County, this agreement may not be terrnined without 
adoption of a new agreement. 
F. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
5 
0-039-10 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
This agreement shall not become effective until properly executed by both the City and 
the County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Reserve 
Area Management Agreements. 
The Provisiions within this agreement are serverable. If any section, sentence, clause or 
phrase of this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, 
said invalidity shall not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the 
agreement. 
ADOPTED t h i s - o f January, 2009. 
CITY OF MADRAS, OREGON JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON 
G. SEVERABILITY 
Mike Ahem, Commissioner 
ATTEST: 
Jefferson County, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Urban Reserve Area fURA) - Exhibit 1A 
H i 
I 
O 
v P 
(JRA- 3B15 acres 
* Madras UGB 
0,2 0.4 0.6 
• MfTes 
r^twvw CeuaV CI* if, up port ol Ei feSamil 
hithei /mdtoci VM puble «*Mt*i H printf", 
Ifc&i* GiS <Jila. ASerton Cotr&f jfsrtxrtti, may 
noibt nSiUi tar attar jwpom of nquiatot** 
t&iporalffly to vwtfr W Wsmefw ttorired fmai Q|3 
tiati 6afcr» traiir.g d fftiifcnj orbing &einA» 
m tM iJifcnw JtfteteA Cccnfy this run b • b for 
tfsf men a ih* GI3 «J»ta TMs rx&au of emSuiH. 
cotfndHfan. eras oarenffeg ihi ecstori ai ftt daU, 
feJ/tfrt mi pwttfcui tutn^ of S*Si. JtRtowi CourJy 
usipnet nu togri mpsftdbKy ft* to htvm o^n JHTerwi Cb® 9 fiO, J*WJ ISM 
0-039-10 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
EXHIBIT IB 
URBAN SERVICE TRANSITION POLICIES 
Terms and Conditions under which Sendee Responsibility will be transferred or expanded. 
A. Special Districts. The City shall agree to the formation, of any special district within the 
Urban Reserve Area prior to the approval of the formation of the district by Jefferson 
County. This provision shall not apply to County-wide service districts formed under ORS 
Chapter 451. 
B. Service Expansion Plans. Service expansion plans shall be consistent with the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan. As the future provider of, sanitary sewer, storm water and potable 
water services, the City shall prepare, and from time to time, update utility expansion plans. 
These plans shall provide a basis for the extension of services within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, and as such shall be referred to Jefferson County for information and comment. 
C. Transition Policies Relating to Service Responsibility 
1. Sanitary Sewer Service . There will be no public provider of sanitary sewer service until 
City services are available, except in the case of a state mandate due to a health hazard. 
At the time of annexation, the City will require hook-up to City sanitary sewer services. 
There shall be no special sanitary sewer districts created in the Urban Reserve Area. 
Nothing in this provision shall limit the ability of individuals to provide septic services 
(i.e. septic sewer systems) on their own private property within the Urban Reserve Area. 
2. Potable Water Service. The City of Madras and Deschutes Valley Water District shall be 
the public providers of water in this area, unless new districts are expanded or created 
through mutual agreement by the City and the County. Nothing in this provision shall 
limit the ability of individuals to provide services on their own private property within the 
Urban Reserve Area. 
3. Fire Protection. The Jefferson County Fire District #1 provides fire protection services to 
property within the Urban Reserve Area, the Urban Growth Boundary, and the City 
limits. 
4. Parks. Jefferson County provides parks services within the Urban Reserve Area. The City 
of Madras provides parks services within the city limits and the Urban Growth Boundary, 
The City of Madras will provide these services as park properties as they are included 
within the city's limits unless agreed otherwise. 
5. Recreation. The Madras Aquatic Center is separate recreation district that serves 
Jefferson County.. The Madras Aquatic Center District will continue to provide aquatic 
recreational services when property is included in the City of Madras Urban Growth 
Boundary and city limits. 
P f - O f t f - T 
6. Transportation and Street Improvements. Jefferson County provides transportation 
services on county roads within the Urban Reserve Area. Upon annexation from the 
UGA, the City of Madras wiil accept all paved Jefferson County roads that have a 
pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the county may 
structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70 at which time the City shall be 
obligated to accept jurisdiction of such road. Jefferson County policies for road design 
and construction standards to be used in the Urban Growth Boundary and Urban Reserve 
Area are outlined in the Jefferson County Code, Sections 12,18.070 and 12.18.080. Per 
Jefferson County ordinances, the Jefferson County Public Works Director may require 
roads to be constructed to City of Madras standards. 
The Oregon Department of Transportation provides transportation services on state 
highways within the Urban Reserve area. The Oregon Department of Transportation 
retains jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities on all state highways after 
incorporation into the UGB and annexation except in special cases where jurisdiction is 
transferred to the City or County by a specific agreement. 
7. Storm Water Management. Jefferson County provides public storm water management 
services to property where required within the Urban Reserve Area. The City will 
provide storm water management services to property within the city limits. Transition of 
public storm water management services will follow transition of road maintenance 
responsibilities. 
Jefferson County Code Section 12J 8.070 : 
12.18.070 Roads within an urban growth boundary. 
Roads within an urban growth boundary (UGB) or urban reserve shall, at the discretion of the 
Jefferson County director of public works, conform to the design and construction specifications 
of the city contained within the UGB boundary and shall be subject to review and approval of 
that city's director of public works and the Jefferson County director of public works. (Ord. O-
69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007; Ord. O-l 10-02 § 2 Bxh. B (part), 2002) 
12.18.080 Roads within one mile of an urban growth boundary. 
At the discretion of the Jefferson County director of public works, design and construction 
standards and specifications for roads within one mile of a UGB may be modified to 
accommodate future reconstruction to city standards. Roads in zones contiguous to the UGB of 
Madras, Culver or Metolius may be required to be constructed in accordance with Section 
12.18.070 of this chapter if, in the opinion of the director of public works, such roads would 
become connected to the city road system. (Ord. 0-69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007: Ord. O-l 10-
02 § 2 Exh. B (part), 2002) 
0-039-10 
Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
0-039-10 
S.E. D Street, Madras, OR, 97741 - 541-475-3388 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: January 26, 2010 
To: Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Madras Planning Commission 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Community Development Director 
Cc: Nick Snead, City of Madras Community Development Director 
From: Gus Burril, City of Madras Public Works Director 
Overview: 
The City of Madras (City) has filed a post-acknowledgement plan amendment application with 
Jefferson County to expand the current Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) by 
approximately 37 acres and re-zone 20 of the 37 acres from Range Land (RL) to Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2) as shown in the attached map. To complete this land use action the City is 
required demonstrate that public facilities (i.e. wastewater, domestic water, stormwater, and 
transportation) can be extended to serve the area proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
The City provides wastewater and stormwater service and the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB are located within the planning boundaries of the City of Madras 
Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans. 
Wastewater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Wastewater Master Plan. Figure 5-2B (attached) identifies a planned 8 inch 
wastewater service line to be constructed in the Ashwood right-of-way that would service the 
properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. Additionally, the City constructed a 10 
inch wastewater service line to Oregon Department of Corrections Deer Ridge Correctional 
facility in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB 
(see attached drawing). 
When the proposed properties are developed, the City will require the property owner to extend 
wastewater service in accordance with City standards. Based on the planned improvements in 
the Madras Wastewater Master Plan, the existing wastewater facilities in Ashwood Road, the 
City of Madras has capacity to provide wastewater service to the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB at the time of development. 
Stormwater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Stormwater Master Plan. Figure IV-5 (attached) identifies a planned 12 inch 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 1 of 2 
0-039-10 
stormwater service line to be constructed in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed 
to be included in the Madras UGB. Furthermore, Design Criteria (1) in the City of Madras 
Stormwater Master Plan in Section IV, requires" 
"Any property development or redevelopment shall include stormwater facilities 
designed to handle runoff from all tributary areas for the 24-hour, 25-uear design 
storm event. The facilities shall limit the peak discharge from the development in a 
24-hour, 25-year design storm to the estimated pre-development peak flow rate in 
a 24-hour, 10-year design storm." 
Considering the planned stormwater facilities identified in the City of Madras Stormwater Master 
Plan and the existing stormwater design standards for development, the City has capacity to 
provide stormwater service to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
Conclusion: 
The City of Madras has capacity to serve the properties proposed to be included in the Madras 
UGB with wastewater and stormwater service. Should there by any questions, please contact 
me at 541-475-2622. 
Sincerely, 
Gus Burril, P.E. 
City of Madras 
Public Works Director 
71 SE "D" Street 
Madras, OR, 97741 
541-475-2622 
Attachments: Figure 5-2B Wastewater Collection System 
Phase 1B Segment 2 Wastewater Improvements 
Figure IV-5 Stormwater System Improvements 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 2 of 2 

0-039-10 
0-039-10 
Nick Snead 
From: Edson at DVWD [edson@dvwd.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:15AM 
To: Nick Snead 
Subject: RE: Domestic water service availability 
—> 
Hi Nick-
DVWD should be able to serve that property. Naturally, the mainline upgrades and/or extensions would have to 
be paid for by the developer. When there is an engineered pjan for the required infrastructure, I will be happy to 
do an estimate for the waterworks portion to be Installed by DVWD. 
Feel free to call if you need more information. 
Edson Pugh, P.E. 
General Manager 
Deschutes Valley Water District 
881 SW Culver Hwy. 
Madras, OR 97741 
Ph. #(541) 475-3849 
F r o m : Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
S e n t : Monday, January 25, 2010 8:45 AM 
To: Ed Pugh 
S u b j e c t : Domestic water service availability 
I m p o r t a n c e : High 
Ed, 
3/30/2010 
Fml%2 
Good morning! You may have heard the City is proposing to expand the Urban Growth Boundary by 
approximately 37 acres and annex 20 acres into the City for the Jefferson County School District. The property 
proposed to be annexed is south of Ashwood Road. I have attached a map to quickly orient your to the property. I 
am wondering if DVWD domestic water service is available or if not, what facility improvements would future 
development be responsible for constructing? This email is a formal request and I would like to put your response 
in the record to demonstrate (hopefully) that water service is available and/or the facility improvements needed to 
serve the area proposed to be in the Madras UGB. 
Let me know if you have any questions. Call me at 541-323-2916 if needed. 
Take care, 
"One may walk over the highest mountain one step at a time" -John Wanamaker-
Nicholas S. Snead 
Director 
Community Development Department 
City of Madras 
(541)475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.niadras.or.us/ 
No virus found in this incoming message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.4321 Virus Database: 271.1.1/2644 - Release Date: 01/25/10 07:36:00 
3/30/2010 
0-039-10 
Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
f 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
The undersigned property owner(s) hereby consents to the annexation o' 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
0-039-10 
JfcFi- pRSO-\ • O-JNTY 
JA-.'i i f? ?? J 
(Legal description of property): 
Map #11-14-7. Tax Lot #101 . 
(See A t t a c h ^ Bghifrit "B") 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation 
of the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, 
further or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws 
of the State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the property described. The undersigned 
and City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the 
undersigned and the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the right to 
consent to its annexation. 
Address: „ S p r i n p v i e w F a r m s . LLC 
2519 E. Ashwood Road 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this day of ffitftljjfa 20 03 the above named 
Albert L. ZemVe (List name of individual(s) having signature notarized) 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act. 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
KAREN J COLEMAN 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 338495 
COMMISSION EXPIRES SEPT. 14,9M\i 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
2003-5431 
$ j Q p m r u Q > ( M u m n m ) 
Notary Public for Oregon _ _ 
My Commission Expires: n " 1M»- rtflfl^ 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
00016169200300054310030036 
D-ANXCON Cntnl Stn«2 KATE 
113.00 £11,00 $10.00 15.00 
2003-005431 
$41.00 
10/13/2003 04:08:44 PM 
0-039-10 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consent to 
Annexation" for the following described property and acknowledge that the consent shall remain in effect 
indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
"See Attached Exhibit "B" 
Signature; 
Typed Name: Albert 
STATE OF OREGON 
L. Zemke ( ) 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this I f i f o day of fflot/tllSfy, 2 0 Q 3 the above named 
Albert L. Zemke 
(List name of individual(s) having signature notarized) 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act. 
ffittvwnj 9 ' M w f l f f p 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission Expires: i H ^ t M O H 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
KAREN J COLEIIAN ® 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON (0 
COMMISSION NO. 338495 § 
, v^^SSION EXPIRES SEPT. 14,2004 
S x S S S S S S S S S L JJI it i j l — i n £•' 
2003-5431 
0-039-10 
EXHIBIT "B" 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #101 
ALBERT L. ZEMKE 
PARCEL I: Northeast quarter, Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, North 
half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter, Southeast 
quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, 
Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian 
Jefferson County Oregon, and the Southwest quarter of the Northwest 
quarter of the Southeast quarter. 
2003-5431 
Jefferson C o u n t f i c i a l Records 0 ~ 0 3 o f l n o n f t 9 9 7 Q 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk t v 
$56.00 
06/17/2008 04:16:27 PM 00061426200800022790060062 
D-ANXCQN Cnt=1 Str>=2 KATE 
$30.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
RECORDED DOCUMENT 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 
DO NOT REMOVE THIS CERTIFICATE 
(This certificate constitutes a part of the original instrument in accordance with ORS 
205.180(2). Removal of this certificate may invalidate this certificate and affect the 
admissibility of the original instrument into evidence in any legal proceeding.) 
KATHLEENS. MARSTON 
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK 
{ 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
( 0-039-10 
The undersigned property owner(s) hereby consents to the annexation of the following described 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
(Legal description of property): 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #200, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 
ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation of 
the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, further 
or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws of the 
State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the property described. The undersigned and 
City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the undersigned and 
the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the right to 
consent to its annexation. 
DATED this k j day of 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
. , 2 OgjL. 
DOROTHY (JtlQMS 
AJ. ThortfiS 
Address: 2465 E. ASHWOOD ROAD 
MADRAS, OREGON 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
)ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this, .day o f _ 20 & the above 
p. . ) -r-1 f rs 11 - h ^Atio^J- \AJ. Thorns* 
named D o m r h * I hcWf tX . t r D a w - r h * I VsoMft-j* and acknowledged the foregoing 
(List name-tft individual(s) having signature? notarized) 1 ^ 
instrument to be a voluntary act. 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E, "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
Notary - State of Oregon , , r t ^ ^ r y 
My Commission Expires: P ^ f ( r i o i O C r f 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
RUTH E BARRINGER 
NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 396406 
™ J X P I R E S A y a 2 4 , 
^ S S S S S S S S T 2009 
63885 N. Hwy, 97 A Bend, OR 97701 A (541) 382-4192 
City of Madras 
May 13, 2008 
Job # 08029B 
Tax lot: 11-14-7-200 
CITY OF MADRAS ANNEXATION #2008-02 
A Tract of land located in the Northeast One-Quarter of the Northwest One-Quarter (NE 1/4 -
NW 1/4) and the Northwest One-Quarter of the Northeast One-Quarter (NW 1/4 - NE 1/4) of 
Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, 
Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
Beginning at a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears South 
00°17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 7; 
thence leaving said North-South Section centerline and along the South right-of-way line of 
Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson 
County official records South 89°39'39" East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-
of-way line South 00°17'35" East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 89°42'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet to a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 
7, being a point on the boundary of Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2004-15 (recorded as MF# 
2004-4735); thence along the boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 
354.87 feet; thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right with : 
a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a distance of 117.35 feet; 
thence North 00°17'35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; thence 123.03 feet along the arc of a 
tangent curve to the right with a radius of 240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" 
East for a distance of 121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left 
with a radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°12'33" East for a distance of 
184.75 feet to a point on said South right-of-way line; thence along said South right-of-way line 
the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South 88°42'59" East a distance of 170.57 feet; 
18.12 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 feet, the chord of 
which bears South 89° 11' 19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet; South 89°39'39" East a distance of 
104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the terminus of this description. 
End of Description 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
Page 1-of 1 
08029B 
i 
{ 0-039-10 
0-039-10 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consent to Annexation" 
for the following described property and acknowledge that the consent shall remain in effect indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
Map # 1 1 - 1 4 - 7 Tax Lot # 200 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Address: 
DOROTHY THOMAS „ „ _ _ „ 
c / 
2465 E. ASHWOOD ROAD 
f f^BAS. mtEGOH 97741 
STATE OF OREGON 
County of Jefferson 
jss. 
a g - day of 20 O X the above 
I\J Thomas, j Pery+hij Thp^rfcS a-H 
named DqrqtH k "T^aMft-i fW-oxH^ I hoMfiS and acknowledged the foregoing 
(LisTfllame of individual(s) having signature notarized) J ^ * The*JfrJ f A f - W ^ e y - ; ^ -ft 
instrument to be a voluntary act. s 
4 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
Notary - State of Oregon n / i ^ y ~ 
My Commission Expires: < / H ( A O O ^ 
\J 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
RUTH E BARRINGER 
NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON 
« COMMISSION NO. 39S40S 
0-039-10 
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION BY CONSENT 
PURSUANT TO ORS 222.170 
I/We, BvPtfJ l/U- 4 - Q o ^ k o hereby respectfully petition the City 
Council of the City of Madras to annex contiguous property to the City pursuant to 
ORS 222.170 (1)(a). 
(Metes and Bounds Legal Description and Map Required) 
(These can be attached to the Consent to Annexation Form) 
Map # 11-14-7 Tax Lot # 200 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Attached hereto is the consent of the owner(s) of the property, and is incorporated 
herein as Exhibit "A". Petitioner hereby certifies that they are the owner(s) of said 
property as ownership is described in ORS 222.120(7). Petitioner further certifies to the 
City that they are the legal owner(s) of record and are the sole owners of the property. 
Dated this X K day of A ^ A j , 20 Q g . 
Signature: / f l ^ t ^ i C * 
Typed or Printed Name:^ d o r o t h y tiiomas 
t o . 
Signature: C -
Typed or Printed Name: £ v v w \AJ. o / n f t i 
Petition for Annexation by Consent 
( - ( • 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:07:49 pm 
Account # 
Map# 
Code - Tax # 
Legal Descr 
13274 
111407-00-00101 
See Record 
LINCICOME MADRAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
63227 SERVICE RD 
BEND, OR 97701 
Prop Class 550 MA SA NH Unit 
RMV Class 500 05 60 000 -9922-0 
ASSESSABLE 
CANCELLED 
NORMAL 
See Record 
See Record 
Situs Address(s) Situs City 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0020 Land 
Impr. 
219 
0 
4,400 
0 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 219 4,400 0 
Grand Total 219 4,400 0 
Code 
Area IDS RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone Value Source 
Land Breakdown 
TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0020 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Grand Total 4.00 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
ID# Built 
Stat 
Class Description 
Improvement Breakdown Total 
TD% Sq.FL Ex%MSAcct# 
Trended 
RMV 
Grand Total 0 0 
Code 
Area Type 
Exemptions/Special AssessmentsfPotentlal Liability 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
Comments: SPLIT CODE WITH #13134 Combined with account #13134 
Page 1 of 1 
( ( 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
/' 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
January 25, 2010 2:07:27 pm 
Account # 
Map* 
Code - Tax # 
Legal Descr 
13134 
111407-00-00101 
0020-13274 
0110-13134 
See Record 
JOHN, HEINZ A. 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
3879 LADERA VISTA RD 
FALLBROOK, CA 92028 
Prop Class 551 MA SA 
RMV Class 501 05 60 
Deed Reference <f 
Sates Date/Price 
Appraiser 
2009-741 
03-02-2009/$350,000.00 
COX, DON 
NH 
000 
Unit 
9922-1 
Situs Addross(s) Situs City 
IDS 2519 E ASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Value Summary 
Code Area AV RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0020 Land 
Impr. 
225 
0 
4,460 
0 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 225 4,460 0 
0110 Land 
Impr. 
6,016 
166,480 
79,020 
218,540 
Land o 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 172,496 297,560 0 
Grand Total 172,721 302,020 0 
Code 
Area 
Plan Land Breakdown 
ID# RFD Ex Zone Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0020 3 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Code Area Total 4.00 0.00 
0110 2 R RL Farm Site 100 A 1.00 MHS 
0110 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 7.28 TD2 
Code Area Total 8.28 0.00 
Grand Total 12.28 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
ID# Built 
Stat 
Class Description 
Improvement Breakdown Total 
TD% Sq. Ft Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 1 1962 142 One story with basement 100 3,718 185,200 
0110 2 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 2,400 30,390 
0110 3 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 128 850 
0110 4 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 400 2,100 
Grand Total 6,646 218,540 
Code Exemptions/Special Assessments/Potential Liability 
Area Type 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
0110 
NOTATIONS): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
Comments: SPLIT CODE WITH #13274 
Page 1 of 1 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
3.': 
& =!i' 5S » 
toitotjSfoiifa 'tlnyfSda ' 
is J i" ar 
QZt Cl 11 dWJ 33S 
iS -
Xi 
/ ' 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
s. 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:06:46 pm 
Account# 
Map# 
Code - Tax # 
Legal Descr 
2602 
111407-00-00200 
0110-2602 
Metes & Bounds - See legal report for full description. 
Mailing Name THOMAS, EVAN W & DOROTHY E 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
2465 E ASHWOOD R 
MADRAS, OR 97741 
Prop Class 401 MA SA NH 
RMV Class 401 05 52 000 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
Deed Reference # 
Sales DateJPrice 
Appraiser 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
See Record 
See Record 
COX, DON 
Unit 
1857-1 
Situs Address(s) Situs City 
ID# 2465 E ASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0110 Land 
Impr. 
81,960 
131,050 
130,790 
211,530 
Land 
impr. 
Code Area Total 213,010 342,320 
Grand Total 213,010 342,320 
Code 
Area ID# RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone 
Land Breakdown 
Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class irr Class Irr Size 
0110 1 R RL Market 100 A 3.94 
Grand Total 3.94 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
ID# Built 
Stat 
Class 
Improvement Breakdown 
Description TD% 
Total 
Sq. Ft Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 
0110 
1 1956 
2 
142 
300 
One story with basement 
Farm Bldg/Res Gp 
100 
100 
4,173 
224 
210,280 
1,250 
Grand Total 4,397 211,530 
Page 1 of 1 
Send tax statements to: 
dr H ^ O ^ ^ S 
7 1 <£• O s S + . 
on. 9 7 - 7 4 I 
After recording return to: 
Jefferson Cou/*^'Off icial Racord£>-039-UU«e fifinAA 
Kathleen B. ML -ton, County Clerk 
00028548200800002620020028 
D-WD Cntsfl Stn=2 KATE 
$10.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
$36.0! 
01/18/2006 02:31:06 PFT 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras OR 97741 
WARRANTY DEED 
(Statutory Form) 
(ORS 93.850) 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, Grantor, conveys and warrants 
to the CITY OF MADRAS, an Oregon municipality, Grantee, the following described real 
property, situate in Jefferson County, Oregon, free from encumbrances except as specifically set 
forth: 
Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2004-06, recorded April 15, 2004, as 
Instrument No. 2004-1610, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
SUBJECT TO: 
1. 2004-2005 taxes, a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet payable. 
2. As disclosed by tax roll the premises herein described have been zoned or classified for 
farm use. At any time that said land is disqualified for such use, the property may be 
subject to additional taxes or penalties and interest. 
3. The property lies within the boundaries of Deschutes Valley Water District and is subject 
to any charges or assessments levied by said District, and pipeline easements in connection 
therewith. 
4. Rights of the public in and to that portion of the herein described premises lying within the 
boundaries of roads or highways. 
5. Right of way, if any, of Public Usage Road No. 3053 as shown on tax assessor map but 
which the Grantor declares may be closed or vacated by prior Federal or County 
governmental action. 
6. Mineral reservation by the United States of America as disclosed in Deed recorded April 
28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
7. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
The true consideration for this conveyance is an exchange of real property between the 
Grantee and Grantor. 
-1- WARRANTY DEEDuServerUKathyVMorrowWorrowProp erties - Warranty Deed.wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REEDER, LLP 
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W 
205 S.E. Fifth Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
Fax: (541) 475-3944 
f 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
8. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
9. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for electrical transmission lines 
granted to Central Electric Cooperative, Inc., recorded April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147456. 
10. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for communication lines, granted 
to Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, recorded April 28,1983, Fee No. 147458. 
11. Easements as shown on Partition Plat 2004-06, for utility and access. 
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN 
THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND 
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE 
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED 
USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR 
FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. 
Dated this "T" day of 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC: 
ANDREW J. MOKROW, President 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared ANDREW J. MORROW, who being duly sworn, did say that he is the 
President of MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, and that the seal affixed to 
the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation by authority of its Board of 
Directors, and lie-acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed, before me this 
4 day of x J u u u ^ ^ 20C&. 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
SANDRA KBUEGER 
NOTARY PUBLtC-OREQON 
COMMISSION NO 378974 
^^^WISSION FXPiRESM^^a 2008 
3tary Public for Oregon 
My commission expires: 3 -
-2- WARRANTY DEED\\Serverl\Kathy\Moirow\Morrow Properties - Warranty Deed.wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REEDER, LLP 
A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W 
205 S.E. Fif th Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
Fax: (541) 475-3944 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
11 .14- 1 100 
\ y 7 7 p 
r w p . S. ROE. E. SEC. t A l / l 
OFFIC IAL RECORD O F DESCRIPTIONS 
O F REAL PROPERTY 4566-:] 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
p \ T o n \ v a n 
T11S RUS WM 
Sec 7, HB±| NE^ SEi; 
N^NWiSEi Exchange D 
Exc: 
Co m 809 1.82 
Zemke, Bnma dth cert 
Annexation to DVW 
Annexation Resolution 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration- Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Zemke to Zemke, TR B&S Dd 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Zemke, AC 
* * Also s TL 600- 10 Ac. (The SW 
SE^ Sec-. 7, T.11S, R.14E, W.M. 
All in Code 13 
Morrow Prop, Inc. to Zemke, AL 
Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust 
DC 
WD 
Boundary Adjust. BA 97-14 
Code Totals 
#2836- Code 13= 10 AC. 
#2833- Code 11= 228.18 AC. 
Total 238.18 AC 
Zemke, AL Succ Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust to 
Springview Farms, LLC 
10-15-97 
4-15-98 
BS 
2 h 77 
02/08/88 
02/08/88 
02/15/85 
02 /13 /85 
12/01/89 
03/16/92 
1 /04/95 
5-22-97 
26 540 
5-7-01 
E>7 L$9 
#881533 
230.00 
228.18 
#88: 
#881 
#892 
921 
#95C 
293 
294 
748 
£44 
029 
971966 
9'7| 
981 
425 {I 
538 
200:.181A 
238.18 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
11 14 
rvvp. s . | r g e. e. | s e c ^ \/* i / t a 
M A P N U M B E R 
100 
TAX LOT 
NUMBER 
s r e c , 
lNT v IN 
REAL PROP, 
A C C O U N T N U M B E R 
11 
C O D E 
A R E A 
N U M B E R 
OFFICIAL, RECORD O F DESCRIPTIONS 
OF REAL PROPERTY 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
Exc. 0.45 Survey Adj. 
Exc. 0. 10* Road Ded. 
Exc. 13.43 AC. Parcel' 1 of PP 2002-12 
New Desc. for this TL 
Parcel 2 of PP 2002-12 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
' Code Totals 
Code 110 = 213.7 AC. 
Code 130 = 10.0 AC. 
Total 223.7 AC. 
Springview Farms, LLC to City of Madras 
Code change 58.56 acres annexed into City of 
Madras, Ordinance #711 
Code 10- = . 8.44 Acres 
Code 20 = 58.56 Acres 
Code 110 = 155.14 Acres 
Code 130 = 1.56 Acres 
PP 12-30-02 
2-5-03 
2002 
12003) 
WD 
31-13-04 
1-2-03 2003002 
5926 
1589 
223.7 
223.7 
o o o ^ 
c «J -J I CM CM 
<D 
<0 a 
d> 
15 
</) 
% % 
££ 
LU 
o 
Q 
UJ 
-J 
LU 
(0 
O 
(0 
CO 
LU 
(0 
< 
>-
h-
Z 
D 
O 
O 
z o 
(0 
a : 
LU 
U-U-
LU 
I-
<n UJ 
cc UJ j-
z 
< 
o UJ 0. 
V) 
2 ° 
S s 
(0 
o o o 
c «J -J I CM CM 
(0 a 
•a « •a 
o u 0 
cc 
o o o CM c aj —; i CM CM 
(0 a 
z o 
F o ° UJ <n 
UJ 
O z 
0. X 
w z 
o I-
e UJ 
CO o 
CO o 
c o 3 O (0 (0 c (0 
o o 
CM T— 
o o o CN1 
c «J 
CM CM 
n 
Q 
a> > 
u 
£ 
UJ 
UJ 
z 
z 
o 
55 a: ai UJ cs > z Z < O X o o ft •H 
•S w at 
e o 
w 
£ 
u 
UJ > 
<B « 
I 2 
^ w 
(0 
3 Q 
n) 
m 
tn 
9 -
6 
CM O o 
<u Q 
5 10 Q a> 10 
<n 
CM O 
i 0 <D a 1 CO 
0) 
(0 a 
•o 
a> 
•2 o u « 
a: 
CM O O ^ 
a 
a 
(0 a 
c UJ 
o 
CO o 
c o +3 U <0 
W 
c 
2 
t-
o o 
CM 
CM 
o o 
a> Q 
i oo 
£ m a 
a > 
u ® 
s 
z o 
w oc UJ uj a 
l< o x o o 
ft •H 
A 
in u at 
ft •H 
A 
U1 M ai 
B 
o o CM i 
a. a> co 
a 
(0 
a 
a» 
re 
V) 
in o o 
CM t a. (D CO • 
lO 
a n a 
•a at •a k. o o <B Q£ 
lO o o 
Q. 
a> CO I ID 
iJ (0 a 
c UJ 
a> m 
c o 
o (3 10 c 
e t-
o o 
CM 
W) o o 
CL d> <*> 
( 
lO 
« Q 
<B > 
O 
£ UJ 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
+> 
0* 
m 
o 1 o rH •d rH rH 0 rH 
o o o 
n a 
o 
n CO 
r-o o 
CM * 
0 1 
CM 
CM 
1 a 
•o « 
•a 
o u & 
o o 
§ 
O • 
CM 
CM 
(0 a 
ai CO a> co CO CO 
c o +3 U ra (0 c A 
CD lO 
o o 
2! a 
9 CO CM 
O ^ 
a 
0) > 
u 
£ UJ 
a. < S 
s 
§ u. 
O I-
Lil a. o 
3 O w 
a 
£ 
c 9 UJ 
a 
UJ a. 
UJ ^ 
O (/) 
I -z UJ S 
=) o o 
a 
a. < 
UJ > 
a. UJ i o 
O > 
a UJ 
v> 
z o 
O ° 
M CO 
UJ 
O 
a. 
X CO 
z 
1 
1X1 
CD 
Z 
O 
UJ 
N 
W 
(/) 
UJ 
A : 
UJ 
< 
O 
UJ 
a. CO 
3 § 
< 1 
aj w 
O O 
TJ 
0 
U 
0 +J 
D) > 
0 
2 
+> 
0 
0 +) 
111 
T> 1 
TL ai +) 
ai 
H ai 
Q 
id 
<I) 
A! 
•3 
0 
U 
ai 
N 
•H 
CO 
A> +) 
N) C 
M ai +) 
vo . in 
oo in 
I 
0) 
T> 
O 
O 
W ai Oi 
U 
at 
M 
•H 
CO 
+) 
tr 
W 
ai 
•0 
O 
O 
i/i 
H 
N) +) 
O 
EH 
H 
•H 
M 
•S ffl a « 
M 
(O 
CO o o 
<V c 
—5 
[ in 
CM 
n 
A 
•a 
V •a 
H. o 
O 
0) 
0£ 
CO o o 
CM I 
—5 
TO 
A 
c UJ 
in 
O) oo 
c 
O 
U 
M » 
< 
(D 
CRI 
CO o o 
CM 1 
O> 
<f 
CO 
CM 
ffl 
A 
0) > 
A. < 
S 
s 
o 
a: 
O 
W 
Q 
O 
U 
H H-I 
• - I 
CO 
UJ 
Nl m 
CO 3 £ 
3 
O CO 
Q 
A. 
a 
4* 
a 
ui 
A. 
ui 
O 
££ 
D 
O CO 
UI 
E 
3 
O o a 
a: < 
ui >• 
« ui x 
O 
3 
O > 
a 
UI CO 
O 
U 
U < 
o" o 
™ L-L X 
00 
S3 <=> CO I CM Tt 
00 W 
Ut CN 
O „ 
H-I O 
(N FE 
So 
O H 
p P < H U oo W > % o 
S " 2 
U — 
H-I ^ 
g | 
fc < 
to 111 tN 
C 
N) 
6 
0 N 
•H CO 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
+> tr 
03 
<D 
3 3 
< cu 
C\| 
CO 
A) 
(0 
CL 
I-
U) 
LU 
U. 
LU I-
z 
-I < 
o UJ 
a. 
V) 
i-
o ° 
to 
31 ° 
S o 
Z o p 
o 
UJ 
<n 
UJ 
a 
i 
CO 
z : 
I H 
•s 
6J) a I o | 
3 O " 
o ^ 
o o 
TO 
O a. 
a> _o> 
<a ra 
eo eo 
<p 
UJ 
o © o © © o 
< < o o o o o o o o o o o o t- t- t-
© © © "3- "3- TT 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Cn C <d 
A 
u 
<D 
N 
•H 
M 
o o o 
o o o a) ai to £L 
10 
tn 10 <0 a) <D (U M N M M o •H u O CO A < 
t VD -s. vo LO 
+ Ln •sf 
• * OO rH 03 LO 
a) o O O J T) ro rH CN 0 rH O O 0 u O O O u 
o o o o o o o o 
o o o o 
CI U3 U) oi in t m 
OJ H 00 CO 
lo m 
o o o o f0 CN rH O O 
o o o o 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
11 14 
TWP. RGE. SEC. 1/4 1/16 
MAP NUMBER 
101 
P A R C E L 
N U M B E R 
T A X LOT NUMBER 
Type Spec. I n t . I n 
REAL PROP. 
Indent each new 
course to this point 313 
no/ m — * • 
CODE 
AREA 
NUMBER 
OFFICIAL RECORD OF DESCRIPTIONS 
OF REAL PROPERTY 
COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
11 14 7 100 
DESCRIPTION A N D 
RECORD OF CHANGE Date Recorded 
Ref# or Acres 
Remaining Vol. PG. 
T11S R14E Sec. 7 
Partington Plat.2002-12 
Parcel 1 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
Code change 4.0 acres annexed into City 
of Madras Ordinance #711 
Code 20 =4.0 acres 
Code 110 =9.43 acres 
Springview Farms, LLC to Zemke, AL 
Zemke, AL to Lincicome Madras Development, 
LLC 
PP 
BS 
WD 
L2-30-02 
2-5-03 
01-13-04 
02-28-05 
i -1 -05 
20025926 
120030589 
13.43 
13.43 
20050974 
20052823 
£ 
UJ 
O 
Q 
UJ 
_ J 
UJ 
S < 
z 
Vi 
k. o 
tn 
W 
UJ 
</> < 
z 
D 
O 
O 
z o 
W 
cc 
UJ 
U , 
LL 
UJ 
H-
( 0 
UJ OJ 
LU 
H 
Z 
< 
O 
UJ 
CL to 
3 ° 
H 
ts 
Z 
O 
P 
O ° 
UJ to 
UJ 
O 
a. 
X 
<0 z 
I 
H 
10 
O 
O 
XJ 
0) LL 
1 
lO 
CM 
at 
a 
A 
(0 to 
M 
O 
O 
^ 
XJ 
A> 
LL 
1o 
CM 
ra a 
•a a T3 
O 
O 
0 
0£ 
LO 
O 
O 
CM 
1 
-Q 
(1) 
U -
I 
LO 
CM 
« Q 
c 
UJ 
CM 
CO 
CO 
c 
O 
O « 
(0 c ra 
< 
O 
O 
(Si 
X— 
LO 
O 
O CM 1 XJ 
A) 
A . 1 10 
CM 
RE 
Q 
ffi > 
t£S 
O 
£ 
UJ 
UJ 
5 < 
z 
z 
O 
W 
C£ UJ 
W C9 
> Z z < 
O X 0 0 
a si 
to 
U 
D) 
51 A m 
H 
® 
0) 
m w 
® § 
a: 
UL 
CO 
m ui 
P fc uj 
N 
W 
CO 
IA 
01 
TN 
U 
10 
O 
O 
CM 1 >< to 
55 
N 
Q 
A> 
ra 
( 0 
10 
O 
O 
<0 
CO 
re 
Q 
•O 
<D X3 tm 
O 
O «> 
0£ 
10 
O 
O 
CM 1 >> to 
CO 
D> 
(9 a 
c 
UJ 
CO 
CO 
CO 
•ST 
U re 
W c ra 
O 
O 
CM 
LO 
O 
O 
CM I 
>< CO 
CO 
4> -i^t ra 
a> > 
O 
<D & 
UJ 
UJ 
< 
z 
z 
O 
W 
a: uj 
uj 0 
I I 0 0 
FT 
•H A 
to u 
<S 
ft 
•H A 
M u ® 
<D 
l i 
z 
uj s 
Q. 
O —I 
UJ 
FI 
Q « 
UJ 5 
O 
3 Q 
3 O 
« 
B o 
N) +) 
CO 
0) 
& 
FL 
NT 
U 
25 
10 
O 
O 
^ 
CL 
C£> 
CO 
ra 
Q 
« 
RA 
( 0 
10 
O 
O 
Q . 
0) 
CO 
& ra 
O 
•O <B •a tm 
O 
O 
0) 
0£ 
10 
O 
O 
CM 1 
Q . 
(D co 
ra a 
c 
UJ 
LO 
O 
c 
O 
U ra 
W c 
(0 
O 
O 
CM 
LO O 
O 
^ 
a. a> 
CO 
re 
A 
® 
> 
O 
£ 
UL) 
O-039-10 
& < 
s 
s 
8 
U. 
0 
Z 
0 
W cc 
LU 
1 
O 
O 
Z 
O 
s UJ g 
O 
O 
Q 
a. 
O 
00 
<0 
CM 
IN 
O 
O 
OJ 
UL 
A 
UJ 
O en z> 
O <0 
H 
Z 
Ul 
S 
O 
O 
D 
a < 
UJ > 
a 
UJ x 
O 
O > 
O 
UJ U) 
0 
U 
0 +> 
A) > 
4J 
0 
0 
4J 
ai > 
I 
•0 
0) +> 
0 
H 
CI 
Q 
Id 
A> 
A) 
•0 
0 
U 
N 
•H 
CO 
<B +> 
N) 
AI +> 
, 00 
S1 
id 
O 
A> 
N 
•H 
CO 
•8 
0 
O 
ft +) 
0 
H 
FFL 
N 
•H 
CO 
co 
O 
O 
(N 1 
C T-
3 CM 
7 CO 05 
CM CO 
| I 
O A . 
© « 
ra ra 
CO (0 
CO 
O 
O 
CM 
O 
CM 
M a 
T3 
A> 
•O 
O 
U "i 
CD 
O 
O 
CM 
LO 
CM 
O 
fr 
c 
UJ 
CM 
CT) 
O 00 
10 
CM 
c 
O 
+3 
O 
RA 
W c re 
co 
CM 
CO 
O 
O 
CM 1 
Q . 
(U 
CO 
RA 
O 
A> > 
O 
A> St 
UJ 
0. 
i 
s 
o St 
<N o I—( o o o o s 
z 0 
1 u 0. o 
H a 
O a: u. 
2 O 
O 
UJ 
DC O 
UJ w 
3 o CO 
g 
CL 
in 
a 
UJ p. 
UJ o m 3 o CO 
UJ S 3 O 0 Q 
a. 
2i >-
1 
a 
UJ x o 
3 o > 
a ui CO 
Cl o 
+J 
ft tr M 
o J o rH T) rH rH 0 iH O U O 
o o 
c 3 
0) 
n O 
® 
n (0 
r-o o ^ 
c 3 
4) 43 m a 
•o d> •o t. o o a> DC 
o o 
CM i c 3 —5 t 
CM 
a a 
c 
UJ 
m 
oo 
oo 
c O 
lw O ffl U) c ffl 
< O) 
vr 
ai 
r^  o o 
CM i O) 
CO 
o 
a> 
n a 
a> > 
t ! 
it: 
UJ 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
W 
ai ffl 
N M 
•rl O W 
1 
-31 
+ rH 
O 
UJ o z 
u UJ M W 
S3 O CO 
8 V£> CN 
* 
o H 
Tt CO 
3fc 
H 
O O o < 
o" o 
(N 
O 
O H 
w & 
9 
u 
ai 
•rl M 
o —I I-
tn 
n r-<-> <N 
^ H o C 
w g < O 
5 ° e u 
§ 8 
W Ph <! 
oo y oo o ffi i—i 
" P ^ f 
^ ci 
> 2 & w 5 
H o 
>< U 
W < 
< & w 
O 
o" 
J 
i—1 
H 
2 
en *s o 5-a> O 
' H w * W <N ce > £ 
y w o d o o 
w Q 
8 S 
S p 
^ 6 H i 
CO Ui & 
UJ 
< 
O 
UJ 
0 . 
CO 
K -
O 
O 
O 
CO 
Z 
O 
P 
O 
UJ to 
R--
O 
UJ a _ 
z 2 
0 . 
X 
CO 
Z : 
5 o 
ai< tj -
O 
O 
rt +> 
O 
EH 
ai 
N 
•H 
CO 
T) 
0 U 
01 
r-l «J +> 
0 
EH 
ffl N •H 
C/J 
I-
t-
O 
° Ju 
* £ 
* o 
a: H 
A O ^ 
CO T—t OO 
CO 
I 
R -o o CN * 
D 
O 
R-
O 
A o CM 
U 
m w o 
s i s T- 00 
^ < W 
W Q 
FT 
CO 
00 o o 
>N 
CO 
CN 
S3 m C 
a a. 
a; « 
n (a 
CO <0 
oo o o 
CM 
£ 
CM 
A> 
M 
Q 
TJ a> T3 
O 
O 
A> 
CC 
CO o o 
CM 
I 
> . 
(0 
CM 
2 
(0 
O 
c 
UJ 
> • Q CO H 
CM 
O 
O o 
O 
F -
O 
CO 
H 
O g w O 
W O 
UJ H w v < 
^ W 
Q 
O 
g O 
o H C\J h 
)-J 
Dk 
<Z> 
W 
2 5 
I S 
CO 
O 
O 
0 ^ 3 9 - 1 0 
W 
& | 
E 
N) 
6 
CD 
N 
•H 
CO 
o o o o 
co o CN O 
o o rH CM rH O 
O O 
O 0 
CM 1 flj 
o 
o 
o f o 
CM IN 
u C7 
W £ aa. a> a, 
cs n co co 
05 o o 
<0 
o 
<u 
IS 
Q 
T3 a> 
TJ 
o o a> CC 
3 
O) 
o o 
CM 
in o 
3 «s Q 
c 
UJ 
3 o> o co 
c o 
•s n w 
2 < 
o cri 
o> 
o 
o 
CM 
I O 
0) 
.a 
O 
£ 
UJ 
& < 
s 
s § 
u. 
£ 
z o f= 
UJ a. o 
UJ O z 
o 
3 o 
CO 
a £L 
a 
* a 
UJ a. 
UJ u o: 
O 
CO H 
Z 
UJ 
S 3 O O a 
0£ < 
UJ >-
a. ui x o 3 O > 
a UJ 
CO 
CO ffl O) <0 CL 
i 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Sr 
n 
n 01 
a: ol Ui UJ z z 
o o 
H 
tn ui 
on Ul 
h-
z 
< 
o Ul 
a . 
tn 
h-o _J 
X < H 
Z o 
5 ° 
UJ 
W 
UJ 
o _ 
z 2 
W 
z . 
5 o 
h-
<1) 
£ 
a: o: UJ UJ 
z z 
l o o 
a < 
w ai tn 
a 
(4 
A 
u 
o 
h-z Ul 
5 
a. 
O 
Ul > 
Ul 
Q 
to 
Q . < < 
S N 
UJ S 
SuJ 
ID O I 
oa o 
(M o 
o o o o 
o o 
(M 
i—I o 
o o 
-If 
0) 
o> 
(0 a 
I O R E C O N 
T I T L E C O M P A N Y 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
uuuoDDUiisu0SUU007410020021 
D-VYD Cn(°1 Sln°2 KATE 
$10.00111.00 $10.00 $5.00 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
2009-000741 
$36.00 
03/04/2009 03:26:23 PM 
After recording return to: 
FIRST OREGON TITLE COMPANY 
116 SE D Street r Ste A 
MADRAS, OR 97741 
Until a change ia requested all 
tax statements shall be sent to 
the following address: 
Heinz A. John 
3879 Ladera ViBta Road 
Fallbrook, CA 92028 
Escrow No. 
Title No. 
001110STD 
11105 
WARRANTY DEED 
a 
E 
o O 
c o a 
8 
t 
£ 
Lincicoma Madras Development, LLC, Grantor(3) hereby grant, bargain, sell, warrant and convey to: Heinz A. John Grantee(s) and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns the following described real property, free of encumbranceB except as specifically set forth herein in the County of JBFF8RS0N and State of Oregon, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT A WHICH IS MADE A FAST EHRBOF BY THIS REFERENCE Acct# 13134/13374 Hap# 11-14-7 101 
SUBJECT TO: all those items of record and those apparent upon the land, if any, as of the date of this deed and those shown below, if any: and the grantor will warrant and forever defend the said premises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, except those claiming under the above described encumbrances. 
The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is $ 350,000.00. 
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER SECTIONS 2, 3 AND 5 TO 22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007 (MEASURE 49 (2007)). THIS'INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OP APPLICABLE LAND USB LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER SECTIONS 2, 3 AND S TO 22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007 (MEASURE 4 9 (2007)). 
OfO Dated this day of March, 2009. 
Lincicoi BY: James FKEcE e, Member 
_ of Oregon —v « ty of jfflpganoeN O c i O w * * ^ 
This instrument was acknowledged before rae on March 2 , 2009 by Mitch Cole. 
£ i ^Notary PuDiic tor uregonj 
My commission expiree (p J 
OFFICIAL SEAL OAPHKEHRH 
NOTARY PUBUC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 407450 
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 1 9 / t t i a 
( , 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Order No. 00086S1 
Page 5 
EXHIBIT "A" 
Legal Description: 
A parcel of land containing 12.28 acres, more or less, being a portion of Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2002.12 
located in the Northeast One-quarter of Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette 
Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: 
Commenoing at a point on the north-south center! ine of said Section 7 which bears South 00°17'35" East a 
distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Section 7, thence leaving said north-south 
section centerline and along the south right-of-way line of Ashwood road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded as instalment No. 2005-005605 of Jefferson County official records South 89°39'39" East a distance 
of 61.23 feet to the true Point ofBsginning of this description; thence continuing along said right-of-way line 
South 89°39'39" East a distance of 538,68 feet to a point on the east boundary of said Parcel 1; thence along 
said east boundary South 00°17'35" East a distance of935.15 feet to the Southeast comer of said Parcel 1; 
thence along the south boundary of said Parcel 1 North 89°40' 13" West a distance of 599.90 feet to the 
southwest comer of said Parcel 1, being a point on said north-south section centerline; thence along said north-
south section centerline North 00°17'35" West a distance of 510.26 feet to a point which bears South 
00°17'35" East a distance of505.00 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Section 7; thence leaving 
said north-south section centerline North 89°42'25" East a distance of 61.22 feet thence North 00°17'35" West 
a distance of424.32 feet to the point of beginning. 
{ ( JEF FERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR 
REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT REPORT 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Jan 13,2010 
ACCOUNT # 
MAP 
C O D E - T A X # 
15964 
1114070000102 
0010-15964 
M A I L I N G N A M E OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 
AGENT 
I N C A R E O F ATTN; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MGR 
MAILING ADDRESS 
1793 13TH ST SE 
SALEM, OR 97302 
TAX STATUS 
ACCNTSTATUS 
SUBTYPE 
DEED REFERENCE # 
SALES DATE/PRICE 
N O N A S S E S S A B L E 
A C T I V E 
N O R M A L 
2006-4457 (SOURCE ID:) 
06-23-2006/$39,021.00 
PROP CLASS 960 MA SA NH UNIT 
RMV CLASS 400 05 52 000 68912-1 
SITUS ADDRESS(S) __ SITUS CITY 
ID # 
CODE AREA AV RMV 
VALUE SUMMARY 
RMV EXCEPTION CPR % 
0010 LAND 
IMPR. 
0 
0 
64,550 
0 
LAND 
IMPR. 
TOTAL 0 64,550 TOTAL 0 
GRAND TOTAL 0 64,550 GRAND TOTAL 0 
CODE AREA ID it RFD PLN ZN VALUE SOURCE 
LAND BREAKDOWN 
TD% LS SIZE LND CLS IRR CLASS IRR SIZE 
0010 R 1 RL Market 100 A 0.69 
TOTAL 0.69 TOTAL 0.00 
Page 1 
t£ 
LU 
G 
0 
UJ 
- J 
UJ 
1 < 
Z 
CO 
(XL 
o 
CO 
CO 
UJ 
CO 
CO < 
z 
ID o 
Q 
z o 
S2 
A : 
UJ 
UL 
UL 
UJ 
H 
V) Ui 
on ui 
H 
< 
O 
UJ 
CL 
</> 
gs 
CO 
I -
O 
UJ 
</> 
R--o 
UJ 
O 
I 
W 
Z . 
o 
I -
co o o CN 
I 
C V-
3 CN 
7 co a> cn oo 
& o 
n 'C 
Q CL 
FL) « 
N ra 
co co 
A 
CD o o 
CN 
O 
CN 
<9 a 
•O 
0) 
"S o 
O 
A 
CC 
CD 
O 
O 
CN 
IT) 
CM 
IS 
O 
C 
UJ 
CM 
(3> 
O OO 
W 
CN 
c o 
T> 
<0 <fl c IS 
co 
CM 
CO 
O 
O 
CN 
I a. 
A> CO 
D> 4-1 
N a 
» 
> 
O 
<D 
UJ 
a. 
0 
M 
1 
* ZL 
^ 2 
UJ 
CD ^ O < 
i—i . ^ 
0 
01 
u. 
G O 
n oca: Oi uj UJ z z 
o o 
<V 
J* a: a: 
UJ UJ z z 
O 
H ° ° 
Z 
O 
H-
O 
UJ a: 
CT o z o 
O U. O o uj r~ 
A: T 
A) 
2; P UJ CO Q 
< < 
O G 
T 5 
ui cc 
tn 
+» tr 
CO 
N a 
O 
M 
CO 
CO 
O 
O 
CM 
( CL 
A) CO 
I o 
CM 
<9 
D 
•a 
A 
"E 
o 
O 
D> 
OC 
CD o o 
CM 
( a. 
A) 
CO 
r o 
CM 
& 
(S a 
c 
UJ 
CO 
A> co cn oo 
CM 
c 
O 
'•M 
U IS 
(A C IS 
o 
M 
co o o 
CM • a. 
A> 
CO • 
o 
CM 
a 
Q 
0) > 
S3 
U 
£ 
UJ 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
UJ UJ 
CD ^ 7 CO 
i -
O w CJ UJ 
CO CO 
£ z 
w O 
gp 
•P 
W 
.8 TJ 
0 
O 
s 
10 H nt 
•P 
O 
11 
N 
•H CO 
/' 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen i . Mansion, County Clerk 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
2006-004457 
$41.00 
UQO44474200SQ0Q44670030031 
07/20/2006 02:32:09 PM 
D-WD Cnt«1 flln»2 KATE 
115.00 $11.00 $10.00 15.00 
Space above this line for Recording Office Use 
After recording, return to: Send Tax statements to: 
Oregon Department of Corrections (same) 
Attn: Community Development Manager 
1793 13th Street SE 
Salem, OR 97302-2595 
WARRANTY DEED 
(ORS 93.850) 
Lincicome Madras Development. LLC, an Oregon limited liability company . 
Grantor, conveys and warrants to STATE OF OREGON, by and through its 
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Grantee, its successors and assigns, the real 
property described in Exhibit A (the "Property") free of encumbrances, except for 
easements, conditions, and restrictions contained in the public record, and except 
as specifically set forth herein (none). 
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF 
ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE 
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE 
LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS 
INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD 
CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO 
VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST 
FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE 
ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 
197.352. 
The true consideration for this conveyance is $39,021.00. 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
Page 1 of 1 
/' 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Dated this day of 
STATE OF OREGON 
County of 
_, 2006. 
) 
)ss. 
j Grantor 
by James Mjtch Cole, Managing Member of 
LincicQiu^Madras Development, LLC 
This instrument was acknowledged and executed before me on this IJ"^) day of 
by James Mitch Cole, Managing Member of Lincicome Madias Development, LLC. 
i|i*i|illliiniliil(liiif[liil||Blli|i|JLi!lliiiQiiilI|'li ' ^ - $ J J L A C.SJ 
^Public for(Oregon y 
2006, 
JUUTAJ 
Mcnmv PUBUC«M»OM 
COMMISSION NO. 380978 
' MV COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY I V 
ommission expires:  . S / f o j o i 
ACCEPTED BY: 
The State of Oregon, acting by and through 
its Department of Corrections 
By: 
As: T^pfrePCiPrnj&Ga*. 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
County of U i a j r i d r s ) 
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this f ^ d ^ - day of c J UsrLa~> , 2006, 
b y &Q/3&)' /3u£jriir>j a s t h e d t r n m u ^ / H p M ^ s n ^ e s ^ a n d 
authorized representative of the Oregon Department of Corrections, acting under authority 
granted to him/her by the State of Oregon. 
- 2 - f f l t i r 1 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
CAROLYN R PATTON 
V NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
' COMMISSION NO. 388422 
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 11.260g 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission expires: / - / / - a y 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
Page 1 of 1 
f ( 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
EXHIBIT A 
Legal Description for Warranty Deed 
ASHWOOD ROAD 
Section 7 (East Property) 
A 60.00-foot wide strip of land, lying 60.00 on the south side of the following described centerline, over land 
located in the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 7 of Township 11 South and Range 14 East of the 
Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, described in the Warranty Deed recorded at 2005-002823 of the 
Jefferson County Official Records: 
Beginning at Engineer's Centerline Station 5+00, on the section line between Sections 6 and 7 of Township 11 
South and Range 14-East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, which bears North 89°39'17" 
West 1481.20 feet from the 1/4 comer between said Sections 6 and 7; thence South ,89°39'17" East 138.33 feet, 
along the section line between said Sections 6 and 7; thence leaving said section line, 17.02 feet along the arc of a 
1039.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 89°11 '08" East 17.01 feet); thence South 
88°43 '00" East 1205.50 feet; thence 17.13 feet along the arc of a 1039.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of 
which bears South 89°11'20" East 17.13 feet); thence South 89°39'40" East 2394.42 feet; thence 633.14 feet along 
the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 62°10'44" East 609.14 feet); 
thence South 34°41 "49" East 774.75 feet; thence 1709.82 feet along the arc of a 1000.00 foot radius curve left (the 
long chord of which bears South 83°40'47" East 1509.02 feet); thence North 47°20'15" East 542.88 feet; thence 
2560.21 feet along the arc of a 1400.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 80°16'24" 
East 2218.09 feet); thence South 27°53'03" East 943.15 feet; thence 1158.98 feet along the arc of an 850.00 foot 
radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 66°56'44" East 1071.26 feet); thence North 73°59'34" East 
585.08 feet; thence 368.57 feet along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears 
South 74°57'06" East 350.79 feet);thence South 43°53'47" East 305.17 feet; thence 254.87 feet along the arc of a 
340.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 65°22' 17" East 248.94 feet); thence South 
86°50'46" East 596.74 feet; thence 122.81 feet along the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of 
which bears South 81°30'56" East 122.63 feet); thence South 76°11'06" East 271.44 feet to engineer's centerline 
station 151 +00, the terminus for this description, from which the 11 A corner between Sections 9 and 10 bears North 
89°14'59" East 2049.79 feet. 
The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 30,016 square feet, more or less. 
This description may include areas that are preexisting public right-of-way or easements, which are retained, and 
included herein to provide a clearer record of title in the future. 
f R E G I S T E R E D ^V 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
OREGON 
JULY 18, 1980 
JERRY C. P O W E L L 
V 1 9 1 9 J 
R E N E W S 1 2 - 3 1 - 2 0 0 6 
Warranty Deed Legal Description - East Property 
Lincicome Madras Development, LLC 
Page 1 of 1 
11 u 
r w p . S. RCE. S. SEC. /4 /«« 
M A P N U M B E R 
200 
TAX L O T 
NUMBER B S A L P R O P i 
A C C O U N T N U M B E R , 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
11.4,1 
C O D E 
A R E A 
N U M B E R 
OFFICIAL R c C O R D O F DESCRIPTIONS 
* O F REAL PROPERTY 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE* 
FORMERLY PART OF T.L. NO. . 
" X 
I N D E N T E A C H N E W 
COURSE TO T H I S P O I N T 
A D D I T I O N A L . OBSCRIPT ION A N D 
HECOWO O F C H A N G E 
D A T E OF E N T R Y 
O N T H I S C A R P 
D g g P RECORD ACRES 
R E M A I N I N G 
T11S TQ4E WM 
Sec 7, The N 475 ft of the E 4-00 ft of the 
NE^NW^. 
WD 
WD 
Exc J 
Co Rd No 809 0.27 
Code Change Rural Madras Sanitary DiSt 
Dissolution of Rural Madras Sanitary District 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record • 
Easement inside 11 14 7 TL 302 for this tax 
lot (Granted to Thomas, E & 0) Included in a 
Warranty Deed worked on 11 14 7 TL 302. WD 
9 5 78 
9 -2-81 
02/13/85 
12/01/89 
1/04/95 
07-28-05 
21 
25 
389 
530 4.63 
4.36 
0 81 
0-94 
#88; 
#89$ 
78 
-81 
294 
748 
#95C 029 
20054126 
££ 
LU 
O 
0 LU -J 
UJ 
1 
Z 
w 
O 
w 
U) 
LU 
<0 s 
I -z 
D o o 
z o ( f ) 
UJ 
Lt, 
LL. 
UJ 
- > 
H-(0 UJ £ UJ H-
Z 
< 
O UJ a. 
(f> 
H 
O -J X 
2 
o 
o ° 
UJ <0 
UJ 
a z 
a. 
X 
§ 
1-
m o o CM i CL 0) 
CO I in 
« 
"S a 
a> 
re 
<0 
m o o 
CL CD 
CO I m 
« 4-1 
ffl o "O 0> T5 w O U <u 
0£ 
m o o CM I Q. <U 
CO 
re O 
c UJ 
oo 
s T— CD 
o 
o IQ (A E re 
o o 
m o o ^ 
CL <U 
CO 
re Q 
a> > 
o 
£ 
UJ 
a. < 
S 
s 8 u. 
8 
z 0 
1 111 
CL o 
z o 
2 UJ > 
z o o 
a 
CL 
O -J-co 
o o 
CM 
UJ a. 
UJ o 
a: D O « 
I-z UJ s 3 o o a 
tt < 
UJ >-
£ UJ £ O 
o > 
a 
UJ 
-8 o o 
o +1 
(11 > 
$ 
+1 o 
3 
0 •p 
1 
-a ai +> 
<u H HI Q 
<B 
•8 o o 
ai N •H co 
ffl +) 
n) 
ai •p 
. VO m 
•8 o o 
« di w 
o 
ai N 
•rl CO 
Tt 0 O 
10 H 
3 0 H 
ai 
N •H co 
cn cn O) 
o cO 
re 
Q 
® 
re 
(0 
CD o o CM I 
3 
- 3 i N-CM 
re D •a v •o w O 
U a 
oc 
CO o o CM 
00 CM 
re O 
c UJ 
CO O) N-O CO CM 
c o 
"5 
re W e re 
co o 
CD o o CM I CD 3 <£ 
CM o 
o 
re Q 
0 > 
1 s 
CL 
< 
s 
s o 
a 
i 
UJ a. O 
• tn 
a 
a. 
<M * 
Q 
* a 
ui 
CL 
C/5 
a: UJ x o 
O > 
a 
UJ <o 
B g 
•p a1 
CO 
» H 
m +j 
o B 
a> N •H co 
O CM 
CM 
O o 
o_ 
oo" N-
® 2 re ~ 
O OL 
a> a> 
re 13 tn tn 
CO o o 
V oj 3 
00 o 
re Q 
•o o> •o w o o 0) 
CC 
CD O 0 CM i o> 
1 i 00 o 
re O 
c 
UJ 
o CO 
oo 
to CM 
e o IP o re 
in c re 
m m oo 
CD o o 
Q. d) <0 t o 
CM 
U 
re a 
a> 
.2 
o 
£ 
UJ 
0-039-10 
•8 
o CN O O O O c-o 
cc O m i 
K — 
UJ o ^ 
O i-l 
CD k J 
o H 
a> 
? o 
S CO 
<*> ro 
3 
0) 
Si c n) 
0 N •H co 
a) 
u> tn a 
+J a* 
CO 
o 
n 
m N •H CO 
H 
C O 
U J 
tc 
U J 
H 
Z 
< 
O Ul 
a. co 
3 § 
CO 
Z 
O 
H 
O 
U J 
<0 
UJ 
a z 
a 
x 
C O 
z 
o H 
o 
o CN 
CD 
O 
0) IS 
Q 
_0> 
w 
C O 
o o CM 
co o 
m 
a 
•o 
V 13 k. o o 0) cc 
o o CN 
o % 
a 
c UJ 
lO 
oo 
CO 
c 
o 15 U ra (A 
< 
O) 
6) 
o 
o ^ 
CO 
•=? 
CO 0 
01 
Is 
o 
w > 
'•3 & 
Ul 
a. < 
S 
s o a: u. 
ID <D 
2 UJ 
a o 
i-a. 
3 
O CO 
a 
£ 
CM CM 
CM 
* a 
UI a. 
U i 
o tt. 3 
O CO 
l-z UJ 
S 
3 
U o a 
s UJ > 
X UJ X 
u 3 o > 
a UJ CO 
. s 
T ) 
0 a 
o •p 
•p 
o 
o 
< ! 
o 4J 
ai > 
£ 
n o •p 
m iH Hi a 
a 
ai 
•8 
o 
o 
0) N 
•rl 
to 
ai •p 
(0 
a> •p 
. CM 
O 
% 0 u 
Ul 
a 
a 
9 
fl 
0) N 
•rl OT 
+J 
tr 
CO 
J! 
0 
O 
Ul 
H « 
•P 
0 
EH 
ffl N •H W 
w 
Q 
uj O 
C3 O 
I S o S UJ 00 
w < 
<ZI < 
ffi 
K 
U 
ci ID 0\ 
H 
Z 
U 
u 
s 
CN 
o ci r» 
o 
So CM f-i 
O o 
CN 
£L 
O 
£ V 0 
0 
0 
•P 
<1) > 
1 
•p 
o 
0 
0 
•p 
a > 
o 
T) 
<1> 
•p 
HI H 01 Q 
£ V 
o 
u 
a) H 
•rl 
CO 
01 
•p 
(0 
C! 
M $ 
o . IP 
o 
I 
tJI 
A 
U 
d) N 
•rl Ul 
SI 
HI 
W 
jj 
id •p 
0 EH 
a> N 
•rl 01 
o W 
a vo 
H ° 
8 S j 5 
Pk =tt 
•P h 01 w 
0 - 0 3 9 -
o o ^ 
c 3 
ffi 
Q 
® 
IB 
(0 
o o CM i c 3 
I 
o 
•o 0> •o 
L. 
Q O 
a) 
£ 
o o CM i tz 3 -3 I CM 
ra 
Q 
c UJ 
lO 
00 
CO 
c o 
n (A c ra 
o > 
6) 
r-
o 
0 ^ 
01 3 
-F CO o 
2 
ra 
Q 
a> > 
O 
£ 
UJ 
a. < 
S 
S 
s 
LL 
z o p 
UJ o. o 
l -o. 
3 0 Ul 
a 
a. 
* a 
* a 
UJ a. 
UJ o 
cc 3 o 
<n i -z: 
UJ S 3 u o a 
a. < 
UJ > 
a. 
UJ x 
u 3 
O > 
a 
UJ <0 
f 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
•B W 
60 cf 
.3 
20
07
 
w 
w 
Q 'oo ID 
4-1 o p—I r-O H o 
S o 
to <_> W 
U-i 
00 f 
c-CL. o a> 
•S P JN A* * 
0) o n 
3 
"0 0 o 
(It +J 
o H 
<b N •H CO 
co LU 
01 UJ t-
< 
O 
UJ Q. co 
g g 
< o H 
co 
Z o p 
o UJ 
co 
UJ 
(3 
£L 
X 
co 
•P 
•a tr w 
<n 
IV M 
3 
it 
•P 0 EH ® 
N •rl W 
o 
CM 
-A O 
9 
CN O 
B 8 
5 "c a a. 
_aj a> 
bj ra co co 
O o 
CN 
tj 
0 1 co 
2 ra Q 
TJ 41 
TJ 
o o 0) 
O O CN 
i> 
o 
to O 
e UJ 
0 
LU to 
+> 
•ft tr 
CO 
w <d , U o < 
$ 
0 
EH 
0) N •rl w 
® s y« 'C a a. 
® ® 
ra ra co co 
o o oo 
o 
9 6 o 
ra 
O 
•o 
03 
"S o o ai 0£ 
CM 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
a 
S5 
0 o> 
co 
a. 
•P 
ft 
CO 
01 
ai 
n tj 
<FL 
•P o 
EH 
ai 
N •rl 10 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marstan, County Clerk 
uuu34Z4:«uu/uuuat)uru(Kuu*a 
D-BSD Cnt»1 S(n=2 KATE 
$10.00 $11.00 J 10.00 55.00 
.<307-003807 
$36.00 
07/23/2007 10:29:17 AM 
O-039-10 
-Space below for Recorder's use only-
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas, as 
husband and wife, Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of ZERO and 00/100 Dollars 
to it paid by the grantee herein, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Evan W Thomas 
and Dorothy Thomas, as husband and wife, Grantee(s), the described tract of land in County of 
Jefferson and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
See Attached Legal Description as Tract 'B' 
c <0 Q. 
i o ® 
e t-
c o 
CD ffl 
0 
1 
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the granted premises unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. 
WITNESS their Hand and Seal this day of 
This instrument will not allow use of the property 
described in this instrument in violation of applicable 
land use laws and regulations. Before signing or 
accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title 
to the property should check with the appropriate city 
or counly planning department to verity approved uses 
and to determine any limits on lawsuits against 
Fanning or Forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. 
« 2007. 
By: Evan W Tpomas 
By: Dorothy 
C 
Tgjwnas 
ft ^fZ*^-*^ 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY oF-eeeewn •ES jeFp&se*] jWd^v^rtlOwulS, AHomC-f- Tin- -Atf—W-
I, certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Evan W Thomas and Dorothy 
Thomas and is the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that 
he/she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the 
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 
Dated: (if h i 
Until a change is requested all tax statements 
Should be sent to the following address: 
Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas 
PublicTor tlW State oTOREGON 
My Cammi^ion Expires: l3~-0i~fl 
SFAT^  
WrWMtfHETfilDOE 
V/71 ^ ^ S g U C . OREGON 
w MMHS8M BWti Me "gum f 
After Recording Please Return to: 
<r 
pJ Same as above 
Q 
sJ 10 Q 
Escrow No. 
2007-3807 
0-039-10 
TRACT B 
A parcel of land containing 3.94 acres, more or less, located in a portion of the 
Northwest One-quarter (NW1/4) and a portion of the Northeast One-Quarter 
(NE1/4) of Section 07, Township 11 S'outh, Range 14 East, Willamette Meridian, 
City of Madras, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as 
follows: 
Beginning at a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 which bears 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter corner 
of said Section 07; thence leaving said north-south section centerline and along 
the south right-of-way line of Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson County official records South 
89°39'39" East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way line 
South O C ^ S " East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 8Q°A2'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 
which bears South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-
quarter corner of said Section 07, being a point on the boundary of Parcel 1 of 
Partition Plat No. 2004-15 (recorded as MF#2004-4735); thence along the 
boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 354.87 feet; 
thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right 
with a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a 
distance of 117.35 feet; thence North 00o17'35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; 
thence 123.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 
240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" East for a distance of 
121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left with a 
radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°12'33" East for a 
distance of 184,75 feet to a point on said south right-of-way line; thence along 
said south right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South SS^'SO" East a distance of 170.57 feet 
18.12 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 
feet, the chord of which bears South 89°11'19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet; 
South 89°39'39" East a distance of 104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the 
terminus of this description. 
Subject to: All easements, restrictions and right-of-ways of record and those 
common and apparent on the land. 
REGISTERED 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
JON / OREGJULY 17, IflBB 
PETER A. MANLEY 
221* 
RENEWAL DAtt: 12/31/08 
April 11, 2007 
S:\Land Projects\051213-Cole subd in Madras\docs\TRACT B(2).doc 
Thomas to Thomas 
2007-3807 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rufe Analysis 
(Kittelson & Associates, January 2010) 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , LNC 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 SW Upper Terrace Drive, Suite 101, Bend. Oregon 9770Z •• 541.312.8300 >r 541.312.4585 
\ 
To: 
From: Chris Brehmer, P.E. & Joe Bessman, P.E. & Matt Be 
Project: Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
Subject: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
Date: January 22, 2010 
T o : Nick Snead, City of Madras 
M E M O R A N D U M 
EXPIRES: 12/31/ ^ 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document compliance with the Transportation Planning 
Rule for the proposed rezone of 20 acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) 
zoning to Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This memorandum was prepared to address 
the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-12-0060 
(Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for a zone change 
analysis. The intent of the TPR is to ensure the transportation system can accommodate the 
change of uses to the adopted system plan and that any resultant significant affects are mitigated. 
The land included in the proposed rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of 
Jefferson County Middle School, and south of the existing Juniper Hills County Park near Bean 
Drive. The property is within the Yarrow development and its rezone to accommodate a school 
was identified as part of the original Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is 
generally shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the 20-acre future school property on the 
Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development plans or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
This study determined that, with the exception of the US 97/J Street intersections, all of the study 
area intersections operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon 
analysis period. The US 97/J Street intersections exceed ODOT mobility standards with or without 
the proposed rezone. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental impact 
on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. The City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) 
Amendment previously identified a mitigation plan for this intersection and, with the planned 
improvements in place, the transportation system will operate acceptably with the existing 
zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the proposed rezone. Assuming that the 
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is able to make a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements in the TSP, no unmitigated significant effects will 
occur with the proposed rezone. The study methodology, findings, and recommendations are 
detailed herein. 
FILENAME: H:\PRQJFILE\10028 - MADRAS ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLESCHOOLS\REPORT\FINAL\IOO28REPFINAL.DOC 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
wBu:qE±inofe7 IIBqw • uiezpm - 0103'33 "T 6Mp-g6ljB300l\sBms6rw\sioonas BjppMpue timuewes seipem - Bzoomuto'd&utW HM 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
ZOGu mj. inoXr) imui • wezroi - 0103 "OS UBP 6Mp-g£ueiO<ms6!i[sSMpisiooii!i$ sippi^pue AieiueuiBB seipew • sgaoneiijtoJdWuas-HVX 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 4 
BACKGROUND 
The City of Madras, in partnership with the Jefferson County School District is proposing the 
UGB amendment and rezone to accommodate a potential future elementary school site. Jefferson 
County School District currently operates two elementary schools within the Madras City limits 
that served approximately 1,060 kindergarten through fifth grade students during the 2008 school 
year. The recent closure of the Westside Elementary School due to budget shortfalls has split 
Madras kindergarten through fifth grade students between Madras Elementary School 
(kindergarten through 2nd grade) and Buff Elementary School (3rd through 5th grades). 
Future building needs and the current location of Buff Elementary School within a 100-year 
floodplain has created a need for the School District to look at alternative future sites. The 
location of the proposed land within the Yarrow neighborhood is expected to help accommodate 
future growth along Madras' east side, and the adjacent Jefferson County Middle School and 
Juniper Hills Park ball fields are expected to be complementary uses. A new school is not 
proposed for construction or entitlements at this time; the purpose of the zone change is to 
accommodate the long-term educational infrastructure needs in the City. 
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 
The existing transportation infrastructure assessment is provided herein to assist the City of 
Madras with the planning and prioritization of maintenance and infrastructure improvements 
within the study area. The existing conditions analysis is intended to identify operational and 
geometric conditions surrounding the site to ensure the necessary right-of-way will be available 
to accommodate needed system interconnectivity and accessibility, and to ensure existing 
transportation safety needs are addressed. 
Roadway Facilities 
As illustrated in Figure 2, Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary 
access and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road erves 
Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west transitions into B 
Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recently constructed extension of 
City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City limits, and Bean Drive connects 
toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 summarizes key characteristics of the existing 
roadway facilities. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 5 
T a b l e 1 
Existing Transportation Facilities and Roadway Designations 
Roadway 
Functional 
Classification 
Number of 
Lanes 
Posted 
Speed Sidewalks 
Bicycle 
Lanes 
On-Street 
Parking 
Ashwood - B Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25-45 mph Partial2 Yes Partial1 
City View Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
Bean Drive Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph No No No 
Kinkade Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
Ashwood - C Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
10th Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes No Yes 
J Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
1 On-street parking is provided along sections of roadway within the City limits. 
2- Sidewalks are located on one side of the street only. 
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 
Sidewalks are currently provided along the south side of Ashwood Road primarily where 
frontage improvements have been completed. As shown in Table 1, sidewalks are generally 
provided along a majority of the roadways within the site vicinity, with the exception of Bean 
Drive, where pedestrians may rely on the multi-use path within Juniper Hills Park. 
Bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of Ashwood Road and extend west to the City center. 
Bicycle lanes are also provided on both sides of City View Road, which connect to J Street and the 
City center to the south. 
Review of the project vicinity identified that pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway 
crossing treatments should be considered to connect the existing Jefferson County Middle School 
with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow neighborhood should also be 
provided concurrent with development, including appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments 
along Ashwood Road. These connections could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the 
complementary uses and increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transit Facilities 
Limited transit service is available throughout the site vicinity through services provided by the 
Cascades East Transit (Reference 1). Cascades East provides community connections from 
Madras to Redmond, Culver, and the Metolius City Hall on two trips in the morning and two 
trips during the afternoon period. Fares on the intercommunity connections are $5.00 per day. 
Curb to curb on-call transit service is also available through Cascades East Transit Mondays 
through Friday with reservations. These services are available within a five-mile radius of the 
town center, and the fare for on-demand service is currently $1.25 per trip. In addition, the 
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) also provides bus rides to Medicaid eligible 
clients within a nine-county area throughout Central Oregon. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Existing Traffic Counts 
Historical traffic counts were obtained at City of Madras intersections from May 2007. Review of 
the manual turning movement counts showed that during the critical evening peak hour B Street 
near its intersection with 10th Street carries approximately 145 vehicles in the eastbound direction 
and approximately 275 vehicles in the westbound direction during the evening peak hour. It was 
also noted that of the westbound vehicles approximately 20 percent were expected to travel south 
on City View with the remainder continuing westbound along Ashwood Road - B Street. 
Figure 3 provides a summary of the historical year 2007 existing weekday p.m. peak hour 
turning-movement counts, which are rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour. No historical 
traffic count data was available for the Ashwood Road/Bean Drive intersection, so new counts 
were conducted in January of 2010. The new traffic count showed similar but slightly lower 
through volumes along Ashwood Road as compared to the historical 2007 counts. Accordingly, it 
is expected that the 2006/2007 counts continue to reflect the existing roadway condidons. A 
summary of the existing traffic volumes throughout the study area is shown in Figure 3. 
Attachment "1" contains the traffic count worksheets used in this study as provided by City staff. 
Current Levels of Service and Performance Standards 
Intersection performance thresholds vary throughout the study area based on the roadway 
jurisdicdon. Jefferson County traffic study requirements included within the County's TSP 
(Reference 2) identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should be maintained at all County 
intersecdons. The City of Madras TSP (Reference 3) identifies a target Level of Service (LOS) "D" 
for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersecdons (or LOS F with a volume-to-
capacity rado below 0.95). ODOT mobility standards included within the Oregon Highway Plan 
(add subsequent updates, Reference 4) require a volume-to-capacity rado of less than 0.90 on the 
stop-controlled minor street approaches at the J Street intersecdons and a volume-to-capacity 
ratio of 0.80 at the signalized B Street intersections and future signalized J Street intersecdons.1 
Intersection operations were reviewed to identify current capacity and safety constraints on the 
roadway network. Field review of the study area identified that all of the intersections are 
uncontrolled in the east-west direction along B Street - Ashwood Road and are stop-sign 
controlled along the north-south minor-street approaches. Relevant intersection performance 
standards for the study area intersections are summarized below in Table 2. 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 6 
1 Per the Oregon Highway Plan, US 26/US 97 are classified as Statewide Highways, Freight Routes, and 
part of the National Highway System and contain a posted speed of 30 miles per hour through the study 
area. Unsignalized highway mobility standards are based on a District/Local Interest Road in a non-
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) outside of Speaal Transportation Areas where the non-
freeway posted speed is less than 35 mph. Signalized highway mobility standards are based on a Freight 
Route along a Statewide Highway in a non-MPO outside of STAs where the posted speed is less than 35 
mph. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Table 2 Summary of Intersection Performance Standards 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 8 
I n te rsec t ion Jurisdiction 
Traf f ic 
Control 1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive 
Jefferson 
County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Kinkade Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
B Street/ 
10th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
US 97 Northbound ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
B Street/ 
US 97 Southbound ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
J Street/ 
US 97 Northbound ODOT TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 
J Street/ 
US 97 Southbound ODOT TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 j 
'TWSC: Two-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) 
Results of the existing conditions intersection operations during the weekday p.m. peak hour are 
illustrated in Figure 3. As shown in the figure, all of the study area intersections currently operate 
acceptably. It was noted that the J Street intersection with Southbound US 97 (4lh Street) meets 
mobility standards but operates with high delays (Level of Service "E") along the stop-controlled 
east-west approaches. Existing conditions level-of-service worksheets are included in Attachment "2". 
Existing Conditions Summary 
The following transportation system improvement needs were identified based on review of the 
existing system conditions. Since mitigation of these existing deficiencies is not applicable to or 
caused by the proposed zone change, it is recommended that these safety and performance 
improvements be provided by the City of Madras as part of the City's regular maintenance or 
incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Plans. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
• All of the study area intersections operate acceptably, although the Southbound US 97 (4th 
Street)/J Street intersection operates with high minor-street delay at a Level of Service "E". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 9 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
The applicable criteria for zone change analyses are found within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060, also known as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR, Reference 5). The TPR 
is intended to require that any changes to the adopted and recognized Transportation System 
Plan show consistency and compliance with the stated goals of the plan, the development and 
regular updates of which are a mandated requirement for cities. The overall purpose of a city's 
TSP is to 1) provide a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system that encourages and 
supports the availability, safety, convenience, and efficiency of a variety of transportation choices 
for moving people that balance vehicular use with other transportation modes, including 
walking, bicycling, and transit in order to avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of 
transportation; and 2) to protect existing and planned facilities for their identified functions. 
The City's applicable Transportation System Plan was completed in 2001, with updates 
completed for the J Street connection with the US 97 in 2005 (Reference 6). The initial plan 
provides an assessment of roadway classifications throughout the City and potential intersection 
treatments at a sampling of collector and arterial intersections along with associated planning 
level improvement costs, and is the applicable planning document related to the City's Ashwood 
- B Street intersections. The J Street amendment reviewed improvement options specific to the US 
97 intersections and is considered the relevant planning document for the J Street intersections. 
The City's adopted TSP does not include a specific assessment of the long-term intersection needs 
at any of the City intersections along B Street-Ashwood, as the TSP focused on the more critical 
intersections along the US 97/US 26 corridor through downtown Madras. The intent of this zone 
change analysis is to provide an assessment of the long-term system needs that should be 
considered for inclusion within the City's TSP (as summarized within the Existing Zoning section). 
In addition, to support the proposed zone change this report also includes an assessment of 
additional impacts that could occur with future development resulting from this zone change (as 
included within the Proposed Zoning section). 
All analyses assess year 2020 conditions on City facilities and year 2027 conditions on County 
facilities for consistency with the adopted TSP horizon years. ODOT's US 97 intersections with J 
Street are assessed under year 2025 conditions, consistent with the TSP Update and meeting the 
minimum 15-year planning horizon required for consistency with the Oregon Highway Plan 
(Section 1F.2). ODOT's intersections with B Street are also assessed under year 2025 conditions for 
consistency with the 15-year minimum planning horizon identified in the State's TSP, the Oregon 
Highway Plan (the City TSP assesses only 2020 conditions at B Street). 
Reasonably Likely Transportation Improvements 
Transportation Planning Rule analyses allow the inclusion of planned improvements in the 
horizon analysis period for which a funding mechanism has been identified. The funding 
mechanism could be an established local Capital Improvement Project, local projects contained 
within a City's Systems Development Charge (SDC) list, or funded ODOT Statewide 
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) projects. No funded improvements affect the study 
area intersections. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 10 
The US 97/J Street improvements are identified in the City's TSP Amendment as a needed facility 
improvement and included within the ODOT 2010-2013 Draft STIP list. Improvement plans 
include realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the 
new J Street intersections. A request for a "Reasonably Likely" determination for the planned 
improvements has been sent to ODOT and is pending approval. Attachment "3" includes an 
illustration of the planned } Street Improvements. 
Existing Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
An analysis was conducted for the horizon years as identified in the applicable City, County, and 
State TSPs. The existing zoning assessment was prepared to identify how the study area's 
transportation system operates in the horizon year with build-out of the subject parcel as 
currently zoned (without the impact of the proposed rezone). This analysis will supplement the 
City's TSP efforts along this segment of Ashwood Road and will provide a basis for comparison 
to potential future conditions with the proposed zone change. 
Review of the City's TSP (TSP Technical Memorandum #3, Reference 7) shows that future horizon 
volumes were developed through the application of an annual three percent growth rate for all 
turning and through movements to and from City facilities. ODOT facilities were assessed using 
a two percent annual growth rate for through movements along US 97/US 26. County facilities 
were assessed with a 3.2 percent growth rate through 2011 and 2.5 percent annual growth from 
2012 through 2027. 
To identify the existing trip generation potential of the subject property, review of the County 
zoning, allowable land uses, and site constraints was conducted. The existing Range Land zoning 
is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within Jefferson County. The RL 
zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural lands for livestock 
grazing, and the RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum of 40 acres. A 
variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these uses require 
more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low intensity uses. 
Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely limited, and for 
analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Intersection Level-of-ServIce Analysis 
Figure 4 illustrates the weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes inclusive of regional growth and 
potential site build-out with the existing zoning. These volumes were used to conduct an 
operational analysis at each of the study intersections to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of 
service with exception of the US 97/J Street intersections, which exceed ODOT mobility standards. 
With the planned J Street improvements in place both the US 97 Northbound and Southbound 
intersections with J Street are forecast to operate acceptably. Attachment "4" contains the horizon 
period existing zoning level-of-service worksheets. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 12 
Proposed Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
Future horizon year conditions were developed based on the same methodology used to assess 
the existing zoning conditions. The proposed zoning conditions also include the incremental 
increase in trips that could be generated with the Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning, as 
described below. 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, including apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723 (Reference 8), were 
reviewed to identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses 
are typically not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the 
rezone is to ultimately allow for a new school this specific conditional use was reviewed to ensure 
that a reasonable development scenario considers the potential impact of a school. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses in the R-2 
zoning: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use category from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building 
space, parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included in Attachment "5". 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise ten 
acres of the overall land, with a minimum of five acres dedicated to the elementary school. Any 
additional lands would be retained for residential uses. The most likely school type would be an 
elementary school given the regional needs and recent closure of the Westside Elementary site. A 
new elementary school could be expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students 
(historical records from the closed Westside Elementary School showed an enrollment of 325 
students). 
Accordingly, in addition to consideration of build-out of the 20-acres with residential uses, this 
provides two additional R-2 development scenarios to consider: 
1. 116 attached residential units on ten acres (11.6 units/acre * 10 acres = 116 units) and a 350-
student elementary school 
2. 174 attached residential units on fifteen acres (11.6 units/acre * 15 acres = 174 units) and a 
350-student elementary school on the remaining five acres. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 13 
While a ten acre school site is more typical, the minimum five-acre site provides a reasonable 
worst-case development scenario resulting in a more conservative analysis. The two scenarios 
forwarded for consideration include build-out of the parcel with residential and build-out of 15-
acres with residential and 5-acres with a new school. 
R-2 Zoning Trip Generation Potential 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within ITE's standard reference Trip Generation, 
8,h Edition, using the Apartment land use category (Land Use Code 220, Reference 9). 
Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared using surveys of schools 
within the City of Bend to better approximate local elementary school trends. The surveys of the 
Bend locations contain slightly lower trip generation rates than national surveys of elementary 
schools (0.13 trips/student versus 0.15 trips/student), but are expected to better reflect local 
characteristics of Central Oregon schools than the national data due to similarities in weather 
characteristics, mode splits, and after school activities. 
All of the elementary school surveys were conducted in early fall at each of the five school sites 
and include an account of after school activities and public use of the adjacent ballfields. Because 
the evening commute period analysis of the school primarily reflects faculty trips (student trips 
typically occur in the afternoon), the increased student walking ratios during fair weather 
conditions are not expected to impact the results. The study found that the increased public use of 
the ballfields due to the fair weather likely results in a higher than typical trip rate. While the 
Bend Elementary School surveys were conducted at locations within developed residential 
neighborhoods, it is assumed that the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary area will be fully 
developed by the horizon year providing similar characteristics at the proposed location. It was 
also noted that the surrounding neighborhoods have already been master planned, with portions 
of the roadway infrastructure for the first development phases already in place. Attachment "6" 
contains the Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement with the adjacent middle school, recreational facility, and benefit 
from the adjacent Jumper Hills Park ballfields, additional trip discounts were not applied to the 
trip rates obtained from the Bend-La Pine School District facilities. Mixed-use incentives provided 
in Section 6 of the TPR were also omitted from the analysis, though the densities and integrated 
uses planned within the Yarrow development are expected to comply with the applicable 
definitions of a mixed-use pedestrian friendly neighborhood. Table 3 summarizes the trip 
generation potential of the two potential land use scenarios. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
T a b l e 3 R-2 Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 14 
Land Use ITE Code Size 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments (20 acres) 220 232 Units 145 f 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Pius Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments (15 acres) 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School (5 acres) N/A 350 Students 46 25 21 
Total Trips 159 99 60 
As shown in Table 3, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out of residential uses alone and was used to assess the incremental system 
impacts associated with the proposed rezone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the UGB 
amendment was determined through review of existing traffic patterns, likely school 
faculty/employee housing, and residential destinations. The trip distribution patterns were 
separated by residential and school trips, with the resultant trip distribution pattern illustrated in 
Figure 5. As shown, the pattern highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west 
toward the City center and US 97 corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute 
onto the available parallel routes (Loucks, City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel 
destination. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 4) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour was assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing. These incremental trips were added to the existing zoning 
traffic volumes, with the resultant volumes illustrated in Figure 7. 
Study Area Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning, the following 
intersections of collector and arterial roadways were identified as study intersections due to their 
potential for being significantly affected by the proposed zone change. Scoping materials and 
conversations with the affected jurisdiction staff provided concurrence on the study area. The City 
of Madras roadway classification map is included in Attachment "7" and the scoping letter is included as 
Attachment "8". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
goBy:qej.woAei iiaqui -uidgozi -0lOZ'Z3UBr 6"p-z6iMzo0l\sE!i\sB/Lsp\siooi]asaippiwpus Aisiubuibb sBjpew-9g00lWyl°Jd\PV*g-H\:i< 
f 0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
goBy :qeipoA^ ipqui -uxfeo-'Si -mOS'ZZUBr Bwgeyeeooi\sBg\sBMp\siooii!is sippmpubX/biusu/sssripejv-QSOOi\ml°>dV>u9B~H\:x 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 17 
• Ashwood Road/Bean Drive (could be impacted by up to 137 additional weekday p.m. 
peak hour trips, a 46 percent increase from existing volume) 
• Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by up to 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 34 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by up to 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 22 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by up to 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, an 18 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/10lh Street (could be impacted by up to 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 12 percent increase from existing volume) 
• US 97 Northbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Southbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Northbound (Fifth Street)/J Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
® US 97 Southbound (Fourth Street)/J Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required in the future as part of the entitlements process when a 
specific site plan is available. However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to 
provide consistency with the adopted Transportation System Plan only the weekday p.m. peak 
hour operations (design hour) are summarized herein for TPR purposes. 
Intersection Level of Service Analysis 
The weekday p.m. peak hour turning-movement volumes shown in Figure 5 were used to 
conduct an operational analysis at each study intersection to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, with the application of regional growth and the incremental trip generation 
potential of the proposed R-2 zoning all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at 
acceptable levels of service during the weekday p.m. peak hour with exception of the US 97/J 
Street intersections. With the planned J Street improvements in place, both the US 97 northbound 
and southbound intersections with J Street are shown to operate acceptably. Attachment "9" 
contains the horizon year level-of-seroice worksheets. 
OAR Section 660-12-0060 sets forth the relative criteria for evaluating plan and land use 
regulation amendments. Table 4 summarizes the TPR criteria and their applicability to the 
proposed rezone application. 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 18 
Table 4 Summary of Criteria in OAR 660-012-0060 
Section Criteria Applicable? 
1 Describes how to determine if a proposed land use action results In a significantly affects transportation facilities. 
Yes 
See response below 
2 Describes measures for complying with Criteria # 1 where a significant effect is identified. 
Yes 
See response below 
3 
Describes measures for complying with Criteria # 1 and #2 
without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with 
the function, capacity and performance standards of the facility 
No 
4 Determinations under Criteria #1 , #2 , and # 3 are coordinated with other local agencies. 
Yes 
See response below 
5 Indicates that the presence of a transportation facility shall not be the basis for an exception to allow development on rural lands. 
No 
(Lands are part of a 
master plan area) 
6 Indicates that local agencies should credit developments that provide a reduction in trips. 
No 
(No concurrent site 
plan) 
7 Outlines requirements for a local street plan, access management plan, or future street plan for commercial areas. 
No 
(Commercial lands are 
not proposed) | 
8 Defines a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood 
No I 
(No concurrent site I 
plan) j 
As shown, there are eight criteria that apply to Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. Of 
these, Criteria #1, #2, and #4 are applicable to the proposed land use action. Applicable sections of 
these criteria are provided below in italics with a corresponding response shown in standard font. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive 
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to 
assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance 
standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio> etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use 
regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility 
(exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing afunctional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation 
system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels of 
travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #•• 10028.0 
January 22, 2010 Page 19 
Response: Based on the incremental traffic increase from RL to R-Z zoning, the functional 
classification of all the adjacent roadways will not be affected with the proposed zone 
change. 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below 
the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
Response: The intersections of US 97/J Street performs below the minimum acceptable 
performance standard in the City of Madras TSP and the OHP with the existing zoning. 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is 
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
Response: The performance of the US 97f] Street intersections are degraded with the 
incremental trips from the proposed rezone, and therefore a Significant Effect occurring 
with the proposed rezone. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant 
effect, compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the planned 
function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the 
requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan or mechanism 
consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so 
that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the planning 
period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce demandfor 
automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance standards 
of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development 
agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system management 
measures, demand management or minor transportation improvements. Local governments 
shall as part of the amendment specify when measures or improvements provided pursuant 
to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: The J Street intersections are significantly affected. An amendment to the City's 
Transportation System Plan identifies the long-term needs at these intersections, but at the 
time the TSP amendment was approved a funding mechanism was not simultaneously 
adopted. However, because the J Street improvements are located on US 97 and under the 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #.- 10028.0 
Page 20 
jurisdiction of ODOT additional steps are required to provide a Reasonably Likehj 
determination. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (4) Determinations under sections (l)-(S) of this rule shall be coordinated with 
affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. 
(a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or planned 
transportation facility under subsection (l)(c) of this rule, local governments shall rely on 
existing transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities, 
improvements and services set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below. 
(b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered planned facilities, 
improvements and services: 
(D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in 
a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when ODOT 
provides a written statement that the improvements are reasonably likely to be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to paragraphs 
(b)(D), (b)(E) or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or transportation facility 
provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining whether a transportation 
facility, improvement or service is a planned transportation facility, improvement or 
service. In the absence of a written statement, a local government can only rely upon 
planned transportation facilities, improvements and services identified in paragraphs 
(b)(A)-(C) to determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the 
remedies in section (2). 
Response: A formal request has been provided to ODOT for a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements. The ] Street improvements are included in 
the City of Madras TSP Amendment, conceptual design and cost estimates have been 
completed, and the project is included on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP, expected for approval 
in October 2010. Pending the anticipated receipt of the Reasonably Likely letter from the 
ODOT Region Manager the ability to assume completion of the J Street improvements as 
part of the horizon year transportation system will be conclusive. 
PROJECT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
Existing Transportation System Findings and Recommendations 
Findings of the existing transportation system review and analysis are summarized below. 
• All of the study area intersections currently operate acceptably. The Southbound US 97 (4th 
Street)/J Street intersection meets City and ODOT operational standards but operates with 
high peak hour delays on the stop-controlled east-west approaches. 
• No marked pedestrian crossings or continuous sidewalks are provided between the 
Jefferson County Middle School/Yarrow and Juniper Hills Park. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #.- 10028.0 
Page 21 
Recommendations from the existing conditions assessment are provided below. The City of 
Madras should incorporate these recommendations into their scheduled maintenance plans or 
assess the priority of the improvements based on the potential system safety and performance 
benefit. The identified improvements are currently needed regardless of the proposed zone 
change. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transportation Planning Rule Findings and Recommendations 
Key findings from the Transportation Planning Rule Analysis are summarized below. 
• The proposed 20-acre rezone from the County's Rangeland zoning to the City's Multiple 
Family Residential zoning could generate an additional 159 weekday p.m. peak hour trips. 
• With exception of the US 97/j Street intersections, all of the study area intersections 
operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon analysis period. 
• With or without the proposed rezone the US 97/J Street intersections exceed ODOT 
mobility standards. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental 
impact on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. 
® The City's Transportation System Plan Amendment was prepared to identify the system 
improvement needs to address the J Street needs. Identified improvements include a 
realignment of Northbound US 97 (5th Street) east onto Adams Drive and two new 
signalized intersections along J Street for both northbound and southbound highway 
traffic. With the planned improvements in place the transportation system will operate 
acceptably with the existing zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the 
proposed rezone. 
• A request for a Reasonably Likely determination has been provided to ODOT. With a 
Reasonably Likely determination for the J Street improvements, no unmitigated significant 
effects will occur with the proposed rezone. 
• Intercormectivity should be reviewed with subsequent Yarrow development (including 
within the subject parcel) to provide direct and convenient multimodal access to the 
potential school site. Additionally, pedestrian treatments should be considered between 
Yarrow, Juniper Hills Park, the adjacent recreational facility, and Jefferson County Middle 
School. 
Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this zone change analysis at (541) 312-
8300. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
ATTACHMENTS: 
1. Historical Turning Movement Count Data 
2. Existing Conditions Level of Service Worksheets 
3. J Street Concept Map 
4. Horizon Year (Existing RL Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
5. R-2 Residential Density Development 
6. Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
7. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
8. Project Scoping Letter 
9. Horizon Year (Proposed R-2 Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
REFERENCES: 1. Cascades East Transit, http://www.cascadeseasttransit.com. January 2010. 
2. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan. 
2001. 
3. Jefferson County & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Jefferson County Transportation System Plan. 
2005. 
4. Oregon Department of Transportation. 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. March 1999. 
5. Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-
0060, http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/banners/rules.htm. 
6. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan 
Update. 2006. 
7. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Technical Memorandum #3: Year 2020 Operations Analysis. May 
2001. 
8. Citjrof Madras. Ordinance 723, http://ci.madras.or.us/agendas/agendas ordinances.shtml. 
February 2005. 
9. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 8lh Edition. 2008. 
Project #.- 10028.0 
Page 22 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
A t t a c h m e n t " 1 " 
Manual Turning 
Movement Counts 
• »WMHII—'MM'WMI 
0-039-10 
0-039-10 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Project Title: 
Project No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT0000-0408 
OR 
Hwy 97/5lh Street 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Rate: 
# Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 
NA 
NA 
PM 
Weather: 
Road Surface: 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect, type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Stop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
15-MIN HOURLY 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:00 16:15 2 13 0 0 52 20 5 141 23 0 0 0 256 984 0:00 
16:15 16:30 4 11 0 0 44 6 12 133 26 0 0 0 236 1014 0:00 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 1035 10:30 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 1013 0:00 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 964 0:00 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 678 0:00 
17:30 17:45 1 12 0 0 40 12 5 142 24 0 0 0 236 421 0:00 
17:45 18:00 2 1 0 0 19 11 6 133 13 0 0 0 185 
1948 
185 0:00 
Actual PM peak hour oarlod Is from: 16:30 to 17:30 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 36 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1035 
Mvmnt PHF 0.64 0.75 SiDIV/0! 8DIV/0! 0.70 0.88 0.88 0.94 0.61 #DIW0l 8DIV/0! #DIV/0l Int. 
Approach PHF 0,79 0.73 o.esi SDIV/0] PHF-j. 0.90 
The PM peak hour used Is from: 16:30 to 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
15-Mln Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Totat 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 i a 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 a 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 36 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1035 
Mvmnt PHF 0,64 0.75 SDIV/0! W1V/0I 0.70 0,88 0,88 0.94 0.61 #DIV/0! ffDIV/OI SDIV/Of Ini, 
Approach PHF 0.79 Cf.?3 0,95 #DIV/0! PHF-> 0.90 
ACTUAL P 1 ^ 7 H 6 U T O N K VOLUMES 
16:30 to 17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EASTOF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 26 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 48 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 17:30 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 679 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
LINK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED : 
16:30 to 17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 26 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 48 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 17:30 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 679 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
COMMENTS: 
0-039-10 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Project Title: 
Project No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT0000-0408 
OR 
Hwy 97/4th Street 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Hate: 
# Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 
~NA 
NA 
PM 
Weather: 
Road Surface: 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect, type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Stop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
15-MIN HOURLY 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:00 16:15 0 9 5 50 8 0 0 0 0 4 170 5 251 953 
16:15 16:30 0 10 4 49 6 0 0 0 0 9 141 6 225 966 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 974 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 930 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 869 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 605 
17:30 17:45 0 2 4 40 5 0 0 0 0 9 130 4 194 372 
17:45 18:00 0 1 4 21 5 0 0 0 0 4 141 2 178 178 
Actual PM peak hour period Is from: 16:30 17:30 
1822 
0.0Q 
0:00 
16:30 
0:00 
0:00 
0:00 
0:00 
0:00 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUH VOLUME 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 0 28 678 21 974 
Mvmnl PHF ffOIV/OI 0.67 0-65 0.86 0.63 #DIV/0l SDIV/OI (IDIV/0I (TOIWOl 078 0.94 0.58 Int. 
Approach PHF 0.71 0.85 #DIV/0l 094 PHF-* 0.92 
The PM peak hour used Is from: 16:30 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
15-Mln Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
18:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 0 28 678 21 974 
Mvmnt PHF ITOIWO! 0.67 0.65 0.86 0.63 SDIV/01 flDIWOI ffOIWOI mw. 0.78 0.94 0.58 Int. 
Approach PHF 0-71 0.85 #DIV/0l 0.34 PHF-> 0.92 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR UNK VOLUMES 
16:30 • to .17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 0 176 0 217 7 13 49 14 
16:45 17:00 0 182 0 214 19 4 53 6 
17:00 17:15 0 193 0 235 11 9 62 18 
17:15 17:30 0 176 0 210 9 11 46 1-4 
TOTAL 0 727 0 876 46 37 210 52 
LINK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
16:30 to 1730 
TIME NORTH OF INT, SOUTH OF INT. ' WEST OF INT.' 'BAST OF INT, 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 0 176 0 217 7 13 49 14 
16:45 17:00 0 182 0 214 19 4 53 6 
17:00 17:15 0 193 0 235 11 9 62 18 
17:15 17:30 0 176 0 210 9 11 46 14 
TOTAL 0 727 0 876 46 37 210 52 
COMMENTS: 
0-039-10 
Type of peak hour being reported: User-Defined Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume 
LOCATION: 4th St - B St 
CITY/STATE: MadrasjOR 
QC JOB #: 10274001 
PATE: 8/7/2007 
aes|q9a| o 
26 831 28 
J • 
Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM - 6:15 PM 
Peak 16-Min: 4:50 PM - 5:06 PM 
0.74 36 «• 0.98 4> 42 0.82 
S6 «• 20 *l t 
0 
r 201 • 
o * 
105210.00 0 
7.4 •*> 0-0 J 
5.6 
5iA «• 5.0 "V 
11.2 0.0 
• * 
0.0 11,8 3.6 
«> • V 
X L Jm}-
a o * 17 
* 11.9 
Quality Counts 
TRANSPOhTAtlO?! OATA COIL-ECHOM SBiVKSi 
r 
"1 * r 
0.0 O.O 0,0 
« * 
9.8 0,0 
*> * w 
J H 
• < ( # & > > * 
\ s r 
*t * rf* 
6-Mln Count 4th St 4th St B St B St 
Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound) Hourly 
Beginning A t Lef t Thru Rif lht Lef t Thru Riqht Lef t Thru Rif lht Lef t Thru Rif lht Totals 
4:00 PM 0 0 l5 1 72 
. . . . . 
0 5 2 10 3 0 93 
4:05 PM 0 0 0 5 81 2 0 0 3 11 2 0 104 
4:10 PM 0 0 0 1 62 4 0 3 0 13 1 0 84 
4:15 PM 0 0 0 3 B5 4 0 3 3 29 1 0 ' 128 
4*20 PM 0 0 0 4 64 1 0 0 2 12 2 0 65 
4:25 PM - 0 0 0 2 44 4 0 3 1 17 6 0 77 
4:30 PM 0 0 0 3 61 1 0 S 2 20 2 0 94 
4:35 PM 0 0 0 2 71 0 2 3 22 7 0 110 
4 4 0 PM 0 0 0 2 68 1 0 3 0 15 2 0 91 
4:45 PM 0 0 0 1 71 1 0 1 0 18 4 0 94 
4.50 PM ' 0 ' 0 - 0 . , 4, 74 . 1 . , 0 4 ' - 2 1B 2» • 0 105 
4'55 PM 0 , 0' - 0 7 5 72 0^ ' ' 0, 2 "3 12 6>> ' 0 : 9 9 - 1164 " 
• 5:00 PM' 0 .0 0 . 0 64 , 3 p ' 5 < V - ?1 0 97 1168 -
5.05 PM • 0 0 0 1 72 5 0 5 3. 10 5 0 101 1165 
5:10 PM 0 0 0 1 85 2 p 3 0 9 3 0 103 1184 
5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 66 3 0 0 1 10 1 0 81 1137 
5:20 PM 0 0 0 4 57 2 0 4 3 7 1 0 78 1130 
5:25 PM 0 0 0 1 73 2 0 1 2 13 1 0 93 1146 
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 61 1 0 1 4 15 5 0 87 1139 
5:35 PM 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 2 0 5 4 0 92 1121 
5:40 PM 0 0 0 3 49 4 0 5 0 9 5 0 75 1105 
5:45 PM 0 0 0 3 57 3 0 4 0 3 3 0 73 1084 
5:50 PM 0 0 0 3 66 4 0 2 2 4 1 0 82 1061 
5:55 PM 0 0 0 1 57 2 0 2 2 8 1 0 73 1035 
Peak15-Mln Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 
Flowrates Left Thru Rif lht Left Thru Rif lht Left Thru Riqht Left Thru RInht 
All Vehicles 0 0 0 36 840 16 0 44 24 204 40 0 1204 
Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 4 88 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 96 
Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped Buses 
Comments; 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 
0-039-10 
Type of peaK hour being reported: User-Defined Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume 
LOCATION: 5th S t - B St 
CtTY/STATE: Madras, OR 
QC JOB #: 10274002 
DATE: 8/7/2007 
O 0.00 741 * » 
0 0 0 
J • ** 
Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 
Peak 15-Min: 4:25 PM - 4 : 4 0 PM 
247 * 23 f i . 43 + 239 
0.77 42 + 0.92 196 0.78 
65 * 0 « 
51 675 92 
r 0«» 134 
o.o e.5 
* t 
0.0 0.0 0.0 
V • V 
3.6 -•> 8.7 J t 2.3 • 2.9 
2.4 • 3.1 
4.8 * 0.0 -V r 0.0 3.0 •h • i*, 
Quality Counts 
ISWNSF-DRWTtGN OATA 
CCU. ACTION SCf tV im 
5.9 8.9 3.3 
• • 
0.0 8.1 
•tPt-
6-Mln Count 
Period 
Beginning At 
4:00 F 
4:05 PM 
4:10 PM 
4:15 PM 
4:20 PM 
4:25 PM 
4:30 PM 
4,35 PM 
4:40 PMi 
4:45 PM 
4:50 PM 
4:55 PM 
5:00 PM 
5.05 PM 
5:10 PM? 
5:15 PM 
5:20 PM 
5:25 PM 
5:30 PM 
5:35 PM 
5:40 PM 
5:45 PM 
5:50 PM 
5:55 PM 
Peak 15-Min 
Flowratea 
Alt Vehicles 
Heavy Trucks 
Pedestrians 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped Buses 
5th St 
(Northbound) 
Left Thru Right 
51 
47 
2 59 
5 46 
_3 ZS-
50 
57 
72 
51. 
60 
43 
_SL_ 
6 
7 
8 
5 
10 
15' 
45 
49 
59 
59 
66 
54 
47 
50 
54 
9 
3 
9 
10 
3 
2 
6 
7 
4 
Northbound 
Left Thni 
40 
4 
"735" 
68 
0 
Right 
5th St 
(Southbound) 
Left Thru Rlnht 
0' 
0 
JL_ 
Southbound 
Left Thni Right 
8 St 
(Eastbound) 
Left Thru Right 
3 0 
6 ' 0 
a_ 
Eastbound 
Left Thru Right 
2S~ 
4 
44 
0 
0 
B St 
(Westbound) 
Left Thru Rlnht 
11 
10 
18 
24 
13 
0 14 
0 22 
J ! Z2_ 
13 
19 
12 
i e 
16 
,14 
8 
8 
12 
12 
9 
5 
6 
3 
6 
Westbound 
Left Thru Right 
238 
12 
0 
88 
4 
Total 
77 
80 
98 
98. 
75 
69 
102 
86 
90 
106 
96 
96 
75 
96 
72 
71 
87 
89 
91 
68 
70 
68 
78 
Hourfy 
Totals 
1110 
1129 
1124 
...1123 
1098 
1094 
1092 
1079 
1055 
1037 
1017 
979 
961 
Total 
1224 
100 
0 
Comments: 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 
0-039-10 
YEAR 2020 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WEEKDAY PM PEAK 
"WITH IMPROVEMENT" SCENARIO 
im ® 
CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE S>\UK2JS\Aodro3.«f 
FIGURE 
3 MAY 2001 
4139\DWGS\TECH MEMO S3VI139F003 
O - 0 3 9 . - 1 0 
^ M I ' 
v r | 
•ftt 4 1 
r V i 
1 1 
.^^'sgWi. * f 
sSSISS 
! - " M "^ ^cK J 
* J 
l i u ^ T a - gj?T!-j PERCENTILE QUBJE f 
l | c r m > - WOWf-OF-WAY IMPACT 
I 
, ™ _ p q t e n t I a U j STREET ALTERNATIVE C S i l l d l 
US 97/US 26 NORTHBOUND APPROACH REALIGNMENT R B h 1 
MADRAS, OREGON fiBflP 
Kitia'aon & Associates, inc. 
0-039-10 
A t t a c h m e n t " 2 " 
Existing Conditions Level 
of Service Worksheets 
0-039-10 
a I I I 
I 
h 
s ° . s 
O if) -V 
s l l 
Is, s 
M i l 
P i 
I I ! 
< -H 
c 3 S 
i U S 3 3 
I 
? a s g 
ii} «—4 JT CD tu 41 C) ' > 
I S 8 * CC -H -G 
3,1 
I s 
i l 
u s s 
O O 
> t~- «r> 
£ £ 
2 2 S 8 O o vn 
I 1 1 , : i t i 
X % 8 a £ S x: > a u r^ t; <-! re JC -c 
2 3 2 3 £ £ -X, -X, -X, <J <J <J u U U 
i i i n n 4J Li iJ OJ 4-8 
& & 
! 
I s i I 
I n I { O >« > tl 4J f$ 
'II 
• I f 
ill 
a f a 
g p 
2 d - d 
8 5 
I 5 - 5 1 
4.» *J J.f i-1 
1 H i 
.. § 
S 3 
• S i 
i l l l l l l i l ! 
3 
2 
i t § 
H 
5 
& 2 
9> 
§ 
P 
8 
0-039-10 
a ! 
i 
s i 
I i5 
T1 I 
O >: 
P i 
i l l 
tij t-1 !t 
l l 
1 
i 
» r-i " 
5 
S -
•v 8 > >J » fj 
ig I 
0 
•a 
1 
u 
I ' 
O X 
> s r 
! S I £ A, 
1 
' S g ' 
p p p l p 
g g g g g g 
g g § g § g g f j 
-< —. rH r-l <-I N O 
g g g g g g i R ; 
g g g g g 
g p t g g p 
»-< O —! ,-< Cl 
g p g g ^ 
O t-« r-< O 
g g g g S 
r-t O >-< <-l O 
A 
M 
I ' 
8 8 § § § § a | g a g g g 
•H —! «»t r-« O N O O 
• g g g g g 
l r 
g S * S I 
5 a S 
A A * 
A /> O 
•\ A O t 
A A 
, . g ; 
A A «-< A 
/ S A O . O ». 
A A ' • r-t ) 
A • 
v - g : 
A A • * 
A A * 
* g I 
h : 
j a. ^ g o c 
1 3 
7 S 
! 
! S , 
! = 
i i : 
I o - i 
u c 
s I 
I I 
I I P 
i i -
I s •H < 
-M r 
1 
I 
1 
g g g g g g g g 
i-t O J"I r-< <-< r-
g g g g g g g g 
o m o m in 
Cl (W O CTi -XS 
*••« O <••! O O 
i c a o 10 <n 
i o ••» o o a) 
f< o <••! »•« —: t-* ^t •-< r-< o «•< o o 
gggggggggsgas 
r-t O »-« i-l >-l i"« W «-< ,-J O i-l O O 
g g g g g " 
$ S g g g g g 
S " 
g g g g g ; 
P. w -
a . . 
III! 
I ft** HL 
l l l f l i l l l l S ! M l 
i < 
cl f S ^ S S 
i s i l s l l s s s l i l s l f i 
t i g ; 
» 
v Si 
v' V « r 
. V * 
V V O + 
y V V ^ * 
V' V * 3 O + '0 V V O ^ 
V V f 
VJ V V o t 
I — 
v § 3 C v V • t 
« O » 
t i l e ! a s1 • a t 
q 8 S a: 
S. 
£ 
i i ^ i 
' S 
c S : s 
p I 
c 2 
I I 
-U w' 
S 
•d 
1 
II 
i i 
S i 
H I 
J 
U 
I 
O CO '£> 
O fO 
A 
^ -.-« »—i 
si I 
a 
& 
+J 
. 1 
III 
o o 
o 
I I 
o o 
XT O 
° g 0 g S 0 0 0 g § < : : ' 
W W O r-i t-» 
n a n o J! rf) o irt o o 
W I—: O >—( i—• 
s g s s a s ° s § § a 
OsJ • Cl ' • IN • CJ r-> r-f O W -i 
o o o o <n w o o o 
: cvj o rg o o-s rvi Csj o o eg 
If? I—i I-I O r-t 
o o o o o u n o o o o o o 
5 iy i 
f i 
i . 
& 
o o 
• o 
•t v£> o u; o u"> r - o 
o c « o cn n 
V W W O 
o !') o ^ o r^ 
rH ."« O 
o o 
•<* o 
< f^ o N O r ; ° 
o o 
o 
«H T--I O r-! 
s c i g 0 g a i : : j ° 0 g g < 
O r-< O »"l <~< 
JJ 
C O O O O O O O O O < J3 O O OV O O 
(„> <-i --I O «H 
n* O C _ 
O O 
r< O 
4J rj < 
11! 
s r . . s i i : 
O f- I 
£ ; 
j i tt\ a) 
r- • » \r, 
—t o o 
s s s s 
r~ • > o 
o o w 
o o o o 
if. o o • « 
I-: r-" o 
g s s s 
1-1 o o 
o <o o 
r-. O rH 
aS TO o a, >-< • ' 
O O 
g g g ° 
«•« f< o 
l s g g ° 
*CJ 1-t rv* O 
O H H O 
g g g 
o o o < o 
r- o o 
to in « o 
O O N H 
f - o o CO to ' o . . . O O N H 
P, S g ! 
. ' o « < 
O O t-* ! 
r o a\ o c 
rt h - o 
O O S W ( 
g g g g * 
» « o < < O O T-t 
« • m • i 
o O r-l i-l . 
uo m . o 
O O H w ! 
i i 
CJ \ 
i 
§ .. i i j 
n g s a 
B i l l s 
5 S 3 3 E : I S l I 
!§ 
s s 
g g g g . . o . O O Y~ 
g g g g 
• • o « 
o o <-< g g g g 
. . Q « 
O O r-i 
i l l 
o < o 
o 
O ft, o 
o 
o < o 
g a l ! 
§ 
f 
•A 
I 
S t 
3 •u 
«Q 
& 
IS 
0-039-10 
0 1) 
zj a» CO 3 {••I X O' 
o ir. M o 
•0 o u to o 
r^ J 
n? X 3?. T. 
-u u^  X 
— Xi o u i.i l-l .c 
C T3 
o <u 
e tXTi! 
c s m vi 
C c: o to <>Tl 
v «a o tn ty -H 
•B "O • H O C U O O O -C (J 
C 41 c 
•Jj •—i •—i 
{-> UJ i-> -H « X V) -H 
fll X U t$ 
•A . . 3 
m 
!3 ^ CI 
U H) Is 
3 Cu 'J a o -i 
x: 4-) 
'.J c 
g g 
0 o o o c> o o o o o c» O i O c c> o 1 o o o • c o Vl so I 
— o o o *"' 
%"A j eg 1 eg 
O 02 ( - CO C vPl fO CT! •a- r -
1 
I <Ji y j rg »-« I ^J va 
o . 1 vo 
• vo 1 O eg o r--l o o o r-< 1 V* l fM c-< 
r- o tc r- co o ^ ro c^ I cr f-i «•« 1 <N» o Tf CO x vc-o C". • [ fO • i CsJ 
o o o o J_ —* _ 1-1 "** I cr r-« 
( - o — o o eg C« i a* VO «f| 7 o o eg i O . f <£> • i - rg 
Cl o o .H ^^ t M 1 <-i 
r- o •-« o o o >-» r<i o a; cr\ 
1 t to ^ ^ UJ >n ! '•< 
m o < o o O ' ro ft I r- o • i « • o i < rg 
o «-« o o r-< i '••< CM ! 
o o o o o o o o o O o i c^ o o o 1 o o o » o o o • f-M vo < cc-
' Q o o { . o ' O 
o r-5 o c o t «-« _!_ M 
tfi O <3^. O o o ro ^ CO <I> c> i T TJ- r- i vo 
m C3 o o • tn 1 i t-< • CD o ijr> 1 cr> 
o o o T-. <••< r-i 1 «-1 
<-* r-| 1 C\i JN 
lO O o o O M CO <T. f i E 1 r^ r- } vjft CTs 
O • o o o - 1 d vn I 1 ' <-< 
o r-r o o I r-t 1 CsJ C-J 
iTx o a» o o O f^ s H CO —J fO ( T" •o 1 VO <? > vXl o • o o o • 1 vo m • . <33 
o —1 o o r-« t-< i r-. | (N 
o o o o o o o o o o " 0 O 1 O o o o 1 O O 
o o - o o o « rg 1 CO 1 f- ' ' o ^ o o o o 1 4 o • o 
o o o 
° 
< —! 
1 
( OM 
o o o O <5 o o o o o o o 1 t o o O O 1 O O 
o o • o o <M VD 1 CO 1 1 • o • o ^ o o o 1 o 
o o o <~* —i 1 l\i t rg 
o o o O C5 o o o o o o o i o o o o 1 o c o o » O CJ o * 1 lO i r- • 
• o ' o o o o l < c> I • o o d O o I-H " I t-i 
ni •ri ^ M j : ! M 1 )-; 
p U Ti x> s o o 6 o 1 o C>' o O i O O o o > < < p .a 1 tJ .u .c « x": J.J M 01 f j l.l a sJ 1 o tJ O JJ t U iJ 
o tH « « M o fa o Hi U"! 1 « o Q in 1 >9 v2 flj n< <i; o r - it; iK t u, m lu 1 {w c > u* U H >1 ^ I ^ & Af 1 & « 
a> CJI fcj 4-S ,-i CN rg jr; <M J -a <*g X IM j x: IN 01 o •• w « IK 4-1 s: w 2! i i-i F* w s f % I-H Q. O, rtJ rg f > o u V.J 1 o u o ( as L> 
a O 'P ci t - x <D X ( ai 2t l <X». X. 
4 
as < 
u> tu m 
to 
c; 
o 5-1 Zi VJ i -M 
CO O o 4J >M 
o <U 
o 'A .X ,-J r§ L, C.I '0 
"O fU 4' 4J n 
u S S IJ tu 
CTi 6 V. o u o 0! * Vj «y jC > 
n. 'O Cu -S-> •H t bC. 0> 
i X •TJ • <-i •8 C3 4-1 a * C J-i (0 
u u> o c <V T Cj e a o t-H ^ •A d> H i-H -> 
O OS i-> ti rg to 0 •j) O •ri C M -r <y o •fJ O fl> E » i^j i j •H •••{ a l-l 
•M nj r--I *g O /H i CI o - <y 
c y o o -JJ 2 > * 
m O u a u a,x u VJ in n 
•<1 < o o .Cl 'H >i o o CQ •> i j ts u o 
•d «%« c: t> 4J -r 
O H w Q> <y 
c y- M 
fl> XJ <j t-H •H C) w 
U 111 i j 
-H wi 
ir. 4) OQ n X V u U3 
T5 > n) j- <y 
O •f v-i 
o 4-1 O 
M 5-1 
a; JJ 
c 4 
T 
1-1 
o o a n a w ui o x y, ci o o oj im — « ^ n N O X ^ v p O r - i t - t ^ •i in i^i o vo o : -• M c a o < n « i O O O 
O O l O r-l j-< O O O 5.0 O rH X >! 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X u ^ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x o y. x x x x x * x x x x x x x x x x . m x x x x :< x x x x x x x x x x x x til x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x f. X X x x x x x x . 
x x x >: >'. x x y, x x x x x x 
y, x x x x x x X X X X X X X 
x x x x x x ss 
x x x x x x x 
x x .x x x x X h 
X X X X X L< x -
X X X X X X X H 
... ,, ^ ,, X X M X X >5 X •. 
x i t x x x x x x x x X x x x tf x x x h 
X X X X X X X X X X X X .X X X X X X H 
X X. X X X X X 
X X X X X x X . 
X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
I X X X X i-1 X X X ., w x x x 
X x x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
X X X X x X X X X X X X 
X >: x x x x x x X 
X X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X K X t f " 
X X X X X X x x x x x x 
X X X X 
X X X X x x x 
X X X X X X X . x x x x x x x x x x x 
a Zi -
O 5 
> c. cl 
/ i3 a • • a - • J o o ^ -v 2, o aj c e 
Li flj H - i ' 
- W rt: c. 
X X X X -v. « X X X X ; X X X X X X -
x x x x X x . X X X X X X : 
X X X X X X : 
£ 
W o 
u 
v) a 
j M a 
(13 01 £C 
JE 
i • V 5 . 
! O S) E 
J u o s> ? <u o, c. i -• a « 
> O ' 
en c 
w H c > 
O O U -rf c j 
P JH C H 3 
i -U o -H -t m w tL u 
<y H CL- to 
s <—i »a o ^ » 
t ' i j U t 
r j £ «-» * 
fc< a? «H + 
S •> 
.!-> - + 
C W ^ -i 
<L> J3 0 -t 
E n ^ t 
S 3 
> t,- u . 
» P 0} : 
; f-> iy s -
P 'J O H 
a u x: m 15 o - i 
a o u w C, >. O '+J n: L> er, 
•H M ^ j tr? iy e O Si J) 
« *C CP c t i 6> c c , -H -H f-« 
w w w 
i a o o u 
? v-i a a 
)T! a a o 
s o o 
j i n O c 
I> O H ^ • : c; c a iJ 3 . ( H l i C . H U 
j o> tr- o o i 
c s c 
c u is-
- i t ^ 
••!-1 <M X 0 ^ o 
) 2 CI h , i g -H 
r> -H O' -
X s 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
1 , 
l i s 
• I O >. M If fC 
' I I 
s i 
a, ( ws u -i-i 
i <1: H i a n u 
4J —< -r-> J u 
5 Vi 
S 3 
E 
SJ 
E S 
» 
•M O 
3 8 
s i 
a 8 -
8 
j f s 
M 
.y a g 
M t> 0) 
o • • •' 
a: 
S 3 I f 
o o • o £ g S g £ 5 ° 'S g g s  S 2 £ 
l ! ^ .-I ,..1 o <-< «•< <••) o o 
S."H o 
O O 
T O 
sgsgs.|°'|ggg 
«•» «-•! O <"< 1-4 
0 ® t M r-
i n o i a i o • . I'i O O rH 
o o o o m o o o o o o O O o o ggg° r- • • 
or, 
1 , o I f CO 
f-t E l 
I ' 
.-3 
s- o o 
•5- O 
r l • 
I.... 
I l l 
S l l 
o o 
v O 
M iJ OT 
a s s 
» o c- o o jo o o o o o o 
r e "i ' ^ . I * W r-t O «-« r-» 
» ex-
. . a -1 
T T O O O O I O O O O O O O • • 
V «-< c-l O H H 
|°g0gs0°°gga 
!-< ,-H O !-< r-H 
I°g°gaooogg° 
(—l <-H O «—t .—I 
0i in o M o ut ^ o r- o o ',T» o a\ o <y> <r> ci o o <r> 
q H o i—i < 
C S-O O irt o r-H o r-< o o i—: n O f- O .-H O O W 
U ^ «-i i-t O H H ' 
A r-t O ,H O to -«r o v o O "->• a in o u) o v1* ui u i o o in 
,-» CP ,-H W 
J | 2 „ J 
IMnmmi 
;gg' 
O \D a 'f> 
?•» O O 
W O " o o
o o 
o o o o irt O O 
r- . . 
W r-i o ggg° 
•-< !-l o 
S CD CM f-T 
W O O * 
} C « » if, • ui co r-
ifi CO .-4 to S i" • . -H C o o 
c 
111 j 
S S H I 1 
3 5 3 , 3 s! 
"2 f-
o 
o L> r* 
O o O iM w C-i 
u") + c! 8 VT o r-
' ' ^ <D CD 
o * C5 o C\' I—< 
8 O o g O g o it; a 
o o o - • 
g g g O g O CiJ O O o o o o 
s s m ,H <T> g cr>. u - i 
o o O CM N 
g n in w g 
o o O C-J w 
o o g g O g o < o o o 
o o o 
g g g o o o <i, o • o » 
o o o 
g g g o g o cd o 
o o o c-l 
a* fM s r- o g o ttJ cc 
o o o c-l I—< C-l 
CTi 
cy 3 t- o g o ca co 
o o o ^ 
!T! T (M s -g. o g o IB CO 
o J o O w 
iJiMlh 
•Ti \ .S.5 0J D T) ^ f l 
s S s J I s l s s i 
I 
3 : 
a ; 
0-039-10 
•O Gj 
JJ <0 
U £ JB 
'O •U 
• c rs 
c, . (0 c 3J If? H oi r j u 
. j —i 
it) <-t T> o c u o o o x: y ^ u !(| W U ci; 
to <y r-t e 
<U (U c :.) ,-t -H 
-J Cj3 JJ 
-H « 
ill X ti U 
.11 ^ t i i <i> 
3 a. ^ o. c -» 
G , ,o -v o x > •» L> U -> 
x a> * "d w (DO Sl * r-l O <0 » O 
c: • Q.o 
O vD O O O I 
O « O O O ' • I • SO » • • O I 
< m o o o o oi in t co i -
o • o o o » ' i «-< ' * ' i f . • • » o vss i « r -> rH O O !•-< i <-« I 
j c o o o o o o i o o 
> O ' O O O • * I CM > > O . * • O O I ' o 
> w O O O t --I 
o o o o o o o 
CS * O O O ' • . C5 • • • O O r-t O O O 
» <•*) O ""? O O f** * 
1 O • o -sr _ 
i W a r-< o 
i o t o o r - ' 
o o o o o < 
o . o o o 
• o * • • ; 
r i O O O 
o o i o o o o o o o 1 o o 
o o • o o o • ' i f'j • . o • • • o O j • o 
O !-» O O O 1 w I 
O O O O O O O O 1 o o 
O O • O O O > • I (N • . o • > • o a i • o 
O rH O O O I H 
o o o o o a. co 
O ' o o o • • . , « . o r-w o o t-I 
to o <r>. o o o o co o • o o o • , kc . . • o f-
» >i o 
. 'd ijj 
) "O *CJ 
I W H 2 I iJ X i. o, m o4 u i o o . p w O x r c- s; 
' f\J 
o o vo • • o 
o o i o < 
o o t o o I o o 
o o t o < 
o o i o o i o o ctj . f ,-. , i r- . 
> o i . o I - o 
o o » o o I o < 
[ <M w 
I xn J", r » 
j & w 
I -.rt -.r> 
r- o t a-, i 
vo • i ta 
• ci I 
o C? I O O I O o I I 
I) l 4-: 
> o l IT. i.O f lC co 
• <Xi i u. ai I lu <r> J X I &> I At : <M i CS I JC CM 
o u i •/> U i <» L) I w ® I a K 
^ x x x, n y. x y. x x x x x >: x x x >: 
>.* x x x x* X v: x x x x x x x v x x x in y. x x x x x y. x v. x x x x x x x x x o> x x v. v. x x x* x x x '.< x x x :< x x x * 2 r x x x x > : x x x x x x x x x x x > ; x x > ; 
x x x n y. y. x x. x x x x x x x x x x x y. 
x x x x x >i :< i x x x >: x x x W -
x x ;< x n x x 4 x x y. >j x x w x -» x x >; x x x * x ;< x * x x x 1 
« »r tA O r* M o O O vs a\ TT -T O O X >!C< 
N n O \P l/l O O O ^ vO If' W O O X f f i ! 
ai M 
M D 
CO o O 
M X o ^ O K ^ w fij flj-
:c: M O •O Q, U rtj 
U S SI 
[-. I 
ti4 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
-u x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
a x x x x x x x x x x x x >: x x x x x x x x x x x x x x -r o x x x >; x x x x x x x x x x x x x x v: :< x x y, x x x > - ! x x x x x x x x x v. x x x x x x y. x x * ,, ... ,. ,» ,, ^ -- -T J^  s X Jf S f '•A X >', x i< x x •< X ii x sj >i x >i >i x -z x 
X X X X X X X X X >: x X : 
X X X X X 
x x x x x >t x X X X X X X X X X X X X 
.. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x x x 4 
x x x x x x x x x x >: y, * X X X X X X X X X X X X r x x x x x x x x x x x x •> 
x x x x x x x x x x x x + x x x x x x x x x x x x * 
V< i.i H O C 0} , 
a o u H 
OHi -J 0, Zi H 
o o o 
° -n u 
V) o 
V) If) u 
© -» 
M « +J ^ 
w •» 
•C + iJ -f 
lO + 
^ » 
<l> + 
•V + 
t-> + 
£ d J-& a CP 0) 
s o 3 <y 
•H Z O J ' t - (! • 
v U a C 3) 0} fiJ CU jt <B C C 0 
H !0 13 H 
t3 J ^ l ^ l 
4J ij» C C -C !••< s.« i •'i -H <0 S5 t - ' o o 3) r & p, C i ! • en O, ill Hj 
5H o >-1 <» 
zi - o, o> 'H ^ -
tr > » to O* 3 a* H II 9 
OJ -rj 
- I ,e 0) 
6} . a< u 
0' 3 r-i O CP ^ 
c Ol i i O —< c ^ VI If) •;•} H 
c o c > 
a m -h 
s o c <y c x: w j 
« a, i.^  
M a r a 
o o 
H H H Jj H - * 
M C H 3 C » »-' 
O " I Ci ff 4) O O 4 
W E T-1 -U 4 O W 4-J O O 4 i0 C VI M 9J «£ •"!>•. Ci> M U q 3 In 
3 c u t-« c; * 
c e- a> I "C n j j -r O H £ 3 c! + • xj (Q O' t - a> » 'w 3 c h •» <y - i o m ••) 4j 
3 M ~ —J tft 
e r r r< <u 3 1 
O O Cu Oi O ^ fii •'•» 0J U {? 0 <5 o 
M 
CL O ^ a >. o < O rt, w i 
C C W Q f 
o o c —I -H M T} a> £ 
JJjJ 3 Jl C C - l 
n M £-« (J ~l -<-I t-< 
O O WWW 
o« a u 3 o o + j 
> o o n a a « 1 M U 0) TJ Q< O- O 1 Cu in J < o O I 
I +J 3 O H a 
c c c a n •H S-i i i D, 5-1 4J 
i j ) C ( T O O I 
o W. »--
o ^ ^ X O "W fi.is-4 uj n? ?-« o O ^ i J S l h l 
•H 1 
4-5 Xi E 
O P S ' O. O 0---H i 
o w e s ; ! VI JZ —) -
Cu r - Ifl E ; 
0-039-10 
a; ^ u ^ co o O 
o n t-
<u x 
X' X X X X X X X 
x x ' x 
X x X X 0 X X • X H X X X X M 4) [A d c; 01 a 
a m x x x x t.5 x x x o x x x x o x x x » (l< X x x x . 
: O O • C. 
© o 
X X - ^ . O TJ X X X X < ^ <ii i o .x x x x x o o x - ~ O O X O Xi j. <N O tit ai o O o O O o X < X •H X • X •w o «J <li O >2 X X X ^ X X X S.J -C txi o o o o o o o if) o O o c 3 >0 U o o o o o 3 o o o o o o flffiona <S) -u fiJ •H o fij o o m o «o « O "V* fO o o XI J-J VD . c 0. " ft) o i o o <t» £ 15 m ITS © c; o <y >J M tr> ui o m e o o o o N © i X o o a o O V o j -H •rs o s*: > r* o "O '-t C ..v: c o 41 <0 f t 3 < -H « - o H C o G) s> VI - i cr <u m df <y •H •o u o r- « IT' -t Si o >.j CQ o a o «-< U V£> o u> % w 3 ai m o m « T O <D C O <rs o c i-i a> Q » o H 3 i Jj o i £} T~\ c i-l to •H o 3 c 0) X to qi» tn m o m 01 O -v U O 41 o S-J u Ci. ,-i I-f O «-H o c-G) <U it tO m . er» 
> >0 «J O f j « a> O rH """ o ^ O £0 o O ^ <y o tu Cl) 04 O w CC'OOJ t/j o O )i 4J O VU >tC0 O CD aj CV TJ o o c q .-< O H •J 10 o =x- o 4) ^ •H O <11 i O pH y «-< -k b !U CJ 4) +J 'VI6 4» t: c r- £Xr-« O t-t 0) -» U) o o -o w 3 H •H r-\ c o o o o o .CJ 01 O t-< a. U-! O t/> tU «-» 
a SI H 1 in o w »n C4 n r^ in K r-j o a\ & o. a .if C c: r: o a o o c (N o r-i o r-4 o O 0 o o iO u1) . iri r; o 3: iJ *J u .. i i .. o •H i3 * i? -H .. .m— i fO —i 'Ji X M fr a> (•> t J O U O «H O cxxj a j.) U =>) rt *o K cs o 3 3 -Q 3 O si > 3 fa ^ <T} i.) n' c= n F; -H h Iw a V, 3 o< (_• ft O •H a» <; 0 M c: •<l 1-1 u E & ^ .H iTS O fi i-1 1*3 tn ivl Oi ar <y m <0 o d) 0 o a a-i OJ *ri o o <y u 0 e CD ej JS M w -a <y u L) .c M n a C U w c a. h c 13 0) H <y « 4' <y 41 H5 .. .H iJ 4-5 <•) t-' o« > <0 TJ Ti S O V) 4) u tJ t-f CN q. j j e _o •n J) c: ^ H (5 U C o l-i <y <p 13 •H Cu •H a n fx 0) y U 0 a * c *o <x o « c a o cC 5- (5 CL sx -J O 01 w o S-1 V) KD f tu o> U1 6 si .Q u a. > G. 4 a. V n < O IJ » H D D< 
D 
T3 
-» - o o o o o X X X x x X X » X X X CNj •t P; •o o o o CO X X X X X X e-' X y, X 
—, > TJ <y X X X X X X >1 rrt X X 3 J CJ rJ i r-l <3 TJ o r-* 1-f o X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X » a, JJ d ^ o O 3 o <y cc M r-J cr, O cr. o m o -.n X X X X X X X X •35 X X X X ^ E- 4.) O o in o «n o CD o o X X y. X X X X X (H X X X X rj; X nj 
w : 
j j C K <N m s-n X X X X x x >2 X X X X X a. to O M o X X X X X X X X X X X X a) 5 o y. M o * > 4-J c o o m o o o O H ID *K X o VP :< 4 iU a> 23 o o CO <N lO CN o E- X ^ O o * Q) o o X o H OJ •H i u i-t o i—1 o sy S-l > > 4 4-» V2 3 »-l 4 in CD o {!) 4 « CM m X X X X X ~ X x X X 4 r«< x: u (.0 + x: 73 o (3 CO X X X X X X X H X X X o i j TJ <1) 52 X X X X X X X ttJ X X r j o w Lf 4 + o H S) ft- 1-f o X X a X X X >'. X X X X (—1 (3 •a ft) »-> * O 4. 3 O i «H O O 3 1-f o X X X X X X X * F' l-l t i Cx, L. -« £0 S U o CN o tN o m o in X X X X X X cs X X 4-» < 0) « £-< o {"> o (O o (!) m m X X >1 X X X X X E- X X X X O £ « C C lO r-i H r-l X X X X X X y. X X X X X o O d) a, <11 a) 01 * CO O '-< 1-f o X X X X X X y. X X X X 4-J o o t-i « nj 1 a o o X •C G tv o 3 c *J O O o m o c^ o X X X X X X X X X X X <y ; 1-4 <u -* o o CO X X X X X X X X X c as to He Ti 0 o <0 4 >•1 o o X X X X X X -a X X 41 
yi I <u r- 4) -5) 
•H 4J « ai -» 
D 4 
U -r ; ; . TT .... o X X X X :< X X X X x X X X X t —1 * 14 * 
c nj o 
•JJ 
Tj 3; 4-J w o o o in o w o X X y. X X X X X X <y j •H TS u 3 TJ V) + a; o V o CO X X X X X X X X X X X (J •H o f-2 l-i w Cl. e CQ > o i T5 <; c © V rH t-H o X X r j X X X X X X X X X vc X X X X X '* > V) A s o o 3 f 3 i o X y, X X X X X X 4 6 T) tN} cn o » O •H 3 CJ <3 4, o c « a O al M .-« G O o o m o o o X i: •A X X X X X au X X X X 4 « u i (ft 15 C) r> O.i 4-J O o o CO X X •s. X X X y. X E- X X tn ro •H o -C O. C X X x x X J X N X X fs (3 i—i o T3 c *> • <u >•< ; , O M 4J o >. IQ «-« o X X X X X X X X X X * o * n» ti" n3 u o o 4-> o LO in o o o o in G o o X ;< X X X X X X X X X V4 ^ c <T! o u a> t/3 CO 4 o to o o CD X X X X X X X X E". X X <il 4 •H c w u to • 4 4> o A X X X X X X X v^  X X X .» H CJ W'i CO u s f o -» r-l o X X x X X X X X N X e •» £ •H 4J -» X X - X X X 3 + i v O O 'Ji 13 •TS c-< o r> o m •n o «n <N <13 CD <M X X X X X ui 
+ + o o o «> K£} CO CO o X X E-t X X CJ 4 CO a 4-' 4' u CD >x> 1-f CD CO • X X a: X X X X 4- o 10 0 C- il) c C 0) Q o o X X X X o « 0! 0> CJ 3 i o •• X X X X X V C«l tf i—i cn c 0 •H 3 0) TJ <y c ••C ^ m L0 tH c o o o o m o o o in o U-J O 1 X X r>'« r-l ft* tn t "H * HJ j j >r4 </3 £U i O o CO o I.C o 3 X X H CTi O D cu •V > y Q. C o »• V£J m TJ X X VP o o o TD t •H (rt o ^ V j j O o o o O X X ei l •H ta u *•> o X -u ^ X + <y o A <p o a> o m O i—l C7> f") CM X X X X X 4* CO Ui A o o a » .» o f-l O a) x X X X X o - r-i a O o o 4) i/^  m in » O X X X a 4 o o •T) O S3: t-H o X '—i o 'H X X X X X 3 4 O fV - ~ 2> X X o , i m h 4S i—1 a. •• TI •• S-l " * O i—i + 3 &> pj a E O -H a> <y 'H w + % •H 5r * £ •o <r> 41 "H £ O ID X o - a to «• > a tu w Q * ^ -f i—I a , o £Q £ O 3 t- ' u of o (J <y Q o Q 4) 4 x •H 'J Z s: < 3 <—i a o a u x: s »-> u 3 c £ * 3 % •H <D « 4 u .. Q i—i TJ --J o ^ O u c o o u , cf * 
-» O'* 
g 
O OT 4) -C ra < T3 O +J > o u 3 •H 0 u u oi m p <y rs TJ u a nf fC « •4H o i j 13 4 <y M f> £ •r-i > U '-I •H c? U H c 4) 4) p p 4 <3 4) H 4 «y >-) i j 05 4' 2 4-1 S-l 3 0} +J U '-I (0 -H <y <U 3 <u > S) M TJ u a> 4 4-> O 4 u o. > C cn c w o £) U. c -rl -H G.H.J 4-> > > nj c W > (3 u U CL CL i 4-> ( -S C > + a 0 O -H 13 O ftj C a: <1) -H 14 14 tt> C o O O <U o s o x: x: a. CL i O 4 -< >-1 1 U OS > ai •J3 l-i z> Cu fC fe. (J u Li. ^ s: > of S W tri ui Ui < < + 2 X X 
0-039-10 
o> o p r-j 
l i i 
% 
s i « 
P i 
5-1 U-i 
l lS 
III —! ii} }C Vt -H 
! 
tJ.ce> 
3 S 3 : 
• • a 
III 
IP 
ss< 
8 S : 
c r r-
5 
r 
S O O O W 
1 <4-1 
g 
SSc 
I!i HI . 
m*m I 
1 
I 1 
o o ^ o o | g g g g = j 
. i J O • - * c 
1 O tf - O O CD o 
o e 0 g 4 = | S § g | 
M 
V "O 
i., -M 
s a 
O 3 
S § 
S! 
> 0 0 0 0 0 
o o o o o 
> e o o o , s a >1 x S | s * S 
= 0 0 s 0 Q S g « •s SS^ S 
S o 
I J 
S £ 
I I 
I I 
s ii 
mfimUIB 
I l l l l l l l l f t S S l l i r ^ t t g r l ' f l s ^ ^ I t l t r I f IS l I f 
C} K •j"> O 0> ~ ^ c -i > o ro 
W 
¥ 
Us Q M r> O n <-« o <- t •h ^ o rf! o m 
£ 
vj iil n « 8 J" n o n 
ci -<.- <a- • »- -.rs « tn 
| 2 . ^ ° ~ o o 
c H 5 5 l 3 i r g l l 
C r-i O rH Q- O f^ -
t-t o r i o r , 
•H M -H H r< O »J *-> " J 
j j o 3 o <-! 'o o 2 a ij" 
s j a ^ i b f s i s $ 
0-039-10 
I 
si s 
f ' i 
- ! P I 
pj -H * G 
< H 
yj) I- IK" 
c 2 2 
As 
i 
! 
s i s 
III 
"S 'SS 
3 S 5 
g s - 3 
a s 
1 
r 
i ' 
O O O •-<-' 
i 
J ' 
Ls J 
£ 
O O O M 
Vl (VJ 
'S 
8 
O O O T3 ' t-t 
3 
1 
s 
J3 ii. 
I 
l g 
o o o o o a ' o o o o ^ j o o o o o o ^ o o o o o o o o o • ^ o • » • o o o o o o ° a * 
c c > g - g g g g 1 
1 i m m jfl XXX X u X X 
§ s s § s 2 s § 
l l H I s l i l 
o o o o o < 
o o o o o 
1 
j y 
X X t! K X X 
i s g s 
s 
o 
2 
I S S t J S g S > r- i a> m o u1) 
s 
c 
! 
I I - - ? 
m f t o in w o O o u< <r, c?: o cr> r> o 
C r> • ro >-J m • vn S iT ~ -s 
id —i in ui o in ii-v o o •P m o m o-s o £ O rH %-t O i-i ccv o co 0 A <•« i.) ,-< 
2 Isagalsgc 
?i« o n n o so o m o in 
n in g; g g s 
•• rtr 
w w a ( 
tn o m c h o r-• r"> O >.!•} r. „ i 
& 
z 
• rH C c 
"3 ° 3 -3 S 
i i l i f l l l l l l l l I I i t i f i l l t f P 
s l f l ^ S i l s s i ! . . 8 .... I H . J 5 f 5 y H B d , s S S £ 
J I I f l l a l H & H l s s l i -ggg t t l s i ; , - ; ! S I I* S f l ' S i S I I 
I 
M O O {SJ X 
g 
« ! ! 
•n I 
I 
K % 
5 I S 
Hi 
i 
b a t 
;i! 
3 I i 
8 • g g 
I f 
fi/ 35 
£ M 
I . C T3 
5 | , 
i j 
I ' 
I ' 
j|< 
I I < 
If 
s i ' 
I r s-< 
I I I 
B U S 
O -C O to 1-J o «-< 
in o (ii o 03 n m 
.-< wo 
rH <H O 
•a* O O LO -J") O U > 
Q4 <—I 1-H O 
g s g g g s s 0 ^ \C rt • H . . « >-l tH H O o 
i j ^ o t~< o m h o .-h 
O O CO g rH rH O 
' g - ' g s -
r-! O 
s - g - s s 
2 ^ 
r -t O t-« 
in .N O N 
I I 
fM in 
VCT ro 
^ S S 
E l -
I 
f-l IB (U O 
N n tn . 
H n n o {') rH «H O 
N CO O) . 
i X g g .03 ID • 
« r- w o 
o 
.. % s s s oj to io m • 
o in < 
o r- , 
i H i i r 
- - i i i r 
s l s l 1 
O »H } 
|J l;l O 'H S S ' S 
l ^ f 1 . ^ . . ! ! ! 
l i n i n g 
l l g s l l l l a 
a - . 
s s i 
m 
•H -H -
tilu 
'A. a j ^ ..> 6, 
t j Ci. U ! -C S I i U 
g l s l ! I s s i l l l 
a 
s 
g1 
—1 
I 
'u rg 
P. 
5 
I 
«J 
-i 
a 
0-039-10 
o <n -•>• 
S f f 
•r\ I 
O >v 
i i ; 
m 
>4 •-»-• 
c s a 
S S? SJ rH -H JJ 1:3 M 
I 
I s . 
S S . 5 
111 
i l l 
s § >1 
H i 
ss 
O O O 
s ' 
ss< 
11, 
s . 
s s 
p 
I 
g 
g : 
1 
3 
IIS 
HSliISS 
^ o1. o -:•"! f i o PI t,': m o Cs o M 
S 3 
gg o o o o g j ; g g g 
m ~ w <M O fi " C o o o 0 
0 0 0 i . = g g g g § 
o o o o o < 
o o o o © g 
3 
3 
5 
I 
I 
1 
5 
o 
S c 
I 
CI f 
r 
g i l l BS 
i i l p i 
X X M X X X 
£> O f.TS tf OVD 
I 
j f i i i i i i i i i 
SI! 1S I f I i tgSJf f S13 ^  ^ I r I s-^nr 1& 
'0 \o vo o .•-> IT) o *n 
s a s s g s g g g g 
I 1 " ¥ U £SS§S O T gg§ 
r-i O > C 'M 
W tr -T O T^ CI O ^ 
S S 3 § ^  &5 g g 
A 
I 
3 W S) 
r-. ( 
" i f 
'II 
«fl iJ '-5-I 
| 3 3 
"3 1 c 
S 3 3 
3 3 "3 
r 
s i 
M 
O -H 
I I ® S 
1 
I ' 
rH T> O 
O 2 
I I ' 
a c ! < 
n o m o t O T O - v 
{-• O I"- O (D o o - i • f-i - - cn- co t- r- O 
Ci o o o if> i- o r-
tH -h o 
S»1 Q i'l O W> in o U) 
3 «-» i-i o 
> r-t . r-« . • rH »-« 
O O O O u*) Ci o o 
° ™ 
i -o 
O w O O O L O O O C 
>, r -i r-i O 
S o o o o i n o o o 
r- . « • «-« «-« rH o 
f "g 
1 ' 
s , 
£ 
m m 
o S 3 § a g s s 
S 
a a 
O 
«-» O 
O O O U') O O O !D 
i—1 rH O 
if) 
O 
A 
A g s g s s 
- e 
t-l O 
S 3 S 8 
nn 
o o o H m iJ> « 
s s s s -ST U-) -V ' 
m m 
O {*• 
irn 
P ' s 
H ' M I S ' 
>-1 a o o 
S 3 1 3 6 £ i l s l s s l l s s l l l S i 
g1 
I 
•3 
a 
•y 
0-039-10 
; X X X X x X rH "O y. X X » t j X X X X 3 1 0) X X a M tV H X X x X X X X CJ O o O c x X X X T- H X X x X 0 X w X 10 CS' 0 j j X X X <y 1 ;•) X X X X X X sr. o •13 Of 5? Q O o o a, ve-o (.5 o (f) o to o 
•0 vi> o 
«! i-i Zi 0) i—1 X 5.1 3 o iX> o O a> O U X y. X V X X X i/) u c> e> x X o :•: X o u CL X X X X U) (A o X y. •9 * X nj a 3 I u ft a T1 X X X X X X u. <y a» 0 o o O O o S O O o o o CJ o O o O o 5 Qi cn <y o o o o o o c» o O o ik x X X X X- X o o o o o O o o U X X X X a-- x o T,: o Vt • o o o C.) 0 X X X c: x Xs a a> 0 'O <n (V| o O o .-1 X X X •H X X <M rt O l o o x >! X X M X X X (N" o •U tf o o O o o o o w o c 3 c w i i n ••) t> o o o O D vo LD U3 Q o ty .U v o o «s O VO O %n w <u -j X ;>J • o o o x: (s- (N- fNj r: i E «v a Q O <) a> a) e T> c Q") IU C:> o n: 0 4> J-: :»l io VJ> o o CTi •H £J U N 05 c£ '0 o ii w 
£ • H J-> D tyc* M > CT) o ;o w O -! rH C H a 0 •51 <5 tC »-) O •H s y o r-i C O a> ty O 01 u ?0 C5 •H —! CP «y LH •sf <y «-» •a J^ oo o CO »j CO <i> «J -< s <;> o o U «J C3 a o c o O o in •H 4J CO 'J •i 4> JZ •H W> G> rr o tM <0 T) 0) C M •v > ir> Ct Zj o 3 i o .O CP (1 u Q- o o ri ib o n o o ^ tfi Si rH to <o o to trt c\ » O L> G) O o o (V o C\J —( w f.t -h 2: to <53 S -.n J-. UT X > ^ v 0) a; i0 ij) >T. O o h o a CX > c a w «H <y o r di ••-j ro o oi o ni M JJ 4-J r- o cr. o CO c 4-i <N t M n o o o j m o <Ti o 
£-« 'M .y c •H w & o -V V ( ;-J O <-l o a> u Q? •ii c: 1-1 fO itl r4 os o CO 3-r-. •H <U tn o X) W o o o JB o r~ (J £U o r- a. i-1 u «-- a to di Cir; T, n » a l/) «J X o 0') .•n u-) W lu r-> e> in u"i o \n o \£l r-"13 i a a ci CM o CM o o sJ C c o Q <..-) O -vr •3 o + c u xi X (1) rti —i l"0 . -H o X n at & M o O r.1 o O. 52 & o >. 3 ffl X .. o -.j u c t3 .-H £ c: a a a. « a. Oj rH 4J a u Cv ; 45 D *o r. T-l e P- U 'Si fO •i I —i (l; G ff 
•fl 
O o 0 <u 6 a o c ii —I O 0 >1) u + H o a) « U 5 0) M f j u is 01 a r-l o ti, i j * 1' t^  fl.' a> d; 0J c JZ K} (9 4-> LJ Tj Lt t M o. > TJ •O e c 4) %< u 4- rH o. i.) e •T- 0 -H <n » -H so u I-. SJ D. .u 4> >4 -H •a >i <z X cr rr rH *} u (.3 o •q a o » c o n. * -f » x '."3 ».3 t- £A to U f/> < + O, o> * >15 ij Ir. > a -i v J—1 3 CJ o Cu 
i t o o m O r-i 1 X X I X X X X t X X v X X » 01 i *a O i o o to 1 X X i X X X X » k X X X X 
1 * 
•o i <y f 'H ( rH Q> Tj 
i 
- o 
1 i i 
X 1 X X 1 X X 1 
X X X 
X X X X X 
X I X I t 
X X X 
X X X 
X X X 
X X X * X 
* + 
O s o 3 i 1 i ca 1 u 'H i rO ft o u> U~l o m t x x r X X X X [ X X a. X X 
<y c- I iJ O O i CO o CO r—' I y, A i X x x X 1 x X X X x u » c <N <N 1 X X 1 X X X X f X X j X X X S fli (0 1 o » T X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X i u O i { 1 t x at r c i o o m O O 5 x x i X X X X f x ."< X X X P c <U - > I o o CO I X X I X X I j< X X X X o •H J i O i 1 V? X 1 X X X X » X X X X tr 0) •H u t i o 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X 4' > a X X — X X :< M £f- O 0 +J c i i o o «n O O O 1 X X I X X X I X X X X CN SU a: 1 TJ O 1 E o o a? 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X N (-, ;< « X rl c 0) Xi 1 4; 1 - 1 X 1 X X X X 1 X X hi X x X to O V3 M CJ Z. 1 rH G) f o4 o 1 X. X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X £H CJ n CD 3 t ' H X> O 1 I x x i X X x 1 X X X X X £H tl & »J XJ O 1 o 3 1 O 1 t 1 '3 a. ^ H1 03 1 1 o iN o Ol o fO o m i y, x \ X X X X f ?! X X X ItJ 4J O < t u U t " o «.C> o CO r- i X X 1 X X X X 1 •A X X X X X o s s: iX U 1 c C ( -J i X X 1 X X X X I X X X X X O 0) Oi d» a> 1 o 1 o i X X J X X X X 1 X X X X nr. E 1 u O 1 0 l i t o n w t o (•t o m <7: o cn i r-i CM » m l/> to i < X X N ts 4J '3 c: >H t a 1 on o a\ o CO O O J • • 1 UJ VQ O 1 X X X ai O O t 1 O rH J oo | CO a X X X •'0 M 
T. i i) 
'5 
M & 
6) to <i> 
* r 1 o — 
w 5 1 O } X X X X X > S-) 
* n 
'.j c 2t u w j_> i o o o o sn o m j cvj s US u» Cl X X X X a> 
o s 3 fC- fli i a / V o o CO fl I CN CM O 1 X X X X X Q. .-a c D. ffi 'O i 1 V 1 us n ? (X CD <o X a: X X X (-1 V) s — c 1 c <1) 1 o 1 r o t X X if) o I ov •u o 1 O 1 i i X X X X X u cj £0 O C) X) o 1 -H 1 i i to o V) VJ ...» o tl» f w 1 o o o o o lil o O O 1 in o i fO O 1 X X iX VD cc u to <u <y A i- 1 U 1 CM o o t - * i o r~ O 1 X X r-< o V) CM XJ o ^ IT i n« s XO XT l lf> X X >1 r- o a\ < CM ^ O •h a? t> s > •H 3 t o r-« o 1 C. 1 TO ^ CJ 1 1 i \ X X * o * CP c o O o w Lt .u o t tn 1 <N OJ o <N o rw l m [ CO cn <JD O 1 X X X X M c 
fl* o u O TJ O CO £1 CO t o o to 1 » ' t CD CN C\ o » X X i- X X CU r> >s> o Irt <J! r / i r 1 vo r i f X X X X f ^ rH i't I/) y N C r i i J r-l -••» o 1 i o / X X X X X K 3 •H < X o a; OT ca r>.< <TS £Q r 1 0) o o o o O O 1 X X i X x b: X 1 X X X ,*< X i c (X i o o o CD 1 X :A i X X X I X X X AJ G2 +J 03 T5 r 1 « 1 x X i X X X I X X X X o o £- —1 0} t Ci r-i 1 X X l X X X X 1 X X X X X t3 o w y U2 0) 3 i CP "0 o 1 1 X X t X X 1 X X X X CM 
e o> rA c Li O 1 -H 3 f i ' 1 I to a> i to o o o o o o O 1 x x i X X X X I r-j X X X X •H M 1H i u o » 3 o CO 1 X X 1 X X X X 5 3 X X fH X X X X o •J ±J T. i a r 0 1 X X i X X X t -o X X X X X X "O ir> U 1 o 1 O O I «y x x » X X X 1 O X X X X X X 4> C5 X m i o rH 1 1 X X y. o J v> 1 A i A o o o o a o i 3 X X 1 X X x r X X X x X X M M jr. i o o -a x x i •> X X X x r © X t- X X X o "O o t o 1 ' i Q X x i «y x X X X I O X X X a, O (0 o i l •* «H i s: x x i r-l X X X x t -H X X X X X fV X <N 
o <n 
t 
t 
— a? i —i J 3 " 4! i 
X X — 
a >• •• i a j* i 
p ~J " l > u <y 
X 
<JJ at 
X 
rH 0) 
•f O 
CD i 1 "O iO rH 6 C o a H » i : o a i in d> > a 3 <1! J/3 3 rj .. i i o e O 3 1 iH 1 nj ( ct o G G) « a >y l jr > r-l | rH r-l Q. t > > ' o o U 1 32 u) u • c J; 3 0) 0J u 1 V. O 1 nj iO T XJ iJ n} r o a o V? a If) i-> nj f o if) 1 S f? < -o O *J > 5 U 0 3 t •H O CJ <y i m o !>> & -O '<1 (J 'O •T5 <t- + u •U a> o fi > u 4J w AJ •r{ > 0 rH I •H -«H o 1 U H s I rH t?l IM J3 £ iy CJ p JO v a> u a> J^  a> 3 1 -U JJ » rtJ W ty Q> 3 1 <y M TJ M ty u a IT c 5ft o -i <i> "U £ 1 •<H -H —1 1 a«M t-i «H I > « c in > fjj nj 'M AJ XJ iJ a o i o •H •'0 1 Q n v'i X 0) "i < M H O 1 £ o O O 1 G Q O j ; O S < a j « o ££ a 1 > m f3 r>. a. a: C»I | u u l " 1 L> a ft: > I -3 Ol u s C5 t/3 W JiC < * 
0-039-10 
s i | 
.cC O Vs 13 -H U 
a i 
$ i 
C 7 
o 13 -t o « .i.-; <y flj AJ -r 
•-> e* •* o x u -«. iX -i 
£ 73 C -i 
" ' * > o <y 
fy RI w r-i c •w tr- q> » 
IJ w 3 + « C H •» Q O + 
O U 4! 4 r| 4.' f) > 
i> 55-* J-» O Cl -j <y o » V; O * 
f l r : O !*) «-! o • f-l ^ O f I 15 O C ' OJ OI O "NJ o «-' o • 
r^ o a. o o pi i t v o v n o m o r • r- 'O o » 
w ic <a o li> ^ o ifl a) co tr< o <o o ro o w 
.v. « «*-» o f i «-« o r-t >j ;c co O wo-; o O r-! W O C H O r l 
D ® ra O fl O H O r 
o o o o 
o a> u .x <o ii > G i O O O C i OO > O C> O O rS O • <_> O « » • £H O 3 • O O O c - o c o u> G 
C) O O O " j a5 o o o o 4J 
w x x x x x x x' < x :> x x x 
o o o o o o o o o o o o o - c. • a o o o o o 
$ x x x 
C ti •r( zi X X X <t» Q X X X u x x x 
o cj a a o 
: tJ x u x : «5> x ' -«-! X 5 X X X X jO x 
X X • x x x 
4s 
.4 
O r O O O t tJ o u . o 
,v3 cr» r-1 > ^ g w o -h x x X : o u x x x : c o u x x x o > >h >; x « ; o O r-f x X x . 
o c x x x ; i-4 ci o >: x x : 
a o x x x ; x x • : >. o x x x 
<o c 
<?. < U 
. - & m 
- C - O V> X <A £ »J 3 $ C jX 
M iJ ii o 'a <u 
.C " X JJ -H VXJ <y <y o> 3; > Cl tt> -3) • 
> rtj • V. O ^ < i « 
— ~D nj a> : : -u -y c ^ -; « rj i i • 
0j a* IT- D' i. i\i X) u ft, W-I 
«,->>{='. ^ O , -w f-. W G O O a ¥ -T c -q a o -> > -.1 CL « a »• i-« C3 o •» 
1 
1—1 
<D a> 
OJ 
G O cr <i» Vf 3 u> O o «J (N f? 
O C O to M 14 rH nj O n V P Vu H 
a o < U K a. « a> fN O V-l IS c f« C. TJ o 
<y > 1 £ £> IJ 
V. •X
s 
w 
5 o «J O (Z s. C, 02 w e o n o <N CJ o <J CO tn •H d 
© 73 4.) C) 4-> •H CJ 
CV CO rH -r; •o> 'H o > IS o o O 
•:!) O x: o <L? -O O o If} as UJ D •H 5-1 > «M o 
« u «M re 
n) •M c c 'M a> 
o H w » rH e o> 0) & G H 4-1 CO 4-1 •1-f i/J o iD -H X u ID o 
n o 
«> o z iW 
£ 
ta1.. 
o + "H > + 
!V + »J 
0) y 
i i t a t ) o » f —1 3 > 5 r-( E-- I O O 
I ( c o t G»-a trl 1 'H a 
J i-0 »-i 1 u o I D. C I o ^ 
o + 
3 -
s x: iJ i •* o c I H •• M .9 I O B a 0 E l m « 4) y 9 t x: o 
. > » ^ O I o • 
a* t 
; cn o to in o i 
O © O O IT) o o o 
CJ 0 0% 
r-4 rHO 
> ^ > 
r-i « o -H tu U« ' 
O (3 M SI SI I X 
> ca t.7 o a- 6< ( 
(V {O 
PI 
i/> o 
\s5 
H J-l ^ p O fx, 
x x x x x x x x 
X X X X x x x x 
X X X X «• X X X X x x x x 
r-f X X X X 
i xj o a> : K S <u o> a 
x x X X X X 
l-< .N 
rJ :< x x X X X 
VP i X X + o rH vl> £jJ a? CD CD O | X <r> U1 in N X ni r) CO O 1 X X . X X 
—. in i X X cc X X X l£> CL) £D Ox t^ in j X X X X fl :< X X X X 
-•« a i X X X 15 
X X X X 1 X X X # X X 1 e-t X X X X X X i V, X X X X X X X X J X X X X X X X 
X X X X T X X X X X X X X X 1 X X x X X 
N X. X X t X re; X X X X X X X f X X X X X X X i X X X X X 
X X X x c X X X X X X 4 
>: X X X ( X X X X X X X X X X 1 X 9. >4 X X X X X J X X X X X X t X o r^ a? l < X tn -X cr> O < tn X 
m in O- r- 5-5 X o r-
a: X >x £-< X x ; P X x : 
X x £-» X |< HJ x x ; 
a> > 
->J Hf 
e * 
4J ^ 
_ 3 4? C. -u q; Q Q Li + ; ^ U 3 c A j- • c o O o u + i ?J "O ™ U "D <5 <0 t I E & <y « o o > O i i U T> w >•« * 
• ^ JO re Q. c l * • O ,c .r: si Q. Q. -
2 B B W » ^ / f t 
0-039-10 
L 
3 * 1 
111 
I S g 
I s i 
iji 
5! 
U 
E 
i l 
8 7 
U 
n 
c 3 S 
8 
3 § ? 
' g j 
5 V) 
E 
tn 
t r 
H ' 
3 ! 
V 
s i ' u c 
a^  o oi o m c ci 
n^ O m O fn vC "x; 
r-i r-f o 
O O O O iO f l O fO 
VO O »J3 a a", vo *•£> 
>-• —< o 
o o o o in o o o 
rH r-f O 
o o o o o o o 
g o o o in o o o 
> 
) O C O 
a) o m o m o; o ^ Ci O N O fll !N CN 
<H r-» O 
s § s g s i 2 0 s 
so • m • • r-: rH O 
• o *r o in i I O r-1 O O r 
rH rH O 
UJ O 
o 
m -a- o r 
S S S ^ 
I I 
l£> ft C> • o 
r u f i T • 
! K U) H 
o in m -»-« rH o 
Vf> { 
o 
in: 
O ft ft 
U O F-- > 
s 
s Q 
'S 
! 
i r 
: o < : 
: o 
S 3 
8 2 
1 s t 
l ! 3 . 3 -H 
w u o u u u> 
l S I S ! 
0=039-10 
Attachment " 3 " 
J Street Conceptual 
Improvement Illustration 
0-039-10 
Oregon 
Department 
of Transportation 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Alternative Concepts of US97 Realignment Shown 
0-039-10 
Oregon 
Department 
of Transportation 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Conceptual Drawing of Signalized Intersections @ J Street US97 Option B Realignment Shown 
UjQUft&roueiaflHa and Atawrftcnte 
0-039-10 
Attachment "4" 
Existing RL Zoning LOS 
Worksheets 
0-039-10 
3 a 
o o o o 
o . l o <n <55 1 
2 3 i £ ! 
•'A » I s l 
' 1 1 
% h i » s 
I* <4J 
I : 
i t J i 
: I1 
111 
- s i 
r 
S 
a o 
S o U 
££5 U"> 
a > r j 
f t 
O 
iC 
3u 
1 I 
a I § a s 
iJ 1J i j t^ u f7) '.'J 10 ID 
J 
I 
5 
h h h 
= ? 5 
£Q m 
I ! 
s 
1 
a 
g-
a 
s 
g 
1 
s 
d M u. a 
s 
o 
1 
'3 (C q -i! 'H rtl rt5 <C <4J !*J in <44 
S S I ^ Q C f f i 
a 
s 
I 
a 
1 
d 
A3 
f i 
0-039-10 
£ 
* 
I o 
D". ? ^ PJ 
G -1- £ 
5 
c n at ' j 
'-i o 
Oi o 
o - CJ o E-i f} a? 6-M & 
"O « 
JS £ O 
I >. UI O TJ H V 
a? c .V re 
<y o /-i 
E <y Ci 
T> i t 14 c G) <J - a o c F. 91 ft. c if> 
o n a i"\- K) H o <0 O 4J o 
•a JD -H IN T5 U.I (N re r-i C 
-H ft o o-C O O CJ 
ft O <J> 
'"> (0 o u 
V) W -H & < VI o M >,<*-» a 
s-i 
![} U 4J H o 
O c o « 0J -O CM 
« c «o 03 'J 
-i o a fjJ l-i TJ •H Cn 4> ij) ..V 1 
re O 1 i j -> if (C O T) tQ J a Ci <U 1 a* 
s: o 
: a 1 <0 
} O 
O-
'3 <y 
4-J 
7- o n. 
d 
• » - 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 O uT> O 0 0 0 0 O 1 O 0 0 O O 0 O 0 0 0 rf 0 iv 
or. O 0 av 0 I XT> 0 O O 0 O 0 . 'a TJ -cr } 0 « 0 f j a 51 jy 0 J t-H O O 0 O r i CJ 4-i 1 
fN O Jj 1 P 
^ « 0 O 0 0 ID O U7 0 0 0 M { O 0 v£S 0 en tii <T» % 0 v3« 0 £-> 0 O CO 0 C» CD O cr» cr. 0 0 o\ 1 to r-* rg lO C^  LO •£> 0 • S! 'X T5 c c •er 1 r i • J •ri 
•i w O { 0 0 O 0 O rH rH 
«] 1 f%< 1 C4 * iJ 0 0 CO 0 CO 0 0 O m in m 0 0 m I 0 CTi in VP vt? CTl 0 a* CD cn O re GJ CJ 0 CVJ O ai -j" 0 0 ;C r* <z> m iO 0 • Zu lH 
o <D O ro m tn m m m f (Ti 10 «vo r-< 
cr U a; M 0 l 0 0 0 
3 a: 'x <!i O to <5 -r-i a> o a: XL 0 in 0 10 0 srt O !a'> r-- 0 0 f-> 1 r - •C eg <•0 ffi rg ^ w tur 
IN (U C r> 0 f j O 0 i <n 0 0 • 
o ^ tz X T^  'D 1 in 0 « 0 w re rtJ i< OS 0 i a O 0 0 rH rH <—1 H nj <1) 4? r j ( u T) I + tH Jj >4 cu 4J d 0) 0 4-J r 
TJ to C? CD 0 0 0 0 cr» O m «n 0 tn 0 r> i 0 10 10 Cfl vl> rg 0 m Gj eg * M » •M fD T. O rj; u O •i [-1 C? 0 O 10 O en r - e.- 0 r - { a-. 0 CJ •J'J rH 0 • -H o Ci a •H •J 14 "SI- i r - 0 • 0 0 0 o 45 cy >« > « QJ I-l O l 0 CJ O a i j 0 >s CC rH .13 re { tl. i x: ITS O (U 3 0 l-t CJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 O uT O 0 O d 0 0 1 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 ri: 0 X T> 0 u U *D c r-i > Q) to 0 O m 0 0 1 U7 0 O 0 O 0 0 « 0) (O 03 a, C A; Cl CJ O 1 0 • 0 % 
01 d) > V}-( 0 » O 0 <v> 
S ai 4.; <0 d> O •-j I-H TJ ffl tu 0 t? 0 '0 »-H 4-2 •r< <0 r-i 0 O fTV 0 0s* 0 O <Ti O 10 n 0 0 tn I O ir- 0 0 0 a 0 * •H •0 01 ^ Z3 4-i «y nf. O vc «x> vo O CTl r-- 0 0 r* i 10 rH in VD 0 • l-H ^ ,-5 
£ w a d) > a) 1 J- m CO • CO c: D •i ^ > <y e to 0 I-H i-H 1 0 O O 04 rH CN" 
o o o a. O qt P 1 JO 'O 1 f j T3 eg eo o 0 1 O c W O 4J CL, 0 O CO 0 CD 0 0 CO O in VO 0 vo O O { 0 Cl f j l£l xr 0 O O '"v> O .} re O -H T) b> 0 O r-i M <V| O CTi m \r> O O If; 1 m CO U5 rg cn ID O • to <V| 4-J T; o o jJ *•• c m un m m to LO | r-- w (£ <V| fG H r: jr. <u «•> 0 1 0 CV 0 0 0 rg rH rg V4 -H o o > <u } I !7> re C o o u u <0 5-4 O a. 0 O en 1/4 0 O in O UI r - 0 O O 0 rg 10 T 0 0 'O O - t. C i-> ITI o a T. i-i + <y 10 0 m O ISN « tn O O cn 1 10 M r> I.O 0 ' --4 n if} o o Ui 10 a? ^ O 1 r* CO + rH 5 
!fi </} if} + l-s rH O I-H f rH O CJ 0 0 O eg X H jj; »4-4 >f-< c O ^ M >1 o JJ to a r*. i-l •H 0 O 0 0 a 0 O LH 0 O O 0 l 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 < O •> ui M <-4 Ct O 0 O cr> O I lO 0 0 0 0 0 • OQ 
E- a' fy 4-> ca a XT 1 r« « 0 •> CO o > 14 01 + i-H 0 I 0 0 O 0 0) a> T; <15 (U O O 1X> 1 "D O I CJ INJ u 
e C >A o l-i O O -C I rH T) 
o sJ 1-f <13 n. r-i 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O in 0 0 O O O 0 1 Jl) <D 0 0 3 O 0 O 0 0 0 r j ;J I-l O to + t-1 O O 0 O Oi O 1 ih tn 0 TJ O 0 O 0 « 0 £ 4J Ui c: j O ' 0 
u 4J 0 1 ~0 rH 0 35 O 0 O 
<n i.' n: + iTi + + W f O 1 O rO U O O. 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O i 3: O 0 0 0 10 O 0 O 0 O O eC O CO M (0 t/> 0 O O IO 0 •rj O 0 O 0 . t -
T) t1> 0 t-t ^ O i 2 c- 0 • 0 0 0 sTi 0 O 1—1 0 O rH Ci > lO 0 O CN O 0! - ai - l-t 0 rH 
{ - t 
+ O O ^ a <y 0 1 •I-l •« G) « CO *GJ >1 E T3 m p <y 6 B 1 -U •3. Ui W a T) JZ > 1 V <0 & U re O •» •g 03 tft ts 0 i> •J J O 4J 0 •J re x: rf: e> O C»-» y, O IT: -i -C V E -1 p rH I •rj a iy K > > i j •H > S C^ -fc -rl a> u d 1—( O > y "3 -0 O J 4-> C V) 4-1 JJ 0 (J •y > * •4-1 50 4-5 ra O O V) fi> > JZ re 0 re "C- 0 OJ •cs TJ > 1 re >i5 4-> •r! «J H 4) a 0 
* 5-t + e p •i 0 e it j j if} a 4-1 'O •H < t> 0 u u. O. rH 1 n « .—f 0 to £t £ + re u 63 O 0 j j <3 0 01 j j u IU ! a v. a re re ^ U 5 re u a rg r a P fj u V4 0 > c v & e r-l to O •H <u Cl. tu •a X) U tu u c.' c a n <55 O T-l ta 7£ + H C + >. 0 a tJ a 0 O 1 •H •I- w X <y U - I -J { re re X- r<} •H re 0 u d <y •Is "C Q O * a. + r-l •i CJ 0 CO < u > -1 > CO O 1-: < >-4 p o« OS a: t'- I 10 CO r* sJ ft. 0 > u a » rX. 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
- to { - 43*. O X X \£> O U3 O O •» ' v c x x o o r- r-
r O O O i r t O — t >< t-< —1 o O o A. 
x x x p >, x x >: x x x x x 
x x x x« x x y. K X 
x x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x y. * • x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x * x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x » x x x x x x x y. x x x x x x x x x x x x x .S x -. * X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X x X X 
X X x X X >1 X X X X X X y, >\ x X X x X X X X X X X ....... ... ... .v5 y ^ .. ^ _ .. .. X X 
o x x x x x x x x x Ui X X X X x >: x x x x 
x x x x x 
X x X X X X X X x X X X ! Y, X X X X X X X x X V. x .: 
•«• x x x x x x x x x x x -x x x x x x x x y, x x ^ x x x y. x x x x x x x < x x x x x x x x x x x • 
CO H w if) a? rn> -H 
« Us eft 
-J i) G 
o c 
•••i £ c 
•H » <5 T5 SJ ~ 
J-i O > » •y .c -H * fi» 4-J 4.5 
f . c; iJ h u- <i> ^ 
o fi ^ 
O, O r-i -V m < u tfc 4-' * 
•H G«H + •J O o 4 '15 > > 
x x x x x x x x x x x X x x. x X X x x x x x x X X x X X X X X X X X X •/: 
O X x X a x x x X X X X X X X X X 
X X x X X X X X X X X X X X -x x x x x x x * x x x x x , - - x x x x v; x x x x x x x .. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x . . . . P x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X x x X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X -
-o 4J o » c ^ 
i H H 
; u to tf) c- « 
S.< (8 
o » 
0) o-
6) * O vJ U H Q. r-4 •• n} Oi X O (C fv " s-l IJ - - o a y a> o -M v o c -•» —( • j -.< m JJ - ftt O < fj.< J iS O - I J SO -U •i CP n <tj ^ 
) i-1 1) C ' * - j a, o « > -o .~4 m O <y -:.> a i y >y i <y (.) t 
u <Q -5 (-' 
O <D U H H 3 0s 
a u j j a >. u -M < L? < tu 
r *o H h u 'O 
sj -s; . o /Q i a § K • i c o n W v. <y a- - l 
VI 'fi to 
z> O O w r-i p. a. ; 
3 O o ' ^ < 
: c c c • h w H n a I? a1 o i a. »H w i a. 
! o ItJ £0 
CL*.' 
a o o (i x o 05 is a. 
i »• >4 
: B m <H i j U4 ,c <3 EM J '/) •• > rH -H 4J 
) J l V? -H 3 C i o < o) ir ai : Di t= 
( y - •>-' 
rt5 C « 5-« W jsU. l j p 3 : 3 C U r-. i c h ai i "d > o »H .c ti: ) —i JJ ^ i, -u <i.! > 3 C <0 (1) '•! O ~ 3 M 3 CTJ^  r-t til &« <0 O 4-J If) U <( m ** fa c C O U ifl < u -h i ..n 3 ..) -C P: U M IJ 0 ^ I O 3 rH, g 
D. O CP -H "H O H C C Q) M .C -H -f 
^ o. H tfl X 
:> o • •ri jJ . 
"a u , 
rt c -
3 -r 
O -O W RJ " r T SJ 5T " » ^ U, 
C C to h- < q o 
- ca -H VI li) u 
(0 U 
C 4-> £-« 
C C _ 
•rS 'a » •U O > ro .13 —• + 4J 4-1 JJ + 3 0) <T3 -V 
a s c ^ e t o « a> -v o + 
O ' J * 
a> J-> « r-s 1-0 ® * •r; W j" .| 
63 a> 3 
(DO Q > + 
O <_) • i> .V 
O X it i 
•--{ 3 a 
> O iJ + 
J-; o a i rj o lu J. 
CO M ; 
uj * 
I 3 O 
> *C I o 
- rtl 
1 M O 
I -rl [ -U o 
<li o I c I rtj o 
I "0 I <y o 
- a 
J: tJ i u c j 
m Gi l o & I ^ <3 » a > i a o i < j 
<£ 3 a o M 
» ^ o a •• o c O M w ' II fi 5) S c i i q o « « .u ,-T 
«•{ fS <ti o # 0 0 
J a .c x x a) * -} JC O -v. Q, T5 
< -h > a. >. <0 : fQ " c -u t-* s > <y -H t/j ) V) 0} 13 ^ fJS 4J » : » x si m » id <h J U J.« rt3 3 H c 1 u =f O f-. ffl < U ! 
1 X X X X X X X X 0 0 13 0 O 0 I X X X X X X X X 0 0 0 0 O A 0 + 1 X X X X X X X C3 1 X X X X X X X X X rH rH 0) 1 x X X x X X X X •a 1 * 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 O 0 A O 
1 X c 1 r-< •H •H r-i r-l i-t X 0 •H 0 • -1 1—1 O A rH + 
i O 0 0 0 0 a X 0 0 0 O 0 O A A O 1 O 0 0 0 0 X 0 O 0 O * t A A 1 (-1 r-i 0 0 i-t 1—1 O 
A A 
{ X 0 0 0 0 0 U3 V 0 v£> O 0 «> A A O + 1 X 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 cn O 0 CSt O 1 X X A -* x (-1 »-i 0 X O i-t 1—1 O a> { X- A A +-
*c \ + 3 0 1 X 0 0 0 0 0 '.o x 0 y j 0 0 U3 A A O t r-t I X 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn X 0 <r> & 0 <31 O u 1 X A + cz 1 r-i rH 0 X O —» ! < r-I + A i X X X X X X X O O O 5 X X X X X X X O O O /•, •O O f X X X X X X X J X X X X X X X rH rH Vi O O flj * 
% 3 
1 u 0 0 0 0 0 CD O cz\ O in Vi O 1 0 CA 0 0 0 cn O CO O <x <35 U O •> i V •y 1 0 r-l r-i O 0 0 0 + 
1 V * 
TJ 1 > O J H 1 
M 0 0 0 O O «> Cfi O CO O T V O * in 0 en 0 O 0 O ot Cfj O O 01 CD O 0 1 V V r-i 0 •-1 0 0 rH O 0 O i 
•/ 
] 0 0 0 O 0 O CD <r- O 03 O m •ST O 1 ut 0 cr. 0 O 0 O tr- O m O cn CO V V O 
1 (-1 0 r-I r-i r-5 r^ O 0 0 rH 0 O 
— © 
V V i—l -> 
V - <y _l V 1 M X X X X X X X X O 0 O 0 O 1 3 O + 1 3 X 3' X X X X X X X O 0 O 0 O V V O 
{ T3 X X X X X X X 1 O O 1 O X 0 X X X X X i-t rH i-t rH i—l 1 S V V Q> 1 X 5: X X X X X TJ i 1 w •/ V 3 O 1 <1> X X y. X X X X X O O O 0 O 1 O O to X T3 X X X X X. X X X O O O 0 O I 5-1 V V O -4-X < X X X X X X 1 u 
C ! (.3 x X X X X X X X rH rH i—l 1 V V O -4-c 1 1 •r-, X 0 X X X X X X X X O O O O O V V O I "O X •H X X X X X X X X O O O O a O f x X X X X X X X X V V 
{ X Rl x X X X X X i-t i-t r-< ! <11 O 
- U -» 
3 + i •H .1 a 1 !S) 0) fV jJ | — 0 e> •0 "C r TJ •q '0 n \ 3 flj a m 
a> 0 1 VI &•> 10 -rt rf. ft c. >1 4-» i> i RJ < 0 1 -a ns R t» 
-H ^ 1 w u (0 x; < CP a -c v-» j j u 1 < G u. W CL, | a a t ? d> c: 4-> .X « iU 3 l 0 0 rl > <y •H v> TJ Xi M W CO L0 00 \ >TT5 fi> T> ,H H } JJ "O < ffi -» O OS 1 E > v> 1!) *o 0 CP + X f u ^ u c M 3 H t-r •11 U (0 c 1 -u •t Lj tff 1 :H X X (L so trl >3 X 0 % 1 0 u 00 Q 4 
0-039- 10 
• 0 O r- O O O 0 vo O 0 cs vo O G\ ,,, r- <xj 'O 0 C£> O M> O 0 XT, ! - 0 0 r* LT5 fl C I f [ \r> in • 
* I r* <J c "T rH „ r-« 
r"< r_; rH r-« - H ^ r- O O d Cl O r-» ^ 
* o • o 
1 *c a rsj co O O O ul H O 0 O O r^ co \s> 0 § P d O IV ••.ii O <Il CD 0 0 ro »".• li'i • 0 •u *-> 5-1 r-} • r) r-
1 J + 0! [ 4' a. »-« 0 «-< ,-•« ° rH r « C> 0 n 0 O O r" r-i 
a 0 O O O 0 0 in c 0 0 0 0 c> a 0 0 0 0 O ci; Ci P c 4! 0 0 0 m 0 O 0 0 0 • 0 o © j O « « 0 O a> r-i rH O 0 •i» iJ £ 8 o 0 O O O O c» O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci O sz (£ O 0 Cft O O 0 O 0 0 • C3 X > TJ • - 0 O O « in £ c © <ij O 0 0 0 a* © u » (3 h-i u i j •T- 0) CD •rl rH 0 0 CO CO O 0 vC O ITi n O O O l-< 0 Ov r- 0 O O (IJ M J-5 © X o o O u-) 0 cr, o o « m 0 in <-' • O •i o s: a AJ u - - 0 O O 
© © > > © r-i O 0 0 0 0 <-• •ri ct <0 TJ a. O <0 © tJ 0 O O 0 O 0 O O m n O C-J O O C3 m \o O O •O H CO O •o- 0 e w c? tn> v r- 0 m r-l « O © {tft CL. o Q t^ m • ' 0 O W 
1 © £ % sJ * * •Xi © «M o H O t-l >-H 0 0 
0 0 0 - 1 1-5 * CJ £ <13 C7> •rl ft 0 O O O O O O m O O O O O O 0 0 O 0 c o o O O 0 u b 2 © CC O Ci CTi 0 0 (3 O 0 0 . O H a i-i •r| O 
*£ h © C © !-» 0 0 0 0 o o o 1 75 O u C-l CO O 0 m 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 m 0 O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 
•a 0 O tTl «n 0 0 0 O O ' JN a 
o 
<> o XJ .c C T O rg 
> JJ © + p , <—1 j—1 O ° r-< 1-t ^ rH 0 0 0 0 •> -» 0 o u U © A iJ O 0 O O 0 O 0 O O O O 0 c> 0 O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 r. 
nj .e © s -P <B in C> O 0 cn 0 0 m 0 0 0 • O >"3 ift u 
•rt 
V) <n I CO •* a' O 1-1 0 ,-H rH rH O 0 0 0 w O —i -r-l < X-U >1 H-l o o to Q Vd rt vn 0 O O O 0 r- 0 LTI O O O O in 0 w> is- is-. O m CO 
fO M 4-1 cc O <N O r-i <N 0 cn to rO 0 0 <n in a; «J3 r-i r*i ui « O c •1' © ID © €-4 - • T-1 -» 
CO c u 'O © U © * S o CO r- * O •-« rH O r-l <H ^ 0 0 
.. 0 
© * O O N ~ ' fNJ 
K IX 0 j:; •JJ rH a> 3 o i i £U 0 O in O LO O 0 in 0 vr» u > <3 Lil 0 0 in © r- 3 0 in c. if} C) u —i o 5/f O O (S> K.O OiO O 0 0 0 CD 0 '0 ^ n LT\ . O a CJ jr j j m . . 0 • • • r-
•rt cy- o 'O 0 X 0 0 0 r-i -J. » CC J-? rH (> <0 * E a VJ 0 —' IT: O O c £<1 0 1 n o
1) tn O 01 SO O in 0 0 tn 0 0 in TC «> CO Ifj 0 •rt (M in co m O O L> CO f-
<0 
Cfl o * <r-t Ii ir cs r-« O rH r-) z 0 0 CJ fV W « . , (-• O O N r- O M 
-» -rt 
-» 
a" 
0) f) © rH o :>-» -» © £ 
- © 
"5 © JO to 
j j rH 
.0 0J 
- rH t--. 
c u •V " <H a »• TJ © © U <i> C- (11 -H to a- g O 3 0 c j j © y © rtc O O 0 w E .CZ 4i © s: O 0? > © © «5 > >»o 0 r-l > X © •r| (.} M 0 (> -H -O -n r t 13 •ri-{-» O J.) e C/i i.) :J O U ^ » £-i =3 .8.J ai 0 41 > © p © '0 0 > fis u •rt /D © -v. $-1 0) © 6 e (O •rt y u fit *T< r-i M -4 to to r-\ 0 in c g > 0) £3 ..si 0) <D © w © 3 (3' 2 4J © •W M M 3 si © 3 (!J 11 » iJ M Cu a -! 'A O •rt •r-i © ^ Uj C3 M tu c +-> c a-w -rt © rH OO X CI, c >, O Q, tJ ix 0 0 •rt O n} M •0 C W — Tt. © U !••« -rt IU (5 -rt .0 5-1 u 0 © W 3 O - o O CO < u cc S >• -4 > £a O < *-* O, fOi ex. II. 00 to < tn L) > O a > a O * 
S i c o - ra - i to 1.5 © o -rt 
w u o W (f) -rt < 
>> l :< wj i-t ,u ra n s:: jJ t-1 o r: to © -o c 
CJ ry m -f O oJ ro u 
•0 03 © 
O ri di *. •H +-1 « P ii! 41 « flUgl © 3 -T 3 G.rH 
8 5 s : X u -"D 3 i O O -U -v rt O 3 j. J r i » 
13 C ~> i 
O C is 4' o e ^ iD P. > a o < s 
o o o < o • O t • o » 
O O O O 1 0 0 O 0 1 0 0 1 0 <3 ! O O ? Ci ic 1 CO 0 O \ 0 O O 0 1 O O O 1 rH < 1 1 CM i <M 
<T, <vO O 1 1 so r- rt <x> i 1 m cn 1 1 J <0 1 O 05 -y j «-« m 1 10 P Oi iN O Ol 1 0 U5 1 cr. O O I <H rt rt rH 1 7-i rt 1 r j rt 
<5\ IX) CO O 1 CO r- CN CO t 0* I "vO cn I O CT» I '-i I/) { t Cii <N O OS 0 m vc I cr> O 0 1 rH t-< «H r-l 1 r-H 2. C-J «-H 
O 0 _ U) 1 O 01 CO t ft T r- CD l in CN 1 (Si O O 0 1 IN \ 0 m O 1 (SJ O <-1 1 «"< 1 vH 1 '-» 1 i <N i tN 
O 0 1 I O cn CD uo 1 a> f 1 r m oi 1 cr» C.0 O 0 1 C\J m j 0 O 1 t\i m 1 
O r-l j r-1 «-» 1 ,-< } r-i 01 
O O O 0 i 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 t 0 0 1 0 0 O O t •'•-! 1 ;i> f rH O O I » 0 0 0 0 1 0 O O I f-1 «-i 1 1 (N CN 
O O VD r- 1 GO in ' fN cn 1 m 0 1 in 0 1 O O ] rH m 1 10 r <0 cn i rH vc CO 1 O 1 
,-l fH «-< 1 * " ' 1 <H ( <~i 1 CN rs 
O O I 1 m rg CO 
i 
1 m 0 1 1 m 0 f <-« O O r rH 1 0 1 av £3\ 1 *H V0 cn I rt J ^ rH H^ rt j <-< rt J rt rH J <N Cs/ 
O VD 1 05 iO CN CD r in O r m 0 1 O 1 m 1 "-P 1 CO <T> I rH \D CO I 
O rH 1 rH rH _L 1-1 r-l •H [ CN O-i 
O O 0 O f O O O O 1 0 O 1 0 C3 f O 0 O 1 CN itf 1 cc-0 0 1 O O O O f 0 O O 1 rH 1 
rt 
1 1 <N 1 -M 
O O 0 O 
1 I 0 O O O 1 1 0 O ) 1 0 O } O 0 O 1 CNl vC 1 CD 1 rH 0 0 O O 0 r 0 O O f Trt rt 1 CN Ol 
O O 0 O 1 0 O O O 1 O O l 0 0 1 O 0 O O 1 \0 1 CO 1 I-H 0 O 1 O O O 0 1 0 O O I rH 1 rt J CM <N 
1 •• I u !.< 1 M 1 J-f -Q © \ 0 a O r 0 c* 1 0 0 1 b 0 1 t-l .«.) /z z: r u JZ 1 JJ x: u © » u Xi O •U ; 0 t-i t 0 j j 1 u tJ 1 <n 0 m 1 re 0 1 ro in t ca 
< O J U--r*- ti. CO ( lb <J> 1 u--cn 1 oi £ J O^J 1 c I 0* -X | <JP .V AJ CN I sr. tN .c I .c CN 1 JZ CN 1 -C r-i <0 It 1 -U PC S 1 u \ U E 1 . O CJ CN 1 0 O l O O 1 %n L> 1 tc U CJ id O X 1 r~ •T CO X } CO X \ cn X I CTi 
0-039-10 
I I , 
! U 3 
t ^ 0 I O) O X 
i - S 
I S a l 
S 5 S 
t >« 
S^s 
, I s 
t ; 
I 
i P 
sia i n 
8°$ 
sS S 
t s i 
SS1" 
I 
s 
II 
11 
r 
>5' 
c-« 
I ' 
'Si' 
, 1 
% 
I f O Zf I 
O O O O O O X O VD O C3 O I 
O CJ O O O O O O O I 
^ ^ ^ ^ o K' -H O O | 
g g g g g g g g g s g g s 
r 
v g 3 0 V O 3 < 
V u 
§ 
s * 
•• ) o E" 
a: M 
I .... 
O « 
l l l l 
7 . 3 u T i l 
!., u 
r 
s -
P I I ; 
! x u d a t l «i! o t=? <*> 
I 
p g i | p | g § g § g 
§ § § § § § I ' p g p g g ? 
«-« <— X O >-! O H r < O 
O O O O O O X ifl O wl O O o o o o o o r - o o o r-
--I ,-« ~H -4 >I O <-t O |-t :—I o 
y H I y s g g g g g 7 
y i i y p g g g g ^ 
ssiiiiiiffiS. 
g S g g g g £ S g £ g S S 
«—»Q«—fr-'*-<»-«00«-«0»-H00 
b' o o o o o d'i o cd o o\ co 
' «-" O r - - f r - «•« o o o .••« o o 
I g S g g g g S l i g S g S S 
,-g o «•« «-« O O Cj rH O O 
i ^ i i l i l s s l i i ^ 
A •— 
A A 
A A S 
A A 1-1 
A A g 
A A • O 
A A 
= g 
A * o 
A A 
g 
V V » o 
v V o 
v v o 
i v V 
M v V 
3 v v § 
^ v g 
C V V j 
Hlu 
• r-i oj >. aJ 
l | l | 
:-S 3 » a 
s 
3 
I I 
g 3 
3 
g' 
3 I f ; 
t-. 1 >. 
IsS 
I I 
in to -w 
< <n 
><«w vs U fij 
III *-J W J-» 
S U S 
3 
I 
s 
•g 
s 
1 
5 
0-039-10 
+ 
i C? o o o . 'tf ^ * CO * , , , 1 i-g UT t <N 
i i / ) o o » u 1 CO 
CO • o i « r > o ( > 
I c 1 o o O rH <N 1 <N r r 
vc- 3 j 1 
o i Cl 
OJ SQ 1 r - o a-. O o -"J" o I (N t o 1 (N 
TJ 1 iT> o I J r"* 
C2 o 1 > rH / n a> o 1 
SJ 1 o o O r - I rH tN 1 f j r g 
VI I 
c o o o o o » CD o O O I O o i o o p S o o c » • •V 1 ' O CO • I 
o ,.ri f . c^ C3 o o o I o 
u a1 » o o o o 1 f IN 
•n 3 ^ 
o a* o 
CO o a 1 o o o O O O Cl o o I O o o o t O J o o CO 
IN a 1 o o • o o o • CN C17 • I r " ^ 
o .v; TS 1 » • • o o a o t o 
CO re o 1 o o o o t CN s r i 
rH (C o i 
o o i 
T-l CS £3 i r - r*s O r > f-4 O M «••« / Cl r - 1 i n <r> J o 
4-> re { LO O • O • i m \ Q 1 10 
O 4-' • • o CNl r- i CN I o 
© w i a o r-4 O 1 f-J s CN 
r - • p & (T. i 1 
iO o UI ( O (NJ O CN •— CJ { CP, r - m ( U'l c r ! O 'O 
>.1 U + 5 m O ' o • CN { i / i ! VP 
4-' I-i l - » ' o T~l CN) CN tM 1 v'J 
CJ q to t o o •—( o 1 CN ! tN 
1 ••y x 11 
<5 M 
cC « C! 1 o o o o o o o o o o 1 o o o o 1 o o i O o 
u K i O o « o O O • 1 10 <15 • 
o to c: O t o o o I 
< c 0 •rf * 1 O o o o 1 <N 1 
o o •H »J 3 1 (.j 
c-i & •H re •*> 4. o 1 o 
iO 12 i > re >4 e (13 1 o r-) o O o o o o o Ci o f o o o o { o o I o 
3J 73 H <D i ° o O C3 - 1 VO 1 « r g - c 5 CL i- l u ' • O o o o o o 1 » o 'Sj 
cn =15 c: a o 0 A <y i j o O O I e g 1 CN O a c > + 3 1 » 0 ' 
c u u O X 1 O o o o o o o o t o o o o 1 o Ci c 
o , c U u o * t o 1 O o o o o « A} CO • i f ^ •H 
o u x /.I CO >-> 1 • • o o o • o I o 
CO •H TJ CJ * I o o o o » <N X 5M <y o SJ * X 0 
v-i o 3 * i j c t 
<» J j re - 4 o in o o c> «-o Co cn o-i •i> o 1 CO CO \ C l re M re r g cC o * o o o - f CO 1 CN ac 
c E-» j j 1 « I*- <jj o*. (N i n 1 
o 0) c o O —i i 
CO TJ a at 3 1 r-i c * O < 1 
fl) 3 a a> ca J i n d o O CO m 1 CO OS \ E O 1 CO cr> 1 <N C" 
I.J —C o u tf i f - 1 <>-> o o o * - t CD f CN u ' JJ M V-l X J ' ' r - CO r-i 1 ' CO 
H FT > u < o o O v< » r g JO u tn >< 1 i re u as o r t o o O O cr> <r> { r o <y. vO O 1 CO CO l r-i rH 
'H re <0 l f o o o • 1 t o vo • » cr> 1 <••-! r%-
re 03 CN i » r - 00 CVJ • V i CO O 1 o o o r-« r-» i eg 
o — - r T o 
r-i c- i <y a> . . u 1 lH U I M 1 M '1> 
a ! i i o j ; o & I o O" o o 1 o o 1 O o 
4-J l u > . o > < £ Zi JZ < (-) l ._> b o •j j i f5 4-> o VJ t o f o QJ U c I u *—l u re re V-! >3 o ti l »o o * 10 i n J 
M <y ! ^ re re a> •V < Ti. •X> t ( u OI 1 f4« O'/ 
0 i n > Ju n zt 1 OP t 
G1 <8 1 d ' C^l JZ r-j f JZ C-4 jQ <N f . C <N i JZ 
t i > r fj) M O •• tJ S t 1 -M >1. f i-i 
c a o J-j U n a d 15 ^ a <J J : 0 u O ( J I m I iV •J 
Ci, < 23 i 5 < a . C a y t J o — r-X 1 CO X cr. x I o-. 1 ON X 
+ •A X i : X X X X X X X X y X X v : •y X w X X X 'A >; y. k X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
4. 50 X X N X X X X X X « X y. X X X X * X X X x 
r-g a> X X >: X X X X X X X X X X X X' v.- X X 3 
i ? c X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x x X X a 
i c >c X X X X X X X X X X * X X K X X y. 5*' <>c X M * X X a u :> 
Cl •<rt • ^ Q rtj u o <E CO C- l o r - r - o o C l o o o ,-•« O t o fcO l O v.i •H re 
CO * 
4-1 
ei 
o 
'"1 
v o 
* 1 
o o vs- CN o o o X ^ X o o H re O O 1X> CO CN cr, o X CN H o o 
2 
re 
C c* M -»o i O m CO X y. 14 
O u X t-
cr- 3 
tj' 
3 
o 
£•* * z o 
X 
•H 
m o X 4J . C N X X X X X X X :< X X X ;< X X X y. X X X to 
r g X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X -A X X x X . . i 
o a> X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X re 
o Vl O v ; X X X X X y. X X X X X X X K W X y . X M 
re 
T 1 
51 X X X 'A X X X X X x X X X X '£ X X X X X X 4.1 •tt n 
a> * 
X •A x X * :< X X X * X X X X X •A X X >i X 50 re 22 .i.) r i 
i j 
<D 
E Cu o 
. c :< X y. X X X X X X X X X X X >l X X X •A, X 4 J o 
•i—i f= T J •> 4. 4-J y. X X X X X y. X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X 
JO o re u o > 14 y. X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X ;< X X X X X u U 1 7 s> X - H O r< y. X y. X X X X x X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X <y to iO n CU +4 • X ;< X X X X X y, X X X X X >: X X X X, 'A X 
<u d> ~ <51 rc X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X a) 
{ f= «U X E: 01 •H 
r H T J 4—
: U O H 
u 
C 
<L> „ i4 Cl O C a» 4J * H J* t J •A 
o £ W c . c - r H j j o s X 
C <J1 - r i o C L 
0 CC 4-' CU 4J t r i j c u "0 
eg ca •H re « * 1—( 3 Ci. CN o c: 
iO C n E a , 0> v-f vl> E re 
o •H o us 3 D> a u 14 c r C ui o 'A 
r g 4-J T ; - i a n 3 r-i re g ca u fSl 
r g re r H +-« o O Cl > o 3T o O a O* M o o >H 
•H o 5 Cl * u i u a > L i re 9) re re 
e y c - o 4J X >-> <. CI r H c X o q a.- J J re o xz 3 O a* i-» * O 4-' a> J j 4> •H c 
-> w u o a x to * . a '.25 o i y 3 c_ U 4> ' j 4-> 4-» —I g> (SI •r! 3 ( 5 c o •-H 4J a> J j OS CO (XI <0 , - t 3: 
•H < o o 4-1 X 0 re a o 3 u xz •c <i> I I I O ll.f u o a ^ Vi <Si <t» a . ^ o 4-J D* i-i 3 'Si > ^ 
i n i e i - l re uO ( 5 o 3 u '1-! •—! TJ vH 4-J i j ca 
fi) TS 4 + re o £ « 4) o o Qi •r-i 14 C —! 3 c 'j, Vl CO 
4-' t-* •» 01 J j re <1 4-1 Li a . O •H «i> o* o o ¥) 
O © 4 o tc u re <D o -'•1 tw i£ 4-J o re 
M <y 'O -V <y >-s (0 (0 Ci •X CU ll.{ u CO *n v i H O CO D u eg M 
r H 
a ' 
i j ,t Cl CP £1 c C r H o c r O > c in re o 
.1) •j 4-5 J j 4 CL c o V4 U jC a o 4-1 a 14 •ri Ut i - l 4-5 RJ 3 re 
4-1 p & CO ..» u i i re re 3 3 o •H a - j c Z1 a o o 3 1 
i J U) 
c r 
Q * . ^ o a, to S w t u •u r 1 re 4-1 «u <3 o o J-3 iO c ; O {••< 01 f -i .ci sC M n 4-5 
m t ft! rr- c C 4.; •tJ o (C 50 4-1 sJ o •H 4-J re cn £ i n 
ID O O f H > c t-H U <41 V4 CD re . Q <e.l 10 c x '-i-l c £ 
VJ re - H •H 01 u a i e X CC <U M a) «1> - H o v< 4-> 4-1 r g x> tn <N O C oi J •rl Oi o CL: T J re o }•< t-H a v.? 3 10 o o re u C-< O <11 V4 10 o 0} 01 L> U-l 01 41 <Si V a 4J <3J o A-t L<- 3 fl) rA o rH 
to c x : v. 4-. a re O O C4, o re <11 •rj as (J i - l c r re O T» 
o 05 V-t o r-? ft r H r H (4< 4-' 3 o . - 1 e c.0 u a;- W rt: <r> <y o <u 10 o Cl, c C * r H rf C c m c <U i H 
O ^ * c ty O o e 0> U V> o c o i > re re 7* u + C-' > c r Q Q *o •H Vt TJ 0* 3 1 E D •H ) 14 -j-i 
oi « O v.3 c 4-1 3 Cl r : C c C c C a . 4.) 3 i-> J Z E «M 
a) JO ? re t j u H >H V* iJ -r^ •H t l i w •1 u V4 a U S-i -at 4-i O 
> ^ » o 01 re n <u co O O JO 50 10 c r (0 o o o e i—i re 14 
a» (11 •> s- j—I 3 o a 3 o O o a - M O i o " c c r M 
a o 4-1 a c : o o O . CL B 0 •i-J X o 
:4-< o >-« c c «.•« 
5 ; a o 4H a a 1 3 i4 <y 73 O . O a «H re n X —1 —i —i a 
f-4 * < ij o 2 < Cu CV < O O >-S t d w UI T, cu a . H C/> T. CO * X 
0-039- 10 
L? 1* -
5S S C «- Ctl H » U) <•» a; O H 
o o o o u O x 
<u o 
ts •u X) -H 0 J.) - 3 
W 1' \r, sC TJ c O 0 r-i ra 
q» > (-> <i) » 
CJ 
0 'A 
C) 
.1.1 
« I-l 
0 c 
C-5 3 
O C I -
O Ct> «J \c-. * CN rg i-« c 
•xO o vo o o vo c 
in O <n O o i o m co o cn 
> CO O O t"N ' 
o o o o o o 
o o o o o o < 
o a o o o o < 
o o o o o c: 
i-< o 
o -j-. o o o 
O <y 
I > O rH i 0 4} I T3 w -H 
TS • 
gj 
a' —i i i t~ o 3 > -i 
I ill O ' i re k • as O » 
rf, -a o > < o i—<. U .TJ <y r« u, -a a « x x <y h a. o. cc CJ-. 
C2 if) T1 ' Ci to n 
oi n : J 0 0 3 O 4-J 4-1 »H 
X X 1 X X X >; ^ X X 1 X X X 1 y, X X X X X X X x X j X X W X X • 
x x ! X X aj X X X X 4 X 1 X X t-< X X X X X { X X X X X X X * X X >1 X + f X 
C4 'V f CO 'A I-J < X 0 r X 
^ < < 0 X 0 1 X 
X x 1 X X X X * x 1 X X X >; X x 1 X X X X X X X 1 X X X X 
;< j X X X X 
X x t X fS X X y « X * X X } y, X X X X X X X 1 X y. X X X X J X X X y. X X 1 X X X i x X X X X © * X X 1 X H X X C. i X 1 ^ X X X X 1 X X X X X X X M 
X 1 X X X X •h at * U X 1 X X f-. X X X Cl i x x ;< x* 1 'A X X X I 
x x x x 1 X X X X » 
» vo V£> lv> j r> o J CO CO • E-. S 
iO r— rg 03 f <y x x 
(J X X 
«•» X W 
X X X 
: xr rJ n.) rg m 
x x x . fr> X X X .-1 x x x X X X 
4.J •H 
O '! <t <H 0. « C 
u u 
, o, •• a. j o • <•? J u a u ( 
I to 
J i 4.5 tJ 01 J C £5 » «« s i xJ > -I » 
G O O > 
a> > a 3 a> w e> 0 O Q o •• 13 o a q o •-« <M X X l-' CJ 3 C -1 X 
o 4-1 -t C 0 0 (J 
- - O U 'O U -O a - " ~ H Ol h J] 0} >• +J > a) c: «) » o Q n u 
fii T) 1-! > «TJ (C . .. _ 
o X .c X X P. _. S ' J iw <0 y> < rt: 
i i 
r-. I O «\3 
-4 O O I 
O 0 U I O X I « o o r » ifi •'•>. I < '«-i I >«r*-: I <-3 i-l I 
C I O C » » a> "D 1 rH e c f 05 -H * W •>. 
3 3 1 c rH ;«i 0 ( ^ 1 o» 1 y. V) A.' I 0 PJ 0 1 u <3 I 
"O to 1 0 1 0 t-X > 0 + 
4.1 o cj c •-1 D- J 
«y s. M t ^ i 00 -» 
+ -S-l -V + «U T2 
3 I 
C 4 •H > 
X O C 4-i <e a> 
ai 0 s a i< a n 
i i P. o W < X 
r 'O l .. r : .-j < 
O <H > • > Xl ra 4-1 U ; J JJ 0 ! ! (/) O H "0 i r<} Ut c "U 1 • a o H < » 
0 0 0 m 0 0 0 1 X X X N X O CO 1 X X X s 1 X X X rH 0 1 X X X .X X X i X y. x X 'A 
0 0 O 1/1 TT 0 iP J X >; X X 'A X (J? 0 ll> rg J X X y. X X X X X X X O 1 X X X X X X 
0 0 m cn 0 CO f rH CN in •=r eg ••g O «l CN <N 1 fO 0 1 eg ro 
rH 0 J "'* 0 
0 r* 0 I/) 0 0 0 r V X X X X X rH O to N rg { X X y. X X X r X X X X X 
•••I 0 j V x X X X X X X >; X X-
0 n 0 tn LO 0 LO p .V '/, X X X X CD 0 ® rH 1 X X X X X » ' rg C'l 1 X X X X r l O 1 ^ y. X tt X X 
l-> 0 O U". O 0 0 1 X X X X O -11 1 X X X X >! 1 X X X X X 
r-i O 1 y. X A X X X 
* x -
a 0 O i D O 0 O 1 >: X " X X X O CO 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X 
rH O I X X X X X X 1 X X rt X X 
0 0 O O 0 O J X X X x •x X O CO 1 X X X •A x X J X X X X x X r-< O \ X X X X X X 
0 0 o n o o o 1 X X X X X y. O CD \ X X >: X 1 X X X >1 X 
rH O 1 X X y. X X X -
0 CO O m rH 0 rH f <N jrj " tn crv cn JO rH O CO N r-i 1 CN rH -H O 1 U3 CJ CO 
T-l O 1 t 
O 
0 0 0 m 0 
1 
0 0 t ir> 0 m n O O CD ( 0 l£J m O I OT C1! rH O 1 a> O 
I 
0 <0 OlOlO 0 m 1 m X43 a\ O CO (-» TJ » 0 O <7\ O 1 O IO 01 1- r> --1 0 t s: —{ O 
T - 3 
4J 0 1 « a e s rH a 0) .-j e 1 U5 0 •H s: O •A e 0 3 i > «0 r<j •4-» a >- rH 1 cH r ? u d 0 r-1 'O -n-H O 1 T> TJ ij jJ £U 0 TO TJ a 1 a 0 2 O i-l •H 7] < > u r-i 1 •H -H O -H c e a. TO i 4J JJ rH <(i <1? Q> 3 •v tu u. TJ -H -H rH a > cz sz •M x. if •rj I H tH O •TJ O O 0 o« a< Oi 1 U O u O > 
X ^ X X x X X X X X X pj X X X X X X X X X 1 X X X f 
-A X c: X X X + X X X p X X X X X X M 'A X X X A X X X * 
r- X t-H fZ, x * 
0 r- X O 
* 
X y. X - / ¥ > t X X E-< X X X X X fS X X X 
X >: X X X X -X X-
X CC X X X r + X X t- X X X X X X rA X X X X X y. X X i X X X X X X <y * X X X X V. X X X A X X X X X X X 14 .1 
X 'A X X X -» -1 X X C- y. X X O.A y, X 01 X X X y. X X X X 10 .». 'A X 1 X M t n * 
X a. X X X -K X u X X X y. X X X X " i X X X X m T X X X X X C A 1 X 
X X * X X •> n •» X X X X 0 •> x X X y XI -» X X X X f= ^ X X X 3 t> C f X X X X X X X 0> X re X X X X > X X X X Ll y > X X 1 X 
[ -> 31 4 1 X X ei CO rg CO CI CO £2 k —4 r 
1 r, X t-. u> f + t X X in 0 rH rH T> 
' y< X rH 1 
X x X X X M 4 1 X A E-< x X X O ^ 1 X y. X X 1 X X X X X X X u t 1 1 rH dl rH 'H tn i •01 4 t «- 3> > <i 3 01 OT 0) Q * 3 * 0 O a) Hi a Q a ^ r 3> f 1 X 2 4-5 U 3 rA X 4 3 4 rH Ci 0 / j u , C -t O >! O T? TJ D X> t 0 J3 e C" Hi 0 0 * 1 > u e M n -g >J M IJ v <tf * • fQ u 
' 2: O 0 X X .c Cl- 0.+ O 4 1 CN O w tn to 4 
0-039-10 
o u> rt =0 it) 4= a 
u <y 
~ 3 : 
- tu 
(/ O L> o -c: M O o BJ CO -rt 
& <0 3 -«.> rt o U M 14 
1 C: O o o o o O MT o o o X X t ^ X I X X X X * ; ct 1 T> o o O CO X 1 X X 1 X X •a 1 X X I X X x X X X X a-
3 I ^ S o 
r- rt X X 1 X 1 X X X X X J J X X X X I £ X X * c J o 3 i I a (U 1 U .-( o CJ o Ci i!) r-4 o n X X 1 x X { Oi X X >: X a i- } u U o OlXXO X/ M X 1 X X X X X £- X X X X < 4J 5 IZ c M I'M • . f^ IW X \ i X X X X i y, x X x nr * VP I Ci r <i o rH r-l c; X X i 1 X X X f I X X X X X X * CC » vo o VO O L:"> VO O •£> es; 1 o c m 1 \Ni X X 9 <L: 1 c> IT) o <rj <jc io o 1 X >i V (U 1 CN 1 1 O X X 
£ * 1 
rt fH o 1 «••« O J. * X X >i z U 
a? » a? CO o cu O T--I O rH X X X X X X X X to to a'. I 77 tH o o r o r j r-t X X I >'. X X X X 73 5 O X X I X X X t X X X X M or 
o * 3 
5 rt 
s —J "O o 
r-t r-t o X X X 1 X I X X x X X 1 1 X X X X X X X X t; o 1 O 3 \ I M rH 03 1 (-1 o o o o o o O 1(1 o o o X I X X X J X X X X X X as c-i • 4-J o o cc> o C5 X 1 X X X J X r-« X X X a- > .iJ 1 E • * IV CN X X 1 X X X X J X -7 X X 0 a) <u SO i O —I o X 1 X X X I X X X X y. a: rJ o t 1 X c>) 1 C. o o o o o trt O O O X X X X X 1 X X X X O 1 D o o a> X B 1 X X I X X X & 0 t> « 1 Cf X X X X 1 X X x CJ 4. 
•rt (0 1 rH O X H ' X X ) X X X X c 4-J X X X © 0 XJ o o o O o o o X X t X X X X 1 X X X X * •rt 3 JJ 0J i o o O CO X 1 X X X 1 X X X O. -a T) r X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X 
£ ft. 1 c f t o X X 1 X X X X 1 y. X X o 3: 1 O" X i X X X } X X X X o O 3 I I CJ .j, O "O ii) \ if) o o o o o o o m o o o X X \ X X I x x X X O -» 0 E-* 1 o o o O (D X } X X X i X X X X X G) 0 j" 1 ii. X X 1 X X X I X X a X X X •H + < 
•rt JJ u \ a tH o X X 1 X X X ) X X y. X 0 •i 
> 5) 3 o I 1 X <7> 1< O i co o o O O O o o m o o o X X 1 X X X t X X X X X X 'rt 4 a> 03 f o O CD X X 1 X X 1 X X t-i X X X •rt to 6 ^ CN * a> 5-1 } I o rH O X X 1 X 1 X X X X X X 1 1 X X X X x X X x * ?{ U iJ X X X X 3 t o o •H rt CO a I lO O Vi> o o vo O in v O ^ CO t o «£> j X X X X a: i o o OtC ifi iO o o } X x X x X CO 4' jj (U -o { S.O C) 1 IN CO CO X ^  ai X x: * o 
> O* C 1 c © v* O 1 o 1 X X X «-> •» o 0> a 3 \ o> 73 o 1 1 X X <N V) O 3 1 1 <» V) 
£ JZ CQ t w rH o o o o o o O ii") O O O m O 1 o o 1 rt X t/1 ai £D v •rt •» 3 If) (1) > •c; t i a 'J ^ o O CO »• Id ^ o o I 3 1 -o X X X L-t >0 o "O i •3 
£ XJ f o <••( o 0) 1 o 1 O X X —i O • c !T; o v) 1 l-i o rt 1 U » m o 1 LO m o c> C3 r> O CTi O CT^  CJ'. 1 X X X M > I o O CO C) r'l -o » ITS o f d) X X £H X X o » i-
! o O vo J'O f (U VO 1 u X X X X X a • O •St 1 O 1 rt O I -H X X X 0) . o • i}> 3 X X »•« + o eg O rH 4- tl f i rH 3 a> xJ .. .. ro a •» nj n. e i T> •« O rt I i-t f sl> <u fi! rH <-< CO ^ a * cn 1 -O (0 •Ji C rt s LD o -rt i d« a. 1 09 flj n. 3 4*' lo © S : 3 + a 1 o •• P3 CI £ O 3 EH 1 u •tj e» a o © D iy o w X rt. o •n •• 3 > .H rH rt a i >. V a o 1 <<•« JZ X iJ o x: 3 .. 
& <y o o —1 ~ T-. rH o in ! 4-1 4J 
! ° 
C Cf 0 u >»-: 
fi} 0) 1 O Vj 0J > .c H5 o SO < T; O -U p> o u :< r •rt U u G> tO o >• <y 'O 73 O <3 •TJ + 
© o E 1 M VI a M rt > u .rt •H 'H o t O -rt c U 1 -t t-l 6 G> © o O -v 
} G> Gi .1' •3 Q» 45 4J ^ 3 iO 115 rt <1> 3 I <Li nr *D W i © » tJ <a U a c 'H 55 o •rt at t : j a, -a « rt -rt a. -M u I > lU tz ro £» CO ro M nj f.X 5 Tr< c > jj a. o r c> 0) O ID tf c •o sn s x «> -H U W a i lU C Q O O i 4! I i o 3 o JZ Q, O • 1H < V CO < z 1 o hr. tr> ai •s —t < rH o ii. di s; iy o u r^ i Cu sc > 1 -H CN L/ 3; if) Ui 10 Vi n: o: + 
* •> rH o o o o lO rH O X x t X X X X X X X X * 
«; TJ o o CO X X i x X X X X X Eh X X X T5 4' X 1 X X X X X Pi X X 1 U> 4 C <a o X X 1 X X X X X X X X i3\ • + 3 i T5 o X X l X X X X X X y, tN O I CJ <y ® ^ rt r i o IN o O CD lO O o o X 1 X X X A X X a A X X X Eh o o o as eg CN x X 1 X X X X X X X 4J c SN r-v CN r> i-t X X 1 X X X X X X X X 
w + <0 »H rt o X X 1 X X X 'X X X X X X fr« -Q d> I U o I X Hi U C t-i o o O o C) <-•1 IV I o .-1 o o X X X X C a- + O o o OJ r^l 12) O 6-> "X X a, o 0) o 7f OS o M i W cn p-» • X X CP u •rt + rt o 1 •—i o X X 3 <1> X X V VI o u o 
o Pi © o o o tr? r- o r^ X 1 X X X X X X w CN c CO ^ IX. 73 o O ro X .V I X X X X X X >-1 o Jll v< 'S a; X X 1 X X X X X X X X X o to d) © o X 1 X X X X X X nj HI u O •* 3 t 'O o X X 1 X X X X X X X X IJ a* j j w o o I M 
73 i-i < m Vf rt o o o U"J n o iO X X f X X X >: X X f rX X X X X rj X o <1> + 4-t o o CD o <o X X 1 X X y, x X X D« •A X X X u X a. > -V c I\I CN X X J X X x x X X X X X X o a? q) S o o X X 1 X X X X X X X X OL ZS f?> 1 o o 1 'X In o St» U3 E o o o o m o CM f o o o £7> X X X X © 73 4J c: d Gl + o o CD c-J m m O E- X o CO CL O > w +• -J o rt CN fM • r- X X + CO VI a 10 o 1 rt o X X X r-l 4 c 
! e 1J a> U X rt •o CD ^ o *J 3 4J H o o a o o CN n i in in o X X X X X rt IJ © 3 tJ W o o CO CN (N O X X X X G," r rJ c rs d. 3 (-1 -» Tl CO 1 tn r- h- ' X X X X X c £= U + o r« C C) o i o X X X X o o O — ] cD i X X X X U ~ 6 r\i m O o •rt 3 i o to ID i.) TJ •o (Xi to trt CC-CO O X X CO 03 CO ft) O -I rt 
© o rt a» o £-1 o o a> X :< 6- ^ CN "O o x: JZ a c \o in X X o 5N rt, CN CO •rt o rt o i X c •» o o 3 o i cr r. b o 0) iJ O CO lO o o o VO o m r - o f- in i to Cs (N X X X X u Z c 0 0 0) m « W o o CO in X X X X >{ CO 'a rj Ui 73 It © o n » ifi X X X X X rt w to •rt 0J o ^ vi o > O X X JX X X £ vi 5 < >M "i- <>l * iJ X X X O 
>. m * to r. * a u. it m o rt o o o to o r-j CO t (O O X X X i-i rt CO o GJ tN O X C-. X & I Cf/ E .sJ fH © C m 73 iO <n i (N CO CO > X X o5 X X » o O > Cf C 0) o i X X X u + o to <y y. -rt + 3 *a o i •• X X X X X + fN t-j Ui + U o -r t i at rt * a) a> XJ 01 rt o o o in o ir> O 1 o cn I-H rt X X e: CN CO £0 ra rt Q to CI +. tH O o CO U3 •sr O :a x X o u w !H > * o vo « 73 X o CN 73 -k 
-rt cn 1.1 o o <i> t •o o X a> i ro .X CD u { iJ o i X tJ * i.n f0 U O o to M> o o o o m i ;o rt <M X X X u « i< .'O o <Ti 'C tn i/J O 0! X X £H X X X O -f i?) O Lft o o r - m i U X X X X + a.* <3 O o s i r-l O X X O • <y 3 X X V< - o c 1TJ + 73 u 
a> 3 4' is m a 6 1 O rt m «a co « -X CO -H © « & 73 CO to rt 13 CD 'rt I s: o Q. " a to fij > a 3 a) CO 0) o 3 .» +J (.?! .y ro c 0] 49 a. c o 3 | It» • rs oi a o ft) G) o Q X O +J X rH tc o •u > a \ >1 "* u a u 3; XJ o tz a x: 'H 
& & X o f: r-l o > o o re cd 1 «J -U o •»•» c <y o o o a * PI rt 0 in <y E> X o a 4J > O u rt i rj o 4-> O e ir> <3 <v 73 13 CO « M nj f <!) 0 £ S-j i j e Jj .-I T, u < > o rt O } r: E cn U -O B <y 0 6 o o f5) M -9 CJ <L! j.t <y 3 fij (J 0> u JJ .a rt J <T> rt Gt 4S 3 Q) > i-t <v u u 73 M 65 X. u a> Jj a > <z cr rt tn G TJ •H cs Fx. 73 t-i -rt rt { -I-t > rH ^ 10 c to ,T5 2 o a. l-! « > » o p <D 73 c c to X •> •H M (-i O 5 13 C O o o <i> s o Q 0 JZ JZ a a o » &< r-t •V) f/C ..3 > CO •H ^ irt "-i r? Cu & Ui U u ti, [ O U s: > w- rJ o s fjt 10 CO 03 rt*. % « 
•o 
•rt 
% 
T> 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
® o 
u o 
u> o 
VI 15 rs; c: -v: ou iy I E <U 
u a» •• c: £ « n ft, C 
•c —( c: •H o o o o 
<J7 LO H < <*4 
L3 ItJ 
ftj M 
c ^ t-D C n o t ) - i g c, <1! <l» 3 i J H O i-l W V> •H £3' ^ iO -C nj U M T) 
t j in 
3 l 
Jii ^ 
W * 
o 
{£. 
1 
C J 
-3 1 a* 1 
3 O 1 p 
i vi f o o t 
( 
to 1 Q> 1 
<y at I iTJ © 1 rH 
J 
f.O I m Oi O 1 I i } 
c 1 C HI i rH i 
o 1 I it} i t.n rH \ a o O 1 
J D, 1 rH I > -I.-1 O 1 
U ! tO I o 
>-4 o r i 
7 2 o t i 1 T> O 1 
'd 1 « rH Q.I i 
rs 1 r-i T3 •H 1 o 1 O I KJ » li> J 4J O o 1 X c 1 in 
iJ 1 o 1 
o 1 <z 1 o <1) if) \ 3 1 VO O J 
u 1 
w 1 o CC 1 T> o \ TJ \ O \ <l» t I ,-i T3 o » 
o 1 O 1 cu f u 1 o 1 u CZ> f 
xz 5 c c J u> i a 1 
u 1 * o O I 
o J X r O l 
— 
a? i D i •C 
& i O .c i X, rH 
u C | rH j Q i.t fO 1 0 tn g> > o 1 v< 4-> SO 1 5 i-J S' 1 a« vi cx > i c rH CJ w a 1 o .,-r fil I O r?) 
tn s: t L) 1 > £0 
o u-i o o m 
o o o o o c 
© o o o o o 
• t j cn '••» f" 
u h a n s G) Cl 
O "J "O j 
O C^  lf> 0 0 c I X X C. 1 
( X 1 X i X 
ifl O in <T O i I/) c-cc O CO CD 1 1 o 
—5 1 
-n o •Tf o m i rH Ifi to crs r-
Q i 
m o \ft r- 0 r— 1 C-J « CP 1 
— o 1 
o m p~ o r- 5 uT o cn r^ I vO 
<-« d I 
0 in o o O 1 X X c. 1 X 
{ X X 
o t X 
X X 
o o m CD o CD I X X VJ o c< Vd I X 
<-) 1 X X 
o i X 1 A X 
o m iAS o CO 1 X X r- o cr, lO I X U> >_o I X X 
•-t r-» o f X X 
c? o m -7 o 1 Oi frj 1i> o cn 1 CN Cl <N 1 CN o 1 
O o ui o ® O 5 X X o a-. 1 X X 
} X o } X 
} X X 
O o m o o O 1 X X o CP I X X 1 •• X X o t "V X 1 rH 
C> m o o o 1 3 X X {TS } T> X X 1 0 X y. 
O 1 X X X 
X X a ^ 4J Q I to c. C! 0 O o 5 i r> r-| J rH rH a -q r-| O 1 m ra 
fG TJ O 4-1 p> 1 y u 
<1 P5* o r-| | •rl >H c D S1J 1 •M Jj 
<j? u O C 1 -H -H rH 01 -H J C a* al U. 1 a u tb 
X 
1 X X : x X X X X ; x X 
in <!\ CN 
rt 
! o O v 
X X X 
T •V n 
o 
r O ^  a\ 
t ^ 
«r 
X X X X X X X X X 
X y. X X y. : x X 
X X X X X 
X X X X X X « X X 
c-
a* m .-« o 
X X X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X x 
X '/, X X 
y. X X X, 
• ci a HJ IC u a u (T) 
o ai e a> a» 
> b o Q o. X > 
j; X • X X X X Nl X X X X X M X X 
X X X >i >; x t>-X X X x X TA X X X X >'- X X 
X X X X X X X J X y. X X X X X 
y. X - Ct V.} m * X e-< fn X CN X X <N X X 
v, X v; X X «•< u. X f- X X 
>! X J X X X X X X t— <7i 
X y. i X 41 X X >: X X X X »n X X X X X X X X X 
X X .J. X X X fu X X X X cc X X X X X X X X 
cC X X > o X X X X X X X X y-X rt X- y. >i 
*£> r- sC X <£> < X S-J X -> O r- X O r-X 1 
X X X ! H X X X ttf X X 
X X X X X x x x 
X X X X X X X X 
• (1» r-< •• r-i V) H Q, D Js» */> 01 C^  •) 
S H u D C I 
: r,o > 
C O u u * 
T> "O U T> U ® r at «» ID o D ^ n W -Q u U U , m u -o a a «• £ £ £ £ a * If) CO W ->', * 
(U O CJt VI 
a> Z3 u O 
o 
o •X o % ni (il St VI 
TJ 
a. 
13 S 
(1! >. 
O ftj -U T> 
<ii «y B CJ 
o o * 
S I S o i {D -H 
n o J <W » "H 4-1 Ti 
« i h r. •H O O 
u o u O X 10 u o 
<fi CO -H 
VI C »-» f-» 
o c 10 ss> -a h e e •a <y 3 
5 iO « o Vl "3 
T3 <ti 
i 
1; < r l O 01 + 
s > a>' f= Di 3 * >4 + 
c o a) 
o i> » •iH nj 
4J G) (J i4 •t 4-> 3 3 4-i » 
a 3 M £ tu a o SB o 
-> 
0J O q .c 4-5 * 
> CP U £ ai 4 rH w T) 05 CO (4 •H 
r-J a) 
c: tJ 
CT»* -> e ••H •-2 w 1 •C1 
» f t 
2 £ J-1 O C 
a ro <y « 0 E <y sj <y vi a > » J 0. o ui < £ 
u , c c O i-t 
C^ TJ O Jj 00 r-l — 
Cl O CN! O O CN o m JN O <N t X X 1 X •A X I x X E-. 
X K X + 
o <0 i X y, i Y, X X X 1 X X X X X i X 1 •A X X X J X X QZ X X o ( X X 1 X X X X 1 X X v< X X j X X 1 y. X rt ) X X N JS X 
m o in o o JO o m in o m i X X 1 X X x X » X X a X X x X • « o CO •v X y, J X X X :< i ;< X ;< X X X * (N • CN CO O l x > x X X x \ X X X o i X X 1 X X X A 1 X X X X X X 
O O Ci o o O cz> in o O O 1 X X 1 :< X X X 1 X •A + H X X X 
I 
o <o 1 X X 1 X X l X X X J X y. \ X X X X 5 x X X X X o 1 X X 1 :< X X X » X :< X 
— X X — — y. X X 
o o o o o O o m o o t y, i X X X 1 X >: 4 X x X + + o o CO 1 X X 1 X X 1 V, ir» X X 1 X X 1 X X X t X X X X X" o 1 'A J X X X V, 1 X X X X- X 1 -X X X- -r - >/r X 1 -X X X 
O C7S O O Ci o iTl U) O i£> » X X J X X X X 1 X X v Ai u: X X o X X 1 X x X V. 1 'A X X X X -k X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X X ,-t rH o » X X 1 X X X X 1 X X *v X X 
cn o cr» o o cn o in o in j rH CN 1 o m XT ! m T < F-- X X 
-j X I 
M- O o so •v IN fN i-i i o 
X X X 
r-i < r-J «H | CN 1 CN • i CO X X X rH r-i c j 1 rH I-H o \ X X X X •r 
a) O (o o o CO o tn O KO 1 IN f ) ( VC CN -N CO 7 X X X X X + $ 
TJ- O •v o cc m m j o o o > X .X [-< X X X j V0 n i r- • 1 y. X Pf, X 
o l 1 O 1 X X X X N 1 i t X N -v> X •* 
o o o o o o 0 1,- o O O 1 VO o 1 ro in o O 1 X X ci n I-l a] rH CQ 
o o ce i j—i I-H r- O 1 w f-. l vD CO n X X IO o H^ rH 
rH rH o 1 J O I X X rH 
cn a ? o o tn o in o ^ i TT «n J fO rH w rH I s >; X X X > cc 1 in O 1 X X H X X X 1 cn i CD <n • I X X X X X * 
o i i O 1 y. X X — — X X -* 
Q o o o o o c tn o O O 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 y. X X X :< M o CO 1 X X 1 X :< X 1 v. X E-i X X 1 X A 1 X X X 1 X X C£ X X X 
o 1 X X 1 X X 'A » y. X X :< 1 X X 1 X >i "A 1 " X X X X >i + 
o o o o o o o tn o O O 1 X X » X y. y. X 1 rH X x CC X X X y. * -t o 1 X X 1 X X .*< X I 3 X X E- X X X X 1 • • X X « >; X X X 1 T> X X X X X X 
o 1 (0 X X 1 X X X X 1 o x X X X X 1 rH I I >: X 
o o o o o tn o O O | -2 M v: i X X X X 1 X X X X X o o oo J X 1 " 'A X X X > a> y. X X X 
{ Q X X 1 <y x X X 1 o X X X X o 1 S X tf i rH x X X X t X •A X X x — 3 X X X r-} a •o •• i 
" 3> 1 in a £ ) O - l { <y rH o CL) 10 + 
"O 'n ia •• w d) .H £ 1 5J O -H } E O a a i CO " p d 3 <11 w 01 O •• TJ £0 rH V> U-, O 3 1 f-< t p> ce a o p a> o q Q 5* —1 rT o Q> •1-1 3 > r-| J H rH a t o D. U I XI X 4J o 3 x « 
C r-| > O —1 73 •nH O J nj <5 » > 4-1 4-1 r O t J rH C O o U 0 * C5 > .C fa O ci Tl o JJ > I O O 3: i -r{ u u 0) 1 in o > O T) '0 Ti IU + E »J "D V4 : > a > -H O l t) -Ti £ > .-H cn i-t e CJ PJ o p + 
3 O 1 SJ 4-1 H TJ 13 J JJ .JJ - i i ID rH 3 I a* > «J 0> V4 'P V4 H Id GHZ) i & TD C t -H 'r-f - j i O-'-w .P > <—! J > '3 CO <a •rs ro a * O u k C D C c (a tn X 0J -H 1 u ^ O 1 fij c o o Q 1 o Q J2 X a ^ * > Q3 O H f i H CL a. C£ £=- J UU>« 1 U O T. P> 1 H N U 51 Ui V) V) WJ 
0-039-10 
* * 
cS 
TJ CN , c c 0) 3 1 o *o rH -r o •rH 
a' + CO <y CM -j. CH o- a o Cu t- <5> f O 4-» 3: w 
* 2J O 05 f j v. u; > rt • M M 
n * to UJ c X u> « N q w -v .C o o jj; iJ -a o Vs 05 •w * in <p 
© •> o -> 3 I *o a u O 0 -•I m to as is 0 a> I u rt JZ fii a 05 > * 4J o. c 0) a> 6 <3) « o ro >> oi 3 ^ f. 1 o W) 0 rt M to 'O c 0 a> j, CO a* X o > VI -t ,.3 0J -1 * 1 e 05 4-1 4) t j * rt -o » (tJ ^ c •U 3 U <1! 3 W .;. ££ o O CO 
t 
Vj ^ •a ® t-l M c tu o -i ai O c O ne * 3 1 CN fTi U o o to a J-J aj rt 0) « O j j o o CM r= u -C 4-> + c CM sti c •rt 4-! rt o c P <y 3 1 o CZ o o ^ K M o .c CI 4J r-i Q to m o co •a CO O 10 in V£1 ^ i j 
•rt < N -V J: Ifi + j-J O rt IJ <f) Cu vi nJ + ns rt ra ill t-l E- c n *TD O i" :> CP e» rt 
© X) 41 0) " * 3 f rt 6 c. >-< O o 3 «3) 02 C 4-1 m S-o z> CO © f «J CU > -» rt o» 4-i o W o O + M 1 o rt <H X + © ^ o i-i nJ « * 
<fi o <y\ A o m rtJ: 
S o >i I CN c 
* o rH v •rl 4-> 
O z j j iS u C VI c + Q> u 1? -i <y o e CO <y o a) •p <D j j <y a > c X c > -i u tL o o rt m ft. < -Y to AC s u 
o o o o o o O m ve o V3 1 CN iH o O VO N5 rH rt 1 VO (n <XI r-l rt o f 1 
XT, O m o o O m m o J <Tt 1 \T) o •v in CD O r~ O CM 
) <XI Vf 
«••< rt o 1 rt 
O O o o o o O in c? o O J s; X X X X O O OS \ X X X X J X X X t-l o f X X X X 
X X 
o o o o o o O in o o O J V >: X X X o O c. I X X X 
] X X X r-l o 1 X X t X X X X 
o o r> o o o O m co- o CO 1 m o CO cn CN UI o in m o c\ in m i \o ;N CM TT T-I <-• o 1 
in o «n o <3 m o in cn o ro 1 m cn o sn m o CTi \C I CTl rt iH rt rt | i-- n CCS rt o J 
o o o o o o o m <3 o O I X X X X X o o 1 X X X 1 X X X X X o 1 X X X 'A. I X X X X X 
o o o o Cf o o m O o O I X X X X X o o cr» I X X X X 1 X X X X X rt rt o 1 X X X •A X 
o o o o o o o in O o O 1 X X X X X o <3 ch 1 X X X X I X X X rt o 1 X X X X x X X 
1/1 o in o o UI O m <3 o (Xr 1 X X y. X X iO o VD o cn 1 X X X X X 1 X X X X X o ^ X X X X i X X X X X 
o o o o o o o m <•0 o <"i l X X X X x (Ti o CP. Cfi <3 cn cn LP, | X X X X rt CN t - X X X X rt o OJ X x X X X I rt o m o 3 CN CO o 03 o r- O tr» r~- i TJ • r-i O (N 1 fij m in o l s rt 
© rt a - I -O J-> a> i I'J o. C 1 o rt u> £ J U7 (5 —i I X C 0 rxs to bL, o 3 1 EH 5; < o 05 3 > rt | rt , D, 1 >> a o. c o •r-i rt C 1 fij .-o ZD m >3 ITJ n 1 0 o X o o s rt o rt 1 •H -rt O 1 o •rt c 0) 4J i-t « 1 JJ 4J rt 1 Rj rt <s> & rt •o o —1 Ct- C 1 •rt rt rt J o^  y-t 4-> o ra I-t a W 6 •rt 1 M M O I n; r. o o > < .-1 »••« fi- Oc C£ r>, i U O Is. / -J u cw 
o o 
m I X m 03 I r j C*-J I X X CN U X :< cZ fN \D 3 O 1 X r- o« I X X I I & d CN 1 X X iC X X X CSv iu o VO 1 X X X X X X X X • a X X X O 1 X X X X X V fr* I i a; X I X X X X iQ X 1 X X C"< X X X X 1 X X X 1--X f X X X X X 
— X X X •> -z. X 
X 1 X X X x X s ui X 1 X f-. X X X 1 X X Cii X X bl '0 X 1 X X X X H V-4 1 x X X X X H 
1 r-J ••o L, k: X x X CN Lu S lo CN 1 X X rt o X X X O o X X CO 4J o CN c: «> I T X X X 2 * *G O C"< X X X «> to sD -A X 03 -t W 
rt { 0-1 X X X R C) X X e> l-l 
X ^ -r u T! X 1 X X X X •rt •a X I X X t-f X X X 0, r •rt X 1 X X a: X X X X 1 X X X X X Vf t X X X X »-| V D 1 o X t X c,< X X X X U tn X 1 X fr< X X X to X 1 X X X X X w I fC X 1 X X X X X 1 X 1 X X X X X X X c: U X 1 X X t-f X X X e> -r X 1 X X X X X Xi * <y X I X X X X X E: -r tc £ X X X 3 o <3> 
^ + G X » X X X X X f X X X X X CD X I X 'A X X •C + o « X 1 X X X X X »J ? o 1 •• X X K X y. CS VJ 1 ifl -X 1 r-i X X cc X X X X vl fij X | 3 X X X X X X o 2E X I X X X X X 1 O X X X X X 3 -r < 1 £ X iJ U3 IT, | X X 5H ^ CO o t -y - (-4 X O * C-l O Cs X <3 r - P- * o O 1 X O o > Vi + 
! u 
G> rt af <y rt i» + •X- a> i i 1 CO »> 05 > ft. CD & q- 3 t rt ft 1 a o CO 0) O •y .y rt U I u., x: u u 3 (Z sz X 3 •> Ci-4 
o ^ c c* o u u Cf + 0) 1 m n « xf -a D t3 (S n .-••» CTi £ o •s> 4> o C3 u 55 >. u -U T> u 5) * Q, rt | > c3 f/7 > fij u .U Q. a O 1 4) 3: c Q O x: -C x: a. o O t > i CM L> X to oo to *Ji <a < 3< 
0-039-10 
-Attachment -5" 
R-2 Residential Density 
Development 
0-039-10 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project 10028.0 
January 2010 Page A5-1 
Derivation of Potential Residential Density (based on provisions within City Ordinance 723) 
5 acres * 43,560 SF/acre = 217,800 SF 
217,800 SF - 25% roads, offsets, easements = 163,350 SF Usable 
• Assuming 18 units per typical apartment structure 
First two units 
= 10,000 SF (first two units) + (2 units * 200 SF lawn/unit) + (2 units * 300 SF parking/unit) 
= 11,000 SF 
16 Additional units 
= 16 units * 200 lawn + 16 units * 300 parking +16 units * 2,000 SF/unit 
= 40,000 SF 
18 Unit Apartment Building 
-11,000 SF + 40,000 SF 
= 51,000 SF 
Total Buildings 
=163,350 / 51,000 = 3 Buildings 
• Assuming final building has more than 18 units to utilize remaining land 
=163,350 SF - 51,000 SF/Building * 3 Buildings 
10,350 SF = (x units * 200 SF lawn/unit + x * 300 parking/unit + x* 2,000 SF/unit) 
x = 4 units 
Total Residential Units 
= 3 Buildings * 18 units per building + 4 units 
= 58 units multifamily units, or 11.6 units per acre per five acres 
= 232 apartment units on 20 acres or 174 units on 15 acres 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Attachment 
Bend-La Pine Trip 
Generation Study 
0-039-10 
: ' K l T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . ' 
' v . T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
j " \ J 3 5 4 S W U p p e r Terrace Drive, Sui te 101, Bend, O r e g o n 9 7 7 0 2 r 541 3 1 2 , 8 3 0 0 • 5 4 1 . 3 1 2 , 4 5 8 5 
M E M O R A N D U M 
Date: October 14,2008 Project #: 9140 
To: John M. Rexford 
Bend-La Pine Schools 
520 NW Wall Street 
Bend, Oregon 97701-2699 
Prom: 
Subject: 
Joe Bessman, P.E. 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
PURPOSE 
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize measured trip generation rates for elementary 
schools in Bend during the weekday p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Standard reference 
manuals contain trip generation data for elementary schools during the weekday a.m. peak hour 
(7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and during the afternoon school peak hour (2:00 to 4:00 p.m.), but no data is 
available for the evening commute period. This time period is commonly used to assess off-site 
impacts of schools to the transportation system. 
This study identifies elementary school trip generation data during the weekday p.m. peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic, and was prepared based on surveys of four elementary schools located 
within Bend. The study methodology and resultant trip generation rates are summarized herein. 
AVAILABLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA 
As defined within Trip Generation, 7"1 Edition, elementary schools serve grades kindergarten 
through fifth or sixth grade, are typically centrally located within residential communities to 
facilitate access, and provide bus service to students within specific geographic boundaries. The 
ITE land use category for elementary schools includes both public and private elementary schools 
within the dataset, although data for this study was collected exclusively at public schools. 
As identified within the Trip Generation manual, school bus utilization may vary significantly 
between elementary schools, and may result in varying trip rates between school sites. Potential 
factors for school bus utilization could include the proximity of bus service, service boundaries, 
transportation infrastructure, crime, income, or other factors. School bus utilization data was not 
collected as the purpose of this trip generation study is to identify characteristics specific to the 
Bend-La Pine School District, and specifically to elementary schools within the City of Bend. 
Available data contained within the standard reference materials includes elementary school 
surveys during the weekday p.m. peak hour of the generator only. This coincides with the end of 
FILENAME: C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\JBESSMAN\DESKTOP\PROJECTFILES\9140\FINAL\TRIPGENMEMO.DOC 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study Project #: 9140 
October 14, 2008 Page 2 
the school day, which typically occurs between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. However, the critical off-
site transportation analysis period typically coincides with the evening commute period (4:00 to 
6:00 p.m.), which does not occur simultaneously with elementary school peak trip generation. No 
standard data is available within the ITE manual related to elementary school trip characteristics 
during the weekday evening commute period, when limited after-school activities or staff trips 
represent the primary uses. 
As part of new elementary school projects for the City of Hillsboro School District, trip generation 
studies were conducted at several locations during the critical weekday p.m. commute period 
(4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). These studies showed that the schools' trip generation rates during the 
evening commute period were approximately 30 percent of the peak school trip rates that 
occurred in the afternoon. Given the unique characteristics of Bend (population, service 
boundaries, and bus ridership), a trip generation study was conducted to assess trip generation 
rates applicable to local conditions. 
TRIP GENERATION STUDY 
Four school sites were selected for analysis throughout the City of Bend. School sites selected 
were those that were in operation for at least two years, were centrally located within residential 
communities, include typical school hours and amenities, contain defined attendance boundaries, 
and include configurations that would allow the separation of trips from those associated with 
surrounding uses. The school sites selected for the survey, data collection dates, street address, 
and year 2008/2009 enrollment data are identified in Table 1. The attachments include the school 
attendance boundary map illustrating the location of the elementary schools and the areas served. 
Table 1 
Elementary School Characteristics 
School Name Data Collection Dates 
School 
Enrollment Street Address 
Pine Ridge Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 540 
19840 SW Hollygrape St 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
R E Jewell Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 557 
20550 Murphy Rd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Juniper Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 509 
1300 NE Norton Ave 
Bend, Oregon 97701 
Elk Meadow Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 568 
60880 Brookswood Blvd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Each of the ingress/egress points at the school sites were videotaped on September 16, 2008, two 
weeks after the start of school to ensure that school attendance patterns had normalized. It should 
be noted that many of the schools are situated adjacent to public parks, and trips associated with 
the ball fields or adjacent parks could not be entirely separated. During the surveys, the weather 
was sunny with a high temperature of 90 degrees. Accordingly, it is expected that the trip 
generation studies are conservatively high given the higher usage of the adjacent ball fields than 
during the majority of the school year. As trips during the evening commute period likely reflect 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study Project #: 9140 
October 14, 2008 Page 3 
low levels of student trips to and from the school, the potential impact of weather on student 
mode choice is not expected to have a significant impact on the measured trip generation rates. 
Intersection traffic counts were simultaneously conducted at nearby collector and arterial 
intersections to identify the time period with peak traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway 
system. Given the relatively low school volumes, this hour represents the time period when the 
combination of site-generated traffic and roadway volumes are expected to peak. The peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic identified in the study typically occurred just prior to the 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 
period, with exception of counts collected near Juniper Elementary which identified an earlier 
peak hour between 4:25 and 5:25 p.m. 
TRIP GENERATION RESULTS 
Videotapes collected at the school ingress/egress points were manually reviewed in five-minute 
increments coinciding with the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Trip rates on a per-student 
basis were calculated at each of the four school sites, and a weighted average was applied to 
generate a local elementary school trip generation rate on a per-student basis. A summary of the 
trip generation data for each school is provided in Table 2 and Figure 1, and worksheets from the 
data collection efforts are included in the attachments. 
Table 2 
Measured Trip Generation Rates (Weekday PM Peak Hour) 
School Name 
Student 
Enrollment 
Weekday PM Peak Hour of 
Adjacent Street Traffic 
Trips Per 
Student 
% Trips In % Trips Out 
Pine Ridge Elementary 540 4:50 to 5:50 p.m. 0.16 40 60 
R E Jewell Elementary 557 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.09 68 32 
Juniper Elementary 509 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.15 52 48 
Elk Meadow Elementary 568 4:55 to 5:55 p.m. 0.12 58 42 
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate 0.131 55% 45% 
'The weighted average is calculated by dividing the sum of all trips or trip ends by the sum of all independent variable 
units (total school trips / total student enrollment). 
Based on the resultant trip generation rates, trip generation rates for elementary schools within 
the Bend La Pine School District were identified as 0.13 trips per student during the weekday 
p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, with 55 percent of the trips inbound and 45 percent of the 
trips outbound. This local trip rate is approximately half of the national trip rate of 0.28 trips per 
student during the weekday peak hour of generator (2:00 to 4:00 p.m. time period). 
We trust that the information contain herein adequately summarizes the trip generation 
characteristics of elementary schools within the City of Bend. Please let us know if you have any 
questions or need any additional information to review the analysis findings. 
Attachments: Traffic count worksheets 
School Attendance Area Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0-039-10 
Elementary School 
(520) 
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students 
On a: Weekday, 
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, 
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 
Number of Studies: 4 
Average Number of Students: 544 
Directional Distribution: 55% entering, 45% exiting 
Trip Generation per Student 
Average Rate Range of Rates S tandard Deviat ion 
0 .13 0.09 - 0.16 0 .03 
Data Plot and Equation 
•o 
c UJ 
Q. 
JU 
j c <u > 
<D D) « 
i OJ 
> 
1 0 0 -
60-
4 0 -
500 
X 
T~ 
520 
X Actual Data Points 
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 
X 
~1 T 
540 
X = Number of Students 
560 
X 
580 
- Average Rate 
**** 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
0-039-10 
s s a j y j i p a s s 
I I 
3 
E 
p 
illy III 
i i 
i i 
»• r 11 2 
i I 
i i 
f r 
r i " 
» a 
I S 
f f 
l ' f 
I I I1 
[ I 
r 
i ^ 
III! 
f s 
m n i i fiiisMiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii! i m m m m m 
ii 
0-039-10 
0-039-10 
0-039-10 
I1 
Hi! 
m i ! 
I 
I 
I I 
s I " — 
r r " " " ~ 
r { • • • - " - • 
i i 
i — — — — 
a 
r r — — " 
a a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ? 
f " I " I 
1°° | s s S 
s i 
1 — I 
s a a 
I " - l l " " - ™ ' . I 
S ! S .. i 
% s a 
I " " " " " " - | 
s s 
I 1 f — I r I - - - - - i 
n r r " " " " i 
l i s i J «; 
| 1 g gg5?S??g8538 
|2 
55?558S52sS 
m u n n u z 
m r n m s m 
i n n n I 
0-039-10 
3 
3 
3 
' a J " 
( 5 
fa 
r 
! 
f r 
r f 
i < 
i i 
i i 
i i 
a ; 
I I 
Is f 
ss}gs|§BSs=?s 
j" i 
HI US' / p r 
isil I I ! 
i l i l i l l l iLl S In 
I'm 
I 
wmmmm fiiiiiMiniiiiiiiiiiiiii t\ 
i I 
fifififfiliiiliiitli 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
38SS 
8a|| 
Sill 
m i l 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
I Hgxstmmv 
1 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Bend Area Elementary School Boundaries 
\ i 
I: 'I 
i ' 
I 
' X 
V1 
I < ! 
!. I 
v: t / \V i . .i', |i A\H " 
M f e 
"•' S' ^  —ihf^ kL 
- V 
! P 
/ 
. /I 
B I K O ^ UMKI 
I t k A • I * 
.CrJw Bi'un 
- • Mwwi 
I 
0 0.45 0.9 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Attachment—7" 
City of Madras Roadway 
Classification Map 
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP 
CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE 
EXHIBIT 
G5 MAY 2001 
«139*7ECH MEMO X/H&&6S 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Attachment 
Project Scoping Letter 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . 
r \ T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
• 354 SW Upper Terrace Drive, Suite 101, Bend, Oregon 97702 - 541.312 8300 F 541.312.4585 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: December 10,2009 Project #: 10028.0 
To: Nick Snead, City of Madras 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County 
Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 
From: Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
Cc: DJ Heffernan, Angelo Planning Group 
Project: 
Subject; 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
Transportation Planning Rule Scoping 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document transportation analysis scoping to rezone 20 
acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) to include this land within the 
City's Urban Growth Boundary as Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This scoping was 
prepared for consistency with the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060 (Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for 
a zone change analysis. The purpose of the TPR analysis is to ensure the transportation system 
can accommodate the allowable land uses and that any significant affects are mitigated. 
The land included in the rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of the Jefferson 
County Middle School, and south of the existing ballfields near Bean Drive. The property is 
within the Yarrow Master Planned Community and its rezone to accommodate a school is 
consistent with the approved Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is generally 
shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the approximately 20-acre future school property on 
the Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
Note that while specific parcel boundaries have not yet been identified, the general location of the 
property south of Ashwood and east of Bean Drive within the future school boundary location 
shown on the Yarrow Concept Plan provides adequate information to accurately assess the 
transportation system impacts. Specific definition of the property will be provided as part of the 
zone change application pending further area refinement with City and County staff. 
LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 
Two reasonable development scenarios were identified to assess the potential transportation 
impact of rezoning 20-acres from Range Land to Multiple Family Residential Zoning. The two 
scenarios reflect County and City zoning provisions and are presented below. 
FILENAME: W028SCOPINGLTR.DOC 
f 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
December2009 
X < £ i 
'9* 
Sliou-vRi) '. $ 
i t 4? 
s- H ® S 
/ / i 
'MEPolKSf 
a 
"NE Jaffeoco 
/V L oe st" / 
/ 
• NE tbuofei Rd 
r 
% 
(NO.SCfiLE) 
Sfi 
HE Loucka Rd: 
. 
N Inn Al Croat . Kejfa SloJon 
'X 
55 .'g 
© 
F * ^ 
s § §. 
§ ' M jn' 
a 
i f . 
.NEChoiltuil ST : 
z • rn. 
Ook: Btreel iPot* 
s \ 
•8-
Ng.OaKSI 
AG Wort j . Simply a 
m 
,BIBI0CI inr-
I* i 
J- ! B 
f NEASC 
j i • 
NEOaSa"-—-
1 ' * • 5 
? ! • V , 1 « 
:S5 ! ..baqi Mountain View * " t n 3 1 Hospital DlHrtd 
'"Cwtfm Pain 
NEASl ^ 
Beori'Pcik 
"/ojltfm, S Conimiriry. Sffi 
Minn - j (Part ' IS 
55 ® 6E c'st 
BlocH i ~nr Olsie/ 
fV; i 8 
. Madras f 8E0 81 
" I M * 
42 
•••I i • » en , rn . .in 
9 3 13 B 
NE.B 8t «p w / j 
m • 
<31'SECS> g, 
H 
'J 
SEOSt 
m 
w 
JESt 
endship;] 
"if •SEE SI 
% 
® % 
- ; • § K 
g'jjjjj 1 
• i i 
s : : : i 1 ca 
SE PAI 
• $ w 
, m Mqdiaa 
§ a ;H l { ih Sulioal 
$ 2 
Hi 
j a 
• 2 
. SE E Et' 
•o a 
to 
> t ; ; 
vCf i si,—> SE I SI v> t m ' © a 8 
S ! , ; 
• ! \>o &EH8t ffl<f 
. I ' "ni u^ . «* 
sE.fliifl.sr. «E Butvsr 
im 
.: &E J si, 
2 • 
SE D»v» SI 
SETracs«S( 
EE LSI 
ft 
r* ^ * _ Imagery obtained from maps.gcogle.com 
% 
. WtUeffehtoh} 
loolCemstKy 
NE Lcuckl Rd' 
i Q-
f 
i ? -
NE racHBitl» Ln 
a St:. Al'wwojif'liJ." E'Ashwoid fld : 
. SE'KORRTFA. , 
i ,«> 
t ? 
'' i J^im'pfir Ml PaHiti 
0 •a s 
.0 « 
• ' f t 
• \ SITE 
SITE VICINITY MAP 
MADRAS, OREGON 
S ^ j K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . 
i i g f e j TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December2009 r 
§ •2s I 
f l 
•i i kk I I loc 
l i f iJ-J § 3 I 3 < 
e , -3- I i: 
YARROW MASTER PLAN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
| 0 p j K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . 
I g X i ! TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 4 
Range Land (RL) Development Potential 
The Range Land zoning is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within 
Jefferson County. The RL zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural 
lands for livestock grazing. The RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum 
of 40 acres. A variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these 
uses require more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low 
intensity uses. Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely 
limited, and for analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Multiple Family Residential (R-2) Development Potential 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, to include apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723, were reviewed to 
identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses are typically 
not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the rezone is to 
ultimately allow for a new elementary school, this specific conditional use was reviewed to 
ensure that a reasonable development scenario considers the impacts of this intended future use. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building space, 
parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included as an attachment. 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise five 
acres of the overall land, with the remainder retained for residential uses. The most likely school 
type would be an elementary school given the regional needs. A new elementary school could be 
expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students. This would result in a second 
potential development scenario that would include 174 attached residential units (11.6 units/acre 
* 15 acres = 174 units) and a 350-student elementary school (remaining five acres).. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 5 
TPR ANALYSIS SCOPING 
Trip Generation 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within the Institute of Transportation 
Engineer's (ITE's) standard reference Trip Generation, 8th Edition, using the Apartment land use 
category (Land Use Code 220). Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared 
using surveys of schools within the City of Bend, which contain slightly lower trip generation 
rates than national surveys of elementary schools (0.13 trips per student versus 0.15 trips per 
student) but are expected to better represent local characteristics. The attachments contain the Bend-
La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement the adjacent middle school, and benefit from the adjacent ballfields, 
additional trip discounts were not applied to the trip rates obtained from the Bend-LaPine school 
district facilities. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation potential of the two scenarios. 
Table 1 R-2 Development Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Land Use ITE Code Size Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments 220 232 Units 145 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Plus Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School N/A 350 Students 46 25 21 
Total Trips 159 99 60 
*Trip rate reflects data collected at elementary schools in central Oregon 
As shown in Table 1, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out with residential uses alone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the 
proposed UGB amendment and rezone was determined through review of existing traffic 
patterns, the locations of other elementary schools, residential destinations, and review of existing 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 6 
school attendance boundary maps. The resultant trip distribution patterns were separated by 
residential and school trips, and are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. As shown, the pattern 
highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west toward the City center and US 97 
corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute onto the parallel routes (Loucks, 
City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel destination. Both trip distribution patterns 
reflect a regional draw as the school trips are primarily associated with faculty and staff during 
the evening commute period. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 1) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing, as illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5 includes a sum of the total 
additional vehicles that could occur at nearby collector and arterial intersections. 
Study Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning (as shown in Figure 
5), the following five intersections of collector and arterial roadways are proposed for inclusion in 
the traffic study. 
1. Ashwood/Bean Drive (could be impacted by 137 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
2. Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
3. B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
4. B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
5. B Street/10,h Street (could be impacted by 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
These intersections are those that could experience more than 50 additional weekday p.m. peak 
hour trips with the rezone/UGB amendment, or those that could experience a significant increase 
in total volume with the amendment1. The City of Madras roadway classification map is included in the 
attachments. 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required at the time of site plan application/land use entitlements. 
However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to provide consistency with the 
adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP), only the weekday p.m. peak hour operations are 
applicable to the TPR analysis. 
1 The City of Madras Technical Memorandum #2B contains traffic study guidelines that identify study area 
intersections as those that experience a 10 percent volume increase as a result of a proposed land use 
action. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
<r 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
December 2009 
(NOSfcALE) 
r ^ Imagery obtained from maps.google.com £ 
V 
ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
l ^ j K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . 
i S y TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
r Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
December 2009 
10% 
• . <3 " • ? / y , a.. 
© 
(NOSpALE) 
^fr-.lt (W. 7 t . ^v**!it 
® 
A'.:; V 
' ~ ' -© © | ? ' Ml;*" 
MEt&tjut ft: : 
V v!: ': J* 
w t l l l ® : 
•-'ft. 
V 
tij.b.141 
N j f l y k i i ^ . . i: a.,: i - i? 
S'^H; - KG***'. „ 5 1 :.s 
\VHmfW Of**;] Ifi' 
'J-CttCT J. jj 
<v. ; 
: t A-j'^xtjvd 
iii'l' 
l 
SITE 
•"^ •••ti -> '!! 4. • ' S S 
- : j •-••! ';«K i ff 
"••»<> {BJ-j § " I tiiiws, -
.'*' (HJ "HO' 
26% YARROW 
' O-.VI g : 
j I f 
® ;' 46 LB 
Imagery 6blainedfrbmmaps.gdbgle.com 
. .' a -' 
V 
ESTIMATED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
K i t t e l s o n 8c A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . 
I ^ y TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
r Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
December 2009 
. "J 
r V • : e ^ E%» i>d . 
/ a 
& 
; HS . 
3 
• »• • 
(NOSfcALE) 
Oftwuio • m 
m * 
• 50I»J &«»".' 
ri/fv^lrtrf--
. I 
ft - J;. 
• ! . 
1 S •' -
I 
X 
1 • 
i 
fl.. 
.. fSlZLsllfll 
• w 
i '•••i/.ir^^vv: J ; < 
• Krt'a y 
3«1 Viti: 
V 
\ 
V 
Kb .^rJ;;:?;-
a . M&a»rTv 3 seV« /Seup 
v© 
$ I:. 
: • •ifi 'l^i. li-i" M i ll ©a 
i f l v M 
•if-
seiWii:.. . BE'out'RV• 
'• J'-i 
- s • r- ' 
.-s; e u 
N , 
"• -
^ i • 
.Vtfahn^ iB^ "^; 
f A"!* ' si 
* 
SITE 
V 
J !£t»,,e 
© 
Si 
\ 
© 
frti. a. -fr-1-,*-. -,- .: • ' 
Imagery obtained from maps.google.com 
TEV=TOTAL ENTERING VOLUME 
V 
TOTAL ADDITIONAL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP POTENTIAL 
MADRAS, OREGON 
K i t t e l s o n 8c A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . 
I ^ y TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 10 
Jefferson County traffic study requirements identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should 
be maintained at all County intersections. The City of Madras TSP identifies a target Level of 
Service (LOS) "D" for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections (or LOS F 
with a volume-to-capacity ratio below 0.95). 
Study Periods 
The purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to ensure that the proposed zone change will 
continue to be consistent with the system planning required under OAR 660-12. To assess 
consistency, the horizon analysis period is selected based on the horizon period of the adopted 
Transportation System Plan. The Jefferson County TSP considers a horizon year of 2027 and the 
City's TSP assesses year 2020 conditions. Accordingly, the applicable horizon period will vary 
throughout the study area based on roadway jurisdiction. All traffic volume forecasts will be 
obtained from the applicable TSP or based on continued application of the approved growth rates 
where otherwise unavailable. Table 2 summarizes the study intersections, roadway jurisdiction, 
applicable performance standards, and horizon analysis year required for compliance with the 
TPR.2 
Table 2 Summary of Intersection Performance Standards 
Intersection Jurisdiction 
Traffic 
Control1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive Jefferson County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Kinkade Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street/ 
10 th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
lTWSCr Two-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) 
Recent or Upcoming Roadway Improvements 
There are three identified public improvement projects within the vicinity of the property. 
• The J Street improvements will include traffic signal upgrades at the US 97 northbound 
and southbound couplet, realignment of the southern couplet terminus, and roadway 
widening. The J Street project is identified on the Draft 2010-2013 State Transportation 
Improvement Program (STIP) and is likely to be funded by the horizon period (note that 
z Additional discussion on applicable horizon periods can be found within Section 3.2.01 of ODOT's 
publication Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Reviews: Guidelines for Implementing OAR 660-12-0060, which 
can be found at the following link; http://www.oregon.gov/OPOT/TD/TP/docs/TPR/tprGuidelines.pdf. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment Project #: 10028.0 
December 10, 2009 Page 11 
while the improvement is likely to occur, a reasonably likely determination has not been 
provided by ODOT). 
• The Fairground Road extension is identified as a new east-west route within the City of 
Madras on the Transportation System Plan. Similarly, the roadway extension is likely to 
be provided within the planning horizon. 
• The City View to J Street connection has been recently completed. This new connection 
provides convenient and direct access from the proposed lands to US 97. 
The recent construction of the City View connection will provide convenient access to the south. 
The future funding and reasonably likely determinations for the J Street 
realignment/improvements and the Fairgrounds extension are not critical to the proposed UGB 
amendment as it will not affect the selection of study intersections, assumed intersection 
configurations, or result in modifications to the demand-based regional trip distribution patterns 
included herein. As a result, to be conservative, neither the J Street realignment/improvements 
nor the Fairgrounds extension will be assumed in the traffic analysis. 
NEXT STEPS 
Please provide written comments or concurrence on the proposed analysis scope at your earliest 
convenience. If you have any questions on these materials please call us at (541) 312-8300. 
Attachments 
1. Residential Density Development 
2. Bend - La Pine School District Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
3. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Attachment"®" 
Proposed R-2 Zoning 
LOS Worksheets 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
i O « 
I — > - o 
y 40 2: 
: u ^ 
i <3 $ 
-r-, 1 O U tJ 
u a> oi 
V) u o w to O 
>.0 18 ^ id c; jj v? o c «c 
m a? J-= 6 tr* a> <1? 
jJ Lii <c 
re <b 
<15 « t ST; tJ 
» o o « W (J 
+ *D fv U C 
<N o tN O (J 
£ GJ J.> 2£ 
a> ij 
+ in IJ .C TO 0) jr 
X t> C <1! (J IJ 4J Ov 0) O m <U Oi C < u C> -H JJ iy ® > > VI Oi E -i AS V + 
o o i-H Q> u 
> <v CO o a H > —i HI 10 <3) o !U <W u O1 •H 
EJ 2 4J M <u a •H > T> > C o L? <£ >1 CJ C 
CI 
a> 'O o o + xz -H e> 4J 
> 4J f <y •M ai u 4-> CJ 
<y 2: ui 
in w 
V) Vi mi t: ^ o o jj 0"; 
•K o o f0 > u di u O fj; a O CO <w S3 a t-r o 
o «-< Pi 
•M r-i O < U 14 a 
1 -H H« I -t i a < I £0 
i o o 
* u G) <1  0 5 a) o •• T> o 3) g JZ ii 0) < a> u C «—i •» o w f-« AJ O 0 14 £ o f5 u u £ xj 
£) •H <U u <5  *J JC • ta <y o i-J i-t t> t- tr- c: « c: V) O 
CI 0 O O H -H + R3 o as i-J 
+ u o <fi < XI U c: > ca U) 
o o o o o < 
1 > H J 
) a) QJ J < TJ 13 • : T> T5 
< ef. tf( » 
o o o o o 0 o O 1 o O o O 1 o o o o o o o Cv o o J o o i o o - o • 1 i o - o r-t O 1 J «•! «-« o i \ o o o ,-t 
\C o in r-i o O O ) r-f ) o cr» o r CO ( r» r> io O O O (• 
tx> Cr. O cn <Tv « ui CN~ m u*) iO 1 <V f r> » r-l-« O 1 <••' o C-> i a * o o r-i !••< 
vo o m o o o as o (-- i r^  r^  io o o o rn o •J1- o m i ICJ oo U) 1 » o • f> I r^  <x> t « r-<H O ^ I r-l o o 1 
° 
o o «••< r-» r-i 
LTi O r- o r- o o r» 1 o vo •a- r-i I r- r~ <n OJ O M (II C5 CO en o m | u? } o ui • o • 1 » C3 • O ft O I—l " " i <-t o O l 1- o o o ^ ^ 
O'- O ;n m o o o 
i 
T> 1 o i av i r- r- o eg in vj) O (TV r-- o o r~ i u"> cr, vo O I o tn * o • 
> Is- r-< 1 o • o <-4 O } ^ o o 1 o o o H rl H 
o O u-j O a o o O l o o o o | o o o O O o cC o-. o 1 in o o » o o o . G . 1 1 O • O o r- 1 "~H *""' o I o o o 
•OS UT CO o O o r> J o ^^ 1 o LO U"I tfi C l/) u tp CR r^  r- o o r^  I in CD w « o • I r^  n> I CO • CO o r-i i i 
rH O o 1 1 o O O W «••« <N 
O) o ir> t^  o o I <4? 1 O r^ i 1 iO 1 io o l'j u o en o o <n i u"> KO 1 m . o • m m 1 r- O ' CO 
«-• o t-! «-• 1 r4 o r-» rj I o o o r-4 <••! 
ON U-J r« o «-< o o r-l I O <n N <7v I CO lO U} tn o in u ci o o "ST 1 in r^  t fM CO » CO * c& o «-< f ^ O O I o * o o CJHN 
0 c IJ-) o o o o o O ) o o o O 1 o c o o o o < o cn o o I LO o o 1 o o o • o » 1 r* i O ' o o 1 r o o o 1 f <w 
O o m 0 o o o O O 1 (1) o o a i O 1 Ci o o o G O O < o o 1 o o t T» o o o . o « 1 i o • CJ » o r-< o r-J J T? «"H «-« a i 21 O o o «-• 
O O uT o o o o O O J S o o o o c OT O o o o o o < O o o 1 «o o i -H O o o ' O ' 1 i irt • o « o o 1 o «-. o 1 > . o o o 
l U r-i ft 1 c •r-i GJ Z5 h o § 1 JJ a -H c. ^ O -C > n a > O U t a U u a> o a > W j •H CU & fjS I t> >«o & w > Z •—i T5 •r—1 O J +J W> 1 JJ' iJ o U ^ > •TJ < .o <u TX > I « SJ 4-J t rti ^  A) N U H > < u y U rl •7) *fs -5 1 u to >* o .a ji 'fli I 3 ^ «y o r st ZJ « ^ n; M Q (u C. 1 JJ JJ -m c c t •H 0/ r-i r-t 4) VJ C <Ji 5C 0) a) L5 .Tj 01 •H 1 •11 o u U 0 CJ « -q q oc & s: i (/; u> < •"3 U. | u > l> a > ^ 3 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
fig; 
5 '£> \P 3; y. m O O ai 'n —
1 O O O ; 
l ^ a s s s 
0 0 0 
1 ISIisssSisSsSlsSsls 
f y m i y i y y i * 
£ X X * S 
1 1 1 1 1 1 mm 
1 
..H* i 33 is 
gpyc , ,5 „ .u 
a» d u u 
g -i t 8 tf CL WO > M ti. rg « w « 
o o •• -p ^ fa « E a) fl o* § c .3 .. p. M «•< <!> <3 3 3 C h H © o J-? 
§"' . .>18: V - s s s s 
S S S s S . - " 0 « ^ r * . . ' ^S^ .S . 
) 3 S ^ S 3 .5 -S » | >j a. 
§SSS . i r ? • • ^ ^ I n i i ^ r r ° ^ ^ -3 V ^ ^ ^ - t- ^ 
£} I 5 r^  £> ^ 3 jj - g a o i t .h e £ ® V -If £ ^ 
^ «y o> a c. u ij rj a: 3) .D >, ,!I o -u m o> E- S 
.. S'S'S&g-Sc5 tsar ' s u a IA v> i-< >1 t-i -10.00. so -a « o ^ H 3 w 3'M if) \ m c a c tJ !h »" <y o S •£•> vj -h 3 Ai flj H-i u £.< f-i 
' M '' ."I 
g i O O X j - ; l i l ^ S - j I S f l t l i l P P i 
a> ^ jj v< i-j j'j w m £•< «-i & •»•! li a, u if jj :5 q {2 
8 m § It- o 5 .0 5 a a u S 3 a 01 o ° ° ° 8< j j a o o> ••« o> 0. g o,e g r-. o o r-s a a, « m a >=•«• x o o m c c c: 'm 
^ Si o I I S a! £ S 3 o " M O S S X S £ S Si s i/'i .3 
3 
2 
I 
S 
s-H rtJ 
i i i 
P i 
SI 
I 
3 a 
" 2 
2 5 -d 
J l IS 3 
g o d 
gSK 
Sis 
o w a 
a 
: i 
S ^ Si g 
SSSSS 
l o o o o o 
sgsgg: 
g g g g g g s s g s g g s 
: o iH o i-H i-« o 
g g g g g g s g g s g g s 
.-i r-( I-H .-( t-< O X«-<0»-t'-tO 
S E g S S i S 5 § S § g S 
1—t I—I I—I M f-t O >: r-l O <-H O 
s p p p p g g g g g 
o 01 a o o o ® S o to o S oi 
c-lO-Hr-Ji-lt-iOOr-sOrHGO 
o m o o o o ^ a l o a c a i c 
r-i O <-« >-i O O r-! O r-l O O 
0 0 0 0 0 0 to o a> o in n Qdioooooioioajotn® 
w rc 
^ u <«•  <3 
ti « S 'o S 
?I 
«J <—1 »> w 41 
* S 
K 
I S 
I g g g g g 
g g g g g 
f i t 
p 
u M l M u l i m t 
A 
A A O 
A A O 
A A O 
A O 
A A «• < 
A A A • (—( 
A J\ 
A AO 
A A • 
A A 
A A o 
S3 
v v o 
« V V r-» 0) 
'•< v/ V 
% V V o 
S V V o 
*•« •/ v 
•' j v v o 
£ v v ^ . w o 
- I 
v v 
3S2SSif.Hl 
-H t-< "(-I 
"B * CT> <-i 
HB is 
g' 
I 
2 
S 
y g. 
s o o iH 
u /-I •H 'M 
a 
0=039=10 
• c © 
(J «i> <0 
- SO Vi w O £ OD o 
•H O f-l u o 
O .C {r. 
til V o 
if) 'J) L? < 
c •-> o c n tn O tj -H & fi-
v <y jj .-•» 
O ril * 
3? * 
(•> 'O •> u o .» 
.O o < r- O r- o -v- C-! o c o c? C) O 1 O a: O 1 lo r* o O': CD o o ^ I 11 f T> 1 
1 5.A 
<i> si J r-t r-i c- i-i O O O O 1 i-J i \0 CJ-tvJ 02 
•Ji 
o o i o <NJ <P o o vO 
I a* 
<7 
o ? i 1 n 
O 0> 
O tn 
o iX> » 
s o o 2 
o o Cj O o m o c O | o i c» O'. o 
<y f o 
!A o o l o o O O o to o o O O t o o o 'flj O 1 o o l/> o o > 1 vJ t 
'T o i/> 3 I <y i O 1 -i o 
•r-l T- ••< O 
a d» o i «J a i w a> cn 1 H •H o o i •a> o ED o O in o trs O UI i o '•>' 
S >1 
o 
w 
t-
j o> 
y > I 
i/> CJ O 
o 
O « 1 >ri r- o o o S 
o rj h a> Ui 
I a, o o } C." o Cf o o 0 O m 0 i^ j o o 1 o Kfi (7\ r-0i U) t o f7\ o *T 1 r* to 
a 
Q) 
o » o o \Ci 
sa 
«».« ' O t o r-J 
tj <T. u a> ^ o 
I o o o o o o o ui cs ° 
o o o o O 1 o iSi o o o o o 
a' > 1 u> } r- -- o vj a> 1 d» ! o o k Hi 1 r. CJ O J 1 cc 1 ^ y o I O 1 o o o o o o o o o V) CTi o o o 
GO o o O 1 o i/) o o o o o 
S) 23 i l-« •es- 1 1 o ,-H 
t-- r-i o 
i •—i O 1 o f 04 o J o o o o o o o o o o o o o J W r o o C\ o o o o o » r-4 o vi i o .-1 
JZ 0*5 
\J~t s 4.) 
o l r- o o o I/) <Ts o o CS { t.-
ii •v. < O 1 i 
C-l ^ o ot •g- i—l <m o in f*- 05 r-
as c: a> 1 o r-M <:> o 
Of CD CO i ! tf 1-1 \ 
ti ^ cc 1 C/ ^  o o i If; o l/> o o if) o U-) o lO O o uf> t 3> O u c O f 03 o <6 C) <T\ o o O o un a> o x: ( -iJ { JO r) J C. I ^^  1 O o » ai r-l 1 o o I eg o CN! o o r-i o »o HI C? in O ( Y. o z I O) 1 o trt tn o U\ '-TJ O o ir- | •X5 CO J O 1 I JC ro ut 0 OJ 0) cl O r-i -L 0 o o c vi f ,-i u* o 1 (U i u >1 E c 1 0 rH o 4> fj 0! 1 CJ •• fd i—! 0) o rj j I>) 4-» «> { S "H 13) o T-. T> '••i f •-I a; G; tn u w < o c-< T5 O 1 •D r o gj > !« « o "5 0} <y <i> C G W I c; "D "O > a o < •H 1 VI >-J M w u> •Is U a> [ iJ -C <•) 1 a a« tu Ci n i • ^ tti u w *-> P. C } H « b *D TJ L) UJ a i 4J 
3 Q. a o i p •H 
+ fO i O fj c: T5 c? «T1 ^ o UJ X, >J 1 J> OT l-< a. a — 1 U) <A I'M 
r- o o < 
> . o • 
o o < o .. o • i - o -j 
• C5 <••< m <••< 
o o o o o i o o ' o • • « o • o o o .-T 
3 O O O < O 1 
rn o r- o r - ' fi '.a • o • , , t- • f o a N ri N 
m o o c^  f) ^ • o » r- • c-
r-i a- T> jz > cj it! .c < at o c> •• 
>t o <y -i > > > C <J ^ > + 
i X \ a» "v O <-< >• en ) C n >t a) XI + , U 3 m >-J Ct sm + < -i <•; #—f a> Tilfl I k H O 5) 'Jl Ti <2 U 
• <_S » > Q t. 
o O ^ !N D O - O o w 
I I ( (-• I m 
o o o o o o o o • o o o • • • c> . - < o o «-i o o o 
i o fl o is </i a) ci O • ! - T • ' 
• Co • ' -Ofli .—I O G O 
o ir) o r- co rn 
o . ^ r- t * • »<n . • « a en -H o o o 
u o <s -> 0 CO 
1 » r- f) o o o o 1 r, I i o a> 1 a> r- i in r-j 
1 1 CTi O 
35 f-' ( m o o 1 <M ' 1 tn 1 o 1 LT» L» i; On y + JJ I • r\5 rvj 1 IN 1 <>i <y o 
! ° 
o 
•m X, ^ TJ o 0) * 10 w j o o o o o o 1 1 o o 1 1 o o o o i 1 o O 1 O O 
M IJ u .n 1 o o o o 1 IVJ ' I V£j a? i «-• O i r* o U U o o o t • o o 1 <N S XI o <y "5 ; 1 c> rH o o o I «-l 
1-1 i fj 
0 c <D «y fc w 
Vt * * r m o CM o o o r- CTi 1 CO f- o fO i m ro J r-<s> 
o r.: Jj o; f r> o o o 1 VD 1 CD 1 < c o l-i I ' Co m m OS O -H ^  -» t o o o 1 r- CN •o u a 1 t 1 1 
« cn x") « t: 
4J ra <c a> g 
o « r m fo o <N o o 0 f- cr. 1 1 CO tw- 1 1 t-i o n t I tn fi I r~ ir> 
o 4J 1} I n o o \ m in V3 VO 1 CO 
| Vi 
-H i CD rH | « I f8 c , o o a1 j-i l o CJ j t -< <-* 1 <N IN o > a I » 1 l i m i irt 0 o •b o z v< o 1 LO o f-J o o o a\ i CD V 1 <N r') I r-O c r- v u 45 to r <o o o o o { <n m vo 1 CO J c-4 fj o to » ' (D I 
Ifi o T> ^ -» r o o o f iH f< 1 r« I r-< I J^ tN 
0 O -» 
> o "H 
i—: O a Or -» ir l o o O o o o o o ( o o < o o c? o 1 O O 1 o o 
'O <M a: { o o o o o { ITS * a? J .-» o i o 1-1 4J -Q i • O o 1 • o o a i < 1 CM ( Q as m vi * 3 l o j o o o i { 1 <w 1 
e t- di * 
u o tn i 1 o «v o o o o o o CD { t o o ( 1 o o O o I o o 1 O o ii 4-1 w o o o I CJ • { CD 1 <-> o us '»TJ i o o I • o o o 1 ' u 1 c. Q 1 r-i i2 w O Vl * 03 * u o j 1 o 0 o o o o o o 1 i o o t { o o O o 1 1 o O I 1 o o i! W S5 1 o o o o o 1 Ol • 1 vO TO i r-l 1 F-o T> 1 ' o o o ( • o o o O 1 1 IN 1 o o o o ( rl J fS 
E o a I », .< 7 1 •• 
a> * u ti> i ta "i 
4-i • 0, > I o> u c + a O J w < x i m < 
> ft PC =5 
C •» 3) 5/1 H S ^ rH a a II! » U li. O D D M O X' 
O k. r-
o O" 
Xi O U <T> in 
iu CD 
Si fM 
uo u 
O -ut «o o 
I C\ ; 
I I/) 
I IS ' 
> 0 O I o o —> J^  I o SI o iJ i o iJ .n in i cd Cu th i (ucr, 
& U ( !ffl -X 
X. ( I i (VI U2 I 4JS 
g 
ui 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
1 
O 1-1 
i! f 1 
V ii 
1 g 2 "8 0! XI c >, 
is |I 
P as "Si 
H I 
111 
s 
3 
V 
! S r 
!SS f 
i O -4 
5 
r 
«' o 
. 3 
11=i 
7 B i i 
1 ni 
ii' 
I' 
• r 
MCOO o I ' 
H OI <t« Or 
8 
g 
g g g g g g g SSSgSX 
^ rH r-» r-t O X f"? O ! O 
o o § o o o tr. o o o 
^ O rl C rl H O 
l i l l l l l l ! ^ ! : . 
g § g g g § * 
g g g g g g 
—i «-« »•{ r-* rH i-« x O H o O 
O O O O O O X ti> o O O OOOOOO XT* CM*" OOf^  
r.( i—* i—t »—< i—I i—I X O r-4 O «-i i— O 
| x t | ; J p o o o o r j 
5 3S £ £ g § g § § § 
: § g g g 
A 
o 
\ A O 
A r-l A o A A o 
A A rH 
•V A° 
A A * o 
A 
' g 
A A * O A A 
» 
S 3 
IIISS1I 
I I 
'D £ ' 
1 
s I I 
&..SS O ''1 -H 
1111 
iU 
i l | l l ! : I 
|-.c3 .. 
l l l f l l l l l ^ 
r 
1 3 
' s g a g g g g s s g g g s s 
Q o «-!<-<«-« —f O O O r-l o o 
-o ro o o o o -x! <?> o cd o tn -v-"0 o cr» o o o o ct\ <y> o co cv i»"> oo 
T-f O .-I '-I O O «-« O r-» O O 
S o ffi 5 o o o £fi ai o S o S co 
r\3 <••! C> '-I >H IH C- o O r-1 O O 
I s l s s l l E S i l l i y 
v v d 
V V 
V V o 
» v V O r-l V V a o TJ V' V o 
V V 
iJ v v o 
fC V V «-< 
J v v g a w « 
I . . 
m 
I f 
a s l av 
"A 
£ 
1 
m 
f 
1 
S3 H 
-s 
3 
i 
! .—I 
I 
& 
3 
i 
CO C ) 
g 
5J 
3 
2 
H 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
t o o o o w r-
o • o o o > • • o • • • «-H «-< —« «-i O O f-« 
o o o o o o o o ' o o o ' * . o . « . 0 0 «-« 0 0 0 
15 • I CU • . 01 I • r-> t- 1 rH r4 I 
IN O i rt m 
J O o o c o o o o JO O • o o o • * 
J » . 0 . . < c o I O r-l OOO 
o o o o 
ii XI & c > 
1 e -a * c <y o <u 
«sa « « o r. a> o o 
O O + iJ x: -1 M 4-» t-l O « -t fts 
C O . j O -H S, -i •H aj 4-1 m <y -r (0 s + 
.ui qj p 53 O..H * CL Q O £ ~ > + o s + u u o * X i-t * 
I O O O O O O O O : » o o - o o o • • 1 » . ir • • >00 i O '••« 0 0 0 1 j 
J O f O O O O O O O O I 1 o o - o o o - • • . o . • . o c •I 0 0 0 1 o I J o o o 0 0 0 0 0 O • O o o • ' . o « • ' a o 
o o 
' o 
«- I fM 
0 0 f o o 
00 1 00 
o en o o o r-o - O O O < » . r- » • • i-t co o o 
<0 \n i r- jo 
i rn <0 0 o 0 < vsin 1 1- n 
to + M 1 1 
• O 
j <u «• 
o G 1 1- > <1? u a 
• l i s 
as u <y <u < 
1 u o " « to w •• 3C i n !•• ^ a a is n u 1 '.c a. a rj w o \c 
CI O" 
-r •• •3 C5 u ,c y 4-» i U n o I f3 uT tu <T\ I <7> rf I a? M .C «M t iN 35 1 J-> X O O ^ O <ri J O. X 
W U 
•a ra 
u se 
(!) m j £ u 
73 -M • C QJ o a o> c ^ 3: 
>2) C! 
(DOC <y o o 
o o x> O -C K in u o if) V) O 
*>,o 
tl -H •U u-i c U w 
o c « « GJ -5 e E-o tu At .-f rH 4-1 [J <T3 
2 c : . 4-1 M > l-l W (\l k O C JJ f a c <-! * 
& -ri cii * CS 4J * m 0 + c u e -» o c -j -r •H 0«"H -» 4J o o •» •# 
U S •» U <u + a i m J-
t- P + o o * u o rs + O S" f T3 (N 
U .s. i-l i 
V) A 
X >; x X X X X X X X :< X X X X X X X X X >: x ••, 
•x X X X X X •A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X .1 
X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X :< X * 
•x x X X X X X 'X X X X X X X X X X X i< -
X X X X X X 
X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X «• 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -f 
tf! vD r^ i 0 r - CT- ^ 0 0 a^  ^ 0 0 X X 
V 0 xr» in m Z 
O 0 O CI 0 VO Cr5 0 0 <Ts 0 0 X T 0 0 
»n X X 
r- r- 0 0 in r—l 0 tvj w 0 X X 01 iH 0 O O i 
m in f« X X * X X + 
X X X X X X X X X J.J X X X X x X X X X x « 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X x' X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x 
X X :< X X X X X' X V->: >1 :< X X X X X X X X 
V. X X X X X X X X X X X X X V. X X X X X X X X X -j. 
X ^ X" X X X X ?e X" X X X "X T{ X X X" X sr X X X 
•> 
X X X X X X x X y. V X X X X X X X X X X X X x X 
X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X -» 
:< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -r 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + 
X X 'X X X X X X X V. X X X X X X X X X X X X •» 
>: X X X X X X X X X 94 X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X 
+J 0 e 
* 
0 c 0. <M s 0* \J c p CL •r| 
ru --H e U 
01 a 0 c? c O .—1 rtj <r J co (C 4-1 
0 3 0 u en p <r n j.? O O 
—i 
M 0 M 
P 0 c 0 '0 4J 0 + 
O c u. M •li JJ a* a> C Xl 
a a> <v p p c: C_l u G! 0 xJ 
O c a rH <y 5.1 T i w rtJ -H •H i. 
6 (0 > u p m O K4 + <u a O >, J j p > S f 0 p 0 H T) 4J - * 
0 4.1 c c 0 cn -4 3 M c -i c: 2 i i + 0) E- H3 4J n a rH c U 0 11 D' a? O + 
c 6 tf. 0 4) ac 0 -H C 4.) [J Li c Ifl ff) w ai P4 u M to 0 JJ T> 
a> u a CI c ..3 0 tr O C > tfl c IJ) Li V) < a, 0 M M x d.1 0 JJ a J.4 •H [u 1-, 4-S flj p A P 0 G rH Q. p U c; 
41 H a) <13 n 0 0 M c a
5 1 u 4-» t 
ns G> > rO V) 0 p •r\ <i! C^  l) a « •H 4J >> 4_J O --J 4i re cr> £-« 
0 > c t-t cr< c< 
U u x? m W a- 4-! > p c 
j= 1-1 -H iy <1> u p. „C 5-1 'U H a cc q 0 4J C. 4- vO e-i 
-<•1 0 a *D «H (D O M p M p 50 + a' O O 4) « 0 <s- a t-i p a" .c a 3 + 0 © a 4J 't-i iij 4» O u M .—i p <v s.> us E- •A •O 4 
o + a» * 
jz c ^ 5m a. nj . fl> O O •J <1> 
o nj iH 0 <u O i-> rH 3 flJ a o ^ a >1 o w 
c <u j -H M M -U w <y iB « O fJ U D ag £'o a 3 2 t) O ^ 2 
i-f fr* O O aafJ o o ^ 
73 O^  & 41 e c -H 4-» -H -H f" Uj R 1/3 P O O JJ n a a o •o a a o < O O 
01 P jO 3 
. . . tJ» O ft > .-1 <: t/i X-H C 
c c c c a 3-_ „ e u w hnaiiiJwDi«pis o>w ox? 001 C3<HE<H o ct^ ao F-H J? •w •*-> x o «h o m •-4-t a'-w ^ M <w n JE w -H —1 w o a y s h w a w 
P -V-
-o 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
I I 
I ! 
C-l I 
. ! 
I 
£ 
s l l 
i ; : 
•Is 
IP 
si i 
IP 
1 
3 1 s U -!-> •-« 
l i i 
•S'S3 
3 - 3 , 3 
X :'i $ 
I ! I 
s 
1 
5 
SS = 
I ' 
5 
1 ' 
S S < 
.. Si, 
fj C O 'O «--> : 
, I 
> o o c o 
• o c-g 
3 
° g iiggg 
° r ' ' ° g ^ g g g g 
g 
3 
a, 
1 
2 
1 
m n 
I 113 I f 1S1 
S S g 5 & 2 g S 
> O O O CJ t 
> u : 
IS i 
j m • c i 
I l l s B H I I I 
T5 O o a O O O C5 O ,, AMU j X >: x x d x k 
i O O O O Q iO O U) 
m .. Ol iO 
5 O « 
•g" 
s 
.. Tj 
3 
3 § 
3 
C 
1 
t- r* o r* 
f i i l i l i i i P 
l.j «i-< (J 4) 
f l l ' S I l I S I I I S I ^ I I I & l s l S t a s i s - ^ I g ^ i . - l l ' i & a : i t 3 
S J 
s 
s 
u m ifl o in >-. m a cj\ 
0 cvj rvi o M ••„> o r -
r i '-r ui 
o o o o tn o tn n c \£i o o r- o ci 
O O (•• • r* o in • tn 
§ 
t i l l 
a5 
•n I S 
I * 
I I 
S 
II 
s 
s a 
U 
— 
£ 
52 
P 
s i 
••H 
S3! 
f!i 
o -»•< 
?! 
8 . 
r -
ill 
v / 
1 1 ' 
i f 
P : 
B i s 
n • 
o o ifi m 
cn m 
s g •c o m 
s g o o 
18
3 
L .
00
 ]
 
(*» O -V t-MO rH Ci 
o o o o 
° g O O Cl Q 
o g o o o o 
o o o o o m m 
s § cd o m n rH Cv 
° g o o o o 
r-i 
m o o n 
r-f «—' 
2 _ 
4.1 «i-i Jj 
H>°SH 
S 2 3 g 
" 3 3 o 
IS - a 
i-J CO 
» • H o r - »-2 
o 
o in o o o 
x - II 
O to o o o 
r-« O i | I I P Si's 
o o o o 
O CO 
o IS I I I I i n 
O tr> \D O 
r-i O 
H m 
r- f) 
v c? rg r- < -i o o 
r%- r/) f>-, , CJ 
^ * |1 a 
oifli- o r-
O CO f-J 
o 
IN r> 
to r> cvj r- r- ' 
o s h 
o m o o o 
r-i O 
»n o 
a> 
SRSCS r- r> • 
o i l l ' s 
o tn in o -.n 
r o 
^ H tn 
JH 
Q IO ni irt " w OJ H G su r^  ro m « -t o j t p 
If 
U 
r 
Hi 
; u^  m ca t 
] »iS O Cvl 
.. i 
l l l s l l i s l l l l s 
si'i 
1 s t 
a P -3 
<J o u. 
: .o o. •• a. 
; ti« s "s 
! H s n i 
resii 
S l f l p l ! 
^ t s - i i O i 
l l l s l l l s l ; 
•Ss 
g 
.3 
W 
a 
2 
8 
I 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
* > X X 
* x x "G X >: x x a x x o x x x 
rsi f -j t 
t? r-j <nj 
^ a 
tj ra •J a G> O Z »i 
n «J 
rs» c >• <•> flj i & •O ii • C CJ O d! a u t< 
v <d in w O c: © p o 
rtj 4-1 
|J C-f 3 S O 
O < 0) 15 
E 
<B B) >OC< OO 4>OOOOOCOOOOOO< 
o o o ^ o o o o o o o o o o • . U O • ' • o o o o c.-> » o (n < r « » o o o o 5 o as o. o O O O O O 
C O O C V " 0 0 0 0 l'> O O O t 
o ij x ;< y. X <-> x x x x o x x x "i x' * x 
o a x n m x O O X X S X o o r. x x x . ,-i :< vs - x 
o ,G x x x x 
zS o o o o 
<\f O < <3\ <?1 C3 < fj^ rsi a o < 
* x x 
r> y. y. x 
c x x y. •h x . W M X x a a vc o '-o f} o ro . VC 
CS <?» '31 o Q f r- o U.-> \t> O 
I 4J -.O O ViJ o r- o f-f a? <"> C> ro 
O O " O JZ • M (J : V) CO * 
«J s <u D O ' •h n; 
•h m m o s _»J U> O 5 O f - s rs- o f 
i ffl O <31 V£> O «> i iv1 • CO 
r-l O H >. 0s o CA -»-> f- O v-
O O O 'CJ y 
Q} D-£0 »n CV 
o <—1 •1) 
» o» -H X o tn W (D 1! <y a. S-i a e> O. & £ o JJ 'O •H a •rf r-i o « m c r-i tJ —I rr: iJ -:H a> o !>> m 3; fC «y U i> 
« OJ CD © c CJ •Ji •H '» V) « a> c- o <D iH Cu a rH •1) W a. ...1 C5 !/) CO O fft c. • tc y t . n-. u> ; 
a 
—\ a; < 10 i 
c o o o o avo o vo <T5 <D o 
O o fs 
cj > 
P? •» -n.-i nj •• -f-> • 
- • t >-t -a o -j a tj a. 
o > 'j <a ri; . p, g tj ay Ku £ 10 B !H -I 15 •) e iJ G O, O C ci o O O iJ 'J ^ U O ' - • " ' ~ u J.1 •H r-» W C . co a o h< < o u J 
U iJ GJ /•I W U c (X o hDCI< 
cd w a: 
ffiC n -V. 
•t~> f J G I in ii 
• c a> 
u <y a> 
c | & 
v ca o « t.7 r-<j> 3 o 4-> l 4-) •H O -H O O o -c c w o o o 
>1 u 
i-5 M -H 
C WW 
o rz n « a m 
r-i t£ H fii 4J I-H xi U rO •H M a o rt t-t 
a p + e ii. 
o — 
<a o * 
o jr. + •h *t « 
oJ o o 
G C o 
t ^ o o •H D 
O O 
W -O r a c 
•1) * £ Q 4 •• ,t ti> * O c: 4-5 rt} © ca j o o £ 
H -* O JH <SJ q> * l-t a. > 
> * ->j a o < + w s 
>4 |J «) 
JZ 41 c cfC O "I tt O (S r5 
r- o r- o «••• cc o m f t o im O c-l CM sr O OO tn 
>£ O O O M ® O tfi (O O CO '•j-O-sr T O OJ Ol uT 
vo o fn cr» cj co n 
1-1 • r-l r-< ' - <N «-< r-i O 
r-^  r-f O 
O O O O O O O l T / O O O O O CO 
r-5 rl O 
O O O O O O O u - . O O O 
O O 00 
r-i r l O 
o <—1 •• 
0 •• xJ T3 r-. VI .. Uj O »• TJ m <—( « SHtC O U 
" > O 
> © S -i a> <y i n : -D tJ 
; < < 
•0; !—i C 
£ O 3 r~< •• 3 > H -? -Q O fC < TJ O <-> > < > • M , 3 ra (!) tu b, 71 ; to x x RJ -H , ^ ft a u-
X X X X X X « X X 'A X 4 X X y. x X X 1 X X fr- X A 
X X X X I X X aL X X X X X X X X X 1 X X 'X X' X X y. X x 1 X X w X X * 
X X X X X X 1 V. X & X X X + X X x x X X 1 X E-> X X X X X '•< X X M 1 X X N X X X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X * 1 
< 
X H <N CO M CA ch >1 r- o o o t y. rsl r') o o 
*" ' 
O l >; 
y. X X >\ x i X X j,. X X X X x x y X t X X X X X X X X X X X 1 X X Ol X X X + X :< x X x r y. X X X X x :< X j X X :< x X V x X X X 52 I X X it. >1 X X >? X >: X X x 'A f X X fr- X X X + 
y. x x :< X 1 X X X X X X 
x X x y. X X X 1 
K X X X X 1 X X X X <u .»• X X X X I X X >: X c * X X X X •>* X 1 V, X .J X* ra + X X x X X 1 X X X X X 
X X X U -K x X X X X x i :< X X X X (ii + X X X X X 1 X y. F-t X y. X X X X X X X f X X X X x X X X X X i X X X X X X X X X X i X X X X X 
X X X X X V. 5 X X + X X X X 8 ! X x y. X y. I X X C- X X X X ^ X X X X 1 X X X X X X X x x X X 1 X X X X >; X O I X x X X X X X 1 X X X X X X H X X X X X X 1 X X X X 4! •» X :< X X X X 1 X X X X X £> •t 
y. X X V, X I X '/< X S •» x x - X X c: -j <N fO fO H y. X X X 
in CTi O 1 y. X e-> X X >; y i f) eg r* X cc X X X O 1 X X V, X W » t • • X X X X >' t a< Vs tn o to a> o i ~< X :< irj itt u> ro vo » O 1 3 X X t-t c-t VO <.1? ro ~o X X tn o r-J CvJ "O •>. O 1 O X X r-l 1 X 
^ O rH U5 1 X X X X wion O 1 a> x X H X X X O f n n) u X X J X X X a -r-l o r X X X X c; ^ 
- p X X X ^ ? 
CL e o ^ * r-i d) © 1—1 ^ in G) * «H 2 O a a i SO " u> Q. <y V) tt) q E- > fO <•3 1 o» a o IT} a o 61 * —H a. >. u C-L> 1 4-1 o 3 c 3 <9 p 4-1 13 •X 1 o •H G Cf o o O' ^  O 3: •H U 4J o <S 1 in o >i -o o 'O M 0 O C E i r-i 0< u XI S ai 0) p + t> rt} W Gl 4) '.i 1 a> >» 4-> <L» M t-i © -r •i'4-i u t> w t > Cli to > (<J n M ni a 4-! + 
U 0 :T3 C O C ( <y K o o O JG rC a a O + 
U u O U X4 > 1 t-5 u 3Z M in co X + 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
» k <a u oi a t- s 
•i,} « u 
* >.0 
J-i -.-» TO ^ C o c to a> <ti m -I" H C-« o> v 
u —i W nj 
4J X > -} m u -H J u) <y 
•J <u a> t. (I N ii f 
a> £ G> • TJ • O U + TO --i :r. p - -t> CJ U O P « «-< « 0) O U. « « < VI O -i S 1 
X x 
> 3 0 0 0 o o o o o « o o 
o o < 
o o. 
O O O O 
• OOO y 
x x x x o x x x X X • X rt X ' X x x x u x x x 
o x x y, x u x x y, o a> >: x x x o x >; x o u. x x x x h^ x y. -.< xx » X £3 x -X o -0 x x x x c x x x 4' O X X X X X X X o o x x x x o> >: x x o o x x x x c x x x • '•> xx - >: •'•} x * x .0 X X X X M x X X 
C P 
a N N O N s \£> £ if) s/> O t/> CO CO < o> so m o r*> > vo < 
[3 fO CO O O < «.t> o tf) •!> -
O N M O M . 
C <V« O CM U 
cr. o c. < CsJ O CM i V.O O VO { 
eft o C7i a> OM c c-f rv o <s! c ci o cr. O vo - w o n • co 
I LO X I 0! t si T3 ' TO C • 
X <y a* < «T) £ i 
TO X •U fl« <5 HH rH 0 TO TO 0 6 O 0} a? 3: '0 TO a> > ^ {> U O V) X c M <u > <fi <y £ At •«J <3) C -H r-J IT) a > C <ti o> t:-•H u M U » H <N D. e 41 <L! TO H -H a i>i TO M » - cr rr O1 - H ili TO . .. U y b <1: s: zc 'S >••1 a u M 02 + tX O v C TO .Q 
P .0 3 > a 2 a>-j 2 W E TO U 
J TO ) E U 
O O O 
* 1 T-I O 0 C-i O U~/ 0 • J X 1 ^ x X x 1 y. X • X x X * Ol rti 1 TJ O O O CO X 1 >', v. X X X £••« X X 4J 
V * O' * TJ 1 01 1 0) rH O J,; X I X I ;< x 5s* X X X x 1 X ) X X :<i ^ X X X * * P a ! H tj O X > 'A X X { X x r X jj 4 Ci 1 O 3 1 1 p p £Q 1 i—l — cn: 0 \o CD G irj 0 X X 1 X X X x 1 X X « oi "A X X X 0 i- 1 -U O r- 0 <N O CO ifi x y. 1 * X y. x 1 X X (H y. £ + 4.? J f^  CM • cn: rg r> x 1 ;< x x X 1 X X :< 
t« U) 1 O * 0 X X { X X K X 1 X X ^ X X X Oi T5 -5J I O O 1 I l X TO sc 1 a r~- O 0 c O u"> 0-J 0 n tH CM I C^  Ci m 0 1 0 00 £f, X X X ^ a TO a 0 O 1 p O 0 ® r- 0 0 0 I £-4 X x X >-< 0 0) K 1 O f\l 1 nj m m 0 fv ^ N X X tr a* > •H > + 1 0 J rH r-« 0 1 X X X X ;< I + z "x u JJ V4 "O 0 CO O M TO V TO 1 >£> O \o 0 0 O 0 X 1 X X X X 1 X 'X r X X w (J-i CN 3 c w •1 \ O O CO X X 1 X X >; X 1 X E-^  v; X X yl "4-t O O c 1 01 X X 1 X X X X I X x a: X X ili O V) •i c: 1 -H 0) O X X 1 :< x X X I X X X X X fr* M 0 + r> 1 »—1 •0 0 X X 1 x X 1 x t X X £-« SC ^ J^  4-> O 1 O 3 1 I TO U < + '-1 EG 1 M nH O 0 T in O Ul 0 m X 1 X X X x 1 X X 4 CJ X X X t> k-' <3 0) O 4> •t> f- 1 -sJ O 1—< CO O CD rsj O OJ vo U) X X' J X X X x 1 x e- X X X 'X O x a. a. TO > u 1 C C" CJ 0 X X J X X X x « X yl X X X X O d 
Qi <u e 0 1 O tH O X 1 n >; X x 1 X •A X X X n 1 T. & TO 1 O O J 1 i x r, O (U Id 1 c tH 0 O t:> IA 0 <"•[ 1 U3 0 1 0 0 < X X X X oJ T3 0 M 4J c. a + U) r O ;X> ir> IH 0 1 X X X w 0 tij C 0 r-' 3) * 1 O 1 ir.J Cf OJ 0 CO X X X TO 5.1 if) G> TO TO 1 r-i O I iH 0 1 X X X c O > £ 73 U ,N X 0) r-J *a -vi TO M + V. 0 c CI 4-? 3 u »» 1 «••« O 0 O 0 in r-i 0 (V in l 0 1 X X + X X Oi •H 0 0) » od 1 O O 0 CO iri oi cy. 0 1 X X c-< x X X a tJ O ft R a 0 •D 1 US to I n \o y. X ctf X X 2: 
»-t ft t= Lu 0 in 1 c 0) sH v-i 0 ( 0 ) 3i X X X Vi 0 s * t 0**0 0 1 X 1 X X :< + yt u •0 C\J to 40 0 1 -H p I i TO 0 TO w id Ti "O (C 1 w — <••< O 0 O O U"< t-i 0 <p I 0 0 1 X 'A t CZ r-l 0 « 0 CO f <> w as » O 0 0 TO i O O O 00 n 0 0 0 i X 9, i-> VI rg u a .c O "fi _c 1 a C y> -c 1 vo y, X i-5 O rg TO ^ 4-» « r c tH l 0 1 X X O 5-. •rH 0 •H >' a> a 1 O 1 i 1 u- TO c v 0 y M X O •M 0 [ CO VO O 0 CM <x> 0 t/i <n 0 CR m 1 th r^  CM CM J X X + X l-i 4J TO 0 .c «y T3 O 1 O O CO CO cn cn O 1 x X E- X X >i SU c 
i 
« 0 O U t/S 01 •j 
TO M « O 0) VI A 1 1 O ! - ( >H O r- fO 1 1 v? m CO O t X X X X X X X X X X ,0 5 • «H s •H < ^ N C X X X P 0 
{-» O c —I m c 0 l>4 W5 H -H •H + 1 T-I O 0 <N 0 in rsi 0 OJ <M tn 1 ro in t/i O 1 X X + X X w TO <4-1 TO 1 O O 0 CO r- O ) X X * ^ X X <a CO C U-I & C 4J + in •O 1 ro 1 CM r-r^  * X oi X X xz 0 rt O C > t? d) c. « c S) rH >H O 1 O 1 X :< X X 4> 0 TO W 5> M © -H * a< + * 1 o-•O O T 1 X ( X X >,« CN H 1—1 s w M 0 1 M 1 1 + CO -» -o a> <u c u it) 1 (/> tH cn O ir) 0 (•_"! m 0 ( / ; 0 1 Ol CM 0 - ! >1 x + cc U3 r/j 1.0 to + •H TO 4J iH to * 0) I 0 O 0 n> <g 0 0 O 1 3 X X IH <0 O X 4J u TO > ^ 1 O, c .. \0 1£> -T 0 X X co ro •0 iJ 22 4J 1 O w iH 0 ® 1 O 1 0 >5 X iH 1 O U (O * 0 M I -U 0 —f 1 I X J u «n H] JC <L> O 1 W O 0 0 UJ O <r, 0 "J rH in 1 en to f\) | X X -> X u r-i CD M C.1) X 1 O O CO V ' " tN) i.Ti c?> O 1 4) X X X X X 0 CM "0 O + j 1 0 c r* i 0) vo rn 0 0 X X ^ X n O O TO O O rg 
•i + A c: 
* >. TO 
1 
1 - gj r~' 
r-« 0 X 
a •» 
i .H P T3 •• •• 
O 1 
1 
•H X 
i-l 
X X X X X y, :< <51 M * O O 
0 «-< © J P »• u> !H jj OJ e r O "H . tt •H (1) -H CO + O CO % •H O £ 1 TJ -n V) '•H a <3J P •H r s 0 a a « to - a> > a p <u CO 0) 
S ; U D TO I 0 •• n 03 iH i'J 0 3 t- 1 > TO TO 1 O Q O •• TO ti.1 0 6} X •H u ££ x: jj T. - < << 0 JH > >H -I a 1 >: u a o 1 5: 4J p C P -H 3) e> 0 I H O > £-> O T-V—1 O <3 TO U -iJ TO 1 0 1-1 •H C CJ 0 0 a CJ Cft 4J TO 0 1 O en <1^  > XJ TO TO < t ; O > 0 0 £ I •H O 1-1 a> 1 in 0 >. <y '0 *o 0 •0 TO TO * b Vj TO O 0 1 M u w & « •H 'a O < > U •H H O I U -H C tH <n U & 0 <0 P O P * TO <U Ci M a> i 4J <L> P O 3 Jj 0 <U jj 14 P TO 4-5 4-> -H 1 TO «H 0> <y 3 j a) >1 -u cy i-i u ^ a) U VI a i C o> c V! 0 •H T3 0) Uu C -H -H iH 1 a w 4J > «-i 1 > TO c to > TO Jl TO a a t f-t c ^ + u a 0 1 • •'•1 A3 O TO W c -0 TJ c 'Si X a' — (4 5-1 P » TOCO 0 O 1 a> ss O O O x: XX x: XT. a a b £U -r 10 < X 1 U CC ,-T > (U c? M < < 15. OL- li. Li, U O Cu | DUO' > I OJ U ^ Ul ifs m C.0 < z » a: 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
- to woe <y d o «-> *H 
•H o -H u o t> o -c c a u o a <n 'J 
> , o 
•Jt Sj ..-I f3 -M C xJ 'i-J O 1.7 (0 « 0) u ri g h 
w rj 
» <—1 
G) 0» O U U 
•'-i p: a ^ 4J 
M O O 
cn o 
x x x x u x x X y, >: O x i-s x x - x -« : 
1 o o 1 1 • . • o O ! 
o 5J o s 
o S 
> o o o o o o o o < 
> 0 0 0 0 ' t 
, 0 0 0 0 CD < 
> 0 0 0 0 { 
0 0 0 0 0 
o x x x x O (l) X X X X o X X X X 
O TJ x « X X 
X X x x X X ' 
L> x ; o x ; «••< x : X3 X c x ; r> 
o o x x x • -H x x • x • o xz x x x x : 
1 o i o •— > o r"> 
C«J O O VP r^  r* o r-
HUl U3i AC i3\ r- • r*- ' 
v O * O CM - o r-
> o ? o o ; - ci 
J O CO 5 O 00 - o r-
a o IP —-
o r- o o <• 
o VD : m o O) 
i; a n e g o s 
u o P o -1 -a 
„ - E : c "t —'» © i-« S TJ 
O 4J I 
> 2 ' 
o ^ T3 U < 
.. 3; i.} H Q. J fii <1? ^ p> 'O f) 4« a> a) • 
> .TS -O X3 >3 - - - -41 14 4) 01 rt O. -i Ci. >1 >' I U fj, t .J f1 3 ih Q W CO U ' 
' K S-l 4) -H O O 4> ^ U C M U 1-  -u o u (n u iJ <y -.•I -r. « c « -'-s n sJ "O Q. O • c a. o 
ID O H rvl 3 O - O o X 
J^ aj <3 u s: ^ a> 
i X 0 
U i j ai c: >•. <|) it» 1 6 -a TJ « c <y a <v a 
£ 3 ^  
«[D J) 
B U C si o 4J -H r- i 
O r1 a o o r c « U1 o 
in lo u 
^ » , 0 »a i>| -H 
c u w o c .u 
tn a) H 
H 4» U H H JJ tO ft 
ex as , © E < 
15) M i 
<y o « u x: n 
i 
M + U + W + 
0» ^ "O O a 3 
O O O o O O O U"J o o o 
O O C ' O C ^ ^ O t O U J O ^ ^TO'f CN vC O CD <-< f Csl . C\' Of • • fl ra 
o o c.» o r- c 10 i/i o 10 r- o f- 'v- t-t o cc u") in 
r-i • t-« IN « > fM 
l-l c-H O 
OOOOOQOirtOOO 
o o o o o o o t n o o o 
tn — to O VD 0 r-. O tn to 0 \ CJ ro t to CO r-, V, X + X X X O O M- r- O CO CO 00 1 aj CO X X e- X X >E to t yj 1 <v ^ X CC X X X 
1 1 a 1 ai -O 0 rH 0 1 1 0 t 0 1 H 
x X X X X X X X x r-
•p > 0 CD I CO 3 rM O O O 0 O 0 O i_n 0 0 0 ( < to O 1 ^ \D Xf 0 X X ai r-. CD <Ts tnr3> in n> O O C£l ( (M 0 X X CD » a c i 0 1- I m CO f "O >; X in 0 rv? JJ »-< T-* 0 1 4) 0 I O >< X T-! <—' u * 0 f t (O O m 0 m 0 O p") O CT! 0 CT. 1 '-i ( 3 <7 LO I 1 vO r- r- 1 X' X X + X X ^ z m O n") nt O CO m f T3 I •« TT 1 a> X X frH X X X 1 O ro 1 4; r-n ( O X X K-l X X X 
>1 — C) 
" a» tf> s 
f S 
T G. f <0 a. '<k 
1 <—) 
T -6 •• 1 0 «—i 
0 r »h — i> 1 u 
1 OS 
X X X <—) 01 
* s 
X X 
4> 
VJ 0J a S ! 3 OS —1 r 0 0 ;H 1 £ 0 d a 1 to a* > a y «y w * JC 1 0 1 2 r- 03 fi ro f G 0 > «—1 { l —i a > > i >1 « U • 0. u f 0 « 0 s A3 O •a a 3 C a -C x: O > a Q l m <3 1 U 4J t 0 c O" O O 0 
a> 
n 
} Q VI 1 O > £ l\J «0 tC TJ Q l_l > » 0 u 1 a f j u <y uO 0 <y 'O *D U 'O Efl <0 (jj O & 4' i VI iJ W i e u -0 "O -'•I ra! > 0 1 -i f CJ H c. E 1 -< CTI M e p 4) 4) O O 1 JU> J= i 3 <y 3 4J &) 4) u 3 1 4J 1 AJ .-4 ' ai t <0 4.) Ui <P W 'O Li > 1 C c ) 0 "a TJ •H "O 1 -H 1 AJ 1 i» •TJ iJ rj CL a t> 1 O •H (9 J 0 C a "O C 10 'X. a< J J4 u O 1 RJ c O Q 0 1 0 Q Q JZ A- a. UJ < X 1 O c: 1 > CD (3 1—< Cu Oi » O O 1 u u a- X 1 .-J <NJ u en w V) ti er, a; 
x x x X x x 
X X X X 1 •A X 41 X X X t X X X X f X X x y. X X X X / X >; X X X X X 1 X V X X X X f X X 1 X y. X 
X X X X 1 X X CC X >: x X X X X I X X L-< X X X X X X X J y. X rl X X X X X J '•< X X X X 
m TO r- f 0 >1 >; X * r- CTI cn O f e- X X x ro <NJ 0 CO x y. «H 0 J >: X X X X 
X X V X I X X V y. :< X * 
>: X X X 1 X X f-« X X X X X X X 1 X X Pi X X X X X X x J X X X X X X X X 1 X X 1 X X X 
x x X X 1 X X cu X x > X X X y. > X X X X X X X X J X X X X X 
X X X >< X X X X 
X ^ 1< :< 1 X X * X X X -r X X K 1 X X X X X X X y, X 1 X X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X X 
X X X X 1 X X -t X X X » X X X 1 X 'A f--X X X X X y, » M X Pi X X X X :< x 1 X X X X X 
* X X j X X 1 X x X 
X vi y. X 1 x X * a: X X X « X y, X X ! X X e- X X X X y. X X 1 X X p y. X X X 1 X X X X X 
X X X X J X X -k X X X X X 1 X X t- X y. X X x X » X X X X V, X X x X 1 X X X X X 
C,* 
•j> + 
i j •r o a « 
3 -6 0 + 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
* 
(C 
c tO 1 0 
O 
« 
Cj at 1 
* 2t (5 x j 
4! 
1—s 
0i Iv O 0 -0 O « O c 
M a' 0 •0 fl) crt CJ <3 O Si Cu 4J Q> 0 « •w 0 4» CM UJ 
U 4J P O cu C >« P <y tn CJ 3 ra 
I £ TJ 0, 
£ T) u C « O 4) 0 
i) <l' 4) O N d 0 c •H H 0 
»-« TJ c 0 ai tM tn (0 £ 4} > 0 w CZ •H CT m 01 O H p •H •Jj 01 •—I u> <3 -1 *J O c c > •rf 0 •ri a D 0 O O ,c c 0 £0 « 0 u <J J w trt •M 3 c 
> xi fO j-j O U O 3 tf En J-! <U fli « to O cs iJ CM + P -0 O 4) w >-1 <5 4) 
H 0 <31 <y U a) P ty tn 
i-i 53 •H ••> JO O j PG M 1 -V 0 
•0 •TJ *»fc 5" •y 
0 
-C (j c: « fO ^ 0 n Si a. > c a-O £1. >-< < "Z 
i o o o 
> 0 0 0 I'-O O O O D O O O O O C O S-J O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 • Ai O • - • -i-i o o o o OS) ' o o o o • » • • • o, O O O O O o 
l o o o 0 0 0 0 « o c O .C O O O O 3 o • u o • . . n o O <3 « O 0 O U ij o <a o aj 
t n m x: t P H. t-> i-i 1 " o M vV a 1 .c >« s: P -M r t © q> ;o 3: t > "D tr: <i» 0; 1 > « 'O T) r. c «i 1 & 0! CJ 53 -rf O* 
r, ,. X •• m x n x: ® 6i uj o» o, v e E "O r-i e r-
u — 'Ci is <y 4J .X iJ <K C 1—! CT- Ci Q. >•> 
if) tji O a s 
•• <y •V c o, fi o >. 3 -H £-'••I P -I o n to > ^ 
-P 3 -ri -H 4-1 U ( " ns J-i • 
in < 1 
X X X X X X X 
>: X y. x X X TD X X X X 4J X y. X X X a X X X X X ni X X X X X X X X X 0 X X ,4 X X •H X •VJ X X X M X X X c 0 0 0 0 0 G. Vii 0 VO 0 0 ri O c TJ Vi m 
O 0 X X y. X 0 X X CO 0; X y. X 0 X X, X 0 a, X X X X X X X vX X .fi X X H 0 V, >; X X X X £-4 0 O O 0 O 0 M X X X X X X O 0 U X X X CJi X X X 0 O X X X X X X O X X x •w X X 3 X X X X it X X O O n •a D CD tO O CO 0 O 0 0 0 0 U3 0 « 
O O fO «y O ill "•j m « (V O M •H 0 0 0 0) m 0 in CJi -c •CT co 0 C O d 
<n 0 •0 r- c? 0 0 0 if) 0 u"> m 0 0 <.5 LI CTi 0 \T> © (N 0 VI ^ u in 
£ ij' fj-a. G 
•-t r- 0 in U) 0 CO •H 
in m LO m CO 0 0 c CTi CI u CM CSJ J rH 0 O 
> O W •H O •cr Cs* csj iJ c» 0 0 0 aj c 0 CM SJ C.C-0 a> 0 0 •ri 0 0 t-i 0 r-t OJ •M "J ••3 O a O (O H 0 O O in (J a. u as 0 ai I) O CM 
i-l H »n tn u> 
try O m O or. c c <0 to 0 CD O C>l 0 0 <T>. iV- CTt 0 CJ •H •ri 0 iJ ro a -3 CO 
j-i 0 O r-l 0 •P a T! 
b -O 3 > 0 w* > =5 Cd < X D a f? Xl rv, t_) fe 
fs yj 6 w-. «} ;> g (3 O fio 0 c 3) 0 0 'H U ^ 0 u d •H L» O: fO •H U jJ U U - C O 50 C •H Q. a O {Z Q. a 
> •J Ci-+ 0, t >-i O >-1 a. 
* 1 1 <N 0 rs 0 r-cn O m r-t O r-l J X X 1 X X X 1 y y. X ¥ X 4 + 
CC ( -d 0 1 0 O CQ r-l I X X I X X X 1 X X t- X X X 
+ 3? X u c \ 1 Q> »-l iu 1 1 V-! r-l 0 } 1 X X 1 X 1 X X X X X X X I X 1 X 'A X X CU x X X X X + u> 1 1 •0 «-i t 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X cs + O 1 O P 1 I 1 f 0 (X) i M •H 1 O 0 l/> CO O m as O CO 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 •A X OS •A X X * <1J E-* 1 jJ CJ 0 1 CT: 0 CTi O CO CTi 1 X X 1 V, X X 1 X X H X X X £T> 4J » C r CJ CM ro t») fl » x r X X 1 X X X x X •3 tf) r 0 » 0 1 X X 1 X X X X I X X X X x X 0 1 1 u 0 » 1 1 1 cs 4J i£ 1 c f 0 O 0 O O O O O O 1 X { X X X X I X X X X X * c <y -ir > 1 r O O CD 1 X X ) X X X 1 X X f- X X 2 0 d) * u •H 1 0 t 1 X W } X X X X 1 X X X X X CP rf + M 1 1 0 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X a' > Q X X — X X X M 4J W| -« 0 CO c> M ru O ^ C. I t O 0 0 O 0 O O O 1 X t X X X X 1 x X X y, X -K K rv u c M + (3 az 1 0 1 O O CO \ X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X O 0 * 4) "0 1 Q) 1 I X X 1 X X X J X Cd X X « EJ O w a> cJ c j r-i 41 1 0 I X 1 X X X 1 X X i-i f5j u O + a 1 ( 0 1 I X X 1 X X J X X x H -M *J 0 1 O l 1 1 1 
'O fil fit r-J ^ m 1 U —1 1 <Ti O m O O in O 1 X 1 X X X 1 X x ni X :-< X -f X- « M O SI a O OS O m r- r- O 03 0 1 x X 1 X X X X 1 X X E-* % X X X O <u a 4) <u £ * > to 1 t c 0 C • -I 1 i r-t -i 0 Oi CM J 1 X X > X 1 X X X X X 1 X 1 X X X X X X X X X X * 0 
cc + <3 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 X <N 0 a. CJ 1 c t O <j\ 0 0 O O U1 i /••I CM 1 to r-t m 1 in to X X X -t X Q) -o n c: 1 1 O O 0 M3 V£> r-l 1 H X X c 0 O a. iZ 0 « + -i i vl l r-l | f\l f l-l c; CO X X X a) CI 4) ra 1 { r-l 0 i I rH 0 1 X X c ft 'S -P a> Us U -j. X OJ J.' g rH c 0) HJ 1 i CCi O CD 0 0 O ir, '-C O U) 1 (N f-J I tn CJ CM 1 x X X X X + 0$ O 41 (i) » 1 0 » O T O tn lO 1 0 m m O 1 X X X X cx i & & Ji + -0 1 j 1 VO fj 1 CO «X> y. X (r. X X T-t Ht f= 0 * r: t 4) i 0 1 1 O 1 X X X X 10 O 0 a 1 1 0 i 1 I 1 X X X X CJ Of) 0} c; 0 t i { T 1 <3 0 CO (.? c *o * CD 1 in tH 0 O Cr 0 0 O O O O 1 m O | "t-* 0 O 0 r X X az tr> CO (TJ CO m 0 in 0 il) 0 £-< 1 a O oa 1 in VP (M O 1 X y. t- 1/1 CM rH O +J 
CJ •H > xz 4-J Q! 
•> 41 > M ; * 
JZ 4J D 
1 I 1 ( 0 
i t 0 i i 0 
f t 1 
UT 1 J 
CM CVJ 0 1 I 
x X X 0 fn "M 
c u O T5 V( + O I (n ( tn 0 O <-i O m O sO t LO 1 r- CO m vo 1 X X X X x f ti c: •U .c r< <u a + CJ w 1 \ 0 O fO f-j r-i | 1/) CO m 0 1 X X X X X a> •H 
v> 
V) t.o O u t.0 S * c • -f CI VI 1 r 0 1 1 l-l 0 1 1 vo Ci J ( {VJ CM 0 I V, X X X X X X X ji s * ^ •H <t< II •Y- +J X X X 0 
V O C/j c 0 >3 Vi •H CO i t 0 0 0 0 0 O O m 0 O O J X X 1 Ji X X X 1 X X x X V. , H-i * or. 1 0 i 0 Ci CO J X X 1 X v. x 1 X X E-" X X X u CO c i-i m 0} C 4-5 ai -o l 1 I :< X ) X X X X 1 X X X X X X: 0 0 c f c 0) r tH i 0 1 x X i X X y. X 1 X X X X p 0 w OJ M a) 1 1 cr •0 0 f i X A \ X X 'A l " x X X X X CM e E-* e> u O r f 1 i l <D w 0; c 4-* m 1 (0 •H 1 O 0 0 c> 0 m 0 O 1 X X i X X X X 1 X X X X X t X ^ •H t-> rH H (0 Q) i. £-* l O 0 1 O CO 1 X •A t X X X 1 3 X X X X X X 0 m * J: 1 C 1 1 • • X y, f X X X 1 O X X X X X X *o P m t 0 i r-l 0 » W X  t X X y. x 1 0 X X X X X X aj vj tfl 0 CJ (0 O f 1 1 0 1 1 I 1 X tfl H fi) }i 0 1 so 1 0 O 0 0 c 0 O O J x X I X X X x 1 X V X x * X 
u 50 * J2 1 i O C) <0 J TJ X X I " X X X X 1 •a> x X t-t X X X 0 
•0 0 t 0 i ( 0 X X » ffl X •A X 1 ' J X X ^ X X X G b ra 0 ijr 1 t r-t 0 { X X X » % X X X 1 X X X X X flj s 0 G * <4 + 1 r r-i T X X — 'O 1 »> M X X 'A u t 0 O W + 1 Z3 tj.i 41 J <3 C<b O rH (1) 4« r-i to . 4J OD 4J ? £ f 1 0 in .. t;.J U t O C5 z 0 ci a 1 if) 4) a p 4J to Of Q a w -P a * fO 1 0 " U £D H Rl tb e O t3 J fO (3 1 O! Cf 0 <y Q Q 5l O * S J^  4-1 t 1 s; T-I *•x; O 'W p > .-i { H -I a t > . " 0 u > u D c 3 x: jn 4) 0 * C> C. 1 1 0 > t"1 M O t i3 <D 0 1 JJ iJ <3 % 1 0 p C 0 a t> 0 W <3 4) r > «c HJ < T3 0 iJ > \ o 0 3 1 —! 0 O 0 1 in 0 >, 4> 'O TJ 0 T3 fQ <g M <TJ 4> 0 s 1 -P in \ e 4J XJ '0 < > u •H f -H -H 0 t O -H c E I «—5 Ch n £ 41 01 4} 0 0 <3 4J U &> 14 4> 1 iJ JZ CO t y cj a> cu 4J a a t -P P fO ^ CJ a l a> >i+j at J-l ^  TJ W M © +J U a 1 cr c: 1 —! 05 O "0 fu Cl4 T3 {> —1 l w > <3 ty v< fC Q, CL p 
> * jj a 0 1 0 •H nj ( 0 T5 TJ e i' H U 0 I A3 C 0 0 0 l 0 3 0 JZ Cu a « i-i * ft + 2C 1 0 a: J 1 > ai ID < < M O4 a. U* { u 0 O O 0- > 1 l-l r 0 s Ui to CO l/J < < 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
o o o o t-< O r 
O o i 
n N o n incm co as o co 'o n o fo cO rt O « O o cm a • iv -t 
O D -f •H O O .C > r TO *J •<-! • iJ rtj sJ -V 
3 S TO * 
e -o H 
-I H ^ fj; -
V; U1 U 
>, o 
tt 4> U »H 2 t-« <y at 
i-« O 3 0> O CO o 
o o o o cj o o o i ( O C) O i > O COT , r. w - w' O H C! r •DO • • « £0 O t • OOO oo doc 
i o o c :» o o J o o 
J o o » o o o 
3 O o O O ! O 6? O o O ' • c- o • • o e; « o o • 
u- C5 • 3 -H U O M "O : .. t. u -1 t 
I Of W 3 
• "a Vi <1* fi< • ra "O c: fc i oi a; fi -: C o, a. h 
01 I 
x <o xi v a» TO a a. « (!) Q."0 S E O >1 
' "O TO <U I> I> l !D c: H i-1 2 -«-f " ) O CP u 'H P i-i U • 
i 0, -•« C TO >- . ! f/T V) u »•« w fj; u) • o 0 a -
•n x* T r-i r-4 v r» •H •5 <••1 z j i 
t - r-i o 0) o r-i o CO O cr. Oi ^ 3 o T) c-< 01 o •X a> a? o CD « •'j ?r» o cr> O 
o CM CJ o o 
—i C*i CM n -H u 
.o M 3 
CO c-) Q o vc oi 
o CM O C-3 40 
ro to iJ O OJ I-*) M ci TO a> u X X £ X y. X •H X X <L> X X •J a> X X X > y. X 
13 c: >{ X 0 X .y 
(D X X X X X X X X o w cn j j o 
TJ 3 X X X t4 X X in O TO X X X IJ X X » •H u X X X X 0> X X 
u JrJ V5 X X X X 
io x X X X X ii X X 
^ c o 
o .-i o o o o w O r -o u. o C7\ o cr. 
c c in 
a> ty <H 0 o 
c 
•io o X X X X v. X o a K X X X >•, X X X o X X X a X o 
o •i* X X X o 
H X X X u X X X <N' !j ^ TO TO c X X v. X a X X >: »H O X •A X X TO y. X X u o u X X X X X X X u X X X X X X X x X X sn 
to o o o o O \C> o c CO o o 
6 o U3 
-( j i 
•rA 
U « v> 
r-i ^ o TO TO —1 TO a sO U o 4J o TJ o ti 3 3 > o > 3 a, > E a. U u -f 
!ti P. w TO u £ U-l o a o 01 -H 0 O •V 
a U c t-i ( j a. w c TO e o <J V-J iJ 0" H o -r-J « C P 
-o •G a o c G, o 
•j a •t t-i i t u Cu 
•> a: O 
o O 
r "1 t3 
| t c O 
r- 5< 4 n i 1 D>T3 o 
« * X x 
o 03 1 -H i in 3 r-i »n o 
o X 4 1 o. 
1 D 
IJ o CO o 
TO I K : Vs H< r-4 EU * * + 4) » ( n 1 w ^ LO o 
0) A •J") o 
o o •» o > 4 •H ^ 
a' w 
•r-) * JJ jj * u * to 
CO O M TO 4 <p in o CV 3 e + -» o T O O T5 $} o f> 31 <p + 'M 4 1 OS TO O 4 3 r "O M Ji U •H F <5 i •<-) TO k4 fC 4 •H f 1 LO o o TO Q) O 0) 4 t-< O o r^ O o b a. TO 4 > •» 4J I O- C rH • Cl ^ + Oi * 1 O ro s: cc l- l * TO 1 1 u o O O O « o u Cu c r-\ * o * * <1> * W 1 to 
o CL, >, o > -V M ^ r-J o m a TO + TO 4 
f a 'O 4-> a> + U 
T> TO ^ + c 01 a> U IJ + O O 6 
1 
3 *•» + W <C 1 o VO o 
o » a ^ + L. » •n 1 0) I-» • l-« O c r H Of 
o O + 3 1 1 r-l 'O 
(%' ta sa U O 1 o 3 c "o Z to 1 M rH 
u Zt o a> o * t-< i P U a r* o Cg o JC * J" r c C-i TO 4J u + 111 jJ f o •H o > G> <y + 3 I f u o o c c o X5 w JC 4 M 1.1 O TO o jr C 0) + Se •> G> in 1 \D O O in v O w "O w + a : ; 0J o cs • Vs 01 O G> K +• t-i 
v-i (X. J^ * tj > c/i U o -t-1 + *J * crt O o O t« M TO TO * •«T -)f N a M > -» OS ! 'o o c <4-1 C , li O * i a> « c TO ty « at -» c t iH o so a> 
e 
M iy n i 1 rH T) f- w ^ J-I ^ o 1 o 3 O O CJ ft -s 4J .a •» ai ? H rH jj —i •H w > 0) * 5 iJ o o o u> TO •> > 4 I c c •H 4J I o rH « O U 4 b l o } kl 1 i o o o o Q O { c M rz. i o o 
o 00 ^ * o TO o « - To CS i 
§ i 
O 4 at 4 
TO + •H + 
8 : 
o t 
C) 
TO 
u c 
M 3 'O 
O « 
X '-i '-K o 
Ui 4 ty 4-s so 1 o « <D > jr M 4 TO * a» o s r vi W V) g if 
V * « r -m •V 3 <y 3 »J -V oi CL P 1 C c .••« « o 
> + -U a o 1 Q ...» TO .0 TO a. < I CO ft: x t L> CS r> cc 
o o o m o o O X X y. X X X i X X X X X .y o o* X y. X X X > X X E-i X X s X X X X X S X X o X X X X X X 1 X X ^ X y. X I X x X y. Q 1 + o m o a% o (ft m o t-i iS\ 'A >: oi X X X X ii. 3 a? o <n a> <u vo w CO CO CO CO 1 •A X X E-(J X H X X X X * s 
r-t o CM CO I 1 y. X X X X P o: ro CO o <r> r- r- r-t sn o X 1 r. X X X S vo o cr» r- r» m o X < y. X X 
-H o r- r-4 X t X t X X •A 
y. 
X X X X X 
o O in r-o r» r=i fO r-CM rg TP | X :< + r-C>) Cu A. O 
o iC a, 
CO CJ ro r*/ O f ( 
X X X yc 
X X X X 
hi rj 
o o CM Y 
>•4 W E-« 
o o o io r-o r- m O CO O^  O i X X sX w X X <r (x + * b£ o cr. cr CO OP 1 y. X X X :< f-l X X :< X s CM O ^ o CN V 1 1 X X x O O + + 4J o CD o if/ o o o X X X X X 1 X X t- X X rl 0} 'O o Ci Si X X X r, i X X X X c CD X X X X 1 X a X TO to o X X X X X X 1 X X X + x - X X X Cl> O o o tn ce> X x X X X X 1 X + X X X 0> + -I o u> y. X X X * ! X >; X X a X X X X X 1 X X o: X 'A X + o X X X X ',< X 1 X 3 X X X w O X X X X X i X X j TO O CO ro o U"} VG VO X X X X •A J X X X X t- X O + tf) cc-o <J> SB V, >: X •A X X J >i X X X y. + « in ' is yj X X X X X 'A J y, X X X X 'A O r-i X X X X X X l X X X X X a> l X o G o in J^J CV fO o r- r- i so cC X Vl c o C35 T-I i <u •r| c^  <Nj m LH O O r- •Q 
" O H O 1 X B 3 C + o o o o o tn o o o X X X X X X 1 y, X X >: X + a -t CD o x X X X X X f X X f-' X X X x X X X X X 1 X X cr x •A ,c o o X X X* X X X 1 X X X X o X y. X * X i i X X X >1 rj cr> o o in o o o X V X X x X 1 r-4 X X CJ X X X X * i •H + ^ cr. X X X :< X 1 3 X X X X X (j •» X X X X X 1 -C X X X X y. X T) o a? x X X X X 1 X X X X X <y tn rH 1 s >-» + o o m o o 3 X X X X X ( X X y. X X rH o <7l t> X X •« X X X X f <u y. X H X •A X o r-G X X X OJ X X X f c X X r-J y, X vX + o o X X rH X X X X 1 X X y. y. a> in X X -- 3 ^ X X X o cu 'O f 
tA I O + j_> a (3 CL C 0) H cu ,-i '-I * w 3 or rH o o £ o H. i if > .. Gl > £2. 3 w HI 3 : 3 X TO 1*4 £ o § > TO TO 1 ao O TO 0) a n 01 > <~t CL, >> o IX U f s i-> O 3 q SI M •<-i t^  'b T-, rH o fG fij 4J TO o rH c o o u o - o 0-4 TO rs; -c? O ii > u u % • H O 4-*D 0 i i/> O > o u -o TO TO + •44 T3 rU > i) •H. o V "H c & t r-j a* VI e 0 0) a O o i TO 01 »-{ 3 4-' 4-J 'H TO rH & tl> 3 I O >» iJ o L: u *G M M y o> *o "•I <y "D & c •A a. i-> —5 J > TO w > CO TO TO a. D, -I £-« *o c 2: a: U l< o ro c o O O 1 «y 2; o a o JZ p. Q.+ o Oc in O O Cu u u s. > 1 L> z V> W 10 w ci; 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
u -u n 
, (0 « in o c <u o u «3 —i .4-5 •H o o o -o O .c; c. MOO <n (f) o 
* > . « 
-j) j.{ ...i 
to w C fc* '4-t O k II! W Vl h g e -
© © P r -S 
n ». c - o m ro .c -h 3 -,-} 4-1 t-i O M iJ fi) .r; ». q^ u -H tu tt) ej « ss 
> X! K © V > TO TJ TJ C g 1) M 01 a) ill -H X ID ^ G- J 
* * o o o 0 o o O m KO o VO (Nf ro o •c- to X X (T. ro u. ; o o O Ch CO m i h C4 X X o iH •g vo fO vo X r.| or) csi 1 r* a a; O o X X CTt » X >: o -H 3 Cj rn £fl tii rH in tn Oft O m o ro m o o en «n X X it. X X <••« t»- * •jr. 
© E- u o r-< O <3% cn ID m <N r- X X X v. X 4-1 a c X x X >1 TO v> O »H o o X X X X t-a, 01 1 o rH , rt 4-» » w o o o o o O sn o o O X X X X X y. X X o d <l« 01 o O m X X X X y. X X X as 0 0J U 0» o X X x >: X X X X X X o> 3> •H t-l o X X X X X X X X •H £ 4-t 01 X X - X X X 4 4 to o TO © •t o o o O o O UT o o O j.; X X X X X X X >« X X • fN.' 3 C yi j:: CC o o O CD X X X X X X E-« y. X o O g X X X X X X X a: x X U3 o <11 uO c a» i-i iH O X X X X X x >; X X 
r-i TO o 3 c o o X X X X X X X X X 
U. 4-> rH * o «-« 3 TO Vc rH CD V) rH o o o O o O oo o «• in o r- CN VO a? cr. a: X X X X TO © O © u «H in o m m O tn in m o IO ( - t- X X 
U 52 Oi a, ai a c r-t m rH O OI •J X X X t-4 , O Q> a <U tn O r-J O rH X X * 4J r> £ 3 TO o CN o1 a. <H 4 w w >j\ o m o ul ri Pi »n in r- x X 01 •k •a 4J O in •JI m o Oi VO fN1 CTl 'JO O X G © o C o > V) rJ rH r^  fO CD IN T -i X X TO w m a> TO -H TO O C-X sH r- X X X c 
} e -a iJ © u m X © •y J-i TO M M c iJ p Jj o o o o O o o o o O X X X X X X X X X X X © •A d © 0» 3 .a s> '0 o o o <3% X X X X X X t* y. X o >-3 o c E; JX 3 4 M X X X X * X a: y, X u. O iz X X X X X X X X X cn o o 55 3 —« ^ o X X X y. X X l-i CO V) u O O 3 TO o ci "O m M o o o O o o u"> o o o X X X X X X X ai X X * X 4 U « <u O © o U V o o o O x X X X X X X [••« y. V. X 4 f} r-i 4-1 •<•» 4 c c X X X X X X X X 4 'W IN TO •—1 •H 4.» ai u O •H O X X X X X X X X X .>• o •H o > © © 3 I o o X > n> C o 0 •u Vl X \i 4-> O c o o c O CI o rn o o o X X X X X X x X X x ; M TO o c: •y 0» «r o cn X X X X X X X E-' X X X •H t-D <0 o o t/> TJ w 0) o X X X X X X X r-l X X JZ i-H « t/> a? C-J 1H rH o X X X X X X * X X X X 15 2 •H < V-l M 4 CO X X X 3 O O •M XJ tn e a V* •H rH m lO o »n o Cl o C-i X X X X X M X X X X TO -H TO + o vo o <N a> o c^  <T, a^  X X X >: X X X r-« X X X CO c: 4J '+4 4-1 T5 X X X X X X X X oi X X. X X .c o o C TO a C -H <l> rH o X X N' X x X X X X 4J o n <y •H a) 3 t rH T> X X X X X X X CN rH £ f- 3J u O O 3 OS Cl !l> <U i.t X •3 J.I r-l o o o m m o m CP o ai X X X y. X rH X X oi X X X * 4 •H 4J D 00 © 4-> O o <Ti O iH o o <Tl <£5 X X X X X 3 X X X X X -V u 4J W TO > c d «H C-l rj Cvf • ' X X X X X X X .-1 X X X -K •H 4J s: i.) O *-t iH O rH f|> X X X X X X G X X X X X ; © G I.) >-3 O .M I V x 4 M m TO rc <D c o o tf) o 3 fNl ro o CD m iH X X f 1H ( - o o cn r- T} « r- o X o o •y o O T CM in m O O y. o a TO o i t-t o 5; rH |H o •H x c/ 
T. o >1 - 0) - 3 - > M O Cxi c TO a •• -o M o > 3 <4-1 iJ a? TO a e O »—i <y rH © a> c/l 4 £1 u> •H 01 fi y <fi 3 !U e M X D n. to •• ill > 6. 3 <s CO IB O 4 3 4-» a TO O •» to -H TO o b* > CO CO c* o TO © a o a X 01 o 2 4J ZC rH < o 3 > •H rH a o a L> UH JZ s o 3 c SZ .C 4 3 -H TO O C rH •• G > t- 'O o TO TO 4J 4-J TO C5 u r-t c a o u u * a 01 iJ TO O ift V > x: TO TO < -o O 4J > o o 3 •H o o 0) O >, o t> T] TO TO * u-l M TO <y O P M U V; & •H 13 •H > u •H -H V -H 6 —s cn M XI £ © © o o ; TO TO <y M 5? 4-1 JZ 0) 3 0? a 0! M 3 TO 4J (-» TO rH a> TO 3 © i-t VI TJ vi Vl M A © Vi 4J M a > c c -{ Vs o •ri V © tx. Cl. TJ •H > > TO Vi s TO TO a a ; fr-
^ C > * u o O H O TO u C •VJ x> VI X X <0 Vt M O TO C o o O © e^ O q O £ £ JZ £ a a * o C« t rH < * to s: O ai > ro o < J3 a a. a. U O u. u u OJ 2S > #-3 CJ L) O'j W if) oi < <c; « 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
• c o * c e i 
»••« iX. 
u > o a> 05 
,v> 
•a O 
uT o VD r-r- ^ 
d o 
+ 
<r> IT) crc r*-
o o 
.H «-« 
LO r-l 
a; 
a> SO vo 
o o 
^ 
VO 
D") m 
•'0 L-T-
4J jj 
X 3? 
4J u a <0 <s> <B L} u 
ii'i W 
.a .CJ 
i.i IJ 
^ 
4J •V OJ 
© OJ M M •iJ 
tn U) 
h> '"> 
CJ crv 
5 
s g 
3 2 £ 
0) i e --o '0 • ju a) o <y *J c G m r-i .-3 01 •H w CO 4J (n 13 -H ?i» CJ S 
xJ *o <•« I •--i o o o w 
O ST. (Z woo Irt vi -H 
« >, ii W TJ G 
c *j o O c U r-l £ O aj <u —t a w u £J 
.^s <w ^ Es:s:a>3;4><pa>& 
TJ <-t flJ ffl 
5: *-> 
> 4J o O » n o> • a) o w QJ -H 
j £ re a -u «h c o a --t -w -fj 3 c: I 01 E; M M IS C O ' >3 w h h Ci U 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
OT O '2 rg O ^ 
02 -v> M C5 H (IPS jJ nj r-: J •h O () O « 0 SX C « y o 
3 v, 
o a 
* * o o O o c> o a o O o o o o o o 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 O O O < O o o o O CT m 0 O 0 0 O • 
T> TJ 0 • O .» 3 <y o rH 0 O 0 0 rH O, ro Lf> 5 1 tJ "0 u") o 4J D Cl 3 iH tn o tD in o in o m en cr> O O O 0 0 in CJ O VD U CJ * O O i-. O i—i <o o <r.» fU o (Ti .ij O O CO m 0 0 in Cl O • * X rO M n CJ • CJ * s !/> o rH —| 0 O ri t—f r*> -* 1-i o 1 P. <> 4-J 3s o s.'l o o ffl o o o 0 r-» 0 UT CO VO o c i Q i d l 0 iU 3 Q5 in l/> <£• Ct o m sD 0 CO O - a & O O V rH 0 01 • cr» j. CP a: <U • i.: o TH I—1 rH 0 0 O rH Q> > -V VC 
iff Q •H U> o •u + o o m m o o in o m o o r- rg CA 0 vo iN Q CO (J O * iv «1> 05 4 4 a1 XI ar o o o C?v o o m Ch. CD 0 IN CN 0 • * o QJ C -r > 4-i a IN . <\l i CJ o « M * * C •y GJ rH O rH 0 O 0 d O ro rH C"> ^ •U s <U + o * { "O at- l-l 4-1 *-> * a n O 4J 
Ti H M e ££j •H r-t o o o o o o o o o o o r- 0 eg •jp Cv' CO CO 0 CD u n « « 
ca >< o rf! X o u f-" e U o o o o m ai »n <N <•0 rg 0 • * b •TJ (X W c r-l r-l <-< CJ • ci -i. 0 O a> 'O <1> <u * 35 n •-1 o CI O 0 0 m 1-" n , 4-> o E H ra .-o l a. o *o © y * 0 •y o o o o o o o o o in O o o o o 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 c^  0 0 o", 0 , TJ iJ C a> w o o Ci o o m 0 0 0 0 > * SJ £ c 0 0 -r '0 Q + o 0 • 0 J. OT 
if) •a H > -r d> •H O Q d © rH X c •a t n >3 0) o + a> -C iTJ 4> X -u o Cr u 'O 
c, «y u-> -H J H o o o o o o Q o •J1 CD CO o o CD 0 0 0 fO 0 rH O H < (VJ « •H o <S> 4-> 3 5 X 4J Vi o tc o yj o V£» o o m CO 0 0 f~ O - y rJ H fo a p » •H 6) > & I—1 *H ?—1 U) « U") , 2*. £ CP e p * >-« ;> m to O 1-4 r-i 0 -H o X O > re o 0 T3 CJ ta !j u Q 0 
M (3 -H 02 a. •H o o LO o m o CO o sn M> o •-£) O O Q 0 0 l/l 0 vo 0 0 0 Gl r- .j M fO 
& £ a» C-« o r- CD o CTi V£> ID o o \o U1 o> 0 r- r- O • rH .y <SJ o + + iJ n m m m VD VC rH rH 1 JC i <J> o rH '-I :•••! c 1 O 0 c- W •>H 'd > -|J 4> 1 o Oi •-0 O o 2 u a) r n Q, o o o o o Q o o in o Q O 0 0 0 fi O 0 Ol- CO 4 rts o .c. <ir s: + QJ to lO o ve o r^  o o m Cft 0 0 rg O • i •H CO u o 01 W QJ Oi r-l f^ l CM Ol r- m • LO » rH 
r> 10 •H « * r-l 0 T-I r-l 0 O 0 rH ? :x < 0 >1 •H O o * (> to .0 (.1 •••< o o o o o o o o O o O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 Q 0 0 O O < O 3 w ffl (•> .< cd o Q o c. O O m 0 O 0 O > , «» o ts * e> O ' O •) 0 « o o > u « flJ {/) <y o r-l 0 »» 0 O 0 0 •-5J 
!t\ a 0 <0 -r o ao t fg o a> C4 >-1 G l-i o o jr. 
'fi? 0> o I-I .13 cu H o o o o o C3 o Q o m O o O o o o <u 0 O 0 O O 0 0 O O < O 4 4-1 W o o o <7» o o ^ m O 0 T5 0 O 0 O • ^ O V 4J CJ 52 * 4J xr 3 r- O » 0 ' O -•H fl •H o l-l =-< *o <-< 0 5J O O 0 rH ^ 1 
tn VJ x V.I i .—I o 0 U1 
rt) £-< O a o o o o o o o -n O O o o O 2 0 O 0 O « O O 0 0 O O < O CO c> * X w o o cr; o o in O 0 -r-J O O 0 O • - CO XS •H O -> a> o ;t r- CJ ^ 0 * O , O 0 r«J o * V rH o Q r-i rH O > . 0 O 0 c 
X (NJ + 0) 01 - <y - -H - r-l O O rH rtJ H O o U> U-l q a> n <y 4 CO 0) u > c TJ a & -H o w —i c. *D JU > * P (U 0) u O - 'O 03 e o 3 0 4J <y rt, a> 0 0 * •H n £ e> S 6 U P > H —i <y 0} fj •• > O 0) -1 > X. ^ -H •H •H o H S-l O > E- —i TJ O 0T 0 u -x > <u >Z U-l H ^ <B o m > < o 0} T5 73 •Ti iS JJ « 2: <D u -j 4> e •i o M u « u ~0 -H < > O < ft •—1 % to '-f 0 W £ U £> & * vi CJ GJ iJ 4J c. 0) 3 ai QJ & »J 3 3 •TJ 3 RJ a> M « ^ a ti W i-J > C c ue c r-i to o '0 o t- TJ •O JJ P c a - I -H 0) r-l <y -(-> w JS • o D. O O •H •H O u •a w <y CJ o ^ -H a nj 'q « •H tn 0 u O <U &) TJ n tJ . ai 4 O O * in U cc •z. >• > ca o -—• < < 3 a, OS a< 2: w </> flC CM u u u > a d < j 2: r s 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
O - CL. o 01 TO X 
O L.O in ;NJ rH I— o 
-H 17 O O O ' 
iO X {•3 X CJ X 
; x x x x x x x x x x x x .•< x : X X X X X X X X X X x X X X x : X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X : X X X X x x X X X X X X X X X : x X- x x x x x x y. x x x x x x I X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
: x x x x x X X x * : X >; X X X X X X 1 : x x x x x x x x : tt X X X x X X X » 
; x x x x x x x x : X X X tf X X X .X " x x y, x x x x w ~ .. .. .., . . . . x x x cn x x x x x n x x x x x x >; x x x x x y. x x ~ - ~ ~ « 
x x x x :< x x x x x x x x x x * x >: x x x >: x x x x x x x x x x * x x x >: x x x x x x x >: x x x x ^ x x x x x x x x x x x x x * ' x x x x x x x x -X X X X X A X X X X X 
•h 
.c x x x x iJ X- >! x X tj x y, x x 
X X X X X X X x x x x x x >: xxx x x x x x x x x x x x 
xxx x x x xxx 
w w jOJ JL. 4-J '2 "CI X k' x' X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X + 
0) © TO © X X X y. X X X X X X X >: y. X X X X X X X X i e C u "O TJ i-1 W TO 
» c ^ » tl> Ov QI 
S, 1 
jj 
55" cc 
c: o 
M 
4-1 
a 
-.H t-l 
•ri 
X QJ 
0 4.; U-* cn 
c 0 P a 
pi
: 
c; 
e li-4 •> 
~ (XI jj TO © 3 •r « o a> •H c: o U G) 1 17> a. ^ 0 cr a ^ © tn r-t UH O * 
TO .-< o 
a Q © 
3 0 -i 0 u sT CP a 0" w >H TO v O 
;> 16 D, iH C tr TO •O 0 TO o o S M 3 c xz U 4-1 o .r. to (; c o a a u <D n « d O '"l (T> •H 4J rH © Iw 0 u p 3 4-1 c H D M (2 «» I) 4-J 4J -1 3 
© 
> c a. 6 t-J © >H •ri ai ?! TO H #<6 i 
n 
•'4 
o u o 
4-J 3 JZ iJ * o u © d 
TO a > O 4-J 3 a <y 4-) M 3 W TO «< © C '+4 
o c: o 3 «y 6 "-J-4 c 0 3 CJ 
•H •i TO TJ TO p 4J C d © 0 -H .-H © c SO -» 
o 
u 
}J Cj •J E-i •H P CM rH c V- 14 O H 3 O 
o c •;-> cu 
© U TO O -4 C 4J iJ 
© TO 14 c w to t-' t« a. !M w UJ E- u 'a o M © 4' © & 3: c: .-1 O O' 0 > rt c M 0J ct TO U4 *a> <y o< O 0 >H U © 0 l-l •H VI 4-1 TO 3 tl 14 TO TO r-l 3 3 0 •-H rH G. 3 (4 C 3 C O 
iJ w TO Q O a. © tv o .-1 Ui H f-> © rH U. TO U TO © TO c 0 iJ 14 •H OR
 i-< © -1 TJ < 3 4.' C * 
i w © V c 4J 4J fj « 4-1 4J 0 4-» TO E-> H b © > C 4H 0- i4 TO M 01 a. jj 3 E £2 3 Q © L> c. © XX M © a t © 4J H a> u (5 4J M w •-1 •r< 0 fi. TO TJ rH fD O >-: 3 ti 3 « B Li t-i © o O » 9) 0 © © u <H c ,S 4_) © © a. c: U 44 © O '< 4-1 V-s 3 M © 4i 1- 4J Q W iZ c: 1-4 4-1 p. TO O 0 Bi 0 TO © •rl © 0 O TO  TJ 
I- o 4-5 © 'M o © a VH a. 4-1 3 0 •A c VJ u © © c © w C c « a. c; O J-1 •H c C <G tn P c V4 © O 0 C & 3 S3 0 U O U TO I) .c © c? o o TJ • H -H l; TJ &> S cr- 0 •H rH © -H c © 4J 0 C CL u 4-' IS © 0J > ii) 4-) u 14 4J i4 yi t"« iJ •rl t- 14 -t Vi CL 4-1 ijt © ir* c © u © Vl O O VJ Cl o> w c--<j> O O a e rH •k 
© 3 4) G 
i 
3 Q< i'4. 0 O 0 a. G, O -H Ql »J 4-1 0. K •O O O '4-i a <X « <4-( fj. t-4 X 0 »4J O IH C C o. > o O, 3 3 •O M >4 •0 a a 0 "4 i U-l TO V| u: .Ci •H © hH < Z. < a. a. 0 O Ul 0 tlj M £ ir< UJ CO 
a £ a g 
+ 2 f X 0 1 ci J 0 X J 
* * TJ 1 C J 'A J X I 
* 3 1 0 1 0 1 1 
© -i. -* 03 1 t" T H J TO 4J 1 I a. + to 1 © 1 0 5 J 
tH % 1 3 1 1 
0 O | rH t cr- J 1 
-» !H jjt 03 CJ TO J E-< CM 1 01 CD 4-) a: 1 O CJ - IX i4 * TJ r J 0 1/1 O H- c 1 1 «=« TO 32 O. * •T 3 1 1 © 4 -2 ! } C-J 1 'O CC (D I 4-1 «J {-> 1 rH E-> » u 5: TO c •* 4-1 t © TJ 0 4 « f O I -r-t 1 Ai •H *d <i> * TO 1 { O M 4J ID © 4-1 0 > « TO ri * He UJ 1 1 X O » X ? 
^ iZ 4J 4-> •» TJ * -J I O X » UJ O ; ; © TO © 1 X 1 ! P. CiX tz + -P -i TJ TJ G TO -•» C © O to © cr-..- f iH i a u> U C4J-, •rf T cc 1 cc 1 0 c ^ HI »53 TO OH + p -* "O 1 i •CJ rt * •H -j. c 1 0 •rl 4' -P £ -s. 3 1 •• O <ss ro 4-1 r-i TO tU + O f © } K U) -H •h m a 4 1 ? CO 1 Cl | © 0 £ © 3 f Sh j 3 OI £-< 1 Oi 4-1 »J a n y u > X 1 T> 1 
TO —1 1 © 0 0 © 4-1 I G 1 •H C> a > , 3 1 5C O ( © c V < 'Ji s + t-l -» O 1 iH f TO C -C © u <u 00 1 -0 f 3 K) O 05 W 0 O S ^ C.0 4 I I O rH • H ( 1 TJ O cC IJ '> 0 .d + X jJ X U -rl V4 O 3 4-1 .* X O J U: UB JH TJ H.I O 64 4 i N •r-t '0 C w r-i s * fit: i O x 1 
C. -P O + -r TJ J X 1 0 c O •4H -r O « x 1 w © O -» © -> 3 1 1 •P O 1 C rH 6 O V4 v O I i O <p 41 •H H » 4-1 -w GQ t X 0 1 •rt 4-S "-H © -» Ifi P-< i <L« O X 1 4J L1 > 4 JZ 1 c x 1 TO TO -r 4-1 I TO x 1 iJ « CO M -1 -V I? * U ( 1 •H O j y. 0 1 X 1 
3 TO M ^ » O I 2 1 •j-j 4-1 TO 'O H CO + -1 1 © O x t to TO TO HE 1 X t SI 4-) » jj O 1 3 1 
h< 0 - 1 O, 
•rf « t d w 1 c 
3 a. » 
u JZ P 1 0 1 O C 1 w M O 1 'A TO © 1 a - 0 c 1 a M , O £ I O 'A 1 0 © 4 © 1 © © » 1 4-1 < a > 1 G c c 1 X 
s c; -» a. c 1 U TO TO .-J 1 LJ -* < x. > X -3 I 
ry ir> O sH> O O 
...» 14 f-V4 «« X Q5 -a: a: © ^ a? 
i iX T) > J tr. <X >« © -H • • C Jj H Cv « f 0! -ri O) 3 o TO P .-M ! TO H W Hi ^ O t ll !{ a ii C X 
! IJ C5 -< U trJ t 
— <y *+» to TO 
'A U CL o -p 
X H u — 
X X X X X X : x x ,x x x x x x >; x x x X x X X 'A X :. . 
y, x x x x x x x, 
O O O O O O x X O O O O O O O O O O O x X O O O O O . . . . . . X- X 
r-JrHrHi-Hi-Hr-* X X iH rH rH «-< r-t 
O O O X X O X'-tOrHOOrH 
I O rH rH O 
I rH rH O X rH O r 
x x x x x x x x o o o o o x x X X X x X x o o o o o X x 'A X X X X X X X X X X X X X rH rH rH rH <••« 
o ^ r o x n ' o x x o - v o i n o o o x X o y. x o ci o it, m 
- x X x x -i o o 
r o x x o x m o o o o o * o x x o x oc o CD o o CO . . x X • X « • • • ' • > -« X X r< X O rH O <H T-I © 
A A * O » A A O » 
A A O + 
A A O i A O -x 
A A rH h 
A A O i 
X X O O O O O X x o o o o o XX X X '-I «-< -1 «-» rH 
h x x x x x y, 3 x x X X X 'A X X x X X * 0 X X x x x x E X X X X X X 
-r-i x x x x y, y. x x o o o o o TJ x x x x x x x X O O O O O ft x x x x y, x x x X X X X X X X X H H H H r -
a o x x x x x X x X O O O O O X X X X X X X X •' -* xxx 
X X O O O O O 
•q'-b'-b TJ (3 ft iS "3: TO •r-.'b •• TJ TJ a» TJ r-i < *C ' *a « ^ < a> ats » » 6) y jJ G, 'O © C 4-i < n n u TO TO TO TO c "-» > <y -H '/) 'o H w « w w at TJ TO < CC 05 S > TO '» U) X Ulu U C |J 3 M t-. t-< 41 U W c i ..i i a ft. ffl < J M D s iw 
A *§ ^ * il o t 
V v ' > ft • V V « O *. V V o 
.. v v rH 4 d» 4 • rH v •» P O 4 TJ V V o + O • -» cs v v o + 
V "v > o o v V O « u • * ^ v v o + 
w T3 iy 3 © a u j •n-tJ >, JJ H 
T) TO s 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
* * I 1 0 O O 0 O O O O V"J 0 a «) C O VD a r- 0 U") IX> CO 0 or. O M * c: 1 0 0 C3 •-« 0 0 rH vn CI 0 CJ CT 0 • 1 TJ rH CM • CM I iU 1 0 0) t-4 r-t 0 r-' 0 O O CD 3 1 P r- O 1 4J 3 a 
$ r-i cq 1 —1 rH Ci O 0 a> O m 0 VI O O r- O m <•> O i-H U CO 0 L-< \ E U 0 O CTi G\ cn 0 0 cn Lf> <0 CJ 0 (M CJ 0 • rC 4J 1 M r* CM ' 01 J Vi J Gi CJ 0 0 0 r) —1 m j a< 0 
u 35 J 0 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 tc 0 c a ( 0 O ON 0 0 0 0 0 0 « 0 0 41 i 0 r- • 0 0 4) tl } • H 0 0 0 0 G1 > •z 
U •f \T> 0 
KTJ O 1 0 O O 0 O O 0 O m O 0 O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O CM <u SX nr. 1 0 0 cr. 0 0 lO 0 0 0 0 • O a. c X > TJ 1 Xi r- • 0 w O M J-? m C 1 0) 4> 0 0 0 0 X <y 0 3 TJ 0 fr* M cu 4> A 4) O 1 AJ 3 n '0 H M OJ ai 1 -H rH 0 O O 0 0 O O O O m 0 CO 0 0 o> 0 O 0 <7N 0 0 V£> O vO C.J 4-1 i-a O c£ 0 m 0 m SJV m m 0 0 in O m O i\} tr O • U 5: RJ a •H .sJ 1 JH r-> -H cn * <n O O x\ a» 4J > 1 at 0 t-H O O O rH O 0 a: E nj U •i 1 Ot 0 
G '6 a 0 O CJ r 0 O m O •j") O O »n O 0 ft 0 0 0 O 0 VO P'I ON CO O CO in M -U 0 4J Ui 1 m 0 in tn m IP v£> 0 0 ;r> vo m <M VD O • 4J a. c 3: 0 0 O 1 0 n • m 01 m <y -<H > 4J U-t 1 r-f d 0 O d d C 1 e nj & O Cl) rH TJ 0 u SJ iC D tr O c -{-> CT •H ra ,-i i 0 0 0 O O O <3 O in 0 0 O O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 a: 0 •H u •H JJ 14 «y 1 0 0 C) ON 0 0 IT; 0 O O 0 0 0 • 0 c £ a 4-i jJ -H 0 > 'U 1 U) 0 • 0 3 •H t^  4) 1 (0 4» 0 t"H "-H O O 0 0 •r| 0 0 1 slj *0 0 O ai U O 3 O 
if) 13 + £0 f «-» 0 O 0 0 0 O O O Ir'J 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 O 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 < i.1 cu X 4? 'Ci 1 0 0 0 O tn 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 - CJ Ol AJ O O -U JS 1 4-> d - 0 ^ CN m 1 OJ 1 -H M 0 d 0 d 0 j. O > 41 3 1 r-l 0 c: 0 0 JO M O u iJ O I a 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O U*l 0 0 O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 c (U 0 .c 4J » JJ 4> t/J ! t/J 0 O 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 • « 0 0 CO CO 4J 1 0 - 0 to 1-! i r-l 0 0 0 0 0 -H < 4j U-t C. AJ + O r1 O O -U ••a "D •rf I O in O <M O i/i CM 0 (M 0 0 f>,< 0 VD tn Oi er> cn cn 0 m 4J t 0 O Oi O tr> ON ON O O O U") a> r-l IJN vo ve 0 • (X) cu O ,u 0 'CJ 1 4J <5N 0 0 U 4) r ti 4) 0 0 O .. 0 O O 0 
<n a> <y O a 0 CO r- 3 1 (0 TJ 4J <N -t L) a H 0 O 3 41 "1 Q « l 0. 0 0 O 0 U") O 03 0 ® o o CO at 0 \ti r- CN 3 CO C?« £IN <Ti O o> 1 O cr. O r-l 0 O U) o o o ' c tu t- -O M' so vo 0 • rH y X 1 AJ C <v CM C'-J • ' (M 3 O • CTi • <T\ 
u jJ J -H rH 0 t-H TJ r-» 0 rH CM S O 0 0 r-i CO l-i 5-t { vl T-l O vn <0 * O 1 a O 0 0 O O 0 O LO 0 0 0 0 VI? O in co <5N Oi G\ O CN u X 1 CO O r* f- 0 0 r- tn a? in 1,0 VO O • 4 r-'O 0 0 •i O r- « • i-TN » ON c> <•0 0 0 / 0 0 O > . 0 O O f-> <-3 4» 41 • 4) .H - r-l 0 O r: if) r-l j FM « 0 O 4! i 3 4» •+J 4> O •• CO •H 0 •y £ t c 3 4J O AJ CO r-l a. T> -n > 
V U 02 1 4J 0 TJ CQ t.. fi 0 > 3 O XJ CJ O fD < 4J O a •a S jj } «• Q) s: " ! O 3 •"t 4' >> «« >.u 4> <-i > 
"i O 1 -1 Vi O t> t-* M TJ' Xi -r-s •«-» CN t-J a i= tn j.) »i 0 u > QJ > 
!f> f-. 4J <0 a) 1 0 » ID 4) .C TJ 0 ij Oj T> T-> (U •ri IS £ Cl «-! >1 'H u> s 4) O 1 M 4J W £ T' TJ •r| rt, O D rf rtl rH Vl 0 w c e 4) 0} <l> rH to fl! <11 1 >* <u P 4J a> q< 4-J 3 3 ra -v. 4( <55 3 fO H 
i J •i 0 iO a U a, I c. <J> u v> 6 •H *t? Tj -H TJ TJ tO u-c +J 4J ar-i <u r-j 4.' -r- CO I" 0 JJ a O 1 0 -r| fa C nj M fZ T5 T5 ID 3: 4t •rl nj 0} *o <0 -«•» rj O M U 0 <0 « - o Q 6 v-i 0 0 * IT: < \ u fS^  T. > <0 ID < < M n ti. a', f U X fx, cn 01 < l-l Cu u > 0 > 0 P fK X •> 
P"> TJ J c 3 
-* O 4J 01 CP TJ (3 O 4-) o< .c + « AJ 4J 4) -i ta c 3 0 O cn a» > 
u 4! > CO O RJ CJ O O G, T> O w O c m S O 3 ii O, O O <M 
ra :>, O X C.J 4J a> TJ ;r. •K <0 O •0 TJ <2) rH O 4J O > (4 M 4-J 0) 4-> SZ •t a,- c J-l «J 4-J TJ tn O 4) nj •3J f £ a. 5: C iJ t—1 TJ 'Q <J ra TH c 4> sz m cu cr 0 (JJ .».} -u -H 0 § c 0 4-J TJ 0 -H < -H C 0 •rj 4J X 3 eg cn •li •J fij <u 0 35 ti) -H aj VJ £ } as 4J IJ <5J 3 (V 3 a 4J -C Cv? ro rH t a 0 O a> 4-J O £= <y 3 r. u O M 0 M 0 CC 0 jr. c; 0 •D >-> W «n Cl O -VJ Vl 10 •H "TJ 3 i -H e(. 4J 0 4-J Jz -•H -H O 3 4-J CM M O •H O U4 C nj eg > 4J O •U -Q O (J 4) <U 
•S) <D Q <1) 3 rH s O + $4 O 4J 0) •H 41 4J rt> •—1 *M U 01 * w + Ai > jJ CO Li *-> nj O u 
T3 -•I CD rtJ fl} + SB S AJ O 4-O c •—I C-5 
> u 4 4J tJ x: .•y u £T) i!5 JH 0 4J in +J 9-4 C a Bu < 
O t", o o o o o O " o o o• • • • o • • - o o r-i o o o 
<-i O O O 
O ® M ' ' O >11 1 
o • CM awn * . . tp . • • o m h o o o 
I O v," O O O •«?• CD o . 0 0 0 • • « eg • « * O CM rH O O rH 
OOOOOOO O - O O O • • • o • • - a o 1—1 O O O 
c-H tH O O O i-< 
o op o m r- of o o • r- vxj • • . (M . . . o n 
rH 0 0 0 
to OOOOOOO 10 0 • o 0 o • • T • • O • . - O O 1 0 rH O O O I I I o <0 o o o o o o o 1 0 o • o o o » « I . » o • • • o o I O rH O O O 
rH O, JH 
V o >, S- Jj 
1 (i) h o •• a ci n •• 5 
1 u H H .-•< o. C. 13 M I 1 
0"> 10 
* CM 
o o 
' * o 
o a -U .C O p fij o U r-*» ^ 
XI o| 
o o » 
' o 
o o 
o 
U o a 
x: 
XT 0-J XJ S; 
o o CO • ' o 
o a •JJ JS o P 
Ji CN 
SB 
ro m r- ' • cn 
ri o o -• vo 
o o 
» o 
jj o a -u x: 
cm p )5 
ir* m in -• m 04 
vo cc 
' - CN 
r- m on • * <0 
O O 
O 4J 00 but C-. iu' 
a! (M 
« s 
-d '0 
X 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
1 
s 
3 
£ 
J 
u 
s 
£ 
ui ^ 
I 
a 
h 
> s o r 
2 
'SS' 
I : 
i i 
? 
A.t rH 
c «r. 
s 
a ti-
l l ! 
1 
,1 
1 
A A 
; o c n o ai 
rl rl r! r< n ri O <-I O '••! O O 
o o o o o c- cm x o r-J o m r^  o o o o o o c n x o o o ^ oj 
ISSI g g g g g r * I—I <-< <-i 
g g g g g 
rH <-< rH r-t 
g g g g g g S S g g g g g 
g g g 
n \ 
; W O T O 
i O H o rl H C) » 
; j j g g g g g " 
: g g g g g g 
& 
a -
m a s ? 
i i l ! ! i i is i ! 
! i i : J 
S | g g g g S 
Y. X rH vl «••« r-t r 
O r< C? x-* r-> H O O H O r-t O O 
•r-i O CM O O O O QN <7> O O O sn ID y O a O O O O ffi a o O ^ W 
«-l O «••! «-« «-« O O r < O «-< O O 
I g a g g g g s a g s s s s 
« H o «-« rH ,-1 rH O O rH O r-J O O 
I s ! H P s ^ l s I s s 
I s l I l i S J a l i l l S 
, i 
A A «-« 
A o 
A A. O 
A «• 
A A O 
A A < 
A A 
A A g 
A A ^ 
A A 
A A g 
i> r 
I 
<0 = 
2 § 
•H rH 
1 
1 & 
.3 
2 
a 
I 
0 - 0 3 9 - 1 0 
+ I fO o «x. o o o sn fn i cr> O i V cr- i 0 r* 
cc / <\' O • o o o • « 1 rH i tn • 1 0 • i • ' 1 xr. 1 • V£-i o o o <••« 1 r-t 1 <N 1 Cv' 
M? r.J 1 1 r 
a o 1 1 i a C' C-J o o a *r- vo ! cr. f rH 0 VD 1 CN v -4 1 r-i m t o • O O O » ' 1 <- i tr» • r- 1 O - 1 <n 
C3 o 4J ( • cv • • • O AJ 1 . fn 1 V f ' m l u> Cl. jC 4-> * VI 4» l CT 1 
o c ^ 1 r-i 
1 
1 T-H 1 ^ I CJ 1 CM 1 i-l s: 1 CT a o O O o o o I o 1 o o 0 O 1 0 0 l 0 0 C 3 J.. 1 O o ' o o o • • 1 Cv: 1 IX> - CO 1 r-o o f < • c « • • o o o 1 o 1 • 0 0 a> o o o 1 1 «H 1 CM 1 CN n 
O * 3 1 O O CT o o o o o 1 o 1 O C5 0 I O O 1 0 0 w? Oi a ft' 1 o o • o o o « • J CN 1 VD - CO 1 r* o 1 • « • o o 1 O I o O I , O 1 o VI o 1 o o o o 1 r-> 1 •—1 1 Cl I C-J s.* o •> 3 J 1 \ o O 1 1 \ 1 cs* lli 1 r , o r~ co t- t-i o I 'Ji CSV i -o cn 1 co tr. i cn CO >. 1 <N o - <V} CTi -rr • • ( —t t m . r- 1 CN • s .U o u 1 « • Ci « . > o ^ ( 1 V£> 1 • c- 1 ON 0 a) T> V) • O o o o S W 1 l cM 
i-l 'O 1 — -O <y CO 1 t { 
r-l o OJ U) r O cn; CQ O W CD t vr- rH Cl I M? >5T 1 ON u J-S CJ tJ x: •H t o . CJ ON n> • « } -JI . r~ 1 ON • f m <y Cb ^ JJ u TJ i ' • 'r • • • O T { ut CD } • ON iiil Qi o <y a) o c;; o 1 «-< 1 rH 1 CJ r e - a s ; c T> T5 0) ^ 1° C Oi Hi W 0) 1 o CJ o O o o O O 1 o O 1 O O 0 O 1 O O 1 0 o d' u c; 4J I r.s ra • O O O • ' 1 CN 1 • CO a O c: vz o •o • • ' o o 1 - O 1 • O 1 O M £ u> O •'< rtj i. f o O O O 1 rH 1 rl t c-J 1 eg O -H U 5 I i 1 d Cv' cn 4J -iJ nj 0 o t \ i i 0 
0} O -H fij M I CO i o tn O O O O O O O J O O 1 O O 0 O 1 O O i 0 0 <r< 
<m O s «.l 0) o • o o o « « 1 IN J VD - CD < r- w CM 4J u Xi > o* O 1 « O 1 * O nj —t -H f a o »> a> ll! D 
1 o l o o o 1 1 f rH f ^ 
f' 1 CN 1 CJ 1 i'ji 
c: V 0 CT O SI ll o t o O O O O O O O / O O O O J O O 1 0 O p js r; o y 4J w 1 o o • O C5C - ' 1 CN 1 • CD 1 r-o o u w 1 • o ' • ' c» o 1 • o 1 • O O 1 • O yj -«H 3 1 CJ r-l o o o I rH I r-| I 04 1 CN 2 < <y a 4J j : •> O >> H r-t o ti 
h< >•0 P TI 
c 
•'•i O fg CM u. ^ j tc » cn i VD o tn o o o «-« o o o • » 1 r-i rH cr> 1 Ci -v 1 r^ • in O { r^  in 1 « 1 Cl 1 0 Ci m c ^ o aJ •a 1 - • > • CM M" i 1 r~f n i • in I ' 0 Q a> ti 1 O O O r-l r-l ( *••! 1 rH Cl CN l «-« eg 1 CN CM 
'Ji CD <y 1 1 1 t t CJ t-H e o !J o > r 1 O &> —< A) •U ca { v?> O rl O O O t-l ^ r r* I ON <rs O t CN CJ 
!•> ,-( U-4 O xn t-l o • O O O • • 1 M- ' vn 1 f^  • 1 O O jJ OJ <M JZ • «N 1 • <£» ft I 
> 4J 1 O O O i-« l-l f r -l Ci (N 1 rH CM 1 C4 CM o 1 [ 1 1 1 in IC t- <y 0 [ CTs O CO O O O --- f r- CO 1 ON 'S- wv O I r- f Hi CN 
u tn s: i \S> o « O O O » • < rH I xf -cn r^ i 1 • CSI . . . CN -a- i VD f»> \ • m ON p % d 1 o O o r-l T-? 1 r-! 1 rH (Si r-l I'M j «-i eg l fN-eg 
y. a O o c 1 .. 1 •• 1 >> 1 >> E-« 1 a> a) •• -n-n 1 u 1 Vl 1 u •• J H CO G> 1 Q L> T5 TJ 0) 1 o o } O Oi 0 C* 1 0 a J 0 O 
> 1 o > c > (S, C CJ i .I.J 1 «.J .c: XZ 1 u xr. 1 .c: 
X i-t * >nE-< I-i <5 £s a» 1 u 4J O 4.4 J O 4J i O 4J >•1 o c. } O -t !TJ J^ tJ Zi i m o f fi? xn <1  O < /a M") 1 & « & <u { ii m ef, O i tu l U 03 ON t Ci-> <J\ i u. cr. o e I c. > (x. M »-J 5-t Jirt i <*> M { -u 1 # t 1 1' -r< cr> 4.J .',.> r-i Cv' 1 X. C-l t .c eg •C CJ f JZ C i » .c CM 
> 1 <J) JJ O •« w w i-i Si i tJ 1 4J x £ i 1 4-) ou o 1 1< a B A IN u 1 O o i m o O U 1 m 0 1 U; O 
tC - •—= * Su I o a, O' ^ I" C> X 1 r- i 03 a; ON X 1 on 3: 1 C^  
X w X 'X X X X X X X X X y. V X X tf X x X X X + 4J X V. X X X tf X X X X X X X X X X y. X X tf X X X X X * tf) r. -A X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X x X X y, X X X * eg } O X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X y. X X x ;< + rs X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X tf x + vc y. X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X x + T} a> •> 
cc 4J 0 in vn ^ CN f—t cn 0 X Co ON 0 0 0 c* m 0 V X «n 0 rH X CD 0 0 a. >1) 0 UN a> 0 X 0 CO 0 0 0 f** r- CD X X \0 X CO (Ti X eg X X X l-l eg eg X CM 0 0 0 X 0 X 0 O O I D UJ CM CM <N X CM X X X O O u X X X X 
V- X" <i> H 
CO O it; 4J .c: :< •A y. y. X X X X X X ;< X X ^ M X X X X X x X X v» v I eg 5) - it-; a •A X A X X tf X X •A X X >: tf k tf X X X X X' X X X + 0 CI4 O 3 X X X X X X X X X X :< X X X X X X X X X X X X X :< x + 0 0 X x< X X X X X X X X X X X K X X X X X X X -» «J T. 00 X 'A y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X tf X X X X X X X X - ) W: 'd >} X y- X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X tf x .-« 
4J >r CJ * 
O <0 
0) "O y, X X >'. y. X vj X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A •—i .v: E 0) J> X y. X X X X X X X X X X bi X X X X X X X X X X i 4J vl 0 > 
'6 
X •A X X X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X x t 4-J a) G) x; -rl 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X > 
r-l A- JS a.- 4J •D s X X X X XA X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X * in Hi <D w a> 'A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X f 1 £ s c: u TJ u w «j c 14 w 5) + U 01 jJ 0 c —1 0 to a 0 -H u JJ 0 B t Oi 0) *H 0 a V4 * 0 JZJ •iJ 3: 4J tr s-} CN CJ 4J <u a n UJ •rf c J4 5 l Of <s> e J>4 ^ 0) iZ) c a> cn a IJ (4 c <u <4-1 0 + eg -rj a ij 3 m w + 
a <—i 1 4J 0 0 2 0 0 O1 o* Ui a 0 ^ 0 a> 6 ou u 0 > 0' <•3 m >4 ra + c u 0 « 4J X JH 3 W E c JZ D •0 0 (u -) 0 SZ c u OJ u 0 b 4J 0) u Oi 4J 
in u 0 a x u C/J a '-t IT" r-i D « 3 c u 0} 0 •U ii i 
Vi w •H t;- 3 3 CJ C r-i 4i © 14 •rl « n rj r* C H « 
tX. 0 0 4J sz c fC a > 0 14 «44 It} 6) Vi * u u 0 3 u j 0) a. -U y- 3 tfj > e + tu M "O 0 m c 5 0 3 0J (J TJ •H A £ T5 OJ 
CI ^ •rl 0 JJ c: c 1! 0 Q> tx 3 (Z r-t c Vi M ^ 4J O <y rA -i-i 4J Vi a c {J. 14 0 a> cr CJ 3 O + C O r-t 0) c 0 « fij 0 0 •H fZ u UJ e -t-i 4J + 
Vs 0) -I nj 14 c V) « « E- •+4 u w 10 EH 0 Vi -0 0 -» e O CO H4 a* <y & <y 3 a O u 0 c > •TI 1ft u rt < ^ + <y -H 4J •j a> u» 0 is 3 QJ 0 4J a u •H fc- U Rl 3 Cn. + r-l 4-1 <5J cn t4 (4 f3 3 C c •H a 3 U c 3 c O C * +J W ^ H a CJ 4J U i-i u. JH t< CD H «J 4J 0 0 v< d! W CL e tu & > <0 (ft O •-1 < 3 C + 
£fl U 0 •rl Qf <7 c 4J 4J cc m -'•I >, 4J 0 •H rtJ D* E-. O + rtj H 0 a EH > C t-H u «l-f cr> M <5 ro Xi n a 4-j > c: M —t E -rl (U c a c xz V4 a: «u a C! rl O J iJ i T> M > •A cn if} L-i -H Cb 0 CL< fC 0 r-H •TJ 0 Vi 3 M 3 «4 1 CJ 4 RJ ra 0) U O 0) cn 0 CJ 4) U 3 L-« OJ 3 t 2: u <D 0) a •as 0 •J v< JJ O '•M U '4-i U3 0 w c c. M •u U-f O 0 Oi a 0 G) -j QJ 0 <7" 0 fiJ O jJ TJ + E-« 0 £ 15 H-l O 0! a "-i 0 C tn M 4J <«l 2 < + vs —1 Lf< C c* w 0 tu fi. O >H JZ —I c <L» 
0 u c V4 a) <4-1 O 0 c 3 Xi ~s « 0 0 0 nj S e t 0 U > O 0 TJ J-I TJ y> e D- 0 -H •1 •H rS JH * 
<••< 0) 0 c 4J G> cr •rH C C c (Z a U 3 U e 3 ^ ?u V) ra r-t 4J -1 Vi M U u fc* 4J M u •>•4 V4 1.: a 4-5 O CJ 3 a> £••• -» 
> «a C3 0 0 <3J O 0 B> as W XT' ti t? 0 O 3 s r-J + ai V 1-1 3 0 Xi Xi a 0 O 4-1 O a 0 Oi -H Cn 4-i J. -4 iJ a u 4J p. e •r\ O CL a V) •44 a X 0 <4i G 
s C a U a 3 3 T5 i-; J-I « T3 0. a O <4- (V M S3 Vj >•1 •H -H a* * Or -fc < 0 < W 0 •z 3 < CL-Cu < 0 O^JUJ 0 ts3 £ Cu CL. t-i V) S W hJ tc 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely 
Determination for US 97/J Street Improvements 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Department of Transportation 
Rober t W. Bryan t 
Region 4 Mnnagc r 
63055 N. Ihvy 97 
Bend, OR 97701 
(541) 388-6180 
FAX: (541)388-6231 
FILE CODE: 
February 2,2010 
Nick Snead 
Community Development Director 
71 SE "D" St 
Madras, OR 97740 
Subject: Madras UGB Expansion TPR Analysis; Reasonably Likely Determination 
Dear Mr. Snead, 
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) appreciates the opportunity to review and 
comment on the transportation study prepared for Madras UGB Expansion and related TPR 
Analysis. We received this study from Kittelson and Associates on January 22,2010, Our 
planning staff also reviewed the City's plan amendment application and DLCD's recent 
response. 
As part of the UGB expansion, the City of Madras is considering a 20-acre rezone of Range 
Land to R-2 Residential uses, including a new elementary school. The proposed amendment is 
located at the outskirts of town,'near the intersection of Ashwood Road and Bean Drive. Neither 
roads are state facilities; however, the traffic study concluded that the proposed rezone has a 
significant effect on the US97/"J" Street intersections (degraded operation with incremental trips 
within the planning horizon). This is an important state facility where ODOT and the City are 
planning significant improvements in the near future. 
On January 21,2010, pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060(4)(b), the City has written ODOT 
requesting a determination as to whether planned state highway improvements at US97/ "J" 
Street are not only included in the City's TSP, but also: 
« Funded for construction in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); 
• Part of a regional transportation system plan; or 
• If neither of the above, the planned improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by 
the end of the TSP planning period. 
ODOT offers the following comments in response: 
1. US97 is a Statewide level highway facility and a freight route. 
2. The City of Madras completed a TSP Amendment in 2005 to address the anticipated 
failure of the US 97/"J" Street intersections. 
3. A preferred concept was identified by the City and ODOT as shown on the project 
website http://ci.madras.or.us/pnblic works/pw hwy97southY.shtml. The concept 
includes cost estimates, right-of-way needs, and a double-line sketch of the preferred 
roadway alignment. 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Mr, Nick Snead 
February 2,2010 
Page 2 o f 2 
4. Funding for the construction of the US97/"J" Street improvements is included in the 
Draft 2010-2013 STIP, which is expected to be approved in October 2010. The "J" 
Street improvements are not on the current 2008-11 STIP list, At this time, there is a gap 
between funding identified in the Draft STIP and cost estimates submitted by the project 
team. However, the City has been collecting transportation System Development 
Charges slated specifically for US97/"J" Street improvements. 
Based on ODOT's review of the circumstances associated with future improvements to US97/"J" 
Street intersections, it is our opinion that the necessary improvements are reasonably likely to 
occur by the end of the planning period. ODOT lias reached this conclusion based on the 
following factors: 
1. The planned improvements are listed on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP and will iikely be 
approved. 
2. The planned improvements are located on a statewide freight route, an important facility 
that will likely receive future funding. 
3. The City of Madras has land use regulations that allow the City to impose conditions on 
future development if such conditions are needed to avoid or remedy a significant effect. 
These include ordinances enabling transportation System Development Charges for 
US97/"J" Street improvements and City approval of the proposed intersection redesign. 
4. ODOT has a positive working relationship with the City of Madras and collaboratively 
funded other projects in the area. We are confident that the City, ODOT and other 
partners will be able to fund the needed US97/"J" Street improvements. 
This reasonably likely determination does not constitute a commitment on the part of ODOT to 
fund the planned improvements at US97/"J" Street. Further, this written statement applies only 
to the subject property and only to this specific proposed amendment. It does not apply to any 
future amendments that may rely upon the same project. Instead, future proposed amendments 
will require a new written statement from ODOT. (see 
http:/Avww,oregoo,gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docsATR/tnrGuidelines.pdf. Section 3.2.09) 
ODOT appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this written statement. If you have any 
questions, or need more information, please contact Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 Planning 
office, at (541) 388-6046 or email ana.'iovanovic@odot.state.or.us. 
Robert Bryant, PE 
Region 4 Manager 
cc via e-mail: M&riciWdabaugh, DLCD; Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Assoc, Inc.; DJ Heffernan, 
Angelo Planning Group; Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Planning Director; Matt Garrett, 
ODOT Director; Jerri Bohard, ODOT TDD Manager; Pat Creedican, ODOT District 10 Manager 
rage 1 u i ^ 
0-039-10 
Nick Snead 
From: JOVANOVIC Ana [Ana.JOVANOVIC@odot.state.or.us] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:34 PM 
To: Nick Snead 
Cc: RADABAUGH Mark; Joe Bessman; DJ Heffernan; Jon Skidmore 
Subject: RE: Madras UBG expansion & TRP Analysis 
— > 
Nick, 
Here is ODOT's Reasonably Likely Determination letter for Madras UGB Expansion and TPR Analysis, Please 
contact me if you have any questions. 
Thank you, 
Ana 
Ana Jovanovic 
ODOT Region 4 Program and Planning 
541 388.6046 
ana.jovanovic@odot.stole.or.us 
From: Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:49 AM 
To: JOVANOVIC Ana 
Subject: Madras UBG expansion &TRP Analysis 
Ana, 
Good morning! I hope you had a good weekend as well. I am writing to determine the status of ODOT's review of 
our TPR study submitted by Kittleson & Associates related to the 37 acre UGB expansion proposal. Can you give 
me an update? 
"There are no short cuts to any place worth going' 
-Beverly Sills-
Nicholas S. Snead 
2 / 5 / 2 0 1 0 
t'age I ot l 
0=039-10 
Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
(541)475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
2 / 5 / 2 0 1 0 
0 - 0 3 9 - 10 
Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
I 
\ ( teJl-06 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
For the City of Madras 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madras, an incorporated municipality in the State 
of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political subdivision of the 
State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "County". 
RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson County are authorized pursuant to Oregon 
Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 190 to enter into an Intergovernmental Management Agreement 
for performance of functions which either governmental unit has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS, this Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative agreement under 
ORS Chapter 195; and 
WHEREAS, Goal 14 [Urbanization] requires that the City and the County establish an 
urban growth boundary to identify and separate urbanizable land from rural and that the 
establishment and change of urban growth boundaries shall be through a cooperative process 
between the City and County; and 
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions in Goal 2 [Land Use Planning], the City and County 
are required to have coordinated and consistent comprehensive plans which establish an Urban 
Growth Boundary (UGB) and a plan for the Urban Growth Area (UGA) within the boundary; 
and, 
WHEREAS, the City and County share a common concern regarding the accommodation 
of population growth and utilization of lands within the UGB; and 
WHEREAS, the City and County consider it mutually advantageous to establish this 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) for the purpose of facilitating the 
orderly transition from rural to urban land uses and to enable the City to plan for and provide 
urban services such as sewer, water and street facilities in a timely, orderly and cost effective 
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF MADRAS AND JEFFERSON COUNTY 
MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 
1. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1.1. To establish standards mid procedures for review and action on proposed land use actions 
and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to lands within the UGA; 
1.2. To transfer authority and jurisdiction over current planning activities, land use decisions, 
provision of urban services and code enforcement within the UGA from the County to the 
City; 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 1 
r J t - J l - 0 6 
1.3. To benefit the public through reduction of governmental processes; and, 
1.4. To establish procedures for City and County consideration of expansions to the UGA. 
2. DEFINITIONS 
For the purpose of this agreement, the following definitions shall apply: 
2.1. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
2.2. City: the City of Madras. 
2.3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
2.4 County: Jefferson County. 
2.5. Land Use Decision: A final decision or determination concerning the adoption, 
amendment or application of statewide planning goals, a comprehensive plan provision or 
a land use regulation. 
2.6. Public Facilities Plan: A document or documents describing the water, sewer and 
transportation facilities which are to support the land uses designated in the appropriate 
acknowledged comprehensive plans. 
2.7. Urban Growth Area (UGA): The area between the Madras City Limits and the Madras 
Urban Growth Boundary, as designated on the City's and the County's Comprehensive 
Plan Maps. 
2.8. Urban Growth Boundary (UGB): The boundary line which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the surrounding rural 
lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
2.9. Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA): This Intergovernmental 
Agreement between the City and County that coordinates the management of land use 
and development within the City of Madras UGA. 
2.10. Urbanizable Lands: Lands inside the Urban Growth Area that are designated for future 
urban development when public facilities and services can be provided by the City. 
3. URBANIZATION PROCESS 
3.1 The UGA shall be managed to maintain the potential for future urban development until 
such time as the land is annexed into the City and is converted to urban land. 
3.2. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban development can occur when public facilities 
and services are available and adequate to serve urban levels of development, or the land 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 2 
M O - 0 3 9 ^ - 0 6 
is annexed into the City and zoned for urban development 
3.3. Rural levels of development within the UGA shall be sited in such a way as to not 
interfere with urban levels of development and services when conversion from 
urbanizable land to urban lands occurs. 
3.4. Extension of City services within the UGA may be permitted when approved by the City. 
Establishment or extension of sewer systems outside the UGB is prohibited except to 
mitigate a public health hazard in accordance with the provisions of OAR 660-011-0060. 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making authority 
regarding all land use applications within the UGA except applications for amendments 
to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of lands in the UGA. Lands outside the 
UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to include the territory to be 
annexed. 
5. PROCESS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE UGA 
5.1. Land Use applications shall be processed through the City Community Development 
Department. 
5.2. Notice of all land use applications within the UGA shall be sent to the County 
Community Development Department and to any other affected County agencies and 
other applicable special service districts for review and comment prior to any decision by' 
the City. Such agencies or districts shall be given ten business days in which to provide 
comments on the application. 
5.3. In making its decision, the City shall consider all comments received under § 5.2. 
5.4. The County, any agency or special service district that provides comments on the 
application shall be mailed a copy of the land use decision and shall have standing to 
appeal the City's decision. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
6.1. Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
6.2. An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community Development 
Department along with the applicable City and County plan amendment fees. The City 
shall forward a copy of the application to the County Community Development 
Department, together with the County's plan amendment fee, within five working days of 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 3 
0-039-10 ^ , 4 1 - 0 6 
the date the application is filed. 
6.3. The City and County Planning Commissions shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may hold a 
joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
6.4. The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be forwarded 
to the City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment 
to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be forwarded to the County Board of 
Commissioners. 
6.5. The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final decision on 
whether the UGB should be amended. 
6.6. If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint meeting of the City 
Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to resolve the 
differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution process to resolve 
the differences. 
6.7 If the governing bodies arc not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be no 
change to the UGB. 
7. OTHER LAND USE ACTIVITIES 
7.1. The City and County agree to mutually review any proposed action on public 
improvement projects and similar programs, projects or proposals that apply to the UGA. 
7.2. The City shall be responsible for public facilities planning within the UGA. The City 
shall coordinate with any affected County agency in the development of a public facilities 
plan for the UGA. 
7.3. The County shall be responsible for administering the state Building Code and issuing 
building permits for all construction within the UGA, until such time as the City has its 
own state-approved building code program. 
8. ROADS 
8.1. Public rights-of-way within the UGA shall be accepted by the City upon annexation of 
adjacent lands. 
8.2. The City shall accept jurisdiction over County roads within the UGA that have a 
pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the County may 
structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70, at which time the City shall accept 
jurisdiction over the road. Nothing contained in this subsection shall restrict the City from 
accepting jurisdiction over a road or public right-of-way within the UGA that does not 
meet such minimum standards. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 4 
M - o J i i - 0 6 
8.3 When a parcel in the UGA is initially partitioned or subdivided and creation of a street is 
required, development shall proceed initially with streets to City road standards 
8.4 Streets in subdivisions and PUDs shall be developed to the City's improvement standards 
8.5. All unpaved county roads, excluding public usage roads, within the UGA shall be graded 
biannually by the County until the City has accepted jurisdiction over the road. 
9. FEES 
9.1. Applications for land use permits, including all land use appeals within the UGA, shall be 
accompanied by a fee set by the City. 
9.2. Applications for UGB Amendments shall be accompanied by fees set by the County in 
addition to any City fees. 
9.3. System Development Charges for lands within the UGA will be collected by the County, 
prior to the issuance of building permits. 
10. ENFORCEMENT 
The City shall be responsible for enforcement of land use regulations within the UGA. 
11. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
11.1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both parties, after 
public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the Board of Commissioners. 
11.2 Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and County 
Comprehensive Plans and the statewide planning goals. 
11.3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the other 
party at least forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the 
publication of public hearing notices in order to provide ample time for resolution 
of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the party considering termination. That party 
shall give the other party at least 20 days prior notice of the scheduled hearing 
date. The 20 day period shall be used by both parties to seek resolution of 
differences. Both parties shall also request a collaborative conflict resolution 
process to resolve differences that remain. 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and local 
ordinances. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 5 
e. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide planning 
Goals 2 and 14. If this agreement is terminated without adoption of a new 
agreement, jurisdiction and authority over all planning activities and land use 
decisions within the UGA shall revert to the County. Therefore, this agreement 
may not be terminated without adoption of a new agreement. 
12. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
This agreement shall not become effective until properly executed by both the City and the 
County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Growth Area 
Management Agreements. 
13. SEVERABILITY 
The Provisions within this agreement are severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of 
this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, said invalidity shall 
not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the agreement 
ADOPTED this S " day of / I f U ^ J L ^ , 2006. 
RAS, OREGON JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON 
ick Allen, Mayor 
Date: 
ATTEST: 
Bill Bellamy, Commlssiol 
MlUu 7 *aa1J 
Mary Zfyoike, Commissioner 
D a t e : A j i g , SL&bU 
6 
DLCD 
Notice of Proposed Amendment 
(12-14-09) 
& R M 1 DLCD Notice of 
Proposed Amendment 
THIS FORM MUST BE RECEIVED BY DLCD AT LEAST 
45 DAYS PRIOR TO THE FIRST EVIDENTIARY HEARING 
PER ORS 197.610, OAR CHAPTER 660, DIVISION 18 For D L C D Use 0„h 
Jurisdiction: City of Madras and Jefferson County Date of First Evidentiary Hearing: 2/3/10 
Local File Number: UGBE-09-1 Date of Final Hearing: TBD 
Is this a REVISION to a previously submitted proposal? • Yes X No Date submitted: 12/14/09 
X Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment X Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
• Land Use Regulation Amendment X Zoning Map Amendment 
• New Land Use Regulation X Urban Growth Boundary Amendment 
• Transportation System Plan Amendment • Other: 
Briefly Summarize Proposal. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached" (limit 500 characters): 
The Ci ty of M a d r a s and J e f f e r s o n County propose to adopt the J e f f e r s o n County School District 2 0 0 9 
Long R a n g e Faci l i ty P lan as an element of the i r comprehensive plans. The Ci ty and County also propose 
to amend the M a d r a s U r b a n G r o w t h B o u n d a r y (UGB) to include a 20 -ac re site f r o m the M a d r a s U r b a n 
Rese rve A r e a ( U R A ) to be designated wi th Ci ty R - 2 zoning. The site prov ides l and f o r housing and/or a 
school. T h e need f o r land zoned R - 2 is established in the 2 0 0 7 M a d r a s Urbaniza t ion S tudy . The J e f f e r s o n 
County School Distr ict 's 2 0 0 9 L o n g R a n g e Faci l i ty P lan documents the need f o r a school faci l i ty in the 
proposed U G B expansion location. A n assessment of t ranspor ta t ion impacts is being p r e p a r e d f o r the 
Oregon D e p a r t m e n t of Transpor ta t ion ( O D O T ) to show that the proposed land use change can be 
accommodated b y the existing T r a n s p o r t a t i o n System Plan (TSP). 
Has sufficient information been included to advise DLCD of the effect of proposal? X Yes, text is included 
For Map Changes: Include 8V^'xH" maps of Current and Proposed designation. X Yes, Maps included 
Plan map changed from: Resource/Range Land (Jefferson County) To: Residential/R-2 (City of Madi as) 
Zone map changed from: Range Land To: R-2 
Location of property (do not use Tax Lot): East of existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Rd (Attachments A & B) 
Previous density: Min. lot 40 ac (for non-farm dwelling) New density: Min. lot 4,000 sf/unit (for 2 units or 3 units) 
Acres involved: 20 acres 
Applicable statewide planning goals: 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 
x x x • x x x G D x x x x X • • • • • 
J e f f e r s o n County School District , Deschutes V a l l e y W a t e r District , Oregon D e p a r t m e n t of 
Transpor ta t ion 
Is an exception to a statewide planning goal proposed? • YES X NO Goals: 
Affected state or federal agencies, local governments or special districts (It is jurisdiction's responsibility to notify these 
agencies. DLCD only records this information): 
Local Contact: Nick Snead, Community Development Dir. Phone: (541) 475-3388 Extension: 
Address: Ha l l 71 S.E. "D" Street City: Madras Zip: 9 7 7 4 1 - 1 6 8 5 
Fax Number: ( 5 4 1 ) 4 7 5 - 7 0 6 1 E-mail Address: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This fo rm must be received by DLCD at least 4 5 days p r io r to the first ev ident iary hear ing 
per O R S 197.610 and O A R Chapter 660, Division 18 
1. This form must be submitted by local jurisdictions only (not by applicant). 
2. When submitt ing, please print this f o r m on light green paper . 
3. Text: Submittal of a proposed amendment to the text of a comprehensive plan or land use 
regulation must include the text of the amendment and any other information the local 
government believes is necessary to advise D L C D of the effect of the proposal. "Text" means the 
specific language being added to or deleted f rom the acknowledged plan or land use regulations. 
A general description of the proposal is not adequate. Do not submit this f o r m wi thout 
support ing documentat ion. 
4. Maps : Submittal of a proposed m a p amendment must also include a map of the affected area 
showing existing and proposed plan and zone designations. The m a p should be legible and on 
8/4 x 11 inch paper. Please provide the specific location of property, such as an address and/or 
tax lot number. Include text regarding background and/or the just if ication for the change, such as 
the application accepted by the local government. 
5. Exceptions: Submittal of proposed amendments that involve a goal except ion must include the 
proposed language of the exception. 
6. Unless exempt by O R S 197.610(2), proposed amendmen t s must be received at the D L C D ' s 
Salem of f ice at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hear ing on the proposal . (The clock 
begins on the day D L C D receives your proposal.) The first evidentiary hearing is usually the 
first public hearing held by the jur isdict ion 's p lanning commiss ion on the proposal . 
7. If you have an electronic copy of the proposal , we would like you to submit one electronic copy 
[email, CD, or upload to D L C D (for submittal instructions, see # 4)] and ONE P A P E R C O P Y 
of the proposed a m e n d m e n t to: 
A T T E N T I O N : P L A N A M E N D M E N T S P E C I A L I S T 
D E P A R T M E N T O F L A N D C O N S E R V A T I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T 
6 3 5 C A P I T O L S T R E E T NE, S U I T E 1 5 0 
S A L E M , O R E G O N 9 7 3 0 1 - 2 5 4 0 
8. Electronic Submit ta l s : One hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, by either email to 
larry.french@state.or .us. On the same day, please mail [1] hard copy to our off ice . 
9. Need M o r e Copies? You can n o w access these fo rms onl ine at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please 
print fo rms on 8 -1/2x11 green p a p e r only. You m a y also call the D L C D Off ice at (503) 373-0050; or 
Fax your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to l a r ry . f r ench@sta te .o r .us . 
hnp.V/w w w ,Jc d.state .or.us/LC D/forms .shtmj Updated March 16, 2009 
Attachment A - Vicinity Map r 
H, 
y I I 
/ m ,-<N0 8C|LE)|| 
V 
5n «•.- R'J 
/ - « J 
? / / I * " © 
w 
IfA1 Cfuis 
NEPoftSf 
s s » g 
a a, 
NE Jefteraon S» 
/ NE Lrfucfcs Rti "NEUJuckiRd 
e* 
© 
. f 
f & C rtr-
ft 
9 ?J 
NE Oak fc 
r, trr' Pjl* 
\ 5 | 
•s 
1 
« NEV. "I z 
© Bit , © ^ I'll 11 • fi „-3 Bill 
m c » • 
e 
u 
£ Madras •v St [ :l 
1! ip H 
© -' ~ " S1 
. a © 1 If 
r.r/^ tf f. 
C.ifl 
-, Mountain </iVi 
Ho*p»!Jtl OifUfrt 
Nf f*M r,, A n*1 
se c sfl a 
m* *,-? 
e-'.tn Ojrl 
SED& 
0 © 
: s 5 - • 
if. S£ ftuflSt 
£ I £ K 
a V 
— tr 
a 
?f Qwi ! 
SE L SI 
Innjiry oWilntd from nMp«.gooeW.con 
Ml JertlHjWrt 
l«W O'v.^ XV 
% <t 
htHomf* LR 
\ 
o 
SE f . r -
% f 
V t 
> 
/ • % too, 
V 
£ AvwuoJ R-J 
* SITE 
SfTE V1CJN0TTY MAP 
MADRAS, OREGON 
Source: Google Maps 
Prepared by: Kiltelsou A Associates 
c o l I 
PQ 
<B 
S J3 u 91 
i 
. v 
y 
v/ ^ A . 
- > / " V / \ / - ; 
fo / < 
X 
, X / / 'V ' X 
" V 
> t J 
/ r T " - J a 0 
X N / 
^ / 
V 
/ V 
ai-j! • 
f h x . ; . . 
X j 
o 
a: 
o 
§ i 
00 
r 
V 
v 
X 
/ V 
V 
\ 
y 
/ /C 
\ 
S v3 
* i 
N 3 
/ X / -
/X, 
—\ 
X / \ 
X / 
> 
/ 
I) ^  '-V: :>J 
V 
1 " 
I 
( 
" \ 
; T M 
w f 
I o 
X / 
o 
Co 
JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 
FACILITY PLAN 2009 
September 2009 DRAFT 
Prepared by: 
, A n ^ e l o 
p l a n n i n g v » - J g r o u p 
921 SW Washington Street 
Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
503-224-6974 
t / ^ i -
JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 
FACILITY PLAN 2009 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Chapter 1: Introduction 1-1 
District Characteristics 1-1 
Student Enrollment and Distribution Patterns.... 1-2 
Funding for School Facilities 1-2 
Facilities 1-2 
Facility Plan Summary 1-4 
Chapter 2: School Facility Planning Guidelines 2-1 
State Requirements for School Facility Planning 2-1 
Local School Facility Planning Policies and Guidelines 2-3 
School Facility Design and Location Policies 2-4 
Chapter 3: Enrollment Forecast 3-1 
Chapter 4: Existing School Facility Conditions 4-1 
Schools 4-1 
Madras High School 4-2 
Jefferson County Middle School 4-3 
Big Muddy School 4-3 
Buff Elementary School 4-3 
Madras Elementary School 4-4 
Metolius Elementary School 4-4 
Warm Springs Elementary School 4-5 
Westside Elementary School 4-5 
Other District Facilities 4-6 
Loucks Road Site 4-6 
Yarrow Master Plan School Site 4-6 
Calculating Capacity 4-6 
Chapter 5: Facility Needs and Location Analysis 5-1 
School Facility Need Analysis 5-1 
Existing Need 5-1 
JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 
FACILITY PLAN 2009 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
Future Need 5-2 
Options for Improving Existing Conditions 5-3 
Warm Springs Elementary School.,.., 5-4 
Madras Elementary School 5-4 
Westside Elementary School 5-5 
Madras High School 5-5 
Options for Adding Capacity 5-6 
Location Suitability Analysis for New Schools 5-6 
Chapter 6: Recommendations 6-1 
LIST OF FIGURES 
Figure 1-1: Jefferson County School District Attendance Boundaries 1-1 
Figure 3-1: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Total Enrollment (Grades K - 12) 3-2 
Figure 3-2: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Elementary School (Grades K - 5) 3-2 
Figure 3-3: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Middle School (Grades 6 - 8) 3-3 
Figure 3-4: Actual & Projected Enrollment: High School (Grades 9 - 12) 3-3 
Figure 4-1: Jefferson County School District Attendance Boundaries 4-1 
Figure 4-2: Willow Creek 100-year Floodplain and Side Channel Floodway near Madras Elementary 
School and Madras High School 4-2 
Figure 4-3: Buff Elementary and Willow Creek 100-year Floodplain and Side Channel Floodway . 4-4 
Figure 5-1: Enrollment vs. Available Capacity 5-3 
Figure 5-2: Potential School Sites Inside the UGB 5-8 
LIST OF TABLES 
Table 1-1: District Facilities Site Acreage and Building Area, 2009 1-3 
Table 2-1: Summary of Regulatory Provisions 2-2 
Table 2-2: School Site Guidelines 2-5 
Table 3-1: Projected Enrollment by Grade Level 3-4 
Table 3-2: Projected Change in Enrollment Compared to 2008 3-4 
Table 4-1: Summary of Facility Data for Jefferson County School District 4-7 
Table 4-2: Number of Classrooms and Class Size Data for Jefferson County School District 
Elementary Schools 4-8 
Table 4-3: Other Jefferson County School District Facilities 4-8 
Table 5-1: Existing Facility Needs 5-1 
Table 5-2: Projected Enrollment vs. Available Capacity 5-2 
il 
JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 
FACILITY PLAN 2009 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 
APPENDICES 
Appendix A: Land Use Planning Policy Framework 
Federal/Bureau of Indian Affairs 
State of Oregon 
Jefferson County (inc. Urban Reserves) 
City of Madras 
Appendix X: Full Conditions and Capacity Report for Existing Facilities 
Elementary school facility conditions report 
2000-2010 Long-Range Facility Plan 
iii 
Chapter 1 
Introduction 
Chapter 1: Introduction 
District Characteristics 
Jefferson County School District 509 J (JCSD or District) covers 1,470 square miles in Jefferson and 
Wasco counties. It serves cities of Madras and Metolius, the Warm Springs Indian Reservation, of 
the southeastern part of rural Wasco County, and most of unincorporated Jefferson County. Three 
other smaller school districts — Culver School District 4, Black Butte School District 41, and 
Ashwood School District 8 — serve small communities in the rest of Jefferson County. Figure 1-1 
shows the District's service boundaries. 
Figure 1-1: Jefferson County School District Attendance Boundaries 
Source: Jefferson Comity School District | Question; can w e g e t a better map?] 
In 2008, the District had total enrollment of around 2985 students. Elementary school students 
comprise about 48 percent of the District's enrollment while middle school students and high 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 1-1 
Chapter 1 
Introduction 
schools students account for approximately 23 and 29 percent respectively. The District employs 
around teachers, support staff, and administrators. 
Student enrollment in the District has been increasing steadily over the last decade although at a 
slower rate than the population as a whole. That trend has changed somewhat in the past few years 
with a faster increase in elementary enrollment. Chapter three provides more detail about the 
District's enrollment trends and forecast. 
Student Enrollment and Distribution Patterns 
The District's enrollment is clustered in four areas. The largest concentration of students, and the 
area where most enrollment growth is expccted to occur, is in Madras. Madras is the location for 
the District's only high school and middle school, as well as two elementary schools. The other areas 
of focus for the district include Warm Springs, Metolius, and Antelope. The District operates 
elementary school schools in Warm Springs and Metolius. There is a "satellite" school facility in 
Antelope serving southeastern Wasco County. Enrollment forecasts in Chapter 3 show that very 
little growth is anticipated in these outlying service areas. These schools will continue to serve the 
communities in which they are located and surrounding rural areas. 
Going forward, the District will continue to adjust attendance boundaries to balance enrollment 
with capacity in its rural community schools and will expand capacity in Madras where most of the 
enrollment and population growth is projected to occur. A detailed enrollment forecast is presented 
in Chapter 3. 
Funding for School Facilities 
As is the case with most school districts in Oregon, JCSD receives the majority of its operating 
budget from state and federal revenue sharing but has relied on local ad-valorem bond measures to 
finance capital expansion for school facilities. [Insert bond measure history] 
Facilities 
The school district encompasses five elementary schools, one K-8 school, one middle school, and 
one high school. JCSD does not own the K-8 school in Antelope, whose enrollment is very small, 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 1-1 
Chapter 1 
Introduction 
but this pact of Wasco County is included in the district's attendance boundaries. Further, the 
District closed Westside Elementary School before the 2008-2009 school year; it retains ownership 
of the school facilities and land. Table 1-1 provides a summary of all District facilities, except for 
the K-8 school and including support facilities such as the administration center and maintenance 
and transportation facilities. As can be seen from the table, the District owns, operates and 
maintains over square feet of building area. 
Table 1-1: District Facilities Site Acreage and Bui ld ing Area, 2009 
Facility Total Acreage Total Building Area 
Elementary Schools (5) 70 acres 234,500 square feet 
Middle Schools (1) 23 acres 124,300 square feet 
Fligh Schools (1) 48 acres 138,366 square feet 
Support Facilities & District Property acres square feet 
Totals acres square feet 
A facility assessment performed by the District in Summer 2009 and mapping of FEMA floodplains 
and floodways have been used to established facility needs discussed in this plan. The following 
issues have been identified: 
• Madras High School — Madras High School has capacity to serve the District for the next ten 
(10) years. Tt was recently renovated and expanded. However, the school does sit squarely in the 
floodplain and floodway of a Willow Creek side channel. 
• Buff and Madras Elementary Schools - Currently, these schools combine to serve a full set of 
K-5 elementary school grade levels. Buff Elementary School lies outside of the Willow Creek 
floodplain but Madras Elementary School lies within it. Madras Elementary School 
environmental control systems need to be overhauled or replaced. 
• Warm Springs Elementary School — Warms Springs Elementary School faces capacity and other 
building issues that led the District to recommend building a replacement school almost a 
decade ago. Replacing this school is the District's highest priority. 
• Westside Elementary School — Westside Elementary School, amongst the oldest in the district, 
suffers from many major systems needs in addition to being located on a state highway, which 
causes safety concerns for students walking to school. 7'he school was closed in June 2008 and 
its students transferred to Metolius, Buff, and Madras Elementary Schools. 
• Other District facilities — The District's maintenance and transportation facilities are east of the 
high school and are also in the floodway and floodplain. District offices adjacent to Buff 
Elementary School are not in the mapped floodplain but staff have reported high water there. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 1-1 
Chapter 1 
Introduction 
While there are not facilities on them, the District also owns property on Loucks Road and has 
been involved in an exchange with the City of Madras for land in the Yarrow Master Plan site. 
A detailed evaluation of the District's facilities is presented in Chapter 4. 
Facility Plan Summary 
The District has developed facility plans in the past to address specific needs. This plan is intended 
to provide the basis for a more comprehensive assessment of facility needs that is integrated with 
local and regional land use planning. The plan also complies with recent amendments to ORS 
195.010 that requires "large" school districts to prepare facility plans and link those plans with 
locally adopted land use plans. The Jefferson County School District 2009 Facility Plan includes the 
following elements: 
• Chapter 2 - Policy Framework. This chapter identifies local land use policies and regulations that 
influence school facility decisions, as well as state rules that guide how school facilities are 
addressed from both a policy and development perspective. This chapter also includes the 
District's policies and criteria that it uses to guide expansion and investment decisions. 
• Chapter 3 - Enrollment Projections. Student enrollment trends (both historic and future) are 
examined and summarized. The forecast methodology and results were peer-reviewed by 
Portland State University Population Research Center. The forecast was developed from 
approved county population forecasts and provides the basis for determining future school 
facility needs. 
• Chapter 4 - Facility and Property Evaluation. This chapter provides a condition assessment of 
existing facilities. An overview of existing conditions of District facilities is presented, with an 
emphasis on school facilities. In addition, current enrollment figures are compared against 
estimated existing school capacity. 
• Chapter 5 - School Facility Needs and Location Analysis. This chapter provides an analysis of 
school facility needs for each category of school, including the need to address condition 
problems with existing facilities and the need to expand capacity to meet projected enrollment 
growth. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 1-1 
Chapter 1 
Introduction 
• Chapter 6 — Recommendations. This chapter presents recommendations for addressing facility 
needs, including both short-range and long-range needs and financing strategies. It also 
presents recommendations for updating local plans and procedures consistent with the analysis 
and conclusions in this plan. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 1-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
Chapter 2: School Facility Planning Guidelines 
This chapter reviews state and local planning requirements for preparing school facility plans. State 
criteria include statutory guidance for the preparation of school facility plans. Local requirements 
include adopted land use plans, policies, and implementing regulations that affect school locations. 
}efferson County School District (JCSD) also has adopted policies that guide the location and 
development of primary and secondary school facilities. A summary of these planning requirements 
is presented here. State and federal laws and rules also require school districts that receive state and 
federal financial assistance to develop educational plans but those plans primarily focus on 
curriculum and student achievement needs. This planning document only deals with facility needs 
and does not address educational curriculum requirements. 
State Requirements for School Facility Planning 
Under Oregon law and planning rules, there are two levels of school facility planning that schools 
districts and local governments need to address. The first involves general land use planning 
requirements consistent with Oregon's Statewide Land Use Planning Goals. Under the goals, school 
facilities are addressed in Goal 11 — Public Facilities. The Goal requires that locally adopted land use 
plans include provisions for coordinating this public service and integrating the needs associated 
with that service into locally adopted land use plans. This includes documentation of an agreement 
between school service providers concerning service area boundaries, and allowances in local plans 
for the development of school facilities. Goal 2 — Land Use Planning, requires local land use plans 
to include a fact basis for school facilities that helps determine the need for future school facilities 
and estimates the amount of land needed to accommodate this use. Local governments also need to 
adopt land use regulations that govern development approval for school needs consistent with 
locally adopted land use plans. 
Generally speaking, the locally adopted land use plans for the cities and counties that JCSD serves 
comply with state land use planning requirements for schools, and those jurisdictions have adopted 
regulations governing the development of school facilities. Appendix A includes a summary of local 
city and county planning policies and regulations that affect the location and approval of school 
facilities in Jefferson and Wasco Counties. The preparation of this plan, however, renders some 
planning assumptions in existing local plans obsolete. As such, recommendations for updating local 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
plans and procedures consistent with the analysis and conclusions in this plan are set forth in 
Chapter 6 — Recommendations. 
The second level of school facility planning involves special facility planning requirements that apply 
to "large" school districts. In 1993, the Oregon Legislature enacted ORS 195.110 setting forth 
specific requirements for school facility planning. The legislation was updated in 2001 and 2007 by 
House Bill (HB) 3045 and Senate Bill (SB) 336. Presently, Oregon school districts with enrollments 
greater than 2,500 students are required to prepare facility plans that meet the requirements set forth 
in the law. A summary of the major planning requirements in the law is presented in Table 2-1, as 
well as other regulatory provisions. A copy of the ORS 195.110 is included in Appendix B. 
Table 2-1: Summary of Regulatory Provisions 
Reference Provision 
Oregon Revised Statutes 
(ORS) 195.110 (2)(a) and 
The city or county in which a "large" school district (more than 
2,500 students) is located and that includes more than 10% of 
the district's student population must adopt a long-term school 
facility plan as an element of its comprehensive plan. The plan 
is to be prepared by the district in consultation with the city or 
county. The district must appoint a representative to meet 
regularly with local planning staff. 
ORS 195.110 (5)(a), (5)(b), 
and (6) 
Required elements of a school facility plan include: 
D Enrollment projections by school level 
D Identification of desirable school sites 
D Descriptions of improvements needed in existing 
schools 
D An analysis of potential measures to meet facility needs, 
including financial plans 
n An analysis of alternatives to new school construction 
and major renovation and measures to efficiently use 
school sites 
a An estimation of land needed for projected enrollment 
over the next 10 years and an analysis of meeting those 
land needs inside the UGB. If insufficient suitable land 
is available, then the district and the local jurisdiction 
must work together to meet the land need by means 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
Reference Provision 
such as re-zoning land, assembling multiple lots or 
parcels, or expanding the UGB. 
° A 10-year capital improvement plan 
° A site acquisition program. 
ORS 195.110 (8)(b) The school district must update the plan during the local 
jurisdiction's periodic review or more often according to an 
agreement between the district and the local jurisdiction. 
ORS 195.110 (9)(a) and 
(13) 
The school district may adopt objective criteria for determining 
school capacity in consultation with the local jurisdiction. 
Once adopted by the district, the local jurisdiction must use 
those criteria when reviewing comprehensive plan amendment 
and residential land use regulation amendment applications. 
The local jurisdiction may also use the criteria to deny a 
residential development application if the district identifies that 
there is insufficient capacity and the district and local 
jurisdiction have explored options to address this lack of 
capacity. 
Statewide Planning Goal 
11 (Public Facilities and 
Services) 
• "To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient 
arrangement of public facilities and services to serve as a 
framework for urban and rural development." 
• This statewide planning goal provides the basis for public 
facilities plans to be coordinated between service providers 
and local jurisdictions and to, ultimately, incorporate 
public facilities plans into local jurisdictions' 
comprehensive plans. 
| Placeholder! [To the District: arc there any other policies or regulatory 
provisions thai need to be identified here?] 
Local School Facility Planning Policies and Guidelines 
School facility plans identify long-range needs for a school district's physical facilities, such as new 
schools, additional classrooms, alternative educational space, and supporting facilities and programs. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
School Facility Plans also may include program strategies to meet identified needs. Planning for 
current and future needs requires balancing long-term educational facility needs with improving the 
quality of educational programming. 
State, regional and local agencies are increasingly recognizing that school facility planning is 
important for growing communities. According to existing regulations, new school facilities serving 
urban school districts must be located within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). Population and 
employment growth continue to put pressure on schools to expand, while at the same time 
residential and commercial uses compete with school districts and other service providers for land 
within the existing UGB. In urban areas, schools and associated facilities often are constrained by 
surrounding development or ownership patterns on adjacent land. These factors make it important 
for districts to determine what facilities are currently needed and what facilities will be needed in the 
future. Planning for future facilities includes the identification of land for new or expanded schools, 
and planning the supporting infrastructure for transportation, municipal utilities, parks, and other 
related public investments that coincide with schools. 
It is important to note that legislation governing school facility planning in the state requires that the 
facility plan be adopted by jurisdictions in which the school district is found, as an element of their 
comprehensive plans.1 This affords school districts the opportunity to plan proactively for capital 
investment, including planning sites for future schools and enacting programs that help finance new 
school facilities. 
In this vein, the following local facility planning policies are to be used by the District for assessing 
needs and identifying appropriate locations for school facilities. 
School Facility Design and Location Policies 
The following policies shall guide die development of facility plans and decisions affecting the 
location of school facilities. 
1 Pursuant to ORS 195.100(3), this provision does not apply to jurisdictions that have less than 10% of the school 
district's population. In this case, Wasco County has less than 10% of Jefferson County School District's population 
and will not be required to adopt it as part of its Comprehensive Plan. There is nothing in the statute, however, 
preventing this. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan Page 2-4 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
Site Size Guidelines 
Site size guidelines vary greatly depending on the context and the educational program desired for 
each school; however, the ranges in Table 2-2 are generally accepted for school facility planning. 
Table 2-2: School Site Guidelines 
School 
Type 
Grade 
Levels 
Site Size Enrollment Amenities 
Elementary K - 5 7 — 15 acres 300 15-18 classrooms, gym, 
playgrounds 
Middle 6 - 8 10 — 20 acres 600 - 800 40-50 classrooms, gym, arts and 
enrichment rooms, science lab, 
sports fields 
High 9 - 1 2 20 - 50 acres 800 - 1 0 0 0 50-70 classrooms, science labs, 
computer labs, gyms, art and 
enrichment facilities, performing 
arts 
Note that existing District school sites are on the larger end of the size ranges presented above, and 
that the smaller site sizes may be more appropriate in a high-density urban setting than in a low-
density rural setting. 
Minimum Site Suitability Criteria 
In addition to the physical size of its school facilities and sites, the District has established the 
following site selection criteria to be used to inform the identification and selection of new sites for 
schools. 
• Land use condition: The site must be unimproved land (not counting parks and open 
space) or land with improvements valued at less than $50,000. This keeps costs down and 
avoids the need to use eminent domain. If in the future undeveloped land becomes scarce 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
within the UGB, this criterion may need to be revised to allow for consideration of 
redevelopment opportunities. 
• Size: See size guidelines above for suitable site sizes by grade level. Aggregation of smaller 
parcels to meet these site sizes may be considered where feasible. 
B Environmental hazards / buildability: The site must have sufficient level ground to 
accommodate the school building, parking, and playing fields without the need for excessive 
grading. This requires an area large enough for the building, parking areas, and playing fields 
with slopes of 5% or less. (In the case of an elementary school, for example, this would 
require at least 5 acres of flat land.) In addition, the building must not be located in a 
floodplain, so that schools can be safe from hazard and serve as a resource in times of 
emergency. Playing fields and parking may be located within a floodplain, however. (For an 
elementary school, this requires a minimum of 2.5 acres of land that is both flat and outside 
the floodplain.) 
* Zoning and existing uses: The site must not be zoned for industrial use. Industrial areas 
are not suitable for locating schools. Elementary schools should be located in residential 
areas; middle and high schools can be located in areas with a mix of residential and 
commercial uses. 
* Serviceability: Water and sewer systems to serve the site should be available by the time the 
school is expected to be built and should have sufficient capacity to serve the anticipated 
demand from the school facility. 
" Geographic distribution: New schools should not be located within a half mile of existing 
schools of the same type and grade level. This supports the development of neighborhood 
schools and increases the efficiency of transporting children to schools. In addition, new 
schools should be located where they can best serve existing and future residential 
development. 
• Traffic safety: New elementary school sites should not be located on a highway or arterial. 
Middle and high schools may locate on arterials if traffic conditions in the vicinity permit 
safe walking and biking to the site. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 2 
School Facility Planning Guidelines 
• Availability: The District will not consider sites that have approved development 
applications to be available for use as schools. 
Additional School Siting Considerations 
In addition to the minimum criteria listed above, the following considerations should also help guide 
school siting where multiple options exist: 
• Co-location: To maximize the efficient use of school facilities, co-locating schools of 
different grade levels and/or schools with community or neighborhood parks is desirable. 
• Bus access: For safety and traffic management reasons, sites with direct access from a 
collector street for buses transporting students from rural parts of the district are preferred. 
• Allowed use: To minimize the time and cost associated with permitting, sites that are 
currently zoned in a manner that allows the school use outright or conditionally are 
preferred. Similarly, the project should not require rezoning properties in the vicinity of the 
school to avoid conflicting uses (e.g. adult businesses, taverns, and bars). 
• Walkable neighborhoods: Sites that will provide for safe walking and biking routes from 
surrounding neighborhoods are preferred, especially for elementary schools. 
• Minimizing life-cycle costs: Sites that allow for the use of design techniques that reduce life-
cycle energy costs (e.g. passive solar, active solar, geothermal, landscaping, etc.) are preferred. 
• Planned uses: Where a public agency or non-profit organization has long-term plans for the 
use of a site that do not include a school, these sites will be given a lower priority. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 2-1 
Chapter 3 
Enrollment Forecast 
Chapter 3: Enrollment Forecast 
Three enrollment forecasts were prepared by Angelo Planning Group using three different data 
sources: 
1. A short-range projection covering the 2009-10 school year through the 2018-19 school year 
was derived from existing enrollment, recent grade progression rates, and recent birth 
trends in the school district. This forecast is likely to best capture expected enrollment in 
the next 5 to 10 years. 
2. A long-range forecast based on age-group population projections for Jefferson County 
from the Oregon Office of Economic Analysis (OEA) provides estimates in 5-year 
increments from 2000 to 2040. The OEA data is based on demographic trends and seems 
. to be a fairly good fit with historic data (in years 2000 and 2005). 
3. A second long-range forecast was generated based on the county's coordinated population 
forecast, prepared by the economic consulting firm EcoNorthwest, Inc (EcoNW). The 
EcoNW projections are based on past growth rates, and, having been prepared in 2007 at 
the height of a building boom, are likely to overestimate future population. This forecast is 
included in this chapter to represent the high end of the spectrum, but was not relied upon 
in in the final enrollment forecasts used to project future facility needs. 
These three projections for total enrollment are shown in Figure 3-1, along with historic enrollment 
data provided by the District. Enrollment forecasts and historic enrollment data broken down by 
grade level (elementary, middle school, and high school) are shown in Figures 3-2 through 3-4. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 3-1 
Chapter 3 
Enrollment Forecast 
Figure 3-1: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Total Enrollment (Grades K -12) 
6,000 
5,000 
4,000 
3,000 
2,000 
1,000 
0 
l » • ' I • • • • 
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 
Year 
Total Enrollment Actual • Total Enrollment SR Projection 
Total Enrollment LR Projection (EcoNW) • Total Enrollment LR Projection (OEA) 
Figure 3-2: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Elementary School (Grades K - 5) 
3,000 
2,500 
2,000 
c 01 I 
I 1,500 
1,000 
500 
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 
Y e a r 
2040 
- Elementary Actual a Elementary SR Projection 
• Elementary LR Projection (EcoNW) • Elementary LR Projection (PEA) 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 3-1 
Chapter 3 
Enrollment Forecast 
Figure 3-3: Actual & Projected Enrollment: Middle School (Grades 6 - 8 ) 
1400 
1200 
1000 
E 800 
JS 600 
400 
200 
1885 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 203S 2040 
Year 
I Middle School Actual H Middle School SR Projection 
| •• Middle School LR Projection (EcoNW) t Middle School LR Projection (OEA) 
Figure 3-4: Actual & Projected Enrollment: High School (Grades 9 - 1 2 ) 
Year 
High School Actual • High School SR Projection 
- - - High School LR Projection (EcoNW) • High School LR Projection (OEA) 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 3-1 
Chapter 3 
Enrollment Forecast 
A weighted average of the short-range and OEA long-range forecasts (weighting the short-range 
more heavily in the near-term and shifting gradually to give the OEA long-range forecast more 
weight) was calculated to provide the best estimate of future enrollment over the next 10 years. 
Table 3-1 below shows actual enrollment data for 2008, weighted averages of the short-range and 
OEA long-range projections for 2010 and 2015, and OEA long-range forecasts for 2020 through 
2040. 
Table 3-1: Projected Enrollment by Grade Level 
Year 
Elementary 
School 
Middle 
School 
High 
School 
Total 
Enrollment 
2008* 1.445 677 853 2,985 
2010 1.487 715 773 2,979 
2015 1.685 746 838 3.279 
2020 1,898 850 911 3,659 
2025 2,061 938 998 3,997 
2030 2,210 1,021 1,099 4.329 
2035 2,377 1.097 1,193 4.667 
2040 2.378 1,187 1.289 4,854 
* 2008 data shown is actual enrollment provided by the school district. 
Table 3-2 below shows the projected enrollment increases relative to actual 2008 enrollment by 
grade level based on the combined forecast described above. 
Table 3-2: Projected Change in Enrollment Compared to 2008 
Year 
Elementary 
School 
Middle 
School 
High 
School 
Total 
Enrollment 
2010 32 38 -80 -6 
2015 230 69 -15 294 
2020 443 173 58 674 
2025 606 261 145 1012 
2030 755 344 246 1344 
2035 922 420 340 1682 
2040 923 510 436 1869 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 3-1 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Chapter 4: Existing School Facility Conditions 
This chapter provides an overview of existing facility conditions in the Jefferson County School 
District with an emphasis on facility needs. The conditions described below are based on reports 
from District staff, including a written summary of elementary school conditions (Appendix Jp , as 
well as the District's 2000-2010 Long-Range Facility Plan (Appendix 
Schools 
A summary of school facility data is presented below in Tables 4-1 and 4-2, and an excerpt of a map 
of attendance boundaries for elementary schools in the district is shown below in Figure 4-1. 
Figure 4-1: Jefferson County School District Attendance Boundaries 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Madras High School 
Madras High School is the District's only high school and is located on the east side of Madras in 
close proximity to Madras Elementary School, Buff Elementary School, and District offices. As 
called for in the 2000-2010 Facility Plan, Madras High School underwent major renovation and 
expansion that was completed in 2005. Total building area was increased from about 84,000 square 
feet to 138,000 square feet. The school was registered as having 838 students in 2008-2009 and the 
most rcceni figures available show the school has capacity for roughly students. Staff 
reinforced this finding about available capacity, reporting that there are not crowding issues at the 
school. The 2000-2010 Long-Range Plan did not identify school replacement as a need, but rather 
expansion and the addition of a new performing arts facility. 
Based on county-provided FEMA floodplain maps and Google Earth aerial photography, the high 
school site lies in the 100-year floodplain and, in part, in the floodway of a Willow Creek side 
channel, although the building itself lies outside the mapped floodway (see Figure 4-2 below). 
Figure 4-2: Willow Creek 100-year Floodplain and Side Channel Floodway near Madras 
Elementary School and Madras H i eh School 
Note: 100-year floodplain is shown in light blue, floodway is shown in darker blue. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Staff report high water issues at the high school, Madras Elementary School, and District offices, 
which all are in the same Willow Creek side-channel area. Staff also report that the City has installed 
piping to help alleviate high water situations. 
Jefferson County Middle School 
Jefferson County Middle School was built relatively recendy (1995) on the east side of Madras, and 
no substantial service or conditions issues are reported for the facility. In particular, it features 
plenty of capacity; 2008-2009 enrollment (673 students) represents not even two-thirds of the 
school's capacity (see Table 4.1). The 2000-2010 Long-Range Facility Plan did not identify 
replacement or expansion needs, but did recommend potential modernization needs. 
Big Muddy School 
The District does not own this school near Antelope in Wasco County, although it is technically 
included in the Jefferson School District service area. The school is a very small one; it is a K-8 
facility that served 11 students in the 2008-2009 school year. No outstanding conditions or capacity 
issues are reported for the school. 
Buff Elementary School 
The Buff facility has served as an annex facility in the past, and this school year is supplementing 
Madras School; the two facilities are in effect operated as one complete elementary school. Buff 
Elementary School is serving grade levels 3-5 this school year while Madras Elementary School 
serves grade levels K-2. The two sites are located in close proximity to each other and to Madras 
High School on the east side of Madras. Unlike Madras Elementary School and Madras High 
School, however, Buff Elementary School does not stand in the Willow Creek side channel 
floodplain (see Figure 4-3). 
The school is not reported to have any major conditions issues. It was renovated in 2005, increasing 
its building area from approximately 34,000 square feet to 41,000 square feet. Its 2008-2009 
enrollment is below its reported capacity by approximately students. Buff Elementary School is 
one of three schools - the other two being Madras Elementary School and Metolius Elementary 
School — that have absorbed student population from Westside Elementary School after it closed in 
2008. The opening of either a renovated Westside Elementary School or a new elementary school 
will alleviate future capacity issues at Buff Elementary School. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
& 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Figure 4-3: Buff Elementary and Willow Creek 100-year Floodplain and Side Channel Floodway 
Note: 100-ycar floodplain is shown in light blue, tloodwayis shown in darker blue, 
Madras Elementary School 
Madras Elementary School is located in close proximity to Madras High School and Buff 
Elementary School. It splits elementary school service with Buff Elementary School and serves only 
grade levels K-2. Given this shared service, the school had sufficient capacity in the 2008-2009 
school year with an average class size that was comparable to Buff Elementary School and Metolius 
Elementary School (see Tables 4-1 and 4-2). 
Madras Elementary School, however, lies in the Willow Creek floodplain as shown in Figure 4-2 
above. District staff also report significant HVAC systems conditions issues. The school's boiler 
and heating system is in need of complete overhaul and its insulation must be replaced, involving 
asbestos remediation. In the 2000-2010 Long-Range Facility Plan, Madras Elementary School was 
rated in the worst repair behind Westside Elementary School and was recommended for closing 
along with expanding another school or opening a new school in its place. The plan also suggested 
that this site be considered as an opportunity for future expansion of Madras High School. 
Expanding Madras Fhgh School on this site, however, is inadvisable due to its location in the 
floodplain and the presence of the floodway running between the two buildings. 
Metolius Elementary School 
As is shown in Figure 4-1, the attendance area boundary for Metolius Elementary School extends 
into southern Madras. The boundary runs along ) Street and Adams and these students are bussed 
to the school in Metolius. Fven with absorbing overflow attendance from south Madras, the school 
does not have any capacity issues. Its 2008-2009 enrollment was below its design and functional 
capacity (see Table 4-1). 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
A conditions assessment by the District did identify major systems needs for the school, including 
an update of the heating and plumbing systems (Attachment Q). The District has not necessarily 
determined that these needs rise to the level of closing or replacing the school, but involve 
significant costs that the District needs to plan for. 
Warm Springs Elementary School 
The Jefferson County School District operates Warm Springs Elementary School through lease 
agreements and memoranda of understanding with the Warm Springs Tribal Council. 
The school has undergone a series of renovations since its original construction in 1938, and 
currendy relies on four sets of modular classrooms; Warm Springs is the only school in the district 
with modular units. The school has a larger number of students than other schools in the district 
and also a larger average class size (see Tables 4-1 and 4-2). 
The elementary school has been slated for replacement dating at least back to the 2000-2010 Long-
Range Facility Plan. A Memorandum of School Construction and Lease Intent (April 2001) and a 
Memorandum of Understanding for Education of Tribal Students (June 2003) reiterate this need 
and suggests steps to take for the school's replacement. However, a new school has not yet been 
built 
Westside Elementary School 
Westside Elementary School was closed for the last full school year (2008-2009). Students that had 
previously attended the school were distributed among Metolius, Madras, and Buff Elementary 
Schools. As reported in the 2000-2010 Long-Range Facility Plan, the school facility itself was 
reported to have the worst conditions of elementary schools in the district. The most recent 
conditions assessment from the District (Attachment { ) and the previous assessment for the 2000-
2010 plan call out the need for boiler and heating system overhauls, insulation replacement and 
asbestos removal, and a plumbing system update in addition to addressing safety issues associated 
with its location on Highway 97. 
The 2000-2010 facility plan identified as a priority selling the school site and making the site 
available for more appropriate uses given its location downtown on a major arterial. Sale proceeds 
would be directed to constructing a new school in a more suitable location. The process of updating 
the facility plan should be used to explore options for replacing Westside Elementary School, 
including rebuilding the school in its current location but with access reoriented away from the 
highway, as well as building a new school in a new location guided by the location criteria set forth 
in Chapter 2. It should be noted that an approved bypass for US 97 will reduce truck traffic and 
other heavy traffic from this roadway. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Other District Facilities 
District facilities also include administration offices and a set of maintenance and transportation 
facilities. All of these uses are located in the vicinity of Madras Elementary School, Madras High 
School, and Buff Elementary School. The administration offices are directly east of Buff 
Elementary School and the maintenance and transportation facilities are east of Madras High 
School. The maintenance and transportation site is squarely in the floodplain and floodway of the 
Willow Creek side channel. District offices are not in the floodway or floodplain (sec Figure 4-3), 
however, staff report occasional high water issues at the offices. More information about the 
administration offices and maintenance and transportation facilities is presented below in Table 4-3. 
The District also owns vacant property north and east of Madras, and has prospects for acquiring 
additional land. The following sections describe these sites. 
Loucks Road Site 
The District owns a site on Loucks Road outright (Taxlot ID 1 IS, 14E, Section 6, Lot 1000). The 
property straddles the existing UGB. Of its 67.3 total acres, 24.8 acres are inside the UGB, and 42.5 
acres are outside the UGB in Urban Reserve Area (URA). Land in the URA is first priority lor 
being brought into the UGB. 
Yarrow Master Plan School Site 
The District has a financial interest in a 20-acre site identified in the Yarrow Development Master 
Plan as a future school site. The site is outside but adjacent to the existing UGB, south of Ashwood 
Road and across from Juniper Hill County Park. The site is in the Madras Urban Reserve Area 
(URA), which is first priority land for inclusion in the UGB when it needs to be expanded. The 
District's interest in this site is linked to a land exchange with the City of Madras. Terms of the 
exchange include a condition that the City complete land use planning steps for the site so that the 
school district may develop it when the need for a new school arises. The Yarrow Master Plan calls 
for co-locating a city park on the site to serve Yarrow and urban areas to the north and west. The 
City is working to fulfill its obligation to complete planning for this site. 
Calculating Capacity 
Table 4-1 reports both the design and functional capacity of schools in the district. 
[Note: the statute requires that the District explain in detail its methodology for calculating school 
enrollment capacity and any changes to the methodology tin at have altered how the district 
previously estimated enrollment capacity at its schools.] 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
o> .c 
3 O 
u 
c 
o 
t 
£ 
v 
w 
rt P 
fc « 
E E 3 CD 
r-i i 
jj 
H 
O £] 
S . I 
<j 3 
c? = <0 
& & 5? 
0 
u 
I 
g 
£ 
1 1 1 1 -8 8 | 
< K vj s ^-a? 
o -a 
^ 2 
is § 
I 
3 
0=5 
</3 ^ 
<U •Q ji as u 
0 0 
1 
T3 
o cn 
(N 
n- u-i so o c* o 
rO co" fO 
in 
.&P 
oc in o 
00 Lfl o 
cn r-so 
oc <N tJ-" <si 
00 
3 o o o 
C L0 
n ^ QJ JJ 
m 
* 
o m 
VO in LT) O O O — <N 
• t -in 
oo 
E? 
2 
c 
v 
B V 
3 
u-i 
3 
pq 
>n O 
o 
r O 
m >n 
US 
so in 
m (N 
in cs 
co M 
<N 
V 
w 
S 0 -o o TO .x* 
o 0 01 
C\ 
o 
00 
2 0 u 
o — <5 TD 
o <N 
Tt-<n 
^ oo 
oc t^ r-
r O C S o 
Cn C s O 
<-1 r-i CN 
in •nf Gs 
o <N 
V 
o c rQ M l_l &C <J~> 
r 2 V) c 
g 6 rt QJ 
£ w 
-o u 
U 
•a 
VI 
o 
U 
m r-j 
o o m 
T) •u IA 
o 
U 
-a 
u 
o 
U 
CO Cs Cs 
CO m cs 
tI-in 
m o 
ni tj 
-a u 
u 
e.' 
3 
&c c 
60 
C o -I 
8 
S -C 
o e. 
! 
a 
o o -C 
E 
Q 
-a WJ 
e-
Q 
c 
3 e>c 
'/; O 
Q S 
o a o Pi 
c u 
Ph 
t 
u rt 
60 C 
o 
o 
o o o : (si 
e .s 
o ° 
a s W I 
h c 
a 6 
o F. u 
w Q 
5 -3 
8 * 
2 c o- o 
pi a. 
P u S G O v. tfl 
.y ^ < 
a § K (SI rt 
T3 ° ^ ^ 
O P M 
O - o Cu o ii fl C i t ' J 
Chapter 4 
Existing Conditions 
Table 4-2: Number of Classrooms and Class Size Data for Jefferson County School District 
School Average Class Size 
Number of K-5 
Classrooms 
Buff 
Elementary 
School 
23.5 15 
Madras 
Elementary 
School 
24 15 
Metolius 
Elementary 
School 
23 12 
Warm Springs 
Elementary 
School 
27.5 19 
Source: Jefferson County School District 
Table 4-3: Other Jefferson County School District Facilities 
School Site Area Building Area 
Administration 
Offices — 
Maintenance 
and 
Transportation 
Facilities 
Source: Jefferson County School District 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 4-1 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
Chapter 5: Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
This chapter presents information about facility needs in the near term and long term for all types of 
school facilities. The analysis uses enrollment forecasts and facility conditions information from the 
previous chapters to establish existing and future facility needs. The school location criteria in 
Chapter 2 were used to evaluate different options for addressing these needs. 
School Facility Need Analysis 
Existing Need 
This plan is intended to address needs both related to future enrollment growth and existing facility 
conditions. With regard to existing needs, the Warm Springs Elementary School, one of the oldest 
schools in the district, needs insulation, a new and larger cafeteria, and more capacity (Attachment X 
— conditions report). As discussed in Chapter 4, a replacement school on reservation land has been 
an identified need for at least nine years. Also as discussed in Chapter 4, Madras Elementary School 
and High School are in the floodplain and floodway of a Willow Creek side channel, and Madras 
Elementary School is in need of major systems overhauls. Westside Elementary School is currendy 
closed, and is in need of major systems updates as well. The school faces serious safety issues 
because of its location and access on a state highway, however — as noted in Chapter 4 — some of the 
safety issues may be alleviated by the construction of the planned US 97 truck bypass west the 
highway's existing location. The District's facility needs related to age, condition, location, capacity, 
and hazards at its existing facilities are summarized in Table 5-1 below. The choices presented are 
not discrete and there are many possible combinations of solutions. 
Table 5-1: Existing Facility Needs 
Facility Action/Need Location 
Westside Elementary Upgrade or Replace TBD 
Madras Elementary Upgrade/Protect or Replace TBD 
Warm Springs Elementary Replace In place 
Metolius Elementary Upgrade In place 
Buff Elementary Expand or reuse In place 
Madras H.S. Protect In place 
District Admin Offices Protect or replace TBD 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
Future Need 
Chapter 4 shows that existing facilities have capacity for current enrollment levels but the enrollment 
is projected to grow beyond that capacity within ten years for elementary grades. Table 5-2 
compares current capacity with projected enrollment by grade level for the District. Figure 5-1 
shows the projected enrollment year by year compared to existing capacity. The data indicate that 
elementary school capacity will be exceeded in the year 2020 by more than 160 students. As shown 
in Figure 5-1, enrollment is projected to exceed capacity for the first time in the year 2017. This date 
is significant because it is within the 10-year planning horizon for which ORS 197.010 requires large 
school districts to develop plans to address deficiencies. Middle and High School capacity is 
projected to be sufficient for the next 10 years. Capacity constraints for those facilities are not 
projected to arise until sometime between 2030 and 2040. 
Table 5-2; Projected Enrollment vs. Available Capacity 
Functional 2008/09 Projections 
Capacity Actual 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 
Enrollment 1455 1487 1685 1898 2061 2210 2377 2378 
Elementary 1735 School Remaining 
Capacity 280 248 49 -163 -326 -475 -642 -643 
Enrollment 677 715 746 850 938 1021 1097 1187 
Middle 
School 1062 Remaining 
Capacity 385 346 315 212 124 
41 -35 -125 
Enrollment 853 773 838 911 998 1099 1193 1289 
High 
School 1230 Remaining 
Capacity 377 457 392 319 232 131 
37 -59 
Source: Capacity numbers provided by JCSD; enrollment projections performed by Angela Planning Group (see Chapter 3 JorjulUnrollment 
projections and methodology). 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
Figure 5-1: Enrollment vs. Available Capacity 
Projected Enrollment vs. Capacity 2008-2040 
Year 
—•-Projected Elem. Enrollment - " -Pro jec ted MS Enrollment - * -P ro jec ted HS Enrollment 
- — T o t a l Elem. School Capacity Total MS Capacity - Total HS Capacity 
Source: Capacity numbers provided by JCSD; enrollment projections peiformeci by A/igelo Planning Group (see Chapter 3 for full enrollment 
projections and methodology). 
Options for Improving Existing Conditions 
The previous analysis shows that most of the District's immediate facility needs relate to condition 
issues at its elementary schools. It may appear that the District has capacity to manage elementary 
enrollment levels for most of the next decade, but that assessment ignores serious problems with 
individual facilities and significant operating costs associated with managing elementary enrollment 
using busing to balance the distribution of available capacity. As noted above, the solutions are not 
necessarily discrete; there are interactive effects that need to be considered to develop solutions. 
In addition, there is a persistent flood risk to Madras High School and Madras Elementary School 
that cannot be alleviated without significant investment in protective infrastructure. The problem is 
especially challenging because protecting these facilities from flood hazard may endanger other 
properties that are not currently threatened. The risk to school facilities is amplified because schools 
typically are used as places of refuge in times of emergency. These schools, however, arc located in 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
the hazard zone for the natural disaster most likely to affect Madras making them unavailable in an 
emergency. It is inadvisable to expand either of these facilities unless they can be adequately 
protected from flood danger. Determining a course of action to address this problem is beyond the 
scope of this analysis and more work needs to be done to establish a reliable course of action. 
The following discussion presents a series of possible solutions to address existing problems at 
school facilities; some solutions also will help the District meet forecast capacity needs. 
Warm Springs Elementary School 
1. Replace and expand the existing elementary school. 
The needs at Warm Springs Elementary School have been documented for years and replacing the 
school has long been a priority. Unlike other schools being considered for expansion, replacement 
or relocation, Warm Springs Elementary School either needs to be replaced on the existing site or 
replaced at another suitable site on the reservation. If the school cannot be rebuilt on the existing 
site, the location suitability criteria from Chapter 2 may help guide the selection of a new site. 
Madras Elementary School 
1. Expand and protect the existing school or; 
2. Close Madras Elementary School and; 
a. Expand Buff Elementary School facilities to accommodate all elementary school 
grade levels at that location, or 
b. Build a new elementary school at a new location in Madras that better serves the 
community's youngest students on one of the sites identified in the next section of 
this report. 
As noted earlier, expanding this school is a significant problem because of its location in the Willow 
Creek floodplain. Furthermore, repairing the facility will be very expensive because of hazardous 
materials in the building. Moreover, the investment would be at risk of loss in a flood event. For 
these reasons, Alternative 2 seems the better choice. Expanding Buff Elementary School has the 
advantage of letting elementary students that live in southwest Madras continue to walk to school, 
That location may not, however, be in an ideal location to promote high walk rates because the 
school is pinched between US 97 and the Willow Creek floodplain. There simply is not as much 
residential development in this part of Madras compared to other parts of the city. If Buff 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
Elementary School is not expanded, it could be used to meet other District facility needs, such as for 
administrative offices, as a location for additional high school facilities, or as a special needs or 
enrichment school facility. 
Westside Elementary School 
1. Re-build Westside Elementary School on the existing site but re-orient the building away 
from the highway. 
2. Relocate the school to one of the sites identified inside the next section of this report. 
3. If relocating the school: 
a. Sell the school site and use the proceeds to finance other capital needs; or 
b. Reserve/landbank the site for a future school or other District facilities (e.g. admin 
offices, special education needs). 
The Westside Elementary school site has the advantage of being located south of downtown in an 
area with a grid street pattern and on the edge of a neighborhood where almost all students currently 
must either be bused or driven to school. As noted earlier, however, repairing this facility will be 
expensive because of hazardous materials in the building and the need to reorient the building away 
from the busy highway. In addition, the surrounding property to the north and east is zoned for 
commercial use and this part of Madras is expected to become more employment-oriented over 
time. That trend also may include mixed use development that could accommodate both 
employment and residential uses and provide much needed higher-density affordable housing. Until 
the redevelopment pattern for the area immediately south of the downtown becomes clearer — 
which may not happen until the truck by-pass is built — it is too early to judge whether the Westside 
Elementary site will meet the District's aim to locate elementary schools in walkable neighborhoods. 
Given the depressed market for commercial property statewide, it may be in the District's best 
interest to hold this property until development trends for the southern part of the city become 
clearer and preserve the school, possibly leasing the space on an interim basis. 
Madras High School 
1. Protect the site from the flood hazard and keep the school in this location for the long term, 
or 
2. Adopt a policy to relocate the high school at some point in the future to a location outside 
the floodplain: 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
a. At the Loucks Road District Property (approximately 67 acres total, 25 acres inside 
the UGB, and 42 acres outside the UGB in the URA); or 
b. At another of the suitable sites of at least 20 acres that arc identified in Figure 5-2. 
Options for Adding Capacity 
The District also must address future growth in enrollment and, in particular, the situation in which 
elementary student enrollment is forecast to outstrip capacity as shown in Table 5-1 and Figure 5-1. 
The District could potentially accommodate the growing demand for elementary schools by using 
portables for the first few years in which the capacity of existing facilities is exceeded. Portable 
units could also accommodate the smaLl over-runs in capacity forecast after 2030 for the middle 
school and high school. Portables are intended as a short-term solution, however, and at the very 
least the District will need to add permanent elementary school capacity to accommodate the 
growing student population by 2020 if not sooner. 
The options for adding capacity are similar to those identified above for replacing existing capacity. 
A key element in increasing capacity is that new elementary school capacity should be constructed in 
Madras where most of the enrollment growth is expected to occur. The schools in Metolius and 
Antelope and the new school in Warm Springs (when constructed) have capacity to accommodate 
enrollment in their respective rural areas. Metolius Elementary also has enough capacity so that the 
school may continue to balance overflow enrollment from south Madras and the southern urban 
fringe. To meet its other elementary enrollment needs, the District needs to have two full size 
elementary schools in Madras. Options to meet this need include: 
1. Locate two full size schools with one at Buff Elementary School and one at Westside 
Elementary School; or 
2. Build one full-size elementary school either at Buff or Westside and one new elementary 
school on one of the sites reviewed in the next section; or 
3. Build two new elementary schools on two of the sites reviewed in the next section. 
Location Suitability Analysis for New Schools 
A number of different properties were evaluated against the site criteria established in Chapter 2 to 
determine their suitability for siting new elementary school facilities. The Buff Elementary School 
site was considered for expansion, and the Westside Elementary School site was considered for 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
redevelopment. Eight properties inside the existing UGB that meet the District's minimum site 
suitability criteria (from Chapter 2) also were evaluated for siting a new school. Those sites are 
shown in Figure 5-2. Also included in the analysis is an evaluation of the two undeveloped sites that 
the District owns, both of which currently straddle the UGB. As die portion of the Loucks Road 
Site that is within the UGB meets the District's minimum criteria, that portion was included for 
consideration along with other properties within the existing UGB. Development on District 
owned land outside the UGB, however, may not proceed until that property is brought into the 
UGB. 
• Buff Elementary School Site — expanding and replacing Madras TLlementary School 
The site is already developed with a school. At 15 acres, the site is ample in size for an elementary 
school and can accommodate expanded facilities. However, only partially new construction would 
make it more difficult to incorporate. The site is relatively level and is outside of the Willow Creek 
system's floodway and floodplain. The site is already served with water and sewer, and is ccntrally 
located for the growing student population projected for the city of Madras. The school fronts local 
roads, which are appropriate for an elementary school. That coupled with adjacent residential 
development makes this a walkable school site. [Bus access?] Life-cycle cost-saving and energy 
efficiency features could more easily be incorporated into the expansion and new construction than 
the existing buildings. 
• Wests ide E lementa ry School Site — rebuilding existing school, or selling, or savingjor relocation of other 
District facilities 
This site is also already developed with a school. Its site size — approximately 12 acres — is sufficient 
for an elementary school or a small middle school, although there is not a need for a middle school 
in the planning horizon. The site is relatively flat and outside floodways and floodplains. It is zoned 
for open space/public facilities and is surrounded by land zoned commercial on the north and east 
and residential on the west. The site is already served by water and sewer and is located west of 
Highway 97, making it walkable and suitable for serving students on the west side of Madras while 
posing a large barrier to students coming from any other part of Madras. The site is served by both 
a state highway and local streets, but its current orientation to the state highway presents serious 
safety concerns, although its proximity to such a major arterial allows it easy access to bus and other 
transportation services. Rebuilding or relocating this facility would allow for new construction and 
easier integration of life-cycle cost-saving features than would retrofitting existing development. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
Figure 5-2: Potential School Sites Inside the UGB 
Identification of Parcels Inside the UGB for Potential School Sites 
' X Ex'sl'ng School 
1 ] Existing D&tict Property 
i Apjxoximate location of Yarrow Site 
• Sitfr-s Meeting OistTlct Minimum Criteria 
Dis tance f r o m E x i s t i n g E l e m e n t a r y S c h o o l s 
If I \f2 M))e 
I mie 
Boundaries 
UGB 
City limits 
Tax lots 
Road Functional Class 
ArtfliijIS Hyfrf/ay 
Collector 
local & Other 
Envlronmtntal Constraint* 
100 Y*ar FJood Plain 
Floodway 
>5% Grade 
/ f 
tfte Bureau of Land Management. Source: GIS data provided by Jef ferson County and 
Cntena applied. 
Land o$e cond/lon unimproved land (not 
counting parks and open space) w 
improve men Is valued <S50 000. 
at least 7 acres within UGB 
Environmental hazards / buildabifity a) 
5 acres flat (slopes <$%}. at least 2 5 
flat acres outside the floodplain 
Zomng not zon&d for Industrial use 
S&v/ceabiltty not In areas with constrained 
| sewers 
! Geographic distribution not fully wrthin a 
: haft mle of an existing elementary school 
] Traffic safety not on a highway or arterial 
| Availability not committed to another use 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
• Sites 1 and 2 -Relocating Madras High School, or building a new elementary school 
Sites 1 and 2 are vacant land under common private ownership and together total 35.6 acres. Site 1, 
at 25.7 acres, is large enough on its own to accommodate a middle school or small high school. Site 
2, at 9.9 acres, could potentially accommodate an elementary school. When aggregated, the sites 
present an opportunity for a large high school or for co-locating a park or other community 
facilities. Currently, no development applications have been submitted or are pending on the sites. 
They are relatively level sites, outside of local floodways and floodplains. They are zoned residential 
(R3) and are surrounded by residential zoning. They are just inside the border of the UGB and the 
city limits, and are adjacent to land that is already developed with housing and on the east with land 
in the URA that is expected mainly to provide land for housing. Their location would serve students 
in north, central, and east Madras. A collector (Loucks Road) runs along the northern border of the 
sites and all other adjacent roads are local roads. Loucks Road would need safety treatments to 
border an elementary school but otherwise the classification of the surrounding roads and 
surrounding residential development supports walking. New construction on the sites would allow 
for integration of life-cycle cost-saving features. Sewer service is problematic, however. The 
preferred service solution would be to connect to a south-flowing sewer trunk in road, but that 
line is not in place. A significant amount of vacant land south of these sites must be developed 
before the sewer trunk would be extended to this site. 
• Sites 3 and 4 — Relocate Madras High School, or build a new elementary school 
Sites 3 and 4 are located just to the southeast of Sites 1 and 2. They are inside the UGB and 
immediately inside the city limits. Like Sites 1 and 2, Sites 3 and 4 consist of vacant land under 
common private ownership. Site 3, at 8.5 acres, is potentially large enough to accommodate an 
elementary school, although its long, narrow shape could make it less than ideal. Site 4, at 40.2 acres 
is large enough to site a high school with room to spare or to co-locate multiple facilities. Both sites 
are also relatively flat and outside floodway and floodplain zones. The sites are zoned low-density 
residential (R l ) and are surrounded by other residential zoning and development, in addition to 
open space zoning for open space and public facilities. As with Sites 1 and 2, the location of Sites 3 
and 4 would most easily serve students in north, central, and east Madras. All adjacent roads are 
local roads; without direct access to a collector like Loucks Road, the sites may be more suitable for 
a neighborhood elementary school than a high school. The relatively gentle grades between the sites 
and residential areas to the west suggest that these are the most walkable connections and 
conditions. As with sites 1 and 2, sewer service is problematic. The preferred service solution would 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
be to connect to a south-flowing sewer trunk in road, which is not in place. Vacant land south 
of these sites must be developed before the sewer trunk would be extended to this site. 
• Site 5/Loucks Road Site —Relocating Madras High School, or building new elementary school 
The District owns a property that is referred to in this plan as the Loucks Road site. Because the 
property is divided into parts inside and outside the UGB, for planning purposes it is essentially two 
sites. The portion within the Madras UGB (from here on referred to as Site 5), is about 25 acres; the 
rest of the Loucks Road property, which is located just outside of the UGB, is about 42 acres. Both 
sites are vacant and are not currendy the subject of any submitted or pending development 
applications. Site 5 is of sufficient size for an elementary school and a park or other community 
facility, or for a middle school, or for a small high school. The shape of Site 5, however, would pose 
a design challenges for upper grade facilities. When taken as a whole, the property is large enough 
to co-locate a high school, and a middle school or elementary school, and other community facilities. 
The site as a whole is not constrained by slope, although significant slope is found to the east and 
west of it. There is no floodplain or floodway identified on the site. That part of the property 
within the UGB is zoned as Open Space, which would allow development of public facilities such as 
schools, while the rest of the site is 'zoned for rural uses — agriculture and range land. The whole site 
is surrounded by a combination of low-density rural and urban residential zoning (Rl , RR2, RR5, 
and RR10), with existing rural subdivisions direcdy to the north and subdivisions within the UGB to 
the west. As with Sites 1, 2, 3, and 4, the site's location would serve students in north, central, and 
east Madras. Steeper slopes to the east and west may make the site less walkable from those 
directions but less so to the north and south. Residential 2oning and a predominandy local road 
network in the area — with Loucks Road as the only higher classified road for now — can support 
walkability. New construction on the sites will allow for integration of life-cycle cost-saving features. 
Sewer sendee is a significant problem, however. The preferred service solution would be to connect 
to a south-flowing sewer trunk in ____ road, but that line is not in place. A significant amount of 
vacant land south of this site must be developed before the sewer trunk is extended to the 
northeastern most corner of the Madras UGB. 
• Site 6 — building a new elementary school 
Site 6 is located southeast of the existing Jefferson County Middle School. It is made up of two 
parcels, both owned by the Bean Foundation, and both unimproved. The two parcels together total 
8.4 acres. This makes it an appropriate size for an elementary school, especially because it is 
adjacent to the existing middle school, allowing for potential efficiencies and sharing of certain 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
facilities. The site is zoned residential (R3) and is mainly surrounded by residential zoning, including 
a developed subdivision to the west. Its eastern border lies along the UGB, and rural land on the 
other side of the UGB is zoned for low-value resource use (range land). Floodways or floodplains 
are not found on the site, nor are significant slopes. However, land to the west, south, and northeast 
is significantly sloped and may present challenges to the site's walkability despite predominantly 
residential zoning and local roads in the area that can make walking more viable. Site 6 is not 
located on a collector or arterial — the nearest collector is Ashwood Road adjacent to the north side 
of the middle school site. Yet this site is also relatively isolated in terms of a road system. Services 
are available. Like most of the other candidate sites, new construction on the sites will allow for 
integration of life-cycle cost-saving features. 
• Sites 7 and 8 — Relocating Madras High School, or building new elementary school 
Sites 7 and 8 are adjacent although separated by Hall Road. Site 7 is made up of 3 parcels, totaling 
16.6 acres; Site 8 is a single parcel of 11.1 acres. All parcels in both sites are vacant and under 
common private ownership. Individually, either site could accommodate an elementary school. Site 
7 also could provide for a small park along with a small elementary school facility. Combined, if 
Hall Road were not used as a through street, Sites 7 and 8 (27.7 acres total) could accommodate a 
small high school, or a middle school co-sited with an elementary school, or park, or other 
community facility. The sites are located between the city limits and the UGB in south Madras. The 
sites and land south of them are currently zoned by the County as County Commercial (CC), which 
does not allow schools, and they have been identified as possible sites for light industrial use. 
Currently there are no submitted or pending development applications for the sites. Sites 7 and 8 
are flanked by Corridor Commercial (CI) zoning inside the city and residential zoning (RR5) outside 
the UGB and inside the URA, which allow schools at least conditionally and provide a student 
population. These sites would serve students in the south, west, and east portions of the Madras 
area. They are relatively flat and do not contain floodplain or floodway. The sites are close to but 
not adjacent to US 97, a major arterial, and are served by local roads — Hall Road and Merritt Lane. 
Services are available. Despite their location on local roads, commercial zoning to the west and 
south and steep slopes to the east where there is residential zoning call into question how much 
residential development will be within walking distance and how viable walking conditions will be. 
Like most of the other potential sites, though, new construction on the sites will allow for 
integration of life-cycle cost-saving features. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
Chapter 5 
Facility Needs and Location Analysis 
• Yarrow Site — relocating Madras or Westside Ulementaiy School, relocating Madras High School, or building 
new elementary school 
The Yarrow site includes as much as 20 acres that is identified in the approved Yarrow community 
master plan for school use. Its location directiy south of Ashwood Road, a collector, which allows a 
higher level of access while also being part of a planned development that will include local roads 
toward winch the school could be oriented. The site is outside but adjacent to the UGB in the URA 
and is first in line for UGB expansion given it is master planned status. It could serve students from 
the north, east, and south parts of the Madras urban area. It is a vacant site that is relatively flat, 
although the southern part of the property rises up gradually to an upper plateau; the site does not 
intersect with floodways or floodplains. It is currendy planned and zoned as range land in the 
County plan and is bourdered by range land zoning on the east and City open space/public facility 
and residential (R3) zoning to the north and south. To the north is a large county park. Land to the 
northeast, east, and southeast is all zoned for open space/public facility and range land. This land 
also provides an opportunity for residential development in close proximity to the school site where 
it would provide a walkable environment using local roads and, with proper safety treatments, via 
Ashwood Road. Services are available. At 20 acres the site is large enough for an elementary school 
co-sited with other community facilities. Last, as with most of the other potential sites, new 
construction on the Yarrow site would allow for integration of life-cycle cost-saving energy features. 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 5-10 
4 
Chapter 6 
Recommendations 
Chapter 6: Recommendations 
This chapter presents combinations of the options outlined in Chapter 5 for addressing the existing 
and projected facility needs of Jefferson County School District. The combinations represent 
recommendation "packages" based on the findings of the locational analysis in Chapter 5. 
Based on that information, the following recommendations and actions are proposed by the School 
Board: 
Immediate (1 to 5 years) 
• Secure adoption of the Facility Plan and related implementation measures by local 
governments; 
• Prepare and enact a district wide excise tax on new development to help finance school 
construction; 
• Secure financing, selcet a site and then design and construct a replacement elementaty school 
on Tribal Lands in Warm Springs; 
• Securc financing, selcct a site, and then design and construct a replacement elementary 
school in Madras; 
• Secure financing to assess and repair Metolius Elementary School; 
• Secure funding to conduct a site search for a new elementary school in Madras; 
• Secure funding for a study to determine how to address catastrophic flood hazard problems 
at Madras l l igh School and the District's Administration Building. 
Near Term (5 to 10 years) 
• Secure a site and funding to construct a new elementary school in Madras; 
Securc funding to resolve flood hazard problems at Madras High School and the 
Administration Building. 
[To be modified after consulting with the City, District staff, and the School Board. More detail on 
how to proceed may be included in the plan depending on the wishes of the Board.] 
Jefferson County School District Facility Plan 2009 
September 2009 - DRAFT 
Page 6-1 

Transmittal 
Date: December 29, 2009 
To: Plan Amendment Specialist From: DJ Heffernan 
Firm: DLCD Phone: (503) 227-3488 
Address: 
RE: 
635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 E-mail: dheffernan@angeloplanning.com 
Salem, OR 97301-2540 
Proposed Jefferson County School District 2009 Long Range Facility Plan and 
Madras UGB Amendment and Annexation - ADDENDUM 
This is an addendum to the original notice form. The proposed UGB amendment and 
annexation is being amended to add 16.91 acres that comprise two additional parcels that 
lie between tax lot 100 - the previous subject site - and the existing UGB. 
Lots 101, 102, and 200 are proposed to be added to the Madras UGB and annexed to the 
city, but would not rezoned at this time. Those parcels will retain their existing County zoning 
(Range Land) and will be considered for rezoning once the private landowners are prepared 
for further land use action. The additional land is intended for residential land use 
designation to help meet the need for residential and public/semi-public uses in Madras for 
the next 15-20 years, as determined in the Madras Urbanization Study (ECONorthwest, 
April 2007) and Madras Urbanization Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007). 
Therefore, the entire subject site is now comprised of the following parcels in Township 11S, 
Range 14E, Section 7: 
1) Parcel of Lot 100 - 20.0 acres 
2) Lot 101 -12 .3 acres 
3) Lot 201 - 0.69 acres (County right-of-way) 
4) Lot 2 0 0 - 3 . 9 acres. 
The attached maps show: 
1) The taxlots for Section 7 (Attachment A); and 
2) The survey map for the parcel in Lot 100 (Attachment B). 
As described in the original notice form, the parcel in Lot 100 is proposed for annexation to 
the UGB and the city, with a change in zoning to from County Range Land (RL) to City Multi-
Family Residential (R-2). 
921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com 
Proposed Jefferson County School District 2009 Long Range 
Facility Plan and Madras UGB Amendment and Annexation - ADDENDUM 
| Page 24 
In addition to these map amendments, the following table is proposed for addition to the 
Land Use Element (Section IV) of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. The table lists city and 
county zoning districts that are allowed within the various land use plan designations that are 
used to depict future land uses on the Madras Comprehensive Plan map. The table is 
needed to clarify how City Comprehensive Plan designations correspond to City and County 
zoning designations. 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home subdivisions, 
and for duplexes 
R-1 EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-
10, RR-20, ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family Residential Land for multi-family housing to be close to 
businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-
10, RR-20, ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential development 
that allows site design flexibility to promote 
creativity and protection of scenic and 
natural resources 
R-3 EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
C-3 Community Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD, EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
I Industrial Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
I EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, ERD 
O/S Open Space Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise publicly 
owned 
OS/PF EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, PM 
A/D Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for future 
commercial and industrial uses, particularly 
those that rely on air transportation 
A/D EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFUA-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com 
Proposed Jefferson County School District 2009 Long Range 
Facility Plan and Madras UGB Amendment and Annexation - ADDENDUM 
| Page 31 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Please contact me with information requests or follow-up questions. 
Thank you for your time and consideration. 
921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468, Portland, OR 97205 • tel 503.224.6974 • fax 503.227.3679 • www.angeloplanning.com 
Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map 
Amendments - DRAFT 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Prepared for: 
Jefferson County 
66 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
Prepared by: 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
January 2010 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Shelly Tack Chair 
Vice-
Lynn Kowaleski Chair 
Alan Hurley 
Kasey Cousens 
Richard Ladeby 
Joe Krenowicz 
City of Madras City Council 
Melanie Widmer Mayor 
Tom Brown 
Walt Chamberlain 
Royce Embanks Jr. 
Benjamin Keeton 
Bob McConnell 
Kevin O'Meara 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Donald Martin Chair 
Evan Thomas Vicc Chair 
Dick Dodson 
Bob Powers 
Roy flvder 
Jim Day 
Kay Moon 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
John Hatfield Chair 
Mike Ahern 
Wayne Fording 
Project Support and Consulting Team 
Angelo Planning Group Land use planning, project management 
Kittelson Associates Transportation analysis 
Jefferson County Planning 
City o f Madras Planning, technical support 
Jefferson County School District 509-J Planning, technical support 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Table of Contents 
I. Proposal Summary 1 
II. Introduction 3 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Amendments .... 5 
IV. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning 
Map Amendments 7 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement ., 8 
Goal 2 Land Use Planning 9 
Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 14 
Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces ,.15 
Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 16 
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards 17 
Goal 10 Housing . 17 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services IB 
Goal 12 Transportation 21 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation...;... 23 
Goal 14 Urbanization 24 
VI. Conformance with State Statutes 
ORS 195,110 26 
ORS 197.298 29 
ORS 197.610 31 
ORS 197.626 :.... 31 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) 
33 
VIII. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Section III, Goal 14 - Urbanization 35 
VIII. Conformance with the City of Madras Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 7.2-7.4 - Annexation 42 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 8.2 - Zone/Plan Map Amendments 45 
List of Figures 
Figure 4-1: Proposed UGB Amendment and Annexation Area 7 
List of Tables 
Table 3-1: Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 5 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) .30 
,12 
13 
List of Appendices 
• Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
• Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey Map (20-acre parcel) 
• Appendix C: Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
• Appendix D: City of Madras and Jefferson County School District 509-J Land Exchange 
Agreement (September 2006) 
• Appendix E: Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
• Appendix F: Transportation Analysis 
• Appendix G: Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
I. Proposal Summary 
File No.: 081-004 
Applicant: Nick Snead, Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-3388 
(541) 475-7061 Fax 
nsneadfSjci. madras, or. us 
Jon Skidmore, Community Development Director 
Jefferson County 
85 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-4462 
(541) 325-5004 Fax 
ion.skidmore(5),co.jefferson.or.us 
Applicant's 
Representative: 
DJ Heffernan 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
(503) 227-3664 
(503) 227-3679 Fax 
dhefferivan®.angeloplarming.corn 
Request: • To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plans - to incorporate the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan as an 
element of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the 
City of Madras Comprehensive Plan (Attachment A). 
• To amend the Madras Comprehensive Plan — to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond 
and are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
(Table 3-1) 
• To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps - to expand the 
Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); to annex 20 acres 
of City-owned land ("east site," Figure 4-1) to the City of 
Madras and apply City R-2, Multiple Family Residential zoning; 
to annex 16.22 acres of privately owned land plus 0.69 acres of 
land for County right-of-way ("west site," Figure 4-1) and retain 
existing County RL, Range Land, zoning. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Location: • West site: tax map of 16.91-acre west site (outlined), directiy 
east of the existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road 
(Appendix A) 
• East site: survey map of 20-acre east site, east of the existing 
Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road (Appendix B) 
Legal Description: West site: U S 14E 7 Lots 101 (12.28 acres), 102 (0.69 acres for 
right-of-way), and 200 (3.94 acres), entire lots 
East site: U S 14E 7 Lot 100 (20 acres), parcel of lot 
Legal description of Lot 100 parcel (east site): 
A. portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 asfiled in the Jefferson 
County Clerk's Office, sittiated in the Northeast Quarter (NE 1A) of Section 
7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson 
County Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 
Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, momimented with a 2 inch 
diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears 
South 89°39 '40" East a distance of2640.53feet; thence South 89°39 '40" 
East along the North line of said Section 7 a distance of599.997feet; thence 
South 0°17'36" West a distance of40.00feet to the Northwest corner of said 
Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; thence continuing South 0°17'36" 
West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance of40.00feet to the South 
right-of-way line ofEast Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 0°17'36"East along said 
West line a distance of935,13feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said 
Partition Plat No. 2002-17; thence leaping said West line South 89°39'40" 
East a distance of931.70feet; thence North 0°17'36" West a distance of 
935.12feet; to a point on the South right-of-ivay line ofEastA.shwood Road; 
thence North 89°39'40 " West along said right-of-way line a distance of 
931.70feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Contains 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. (Appendix B) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
2 
II. Introduction 
The Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved by DLCD in July 2009, and was sized 
to provide urbanizable land for the next 50 years. Land from the URA is the first priority 
for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The City of Madras is not currently in 
periodic review or evaluating its existing UGB for a 20-year land supply. The City, however, 
has initiated this UGB amendment and annexation process in order to abide by terms of an 
agreement it has with the Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or the "District"). 
In September 2006, the City of Madras and JCSD signed a land exchange agreement. The 
District owns property — "Friendship Park" — on Highway 97 that is basically too small to 
site a new school and is poorly located along a state highway. The agreement specified an 
exchange of this land in the city for 20 acres of land that the City owns just outside the 
existing UGB (Appendix D). This land is proposed for annexation to the Madras UGB and 
city limits and for re-zoning as City Multi-Family Residential (R-2), a designation that will 
allow for a multi-family and single-family housing as well as public/semi-public uses typically 
sited on residentially zoned land. The 20-acre parcel is within the Yarrow Master Plan area. 
The plan conceptually identifies a school site along its northern border with Ashwood Road. 
The terms of the land exchange agreement concerning this land is cited below. 
... (TJhe City has agreed to the folloiving conditions as part of the property's conveyance, all of ivhich are to be 
completed within jive (5) years: 
(a) The City and its "Planning Department will take such efforts as are reasonable and practicable to 
expand the Urban Growth Boundary for the City so that the parcel described in Exhibit "B" is 
ivithin the Madras Urban Growth Boundary ivithin five years of the signing of this Agreement, and 
that said property, when brought within the Urban Growth Boundary, shall be stoned to permit 
siting and construction of schoolfacilities on said land; and 
(b) A t no Cost to the School District, the City agrees to have sewer lines and water service lines adequate 
to accommodate a 600 student public school extended to the lot line of the parcel described in 
Exhibit "IV; and 
(c) A Warranty Deed containing a legal description of the 20.0 acre parcel described in Exhibit 'B" 
shall be signed by the appropriate representative for the City and placed in escrow, with instructions 
that allow the School District to removed the Deed for recording in favor of the School District as 
soon as the parcel described in Exhibit "B " can be legally partitionedfrom the other property owned 
by the City in which said parcel is located; and 
(d) The City will cooperate with the School District to process and complete any necessary partitioning 
and other legal procedures to segregate the School's parcelfrom the City's contiguous realproperty so 
that the Warranty Deed may be lawfully recorded in the records of the Jefferson County Clerk. 
As part of the process of fulfilling its obligation under terms of this agreement, the City of 
Madras prepared an update to the Jefferson County School District 509-J Long Range 
Facility Plan. The facility plan, which the District has adopted, complies with ORS 195.110. 
The plan includes enrollment forecasts to 2025, an assessment of current conditions for 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
3 
existing District facilities (Appendix C) and recommendations to address identified capacity 
problems. The plan recommends that Warm Springs Elementary School be re-built, that 
Metolius Elementary School undergo repairs, and that Westside Elementary School and 
Madras Elementary Schools either be renovated on site or replaced. The projections, 
assessments, and recommendations of the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan provide a basis for 
studying the efficacy of these alternative solutions to inform a potential bond measure 
campaign and possibly adopt an excise tax program. 
In addition to the 20-acres of school district land, herein referred to as the east site, there are 
an additional 16.91 acres of land in the proposed UGB annexation, herein referred to as the 
west site. The west site is comprised of three lots that provide County .right-of-way, better 
connect the east site to the existing UGB, and contribute toward meeting the long-term need 
for residentially zoned land. The west site is privately owned and is not proposed for re-
zoning at this time; it will apply for re-zoning when the owners are prepared to file land 
development applications in the future. It is planned that the west-site land also will provide 
the same range of needed housing types and public/semi-public uses as the east site when 
re-zoning is approved. 
In order to accommodate rural zoning in the urban growth area, text amendments are 
proposed for Chapter 2 of the Madras Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones 
allowed on land that is designated for urban residential use on the comprehensive plan map. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
4 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
• Language adopting the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range 
Facility Plan (Appendix C) 
• Language amending Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element 
that identifies die appropriate location for this table. 
Table 3-1 Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home 
subdivisions, and for duplexes 
R-1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family 
Residential 
Land for multi-family housing to be close 
to businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential 
development that allows site design 
flexibility to promote creativity and 
protection of scenic and natural 
resources 
R-3 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
C-3 Community 
Commercial 
Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
I Industrial Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
I EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, 
ERD 
o/s Open Space Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise 
publicly owned 
OS/PF EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
5 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
AID Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for 
future commercial and industrial uses, 
particularly those that rely on air 
transportation 
A/D EFUA-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFUA-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
6 
Q. 
O) 
c 
' c o 
N 
T5 £ 
Q. 
re 
c 
re 
a> > 
c 
<d 
<D i— 
Q. 
E 
o 
o 
V) 
re i— 
- a 
re 
o 
£ 
b 
"O c re ^ 
c 
3 
O 
o 
o £ 
S2 £ 
a> a> 
t E 
<D ~0 
- ) £ 
(1) 
x—i CN o VD T—1 O 
r-- c l 
P3 o T—1 
T—• 
C/) T—< CA 4J VJ T—1 U cn rt 
'6 o CO <N 
c/5 
7) H o 
• 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement 
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be 
involved in all phases of the planning process. 
Response : The proposed amendments have been reviewed during a series of public 
meetings and hearings in order to allow for consideration by public officials and public 
feedback. 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or "District") Board ("Board") was 
briefed by the Superintendent about the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan in meetings [when, 
covered what]. The draft plan was brought to them first for formal review at a Board 
meeting on January 11, 2010. After [describe deliberations], they adopted the plan on 
DATE. 
The proposed Madras Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan amendment and 
amendments to the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Maps and 
Zoning Maps were presented and reviewed in a series of meetings in early 2010. 
ASK THE CITY FOR MEETING AND HEARING SCHEDULE AND INFO 
Notice methods 
Measure 56 notice 
45-dav notice to DLCD 
December 14, 2009 
Addendum 
January 2010 
Info available on City website? 
The UGB expansion area is drawn from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA), which was 
developed through an intensive participatory process. A Technical Advisory Committee 
(TAC) and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) were formed to provide guidance for the 
project. The TAC was comprised of staff from project team members, including Jefferson 
County, the City of Madras, ECONorthwest, Kittelson & Associates, David Evans & 
Associates, Ball Janik, LLP, and Angelo Planning Group. The PAC included representatives 
of the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Jefferson County School District 509-J, local 
farmers, housing advocates, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, and 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). 
A combination of bi-weekly TAC teleconferences, public forums, PAC meetings, and 
meetings of the Madras Planning Commission and City Council, and Jefferson County 
Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners informed the final URA 
recommendation. Public events included the following: 
• PAC Meeting 1 - May 2, 2007 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
8 
. Public Meeting 1 - May 15, 2007 
• PAC Meeting 2 - May 24, 2007 
• PAC Meeting 3 - October 22, 2007 
• Public Meeting 2 - November 6, 2007 
• Joint City Council/County Commission Work Session — November 20, 2007 
• PAC Meeting 4 - December 3, 2007 
• Joint City/County Planning Commission advisor)' hearing - April 3, 2008 
• Joint City/County Planning Commission advisory hearing — May 8, 2008 
• County Planning Commission hearing — May 22, 2008 
• City Planning Commission hearing — June 11, 2008 
• City Council/County Commission evidentiary hearing—August 13, 2008 
• City Council hearing/deliberations — September 9, 2008 
• City Council hearing/ls l ordinance reading - September 23, 2008 
• City Council hearing/final adoption — October 7, 2008 
• County Commission hearing — September 24, 2008 
Findings : 
• According to both their Comprehensive Plans and code, the City of Madras and 
Jefferson County Planning Commissions serve as their official citizen planning 
committees. 
• Adoption of the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) complied with Goal 1. 
• Members of the public have been able to participate in reviewing the proposed 
amendments. [DATES FOR MEETINGS, WORK SESSIONS AND HEARING] 
• [WEBSITES AND OTHER PLACES MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE] 
• Measure 56 notice about upcoming County and City Planning Commissions and 
legislative hearings was mailed lo [specify which property owners] on DATE. 
• 45-day notice of proposed plan amendments was sent to the Department of Land 
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on December 14, 2009 prior to the start of 
hearings held by County and City Planning Commissions and legislative bodies. 
• Notices of the public meetings were published in the City's local newspaper, 
including contact information for the City and County. The paper also published 
articles [about what, if articles were published]. 
• ANY OTHER NOTICE AND PUBLIC ANNOUCEMENT INFORMATION 
FOR ADOPTION HEARINGS? 
Conclusion: The City of Madras has complied with State requirements for citizen 
involvement per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 1. 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all 
decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
9 
Response: The state statute governing long-term school district facility planning — ORS 
195.110 — was revised in 2007 and expanded the definition of which districts were subject to 
the planning requirements. The statute is addressed in more detail later in this report. The 
Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) 
includes elements pursuant to ORS 195.100(5)(a) such as enrollment forecasts, an 
assessment of existing facility conditions, and an analysis of options to meet forecasted 
needs. Given projected future need, the plan recommends that the District proceed with 
implementation of re-building a school on the Warm Springs Reservation and providing a 
new elementary school to replace substandard existing facilities in Madras. The 2009 Long 
Range Facility Plan was adopted by the JCSD Board on DATE and is now proposed for 
inclusion as an element in the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans 
pursuant to ORS 195.110(2)(a). 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is based on the buildable lands inventory 
and needs analysis performed by ECONorthwest in 2007 and for the Madras Urban Reserve 
Area (URA) adopted in 2008 and acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development (DLCD) in 2009. The proposed table of corresponding City land use 
designations and City and County zones (Table 3-1) facilitates the annexation of land in the 
URA to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
Madras Urban Reserve Area 
The Madras City Council adopted the Madras Urban URA and related provisions in October 
2008 and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD 
acknowledged and approved the URA and related amendments in July 2009, with 
stipulations that some of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County development 
code be modified. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a 
UGB is land designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the 
first priority for UGB expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 
years, as was found by the Madras Urbanization Study and Addendum. 
The URA and its related plan and code amendments were developed over the course of 
Spring 2007 to Summer 2008, They were developed using the guidance and input of a 
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and a Project Advisory Committee (PAC) as well as 
City and County Planning Commissioners, City Councilors, County Commissioners, and 
participating members of the public. These various elements of public involvement are 
described in more detail in the response and findings for Goal 1. 
At the same time, amendments to the County and City's Comprehensive Plans and 
Development Codes were developed in order to implement the URA. Proposed 
amendments to the Madras Comprehensive Plan addressed Goal 14 (Urbanization) and 
recommended the following: 
• Description of the Madras URA, its role in providing a 20- to 50-year land supply to 
the City, the cooperation between the City and the County in establishing a URA, its 
priority for inclusion in the City's UGB; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
10 
* Master planning provisions for areas added to the City's UGB, including cooperation 
with the County and new master planning requirements (Area Master Plans or 
AMPs); and 
• UGB expansion proposal requirements including proposed zoning, an annexation 
program, adequate public facilities and transportation facilities, protection of cultural 
and natural resources, protection from natural hazard, and area properly owner 
support. 
Land in the URA is the first priority when designating land for a UGB expansion and the 
land in this proposed amendment to the UGB, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning 
Maps is drawn entirely from the adopted and acknowledged Madras URA. The selection of 
land from the URA is based on criteria that Madras addpted as a Goal 14 policy as part of 
adopting the URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities required by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary to 
serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements outlined in 
adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements that augment 
adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements of 
OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in the 
Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet transportation 
needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental transportation 
improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation; emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
'' 'I - so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
These criteria are addressed later in the report section on the Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
11 
Madras Urbanization Study - Residential Land 
The Madras Urbanisation Study (ECONorthwest, April 2007) and Madras Urbanisation Study 
Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007) identify a shortage of residentially zoned land to 
meet single-family and multi-family housing needs and public/semi-public use needs in the 
next roughly 20 years The needed number of housing units and acreage for residential uses is 
summarized in Table 4-18 of the August 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (Table 5-
1)-
These needs are compared to the available land supply in the existing UGB in Table 6-4 in 
the study (Table 5-2) in order to determine whether there is a surplus or deficit of land for 
residential, public and semi-public, and employment uses. The table documents a shortage of 
land zoned R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) and land zoned R-l (Single Family Residential) 
inside the existing UGB as well as a need for roughly 350 acres of public and semi-public 
uses over the course of the next 15-20 years. These public/semi-public uses tend to be 
related to residential uses and are usually allowed and sited on residentially zoned land. 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
I ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 4-18. Forecast of needed housing units and residential land, 
Madras, 2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Density Net to Gross Density 
(DU/net Net Res. Gross Res. (DU/gross 
Housing Type New DU Percent res oc) Acres Factor Acres res ac) 
Needed Units, 2007-2027 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 1,791 61% 4.8 373.1 25% 497.5 3.6 
Manufactured 206 7% 5.5 37.4 25% 49.8 4.1 
CondofTownhomes 206 7% 9.0 22.8 15% 26.9 7.7 
Subtotal 2,202 75% 5.4 410.5 574.2 3.8 
Multi-family 
Multifamily 734 25% 14.0 52.4 15% 61.7 11.9 
Subtotal 734 25% 14.0 52.4 61.7 11.9 
Total 2.936 100% 6.3 462.9 635.8 4.6 
Needed Units, 2007-2057 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 5,516 61% 4.8 1.149.1 25% 1,532.1 3.6 
Manufactured 633 7% 5.5 115.1 20% 143.8 4.4 
Condo/Townhomes 633 7% 9.0 70.3 15% 82.7 7.7 
Subtotal 6,781 75% 5.4 1,334.5 1,758.7 3.9 
Multi-family 
Multifamily 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 10% 179.4 12.6 
Subtotal 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 179.4 12.6 
Total 9,042 100% 6.3 1,495.9 1,938.1 4.7 
Source: ECONorthwest 
Note: Gross acres calcuieted by dividing net acres by (1-net lo gross factor). For example, for single-family 
detached, 477-1/(1-75) =636.1. Conversely, 636.1 x .75 = 477.1. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
12 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451-9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46 1 138 2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 148 0 444.0 242.8 94.3 (201.2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47 5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 38.7 38.7 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 358.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) ( 7 7 0 7 ) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1.004,2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercia l (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) ( 8 5 4 ) 
cc 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercia l 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
t ides a'l public and semi-fxjfcjic 'and needs were allocated to residential zones 
The proposed UGB amendment of about 37 acres addresses part of the residential and 
public use land need presented above. Annexing 20 acres that are owned by the City (the 
east site) and rezoning it R-2 allows the City to fulfill its agreement with JCSD, dated 
September 2006 (Appendix D). The proposed UGB amendment provides land to meet part 
of the need for residentially zoned land. The remainder of the land need will be addressed 
during the City's next cycle of periodic review. 
Findings: 
• The 2009 Long Range Facility Plan was adopted by the Jefferson County School 
District Board on DATE and is now proposed for inclusion as an element in the 
Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans pursuant to ORS 
195.110(2)(a). 
• The JSCD 2009 Long Range Facility Plan includes an enrollment forecast and 
analysis of options for meeting projected needs, and recommends that a replacement 
school be built for the existing elementary school in Warm Springs and that Westside 
Elementary School and Madras Elementary School in Madras be renovated on site or 
re-built on new sites. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is drawn from land in the adopted 
Madras URA and meets some of the need for residendally zoned land the next 20 
years as established in the 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study and addendum. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for land use planning per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 2. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
13 
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands 
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 
Response: The entire Madras URA includes land zoned for rural residential, range land, 
and agricultural uses, as shown in Table X. 
Table X: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 
Land Type Zones Acres 
Exception Land RR2, RR5, RR10 
(Rural Residential) 1,709 
Non-prime Resource Land 
RL 
(Range Land) 2,038 
Prime Resource Land A1 
(Agricultural) 68 
Total 3,815 
Prime agricultural land makes up less than 2% of the total URA. When prime agricultural 
land is included, it is only when it is adjacent to the existing UGB, surrounded by exception 
land or non-prime resource land, and/or will be more easily served with public facilities — 
sewer service, in particular. The rest of the URA is comprised of rural residential and range 
land. Rangeland was included in the URA because of serviceability advantages it has over 
other land surrounding the Madras UGB and because all the exception (rural residential) 
land adjacent to the Madras UGB would not fulfill the city's estimated land needs for the 
next 50 years. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation a.rea is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning. 
As explained above, land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet 
land needs and because of server service advantages over other areas around the existing 
UGB and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 
50 years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer 
serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Pursuant to ORS 197.298(a), the first priority of land to be included in the UGB is land in a 
URA, Beyond that, local criteria can be relied upon to prioritize land from the LIRA to be 
included in the UGB. Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan 
or Area Master Plan (AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient 
public facilities, financing prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard 
areas for the proposed UGB amendment area. These policies are addressed in more detail in 
the response and findings for Madras Comprehensive Plan Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
14 
Land in the URA is subject to joint management under the terms of the City's and County's 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. 
Response and findings related to the UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Findings : 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is land from the Madras URA, 
top priority land for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298(a). 
• The adopted Madras URA includes primarily land that is "exception land" (zoned 
Rural Residential) or non-prime resource land because exception land alone cannot 
meet land needs for the next 50 years. 
• Some of the non-prime resource land (zoned Range Land) is easier to serve with 
sewer than other areas around the existing Madras UGB, based on public facility 
analysis done during the development of the URA. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of 
the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in 
the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for agricultural lands per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 3. 
Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. 
Response: The land being proposed for inclusion in the Madras UGB is currently located 
within the Madras URA, jointly managed by Jefferson County and the City of Madras 
pursuant to the terms of the Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA), 
adopted in January 2009 (Appendix E). Pursuant to the URAMA, the County processes 
land use decisions in the URA. In addition, conversion plans must be submitted to the City 
for land divisions in the URA. 
Madras Comprehensive Plan policy language regarding protection of open space, scenic, 
wildlife, and cultural resources was adopted as part of amendments to Goal 14 
(Urbanization) concurrent with the adoption of the Madras URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
The land in the proposal does not include floodways, floodplains, significant habitat, or 
cultural resources that are identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 
inventory, or Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) files. The only 
resources cited in Policy 14J(8) that may apply to the site are open spaces. Open space will 
be a required part of school or multi-family residential development that occurs in the UGB 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
15 
amendment area. However, this proposal itself is not a development or entidement proposal 
and, therefore, is not required to specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
F indings : 
• Recently adopted amendments to Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan require 
idendficadon of protecdve measures for significant open space, scenic, historic, 
cultural and natural resources in proposed UGB expansion areas. The Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan and Goal 5 inventory does not identify natural, scenic, 
or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• Open space designations will be made as part of development entidement for the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for open space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources per Statewide 
Land Use Planning Goal 5. 
Goal 6: Air, Water and Land Resource Quality 
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. 
Response: According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon 
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) there are no federally designated air quality 
management areas or federally designated hazardous waste sites in the Madras URA. Of 
Environmental Cleanup Sites reported on ODEQ's website, there are no sites identified in 
the URA. Further, R-2 zoning is proposed for the UGB amendment area to be brought in 
to the city, allowing residential uses and other compatible uses. These uses tend to produce 
less noise, air, land, and water pollution than commercial and industrial uses, which typically 
manufacture goods, produce by-products, and generate more vehicle traffic. 
F indings : 
• There are not federal- or state-registered environmental quality sites within the URA 
boundary recommendation and proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• The amendment and annexation area is needed and planned for residential and 
related uses, which tend to have fewer adverse air, water, and land quality impacts 
than commercial or industrial uses. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for air, water and land resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6. 
1 Air quality management areas, hazardous waste sites, and environmental cleanup sites can be searched on the 
U.S EPA's and ODEQ's websites at: http://www.deq.starc.or.us/aq/planning/index.hlm. 
hi rp: / / www.cpa.gov/super fund / sites /sitci nfo.hrm. and 
http://www.deq.statc.or.us/lq/ccsi/ecsi.htm. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
16 
Goal 7: Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 
To protect people and property from natural hazards. 
Response: Primary potential natural hazards in Madras include steep slopes, floodway and 
floodplain, and wildfire. Statewide Goal 7 is reinforced in Madras Comprehensive Plan 
policies (Goal 14) by requiring protection from natural hazards be demonstrated for 
proposed UGB amendments. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion area. In fact, the proposed amendment and annexation are 
driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway and floodplain 
of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. Area in the district is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan 
(CWPP) that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and 
federal agencies. 
Findings: 
• There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. 
• Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 provides fire protection service to the 
proposed amendment and annexation area. The area is subject to the Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) developed and adopted by the County, the fire 
district, and federal agencies. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for areas subject to natural hazards per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 7. 
Goal 10: Housing 
To encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price 
ranges and rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon 
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. 
Response: This proposal provides land for housing and compatible public and semi-public 
uses. The Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (August 2007) shows that there is a shortage 
of land zoned R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) and R- l (Single Family Residential) inside the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
17 
existing UGB in the next 20 years, in addition to roughly 350 acres of residentially zoned 
land needed for public and semi-public uses (Table 5-2). 
The proposed annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits addresses this need by 
including 36.91 acres of land from the URA for residential and public/semi-public uses. It is 
proposed that the east site be re-zoned from County RL (Range Land) zoning to City R-2 
(Multi-Family Residential) zoning. It is anticipated that this land will be used for a 
combination of housing and a school. The need for a new elementary school in Madras is 
established in the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
(Appendix C). 
These proposed amendments are not part of a periodic review work program and the next 
periodic review process will ensure that the UGB does include enough land to meet all the 
land needs that are projected for the next 20 years as shown in Table 5-2. 
Findings: 
• The Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum found a need for about 22 acres of 
land zoned R-2 and 53 acres of land zoned R-1 outside the existing UGB in the 
next 20 years. 
• The urbanization studies as well as the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan indicate 
the need for public uses on residentially zoned land, specifically one new 
elementary school in Madras. The proposed UGB amendment provides 36 acres 
for residential and public/semi-public uses. A majority of this land — 20 acres — 
is being made more readily available for development of these uses by proposing 
its annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
• The remainder of land needs determined by the urbanization studies will be 
addressed during the next City of Madras periodic review. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for housing per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and 
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
Goal Requirements 
Urban Facilities and Services - Refers to key facilities and to appropriate types and 
levels of at least the following: police protection; sanitary facilities; storm drainage 
facilities; planning, zoning and subdivision control; health services; recreation facilities 
and services; energy and communication services; and community governmental 
services. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
18 
A. Goal 11 Planning Guidelines 
5. A public facility or service should not be provided in an urbanizable area unless there 
is provision for the coordinated development of all the other urban facilities and services 
appropriate to that area. 
Response: According to terms of the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras, the City will be the primary sendee provider for land within its UGB, in particular 
coordinating police, sewer, stormwater, land use, recreation, energy, and governmental 
services. City urbanization regulations amended with the adoption of the Madras URA 
require either a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan (AMP) for 
UGB amendments in Madras for areas over five acres (Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 
141). Both MPC plans and AMPs must show "appropriate locations for transportation 
improvements, public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and 
natural resource areas" and how proposed land uses will integrate with existing development. 
Transportation facilities are addressed in more detail in the response and findings for 
Statewide Goal 12 next in this report. 
The adopted Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site, land proposed for annexation both 
to the Madras UGB and city limits. It is also proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 
upon annexation so that it can provide land for uses such as a school and urban levels of 
housing. These uses are similar to and compatible with surrounding development. The east 
site is tangent to the existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector 
road, which lends itself to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city 
limits. SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
f low do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
Pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141: "An AMP shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified urban land need, 
appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, protection for 
significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource areas." It is proposed to annex 
the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits. While it is also proposed that the site retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development, the site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future designation must allow for residential and compatible public/semi-public uses in 
order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated with the existing urban 
development pattern." (Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141(2)) Further, 
the proposed addition of a table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with 
Madras land use designations to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use 
Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate the transition of existing County zoning for the west site 
to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
19 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circuladon. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circuladon system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
How do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City-
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
This application also proposes to adopt the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan as an element of the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plans, pursuant to ORS 195.110(2)(a). The Jefferson County School 
District 509-J Board adopted it on DATE. The plan (Appendix C) establishes school facility-
needs over the next 10-20 years and will facilitate coordination with financing opportunities 
and the provision of other public facilities and services. The 20-acre east site is the subject 
of an agreement between the City of Madras and the District (Appendix D). Upon 
annexation, re-zoning, and transfer of the land to the District, the land will be available to 
meet projected school facility needs, such as the need for rebuilding Westside Elementary 
School and/or Madras Elementary School on a new site in Madras. With Jefferson County 
Middle School and Madras High School nearby, the east and west sites will be adequately 
provided with school services. 
Finally both MPC plans and AMPs must have documented approval from a majority of 
landowners pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 141(3). 
Documented consent of landowners? 
B. Goal 11 Implementation Guidelines 
5. Additional methods and devices for achieving desired types and levels of public 
facilities and services should include but not be limited to the following: (1) tax incentives 
and disincentives; (2) land use controls and ordinances; (3) multiple use and joint 
development practices; (4) fee and less-than-fee acquisition techniques; and (5) 
enforcement of local health and safety codes. 
Response: The proposed land use designations and zoning for the annexation area — the 
east site and the west site — is appropriate for the type and level of public facilities and 
sendees that can be extended to the area. It is proposed to bring the west site into the 
Madras UGB and city limits but to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until 
landowners are ready to propose development. The site is surrounded by land planned for 
or developed as predominantly residential development. Given that the site will have little 
or no development for at least the short-term and its location adjacent to the existing Madras 
UGB and Ashwood Road, the site will not need many facilities or services for a while and is 
well situated for extension of facilities and services when they are needed. The proposed 
addition of a land use and zoning designation table to Section IV (Land Use Element) of the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
20 
Madras Comprehensive Plan (Table 3-1) establishes the City and County zoning designations 
that correspond to City land use designations, and will guide the transition from County 
zoning to appropriate City zoning once a land use action is proposed. 
It is proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide 
land for uses such as a school and urban levels of housing. These uses are similar to and 
compatible with surrounding development. The east site is tangent to the existing UGB and 
is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends itself to the extension 
of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS, any changes to master plans? 
The site is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan, a plan that overall features mostly a 
mixture of housing and then an internal circulation system, open space, public uses 
(including a school), and a small-scale commercial area to serve the residential uses. 
Funding for public facility improvements? 
Findings : 
• The text amendment adopting the Jefferson County School District 509-J Long 
Range Facility Plan as an implementing element of the Madras Comprehensive Plan 
addresses goal requirements for coordinating land use planning with school districts 
and other urban service providers. 
• The Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan meets 
statutory requirements (ORS 195.110) and provides an updated capital improvement 
and financing plan for school district facilities in Madras. 
• Implementation of public facilities and services in Madras is primarily regulated by 
land use plans and ordinances and public facility master plans, which are elements of 
the City Comprehensive Plan. 
• The City of Madras will be the primary provider of urban facilities and services in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. The City will be able to coordinate 
service to the area with facilities and services already provided to adjacent land within 
the existing UGB. 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan applies to the proposal area and shows an 
internal transportation network and sites for housing and a school. 
• Updates to water and sewer plans or service provider letters saying existing 
in fras true lure and plans sufficient? 
• Funding for public facility improvements? 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with Goal 11 for public facilities and services subject 
to OAR 660, Division 11. 
Goal 12 Transportation - OAR 660-015-0060(12) 
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. 
660-012-0060 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
21 
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 
(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or 
a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of 
this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, 
capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) 
of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a 
transportation facility if it would: 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation 
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted 
transportation system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels 
of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility 
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that 
is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
(2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, 
compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the 
planned function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent 
with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan 
or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the 
transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce 
demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance 
standards of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a 
development agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system 
management measures, demand management or minor transportation 
improvements. Local governments shall as part of the amendment specify when 
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: Reflecting Statewide Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule, UGB 
amendment applications must provide the following pursuant to Madras Goal 14 policies: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
22 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
(Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 14J) 
City R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning is proposed for the east site of the UGB 
amendment and annexation area. The zone allows multi-family and single-family housing 
outright and then allows associated uses such as schools, libraries, and community centers 
conditionally. The minimum lot size for single-family housing is 7,500 square feet and for 
multi-family 10,000 square feet for the first two units and 2,000 square feet per each 
additional unit. 
The east site is adjacent to Ashwood Road, an existing road built to County standards as a 
collector road. 
More description of the surrounding system, from the analysis (Appendix F) 
The transportation analysis for the annexation and re-zoning of the east site was based on 
assumptions of a combination of multi-family housing and a school. A mixture of housing 
and a school is anticipated for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
Specifically, the analysis assumed [describe assumptions]. 
Findings of transportation analysis (Appendix F) 
Findings : 
• Transportation analysis for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area 
assumed that the area would be developed with amount of] housing and a [specify 
type or size] school. 
• Transportation analysis showed that [analysis findings]. The proposal does not 
change functional classifications of any roadways and nor the standards that apply to 
them. It complies with mobility standards established in IDENTIFY 
DOCUMENTS for IDENTIFY ROADS. Therefore, the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation was found to have no significant effect on the 
surrounding transportation system. 
Conclusion: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Map amendment complies with Goal 
12 and OAR 660-015-0060(12). 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 
To conserve energy. 
Response: The east site of the UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the Yarrow 
Master Plan area. The master plan includes a range of land uses so that residents can meet 
many daily needs within the neighborhood. The plan designates land predominandy for 
housing, but for parks and open space, a school, other community services, and commercial 
services as well. This mix of uses will provide for these daily needs and reduce the need to 
drive outside the neighborhood to access these uses. The subject of this application is part 
of that plan area- a 20-acre site for housing and a school. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
23 
The Yarrow Community Master Plan also includes amount] miles of sidewalks and [amount] 
miles of multi-use paths. This supports the use of non-motorized transportation and the 
conservation of fuel resources. This proposed UGB amendment and annexation does not 
provide all of the land needed to implement the master plan but provides part of it. 
The west site is not part of the Yarrow Master Plan but will be subject to internal circulation 
and multi-modal standards when a land division or planned unit development is proposed. 
Like the east site, the west site is adjacent to Ashwood Road. 
The JCSD 509-J Facility Plan includes location policies that call for siting elementary school 
facilities in residentially zoned areas to promote walking to school within urban 
neighborhoods. This policy is included to reduce the need for bussing in urban areas. 
While water service was projected to be of similar cost to provide to all the study areas that 
comprise the Madras URA, there were differences in relative cost for providing sewer 
service given the need for pumping in some of the study areas. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area is part of a study area and a drainage area where no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required for sewer service. This minimizes the 
amount of energy needed to provide that service. 
Last, the City of Madras has adopted energy conservation standards for building. 
Or is it Yarrow? Describe. 
F indings : 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the east site of the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area proposes a variety of uses that will allow residents 
to take care of day-to-day needs without always having to drive out of the 
neighborhood to do so. The plan also indicates multi-use paths and a continuous 
network of sidewalks to promote walking and bicycling. This supports fuel and 
energy conservation. 
• Providing sewer service to the proposal area requires less pumping and, therefore, 
infrastructure, energy, and cost than other parts of the URA and other areas around 
the existing UGB. 
• Local energy conservation (building) standards 
Conclusion: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation complies with State 
requirements for energy conservation per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 13. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to 
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, 
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
24 
Response: Transportation, water, and sewer services are among the critical public facilities 
that must be provided for the proposed UGB amendment area. Also discussed in the 
narrative and findings for Goals 11 and 12, these services can be provided to the UGB 
amendment area according to existing facility plans [no updates needed?] and [transportation 
improvements required of developers?]. 
Transportation — transportation analysis findings 
Water — During the development of the Madras URA, Deschutes Valley Water District 
(DVWD) reported that there would be no supply constraint for urban development in the 
URA. Significant expansion of the District's distribution system would be necessary to serve 
urban demand in each part of the URA, and the water service study found that the marginal 
cost differences between the URA study areas were insignificant. Updated or existing plan 
can service the UGB amendment area? 
Sewer — Public facility analysis conducted in developing the Madras URA showed that sewer 
service to the eastern study areas in the URA would be more cost-efficient because no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required as compared to areas to the north, south, 
and west. For the proposed UGB amendment and in particular, updates to the/the existing 
Madras Sanitary Sewer Service Master Plan have capacity to provide sewer service to the 
annexation area. 
Schools are also another important public facility and service, and the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan determines the need for a new 
elementary school in Madras over the next 10-20 years. The Yarrow Master Plan that 
applies to the east site of the proposal area identifies land for schools. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area of 20 acres will provide land that can accommodate a 
school and housing. 
Findings: 
• Water service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing and planned 
water facilities that are identified in the Deschutes Valley Irrigation District's water 
master plan. Providing water service was not found to be significandy different in 
cost between different parts of the URA in studies done in developing the Madras 
URA. 
• Sewer servicc can be provided to the proposal area using the existing sewer master 
plan. Studies did find, however, that drainage areas in the eastern and southeastern 
parts of the URA were easier to serve in that they needed no pumping or minimal 
pumping of sewage when compared to other parts of the URA. 
• General transportation analysis findings 
• The proposal provides land for a school site, and need for potentially one or two 
new elementary school sites in Madras was found in the Jefferson County School 
509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C). The City owns the land being 
proposed for UGB expansion and annexation, and has an agreement with the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
25 
District to exchange the land with the District once it is annexed into the UGB and 
city limits and re-zoned (Appendix D). The site can serve as a replacement site for 
Madras or Westside Elementary School. 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with State requirements for urbanization and orderly 
and economic provision of public facilities and services per Statewide Land Use Planning 
Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
26 
VI. Conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORSs) 
ORS 195 
195.110 School facility plan for large school districts. (1) As used in this section, 
"large school district" means a school district that has an enrollment of over 2,500 
students based on certified enrollment numbers submitted to the Department of 
Education during the first quarter of each new school year. 
(2) A city or county containing a large school district shall: 
(a) Include as an element of its comprehensive plan a school facility plan prepared 
by the district in consultation with the affected city or county. 
(b) Initiate planning activities with a school district to accomplish planning as required 
under ORS 195.020. 
Response: Jefferson County School District 509-J registered 2,985 students enrolled in the 
2008-2009 school year and, thus, qualifies as a "large school district" pursuant to ORS 
195.110. This application proposes that the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) be adopted as an element in the Jefferson County 
and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans. The City of Madras has coordinated with the 
District in developing the plan. 
(3) The provisions of subsection (2) (a) of this section do not apply to a city or a 
county that contains less than 10 percent of the total population of the large school 
district. 
(4) The large school district shall select a representative to meet and confer with a 
representative of the city or county, as described in subsection (2) (b) of this section, to 
accomplish the planning required by ORS 195.020 and shall notify the city or county of 
the selected representative. The city or county shall provide the facilities and set the time 
for the planning activities. The representatives shall meet at least twice each year, 
unless all representatives agree in writing to another schedule, and make a written 
summary of issues discussed and proposed actions. 
Response: Jefferson County and the City of Madras are the jurisdictions in which most of 
the students in Jefferson County School District 509-J live. The District has met with the 
City at least twice this year in developing the facility plan, and the District and City have 
both worked with a consultant firm — Angelo Planning Group — to prepare the plan. The 
firm has worked on other school district facility plans in the state. 
(5) (a) The school facility plan must cover a period of at least 10 years and must 
include, but need not be limited to, the following elements: 
(A) Population projections by school age group. 
(B) Identification by the city or county and by the large school district of desirable 
school sites. 
(C) Descriptions of physical improvements needed in existing schools to meet the 
minimum standards of the large school district 
(D) Financial plans to meet school facility needs, including an analysis of available 
tools to ensure facility needs are met. 
(E) An analysis of: 
(i) The alternatives to new school construction and major renovation; and 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
27 
(ii) Measures to increase the efficient use of school sites including, but not limited to, 
multiple-story buildings and multipurpose use of sites. 
(F) Ten-year capital improvement plans. 
(G) Site acquisition schedules and programs. 
(b) Based on the elements described in paragraph (a) of this subsection and 
applicable laws and rules, the school facility plan must also include an analysis of the 
land required for the 10-year period covered by the plan that is suitable, as a permitted 
or conditional use, for school facilities inside the urban growth boundary. 
Response: The Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
features forecasts that extend to 2040 and programs for financing, acquisition, and capital 
improvement that cover a 10-year period. The plan (Appendix C) includes the required 
elements as follows: 
• Chapter 3 — Enrollment forecasts 
• Chapter 4 — Existing facility conditions and needed facility improvements 
• Chapter 5 — Analysis of needed improvements, additional capacity, and potential 
school sites 
• [REFERENCE when plan complete/updated] — 10-year financing, acquisition, and 
capital improvement programs. 
The analysis of additional capacity considers the re-use and expansion of existing facilities. 
Ultimately, the plan does recommend re-building Warm Springs Elementary School on site 
and building a new elementary school in Madras (Chapter 6 — Recommendations). The 
locational analysis in Chapter 5 looks first at sites within the UGB, using the following 
criteria. 
• Land use — unimproved land, except for parks and open space, or land with 
improvements valued <§50,000. 
• Size — at least 7 acres 
• Environmental hazards/buildability — at least 5 acres flat (slopes <5%), at least 2.5 
flat acres outside the floodplain. 
• Zoning — not zoned for industrial use. 
• Serviceability — not in areas with constrained sewers. 
• Geographic distribution - not fully within a half mile of an existing elementary 
school. 
• Traffic safety — not on a highway or arterial. 
• Availability — not committed to another use, built or in the planning process. 
Eight sites in the UGB were evaluated using these criteria and, while most of the sites 
performed well on some to most of the criteria, none of them met all of the criteria. In 
particular, the sites would not be easily served with sewer and transportation or, in the case 
of sites 7 and 8, they are not necessarily close to existing or planned residential 
neighborhoods and students. 
(6) If a large school district determines that there is an inadequate supply of suitable 
land for school facilities for the 10-year period covered by the school facility plan, the city 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
28 
or county, or both, and the large school district shall cooperate in identifying land for 
school facilities and take necessary actions, including, but not limited to, adopting 
appropriate zoning, aggregating existing lots or parcels in separate ownership, adding 
one or more sites designated for school facilities to an urban growth boundary, or 
petitioning a metropolitan service district to add one or more sites designated for school 
facilities to an urban growth boundary pursuant to applicable law. 
Response: The eight sites in the UGB were evaluated using the criteria from the response 
above and none of them met all of the criteria, particularly serviceability criteria. Because 
issues such as zoning and parcel aggregation were not the reasons that the evaluation sites 
within the UGB failed to meet criteria, the District and City added the proposal area — a 
City-owned site outside and adjacent to the UGB — to the evaluation. It met the criteria. 
The site is located within the Madras URA and complies with regulations for including land 
in the UGB, pursuant to ORS 197.298, which is addressed next in this report. 
(9) (a) In the school facility plan, the district school board of a large school district 
may adopt objective criteria to be used by an affected city or county to determine 
whether adequate capacity exists to accommodate projected development. Before the 
adoption of the criteria, the large school district shall confer with the affected cities and 
counties and agree, to the extent possible, on the appropriate criteria. After a large 
school district formally adopts criteria for the capacity of school facilities, an affected city 
or county shall accept those criteria as its own for purposes of evaluating applications for 
a comprehensive plan amendment or for a residential land use regulation amendment. 
(b) A city or county shall provide notice to an affected large school district when 
considering a plan or land use regulation amendment that significantly impacts school 
capacity. If the large school district requests, the city or county shall implement a 
coordinated process with the district to identify potential school sites and facilities to 
address the projected impacts. 
(11) The capacity of a school facility is not the basis for a development moratorium 
under ORS 197.505 to 197.540. 
(12) This section does not confer any power to a school district to declare a building 
moratorium. 
(13) A city or county may deny an application for residential development based on a 
lack of school capacity if: 
(a) The issue is raised by the school district; 
(b) The lack of school capacity is based on a school facility plan formally adopted 
under this section; and 
(c) The city or county has considered options to address school capacity. [1993 
c.550 §2; 1995 c.508 §1; 2001 c.876 §1; 2007 c.579 §1J 
Response: The facility plan establishes calculations for capacity in Chapter 4. 
INSERT/SUMMARIZE HERE IF DETERMINED 
When the Board approved and adopted the facility plan in January 2010, this included these 
capacity formulas. The County and City understand that these formulas must be used in 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
29 
evaluating future amendments to comprehensive plans and land use regulations, and may be 
used in denying a residential development application but not in instituting a development 
moratorium. 
Findings : 
• Jefferson County School District 509-J is required to prepare a facility plan, and it 
has coordinated with the City of Madras in developing its 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan (Appendix C). The plan was approved and adopted by the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J Board on DATE. 
• Jefferson County and the City of Madras must adopt the facility plan as an element 
of their comprehensive plans and that has driven this proposal for an amendment to 
their comprehensive plans. 
• The facility plan uses at least a 10-year horizon in projecting enrollment, estimating 
future facility needs, evaluating ways of addressing these needs, and preparing 
financing, acquisition, and capital improvement programs. 
• The 2009 Long Range Facility Plan evaluated eight sites in the UGB using land use, 
site size, zoning, buildability, serviceability, geographic distribution, and traffic safety 
criteria in order to address land needed beyond existing facility sites. The sites were 
either difficult to serve with sewer or roads, or were not located near existing or 
planned residential neighborhoods. 
• The plan evaluated one site in the Madras URA, adjacent to the existing UGB, that 
the City owns. The site met the land use, site size, zoning, buildability, serviceability, 
geographic distribution, and traffic safety criteria. 
• The adopted facility plan includes capacity criteria that the County and City must use 
in reviewing land use plan and regulation amendments. 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with State school district facility planning requirements 
in ORS 195.110. 
ORS 197 
197.298 Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary. (1) In 
addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land may not 
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities: 
(a) First priority is land that is designated urban reserve land under ORS 195.145, 
rule or metropolitan seivice district action plan. 
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the 
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to an urban growth boundary 
that is identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as an exception area or 
nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land that is completely 
surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is high-value farmland as 
described in ORS 215.710. 
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as marginal 
land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition). 
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
30 
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in an 
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both. 
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the 
capability classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate for 
the current use. 
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section may be included in an 
urban growth boundary if land of higher priority is found to be inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or 
more of the following reasons: 
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on 
higher priority lands; 
(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be provided to the higher priority 
lands due to topographical or other physical constraints; or 
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary 
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services to 
higher priority lands. [1995 c.547 §5; 1999 c.59 §56] 
Response: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is solely comprised of 
land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority of land to be included within the UGB 
pursuant to ORS 197.298(l)(a). There is sufficient land in the Madras URA to provide for 
the land needs estimated for the next 20 years in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) and presented below. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation provides land to meet a portion of the need 
for residentially zoned land over the next roughly 20 years (Table 6-1). The City's next 
periodic review process will ensure that the Madras UGB includes enough land to meet the 
remaining land needs projected to 2027. 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.3) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 143.0 444.0 242.8 94.3 (201.2) 
RR5 0 0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 O.O 38.7 33.7 38.7 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 353.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2.708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
1 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Motes: all public and semi-public land needs were allocated to residential zones 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
31 
197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; 
exceptions; report to commission. (1) A proposal to amend a local government 
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use 
regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The 
proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local 
government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. 
The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall 
notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. 
(2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular 
proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is 
not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new 
regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there 
are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: 
(a) The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided 
in ORS 197.615(1) and (2); and 
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other 
person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. 
(3) When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a 
local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed 
amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use 
regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: 
(a) Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and 
(b) Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to 
address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve 
compliance with the goals. 
(4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission 
on whether the director: 
(a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and 
(b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 
§7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c.761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] 
R e s p o n s e : Notice of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County and City of 
Madras Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps was sent to 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before 
the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. Notice was sent to D L C D on December 14, 
2009 before the first advisory hearing before the Jefferson County and City o f Madras 
Planning Commissions on February 3, 2010. Further hearing dates have yet to be 
determined but it is expected that D L C D will provide appropriate comment on the 
proposal at least 15 days prior to the final adoption hearing date. 
DLCD comments/application revisions, once received 
197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary or designating urban or rural 
reserves subject to periodic review. A metropolitan service district that amends its 
urban growth boundary to include more than 100 acres, or that amends the district's 
regional framework plan or land use regulations implementing the plan to establish 
urban reserves designated under ORS 195.145 (1)(b), a city with a population of 2,500 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
32 
or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to 
include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve under ORS 195.145, or a 
county that amends the county's comprehensive plan or land use regulations 
implementing the plan to establish rural reserves designated under ORS 195.141, shall 
submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development 
Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. 
[1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10; 2003 c.793 §4; 2007 c.723 §7] 
Response: The City of Madras is coordinating with Jefferson County regarding the 
proposed amendments to their Comprehensive Plans, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and 
Zoning Maps. Adoption of the UGB amendment involves amendments to the City and 
County Comprehensive Plans that are post-acknowledgement plan amendments. However, 
the adoption process for the amendments will follow periodic review procedures pursuant to 
ORS 197. As part of periodic review procedures, the proposed amendments are subject to 
review by DLCD and approval by LCDC. DLCD and LCDC will conduct their review 
process upon adoption of the proposed amendments by the Madras City Council and 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is entirely comprised of land 
from the Madras URA, the first priority of land to be included in the UGB pursuant 
to ORS 197.298(l)(a). 
• There are 36.91 acres in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. This meets 
some of the estimated need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB 
projected to 2027 by Urbanization studies. The proposed R-2 zoning for the 20-acre 
parcel (east site) allows housing and public/semi-public uses such as parks and 
schools. Other land needs for the next 20 years will be addressed during the next 
periodic review cycle. 
• Notice of the first advisory hearing on February 3, 2010 was sent to DLCD on 
December 14, 2009, more than 45 days before the advisory and evidentiary hearings. 
• The City of Madras and Jefferson County are coordinating this proposed set of 
amendments. 
• This proposal is a post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) but will follow 
procedures for periodic review. DLCD review and LCDC approval of the 
amendment will be necessary for the proposal if it is adopted by both the Madras 
City Council and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Conclusion: The proposed amendments to the City and County Comprehensive Plans, 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps comply with applicable State requirements for 
urban reserve area planning, plan amendments, and UGB amendments pursuant to ORS 
197. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
33 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) 
4. UGA ADMIN IS TRA TION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making 
authority regarding all land use application within the UGB except applications for 
amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of land in the UGB. Lands 
outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to 
include the territory to be annexed. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
1.1 Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
1.2 An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community 
Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan 
amendment fees. The City shall forward a copy of the application to the County 
Community Development Department, together with the County's plan 
amendment fee, within five working days of the date the application is filed. 
1.3 The City and County Planning Commission shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may 
hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
1.4 The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be 
forwarded to City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the 
proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be 
forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
1.5 The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final 
decision on whether the UGB should be amended. 
1.6 If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint hearing of 
the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to 
resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution 
process to resolve the differences. 
1.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be 
no change to the UGB. 
Response: The Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (Appendix G) 
was adopted by the City of Madras and Jefferson County on April 5, 2006. Pursuant to 
UGAMA terms for UGB amendments, the City is an eligible applicant for a UGB 
amendment application (Section 6.1). The UGB amendment application and appropriate 
fees were forwarded to the Jefferson County Community Development Department within 
five working days of being initially filed (Section 6.2). 
Hearings by the Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission 
were first held jointly on February 3, 2010 and then separately on DATE and DATE 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
34 
respectively. OTHER PC HEARINGS? The Madras City Council will review the City 
Planning Commission's recommendation at a hearing on DATE, and will forward its 
decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing on DATE (Sections 6.3-6.5). 
OTI1ER LEGISLATIVE HEARINGS? 
It is proposed to annex both the east site and west site to the Madras UGB and city limits, 
and it is proposed to re-zone only the east site at this time. Regardless, if both sites are 
brought into the UGB and city limits, Madras will assume land use administration and 
decision making authority for the sites pursuant to Section 4.1 of the UGAMA. 
Conclusion: The proposed amendments to the City and County Comprehensive Plans, 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps comply with applicable local requirements for 
UGB amendments per the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of Madras, 
adopted April 5, 2006. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
35 
VIII. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Note: the highlighting in the policy text below indicates text that may not have 
been adopted by the City 
GOAL 14 - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, and 
to provide for livable communities. 
[Paragraph amended by Ordinance No. 781, Passed by Council on December 12, 2006] 
POLICIES 
A. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
B. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall mutually agree to a management 
plan for the Urban Growth Boundary area. 
C. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary revision process to be utilized in a proposed change of the Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
D. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall support adoption of an Urban 
Reserve Area boundary that, when taken together with land supplies in the Urban 
Growth Boundary, may contain up to a 50-year supply of land for the City of Madras to 
support housing, economic development, public facility, recreation needs and other 
urban land needs. 
E. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall give priority to land in designated 
urban reserve areas over other land when considering urban growth boundary 
amendments. 
Response: The Madras City Council approved the Madras URA in October 2008 and the 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD and LCDC received 
the URA proposal for review in January 2009, and approved the proposal - but remanded 
sections of proposed County Zoning Ordinance amendments having to do with use 
restrictions in the URA — in July 2009. The land in the proposed UGB amendment that is 
the subject of this application is land entirely drawn from the Madras URA, land estimated 
to be needed for urbanization over the next 50 years. 
F. The City shall favor UGB amendments that involve land in locations that are suitable 
to address identified urban land needs in order to minimize buildable land supply 
shortages and address identified needs. Factors that will be considered when evaluating 
UGB additions include: 
1. Existing and planned capacity of the transportation system 
2. Existing and planned capacity of the city waste water treatment plant 
3. Existing and planned capacity of the city sanitary sewer conveyance system 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
36 
4. Existing and planned capacity of the Deschutes Valley Water District supply 
system 
5. Impacts on schools, parks, and public safety service providers 
6. Impacts on future operating costs for public facilities and services 
Response: 
G. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall undertake an evaluation of the 
urban growth boundary land supply once every five years or more frequently if certified 
population growth rates exceed 3.2% in three consecutive years. In the event certified 
population growth rates fall below 3.2% for three consecutive years, the City and County 
may agree to postpone the evaluation of UGB land supply for up to three years. 
H. During years when a comprehensive UGB land supply evaluation is not scheduled, 
individual applications for adding property to the UGB shall be limited to requests of less 
than 40 acres. UGB amendment applications must demonstrate consistency with 
applicable Oregon statutes and administrative rules and be accompanied by information 
that addresses Policy 14-J below. Applications that involve more than 5 acres also must 
comply with provisions of Policy 14-1. 
& [. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall encourage the development of 
complete, livable communities that include characteristics such as: a variety of lot sizes, 
dwelling unit types and ownership types, open spaces and other recreational amenities, 
a mix of land uses, school and community facilities, connected streets, proximity to 
downtown and other employment centers, and development that is scaled to the 
pedestrian and creates a sense of place. New growth areas of more than 5 acres that 
are added to the UGB shall should be planned and developed in accordance either with 
a master planned community development plan approved under the city Master Planned 
Community Overlay zone, or an Area Master Plan. The City encourages Master 
Planned Communities as a means to meet city housing needs as explained in other 
comprehensive plan documents. It may be appropriate, however, for the city to add new 
growth areas to the UGB that are planned and developed in accordance with an 
approved Area Master Plan. A majority of property owners subject to a Master Planned 
Community, or to an Area Master Plan, must consent to be included in the plan. 
1. A Master Planned Community (MPC) Overlay may apply to large multi-phased 
development projects where the master plan is intended to guide future 
development patterns and serves to regulate the site-development approval 
process. A MPC requires generous open space and amenities, and encourages 
efficient use of land and public facilities and services, a variety of housing types, 
innovative designs and complete pedestrian-friendly communities. A MPC shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land consistent with an identified urban land need, 
show appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, and 
the protection of significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas. A MPC must show how planned land uses will be integrated with the 
existing urban development pattern. Physical barriers, such as highways, tend to 
disrupt complete communities and livability because they disconnect areas from 
downtown and result in an auto-oriented environment of sprawl along highway 
corridors. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
37 
2. An Area Master Plan (AMP) is appropriate for land added to the UGB where the 
approval of future urban development is expected to rely on conventional urban 
zoning and the application of codified development standards and review 
procedures. An AMP may be prepared for contiguous properties added to the 
UGB that are greater than 5 acres and are not subject to a MPC overlay. An 
AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified 
urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public 
facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural 
resource areas. An AMP must show how planned land uses will be integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern. 
3. An approved Master Planned Community Plan or an Area Master Plan must 
include documentation that a majority of property owners support the conversion 
of land to the planned urban uses and also consent to annexation by the city of 
Madras using a voluntary annexation process that is outlined in the plan. 
Response: The total area under consideradon is 36.4 acres, which is less than the 40 acre 
maximum established for interim UGB annexation requests. The east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan area. The 
plan designates land for predominantly residential land uses, which is compatible with 
adjacent development in the UGB, while also designating land for open space and park uses, 
community services including schools, and limited neighborhood commercial services. The 
conceptual plan also shows an internal transportation system that includes sidewalks and 
multi-use paths. 
For the east site: 
Connections and improvements to the surrounding transportation network — transportation 
analysis results 
Existing water and sewer master plans are adequate to address facilities and service in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
The designation for medium density Residential use is consistent with an un-met land need 
and identified housing need in the 2005 Urbanization Report. 
Pursuant to Policy 141: "An AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent 
with an identified urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, 
public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas." It is proposed to annex the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits but to retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development. The site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future land use and zoning designation must allow for residential and compatible 
public/semi-public uses in order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern." (Policy 141(2)) The proposed addition of a 
table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use designations 
to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate 
the transition of existing County zoning to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
38 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which eases 
extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits to the west site. 
The plan map designation of medium density residential (R-2) is consistent with an un-mct 
land need and identified housing need in the 2005 Urbanization Report. 
For the west site: 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
[ low do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities reguired by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary 
to serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements 
outlined in adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements 
that augment adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with reguirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning 
horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected 
from these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
Response: 
Zoning and Land Use Designations (PolicyJl) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
39 
The east site is proposed to be re-zoned to a City R-2 designadon. This meets some of the 
need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB that is projected for the next 15-
20 years. Residentially zoned land will provide for housing and public/semi-public uses. 
This land need is documented in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 
August 2007). (See Table 5-2) 
The west site is proposed to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) designation until the 
time when further land use action and development is proposed. Existing zoning will allow 
only limited development, and appropriate future designations for the site will be City 
residential designations given that City open space and residential zoning currendy surround 
the site. 
Annexation Program (PolicyJ2) 
The City is the applicant for this proposal, and annexation program pursuant to Article 7 of 
its Zoning Ordinance is described later in this report. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities (Policy J3) and Transportation Planning Rule (Policy J4) 
Kittelson & Associates has performed the transportation analysis needed to deem whether 
the proposed UGB amendment constitutes a significant effect on the transportation system. 
The scoping memo concluded that, of two development scenarios allowed under proposed 
R-2 zoning, considered to be possible according to preliminary conversations about potential 
uses, and estimated for "worst-case" levels of potential traffic generation, the scenario that 
included both an elementary school and multi-family housing was found to generate more 
peak hour traffic than housing alone. Using this scenario in a Transportation Planning Rule 
(TPR) analysis for significant effect, it was found that the increase in traffic did not 
constitute a significant effect on the transportation system. Existing facilities and facilities 
identified in the Jefferson County and City of Madras Transportation System Plans (TSPs) 
that would likely be funded and built in the next 20 years arc adequate to accommodate the 
projected growth in traffic without violating adopted performance standards. 
Public facility analysis for establishing the Madras URA ranked drainage catchment areas 
around the existing UGB for sewer service costs and serviceability. Of the six study areas 
that comprised the preliminary and then final URA, Study Areas 3 and 4 on the east and 
southeast consistendy ranked higher than other areas. This can, in part, be attributed to 
proximity to the new South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) and being upslope of 
the plant. In particular, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation are is located in 
Catchment Area 180 and bordering on Catchment Area 179. These areas ranked 8th and 12'h 
out of 60 catchment areas, making them among the more cost-effective and serviceable areas 
of the URA. 
As was also determined during the URA public facility analysis, Deschutes Valley Water 
District (DVWD) found that there would be insignificant differences in providing water 
service to the different parts of the URA. Water supply in the region is adequate to ample. 
Implementation of existing water and sewer master plans will be sufficient to provide service 
for the proposal area. Or are updates needed? 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
40 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
Other Public Facilities (Policy J5) 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan includes 
enrollment projections for the next 20-25 years and compares the projected enrollment 
against the capacity and conditions of existing facilities. Even with shared uses or 
renovations, the plan recommends that a school be re-built on Warm Springs tribal land, that 
a new elementary school be built in Madras to replace substandard facilities, and that work 
be done to address flood hazards at Madras High School and the administration offices. It is 
projected in the plan that between 2025 and 2030, elementary school enrollment will exceed 
existing capacity by more than 400 students (Table 5-2, Appendix C). 
As part of this proposal, it is requested that the adoption of the 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan as an element of the County and City Comprehensive Plans be approved and 
acknowledged by DLCD. 
The east site has access to substantial park and recreation resources. Juniper Hill Park 
(City/County) and Bean Park (City/County) are nearby, as well as Jefferson County Middle 
School and its fields. The Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the site and surrounding land 
also designates open space and parks throughout the plan area. 
The City reports that Mountain View Hospital and City public safety and emergency services 
are sufficient to provide services for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
Financing for Improvements (Policy J6) 
Financing? 
For facility plan and other transportation, water, and sewer improvements 
Protection from Natural Hazards (Policy J7) 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. In fact, the proposed amendment and 
annexation are driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway 
and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. The area is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 
that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and federal 
agencies. 
Protection of Goal 5 Resources (Policy J8) 
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files do not identify floodways, floodplains, 
significant habitat, or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation 
area. The only resources cited above that may apply to the site are open spaces. While open 
space will be a required part of public use or residential development that occurs in this area, 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
41 
this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal and, therefore, does not 
specify precisely where such open space wili be designated. 
Findings: 
• Amendments to zoning and land use designations are planned and proposed. The 
proposed City land use designation is residential and City zoning designation R-2 
(Multiple Family Residential). A need for about 22 acres of land outside the existing 
UGB zoned R-2 was determined in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum. 
• Transportation analysis and results 
• Implementation of existing water and sewer master plans will be sufficient to provide 
service for the proposal area, or are updates needed? Include/reference servicc 
provider letters. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area has access to nearby parks and 
a middle school. Part of the proposal is to adopt the Jefferson County School 
District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan as an element of the Jefferson County 
and Madras Comprehensive Plans and annex the 20-acre site in order to fulfill an 
agreement between JCSD and the City and provide land for an elementary school 
that will be needed in the next 15-20 years. 
• Financing — facility plan and other transportation, water, and sewer improvements 
• In terms of natural hazards, there are not slopes greater than 25%, floodway, or 
floodplain in the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. The proposed 
amendments and annexation are based, in part, on the need to provide a school that 
is outside the floodway and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. Fire 
protection sendee for the proposal area is and will be provided by Jefferson County 
Fire Protection District #1. 
• There are not floodways, floodplains, habitat, or cultural resources that are identified 
in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files in the proposal area. Open space will be 
provided as part of school and residential development pursuant to District school 
site and facility criteria and Madras zoning ordinance (MZO) in which 30% of a 
Master Planned Community must be open space (MZO Section 3.12(D)(4)). 
Conclusion: The proposed comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, and zoning map 
amendments comply with the relevant policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
42 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Community 
Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance 
ARTICLE 7: ANNEXATION 
SECTION 7.1: PURPOSE - The purpose of this section is to: 
A. Implement the policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan; 
B. Provide for City review of all annexation requests for a determination of the availability 
of facilities and services as related to the proposal; 
C. Provide for dissemination of public information and for sufficient time for public 
review; 
D. Provide for City and County coordination of a request for an annexation; and 
E. Provide for an expedited process by establishing procedures whereby the annexation 
and zoning, if applicable, may be considered concurrently. 
SECTION 7.2: APPLICATION PROCEDURE. Annexation is a land use decision and is 
subject to applicable provisions of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan, Oregon 
Revised Statutes, and Oregon Administrative Rules. In addition, the procedures below 
shall be followed: 
A. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing after notification of all 
property owners with two hundred fifty feet (250') outside of the boundary(ies) of the 
proposed annexation. The Planning Commission shall review the proposal for 
compliance with the annexation policies contained in this Ordinance and make a 
recommendation to the City Council, based on: 
1. The annexation proposal which meets the application requirements; and 
2. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to determine a 
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the annexation proposal based on the 
criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below; and 
3. The Planning Commission shall state its recommendation and the reasons therefore 
in writing to the City Council. 
B. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall 
conduct a public hearing and consider an Ordinance declaring the requested lands to be 
annexed to the City of Madras. 
1. The City Council shall review the record of the Planning Commission hearing their 
recommendation and shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the proposed annexation in accordance 
with the criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below. 
2. The City Council may conduct additional public hearings to assist their making a 
determination. 
3. The City Council shall state its determination and the reasons therefore in writing. 
Response: The City of Madras sent public hearing notice to the surrounding property 
owners on DATK. The City and County Planning Commissions held their first public 
hearing on February 3, 2010. The City Planning Commission decided upon a 
Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Madras UGB Amendment and Annexation 
DATE 
43 
recommendation of [dcscribc recommendation] at its hearing on DATE and forwarded it to 
the Madras City Council. The City Council is scheduled to hear the matter on DATE(S). 
SECTION 7.3: ANNEXATION APPLICATION. The petitioner for annexation shall 
complete an application form provided by the Community Development Department. The 
application fee, established by Resolution of the City of Madras City Council, shall be 
submitted with the application. The application shall include: 
A. A map demonstrating that the proposed annexation is contiguous to the City Limits; 
B. Specific information on each parcel within the proposed annexation area: 
1. Current assessed valuation shown on Jefferson County Assessor's tax rolls. 
2. Acreage of both public and private property to be annexed. 
3. Map and tax lot(s) number. 
C. Names and ages of all residents and list of registered voters in the proposed 
annexation area. 
D. Addresses of all parcels within the proposed annexation area. 
E. Consent to Annexation forms, provided by the City of Madras, with notarized 
signatures of all property owners and electors within the proposed annexation area. 
F. Written findings, which address the following: 
1. Existing land uses within annexation area. 
2. Existing zoning within the annexation area. 
3. Existing improvements: 
a. water system 
b. streets 
c. sanitary sewer 
d. storm drainage 
4. Special Districts within the area: 
a. water districts 
b. irrigation districts 
c. fire district 
d. school district 
e. other 
5. Urban services, the present availability of urban service systems to the proposed 
annexation area, their capacity and cost of extension and/or improvement to urban 
standards: 
a. sanitary sewers - streets - parks 
b. storm drainage - water 
c. fire - power 
d. schools - police 
G. Compliance with all applicable policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Response: The City is initiating and applying for the proposed annexation. Maps of the 
west site and east site in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area are included in 
this report as Figure 4-1. Parcel size and other parcel information is presented in Section I, 
Proposal Summary. The City owns the taxlot where the east site is located. The 20-acre 
parcel that is being created from the taxlot has been surveyed. Annexing the parcel to the 
UGB and city limits and re-zoning it to R-2 will allow the City to honor a land exchange 
agreement between the City and JCSD, which needs to occur by 2011 pursuant to the terms 
of the agreement (Appendix D). The west site is comprised of three taxlots, two taxlots that 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
44 
are privately owned and one small taxlot (0.69 acres) that is County right-of-way. Re-zoning 
is not proposed for this site at this time as there are no immediate development plans. 
However, this site does better connect the east site to the existing UGB and will be suitable 
for residential uses and compatible public/semi-public uses, for which Madras urbanization 
studies have found a long-term need. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currendy vacant and not in active 
use. It is land under Jefferson County jurisdiction and zoned Range Land (RL). There are 
not water, sewer, or storm water facilities and services extended to the site yet, but they can 
be extended using existing City facility master plans [or with minor updates to the plans?]. 
The Deschutes Valley Water District (DVWD) provides water service to the area and can 
provide facilities and service to the site, to be financed primarily by development applicants. 
The same is true for sewer and storm water facilities and service, for which the City of 
Madras is the service provider. As part of its agreement with JCSD, the City will extend 
water and sewer to the edge of the east site. There is an irrigation district in the region — the 
Central Oregon Irrigation District — but the proposal area is not irrigated nor is it proposed 
to be. 
There is a County collector road — Ashwood Road — along the northern border of the area 
that will/will not need improvements according to transportation analysis conducted for this 
proposal. Analysis results (Appendix P) 
Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 currently provides service for the area and will 
continue to do so. Public safety responsibility for the area will be transferred from the 
County to the City. In terms of parks and recreation, there are two parks and a middle 
school close to the site, and the Yarrow Master Plan, which includes and surrounds the east 
site, includes the 30% of parks and open space required by local code (MZO Section 
3.12(D)(4)). 
The proposal area is in the Jefferson County School District 509-J. This application is 
driven, in part, by the need for a new elementary school in Madras in the next 10-20 years, as 
determined in the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C). The east site will be able to 
accommodate both school and residential uses once it is annexed and zoned R-2 as 
proposed. Pursuant to ORS 195.110, the facility plan needs to be approved as an element of 
the Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans now that it has been adopted by the 
District Board. 
As addressed in the previous section of this report, the application complies with the 
applicable policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
SECTION 7.4: ANNEXA TION CRITERIA. Lands may be annexed only if the City 
Council finds that the following criteria are met: 
A. The property is contiguous to the City limits. 
B. The property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. 
C. The annexation meets at least one of the following purposes: 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson C o u n t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
45 
1. To serve lands needing City water or sewer to alleviate a present or potential 
health hazard; or 
2. To provide land to accommodate future urban development; or 
3. To provide land for provision of needed transportation or utility facilities; or 
4. To ensure that lands adjacent to the City are developed in a manner consistent 
with City standards. 
D. The petitioner has adequately addressed infrastructure supply and demand issues. 
The annexation is considered timely in that an adequate level of urban services and 
infrastructure can be provided upon annexation or a plan is in place for the provision of 
such services or infrastructure in a reasonable period of time. 
E. The proposed annexation complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the 
Comprehensive Plan does not control the annexation, or substantial changes in 
conditions have occurred which render the Comprehensive Plan inapplicable to the 
annexation, the proposed annexation complies with current Statewide Planning Goals. 
F. The City is capable of extending City services to the area proposed for annexation 
without negatively impacting existing systems and the City's ability to adequately serve 
all areas within the existing City limits. 
G. The proposed annexation is compatible with the existing topography, potential for 
future land division, natural hazards and other related considerations. 
Response: The proposal area is adjacent to the Madras city limits and is simultaneously 
seeking to be annexed to the Madras UGB and to the city. The proposed UGB amendment 
and annexation area provides land for future urban development, specifically for a needed 
school and housing as demonstrated by the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) and the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). The east site of the proposal area is part of the Yarrow Master Plan 
area that the City has approved and found to be consistent with City development goals and 
standards. 
The proposal area can be served by water and sewer using existing water and sewer master 
plans and being financed by the City and developers of the sites. Ashwood Road on the 
north side of the proposal area is a County collector road and does/does not need 
improvements in order to serve the area. Transportation analysis results (Appendix F). 
Internal circulation and transportation facilities will need to be shown in future development 
applications. 
SECTION 8.2: ZONE/PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS 
A. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map 
1. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map may be initiated by the Planning 
Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Land Use 
Periodic Review, or by application of the property owner. 
2. If the application is for a change of a quasi-judicial or legislative nature: 
a, the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the 
proposed amendment at its earliest practical meeting date after the 
proposal is submitted and shall follow the adopted rules for quasi-
judicial hearings; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
46 
3 . tx the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the 
City Council based on findings-of-fact; 
4t c . The City Council shall hold a public hearing and review the 
recommendation of the Planning Commission, along with any public 
testimony on the issue. The City Council must take final action on an 
amendment request and amendments shall be made by ordinance. 
3. An application for a zone change for land annexed to the city that is 
subject to an approved Master Planned Community Plan or an approved 
Area Master Plan may be considered as an administrative action per 
Article 9.3. 
B. Criteria for Amendments: The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The 
applicant shall show the proposed change is: 
1. In conformity with all applicable state statutes. 
2. In conformity with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; and 
3. In conformity with the Madras Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land 
Use Ordinance, and policies; ami 
4. In conformity with an approved Master Planned Community Plan or Area 
Master Plan, if applicable to the underlying properties; and 
5 . That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the 
amendment or mistake in the original zoning. 
Response: This application is being initiated by the City Community Development 
Department/Director. Also pursuant to the terms of the UGAMA between the County arid 
the City, the City forwarded the UGB amendment application and appropriate fees to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department within five working days of being 
initially filed. 
This application is subject to legislative procedure and will receive full review by the public, 
the City Planning Commission, and the City Council. Hearings by the Madras Planning 
Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission will be held first jointiy on 
February 3, 2010 and then separately on DATE and DATE respectively. The Madras City 
Council will review the City Planning Commission's recommendation at a hearing on 
DATE, and will forward its decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing 
on DATE. 
As demonstrated by the previous findings, the proposed comprehensive plan, 
comprehensive plan map, and zoning map amendments comply with applicable Statewide 
Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Findings: 
• The City has followed procedures for providing notice and holding public hearings 
for the proposal. Notice was mailed to number and type/distance from sites] 
property owners on DATE. A joint City and County Planning Commission hearing 
was held on February 3, 2010 and then separate hearings were held on DATE and 
DATE respectively. The City Council and County Board of Commissioners heard 
the proposal on DATES and approved the proposal on DATES respectively. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
47 
• The City of Madras has initiated this proposal. It owns the east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area and has an agreement with Jefferson County 
School District 509-J to exchange this land for land downtown upon annexation and 
re-zoning. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area provides land needed for 
residential and public/semi-public uses, specifically for a needed school and housing 
as demonstrated by the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range 
Facility Plan (Appendix C) and the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). 
• All service providers — the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Deschutes Valley Water 
District, Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, Jefferson County School 
District 509-J — have capacity to serve the proposal area given: approval of the 
adoption of the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan as elements of the City and County Comprehensive Plans, implementation ol 
existing water and sewer master plans, transportation improvements?, and financing 
from future proposed development. 
• The east site of the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the 
approved Yarrow Master Plan area, and the west site fulfills the requirements for an 
Area Master Plan. The set of proposed Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan 
Map, and Zoning Map amendments in this application comply with applicable 
Statewide Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Conclusion: The proposed comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, and zoning map 
amendments comply with the relevant provisions of the Madras Zoning Ordinance. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
48 
Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning Map 
Amendments - DRAFT 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Prepared for: 
Jefferson County 
66 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
Prepared by: 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
January 2010 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Shelly Tack Chair 
Vice-
Lynn Kowaleski Chair 
Alan Hurley 
Kasey Cousens 
Richard Ladeby 
Joe Krenowicz 
City of Madras City Council 
Melanie Widmer Mayor 
Tom Brown 
Walt Chamberlain 
Royce Embanks Jr. 
Benjamin Keeton 
Bob McConnell 
Kevin O'Meara 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Donald Martin 
Evan Thomas 
Dick Dodsoti 
Bob Powers 
Roy Hyder 
Jim Day 
Kay Moon 
Chair 
Vice Chair 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
John Hatfield Chair 
Mike Ahern 
Wayne Fording 
Project Support and Consulting Team 
Angelo Planning Group Land use planning, project management 
Kittelson Associates Transportation analysis 
Jefferson County Planning 
City of Madras Planning, technical support 
Jefferson County School District 509-J Planning, technical support 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Table of Contents 
I. Proposal Summary . 1 
II. Introduction . 3 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Amendments .... 5 
IV. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning 
Map Amendments 7 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement 8 
Goal 2 Land Use Planning 9 
Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 14 
Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 15 
Goal 6 Air, Water and Land Resources Quality 16 
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards 17 
Goal 10 Housing 17 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 18 
Goal 12 Transportation 21 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 23 
Goal 14 Urbanization 24 
VI. Conformance with State Statutes 
ORS 195.110 , 26 
ORS 197.298 29 
ORS 197.610 31 
ORS 197.626 31 
VTI. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) 
33 
VTII. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Section III, Goal 14 - Urbanization 35 
VIII. Conformance with the City of Madras Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 7.2-7.4 — Annexation 42 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 8.2 - Zone/Plan Map Amendments 45 
List of Figures 
Figure 4-1: Proposed UGB Amendment and Annexation Area 7 
List of Tables 
Table 3-1: Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 5 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 12 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 13 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 30 
List of Appendices 
• Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
• Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey Map (20-acre parcel) 
• Appendix C: Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
• Appendix D: City of Madras and Jefferson County School District 509-J Land Exchange 
Agreement (September 2006) 
• Appendix E: Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
• Appendix F: Transportation Analysis 
• Appendix G: Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
I. Proposal Summary 
File No.: 081-004 
Applicant: Nick Snead, Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-3388 
(541) 475-7061 Fax 
nsnead(3!ci. madras.or. us 
Jon Skidmore, Community Development Director 
Jefferson County 
85 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-4462 
(541) 325-5004 Fax 
ion.skidmorefflJco.ieffersori.or.us 
Applicant's 
Representative: 
DJ Hefternan 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
(503) 227-3664 
(503) 227-3679 Fax 
dt^iffe rnanfS3anseloplanning.com 
Request: • To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plans — to incorporate the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan as an 
element of the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and the 
City of Madras Comprehensive Plan (Attachment A). 
• To amend the Madras Comprehensive Plan - to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond 
and are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
(Table 3-1) 
• To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps - to expand the 
Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); to annex 20 acres 
of City-owned land ("east site," Figure 4-1) to the City of 
Madras and apply City R-2, Multiple Family Residential zoning; 
to annex 16.22 acres of privately owned land plus 0.69 acres of 
land for County right-of-way ("west site," Figure 4-1) and retain 
existing County RL, Range Land, zoning. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
Location: • West site: tax map of 16.91-acre west site (outlined), directly 
east of the existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road 
(Appendix A) 
• East site: survey map of 20-acre east site, east of the existing 
Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road (Appendix B) 
Legal Description: West site: U S 14E 7 Lots 101 (12.28 acres), 102 (0.69 acres for 
right-of-way), and 200 (3.94 acres), entire lots 
East site: U S 14E 7 Lot 100 (20 acres), parcel of lot 
Legal description of Lot 100 parcel (east site): 
A portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 asfiled in the Jefferson 
County Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE 'A) of Section 
7, Toivnship 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson 
County Oregon, more particularly described as folloivs: Commencing at the 
Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 inch 
diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears 
South 89°39'40"East a distance of2640,53feet; thence South 89°39 '40" 
East along the North line of said Section 7 a distance of599.997feet; thence 
South 0°17'36" West a distance of40-00feet to the Northwest corner of said 
Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; thence continuing South 0°17'36" 
West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance of40.00feet to the South 
right-of-way line of East Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 0°17'36"East along said 
West line a distance of935.13feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said 
Partition Plat No. 2002-17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39'40" 
East a distance of931.70feet; thence North 0°17'36" West a distance of 
935.12feet; to a point on the South right-of-way line of East Ashwood Road; 
thence North 89°39'40 " West along said right-of-way line a distance of 
931.70feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Contains 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. (Appendix B) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
2 
II. Introduction 
The Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved by DLCD in July 2009, and was sized 
to provide urbanizable land for the next 50 years. Land from the URA is the first priority 
for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The City of Madras is not currendy in 
periodic review or evaluating its existing UGB for a 20-year land supply. The City, however, 
has initiated this UGB amendment and annexation process in order to abide by terms of an 
agreement it has with the Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or the "District"). 
In September 2006, the City of Madras and JCSD signed a land exchange agreement. The 
District owns property — "Friendship Park" — on Highway 97 that is basically too small to 
site a new school and is poorly located along a state highway. The agreement specified an 
exchange of this land in the city for 20 acres of land that the City owns just outside the 
existing UGB (Appendix D). This land is proposed for annexation to the Madras UGB and 
city limits and for re-zoning as City Multi-Family Residential (R-2), a designation that will 
allow for a multi-family and single-family housing as well as public/semi-public uses typically 
sited on residentially zoned land. The 20-acre parcel is within the Yarrow Master Plan area. 
The plan conceptually identifies a school site along its northern border with Ashwood Road. 
The terms of the land exchange agreement concerning this land is cited below. 
,.. (T)he City has agreed to the folloiving conditions as part of the property's conveyance, all of ivhich are to be 
completed within five (5) years: 
(a) The City and its Planning Department will take such efforts as are reasonable and practicable to 
expand the Urban Growth Boundary for the City so that the parcel described in Exhibit "B " is 
ivithin the Madras Urban Growth Boundary ivithin five years of the signing of this Agreement, and 
that said property, when brought within the Urban Growth Boundary, shall be %oned to permit 
siting and construction of schoolfacilities on said land; and 
(b) At no Cost to the School District, the City agrees to have sewer lines and water service lines adequate 
to accommodate a 600 student public school extended to the lot line of the parcel described in 
Exhibit IV'; and 
(c) A Warranty Deed containing a legal description of the 20.0 acre parcel described in Exhibit 'B " 
shall be signed by the appropriate representative for the City and placed in escroiv, with instructions 
that allow the School District to removed the Deed for recording in favor of the School District as 
soon as the parcel described in Exhibit 'B " can be legally partitionedfrom the other property oivned 
by the City in Ivhich said parcel is located; and 
(d) The City mil cooperate ivith the School District to process and complete any necessary partitioning 
and other legal procedures to segregate the School's parcelfrom the City's contiguous real property so 
that the Warranty Deed may be lawfully recorded in the records of the Jefferson County Clerk. 
As part of the process of fulfilling its obligation under terms of this agreement, the City of 
Madras prepared an update to the Jefferson County School District 509-J Long Range 
Facility Plan. The facility plan, which the District has adopted, complies with ORS 195.110. 
The plan includes enrollment forecasts to 2025, an assessment of current conditions for 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
3 
existing District facilities (Appendix C) and recommendations to address identified capacity 
problems. The plan recommends that Warm Springs Elementary School be re-built, that 
Metolius Elementary School undergo repairs, and that Westside Elementary School and 
Madras Elementary Schools either be renovated on site or replaced. The projections, 
assessments, and recommendations of the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan provide a basis for 
studying the efficacy of these alternative solutions to inform a potential bond measure 
campaign and possibly adopt an excise tax program. 
In addition to the 20-acres of school district land, herein referred to as the east site, there are 
an additional 16.91 acres of land in the proposed UGB annexation, herein referred to as the 
west site. The west site is comprised of three lots that provide County right-of-way, better 
connect the east site to the existing UGB, and contribute toward meeting the long-term need 
for residentially zoned land. The west site is privately owned and is not proposed for re-
zoning at this time; it will apply for re-zoning when the owners are prepared to file land 
development applications in the future. It is planned that the west-site land also will provide 
the same range of needed housing types and public/semi-public uses as the east site when 
re-zoning is approved. 
In order to accommodate rural zoning in the urban growth area, text amendments are 
proposed for Chapter 2 of the Madras Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones 
allowed on land that is designated for urban residential use on the comprehensive plan map. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
4 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
• Language adopting the Jefferson County School District 509-j 2009 Long Ilange 
Facility Plan (Appendix C) 
• Language amending Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element 
that identifies the appropriate location for this tabic. 
Table 3-1 Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home 
subdivisions, and for duplexes 
R-1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family 
Residential 
Land for multi-family housing to be close 
to businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential 
development that allows site design 
flexibility to promote creativity and 
protection of scenic and natural 
resources 
R-3 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
C-3 Community 
Commercial 
Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
I Industrial Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
I EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, 
ERD 
o/s Open Space Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise 
publicly owned 
OS/PF EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
5 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
A/D Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for 
future commercial and industrial uses, 
particularly those that rely on air 
transportation 
A/D EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFU A-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
6 
Q. 
re 
U) 
c 
"E 
o 
N 
~o 
c 
re 
Q. 
re 
c 
_re 
Q. 
0) > 
'w 
c 
0) 
. c 
0) 
Q. 
E o 
o 
re L-
"O 
re 
o * 
O 
T3 
C re * 
c 
3 o 
o 
c 
0 
1 
0) 
c 
0) 
E 
T3 
C 
0) 
E < 
CQ 
a 
D 
<D UJ 
cO <~H 
O 00 
-a 03 
^ X o 5 
t - , c 
V v c S u y 
<Z) CO CO _ a- t - u < WJ C5 
CO -a 
c 
o 
-O 
•a 
c 
CO 
"s 
J ck ' 4—1 c u 
rS 2 V -g 
r^U c/j bo C c 3 0 
1) 
'H 0 — ^ 0 U - a N c r-1 
"O U 
£ 0 rt J 
c 
Up •fs 0 <i! u too bJ) c a. u C 0 c o N & o N 
D-, E o u 
"O C 
=1 
O U 
60 C 
. o 
N 
"O 
E 
S p 
C 'tfl c -!- e <-' qj o T) X M aj o . 
c « £ 2 ° £ p. u ^ 
o CU o 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement 
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be 
involved in all phases of the planning process. 
Response: The proposed amendments have been reviewed during a series of public 
meetings and hearings in order to allow for consideration by public officials and public 
feedback. 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or "District") Board ("Board") was 
briefed by the Superintendent about the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan in meetings [when, 
covered what]. The draft plan was brought to them first for formal review at a Board 
meeting on January 11, 2010. After {describe deliberations], they adopted the plan on 
DATE. 
The proposed Madras Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan amendment and 
amendments to the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Maps and 
Zoning Maps were presented and reviewed in a series of meetings in early 2010. 
ASK THE CITY FOR MEETING AND HEARING SCHEDULE AND INFO 
Noticc methods 
Measure 56 notice 
45-day notice to DLCD 
December 14, 2009 
Addendum 
January , 2010 
Into available on City website? 
The UGB expansion area is drawn from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA), which was 
developed through an intensive participatory process. A Technical Advisory Committee 
(TAC) and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) were formed to provide guidance for the 
project. The TAC was comprised of staff from project team members, including Jefferson 
County, the City of Madras, ECONorthwest, Kittelson & Associates, David Evans & 
Associates, Ball Janik, LLP, and Angelo Planning Group. The PAC included representatives 
of the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Jefferson County School District 509-J, local 
farmers, housing advocates, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, and 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). 
A combination of bi-weekly TAC teleconferences, public forums, PAC meetings, and 
meetings of the Madras Planning Commission and City Council, and Jefferson County 
Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners informed the final URA 
recommendation. Public events included the following: 
• PAC Meeting 1 - May 2, 2007 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
8 
. Public Meeting 1 - May 15, 2007 
. PAC Meeting 2 - May 24, 2007 
. PAC Meeting 3 - October 22, 2007 
• Public Meeting 2 - November 6, 2007 
• Joint City Council/County Commission Work Session — November 20, 2007 
• PAC Meeting 4 - December 3, 2007 
• Joint City/County Planning Commission advisory hearing — April 3, 2008 
• Joint City/County Planning Commission advisor)' hearing — May 8, 2008 
• County Planning Commission hearing — May 22, 2008 
• City Planning Commission hearing - June 11, 2008 
• City Council/County Commission evidentiary hearing — August 13, 2008 
• City Council hearing/deliberations — September 9, 2008 
• City Council hearing/ls 'ordinance reading — September 23, 2008 
• City Council hearing/final adoption — October 7, 2008 
• County Commission hearing — September 24, 2008 
Findings: 
• According to both their Comprehensive Plans and code, the City of Madras and 
Jefferson County Planning Commissions serve as their official citizen planning 
committees. 
• Adoption of the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) complied with Goal 1. 
• Members of the public have been able to participate in reviewing the proposed 
amendments. [DATES FOR MEETINGS, WORK SESSIONS AND HEARING] 
• [WEBSITES AND OTJIER PLACES MATERIALS ARE AVAILABLE] 
• Measure 56 notice about upcoming County and City Planning Commissions and 
legislative hearings was mailed to [specify which property owners] on ©ATE. 
• 45-day notice of proposed plan amendments was sent to the Department of Land 
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on December 14, 2009 prior to the start of 
hearings held by County and City Planning Commissions and legislative bodies. 
• Notices of the public meetings were published in the City's local newspaper, 
including contact information for the City and County. The paper also published 
articles [about what, if articles were published]. 
• ANY OTHER NOTICE AND PUBLIC ANNOUCEMENT INFORMATION 
FOR ADOPTION 11EARINGS? 
Conclusion: The City of Madras has complied with State requirements for citizen 
involvement per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 1. 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all 
decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Coun t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
9 
Response: The state statute governing long-term school district facility planning — ORS 
195.110 — was revised in 2007 and expanded the definition of which districts were subject to 
the planning requirements. The statute is addressed in more detail later in this report. The 
Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) 
includes elements pursuant to ORS 195.100(5)(a) such as enrollment forecasts, an 
assessment of existing facility conditions, and an analysis of options to meet forecasted 
needs. Given projected future need, the plan recommends that the District proceed with 
implementation of re-building a school on the Warm Springs Reservation and providing a 
new elementary school to replace substandard existing facilities in Madras. The 2009 Long 
Range Facility Plan was adopted by the JCSD Board on DATE and is now proposed for 
inclusion as an element in the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans 
pursuant to ORS 195.110(2)(a). 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is based on the buildable lands inventory 
and needs analysis performed by ECONorthwest in 2007 and for the Madras Urban Reserve 
Area (URA) adopted in 2008 and acknowledged by the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development (DLCD) in 2009. The proposed table of corresponding City land use 
designations and City and County zones (Table 3-1) facilitates the annexation of land in the 
URA to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
Madras Urban Resetve Area 
The Madras City Council adopted the Madras Urban URA and related provisions in October 
2008 and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD 
acknowledged and approved the URA and related amendments in July 2009, with 
stipulations Lha i some of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County development 
code be modified. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a 
UGB is land designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the 
first priority for UGB expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 
years, as was found by the Madras Urbanization Study and Addendum. 
The URA and its related plan and code amendments were developed over the course of 
Spring 2007 to Summer 2008. They were developed using the guidance and input of a 
Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and a Project Advisory Committee (PAC) as well as 
City and County Planning Commissioners, City Councilors, County Commissioners, and 
participating members of the public. These various elements of public involvement are 
described in more detail in the response and findings for Goal 1. 
At the same time, amendments to the County and City's Comprehensive Plans and 
Development Codes were developed in order to implement the URA. Proposed 
amendments to the Madras Comprehensive Plan addressed Goal 14 (Urbanization) and 
recommended the following: 
• Description of the Madras URA, its role in providing a 20- to 50-year land supply to 
the City, the cooperation between the City and the County in establishing a URA, its 
priority for inclusion in the City's UGB; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
10 
• Master planning provisions for areas added to the City's UGB, including cooperation 
with the County and new master planning requirements (Area Master Plans or 
AMPs); and 
• UGB expansion proposal requirements including proposed zoning, an annexation 
program, adequate public facilities and transportation facilities, protection of cultural 
and natural resources, protection from natural hazard, and area property owner 
support. 
Land in the URA is the first priority when designating land for a UGB expansion and the 
land in this proposed amendment to the UGB, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning 
Maps is drawn entirely from the adopted and acknowledged!Madras URA. The selection of 
land from the URA is based on criteria that Madras adopted as a Goal 14 policy as part of 
adopting the URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities required by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary to 
serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements outlined in 
adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements that augment 
adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements of 
OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in the 
Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet transportation 
needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental transportation 
improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation; emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services;, 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
These criteria are addressed later in the report section on the Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
11 
Madtas Urbanization Study - Residential Land 
The Madras Urbanisation Study (ECONorthwest, April 2007) and Madras Urbanisation Study 
Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007) identify a shortage of residentially zoned land to 
meet single-family and multi-family housing needs and public/semi-public use needs in the 
next roughly 20 years The needed number of housing units and acreage for residential uses is 
summarized in Table 4-18 of the August 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (Table 5-
!)• 
These needs are compared to the available land supply in the existing UGB in Table 6-4 in 
the study (Table 5-2) in order to determine whether there is a surplus or deficit of land for 
residential, public and semi-public, and employment uses. The table documents a shortage of 
land zoned R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) and land zoned R-l (Single Family Residential) 
inside the existing UGB as well as a need for roughly 350 acres of public and semi-public 
uses over the course of the next 15-20 years. These public/semi-public uses tend to be 
related to residential uses and are usually allowed and sited on residentially zoned land. 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 4-18. Forecast of needed housing units and residential land, 
Madras, 2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Density Net to Gross Density 
(DU/net Net Res. Gross Res. (DU/gross 
Housing Type New DU Percent res ac) Acres Factor Acres res ac) 
Needed Units, 2007-2027 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 1,791 61% 4.8 373.1 25% 497.5 3.6 
Manufactured 206 7% 5.5 37.4 25% 49.8 4.1 
Condo/Townhomes 206 7% 9.0 22.8 15% 26.9 7.7 
Subtotal 2,202 75% 5.4 410.5 574.2 3.8 
Multi-family 
Multifamily 734 25% 14.0 52.4 15% 61.7 11.9 
Subtotal 734 25% 14.0 52.4 61.7 11.9 
Total 2,936 100% 6,3 462.9 635.8 4.6 
Needed Units, 2007-2057 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 5,516 61% 4.8 1,149.1 25% 1,532.1 3.6 
Manufactured 633 7% 5.5 115.1 20% 143.8 4.4 
Condo/Toivnhomes 633 7% 9.0 70.3 15% 82.7 7.7 
Subtotal 6,781 75% 5.4 1,334.5 1,758.7 3.9 
Multi-family 
Multifamily 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 10% 179.4 12.6 
Subtotal 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 179.4 12.6 
Total 9,042 100% 6.3 1,495.9 1,938.1 4.7 
Source: ECONorthwest 
Note: Gross acres calculated by dividing net acres by (l-net to gross factor). For example, for single-family 
detached, 477.1/(1-.75) = 636.1. Conversely, 636.1 x .75 =• 477.1. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
12 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451 9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46 1 138 2 23 5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 I48.0 444.Q 242.8 34.8 (201.2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 33.7 38.7 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 358.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1.004.2 2.708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1.925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Metes: O'l public and semi-public land needs were allocated to residential zones 
The proposed UGB amendment ot about 37 acres addresses part of the residendal and 
public use land need presented above. Annexing 20 acres that are owned by the City (the 
east site) and rezoning it R-2 allows the City to fulfill its agreement with JCSD, dated 
September 2006 (Appendix D). The proposed UGB amendment provides land to meet part 
of the need for residential^ zoned land. The remainder of the land need will be addressed 
during the City's next cycle of periodic review. 
Findings: 
• The 2009 Long Range Facility Plan was adopted by the Jefferson County School 
District Board on DATE and is now proposed for inclusion as an element in the 
Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans pursuant to ORS 
195.110(2)(a). 
• The JSCD 2009 Long Range Facility Plan includes an enrollment forecast and 
analysis of options for meeting projected needs, and recommends that a replacement 
school be built for the existing elementary school in Warm Springs and that Westside 
Elementary School and Madras Elementary School in Madras be renovated on site or 
re-built on new sites. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is drawn from land in the adopted 
Madras URA and meets some of the need for residentially zoned land the next 20 
years as established in the 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study and addendum. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for land use planning per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 2. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Coun t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
13 
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands 
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 
Response: The entire Madras URA includes land zoned for rural residential, range land, 
and agricultural uses, as shown in Table X. 
Table X: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 
Land Type Zones Acres 
Exception Land 
RR2, RR5, RR10 
(Rural Residential) 1,709 
Non-prime Resource Land RL (Range Land) 2,038 
Prime Resource Land A1 
(Agricultural) 68 
Total 3,815 
Prime agricultural land makes up less than 2% of the total URA. When prime agricultural 
land is included, it is only when it is adjacent to the existing UGB, surrounded by exception 
land or non-prime resource land, and/or will be more easily served with public facilities — 
sewer service, in particular. The rest of the 'URA is comprised of rural residential and range 
land. Rangeland was included in the URA because of serviceability advantages it has over 
other land surrounding the Madras UGB and because all the exception (rural residential) 
land adjacent to the Madras UGB would not fulfill the city's estimated land needs for the 
next 50 years. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning. 
As explained above, land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet 
land needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing 
UGB and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 
50 years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer 
serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Pursuant to ORS 197.298(a), the first priority of land to be included in the UGB is land in a 
URA. Beyond that, local criteria can be relied upon to prioritize land from the LTRA to be 
included in the UGB. Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan 
or Area Master Plan (AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient 
public facilities, financing prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard 
areas for the proposed UGB amendment area. These policies are addressed in more detail in 
the response and findings for Madras Comprehensive Plan Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
14 
Land in the URA is subject to joint management under the terms of the City's and County's 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. 
Response and findings related to the UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is land from the Madras URA, 
top priority land for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298(a). 
• The adopted Madras URA includes primarily land that is "exception land" (zoned 
Rural Residential) or non-prime resource land because exception land alone cannot 
meet land needs for the next 50 years. 
• Some of the non-prime resource land (zoned Range Land) is easier to serve with 
sewer than other areas around the existing Madras UGB, based on public facility 
analysis done during the development of the URA. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of 
the URA consistendy ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in 
the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for agricultural lands per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 3. 
Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. 
Response: The land being proposed for inclusion in the Madras UGB is currently located 
within the Madras URA, jointly managed by Jefferson County and the City of Madras 
pursuant to the terms of the Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA), 
adopted in January 2009 (Appendix E). Pursuant to the URAMA, the County processes 
land use decisions in the URA. In addition, conversion plans must be submitted to the City 
for land divisions in the URA. 
Madras Comprehensive Plan policy language regarding protection of open space, scenic, 
wildlife, and cultural resources was adopted as part of amendments to Goal 14 
(Urbanization) concurrent with the adoption of the Madras URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
The land in the proposal does not include floodways, floodplains, significant habitat, or 
cultural resources that are identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 
inventory, or Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) files. The only 
resources cited in Policy 14](8) that may apply to the site are open spaces. Open space will 
be a required part of school or multi-family residential development that occurs in the UGB 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
15 
amendment area. However, this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal 
and, therefore, is not required to specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Findings: 
• Recently adopted amendments to Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan require 
identification of protective measures for significant open space, scenic, historic, 
cultural and natural resources in proposed UGB expansion areas. The Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan and Goal 5 inventory does not identify natural, scenic, 
or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• Open space designations will be made as part of development entitlement for the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for open space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources per Statewide 
Land Use Planning Goal 5. 
Goal 6 : Air, Water and Land Resource Quality 
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. 
Response: According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon 
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) there are no federally designated air quality 
management areas or federally designated hazardous waste sites in the Madras URA. Of 
Environmental Cleanup Sites reported on ODEQ's website, there are no sites identified in 
the URA.1 Further, R-2 zoning is proposed for the UGB amendment area to be brought in 
to the city, allowing residential uses and other compatible uses. These uses tend to produce 
less noise, air, land, and water pollution than commercial and industrial uses, which typically 
manufacture goods, produce by-products, and generate more vehicle traffic. 
Findings: 
• There are not federal- or state-registered environmental quality sites within the URA 
boundary recommendation and proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• The amendment and annexation area is needed and planned for residential and 
related uses, which tend to have fewer adverse air, water, and land quality impacts 
than commercial or industrial uses. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for air, water and land resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6. 
1 Air quality management areas, hazardous waste sites, and environmental cleanup sites can be searched on the 
U.S EPA's and ODEQ's websites at: hrtp://www.dcq.statc.or.us/aq/planning /index.htm. 
http://www.cpa.gov/supcrfund/sites/siteinfo.htm. and 
http:/Avww.deq.state-or.us/lq/ecsi/ecsi.htm. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
16 
GuaS 7: Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 
To protect people and property from natural hazards. 
Response: Primary potential natural hazards in Madras include steep slopes, floodway and 
floodplain, and wildfire. Statewide Goal 7 is reinforced in Madras Comprehensive Plan 
policies (Goal 14) by requiring protection from natural hazards be demonstrated for 
proposed UGB amendments. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion area. In fact, the proposed amendment and annexation are 
driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway and floodplain 
of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. Area in the district is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan 
(CWPP) that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and 
federal agencies. 
Findings: 
• There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. 
• Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 provides fire protection service to the 
proposed amendment and annexation area. The area is subject to the Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) developed and adopted by the County, the fire 
district, and federal agencies. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for areas subject to natural hazards per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 7. 
Goal 10: Housing 
To encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price 
ranges and rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon 
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. 
Response: This proposal provides land for housing and compatible public and semi-public 
uses. The Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (August 2007) shows that there is a shortage 
of land zoned R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) and R-l (Single Family Residential) inside the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
17 
existing UGB in the next 20 years, in addition to roughly 350 acres of residentially zoned 
land needed for public and semi-public uses (Table 5-2). 
The proposed annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits addresses this need by 
including 36.91 acres of land from the URA for residential and public/semi-public uses. It is 
proposed that the east site be re-zoned from County RL (Range Land) zoning to City R-2 
(Multi-Family Residential) zoning. It is anticipated that this land will be used for a 
combination of housing and a school. The need for a new elementary school in Madras is 
established in the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
(Appendix C). 
These proposed amendments are not part of a periodic review work program and the next 
periodic review process will ensure that the UGB does include enough land to meet all the 
land needs that are projected for the next 20 years as shown in Table 5-2. 
Findings: 
• The Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum found a need for about 22 acres of 
land zoned R-2 and 53 acres of land zoned R-1 outside the existing UGB in the 
next 20 years. 
• The urbanization studies as well as the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan indicate 
the need for public uses on residentially zoned land, specifically one new 
elementary school in Madras. The proposed UGB amendment provides 36 acres 
for residential and public/ semi-public uses. A majority of this land — 20 acres — 
is being made more readily available for development of these uses by proposing 
its annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
• The remainder of land heeds determined by the urbanization studies will be 
addressed during the next City of Madras periodic review. 
Conclusion: Jefferson County and the City of Madras have complied with State 
requirements for housing per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and 
services to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
Goal Requiremen ts 
Urban Facilities and Services - Refers to key facilities and to appropriate types and 
levels of at least the following: police protection; sanitary facilities; storm drainage 
facilities; planning, zoning and subdivision control; health services; recreation facilities 
and services; energy and communication services; and community governmental 
services. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
18 
A. Goal 11 Planning Guidelines 
5. A public facility or service should not be provided in an urbanizable area unless there 
is provision for the coordinated development of all the other urban facilities and services 
appropriate to that area. 
Response: According to terms of the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras, the City will be the primary service provider for land within its UGB, in particular 
coordinating police, sewer, stormwater, land use, recreation, energy, and governmental 
services. City urbanization regulations amended with the adoption of the Madras URA 
require either a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan (AMP) for 
UGB amendments in Madras for areas over five acres (Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 
141). Both MPC plans and AMPs must show "appropriate locations for transportation 
improvements, public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and 
natural resource areas" and how proposed land uses will integrate with existing development. 
Transportation facilities are addressed in more detail in the response and findings for 
Statewide Goal 12 next in this report. 
The adopted Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site, land proposed for annexation both 
to the Madras UGB and city limits. It is also proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 
upon annexation so that it can provide land for uses such as a school and urban levels of 
housing. These uses are similar to and compatible with surrounding development. The east 
site is tangent to the existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector 
road, which lends itself to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city 
limits. SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
How do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
Pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141: "An AMP shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified urban land need, 
appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, protection for 
significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource areas." It is proposed to annex 
the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits. While it is also proposed that the site retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development, the site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future designation must allow for residential and compatible public/semi-public uses in 
order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated with the existing urban 
development pattern." (Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141(2)) Further, 
the proposed addition of a table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with 
Madras land use designations to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use 
Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate the transition of existing County zoning for the west site 
to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots - Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
19 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
flow do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
This application also proposes to adopt the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan as an element of the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plans, pursuant to ORS 195.110(2)(a). The Jefferson County School 
District 509-J Board adopted it on DATE. The plan (Appendix C) establishes school facility 
needs over the next 10-20 years and will facilitate coordination with financing opportunities 
and the provision of other public facilities and services. The 20-acre east site is the subject 
of an agreement between the City of Madras and the District (Appendix D). Upon 
annexation, re-zoning, and transfer of the land to the District, the land will be available to 
meet projected school facility needs, such as the need for rebuilding Westside Elementary 
School and/or Madras Elementary School on a new site in Madras. With Jefferson County 
Middle School and Madras High School nearby, the east and west sites will be adequately 
provided with school services. 
Finally both MPC plans and AMPs must have documented approval from a majority of 
landowners pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 141(3). 
Documented consent of landowners? 
B. Goal 11 Implementation Guidelines 
5. Additional methods and devices for achieving desired types and levels of public 
facilities and services should include but not be limited to the following: (1) tax incentives 
and disincentives; (2) land use controls and ordinances; (3) multiple use and joint 
development practices; (4) fee and less-than-fee acquisition techniques; and (5) 
enforcement of local health and safety codes. 
Response: The proposed land use designations and zoning for the annexation area - the 
east site and the west site — is appropriate for the type and level of public facilities and 
services that can be extended to the area. It is proposed to bring the west site into the 
Madras UGB and city limits but to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until 
landowners are ready to propose development. The site is surrounded by land planned for 
or developed as predominantly residential development. Given that the site will have little 
or no development for at least the short-term and its location adjacent to the existing Madras 
UGB and Ashwood Road, the site will not need many facilities or services for a while and is 
well situated for extension of facilities and services when they are needed. The proposed 
addition of a land use and zoning designation table to Section IV (Land Use Element) of the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson C o u n t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
20 
Madras Comprehensive Plan (Table 3-1) establishes the City and County zoning designations 
that correspond to City land use designations, and will guide the transition from County 
zoning to appropriate City zoning once a land use action is proposed. 
It is proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide 
land for uses such as a school and urban levels of housing. These uses are similar to and 
compatible with surrounding development. The east site is tangent to the existing UGB and 
is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends itself to the extension 
of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS, any changes to master plans? 
The site is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan, a plan that overall features mostly a 
mixture of housing and then an internal circulation system, open space, public uses 
(including a school), and a small-scale commercial area to serve the residential uses. 
Funding for public facility improvements? 
Findings: 
• The text amendment adopting the Jefferson County School District 509-J Long 
Range Facility Plan as an implementing element of the Madras Comprehensive Plan 
addresses goal requirements for coordinating land use planning with school districts 
and other urban service providers. 
• The Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan meets 
statutory requirements (ORS 195.110) and provides an updated capital improvement 
and financing plan for school district facilities in Madras. 
• Implementation of public facilities and services in Madras is primarily regulated by 
land use plans and ordinances and public facility master plans, which are elements of 
the City Comprehensive Plan. 
• The City of Madras will be the primary provider of urban facilities and services in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. The City will be able to coordinate 
service to the area with facilities and services already provided to adjacent land within 
the existing UGB. 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan applies to the proposal area and shows an 
internal transportation network and sites for housing and a school. 
• Updates to water and sewer plans or service provider letters saying existing 
infrastructure and plans sufficient? 
• Funding for public facility improvements? 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with Goal 11 for public facilities and services subject 
to OAR 660, Division 11. 
Goal 12 Transportation - OAR 660-015-0060(12) 
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. 
660-012-0060 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Coun t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
21 
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 
(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or 
a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of 
this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, 
capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) 
of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a 
transportation facility if it would: 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation 
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted 
transportation system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels 
of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility 
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that 
is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
(2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, 
compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the 
planned function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent 
with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan 
or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the 
transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce 
demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance 
standards of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a 
development agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system 
management measures, demand management or minor transportation 
improvements. Local governments shall as part of the amendment specify when 
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: Reflecting Statewide Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule, UGB 
amendment applications must provide the following pursuant to Madras Goal 14 policies: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
22 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
(Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 14J) 
City R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning is proposed for the east site of the UGB 
amendment and annexation area. The zone allows multi-family and single-family housing 
outright and then allows associated uses such as schools, libraries, and community centers 
conditionally. The minimum lot size for single-family housing is 7,500 square feet and for 
multi-family 10,000 square feet for the first two units and 2,000 square feet per each 
additional unit. 
The east site is adjacent to Ashwood Road, an existing road built to County standards as a 
collector road. 
More description of the surrounding system, from the analysis (Appendix F) 
The transportation analysis for the annexation and re-zoning of the east site was based on 
assumptions of a combination of multi-family housing and a school. A mixture of housing 
and a school is anticipated for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
Specifically, the analysis assumed [describe assumptions). 
Findings of transportation analysis (Appendix F) 
Findings: 
• Transportation analysis for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area 
assumed that the area would be developed with amount of) housing and a [specify 
type or size] school. 
• Transportation analysis showed that [analysis findings]. The proposal does not 
change functional classifications of any roadways and nor the standards that apply to 
them. It complies with mobility standards established in IDENTIFY 
DOCUMENTS for IDENTIFY ROADS. Therefore, the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation was found to have no significant effect on the 
surrounding transportation system. 
Conclusion: The proposed Comprehensive Plan and Map amendment complies with Goal 
12 and OAR 660-015-0060(12). 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 
To conserve energy. 
Response: The east site of the UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the Yarrow 
Master Plan area. The master plan includes a range of land uses so that residents can meet 
many daily needs within the neighborhood. The plan designates land predominandy for 
housing, but for parks and open space, a school, other community services, and commercial 
services as well. This mix of uses will provide for these daily needs and reduce the need to 
drive outside the neighborhood to access these uses. The subject of this application is part 
of that plan area- a 20-acre site for housing and a school. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
23 
The Yarrow Community Master Plan also includes amount] miles of sidewalks and [amount] 
miles of multi-use paths. This supports the use of non-motorized transportation and the 
conservation of fuel resources. This proposed UGB amendment and annexation does not 
provide all of the land needed to implement the master plan but provides part of it. 
The west site is not part of the Yarrow Master Plan but will be subject to internal circulation 
and multi-modal standards when a land division or planned unit development is proposed. 
Like the east site, the west site is adjacent to Ashwood Road. 
The JCSD 509-J Facility Plan includes location policies that call for siting elementary school 
facilities in residentially zoned areas to promote walking to school within urban 
neighborhoods. This policy is included to reduce the need for bussing in urban areas. 
While water service was projected to be of similar cost to provide to all the study areas that 
comprise the Madras URA, there were differences in relative cost for providing sewer 
service given the need for pumping in some of the study areas. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area is part of a study area and a drainage area where no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required for sewer service. This minimizes the 
amount of energy needed to provide that service. 
Last, the City of Madras has adopted energy conservation standards for building. 
Or is it Yarrow? Describe. 
Findings: 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the east site of the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area proposes a variety of uses that will allow residents 
to take care of day-to-day needs without always having to drive out of the 
neighborhood to do so. The plan also indicates multi-use paths and a continuous 
network of sidewalks to promote walking and bicycling. This supports fuel and 
energy conservation. 
• Providing sewer service to the proposal area requires less pumping and, therefore, 
infrastructure, energy, and cost than other parts of the URA and other areas around 
the existing UGB. 
• Local energy conservation (building) standards 
Conclusion: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation complies with State 
requirements for energy conservation per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 13. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to 
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, 
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
24 
Response: Transportation, water, and sewer services are among the critical public facilities 
that must be provided for the proposed UGB amendment area. Also discussed in the 
narrative and findings for Goals 11 and 12, these sendees can be provided to the UGB 
amendment area according to existing facility plans [no updates needed?] and [transportation 
improvements required of developers?]. 
Transportation - transportation analysis findings 
Water - During the development of the Madras URA, Deschutes Valley Water District 
(DVWD) reported that there would be no supply constraint for urban development in the 
URA. Significant expansion of the District's distribution system would be necessary to serve 
urban demand in each part of the URA, and the water service study found that the marginal 
cost differences between the URA study areas were insignificant. Updated or existing plan 
can service the UGB amendment area? 
Sewer — Public facility analysis conducted in developing the Madras URA showed that sewer 
service to the eastern study areas in the URA would be more cost-efficient because no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required as compared to areas to the north, south, 
and west. For the proposed UGB amendment and in particular, updates to the/the existing 
Madras Sanitary Sewer Service Master Plan have capacity to provide sewer service to the 
annexation area. 
Schools are also another important public facility and sendee, and the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan determines the need for a new 
elementary school in Madras over the next 10-20 years. The Yarrow Master Plan that 
applies to the east site of the proposal area identifies land for schools. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area of 20 acres will provide land that can accommodate a 
school and housing. 
Findings: 
• Water service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing and planned 
water facilities that are identified in the Deschutes Valley Irrigation District's water 
master plan. Providing water service was not found to be significantiy different in 
cost between different parts of the URA in studies done in developing the Madras 
URA. 
• Sewer service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing sewer master 
plan. Studies did find, however, that drainage areas in the eastern and southeastern 
parts of the URA were easier to serve in that they needed no pumping or minimal 
pumping of sewage when compared to other parts of the URA. 
• Genera! transportation analysis findings 
• The proposal provides land for a school site, and need for potentially one or two 
new elementary school sites in Madras was found in the Jefferson County School 
509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C). The City owns the land being 
proposed for UGB expansion and annexation, and has an agreement with the 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
25 
District to exchange the land with the District once it is annexed into the UGB and 
city limits and re-zoned (Appendix D). The site can serve as a replacement site for 
Madras or Westside Elementary School. 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with State requirements for urbanization and orderly 
and economic provision of public facilities and services per Statewide Land Use Planning 
Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
26 
Vi. Conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORSs) 
ORS 195 
195.110 School facility plan for large school districts. (1) As used in this section, 
"large school district" means a school district that has an enrollment of over 2,500 
students based on certified enrollment numbers submitted to the Department of 
Education during the first quarter of each new school year. 
(2) A city or county containing a large school district shall: 
(a) Include as an element of its comprehensive plan a school facility plan prepared 
by the district in consultation with the affected city or county. 
(b) Initiate planning activities with a school district to accomplish planning as required 
under ORS 195.020. 
Response: Jefferson County School District 509-J registered 2,985 students enrolled in the 
2008-2009 school year and, thus, qualifies as a "large school district" pursuant to ORS 
195,110. This application proposes that the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) be adopted as an element in the Jefferson County 
and City of Madras Comprehensive Plans. The City of Madras has coordinated with the 
District in developing the plan. 
(3) The provisions of subsection (2)(a) of this section do not apply to a city or a 
county that contains less than 10 percent of the total population of the large school 
district. 
(4) The large school district shall select a representative to meet and confer with a 
representative of the city or county, as described in subsection (2)(b) of this section, to 
accomplish the planning required by ORS 195.020 and shall notify the city or county of 
the selected representative. The city or county shall provide the facilities and set the time 
for the planning activities. The representatives shall meet at least twice each year, 
unless all representatives agree in writing to another schedule, and make a written 
summary of issues discussed and proposed actions. 
Response: Jefferson County and the City of Madras are the jurisdictions in which most of 
the students in Jefferson County School District 509-J live. The District has met with the 
City at least twice this year in developing the facility plan, and the District and City have 
both worked with a consultant firm — Angelo Planning Group — to prepare the plan. The 
firm has worked on other school district facility plans in the state. 
(5) (a) The school facility plan must cover a period of at least 10 years and must 
include, but need not be limited to, the following elements: 
(A) Population projections by school age group. 
(B) Identification by the city or county and by the large school district of desirable 
school sites. 
(C) Descriptions of physical improvements needed in existing schools to meet the 
minimum standards of the large school district. 
(D) Financial plans to meet school facility needs, including an analysis of available 
tools to ensure facility needs are met. 
(E) An analysis of: 
(i) The alternatives to new school construction and major renovation; and 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
27 
(ii) Measures to increase the efficient use of school sites including, but not limited to, 
multiple-story buildings and multipurpose use of sites. 
(F) Ten-year capital improvement plans. 
(G) Site acquisition schedules and programs. 
(b) Based on the elements described in paragraph (a) of this subsection and 
applicable laws and rules, the school facility plan must also include an analysis of the 
land required for the 10-year period covered by the plan that is suitable, as a permitted 
or conditional use, for school facilities inside the urban growth boundary. 
Response: The Jefferson County School District 509-] 2009 Long Range Facility Plan 
features forecasts that extend to 2040 and programs for financing, acquisition, and capital 
improvement that cover a 10-year period. The plan (Appendix C) includes the required 
elements as follows: 
• Chapter 3 - Enrollment forecasts 
• Chapter 4 — Existing facility conditions and needed facility improvements 
• Chapter 5 — Analysis of needed improvements, additional capacity, and potential 
school sites 
• |RKFKRKNCK when plan complete/updated] - 10-year financing, acquisition, and 
capital improvement programs. 
The analysis of additional capacity considers the re-use and expansion of existing facilities. 
Ultimately, the plan does recommend re-building Warm Springs Elementary School on site 
and building a new elementary school in Madras (Chapter 6 - Recommendations). The 
locational analysis in Chapter 5 looks first at sites within the UGB, using the following 
criteria. 
• Land use — unimproved land, except for parks and open space, or land with 
improvements valued <§50,000. 
• Size - at least 7 acres 
• Environmental hazards/buildability — at least 5 acres flat (slopes <5%), at least 2.5 
flat acres outside the floodplain. 
• Zoning — not zoned for industrial use. 
• Serviceability — not in areas with constrained sewers. 
• Geographic distribution - not fully within a half mile of an existing elementary 
school. 
• Traffic safety - not on a highway or arterial. 
• Availability - not committed to another use, built or in the planning process. 
Eight sites in the UGB were evaluated using these criteria and, while most of the sites 
performed well on some to most of the criteria, none of them met all of the criteria. In 
particular, the sites would not be easily served with sewer and transportation or, in the case 
of sites 7 and 8, they are not necessarily close to existing or planned residential 
neighborhoods and students. 
(6) If a large school district determines that there is an inadequate supply of suitable 
land for school facilities for the 10-year period covered by the school facility plan, the city 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson C o u n t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
28 
or county, or both, and the large school district shall cooperate in identifying land for 
school facilities and take necessary actions, including, but not limited to, adopting 
appropriate zoning, aggregating existing lots or parcels in separate ownership, adding 
one or more sites designated for school facilities to an urban growth boundary, or 
petitioning a metropolitan service district to add one or more sites designated for school 
facilities to an urban growth boundary pursuant to applicable law. 
Response: The eight sites in the UGB were evaluated using the criteria from the response 
above and none of them met all of the criteria, particularly serviceability criteria. Because 
issues such as zoning and parcel aggregation were not the reasons that the evaluation sites 
within the UGB failed to meet criteria, the District and City added the proposal area — a 
City-owned site outside and adjacent to the UGB - to the evaluation. It met the criteria. 
The site is located within the Madras URA and complies with regulations for including land 
in the UGB, pursuant to ORS 197.298, which is addressed next in this report. 
(9)(a) In the school facility plan, the district school board of a large school district 
may adopt objective criteria to be used by an affected city or county to determine 
whether adequate capacity exists to accommodate projected development. Before the 
adoption of the criteria, the large school district shall confer with the affected cities and 
counties and agree, to the extent possible, on the appropriate criteria. After a large 
school district formally adopts criteria for the capacity of school facilities, an affected city 
or county shall accept those criteria as its own for purposes of evaluating applications for 
a comprehensive plan amendment or for a residential land use regulation amendment. 
(b) A city or county shall provide notice to an affected large school district when 
considering a plan or land use regulation amendment that significantly impacts school 
capacity. If the large school district requests, the city or county shall implement a 
coordinated process with the district to identify potential school sites and facilities to 
address the projected impacts. 
(11) The capacity of a school facility is not the basis for a development moratorium 
under ORS 197.505 to 197.540. 
(12) This section does not confer any power to a school district to declare a building 
moratorium. 
(13) A city or county may deny an application for residential development based on a 
lack of school capacity if: 
(a) The issue is raised by the school district; 
(b) The lack of school capacity is based on a school facility plan formally adopted 
under this section; and 
(c) The city or county has considered options to address school capacity. [1993 
c.550 §2; 1995 c.508 §1; 2001 c.876 §1; 2007 c.579 §1] 
Response: The facility plan establishes calculations for capacity in Chapter 4. 
INSERT/SUMMARIZE HERE IF DETERMINED 
When the Board approved and adopted the facility plan in January 2010, this included these 
capacity formulas. The County and City understand that these formulas must be used in 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
29 
evaluating future amendments to comprehensive plans and land use regulations, and may be 
used in denying a residential development application but not in instituting a development 
moratorium. 
Findings: 
• Jefferson County School District 509-J is required to prepare a facility plan, and it 
has coordinated with the City of Madras in developing its 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan (Appendix C). The plan was approved and adopted by the Jefferson County 
School District 509-J Board on DATE. 
• Jefferson County and the City of Madras must adopt the facility plan as an element 
of their comprehensive plans and that has driven this proposal for an amendment to 
their comprehensive plans. 
• The facility plan uses at least a 10-year horizon in projecting enrollment, estimating 
future facility needs, evaluating ways of addressing these needs, and preparing 
financing, acquisition, and capital improvement programs. 
• The 2009 Long Range Facility Plan evaluated eight sites in the UGB using land use, 
site size, zoning, buildability, serviceability, geographic distribution, and traffic safety 
criteria in order to address land needed beyond existing facility sites. The sites were 
either difficult to serve with sewer or roads, or were not located near existing or 
planned residential neighborhoods. 
• The plan evaluated one site in the Madras URA, adjacent to the existing UGB, that 
the City owns. The site met the land use, site size, zoning, buildability, serviceability, 
geographic distribution, and traffic safety criteria. 
• The adopted facility plan includes capacity criteria that the County and City must use 
in reviewing land use plan and regulation amendments. 
Conclusion: The proposal complies with State school district facility planning requirements 
in ORS 195.110. 
ORS 197 
197.298 Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary. (1) In 
addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land may not 
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities: 
(a) First priority is land that is designated urban reserve land under ORS 195.145, 
rule or metropolitan service district action plan. 
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the 
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to an urban growth boundary 
that is identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as an exception area or 
nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land that is completely 
surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is high-value farmland as 
described in ORS 215.710. 
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as marginal 
land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition). 
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
30 
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in an 
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both. 
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the 
capability classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate for 
the current use. 
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section maybe included in an 
urban growth boundary if land of higher priority is found to be inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or 
more of the following reasons: 
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on 
higher priority lands; 
(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be provided to the higher priority 
lands due to topographical or other physical constraints; or 
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary 
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services to 
higher priority lands. [1995 c.547 §5; 1999 c.59 §56] 
Response: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is solely comprised of 
land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority of land to be included within the UGB 
pursuant to ORS 197.298(l)(a). There is sufficient land in the Madras URA to provide for 
the land needs estimated for the next 20 years in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) and presented below. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation provides land to meet a portion of the need 
for residentially zoned land over the next roughly 20 years (Table 6-1). The City's next 
periodic review process will ensure that the Madras UGB includes enough land to meet the 
remaining land needs projected to 2027. 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 148.0 444.0 242.8 94.3 (201.2) 
RR5 0.0 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR10 0.0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 33.7 38.7 
PublicfSemi-public uses on res land 358.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 236 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
c c 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Motes: ail public and semi-public 'and needs were allocated to residential zones 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
31 
197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; 
exceptions; report to commission. (1) A proposal to amend a local government 
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use 
regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The 
proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local 
government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. 
The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall 
notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. 
(2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular 
proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is 
not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new 
regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there 
are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: 
(a) The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided 
in ORS 197.615(1) and (2); and 
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other 
person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. 
(3) When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a 
local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed 
amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use 
regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: 
(a) Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and 
(b) Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to 
address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve 
compliance with the goals. 
(4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission 
on whether the director: 
(a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and 
(b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 
§7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c.761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] 
Response: Notice of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County and City of 
Madras Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps was sent to 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before 
the first evidentiary hearing on the proposal. Notice was sent to DLCD on December 14, 
2009 before the first advisory hearing before the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Planning Commissions on February 3, 2010. Further hearing dates have yet to be 
determined but it is expected that DLCD will provide appropriate comment on the 
proposal at least 15 days prior to the final adoption hearing date. 
DLCD comments/application revisions, once received 
197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary or designating urban or rural 
reserves subject to periodic review. A metropolitan service district that amends its 
urban growth boundary to include more than 100 acres, or that amends the district's 
regional framework plan or land use regulations implementing the plan to establish 
urban reserves designated under ORS 195.145 (1)(b), a city with a population of 2,500 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
32 
or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to 
include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve under ORS 195.145, or a 
county that amends the county's comprehensive plan or land use regulations 
implementing the plan to establish rural reserves designated under ORS 195.141, shall 
submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development 
Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. 
[1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10; 2003 c.793 §4; 2007 c.723 §7] 
Response: The City of Madras is coordinating with Jefferson County regarding the 
proposed amendments to their Comprehensive Plans, Comprehensive Plan Maps, and 
Zoning Maps. Adoption of the UGB amendment involves amendments to the City and 
County Comprehensive Plans that are post-acknowledgement plan amendments. However, 
the adoption process for the amendments will follow periodic review procedures pursuant to 
ORS 197. As part of periodic review procedures, the proposed amendments are subject to 
review by DLCD and approval by LCDC. DLCD and LCDC will conduct their review 
process upon adoption of the proposed amendments by the Madras City Council and 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is entirely comprised of land 
from the Madras URA, the first priority of land to be included in the UGB pursuant 
to ORS 197.298(l)(a). 
• There are 36.91 acres in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. This meets 
some of the estimated need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB 
projected to 2027 by urbanization studies. The proposed R-2 zoning for the 20-acre 
parcel (east site) allows housing and public/semi-public uses such as parks and 
schools. Other land needs for the next .20 years will be addressed during the next 
periodic review cycle. 
• Notice of the first advisory hearing on February 3, 2010 was sent to DLCD on 
December 14, 2009, more than 45 days before the advisory and evidentiary hearings. 
• The City of Madras and Jefferson County are coordinating this proposed set of 
amendments. 
• This proposal is a post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) but will follow 
procedures for periodic review. DLCD review and LCDC approval of the 
amendment will be necessary for the proposal if it is adopted by both the Madras 
City Council and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Conclusion: The proposed amendments to the City and County Comprehensive Plans, 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps comply with applicable State requirements for 
urban reserve area planning, plan amendments, and UGB amendments pursuant to ORS 
197. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
33 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making 
authority regarding all land use application within the UGB except applications for 
amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of land in the UGB. Lands 
outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to 
include the territory to be annexed. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
1.1 Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
1.2 An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community 
Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan 
amendment fees. The City shall forward a copy of the application to the County 
Community Development Department, together with the County's plan 
amendment fee, within five working days of the date the application is filed. 
1.3 The City and County Planning Commission shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may 
hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
1.4 The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be 
forwarded to City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the 
proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be 
forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
1.5 The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final 
decision on whether the UGB should be amended. 
1.6 If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint hearing of 
the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to 
resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution 
process to resolve the differences. 
1.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be 
no change to the UGB. 
Response: The Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (Appendix G) 
was adopted by the City of Madras and Jefferson County on April 5, 2006. Pursuant to 
UGAMA terms for UGB amendments, the City is an eligible applicant for a UGB 
amendment application (Section 6.1). The UGB amendment application and appropriate 
fees were forwarded to the Jefferson County Community Development Department within 
five working days of being initially filed (Section 6.2). 
Hearings by the Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission 
were first held jointly on February 3, 2010 and then separately on DATE and DATE 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Coun t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
34 
respectively. OTHER PC HEARINGS? The Madras City Council will review the City 
Planning Commission's recommendation at a hearing on DATE, and will forward its 
decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing on DATE (Sections 6.3-6.5). 
QTfIER LEGISLATIVE HEARINGS? 
It is proposed to annex both the east site and west site to the Madras UGB and city limits, 
and it is proposed to re-zone only the east site at this time. Regardless, if both sites are 
brought into the UGB and city limits, Madras will assume land use administration and 
decision making authority for the sites pursuant to Section 4.1 of the UGAMA. 
Conclusion: The proposed amendments to the City and County Comprehensive Plans, 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Zoning Maps comply with applicable local requirements for 
UGB amendments per the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of Madras, 
adopted April 5, 2006. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
35 
VIII. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Note: the highlighting in the policy text below indicates text that may not have 
been adopted by the City 
GOAL 14 - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, and 
to provide for livable communities. 
[Paragraph amended by Ordinance No. 781, Passed by Council on December 12, 2006] 
POLICIES 
A. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
B. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall mutually agree to a management 
plan for the Urban Growth Boundary area. 
C. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary revision process to be utilized in a proposed change of the Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
D. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall support adoption of an Urban 
Reserve Area boundary that, when taken together with land supplies in the Urban 
Growth Boundary, may contain up to a 50-year supply of land for the City of Madras to 
suppoii housing, economic development, public facility, recreation needs and other 
urban land needs. 
E. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall give priority to land in designated 
urban resen/e areas over other land when considering urban growth boundary 
amendments. 
Response: The Madras City Council approved the Madras URA in October 2008 and the 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD and LCDC received 
the URA proposal for review in January 2009, and approved the proposal — but remanded 
sections of proposed County Zoning Ordinance amendments having to do with use 
restrictions in the URA — in July 2009. The land in the proposed UGB amendment that is 
the subject of this application is land entirely drawn from the Madras URA, land estimated 
to be needed for urbanization over the next 50 years. 
F. The City shall favor UGB amendments that involve land in locations that are suitable 
to address identified urban land needs in order to minimize buildable land supply 
shortages and address identified needs. Factors that will be considered when evaluating 
UGB additions include: 
1. Existing and planned capacity of the transportation system 
2. Existing and planned capacity of the city waste water treatment plant 
3. Existing and planned capacity of the city sanitary sewer conveyance system 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Coun t ) ' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
36 
4. Existing and planned capacity of the Deschutes Valley Water District supply 
system 
5. Impacts on schools, parks, and public safety service providers 
6. Impacts on future operating costs for public facilities and services 
Response: 
G . The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall undertake an evaluation of the 
urban growth boundary land supply once every five years or more frequently if certified 
population growth rates exceed 3.2% in three consecutive years. In the event certified 
population growth rates fall below 3.2% for three consecutive years, the City and County 
may agree to postpone the evaluation of UGB land supply for up to three years. 
H. During years when a comprehensive UGB land supply evaluation is not scheduled, 
individual applications for adding property to the UGB shall be limited to reguests of less 
than 40 acres. UGB amendment applications must demonstrate consistency with 
applicable Oregon statutes and administrative rules and be accompanied by information 
that addresses Policy 14-J below. Applications that involve more than 5 acres also must 
comply with provisions of Policy 14-1. 
B I The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall encourage the development of 
complete, livable communities that include characteristics such as: a variety of lot sizes, 
dwelling unit types and ownership types, open spaces and other recreational amenities, 
a mix of land uses, school and community facilities, connected streets, proximity to 
downtown and other employment centers, and development that is scaled to the 
pedestrian and creates a sense of place. New growth areas of more than 5 acres that 
are added to the UGB shall should be planned and developed in accordance either with 
a master planned community development plan approved under the city Master Planned 
Community Overlay zone, or an Area Master Plan. The City encourages Master 
Planned Communities as a means to meet city housing needs as explained in other 
comprehensive plan documents. It may be appropriate, however, for the city to add new 
growth areas to the UGB that are planned and developed in accordance with an 
approved Area Master Plan. A majority of property owners subject to a Master Planned 
Community, or to an Area Master Plan, must consent to be included in the plan. 
1. A Master Planned Community (MPC) Overlay may apply to large multi-phased 
development projects where the master plan is intended to guide future 
development patterns and serves to regulate the site-development approval 
process. A MPC requires generous open space and amenities, and encourages 
efficient use of land and public facilities and services, a variety of housing types, 
innovative designs and complete pedestrian-friendly communities. A MPC shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land consistent with an identified urban land need, 
show appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, and 
the protection of significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas. A MPC must show how planned land uses will be integrated with the 
existing urban development pattern. Physical barriers, such as highways, tend to 
disrupt complete communities and livability because they disconnect areas from 
downtown and result in an auto-oriented environment of sprawl along highway 
corridors. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
37 
2. An Area Master Plan (AMP) is appropriate for land added to the UGB where the 
approval of future urban development is expected to rely on conventional urban 
zoning and the application of codified development standards and review 
procedures. An AMP may be prepared for contiguous properties added to the 
UGB that are greater than 5 acres and are not subject to a MPC overlay. An 
AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified 
urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public 
facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural 
resource areas. An AMP must show how planned land uses will be integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern. 
3. An approved Master Planned Community Plan or an Area Master Plan must 
include documentation that a majority of property owners support the conversion 
of land to the planned urban uses and also consent to annexation by the city of 
Madras using a voluntary annexation process that is outlined in the plan. 
Response: The total area under consideration is 36.4 acres, which is less than the 40 acre 
maximum established for interim UGB annexation requests. The east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan area. The 
plan designates land for predominantly residential land uses, which is compatible with 
adjacent development in the UGB, while also designating land for open space and park uses, 
community services including schools, and limited neighborhood commercial services. The 
conceptual plan also shows an internal transportation system that includes sidewalks and 
multi-use paths. 
For the east site: 
Connections and improvements to the surrounding transportation network — transportation 
analysis results 
Existing water and sewer master plans arc adequate to address facilities and service in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
The designation for medium density Residential use is consistent with an un-mct land need 
and identified housing need in the 2005 Urbanization Report, 
Pursuant to Policy 141: "An AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent 
with an identified urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, 
public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas." It is proposed to annex the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits but to retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development. The site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future land use and zoning designation must allow for residential and compatible 
public/semi-public uses in order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern." (Policy 141(2)) The proposed addition of a 
table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use designations 
to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate 
the transition of existing County zoning to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 2,00 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson Count)' and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
38 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
addidonal public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which eases 
extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits to the west site. 
The plan map designation of medium density residential (R-2) is consistent with an un-met 
land need and identified housing need in the 2005 Urbanization Report. 
I'"or the west site: 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
1 low do existing water and sewer plans fold in? Updates needed? 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities reguired by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary 
to serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements 
outlined in adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements 
that augment adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with reguirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning 
horizon; 
1. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected 
from these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
Response: 
Zoning and Land Use Designations (Policy J l ) 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
39 
The east site is proposed to be re-zoned to a City R-2 designation. This meets some of the 
need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB that is projected for the next 15-
20 years. Residentially zoned land will provide for housing and public/semi-pubLic uses. 
This land need is documented in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 
August 2007). (See Table 5-2) 
The west site is proposed to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) designation until the 
time when further land use action and development is proposed. Existing zoning will allow 
only limited development, and appropriate future designations for the site will be City 
residential designations given that City open space and residential zoning currendy surround 
the site. 
Annexation Program (Policy J2) 
The City is the applicant for this proposal, and annexation program pursuant to Article 7 of 
its Zoning Ordinance is described later in this report. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities (Policy J3) and Transportation Planning Rule (Policy J4) 
Kittelson & Associates has performed the transportation analysis needed to deem whether 
the proposed UGB amendment constitutes a significant effect on the transportation system. 
The scoping memo concluded that, of two development scenarios allowed under proposed 
R-2 zoning, considered to be possible according to preliminary conversations about potential 
uses, and estimated for "worst-case" levels of potential traffic generation, the scenario that 
included both an elementary school and multi-family housing was found to generate more 
peak hour traffic than housing alone. Using this scenario in a Transportation Planning Rule 
(TPR) analysis for significant effect, it was found that the increase in traffic did not 
constitute a significant effect on the transportation system. Existing facilities and facilities 
identified in the Jefferson County and City of Madras Transportation System Plans (TSPs) 
dial would likely be funded and built in the next 20 years are adequate to accommodate the 
projected growth in traffic without violating adopted performance standards. 
Public facility analysis for establishing the Madras URA ranked drainage catchment areas 
around the existing UGB for sewer sendee costs and serviceability. Of the six study areas 
that comprised the preliminary and then final URA, Study Areas 3 and 4 on the east and 
southeast consistendy ranked higher than other areas. This can, in part, be attributed to 
proximity to the new South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) and being upslope of 
the plant. In particular, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation are is located in 
Catchment Area 180 and bordering on Catchment Area 179. These areas ranked 8,h and 12th 
out of 60 catchment areas, making them among the more cost-effective and serviceable areas 
of the URA. 
As was also determined during the URA public facility analysis, Deschutes Valley Water 
District (DVWD) found that there would be insignificant differences in providing water 
service to the different parts of the URA. Water supply in the region is adequate to ample. 
Implementation of existing water and sewer master plans will be sufficient to provide service 
for the proposal area. Or are updates needed? 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
40 
SERVICE PROVIDER LETTERS 
Other Public Facilities (Policy J5) 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility Plan includes 
enrollment projections for the next 20-25 years and compares the projected enrollment 
against the capacity and conditions of existing facilities. Even with shared uses or 
renovations, the plan recommends that a school be re-built on Warm Springs tribal land, that 
a new elementary school be built in Madras to replace substandard facilities, and that work 
be done to address flood hazards at Madras High School and the administration offices. It is 
projected in the plan that between 2025 and 2030, elementary school enrollment will exceed 
existing capacity by more than 400 students (Table 5-2, Appendix C). 
As part of this proposal, it is requested that the adoption of the 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan as an element of the County and City Comprehensive Plans be approved and 
acknowledged by DLCD. 
The east site has access to substantial park and recreation resources. Juniper Hill Park 
(City/County) and Bean Park (City/County) are nearby, as well as Jefferson County Middle 
School and its fields. The Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the site and surrounding land 
also designates open space and parks throughout the plan area. 
The City reports that Mountain View Hospital and City public safety and emergency services 
are sufficient to provide services for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
Financing for Improvements (Policy J6) 
Financing? 
For facility plan and other transportation, water, and sewer improvements 
Protection from Natural Hazards (Policy J7) 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. In fact, the proposed amendment and 
annexation are driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway 
and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection sendee for the proposal area is currendy provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. The area is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 
that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and federal 
agencies. 
Protection of Goal 5 Resources (Policy J8) 
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files do not identify floodways, floodplains, 
significant habitat, or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation 
area. The only resources cited above that may apply to the site are open spaces. While open 
space will be a required part of public use or residential development that occurs in this area, 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
41 
this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal and, therefore, does not 
specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Findings: 
• Amendments to zoning and land use designations are planned and proposed. The 
proposed City land use designation is residential and City zoning designation R-2 
(Multiple Family Residential). A need for about 22 acres of land outside the existing 
UGB zoned R-2 was determined in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum. 
• Transportation analysis and results 
• Implementation of existing water and sewer master plans will be sufficient to provide 
service for the proposal area, or are updates needed? Include/reference service 
provider letters. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area has access to nearby parks and 
a middle school. Part of the proposal is to adopt the Jefferson County School 
District 509-] 2009 Long Range Facility Plan as an element of the Jefferson County 
and Madras Comprehensive Plans and annex the 20-acre site in order to fulfill an 
agreement between ]CSD and the City and provide land for an elementary school 
that will be needed in the next 15-20 years. 
• Financing — facility plan and other transportation, water, and sewer improvements 
• In terms of natural hazards, there are not slopes greater than 25%, floodway, or 
floodplain in the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. The proposed 
amendments and annexation are based, in part, on the need to provide a school that 
is outside the floodway and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. Fire 
protection service for the proposal area is and will be provided by Jefferson County 
Fire Protection District #1. 
• There are not floodways, floodplains, habitat, or cultural resources that are identified 
in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files in the proposal area. Open space will be 
provided as part of school and residential development pursuant to District school 
site and facility criteria and Madras zoning ordinance (MZO) in which 30% of a 
Master Planned Community must be open space (MZO Section 3.12(D)(4)). 
Conclusion: The proposed comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, and zoning map 
amendments comply with the relevant policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
42 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Community 
Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance 
ARTICLE 7: ANNEXATION 
SECTION 7.1: PURPOSE - The purpose of this section is to: 
A. Implement the policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan; 
B. Provide for City review of all annexation requests for a determination of the availability 
of facilities and services as related to the proposal; 
C. Provide for dissemination of public information and for sufficient time for public 
review; 
D. Provide for City and County coordination of a request for an annexation; and 
E. Provide for an expedited process by establishing procedures whereby the annexation 
and zoning, if applicable, may be considered concurrently. 
SECTION 7.2: APPLICATION PROCEDURE. Annexation is a land use decision and is 
subject to applicable provisions of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan, Oregon 
Revised Statutes, and Oregon Administrative Rules. In addition, the procedures below 
shall be followed: 
A. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing after notification of all 
property owners with two hundred fifty feet (250') outside of the boundary(ies) of the 
proposed annexation. The Planning Commission shall review the proposal for 
compliance with the annexation policies contained in this Ordinance and make a 
recommendation to the City Council, based on: 
1. The annexation proposal which meets the application requirements; and 
2. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to determine a 
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the annexation proposal based on the 
criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below; and 
3. The Planning Commission shall state its recommendation and the reasons therefore 
in writing to the City Council. 
B. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall 
conduct a public hearing and consider an Ordinance declaring the requested lands to be 
annexed to the City of Madras. 
1. The City Council shall review the record of the Planning Commission hearing their 
recommendation and shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the proposed annexation in accordance 
with the criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below. 
2. The City Council may conduct additional public hearings to assist their making a 
determination. 
3. The City Council shall state its determination and the reasons therefore in writing. 
Response: The City of Madras sent public hearing notice to the surrounding property 
owners on DATE. The City and County Planning Commissions held their first public 
hearing on February 3, 2010. The City Planning Commission decided upon a 
Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Madras UGB Amendment and Annexation 
DATE 
43 
recommendation of [describe recommendation] at its hearing on DATE and forwarded it to 
the Madras City Council. The City Council is scheduled to hear the matter on DATH(S), 
SECTION 7.3: ANNEXATION APPLICATION. The petitioner for annexation shall 
complete an application form provided by the Community Development Department. The 
application fee, established by Resolution of the City of Madras City Council, shall be 
submitted with the application. The application shall include: 
A. A map demonstrating that the proposed annexation is contiguous to the City Limits; 
B. Specific information on each parcel within the proposed annexation area: 
1. Current assessed valuation shown on Jefferson County Assessor's tax rolls. 
2. Acreage of both public and private property to be annexed. 
3. Map and tax lot(s) number. 
C. Names and ages of all residents and list of registered voters in the proposed 
annexation area. 
D. Addresses of all parcels within the proposed annexation area. 
E. Consent to Annexation forms, provided by the City of Madras, with notarized 
signatures of all property owners and electors within the proposed annexation area. 
F. Written findings, which address the following: 
1. Existing land uses within annexation area. 
2. Existing zoning within the annexation area. 
3. Existing improvements: 
a. water system 
b. streets 
c. sanitary sewer 
d. storm drainage 
4. Special Districts within the area: 
a. water districts 
b. irrigation districts 
c. fire district 
d. school district 
e. other 
5. Urban services, the present availability of urban service systems to the proposed 
annexation area, their capacity and cost of extension and/or improvement to urban 
standards: 
a. sanitary sewers - streets - parks 
b. storm drainage - water 
c. fire - power 
d. schools - police 
G. Compliance with all applicable policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Response: The City is initiating and applying for the proposed annexation. Maps of the 
west site and east site in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area are included in 
this report as Figure 4-1. Parcel size and other parcel information is presented in Section I, 
Proposal Summary. The City owns the taxlot where the east site is located. The 20-acre 
parcel that is being created from the taxlot has been surveyed. Annexing the parcel to the 
UGB and city limits and re-zoning it to R-2 will allow the City to honor a land exchange 
agreement between the City and JCSD, which needs to occur by 2011 pursuant to the terms 
of the agreement (Appendix D). The west site is comprised of three taxlots, two taxlots that 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
44 
are privately owned and one small taxlot (0.69 acres) that is County right of-way. Re-zoning 
is not proposed for this site at this time as there are no immediate development plans. 
However, this site does better connect the east site to the existing UGB and will be suitable 
for residential uses and compatible public/semi-public uses, for which Madras urbanization 
studies have found a long-term need. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently vacant and not in active 
use. It is land under Jefferson County jurisdiction and zoned Range Land (RL). There are 
not water, sewer, or storm water facilities and services extended to the site yet, but they can 
be extended using existing City facility master plans [or with minor updates to the plans?]. 
The Deschutes Valley Water District (DVWD) provides water service to the area and can 
provide facilities and service to the site, to be financed primarily by development applicants. 
The same is true for sewer and storm water facilities and service, for which the City of 
Madras is the sendee provider. As part of its agreement with JCSD, the City will extend 
water and sewer to the edge of the east site. There is an irrigation district in the region — the 
Central Oregon Irrigation District — but the proposal area is not irrigated nor is it proposed 
to be. 
There is a County collector road — Ashwood Road — along the northern border of the area 
that will/will not need improvements according to transportation analysis conducted for this 
proposal. Analysis results (Appendix F) 
Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 currently provides service for the area and will 
continue to do so. Public safety responsibility for the area will be transferred from the 
County to the City. In terms of parks and recreation, there are two parks and a middle 
school close to the site, and the Yarrow Master Plan, which includes and surrounds the east 
site, includes the 30% of parks and open space required by local code (MZO Section 
3.12(D)(4)). 
The proposal area is in the Jefferson County School District 509-J. This application is 
driven, in part, by the need for a new elementary school in Madras in the next 10-20 years, as 
determined in the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C). The east site will be able to 
accommodate both school and residential uses once it is annexed and zoned R-2 as 
proposed. Pursuant to ORS 195.110, the facility plan needs to be approved as an element of 
the Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans now that it has been adopted by the 
District Board. 
As addressed in the previous section of this report, the application complies with the 
applicable policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
SECTION 7.4: ANNEXATION CRITERIA. Lands may be annexed only if the City 
Council finds that the following criteria are met: 
A. The property is contiguous to the City limits. 
B. The property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. 
C. The annexation meets at least one of the following purposes: 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
45 
1. To serve lands needing City water or sewer to alleviate a present or potential 
health hazard; or 
2. To provide land to accommodate future urban development; or 
3. To provide land for provision of needed transportation or utility facilities; or 
4. To ensure that lands adjacent to the City are developed in a manner consistent 
with City standards. 
D. The petitioner has adequately addressed infrastructure supply and demand issues. 
The annexation is considered timely in that an adequate level of urban setvices and 
infrastructure can be provided upon annexation or a plan is in place for the provision of 
such services or infrastructure in a reasonable period of time. 
E. The proposed annexation complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the 
Comprehensive Plan does not control the annexation, or substantial changes in 
conditions have occurred which render the Comprehensive Plan inapplicable to the 
annexation, the proposed annexation complies with current Statewide Planning Goals. 
F. The City is capable of extending City setvices to the area proposed for annexation 
without negatively impacting existing systems and the City's ability to adequately serve 
all areas within the existing City limits. 
G. The proposed annexation is compatible with the existing topography, potential for 
future land division, natural hazards and other related considerations. 
Response: The proposal area is adjacent to the Madras city limits and is simultaneously 
seeking to be annexed to the Madras UGB and to the city. The proposed UGB amendment 
and annexation area provides land for future urban development, specifically for a needed 
school and housing as demonstrated by the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan (Appendix C) and the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). The east site of the proposal area is part of the Yarrow Master Plan 
area that the City has approved and found to be consistent with City development goals and 
standards. 
The proposal area can be served by water and sewer using existing water and sewer master 
plans and being financed by the City and developers of the sites. Ashwood Road on the 
north side of the proposal area is a County collector road and does/does not need 
improvements in order to serve the area. Transportation analysis results (Appendix F). 
Internal circulation and transportation facilities will need to be shown in future development 
applications. 
SECTION 8.2: ZONE/PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS 
A. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map 
1. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map may be initiated by the Planning 
Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Land Use 
Periodic Review, or by application of the property owner. 
2. If the application is for a change of a quasi-judicial or legislative nature: 
a. the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the 
proposed amendment at its earliest practical meeting date after the 
proposal is submitted and shall follow the adopted rules for quasi-
judicial hearings; 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
46 
3. tx, the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the 
City Council based on findings-of-fact; 
4T C. The City Council shall hold a public hearing and review the 
recommendation of the Planning Commission, along with any public 
testimony on the issue. The City Council must take final action on an 
amendment request and amendments shall be made by ordinance. 
3. An application for a zone change for land annexed to the city that is 
subject to an approved Master Planned Community Plan or an approved 
Area Master Plan may be considered as an administrative action per 
Article 9.3. 
B. Criteria for Amendments: The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The 
applicant shall show the proposed change is: 
1. In conformity with all applicable state statutes. 
2. In conformity with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; and 
3. In conformity with the Madras Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land 
Use Ordinance, and policies; emd 
4. In conformity with an approved Master Planned Community Plan or Area 
Master Plan, if applicable to the underlying properties; and 
5 . That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the 
amendment or mistake in the original zoning. 
Response: This application is being initiated by the City Community Development 
Department/Director. Also pursuant LO the terms of the UGAMA between the County and 
the City, the City forwarded the UGB amendment application and appropriate fees to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department within five working days of being 
initially filed. 
This application is subject to legislative procedure and will receive full review by the public, 
the City Planning Commission, and the City Council. Hearings by the Madras Planning 
Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission will be held first jointly on 
February 3, 2010 and then separately on DATE and DATE respectively. The Madras City 
Council will review the City Planning Commission's recommendation at a hearing on 
DATE, and will forward its decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing 
on DATE. 
As demonstrated by the previous findings, the proposed comprehensive plan, 
comprehensive plan map, and zoning map amendments comply with applicable Statewide 
Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Findings : 
• The City has followed procedures for providing notice and holding public hearings 
for the proposal. Notice was mailed to number and type/distance from sites] 
property owners on DATE. A joint City and County Planning Commission hearing 
was held on February 3, 2010 and then separate hearings were held on DATE and 
DA'IE respectively. The City Council and County Board of Commissioners heard 
the proposal on DATES and approved the proposal on DATES respectively. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
47 
• The City of Madras has initiated this proposal. It owns the east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area and has an agreement with Jefferson County 
School District 509-J to exchange this land for land downtown upon annexation and 
re-zoning. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area provides land needed for 
residential and public/semi-public uses, specifically for a needed school and housing 
as demonstrated by the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range 
Facility Plan (Appendix C) and the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). 
• All service providers — the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Deschutes Valley Water 
District, Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, Jefferson County School 
District 509-J — have capacity to serve the proposal area given: approval of the 
adoption of the Jefferson County School District 509-J 2009 Long Range Facility 
Plan as elements of the City and County Comprehensive Plans, implementation of 
existing water and sewer master plans, transportation improvements?, and financing 
from future proposed development. 
• The east site of the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the 
approved Yarrow Master Plan area, and the west site fulfills the requirements for an 
Area Master Plan. The set of proposed Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan 
Map, and Zoning Map amendments in this application comply with applicable 
Statewide Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Conclusion: The proposed comprehensive plan, comprehensive plan map, and zoning map 
amendments comply with the relevant provisions of the Madras Zoning Ordinance. 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
January 2010 
48 
From: Nick Snead 
T o : "French, Larry"; "Mark Radabaugh"; "gloria.gardiner@state.or. 
us"; "Ana Jovanovic"; 
C C : "Jon Skidmore"; "Tanya Cloutier"; "DJ Heffernan"; "Shayna 
Rehberg"; Mike Morgan; 
Supplemental Information to D L C D File # Madras -002 -09 
Wednesday, January 13, 2 0 1 0 4 : 4 8 : 4 5 PM 
DraftFacilityPlan allchapters Presented at 0 1 1 1 1 0 School 
Board mtg.doc 
U G B amdmt Findings 0 1 1 3 1 0 _ nick.doc 
10028Scoping.pdf 
Site Map.JPG 
U G B amdmt report v3 .doc 
4 5 day notice o f proposed_amendment A D D E N D U M memo 
v3.doc 
To all, 
I was contacted by Mark Radabaugh, DLCD, today where it was brought to my 
attention that information was missing from the 45-Day Notice of Proposed Plan 
Amendment submitted by DJ Heffernan of Angelo Planning Group on behalf of the 
City of Madras on December 14th, 2009. The intent of this email is to provide the 
missing information to make the Notice "complete" and also continue with the 
scheduled public hearings. There are a couple points I would like to make: 
1. The documents attached to this email are in draft form and in most cases 
require approval from other organizations. That being said, we fully believe 
that any compliance issue identified by any participating organization can be 
resolved prior to the February 11 th Joint City of Madras/Jefferson County 
Planning Commission hearing. 
2. Please note initial Notice submitted to DLCD on Dec. 14th, 2009 stated that 
the first evidentiary hearing would be in February 3 rd, 2010. That has been 
changed to allow the City and County Planning Commissions to meet jointly. 
They will meet on February 11 th, 2010 at 7:00 PM at the Jefferson County 
Senior Center. Please be advised. 
Subject: 
Date: 
Attachments: 
Additionally, the City of Madras has at great expense tried to follow all required local 
and state procedural requirements. There has been a lot background work 
completed to date. As a result, I believe any issues can be resolved in a timely 
manner. Please note that I will be out of the office January 14th & 15th and back in 
on January 19th. If have any urgent questions, comments, or concerns, please 
contact DJ Heffernan, Planning Consultant for the City of Madras at (503) 224-6974 
or Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Planning Director at 541-475- 475-4462. 
Thanks and have a good day! 
"One may walk over the highest mountain one step at a time" -John 
Wanamaker-
Nicholas S. Snead 
Director 
Community Development Department 
City of Madras 
(541) 475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
Final Findings 
City of Madras & Jefferson County 
City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendment 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive 
Plan, Madras and Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning 
Map 
FINDINGS 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Prepared for: 
Jefferson County 
66 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
Prepared by: 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Portland, Oregon 97205 
February 2010 
City of Madras Planning Commission 
Shelly Tack Chair 
Lynn Kowaleski Vice-Chair 
Alan Hurley Commissioner 
Kasey Cousens Commissioner 
Richard Ladeby Commissioner 
Joe Rrenowicz Commissioner 
City of Madras City Council 
Melanie 
Tom 
Walt 
Royce 
Benjamin 
Bob 
Kevin 
Widmer 
Brown 
Chamberlain 
Embanks Jr. 
Keeton 
McConnell 
O'Meara 
Mayor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Councilor 
Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Don Martin Chair 
Evan Thomas Vice Chair 
Dick Dodson Commissioner 
Bob Powers Commissioner 
Roy Hyder C ommissioner 
Kay Moon Commissioner 
Jim Martin Commissioner 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
John Hatfield Commission Chair 
Mike Ahem Commissioner 
Wayne Fording Commissioner 
Project Support and Consulting Team 
Angelo Planning Group 
Kittelson Associates 
Jefferson County 
City of Madras 
Jefferson County School District 509-J 
Land use planning, project management 
Transportation analysis 
Planning 
Planning, technical support 
Planning, technical support 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
Table of Contents 
I. Proposal Summary 1 
II. Introduction 3 
III. City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments 4 
IV. Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map and Zoning 
Map Amendments 6 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement 7 
Goal 2 Land Use Planning 8 
Goal 3 Agricultural Lands 12 
Goal 5 Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 13 
Goal 6 Ait, Water and Land Resources Quality 14 
Goal 7 Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards 14 
Goal 10 Housing 15 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 16 
Goal 12 Transportation 20 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 23 
Goal 14 Urbanization 24 
VI. Conformance with State Statutes 
ORS 197.298 26 
ORS 197.610 27 
ORS 197.626 28 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) 
30 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 32 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
Section III, Goal 14 — Urbanization 34 
X. Conformance with the City of Madras Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 7.2-7.4 — Annexation 41 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance, Section 8.2 — Zone/Plan Map Amendments.. 44 
List of Figures 
Figure 4-1: Proposed UGB Amendment and Annexation Area 6 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
List of Tables 
Table 3-1: Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 4 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 10 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 11 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 12 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 27 
List of Appendices 
• Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
• Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey Map (20-acre parcel) 
• Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
• Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
• Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
• Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis (Kittelson & Associates, January 
2010) 
• Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely Determination for US 97/J 
Street Improvements 
• Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
I. Proposal Summary 
File No.: 081-004 
Legis lat ive Sponsor: Nick Snead, Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras, OR 97741 
(541) 475-3388 
(541) 475-7061 Fax 
nsnead(2!ci, madras, or. us 
Planning 
Consultant : 
DJ Heffeman 
Angelo Planning Group 
921 SW Washington, Suite 468 
Pordand, Oregon 97205 
(503) 227-3664 
(503) 227-3679 Fax 
dheffernanf5langeloplanning.com 
Proposal: • To amend the Madras Comprehensive Plan - to add a table 
that presents the City zones and County zones that correspond 
and are allowed under City comprehensive plan designations. 
(Table 3-1) 
• To amend the Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps - to expand the 
Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) to include 36.91 acres 
from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA); to annex 20 acres 
of City-owned land ("east site," Figure 4-1) to the City of 
Madras and apply City R-2, Multiple Family Residendal zoning; 
to annex 16.22 acres of privately owned land plus 0.69 acres of 
land for County right-of-way ("west site," Figure 4-1) to the 
City and retain existing County RL, Range Land, zoning. 
Location: • West site: tax map of 16.91-acre west site (outlined), direcdy 
east of the existing Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road 
(Appendix A) 
• East site: survey map of 20-acre east site, east of the existing 
Madras UGB, south of Ashwood Road (Appendix B) 
Lega l Description: West site: 11S 14E 7 Lots 101 (12.28 acres), 102 (0.69 acres for 
right-of-way), and 200 (3.94 acres), entire lots 
East site: 1 IS 14E 7 Lot 100 (20 acres), parcel of lot 
Legal descripdon of Lot 100 parcel (east site): 
A portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 as filed in the Jefferson 
County Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE V-t) of Section 
Proposed Amendments to Mad ias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
1 
7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson 
County Oregon, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the 
Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 inch 
diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears 
South 89°39'40" East a distance of2640.53feet; thence South 89°39'40" 
East along the North line of said Section 7 a distance of599.997feet; thence 
South 0°17'36" West a distance of40.00feet to the Northwest corner of said 
Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; thence continuing South 0°17 '36" 
West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance of40.00feet to the South 
right-of-way line of blast Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 0° 17'3 6 "East along said 
West line a distance of935.13feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said 
Partition Plat No. 2002-17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39 '40 " 
East a distance of931.70feet; thence North 0°17'36"West a distance of 
935.12feet; to a point on the South right-of-way line of Tiast Ashwood Road; 
thence North 89°39 '40 " West along said right-of-way line a distance of 
931.70feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Contains 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. (Appendix B) 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
2 
II. Introduction 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) was approved by DLCD in July 2009, and was sized 
to provide urbanizable land for the next 50 years. Land from die URA is the first priority 
for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The City of Madras is not currendy in 
periodic review or evaluating its existing UGB for a 20-year land supply. The City, however, 
has initiated this UGB amendment and annexation process in order to begin to meet the 
land need identified by the Madras Urbanisation Study (April 2007) and the Madras Urbanisation 
Study Addendum (August 2007), prepared by ECONorthwest. The studies found a need for 
residentially zoned land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB. 
There are two parts to the proposed Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) annexation: the east 
site and the west site. The City of Madras owns the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits and for re-zoning as City Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2), a designation that will allow for a multi-family and single-family housing as 
well as public/semi-public uses typically sited on residentially zoned land. The 20-acre 
parcel is within the Yarrow Master Plan area. 
In addition to the east site, there are another 16.91 acres of land in the proposed UGB and 
City annexation, referred to as the west site. The west site is comprised of three lots that 
provide County right-of-way, better connect the east site to the existing UGB, and 
contribute toward meeting the long-term need for residentially zoned land. The west site is 
privately owned and is not proposed for re-zoning at this time. Owners may apply for re-
zoning when they are prepared to file land development applications in the future. It is 
expected that the west-site land also will provide the same range of needed housing types 
and public/semi-public uses as the east site when re-zoning is approved. Both the east and 
west sites will be designated Residential on the Plan Maps if this proposal is approved. 
Proposed Text Amendments 
In order to facilitate the transition of rural zoning to urban zoning in the urban growth area, 
text amendments are proposed for Section IV (Land Use Element) of the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan that identify county zones allowed on land that is designated for future 
urban use on the Comprehensive Plan map. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
3 
III. Jefferson County and City of Madras 
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 
Table 3-1 lists Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan Designations and corresponding 
City and County zones that are deemed compatible. The table is needed because the 
Madras Comprehensive Land Use Plan map, which applies to incorporated and 
unincorporated properties, and the city's zoning map are one in the same. The table 
clarifies that unincorporated property may retain its county zoning when it is annexed 
into the UGB if the land is not immediately annexed into the city. Such properties may 
retain any of the listed County zones and be regulated under the County's land 
development ordinance consistent with adopted growth management policies and 
procedures that apply to all land inside the Madras UGB. When such land is ready for 
urban development, the owner may request city annexation and zoning that is consistent 
with the land use plan designation for their property. Practically speaking, the table 
simply allows rural zoning districts to be applied in the Madras urban growth area on an 
interim basis, even when the rural zone differs from the intended long range urban use 
for a subject property. The table does not alter anything in practice. County zoned 
properties that are inside the Madras UGB remain under county jurisdiction in all 
respects although they are subject to urban growth management policies and regulatory 
review procedures that have been jointly adopted by Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras. In this context, the conformity table serves as a zoning bridge between a 
property's planned urban future and its current unincorporated rural zoning. 
Table 3-1 Proposed Table for Corresponding City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Map 
Designations, City of Madras Zones, and Jefferson County Zones 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
R-1 Single-Family 
Residential 
Land primarily for single-family homes, 
including manufactured home 
subdivisions, and for duplexes 
R-1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-2 Multi-Family 
Residential 
Land for multi-family housing to be close 
to businesses and services and to buffer 
single-family residential and commercial 
uses. Manufactured homes and 
neighborhood commercial uses are 
allowed. 
R-2 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
RR-2, RR-5, 
RR-10, RR-20, 
ERD 
R-3 Planned Residential 
Development 
Land for primarily residential 
development that allows site design 
flexibility to promote creativity and 
protection of scenic and natural 
resources 
R-3 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, RR-2, 
RR-5, RR-10, 
RR-20, ERD 
C-1 Corridor Commercial Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses located along major roadways 
C-1 CC, ERD 
C-2 Downtown Commercial Land for a mixture of smaller scale 
businesses that supports redevelopment, 
higher density, public spaces, and other 
elements of pedestrian orientation 
C-2 CC, ERD 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
4 
Plan 
Map 
Label 
Designation Description City Zones County Zones 
C-3 Community 
Commercial 
Land for primarily motor vehicle-oriented 
uses but on a smaller scale than Corridor 
Commercial 
C-3 SC, CC, ERD, 
EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL 
NC Neighborhood 
Commercial 
Land for small-scale commercial uses in 
residential areas that includes public 
spaces and promotes transportation 
options 
NC SC, ERD EFU 
A-1, EFU A-2, 
RL 
1 Industrial Land for industrial uses where industrial 
uses already exist in the city and in the 
Madras Industrial Park 
1 EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM, CI, IR, 
ERD 
O/S Open Space Land where parks, open space, or public 
uses already exist or is otherwise 
publicly owned 
OS/PF EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, RL, FM, 
PM 
AID Airport Development Land adjacent to airport facilities for 
future commercial and industrial uses, 
particularly those that rely on air 
transportation 
A/D EFU A-1, EFU 
A-2, AM, ERD 
County Zones: 
AM Airport Management 
CC County Commercial 
CI County Industrial 
EFU A-1, EFU A-2, RL Exclusive Farm Use Zones 
ERD Existing Rural Development 
FM Forest Management 
IR Industrial Reserve 
PM Park Management 
RR-2, RR-5, RR-10, RR-20 Rural Residential 
SC Service Community 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
5 
c 
o 
V) 
L_ 
O it 
A> 
- 5 
T3 
C 
CO 
</> 
CO 
T3 
( 0 Q . 
( 0 
( 0 
<0 
T3 
( 0 
T3 
C 
( 0 
<O 
Q. 
( 0 
C 
CO 
S 0= 
J3 g 
§ '55 
II 
C <D 
E £ 
£ o 
o 
£ o a. o 
R-C 
o ^ r-c O 
pq o 
O 
J3 
CQ 
O 
p 
bO CO 
4) +-> 
c/5 
3 O 
O CS 
00 
O 
O S 
CS U 
CM m • 1) CM ^ 
H 
<51 
£ 
13 
<U 
G 
£ 
O 
U 
CS > 
u I—1 <» at, 1) ^ <u ta G to ^ 
I d 
(X G G 13 w r, «-i 
CS U N 
o 
o T^—I 
O ^ 
L—L 
O 
A) 
o 
<N 
CO 
« <D O 
OA & rt •w DH f—1 <fi « 
CQ 
A 
D 
2 « 
-O 
£ § 
O 
X .TJ 
<D O £ * "G 
U < e3 
13 
4) 
G 
£ 
O 
L) 
G°§ 2 
o 
U 
C 
•A o 
N 
1) 
6 o 
O CL, <U 
O G 
N 
13 
G 
CS 1—1 
4) bO'O 
G -G <51 r^! 
JS c 
Q- c 
<D O 
> N 
</) </) 
C (0 
A > « 
Q . 
E o 
O 
4 -
s a & => O a. 
Cu 
S 
bO 
C 0 « N 
i - S FC « 1) c 
> JS 
?V C ^ <u O -C > JJ -s £ 1) £ 
CL, 
T3 U 
s -r O 3 
" O 
£ U c c Si o V) 
C }-»-« 
6 U ° 
V) w o g 
§ " 9 
pH 2 ' 
o 
CM 
Er 
3 XI 1) U-, 
V. Conformance with Statewide Land Use Goals 
Goal 1: Citizen Involvement 
To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity for citizens to be 
involved in all phases of the planning process. 
Response: The proposed amendments have been reviewed during a series of public 
meetings and hearings in order to allow for consideration by public officials and public 
feedback. 
The Jefferson County School District 509-J ("JCSD" or "District") Board ("Board") was 
generally briefed by the Superintendent about the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan at the 
December 14, 2009 School Board meeting where the need for the updated plan was 
discussed. The draft plan was brought to them first for formal review at a Board meeting on 
January 11, 2010. After the School Board reviewed the enrollment forecast, location and 
conditions of existing schools, and future potential school locations, they adopted the plan 
on January 25, 2010. 
The proposed Madras Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan amendment and 
amendments to the Jefferson County and City of Madras Comprehensive Plan Maps and 
Zoning Maps were presented and reviewed in a series of meetings in early 2010. 
A public hearing was scheduled before the Madras and Jefferson County Planning 
Commissions (joint) on February 11, 2010. Notice of the hearing was published in the 
January 13, 2010 Madras Pioneer. The public notice published in the newspaper was also 
posted at the Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the 
Jefferson County Library 20 days prior to the February 11, 2010 Planning Commission 
meeting. 
Additionally, property owners within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB were notified of the proposed land use action. Adjacent property owners 
were notified that the file was available for review at the Jefferson County Community 
Development Department at 85 SE "D" Street and that copies of any information would be 
provided at a cost of .25/page. The agenda for the Planning Commission was posted at 
Madras City Hall, Jefferson County Annex, US Postal Service Office, and the Jefferson 
County Library 7 days prior to the February 11, 2010 joint Planning Commission meeting. 
As discussed above the City proposes to include four (4) properties that total 36.91 acres 
into the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary. This constitutes a potential "land use 
change" that would typically require notice to affected property owners. ORS 227.186 
(Measure 56 notice) requires property owners to be notified of legislative acts relating to 
comprehensive plan, land use planning or zoning proposed by the City. Additionally, the 
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment is limited to the four properties identified on 
page 1. As such, a city-wide notice is not needed rather notice to the individual properties 
is required. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
7 
The City owns property, has a signed Consent to Annex agreement or a letter from a 
property owner acknowledging the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment that verify 
that property owners are aware of the proposed land use action and a Measure 56 notice is 
not needed. Specifically, the City holds title and owns Tax Lot 100 and therefore is aware 
and consents to the proposed re-zone to a portion of the property it owns that represents a 
"land use change" that may limit use. Additionally, the City of Madras has signed consent 
forms from the property owners of tax lots 101 and 200. Jefferson County owns tax lot 102 
and has provided a letter acknowledging and supporting the proposed land use action. As 
such, a formal notice as required by ORS 227.186 is not necessary as the affected property 
owners are aware of the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. More over, the ensuing 
annexation and re-zoning of 20 acres of tax lot 100 is limited to City owned property. 
45-day notice to DLCD was sent to DLCD staff on December 14, 2009. On January 13, 
2010 DLCD Field Representative, Mark Radabaugh, notified the City of Madras that the 
contents of the 45-day notice was incomplete. Later that day, City staff submitted the 
requested information to DLCD making the notice complete. The materials submitted on 
January 14, 2010 are noted as the Addendum to the notice. 
The UGB expansion area is drawn from the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA), which was 
developed through an intensive participatory process. A Technical Advisory Committee 
(TAC) and Project Advisory Committee (PAC) were formed to provide guidance for the 
project. The TAC was comprised of staff from project team members, including Jefferson 
County, the City of Madras, ECONorthwest, Kittelson & Associates, David Evans & 
Associates, Ball Janik, LLP, and Angelo Planning Group. The PAC included representatives 
of the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Jefferson County School District 509-J, local 
farmers, housing advocates, Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Region 4, and 
the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). 
Findings: 
• According to both their Comprehensive Plans and code, the City of Madras and 
Jefferson County Planning Commissions serve as their official citizen planning 
committees. 
• Adoption of the Madras Urban Reserve Area (URA) complied with Goal 1. 
• Materials were made available to the public at Madras City Hall and the Jefferson 
County Community Development Department. 
• Measure 56 notice was not issued as the proposed post-acknowledgment plan 
amendments are property specific and do not propose additional regulations to the 
properties proposed to be annexed and, in the case of the east site, re-zoned to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). 
• 45-day notice of proposed plan amendments was sent to the Department of Land 
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on December 14, 2009 prior to the start of 
hearings held by County and City Planning Commissions and legislative bodies. On 
January 13, 2010 the City of Madras provided supplemental information to DLCD 
vial email. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
8 
• Notices of the public meetings were published in the City's local newspaper, 
including contact information for the City and County. 
Conclusion: The proposed text and map amendments comply with State requirements for 
citizen involvement per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 1. 
Goal 2: Land Use Planning 
To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a basis for all 
decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
Response: 
Proposed Map Amendments 
The Madras City Council adopted the Madras Urban URA and related provisions in October 
2008 and the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD 
acknowledged and approved the URA and related amendments in July 2009, with 
stipulations that some of the proposed amendments to the Jefferson County development 
code be modified. Pursuant to ORS 197.298, the first priority for land to be included in a 
UGB is land designated as an urban reserve. Therefore, the land in the Madras URA is the 
first priority for UGB expansion when there is a demonstrated need for land in the next 20 
years, as was found by die Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currentiy zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
Land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet long-term land 
needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing UGB 
and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 50 
years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the Madras URA - east and southeast of the city — 
consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation. Land in the URA is subject to joint management under 
the terms of the City's and County's Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
(UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. Response and findings related to the 
UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Local criteria are relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be included in the UGB. 
Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan 
(AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient public facilities, financing 
prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard areas for the proposed 
UGB amendment area. Policyl4J requires the following. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
9 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need; 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties; 
3. Evidence that public facilities required by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary to 
serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements outlined in 
adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements that augment 
adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements of 
OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in the 
Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet transportation 
needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental transportation 
improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services; 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
These criteria are addressed later in the report section on the Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Goal 14. 
The Madras Urbanisation Study (ECONorthwest , Apri l 2007) and Madras Urbanisation Study 
Addendum (ECONorthwest, August 2007) identify a shortage of residentially zoned land to 
meet single-family and multi-family housing needs and public/semi-public use needs in the 
next roughly 20 years The needed number of housing units and acreage for residential uses is 
summarized in Table 4-18 of the August 2007 Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (Table 5-
!)• 
These needs are compared to the available land supply in the existing U G B in Table 6-4 in 
the study (Table 5-2) in order to determine whether there is a surplus or deficit of land for 
residential, public and semi-public, and employment uses. The table documents a shortage of 
land zoned R-2 (Multiple Family Residential) and land zoned R-1 (Single Family Residential) 
inside the existing U G B as wel l as a need for roughly 350 acres of public and semi-public 
uses over the course of the next 15-20 years. These public/semi-public uses tend to be 
related to residential uses and are typically al lowed and sited on residentially zoned land. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
10 
The proposed UGB amendment addresses part of the residential and public use land need 
presented above. Annexing 20 acres of the proposed amendment that are owned by the City 
(the east site) and rezoning it R-2 allows the City to fulfill its agreement with Jefferson 
County School District (JCSD) and provide land for a potential school site, which could 
address the need for a new school or replacement school as identified in the JCSD 2009 
Long Range Facility Plan. The remainder of the land need identified in the urbanization 
studies will be addressed during the City's next cycle of periodic review. 
Table 5-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
i ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 4-18. Forecast of needed housing units and residential land, 
Madras, 2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Density Net to Gross Density 
(DU.'net Net Res. Gross Res. (DU/gross 
Housing Type New DU Percent res ac) Acres Factor Acres res ac) 
Needed Units, 2007-2027 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 1,791 61% 4.8 373.1 25% 497.5 3.6 
Manufactured 206 7% 5.5 37.4 25% 49.3 4.1 
Condo/Townhomes 206 7% 9.0 22.8 15% 26.9 7.7 
Subtotal 2,202 75% 5.4 410.5 574.2 3.8 
Multi-family 
MultiFamily 734 25% 14.0 52.4 15% 61.7 11.9 
Subtotal 734 25% 14.0 52.4 61.7 11.9 
Total 2,936 100% 6.3 462.9 635.8 4.6 
Needed Units, 2007-2057 
Single-family types 
Single-family detached 5,516 61% 4.8 1,149.1 25% 1,532.1 3.6 
Manufactured 633 7% 5.5 115.1 20% 143.8 4.4 
Condo/Townhomes 633 7% 9.0 70.3 15% 82.7 7.7 
Subtotal 6,781 75% 5.4 1,334.5 1,758.7 3.9 
Multi-family 
MultiFamily 2,260 25% 14.D 161.5 10% 179.4 12.6 
Subtotal 2,260 25% 14.0 161.5 179.4 12.6 
Total 9,042 100% 6.3 1,495.9 1,938.1 4.7 
Source: ECONorthwest 
Note: Gross acres calculated by dividing net acres by (1-net to gross factor). For example, for single-family 
detached, 477_1/(1-_7S) - 636.1. Conversely, 636.1 x .76 = 477.1. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
11 
Table 5-2. Land Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
i ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4, Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB. 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Laud Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.9 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114.6) 
R-3 148 0 444.0 242.8 94.8 (201.2) 
RR5 00 0 0 32.7 32.7 327 
RR10 0 0 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 0.0 0.0 38.7 38.7 38.7 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 358.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (770.7) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230 6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
CC 0 0 32.6 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Males: a'l public and semi-pjbic and needs were allocated to residential zones 
Proposed Text Amendments 
As discussed above, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation is based on the 
buildable lands inventory and needs analysis performed by ECONorthwest in 2007 and for 
the Madras URA. The proposed table of corresponding City land use designations and City 
and County zones (Table 3-1) is proposed to facilitate the transition of land from rural to 
urban and the annexation of land in the URA to the Madras UGB and city limits. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation is drawn from land in the adopted 
Madras URA, which is the first priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to 
state statute. 
• The east site and west site are currently zoned Range Land by the County. Range 
land was included in the Madras URA because of sewer service advantages it had 
over other land surrounding the UGB and because including only exception land in 
the URA would not have provided enough land for the projected growth needs of 
the next approximately 50 years. 
• The proposed annexation area meets some of the need for residentially zoned land 
outside the existing UGB over the next 20 years, as established in the 2007 Madras 
Urbanisation Study and addendum. The studies found the need for more than 200 
acres of land for housing and related public/semi-public uses. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
land use planning per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 2. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
12 
Goal 3: Agricultural Lands 
To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. 
Response: The entire Madras URA includes land zoned for rural residential, range land, 
and agricultural uses, as shown in Table 5-3. 
Table 5-3: Exception and Resource Land in the Madras URA 
Land Type Zones Acres 
Exception Land RR2, RR5, RR10 (Rural Residential) 1,709 
Non-prime Resource Land RL (Range Land) 2,038 
Prime Resource Land A1 (Agricultural) 68 
Total 3,815 
Prime agricultural land makes up less than 2% of the total URA. When prime agricultural 
land is included, it is only when it is adjacent to the existing UGB, surrounded by exception 
land or non-prime resource land, and/or will be more easily served with public facilities — 
sewer service, in particular. The rest of the URA is comprised of rural residential and range 
land. Rangeland was included in the URA because of serviceability advantages it has over 
other land surrounding the Madras UGB and because all the exception (rural residential) 
land adjacent to the Madras UGB would not fulfill the city's estimated land needs for the 
next 50 years. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is currently zoned Range Land by the 
County. Upon annexation to the UGB and Madras city limits, City R-2, Multiple Family 
Residential, zoning is being requested for the east site. The west site is proposed to be 
annexed to the city and to retain its existing County zoning, but the land is designated for 
multi-family residential use on the Plan Map. 
As explained above, land zoned Range Land has been included in the Madras URA to meet 
land needs and because of sewer service advantages over other areas around the existing 
UGB and because exception land alone would not meet land needs for the city over the next 
50 years. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer 
serviceability analysis, including land in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Pursuant to ORS 197.298(a), the first priority of land to be included in the UGB is land in a 
URA. Beyond that, local criteria can be relied upon to prioritize land from the URA to be 
included in the UGB. Local criteria are found in Goal 14 (Urbanization) policies in the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan. The criteria require a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan 
or Area Master Plan (AMP), proposed urban zoning, an annexation program, sufficient 
public facilities, financing prospects, and protection for natural resources and natural hazard 
areas for the proposed UGB amendment area. These policies are addressed in more detail in 
the response and findings for Madras Comprehensive Plan Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
13 
Land in the URA is subject to joint management under the terms of the City's and County's 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) once it is added to the City's UGB. 
Response and findings related to the UGAMA are provided later in this report. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is land from the Madras URA, 
top priority land for inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298(a). 
• Some of the non-prime resource land (zoned Range Land) is easier to serve with 
sewer than other areas around the existing Madras UGB, based on public facility 
analysis done during the development of the URA. Land in Study Areas 3 and 4 of 
the URA consistently ranked highest in sewer serviceability analysis, including land in 
the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for 
agricultural lands per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 3. 
Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces 
To protect natural resources and conserve scenic and historic areas and open spaces. 
Response: The land being proposed for inclusion in the Madras UGB is currently located 
within the Madras URA, jointly managed by Jefferson County and the City of Madras 
pursuant to the terms of the Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA), 
adopted in January 2009 (Appendix C). Pursuant to the URAMA, the County processes 
land use decisions in the URA. In addition, conversion plans must be submitted to the City 
for land divisions in the URA. 
Madras Comprehensive Plan policy language regarding protection of open space, scenic, 
wildlife, and cultural resources was adopted as part of amendments to Goal 14 
(Urbanization) concurrent with the adoption of the Madras URA. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
The land in the proposal does not include floodways, fioodplains, significant habitat, or 
cultural resources that are identified in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 
inventory, or Jefferson County Geographic Information System (GIS) files. The only 
resources cited in Policy 14 J (8) that may apply to the site are open spaces. Open space will 
be a required part of school or multi-family residential development that occurs in the UGB 
amendment area. However, this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal 
and, therefore, is not required to specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
14 
F ind ing s : 
• Recently adopted amendments to Goal 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan require 
identification of protective measures for significant open space, scenic, historic, 
cultural and natural resources in proposed UGB expansion areas. The Jefferson 
County Comprehensive Plan and Goal 5 inventory does not identify natural, scenic, 
or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• Open space designations will be made as part of development entitlement for the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation. 
Conc lus ion : The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for open 
space, scenic and historic areas, and natural resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 
5. 
Goal 6: Air, Water and Land Resource Quality 
To maintain and improve the quality of the air, water and land resources of the state. 
Response : According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Oregon 
Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) there are no federally designated air quality 
management areas or federally designated hazardous waste sites in the Madras URA. Of 
Environmental Cleanup Sites reported on ODEQ's website, there are no sites identified in 
the URA.1 Further, R-2 zoning is proposed for the UGB amendment area to be brought in 
to the city, allowing residential uses and other compatible uses. These uses tend to produce 
less noise, air, land, and water pollution than commercial and industrial uses, which typically 
manufacture goods, produce by-products, and generate more vehicle traffic. 
F ind ing s : 
• There are not federal- or state-registered environmental quality sites within the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
• The amendment and annexation area is needed and planned for residential and 
related uses, which tend to have fewer adverse air, water, and land quality impacts 
than commercial or industrial uses. 
Conc lus ion : The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for air, water 
and land resources per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 6. 
Goal 7; Areas Subject to Natural Hazards 
To protect people and property from natural hazards. 
Response : Primary potential natural hazards in Madras include steep slopes, floodway and 
floodplain, and wildfire. Statewide Goal 7 is reinforced in Madras Comprehensive Plan 
' Air quality management areas, hazardous waste sites, and environmental cleanup sites can be searched on the 
U.S EPA's and ODEQ's websites at: httpi//www, deq. state, or. us/aq/planning/index.htin, 
litrtp:// www.epa.gov/supcrfund/sites/sitcinfo.htm. and 
hup://www.cieq.snte.or.uii/lq/ecsi/ecsi.htm. 
Proposed Amendments to Mad ias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
15 
policies (Goal 14) by requiting protection from natural hazards be demonstrated for 
proposed UGB amendments. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected from 
these hazards; 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in the 
proposed annexation area. Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided 
by Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that 
district if the land is annexed to the city. Area in the district is subject to a Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration 
with the fire district and federal agencies. 
Findings: 
• There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain land in 
the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. 
• Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 provides fire protection service to the 
proposed amendment and annexation area. The area is subject to the Community 
Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) developed and adopted by the County, the fire 
district, and federal agencies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for areas 
subject to natural hazards per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 7. 
Goal 10: Housing 
To encourage the availability of adequate numbers of needed housing units at price 
ranges and rent levels which are commensurate with the financial capabilities of Oregon 
households and allow for flexibility of housing location, type and density. 
Response: This proposal provides land for housing and related public and semi-public 
uses. The Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (August 2007) shows that there is a shortage 
of residentially zoned land inside the existing UGB for growth over the next 20 years (Table 
5-2). 
The proposed annexation to the Madras UGB and city limits addresses this need by 
including 36.91 acres of land from the URA for residential and public/semi-public uses. It is 
proposed that the east site be re-zoned from County RL (Range Land) zoning to City R-2 
(Multi-Family Residential) zoning. 
These proposed amendments are not part of a periodic review work program and the next 
periodic review process will ensure that the UGB does include enough land to meet all the 
land needs that are projected for the next 20 years as shown in Table 5-2. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
16 
Findings: 
• The Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum found a need for residentially zoned 
land for housing and public/semi-public uses outside the existing UGB for 
growth expected over the next 20 years. 
• The remainder of land needs determined by the urbanization studies will be 
addressed during the next City of Madras periodic review. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for housing 
per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities and Services 
To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient arrangement of public facilities and 
setvices to setve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
Goal Requirements 
Urban Facilities and Services - Refers to key facilities and to appropriate types and 
levels of at least the following: police protection; sanitary facilities; storm drainage 
facilities; planning, zoning and subdivision control; health setvices; recreation facilities 
and services; energy and communication services; and community governmental 
setvices. 
A. Goal 11 Planning Guidelines 
5. A public facility or setvice should not be provided in an urbanizable area unless there 
is provision for the coordinated development of all the other urban facilities and setvices 
appropriate to that area. 
Response: According to terms of the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of 
Madras, the City will be the primary service provider for land within its UGB, in particular 
coordinating police, sewer, stormwater, land use, recreation, energy, and governmental 
services. City urbanization regulations amended with the adoption of the Madras URA 
require either a Master Planned Community (MPC) plan or Area Master Plan (AMP) for 
UGB amendments in Madras for areas over five acres (Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 
14 I). Both MPC plans and AMPs must show "appropriate locations for transportation 
improvements, public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and 
natural resource areas" and how proposed land uses will integrate with existing development. 
Transportation facilities are addressed in more detail in the response and findings for 
Statewide Goal 12 next in this report. 
The adopted Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site. This land is proposed for 
annexation both to the Madras UGB and city limits. It is also proposed that the east site be 
re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide land for uses such as urban levels of 
housing and related public/semi-public uses. These uses are similar to and compatible with 
surrounding development of residential and public uses. The east site is tangent to the 
existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. Sufficient water 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
17 
and sewer service can be provided to the east site given existing and planned systems, and 
this is documented in the service provider letters from Deschutes Valley Water District and 
the City of Madras Public Works (Appendix D). 
Pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 14 I: "An AMP shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified urban land need, 
appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, protection for 
significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource areas." It is proposed to annex 
the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits. While it is also proposed that the site retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development, the site is surrounded by land designated for residential and public/semi-
public uses, and its future designation as residential allows housing and compatible 
public/semi-public uses that can be: "integrated with the existing urban development 
pattern." (Madras Comprehensive Plan Urbanization Policy 141 (2)) Further, the proposed 
addition of a table showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use 
designations to the Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), 
will facilitate the transition of existing County zoning for the west site to appropriate City 
zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which lends itself 
to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. As with the east 
site, sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to the west site given existing and 
planned systems, as stated in service provider letters (Appendix D). 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
Finally both MPC plans and AMPs must have documented approval from a majority of 
landowners pursuant to Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy 141 (3). Specifically, the City of 
Madras owns Tax Lot 100 and as the applicant, consents to the proposed UGB expansion to 
include 20 acres of Tax Lot 100 and the re-zoning of the property from Range Land (RL) to 
Multi-Family Residential (R-2). Tax Lot 102 is dedicated to Jefferson County for Ashwood 
right-of-way and consent for UGB expansion and re-zoning is not needed as inclusion in the 
UGB and re-zoning will not change how the right-of-way can be used. Consent from other 
landowners is provided in Appendix E. 
B. Goal 11 Implementation Guidelines 
5. Additional methods and devices for achieving desired types and levels of public 
facilities and services should include but not be limited to the following: (1) tax incentives 
and disincentives; (2) land use controls and ordinances; (3) multiple use and joint 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
18 
development practices; (4) fee and less-than-fee acquisition techniques; and (5) 
enforcement of local health and safety codes. 
Response: The proposed land use designations and zoning for the annexation area — the 
east site and the west site — is appropriate for the type and level of public facilities and 
services that can be extended to the area. It is proposed to bring the west site into the 
Madras UGB and city limits but to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until 
landowners are ready to propose development. The site is surrounded by land planned for 
or developed as predominantly residential development. It is well situated for extension of 
urban facilities and services when they are needed. The proposed addition of a land use and 
zoning designation table to Section IV (Land Use Element) of the Madras Comprehensive 
Plan (Table 3-1) establishes the City and County zoning designations that correspond to City 
land use designations, and will guide the transition from County zoning to appropriate City 
zoning once a land use action is proposed. 
It is proposed that the east site be re-zoned to R-2 upon annexation so that it can provide 
land for uses such as urban levels of housing and related public/semi-public uses. These 
uses are similar to and compatible with surrounding development. The east site is tangent to 
the existing UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, a County collector road, which lends 
itself to the extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits. In that vein, 
service providers have determined that sufficient water and sewer service can be provided to 
the east and west sites given existing and planned systems (Appendix D). 
The east site is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan, a plan that envisions a variety of 
housing and then an internal circulation system, open space, public uses (including a school), 
and a small-scale commercial area to serve the primary residential uses. 
Once the properties are annexed into the city limits and developed, wastewater and domestic 
water services will need to be extended to each developed property. The property owner will 
fund the extension of wastewater and domestic water services to their properties. Extension 
of these facilities will be completed as required in the City of Madras Wastewater Master 
Plan and the Deschutes Valley Water District Master Plan. 
As previously discussed, this proposal is not a development proposal that offers entitlements 
for construction. Subsequent to this land use action, the property owner will be required to 
obtain development approvals (e.g. Site Plan Review, Conditional Use, or Subdivision). Any 
development approval will require public facilities to be extended to the subject property at 
the expense of the applicant. 
OAR 660-011-0010 
The Public Facility Plan 
(1) The public facility plan shall contain the following items: 
(a) An inventory and general assessment of the condition of all the significant public 
facility systems which support the land uses designated in the acknowledged 
comprehensive plan; 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
19 
(b) A list of the significant public facility projects which are to support the land uses 
designated in the acknowledged comprehensive plan. Public facility project descriptions 
or specifications of these projects as necessary; 
(c) Rough cost estimates of each public facility project; 
(d) A map or written description of each public facility project's general location or 
service area; 
(e) Policy statement(s) or urban growth management agreement identifying the provider 
of each public facility system. If there is more than one provider with the authority to 
provide the system within the area covered by the public facility plan, then the provider 
of each project shall be designated; 
(f) An estimate of when each facility project will be needed; and 
(g) A discussion of the provider's existing funding mechanisms and the ability of these 
and possible new mechanisms to fund the development of each public facility project or 
system. 
(2) Those public facilities to be addressed in the plan shall include, but need not be 
limited to those specified in OAR 660-011-0005(5). Facilities included in the public 
facility plan other than those included in OAR 660-011-0005(5) will not be reviewed for 
compliance with this rule. 
(3) It is not the purpose of this division to cause duplication of or to supplant existing 
applicable facility plans and programs. Where all or part of an acknowledged 
comprehensive plan, facility master plan either of the local jurisdiction or appropriate 
special district, capital improvement program, regional functional plan, similar plan or 
any combination of such plans meets all or some of the requirements of this division, 
those plans, or programs may be incorporated by reference into the public facility plan 
required by this division. Only those referenced portions of such documents shall be 
considered to be a part of the public facility plan and shall be subject to the 
administrative procedures of this division and ORS Chapter 197. 
OAR 660-011-0015 
Responsibility for Public Facility Plan Preparation 
(1) Responsibility for the preparation, adoption and amendment of the public facility plan 
shall be specified within the urban growth management agreement. If the urban growth 
management agreement does not make provision for this responsibility, the agreement 
shall be amended to do so prior to the preparation of the public facility plan. 
(2) The jurisdiction responsible for the preparation of the public facility plan shall provide 
for the coordination of such preparation with the city, county, special districts and, as 
necessary, state and federal agencies and private providers of public facilities. 
Response: The Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) that implements Goal 11 is OAR 660-
011. The rule establishes requirements for the planning and provision of public facilities in 
Oregon. Pursuant to OAR 660-011-0005(5), a public facility "includes water, sewer, and 
transportation facilities, but does not include buildings, structures or equipment incidental to 
the direct operation of those facilities." Transportation facilities are addressed in detail in 
the response and findings for Goal 12 in this report. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
20 
The City of Madras is responsible for the planning and provision of sewer service in the 
proposed annexation area, and Deschutes Valley Water District (DVWD) for the planning 
and provision of sewer service in the area. The City and DVWD master plans for sewer and 
water provide an inventory and assessment of existing facilities, a list and map of planned 
projects, a timeline for their implementation, and a discussion of costs and financing 
mechanisms. 
The City Public Works Director has submitted a letter that is included with this report 
(Appendix D) that affirms there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned sewer 
infrastructure to serve die east and west sites in the proposed annexation area. Similarly, the 
DVWD General Manager has prepared a statement that there is sufficient capacity in 
existing and planned water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• Implementation of public facilities and services in Madras is primarily regulated by 
land use plans and ordinances and public facility master plans, which are elements of 
the City Comprehensive Plan. 
• The City of Madras will be the primary provider of urban facilities and services in the 
proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. The City will be able to coordinate 
service to the area with facilities and services already provided to adjacent land within 
the existing UGB. 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan applies to the east site and shows an internal 
transportation network and sites for housing and a school. 
• The City of Madras Public Works Director and DVWD General Manager have 
provided letters that verify that there is sufficient capacity in existing and planned 
sewer and water infrastructure to serve the proposed annexation area. 
• When development occurs on the properties to be included in the Madras UGB, the 
property owner will be responsible for cost to extend sewer and domestic water 
facilities to development. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with Goal 11 for public 
facilities and services subject to OAR 660, Division 11. 
Goal 12 Transportation 
To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation system. 
660-012-0060 
Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments 
(1) Where an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or 
a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of 
this rule to assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, 
capacity, and performance standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) 
of the facility. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a 
transportation facility if it would: 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
21 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation 
facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted 
transportation system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels 
of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility 
below the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that 
is otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
(2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant effect, 
compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the 
planned function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent 
with the requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan 
or mechanism consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the 
transportation finance plan so that the facility, improvement, or service will be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce 
demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned function, capacity or performance 
standards of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a 
development agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system 
management measures, demand management or minor transportation 
improvements. Local governments shall as part of the amendment specify when 
measures or improvements provided pursuant to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: Reflecting Statewide Goal 12 and the Transportation Planning Rule, UGB 
amendment applications must provide the following pursuant to Madras Goal 14 policies: 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with requirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need: 
(Madras Comprehensive Plan Policy J-4) 
City R-2 (Multi-Family Residential) zoning is proposed for the east site of the UGB 
amendment and annexation area. The zone allows multi-family and single-family housing 
outright and then allows associated uses such as schools, libraries, and community centers 
conditionally. The minimum lot size for single-family housing is 7,500 square feet and for 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
22 
multi-family 10,000 square feet for the first two units and 2,000 square feet per each 
additional unit. 
The east site is adjacent to Ashwood Road, an existing road built to County standards as a 
collector road. Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary access 
and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road 
serves Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west 
transitions into B Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recently 
constructed extension of City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City 
limits, and Bean Drive connects toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 
summarizes key characteristics of the existing roadway facilities (Appendix F). 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
23 
The transportation analysis for annexing and re-zoning the east site to R-2 was based on the 
assumptions below. Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, 
two scenarios were developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved 
both housing and a school. The difference in the scenarios represents the typical range of 
an elementary school site, 5-10 acres.2 The enrollment assumption roughly approximates the 
average elementary school enrollment in Jefferson County School District 509-J. A 
maximum housing density of 11.6 units/acre was derived from standards for lot and 
building size, parking, setbacks, and infrastructure for multi-family residential uses in the R-2 
zone. 
1. 5-acre school site — 174 multi-family units on 15 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
2. 10-acre school site — 116 multi-family units on 10 acres and a 350-student 
elementary school. 
The analysis found that all the study intersections operate acceptably in the planning 
horizon3 with and without the proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the 
intersections of US 97 and J Street. These intersections exceed volume-to-capacity (v/c) 
standards in 2025 with or without the proposed annexation and re-zoning. Because the 
proposal increases traffic at these intersections, even if minimally, the proposal is deemed to 
have a "significant effect"; it would further degrade the performance of the failing 
intersections. 
Improvements for the US 97/J Street intersection have been included in an amendment to 
the Madras TSP and in the ODOT 2010-2013 Draft STIP. The improvements involve 
realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the new 
J Street intersections, and would allow the US 97/J Street intersections to operate within 
adopted v/c standards. ODOT has deemed these improvements to be "reasonably likely" in 
the planning horizon and, thus, no significant would occur with the proposed annexation 
and re-zoning (Appendix G). 
Findings: 
• Transportation analysis for the east site of the proposed UGB amendment and 
annexation area assumed that the area would be developed with a combination of 
housing and a school. This was because there is the potential for a school to be 
located on the site and schools generate more traffic, thus creating a "worse case" set 
of scenarios for the analysis. 
• Transportation analysis showed that all the study intersections would perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except the intersections of US 97 
and J Street. These intersections exceed adopted standards and the proposed 
annexation and re-zoning produce a "significant effect" on the intersections. 
2 An elementary school is the type of school needed in Madras according to the 2009 Long Range Facility Plan. 
3 Consistent with individual TSPs and a 15-year minimum pursuant to the Oregon Highway Plan, the planning 
horizon for City facilities is 2020, for County facilities is 2027, and for State facilities is 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
24 
However, improvements for the intersections that are included in die Madras TSP 
and die 2010-2013 Draft STIP have been deemed "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon, thus mitigating the proposal's significant effect. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with Goal 12 and OAR 660-015-
0060. 
Goal 13 Energy Conservation 
To conserve energy. 
Response: The east site of the UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the Yarrow 
Master Plan area. The master plan includes a range of land uses so that residents can meet 
many daily needs within the neighborhood. The plan designates land predominantiy for 
housing, but for parks and open space, a school, other community services, and commercial 
services as well. This mix of uses will provide for these daily needs and reduce the need to 
drive outside the neighborhood to access these uses. 
All public improvements within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required to be constructed 
to City of Madras standards, which includes the provision of sidewalks. The Master Plan also 
includes planned open space which will be accessed by a multi-use trail system that will 
connect to existing multi-use trails in the City of Madras. This supports the use of non-
motorized transportation and the conservation of fuel resources. This proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation does not provide all of the land needed to implement the master 
plan but provides part of it. 
The west site is not part of the Yarrow Master Plan but will be subject to internal circulation 
and multi-modal standards when a land division or planned unit development is proposed. 
Like the east site, the west site is adjacent to Ashwood Road. 
While water service was projected to be of similar cost to provide to all the study areas that 
comprise the Madras URA, there were differences in relative cost for providing sewer-
service given the need for pumping in some of the study areas. The proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area is part of a study area and a drainage area where no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required for sewer service. This minimizes the 
amount of energy needed to provide that service. 
All residential development within the Yarrow Master Plan area are required be built to 
Earth Advantage/Energy Star standards and receive certification as stated in the Codes, 
Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&R's) recorded for the development. Such requirement 
reduces energy consumption of each dwelling constructed in the Master Plan area and 
thereby conserves energy consumption which in part satisfies the Goal 13 requirements. 
Findings: 
• The approved Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the east site of the proposed UGB 
amendment and annexation area proposes a variety of uses that will allow residents 
to take care of day-to-day needs without always having to drive out of the 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
25 
neighborhood to do so. The plan also indicates multi-use paths and a continuous 
network of sidewalks to promote walking and bicycling. This supports fuel and 
energy conservation. 
• Providing sewer service to the proposal area requires less pumping and, therefore, 
infrastructure, energy, and cost than other parts of the URA and other areas around 
the existing UGB. 
• The CC&R's recorded for the Yarrow Master Plan area require energy conservation 
by requiring future development to meet or exceed Earth Advantage/Energy Star 
standards. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with State requirements for energy 
conservation per Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 13. 
Goal 14 Urbanization 
To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use, to 
accommodate urban population and urban employment inside urban growth boundaries, 
to ensure efficient use of land, and to provide for livable communities. 
(2) Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
Response: The proposed map amendments respond to the need for more residentially 
zoned land as determined in the adopted Madras Urbanisation Study and Addendum. The 
studies analyzed the potential for development inside the existing UGB and found that in 
addition to development that the existing UGB can accommodate, approximately 220 acres 
of land is needed outside the UGB for residential and related public/semi-public uses over 
the years until 2027. These studies provided the basis for the Madras URA and URAs are 
enabled by statewide rules that address orderly and efficient land use as well as an orderly 
and efficient process for amending UGBs when needed. 
This proposed map amendment draws strictiy from land in the URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298 and Madras plan policies. 
The proposed text amendments (Section III) contribute to orderly and efficient transition 
from rural to urban land use by clearly establishing the ways that Jefferson County and City 
of Madras zones correspond to Madras Comprehensive Plan designations. 
Transportation, water, and sewer services are among the critical public facilities that must be 
provided for the proposed UGB amendment area. As discussed in the narrative and 
findings for Goals 11 and 12 above, these services can be provided to the UGB amendment 
area relying on planned capital improvements. 
Transportation — Transportation analysis shows that all study intersections perform within 
adopted operational standards at the end of the planning horizon, with or without the 
proposed annexation and re-zoning of the east site, except for the intersections at US 97 and 
J Street. An analysis shows the performance of those intersections, as they are currendy 
designed, exceed mobility standards with and without the proposed annexation and re-
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
26 
zoning. Unless the intersections can be improved, the proposed annexation and re-zoning 
produce a "significant effect" on them by making worse an already failing condition. 
Proposed improvements to the "J" Street and US 97 intersections are included in the Madras 
TSP. Those improvements also are listed in the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, in effect 
programming the necessary state resources for them. On that basis, ODOT has determined 
the "J" Street/US 97 intersection improvements are "reasonably likely" to occur in the 
planning horizon (Appendix G). With those planned improvements in place, the affect of 
the proposed annexation is mitigated and the proposal will not have a significant effect. 
Water — During the development of the Madras URA, Deschutes Valley Water District 
(DVWD) reported that there would be no supply constraint for urban development in the 
URA. Significant expansion of the District's distribution system would be necessary to serve 
urban demand in each part of the URA, and the water service study found that the marginal 
cost differences between the URA study areas were insignificant. Existing and planned 
facilities will provide sufficient water service to the area, as confirmed by Deschutes Valley 
Water District in a service provided letter (Appendix D). 
Sewer — Public facility analysis conducted in developing the Madras URA showed that sewer 
service to the eastern study areas in the URA would be more cost-efficient because no 
pumping or limited pumping would be required as compared to areas to the north, south, 
and west. For the proposed UGB amendment area, existing and planned sewer facilities will 
provide sufficient service to the area according to City of Madras Public Works (Appendix 
D). 
Findings: 
• The proposed map amendments address the residential land need established in the 
Madras urbanization studies. It draws from the Madras URA, which is the first 
priority land to be included in the UGB when land need is demonstrated. 
• The text amendments facilitate the transition between County zoning and City land 
use designations and zoning. 
• Water service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing and planned 
water facilities that are identified in the Deschutes Valley Water District's water 
master plan. Providing water service was not found to be significantly different in 
cost between different parts of the URA in studies done in developing the Madras 
URA. 
• Studies conducted for the URA found that drainage areas in the eastern and 
southeastern parts of the URA were easier to serve in that they needed no pumping 
or minimal pumping of sewage when compared to other parts of the URA. Sewer 
service can be provided to the proposal area using the existing City of Madras sewer 
master plan. 
• Sufficient transportation facilities and service can be provided to the proposed UGB 
amendment area given "reasonably likely" construction of improvements to the 
intersections of US 97/J Street before 2025. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
27 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with State requirements for 
orderly and economic urbanization and provision of public facilities and services pel-
Statewide Land Use Planning Goal 14. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan, 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan Maps, and Madras Zoning Map 
February 2010 
VI. Conformance with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORSs) 
ORS 197 
197.298 Priority of land to be included within urban growth boundary. (1) In 
addition to any requirements established by rule addressing urbanization, land may not 
be included within an urban growth boundary except under the following priorities: 
(a) First priority is land that is designated urban reserve land under ORS 195.145, 
rule or metropolitan service district action plan. 
(b) If land under paragraph (a) of this subsection is inadequate to accommodate the 
amount of land needed, second priority is land adjacent to an urban growth boundary 
that is identified in an acknowledged comprehensive plan as an exception area or 
nonresource land. Second priority may include resource land that is completely 
surrounded by exception areas unless such resource land is high-value farmland as 
described in ORS 215.710. 
(c) If land under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, third priority is land designated as marginal 
land pursuant to ORS 197.247 (1991 Edition). 
(d) If land under paragraphs (a) to (c) of this subsection is inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land needed, fourth priority is land designated in an 
acknowledged comprehensive plan for agriculture or forestry, or both. 
(2) Higher priority shall be given to land of lower capability as measured by the 
capability classification system or by cubic foot site class, whichever is appropriate for 
the current use. 
(3) Land of lower priority under subsection (1) of this section may be included in an 
urban growth boundary if land of higher priority is found to be inadequate to 
accommodate the amount of land estimated in subsection (1) of this section for one or 
more of the following reasons: 
(a) Specific types of identified land needs cannot be reasonably accommodated on 
higher priority lands; 
(b) Future urban services could not reasonably be provided to the higher priority 
lands due to topographical or other physical constraints; or 
(c) Maximum efficiency of land uses within a proposed urban growth boundary 
requires inclusion of lower priority lands in order to include or to provide services to 
higher priority lands. [1995 c.547 §5; 1999 c.59 §56] 
Response: The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is solely comprised of 
land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority of land to be included within the UGB 
pursuant to ORS 197.298(l)(a). There is sufficient land in the Madras URA to provide for 
the land needs estimated for the next 20 years in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) and presented below. 
The proposed UGB amendment and annexation provides land to meet a portion of the need 
for residentially zoned land over the next roughly 20 years (Table 6-1). The City's next 
periodic review process will ensure that the Madras UGB includes enough land to meet the 
remaining land needs projected to 2027. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
29 
Table 6-1: Housing Needs, Madras Urbanization Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, August 2007) 
Table 6-4. Comparison of land supply and demand, Madras UGB, 
2007-2027 and 2007-2057 
Land Demand Supply Surplus (deficit) 
Plan Designation 2007-2027 2007-2057 2007 2007-2027 2007-2057 
Residential 
R-1 451.S 1,355.7 398.1 (53.8) (957.6) 
R-2 46.1 138.2 23.5 (22.5) (114 6) 
R-3 143.0 444.0 242.3 94.3 (201.2) 
RR5 00 0.0 32.7 32.7 32.7 
RR1D 00 0.0 47.5 47.5 47.5 
RL 00 0.0 38.7 38.7 337 
Public/Semi-public uses on res land 353.3 770.7 0.0 (358.3) (7707) 
Subtotal (Residential) 1,004.2 2,708.6 783.3 (220.9) (1,925.3) 
Commercial (Retail & Services) 
C-1 230.6 758.1 80.2 (150.4) (677.9) 
NC 28.6 90.4 4.9 (23.7) (85.4) 
cc 0 0 32.13 32.6 32.6 
Subtotal Commercial 259.2 848.5 117.7 (141.5) (730.8) 
Industrial 
I 251.4 749.9 296.9 45.5 (452.9) 
Notes: aJ public and semi-pjbiic iand needs were allocated to residential zones 
197.610 Local government notice of proposed amendment or new regulation; 
exceptions; report to commission. (1) A proposal to amend a local government 
acknowledged comprehensive plan or land use regulation or to adopt a new land use 
regulation shall be forwarded to the Director of the Department of Land Conservation 
and Development at least 45 days before the first evidentiary hearing on adoption. The 
proposal forwarded shall contain the text and any supplemental information that the local 
government believes is necessary to inform the director as to the effect of the proposal. 
The notice shall include the date set for the first evidentiary hearing. The director shall 
notify persons who have requested notice that the proposal is pending. 
(2) When a local government determines that the goals do not apply to a particular 
proposed amendment or new regulation, notice under subsection (1) of this section is 
not required. In addition, a local government may submit an amendment or new 
regulation with less than 45 days' notice if the local government determines that there 
are emergency circumstances requiring expedited review. In both cases: 
(a) The amendment or new regulation shall be submitted after adoption as provided 
in ORS 197.615 (1) and (2); and 
(b) Notwithstanding the requirements of ORS 197.830 (2), the director or any other 
person may appeal the decision to the board under ORS 197.830 to 197.845. 
(3) When the Department of Land Conservation and Development participates in a 
local government proceeding, at least 15 days before the final hearing on the proposed 
amendment to the comprehensive plan or land use regulation or the new land use 
regulation, the department shall notify the local government of: 
(a) Any concerns the department has concerning the proposal; and 
(b) Advisory recommendations on actions the department considers necessary to 
address the concerns, including, but not limited to, suggested corrections to achieve 
compliance with the goals. 
(4) The director shall report to the Land Conservation and Development Commission 
on whether the director: 
(a) Believes the local government's proposal violates the goals; and 
(b) Is participating in the local government proceeding. [1981 c.748 §4; 1983 c.827 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
30 
§7; 1985 c.565 §27; 1989 c.761 §20; 1999 c.622 §1] 
Response: Notice of the proposed map and text amendments was sent to the Department 
of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) at least 45 days before the first 
evidentiary hearing on the proposal. Notice was sent to DLCD on December 14, 2009, 
which was more than 45 days before the first advisory hearing before the Jefferson 
County and City of Madras Planning Commissions on February 11, 2010. A notice 
addendum was submitted to DLCD on January 14, 2010. Further hearing dates have yet 
to be determined but DLCD provided comments on the proposal on January 29, 2010, 
more than 15 days prior to the final adoption hearing date. 
DLCD comments address the map amendments. They call for a boundary locational 
analysis pursuant to OAR 660-024-0060 and a "reasonably likely" determination from 
OODT for the proposed 20-acre rezoning. The locational analysis is not necessarily 
applicable because the proposed map amendment draws from an adopted and 
acknowledged URA. Part of the idea behind URAs is to create a 20- to 50-year reserve 
of land for urbanization all at once so that the process for subsequent UGB amendments 
can be streamlined. For cities or regions that do not have URAs, it is understood that the 
locational analysis established in -0060 would definitely be applicable and needed. 
As to the "reasonably lilcely" determination, ODOT rendered an affirmative 
determination on February 2, 1010. DLCD comments acknowledge that the set of 
needed improvements at the intersections of US 97/J Street is in the current draft STIP. 
Including them in the final STIP signifies a financial commitment to the improvements 
and thus makes a clear finding for "reasonably likely." 
197.626 Expanding urban growth boundary or designating urban or rural 
reserves subject to periodic review. A metropolitan sen/ice district that amends its 
urban growth boundary to include more than 100 acres, or that amends the district's 
regional framework plan or land use regulations implementing the plan to establish 
urban reserves designated under ORS 195.145 (1)(b), a city with a population of 2,500 
or more within its urban growth boundary that amends the urban growth boundary to 
include more than 50 acres or that designates urban reserve under ORS 195.145, or a 
county that amends the county's comprehensive plan or land use regulations 
implementing the plan to establish rural reserves designated under ORS 195.141, shall 
submit the amendment or designation to the Land Conservation and Development 
Commission in the manner provided for periodic review under ORS 197.628 to 197.650. 
[1999 c.622 §14; 2001 c.672 §10; 2003 c.793 §4; 2007 c.723 §7] 
Response: The City of Madras has coordinated with Jefferson County regarding the 
proposed map and text amendments. The amendments to the City and County 
Comprehensive Plans are post-acknowledgement plan amendments. However, the adoption 
process for the amendments will follow periodic review procedures pursuant to ORS 197. 
As part of periodic review procedures, the proposed amendments are subject to review by 
DLCD and approval by LCDC. DLCD and LCDC will conduct their review process upon 
adoption of the proposed amendments by the Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Board of Commissioners. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
31 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is entirely comprised of land 
from the Madras URA, the first priority of land to be included in the UGB pursuant 
to ORS 197.298(l)(a). 
• There are 36.91 acres in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation. This meets 
some of the estimated need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB 
projected to 2027 by urbanization studies. The proposed R-2 zoning for the 20-acre 
parcel (east site) allows housing and public/semi-public uses such as parks and 
schools. Other land needs for the next 20 years will be addressed during the next 
periodic review cycle. 
• Notice of the first advisory hearing on February 11, 2010 was sent to DLCD on 
December 14, 2009, more than 45 days before the advisory and evidentiary hearings. 
A notice addendum was filed on January 13, 2010. 
• The City of Madras and Jefferson County have coordinated this proposed set of 
amendments. 
• This proposal is a post-acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) but will follow 
procedures for periodic review. DLCD review and LCDC approval of the 
amendment will be necessary for the proposal if it is adopted by both the Madras 
City Council and Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with applicable State 
requirements for urban reserve area planning, plan amendments, and UGB amendments 
pursuant to ORS 197. 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
32 
VII. Conformance with the Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making 
authority regarding all land use application within the UGB except applications for 
amendments to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of land in the UGB. Lands 
outside the UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to 
include the territory to be annexed. 
6 . PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
1.1 Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
1.2 An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community 
Development Department along with the applicable City and County plan 
amendment fees. The City shall forward a copy of the application to the County 
Community Development Department, together with the County's plan 
amendment fee, within five working days of the date the application is filed. 
1.3 The City and County Planning Commission shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may 
hold a joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
1.4 The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be 
forwarded to City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the 
proposed amendment to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be 
forwarded to the County Board of Commissioners. 
1.5 The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final 
decision on whether the UGB should be amended. 
1.6 If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint hearing of 
the City Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to 
resolve the differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution 
process to resolve the differences. 
1.1 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be 
no change to the UGB. 
Response: The Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) (Appendix H) 
was adopted by the City of Madras and Jefferson County on April 5, 2006. Pursuant to 
UGAMA terms for UGB amendments, the City is an eligible applicant for a UGB 
amendment application (Section 6.1). The UGB amendment application and appropriate 
fees were forwarded to the Jefferson County Community Development Department within 
five working days of being initially filed (Section 6.2). 
Hearings by the Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission 
were first held jointly on February 11, 2010. The Madras City Council and Jefferson County 
Proposed Amendments to Madias Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
33 
Board of Commissioners held a joint public hearing on March 29, 2010 to review their 
recommendations from their respective Planning Commissions. On March 29, 2010, the 
Madras City Council approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and 
forwarded it's recommendation that evening to the Jefferson County Board of 
Commissioners who then approved the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. All of 
the public hearings before the Planning Commissions, Madras City Council, and Jefferson 
County Board of Commissioners were conducted in a manner consistent with the provisions 
of the UGAMA. 
It is proposed to annex both the east site and west site to the Madras UGB and city limits, 
and it is proposed to re-zone only the east site at this time. Regardless, if both sites are 
brought into the UGB and city limits, Madras will assume land use administration and 
decision making authority for the sites pursuant to Section 4.1 of the UGAMA. 
Findings: 
• The City is an eligible applicant for a UGB amendment application. 
• Appropriate UGB amendment application materials and fees were forwarded to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department in the prescribed amount 
of time. 
• The proposal will be heard jointly by the County and City Planning Commissions 
and then separately by the County Board of Commissioners and City Council. 
• Madras assumes administrative responsibility for any land annexed to its UGB and 
city limits. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable local requirements 
for UGB amendments per the UGAMA between Jefferson County and the City of Madras, 
adopted April 5, 2006. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
34 
VIII. Conformance with the Jefferson County Comprehensive 
Plan 
Goal 14: Urbanization 
Policy 1: Changes to urban growth boundaries, the establishment of new urban growth 
boundaries or urban reserve areas, incorporation of a new city, or annexation 
of land into a city which is not in an established urban growth boundary 
requires an amendment to this Plan and the Zoning Map. The following 
factors should be used in considering such proposals: 
A. Demonstrated need to accommodate long-range urban population 
consistent with a 20- to 50-year population forecast coordinated with the 
cities; 
B. Demonstrated need for housing, employment opportunities, livability or 
uses such as public facilities, streets and roads, schools, parks or open 
space; 
C. Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services; 
D. Maximum efficiency of land uses within and on the fringe of the existing 
urban area. 
E. Comparative environmental, energy, economic and social consequences; 
F. Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural 
activities on land outside the UGB; and 
G. Priority of land as required by ORS 197.298. Non-irrigated parcels may 
be added to the UGB before irrigated parcels that are in the same 
statutory priority. 
Response: The proposed change to the UGB fulfills some of the need for residentially 
zoned land outside the existing UGB as identified in the Madras Urbanisation Study and 
Addendum. The urbanization studies found the need for approximately 220 acres of 
residentially zoned land — for residential and public/semi-public uses — over the next 15-20 
years. This is land that was found to be needed outside the existing UGB once all residential 
land inside the existing UGB is built out. Although the studies found a land need primarily 
for residential uses, employment and public/semi-public uses also were also determined to 
need land inside and outside the existing UGB in the next 20-50 years. 
The studies were the basis for adopting the Madras URA, which the County adopted in 
November 2008 and DLCD acknowledged in July 2009. The proposed UGB and map 
amendments draw strictly from land designated as URA, which is the first priority land to 
include in die UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The proposed residential zoning and 
expected primarily residential uses are compatible with residential development on the edges 
within the existing UGB, and provide a similar buffer to resource land outside the UGB. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
35 
The URA is comprised of land that is classified as "exception" land as well as land zoned by 
the County as Range Land (RL). Range land was included in the URA because: exception 
land could not meet all the land needs of the next 20-50 years on its own; range land is lower 
value resource land; and range land surrounding the existing UGB — particularly to the east 
and southeast — would be more easily served with sewer than other land surrounding the 
existing UGB. 
The ability to serve land on the east and southeast of the existing UGB and to urbanize land 
that is not parcelized like the exception land in the URA, as well as the lower resource value 
of the land, offer more land use efficiency and cost-effectiveness and fewer impacts on 
prime resource land than initially bringing other land in the URA into the UGB. This gives 
land on the east comparative advantages in economic, energy, environmental, and social 
terms. 
Policy 2: The County shall cooperate with each city to determine where and when an 
urban growth boundary should be expanded. 
2.1 Expansion of an existing urban growth boundary shall be in accordance 
with state requirements, including the priority of land to be included 
within the urban growth boundary. Non-irrigated land should have a 
higher priority for inclusion in the boundary than irrigated land. 
Response: Jefferson County and City of Madras staff have closely coordinated the 
proposed map amendments, and the first evidentiary hearing for the proposal will be a joint 
meeting of the County and City Planning Commissions. The two jurisdictions also worked 
closely together to adopt the Madras URA in 2008. 
The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, statutes, 
and administrative rules as demonstrated in previous sections of this report. The proposed 
UGB amendment is comprised of land from the Madras URA, which is the first priority for 
inclusion in the UGB pursuant to ORS 197.298. The land is not irrigated. 
Findings: 
• The proposed UGB and map amendments provide some of the residentially zoned land 
that is needed outside the existing UGB in the next 15-20 years as found in Madras 
urbanization studies. 
• The amendments draw only from non-irrigated land in the Madras URA, which is the 
first priority land to include in the UGB pursuant to state statute. 
• Residential and related public/non-public uses will be compatible with residential 
development adjacent and inside the existing UGB, as it will with resource land outside 
the UGB that already borders residential uses just inside the UGB. 
• The ability of the land in the proposed amendment area to be more easily served with 
sewer than other land in the URA or other land surrounding the existing UGB and to 
build more densely than developed exception land provides land use, energy, and 
investment efficiencies. Developing more efficiently and on low resource land instead of 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
36 
high resource land also present social and environmental benefits when compared to 
other land surrounding the existing UGB. 
• Jefferson County and City of Madras have collaborated on the proposed map 
amendments. 
• The proposed map amendments comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, 
statutes, and administrative rules. 
Conclusion: The proposed map amendments comply with applicable policies from the 
Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
37 
IX. Conformance with the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan 
GOAL 14 - To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land, and 
to provide for livable communities. 
[Paragraph amended by Ordinance No. 781, Passed by Council on December 12, 2006] 
POLICIES 
A. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
B. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall mutually agree to a management 
plan for the Urban Growth Boundary area. 
C. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall establish an Urban Growth 
Boundary revision process to be utilized in a proposed change of the Urban Growth 
Boundary. 
D. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall support adoption of an Urban 
Reserve Area boundary that, when taken together with land supplies in the Urban 
Growth Boundary, may contain up to a 50-year supply of land for the City of Madras to 
support housing, economic development, public facility, recreation needs and other 
urban land needs. 
E. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall give priority to land in designated 
urban reserve areas over other land when considering urban growth boundary 
amendments. 
Response: The Madras City Council approved the Madras URA in October 2008 and the 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners in November 2008. DLCD and LCDC received 
the URA proposal for review in January 2009, and approved the proposal — but remanded 
sections of proposed County Zoning Ordinance amendments having to do with use 
restrictions in the URA — in July 2009. The land in the proposed UGB amendment that is 
the subject of this application is land entirely drawn from the Madras URA, land estimated 
to be needed for urbanization over the next 50 years. 
F. The City shall favor UGB amendments that involve land in locations that are suitable 
to address identified urban land needs in order to minimize buildable land supply 
shortages and address identified needs. Factors that will be considered when evaluating 
UGB additions include: 
1. Existing and planned capacity of the transportation system 
2. Existing and planned capacity of the city waste water treatment plant 
3. Existing and planned capacity of the city sanitary sewer conveyance system 
4. Existing and planned capacity of the Deschutes Valley Water District supply 
system 
5. Impacts on schools, parks, and public safety service providers 
6. Impacts on future operating costs for public facilities and services 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
38 
G. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall undertake an evaluation of the 
urban growth boundary land supply once every five years or more frequently if certified 
population growth rates exceed 3.2% in three consecutive years. In the event certified 
population growth rates fall below 3.2% for three consecutive years, the City and County 
may agree to postpone the evaluation of UGB land supply for up to three years. 
H. During years when a comprehensive UGB land supply evaluation is not scheduled, 
individual applications for adding property to the UGB shall be limited to requests of less 
than 40 acres. UGB amendment applications must demonstrate consistency with 
applicable Oregon statutes and administrative rules and be accompanied by information 
that addresses Policy 14-J below. Applications that involve more than 5 acres also must 
comply with provisions of Policy 14-1. 
D /. The City, in cooperation with Jefferson County, shall encourage the development of 
complete, livable communities that include characteristics such as: a variety of lot sizes, 
dwelling unit types and ownership types, open spaces and other recreational amenities, 
a mix of land uses, school and community facilities, connected streets, proximity to 
downtown and other employment centers, and development that is scaled to the 
pedestrian and creates a sense of place. New growth areas of more than 5 acres that 
are added to the UGB shall should be planned and developed in accordance either with 
a master planned community development plan approved under the city Master Planned 
Community Overlay zone, or an Area Master Plan. The City encourages Master 
Planned Communities as a means to meet city housing needs as explained in other 
comprehensive plan documents. It may be appropriate, however, for the city to add new 
growth areas to the UGB that are planned and developed in accordance with an 
approved Area Master Plan. A majority of property owners subject to a Master Planned 
Community, or to an Area Master Plan, must consent to be included in the plan. 
1. A Master Planned Community (MPC) Overlay may apply to large multi-phased 
development projects where the master plan is intended to guide future 
development patterns and serves to regulate the site-development approval 
process. A MPC requires generous open space and amenities, and encourages 
efficient use of land and public facilities and services, a variety of housing types, 
innovative designs and complete pedestrian-friendly communities. A MPC shall 
demonstrate efficient use of land consistent with an identified urban land need, 
show appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public facilities, and 
the protection of significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas. A MPC must show how planned land uses will be integrated with the 
existing urban development pattern. Physical barriers, such as highways, tend to 
disrupt complete communities and livability because they disconnect areas from 
downtown and result in an auto-oriented environment of sprawl along highway 
corridors. 
2. An Area Master Plan (AMP) is appropriate for land added to the UGB where the 
approval of future urban development is expected to rely on conventional urban 
zoning and the application of codified development standards and review 
procedures. An AMP may be prepared for contiguous properties added to the 
UGB that are greater than 5 acres and are not subject to a MPC overlay. An 
AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent with an identified 
urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, public 
facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
39 
resource areas. An AMP must show how planned land uses will be integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern. 
3. An approved Master Planned Community Plan or an Area Master Plan must 
include documentation that a majority of property owners support the conversion 
of land to the planned urban uses and also consent to annexation by the city of 
Madras using a voluntary annexation process that is outlined in the plan. 
Response: The total area under consideration is 36.4 acres, which is less than the 40 acre 
maximum established for interim UGB annexation requests. The east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the approved Yarrow Master Plan area. The 
plan designates land for predominantly residential land uses, which is compatible with 
adjacent development in the UGB, while also designating land for open space and park uses, 
community services including schools, and limited neighborhood commercial services. The 
conceptual plan also shows an internal transportation system that includes sidewalks and 
multi-use paths. 
The east site is being proposed for both annexation to the UGB and Madras city boundaries. 
The site can be adequately served with water and sewer facilities given existing and planned 
facilities, according to the service providers (Appendix D). The site is not projected to have 
a significant adverse effect on surrounding transportation facilities given planned 
improvements for the intersections of US 97/J Street (Appendices F and G). Its proposed 
designation as Multi-family Residential is consistent with land needs identified in the 2007 
urbanization studies and with residential zoning in the area. 
Pursuant to Policy 1-1: "An AMP shall demonstrate efficient use of land, zoning consistent 
with an identified urban land need, appropriate locations for transportation improvements, 
public facilities, protection for significant open space, scenic, historic, and natural resource 
areas." It is proposed to annex the west site to the Madras UGB and city limits but to retain 
its existing County Range Land (RL) zoning until the owners are ready to propose 
development. The site is surrounded by land designated for residential and related uses, and 
its future land use and zoning designation must allow for residential and compatible 
public/semi-public uses in order to show that land uses on the west site can be: "integrated 
with the existing urban development pattern." (Policy 1-2) The proposed addition of a table 
showing Madras and County zones that correspond with Madras land use designations to the 
Madras Comprehensive Plan Section IV, Land Use Element (Table 3-1), will facilitate the 
transition of existing County zoning to appropriate City zoning. 
The west site is comprised of three lots — Lots 101 and 200 that total 16.22 acres and are 
privately owned and Lot 102 that is 0.69 acres designated for County right-of-way. Lots 101 
and 200 are both adjacent to Ashwood Road, a County collector, and will not require 
additional public roads for sufficient internal or local circulation. At the time of proposed 
development, proposed land division or planned development plans must show an internal 
circulation system that satisfies City code requirements and street standards. The west site is 
adjacent to the existing Madras UGB and is bordered by Ashwood Road, which eases 
extension of services from inside the existing UGB and city limits to the west site. Water 
and sewer service providers have attested that existing and planned facilities will be sufficient 
to serve the west site (Appendix D). 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
40 
The County has not identified historic, scenic, or natural resources on the west site. City 
open space requirements for subdivisions or planned developments will apply to the site at 
the time of proposed development. 
J. All land use applications or legislative proposals to expand the Madras UGB must be 
accompanied by information that documents the following: 
1. The proposed urban zoning or land use program for the subject properties that 
address an identified urban land need: 
2. An annexation program for all subject properties: 
3. Evidence that public facilities reguired by OAR 660-011-000 that are necessary 
to serve the expansion area can be served either by system improvements 
outlined in adopted public facility master plans or by supplemental improvements 
that augment adopted public facility master plans; 
4. Evidence that the proposed zoning or land use plan complies with reguirements 
of OAR 660-0012-0060 either by demonstrating that planned improvements in 
the Madras Transportation System Plan (TSP) have capacity to meet 
transportation needs for the proposed expansion area or through supplemental 
transportation improvements that augment the adopted TSP to meet the need; 
5. Evidence that providers of other crucial public facilities (e.g. schools, parks and 
recreation, emergency services and health care) are able to meet the projected 
demand for their services: 
6. Evidence that financing for constructing needed public improvements is available 
so that the expansion area can be developed as planned within the planning 
horizon; 
7. Evidence that development in areas subject to natural hazards are protected 
from these hazards; 
8. Evidence that known or probable significant resources related to open space, 
scenic areas, historic places or structures, and fish and wildlife habitat will be 
protected from development impacts or have development impacts offset using 
appropriate mitigation measures. 
Response: 
Zoning and Land Use Designations (PolicyJl) 
The east site is proposed to be re-zoned to a City R-2 designation. This meets some of the 
need for residentially zoned land outside the existing UGB that is projected for the next 15-
20 years. Residentially zoned land will provide for housing and public/semi-public uses. 
This land need is documented in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 
August 2007). (See Table 5-2) 
The west site is proposed to retain its existing County Range Land (RL) designation until the 
time when further land use action and development is proposed. Existing zoning will allow 
only limited development, and appropriate future designations for the site will be City 
residential designations given that City open space and residential zoning currently surround 
the site. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
41 
When rezoning is proposed for the west site and for other land being converted from rural 
to urban, the proposed text amendments (Table 3-1) will assist and regulate the rezoning that 
will occur when changing County zoning to City land use designations and zoning. 
Annexation Program (PolicyJ2) 
The City is the applicant for this proposal, and annexation program pursuant to Article 7 of 
its Zoning Ordinance is described later in this report. 
Goal 11 Public Facilities (Policy J3) and Transportation Planning Rule (Policy J4) 
Kittelson & Associates has performed the transportation analysis needed to deem whether 
the proposed UGB amendment constitutes a significant effect on the transportation system. 
Given that schools generate more peak hour traffic than housing alone, two scenarios were 
developed for Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) analysis that involved both housing and a 
school. Using these scenarios in a TPR analysis, it was found that the increase in traffic did 
constitute a significant effect on the US 97/J Street intersections. However, given 
improvements included in the City's amended TSP and Draft 2010-2013 STIP, the effect can 
be mitigated and removed. 
Public facility analysis for establishing the Madras URA ranked drainage catchment areas 
around the existing UGB for sewer service costs and serviceability. Of the six study areas 
that comprised the preliminary and then final URA, Study Areas 3 and 4 on tlie east and 
southeast consistently ranked higher than other areas. This can, in part, be attributed to 
proximity to the new South Wastewater Treatment Plant (SWWTP) and being upslope of 
the plant. In particular, the proposed UGB amendment and annexation are is located in 
Catchment Area 180 and bordering on Catchment Area 179. These areas ranked 8th and 12th 
out of 60 catchment areas, making them among the more cost-effective and serviceable areas 
of the URA. 
As was also determined during the URA public facility analysis, Deschutes Valley Water 
District (DVWD) found that there would be insignificant differences in providing water 
service to the different parts of the URA. Water supply in the region is adequate to ample. 
Similarly, existing and planned sewer facilities provided by the City will be sufficient to serve 
the proposal area. (See service provider letters in Appendix D) 
Other Public Facilities (Policy J5) 
The east site has access to substantial park and recreation resources. Juniper Hills Park 
(County) and Bean Park (City) are nearby, as well as Jefferson County Middle School and its 
fields. The Yarrow Master Plan that applies to the site and surrounding land also designates 
open space and parks throughout the plan area. 
The City reports that Mountain View Hospital and City public safety and emergency services 
are sufficient to provide services for the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area. 
The sites are served by the Jefferson County School District 509-J. 
Financing for Improvements (PolicyJ6) 
Financing for constructing the needed public improvements will be placed upon property 
owners. As demonstrated by the letters submitted by the City of Madras Public Works 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
42 
Director and Deschutes Valley Water District General Manager, each respective utility has 
capacity to service the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB To extend 
wastewater and domestic water services to the properties to be included in the UGB, each 
property owner will be responsible for extending services lines to their property, not with 
standing the requirements for annexing their property into the Madras city limits. 
Similarly, the Oregon Department of Transportation has determined the proposed UGB 
expansion will significantly affect the US 97/J Street intersection but that the design concept 
is established, the City has implemented System Development Charges to partially fund the 
improvements for this particular intersection and in the Draft State Transportation 
Improvement Plan (STIP) is funding for the intersection. With the design concept 
established and both funding sources identified, ODOT has determined that the US 9 7 / J 
Street intersection improvements are Reasonably Likely to Occur and therefore, impacts of 
the proposed UGB expansion are mitigated. 
Protection from Natural Hazards (PolicyJ7) 
There are not steep slopes (slopes greater than 25%), floodway, or floodplain in the 
proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. In fact, the proposed amendment and 
annexation are driven, in part, by the need to provide a school that is outside the floodway 
and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. 
Fire protection service for the proposal area is currently provided by Jefferson County Fire 
Protection District #1, and will continue to be provided by that district if the land is 
annexed to the city. The area is subject to a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) 
that Jefferson County completed in 2005 in collaboration with the fire district and federal 
agencies. 
Protection of Goal 5 Resources (PolicyJ8) 
The Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files do not identify floodways, floodplains, 
significant habitat, or cultural resources in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation 
area. The only resources cited above that may apply to the site are open spaces. While open 
space will be a required part of public use or residential development that occurs in this area, 
this proposal itself is not a development or entitlement proposal and, therefore, does not 
specify precisely where such open space will be designated. 
Findings: 
• Amendments to zoning and land use designations are planned and proposed. The 
proposed City land use designation is residential and City zoning designation R-2 
(Multiple Family Residential). A need for about 22 acres of land outside the existing 
UGB zoned R-2 was determined in the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum. 
• Proposed text amendments facilitate the transition from urban to rural zoning, from 
County zoning to City land use designations and zoning. 
• Existing and planned transportation facilities — including improvements for the US 
97/J Street intersections in the Madras TSP and the 2010-2013 Draft STIP, which 
ODOT has deemed reasonably likely — will allow the study intersections to operate 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
43 
within adopted standards both in the case of the proposal area being annexed and re-
zoned and not. 
• Existing and planned water and sewer facilities will be sufficient to serve the 
proposal area. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area has access to nearby parks, a 
middle school, and a high school. Rezoning the 20-acre east site to R-2 will allow for 
residential and public/semi-public uses there. 
• Financing of wastewater and domestic water services will be placed upon property 
owners once the properties are annexed and developed in a manner that is consistent 
with the service providers facility plans. 
• In terms of natural hazards, there are not slopes greater than 25%, floodway, or 
floodplain in the proposed UGB expansion and annexation area. The proposed 
amendments and annexation are based, in part, on the need to provide a school that 
is outside the floodway and floodplain of Willow Creek and its tributaries. Fire 
protection service for the proposal area is and will be provided by Jefferson County 
Fire Protection District #1. 
• There are not floodways, floodplains, habitat, or cultural resources that are identified 
in the Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan, Goal 5 inventory, or Jefferson County 
Geographic Information System (GIS) files in the proposal area. Open space will be 
provided pursuant to Madras zoning ordinance (MZO) in which 30% of a Master 
Planned Community must be open space (MZO Section 3.12(D)(4)). 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant policies of 
the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
44 
X. Conformance with the City of Madras Community 
Development Code 
City of Madras Zoning Ordinance 
ARTICLE 7: ANNEXATION 
SECTION 7.1: PURPOSE - The purpose of this section is to: 
A. Implement the policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan; 
B. Provide for City review of all annexation requests for a determination of the availability 
of facilities and services as related to the proposal; 
C. Provide for dissemination of public information and for sufficient time for public 
review; 
D. Provide for City and County coordination of a request for an annexation; and 
E. Provide for an expedited process by establishing procedures whereby the annexation 
and zoning, if applicable, may be considered concurrently. 
SECTION 7.2: APPLICATION PROCEDURE. Annexation is a land use decision and is 
subject to applicable provisions of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan, Oregon 
Revised Statutes, and Oregon Administrative Rules. In addition, the procedures below 
shall be followed: 
A. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing after notification of all 
property owners with two hundred fifty feet (250') outside of the boundary(ies) of the 
proposed annexation. The Planning Commission shall review the proposal for 
compliance with the annexation policies contained in this Ordinance and make a 
recommendation to the City Council, based on: 
1. The annexation proposal which meets the application requirements; and 
2. The Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing to determine a 
recommendation to the City Council to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the annexation proposal based on the 
criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below; and 
3. The Planning Commission shall state its recommendation and the reasons therefore 
in writing to the City Council. 
B. Upon receipt of the Planning Commission recommendation, the City Council shall 
conduct a public hearing and consider an Ordinance declaring the requested lands to be 
annexed to the City of Madras. 
1. The City Council shall review the record of the Planning Commission hearing their 
recommendation and shall determine whether to approve, approve with conditions or 
modifications, or disapprove the feasibility of the proposed annexation in accordance 
with the criteria set forth in Section 7.4 below. 
2. The City Council may conduct additional public hearings to assist their making a 
determination. 
3. The City Council shall state its determination and the reasons therefore in writing. 
Response: The City of Madras sent public hearing notice to the surrounding property 
owners on February 1, 2010. The City and County Planning Commissions held their first 
public hearing on February 11, 2010. The City Planning Commission decided upon a 
recommendation to approve the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment (10-PA-01) at 
its hearing on February 11, 2010 and forwarded it to the Madras City Council. The City 
Proposed Amendments to Jefferson County and Madras Comprehensive Plans and 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
45 
Council is held a public hearing jointly with the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners 
on March 29, 2010. The City of Madras has not provided notice to affected property and 
adjacent property owners, or noticed the public hearings for the annexation of 20 acres of 
the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment to expand the Madras UGB by 
approximately 36.91 acres. 
SECTION 7.3: ANNEXATION APPLICATION The petitioner for annexation shall 
complete an application form provided by the Community Development Department. The 
application fee, established by Resolution of the City of Madras City Council, shall be 
submitted with the application. The application shall include: 
A. A map demonstrating that the proposed annexation is contiguous to the City Limits; 
B. Specific information on each parcel within the proposed annexation area: 
1. Current assessed valuation shown on Jefferson County Assessor's tax rolls. 
2. Acreage of both public and private property to be annexed. 
3. Map and tax lot(s) number. 
C. Names and ages of all residents and list of registered voters in the proposed 
annexation area. 
D. Addresses of all parcels within the proposed annexation area. 
E. Consent to Annexation forms, provided by the City of Madras, with notarized 
signatures of all property owners and electors within the proposed annexation area. 
F. Written findings, which address the following: 
1. Existing land uses within annexation area. 
2. Existing zoning within the annexation area. 
3. Existing improvements: 
a. water system 
b. streets 
c. sanitary sewer 
d. storm drainage 
4. Special Districts within the area: 
a. water districts 
b. irrigation districts 
c. fire district 
d. school district 
e. other 
5. Urban services, the present availability of urban service systems to the proposed 
annexation area, their capacity and cost of extension and/or improvement to urban 
standards: 
a. sanitary sewers - streets - parks 
b. storm drainage - water 
c. fire - power 
d. schools - police 
G. Compliance with all applicable policies of the City of Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
Response: The City is initiating and applying for the proposed annexation. Maps of the 
west site and east site in the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area are included in 
this report as Figure 4-1. Parcel size and other parcel information is presented in Section I, 
Proposal Summary. The City owns the taxlot where the east site is located. The 20-acre 
parcel that is being created from the taxlot has been surveyed. The west site is comprised of 
three taxlots, two taxlots that are privately owned and one small taxlot (0.69 acres) that is 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
46 
County right-of-way. Re-zoning is not proposed for this site at this time as there are no 
immediate development plans. However, this site does better connect the east site to the 
existing UGB and will be suitable for residential uses and compatible public/semi-public 
uses, for which Madras urbanization studies have found a long-term need. 
The property proposed to be included in the UGB amendment and annexed currently is 
vacant and not in active use. It is land under Jefferson County jurisdiction and zoned Range 
Land (RL). There are not water, sewer, or storm water facilities and services extended to the 
site yet, but they can be extended using existing City facility master plans. The Deschutes 
Valley Water District (DVWD) provides water service to the area and can provide facilities 
and service to the site, to be financed primarily by development applicants. The same is true 
for sewer and storm water facilities and service, for which the City of Madras is the service 
provider. As part of its agreement with JCSD, the City will extend water and sewer to the 
edge of the east site. There is an irrigation district in the region — the Central Oregon 
Irrigation District — but the proposal area is not irrigated nor is it proposed to be. 
There is a County collector road — Ashwood Road — along the northern border of the area 
that will not need improvements according to transportation analysis conducted for this 
proposal. (See Appendix F) 
Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1 currently provides service for the area and will 
continue to do so. Public safety responsibility for the area will be transferred from the 
County to the City. In terms of parks and recreation, there are two parks and a middle 
school close to the site, and the Yarrow Master Plan, which includes and surrounds the east 
site, includes the 30% of parks and open space required by local code (MZO Section 
3.12(D)(4)). 
As addressed in the previous section of this report, the application complies with the 
applicable policies of the Madras Comprehensive Plan. 
SECTION 7.4: ANNEXATION CRITERIA. Lands may be annexed only if the City 
Council finds that the following criteria are met: 
A. The property is contiguous to the City limits. 
B. The property is located within the City's Urban Growth Boundary. 
C. The annexation meets at least one of the following purposes: 
1. To serve lands needing City water or sewer to alleviate a present or potential 
health hazard; or 
2. To provide land to accommodate future urban development; or 
3. To provide land for provision of needed transportation or utility facilities; or 
4. To ensure that lands adjacent to the City are developed in a manner consistent 
with City standards. 
D. The petitioner has adequately addressed infrastructure supply and demand issues. 
The annexation is considered timely in that an adequate level of urban services and 
infrastructure can be provided upon annexation or a plan is in place for the provision of 
such services or infrastructure in a reasonable period of time. 
E. The proposed annexation complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. If the 
Comprehensive Plan does not control the annexation, or substantial changes in 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
47 
conditions have occurred which render the Comprehensive Plan inapplicable to the 
annexation, the proposed annexation complies with current Statewide Planning Goals. 
F. The City is capable of extending City sen/ices to the area proposed for annexation 
without negatively impacting existing systems and the City's ability to adequately serve 
all areas within the existing City limits. 
G. The proposed annexation is compatible with the existing topography, potential for 
future land division, natural hazards and other related considerations. 
Response: The proposal area is adjacent to the Madras city limits and is simultaneously 
seeking to be annexed to the Madras UGB and to the city. The proposed UGB amendment 
and annexation area provides land for future urban development, specifically for a needed 
school and housing as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum 
(ECONorthwest, 2007). The east site of the proposal area is part of the Yarrow Master Plan 
area that the City has approved and found to be consistent with City development goals and 
standards. 
The proposal area can be served by water and sewer using existing water and sewer master 
plans and being financed by the City and developers of the sites. Ashwood Road on the 
north side of the proposal area is a County collector road and does not need improvements 
in order to serve the area. Planned improvements for US 97/J Street are the only 
improvements needed in the vicinity in order to mitigate any potential significant effects 
associated with this proposal (Appendix F). Internal circulation and transportation facilities 
will need to be shown in future development applications. 
SECTION 8.2: ZONE/PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS 
A. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map 
1. Amendment to the Zone/Plan Map may be initiated by the Planning 
Commission, City Council, Community Development Director, Land Use 
Periodic Review, or by application of the property owner. 
2. If the application is for a change of a quasi-judicial or legislative nature: 
a the Planning Commission shall conduct a public hearing on the 
proposed amendment at its earliest practical meeting date after the 
proposal is submitted and shall follow the adopted rules for quasi-
judicial hearings; 
3. jx the Planning Commission shall provide a recommendation to the 
City Council based on findings-of-fact; 
4t a The City Council shall hold a public hearing and review the 
recommendation of the Planning Commission, along with any public 
testimony on the issue. The City Council must take final action on an 
amendment request and amendments shall be made by ordinance. 
3. An application for a zone change for land annexed to the city that is 
subject to an approved Master Planned Community Plan or an approved 
Area Master Plan may be considered as an administrative action per 
Article 9.3. 
B. Criteria for Amendments: The burden of proof is upon the applicant. The 
applicant shall show the proposed change is: 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
48 
1. In conformity with all applicable state statutes. 
2. In conformity with the applicable Statewide Planning Goals; and 
3. In conformity with the Madras Comprehensive Plan, Zoning and Land 
Use Ordinance, and policies; and 
4. In conformity with an approved Master Planned Community Plan or Area 
Master Plan, if applicable to the underlying properties; and 
5. That there is a change of circumstances or further studies justifying the 
amendment or mistake in the original zoning. 
Response: This application is being initiated by the City Community Development 
Department/Director. Also pursuant to the terms of the UGAMA between the County and 
the City, the City forwarded the UGB amendment application and appropriate fees to the 
Jefferson County Community Development Department within five working days of being 
initially filed. 
This application is being processed pursuant to legislative procedures and will receive full 
review by the public, the City Planning Commission, and the City Council. Hearings by the 
Madras Planning Commission and Jefferson County Planning Commission will be held first 
jointly on February 11, 2010. The Madras City Council will review the City Planning 
Commission's recommendation at a hearing on February 11, 2010, and will forward its 
decision to the County Board of Commissioners for a hearing on March 29, 2010. 
As demonstrated by the previous findings, the proposed comprehensive plan, 
comprehensive plan map, and zoning map amendments comply with applicable Statewide 
Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Findings: 
• The City has followed procedures for providing notice and holding public hearings 
for the proposal. Notice to adjacent property owners was mailed On February 1, 
2010 to all properties within 750 feet of the properties proposed to be included in 
the Madras UGB. A joint City and County Planning Commission hearing was held 
on February 11, 2010 and then a joint hearing before the Madras City Council and 
Jefferson County Board of Commissioners was held on March 29, 2010. The City 
Council and County Board of Commissioners heard the proposal on March 29, 2010 
and approved the proposal on March 29, 2010. 
• The City of Madras has initiated this proposal. It owns the east site of the proposed 
UGB amendment and annexation area and has an agreement with Jefferson County 
School District 509-J to exchange this land for land downtown upon annexation and 
re-zoning. 
• The proposed UGB amendment and annexation area provides land needed for 
residential and public/semi-public uses, specifically for a needed school and housing 
as demonstrated by the Madras Urbanisation Study Addendum (ECONorthwest, 2007). 
• All service providers — the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Deschutes Valley Water 
District, Jefferson County Fire Protection District #1, Jefferson County School 
District 509-J — have capacity to serve the proposal area given implementation of 
existing water and sewer master plans, planned improvements to US 97/J Street 
intersections, and financing from future proposed development. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
49 
• The east site of the proposed UGB amendment and annexation area is part of the 
approved Yarrow Master Plan area, and the west site fulfills the requirements for an 
Area Master Plan. The set of proposed map and text amendments in this application 
comply with applicable Statewide Planning Goals, State statutes, and Madras 
Comprehensive Plan policies. 
Conclusion: The proposed map and text amendments comply with the relevant provisions 
of the Madras Zoning Ordinance. 
Proposed Amendments to Madras Comprehensive Plan and 
Madras and Jefferson County Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Maps 
February 2010 
50 
Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 
Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey 
Map (20-acre parcel) 
Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management 
Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
(Kittelson & Associates, January 2010) 
Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely 
Determination for US 97/J Street Improvements 
Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
Appendix A: West Site Tax Map (3 lots, 16.91 acres) 

Appendix B: East Site Legal Description and Survey 
Map (20-acre parcel) 
63885 N. Hwy. 97 A Bend, OR 97701 A (541) 382-4192 
December 16, 2009 
City of Madras 
Job# 09077 
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION FOR A 20.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND FOR 
SCHOOL DISTRICT 509-J 
A portion of Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12 as filed in the Jefferson County 
Clerk's Office, situated in the Northeast Quarter (NE 'A) of Section 7, Township 11 
South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, more 
particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Northeast Quarter, monumented with a 2 
inch diameter brass cap, from which the Northeast corner of said Section 7 bears South 
89°39'40" East a distance of 2640.53 feet; thence South 89°39'40" East along the North 
line of said Section 7 a distance of 599.97 feet; thence South 00° 17 '36" West a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the Northwest comer of said Parcel 2 of Partition Plat No. 2002-12; 
thence continuing South 00°17'36" West along the West line of said Parcel 2 a distance 
of 40.00 feet to the South right-of-way line of East Ashwood Road and the True Point of 
Beginning of this Description; thence South 00°17'36" East along said West line a 
distance of 935.13 feet to the Southeast corner of Parcel 1 of said Partition Plat No. 2002-
17; thence leaving said West line South 89°39'40" East a distance of 931.70 feet; thence 
North 00°17'36" West a distance of 935.12 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line 
of East Ashwood Road; thence North 89°39'40" West along said right-of-way line a 
distance of 931.70 feet to the True Point of Beginning. 
Containing 20.00 acres more or less. 
End of Description. 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
09077 Page 1 of 1 

^ 3 
o> r--o o 
fw 
Appendix C: Urban Reserve Area Management 
Agreement (URAMA) (January 2009) 
I* - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madras, an incorporated municipality of 
the State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political 
subdivision of the State of Oregon, hereby refereed as "County". 
A. RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson County are authorized pursuant to 
Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 190 to enter into an Intergovernmental 
Management Agreement for the performance of functions which either governmental 
entity has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS the City and County have previously entered into an 
intergovernmental agreement on April 5, 2006 setting forth their respective rights and 
responsibilities with respect to the Urban Growth Bounardy (UGB); and 
WHEREAS, the Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative 
agreement under ORS Chapter 195; and 
. WHEREAS the City and County consider it mutually advantageous to establish 
this Urban Reserve Area Management Agreement (URAMA) for the purpose of 
facilitating the future conversion of lands in the Urban Reserve Area (URA) from rural 
to urban land uses. 
B. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1. To establish standards and procedures for review and action on proposed land 
use actions and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to 
implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Zoning Regulations 
as adopted by the City and County for the Urban Reserve Area (LIRA); and 
2. To affirm Jefferson County's jurisdictional authority for current planning 
activities, land use decisions, building permiUing, public improvements, and 
code enforcement within the URA ; and 
3. To provide assistance to property owners in the URA by laying out a clear and 
cooperative process designed to make decisions on land use applications in a 
timely and consistent manner; and 
4. To clarify pi aiming and zoning intents and to satisfy the requirements of OAR 
Chapter 660, Division 21 relating to Urban Reserve Areas. 
1 
M-014-C 9 
C. DEFINITIONS 
1. City: City of Madras. 
2. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
4. County: Jefferson County. 
5. Land Use Decision: A Land Use Decision is defined by ORS 197.015 
6. Urban Reserve Area: has the same meaning as set forth in OAR 660-021-
0010(1), and means land outside of an Urban Growth Boundary identified as 
highest priority of inclusion in the Urban Growth Boundary when urbanizable 
land is needed in accordance with the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 
14. 
7. Urban Growth Boundary: The boundary line which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the 
surrounding rural lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
8. Conversion Plan: has the same meaning as set forth in JCZO Section 105. 
D. AGREEMENT 
Compliance with OAR Chapter 660, Division 21. In accordance with the applicable 
requirements of Chapter 660, Division 21, City and County agree as follows: 
1. As required by OAR 660-021 -0040(2)(e): 
(a) The County shall ensure that conversion plans are required and 
processed as part of tentative land division decisions in the URA as 
outlined in the Jefferson County Zoning Ordinance (JCZO) Section 
703.2(0). 
(b) The County shall prohibit certain uses in the URA, including plan or 
zoning map amendments that allow a mimimum lot size less than ten 
acres as outlined in JCZO Section 323.3. 
2. As required by OAJR. 660-021-0050(1): 
(a.) Jefferson County shall have authority and jurisdictional responsibility for 
current planning activities, land use decisions, building permitting, and 
code enforcement within the URA. 
2 
M - 0 1 4 - 0 9 
(b.) Upon inclusion of property from the URA within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, the property shall be subject to the Urban Growth 
Management Area Agreement. 
Designation of service responsibility, as required by OAR 660-021 -0050(2) is as 
follows: 
Service Existing Service Provider 
Future Urban Service 
Provider 
Sanitary Trash Disposal No Public Service Provider No Public Service Provider 
Sanitary Sewer No Public Service Provider City of Madras 
Water Deschutes Valley Water District 
Deschutes Valley Water 
District 
Fire Protection Jefferson County Fire District #1 
Jefferson County Fire 
District #1 
Parks Jefferson County City of Madras 
Recreation 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Madras Aquatic Center 
District 
Transportation Jefferson County City of Madras 
Storm Water Jefferson County City of Madras 
(a.) The local government or special district responsible for services 
(including sanitary trash disposal, sanitary sewer, water, fire protection, 
parks, transportation, storm water) for areas within the URA are 
designated and shown on the map(s) attached hereto and incorporated 
herein as Exhibit "1 A". 
4. As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(3), the terms and conditions under which 
service responsibility will be transferred or expanded, for areas where the 
provider of service is expected to change over time, is described in Exhibit "IB" 
attached hereto and incorporated herein. 
5. As required by OAR 660-0210-0050(4), procedures for notification and review 
of land use actions to ensure involvement by all affected local governments and 
special districts: 
(a) Within the URA, the County shall process all land use applications for 
comprehensive plan amendments, zone changes, and other applications 
affecting land use (including conditional uses, Planned Unit 
Developments (PUDs), subdivisions and partitions) in a manner that is 
consistent with the procedures set forth in the Jefferson County 
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the respective land use 
actions. 
(b) Prior to acceptance of a land division application within the URA, the 
County shall require the applicant to submit a conversion plan to the City 
of Madras as outlined in JCZO Section 703.2(0). 
J 
M-014-C 9 
The intent of the conversion plan is that it: 
1. Is not an engineered plan. 
2. May be amended from time to time by property owners submitting a 
new conversion plan to the City and County. 
3. Does not constitute a separate land use decision, as it is part of a 
land division decision. 
4. Must be recorded with the County Clerk so that future buyers of 
newly-created parcels in the LTRA will become aware, prior to 
purchase, that roads and utility easements will be required when the 
property is further developed after annexation. 
5. Serves a guide to placement of structures in the building permitting 
process. 
The City shall review the conversion plan and work with the property 
owner to ensure that the locations of planned roads and rights-of-way; 
and the locations of future easements for water, sewer, and storm water 
facilities that will adequately serve the site when developed at an urban 
density; are protected. The City may recommend that the conversion 
plan be approved, denied, or be approved with conditions. 
Within 15 days of receiving a conversion plan for review, the City will 
forward its comments to both the applicant and the County, and the 
applicant is required to include the conversion plan and City comments 
with their tentative land division application to the County. 
The County shall review the conversion plan as part of the tentative land 
division application, and approve, deny, or approve with conditions. A 
condition of approval for ihe land division decision shall be that the 
property owner record the conversion plan with the final plat at the 
County Clerk's Office. 
The County agrees to consult conversion plans prior to building permit 
approval of structures in the URA, where applicable. 
The City or County may charge a separate fee for review of conversion 
plans. 
(c) Notice of all land use applications within the URA shall be sent to the 
City of Madras Community Development Department and to any other 
affected City agencies and other applicable special service districts for 
review and comment prior to a decision by the County. Such agencies 
shall be given ten business days in which to provide comments on the 
land use application. 
4 
M-014-C 9 
(d) In making its decision, the County shall consider all comments received 
under Section (c) above. 
(e) The City, and agency, or any other special service district that provides 
comments on land use applications shall be mailed written notice of the 
land use decision and shall have standing to appeal the County's 
decision. 
E. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both 
parties, after public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the 
Board of Commissioners. 
2. Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and 
County Comprehensive Plans, the Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
for the City of Madras and the statewide planning goals. 
3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following 
procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the other 
party at least forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the 
publication of public hearing notices in order to provide ample time for 
resolution of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the parly considering termination. The 
party considering termination shall give the other party at least 20 days prior 
notice of the scheduled hearing date. The 20 day period shall be used by 
both parties to seek resolution of differences. Both parties shall also request 
a collaborative conflict resolution process to resolve differences that remain. 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and 
local ordinances. 
d. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide 
planning Goals 2 and 14. Unless the Urban Reserve Area is no longer an 
overlay zone in the County, this agreement may not be termined without 
adoption of a new agreement. 
F. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
5 
This agreement shall not become effective until properly executed by both the City and 
the County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Reserve-
Area Management Agreements. 
G. SEVERABILITY 
The Provisions within this agreement are serverable. If any section, sentence, clause or 
phrase of this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, 
said invalidity shall not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the 
agreement. 
ADOPTED t h i s ^ f 5 > f January, 2009. 
CITY OF MADRAS, OREGON JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON 
^'Kk/a^u^ /, In 
Mellanic Widmer, Mayor 
Date: l - Q I - Q f t f l q 
ATTEST: 
Mike Ahem, Commissioner 
Wayne Fording, Commissioner 
Date: ^ A J U a t A u J g a o l 
SorvJc* | Existing 3«rvfca Pro v! dor Futura Urban S«rv!co Provider 
Sanftsry Trash Disposal No PubOc Sanrfca Pmvfdar No Pubflc Service Provfctof Sanitary Sawer No Public Servteo Provider City of Madras Water Deschutos VaHey Waler OSatrict DesdUites Valey Water District Rro Protection Jefferson County Rre Dtetjict U1 Jeffbrson County Rro District #1 Parte Jefferson County City ot Madras Recrealkm Madras Aqualic Center District Madras Aqualic Center District Transportation Jsff arson County City erf Madras Storm Water Jefferson County City o/Madras 
| | URA - 3B15 acres 
0 0 2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 
County urn GJS In oi KM krtwuJ ftuitvai euxtbcj md PM pObic irAn l prirMu. Thm GJS tjmlM, MHincri Carty iftwtajtra, m»y Hrt bt *j1iUi Cm ofcts pcrpoau or uui a tr* requutor"! mEcniffi/ b Milfjr irrf hfconafan tan 9va GtS diU ijfcra rraljng tfcfislcnj or Ui>C ia/ ecfloro m tM irJaoraler Jtfanwi Cout*? ihifi Ml ta h«td fatft in My «rtr» la 013 dill TWs HW1 0/ crijdon. tjamrriwieft, orco cor-cniVo Iti auieri al t* daU. ard rdafta MoJ fxidJoml taxttCf of >>* toll Jthrwo County (*iu*ii fw ltj«J hr Hi Wtrmifc^  WTtnonOotTOa.JmrnnW 
Urban Reserve Area fURA) - Exhibit 1A 
H - 0 1 A - 0 9 
EXHIBIT IB 
URBAN SERVICE TRANSITION POLICIES 
Terms and Conditions under which Service Responsibility will be transferred or expanded. 
A. Special Districts. The City shall agree to the formation of any special district within the 
Urban Reserve Area prior to the approval of the formation of the district by Jefferson 
County. This provision shall not apply to County-wide service districts formed under ORS 
Chapter 451. 
B. Service Expansion Plans. Service expansion plans shall be consistent with the Madras 
Comprehensive Plan. As the future provider of, sanitary sewer, storm water and potable 
water services, the City shall prepare, and from time to time, update utility expansion plans. 
These plans shall provide a basis for the extension of services within the Urban Growth 
Boundary, and as such shall be referred to Jefferson County for information and comment. 
C. Transition Policies Relating to Service Responsibility 
1. Sanitary Sewer Service . There will be no public provider of sanitary sewer service until 
City services are available, except in the case of a state mandate due to a health hazard. 
At the time of annexation, the City will require hook-up to City sanitary sewer services. 
There shall be no special sanitary sewer districts created in the Urban Reserve Area. 
Nothing in this provision shall limit the ability of individuals to provide septic services 
(i.e. septic sewer systems) on their own private property within the Urban Reserve Area. 
2. Potable Water Service. The City of Madras and Deschutcs Valley Water District shall be 
the public providers of water in this area, unless new districts are expanded or created 
through mutual agreement by the City and the County. Nothing in this provision shall 
limit the ability of individuals to provide services on their own private property within the 
Urban Reserve Area. 
3. Fire Protection. The Jefferson County Fire District #1 provides lire protection services to 
property within the Urban Reserve Area, the Urban Growth Boundary, and the City 
limits. 
4. Parks. Jefferson County provides parks services within the Urban Reserve Area. The City 
of Madras provides parks services within the city limits and the Urban Growth Boundary. 
The City of Madras will provide these services as park properties as they are included 
within the city's limits unless agreed otherwise. 
5. Recreation. The Madras Aquatic Center is separate recreation district that serves 
Jefferson County.. The Madras Aquatic Center District will continue to provide aquatic 
recreational services when property is included in the City of Madras Urban Growth 
Boundary and city limits. 
»-014 -09 
6. Transportation and Street Improvements. Jefferson County provides transportation 
services on county roads within the Urban Reserve Area. Upon annexation from the 
UGA, the City of Madras will accept all paved Jefferson County roads that have a 
pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the county may 
structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70 at which time the City shall be 
obligated to accept jurisdiction of such road. Jefferson County policies for road design 
and construction standards to be used in the Urban Growth Boundary and Urban Reserve 
Area are outlined in the Jefferson County Code, Sections 12,18.070 and 12.18.080. Per 
Jefferson County ordinances, the Jefferson County Public Works Director may require 
roads to be constructed to City of Madras standards. 
The Oregon Department of Transportation provides transportation services on state 
highways within the Urban Reserve area. The Oregon Department of Transportation 
retains jurisdiction and maintenance responsibilities on all state highways after 
incorporation into the UGB and annexation except in special cases where jurisdiction is 
transferred to the City or County by a specific agreement. 
7. Storm Water Management. Jefferson County provides public storm water management 
services to property where required within the Urban Reserve Area. The City will 
provide storm water management services to property within the city limits. Transition of 
public storm water management services will follow transition of road maintenance 
responsibilities. 
Jefferson County Code Section 12.18.070 : 
12.18.070 Roads within an urban growth boundary. 
Roads within an urban growth boundary (UGB) or urban reserve shall, at the discretion of the 
Jefferson County director of public works, conform to the design and construction specifications 
of the city contained within the UGB boundary and shall be subject to review and approval of 
that city's director of public works and the Jefferson County director of public works. (Ord. O-
69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007: Ord. O-l 10-02 § 2 Exh. B (part), 2002) 
12.18.080 Roads within one mile of an urban growth boundary. 
At the discretion of the Jefferson County director of public works, design and construction 
standards and specifications for roads within one mile of a UGB may be modified to 
accommodate future reconstruction to city standards. Roads in zones contiguous to the UGB of 
Madras, Culver or Metolius may be required to be constructed in accordance with Section 
12.18.070 of this chapter if, in the opinion of the director of public works, such roads would 
become connected to the city road system. (Ord. 0-69-07 § 1 Exh. A (part), 2007: Ord. O-l 10-
02 § 2 Exh. B (part), 2002) 
Appendix D: Water and Sewer Service Provider Letters 
S.E.D Street, Madras, OR, 97741 - 541-475-3388 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: January 26, 2010 
To: Jefferson County Planning Commission 
Madras Planning Commission 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Community Development Director 
Cc: Nick Snead, City of Madras Community Development Director 
From: Gus Burril, City of Madras Public Works Director 
Overview: 
The City of Madras (City) has filed a post-acknowledgement plan amendment application with 
Jefferson County to expand the current Madras Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) by 
approximately 37 acres and re-zone 20 of the 37 acres from Range Land (RL) to Multi-Family 
Residential (R-2) as shown in the attached map. To complete this land use action the City is 
required demonstrate that public facilities (i.e. wastewater, domestic water, stormwater, and 
transportation) can be extended to serve the area proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
The City provides wastewater and stormwater service and the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB are located within the planning boundaries of the City of Madras 
Wastewater and Stormwater Master Plans. 
Wastewater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Wastewater Master Plan. Figure 5-2B (attached) identifies a planned 8 inch 
wastewater service line to be constructed in the Ashwood right-of-way that would service the 
properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. Additionally, the City constructed a 10 
inch wastewater service line to Oregon Department of Corrections Deer Ridge Correctional 
facility in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB 
(see attached drawing). 
When the proposed properties are developed, the City will require the property owner to extend 
wastewater service in accordance with City standards. Based on the planned improvements in 
the Madras Wastewater Master Plan, the existing wastewater facilities in Ashwood Road, the 
City of Madras has capacity to provide wastewater service to the properties proposed to be 
included in the Madras UGB at the time of development. 
Stormwater: 
The properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB are located within the study area of 
the City of Madras' Stormwater Master Plan. Figure IV-5 (attached) identifies a planned 12 inch 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 1 of 2 
stormwater service line to be constructed in Ashwood Road adjacent to the properties proposed 
to be included in the Madras UGB. Furthermore, Design Criteria (1) in the City of Madras 
Stormwater Master Plan in Section IV, requires" 
"Any property development or redevelopment shall include stormwater facilities 
designed to handle runoff from all tributary areas for the 24-hour, 25-uear design 
storm event. The facilities shall limit the peak discharge from the development in a 
24-hour, 25-year design storm to the estimated pre-development peak flow rate in 
a 24-hour, 10-year design storm." 
Considering the planned stormwater facilities identified in the City of Madras Stormwater Master 
Plan and the existing stormwater design standards for development, the City has capacity to 
provide stormwater service to the properties proposed to be included in the Madras UGB. 
Conclusion: 
The City of Madras has capacity to serve the properties proposed to be included in the Madras 
UGB with wastewater and stormwater service. Should there by any questions, please contact 
me at 541-475-2622. 
Sincerely, 
Gus Burril, P.E. 
City of Madras 
Public Works Director 
71 SE "D" Street 
Madras, OR, 97741 
541-475-2622 
Attachments: Figure 5-2B Wastewater Collection System 
Phase 1B Segment 2 Wastewater Improvements 
Figure IV-5 Stormwater System Improvements 
An Equal Opportunity Provider 
Page 2 of 2 



Page 1 of2 
Nick Snead 
From: Edson at DVWD [edson@dvwd.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 11:15 AM 
To: Nick Snead 
Subject: RE: Domestic water service availability 
—> 
Hi Nick-
DVWD should be able to serve that property. Naturally, the mainline upgrades and/or extensions would have to 
be paid for by the developer. When there is an engineered plan for the required infrastructure, I will be happy to 
do an estimate for the waterworks portion to be Installed by DVWD. 
Feel free to call if you need more information. 
Edson Pugh, P.E. 
General Manager 
Deschutes Valley Water District 
881 SW Culver Hwy 
Madfas, OR 97741 
Ph. #(541) 475-3849 
From: Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
Sent: Monday, January 25, 2010 8:45 AM 
To: Ed Pugh 
Subject: Domestic water service availability 
Importance: High 
Ed, 
3/30/2010 
Page 2 of 2 
Good morning! You may have heard the City is proposing to expand the Urban Growth Boundary by 
approximately 37 acres and annex 20 acres into the City for the Jefferson County School District. The property 
proposed to be annexed is south of Ashwood Road. I have attached a map to quickly orient your to the property. I 
am wondering rf DVWD domestic water service is available or if not, what facility improvements would future 
development be responsible for constructing? This email is a formal request and I would like to put your response 
in the record to demonstrate (hopefully) that water service is available and/or the facility improvements needed to 
serve the area proposed to be in the Madras UGB. 
Let me know if you have any questions. Call me at 541-323-2916 if needed. 
Take care, 
"One may walk over the highest mountain one step at a time" -John Wanamaker-
Nicholas S. Snead 
Director 
Community Development Department 
City of Madras 
(541)475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
No virus found in this incoming message. 
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 8.5.4321 Virus Database: 271.1.1/2644 - Release Date: 01/25/10 07:36:00 
3/30/2010 
Appendix E: Property Owner Consent Letters 
/ 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
JE>'- c i ' - ; $ p \ • o-.-nty 
|COIVlM,"v.iT - l a m e n t 
i f? r i ) 
REC6 
The undersigned property owner(s) hereby consents to the annexation onft0"foHwyh§tdes©ptbi 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
(Legal description of property): 
Map #11-14-7. Tax Lot #101 
(See Attach K * M M r "B") 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation 
of the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, 
further or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws 
of the State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the property described. The undersigned 
and City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the 
undersigned and the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the rightto 
consent to its annexation. 
Address: „ Spriwgview Farms. LLC 
2519 E. Asftgood Road 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this day of Q f t f r ! ) ^ 20 0 3 the above named 
Albert L. Zemke 
[List name of individual(s) having signature notarized) 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act. 
OFRCIAL SEAL 
KAREN J COLEUAN 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 338495 
Jj^^MMISglONJXPIRES SEPT, 14,8004 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
2003-5431 
M u r o n m ) 
Notary Public for Oregon -
My Commission Expires: i ~ 14^ 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Mansion, County Clerk 
00016169200300054310030036 
D-ANXCON Cnisl Stn-2 KATE 
$13.00 <11.00110.00 85.00 
2003-005431 
$41.00 
10/13/2003 04:08:44 PM 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consent to 
Annexation" for the following described property and acknowledge that the consent shall remain in effect 
indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
"See Attached Exhibit "B" 
bert L. Zemke ( J —' 
Signature: 
Typed Name: Al I 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared beforeme this I f l f f i day of fflftfthlltk 20 0 3 the above named 
Albert L. Zemke 
(List name of individual(s) having signature notarized) 
and acknowledged the foregoing instrument to be a voluntary act. 
j W o f f l i fr^nmnnrO 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission Expires: 9 -
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
OFFICIAL SEAL fij 
KAREN J COLEMAN ® 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON fl) 
_ COMMISSION NO. 338495 fe 
MYCOMMiaSiON EXPIRES SEPT14, ZQM tf 
EXHIBIT "B 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #101 
ALBERT L. ZEMKE 
PARCEL I: Northeast quarter, Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter, North 
half of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter, Southeast 
quarter of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, 
Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian 
Jefferson County Oregon, and the Southwest quarter of the Northwest 
quarter of the Southeast quarter. 
2003-5431 
Jefferson Countjf^ ficial Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
00061426200800022790060062 
D-ANXCON Cnt=1 Stn=2 KATE 
$30.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
2008-002279 
$56.00 
06/17/2008 04:16:27 P M 
RECORDED DOCUMENT 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 
DO NOTREMOVE THIS CERTIFICATE 
(This certificate constitutes a part of the original instrument in accordance with ORS 
205.180(2). Removal of this certificate may invalidate this certificate and affect the 
admissibility of the original instrument into evidence in any legal proceeding.) 
KATHLEENB. MARSTON 
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK 
CITY OF MADRAS 
PROPERTY OWNER 
CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
The undersigned property owner(s) hereby consents to the annexation of the following described 
property to the City of Madras, Jefferson County, Oregon, 
(Legal description of property): 
MAP #11-14-7, TAX LOT #200, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED 
ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" 
The undersigned property owner hereby gives express, continuing, written consent to annexation of 
the property described herein to the City of Madras; and does hereby agree to execute such separate, further 
or additional application, petition, and consent as may be hereafter required by the City, or the laws of the 
State, as now or hereafter enacted for such annexation. This consent is given in consideration of City 
services that either have been or will be applied to the described property. The undersigned intends this 
consent to comply with all requirements of law for annexation of the property described. The undersigned and 
City intend that this consent shall constitute a covenant running with the land, binding on the undersigned and 
the undersigned's heirs, successors, or assigns. 
The undersigned represents that the undersigned is the owner of this property and has the right to 
consent to its annexation. 
DATED this k - j day of , 2 0 ^ ^ . 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Address: 2465 E. ASHWOOD ROAD 
MADRAS, OREGON 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
)ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this ^ ^ day of M f t 
rs ^ i I - r - ! f JN ' , 1 - H ffwW/ \AJ. T^ftS* 
U o r n + ' h u T h e M f t S . c r / J d r f l f ^ I h o M f r S and acknowledged the foregoing 
20 <2&Lthe above, 
named ^ r r , ^ / yj K^aro i / n tv - i 
(List name-of individual(s) having signature notarized) ^ ^ 
instrument to be a voluntary act. ^ M C S c y ^ J ^ e J ^ 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
Notary - State of Oregon K / v w - y 
My Commission Expires: in ^^ c/CCrf 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
RUTHEBABRINGER 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 396406 
^SIONEXPIRESAUG. 24,2009 
63885 N. Hwy. 97 A Bend, OR 97701 A (541)382-4192 
City of Madras 
May 13, 2008 
Job # 08029B 
Tax lot: 11-14-7-200 
CITY OF MADRAS ANNEXATION #2008-02 
A Tract of land located in the Northeast One-Quarter of the Northwest One-Quarter (NE 1/4 -
NW 1/4) and the Northwest One-Quarter of the Northeast One-Quarter (NW 1/4 - NE 1/4) of 
Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, 
Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
Beginning at a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears South 
00°17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 7; 
thence leaving said North-South Section centerline and along the South right-of-way line of 
Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson 
County official records South 89°39'39"East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-
of-way line South 00°17'35" East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 89°42'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet to a point on the North-South centerline of said Section 7 which bears 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-Quarter corner of said Section 
7, being a point on the boundary of Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2004-15 (recorded as MF# 
2004-4735); thence along the boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 
354.87 feet; thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right with 
a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a distance of 117.35 feet; 
thence North 00°17'35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; thence 123.03 feet alongthe arc of a 
tangent curve to the right with a radius of 240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" 
East for a distance of 121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left 
with a radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°12'33" East for a distance of 
184.75 feet to a point on said South right-of-way line; thence along said South right-of-way line 
the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South 88°42'59" East a distance of 170.57 feet; 
18.12 feet along the arc of atangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 feet, the chord of 
which bears South 89°11' 19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet; South 89°39'39" East a distance of 
104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the terminus of this description. 
End of Description 
v. j 
Renews: 12/31/2009 
Page 1-of 1 
08029B 

CONSENT TO ANNEXATION 
ONE-YEAR WAIVER 
(l/We), the undersigned, do hereby waive the one-year requirement on the attached "Consent to Annexation" 
for the following described property and acknowledge that the consent shall remain in effect indefinitely. 
(Metes and Bounds Description and Map to be Attached to the Consent to Annexation) 
Map # 1 1 - 1 4 - 7 Tax Lot # 200 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Signature: 
Typed Name: 
Address: 
DOROTHY THOMAS „ „ ^ 
F^frpj lAJ. ThaiM 
2465 E. ASHWOOD ROAD 
MADRAS. OREGOH 97741 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
)ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared before me this day of 20 the above 
l\J ThoMtfS. j bj Ooro j-h^^ThortffrS A+J - -fAof 
named DoROTHk£ ' .TKoMf t i a K ^ P h r o T h f ^ I h o M f i S and acknowledged the foregoing . 
(LisTriame of individual(s) having signature notarized) J O a ^ - f L j bo^fr-s f Ah/ufiutrj - -f-A&-r 
instrument to be a voluntary act. 
After Recording Return to: 
City of Madras 
71 S.E. "D" Street 
Madras, Oregon 97741 
Notary - State of Oregon s ^ / i / ^ ^ ^ 
My Commission Expires: / H i /JL»j£> J Q Q ^ - f \f 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
RUTHEBARRINGEH 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 396408 
ISSION EXPIRES AUG. 24,2009 
PETITION FOR ANNEXATION BY CONSENT 
PURSUANT TO ORS 222.170 
I/We, ByPiK) \AJ. TKoyvlrt-l ^ Oo^ko1 hereby respectfully petition the City 
Council of the City of Madras to annex contiguous property to the City pursuant to 
ORS 222.170 (1)(a). 
(Metes and Bounds Legal Description and Map Required) 
(These can be attached to the Consent to Annexation Form) 
M a p # n - 1 4 - 7 T a x Lot # 200 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Map # Tax Lot # 
Attached hereto is the consent of the owner(s) of the property, and is incorporated 
herein as Exhibit "A". Petitioner hereby certifies that they are the owner(s) of said 
property as ownership is described in ORS 222.120(7). Petitioner further certifies to the 
City that they are the legal owner(s) of record and are the sole owners of the property. 
Dated this 1 % day of / M ^ w 20 O g . 
Signature: 
Typed or Printed Name:1-' DOROTHY THOMAS ^ 
Signature: ^ k s 
Typed or Printed Name: £ V / W . T U o f a & S 
Petition for Annexation by Consent 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:07:49 pm 
Account # 
Map# 
Code - Tax# 
Legal Descr 
Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
63227 SERVICE RD 
BEND, OR 97701 
Prop Class 550 MA SA NH Unit 
RMV Class 500 05 60 000 -9922-0 
Situs Address(s) Situs City n 
Value Summary 
Code Area AV RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0020 Land 219 4,400 Land 0 
Impr. 0 0 Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 219 4,400 0 
Grand Total 219 4,400 0 
Code Plan Land Breakdown 
Area I ™ R»=D Ex Zone Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0020 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Grand Total 4.00 0.00 
Code Yr Stat Improvement Breakdown Total Trended 
Area |o# Built Class Description TD% Sq. Ft Ex% MS Acct # RMV 
Grand Total 0 0 
Code Exemptions/Special Assessments/Potential Liability 
Area TyPe 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
13274 
111407-00-00101 
See Record 
LINCICOME MADRAS DEVELOPMENT, LLC 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
ASSESSABLE 
CANCELLED 
NORMAL 
See Record 
See Record 
Comments: SPLIT CODE WITH #13134 Combined with account #13134 
Page 1 of 1 
JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:07:27 pm 
Account # 
Map # 
Code - Tax # 
Legal Descr 
Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
13134 
111407-00-00101 
0020-13274 
0110-13134 
See Record 
JOHN, HEINZ A. 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
2009-741 
03-02-2009 / $350,000.00 
COX, DON 
Prop Class 
RMV Class 
3879 LADERA VISTA RD 
FALLBROOK, CA 92028 
551 MA SA 
501 05 60 
NH 
000 
Unit 
9922-1 
Situs Address(s) Situs City 
IDS 1 2519 EASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Value Summary 
Code Area AV RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0020 Land 
Impr. 
225 
0 
4,460 
0 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 225 4,460 0 
0110 Land 
Impr. 
6,016 
166,480 
79,020 
218,540 
Land 0 
Impr. 0 
Code Area Total 172,496 297,560 0 
Grand Total 172,721 302,020 0 
Code 
Area 
Plan Land Breakdown 
ID# RFD Ex Zone Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0020 3 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 4.00 TD2 
Code Area Total 4.00 0.00 
0110 2 R RL Farm Site 100 A 1.00 MHS 
0110 1 R RL Farm Use Zoned 100 A 7.28 TD2 
Code Area Total 8.28 0.00 
Grand Total 12.28 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
IDS Built 
Stat 
Class Description 
Improvement Breakdown Total 
TD% Sq. FL Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 1 1962 142 One story with basement 100 3,718 185,200 
0110 2 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 2,400 30,390 
0110 3 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 128 850 
0110 4 1962 300 Farm Bldg/Res Gp 100 400 2,100 
Grand Total 6,646 218,540 
Code Exemptions/Special Assessments/Potential Liability 
Area Type 
0020 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
0110 
NOTATION(S): 
POTENTIAL TAX LIABILITY 
Comments: SPLIT CODE WITH #13274 
Page 1 of 1 

JEFFERSON County Assessor's Summary Report 
Real Property Assessment Report 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
January 25, 2010 2:06:46 pm 
Account# 
Map # 
Code•Tax # 
Legal Descr 
2602 
111407-00-00200 
0110-2602 
Metes & Bounds - See legal report for full description. 
THOMAS, EVAN W & DOROTHY E Mailing Name 
Agent 
In Care Of 
Mailing Address 
2465 E ASHWOOD R 
MADRAS, OR 97741 
Prop Class 401 MA 
RMV Class 401 05 
Tax Status 
Acct Status 
Subtype 
Deed Reference # 
Sales Date/Price 
Appraiser 
ASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
See Record 
See Record 
COX, DON 
SA 
52 
NH 
000 
Unit 
1857-1 
Situs Address(s) Situs City 
IDS 2465 E ASHWOOD RD MADRAS 
Code Area AV 
Value Summary 
RMV RMV Exception CPR % 
0110 Land 
impr. 
81,960 
131,050 
130,790 
211,530 
Land 
Impr. 
Code Area Total 213,010 342,320 
Grand Total 213,010 342,320 
Code 
Area ID# RFD Ex 
Plan 
Zone 
Land Breakdown 
Value Source TD% LS Size Land Class Irr Class Irr Size 
0110 1 R RL Market 100 A 3.94 
Grand Total 3.94 0.00 
Code 
Area 
Yr 
|D# Built 
Stat 
Class 
Improvement Breakdown 
Description TD% 
Total 
Sq. F t Ex% MS Acct # 
Trended 
RMV 
0110 
0110 
1 1956 
2 
142 
300 
One story with basement 
Farm Bldg/Res Gp 
100 
100 
4,173 
224 
210,280 
1,250 
Grand Total 4,397 211,530 
Page 1 of 1 
Jefferson Cour^ ' Official Records 
Kathleen B. ML. ion, County Clerk 
Send tax statements to: 
7 1 O. S-t-
Oft. 97-74 I 
After recording return to: 
City of Madras 
71 SE D Street 
Madras OR 97741 
2005-00026 
$36.0! 
00028S48200500002620020028 „„ „„ _ 01/18/2005 02:31:06 Pl\ 
D-WD Cnt=1 Stn=2 KATE 
$10.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
WARRANTY DEED 
(Statutory Form) 
(ORS 93.850) 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, Grantor, conveys and warrants 
to the CITY OF MADRAS, an Oregon municipality, Grantee, the following described real 
property, situate in Jefferson County, Oregon, free from encumbrances except as specifically set 
forth: 
Parcel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2004-06, recorded April 15, 2004, as 
Instrument No. 2004-1610, Jefferson County, Oregon. 
SUBJECT TO: 
1. 2004-2005 taxes, a lien in an amount to be determined, but not yet payable. 
2. As disclosed by tax roll the premises herein described have been zoned or classified for 
farm use. At any time that said land is disqualified for such use, the property may be 
subject to additional taxes or penalties and interest. 
3. The property lies within the boundaries of Deschutes Valley Water District and is subject 
to any charges or assessments levied by said District, and pipeline easements in connection 
therewith. 
4. Rights of the public in and to that portion of the herein described premises lying within the 
boundaries of roads or highways. 
5. Right of way, if any, of Public Usage Road No. 3053 as shown on tax assessor map but 
which the Grantor declares may be closed or vacated by prior Federal or County 
governmental action. 
6. Mineral reservation by the United States of America as disclosed in Deed recorded April 
28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
7. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
The true consideration for this conveyance is an exchange of real property between the 
Grantee and Grantor. 
-1 - WARRANTY DEED\\Serverl \Kathy\Morrow\Morrow Properties - Warranty Deed .wpd ty Deed .wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REEDER, LLP 
s ^ f & ^ A A T T O R N E Y S AT LAW 
20S S.E. Fifth Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
/ 1 Fax: (541) 475-3944 
8. Reservation by the United States of America for power line as disclosed in Deed, recorded 
April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147453. 
9. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for electrical transmission lines 
granted to Central Electric Cooperative, Inc., recorded April 28, 1983, Fee No. 147456. 
10. Easement, including the terms and provisions thereof, for communication lines, granted 
to Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company, recorded April 28,1983, Fee No. 147458. 
11. Easements as shown on Partition Plat 2004-06, for utility and access. 
THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN 
THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND 
REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE 
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED 
USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR 
FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930. 
Dated this _ day of 
MORROW PROPERTIES, INC: 
Bv: 
ANDREW J. MORROW, President 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
) ss. 
County of Jefferson ) 
Personally appeared ANDREW J. MORROW, who being duly sworn, did say that he is the 
President of MORROW PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, and that the seal affixed to 
the foregoing instrument is the corporate seal of said corporation by authority of its Board of 
Directors, and ,he-acknowledged said instrument to be its voluntary act and deed, before me this 
day of ' J i i W ^ ^ 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
SANDRA KRUEGER 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION.NO 378974 
^ ^ M I S S I O N E X P I R E S MAR. 28 2008 
Dtary Public for Oregon 
My commission expires: 3 -O 2 
-2- WARRANTY DEED\\Server l \Kathy\Moirow\Morrow Properties - Warranty Deed.wpd 
GLENN, SITES & REEDER, LLP 
ATTORNEYSATLAW 
205 S.E. Fifth Street, Madras, OR 97741 Ph. (541) 475-2272 
Fax: (541) 475-3944 
W U p 
tec i i .14 
r # p , s. boe. e. s e c 1/4 / i 
M A P N U M B E R 
100 
T A X L O T 
N U M B E R 
T y p e 3 , , E C 
I N T , I N 
R E A L PROP 
A C C O U N T N U M B E R 
C O D E 
A R E A 
N U M B E R 
OFFIC IAL R E C O R D O F DESCRIPT IONS 
O F REAL PROPERTY ^ 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
m 
I N D E N T E A C H N E W 
C O U R S E T O T H I S P O I N T 
^^^^^^^^ FORMERLY PART OF T.L, NO. 
t f i A D D I T I O N A L D E S C R I P T I O N A N D P P Q P 1 
g ^ g • • S — ' R E C O R D O F C H A N G E 
D A T E OF E N T R Y 
O N T H I S C A R D 
DEED RgCORP ACRES RSMAINIWO 
w x n l o 
m s r u e m 
Sec 7, NE£j NE^SEi; SE^WiSE^; 
Exchange D 26 540 
Exc: 
Co Rd 809 1.82 
Zemke, Bnma dth cer t 
Annexation to DVW 
Annexation Resolution 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
B&S Dd /Cemke to Zemke, TR 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Zemke, AC 
**Also: TL 600- 10 Ac. (The SW %NW% 
DC 
SE% Sec. 7, T.llS, 
All in Code 13 
R . 1 4 E , W.M. 
Morrow Prop, Inc. to Zemke, AL 
Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust 
Boundary Adjust. BA 97-14 
Code Totals 
#2836- Code 13= 10 AC. 
#2833- Code 11= 228.18 AC. 
Total 238.18 AC 
Zemke, AL Succ Trustee of Zemke, AC Trust to 
Springview Farms, LLC 
WD 
BS 
2 it 77 
02/08/88 
02/08/88 
02/15/85 
02/13/85 
12/01/89 
03/16/92 
1/04/95 
5-22-97 
57 
230.00 
228.18 
#88 533 
#88-
#88c 
#892 
921 
#95C 
971 ! >66 
10-15-
4-15-98 
97 97) 
981 
5-7-01 200: 
293 
294 
748 
£44 
029 
425jJ 
538 
18V 
238.18 
11 14 7 100 
\ 0 / 9 . 0 m 
i i C v m m. 
OFFICIAL. R E C O R D O F D E S C R I P T I O N S 
O F R E A L P R O P E R T Y 
r w c . s . R G E . E . SEC. lA T Y P E S P E C . m 
C O D E ^ 
A R E A ggjS 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
M A P N U M B E R N U M B E R R E A L PROP 
A C C O U N T N U M B E R N U M B E R g g j 
Exc. 0.45 Survey Adj. 
Exc, 10Road Ded. 
Exc. 13.43 AC. Parcel 1 of PP 2002-12 
New Desc. for this TL 
Parcel 2 of PP 2002-12 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
' Code Totals 
Code 110 = 213.7 AC. 
Code 130 = 10.0 AC. 
Total 223.7 AC. 
Springview Farms, LLC to City of Madras 
Code change 58.56 acres annexed into City of 
Madras, Ordinance #711 
Code 10- = . .8.44 Acres 
Code 20 = 58.56 Acres 
Code 110 = 155.14 Acres 
Code 130 = 1.56 Acres 
PP 
WD 
12-30-02 
2-5-03 
1-2-03 
31-13-04 
2002 5926 
2003 3589 
2003002 
223.7 
223.7 
£ 
LU 
O Q 
LU _J 
UJ 
V) 
It © 
m co 
UJ 
V) 
V) < 
>-
h-
Z 
Z) 
o 
o 
z 
o co 
a : 
UJ 
UJ 
co 
m 
UJ 
_J < 
o UJ a. CO 
3 § 
X 
2: 
o 
o o o ^ 
c 
(0 
1 
CM CM 
re a 
v a. 
re | OT i o a: 
u. 
o o o I-o ^ 
c ra —} 
• CM CM 
ra a 
T> a) •D L. 
o a 0) a: 
o o o 
CM I c TO 
Z 
o 
H h-
O 0 UJ co 
UJ 
O 
c 
o 
ti ra w c re 
o o 
o o o ^ 
c CD 
1 CN CN 
re a 
at > 
CM 9 0 11 
ra a 
c UJ 
o 9 CO o 
u « a 
i C LU UJ w 
z 
z 
o 
w a: uj uj o 
H o± u u 
St A 
01 u ai 
£ 
O 
w 
5 OL < u. 
UJ 
si 
3 cc B n-w 
a 
So 
nt +) 
w 
CM o o CN 
o 
a) 
Q 
00 
a) 
ra 
a 
d> 
re 
OT 
CM O O CM 1 o 
a> 
Q 
re 
O 
•o 0) •o k. o o at OL 
CM O o CM 1 0 (U a 1 
00 
re 
O 
c UJ 
•5J-o CO o 
c o +3 a re w c re 
o 
o CM 
CM o o ^ 
0 
a> 
O 1 
00 
& re 
o 
at > 
y a> 
UJ 
£ 
z 
o 
w a: uj uj o 
l< O X o o 
A (0 U 0) 
•H XS in H ai 
ai 
H UJ 
S 5 § o 
u. 
O 
£ 
o 
CO 
s s H 9 55 | 
w 
B o id 
+1 
W 
10 o o ^ 
a. a) CO 1 
10 
a) 
re 
O 
0) 
re 
OT 
lO o o CM 1 a. a) 
CO 
ra 
Q 
•o d) 
•a L. 
o o d) a: 
in o o CM • a. a) CO 
<u 
ra 
Q 
b 
c UJ 
O) in 
c o 
o re w c A 
< O 
o 
CM T— 
in o o CM • a. 
<u 
M 1 in 
n 
a 
4) (> 
O 
£ UJ 
CL < 
E 
£ 
O 
0 
1 UJ 
a. 
O j-
Q. 
Z 
o 
w 
a: UJ > 
z 
o o 
g a. 
m o o r>i 
UJ 
a. 
UJ 
S 
O <n 
UJ s 
CJ o a 
a. < 
UJ >-
a. UJ x o 3 
O > 
a UJ <n 
ai •o o u 
o +) 
ai > 
£ 
+1 
0 
0 +> 
ai 
1 
T3 ai +> 
ai H ai 
a 
n) ai 
ai •0 0 u 
0) N •H CO 
ai +) 
(4 c M 
0) +) 
o 
£ v o 
u 
01 
A u 
fl) N •H W 
tn 
£! T) 0 U 
id +> 
o H 
a) N •H w 
re 
Q 
9) 
n CO 
o o CM 
• i 
0 
O 1 CM CM 
re a •a a> •o b o o 0) OL 
o o CM 
• i 
u 
O I CM CM 
ra 
a 
CT> CO CT> CO CO CO 
c 
o 4S u ra « c re 
a> in 
o o CM I -*—J 
0 
O 1 CO CM 
ra a at 
<M O 
£ UJ 
a. < 
E E 
O 
£ 
UJ 
a. O 
3 O V) 
a a. 
c a UJ 
Q 
UJ 
a. 
UJ ^ 
O <0 
I-z UJ 
S z> o o a 
a; < 
UJ >-
a: UJ x u 
o > 
a UJ 0) 
H V) LU a, 
LU H 
< o 
L!J Q. V) 
i l l CD Z < 
I o LU N W 
cn 
s u < 
O ° J ° 
>< 5 < o 
CO 
Z 
O 
F o ° 
UJ V) 
UJ 
o _ 
2 2 
a. 
x 
to _ 
2 £ 
§ 
•8 0 
CJ 
o +1 
ai > 
£ 
0 £ 
0 +1 
a) > 
1 
•o ai 
0 H ai o 
m ai 
n o o 
ai N •H W 
o 
o 
U3 
. LD 
•o 0 
CJ 
01 ai Cn 
si u 
ai N •H w 
+1 
ft CO 
(1) +1 o 
ai H 
•rl W 
S ra Q 
© 
(9 0} 
00 o o CM 
in CM 
ra a •a a> •o k> o u a> on 
00 o o CM 
a> 
(9 
a 
b 4-1 C 
LU 
05 
in 1--<35 
CO 
c o 
u ra 
(A c ra 
< CD 
00 O O CM i CJ) 
<f 
00 CM 
2 re a 
a) > 
w p o a 
H t—< 
bJ GO o 
H a W eo 
CN 3fc 
o u u < 
o" o 
H O •J 
X 
2 
(±< (N O 
t 
t -H a 
p < o 
O a r" 
(N &-1 
° r i o " =8= ^  fflg 
O E-> 
P o 
< H a w p H w W -P £ 
^ 2 a -1 l 
s i 
M g. 
a m 
a 
ai N •H W 
a o 
o 
'•3 <u p 
T3 cU 
s o 
P 
CVJ 
a> O) <o a. 
I— fO 
LU OS LU t-
< 
O UJ 
a. to 
t-O ° 
><5 
< o H 
g 
i— o UJ (0 
Ul 
o 
X (0 z : 
o H 
cd 
•S « 
IU 
£ 
M G O U „ 
P ,0) o 
t o m 
2 -rf § 
6 r? J8 o 
£ 
a B cd . . 
O T3 
13 fc 
O £ u 
O ^ 
N-O 
a w <u •s M a o 13 • 
i/i 
Cd W 
P I •<t 
O o o o o 
£ o S5 lU o 
13 
CD 
•5 
S,m c / o « (N PI 03 iU 
£ O £ 
•a '3 to TD 
M 
C £ 
<D 
o 
13 o b 
u a 
•3 E N ' 1 ) 
(U 
F -
<D 
o m O 
F -
s 
0 H 
<4H 
o 
0 
( N 
T ) 
• a 
M 
<4H 
s 
o 
<4H 
o 
e u 
O ID 
ID 
U P. "5b £ .0 P & 
$ 
CD •s 
J 3 o o 
>3 Z 
<u ^ 
*—• 
CD 
o CD 
03 •s C4H 
•3 O • f—l o 
% CD 
l+H 
O0 o 
< c 
o 
J U 
•8 
«n 
•<t pi 
1 - 1 
o 
cD 
o 
o <4-1 g o 
CO (U 
o 
TS cd % •t-t 03 t-i iU 
o 'B .5 
< 2 
o 
a 4—> 
C/3 i o <U o 
© ? J5 
00 T3 • a 
C/J cd 
o >b P I S1 o 
S 
0 
CM 
V O 
o 
1 3 
I 
CO <u b 03 
(N 
S" 
!§ 03 
13 O U 
3 8 
© 
ra a (0 (0 
CD o o 
CM 
ra 
o 
« % 
T3 P> 0) oo T3 g L- 3fc 
s i 
cn ^ 
CM 
>> 
ra 
o 
ra Q 
UJ 
pi oo 
a Pi M CQ 
CO 
CO N-
CM 
CO Nf o u u < 
J 
< 
I s 
2 w 
a. 
CO Nf 
CM 
T~ 
cn o o 
CM 
>. si 
ra ^ 
o 
ra a 
0 > 
o £ 
I J Ul 
Q w J J 
oo OJ 
o y 
m « s t--
^ £J O 2 o =tt 
o o o o o o I—I I—I t—I 
o o o o o o o o o o o o r- t- Cr o o o 'd-
Cn C ra J3 u 
o o o o o o CO v 
CD 
£L 
<0 
W w (1) 
ai a) a) H 
N M n o 
•H a a < 
M < < 
t V0 VD lO 
+ IT) • 
• oo 
i—I CO m 
m cn kD HI cn in in M • • • • y CM i—i oo oo 
< in i—i m 
o o o m i-H CM o o o o o 
o o o o o o o o 
o o o o 
o o o o H n H N rH t—I O O 
O O O O 
11 14 
T W P . R G E . SEC. 1/4 1 / 1 6 
M A P N U M B E R 
101 
P A R C E L 
N U M B E R 
T A X L O T N U M B E R 
T y p o 
Spec. 
I n t . i n 
R E A L PROP. 
110/ OFFIC IAL RECORD O F DESCRIPTIONS 
C O D E 
A R E A 
N U M B E R 
OF REAL PROPERTY 
COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
| j = F Q R M E R L Y P A R T O F . 11 14 7 100 
I n d e n t each n e w 
course t o t h i s p o i n t 3134 D E S C R I P T I O N A N D R E C O R D O F C H A N G E Date Recorded 
Ref# or Acres 
V o l . | PG . Rema in ing 
TllS R14E Sec. 7 
Partition Plat 2002-12 
Parcel 1 
Affidavit of Correction PP 2002-12 
Code change 4.0 acres annexed into City 
of Madras Ordinance #711 
Code 20 =4.0 acres 
Code 110 =9.43 acres 
Springview Farms, LLC to Zemke, AL 
PP 
BS 
L2-30-02 
2-5-03 
01-13-04 
02-28-05 
20025926 
£0030589 
13.43 
13.43 
20050974 
Zemke, AL to Lincicome Madras Development, 
LLC WD 5-1-05 20052823 
£ 
UJ 
O 
G 
UJ 
- J 
UJ 
tn 
k 
o 
tn 
tn 
UJ 
<n 
V) < 
> 
H-
Z 
D 
O 
O 
z 
O tn 
tc 
UJ 
LJL 
U. 
UJ 
-5 
I-
C0 UJ a 
LU 
J < 
O LU 0-C0 
l l * 5 < o 
CO 
o 
O 
o ° 
LU <0 
Ul 
o 
X to z 
o I-
m o o CN i 43 <U 
If) CN 
O 4-J n Q 
® 
m CO 
m o o CN 
.a 0 LL i in CN 
ra Q 
•a o •o k. 
o 
o u ct 
m o o CM • -Q (1) 
a . 
r If) CN 
5! IS a 
c ai 
CN CO 
CO 
C o 
^ u <0 (0 c ra 
o 
o (Si 
in o o 
43 d) u. i in CN 
at •4-1 (0 a 
© 
> 
o 0) It HI 
111 
£ < 
z 
z o 
w a: uj UJ C5 
I I O I o o 
CT) ID 
s 5 
a •H 
W h (U 
& H 
•H 
m H a) 
ai 
EH UJ 
2 i a o 
££ UJ CD 
ai uj" p 
w 
B o id +j 
w 
01 a) & 
43 u 
in o o CN • 
ra 
co 
a> 
ra 
O 
a> 
re 
co 
in o o CN i >% ro 
0) 
re a 
T3 a> T3 u O o « 0£ 
in o o CN • 
co 
CO 
a> 
ra 
O 
e ID 
CO CO 
CO 
e o 
u ra w c re 
o o 
(N 
m o o CN i >% (0 
ra Q 
4) > 
Im U 
£ UJ 
CO H a. UJ X o 
o > 
111 5 < 
z 
z o 
w a: uj 
m o %< o x o o 
a •H 
01 H HI 
a •H 
0) H ai 
w 
8 
o 
z UJ 
0. 0 
UJ > 
UJ D 
1 
llJ 
S o o 
3 p 
U! 
w 
-P <« 
4J 
CO 
a 
w <u & 
G n) 
43 U 
in o o CN • Q-<D w 
B ra a 
15 to 
in o o CN i Q. 0) tn 
re a 
T3 0) T3 u O u a> Q£ 
in o o 
a. <u CO 
in 
ra Q 
c UJ 
in o 
c o +3 O (Q </) C re 
< 
o 
o <Si 
m o o CM i a. 0 en 
a> 4-i re a 
4) > '•as o 
£ UJ 
CD O O CN i C T-=J CN 
-? 9. CO O) CN CO 
a . 8 re 'E Q CL 
a> 0) 13 13 <0 <0 
CD O o CN 
+J 
o* CO 
o 
CN 
55 ra O 
•a a* n o u 
CD O O 
CN 
in CN 
ra Q 
£ 
UJ 
CN Ol O 
CO in 
CN 
c g 
O re w c ra 
CL 
CD M-
CN 
(D O O ^ 
CL <D 
ra O 
0) > 
IP u a> it 
UJ 
<1) O) ro a 
Q. < s 
§ L!_ 
fS O i—i 
O o o o 
O 
<3-
O 
A: L!_ • 
2 o 
Sc 
CD 
LU 
a: a 
a 
3 O w 
a 
E 
LU a. 
ID 
O o 
CM 
UJ O a. D O 
CO H 
Z 
LU s D O O 
a 
a. < 
Ul >-
A 
UJ 
x 
O => 
O > 
a 
LU 
V) 
T ) 
0 CJ 
0 •p 
ai > 
O 
O 
O 
C 
O •p 
ai > 
O 
fl 
Q) H at Q 
id 
<U 
"D 
0 
U 
I1J 
N 
•H 
CO 
A> 
•P a) c! M ai v 
CF> 
o I 
ai •a o u 
M ID D» 
O 
0) N 
•H W 
•P En tr O) 
at T) o u 
to H flf •P 0 EH 
0 
N 
•H 
CO 
f-o o ^ 
c 3 
0) 
ra 
a 
_Q> 
ra v> 
f-O o 
CM i c 3 
2 ra a 
T3 0) •a 
o u 0) 
o o 
CM • 
c 
—} 
CM 
a> 
ra a 
c UJ 
m n. 
CO 
f co 
c o £ u ra W c ra 
< 
CJ) 
T 
CRI 
o 
O 
CM 
I O) 3 < 
l 
CO 
o % 
a 
0) > 
U 
0) 51 UJ 
A o 
M • 
A 
UJ 
O H 
Z 
»—» 
Q < 
S B 
o K 
* P 
00 
UJ 
O 
z < 
X 
O 
UJ rsi 
CM 
O VO CM 
CO 
H 
O t- u 
Oi <, 
O " o 
CM 
5 9 a. 4 
O 
H 
a s 
° 9 pi 
U 
< 
o VO 
"O 
O 
U 
O +> 
ai 
!> $ 
•P 
0 
0 
+1 
© 
I 
" 0 ai 
•P ai 
H ai 
Q 
M 
0) 
"O 
O 
U 
0 
N 
•H 
W 
ai 
•P 
IB 
H A) 
•P 
O 
ID 
O 
I 
ai •a 
O 
U 
to 
(D & 
s Xi 
U 
A) 
H 
•H 
W 
•P 
D 1 
CO 
"O 
0 
U 
(0 
H 
ID +J 
0 
EH 
UJ 
N 
•H 
W 
CM 
(D 
D) 
ID 
Q. 
H to ui or, 
UJ 
H 
1 
< 
O 
LU 
Q_ 
CO 
f -
O 
o o 
to 
z o 
P r-
o ° 
UJ 
CO 
UD o 
CL 
I 
CO 
z 
5 
o 
0) tj o u 
w 
H 
rt 
•P 
o EH 
0) N •H 
CO 
o 
u o 
Q 
u 1-J J 
H 
§ 
s Ok o J 
w > 
w 
Q 
cn 
Q < 
s 
w 
£ o 
u 
u 
J o 
H 
O 
J 
J 
H 
§ 
s 
0-o 
w > 
w 
Q 
00 
Q < 
£ 
w a: 
S s ' o 
My 
u j u 
O S 
-I 
S w o W 
CM Q 
o 
S S s 
l & i S " W o fx, cm 
co o 
CO 
I - . o 
OJ 
5 a. 
t*-o 
a: Q co • 
XL K. 
Ill 
00 
I— o © 
ts 
* 
U O 
O 
H 
§ S2 co 
U 
^ H 
- Z 
W 
s o 
oo > 
< H w Q 
•p 
a* to 
oo o o 
CM i 
ra 
CM 
a> g u 
<8 'E a a. 
® fl> 
« (0 
CO CO 
oo O o 
CM i 
ro 
CM 
ra 
Q 
•a a> •a w 
O o e> 
oo o o 
CM i 
(0 
ra 
O 
c 
UJ 
o o o o r-o 
<z> 
H § 
° 3 co O 
S o w y 
CO < 
O co u 
J 
a . w 
w 
m S o 
o 
•p o o 
tl o o tr < • 
CO o o 
CO O 
CM O 
o o 
i-H CM 
iH O 
O O 
o> o o 
2 O 
l § -, o 
CM l O 
O CO 
<2 8 to 'C 
Q CL 
«} a> n ra 
CO CO 
a» a o 
CM 
-tf-
o 
* 
a •a 0> •a u-
O a d) a 
Ol o o 
CM 
Ifi O 
<d 
ra a 
c 
UJ 
CM ri-ai o co M-
c .o iff o ra « c 2 
o 
a» 
CD o o 
CM 
<u •4-f 
(3 
Q 
CD 
> 
o 
£ 
UJ 
a 
< 
§ 
o h-
Z 0 
1 
UJ £L 
O 
H a. 
UJ 0 
z < 
X o 
UJ 
s < 
z 
o 
CO 
Q 
a 
O) o o CM 
UJ 
a. 
t 
UJ 
£ 
O <0 
z 
UJ 
S => o 
o Q 
o: < 
UJ >-
3 
Of 
UJ 
X 
o D 
o > 
in m 
O UJ <0 
0. •r) A w 
U 01 
- CC DC B»UJ UJ 
II 
H to UJ 
& 
UJ H z 
_J < 
o UJ Q. to 
H 
Q 
S 5 < o H 
<o 
Z o 
F 
o 
UJ to 
UJ 
o 
o 
i-
Z 
UJ 5 CL O 
_ l UJ > 
UJ Q in 
2 Q . << 
S N 
LU Z SUJ 
l l i z S o 
Q < 
•P 
& 
w 
o o 
o o 
00 O (N O 
o o <—I CM r-l O 
o o 
I (0 z § 
o H 
01 01 & a 
(S 
O 
(S 
4-1 0 H <]> 
N •iH W 
a> O) (0 a. 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
R E G O N 
TITLE COMPANY 2UU3UU007410020021 
D-WD Cnl=1 Stn=2 KATE 
$10.00 $11.00 $10.00 $5.00 
2009-000741 
$36.00 
03/04/2009 03:26:23 PM 
After recording return to: 
FIRST OREGON TITLE COMPANY 
116 SE D Street, Ste A 
MADRAS, OR 97741 
Until a change is requested all 
tax statements shall be sent to 
the following address: 
Heinz A. John 
3879 Ladera ViBta Road 
Fallbrook, CA 92028 
Escrow No, 
Title No. 
0011105TD 
11105 
WARRANTY DEED 
§ 
a. 
E 
o o <D S3 
c 
o 
CD 
ffl 
I u. 
Lincicoms Hadras Development, LLC, Grantor(s) hereby grant, bargain, sell, warrant and convey to; Heinz A. John Grantee(s) and grantee's heirs, successors and assigns the following described real property, free of encumbrances except as specifically set forth herein in tile County of JEFFERSON and State of Oregon, to wit: SEE EXHIBIT A WHICH IS MADE A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE AcctB 13134/13274 Hap# 11-14-7 101 
SUBJECT TO: all those items of record and those apparent upon the land, if any, as of the date of this deed and those shown below, if any: and the grantor will warrant and forever defend the said premises and every part and parcel thereof against the lawful claims and demands of all persons whomsoever, except those claiming under the above described encumbrances. 
The true and actual consideration for this conveyance is $ 350,000.00. 
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER SECTIONS 2, 3 AND 5 TO 22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007 (MEASURE 49 (2007)). THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VBRIFY THB APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER SECTIONS 2, 3 AND 5 TO 22 OF CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007 (MEASURE 49 (2007)). 
Dated this U. day of March, 2009. 
James MtsDcaXJOie, Memcer 
Seafce of Oregon —„ v , comity of aaFFOMON O i s c K ^ i JBPPtwtren j /in" This instrument was a,sJejQwledged before me on March X. , 2009 by Mitch Cole. 
^Ttid^Sy feoiic^lor oregon) 
My commission expires_ fa] ft[tx»o 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
DAPHNE BRJX 
NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
COMMISSION NO. 407450 
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 18,2016 
© 
Order So. 0008661 
Page 5 
EXHIBIT "A" 
Legal Description: 
A parcel of land containing 12.28 acres, more or less, being a portion ofPareel 1 of Partition Plat No. 2002,12 
located in the Northeast One-quarter of Section 7, Township 11 South, Range 14 East of the Willamette 
Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: 
Commencing at a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 7 which bears South 00°17'35" East a 
distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Section 7, thence leaving said north-Bouth 
section centerline and along the south right-of-way line of Ashwood road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded as instrument No. 2005-005605 of Jefferson County official records South 89°39'39" East a distance 
of 61.23 feet to the true Point of Beginning of this description; thence continuing along said right-of-way line 
South 89°39'39" East a distance of538.68 feet to a point on the east boundary of said Parcel 1; thence along 
said east boundary Soutii Q0°17'35" East a distance of 935,15 feet to the Southeast comer of said Parcel 1; 
thence along the south boundary of said Parcel 1 North 89°40'13" West a distance of 599.90 feet to the 
southwest comer of said Parcel 1, being a point on said north-south section centerline; thence along said north-
south section centerline North 00° 17'35" West a distance of 510.26 feet to a point which bears South 
00o17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-quarter comer of said Section 7; thence leaving 
said north-south section centerline North 89°42'25" East a distance of 61.22 feet thence North 00"17'35" West 
a distance of 424.32 feet to the point of beginning. 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR 
REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT REPORT 
FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 
Jan J 3,2010 
ACCOUNT # 
MAP 
CODE -TAX # 
15964 
1114070000102 
0010 -15964 
MAILING NAME OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 
AGENT 
IN CARE OF ATTN; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MGR 
MAILING ADDRESS 
1793 13TH ST SE 
SALEM, OR 97302 
TAX STATUS 
ACCNTSTATUS 
SUBTYPE 
DEED REFERENCE # 
SALES DATE/PRICE 
NONASSESSABLE 
ACTIVE 
NORMAL 
2006-4457 (SOURCE ID:) 
06-23-2006/$39,021.00 
PROP CLASS 960 MA SA NH UNIT 
RMV CLASS 400 05 52 000 68912-1 
| SITUS ADDRESSES) SITUS CITY 
[IDA .... _ 
VALUE SUMMARY 
CODE AREA AV RMV RMV EXCEPTION CPR % 
0010 LAND 0 64,550 LAND 
IMPR. 0 0 IMPR. 
TOTAL 0 64,550 TOTAL 0 
GRAND TOTAL 0 64,550 GRAND TOTAL 0 
LAND BREAKDOWN 
CODE AREA ID it RFD PLN ZN VALUE SOURCE TD% LS SIZE LND CLS IRR CLASS IRR SIZE 
0010' R 1 RL Market " " 100 A 0.69 ' 
TOTAL 0.69 TOTAL 0.00 
Page 1 
LU 
O z 
X co z 
I 
co o o e* 
C t-
3 CN 
7 oo cn 
CM CO 
£ 8 
« 'C 
O CL 
4) OJ 
« "3 tn tn 
CD O O 
CM 
(D O O 
CM i CL m 
tn d> 
w • 
a> > 
"5 
£ U! 
£ 0) 
LU « z o 
a a E 
a •o ai § UJ 
A. UJ T3 K-
O 
O 
O 
U J 
§ 
0) 
A : 
I -
CL 
< 
z 
<D 
O 
a> 
0 5 1 -
O 
O 
O IS 
3 
tn 
LU 
CM I 
O 
tn 
O 
C O 
UJ 
H 
- 3 I 
I N 
( 0 
UJ 
Z 
_ J 
CM 
® 
O 
CL 
( 0 < o 
N 
A 
£ * 
4-* 
C D
 #
2 < LU A . D #
2 
> CO LU 
H 
z i -
o 
o g 
* o CM 
EN 
O 
Q A 
Z 00 M 
O CO CM UJ 
CL ( 0 O A 
T " c £ 
UJ O 
U _ '•s 
L L S o A » UJ UJ T" C o 
~> 
Z 
O 
s 
H 
A : 
O 
<0 
1 -z 
p r--
o ° 
UJ 
CO 
0. 
<D 
<Si 
UJ 
£ 
O 
o 
O 
X o 
CD 
UJ 
i-4 
to X o <£ 
o 
o o> CO vo 
a 
•H a m M 
1 O 
n aloe w UJ UJ 
Z Z 
I I 
ai 
Qxccl f) LU UJ 
Z Z 
8 
tn z o h-o UJ a: a: 
g 8 
O u_ 
s ° 
D£ t O LL o F 
UJ £ 
< 0-
h a W Q 
UJ 
(0 
<D 
9 
U 
< < 
•P h C 
CO 
0) 
n 
a 
a; 
73 CO 
CD o o 
CM 
A . tu w 1 0 
CM 
1 a 
T3 ai •a k. o o V 
a: 
CD O o ^ 
Q. 
CD 
CO 1 o 
CM 
•8 n a 
£* 
c 
LU 
CO o> 
CO ai as 
CM 
c o '•g 
TO 10 c « 
O LO 
CD O O 
CM 
A . 0) w I o 
CM 
FFI 
• S a 
0> > 
o 
£ 
LU 
UI UJ 
u ' 
Z CO 
£ CO 
o w O UJ 
CO CO P w p"? 
I S Z 
<U O) ro a 
Cr 
CO 
Q < 
§ 
id +> 
o 
E-L 
ai H 
•H 
CO 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk 
00044474200SQQ044570Q30031 
D-WD Cnt^l Stn-2 KATE 
$15.00 $11.00 $10.0015.00 
2006-004457 
$41 .00 
07/20/2006 02:32:09 PM 
Space above this line for Recording Office Use 
After recording, return to: Send Tax statements to: 
Oregon Department of Corrections (same) 
Attn: Community Development Manager 
1793 13th Street SE 
Salem, OR 97302-2595 
WARRANTY DEED 
(ORS 93.850) 
Lincicome Madras Development. LLC, an Oregon limited liability company . 
Grantor, conveys and warrants to STATE OF OREGON, by and through its 
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Grantee, its successors and assigns, the real 
property described in Exhibit A (the "Property") free of encumbrances, except for 
easements, conditions, and restrictions contained in the public record, and except 
as specifically set forth herein (none). 
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON 
TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF 
ANY, UNDER ORS 197.352. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE 
PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE 
LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS 
INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD 
CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO 
VERIFY APPROVED USES, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST 
FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 AND TO INQUIRE 
ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 
197.352. 
The true consideration for this conveyance is $39,021.00. 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
Page 1 of 1 
Dated this day of CTn^e 2006. 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
)ss. 
Grantor 
by James 
Lincio 
Cole, Managing Member of 
adras Development, LLC 
County of J ^ Q ^ W W i ) 
This instrument was acknowledged and executed before me on this day of 
by James Mitch Cole, Managing Member of Lincicome Madras Development, LLC. (J 
2006, 
j uue i . j 
NOiiwy Puaic-onteoN 
COMMtSSON NO, 380978 
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 1», 
'-/^j^f*- J&A CjfJ 
Not^Public for(Oregon y 
Commission e: cpires: S / l ^ J O j 
ACCEPTED BY: 
The State of Oregon, acting by and through 
its Department of Corrections 
By: 
As: op(jXYKjd/b-nS., fa 
STATE OF OREGON ) 
County of U a j r i d y ^ ) 
This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of t j U-qui > 
by Boe&f 
2006, 
and 
authorized representative of the Oregon Department of Corrections, acting under authority 
granted to him/her by the State of Oregon. 
OFFICIAL SEAL 
CAROLYN R PATTON 
1 S P 7 NOTARY PUBLIC-OREGON 
s d S ^ COMMISSION NO. 388422 
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JAN. 11.2009 
Notary Public for Oregon 
My Commission expires: H I - O f 
WARRANTY DEED 
File: Lincicome - East Property 
Page 1 of 1 
EXHIBIT A 
Legal Description for Warranty Deed 
ASHWOOD ROAD 
Section 7 (East Property) 
A 60.00-foot wide strip of land, lying 60.00 on the south side of the following described centerline, over land 
located in the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 7 of Township 11 South and Range 14 East of the 
Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, described in the Warranty Deed recorded at 2005-002823 of the 
Jefferson County Official Records: 
Beginning at Engineer's Centerline Station 5+00, on the section line between Sections 6 and 7 of Township 11 
South and Range i4East of the Willamette Meridian, Jefferson County, Oregon, which bears North 89°39'17" 
West 1481.20 feet from the 1/4 corner between said Sections 6 and 7; thence South 89°39'17" East 138.33 feet, 
along the section line between said Sections 6 and 7; thence leaving said section line, 17.02 feet along the arc of a 
1039.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 89°11'08" East 17.01 feet); thence South 
88°43'00" East 1205.50 feet; thence 17.13 feet along the arc of a 1039.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of 
which bears South 89°11'20" East 17.13 feet); thence South 89°39'40" East 2394.42 feet; thence 633.14 feet along 
the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 62°10'44" East 609.14 feet); 
thence South 34°41 '49" East 774.75 feet; thence 1709.82 feet along the arc of a 1000.00 foot radius curve left (the 
long chord of which bears South 83°40'47" East 1509.02 feet); thence North 47°20'15" East 542.88 feet; thence 
2560.21 feet along the arc of a 1400.00 footradius curve right (the long chord of which bears South 80°16'24" 
East 2218.09 feet); thence South 27°53'03" East 943.15 feet; thence 1158.98 feet along the arc of an 850.00 foot 
radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 66°56'44" East 1071.26 feet); thence North 73°59'34" East 
585.08 feet; thence 368.57 feet along the arc of a 340.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of which bears 
South 74°57'06" East 350.79 feet);thence South 43°53 '47" East 305.17 feet; thence 254.87 feet along the arc of a 
340.00 foot radius curve left (the long chord of which bears South 65°22'17" East 248.94 feet); thence South 
86°50'46" East 596.74 feet; thence 122.81 feet along the arc of a 660.00 foot radius curve right (the long chord of 
which bears South 81°30'56" East 122.63 feet); thence South 76°11'06" East 271.44 feet to engineer's centerline 
station 151+00, the terminus for this description, from which the 1/4 corner between Sections 9 and 10 bears North 
89°14'59" East 2049.79 feet. 
The parcel of land to which this description applies contains 30,016 square feet, more or less. 
This description may include areas that are preexisting public right-of-way or easements, which are retained, and 
included herein to provide a clearer record of title in the future. 
f REGISTERED N 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
OREGON 
JULY 18, 1980 
JERRY C. POWELL 
V 1 9 1 9 J 
RENEWS 1 2 - 3 1 - 2 0 0 6 
Page 1 of 1 Warranty Deed Legal Description - East Property 
Lincicome Madras Development, LLC 
11 14 7 200 
J f O F F I C I A L R c C O R D O F D E S C R I P T I O N S 
1 1 * | | * O F R E A L P R O P E R T Y ^568 
JEFFERSON COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE 
T11S R14E WM 
Sec 7, The N 4-75 ft of the E 4.00 ft of the WD 
NE-^ NWi". WD 
Exc» 
Co Rd No 809 0.27 
Code Change Rural Madras Sanitary Diat 
Dissolution of Rural Madras Sanitary District 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record 
Oregon Corner Restoration Record • 
Easement inside 11 14 7 TL 302 for this tax 
lot (Granted to Thomas, E & B) Included in a 
Warranty Deed worked on 11 14 7 TL 302. WD 
9 5 78 
9-2-81 
02/13/85 
12/01/89 
1/04/95 
07-28-05 
21 
25 
389 
530 
0 81 
0 •9< 
#88: 
#89 
#950 
294 
$748 
029 
20054126 
78 
-81 
4-.63 
4.36 
a: 
LU 
CD a 
UJ - j 
UJ 
CO 
o 
CO 
CO 
UJ 
CO 
CO < 
> 
t— z 
Z) o 
o 
z o 
CO 
£ 
UJ 
u . 
LL 
UJ 
H co UJ a: UJ 
H 
Z 
< 
o UJ 
a. co 
H 
3 8 
< o 
<D 
z 
o 
H ^ 
o ° UJ tn 
UJ o 
z 
OL 
I tn 
z . 
£ o h-
m o o C\l i Q. 
CO 
3 ra 
O 
« 
ra CO 
m o o CN i 
CL <D 
a> 4-1 
ffl 
a •a at 
"S o u ® 
a: 
in o o cm i 
CL 
CO 
a> 
R) 
Q 
c UJ 
CO co 
CO 
e o 
'"S 
re </) e ra 
o o 
CM 
in o o 
CM i Q. 
0 CO 
a> 
(0 a 
o > 
u 
a> tt UJ 
M ai & 
c ni 
u 
(11 N •H 
co 
CD a> a> 
o oo 
a> 
ra 
a 
o 
re 
CO 
CD O O 
CM i 
3 ~3 I 
CM 
ra a 
•o a> •a L. o u o 
a: 
co o o 
CM 
CO 
CM 
<D 
n 
O 
c UJ 
00 o> t^ o co 
CM 
c 
o 
o ra u c ra 
CO o 
co o o 
CM j O) 3 < 
i 
CM O 
a> % 
a 
d> .£ a a 
UJ 
o CM 
I J n N 00 
+> 
h 
CO 
CM 
O O O 
CO 
•S o 
2 c a cl 
o a> 
" « ra 
co co 
CD O O ^ 
O) 3 
CO o 
ra a 
•a o 
S o o o a: 
<o o o 
CM I D) 
CO o 
ra 
Q 
c 
UJ 
o 
CO 
CO 
10 
CM 
c 
.2 IP 
s w c ra 
< 
m 
m oo 
co o o 
CM i Q. a> CO i o 
CM 
a> 
ra 
a 
o > 
+3 O 
£ 
UJ 
o 
CN O O O O t^ o 
a 
o ca • 
a: ^ LU o 
O 
( D K J O ?S O ^ 
o 
H 
O) 
§ o 3 on S go <*> m 
3 
01 •a o u 
o 
5 
o 
0 +J 
aj > 
1 
V ai +j 
ai H 
(U 
Q 
rt ai 
4 0 u 
0 N •H 
CO 
<u 
nl (j N <1) +J 
o 
l 
0) 
0) tn 
CI m Xi u 
(1) N •H CO 
<u ra to a 
M H nt w 
0 
EH 
01 N •H 
CO 
CO 
UJ 
£ 
UJ 
< o 
UJ 
CL 
CO 
o § 
H CM 
O 
UJ 
CO 
o 
UJ 0 z 
X 
CO z 
I 
o o CM 
CD O 
0) « 
Q 
a> « 
(0 
o 
o 
CM 
CD 
O 
ffl 
Q 
T3 
0) 
•o u. 
O 
u 0) a; 
h-o 
0 
CM i 1 
CO 
o 
a> 
ra 
Q 
& 
c 
UJ 
lO 
CO 
CO 
c o 
O (0 0) c (0 
< 
CD 
6j r^  
o 
o 
CM I U) 
3 
CO 
o 
a> 
(0 
a 
0> > 
U 
£ 
UJ 
a. < 
5 £ o a: 
z 0 
1 UJ a. o 
I-o. 
3 
O CO 
o 
0. 
UJ C3 z 
f-o o 
UJ CL 
UJ & 
D 
O 
W 
I -z 
UJ 
S => 
O 
O D 
s 
cc UJ 
X 
o 
o > 
a 
UJ CO 
£ •a 
o 
u 
0 
a> > 
1 
.p 
o 
a 
o 
0) > 
o 
•o 
0) 
dl 
Q 
"0 
0 
o 
d) 
H 
•H 
W 
a> 
n) 
fl 
u 
3 
. CN O 
01 T) 0 U 
tn a 
A) 6 
H 
W 
•P 
•a, tr 
CO 
w <1) U 
T) 0 U 
(I) +1 0 EH 
01 H 
CO 
W Q 
UJ O O U 
ifc 
o s Ul cfl 
w < CO 
33 U 
S 
m 
o\ V5 
- H § 
CJ 
_ . < 
(N O m r-
o 
—1 go 
CM f-H 
O 
o 
CN 
a -a-
O 
* 
o o a 
o 
o o 
5 > 
W 
. D 
o R o W CM Q 
o p 
O) o 
SI w ° PL, * 
•U 
CO 
w a) M 0 < 
J! •o o u 
(t) •p 
0 
0 
N •rl 
CO 
o o 
c 3 
& <0 a 
n 
CO 
o o ^ 
c 
3 
re D 
o o 
2 
t-o o 
c 
3 
i 
CM 
£ n a & 
c 
UJ 
lO 
CO 
CO 
c o '•J3 U re « c (D 
< 
a> 
6> 
r»-o o ^ 
cn 
3 
CO o 
CO 
Q 
<U > 
« 
£ 
UJ 
Q. < 
s 
s o 
Ul O z 
o 111 N w 
3 O CO 
CM O vo 
Q 
CL 
O o U 
-a-
oo m o .—i CO (r, 
H 
o o u < 
Ul o. 
o 
o CM C-£ =? 
-a-
Ul u a: 
O (0 I-z UJ s 3 o 
8 
CC ^  O o 
v: i 
o 
Ul >-
i-
DC Ul X o Z3 o > 
a Ul CO 
s O fiei m 
Cfl 
u < 
o vo 
Q 
Q 
C 

H C0 UJ 
{£ UJ 
< o 
UJ 0. co 
O g 
< o 
to 
S o 
f--o 
UJ 
O z < 
a: 
a. 
E CO z 
I H 
-P 
w 
(0 •p 
0 EH 
ffl N •H W 
o 
CM i -+—> o 
O • 
CM O 
« g 
re c o a. 
a; a> re re co co 
h-O O CNJ -i o 
O • 
<o 
re a 
TJ <u •a 
o o 
2 
N-o o 
-t—' o O 
re a 
c UJ 
o 
W ai 
H o < 
-p o EH 
a) N •H W 
% u 
re 'C a a. fl) 0) 
re re 
co co 
o o CM 1 0 (1) Q 1 CO CD 
ai * * 
re a 
•a a •a 
o o 4) VL 
UJ 
CM 
CL < 
S 
s o X u. 
O I-
z o 
I-
2 UJ 
a. O 
l-0. 
o w 
• a 
CM 
UJ 
a. £ 
a o 
CM 
UJ o X 
3 O w i-z UJ £ 3 O O 
a 
< 
UJ >-
a. UJ x o 3 O > 
a UJ w 
CL O CO 
* 
UJ 
o 
<u en cc 0. 
•p 
t? C/3 
0] ai 
M 
2 
•3 0 u 
(0 -p 
o EH 
0 
N •H 
CO 
Jefferson County Official Records 
Kathleen B. Marston, County Clerk _i)07.003807 
$36.00 
00U04Z3;UUUfUUU3BUrUUZUU29 
D-BSD Cnt°1 Sln=2 KATE 
J10.00 $11.00 $10.00 <5.00 
07/23/2007 10:29:17 AM 
-Space below for Recorder's use on ly-
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas, as 
husband and wife, Grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of ZERO and 00/100 Dollars 
to it paid by the grantee herein, do hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto Evan W Thomas 
and Dorothy Thomas, as husband and wife, Grantee(s), the described tract of land in County of 
Jefferson and State of Oregon, more particularly described as follows: 
See Attached Legal Description as Tract 'B' 
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the granted premises unto the said Grantee, its heirs and assigns forever. 
WITNESS their Hand and Seal this day o f . 
This instrument will not allow use of the property 
described in this instrument in violation of applicable 
land use laws and regulations. Before signing or 
accepting this instrument, the person acquiring fee title 
to the property should check with the appropriate city 
or county planning department to verify approved uses 
and to determine any limits on lawsuits against 
Farming or Forest practices as defined in ORS 30.930. 
'Of 2007. 
STATE OF OREGON 
COUNTY OF-BEeettOTES JTF/=«e*SW ^ o r ^ f l U o m i , 
I, certify that I Know or have satisfactory evidence that^Evan W Thomas and Dorothy 
Thomas and is the person(s) who appeared before me, and said person(s) acknowledged that 
he/she signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be his/her free and voluntary act for the 
uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. 
Dated: Lo ld-€ /0~) 
Until a change is requested all tax statements 
Should be sent to the following address: 
Evan W Thomas and Dorothy Thomas 
]b.J 
MTHYHCPHETRIDGE HOMRYPUBUC-OREGON 
After Recording Please Return to: 
Same as above 
Escrow No. 
TRACT B 
A parcel of land containing 3.94 acres, more or less, located in a portion of the 
Northwest One-quarter (NW1/4) and a portion of the Northeast One-Quarter 
(NE1/4) of Section 07, Township 11 South, Range 14 East, Willamette Meridian, 
City of Madras, Deschutes County, Oregon, being more particularly described as 
follows: 
Beginning at a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 which bears 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 80.01 feet from the North One-quarter corner 
of said Section 07; thence leaving said north-south section centerline and along 
the south right-of-way line of Ashwood Road as described in Warranty Deed 
recorded in Book 2005, Page 005605 of Jefferson County official records South 
89°39'39" East a distance of 61.23 feet; thence leaving said right-of-way line 
South 00°17'35" East a distance of 424.32 feet; thence South 89042'25" West a 
distance of 61.22 feet a point on the north-south centerline of said Section 07 
which bears South 00°17'35" East a distance of 505.00 feet from the North One-
quarter corner of said Section 07, being a point on the boundary of Parcel 1 of 
Partition Plat No. 2004-15 (recorded as MF#2004-4735); thence along the 
boundary of said Parcel 1 South 89°42'25" West a distance of 354.87 feet; 
thence leaving said boundary 117.68 feet along a non-tangent curve to the right 
with a radius of 455.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 07°42'08" West a 
distance of 117.35 feet; thence North 00°17'35" West a distance of 18.24 feet; 
thence 123.03 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 
240.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°23'32" East for a distance of 
121.68 feet; thence 186.84 feet along the arc of a reverse curve to the left with a 
radius of 360.00 feet, the chord of which bears North 14°12'33" East for a 
distance of 184.75 feet to a point on said south right-of-way line; thence along 
said south right-of-way line the following two (2) courses and one (1) curve: 
South BS^'SQ" East a distance of 170.57 feet 
18.12 feet along the arc of a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 1099.00 
feet, the chord of which bears South 89°11'19" East for a distance of 18.12 feet; 
South 89°39'39" East a distance of 104.28 feet to the point of beginning, the 
terminus of this description. 
Subject to: All easements, restrictions and right-of-ways of record and those 
common and apparent on the land. 
REGISTERED 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
OREGON 
JULY 17, 1986 
PETER A. MANLEY 
2214 ] 
RENEWAL DATE: 12/31/08 
April 11, 2007 
S:\Land Projects\051213-Cole subd in Madras\docs\TRACT B(2).doc 
Thomas to Thomas 
Appendix F: Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
(Kittelson & Associates, January 2010) 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 SW UpperTer race Drive. Suite 101, Bend, Oregon 97702 541 312 8300 541 312 4585 
Chris Brehmer, P.E. & Joe Bessman, P.E. & Matt Be 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
s u bj e c i • Transportation Planning Rule Analysis 
To; 
January 22, 2010 
1 0 : Nick Snead, City of Madras 
MEMORANDUM 
EXPIRES: 12/31/f-oit 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document compliance with the Transportation Planning 
Rule for the proposed rezone of 20 acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) 
zoning to Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This memorandum was prepared to address 
the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-12-0060 
(Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for a zone change 
analysis. The intent of the TPR is to ensure the transportation system can accommodate the 
change of uses to the adopted system plan and that any resultant significant affects are mitigated. 
The land included in the proposed rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of 
Jefferson County Middle School, and south of the existing Juniper Hills County Park near Bean 
Drive. The property is within the Yarrow development and its rezone to accommodate a school 
was identified as part of the original Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is 
generally shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the 20-acre future school property on the 
Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development plans or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
This study determined that, with the exception of the US 97/] Street intersections, all of the study 
area intersections operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon 
analysis period. The US 97/J Street intersections exceed ODOT mobility standards with or without 
the proposed rezone. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental impact 
on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. The City's Transportation System Plan (TSP) 
Amendment previously identified a mitigation plan for this intersection and, with the planned 
improvements in place, the transportation system will operate acceptably with the existing 
zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the proposed rezone. Assuming that the 
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) is able to make a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements in the TSP, no unmitigated significant effects will 
occur with the proposed rezone. The study methodology, findings, and recommendations are 
detailed herein. 
FILENAME: H:\PRQJFILE\10028 - MADRAS ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS\REPORT\FINAL\IOO28REPFINAL.DOC 
wo Nvaa 
M3IA Alio 
iS 30VMNIX 
IS QOOAAHSV 
IS H101 
IS HIS ) ® 
1 c 
CD E ^ 
co § 
w 
2 c 
CD E <D Uj 
•a 
IS Hit ) w 
H CO I-w 
\ 
\ 
\ 
\ 
\ 
M S 
cn 
o UJ in cc UJ i-
> • 
Z> I-cn i 
O & n ui 
5 s cn 5 
<f 2 u 
Z h-o< cn £ _i o uj 
t z 
6 
V 
toBu :qaj_ inoXej tteqw • uiegpQi ~OIOZ'SZ uer Smp zBng3oons6!l\s8MP\siooit3S eiPPltfl puv Ajeiusuies sejpepi - gso<H\ailllojd\pueg Ht-'X 
Jt 
SOSu :qe± jno/Bi ipqui -umzpvi OlOS'^uer 6Mp-zeug;eoi\s(>!/\s&up\siootios »»»V Pub Ajbiubumb SBipsyi - gtoOi\m!lloi0v>uBg~H\:X 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 4 
BACKGROUND 
The City of Madras, in partnership with the Jefferson County School District is proposing the 
UGB amendment and rezone to accommodate a potential future elementary school site. Jefferson 
County School District currently operates two elementary schools within the Madras City limits 
that served approximately 1,060 kindergarten through fifth grade students during the 2008 school 
year. The recent closure of the Westside Elementary School due to budget shortfalls has split 
Madras kindergarten through fifth grade students between Madras Elementary School 
(kindergarten through 2nd grade) and Buff Elementary School (3rd through 5lh grades). 
Future building needs and the current location of Buff Elementary School within a 100-year 
floodplain has created a need for the School District to look at alternative future sites. The 
location of the proposed land within the Yarrow neighborhood is expected to help accommodate 
future growth along Madras' east side, and the adjacent Jefferson County Middle School and 
Juniper Hills Park ball fields are expected to be complementary uses. A new school is not 
proposed for construction or entitlements at this time; the purpose of the zone change is to 
accommodate the long-term educational infrastructure needs in the City. 
EXISTING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 
The existing transportation infrastructure assessment is provided herein to assist the City of 
Madras with the planning and prioritization of maintenance and infrastructure improvements 
within the study area. The existing conditions analysis is intended to identify operational and 
geometric conditions surrounding the site to ensure the necessary right-of-way will be available 
to accommodate needed system interconnectivity and accessibility, and to ensure existing 
transportation safety needs are addressed. 
Roadway Facilities 
As illustrated in Figure 2, Ashwood Road borders the site to the north and provides primary 
access and connectivity to the proposed lands. Ashwood Road serves the Deer Creek Correctional 
Institute and other rural uses to the east of the site. To the immediate west Ashwood Road erves 
Juniper Hills Park and the Jefferson County Middle School, and further west transitions into B 
Street and connects to US 97 and the City's downtown core. A recently constructed extension of 
City View to J Street connects the parcel to the southern City limits, and Bean Drive connects 
toward the northern portion of the City. Table 1 summarizes key characteristics of the existing 
roadway facilities. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 5 
Table 1 
Exis t ing T ranspo r t a t i on Faci l i t ies and Roadway Des igna t ions 
Roadway 
Functional 
Classification 
Number of 
Lanes 
Posted 
Speed Sidewalks 
Bicycle 
Lanes 
On-Street 
Parking 
Ashwood - B Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25-45 mph Partial2 Yes Partial1 
City View Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
Bean Drive Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph No No No 
Kinkade Minor Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
Ashwood - C Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Partial2 No No 
10th Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes No Yes 
J Street Major Collector 2-Lanes 25 mph Yes Yes No 
1 On -s t ree t p a r k i n g is p rov ided a long sect ions o f r oadway w i th in t he C i ty l im i ts . 
2- S idewalks a re loca ted o n one side o f t h e s t r ee t on ly . 
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities 
Sidewalks are currently provided along the south side of Ashwood Road primarily where 
frontage improvements have been completed. As shown in Table 1, sidewalks are generally 
provided along a majority of the roadways within the site vicinity, with the exception of Bean 
Drive, where pedestrians may rely on the multi-use path within Juniper Hills Park. 
Bicycle lanes are provided on both sides of Ashwood Road and extend west to the City center. 
Bicycle lanes are also provided on both sides of City View Road, which connect to J Street and the 
City center to the south. 
Review of the project vicinity identified that pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway 
crossing treatments should be considered to connect the existing Jefferson County Middle School 
with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow neighborhood should also be 
provided concurrent with development, including appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments 
along Ashwood Road. These connections could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the 
complementary uses and increase pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transit Facilities 
Limited transit service is available throughout the site vicinity through services provided by the 
Cascades East Transit (Reference 1). Cascades East provides community connections from 
Madras to Redmond, Culver, and the Metolius City Hall on two trips in the morning and two 
trips during the afternoon period. Fares on the intercommunity connections are $5.00 per day. 
Curb to curb on-call transit service is also available through Cascades East Transit Mondays 
through Friday with reservations. These services are available within a five-mile radius of the 
town center, and the fare for on-demand service is currently $1.25 per trip. In addition, the 
Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council (COIC) also provides bus rides to Medicaid eligible 
clients within a nine-county area throughout Central Oregon. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 6 
Existing Traffic Counts 
Historical traffic counts were obtained at City of Madras intersections from May 2007. Review of 
the manual turning movement counts showed that during the critical evening peak hour B Street 
near its intersection with 10th Street carries approximately 145 vehicles in the eastbound direction 
and approximately 275 vehicles in the westbound direction during the evening peak hour. It was 
also noted that of the westbound vehicles approximately 20 percent were expected to travel south 
on City View with the remainder continuing westbound along Ashwood Road - B Street. 
Figure 3 provides a summary of the historical year 2007 existing weekday p.m. peak hour 
turning-movement counts, which are rounded to the nearest five vehicles per hour. No historical 
traffic count data was available for the Ashwood Road/Bean Drive intersection, so new counts 
were conducted in January of 2010. The new traffic count showed similar but slightly lower 
through volumes along Ashwood Road as compared to the historical 2007 counts. Accordingly, it 
is expected that the 2006/2007 counts continue to reflect the existing roadway conditions. A 
summary of the existing traffic volumes throughout the study area is shown in Figure 3. 
Attachment "1" contains the traffic count worksheets used in this study as provided by City staff. 
Current Levels of Service and Performance Standards 
Intersection performance thresholds vary throughout the study area based on the roadway 
jurisdiction. Jefferson County traffic study requirements included within the County's TSP 
(Reference 2) identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should be maintained at all County 
intersections. The City of Madras TSP (Reference 3) identifies a target Level of Service (LOS) "D" 
for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections (or LOS F with a volume-to-
capacity ratio below 0.95). ODOT mobility standards included within the Oregon Highway Plan 
(add subsequent updates, Reference 4) require a volume-to-capacity ratio of less than 0.90 on the 
stop-controlled minor street approaches at the J Street intersections and a volume-to-capacity 
ratio of 0.80 at the signalized B Street intersections and future signalized J Street intersecdons.1 
Intersection operations were reviewed to identify current capacity and safety constraints on the 
roadway network. Field review of the study area identified that all of the intersections are 
uncontrolled in the east-west direction along B Street - Ashwood Road and are stop-sign 
controlled along the north-south minor-street approaches. Relevant intersection performance 
standards for the study area intersections are summarized below in Table 2. 
1 Per the Oregon Highway Plan, US 26/US 97 are classified as Statewide Highways, Freight Routes, and 
part of the National Highway System and contain a posted speed of 30 miles per hour through the study 
area. Unsignalized highway mobility standards are based on a District/Local Interest Road in a non-
Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) outside of Special Transportation Areas where the non-
freeway posted speed is less than 35 mph. Signalized highway mobility standards are based on a Freight 
Route along a Statewide Highway in a non-MPO outside of STAs where the posted speed is less than 35 
mph. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
£0% :qe±inoAe-i neqw -WBpg:ii-oi08 6Mp-38ugzooi\sBu\sBMp\spoy0S eipp/w pug Aieiueu/eB sejpew • eBOOLWi!oJd\puBB~i 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 8 
Table 2 Summary of Intersect ion Performance Standards 
Intersection Jurisdiction 
Traffic 
Control1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive 
Jefferson 
County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View 
City of Madras TWSC LOS E/ v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street / 
Kinkade Road 
City of Madras TWSC LOS E/ v/c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
B Street / 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v /c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street / 
10 th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v/c < 0.95 Year 2020 
B Street / 
US 97 Northbound 
ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
B St reet / 
US 97 Southbound ODOT Signalized v/c < 0.80 Year 2025 
3 S t reet / 
US 97 Northbound ODOT TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 
J Street / 
US 97 Southbound ODOT 
TWSC v/c < 0.90 Year 2025 
"TWSC: Two-way stop-controlled (unsignalized) 
Results of the existing conditions intersection operations during the weekday p.m. peak hour are 
illustrated in Figure 3. As shown in the figure, all of the study area intersections currently operate 
acceptably. It was noted that the J Street intersection with Southbound US 97 (4,h Street) meets 
mobility standards but operates with high delays (Level of Service "E") along the stop-controlled 
east-west approaches. Existing conditions level-of-service worksheets are included in Attachment "2 ". 
Existing Conditions Summary 
The following transportation system improvement needs were identified based on review of the 
existing system conditions. Since mitigation of these existing deficiencies is not applicable to or 
caused by the proposed zone change, it is recommended that these safety and performance 
improvements be provided by the City of Madras as part of the City's regular maintenance or 
incorporated into the City's Capital Improvement Plans. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
• All of the study area intersections operate acceptably, although the Southbound US 97 (4th 
Street)/J Street intersection operates with high minor-street delay at a Level of Service "E". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 9 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
The applicable criteria for zone change analyses are found within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060, also known as the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR, Reference 5). The TPR 
is intended to require that any changes to the adopted and recognized Transportation System 
Plan show consistency and compliance with the stated goals of the plan, the development and 
regular updates of which are a mandated requirement for cities. The overall purpose of a city's 
TSP is to 1) provide a safe, convenient, and economic transportation system that encourages and 
supports the availability, safety, convenience, and efficiency of a variety of transportation choices 
for moving people that balance vehicular use with other transportation modes, including 
walking, bicycling, and transit in order to avoid principal reliance upon any one mode of 
transportation; and 2) to protect existing and planned facilities for their identified functions. 
The City's applicable Transportation System Plan was completed in 2001, with updates 
completed for the J Street connection with the US 97 in 2005 (Reference 6). The initial plan 
provides an assessment of roadway classifications throughout the City and potential intersection 
treatments at a sampling of collector and arterial intersections along with associated planning 
level improvement costs, and is the applicable planning document related to the City's Ashwood 
- B Street intersections. The J Street amendment reviewed improvement options specific to the US 
97 intersections and is considered the relevant planning document for the J Street intersections. 
The City's adopted TSP does not include a specific assessment of the long-term intersection needs 
at any of the City intersections along B Street-Ashwood, as the TSP focused on the more critical 
intersections along the US 97/US 26 corridor through downtown Madras. The intent of this zone 
change analysis is to provide an assessment of the long-term system needs that should be 
considered for inclusion within the City's TSP (as summarized within the Existing Zoning section). 
In addition, to support the proposed zone change this report also includes an assessment of 
additional impacts that could occur with future development resulting from this zone change (as 
included within the Proposed Zoning section). 
All analyses assess year 2020 conditions on City facilities and year 2027 conditions on County 
facilities for consistency with the adopted TSP horizon years. ODOT's US 97 intersections with J 
Street are assessed under year 2025 conditions, consistent with the TSP Update and meeting the 
minimum 15-year planning horizon required for consistency with the Oregon Highway Plan 
(Section 1F.2). ODOT's intersections with B Street are also assessed under year 2025 conditions for 
consistency with the 15-year minimum planning horizon identified in the State's TSP, the Oregon 
Highway Plan (the City TSP assesses only 2020 conditions at B Street). 
Reasonably Likely Transportation Improvements 
Transportation Planning Rule analyses allow the inclusion of planned improvements in the 
horizon analysis period for which a funding mechanism has been identified. The funding 
mechanism could be an established local Capital Improvement Project, local projects contained 
within a City's Systems Development Charge (SDC) list, or funded ODOT Statewide 
Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) projects. No funded improvements affect the study 
area intersections. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UCB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 10 
The US 97f] Street improvements are identified in the City's TSP Amendment as a needed facility 
improvement and included within the ODOT 2010-2013 Draft STIP list. Improvement plans 
include realignment of northbound US 97 onto Adams Drive and two new traffic signals at the 
new J Street intersections. A request for a "Reasonably Likely" determination for the planned 
improvements has been sent to ODOT and is pending approval. Attachment "3" includes an 
illustration of the -planned ] Street Improvements. 
Existing Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
An analysis was conducted for the horizon years as identified in the applicable City, County, and 
State TSPs. The existing zoning assessment was prepared to identify how the study area's 
transportation system operates in the horizon year with build-out of the subject parcel as 
currently zoned (without the impact of the proposed rezone). This analysis will supplement the 
City's TSP efforts along this segment of Ashwood Road and will provide a basis for comparison 
to potential future conditions with the proposed zone change. 
Review of the City's TSP (TSP Technical Memorandum #3, Reference 7) shows that future horizon 
volumes were developed through the application of an annual three percent growth rate for all 
turning and through movements to and from City facilities. ODOT facilities were assessed using 
a two percent annual growth rate for through movements along US 97/US 26. County facilities 
were assessed with a 3.2 percent growth rate through 2011 and 2.5 percent annual growth from 
2012 through 2027. 
To identify the existing trip generation potential of the subject property, review of the County 
zoning, allowable land uses, and site constraints was conducted. The existing Range Land zoning 
is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within Jefferson County. The RL 
zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural lands for livestock 
grazing, and the RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum of 40 acres. A 
variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these uses require 
more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low intensity uses. 
Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely limited, and for 
analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Intersection Level-of-Service Analysis 
Figure 4 illustrates the weekday p.m. peak hour traffic volumes inclusive of regional growth and 
potential site build-out with the existing zoning. These volumes were used to conduct an 
operational analysis at each of the study intersections to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at acceptable levels of 
service with exception of the US 97/J Street intersections, which exceed ODOT mobility standards. 
With the planned J Street improvements in place both the US 97 Northbound and Southbound 
intersections with J Street are forecast to operate acceptably. Attachment "4" contains the horizon 
period existing zoning level-of-service worksheets. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 

Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 12 
Proposed Zoning Conditions (Future Horizon Period) 
Future horizon year conditions were developed based on the same methodology used to assess 
the existing zoning conditions. The proposed zoning conditions also include the incremental 
increase in trips that could be generated with the Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning, as 
described below. 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, including apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723 (Reference 8), were 
reviewed to identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses 
are typically not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the 
rezone is to ultimately allow for a new school this specific conditional use was reviewed to ensure 
that a reasonable development scenario considers the potential impact of a school. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses in the R-2 
zoning: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use category from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building 
space, parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included in Attachment "5". 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise ten 
acres of the overall land, with a minimum of five acres dedicated to the elementary school. Any 
additional lands would be retained for residential uses. The most likely school type would be an 
elementary school given the regional needs and recent closure of the Westside Elementary site. A 
new elementary school could be expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students 
(historical records from the closed Westside Elementary School showed an enrollment of 325 
students). 
Accordingly, in addition to consideration of build-out of the 20-acres with residential uses, this 
provides two additional R-2 development scenarios to consider: 
1. 116 attached residential units on ten acres (11.6 units/acre * 10 acres = 116 units) and a 350-
student elementary school 
2. 174 attached residential units on fifteen acres (11.6 units/acre * 15 acres = 174 units) and a 
350-student elementary school on the remaining five acres. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 13 
While a ten acre school site is more typical, the minimum five-acre site provides a reasonable 
worst-case development scenario resulting in a more conservative analysis. The two scenarios 
forwarded for consideration include build-out of the parcel with residential and build-out of 15-
acres with residential and 5-acres with a new school. 
R-2 Zoning Trip Generation Potential 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within ITE's standard reference Trip Generation, 
8lh Edition, using the Apartment land use category (Land Use Code 220, Reference 9). 
Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared using surveys of schools 
within the City of Bend to better approximate local elementary school trends. The surveys of the 
Bend locations contain slightly lower trip generation rates than national surveys of elementary 
schools (0.13 trips/student versus 0.15 trips/student), but are expected to better reflect local 
characteristics of Central Oregon schools than the national data due to similarities in weather 
characteristics, mode splits, and after school activities. 
All of the elementary school surveys were conducted in early fall at each of the five school sites 
and include an account of after school activities and public use of the adjacent ballfields. Because 
the evening commute period analysis of the school primarily reflects faculty trips (student trips 
typically occur in the afternoon), the increased student walking ratios during fair weather 
conditions are not expected to impact the results. The study found that the increased public use of 
the ballfields due to the fair weather likely results in a higher than typical trip rate. While the 
Bend Elementary School surveys were conducted at locations within developed residential 
neighborhoods, it is assumed that the City of Madras Urban Growth Boundary area will be fully 
developed by the horizon year providing similar characteristics at the proposed location. It was 
also noted that the surrounding neighborhoods have already been master planned, with portions 
of the roadway infrastructure for the first development phases already in place. Attachment "6" 
contains the Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement with the adjacent middle school, recreational facility, and benefit 
from the adjacent Juniper Hills Park ballfields, additional trip discounts were not applied to the 
trip rates obtained from the Bend-La Pine School District facilities. Mixed-use incentives provided 
in Section 6 of the TPR were also omitted from the analysis, though the densities and integrated 
uses planned within the Yarrow development are expected to comply with the applicable 
definitions of a mixed-use pedestrian friendly neighborhood. Table 3 summarizes the trip 
generation potential of the two potential land use scenarios. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 14 
T a b l e 3 R -2 Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Land Use ITE Code Size 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments (20 acres) 220 232 Units 145 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Plus Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments (15 acres) 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School (5 acres) N/A 350 Students 46 25 21 
Total Trips 159 99 60 
As shown in Table 3, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out of residential uses alone and was used to assess the incremental system 
impacts associated with the proposed rezone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the UGB 
amendment was determined through review of existing traffic patterns, likely school 
faculty/employee housing, and residential destinations. The trip distribution patterns were 
separated by residential and school trips, with the resultant trip distribution pattern illustrated in 
Figure 5. As shown, the pattern highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west 
toward the City center and US 97 corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute 
onto the available parallel routes (Loucks, City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel 
destination. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 4) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour was assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing. These incremental trips were added to the existing zoning 
traffic volumes, with the resultant volumes illustrated in Figure 7. 
Study Area Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning, the following 
intersections of collector and arterial roadways were identified as study intersections due to their 
potential for being significantly affected by the proposed zone change. Scoping materials and 
conversations with the affected jurisdiction staff provided concurrence on the study area. The City 
of Madras roadway classification map is included in Attachment "7" and the scoping letter is included as 
Attachment "8". 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 

goBy;qe±imAe-i iiequi -wdgozi -QlOB'BBUer BMptfyezoOHsB!j\sBMp\siooqos eiPPM PM ^ eiueuieg swpew - BS00HewloJd\pimg~H\:)4 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 17 
• Ashwood Road/Bean Drive (could be impacted by up to 137 additional weekday p.m. 
peak hour trips, a 46 percent increase from existing volume) 
• Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by up to 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 34 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by up to 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 22 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by up to 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, an 18 percent increase from existing volume) 
• B Street/10 ,h Street (could be impacted by up to 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips, a 12 percent increase from existing volume) 
• US 97 Northbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Southbound/B Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Northbound (Fifth Street)/J Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
• US 97 Southbound (Fourth Street)/J Street (exceeds ODOT's 300 daily trip threshold) 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required in the future as part of the entitlements process when a 
specific site plan is available. However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to 
provide consistency with the adopted Transportation System Plan only the weekday p.m. peak 
hour operations (design hour) are summarized herein for TPR purposes. 
Intersection Level of Service Analysis 
The weekday p.m. peak hour turning-movement volumes shown in Figure 5 were used to 
conduct an operational analysis at each study intersection to determine the horizon year levels of 
service. As shown, with the application of regional growth and the incremental trip generation 
potential of the proposed R-2 zoning all of the study intersections are forecast to operate at 
acceptable levels of service during the weekday p.m. peak hour with exception of the US 97/J 
Street intersections. With the planned J Street improvements in place, both the US 97 northbound 
and southbound intersections with J Street are shown to operate acceptably. Attachment "9" 
contains the horizon year level-of-service worksheets. 
OAR Section 660-12-0060 sets forth the relative criteria for evaluating plan and land use 
regulation amendments. Table 4 summarizes the TPR criteria and their applicability to the 
proposed rezone application. 
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING RULE COMPLIANCE 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 18 
T a b l e 4 Summary of Criteria in OAR 6 6 0 - 0 1 2 - 0 0 6 0 
Section Criteria Applicable? 
1 Describes how to determine if a proposed land use action results in a significantly affects transportation facilities. 
Yes 
See response below 
2 Describes measures for complying with Criteria #1 where a significant effect is identified. 
Yes 
See response below 
3 
Describes measures for complying with Criteria #1 and #2 
without assuring that the allowed land uses are consistent with 
the function, capacity and performance standards of the facility 
No 
4 Determinations under Criteria #1, #2, and #3 are coordinated with other local agencies. 
Yes 
See response below 
5 Indicates that the presence of a transportation facility shall not be the basis for an exception to allow development on rural lands. 
No 
(Lands are part of a 
master plan area) 
6 Indicates that local agencies should credit developments that provide a reduction in trips. 
No 
(No concurrent site 
plan) 
7 Outlines requirements for a local street plan, access management plan, or future street plan for commercial areas. 
No 
(Commercial lands are 
not proposed) 
8 Defines a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly neighborhood 
No 
(No concurrent site 
plan) 
As shown, there are eight criteria that apply to Plan and Land Use Regulation Amendments. Of 
these, Criteria #1, #2, and #4 are applicable to the proposed land use action. Applicable sections of 
these criteria are provided below in italics with a corresponding response shown in standard font. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (1) Where an amendment to afunctional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive 
plan, or a land use regulation would significantly affect an existing or planned transportation 
facility, the local government shall put in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule to 
assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance 
standards (e.g. level of service, volume to capacity ratio, etc.) of the facility. A plan or land use 
regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it would: 
(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility 
(exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); 
(b) Change standards implementing afunctional classification system; or 
(c) As measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted transportation 
system plan: 
(A) Allow land uses or levels of development that would result in types or levels of 
travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional classification of an 
existing or planned transportation facility; 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 19 
Response: Based on the incremental traffic increase from RL to R-2 zoning, the functional 
classification of all the adjacent roadways will not be affected with the proposed zone 
change. 
(B) Reduce the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility below 
the minimum acceptable performance standard identified in the TSP or 
comprehensive plan; or 
Response: The intersections of US 97/J Street performs below the minimum acceptable 
performance standard in the City of Madras TSP and the OHP with the existing zoning. 
(C) Worsen the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is 
otherwise projected to perform below the minimum acceptable performance 
standard identified in the TSP or comprehensive plan. 
Response: The performance of the US 97/J Street intersections are degraded with the 
incremental trips from the proposed rezone, and therefore a Significant Effect occurring 
with the proposed rezone. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (2) Where a local government determines that there would be a significant 
effect, compliance with section (1) shall be accomplished through one or a combination of the 
following: 
(a) Adopting measures that demonstrate allowed land uses are consistent with the planned 
function, capacity, and performance standards of the transportation facility. 
(b) Amending the TSP or comprehensive plan to provide transportation facilities, 
improvements or services adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the 
requirements of this division; such amendments shall include a funding plan or mechanism 
consistent with section (4) or include an amendment to the transportation finance plan so 
that the facility, improvement, or service will be provided by the end of the planning 
period. 
(c) Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce demand for 
automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes. 
(d) Amending the TSP to modify the planned Junction, capacity or performance standards 
of the transportation facility. 
(e) Providing other measures as a condition of development or through a development 
agreement or similar funding method, including transportation system management 
measures, demand management or minor transportation improvements. Local governments 
shall as part of the amendment specify when measures or improvements provided pursuant 
to this subsection will be provided. 
Response: The J Street intersections are significantly affected. An amendment to the City's 
Transportation System Plan identifies the long-term needs at these intersections, but at the 
time the TSP amendment was approved a funding mechanism was not simultaneously 
adopted. However, because the J Street improvements are located on US 97 and under the 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 20 
jurisdiction of ODOT additional steps are required to provide a Reasonably Likely 
determination. 
OAR 660-12-0060 (4) Determinations under sections (l)-(3) of this rule shall be coordinated with 
affected transportation facility and service providers and other affected local governments. 
(a) In determining whether an amendment has a significant effect on an existing or planned 
transportation facility under subsection (l)(c) of this rule, local governments shall rely on 
existing transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities, 
improvements and services set forth in subsections (b) and (c) below. 
(b) Outside of interstate interchange areas, the following are considered planned facilities, 
improvements and services: 
(D) Improvements to state highways that are included as planned improvements in 
a regional or local transportation system plan or comprehensive plan when ODOT 
provides a written statement that the improvements are reasonably likely to be 
provided by the end of the planning period. 
(e) For purposes of this section, a written statement provided pursuant to paragraphs 
(b)(D), (b)(E) or (c)(A) provided by ODOT, a local government or transportation facility 
provider, as appropriate, shall be conclusive in determining whether a transportation 
facility, improvement or service is a planned transportation facility, improvement or 
service. In the absence of a written statement, a local government can only rely upon 
planned transportation facilities, improvements and services identified in paragraphs 
(b)(A)-(C) to determine whether there is a significant effect that requires application of the 
remedies in section (2). 
Response: A formal request has been provided to ODOT for a Reasonably Likely 
determination for the J Street improvements. The J Street improvements are included in 
the City of Madras TSP Amendment, conceptual design and cost estimates have been 
completed, and the project is included on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP, expected for approval 
in October 2010. Pending the anticipated receipt of the Reasonably Likely letter from the 
ODOT Region Manager the ability to assume completion of the J Street improvements as 
part of the horizon year transportation system will be conclusive. 
PROJECT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
Existing Transportation System Findings and Recommendations 
Findings of the existing transportation system review and analysis are summarized below, 
• All of the study area intersections currently operate acceptably. The Southbound US 97 (4(h 
Street)/J Street intersection meets City and ODOT operational standards but operates with 
high peak hour delays on the stop-controlled east-west approaches. 
• No marked pedestrian crossings or continuous sidewalks are provided between the 
Jefferson County Middle School/Yarrow and Juniper Hills Park. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 21 
Recommendations from the existing conditions assessment are provided below. The City of 
Madras should incorporate these recommendations into their scheduled maintenance plans or 
assess the priority of the improvements based on the potential system safety and performance 
benefit. The identified improvements are currently needed regardless of the proposed zone 
change. 
• Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity and roadway crossing treatments should be 
considered as part of future planning efforts to connect the existing Jefferson County 
Middle School with the Juniper Hills Park. Additional connections to the Yarrow 
neighborhood should also be provided concurrent with development, including 
appropriate pedestrian crossing treatments along Ashwood Road. These connections 
could help encourage non-vehicular trips between the complementary uses and increase 
pedestrian and bicyclist safety. 
Transportation Planning Rule Findings and Recommendations 
Key findings from the Transportation Planning Rule Analysis are summarized below. 
• The proposed 20-acre rezone from the County's Rangeland zoning to the City's Multi-pie 
Family Residential zoning could generate an additional 159 weekday p.m. peak hour trips. 
• With exception of the US 97/J Street intersections, all of the study area intersections 
operate acceptably with the existing and proposed zoning in the horizon analysis period. 
• With or without the proposed rezone the US 97/J Street intersections exceed ODOT 
mobility standards. The additional trips associated with the rezone create an incremental 
impact on the intersection, creating a Significant Effect. 
• The City's Transportation System Plan Amendment was prepared to identify the system 
improvement needs to address the J Street needs. Identified improvements include a 
realignment of Northbound US 97 (5th Street) east onto Adams Drive and two new 
signalized intersections along J Street for both northbound and southbound highway 
traffic. With the planned improvements in place the transportation system will operate 
acceptably with the existing zoning and will continue to operate acceptably with the 
proposed rezone. 
• A request for a Reasonably Likely determination has been provided to ODOT. With a 
Reasonably Likely determination for the J Street improvements, no unmitigated significant 
effects will occur with the proposed rezone. 
• Interconnectivity should be reviewed with subsequent Yarrow development (including 
within the subject parcel) to provide direct and convenient multimodal access to the 
potential school site. Additionally, pedestrian treatments should be considered between 
Yarrow, Juniper Hills Park, the adjacent recreational facility, and Jefferson County Middle 
School. 
Please let us know if you have any questions regarding this zone change analysis at (541) 312-
8300. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 22 
ATTACHMENTS: 
1. Historical Turning Movement Count Data 
2. Existing Conditions Level of Service Worksheets 
3. J Street Concept Map 
4. Horizon Year (Existing RL Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
5. R-2 Residential Density Development 
6. Bend-La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
7. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
8. Project Scoping Letter 
9. Horizon Year (Proposed R-2 Zoning) Level of Service Worksheets 
REFERENCES: 
1. Cascades East Transit. http://www.cascadeseasttTansit.com. January 2010. 
2. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan. 
2001. 
3. Jefferson County & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Jefferson County Transportation System Plan. 
2005. 
4. Oregon Department of Transportation. 1999 Oregon Highway Plan. March 1999. 
5. Department of Land Conservation and Development. Oregon Administrative Rule 660-12-
0060, http://arcweb.sos.state.or.us/banners/rules.htm. 
6. City of Madras & Kittelson & Associates, Inc. City of Madras Transportation System Plan 
Update. 2006. 
7. Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Technical Memorandum K3: Year 2020 Operations Analysis. May 
2001. 
8. City of Madras. Ordinance 723, http://ri.madras.or.us/agendas/agendas ordinances.shtml. 
February 2005. 
9. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 8lh Edition. 2008. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
A t t a c h m e n t " 1 " 
Manual Turning 
Movement Counts 
/ 0 
/ jit 
V w ) 
ra r / 
ST 
CD 
ZD 
CD I 
<NS= 
PS 
" r \ •IS—; 
IS W 
j l 
i i s 
J l 1 
a i l 
¥ I 
is; i 
11 
i l l 
o 
CX> 
cl> 
o 
o 
=t= o 
Q3 
CO 
O 
o HZ n 
aj 
o CO CL> O 
O 
" CO 
O 
O 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Project Title: 
Project No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT00O0-0408 
OR 
Hwy 97/5th Street 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Rate: 
0 Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 
NA 
NA 
PM 
Weather: 
Road Surface: 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect, type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Slop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
15-MIN HOURLY 
TIME EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:00 16:15 2 13 0 0 52 20 5 141 23 0 0 0 256 984 0:00 
16:15 16:30 4 11 0 0 44 6 12 133 26 0 0 0 236 1014 0-00 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 1035 16:30 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 1013 0:00 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 964 0:00 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 678 0:00 
17:30 17:45 1 12 0 0 40 12 5 142 24 0 0 0 236 421 0:00 
17:45 18:00 2 1 0 0 19 11 6 133 13 0 0 0 185 185 0:0O 
1MB 
Actual PM peak hour period Is f rom: 16:30 to 17:30 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 36 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1035 
MvmnI PHF 0.64 0 75 M3IW0' tjDIV/Q! 0 70 o e s 0(M) 094 0 6 1 JfDIWO' KDIV/0! aoiwo! Inl 
Approach PHF 0 79 0.73 0 95 *DIW0l PHF > 0 90 
The PM peak hour used Is from: 16:30 to 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 5 8 0 0 41 10 12 164 18 0 0 0 258 
16:45 17:00 2 6 0 0 37 12 11 143 23 0 0 0 234 
17:00 17:15 7 10 0 0 61 12 12 161 23 0 0 0 286 
17:15 17:30 4 12 0 0 31 8 7 151 44 0 0 0 257 
TOTAL 18 36 0 0 170 42 42 619 108 0 0 0 1035 
Mumnt PHF 0 S4 0 75 »piv/0' •n iv /o i 0 70 0 86 088 O M 0 61 «oiv/oi aoivra Inl 
Approach PHF 0 79 0 73 0 95 *OIV/OI PHF-, 0.90 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES 
16:30 to 17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 26 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 48 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 17:30 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 679 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
LINK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
16:30 to 17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB WB EB 
16:30 16:45 179 0 194 0 53 13 51 26 
16:45 17:00 157 0 177 0 48 8 49 29 
17:00 17:15 180 0 196 0 73 17 73 33 
17:15 17:30 163 0 202 0 38 16 39 56 
TOTAL 679 0 769 0 212 54 212 144 
COMMENTS: 
TRAFFIC COUNT SUMMARY FORM 
Pro|ect Title: 
Pro|ect No. 
Location: 
NS Street: 
EW Street: 
Madras 
ODOT0000-0408 
OR 
Hwy 97/4th Si/eel 
B Street 
Condition: 
Count Date: 
Count Period: 
Growth Rate: 
# Compounding Years: 
2003 Existing 
1/28/2003 
4:00-6:00 PM 
NA 
NA 
Weather: 
Road Surface: 
Traffic Control: 
Intersect, type: 
Counted by: 
Two-way Stop 
4-Leg 
Traffic Smithy 
APPROACH VOLUMES 
15-MIN HOURLY 
TIME EBL EST EBR W8L WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Tolal 
16:00 16:15 0 9 5 50 8 0 0 0 0 4 170 5 251 953 0:00 
16:15 16:30 0 10 4 49 6 0 0 0 0 9 141 6 225 966 0:00 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 974 16:30 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 930 0:00 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 869 0.00 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 605 0:00 
17:30 17:45 0 2 4 40 5 0 0 0 0 9 130 4 194 372 0:00 
17:45 18:00 0 1 4 21 5 0 0 0 0 4 141 2 178 178 0:00 
Actual PM peak hour ger/od Is from: 16:30 17:30 
1822 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR VOLUME 
15-Min Hourly 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Total 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 0 28 678 21 974 
Mv[: , r PHF *0iV.0' o s / 0 65 0 06 0 63 #D!V:Qi IQIV/OI KDIV/0! lOIV/Ol 0 78 094 OSS In! 
Approach PHF 0.71 0.S5 #DiV/0 0.94 PHF > 0.92 
The PM peak hour iisgd Is from: 16:30 17:30 
VOLUME FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
15-Min 
TIME EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Total Tolal 
16:30 16:45 0 8 5 46 3 0 0 0 0 6 166 4 238 
16:45 17:00 0 0 4 43 10 0 0 0 0 6 167 9 239 
17:00 17:15 0 9 0 54 8 0 0 0 0 9 181 3 264 
17:15 17:30 0 7 4 42 4 0 0 0 0 7 164 5 233 
TOTAL 0 24 13 185 25 0 0 0 0 28 676 21 974 
Mvmrtt PHF «OTQ. 0 67 0 96 0 63 fDIV/01 iHDIV-0' ffDIV.01 #oiv;oi 0 78 0 34 o s a Inl 
Approach PHF 0.71 085 #DIV/0! 0 9 4 PHF > a.82 
ACTUAL PEAK HOUR LINK VOLUMES 
16:30 
16:45 
17:00 
17:15 
NORTH OF INT. 
"sE-NB 
16:45 
17:00 
17:15 
17:30 
TOTAL 
176 
182 
193 
176 
727 
1630 to 
SOUTH OF INT. 
•w NB 
217 
214 
235 
210 
876 
17:30 
WEST OF INT. 
"w§ ET" 
7 13 
19 4 
11 9 
9 11 
46 37 
EAST OF INT. 
• w B I B " 
49 
53 
62 
46 
210 
14 
6 
18 
14 
52 
LINK VOLUMES FOR PEAK HOUR USED 
16:30 to 17:30 
TIME NORTH OF INT. SOUTH OF INT. WEST OF INT. EAST OF INT. 
NB SB NB SB WB EB W 6 EB 
16:30 16:45 0 176 0 217 7 13 49 14 
16:45 17:00 0 182 0 214 19 4 53 6 
17:00 17:15 0 193 0 235 11 9 62 18 
17:15 17:30 0 176 0 210 9 11 46 14 
TOTAL 0 727 0 876 46 37 210 52 
COMMENTS: 
Type of peak hour being reported: User-Defined Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume 
LOCATION: 4th St - B St 
CITY/STATE: Madras, OR 
QC JOB #: 10274001 
DATE: 8/7/2007 
885 |0-95j 0 
26 831 28 
^ • >» 
Peak-Hour: 4:15 PM - 5:15 PM 
Peak 15-Min: 4:50 PM - 5:05 PM 
0 * 243 
11.2 0 0 
• • 
0 0 11 8 3.6 
J • «» 
0 74 36 * 0.98 4> 42 0.82 | 
20 "» r 201 • 
• r 
0 0 0 
1052I0.00! 0 
1 * 1 
a 
7.4 0.0 J 
56 * 
5 4 + 5.0 "» 
Quality Counts 
• 1* 
0.0 0.0 0.0 
• • 
9.8 O.O 
X. 0.0 * 37 
« 119 
r 2 0 * 47 
J 1 Jf 
$ s 
6-Min Count 
Period 
Beginning At 
4th St 
(Northbound) 
4:06 PM 
4:05 PM 
4:10 PM 
Lett Thru Right 
4th St 
(Southbound) 
B St 
(Eastbound) 
B St 
(Westbound) 
Right Total 
~53~ 
104 
84 
Hourly 
Totals 
4:15 PM 
4:20 PM 
4:25 PM 
4:30 PM 
4:35 PM 
4:40 PM 
4:45 PM 
85 
64 
44 
61 
71 
68 
71 
29 
12 
17 
20 
22 
15 
16 
126 
85 
77 
94 
110 
91 
94 
4:60 PM 
4:55 PM 
5:00 PM 
4 74 
5 72 
0 64 
0 4 
0 2 
_0 §__ 
18 
12 
105 
99 
97 
1164 
1166 
5:05 PM 
S;10 PM 
72 10 
JL 
101 
103 
1165 
11B4 
5:15 PM 
5:20 PM 
5:25 PM 
5:30 PM 
5:35 PM 
5:40 PM 
5:45 PM 
5:50 PM 
5:55 PM 
66 
57 
73 
61 
80 
49 
57 
66 
57 
10 
7 
13 
15 
5 
9 
3 
4 
8 
81 
78 
93 
87 
92 
75 
73 
82 
73 
1137 
1130 
1146 
1139 
1121 
1105 
1084 
1061 
1035 
Peak 16-Mln 
Flowrates 
All Vehicles 
Heavy Trucks 
Pedestrians 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped BusesI 
Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound 
Left Thru Right Left Thru 
36 
4 
840 
Right 
16 
Left Thru 
44 
0 
0 
Right 
24 
0 
La ft 
204 
0 
Thru 
40 
4 
0 
Right Total 
1204 
96 
4 
Comments 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 
Type of peak hour being reported: User-Defined Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume 
L O C A T I O N : 5 t h St - B S t 
C I T Y / S T A T E : M a d r a s , O R 
Q C J O B #: 1 0 2 7 4 0 0 2 
D A T E : 8 / 7 / 2 0 0 7 
0 jo.00j 741 
0 0 0 
«> • w 
P e a k - H o u r : 4 : 1 6 P M -- 5 : 1 5 P M 
P e a k 1 5 - M i n : 4 : 2 5 P M - 4 : 4 0 P M 
247 * 23 J 
0.0 8.5 
• • 
0.0 0.0 0.0 
^ • V 
0 77 42 * 0.92 • 196 0.78 
• «» a 
3.6 * 8.7 J 
2.4 + 
4.6 + 0.0 "V 
Quality Counts 
• c 
5.9 8.9 3.3 
• • 
0.0 8.1 
t . 2.3 • 2.9 
• 3.1 
r 0 . 0 * 3.0 
• V 
* r 
n 9 
S-Miri Count 5th St 6th St B St B St 
Period (Northbound) (Southbound) (Eastbound) (Westbound; Total Hourly Beginning At Left Thru Rlflht Lett Thru Rlnht Left Thru Rlqht Left Thru Riflht Totals 
4:0o PM 1 53 3 0 0 6 5 1 0 0 U 3 77 
4:05 PM 2 56 6 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 10 2 80 
4:10 PM 4 59 8 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 18 3 98 
4:15 PM 4 51 6 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 24 4 96 
4:20 PM 3 47 7 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 13 2 75 
4:25 PM 2 59 7 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 14 4 89 
4:30 PM 5 48 9 0 0 0 5 6 0 0 22 7 102 
4:35 PM 3 76 3 0 0 0 z 2 0 0 23 6 115 
4:40 PM 2 SO e 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 13 6 88 
4:45 PM 4 57 6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 19 3 90 
4:50 PM 8 72 7 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 12 2 106 
4:55 PM 9 51 8 0 0 0 1 6 0 0 16 3 98 1110 
5:00 PM 6 60 5 0 0 0 3 5 0 0 16 1 96 1129 
5:05 PM 1 43 10 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 14 2 75 1124 
5:10 PM 4 61 15 9 0 0 2 3 p 0 8 3 96 1122 
5:15 PM 4 45 9 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 8 4 72 1098 
5:20 PM 4 49 3 0 0 0 2 4 0 0 8 1 71 1084 
5:25 PM 3 59 9 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 12 2 87 1092 
5:30 PM 3 59 10 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 4 89 1079 
5:35 PM 5 66 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 9 4 91 1055 
5:40 PM 1 54 2 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 5 0 68 1037 
5:45 PM 2 47 6 0 0 0 3 4 0 0 6 2 70 1017 
5:50 PM 0 50 7 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 3 5 68 979 
5:55 PM 3 54 4 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 8 6 78 961 
Peak 15-Mln Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Total 
Flowrates Left Thru Rlflht Left Thru Rlqht Left Thru Right Left Thru Rlflht 
All Vehicles 40 73 i 76 6 " " 0 0 28 44 0 0 236 68 12*4 
Heavy Trucks 4 68 8 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12 4 100 
Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 
Bicycles 
Railroad 
Stopped Buses 
Comments: 
Report generated on 1/21/2010 3:18 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http:/Awww qualitycounts.net) 
YEAR 2020 TRAFFIC CONDITIONS - WEEKDAY PM PEAK 
"WITH IMPROVEMENT" SCENARIO 
w T 
CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE &\UWOS\noc<ra5.tlf 
FIGURE 
3 MAY 2001 
4139\OWeS\TECH MEMO S3M139F003 

Attachment 
Existing Conditions Level 
of Service Worksheets 
i " I JZ CO 
• (U <u • 
Ci > r -
i-t vt 
c 
u i i i o 
•J) CD -H 1) 1) u 
- 1 o c 
u o o O I u 
w o to w o < w > «M XS V-1 U-J 
V\ -H ro y, u LI 
-a 4-> (TJ 
O S S 
M 4-> 05 
Qi C t i <y A; ( E D *C5 CP - c a U QJ 
O JZ D 
to u 
w W O 
< . 
O C r-« in 0) E OI <u ® c 
4-> 
a 3 
Q 
X 
•H 
fH 
a ; >1-4 
o 10 
S . M 
E-I 
2 " x 
O 
tn 
»4-» 
id to 
E-i M 
c-< J J 
£ 5) 
o o 
j j o 
. c 
"O u 
0) t o VI 
c <D 
Q) iH 
o a *D 
•H •H "D 
•H 
3 s 
x> 
•H a "O 
CP JH o C 
4 ' 4-> w <0 
lu W « 
-H a l > 
4-> Q 
O Q) c r <0 
A3 j J c j j 
a -H 4-> 3 c 
t= S-l <U O ,-J 0) 
n t-H a DC £ 
o <U 
4-> 4-> Q r-t 
iH iH iH iH w 
D D D D CO TO <o n ro o CO 
H-l o TO 
r a) s aj a» HI £ CN u 
Qi Q Oi Q Q OJ - c 
o 22 
c •H CD 
o r - f 1 
c •H o O 
o O 
•H a o 
4-1 .O O ^ 
• • ro -H •H a> 0) 
0) u Li j J 
•• o) a» 4-i 0} •H >< a, c V) S-l -H Vj 0) •H . . 3 U-l 
4_> 4-> O O W t7> v< O 
Q) O VI aj -H 0} Ll 
E <o a a xz 4-> S-l a 
O ft'H •H 4-> 3 C E-i ^ 
<u e ^ iH TO O O U n C- Cl, a : O 
O V) 
T3 CI-i_l to U Z £ >1) Dj 
r~> I 
O >1 u u rj 
<y . 
c 3: o 0) 5_l u CM 1 CN o 1 o o o c o O O o o a« o m m U a1 u 0) a: c H 1 o o o O O o O CD o a\ CO o O t J o c: O i_l •U J 1 < W T> c 1 o i—1 o l-H o o c 4) 3 0) 1 (> CO o c—1 rC o I a» n 1 + CO O -H •H u 0) CQ 1 c—1 a: CM 1 CN a> rH o o V s O M r o o o o O o o o O (Ti o m m V o * cn 0) u ID 0) E i a o o z i o <J» o o O o o c O 03 o cn CO o .» (n 
r>i •H U a x: 1 "O J V i V CN .—i T5 C 0) P o 'a * 
<u a» 
oj 
a 1 o V 
c i 
i o 
r-i >-H O H O o 
V * ' * C C o O s: > u o m <NJ I i o o o o o o o c O CT\ o m in O y r: <15 o x: O a» o i j CO 1 C E-> P >-' V m i CTi o o o o o o O CD Cj O". V V o + to u U x a) w - i 1 o o j "U i 
U •H w 1 -H o i o H O H O o V V •H < -H > o rc .e X • (U 
> o m — fij V — <1> — 0) V a 
lu L, 01 o X O J i i—i i •—( X X X X X o o o o o 3 m w CN \ rr 1 -H o y. ( "D JC 1 3 y. X :< X X X X X o o o o o T5 V V o + « c i j ) i—1 < J "D X 1 T3 X X X X >: X X O o o c t- 4-4 01 c X ( O 1 o X X x X X X £ o w a; O 01 a 1 4-1 o c CD I E X X X X X :•< X IN E o-« u o o V TJ 1 U V + 0) 0) c m X O 1 •H r-i ar- O o o o D O 1 0) X X X >; X X X X X o o o o o o 
Jj -H 0) in c- 1 O o H 4-' l-H c V »—f 1 10 X 1 ~G X X X X X y. o o o o o u V V o + O 4-> u 4-J > XZ 1 C x: fC U 1 ft X 1 < 1 
X X X X X X X u •H in a) 4-> I T M V c l U X X X X X X X X X <15 03 •H •J CD U 1 -J o 1 c Ui m TO X o O 1 V X 1 o X X X X o o o o o V V c « u u •z. l T> x <0 1 *D X 1 H X X X X X X o o o o o u o -j. 
•o .—i ^ 1 4) o X CO V 1 < X I VJ X X y. X X X X c V o fi3 1 M X ? <0 X x X X X X X i—1 H 0) o + Z 
5 H i 
— tn 
r 3 
i •a a i0 1 
u 3 
a >• C J^ . •a 
i-i H f," 
I u 
<y 
— M 1 
) 4-J i m -r> T3 *D "O-O "a 
- E 
XJ 7) 3 
•o (1) 0) a 
+ o 
•X-
i < a a i M 4J ai u yj i to < et, ci: < u >! J-J + 'J XI o u i "O "C nJ 1 •q T> <13 U + 0) u c r in a i tn ••••, c. a- 1 C.0 ( j 1 V) XI CT Q. T> a- t j c IK + VI f0 <D r a o C 1 US Q. \ Vu i a T3 c U < M < is ra <TJ H 
+ o E i o tn C u~ 1 O I o H > 01 tn V T3 -H 01 in tn w > V •O + a> o 0) 0) w i ai ir,; •C ?0 u i "D iU d! m It, to c < * tJ a > I X C c C 1 X c: Uj a» u a: J 2 > m V) <v TJ S o <—1 -» c 0. o 1 o <TJ <o j i o !- u x 1 CJ t L> C o M TO 3 M H E- a) o /) >J c 'JJ o r-i ffl + 
cu t-i <4 X 1 X •J J f-« ai w t:J I ar M i n: X \D CL, £D < Ci CL. x ^ X If o L> CO Q + 
o e o o < 
> c- 'J"-1 ! . . . < I r— O S « 
x x •< x 
x :< x x x •a x x x x 
o o TJ 
* * 0 0 0 O 0 m 0 0 O O 0 O O O 0 O O O 0 O 0 O < O + * CM 0 0 0 a\ O 0 m O 0 O O 0 0 4-1 
i * r- CO CQ n c *D a <11 ^ J, 0 
r J, 0 O O 0 O O + * 3 a 3 1 4-1 TJ 0 
Ci 
4-1 
m •.) 4-» 3 3 01 CQ •r-i 0 0 m 0 m 0 m m 0 m 0 0 in 0 r-i CD r- O 0 O U U5 + •z. O 
o> o E 0 0 T 0 CTl •a* 0 0 T m r- CN m m 0 < X <13 4J M C T rg •H a. * I in <li I a> a. M 
M O 0 0 O * 0 0 Psl 
1-1 eg * oc 1-1 4-» 3c 0 0 0 T O m m 0 m in 0 <N m r- r- 0 0 O It) c a« 0 0 0 O cn 0 m r- cn n n m 0 S, Ll 
o 0) J T 0 CJ CJ CN CN 01 O r- E-l CP Li 0 0 0 0 0 0 Psl CN 
a> Li 2; X u 3 s> + CO 0 -H CD o O H > XI 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 f-i 0 0 0 m in Ul 0 ai 0 c\ O i—1 + cn in (M X i-l 1 01 (K 0 0 CN O CTl CN CN 0 0 CN m <Tl r-i 00 0 m 0 in O -V > jJ Ti Ti m 0 0 u n O tfi -X c + \ T c <11 ai G r-i 0 0 0 0 CN .—1 •N w 
+ u 3 1 4-> •0 a 6- u ai a) d ai O 1—1 Tl &I u rt in 0) ca -H >—1 0 O m 0 r- O m CTl 0 (Xi O O cn 0 m r 0 (Ti 0 OI O ^ w 
<-) <0 o i—i - o o E- E 0 0 m 0 f i O cr» CI m O O m m cn U3 00 0 Ci 0 u s: a a: * -H 4-» M c 0 O O + O 0 
<u a. a» > m <11 LQ 0 1-1 0 O O 0 0 CJ CN 0 cn a: o * .—i <0 Li + m 1 CL 0 xz o E + o .—i <y u 0 O O 0 0 O m 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O < O <11 "O 0 
u <c c 3 > 01 w 4-1 0 O CTr O O m 0 O 0 0 0 0) in a. C Tj o i—1 •» o t-t 0 O O <TJ OT •a* i o E <v -H 4-J O > + f3 01 Lw o in *"* *~H O O O 0 0 * •—( c <11 *o <y m O tf> + u Ti c s u CJ * •H <u 0 a 0 O m 0 O O 0 m U3 m O 0 O m O k <y -H "C 
6 0 a « + 4-1 V4 CD cc 0 <N 0 (N O 01 <N O-l O O CN m CO O CO n in m 0 a -H o c E a A3 + <11 > TJ <11 T V m m X M < V) E 03 * s> <11 C V) <11 V 0 0 O 0 0 0 + CO o o U rf 3 1 >0 TJ Ll •c 6 TJ Psl m o u O xz 3 + fO 0 C to o •H TJ * CQ & —1 0 0 0 0 O m m 0 m O O m 0 m CO to m r- 0 0 0 CD O + O to n3 <1> <1J O -r t- U 0 0 0 rr> O a"i r - O O r- m CO CO cc m m m 0 ' * to CN 4J •H o x: + 4-1 x: u c CN CD CO •Q CO 00 m m IM < •>, CN •H i-l o *D C H > 4-1 Jr <y + 0) * + 3 1 M Cfi *~H 0 0 .—I •j 0 0 0 «—i + O * a-- m 
c U o o E u 4-1 o a 0 0 3 00 0 00 O m CTl 0 cn O O o\ 0 m VD T m r- 0 0 0 CD c 4-1 m o XI u <1J (1) 10 V) < CN 0 CN O CTV CN O O r-j m 00 O a m m m 0 «-i + <11 •H c 
^ w u cn tn + If! (1) J 0 in m a 1—1 Q) 
01 l/l o c + O .—1 i-l 0 O 0 0 0 + E 3 < U-J o + JZ 4-1 + O <U (M O tn C a US M •w 4-1 4 0 0 <u c 0 0 O in O 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 < O * UJ Q A3 A3 + \ 0 0 O (Tl O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 <11 CD c U rH (D 4-1 ca TJ 0) m r- 0 0 x: 0 w o c E- > <D c [/) <u a 0 O • • 0 0 0 4-1 0 m 
in CI i) a + O O U5 3 t m TJ 0 0) + fVJ 
•—i E CP j o + Li O f^ O jr a 4J .—1 W "D 01 01 C 4-1 CD Oi •—i 0 0 c 0 0 0 O in O 0 0 O O 0 CD O 0 O 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 ct O + •H to 4-1 .—I •H E + W E- 0 0 0 O CTl O O 1—1 m 0 O •0 0 0 0 0 0 E U u u * .C 4-» c 0 0 r- 0 • 0 0 TJ (0 a: * JJ u 0 •0 O E O 0 0 <13 1 w + 03 u 1 0 0 4-» + m X o + O a 0 0 A 0 0 0 O LO O 0 O O O 0 X 0 0 O 0 to 0 0 0 0 0 0 < O i U 00 M u o 2 tn A 0 O CT-. O O in 0 O •H O 0 0 0 O r- 0 
T> o ^ J 0 CO • 0 0 a 0 O 
(H CN + u 0 0 O > .0 0 0 <y O 
s 
I C o 
<u to 4> O 0) 
- 4) 
c—1 3 <D rH 01 
- 1—1 lb - .—( <13 
C <11 0 •c 
H 
<U 
•c + 
0 
CO / 0) 
o >, E c TJ tn a> 0 E c < tn 6 xz > 3 4-» 0) CD U m <11 O T> CQ E 0 > 3 0 •• c 4-» <D 0 m XI < HI 0 a + 0) X -H u £ z JT 4J <11 S < 3 > •H <11 <11 •TJ >1 > > O <D .—1 > s: cr- + 3 + -H UA 0) •H O c M 0 TJ •0 TJ O iJ c E tn 4J 4-» 0 0 > at \ O 4-1 V) E- 4-» rC V O O V > JZ < V O -JJ <11 3 2 > fO TO 4-1 -H fO 3d \ <11 N. a >1 < * <M O Ij <u g <D O E u Jj tn g 4-1 < > 0 'J r-i U l/l w 1—1 0 tn c E >, <11 XJ Ai + •c nl U <D 10 •H <11 Li 01 4-1 x: 01 a <11 3 JH 
U 
3 m 3 \ <y •TJ <0 \ 4-» <D 3 fO M Q <1> M fi. 4-» u (0 4-» a S" c CP c OS c —1 w O •H <11 [u *o TJ [d Lu c a r^ -H <y r-i r-J <D n in s + 4J (-> 
s c >1 o a a o 0 •l-l 0 rfl M c w zc ar <D 41 L> fO <TJ *0 ft •H <0 0 Ll M O <11 W T3 3 u + 0 CL, + o J o * (SI < 2: CC 2: > m O 3 & PL. CC n. E IM V) V) a. J u > U 0 > a 3 < X * Z + X 
* 1 0 O C c. c; 0 0 0 0 0 0 O cc 1 0 0 VO CO c 
1 1 0 O r i 3 
O 41 1 r~ r- 0c-1 ri t> •r 1 •J-ifi 1 0 0 rg 
41 1 
•V jC I r- O <r r- CD C-"> in U5 O-J C-J C 1 (n f^ i j 
D* •X' I 0 0 0 r—• CI a> vi a 
u 3 >i> CD o c 1 c- 0 O vO u*) CO O' c: O 0 <M O if) O T5 I • • 0 <N r-j O VI r^ i o 1 O 0 r—• VI TO -a o 5 1 vj a> o 0 1 TJ QJ ni 1 r- 0 0 f-. OJ O CTi un y: •i-l ID e- 1 on 0 c 0 • O u s ~ LI u • c r> 0 
a» X « i 0 0 O (N at XJ TO 1 
o 41 * 1 0 O 0 c 0 0 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 "O •j -C > - 0 0 0 0 • OJ vo CP r-r- Oi C TJ u •H + l c • c 0 O 0 0 0 W 0) -X' o 41 4-1 -V l 0 0 0 0 r-* r J IM C 1 £ <U 11. T, TO 0) C. + c S UL VI + 1 m O cr> 0 0 0 p"> CD (j, ^ en u C 4" -r cc 1 tft O 0 CD 0 . in CD o o i-i * "C 1 CD 0 li-) VD 00 <5 w o 1 O 0 O fN (N c S-I rt ; a 1 D or LC O TO 0 O w O -H TO 41 * w 1 m Vi 0 0 O O f i CO ai m VD r- MD at W a> 3 4-> 4-1 I" e + H l m 0 0 O O • in \D CP JN i-i •H 3 a 3 * i-i £ l CD 0 m VD CO < (N TO - i "O Ov 0 1 ». 41 4-1 l 0 0 O r^ j OJ •H o c O • 41 3 l O' 
c 0 0 o O E > U O 1 m 0 0 O 0 n CO m U> vO cn c <13 o SL U o O u tO 1 if) 0 0 O 0 • LO ID 00 •H 
n 1/5 u X 41 + to •J l CD 0 m VD CO 
« to o "O (0 * l 0 0 O rvi •H 01 0 TO -» .c 0 vi >, -i O 03 * 4-1 a [j.. «o VH U-I H 0 l 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O 0 0 0 TO (0 ft) (N a: 1 0 0 0 O O • (N CO C iJ i-t «-i 4-1 T> 1 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o C H 0) 41 C 1 0 0 O 0 1—1 (N !NJ 0 
V) 0) a 41 3 l OJ 
e D> O 1 
V 41 C 41 u an l 0 r^ 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O 0 O 0 4J r-1 «H u CO E-« 1 0 0 0 O 0 • U5 CO J-J fJ i-i -H x: O • 0 0 0 O 0 0 
•H M > e 1 0 0 O 0 (N CJ W *H M m u l m TO X 4) 0 l 0 0 O Cr O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O O 0 O c v. to o 3 1 0 0 O O 0 . U? CD r- r-
•o l O . 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 TO U-i 1 G O O 0 fN f-J 
O + y 0 
0 1 41 a> . . TA .11, u ^ VJ w CD 
a» 1 '—1 a ^ u 73 "O CI a 0 O O" O a- O 0 
> J 1 O >1 0 > < < 4-- sz 4-1 JZ 4-1 X i ' 0 i* JJ 1 > H -U E ^ v> 4' •'J O O «-l U 4-1 u 4J --j a> U C 1 U *—1 0 ia ID 0 ft 'O u 0 n m aj 10 TO 4> 1 nj T> d> 41 < t=. u. cn Cu cn u. Cr. n 0 E 1 C > Cu L, M M sP Jd 41 n 4> 1 •H CP JJ 4-> C-j JZ (N JZ u a O 1 4) V4 O in tfi i-> S u 5: u t--a O 1 M U M a. a lU CN O O iTi 0 0 u u") O CD U Cm I-i s 1 LD eC CU O 3 s CO 0 X •'C ON- x cr 3u CTi 3u 
u 
o 
+ 0 IN* M (N r-l in m 0 VD O I— 0 0 0 m 0 in 0 X X Ol O O fM CM + J-l 0 \o VC CO 0 Cft \£» VO 0 0 O VD m (N 0 X X O r- rvi CM y, X _u (N 41 \C VO M3 0 0 in 0 O 0 O X O 0 0 3 
1 c-> m CO X X a X X 4-1 "O O 3 41 < * 5 O 
<0 u * X X N X X x X X X :< x x >' V X X X X X X X X X + 5 -U CL. <0 1-1 X X X •x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X E- U-i w V) X. X X X X N* X X X X X x X X X X X x x X X X X X X X ai U-i (13 w X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X 0 re C c CO X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X £ u 
O u X X X X X -•< X X X X X x X X y X X X X X X X x X X X E-cn 
4' E-4 Z X 
O CO O O 4-1 JZ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X :< 07 u-< OJ X 4-1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -J 14-. 0 41 O X X X X X X :< X X •<: X X X X :< X X X X X X X CO ro 0 V) >2 O X. X X X X X X X X X X X ?< X X y. X y. X X X ;< w hi r-l <0 n> w X ;< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X E- 4-1 
* Vi 41 "O X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X X X X X X 
"O cu VI 4-1 4-1 r-l U 2C s 4-1 O O JP CL. 'H -C X X X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X >' X X X X 1-1 O m E U X X X X X X V. X X X X X .N y X X X X X X X X X X x X J2 r-l O >, M O 41 * X X X X X X X X X X X X A X X >, X X X X X X X X O u Ti 4) > 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X M X X X X X X X >: X <0 a. c r . a. 4-1 •H + X X X X X X X X X X X X Y. X X X X X X X X X X X X 41 AJ 4) j-l 4 X X X X X X X X X X X •A X X X X X X :< X X X X 41 1 6 4> X .U ^ li —i 1—1 -a 4> 4-1 C « <J -O c 3 Vi (/) T3 u 4> O C 41 ^ + -H O c i a O 4-1 + 4-1 0 e X 1— < W 41 -H 0 *M c JZ a CD C aj 4J rt a J-l CP y c a T3 CM aj O ID •H 3 a CM •H 0 C V) O •H c u 41 ? CL. CP 1-1 4» e ^ CO <13 41 _U 0 4) e , CP a b u CP 41 U-I 0 CO <N J-l •H •H a 3 * 4J 3 •H TO or V) ro JJ < OJ m •H "O 4-1 0 r-l + 41 O 3 0 u a> 3 cr u u M •H O c <0 O 41 LJ 0. J-i 0 > Vi CP ro M Vi <13 cr C O O 0 4-1 > Vi a O d £. O n J-l O UJ c 4-1 ra 0 u 3 0 4-1 0 n -J-l u. 41 1-1 CP 41 d 4J -H d 
w O a x 41 * w O. VJ cn z 0j ai 3 3 d E-* Vi 41 O Jj —i 41 Ui W u £ M - a O d a O r-l j-i a' • H Pi V) r0 r-f <13 I-H 2 £ 
•H fC 'H O 0 nj ; jr 0 re a > 0 3 4> Vi M JZ ro UJ 41 iH 0 <i> 
> >M O 0 CD j j VJ 41 41 a 0 i j cr j j 3 L0 to > + C3 r-l Cu 0 O c E 0 a 01 u u-i TJ •H j-i J j CO |U T3 CM (13 -H z 0 1-1 c c 41 0 41 cr •H 3 M d 3 d CO u CO c -U 4i i j + 41 E- u <0 4J n a c 'W en U O 41 0* 41 0 + 0 CO 0 c E-* —1 4» d 0 tc p 113 41 a: 0 •H c JC «-i CO E •n jJ 0 TO in 41 41 <v) VJ d V) V) 0£ CL. U-i Vi 0) VI -H E-* O CO j j u CM M —1 E CP (13 M 41 Qi 41 Qi 3 d •—1 0 cr O c > n3 c V) Vr CO < nj 45 4) c _u 4-1 a. 41 d 0 n Vi 01 0 a n •H [j-. Vr 4-1 ro 3 [j.. TO •—1 •H QJ W S-i U <0 A3 3 3 O c •H a 3 M d 3 d U » 0 s i-i U 4-1 d 41 4) tt J e- e- ro j-i to 0 0 c E-« 4' i j 
-H « CL, E I—1 Cjl, J 41 > •H (13 « 0 -i JZ < 3 1 !C Hi £0 •H 4) CP c c JJ -U 0 & (0 •H j-l >1 j j O -H 4-1 ro CT> H 0) U7 O U 41 E-* > c m >, n> M ra flj A a u > 3 d e oa Vi w •H C •H D d> 41 u c 41 c x: Vi c: 41 M a to 41 -H 0 Vi j-i 4-1 r- n T3 > 6 •H C 4-1 w E- j ^ •H CL. 0 a- hj •0 r-| <13 0 M O 3 '-M in 0 0 (13 S-i E- 4) 0 41 M <0 O 41 41 O 3 crx: E- 41 0 4) 4) 41 Cu d a 4-1 ii-i 4) 0 3 u) u 3 ^ 41 u IH EO 0 to C -C c U U-i Q. •M O 0 Qj Ci. 0 ra 41 •H ai 0 D) 0 nj O J J 73 O J j 41 O 14-1 0 4" 0. H^ I-H CU 1-1 3 0 •i-i C to M 4> 41 cd CO 41 'i-i -H CP Hi CO J C c M O [j-. CL c C r-| XI ri c C (15 d 41 -i O J-l c: U 4) n-i O 0 d a 3 X) 3 V) 0 c O U ro -J nj d + X -w U -C 41 O > O O T> -H Vi 73 cr CP E O -H •H u U-i 41 u •J •H C 41 J J j j D 41 c c •H C c c d a u 3 U JZ E 3 0) W 113 •—1 J J •H M VJ 4-1 H M j-i •H •H E- Vi •H ^ a M j-i M <U 4) H u-i 0 M 0 41 ra 0 4) 41 W O O 'Sj « Vi CP (0 CP CP 0 O O 3 E rO Vi 41 41 u 3 41 O a a 4J 3 0 0 j-i 0 Cb M D. 0 D) D) 4-1 Vi ft 4-1 a u Jj iw a e £ 0 0 •H a a w 1-1 CL. U-I >M X 0 UJ O VI d C C U-I E-
S c D , > U *+-< a 5 3 T3 Vi M 4) T3 a a 0 a u-i ro M 4> S-i JZ •H •H •ri 41 CL. 1-4 + < u < CO 0 z eC Cu a. •J < 0 0 ^ to 0 co CO s a, E-* a to * X 
CO o 
c-s I O V 
O 4' 
£ I 
>1 
va V, u-i 
•T? ra 
O C H co at i—l E (U 4» C 
4-) CO 4-1 
"1 VI 
M <r> to X 
ro CD g . J O. 3 41 O -
> 0 0)-Li O 03 -0! O to oi 
X o C X o o x 
< 3 a O l-< CO -« LT 
a •» ( j c o to n o w 
X C C C u ra o j 
y J CO O (IP o c? V o 2 o 
a •• -o c x: -h M P s -C 
T) ^ <u IT) -H -H > a s ra 
o 3 > _ to o 
2 C ! « I U T} l-i S J U f !3 p ft 3 M C X 
i o x --< o • 
X X X : 
X X X 
X X X x :< X 
x x x x x x x x :< X x x X X X X X X X X ' 
X X X X X X X x o o o o o x x x x x x :•: x o o o o o x x x x x x x x 
X X X X X X X x •"-< r-f •"-< r-H 1-' 
X X X X X y x x x x X X X X X X X X X X r 
I o O I-I O r 
o 'H > in •h in TJ 
X > ro H W 0' o c a> m .t) 3 u f-< s j l l i j a r o t t a ; E- ti> v_> CO J C 
A O -
A » * 
A -O O + <0 • • 
O fi) » 2 a + 4-' o ^ u o + v tf • 
01 --I •/ v 
3 I T3 V V t O X / \ r 
M V V O < 
u V V c 
V V O + 1 o •> V V -A 
J) 41 •••» 3 Q- D. M » •t 4-1 >i 4J 4 T3 fl : + 
O 
* o O o m o in in o m o o m O a? cu r- " m r- o + + O.I cc o o o o o vr in CT" o i-i o 
1 + t - 03 T C T3 41 41 o r-i r-I c- o O o o o CO CM •—i CO o Zi a iO r ' 3 o 
1 4-1 
4-1 3 * o 
u 
3 
a? 03 o o KO o <X1 O to CD o <J3 o o •£> o CO CM i-i r- o U r- •* •z o o t-< O o o\ o at o cr- o O o o O at CU o o 4 < X 4-1 L} C »—i CM CM CD + 3 •rJ 
a* * + 10 CI i 4> CL, 
n 
o ^ o I-I >-• r-l o o 
1-1 o o o CM l-l CM * f-« tj-l u ^  o o o o o o m o o O o o O O o o o o o Ci o o < o ra c 4< o o cn o o m o o o o o o + a, Li O <y o t- O o H 
CP Li o l-l <-\ o o C3 o 4' Li 4) 4-1 + 2 X M 3 > to O •H CO o O x: o o o o o o m o o o o o O o o o o o o o o o o < t/i tj-l CM X .» 4) JZ 0C o o o cn o o m o o o o o o >M o tD X > 4-1 T3 T3 E r~ o o + CU ra o 10 c "N to c 4) 4) <3 1—1 r-l •—i o o o o £-« <TJ TO u 3 1 4-1 TJ o a + H u at 4) 4-1 a 4) O 4J 3 
•o CW Li ra CO 41 Pi H M o o m CM CM o o o o o vo m VD m to at o CTi U X w 4-1 to O I—1 u u f- E U o •—i o o o o m CD r- o m o u X X -1-1 4-> fcl c r- O o a. 4' >, > CO 4) m o O o o o o CM rM 4-1 o a\ a: 4' ra Li ra 1 CL, JZ 
0 >, E >—i a> u a o o m o m o m T o o o o vo m m m cr, o cn u 4) * a o M ro c 3 > Q) to 4-1 CM o CM o CT: CM CM o o CM m Cl tn o m o c + Q) to 
n 0< c V o i—1 o + r-J o ra + w 41 M 0 tM m I-I o o o o o o CM c 4) 1 E 4) 4-1 > ra QJ o 4) —1 
TJ 41 nj u & + Li * U -a c 3 u 4) r-i ra —1 o o o CD O o O o O o o O o o o o o o o o o o < o + 4) » •ri -o 6 01 10 u L* 41 a: o o o cr. o o m o o o o o o a- . r-J •H o C £ a ra •1-1 41 t» TJ V t- o o X CO E 03 u > 4) c to 41 V O r-l I-I o o o c CO A o c o O < r-J 3 I ra X> o 0 TJ CM CD o O JZ 3 r- ra + o C V) 
4) O D 
•>-t 
4-1 4) TJ o to f-
Q* •—1 U o o o o o o o o 
o o o m cr O o O o o o o o o m o o o o o o o o o 
o o o o o o < O U A ra 
JSI U •H U JZ 4-1 4-1 c <M t- o o <5 >i CM ro i •o •H 4J 4) 4J o o o o o O a 5-4 —i o c > 41 a> 3 r o cn cn ra c O o o Li M 4J O a o o o o o o m O o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o < O ^ n » c uJ O x: u 41 u <11 CO to < o o cn o o m o o o o o o + 41 c TJ a> CO u to u CO 10 C * If a Lf TT o n r-l o r-i H r-rH ^ o o o o o ,_,* o -Q ^ E -r rH 2 4> e -H < -r-i 'M 0 JZ 4-1 3 -i O 4> o —I 4-1 CO C + Q rH M U-I 4-J in o o 41 OJ o CM o m o r-- o o O v^ l r~ ai r- o o o 03 CC t U 
D ra ra V C6 o 4J at o o <T> <T> <J\ o o <T> m CD CM n CM to o 41 + to c xJ M <y Li 4-J ca "O 4) ra n ro l-l + JZ * O >A o C f- 4) 4) c CO 4) D o .—1 l-l o o *• o o o + 4-1 + O ra to 0> 4) a 41 o CO o 3 J ra -a 4) CM Li 
•—1 E O* J o o 0 JZ 3 u rH CO + -Q 4> 41 c 4-J I-I CQ Cu H o o c m o m o o o o 41 O VC vo 3 ai t- o o o CQ CD •-t » 
j-i -H x to E- O o 3 r- o r~ at o o •-I in CD 'C r~ •O f^ J VD c fj £ 4J UJ U u JZ 4-> c o vc vo c- r~ r- 3 r- o • + -a X M CO X 4-1 •H o o •D O CM X o o o 1—1 1—1 4) i CO -H ca Li 1 •—1 O 4-1 m ra X o O CL o o A o o o o o X o vo r-i r- to a> t- o o o CQ ^ * CO ui o z to m o o cn m o o m CO a) —i c^ i ID o O r r-i TJ o CM r-J o jt r- to • > C. . o o TO (NJ 3t U o l-l l-l O O o >»o o o 41 + o 
X * 01 CO 4> O 
+ 
41 
- 4> »—1 
3 41 —i Ui 
- rH 
ra q 41 41 I 
u + 
41 + 
o 
CD *4J 
o E c T) (0 0) —{ o U CO •—1 a -a x: > 3 + 4-1 4J 4) U ra QJ O "O 03 fc p > O " c 4-> 4) ra < 41 O C + 4> * •H 10 e 2 x: P QJ X •—i < 3 > *—i © ra > u 4) *—1 > X CP ^ 3 + •H -H M o c o T3 •—1 T3 •n -r-i 0 4-1 C E to 4J J-l o u ^ > 41 t> * a + t"< ra 4J ra 4) 9) o 4) > JZ < -a o 4J CU TJ -O > ra ra u •i-i ra X "N 4) Q rH >T < + O L* 4J E Q) o E Li 4-1 CO E 4J < > o o < t£ W L* jJ CO w u to c E >« 41 n + ra Li 4> f-1 CO <D Li 4) P 4> 3 as 4-1 3 3 ra 3 3 4> ra ra \ 4-1 4) 3 ra Ct r-l 4> M a 
4-> V w 4-1 U a > c cn c cc c M w o -<-l 41 [li O-i •d T3 UJ u. 4J 4-1 •n c CL *—1 -H 41 r-| <0 to X •» J-l + f-
x o c. 4-1 a o o -H -H ra 0 ra Ll c CO X 4) 4> O j •H ra ra ~o 3 •i-i ra 0 Li L* O 41 to X> Q O ^ O * CL, I— u J o + to < u cc >i tJ > m a CU cu ec tc a. X to to < Ui u > u LJ > o 3 e£ J x ^ X 
1 c o o o •: 
c-j 
o o 
CJ. "> 
S i 
u Jj • 
o o -a s ro 
O O O O O o o O . O O O • ' • c;- • • • ci o H O O O 
o o r-> o 
o X > o o x a) 
o r i o o o c o o o o o - o o o . o •> • - 0 0 o »—1 0 0 0 
o c> o o o o o o o O - O O O • -. c . . . o o 
o o 
« o 
o o r- • • o 
C 4-> M 
O c H to V w E cr (HOC U H JJ M 4J 
•H 10 
id <fr -H <0 X M U 
o ai o o o (j> o ' O O O • ' • kc • • • o r-»—1 o cz H 
< r"> o a-- 0 o o cn a} ) c. • 0 0 o • • . . . . o t-
) H o o w 
« o m o o o ai co » 0 - o o o . vo . . • o r-) r-l 0 O r-
r- 0 -
• f i 
r- o ClJ . 
•J") iTl 
cm • - r-
a > a o o u 
f- X 
o a «-> x: 
u S u^  L) 
-Xi x 
U 4J <TJ O Cu cn 
XI rM 4-1 z in CJ cn x 
X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X y X X >: X X X + 4-1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X c>i (0 y. X X X X X X X y. X X X X y. X X X y. X X X y, X X j j CsJ ai X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 3 
1 + s X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X , a 
-O 
y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X x -t + Q u 3 
41 < -f § 0 X ra 0 0 0 0 l~< m 0 r- CM 0 0 0 \£> cn 0 0 X X 0 0 cn •X- \J3 4 Cu ra m -» 4-> CO 0 CsJ CM CM CM m 0 VO m CM 0 0 0 (Ti \0 \£> 0-1 0 0 X X X X CO 0 O CD CO k E-PC U-I ra 1-1 rH 0 0 0 r- 0 0 cr 0 X X l-l O 0 0 i s ra C c Cu CO CO ro X X Li 
O M X X b* cn 3 
4' M E- z X U 3 0 -H 
CO O 0 4-1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X CO U-i CsJ X 4-> x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X rJ IH 
0 a) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x + w ra 
0 CO O x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X t-l ra to X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X b* j j M d) cu *o a< + X X :< X X X :< X X X X X X X 
>: X X X •*• X X X X X X -r + w 
4J >11 u + 0 s u 0 0 a. XJ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X >: u 0 
0 S TJ + 4-« X X V. X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X y. X X A x: rsi 0 u 0 (U Ll X X X X X X X X X •x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + TJ u M U ra d) x: > r O :< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X ^ a> 00 r- a. C T5 CU 4-1 •H + X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X y. X X • CO T , 4) E M 4) a) s ra T * X X X X X X X X X * X X X x X X X X X X * X X X X X + c OJ 4) i-l "0 a» 4-1 c + u TJ 
6 c 4> 3 
u 0 CO c H -« 0) « —( J "D O c a 0 4-1 + 4-> 0 E X 3. CO <u 1—1 + rH 0 c x: Qi U-» O c X 4J a: Qj 4-1 CT> u c 6 TJ CsJ 
CO CO CJ 
0 
•H c ra M a) •» + „ rH a> 3 a> VI a O CM «—1 •H E u 0 CO C ra 
a> z> U 0 0) E r cr> a 0 L; cr c 4) 0 CsJ 4-> •H a a + 4J 3 ra CO ra 4-1 >> CsJ ra l-l •O 4-> 0 rH « ai 0 0 O o> 3 cr Li 0 + M -H 0 C ra 0 * ai a Ll O > W o> ra £0 Li p cr ra C O 0 O u s > M 3 13 x: u 4-> O Lu c 4J O c, u 3 U 4-1 0 0 4-1 Co Li a> 4-> tF 4) c 4-1 (0 0 a x d) * 07 a M a1 z <U a 3 c H Li 4) a 4-> 4-> f 4) 
V) to 0 E U) * P CJ > C a 0 4-1 4) M •H IX CO ra rH + 0 O ra + JT 0 ra a > u 3 41 Ll lu x: ra u. 41 U-> O <U <4-1 u O CO * 4-1 u 0) <u a 0 4-1 cr U CO > c a rH Cu la O >n U) c e 0 3 J •j rH -0 rH -H 4-1 W <13 ra TJ C>l ra -H 2 0 Jj c c <u 0 dl cr> •H a M c l-l 3 c CO U 4 00 c a) 4-1 0) j Li ra -H 4-1 Li a i-l c 4-1 CP la 0 •H 41 cr 41 3 c + 0 V) O t_i rH a) CJ a: 0 ra d) ct 0 -H c lJ u E 4-> + 0 ra CO 0) H a) ra M C CO CO CO OL CL U-I w CO CO E-i 0 CO 4-1 TJ U + CM rH E cr ra u j <U d) d) d) s c J rH O cr O C > ra C CO CO cC ra •0 at O c 4-1 u CU d) c c 0 Ll M s dJ 0 4-1 a Li •H G> u. LJ Jj ra 3 CL. 4 ra 4-1 •H CU to >H Ll ra ra 1-1 3 3 c •ri a 3 Ll C 3 c 0 'J s U ui U cn a) ai j j Cu t- f- c; r—1 ra ra 0 0 jJ •H c 4> -c i-i 4-1 + •H CO a. E H u. ra a: > -H ra 'ft 0 rH X J 3 c. + CO •H CD CD d) cr- c c 4-1 4-1 u d to 4-> >, 4J 0 •H 4-1 ra cn H 03 * m r0 X u <1) H > c U-I UH >> c> M ra ro a CO a u > 3 c E CO Li CJ •H + £ •H •H 3 a> CJ u c d) c x: u & 41 Ll a< ra 41 •H 0 Li 4-> 4-> + r- c I X) > CsJ 0 -H C 4-1 10 CO j 1-5 a. 0 cu ro TJ r-C ro 0 Ll J 3 Ll U-I CO + 0 0 M (U U O d) w to 0 41 4) 0 3 cr x: t- 41 3 r 0 
s a1 <11 a c 4-J U-c U-i ai 0 3 4-1 Ll 3 41 f4 u U-l u H 0 1—1 to c x: c la U-I a ra U-i 0 0 CL. a O ra d> 41 0 r-l CP 0 fl? O 4-1 • o i 0 4-1 d) O U-i 0 j d) a rH Cu u 3 0 •H c CO Li 4) 41 < + CO d> cr> d) U3 J c c CO 0 Lu dj C O- l-l x: •H c c ra C 41 r-i O 4-1 u a> U-i U-i 0 0 c nj 3 a CO 0 c 0 0 ra a ra c -» X -H 0 x: d) tJJ > CT O O TJ -H •H Ll •a CP a1 E CP 0 -H M •H vJ j ^ -X •H U-. rH d) O j C <11 4-1 j j 3 cu C c c c c a 4j a 4-> c, E 3 * UJ a) CO ra rH 4-1 Li 4-" M Ll 4-1 •H •H Li -H u M a K 4-1 Ll ai 4) 3 0 H b 
> Li 0 0 ra O 10 <u d) 10 O O 10 CO CO o> [0 cr 0 O O 3 «—1 E «—i ra Ll a> 0 rH a) O XJ -O 3 a a 4-1 3 O O 4-> O Cu U a O Cn •H cn i-J + Ll Cu 4-1 a O 4-1 U-i a c E 0 0 U-l a a '-0 U-I Q< U-) UJ X 0 U-) 0 H e C C E-* X c a >, O "»-t a 3 3 •O u d) TD a CL 0 U-I Q. IH ra H 4) M C, •rj M •r| s: CL -» < (J < w 0 Z Z < CU Cx> < O O J U3 O w u X CU iJ cu H CO S 10 X 
ro i ) c- 1 L) o d» x' V; x X o X x J o Li 1 D, >; X X X rH X UI to O 1 CO w X X X) X • X ro a. 3 1 (j ra o o U X >: x X C X X X b' Ll <D <i> O J a> o c. o O o o o o o o o o o a O o Cl o ft; d 01 o o o >- o c> o o o o o o -V X X X X X X X JJ rrj E- 1 O o o U-i o 4-1 O o c o O o O X X X x c >: X X u s: 1 m o o n • o c- o o o O X X X X C X X X O at 11, o T5 V) 1 <M o o,o o o o o X • >: •H X • X o O ra 1 QJ o -a x X X X Ll X X X 
CM o > 4-J jz a> UJ 1 o o o o o o CO o o o o O c 3 TJ ra ra 4-1 > 1 o .n o o o o 3 o cr. o o o o Q VJT o to dJ a. c •D 4-1 H) -H 1 o o ra o O o (n o (n CO 
3 1 o ra • o o jr. 4-1 U? c 
e d) D ra 1 £J ("> j) o 0 a 
TJ 0) E T2 C (Q ra QJ 0 c 3 O 0) l-l 1 UJ Lfl m o m E o o o •ri 
u GJ U N d) CC 1 ra o o o 0) ^ O O c -H 4-J 1 O cn n .•o o n > r- o •—I » ~o rH rH c 1 u c o C Q) ra *.•£ 3 1 ra u -ri s u 
CM ffi o rH c o i <U a) o CO Ll o co ID •rH •r| u> a) CQ [ <•*> <u 3 O 4-i r- o r- CO d> 4-1 ra -H E r i J £- 1 o o o U-i <j 32 o Q ^ rH O O ^ O \£> CO 
:M JJ -rl 4-1 U) 3 0J .c ( •ri m m o m d) < iM fO "D 0) C rH + aj J-l 1 U CM o C CO O C a ^ P •j ^ 3 r d) o 0) 3 XJ CP C u O O O l W •ri cu o 3 c 
fij o -C U d) X ^ + to 00 I d« 4-J •H m m o m 00 O r| 
•"J CO a u u a> •J) i 3 »J u U. rH rH O r- o co to U x w t x: 1 a> a 0) c in in • m Ll -H "H > ra 4-> I 0) 3 10 a) o> o O >> u i M O CQ -» o SH O ' Li > c Q 
M U-I 4> O I d> u -r-l CM CM o CO O CO ra ra tO O CH l o Lf 4-J 4-J vc \o o \D >. CO O CO CD 
c JJ in (N + 4-J *7j I o o c c U T-l i—I o 4-J Xi O GO O O c E- UH d) c I r-i o •ri •ri O (0 flj O * <u 3 i o rH {J CN E > o I aj 0) 0) 4-J ra 
dJ G) cr -U 03 a> E E ra C t- r- o r~-Q, rH O •-« 
4-1 ^  •H ai + w E- r c o o T> 3 •r| -r) rH o o o o o ra r- o r- a 4-1 UI JJ JZ j ai O H e- CU u in m o m L) M-O 
-rH (0 0) •U j <D CM ic (0 -H j + CQ i a in rtJ X o i to m (M CI m IJ 2 i CM to r- o r- er> o er> r-
TJ J i A: rH C c c c o o o o C CM o Ol O ra * i rH O ra o o Ci o in in • m O m • m E i ra c -ri •r| •ri d « c 3 4-J u 4-1 * o i •D •H X a) ra ra d ra .h ra .. • o • CD * -r| i c o to y. CO .c C! a» c D. o 4J O rH TJ o U D TJ D. i Li ra •»-4 Qj <) E o 3 3 3 X} 3 > 0 < > 3 ra CL rr, X o iJ i 3 Ll E "O t -r| 3 "ri a CO 9< 3 a n > 1= 4J a u 
* ' j C 0> ra c "H 4-J E £ <j (0 e rH m u E u iH u< 
i. [0 ra di I JZ JJ CX 0) rH o G ra O O 0J o a o c U-I dJ •ri o o o e I OJ d> to T> ra O" > M > U U ra w c u D L> C M U cu ra a) H ai I > T5 W a- a» G< 4-1 <s c -ri x: ra ra •r| O 4-J 4-1 C. > 1 > ra t j •Q E to c to 'H a1 u •ri +J Ll u CV) a E E o • o CO c C0 4J Eh * c a 1 01 M <D 0! ai a -H cu Ll cr cr rH d> ra O a D a TS -t c T) a o + C a o cu hh < £1 1 x O ^ ru t- n • a to to Ll -0 CJ? + CU O"1 cn C' > ra -Q 4-1 Cu U-I > i> —» Cu + a + M < o u 
+ + J CL f TJ O T> i a) 
1 C 1 rH Q> 
3 1 rH "O O o O 1 O 3 0) m 1 U rH 
Oi t- I 4-» U o ra 4-J 1 c c cu 5B" co 1 O 0) 1 u -i-i 3e 1 C c di Oi 1 O o 0 <u j 1 o cr> dJ •rl M 1 a M > > 4-J 
Li 3 •H M co 
CO o o 4-J a) 1 
CM X ra to JZ a: 1 T> o c c 4-J TJ 1 d) o V) j*; M U-I o f rH dJ ra ra a- O 3 1 rH TJ 3K L( d) 4-J O r o 3 
*o cu Li rH CQ i u rH 
4-J ra < V 0> Eh J 4J U o O 2 a > 4-1 t c C 0J CU <u CJ CD CO J o O CC E J ra 1 0 o 
CM O 3 UJ 1 c Ll 4-J ra c rH dJ * i r- CU c TJ o O i o d) •r| i> ra i 1 E d) 4-J + u "D dJ ra dJ c s 4-J CO 4-J i a OJ 3 ra CO a: i o o c i a cq M TJ i M to E O c I c a> o c o s 3 i cn "o o 
CM m o u •o * O 1 -H 3 
CO e; -H CO 1 CO d) 4-J a- -C 4-J £- i O o 
CM •rl u 4-» QJ JZ i a c 
(M ra rH TJ -r| (li dJ ¥ 4-J 1 o -H O c > X Ll 3 o c U O 0 Ll 4-J * u o i co ra o JZ L> d) TJ to * CD dJ to i >Z) CO u to d) 0) j o to to U N JZ O M i •H cC •H UH -H 4-J j J 
U-I O o to Ui 13 Ll •4-1 ra j ra ra rH c 05 i o c u 'H a« D» 4-J CQ T3 i o c E- > -rl dJ C 1 c a> [0 d) 0J CO 0> 3 1 tJ'TJ o 
rH E cn j c L4 O 1 -H 3 dJ CJ c 4-J * X m 1 to rH 
4-J •H to <y E- t 0 •LJ UJ u s > .c i a c 
-rl to u JJ 1 o 
CO -H m y J-4 1 -LJ o ra X * <u O 1 to u UJ o to 2 i 
T) o + J i o ra o i 
CM >, 
+ c ra t o rH d> i 
•r| 0) E t 
4-J Q ra i u 25 JZ 4-J QJ QJ O 
co Cn 4-J ra 01 1 o CO Li ra d> o E ( M 4-J CO dJ Ll dJ Li <U 1 4-J JZ d) 
4-J dJ Ll a > I C cn c 
2 r. > 4-J a o \ o rO cu + < WeCX 1 u oi J 
o o o o i_r o X X J X X X X 1 o o CO X X 1 X X X X 1 X X 1 X X >: X 1 o X X 1 X X X C 
X X 1 y. X X 1 
cn o cr, o m m o m X X 1 X X X X 1 m o in o CD o o X X 1 X X X X 1 CM m m X X 1 X X X 1 o X X 1 X X X X 1 
r- o r- o m 0 o o CM 1 cn o o o o CD (M (M U) CM O 1 V (M 1 
^ *"• o 1 O 1 
CM o CM o in o T X X 1 X X X J o o CO X X 1 X X X J 
s: x X c X X X X c Oi o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X ( X X x 1 o 1 1 o CM o (M o m in o m X X I X X X 1 m o m o CD m m X X I X X X X J KO X X I X X X X 1 rH rH o X X i X X X X 1 o 1 J 4-1 o o o o m o o o X X t X X X X 1 o o CO X X t X X x X 1 o X X t X X X X 1 o rH o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X — — 
o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 V o o CO X X 1 X X X X 1 V X X 1 X X X X \ o X V. 1 X X X X ( r- X X 1 X X X 1 o 1 1 o o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 CM o o 00 X X I X X X X 1 X X 1 X X X X t >, o X X 1 X X X X I 
o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 o o oo X X 1 X X X X 1 r- X X 1 X X X X 1 o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X — — 
a> m o m o in in o m (M r j 1 CN CD CO CM I 4-1 o o CO • 1 to CO CD O 1 ra iD cn I CO CD Q o 1 o J 
4-1 1 J dJ c o o o o in o o o m O 1 r- O 1 3 o o CO • 1 o r- u> O J 3 O .. l£3 •W 1 m TJ u o dJ 1 o 1 O 1 1 X A cn o Oi o m o 3 m | r- CTl CM 1 A o o •X TJ • • 1 .. O CM o J dJ O U3 m | d) m m in O o Z 1 o r •r| a) 3 > rH ~ cu •• 1 TJ •• r Ll 3 <u ra a E i O rH d> TJ 'O a) rH lD (3 •rl | s o a a i to O T; 03 E o 3 E~ 1 > ra ra i < -o 3 > rH r-i a i u a u t UH o TJ o ra ro 3 i 4-J AJ ra --». i o dJ > JZ ra < TJ O 4-J > o u 3 1 •H U u 0) 1 E 4-J •H < u •H -H O I U -i c £ 1 3 4> s M 3 ra 4-J 4-J •-i r ITJ rH d> <u 3 I d> •H CO o -r| 0) U-. U4 c •rl -rl rH | a uh J j > > 0 ra M c CO X d> •rl i-l L4 O 1 ra c o o O 1 d> CQ O cu cu rr b> U U U4 J u u CU s: > 1 
o 
o "G 
X ^ + X X X * (NJ X X E- X X X 4-J 
> X oi X X X X X X X a X X J X X X a 3 X * f£ X X X X o X B X X X X X X X J X X X X -r| X X X X X X * H UH 
1 X or: UH tc < E-< X X o 
U) < X \ s ra 
r- J X r- H X 2 
O X X X X X to X X EH X X X X X X y. X ca ra X X X X EH X X 1 X X X •» -* 4-> 
X oz X X X + X * * 'co X X E~ X X X X rH X X J X X X X O o X X X X X 4-1 c I X JZ X X X X X X d) T> 0 X X Eh X X X c Q) to X X J X X X + ra CO X X X X X rH c d) X X X dJ •H M u -o X X X X dJ -H ~o X X X X X * a •H X X Ctf X X X s X X X X X w X X 1 X X M (j TJ ra o C X X « X X X X + o to ra X E~ X X X CO X X •J) X X X X '4-1 < >, X X X X X o Ll 
1 X a> ra X X X X X X L4 c X X tH X X d) •r| c X X J X X X •O cu X X X X X * E 3 e X X X + 3 O dJ Q rH 
X X X X X UJ X X X X d> CD X X oC X X X j r O CO X X X X X 4-J o n> X X I X X X u 
CO "U X X rvi CD CD •rl ra X X E- C\ u X X J U) o o o TJ X X d> 1 in 
X X * X X X Li rH CO X X E- X X X O r- OI X X vJ X X a + o X X X X X d) o X X X Ll o rH 
+ ^ 
CJ 0) rH to 0) + CD 0) d) > a 3 GJ to GJ O 3 rH <y G o ra d> Q Q Q 0) -r| JZ E 4-» u 3 c J JZ JZ 3 
4-1 C a o 0 u Q' in o > 0) n o TJ ra ra U-I O cn Lt A E d> 0) d> o 0 ra M 
>. 4-1 0) Li Ll TJ Ll VH rH ft) Ll a ra c to t- r,i ra M ra a a •LJ EH ^ o Q o JZ JZ x: JZ a a O d u J E to to UI to eS < + 2 + X 
X x >: 
k >': X 
>'. v X 1 :< • X o X X Ui u X X 
>: .jj 
X X r-; o X >: • X S.0 X X X a*. o <0 0) O O M2 • a to \r> IC' <3 VP 
o 
a) Q) o 4J r-; u (3 N 
ay t/:- c X X >: X x v; 
cc. a> x X X X o X X X 
o Li •Q a> O 'J* X X X —( X X X UI 01 o « ;< • X -Q X • X E-fl Q 5 i 'rJ .TJ o. "0 X y. x X X X E-. <33 •a- o a> O fl- o O o o s o o O o c <i) 
"C D- C. cn a' o Cj <T) (Tj Q o r> o c.-. o o o :< x X X >' X if. ft» O o o o 4-J O - o o o o o o O X X X CP X X X u LT- o c- tn r> td o • o X x X C X X X O 
£• o V U'J Ol o a. o O o o o o •—t X r< • X •H X • X ^ •H 0 fl I o Q JG >: >: x X Ll X X X 
XJ s: 0' li] CJ o O O o O iO C-- cv o o c- c 3 X) <T° m AJ > x: C O O 3 o n o o o o a o o ai c "O u 01 J u O • f3 o o m O f) 9) ai X 4-J o <13 O O 'J x: U UJ c E a> O ro UJ O a o o 01 
£ T5 c CD T3 o c f O a) Ll u {•J rvj iNl o r-j E in O Ui •H <j a1 O 0) c£ "D o. ai o <y. 0) to o in J o c •H 4J TJ |-H O > a> O OJ to TJ C Li c O o c 03 a'. 3 1 Ul ro -H S o OJ m o c O a> Q) O « o to C2 •H •rH cr a; a> CP c^  a> -H "C sr O 4-J OJ O CD to 13 .u> •H E O o o u a1, o O ro o O i—i O i—I if) <N 4-J •H u (ft 3 SZ •H •Q- o QJ U") o m < OJ TJ *D 0) C i j (J CM o c Ll W o a O 3 1 a» i ' 4.J o a' 3 XI D1 c L> c O > TJ + o w •H a. O 3 C fl o x: u a) s o + to a> 4-J C-. O to CD o a) •H iO c <j u 0) o -» 4-J ' ) M Ui f^ i o f i m o ro tn to L> -rH X to 0) a> o li tn » m 'S -H > fl dj m 01 p> O l-H Ll o CJ + «M a U > c •-4-I Q U, L» u-j 0) o « ; cy •H T-! O O o o rc ro to o CC o Li 4-J fJ ui uo o in >1 o o o c Li CJ «-> + T) o c c U i-H i-H O u cr. O £T" o C (- 03 + C <M O •f—1 i O to a1 o a) + 3 1 4-1 O I-H O CM E CP ^ + O O c> 0) 4J ID 0) o; c. 4-J t CQ ai u E C <-< T-H O a r~ o r-4-1 •H aJ tO , e-« o O O Vt u-i 3 •H •H O c-g CM O rvj iD fN o <-•» u u U3 4-J > x: a> O E- o. CJ o o to O uo CO 03 4-J Ci CM 
ic tf> •H r-i ca M 1 O) i-H to fl 0 w to r-j PI m 
u (U o m O r-
TJ T v^ t M rH C c C f-1 Os O Ps' c en O CTi o ID o 0 O o O O •JO • to 
2 Ifl c -H -H -H -r-t o 
rs 4-J l-l U 4-J •• 4-J o + T3 •H (TJ nl (0 ID r-i •• cc c •• O CO X iT c u u o 4-1 O •-i "O O 4-> CL -o Q. u - n s: •H <31 3 3 3 .o 3 > O cr > 3 in (0 
V -k SZ U 3 •H -5-1 Ll *o -1 p a a fy a 3 a-H > £ 4-J 0, (J K L? 01 - u c 0 ^ "D a' =3 £ o n E 4-1 ^H A3 u 1= 4J 
n * Q 0) x: X ru a» o O •• Q) 0 LL o e •4-1 Q) o o 3' 4-J "4-1 LI O E m CD CO 2 u u n; to c u u u a. LI o ci. LI c: a) » w 0) > w 0' L1 <n x: ro •H p: 4-J (J 4-1 AJ 4-1 (11 a > > fl "D "a c E to o rvj •• • a M E o> o v -H •n trt c i -rJ W E c 4 Q, O Li 01 a ic a C Li cr cr a> o 'J a • c TJ D, o * c a o 
C-, E x C3 a. a- r- CO < 10 - & CP CJ' CP + 10 .D «-) Cu •4-1 > > a-. D -< < 3 o o a, 
u o -o 
* + 
CC TJ o 
o o 
c o o o CO o o o 
X 
X X 
X 
X X X X X 
X 1 X 1 X X X X E- X X 
X X X X * 
+ 
+ OJ 4J 
1 * 
T) C OJ 03 ^ o 
X X X X X X 
X X X X X 1 X 1 X X X X 
CC X X X X X X * 3 a cr» * o + 3 O 
1 
o -a 3 
o X X X X X 1 
1 
X X X X X * + o 3 
QJ •—1 » CQ P0 o m o m CJ o tM X X X X X X 1 X CC X X X X * o cr E- u (J o V£3 o o CO cn cn X X X X X X 1 X X (- X X X X X <9 4-J c C l-H X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X -i + 'f—1 CL. * ! 03 1 o u f-H ^ ^ o X 
X X X * X 1 1 X X X X X X X E- iw >44 
*• + 3 c m o ro o m ai o a\ CN in \£> UD m I l-H \o < X \o < X O fl C 4' + p~. o ro o CO ro ro CO OJ CN o 1 X + £ Ll o O f xs •J o CN o kA X o cr 03 -H -> o l-H o O I X / o- Li > > o 2 X 3 M * o •H a? o 0 «-i 41 * x: ro o ro o uo o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X + to tM X W to CC TJ o r i o rvj o CO tM r-1 X X X X X X 1 y. X E-< X X X J o C fC TJ 03 s X X X X X 1 X X CC X X X UJ m o (0 -X M U-l + 03 a. o X X X X X X t X X X X X M Ifl 03 O + 3 1 -H TJ X X X X X 1 X X X X X + 4J Li 0) l-l 4-1 O O 3 a [ / T> a. Li CQ M rH o o r- o uo CO o CO X X y. X >: X 1 X x & X X X to 4J A3 o cC <13 + iJ o o l-H o l-H o CO ro X X X X X X I X X H X X X rH u E a a > 4-J c c CO X X X X X 1 X >: X •J X X X X O 0 03 Q-i 03 03 03 -x Uj 0 o x X X X X X 1 X X X X X 4J O 
cc E + A3 1 o o o 1 X + x: OJ o >. 3 UJ c 4-J o o o o d*5 o o o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X 03 *D o M xJ A3 c 03 f o o ro X X X X X X 1 X X X X X 01 to CL, c T3 o o w + J o o X X X X X X 1 X X J X X X + fl to 01 M •«H > rc + o o X X X X X X 1 X X X X c ft) 1 E 0) 4-1 U X X - X X X + a> TJ 03 a Q) - -5T o •o C ^ u 1 4-1 * o o o o m o o o X x X X X 1 X X X X 03 •H T) O Q) 3 <n w + a: o V o o X X x X X X X 1 X X X X X a o c a ca ^ + -o V X X X X X I X X X X X + E < \fi E o + c c a) o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X w o C O 3 i CT.-0 o r- X X X X X 1 X X X x X Li U -o r\i tn o o *D o o 1 TO O c w o *f—1 O CQ ts> rH c o o o G m o o o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X + O 03 fl 03 xJ 03 x: U o CJ o o CO x X X X X X 1 X X e-i X X X to CN 4-1 •H o 4-1 a c X X X X X X 1 X X X X X < >. CN fD -H o TJ C f—1 > * + xJ 3 0 4-J f-H o <T3 "~H ^ o X X X x X X I 1 X X X X X X X * o + cn Li ra c u o o Li TJ jJ 0 to E o o o o m o o o X X X X X 1 X X X X X Li + c 4-J ra o x: o <13 •o O CD '-t 03 I f ) o o X X X X ( X X F-t X X >: 03 -H c 
^ w u m O * 03 o r- X X X X X 1 X X X X X X3 © w o N M l-H G X X X X X X 1 X X X X X E + E cC -H x: xJ X X X 3 O <u 
> o hi to Q f-H Du us Li '4-4 IT) < 03 o o m o o o CJ co o o ca i X X X X X Ld 
(Z A3 c \ C£ o 4-1 o G <D CJ CJ ui o o O 1 X X X X 0) CO c 4-1 0' CP 4-J CQ TJ 03 \£> ro l-H cr. o\ X X a: X X X + O tfj o E- > 4^ 0) e c 03 Ci O O 1 X X X X u + o fl P"/ 01 03 trt 0) 3 1 CPT3 o t - X X X X X C-l Ll 
E cr c o •H 3 4-> ( a> trt "O 01 c 4-J JZ + CQ to c o o o o m o o o uo o rO O 1 •—i X X + cc O J CQ r- m *f—1 fl 4-J -H •f—i to 0) + O 3 o G CO CN CN O ( 3 X X CO o E 4J u u s > J , x: a c O ... ve in m *D X X -J vO o o o TJ •H W y o o G 03 O ( 0 X X -H 03 I (0 •f—i CQ o + H 1 4-J o i z 4-1 •J! A3 X 03 O w A o T O m or- o CO uo ro in I X X X X X + + CO Li u o tn A CN o C>] o 00 CN CN "O • .. CN CTl CO o r 01 X X X X X O r- <• 1 TJ o •J o O ro CJ m m O X X X X Cm O O 
<13 o o E O 1 -H X X X X X 03 + o 
z rg 
* c o 
> T fl + 
^ 
- 03 
3 03 "
 a « 03 o. E 
- 3 
-o O <—1 
1 > Ll 01 
X 
<13 
X 
a) 
X 
<—1 to 
+ Li 
03 
o 
CO / CI •f—i 0) + E TJ 'JJ 03 P o o - H s o d a I to •• 03 > d 3 01 to S 3 3 1-1 4-J Q + ro O 13 m P o 3 E- > A n5 1 o a 0 CG 01 a 3 0$ -H o + S SZ 4-J S < 3 > a. L3 CL O 1 ><-i x: E u o 3 c x: sz 
6 
• f—1 
0 ) 0) * U C O TJ •n O ro ra o 4-1 4-1 <13 | O 4-1 c a o u o (0 * 4-1 a) o 03 > SZ "3 O 4-J > (J u •H O 4-1 o 01 ( m o > 03 L3 TJ A A U-i O A3 + 0) O E Li 4-J to E iJ •H < > C3 •M -H 0 U - H C E 1 «—1 cr> Ll XI OJ 03 0) O 0 <13 Ll a> M * e> 0> 4-1 x: 03 3 03 t-i 3 (Ti 4-J 4-J •—1 01 01 3 r 0) >> 4J OJ Li Li *D M U M 03 M a 
* 4-1 0) * M a > c a> c W o -H <13 lu TJ •H -H 4-1 > «—i i > A to > A3 CO Li J a a 4-J EH / 
2 c > + 4-1 a o o •f—i to o <13 Ll C X 03 •H Ll Ll <13 C 0 o O 1 a> 3 o s o x: x: x: SZ a a O 0 4 < * tn r f , E u cc vJ > m l-H D Oi CL, Ct u. O U u o CL, E > 1 J O J O E !/> IO to 00 * z X 
k O CQ OJ O to o 
c o o 
i o o o <: o i t o - o o 
:•: x x x 
x :< x x 
x 'O x x x 
in CTl c> c cr. 
I 3 CD C i C 
! -u r> 
03 
i £ fO , 0) i ? to o 
i l vO < U "x < o) m < 
O p"> 
o <-< o co 
l<- <T CTi O Oi 
-H U) 111 O 1/1 U? C3 CO i j in i/i o i/i >, cr o cr, 0--t«-«Oi-H -IJ co c CO 
i M o t\ Q. r- o r-l o i o o i nj t o ^ > m o m O m o uo 
M N O CN *-H O i—I 
c<xi<xio<ji c r - o r -O ro to • to O • u") 
l, sz —1 r 3 -n y Li £ r 
O vh "O c x 5 s:. •• E JJ -r-l tU !?. r-<1)0> W s > t j « o» 0' o; 4J > ro t j TJ c & <r, c 
Q) Ll flj a) id -H Cu •• x o ^ cj j * 
^ a. 
cr. iX . 
a > 
— 4J 
C 
3 — 
-C f3 — Q. J-) 1 0) «J 
3 J " > O iti o a a^i 11 < > £ V 
(TJ 0 o. <H : e ^ ' - _ 
-1 V 'U " " w w J fl JJ tu > > > 
O o TJ 
+ • + 0 O m 0 X y. 1 X X X X X X X X X CN m 'O 0 0 O CD >; x 1 y. X X X X X X X X 4-J 
J ? ; X "D c a) 01 0 X X X J X J X X X X X X X X X cC X X X X X X * 3 a * 4 3 1 -H TJ 0 X X 1 X X X X X X X X + 4-J 0 O 3 1 & 3 CQ Ll /—I CO 0 CO 0 m 0 X X J X X X X X cC X X X X 0 0) t-> 4J U CD 0 CD 0 m m m X X 1 X X X X X {- X X X X X 4-J C C C.I CN X X 1 X X X X X X X X X X •H fl + tn O i-H 0 X X J X X X X X X X X X H I4-1 On •a 0) 1 'J 0 1 X + a: M-l 
+ A C 0 0 in rH 0 <N J CD 0 0 m rf X X X + \ + g fl c 0) + 0 0 0 CO m 0 E- X X X M 0 0 * « 0 CN 1 0 1— X X X + E^  CP D •H + 0 ) 0 X X X a Ll > > + 0 X X z X L| 3 H LJ * TJ 0 -H CD 0 0 4-J + O + fl 0 0 in m 0 m X X 1 X X X X X X X X X -X tn MH <N fl W 4 cr; TJ 0 0 0 CO X X 1 X X X X X f- X X •J 14-4 O c C TJ d> X X X 1 X X X X X X X X CJ fl C> ci x Ll c •—1 Ol a> 0 X X X X X X X X X E-< i-l n fl 0) O + 3 1 •—i T) 0 X X 1 X X x X X X X X EH 4-J Ll 0) J-J 4-J 0 O 3 0 1 TJ On a •* CQ L4 -1 0 O 0 0 0 m m 0 fO X X » X X X X x (X X X X CJ 4-) fl 0 ID + 4-1 U -H CO 0 Ci 0 CD m m X X 1 X X X X X H X X X X 1—1 O X X a. > + 4-1 C C •vC X X 1 X X X X X X X X X >: O O 0) a, a) 0) n O H <—1 0 X X 1 X X >: X X X X X X X JJ O i-l CC £ •J + ro j O O O J X SZ CI 0 >, 3 td c 4-1 a a m 0 CN J CM CO CO 0 0 1— < X X X ai 'tJ 0 M jJ fl c 0) * 0 0 0 CD CO 0 H X X X c 0) tn a. c T5 O O w + O 0 CN I <N ro ro 0 r* •J X X X fl v\ 
?! 1 e A; 0) •H J-J > J + fl <J + 0 rH 0 ) 0 X X x X X -H * r. 3J 03 rH TJ 0) fl 0) - + 0 TJ rH c 3c 4-1 tn O 0 m 0 CN (*"> 1 ro <0 0 X X X s 01 •H *D 0 0) 3 fl V) -t ct O V O 0 CO CO rH 0 X X 8-f X X a •H O c I a cq Ll ^ TJ V CO (*"> I CN CD CO X X ai X x X •3 M E O + c C 0) 0 1 0 X X X X w O c O s 3 l C" TJ O r~ 1 x X X L| u 'O CM CQ 0 O TJ 0 •H 3 0 1 fl 0 c 
<n 13 H O "0 (£1 t/0 1—t 0 O 0 in 0 in O ) m 0 X X + to 0 sfi rH CQ + O to fl m 0 J-J 0) JZ fl H U CN O 0 CO CTl 0 X X E- CTl * CN JJ •H O 4-1 0 X. a c co 1 CO m m X X m 0 + A! > -CN <0 •—j T5 •H 0) a J j 0 n >, rH 0 J 0 X X O •d M •H O C s 3 1 4-J O in 1 CP fl c O O O Li 0) -tJ 0 to X O O in m 0 «n i—i m 1 CO 0 r* rH X X X X X V4 c I-' fl O JZ O 0) T> TJ OT + 03 to O O CO CTl 1— CO X X H X X X 0) •H c to U to 0) fl 0) O i— cn 1 CO m m X x ^ X X X £3 ai (0 to O M O + Ll 0 1 0 X X X X £ 3 E 
<£ •H VM •H C 4-J X X 3 0 0) i-l >> tM 0 -H to c Q r-| tn Ll fl US 0) O O in 0 CM CO 1 m CO i£r 0 X X X X X CJ ro fl r-1 c (2: O 4-1 O O CO m <31 tj> 0 X X H X X 0) c j j L| a» cr 4-J CD TJ fl \o to 1 CD (D X X £E X X X 0 to 0 c 8-f > •H c C 0> Q 0 j 0 X X X X + 4-> + 0 fl CTJ 0 m 0) 3 1 CT-TJ O 1 .. X X X X CJ Ll •H E C c Ll 0 •H 3 4-J > a; to TJ 0) a) c 0 4-J -C CQ to i-i c O CN O tO CN 0 CN 0 1 CN 1— <0 0 •H X X PS CN 0 c I tn CJ CQ * -H fl J-J •H •H to 0) + H U 3 O O CD CD 0 3 X X H cy, O 3E 4-> U3 jJ s: + > * -C a c O .. \D CO m to TJ X X m 0 T5 •H (0 0 J j 0 -J L) O 0) 1 0 O X X 0) 1 5U tit •H X CQ 0 + Li 4-J O rH » E 4J m ID X 0) O tn A O O m 0 m 3 i-l in ( CN CO X X X X Ll CO Li txj 0 « z A O O CD •a • • • cn 1— CO 0 0) X X H X X X 0 fM XI 0 U1 J O 0 r- 0 1 d co m m O X X X X Cb 0 O fl 0 O i 0 •H X X X X X 0) O s CN J c + fl 4 - 01 .—1 a •• .. T 3 TJ •• - > Li X X X •* * L| * 0 0 •-I + 0' 3 a> D a a e i O ^ 03 rH 0) 0) rH rH to ^ 0 03 •H 01 i E TJ tn 0) E 0 0 •rt 1 X 0 a a tSi .. 0) > d 3 0J tn 0) Q 3 r-| JJ Q + fl O -O CQ E 0 3 H 1 > fl ro O a 0 A 0> Q 3 O 3 + 01 + X -rj O + z x; 4-J X < 3 > rH 1—11—1 CL I >1 O a O M-I SZ X 4-J L> 3 c JZ -C + 3 •H 0) <D + 0 C " O TJ -r~>.—i O A A O I +J 4J ro O H —1 C a 0 0 0 o» n n cr-» 4-J 0" 0 cn 0) > JZ ID fS. "D O 4J > u 0 3 1 H 0 4-J <J 03 m 0 >, 0) -O TJ <J TJ fl fl + O L| <0 A 0) 0 E Ll 4-> n E 4-1 -H < > u •H vH O 1 O "H c E rH <Xl Li _Q E a> 0) a> 0 0 fl L| 0) + Ll + 0) Lt 0) 4J j : (V 3 a> 3 4-J <0 Jj 4-J rH | fl rH OJ 0) 3 fl> > 4-J 0) Ll Li -0 Ll L| 0 M CL +J 0> + Ll a > C CT1 c r—1 03 O •H 0) UJ U. T1 G -H -H iH | a m-i 4-J > rH > rj c tn > fl fl M fl Q. Q. -* 4-J E-* 
X c > + 4-J a 0 O -H ra O A Ll C (0 X X a) •H Lt Ll 0 1 fl c O 0 0 0) & 0 Q 0 JZ SZ sz a O. O Hi -* l-l -> tc * to < E U cs •J > CQ 13 K4 3 On 04 cc O O t" I <J 0 O. z > <N <J X tn tfi to tn < < + z + X 
-H 1-1 T3 rH .H 
<ji m C^ 
HO iO d) o 01 o 
x x x o >; 
. a. f , m 
x x x x u 
i ;.:> o o o O c." o o O C < o -c> o> O -X 
O X X X X X X X x Ju x • x x :: y * x 
x x x cr : 
. o o o o o o o C-. c o o r> o 
• o o » • • o .TJ • O O O 
c: O O O 
O O X X X • x x • x • o sj x x x x 
vc © MJ 
ri O P0 
•-a • co 
O O O O dl ^ O T 
D>N M CO <N > CT? O CO 
> vo JJ 1**1 o co > uo u o o o » i t (jj in o uo 
' 05 ui o o D i CO o o o . TT IJ in • UO 
CT O O T3 4-1 
<U 
<y cn . 
Ol U Ol o o o I Oi O ffi 
' — a ro o m 
: tj* U H O H • T O Wi O liO 
r- o r-
d r- o r-O iO .IT) 
fl JZ • •H 4-1 C. 
o tn x to j tt -i) a- "O E a> o* a' c: Q. 
• X 4-J LL. $ • 
) tO ^ Li I n 4' 41 0) 4J • i TJ X) C 6 to ! i a> a» ra k Cj. I Q. a J h 2 -
fD •• nj h •• - r iH rO •••!-> • 
u c (J o h ^ o 4-j a -a a 3 .a 3 > o > 3 ro <2 Co a a R P a u e. u 
u t «-i r-» u> t; -"G - c T) a O a * n c£ 3 U 
O 
T) + + O o o L/",1 o o o X X X X X X X X * X X X rvj ti T) o o o CO X y, X X X X X E-" X y. X u 
J * iH + 
•a c 03 03 ^ ,_; o X X X X y, X X X X X X X X X OS X X X X X X * * Q. 
* * o , O 
I O T> o X X X X X X X X X X * tl 4-) 3 03 Ll ro o oo o LA o X X X X X X X X a: X X X X O ai H 4-1 o r- o r- o CO o o X X X X X X X E-" X X X X X tn «J c c; CN (N X X X X X X X J X X X -H ro + 1/3 o o X X X X X X X X X X X X U-l o. 01 1 o o X cc >4-1 
5e c: o o o o uo r- o r- <N cn ro ro ro < •< X X Q fl -r 3 p o o CO uo ro ro o H X X X a . Ll o u + ai J <N r- X X X * &H o> 01 •H •H o o X X X * ^ a< s> > -r > X X z X 
Ll 3 Ll ,, o •H 
CD o o 4J «i» + >> m o oo o uo uo o uo X X X X X X X X :c X X + tn C>1 X tn ^ 4-J aJ X) o o CO w w X X X X X X X E- X X X hJ U-l 
o c -H 13 03 s X X X X X X X X a: X X X U3 fl o to Jtf Ll u C -J 01 OJ o X X X X X >: X X X X + E-" Ll 10 fl 03 O + 1 "O o X X X X X X X X fc-w Ll 0) 4-J O O o OJ M •H ^ 03 Ll o CN o rvj o Lf) o X X X X X X y. X az X X X t + CI 
4-1 fl O rf Q1 * E- aJ u CM o CN o CO X X X x X X X X E- X X X o CL > + C CO X X X X X X X J X X X o o 0> a. <13 0) ai * (0 o H o X X X X X X X X X X X X 4-1 o rt E j , fl 1 o o o X • + rvj o >> c 4-1 o o O o uo o o o X X X X X •< X X X X X 03 * X) o 
C4 4-1 fl c 01 Zi o o CO X X X X X X X X i-l X X X C k 03 to f - Ol. c "O o v, + J o o X X X X X X X X J X X X fl + (fl 
1 
(2) 
E as 
H 4-1 > * 
ro * 
(J * 
Cj rH o X X, X -
X X X X X X X X X X X X * 
•H * c 
03 
03 r-l 
X> <y fl 13 + ^ * o TI i-i C 3 U (0 o o o Ci uo o o o X X X X X X X X X X 0» > •H X) u % 3 fl w + o V o o CO X X X X X X X X H X X X a * h-J -H o c a oo ^ ^ V X X X X X X X X ai X X X + s 
w e 0 + c c 03 o X X X X X X X X X M + O C o & - D 1 cr»x» o r- X X X X X X X X X X Li + o X) 
CM 00 o O -H o * fl * o c 
(0 o •H 03 tn o o o o o UO o o o X X X X X X X cc X X X X w fl 0) 4-1 <D JZ E- o o OJ o o CO X X X X X X X X E-" X x X 1/3 rg 4-1 -H r x; a c X X X X X X X X J X X X '4-1 j, < >, r\i fl 
•H 
rH 
o "0 
H > 0) X I 3 0) + 
4-1 1 o LI o >, fl o X X X X X X X X X 
x X X o * cn L. fl 
C o o O Ll .[_) Q tn X o o o o uo o o o X X X X X X X X X X X X Ll * c aJ ro o SZ u <u TJ CI ^ 0) W o o CO X X X X X X X H X X 13 + -H c 
(fl U n 0) ai J o r- X X X X X X X rJ X X X •O + 03 
IN o N >1 M o X X X X X X X X X X X E * 2 
-H < -H 4-1 j_> X X X X 3 , o 13 
U >i o •H tn c + a lu Ll «M fl L) 03 1-0 o n o UO cn o cn <N ro CTl cr. X X X X X ta 'a fl C \ a: o ro o n CC ro ro o o o X X f- X X X 13 + CD 
c 4-1 CT- -» j j CO T3 fl ro cr> t?\ X X a: X X X SZ + o to o d E- > •H 0) 0) Ci o o X X X X X JJ + o fl « <33 13 (0 05 " + 1 en "o o •• X X X X X Li e Oi c Ll O •H a U 03 w j T> 0) 0J C D 4-> x: - to tn G o o o o uo o o o U0 o i-H ro IO o rH X X cc: CN ro U0 03 U0 ca , fl 
4-> -«H tn 0) * H o a o o CO 1—1 cn o 3 X X H CN 0 X jJ CJ 4-1 E > SZ Q c o .. l£> U0 ~o X X J o o o X) + •H to L) N f 4-J o L3 o HJ o O X X 01 + 
Cfl •«H X 00 Ll 1 4-1 o rH X 4-J * UO A X 0) it O n A o o uo CO o CD 3 T u0 r- ro U-> X X X X X !H + ca Li w a (fl z rvj o rvj o •D tvj r\i TJ » r- M? o Q> X X X X X o - r- CI X) o CO J o O IO ro 03 T •-n uo O X X J X X X a + o o ro o st o X *— o --I X X X X X 01 + o 
X CN 
X c 
O fl + I-I + Qi 
- 0) 
D o 03 a (0 CL E 
3 
"C •• 
O rH 
- > 
Li 
01 
X 
01 
X 
01 
X 
^ + tn + 
L4 * 
a> * 
o 
<y o> * E to 0) E u o -H X o D, a tn •• 0) > a 3 01 tn 0) 
3 ; 
3 IT -1 u) a fl o -U 03 E o 3 H > fl fl o» o o fl 03 Q 3 Q 03 * •H o * 2 x; j_> X FT 3 > t-H rH a u a o u-l -C 4-J u 3 c SZ -c + 3 + •H 
0» 0) -r o c o 13 <-H O fl fl D 4J 4-1 fl V. o «-• c Ci o o o + Ol * to en 4-J 10 0) o to 03 > JZ fl < Ti O 4J > o u 3 -H O 4-J L3 01 uo o > 03 70 TJ o TJ fl fl * o 
L. fl 0) o E Li 4-1 to E 4-J < > o rH •ri .H 0 O c E rH Li .Q E 01 03 Q> o o + fl Ll 0) ^ * 0) 0) 4-J JZ 111 D 01 4-J tu 3 fl J j l_J l-H fl rH o; 03 3 03 >• 03 Li Li T> Ll M '•H k 03 * M a Ll 0) -r a > c ry c: (0 o •H o c •ri -H CL U-t -IJ > tn > ra fl M ro a a K 4-1 * t"1 ^ X c > * 4-J a o O fl O fl Ll c V) X X 0) •H M Ll G (0 c o o o o) se o a o JZ JZ JZ JZ a a * o + O. >-• <c + tn < £ u a: j > 03 o a, cu c, Lu O (J u. u u (X X > i J Ol u s cn tn tn 10 < z ; X 
C 
O 
O 
L; 3 
a? 0 O 
O , 
c- w u 
05 a . 
0> o< 
TJ cc 
iO 
0 s X c 
IL O T> 
CN O 
CM >1 4.J x: 
n •TJ <0 4-1 
r- 4-J ai —( 
a> 3 
1 E 01 O fl 
73 •X5 E t ) 
r. O 01 Li 
0 0' O N a 
0 •rH ±J to •O rH 
0 c a» fO < 
OJ £G 0 C to L? — ~H cr cu 
<D j_> ro •H e 
CN U •>H u to 
CN A TJ a) rH 
••H O C Q O 
G 0 O 0 fl 0 -C u o> s 
f-i w u u 0 (V 
to tn -rH to 
•H < •H > fl 
JH 0 CQ 
tn Q) 0 
A fO tn 0 
c 4-J Ll (N 
0 H to ai O 
D> 
01 <u 
CD 
4-J > 
•H to OJ 
cr, ••H 
o c o -1 • O M 
> 0 0 0 • O O O O 
TJ O O c U-H 3 *T 
0 CO CQ cV 0' e tn i- O O O 73 3 •H Jl 0) 0 i-4_> OJ CN CQ 1 a O tn m Z CN to r— rH c 
rH 0 fl 0 fl c 
at TJ •H X <y P5 -H 0 tn b a kJ Li 05 x: rH 0; -rH M e E* F ' p . O c O TJ (It C p-to iC 4-J -H a. V E 0 O £ 0) CO S. to u a1 w a- o- i a > > fl *o 73 £ to c Cf; OJ cn c V.- u a 0 M at ai fl -rH D, -H c_ cz •Tj si". X ••D CL. cu •J f- O LC tn CJ f-! L*. X 
X X >; X X X X X X X 
TJ X X y. a> X 
c. id 
n ft X X X X TJ> X x X x y. 0 X X 0 X X X jj X Li X P: c U) P 0 0 0 CL 0 CP rO 0 O Jj 6 a» • * nj -H 0! 0 x X V to L4 0 01 X 0 X 
U a. x X X rH X X X UJ to X X X X) X ys E-« a Ti X X X c-0 3 0 O C O O G 0 0 a> r j O G O c O 0 .V X X X X x v; • 0 O O 0 0 tl X X X cr X 0 0 . 0 0 X X C X >• X O O O c 0 rH X X •H X X iJ 1) 0 a x X X Ll X X X O to O O 0 a O c O 3 O O \D a in • CO O 0 <x> 0 <0 tn O O cn r-i 4-1 cn c O 0 C rH OJ m a 0) 0 j ] to 0 E cy. 0 cr T> 0 a» o>i 0 (N ai CP CN r-i 0 r-j > a, 0 C O 0 -H S 0 0 Li 
rH TJ 3 CO CO 0 to U r-< 0 to CQ CJ O 0 c 0 0 r- 0 r- to w UT Q 0 < to 
0 0- 3 .Q cy a O C 
«—1 CO CO O tn 0 a\ •H 
f j U. O O O 0 OJ 0 OJ OJ LT> in i-i m in 3 50 0) O O 
> Q 
OJ LU •»H O r> in 0 m *J 4-J r- O r- 0 c O 4-1 Ol 0 cn O 
O •H CD 0 U 1-4 CN 01 fl 
E Q C CO (X- O a 1—• •H 0 0 O O 0 ro r- O 1- O E- a U ^ ui O in U O —' 
,-i rH LO 
iN m m lO in 0 m KD O CO f-
c C CI CN 0 CN C CO O CO O 0 O 0 m in in 0 •H •r4 O U 4-1 4J .. 4-J iO fl flj -H rH (TJ •• 4-J 0 4J O •0 O i-i a TI CL 
•D -C 0 < > p A < fl X CL to G. Cij rH > E CL {J E U E u to E "H fl U E fl O •• a> O •a O C V •H O O «1> 4-J Li.: (J fl w CJ s u u u rH O CL Ll fl x: fl fl •H 4-1 u 4-» u a) -• -> Q» 0 » -H to -* -H to E-CT + rH T5 V u u TI •a O a 0 O + .Q 4-1 LL. •+H > > > 1-' G. a. . ' I < 0 U -H n Ci. 
o 
TJ 
O 0 m O rH X X X X X X X X X + CN 
* OL TJ 0 O 0 CO X X X X X y. X x 6- X X X 4-J 
1 *D 0) rH a) ^ .-j 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X tf. X X X X X X 3 a in rH TJ X X y. X X X X X X X CT* O O 3 a 3 CQ Ll rH m O m O LO in O m X X X X X X X cc X X X X § 0 01 6- 4-J O 0 CO O cu O CO l-H X X X x X X X X i- X X X X X cr JJ c c CN CN X X X X >5 X X X J X X X X •H fl to 0 l-l !—• O X X X X X X X X X X X X U-| CL 01 0 0 X cC LtH (JJ c 0 O 0 0 uo O O X X X X X X >: X X X X X O • 0 a» > O 0 CO X X X X X X X E- X X X CL L< O 0 •H 0 X >1 X X X X X X X X X 
cr 0) •H M r-< O X X X X X X X X X X X ^ 0' Ll > > Q X X - X X X z X 
Lt H Ll 0 •rH CD O O 1) 0 0 0 m O O O x X X X X X X X X X cn 4 fl cn fl cc •0 0 O 0 00 X X X X X X •A X E- X X X rJ in O 01 TJ a> X X X X X X X CC X X X CJ fl O to ^ Ll 144 CQ rH 01 d rH O X X X X X X X X X X E-* LJ fl fl a> 0 t rH T? 0 X X X X X X X X X X E-* 4-» 
* Ll 01 ul O O 3 O 
Ti CL Li rH rH CQ M rH O CN O CN 0 m m O ro X X X x X X X aS X X M to fl O 01 E- 4-1 O CO O CO O CO r- X X X X X X 6- X X X X rH u 3E X O > C C m X X X X X X X X X O O 01 CL <0 01 Q> to O l-H r- 0 X X X X y X X X X X X 4-» O CN C6 E v-1 fl O 0 O X x: 0 >. CJ m O m 0 in 0s. O CTl <N CO m in CO m CTl < X X X X 01 O 
Li 4-J fl rH 0) ZJ O cn O CO 0 0 rH CO •JP 0 E- X X X 01 tn r- Oi C TI 0 O to rJ 0 CN CO m r~ •J X X X fl to 
?! 1 a> E 
V 
01 •H > * fl L) 
0 .-J 0 r-1 0 X X X X X 
rH + tu CJ rH 
TJ 0) fl a Li 0 X to ±j 0 O 0 O m m O in OJ ro CO cr. O'. T X X X X X OJ -H 'O L> 01 3 A to Ct 0 V m O m O CO to ro rH CN OJ 0 X X X X X a -H 0 E CL CQ Li TJ V ID m CO CO X X cc X X X X to E O C C OJ rH 0 0 A X X X w 0 O 3 1 0*73 0 0 X X X X X lH {J TJ CN CQ O U TJ O •H 3 fl O c to ri> -H O CQ CO rH 0 0 O 0 0 m 0 C? 0 m 0 00 m 0 X X * a: CO 0- fC {J to fl 01 4-J O JZ E-* O CN O 0 CO 0 r - CO 0 X X Ch to CN 4-» 
A) 
•H O 
-H 
TJ C 
u 
-H > 0) X I •rH 
JZ 
±J 
3 \ 
a c 
O l-H 
4-1 0 c fl -
rH 0 
CO m 
0 X X 
X 
X 
vj r- 0 CT1 CTl U-| 
O I cn L< fl 
c U O 0 Li O cn ^ CN O CN 0 m OJ O CN m 00 cn lO 0 X X X X X L| c *J fl O O OJ Ti Q CO 0J tn O O CO 0 eg CTl 0 X X E- X X CO "H c to to t3 tn O Ui ai N * 01 0» V4 rJ 0 1-4 rH O CO PO m in ^ 0 X X X N rJ X X X X X X J3 E I rH 2 OJ E 
rH cC •H •4-1 •H * fl »J X X 3 O OJ m 0 0) tn c a 
U. Li m fl CQ OJ O O O 0 m 0 O 0 X X X X X X X X X X X u A A3 rH c s. cC 0 J J O 0 CC X X X X X X X £- X X 0) CO 01 cr JJ TJ fl X X X X X X X X X X x: 0 to 
O c c-- > -H OJ C c 01 Ci rH O X X X X X X X X X X 0 fl to 01 01 to <9 3 l O>T» 0 X X X X •• X X X X CN Li 
rH E CT rJ C O •H 3 01 to TJ 01 0) C JZ CC tn rH c O O O 0 in 0 O 0 X X X X. X rH X X cd X X X X * -H fl 
rH •H tn a> £-• (j 0 3 O O CO X X X X X 3 X X H X X X X + O X CJ 4-1 s JZ a c O • X X X X x TJ X X rJ X X X X TJ 
•H to u s. xJ O n (J l-H O 01 X X X X X X O X X X X X X a> I to •H X CQ 0 Li 1 0 X X ±j in 
<G X OJ O tn A O O O 0 in 0 CD 0 3 X X X X X X X X X X X X CD Ll £0 0 » Z O 0 CO 73 X X X x X X a> x X E-. X X X 0 TJ 0 r- i-J 0 O X a) x X X X U X X hJ X a 0 0 <0 0 r-< O ~ X X rH x X X X -H X X X X X a> 0 
E OJ fl - 01 rH X a .. X -- a •0 - > Ll X X X L| 0 ^ 
O 0' 3 01 0) m a e 0 a> 0) 01 rH tn a> + CD 0 •rH 0) TJ •O to u rH 0 0 £ 0 a a tn •• ai > a 3 0) in 01 3 3 •-H 4-» 0 fl O TJ CQ E 0 E- > A fl <y a 0 fl 0) Q 3 Q 0) O z x: u X <3, •0 •• 3 > i-H u CLU JZ 2: u 0 3 c x: JZ 3 -H »M 
0) 0) 0 O rH Tj -O rH 0 fl fl 4-J 4-J fl 0 <-• c a 0 0 a (4-1 to Cn fl 0) 0 to CO JZ fl fC 73 O > u u 3 -rH {J u <y in 0 >. a> TJ T3 {_) TJ fl fl (4-1 O fl 01 O E M 4-1 to £ ••H ft > u -H -*H O O e rH CTl Ll XI e 0) 0) 01 0 fl M 
0) Li OJ Ll 01 J-J JZ a> 3 01 2 4-» 3 fl 4-1 4J 1—1 rt> rH 0) Q> 3 4) >1 0) JH Ll 73 M M oi Li a 
4-» Li a > c c rH to O •H 0) Ul lu TJ c •H -H rH a, 4-» > fl c tn > fl fl L| fl a Q. EH 
s JJ a O O -H fl O L| c to az X OJ L| L| O fl> c 0 0 0 a) 3 0 3 0 JZ JZ JZ JZ a a 0 CL r cC tn cC E u cc rJ > CQ O Zl Cu CL CC Cu u> 0 u. 0 0 Oi .J CM u s tn '•ft tn in cC < z + X 
O TJ 
•H O 
4-» JZ o» 
M 5 to 
- 03 5 
CO CD -H a) r3 
o x: u 
'Ji o 
B i n o < 
<TJ <Q 
O O O O O 
o o o o 
fij o 
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c 
r — ( O O O O / — I O O O O O • o 
u O • • • CQ O O O O O o o • O O O OO C O O O O O o tJ c. 
O O H O O O O O 
X CO .£-• 1> ' 
O H H O UT3 
. . X 4.) -H CJ x W 2 c n i1 1 ra o "D c U oi oi ra D. Q, J 
H c "O I O (0 c 
G)H 
a> 0) o. £ -i £ c -.- n -- H 
•h g. —< a. -i 
0} •• -rl 
s - t e .. U U U Q. • 
o c - o o ; -1 o 
o o •T. 
^ o O 
Q 
n n o o 
0-1 OJ o IX-
OJ o •"NJ o o 
•-I ' ci; 
-j- _ o - - rC o 
o -'O 
c - r- T) <T} 
6 0) 
o i ; vo ijD U m o m iSi 
CP CD C) Cfc o o - l 
ex. o m o •n CsJ 
H 
"O i—< c H 
a; 
o r . o 
' j CO CP o a> O' cr- o cr-. 
c o 
-H u 
c Zi 
CO CD Q o l i 
o o o o o vC> CO 
x : CNJ CM C-J 4-> iz 
( j CU 
03 CL' (J 
UI >: X X X X X "H 
X X X a> X X J 
CJ1 X X X > X X 
T3 c x X X o X 
0) •H X X X X X X X U 
l/> c H o 
*D •H 3 x X X X X X X co 
O 05 a X X u X CO 
X X X X 0) X X < 
4-1 CO X X X - r i X X 
0 ' CO 3 X X X X X) X X c r 
Cu c o 3 c : 
o o o o o CO r - o r - -H 
u u . o 0s. o 
(Z c Li m m 
a» D H o r-l O 
> \ c U-I a 
u O •H X X X X X X X 
O X X X X x X X tr> 
c o o x X X X 4-) X X o 
o •H X X •H X X o 
o o «H X X X u X X 
4-1 \ Vl 05 ra o C X X X X a X X X 
i—i o o X X X X ro X X X O 
o u X X X X u X X X 
X X X X X 
o X X X X X y, i n 
p"> in 
o o o o VC o vO r -
c o c o o 
o o o vD 
•rl o 
u u U ra ra rH rH (B CD 
o 4-' o rH o 4-) a " o a 
3 .Q 3 o < > 3 ra (s ra X 
Cu 3 a 1 4-1 a u e u •H 
CO E "i-i «J u u ra o a O 'H 0! •H o o a* 4-> u \ u <_> Li rH u Cu Li c ra 
vJ 4-1 <4-1 4J 4-J c Li 
o CO c •rl co 4J E-
c " 9 a o c t x O * a T w u * I-i D JU 
1 r o O o o m o o aL 1 o r O o CTi 1 i 1 1 C 0) i o r- 3 i a>T> O 1 o 1 -H i ca I to rH i 00 O CD o i n o 
a> H i O O 1 O o CT> m in o> cr 
4J i a c i ra CO 1 0 i r-l o cu 0) 1 4-1 4J a i to i vO o vD O m r- o t-
C c> 0> i i r-i o CM O cn CM r-J o u 0> •J i O 1 
a> -H Li i I o 0' Li > + 4-1 
M •H Li to 
CD o O -U 01 i i CM o CM O i n n o ro 
CM X CO cc i O 1 o O cn O 4J •o i i o co ^  UH c 1 c 4) i o <0 ra o 3 1 C»TJ M ai l-l -U o 1 -H 3 i cu Li rH rH CQ 1 to rH i o o ••oD o to 
4-1 o < o H 1 O O ( ON o CJN O ai cr* CTi O a > -Ll i a c i 
a> cu 01 01 01 1 o ( o cc ra 1 4J O [ rg o >. w 1 to i o o o o m o o o M 4-1 ra c rH 01 t i o o CTi r- CU c •c o to 1 O f 01 •H > ra 1 i o 
e QJ M u •D QJ ra a) C 4-1 4-1 1 i r- o r - o UI o 
u a> a w CxL t TJ O 1 r- o r - o CTi CO CD o c a m Ll + TJ 1 0! i co p o + c I «H a> i o o C o 3 I 1—1 T> 
(N m o u T3 O I O 3 i co 10 •H CD I Ll rH i r- o r - o m CM o CM QJ D 4J 0) 1 4J O O 1 o o <ri CTi 
CM 4J •H o 4J 4-1 1 C c i CD CD CD CD 
r j ra rH "O •H a> 4J I O i o 
•H O C > a> 3 1 u c u o o Li Ll -Ll O 1 c i <Ti o CT* o m m o i n ra o x: u a> •D i j tn 0) 0") 1 i o o CTi CM CM 
I'D co o cn 0) OI 0> 1 O 1 to V) u L4 1 i O 
•H < <4-1 • rl 4-) 
Li U-4 o rH 4-1 to U3 Ll UH 1 i O o o o m o o o ra ra K t -U O 1 o o CJN 
C 4J Li (V 4J ro TJ 1 CL) 1 
o c C_i > •H aj C ( i—i a> 1 o co 0> 0) a) 1 rH *D O 1 
rH E C Li 0 1 O 3 I a) a» c 4-1 JZ CQ 1 Ll } O o o o m o o o 
4-J H -r| to 0) B- I 4-1 O O 1 o o o\ 
-U W 4J X > x: 1 C e 1 •H CO o \ 4-1 1 O r o 
CO H X I'D u Ll 1 O O l ra X o o 1 c i O o o o m o o o M w o CO z i i o o cn 
T3 o CO >J i O 1 ra o i 1 r—1 o 
z CM > QJ c ra i i rH o rH It i i 3 01 01 •H QJ E i 1 73 <0 QJ 
-Ll a i 1 O •• ca a 3 
U 2 X 4-1 i S - I eC > rH a> QJ u c 1 rH i O TJ rH o 
CO l-ti 4-) ra 0) 1 o co QJ > JZ ra < -O o 4-1 > 
M ra QJ o E 1 Li 4J co } E 4J •H < > o rH 
01 u 0) L4 0) 1 4-1 JZ O 1 3 a> 3 4-1 Ll 3 ra 
4-1 0) M a > 1 c C C 1 rH CO o •r| 0) L-i u. c E C > 4-1 Q. o J o • H ra i o ra u c CO X X aj •~i cu < t 0? a: E 1 u aC >J i > £33 ID •-I o (V a. cc lu 
u o •D 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X T X X X + CM 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X H X X X 4-1 
X X 1 X X X I X X 02 X X X 3 
X X ( X X X X 1 X X X X X + a 
X X ( X X X 1 X X X X X -» 4-1 
1 1 + CI 3 
m O 1 cn m X X K X X X CN W o 
• 1 C-\ CD 1X5 n i X X H X X X X 
«*> 1 CM X •J X X X m •H 
1 o 1 X X X X + H 
1 i -» UH 
m l cn n VE> | X X CO CM CTi DJ Q n r-l r - X X vO Li 
r - rn i r - m X X J rH CM m C-I 
l o r X X 
X + 
o 
CN 1 «£> i n m CM 1 X X o DJ in U-4 
• 1 CD CD CD O 1 X H <JS J V 
UP m i m in X X rH to u ra 
1 o I X X H M 
1 i X X H vi 
U"l o 1 m i X X X X X •J> u s 
• 1 CD cn r~ i n i X X E-< X X X rH \o v 1 X X J X X o o 
I rH o 1 >: X X X X + 4-1 o 
X X I X X X X 1 ;< X X X ^ + 01 TJ o 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X E X X X c + 01 to X X 1 X X X X 1 X X >J X X X ra » CO 
X •A f X X X X I X X X X rH c m 
X X — X X X 01 rH 
M -» o 73 
X X f X 'X X X 1 X X X X 0J + •H TJ 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X H X X X o. + J •H 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X a ; X X X s y. X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X V) V, X 1 X X X i X X X x X L» ^ o T) 
[ i + o c 
X X 1 X X X 1 X X a; X X X + o + co ra 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X co X X 1 X X X X 1 X X J X X X <4-1 + < >. 
X X I X X X X ( X X X X X X o + Ll 
1 i X cn ra 
CM ro I o r - r - CD 1 < X ro < X M * c i-> 
> 1 CTI CTi o 1 H X 0> > c 
T CM 1 m m o r - J X o r - JD + rH aj 
1 o 1 X e -
3 + o aj c + a 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X + Cd 
X X 1 X X X X 1 X X H X X X 01 CD 
X X 1 X X X J X X cc X X X x + o CO X X 1 X x X X ( X X X X X Ll -f o ra X X 1 X X X i •• X X X X X + CM L4 
1 i QJ CO 
X X 1 X X X X 1 —l X X aL X X X X > •H m 
X X 1 X X X X 1 3 X X t-1 X X X X o X 
X X 1 X X X X 1 •o X X >J X X X X •o X 
m X X 1 X X X X 1 O X X X X X X © -r 1 
1 f s : X 4-1 + m 
3 X X I X X X X 1 X X X X X X ^ > 0 0 
TJ X X 1 •• X x X X 1 QJ X X E-. X X X o + r - r>i 
O X X 1 0J X X X X I L X X tJ X X D. + o o 
X X X 1 rH X X X X I •H X X X X X ij) o 
X X — 3 > X X M + o rH 
a •• 1 1 Li ^ ra a E ( O rH 01 0) oi rH to 0) + CO QJ 
ID o •H 1 E o d a i to •• QJ > a . 3 01 m o> o 3 * 
H 1 ra ra i CT a o ra 4J Q Q Q a 01 + X -H 
rH rH Cu ( >. u a , u i • x : s : 4-) u 3 c JZ JZ 3 -rl ra 3 J 4-J 4J ra i O 4-1 rH c m o u u a + Vi U O 3 1 -rl O 4-1 u QJ 1 in o >1 4> TI c T3 (d ra Vi B 
•H -l-l O ( U H c E • rH CTi M E 0> 0> QJ o o ra Ll 4-) 4-1 h r ra rH QJ 01 3 1 4) > 4 - 1 01 Ll Li TJ M Ll M 0> + Li a 
-H •H h r CL, M-l 4-J > > ra c CO > rt ra Li ra a a H 
Li Li o > ra c o o O 1 01 j t o Q o x : X JZ JZ a a o + 
U O CU ( o o a. 2 > l >J CM o J to to to t o < < z + X 
CN X 
CT * 
O V) a I-l CO fl 
=t Li 0) 
"O cl 
iJ ID 
O X X 
a> CL) 
n J 
I E 03 
X) 33 
• C 5 O OJ C E » i-« < n 
E TJ O 01 
U N O ) 
-r| 4-1 
0 £ U « u 
« IT U < 
MO cu 
03 O CO o 
0) 03 C tJ H M t) U XI 
CL > 
CL O < E 
O U tJ 0) 
SZ •• X -M •<-! tL a' oi \ to s > x? o <L> a' 03 
fl T3 XI — £ a> u o> 0! ra -*4 XUCLQ. J h 
* 1 1 cn o (Ti o m CM c CJ > CM m i CTl | X X + o r- CD CM 
au J O 1 i n o m o as CO CD 1 • i CM CM O 1 X E- CTi 4-J I-l 3 <i> £ TJ C 1 1 c 01 1 1 rH rH o 1 t m r t ro r- f- o i X X X X z * 3 a 
* a i a» TI l-H 1 1 i 1 X X + JJ 
0 1 -H 3 1 1 i 1 a 3 cc 1 V) 1 o o o o (O o m i O 1 ro O r- i X X a: X X X f- CQ o 03 -* E- i a O 1 CO O cc o CC CD I • 1 CO CO CO X X E- X x X X CP 4-1 [ a c 1 i CO i CD CO m X X X X -H fl U * V) 1 o 1 o [ 1 o | X X X X X E- •J-l Cb 0) 1 4-1 O | l i t -* cc 'M 
JJ 5: [ to J o O o o i n o o o t X X I X X X X 1 X y. X X X o fl 
c 4» -» 0) i J G o a% 1 X X I X X X X 1 X E- X X s. M o a + 0) J 1 O 1 i X »X 1 X X X 1 X X X x X + E-« CT» 0) •rH 4 M 1 J I-H o 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X x X X X CL" Ll > > + 4J X X — X X X M 3 M * 03 o •H 
CD O o J j 03 + i J o O o o m o O 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X tn 4H 
N X fl in £ I O 1 O o cn 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X E- X X X j U-l 
O c 4-J XJ 1 1 i X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X CO fl 
O w Ll c 1 c 01 1 I-H T V, X 1 X X >: X 1 >: X X X H W fl fl 03 O -» a J CT»TJ O 1 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X H U Jn Oi 4-1 4-1 o 1 3 1 1 1 1 TJ CL i-l H —f CD 1 V) rH f O o i n I-H o m O 1 CD r- ro m i i n u X X X to (. btf P) 
J-J fl o < 03 + 1 o 1—1 1 CJ O r\i o cr. m m i • 1 r- r- r- CO 1 X X X rH u jr X a > * (J i a c I i—i CO 1 CO ro ro (Ti X X f- o O 0) 04 0) 0) 03 , fl J o H 1 o i 1 O 1 X X X 4-1 O C-J a; E A fl 1 4-J O 1 i 1 i JZ 
cn o >• 3 Id i tn 1 VO O CD ra m CD rH 1 m i I-H o r - CTl | r - CO cn X X X 01 TJ u M 4-J fl c <1» * i 1 CO O CO o Ci cr Ci I • i r - CT. -43 i—i i E- X X X c 01 to r- Oi 
1 
c (l» E 
T; 
M 
a 
o 
rH 
4-J 
> * to + fl + L3 + 
i i I r-i - o 
1 
1 
r- CO j ro m 
O 1 
o 
rH 
i-l X X X X X 
X X X 
fl 
rH 
to c a> 0) rH 
«H X) 0) fl 03 + Ll + u TJ c 3 4-J W 4-1 i 1 O o o m o O O I X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X 03 TJ 
L 01 3 fl to a: 1 TJ O 1 O o en 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X H X X X a •H 
o a CQ M + X) 1 03 1 1 X X J X X X X 1 X X X X X E i-i to e c 0) ( o 1 X •x 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X to o c o D I rH -g O 1 1 X X 1 X X X i X X X X X D 6 •a 
CN 03 o TJ O 1 o 1 1 1 i fl o c CO iD I-i CO 1 Lt —t 1 o O o o o O O 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X + a: X X >: X to A 0) Z3 i-i 0) x: E- 1 4-1 a O 1 O en J X X 1 X X X X 1 X X E-^  X X X 10 
(NJ IJ -H o 4J - P x: I c. c 1 1 X X 1 X X X X I X X X X X X U-l >, 
(NJ fl 
•H o 
TJ c > 03 s * * 4-1 p \ 0 ! L> n 1 O 1 o 1 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 i X X X X 
w X X O * cr L| fl c O 0 o Li 4-J O 1 c. 1 o O o o m o o O I X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X M c 4-J fl o £ a 0) TJ 4-1 CD + 0) tn 1 CD 1 o o 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X 03 •H VI u t/3 03 to J 1 O 1 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X J X X X A -H fl3 CO tn a N «n , Ll 1 1 o 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X e 3 
-H e£ W •rH SZ -* J j X X X 3 O 03 
'H > <+H o 4-1 tn o -H 
Cu Ll U-l fl m 1 1 CO o CD o m cn. o cn i X X I X X X X 1 X X X X X U3 fl fl -H C N a : 1 TJ O 1 r-i o CM o cr rN (NJ 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X 03 CO c 4-1 u 0) CP + 4-J i-> T3 1 01 1 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 X X CC X X X o to o c E- > •rH 03 c 1 rH 0) 1 o I X X 1 X x X 1 X X X X X 4-J o fl tfl 0) 0) to 3 TJ 1 X X 1 X X X I •• X X X X CM L| E CT c o 1 C 3 r I [ 1 01 to •o 03 0) CD 4-J •C t m 1 >-,• i o CO o i n (Ti o CTi | x X I X X X 1 rH X X + cc X X X X "4 fl 
4-J •H 03 03 -k E- 1 tJ u O 1 o CO o cr I-H 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 3 X X E-, X X X u X 
4-J to 4-J X > JZ 1 C c i in m CO CO 1 X X I X X X X 1 *C X X X X X X TJ to u j j 1 O i o I a> x X 1 X X X X 1 O X X X X X X 03 1 w X ^ o + M 1 O 1 rH 1 1 X X 4-1 m fl X a j -» O 1 c i o o m m o m I P CM ro I o CD CO o ro X o ro rf X 'H CD 
Li to o 2 1 o i o o o T> ' . 1 r - f- O 1 03 • X O r - n TJ o cr> J 1 O 1 \ O T C-I 1 OJ m L? O r - j X o r- a o o fl o + 1 i o I X i rH O 1 -rl X 03 o 
CM >*-» fl + 1 i 03 rH T a •• l 3 TJ •• 1 Li L| o 
*—i + a» 1 l 3 Ol 03 1 ra a e i O rH 03 rH 03 0) H —f to 0) + CD 03 *H 03 * E 1 i T3 V] 03 rH S 1 o o -H 1 s o a a i tn •» 0) > a 3 03 0) 3 3 rH 4-J o + fl 1 T O •• PQ E o 3 1 I > A fl i 0» Ci O A 03 a 3 o 03 X •rl + Z JZ tJ 1 X ^ fC 3 > rH | H H a i u a o i !+h x: X u 3 c x; JZ + 3 l+H 0) O C I rH 1 o rH XI O 1 fl ro o i 4J 4-1 ro i O 4-J c a o u a OI U-l tn + i J fl 03 J o VI 03 > x; fl ft TJ O > 1 O U 2 i •H O 4.1 O <£ / o > 03 T T> u TI fl fl l+H p 
+ fl Jf. 03 c E 1 M 4-J (/) 1 E 4-J -H < > 0 rH | -H -H O 1 U H c S i r~l C\ Li E 0) 03 0) o o fl M 03 Ll 0) > (J 0) 1 3 a> i 4-J 3 fl 1 4-J JJ —f 1 ro •-) 0) 03 3 1 03 > JJ 03 M "C M Ll Ll 03 Ll a 
4-1 0) r Ll a > 1 C o> C 1 rH « o -•H 03 u. U-. T> •r| r | rH 1 a t i IJ > rH 1 £> <0 C cn > fl fl Ll fl a a 4-1 E-* 
x > * i J Q, o 1 O ro 1 o ra Ll c to X X 0) -r) 1 Ll M 0 1 fl c o 0 O 1 03 3e o 3 0 s: JZ SZ SZ a a o + O j + M et > V) cC X 1 JJ oi J I > cn I-1 CD a. a, OL [u 1 U U l u 1 o u a. s > 1 _3 u X 'Jl tn t/J w < < + :z; X 
Attachment "3" 
J Street Conceptual 
Improvement Illustration 
Oregon 
Department 
of Transportation 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Alternative Concepts of US97 Realignment Shown 
KKTTTOAattaAttOCUra.Oie. I M » W I I J U U ( m a i C « I W ) M N L U I « 
llll Oregon 
JUL Department 
Jk of Transportation 
FrTTT-7: 
US97 @ J Street (Madras) Project 
Conceptual Drawing of Signalized Intersections @ J Street US97 Option B Realignment Shown 
Attachment "4" 
Existing RL Zoning LOS 
Worksheets 
u o u 
O JZ to o u CO tfl -H 
0) <1) JJ rH JJ Cd 
CO r i £ r r 
0) 4' • 
O > cm 
c o CP Vj 
3 M 0 
CD o X fN O j*: O to ra 
rH ra a) 
tH 
T> 
cu 
4-J ra X U s: cu dJ *ri >i irt O ra Vj 4-J "O 
CU c 
?! r 0) £ d> dj TJ 3: 
(j C d> „ o d <A 
C o o IN ca -r | (0 CJ 4-> a> ^  rH IN i j -o IN ra rH c 
O o C o o L> <0 o JZ 
CO o O 
w •H 
•rl < U-i 
U >1 (b i-S M ra ra M c 4J E-o c to CJ "O 
rH £ c dJ 0) 3 
U rH 0 
4-1 U 'rl 
-H CJ1 
CO 
ra 
tH 
TJ ra 2. 
M 
u ra 
CD 
TJ i 4-» j j u a • • 3 w o^  
vt a) -H e d e its a, a, x: 4J u-i 
g H O Q. -H-H+J 3 CJ o o a > g ^ ^ - i r a o o 
O » - X O 10 111 i-i a- <r =». U CL 
CJ 0 
E <U TJ 3c 
O O U o x w o o 
10 (/) -H 
u 
o XI 
O o o o o o o o o i n o o o o o o O o o o O o O a o o < o + CN 
C£. O o o crt o o m o o o o O o J J 
T> T> r - o o 3 1 IO u C a> nj o o o o O a 
ro ro 3 1 4-J XJ o 
t o (NJ o 4J 3 o o 
CD cni CD rH O o IO o «£> o o o m o o o o o -f t o cn o cn ca cn o 
o> O H P O o CD o CO CO o crt <T> cr. o o cn m r - (NJ m ro m VD Cl X (0 4-J M c h- + t o -H 
a . to 1-4 O o o o o O H •4H 
d) a . o^ 
4-J K o o CO t~> a> o o oo o m m o i n o o i n o o cn i n V.O t o Cft o crw 03 cn O ro 
C 01 fNJ o CNJ (NJ o crt o o T i n r - r - ID ro i n ID o a . L| 
o 01 >1 o ro ro ro n ro ro r - cn ID t o CT M UJ L| O rH o o o o O 
a* 3 > 4-J z X 
LI o •H If) o •r| 
CD o X 4-J SZ o o m o m o o i n r - o r - o o c - o vn CI ro o ro 03 CM to (NJ nj • <1* X a, o ro o n ro o cr. ro ro o o ro in m ro ID o i n o ^ 
O -X c X > TJ X ) T r- M O o Cl] (0 
O CO nj M X c dJ dJ O o o o o O E- H 
I - l 10 aj Ql O 3 xJ XJ H j j 
ap Ll cu 4-J 4-J d d) Q 4-J 
Li R0 CO a> m •H rH o o o o o cn o m ro o m o o ro o IO IO CF» c - LD fNJ ro o ro 03 (NJ M CO 
+J (TJ 2 0 < u C-. O o <£) o <£) ID o cn r - o o f - m cn VD o o i n o rH U 2 a . a \ •H 4-J c T r - rH O o O o 
aj dJ aj >1 CO dJ o o o o o O 4-J o 
LO >, Q£ rH r0 flj 1 cu o X 
IO o r0 3 O rH u o o o o CD o o o a m o o O o o O o o o O o o O o o o < o 75 o 
M 4-J TJ c rH > d> W o c cr. o o o o o o O o + dJ t o 00 cu c M o O a >-} o r - O o + to 
T aj aj •H > «f-i o o o o O c QJ r E d) u nj o> o cu rH 
t J 3 <0 01 O 0» + O T J 
c 4-J Ll •H 40 rH o o cn o o o cn o LO ro o ro o o ro o (NJ cn ro o O o o u o •r| XJ 
u CJ 3 3 4-J L| cc o t o o VD ID o iT\ r - r - o o r - i n a? (NJ (NJ ro to o >-3 •H 
o c £ CO CU 4-1 -r| 0> > T» dJ r - r o CO oo X 
c £ 3 Ll > c CO d> o o o o o O fNJ fNJ 
o o O Cu U < >1 3 CO XJ + 6 T5 fNJ CQ -H U o X 3 O e 
CO & 4-J m cu o o CO o CD o o CO o i n o vn o o V.O o r - ro ro to T o o o u o If) 10 
aj D -H dJ - o t- o o fNJ o OI (NJ o crt I N o o IT, m ID T fNJ r o 1 0 o 
(NJ 4-J •D o O 4-J X 4-J c i n in in M M M R - CO < 3 >1 
(NJ (0 rH C -r| _c 01 4-J •rH O o (N o o o fNJ C-J Ll 
-H O o > 4J d> 3 1 rH o> ro 
c O O u Ll d) M O a o o i n C i n o o m o in r - o R - o o r - o (NJ ro ID T o o o u o C +J 10 O x : dJ X 4-J dJ UJ n CO o CO ro o fO ro o o ro m CO fNJ co o •H C 
CO O o to to 01 J T o r> CD rH <1> 
If) ai -r| CO Li r-i o rH o o o + o o CN {N E H a ; "4-4 lW c -C 4-J o d) 
o o 4-J to * Q rH Uu Ll (0 -rH o o c . o o o o o O i n o o o O o o o o o O o a o o o O < o u 10 M rH 4-J \ cd o o O cn O o i n Q o o o o o oo 
c E- ai flj * CD T J 01 r - o O o CO 
o c > M (9 c CO <1> o r-i o .» o o o o to 
CO d> T J a> d) (9 o 00 rH 3 1 (0 XJ o 01 (N Ll rH E C rJ a Ll o o X 3 rH •c 
Qt CJ 3 o 4-J 03 OI rH o o c . o o o o o O in o o o o o o d) o O o O 3 O o o o o o < o ro U rH O CO E- O o o O c> o o rH in O o XJ o o o o O 2 
UI s x : c T 3 r- O ' o o + -H o> u 4J •rl 1—1 rH o TJ rH o 2 o o o I 
CO if X CD Ll 1 o O m 
m u o a o o o o o o o o O m o o o o o o X o O o O CO o o o c o o eC o CO 
L4 fO o z m c O <T> o o LC, O o •H O o o o R - (NJ 
XJ CD o rH o 2 r - CO • o o o O Id o o o O rH o >1 o o o O 
£ (NJ w GJ - d) - r-H - rH o 
c CO rH rH L. ro o a) 3 01 IJ rH d) C QI OJ <1> •rH o E c XI CO CO D dJ o E 4-J 3 CO rH a TJ X > rH 
4J d> 0) u r0 GJ O " TJ co rH CO Cu g o > 3 o •• 4-J dJ o 40 X a: 0) O o y. •rH 
O CO z X aj X rH < p 0) > •H 0) CU rc >i •• > > . u dJ r-i > X a> -H 
© •H u c rH o > o T J TJ - n O 4-1 C to 4-J U o u \ > d) > 
CO t-H x J (0 0) CO O dJ > JZ (0 o to < •d O J_> 0) TJ TJ > ro ra +J •rH rtj X \ 0) '— CJ -H >, <M o M * d> d) o E Lj +J CO £ L> -H TJ M -H < > o o < < ^ CO CO rH O U) c e >1 5! £1 2 * 40 Ll d» rH V) •r| d> Lj 0» 4-J X 0) 3 a) 3 aj cu 4J Li 3 3 fO 3 \ 3 dJ (0 ro \ D dJ ro u Q (N Li a 
* 4-J o CO Ll Q. t> c o> c cc c rH CO o -rl TJ -H 0) Cu CJU TJ u Cu c 4J 4-1 c c a. rH •r| cu rH rH dJ T - I W X H 
X c >, o a 4-J a o o -H •H 4 - <0 O TJ Ll c TJ c C to X 0) d» u •r| )tJ CD TJ •r| ro O Ll Ll O 0> co T J Q u 
CU + w + u • J o CO a. s u Q5 X >- • J > CD (D M < D a . Q£ Oi cu s Ui m eC • J U, U > U O > a D < X X 
« u u to t/3 -H cC vi IM 
V3 Ui ID 
C 4-1 E-
O C 
to 0) "O 
«—I £ C 
03 <D 3 
4-1 O u M n 
03 JZ -H 
CL JJ 4-1 — (1) fil 
O O 4_l 
U O 3 O U> 73 <N 
x y. :•: x x x x x y. 
sz :< x y. x x x > X X 3 x x x y, ' X X X X X 
x >: x x 
y. 
X X X X 
:c x x x x 
x x >: x x 
X X X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x CO X X X X X X X X X X X X M .X x :< x x x x x x A x x x x x 
X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x 
x x x x x x X X X X X X 
x x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X. X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X >. A X X X X X X y. x x x x X X 
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x y. 
3 -
o 3 
m o 
. 0) I <u 
oi •• a -
E o 3 a> 
•rl Z O 4-J 
J oi o» o; <u 3 
•H 03 0 C C 0)H ? C H ^ 
•• E -H -H 3 U *H C 4_l ra Ti f-E- <u u o a» i fl) oi o. c j j 
SZ C I-I (M Q, RA 4-i <u o ^ o rJ u 
cr» <31 U3 rJ .. G M 4> ^ 
x: o IJ) > c r o c T ) 1.3 -I -H G 0< fij i—l 4_) -i-l U U J 
Of l3n jUtoe3a3to 
a u j j a > o < n 
< v < iu 
Q, £ £ -n Q. 3 3 'O O 2 Z < 
e cx _ . . 
ro a, > u - ^O >1 - L3 
C C (13 
—l-H .. U M 
U nj ai i 
W to h d Qi c c J 
MM 3 <13 
3 3 - O C • 
E— E— dl i—i r0 
H T , J 
4-J 4-J U I U4 lu > Ol l l 
03 03 t_3 C 03 J J -,04 
m to 
U W (53 O 3 -o o c j CL o CL «H ' c c w o ^ i O 0 c: 
-H -H u "O 
J j 3 A) a 
U M E- U rl • O O ?3 £0 a o, 4-1 3 o 
O O 'H -n Q, 
M M 03 T) CL t . Cj J < o 
X X x x x x x x x x >: x X X X X X X X X 
J_J O I 
C 4-1 
01 o 
O -H . M to to 
• Cr o -
0 -H +J >.4-1 0 Vi (D 
z u cc 0/ 
>. (0 TJ «H 
0} 03 -4 3 jt; fl) 
13 H 03 U r-i 
3 U 
ty> u o C -U •H E- U 
•H O1 Lu 
M C M -H C ro to O O -H 
u; a j j HQ.ro 
<0 o ^ O 3 
C r-i 3 C to u 
03 CT OJ 3 O 
CJ E -i-i iJ _ to ~ Jj T) u m c to m w < m 
E- 03 J TJ H X t f nj cn ! 
> 3 C 
rl -r-i 
T3 a-- is; 
O 4-1 a to CL O 
O ^ 
I C C C C £X JJ P 
' M -H M M CX 3-i XJ Cr to o> tr o o i 
t-l Q,«H "-I-I 
CL 'w 
u o u u 
o u ra i-l 
•H I J • 
UJ JZ E Cj OI Q3 3 O 3 H E ' 
D- O D' H I x o o m e c 
«0 M fl) M .C -H -H H w S y 
o - ^ O to nj 
H o o 3C M Cu 
•i—i I >, O (0 
M 4-1 "O a. c -X 
03 03 
( E 03 
t j s . c 
U 03 V 
S I S 
o - m -H 
to ID J-I 0) H> -H 
U T5 
ID /H C •H O O O O (J 
O JZ to o u to C/l -H d. >. t-l u u ra (0 M 
C 4-1 
O C 
to 03 T) •H £ d 41 q 3 
4-1 i—I O 
4-J £J J-i —I Di i i to ro a u nj 
t j m nj 
4-J J-J 4-J + 3 03 (0 * a s: c .. 
E u + O m a; + U c j j + O •—i + TJ -H < -v 
<L1 4-J * 
H <0 03 + 
•H JH £ -v (0 03 3 f 4J a -h > 
> O 4-1 + 
Ll O 3 + 0) O U| + tn c^i * 
01 * 
a> + M + 4-J + w + 
JZ 4-1 
U c 
AJ 03 o e 
M 01 
a > CL o < X 
x o X o x 
—t a." OJ 
a o f-
TJ J 
01 01 to 
S3 c d C {_3 ro (0 rl 1 J J # 
j > ai H t/j 
. . . . M H •• 
m m .. x a 4-i I I (!) S J) U 
--v a TI > -«-» 
U\ Q. >. HI -H Cj 
c +J t-H a. CO CL 
M ra 3 M c X 
i co cu m < u w 
oi x m x <o x 
S - i 
u — s: -4-1 
x x x x x x x x o o o o o X X X X X X X x o o o o o x x x x x x x x 
x x x x x x x x *—' *—' *—' •—' •—' x x x x x x x x 
A A -t o + 
A A O + 
A A o t 
A A + O + 
A /• O -» 
• + 
A A >-• + + 
A A O + O * 
A A • + 
A A * 
A A O + 
X X X X X X X X O O O O O x x x x x x x x o o o o o X X X X x X X X 
X X X X X X XXrHrHrHrHr- l 
TJ X X X X X X X X O X X X X X X X x . 2: x x x x x x x x 
X X X X X X 
O X -H X 4-1 X ro X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X 
15 T i l 1/3 T> f-< 
JZ <T CP CL "O 
1 03 C 4-1 -l-l 
I > 4) -H If) TJ T) Ai <0 < > nj u « a? 
: A3 M ro P M t-. i x 13 cl m nj u. 
ai < <3 ft. < 
.« m JJ 4J JJ u 
•n Jii fO (0 TJ iO 
t j «h w in to </j < CO 
TJ p C4 in H t - o u w j c • j CL x U4 
V o 41 o ^ 
V V • + 
o + 
T3 V V O 4 o • + E v v o + 
4-1 V V o + 0 • + 
fij V V o + U, + V V o + JJ o * c V V • * 01 O 
- E + 
J j ./ .. + 
to TJ 03 •• + 
3 03 CL M + -n JJ >, Jj + 
Sio e- u + c u, + 
>iTJ (0 "D + 
nj M G < H. rH o a> /H + a> o h o> + Q U in Q + 
TJ TO 
X 
o O - ^ O r- c. c, V? . „ -- O r-j O'. fO Vi? 0 vis * o O r- 0 r i r 1 Lfl 
U cl- 1 O 0 i c r 
: j 1 a 
'.C c O Xl CJ 0 O VC« CO c- K.' •.D 0 0 
O1 E- r o & 0 Ui 1 PI U*. 0 ro G ro .0 1 
Cl Q' f 0 CJ O i-< 
© 1 CI; o 1 cc o o o O 0 0 O c 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O 
C •i- O 0 0 1 lH 0 0 0 £-. 
O © r-1 o 1 O 
Ll QJ L. 0 0 O 
© 3 S> j j o •<H u» 0 
CO X o o C- O 0 0 C- 0 0 O 0 0 0 1 O 0 0 0 O O 0 0 < O CO fv' ra a' r cf. o O 0 1 in 0 0 O 0 ..1 o C 4-1 •a 1 ( - 0 C J tn <0 Ll N m © ID 1 O 0 0 O E-* ro a? 0) rJ I T; o 1 E-* u u 4-1 1 
*o Ll «0 CO (1) rr o o CO O <33 O cr> 0 O 0 .n cn r- r- O 0 0 CJ y. nj X o < C J u E- Q m O m -O 0 cn •j? ui r- IT, r- 0 in 0 } 1 S (X o \ Li 1 r- r- O 0 0 0) © 0) >. > CO 3) H- 0 1 O 0 0 O Vi) -r >i cc £ ra ra I CL l in O <0 (1) ic o o o O 0 O O -n C-l CD CNJ 0 0 vN! 1 cr- CD r- O 0 0 CQ 0 
Li T> > © CO C •^ r 0 CTI 0 iT. r- O lD 0 0) 
CO c a; Q o a o 1 r- m O 0 CO 
Qi 0) > O 1 O O O O O J e 0) 4-J ra © o 0) 
•c <0 <D ri D L) c 4-J L. •W ra o a o 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 O 1 0 O O 0 O O O O 0 a < O •H o © 3 3 CD cc o 0 cr> 0 0 1 iD 0 O O O O 0 o E (0 a 4-J •H © t> -a © 1 r— O 0 < c E a) c CO a) 0 1 D O Cl O o o O O < j a ra o 1 u 
C 1 CD rl u o £ 1 •t 0 
CO O a CL. o o o 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O O 0 0 O 1 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 < O CO at d» *o C-. o 0 O cr. 0 0 1 lT) O O O 0 O 0 to c--| o o 4-1 £ 4J c 1 r~ O 0 < CM ra c "H x: a) •H f—' 0 r O O 0 O 
-H o o 4-» QI 3 f o 1 CP u o u Li a) U +J O a o o o 0 0 0 O O O m 0 O O 0 0 0 1 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 0 < O d <0 o 0) s u © to to 0 O CTV 0 0 1 0 O O 0 O 0 •H !0 o u V) in a> o 1 r- O 0 
!!/) V) -H oi O 1 O O 0 O 3 
ft. UH UH c JZ 4-J * O 
Li >. U-i o o 4-1 to Q Cu L, ra •rH i_n C"J5 o r~ 0 r- 0 O r~ 0 m O 0 0 in 0 O in cr- in 0 m U CO 
<0 M rH 4-1 \ Oi o CN 0 CN <N O CTV ro CO 0 0 ro 1 in cc to CM ro m 0 CO c u H tt» ra 4-1 to 'O 0) r~ r-* O c c > Li Qi c 10 a) O 1 0 0 ** O 0 0 CN I'M O 
CO l i 73 a) ai ai O 3 ra TS 1 © CM p C a Li o o x: 3 1 
© a) 3 o 4J m CL O o in 0 lD 0 O in 0 m LD O m 0 0 m 1 iD 0 r— CN a 0 LD cc- 0 in u a> 
j j ^ o CO E- o o CO 0 CO CO 0 CTi 0 0 0 0 0 1 rH m CO m O •C CM ro LD 0 O 
4-J u H JZ c Cl m 3 r~ O 0 • r~ * 
•H C" 0 -p O 1 73 0 CM X O O O CM CM 
cn X CQ Ll 1 rH 1 O L Lfl fO u o a o o CM 0 0 O CM 0 m uO O m 3 0 m 1 0 CO 0 in CO m 0 in u CO 
u »0 o z CO IT, 0 m m 0 CTi 1X1 0 0 m l CO r~ •"O m 0 f~ o CM * J o 1 CN w • r~ O 
ft o 4fc u 0 1 O >-• 0 0 >iO 0 0 CM CM 
X C-l Q) © a> - rH C CO U-i ra o U a) 3 iD U rH 1 © •n © •k CO 
•H u >i £ c m (0 (0 3 0) O 4J ri! CO a. 73 x: > 
4J © 0) o a) o T3 a CO .. ti O > 0 •• c 4 J © O ra x: < © 0 0 >; 
U Vi E z x: 4-J a) 2: -1 O 0 •H © © ra >. •• P >, u © > •5; 0 a) •H o Li 0 rH > u —1 73 T3 0 1 U C E to 4 J 4-J O U s > © \ > (0 t-« ra 4J ra a) 0 CO r-) £ > sz ra 0 73 O C 13 D > 1 ra ra >j •rJ ra S s © Q > < •w Li a) E 0) o E M 4-J V) 4-1 rJ 73 Ll •H O -< li CD CO u to c E >1 © a XI a; ;0 a) <0 -H 0) »H Cl x: a> 5 Q> 3 4-1 0) CL Ll ra 1 3 3 © ra ra \ +J © 3 ra Ll Cl 
4-1 u CO 4J »H a s> cn c c r-J 10 O •H TJ •rH 01 u. lr- "C U'J c 1 4J -P c fX-H •H © rH © CO S £-< c >, O a 4J a o o -<H •ri + 0 ra M c TJ c c to X a © 0 •H 1 rc ra TJ ra •r! nj 0 Ll Li O © CO TJ Q O 
- l-< o J o + to e£ s o a : S J > CD ej n < iX CL 0 ; RI: Cu 1 cn ro < (J > U ej > a Z) < + 
J O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 O 0 O 1 0 0 O 0 CM 
CC O 0 0 0 0 VD CD U 
tn 73 0 O O 0 0 O 1 cz 3 
1 C O 0 0 0 1 CM a 3 0 O 3 a> CQ \C ro 0 c 1 CO cr. vti CO O a- r~ CM CO in cn 1 <•£> CO O 01 0 tn 73 E-i m 0 m r- in vo 1 CO CN X r0 4J CO 0 cn 0 ro 1 VD cn -H 
Cu x: 10 O 0 0 0 rH 1 l-l CJ E-< "4H +J © 1 ( PZ <4H 
© 3: vo 0 CM CO cn to 00 0 r~ CM CO in cn 1 vO CD O CTV 0 ra 
C s m 0 m r- m <X) 1 CO CM a. Li O J CO 0 cn 0 ro MI 1 VD CJ» E^  
O1 Ll a< <3 0 O 0 1 rH r>j / a 3 3 2 X Ll O © O •rH CD O X 3 c 0 0 O 0 VD O cn 00 r- CO 1 m CM CTi O to CM O C£ m 0 0 O 0 CN m r- 1 0 in ^ <4H O -X - c 0 r-< CM CO DJ ra O CO ra • C 0 0 O 1 CN CM EH M ra © 3 1 E-I 4J Li CL O r / 
73 CM CQ VD fO 0 0 O 0 VD O cn CO in r- CD 1 in CM CTV O CO 
4J ra X s + in 0 0 O 0 CM m r- l 0 m r-C 
O £ CL 0 4J 0 CN CM J ro O O © X to 0 0 0 1 r-i CN 4J O vo > -a © + ra 1 1 x: m O ra 0 > cu 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O l 0 0 0 O 73 u W 4J -c 4J x: t-{ 0 0 0 O 0 CM VD 1 rH r~ © to 
CO CL c Ll 4J 4J + j 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 O CO © © O © ra j. 0 0 0 0 1 CM CN c J E © a 2: c + © rH TJ a © Ll + a TJ C OS CO © I 0 0 0 0 vt> in CM CO m O 1 in 0 r~ •H 73 
u © c 4-1 -» cc ro 0 0 O 0 m VD 1 CO J -H 0 E CO c rH t TJ CO CTi VD I CD X 
3, C 0 rl < + C 0 0 O rH ( r-l CN eg 0 O H 4J d J u TJ (NJ CQ •H 4-J ra © J + 0 I 0 C CO LD 4J ra Li CQ ro 0 0 O 0 vt> m CO m O 1 in 0 r~ in ra 
© O •H 4J © E-< ro 0 0 O 0 m \£> 1 CO (0 OJ 4-> 75 3 a M * 4J + x: CO cn ID 1 CO < >, CM ra C a 0 © -» 4J O 0 O 1 rH CN CN Li 
-H O O g > + © -» d 1 1 cn ra c u O O 0 0 vo 0 0 O 0 vo r- CO CvJ CO in O 1 m 0 r- c 4J ra 0 x: u 0 © -» 4-) + <f) ro 0 0 0 0 m vo 1 00 c 
V) 0 O X Ll . CO + r-l CO cn VD 1 CO rH © CO to H TJ 3 4 0 0 O rH 1 r-l rH CN CM s E 
rJ < <4H © 0 +J + 0 © UH —1 0 3 * Q rH Ll ra •H 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 1 0 0 0 O CU ra Ll ra CM CE: 0 O 0 O 0 <N VD CO r- CO 
c -L) f- 4J 4-) + 73 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 CO 
0 c © © + C O 0 0 0 1 CN M 0 ra CO © 73 Q © + 3 1 1 C-l M 
£ c Li t O TJ 
© © 3 © 4-) + CQ O r",- 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 0 O O ra 
4J 0 O 01 + E-< O O 0 0 0 CM VD CO 1 rH r- 0 X 
-L) CJ •H x: 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 O 
-H cr- > 4J O 0 0 0 1 <N CM l CO X W tn Ll 1 1 in ra u © = + 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O 1 O 0 O O rH CO Ll ra to O O 0 0 0 CM VD CO 1 r-C r~ r~ Cl 
TJ CQ 0 0 0 0 0 O 1 0 O 0 0 ra Sfc f O 0 O 0 1 <N CM 0 
X O - ^ + 0 •-1 
0 X © a) •rA •rA M Ll 1 £ CO © © a w u 73 73 © O O" 0 O 0 C* 1 O a O a 
> 4-i + O >. 0 > < < 4J x: -L) x: JZ 1 P JZ -L) JZ y, -H © 0 • x: >1 H +J fc Li © u 4J U 4J 0 4-J 1 O 4J u 4J -H "4H © -» 0 c U rH O ra r j a ra 0 ra m co O 1 0) in ra CO U-I • n 
CO + ra © ra ra © © < O lu lu CO Ui CT> 1 Ui cn Ui <7» O 
y> -» 0 E c > u , Li Ll >1 tfp tfc i/P M 1 0*> JK tfp A.' ra 14 © * L» © © --) cr> +J 4-J rH CM x: CM x: CO x; CN 1 JZ CM JZ CM Ll a 
4-J * a •> © u 0 CO CO Ll a 4J X _u X 4J S I i X JJ X EH / 
X c + a ft M W u a a ra <N u O U m u O y 1 m L> 00 L> 
+ HH 4 x ej ci; 0- c* a UJ O X r- X CO X CTI I cn X cn X X 
t - o O o X sd 
A 
o * 
o tr. X c ^ o •z- o o ci a> o o o • 
7 o X r-i o o A A 
f i> 
u o 
r- j c c o o p o X o IO O o •O o 
o O o o o o%. o a> o c_> iS A o 
<0 CC X J 
a , a o o 
1 o cc CM /- X X X X X X o o c.- o A o p x X X X X X o o o o o o 
<J x A V X X X ^ A CJ X X y. X o 
a> A 1-4 o o CO o X X o CN X X y. X X X o o o o o o CO 4-J ci o X X y. o o o o o o VJ c X A X X X X X X to 
o CO ro o c X X X y. x X X y x X l-H T-. o ro a> CL 1 o A 01 X X X X X X A / E-^  Li CL, a- O TJ 
sc CO CO o Of o o o o o o o o in o in o o in o u (Ti H a f - o o o o o o C" X o o o r- o 
u s £ i-i J A U X O o CI c o i-H o o 
t o > - r{ 71 01 10 1 A 1—» A m o >0 4-1 > CO CM ir; o o CJ a o o X m o o o m o Li 4_> TJ (0 x : •r{ H o o o o o r- o f- o o r- TJ o 0J 
ao Ol c o 4-> 4-J Lt X 01 « 
01 CJ <0 0' X o o 1-H 4-1 
£ 0) CL s c x : o ro 
T> 3: £ Li 4-1 P o c o CO 4» y. o <rj o X X X X X X X o o o o o 4-J o -rl u oi c ±-> Ol o X X X X X X X o o o o u o o c £ (0 o r-} XJ X V X X X X X X X X V < 
3. c TJ •rl eC c X X X X X V. X X X X o o o o 0) 4-1 1 o 0" X X X X X X X X Ol CD -rl rH (0 ^ o 0) "C V) CD •U m X o CN CO o * o O V X X X X X X X X X o o o o o V o CO 01 •<H (0 0) P o o 2 X X X x X X N X o o o o a a to < CN 4-1 T3 u a —H u - x; *o X V X X X X X X X V V CN •0 rH 01 o o o c X X X X X X X' X rH o o O a > 3 o 01 V OP C a o O s o X o -H r-i X X X X X X X o o o o o o c fO o -C CD o 01 4-J tn c X • rH V X X X N X X X X X o o o o o V V o (0 u U U X tn J o o X X) X X X X X X X X * 10 CO Ti •rl X o X N X X X X X I-H rH V V o < U-i > o 4-1 .c - 4-1 - s - 01 o U-l L| o a - 10 V - i ' - ai - V V C'l Li rc 0) o in N Cl2 CN Ll rH o n o o o o r- cn o 00 o m D o 
L| r. CN ^ CC •rl o E- '0 «-< p U*) P o CTl o o o o a\ o CD O Ji CO V o ai c 4J H 4-1 *o J T3 T) 
o c •w V O O o o o rH O c O to 01 T) o p 1 4-1 c « S £ CM —1 £ C o S V XJ Ll 
0) 0) rH iJ m cc CI -A n ro CCr <w a O o p o 01 Li n o n~> o o o o r- cr, o CO o in O o iJ rH o <u tn E- 0J o f- l-l rH o V to Lf* TJ o cr\ o o o o CTl a\ o CD o cr. CO 4-J V V o O i_i [d Li > sz J ro u < o •H p i 01 4-1 ro u i-H O l-H O o rH o o ro V 
to m Ll 1 J c 
nj U o ai CJ 4-" CN V •n L, 0 o n o o o c r - o i o CO o in o •» 
Ll ro z XJ t- it .-» Ti in •<H o cn o o o o a> cn o CD o cn CO i-i o r-
*o CJ CM J 01 o J tn V < 4-1 C V V o 10 4-1 (0 o o o o «—1 o o 01 - £0 £ o 
p 4-1 P i-i CL •• TJ Ll H 4-J to XJ 0) H XJ a to c x : Ll X cc 0) c XJ -Q -g XJ 0' a Ll l-l <t D CL 1— 4_> x : X 0' 0) u n tn < < ft ft < ft 4-> >- 4-1 
si 4-1 o Li TJ u ^ CL TJ > ro rt! T5 T) ro E- a -rH 
u c in Ll 13 (n -w > o a >. 0) •H U i/5 x : T> 0' 4_> U o o ft c U. 
ro <u CL 13 a s c 4J H Qj to CL a Ti o> c rt ro ro ro •H O £ O to o > ;> 0> -H CO P o o H <u ri cn CO to tn >, XJ f0 •O f j J-I 01 0) •V 7\ ai V\ 0) "C <0 4-J £H 4-1 T) < CD 10 c < 4-J a > z c c C s c 'J) X to Ll to 01 <4-1 a aS •z. rH V > nj 14 'A u: TJ S Li Lb o CT" rH 
s: CL o u fO fO J L,' <0 U Ll ro L| C X u a C 01 Li m H f - fl) u to C. 0) o H 0) 1 < X X J J X J u C*1 11 CL co ft (_> t o tff> X X — O a . ft u. CL X iD 53 IM a L> in Q * 
Vi ro <0 OJ U A. 
•n ) 0 iO 
in 4-> X? A. C M 
0) 0) 
1 £ Q) TI 3 • C a a « 
ro ^ c 
•h o o 
a o u o sz 10 O O 
10 CO H 
>. "4-1 
vs Li ro rO Li C 4-i H 
O C 
Ul <U X! 
RH £ C 
4) 41 • i l H Q 
4-1 UJ 
(0 + H + <0 + 
•H + 
TJ + 
> 1> -
; I £ 
o s u (J 0) * X M -»• 
TJ 3 * 0) O 4-1 + 
- I o 3 * 
-rl O Cu * 
ra in , 
0> * 3 u + o i_> 03 
VI -r fl 0) 
a > a o 
< s 
•3- O O C-
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 ) • o o o - • 
» o • • • o o 
• o o o 
f T o t n N O N r 
o m (n o cm <1 
O • rH o Cl? • • ' r- • • • O rH 
> O O O O O • O O O • 
i . • • O o 
O o o 
o ^ ? o o O o o o o 
o o . o o o 
. o • • • o o 
O rH O O O 
G O O O O O O O 
o o • o o o • • 
. o • • . o o O rH O O O 
rH O O O *T » o o o • • r- . . . — w O O rH 
• U* M Li >, ^ I CP IJ JJ rH C-f 
I O •• HI (0 n S i I I H O . Q . U N U : a C O 3 u O I 
4-> X o (J CTl -JZ 
u -• O ct 
U JZ 
O O 
O o 
' • o 
+ A X X >: x X X X X X X X X v X X X X X X X X X + 
u X' X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X x' X X X X X X ' 1 w y. X X X X X X >{ X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X 4J CM &) X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X 3 1 3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X a CO 
TI I * X 
X X X X X X X X X X X y- X X X X X X X X X X X X V * a AJ 3 
CL» < o 
A 
X 
4-) o CD CO C-L o R - r- R - o o o o o X X o m m m -t •H Qi fl tn * * 4-1 tn o ^ •"I o in in o o CM o o o X X o O R - E-i cC 4H '+4 
R - R - R - o o U> CO o CM cn o X T^ o o o * C fl 
c c to in m m tn X a, M o LJ X X E-
CP LI 3 
0 ' 3 E - rz. X 
LI O i O •iH 
CD o X 4-) JZ X X X X X X X X X X X :< X X X X x X X tn 4H 
CM <H 4-) X X X X X X N X X X X v. X X X X X X X X X X X X * K-3 4H o a> d X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X U] fl 
O Vl fl K-3 o X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X V E - M fl a» + ID X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X4 X X X X X 5; E - J J 
A LI 
•a 
CU TJ a) * + 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X 
i CJ 
H-L ro s .u U s cu J J o O CL) *RF JZ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. >i X X X X U o 
CD >. T> O> 4-) X X X X X X X X X X X X y X X X X X X X X X X X X X JZ 
LF) O I? 6 o > X X :< x' X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X N X x X X T» o 
u AJ T? a> JZ H o X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + CD tn 
CO cu c ^ Cu AJ 4.) 2 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X to 
c a) E ai a) 
CL) 
Ji. 
fl c I X X 
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X i 
c 
D> 
01 
iH -a J J LJ u •a 
^ t j 
c Q) 
LJ 
O 
tn 
cz 
a» 
4-) ; + ; •H R J TJ •rl 
O c E tn a o 4 J o rH E X 5 c <u •H < o >4-1 c X Cu 4-4 o o CC 4-1 cn 4.) c a TJ CM m •R| fl ai d CU rsi o c co J J cz LI £ Ol DL E LI (0 <0 a) 13 •H o 0 ) 3 -V D> a u M C P c 0) •4-4 O + 
CN 4-) •o •H a 4-J + d fl cr to (0 4-) <3 > -
CN fl C 4-) o O <u o 3 o U cr d cr L4 O •H o O L? O> * CD a LI o > LI fl tn LI fl + CP fl 
C o o u 4-J X LL + D O c X u •O 4-) o lu c Jj fl o x U A> 4-J + o o 4-J lu LJ <y 4-) cn (1) c 4-J -H c 
V) O a x LI tn Q. M Oi S rH CL) CL) d d c t- LJ CL) u 4-J 4-1 0 ) 
CO to •H E + CJ C O rH 4-1 0) LI CC CO (0 * 2 
-H < O o 4-) X * O (0 a o d A> LI U-l SZ fl <y <H O >, '+4 CJ o 4-1 * LI CL) ai a o -U O ' 4-) a C/7 > e> Cu 1-9 M fl o CJU in t ID E o a) u MH rH TD -H H-L 4-) CJ IB LJ T5 CM S . , fl •RF 5S O 4-J c £ 0) o <y cn •H 3 LI c rH 3 c u, L4 t CD c 4-) fc- A> 4-) a» J E- LI fl *rf 4.) LI a rH c «iH CP LI o •H tl> cr CL) 3 o o 5) o C rH o> + CD CC U fl ai CC o -H JZ L_> u E •I—I J J o fl to G> TJ -rH a) + CO LI C to to to H cc Ol "4-1 LI to (0 E-« r> CO T> o CN LT E C I? LJ .* R-T Q) <u a) A) s C c J o cr O C > RO c to LI (0 < .fl TJ o> A> 4-J +J -i CU ai c c o LI LI 2 11) o 4-1 a LJ •H *-T< TTJ LJ 4-1 (0 3 UI + fl 
4-) rH O 0 ) tn •» M LI fl <0 rH d o c •H rH a 3 LI c 3 c, u •1—1 O X 
4-1 ID a A> CL) O R-1 J tu E- <1) rH fl <D o o J J LJ •H c H A> TJ 4-J -H CT cu E u. J fl <U > •H fl o < 3 C 1 a) a» cn + •H 0 ) cn c c 4-) •»J u cc CO •H Jj > , 4-J o -rH 4-1 it CP E- a> LP, I? f j o + • A> E-I > c L-H LI 4H «H >1 Oi M IB fl X) vi to CL 4J 4-1 > 3 c E r-t ao 
LL fl -rH C -H •H 4' 0 ) u c A> X "M CC 11) LL a ro a) •H O LI j j 4-) r- C-L 
TJ OJ > CM + u •H C 4-J to to J •H CU o CU CO TJ rH CO o LL 3 L4 3 U-l to o o rtl M + H 11) o o 4 ) L4 CO o A> CL) U 3 CT J = Ol 3 o OJ 0) (1) a c 4-1 •4-; 4H 0) o 3 4 J LJ 11) <H 4J <H W t - R4 o tn C + JZ C M a 10 U-J O o Cu Cu o fl Q) •H M U rH cn o fl o 4- J TJ ^ o * Jj o CJ »4H o R4 ai Cu rH Cu i-l d o c to LJ A> «H O CD GJ 
4-1 H + O> (1) U3 ^ c c CO o B-. Ol C Of rH JZ rf c c ro c 0) c + rH o 4-J * c LI 0) <H o a c & d in o c o O fl ^ IB C -H 
O + JZ CL) > O O O TJ •H LI TJ E O •rl -H J r-1 M + -rl i-H A) -u U • H c A) 4-J 4.) a A> C c -H c c c c a 4-) 3 J J JZ E '-4H •1—1 
A> W # fl Jj -H M LL LI H JJ •H •rl t - LJ LI M C L M 4 J LT CD 3 D> E- * 4-1 O 
> LL + o CL) IB U CO ai Q) to o o to to m CP (0 CP O> o o O 3 rH C rH fl LT cu D) + M rH d CD O Si X) D a Q , 4-> O o 4-) o LU 4J CL O D I •H OL 4-1 LL a 
4-J + a O U-J a E -n o o 1 a a to U-L CL ^-4 U-L X o O L-L C C c MH fr* ^ 
X c + a >. O 4H a 3 D TJ LI LJ CL) -a a Q . o it) LL (1) L4 X •H -H -r| CL) Oi * * <t o < to o Z < Cu Cu 1-4 «t O O u O UJ UJ £ CL J Hi F-L t/1 R tn * X 
I * 1 1 CJ 0 O 0 0 0 •-.".OOO 1 X X 1 X X X X J "D O I 0 0 1 X 1 X x y. 1 
I r7 t" T) c 
i a) a- 1 1 0 1 1 N X 1 X £ X r< 1 y. j y. X X X X X X 
on 
ri • o 
I —! 
1 o 
CJ 1 
1 
1 
1 >: I 1 x 
1 1 X X X y. 
1' m I 1 r- 0 0 0 •_'•> r- 0 r- 1 X X 1 X X x 1 X cc X O'- H 1 *-) O 1 tN 0 f j c. LX> X I X X x 1 X X X 
ft* 
c 1 AJ CN 1 X 1 x 1 >: X 
cC * w a) 
I o 1 L) 1 ^ c 1 I X >: 1 1 
x X J I X X X X 
3 I r. 1 •D 0 •X) O 0 0 T 1 CN 1 CD < X cr c: X 1; o i 1 0 CT 1/1 L~> | m 0 1 X O © •D -J i ra i I eg l •N 0 r- J X 
c> •H -. I i O 1 1 0 1 a> p * O w - 3 
OJ o D A i I CN O 0 O) 0 O cr.. | X 1 N X v. x 1 y X X X 
r. to - (K 1 "O O I ri 0 m 1 X l X ;< X 1 X H X X 
O i-i < •o 1 a> 1 1 .X X 1 X N X 1 X X a; X X X O w ra cu c 1 rH a» 1 O 1 X 1 X y. X 1 y. X X X X QI 4-J o D 1 rM T3 !-• 1 1 >; X 1 X 1 X X X X a. O 1 o O 1 1 l 1 
TJ o 1 Li rH 1 «"N CJ O 0 0 0 1—1 1 X" V. 1 >; X 1 y. X CC X X X 
4J <0 X o a- + t-. 1 4-J o O J 0 to 0 iXs cn cn | X X 1 X X 1 X X E- X X X X u 2: a. Q. G> 4-J 1 Cl c 1 X X I X y. X X 1 X X X X QJ <U E 0) * v> 1 o 1 0 l X 1 y. X 1 y. X X X X X r- 3 i a O 1 1 1 1 X 
\D o 05 UJ 1 c I O 0 O O 0 0 x> 0 0 0 1 X >'. 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X 01 M JJ 73 O a) .» 1 o 1 0 0 rt> 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X E- X X X c CO a. c o •j) * J i O 1 1 X X 1 X :< X 1 X X yA X X ra , at E QJ a» j j CL) ra * CJ « i 1 O I :< 1 x — X X X X | X X X X X X X X 
*o 3 (0 M Ll c 4-J 3 ui •» i 1 O 0 O O 0 0 LO 0 O O 1 X X 1 X X X X I X X X X X at 
L> a< M CO * CC i O 1 0 0 CD 1 :< 1 X X X :< 1 X H X X X a O c E V. a 3 H + "O i 1 1 X x 1 X :t x 1 X X ai X X X ^ c E Cm O -* c 1 c 0) 1 0 1 X x 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X CO o c Q 3 * 1 CT' "D O 1 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X Ll C-l m •rl U o 1 -H D 1 1 1 1 ra CO CD 4-J 73 CC 1 to I o 0 O O 0 0 0 IT) O 0 0 1 X X 1 X X x 1 X X cZ X X X n 0 <u o rf a' O H 1 O O 1 0 0 CO 1 X 1 X X X >: 1 X X E- X X X X 4J ~o u x: f CL c 1 1 X X 1 X X 1 X X J X X X X U-i CN CO 
-H o 
c o 
•H > 4-J 0) * + 
4-1 
D r o 1 L> 1 O 1 
0 1 1 X X 1 1 X X X x 1 1 X X X :< X O 
c o o u M X TJ 4-J o i to 1 o 0 0 O 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 1 X X 1 X x 1 X X X X X X M 
CO o x: a> O + o + 0) to i 1 0 0 CO 1 X X 1 y. X X 1 X X E-. X X X a) (0 (j u to 73 O i 1' j O I l X X 1 X X X 1 X X J X X X 
V) tO -rf 0) 3 * CM -r JH i 1 rH 0 1 X X 1 X X X x 1 X X X X X E •H < U-I U-i N JZ 4-J X y, — X X • X >. <M o •H CO * w G u, M ra i-H a, * i 1 O O 0 0 U") CO O CO 1 rg f> 1 CTi ID vC ro 1 X x X X X fi1 Ll rH ra a: i O J O CN 0 CD CN CM 1 O ro ro 0 1 X X f-« X X 01 C 4-J C- c 4-1 X CD •c i 1 1 ID r*> 1 CN) CO CO X X CC X X X x: o > 0) + c 1 c OJ 1 O 1 1 0 1 X X X X X 4-J tn QJ 73 a> •H a> * 1 Cn "D O J 1 1 1 «• X X X X X 
£ C 171 M » o 1 W n J 1 1 1 ai CO a> 0) 3 C 4-1 f jz + ga 1 to o O 0 O 0 O 0 iTJ O 0 0 1 LO 0 1 vn CO 0 r X cc cn c 1 cn CN cn -H 
4-) o JD CO } a) -k E- 1 u O 0 <0 J CO IV 0 c 1 o X x VD JJ U3 V-l > + i a. c 1 1 . . ID LO •u X X J in 0 CN CN "D •H x X i 4-J 1 o 1 O 1 Cl) 1 0 1 0 X 01 
Ui -V a CJ o * I 4-1 O I J i 1 £ 4-J ra o a> i c 1 to I cn O cn O 0 m 0 LO CT» 0 cr. J 3 v in [ lO r~ CN CD 1 X X X X X Li Ll ra til •* 2 I 1 O m 0 CO Cl ro 1 TJ • •• CO l£> O 1 ai x X' X X X O TJ ca CJ J i O I I O VD n l a> in U X X i^ l X X a ra o i 1 O 1 S 1 rH O 1 -H X X X y. X CD V o <N * c * 
o -t 
>, ra 
Q) 
r 1 
1 1 
ai 
rH 
a> 4-J . . 0 1 a •• ra a. E 1 
a •d 
O rH 
1 > M G) rH D 
X 
ai 
X 
—1 to 
Lt 
0) 
•«H , E i 1 -C to •j) a> E l CJ C3 •rH | s: 0 P. C. 1 to •• a» > a> V) J s a Q X ra 1 1 o •• "O ga to U4 O 3 l E- 1 ra 1 O O O ra a> a s Ci ai o + x: 4-J 1 2 : 1 O a) > 1 rH rH Cu I >.," U P 0 1 u-4 x: X 4-1 0 D c sz JZ 3 QJ f a« + o c 1 rH 1 > 0 13 •r~» rH O 1 ra <a ri 1 4.' U ra X | Q 4-J c cn 0 0 O CP * ra a« 1 o CO ai > x: ra 0 ra <1*. -0 0 4-J > I 0 u % 1 • M O 4-J 0 1 0 a) "O TJ 0 TJ ra M , ra + a> o E ( Lt 4-1 V) 1 B •H •d Ll < > O rH J r | -r-l 0 1 O c E i rH Oi Li £ 0J 0) OJ 0 0 a) ^ * 0) a» 1 4-1 x: a' I 0 0 L' OJ 4-J 0 ra ! 4-J *-) rH | ra a> a* a» > 4-1 a» Li TJ Ll Ll © 4-J 0) 4, M a ?« 1 c CP C 1 rH CO 0 •<H -c •H 0) U4 U4 "O C ! H -r-l a. '-1 > > ra c to > ra ra U CO Cu a 4-J 
X C i > , 4-J Q. o 1 o •H ra I 0 ra M c -a c c 0J -H f U Lt O 1 ra c 0 0 O 1 CD 3 0 0 0 x: x: J2 J1 a 0, 0 
» < + CO < s 1 o CC -i i > ai n 3 a, a, OC CM 1 0 u u u a. JC > 1 v-l OJ 0 2: to to to to < < C 
* 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 m 0 O O X X X X X 1 A X X X X ? j 
cc T> 0 0 0 CO X X y. X X X l X X X X X 4-1 
i * CP ^ 
-g a) rH 01 rH ^ 0 X X X X X X X X X X 1 x 1 X X X X CC x' X X X X * 3 a 
r-
rH + 
3 0 1 rH V O 3 
0 X X x X 1 1 
X X X X X * a 
4-J 
3 
ai CD M - i 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 in O "H- X X X X X x 1 X X CC X X X * 0 
Gi { - LJ O 0 ID O ID ID 0 CO C^i CN X X X X X x 1 X X (-> X X X X ^ X ra Cff; 4-J C C ro ro ro X X X x 1 X X X X >: J •H a< * CO a) 1 O >-H U 0 X X X X X x 1 1 X X X X X X X H 05 UH UH 4-J C O 0 0 0 m CO O CO m ^ CN 1 r- X < X O nj 
Q1 + ai O r-i O CN 0 CO CN CO O 1 H x O. Ll O QJ O a) vJ 0 O-J CO <0 0 r~ r l 0 r~ f-> a* Ll > •H + Ll 0 O 1 >; / 
© O •r| + 4-1 2 X u O U Ll J, CO O •H CO 0 X ra a) + r- O r- 0 O 0 in C O O X X X X X 1 X X > X '< X 01 CM c CO 4 x: CC TJ 0 O 0 CD CN CN X X X X x X 1 X X H X X X r l UH 0 -X Ll LJ T> ft) X X X X X X 1 X X OS X X X UI ra 
0 w ro <y 4, 0 c rH 0) 0 X X X X X 1 X X X X f-« w ra 0J 4-J O + 3 1 rH "D X X X X X 1 X X X X X + E- 4-1 
# ^ CL 4-J O Q 3 1 / 
TJ Ll <£ cn Ll —t ro O ro 0 0 CO 0 m m 0 m X X X x X 1 X X a: X X * X * CO 4-J ra E O <y + H 4-J U 0 CO O CO 0 CD X X X X X 1 X X X X X X •H O x CL a a) > 4, 4-J c c <N X X X X X X 1 X X vJ X X X X O O QJ a> E 0) , CO 0 t-» 0 X X X X X' I X X X X X 4-1 O 
r~ >, a: 3 ^ + ra 1 0 0 1 X x: m O ra UJ c 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 O O X X X X X 1 X X X X X X a) TJ O 4-1 T> c O Q) + O 0 CO X X X X V. 1 X X X X X QJ to CO CJ c M 0 > 10 + J 0 X X X X X 1 X X X ra CO 
QJ a) •H ra + 0 X X X X X X 1 X X X X X c 01 
1 E <u 4-J 0) u * X X X a) 0 i-H T> 3 ra L. X Ll TJ C 3 4-J + 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 m 0 O O X X X X X X 1 X X X X <3- •H 73 
O 0J 3 4-1 CO CC 0 O 0 CO X X X X X 1 X X X X X 0. •r| O C E CO a 3 H + TJ X X X X y. X 1 X X a: X X X X < c E C O + C C Qi O X X X X X X \ X X X X X CO 
O 0 O 3 * 3 CTI X) 0 X X X X 1 X X X X Ll u 73 CN a -H O O •H 3 1 ra 0 C to u 4-J ~o m CO rH 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O X X X X X 1 X X CC X X >: X 4, 0 CO ra 
01 •H 0 0 4-J E-. O 0 O 0 X X X X X X 1 X X X y. X X + CO 4-1 XJ O JZ Q) x: O. C X X X X X X 1 X X X X X U-i < > r j ra c •H 4-1 0) + 4J O r i 0 X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X O Ll 
•H 0 0 > 0) 3 1 4-1 0 X 
1 X cn ra 
C U 0 0 Ll 2: 4-1 4-1 O CO 0 O O 0 O 0 0 in 0 O O X X X X X 1 X X X X X X Ll c 4-J ra O JZ QJ 10 A\ + c; to O 0 CD X X X X X 1 X X H X X X OJ + «H 
>~3 CO 0 0 to TJ 01 J 0 X X X X X X 1 X vJ X :< v. _Q rH CD 
CO CO •r| 0) x: 0 + j-i i-H 0 X X X X X 1 X X X X X E c 
•H < UH li-! M 4-1 4-1 X X - X X X 3 + O 
Ll > »H O 0 to C a rH Cu Ll ra rH CO O CO 0 O CO 0 m rH O rH CN CO m cn cn X X X X X CJ ra Ll rH ra X 0: 0 O 0 CD fN CM CN 0 1 X X £1 X X X 0) CO 
c 4-1 tn a' c + 4-J CD TJ ID CO CJ CO X X CC X X X x: 0 to 
0 c > a + 0) q c a) 0 0 1 X X X X 4-1 + 0 ra 
to 0J T> ai -H a) 3 1 ET>TJ 0 1 X X X X + CN L4 E C to Ll 0 -H 3 1 0 CO CD 
to 73 
OJ a) a c 4-1 x: , CQ CO -H 0 O 0 c 0 0 0 m O 0 0 m 0 m CO VD 0 1 rH X X CC CO CN CO a •r-f ra 4-1 rH 0 to Q' + e- O O 0 CD 0 VD m 0 1 3 X, X E- VD + O S 4-J W > JZ a c .. UJ r- CO CO 73 X X m O TJ + 
cr> 2: X -r 4-J O I-H 0 QJ 0 1 O X X 0) 1 
V) U m u ; Ll 1 4-1 0 rH 1 s 4-J + m ra CJ X © ^ O to ro O ro 0 c CO 0 m m 0 m 3 T m m ID cn X X X X X M CO i-i ra to - 2 O 0 CO • • 0 0 cn 0 1 QJ X X E- X X X O r~ CN 
"O (£1 0 ro t j 0 O VD ro 0) r- CD U X X J X X D 0 0 ra 0 0 E 0 1 -H X X X X 0) + 0 
X 0 <N e 0 
> . 
ra + rH + a> 
- 0 
3 a» 4-1 .. QJ ra* o. E 
- 3 
73 *• O rH 
1 
> Jh 
0) 
X 
rH Qi 
X 
ai 
X 
rH CO 
M 
Qi 
0 
CO / O •-H 0J * E -n CO to ai .-» e CJ 0 -«H 2: 0 d a 1 to .. a) > d 3 a) to QJ Q 3 4-J a + ra O TJ cn rH U4 E O 3 fH > ra ra 1 O a O ra Qi a Q a >3 QJ x -H O 2 JZ LJ 2: r-i < O a) 3 > rH rH rH a 0 CL O 1 in x: X l i 0 c x: x: 3 + •r| a) QJ O C rH .. O rH > CJ rH 73 -n rH 0 ra ra 0 D 4-J ra x 1 O rH c Cf 0 0 0 Cf (Ll 
to cn - 4-1 ra Q' 0 to O > JZ, CO 0 ra < 73 O w > (J 0 3: •H O 4-J CJ d) 1 m O >1 <v T> 7 O 73 nj ra •w O 
ra s. a) 0 E U 4-1 CO E 4-J -H T> Ll •r| < > O r-i -r-f -rl 0 O -r| c e 1 rH o> N Xi E QJ 0) 0) 0 O * ra M 0) H r QJ Ll 0J 4-J JZ 0 3 a» •3. 4-J 0) a< 4-1 N 3 ra 4-J Jj r l CO r-i ft* CD 3 1 <y >, 4-J a) H M 73 Ll Ll Ll 0J L4 a 4-J 0) * JH a > C c rH 10 O • r-f TJ •r| 0) U4 u. "O c •rl -H rH a J_) > > ra C to > ra ra M ra cc a 4-J tH / 
£ > + 4-1 a 0 O -rl ra O nj M c 73 c c CO X X 0) rH Ll Ll O ra c 0 O 0 1 ai 3 O Q 0 x: JZ x: JZ Cu D. O CU < X CO a. x 0 cc > ca a < >-l 3 a, CL CC Cu CJ 0 Lu 0 0 a. 2: > 1 ^ CN O P E to to 10 to < < z + X 
4 + O O O O 
a: 0 O O 
"O c 
o 3 l rH 0 O O tu O O O O CM 
oi E- -J '•T O O •x< 
ST c 
CM 0) 
•o !0 0 C3 u 0 3: in O O CO O in 
c 0) 3 in O U") m O CD U? o 03 -* CJ dJ J 
> ? •H 0 
& 3 H * > Ll o 
o X V >, CO O CO O CO O in -J t/3 u TJ l-H O O ct> o -H TJ •1' o 10 fl {J 0' 0 ro 0) O 3 1 TJ 0 cu -H + O O T3 H cn Li rH 0 O 0 O O 0 O m O 4-J CO o 03 EH 4-J u r~ O r~ O O u cu 0) •* > C c OJ OJ ilJ E + 03 CO O 0 r- >. Q£ 3 » J fO 1 O 0 m b CO cu c 0 O 0 O O 0 O m O M 4-J TJ O + G3 c O CO QJ a. c .i- Q > * to J 0 11) 03 fl r-< 0 I 03 jJ 0) « O 
TJ Ss fl Ll 4. c •J 3 X C3 O O m O u 01 3 K. <0 DC 0 O O CO O c e to a 3 * M TJ C e tu + O C c 03 O o o o 3 C "D 0 r-i Oi H u 0 3 ;n 4-J TJ t ca UJ O O 0 O O 0 O in O cu O •x> O + EH O 0 a O CD 
i-> 'D u JZ * JZ a C CN fl 4-1 + 2 0 O •H o o 03 * 03 3 1 0 
c. u 0 o u E * 4-J 0 to O O 0 O O 0 O LO O fl o x: ai > 03 CO O O CD n cn u u tn "o X at J 0 CO to -rl a + > CM Ll O •rl < 4-i 4-1 N + 4-J -P >1 tM o -H i. -H CO Ll fl u CO O CO O O CO O U) CD fl * N 0 0 CD in 
c 4-J H a* C * 4-1 ai T3 o > CP + 0) c c 03 t-H O VI 0) TJ <11 -rl + a> 3 1 0 TJ 0 c j cn •* Ll O 3 11) 0) 3 C 4. 4-1 JZ in W 0 O 0 O O 0 O m 0 -H O O 4. W Qj H (J 0 O CD 4-J Ci] Ll > x a C 
51 t S 0 0 (f. O 4. ca CJ Li 1 4-J 0 fO o x * 03 O CO 0 cn O m O in cn fl 10 Z 0 cn O CD CD VD J 0 "0 * 0 O T >. - fl) CM 4 fl rH 0 -H 03 3 03 4-1 ••H 0> E Ti CO CO ot a fl 0 •a CQ « b-. E i ' 4-J X rH < 03 03 03 u c > U TJ rH 
^ Oi fl ft) 0 to 0) > fl 0 <u < N O fl 0) 0 E Ll to 4-1 TJ Li rl > M 03 0' 4-J JZ V 3 fl' 0' 4—1 u 03 a > c c rH 10 O •H 03 h. UJ c: i> 4-1 a 0 0 -rl ra O 10 L4 C C CO X X i-i < t/3 < 3L u a: j > CD a' Cu cu 
0 O O O in TJ 0 0 O CO l-l TJ 03 
1 CD C rH 03 0 cn TJ 1 rH 0 OI O O 3 
«n eft Ll rH r i 0 CM 0 O O in 0 
o> E- iJ O rH r~ 0 r- r~ O 0 0 CM fl sr J j c c CM Ol m cu 50 0 n rH rH 0 TJ 03 1 0 O fl s c rH O 0 O O in c a O O O CO o 0) -* u OS J O CP Li > •» •H + rH rH 0 a' 3 > + 0) 
LJ O «-> -» Ll TJ CD o X fl + 0) fl CD O CO 0 O CO O m r~ CM c + w a; £E T3 O O O CO O ^ Li -k c TJ 03 O to fl 03 -* >4-1 -H -H 03 0 
—I fl <11 -F O 'JC 1 rH TJ O Li a. rH -* 0 O 3 
TJ Ll < + rH CD Li rH O rH 0 O O in cn 4-1 (0 X o 03 H 4-J u CP O CD CD O CO u s : a. a, OJ + > c c rH HI tu E * 0) to 0 rH rH 0 r- >, cC 3 4. fl 1 0 O LO o fl rH 4t L; c O O O O in M r- c O 03 O O CO CD CU c M o > • -F 10 J O <D 0) fl rH 0 
E a> 4-1 03 4, L3 i-l fl Ll + rH c 3 4. j j IH O 0 O O m o o 3 to Cf, O O O O c i 10 a 3 T Li TJ i-l c £ U-. 4. O c c 01 rH 0 O o o * 3 1 t7>TJ O CM CD •H o O •rl 3 to t j Ti 4. T3 CD UJ rH o ^ •H 0) O + fl (-> U rH O O CO CM 4J TJ CJ XZ + O £ a c CM fl i-H C •H 4-1 + & 4-1 0 rH rH 0 -H O o > 03 3 \ 4-1 O C o o u Ll E 4. 03 4-J O tn CD O CO 0 O CO O in c-fl o JZ <11 TJ m 03 W O O CO CO u o UI T) fl 03 J O w to •H + ^ 0 + H rH 0 •H . < 14-4 4J M + c •» 4-1 >1 4-1 o "H •H UJ Cu LJ fl rH 4 id O 0 O O U*l fl Ll rH fl 4. x Cf, O O O CO c 4-1 (- 03 c + j_j H> CQ T3 o c p a> + 03 C 01 0 CO <13 ~0 03 -H + 03 3 I D>TJ O 
rH E J to + Li O -rl 03 03 3 c + 4-J JZ CO rH m O rn 0 O cn O in Jj rH O R> + if) 03 E- O O O CO W H> > _C a •H CP 2 + j j 0 0 id tn Ai U + CD L Li 1 j j O fl l j 03 * O tn \D O CO O O to O if> r-Li fl to 2 O O 00 73 ffl O + lO J O fl O + 0 
S 0 + > 1 - a; CM + c fl -r rH 0 rH a» 3 03 4-J -rH 03 E TJ •r~> CO to 3 0) 4-1 a <n O T2 01 rH to a. E u X 4-J E rH < O 0) 3 03 03 O c rH 0 rH > 0 rH TJ rH to 4-J fl a1 0 to 03 > JZ fl 0 fl < TJ O Li fl 03 O E Ll 4-1 50 E j j •rl *o Li • rl f£ > 03 Ll aj 01 J j JZ 01 3 0) 3 J j 0J cu Jj Li 4J a) Li a > CP rH CO O TJ •rH 03 UJ L, 
s c > j J a O 0 fl O fl Ll c TJ c e CO X X Ol n l-H * < + t/3 rf. £ u cc rl > CO O n < '"H 3 Qi DJ 
z> O 1 X X >; X V X V 
1 X X 
1 >: x X X X x' X X X X X X 
x X x X X x x X X 
CD r-l I x x X X x X x 0! X x >: X 
CO 1 X X X X X X E-" X :< X X < rv 1 >: x X X X rl X l X X X X X X X >; 1 X QC 
1 0 lN5 CD < X X 
1 0 X a rg f ' 0 r- X X 0 X >1 2 
c O x X X X X X to 
1 X X X X X X X X ,-J X X X X X cc X CJ X X X X X X X Eh X X X X x X X X X X F" 
O 0 X X X X X X X CC X X X X M tJ 0 x x X X X X >; E- X X X X 0 (VJ X X X X X X -J X X X 0 X X X X x x X x X x X iJ CD 
O 0 X X X X X X X X X X X 4 X 03 4 t j 01 X X X X X E- X X 03 a-X X X X X X .J X X X fl I M fl X x X X X X X X X rH -* c X X - X X X 03 
Ll 4 0 O a x x X X X X X X 01 4. X X X X X X E- X X a r ^ X X X X X X cC X X X + X X X X X X X X X X X 10 4. 
X X X X X X X X X X 0 
fl + 0 O 0 X X X X ft. X X X CJ 4. w X X X X X X H X X X X 1/1 X X X X X X J X X X X 4H + X X X X X X X X X X 0 + X CP O 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X LI * c X X X X X X X Eh X X X 03 4. •r| X X X X X J X X X •9 * X X X X X X X X E 4. 2 x x - X X 3 » 0 c + Q 
O •5T m 0 <£> CO CO X X X X m 0 0 X x T - x X 0J + CD 
uO fO Ol CO X cC X JZ 4- 0 0 X X X 4-J * 0 X X X X X OJ 03 03 4> O 0 in 0 0 0 0 X X cf. CN m CD CD -H + rH Ci 0 3 X X E-i JJ 
CO CO cn TJ J vo 0 rH TJ X 
03 0 0 X X 0J 4> >H X 4-J ^ m O <T> 3 ^ m CO cn X X X 
m t j m 0 03 X X Eh X X X 0 + r~ 0 cc m cy CO (J X X J X X a + 0 X r-» 0 -H X X X X 0J * - 3 - > X >H + 0 .. a. 
a, 6 
TJ L| 
0) fl O 03 03 03 rH rH tn a) + CD rH g is CD -H X 0 (1. a w a: a 3 0) cn 0) Q 3 + O >0 0 :13 fl 03 a Q Q 0) * > rH >H rH Q, t.) i\ u _c 4-1 (J 3 rJ JZ JZ =» 4. O rj O fl C Cf 0 0 0 0 * 4-1 
> U U 2 0 u O 03 p 03 TJ L) TJ fl fl •Ll O rH -H -H O O u —1 ai . 0 0) 0> 0) 0 0 fl 3 fl 4-J rH fl 0 a- 0i Li TJ M Ll Li 0) • Li T3 c: rl •H —\ CI fl > fl fl fl a a |J 4 03 •rl Ll Li O c 0 p 0/ O Q O JZ Q. 0 0 + CC UJ L3 CJ u . ( 3 r-T LJ X cn UJ tn tn •a: a\ 
0 
0 
TJ 
0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X >'. X X Eh X -p X X X X CC X X 3 X X X X X X X X X X a X X X X X X X X X X OJ 0 3 0 O X X X X X X X X cC X X X 0 CM X X X X X X X X E-i X X X * X 
O") X X X X X X rl X X X X •rl X X X X X X X X X X X E - 4-1 X cc 4H 0 rH Ol 0 0 0 vo rX X X H> 0 iG CV IO CO 0 (-> X X G. Li -=r 0 1 CM cn m J X X H c X X X X 2 
0 -H 0 X X X X X X X * X X » cn X X X X X X X {-- X X X rl 14-4 X X X X X X X X CC X X X u fl 
X x X X X >' X X X X X * H M X X X X X X X X X X Eh p >-H 0 m 1 .X X X X X X X cc X X X X P3 rH X X X X X X X X X X X X + rH CM X X X X X X X X X X X X 0 0 
•V X X X X >• X X X X X X 4-1 0 
x JZ 0 rH OJ 0 0 0 < X X X X 03 TJ 0 CN m U"5 0 E-i X X 0) cn •3" OJ cn OJ OJ r~ . J A X X + fl + CO rH t-H 0 X X X rH + c 01 X X 03 rH n + u •0 0 cm cn m in 0 X X X X X <1= + TJ 
CM CM O J 0 X X Eh X X a + J co rO m r~ r~ X cC X X X X 0 X X X X X £0 4, X X X X Ll 4- 6 Ti fl + 0 c in 0 Lfi CD CD 0 X X cc rH CO CD CQ ca 0 + 10 «o •ST 0 X X E- r~ VJD TT m X X J 0 OJ "N 4-1 J. ci! >. 0 X X c 4. Ll CP fl 0 r- rH m n CTl CM X X X X X Ll J , c Jj in O X X Eh X X >'. + 0) + -H c r cn m X X -J X X A) rH 03 O X X A X X E 2 E X X X =» + 0 
C 4> Q rH 0 rH ol cn V£> CD CQ O X X X X X * to OJ CN O X X H X X X <13 + CD 
1 0 cn CD CD X a: X X -C » 0 0 O X X X X 4J -» 0 fl X X X X X Ll 03 CO CO TJ 0 in 0 0 cn rH X X o: CD ffl CD * •r| + fl m O 3 X X r- + 0 X 
lO iT TJ X X h-1 0 CM OJ T3 4. 
03 O O Y X * aJ * 1 X 4-1 + in 0 r~ 3 1-1 m •0 CM X X X X X Li + CO 
TJ in m O CJ X X X X 0 r- r 1 0 r- cn m u X X >1 X X X * a + 0 0 
s rH O -H X X X 03 4. 0 - 3 - > X Ll 0 • • a T3 U ^ 
03 fl O. E O rH <D rH 01 03 rH rH cn 03 + CD 0) rH E ID CD rH 0 d a tn 01 > a 3 03 w a> Q + 3 + rH 0 3 E-i > fl A 0 a 0 fl 0) a Q 0 03 + X •rl > rH rH rH a >, u Cu u "4-1 X 4 J u 3 c J JZ JZ 3 + -rl lM 0 fl (TJ fl x O 4-J rH c Of 0 0 0 O -r 4H - n 
4-1 > 0 O 3 •rl 0 4-1 L3 Q) in 0 >, 0) T? TJ L3 TJ fl fl 0 O rH vH •rl O O -r| c E rH Li -O E 0) 03 ft) 0 0 fl Ll 3 fl 4-J rH fl rH 01 03 3 03 >1 4-J 0) M Li TJ Ll Li L* 0) * Li a TJ C -H •H rH Q, 4H Jj > rH > A tn > fl fl Ll fl Q. a 4-1 * EH 
ft) •R< U U O fl c 0 O O 03 0 Q 0 JZ JZ JZ JZ a a 0 + CC 1 l_3 u L3 L3 cu X > OJ LJ 0 E <n tn tn tn < < -* 3 + X 
C o © 
a a> o
u
r > -H 
4-> CO IV CM C o .x M o CO re ai ID itf P at 14 
TJ L« < * 4-J (TJ O u X o. Q. ai 
© © CO >1 CC 3 m o rO i-H u L> TJ o CO CL C o a» 0) 1 E CJ u OJ 
T> ro Ll P 3 a1 3 o C E CO a 3 rH < E u, o o O CM CE •H u if) o 4-> t j 01 —1 OJ o CM 4-J TJ u .c 4-> flj -i 4-J ai •H o O > 0) ai c o o O H X u ro o -C <u 4-J CO 10 0 01 U •-H to TJ ai to 
< H-4 N 
Li o •H 4-1 to IO Li 
fO 
ro M i-H i-H 10 s^. 
c P E- a» c x> o c > a« ai w a' TJ a> -H ai —1 E cn Ll 
© 0) a c 4-> P * i o o to P UJ Li -H rri 3; CO 
fO 14 U rO 
c j 
X 
n 
r6 
CQ o o * CD 
s : o CM - c 
i 1 o o O o O IT. 0 0 0 1 X 1 X X 1 X- + X X 
1 O 1 o O 1 .< 1 X 1 X H X 
•o 1 1 X 1 1 X X X 
0' 1 o 1 X X 1 X 1 X X X 
3 1 r^  O 1 1 X 1 X 1 X X X 
1 1 1 1 O 
3D l t'J 1 m c: O in CI O IT> 1 O J m O: 1 C£ X >. X 
E-« l O 1 o cr cc. 1 CM r-l 1 •< X X X X 
I C- t I Cl t X X X 
CO 1 o 1 I 1 ri 1 X X X X >, X H 
QJ 1 4-> 1 1 1 X a: 
4-> J yj 1 o in C) o m o m 0 «*} J 0 O 1 y. X 
o 1 1 m o m o vD 1 1 X E- X 5 . 
© J l O 1 Cl | X 1 X X r J X 
1 J r l O 1 1 1 X 
4-> X X >: 
CO O 
I 1 in o o o in o m c - r- 1 m ( n 1 X ai Cl U. to JZ OS I O 1 o O U-i c> Cl 1 X X F- c— j 
TJ I ] 1 0 1 <r> 1 X X CM <J\ UJ 
C a' ] *—I o 1 1 O 1 X x CM £-
3 i a TJ l 1 1 X X 
O 3 1 1 1 1 
CD 1 to I o o o o o o o m r- 0 r- 1 m 
0 ! O C". 1 X X CC X :< X U. a: 
i o O 1 o o o> CD n r- 1 X X E- X X >: 
•J i a \ iM 1 X X . J X X X Cl + O 
co r O 1 r-l o J 1 CM 1 X X X X r- t-l 
fO 1 4-> O 1 l t 1 c\ 
td i to 1 o o o o c o o m 0 0 » X •/. 1 X 1 X X X © £ TJ 
i 1 o O <T. l x 1 X X 1 X X F- X X X c * © 
•J i O I l X x 1 X X > X X •J X X ra , 
i 1 l X v; 1 :< X X 1 X X x X 
x — X X © 
O 
i 1 o o o o c o m au O CD 1 X, X 1 Y. X X 1 X :< X X X Qi * •H cc 1 TJ <z> t ve- o vO VD O <T. \c vo | x 1 X X X \ X X t- X X a , 
TJ 1 0) 1 X x 1 X X 1 X X CC X N 
C QJ 1 I-H r-H o J X •/ 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X CO + 
a i i TJ 1 X 1 X X X t X X X X u 
o 1 o 3 1 1 1 1 ro * 0 
aq 1 Li rH 1 in o in o o m o in CO 0 CO I y. X 1 X X X i X X cc X X X X y * 0) 
E- O O I r- c r- O Cf» in m i X 1 X X X 1 X X E- X X X X 
.c 1 c c 1 m m m Vt) X X 1 X X 1 X X X X X X <H + et 
4-> l o 1 r-l r—1 O X X I X X X 1 X V, X X X X 0 >, 
1 o » t 1 Cr 
u o I c 1 o o o o o o o in O 1 CM ro 1 0 c— r- r - 1 VD r - a. X VD r - fit X ^ + C 
QJ CO 1 Zi J vc o ID t o o cn r - r - 1 CTi cn 1 E- s © + -H 
QJ 1 O 1 CN' CN CM C J OJ J CM 1 m i n 1 0 r- ^ X 0 r - X ! + rH 
Ll 1 1 rH o 1 1 O 1 X E , 3 
4-> 3 < O 
to C + Q 
1 1 o o o o o O u") 0 0 0 1 X x 1 X x X X 1 X X X X X + i 
c t 1 TJ O 1 o O CTi 1 X X 1 X X X 1 X X H X X X © + CD n •D 1 QJ I 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X CC X X JZ + O 
1 i—I a ' 1 r-l O 1 X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X P •* O 
3 1 rH 75 O 1 1 X X I X X X X X X X X CM 
o 1 o 3 1 1 J i oi CO + 
CD 1 *-< 1 o o o o o o o m 0 0 0 i X X 1 X X X X X Pi X X X X t 
E-" 1 p O O 1 o o cn 1 X X 1 X X X X 1 3 X X X X X X y 
.C 1 c c J 1 - X X 1 X X X X f TJ X X X X >: TJ » 
4-J 1 O 1 I-H o 1 © X X 1 X X X 1 O X X X X X © * 
Ll 1 U O 1 c rH ) 1 X X p -» in 
O 1 C 1 o o o o o o o m 0 0 0 r 3 >: X 1 X X x l X X X X X X l-l + I-H 
Z I Zi 1 o o cn 1 TJ X X 1 •• X X X 1 © X X X X X 0 + c— 
1 O 1 1 0 X X 1 © X X X X \ O X X X X X a 0 
1 1 I-H rH o 1 S X X t rH x X x 1 -H X X X X © 
© X — 3 — > X X Ll 4 0 
1 1 rH a TJ 1 Ll 
ai 1 1 3 © 4-J 01 1 co a E I O rH i © rH oi © I-H rH to © * CO 
E I 1 TJ CO 10 a> - 1 E 1 tu 0 •r| 1 2 O a D. 1 to QJ a 3 QI CO a» Q 3 -k 
J 1 O •• T) at rH 'Si U-. O 3 1 E- 1 nj 1 0 Cl c ro © a Q 0 P © X 
£ 4-J 1 X rH < © > rH 1 «H rH a 1 >. ~ O a 0 .c u 3 c KJ £ £ 3 , •-H 
a c 1 rH 1 n > a TJ -r-l «H O 1 10 ro l c -Jj rH 0 0 0 O O • 
4-> •0 QI 1 O m © > (0 c fO < a O P > 1 0 0 3 1 -1 U t j 0 1 m 0 > © TJ u TJ nj 10 
a> o E I 14 4-J (0 J e u •H "D Ll M < > O rH 1 •H .rl 0 1 O H E 1 -H LH J-l n © © © O 0 10 
ai Qi 1 4-J JZ © 1 3 a- 4-i © & Ll D (0 1 -P P «H 1 a- Qi < © > . 4J a' Lt TJ Ll Lt Ll © Li 
Li a i> 1 c C 1 rH w b TJ © U4 UJ •O E J •r( -H P . u 1 > (0 c CO > a: Li to a a 4J » H 
4-J a O i o -M fO 1 O ro c V) X X © -H 1 L4 Ll 0 1 <0 c 0 O 0 1 © Sf 0 Q 0 JZ £ JZ XT a a O + 
to < I L> CC •J 1 > CD 13 si! l-< I-H c? CL Oi CC tx. 1 U U U. I L» '• > a 2: 1 J CM ( ) J X to to to to sr. < 2 * 
+ r 1 O CM O 0 CN 0 m CM O CM X X X X X X X x I * C-l cc 73 0 0 <0 x X X X X X X E- X X 4-1 rH 
1 * ^ + 
"D © 
© ^ 0 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X cc X X X X X * * 3 a 3 1 «H TJ X X X X X X X X X X -u rH -» O O 3 3 1-1 + tD L. Cl 0 Cl O 0 rn 0 m in 0 in X X X X X X X cc X X X X y + 0 © E- jJ U 0 a\ 0 cr, 0 CD T X x X X X X X X E- X X X CT jJ C c ci cn Cl X X X X X X X p X X X -r| <"0 a* + CO O O X X X X X X X X X X X X E- 4H CU © O 0 X r cc 4H © 'Jc c 0 0 O O 0 0 0 in 0 0 0 X X X X X X •x y. :< x X g <0 c © > 0 0 CO X X X X X X /. X X Lt 
0 © 0 + -3 0 X X X X X X X X X X X E-D> Ll > -H + Li O X X X X X X X X >: X X a» 3 •H > Q X X - X X 2 X Ll O 4-1 O CD O X n) © C 0 0 O O O 0 in 0 0 0 X X X X X X X >: X X to l|H CM c CO -k n) CC 73 0 0 0 CO X X X y. X X l- X X ^ O -X Li © 73 © X X X X X X X X a: X X w 10 O CO (0 © •4H + CD rH © rH 0 X X X X X X X x X X frt L| 
S rO Li © u 
4-1 
«H * O + 3 O 1 
rH 
O TJ 3 
0 X X X X X X X X X X * * »-? 
U 
73 Ll < rH f CD L, «H ON 0 cn O 0 cn O m ID O VD X X X X X X X X a: X X X X >• -t> M to P ro x a © X E-
4J O cn 0 cr. O •10 X X X X X X X H X X X X + rH u s a. © > 4-1 c C X X X X X X X X X X X O O © © E © + (0 0 0 X X X X X X X X X X X * * 4J O CO •f~t >. cc 3 10 1 0 0 X • JZ in 0 ro «H u C cn 0 cn O 0 cn O in 0 <n r-j r- m Cl T m T < X X X X © 73 O Li 4-1 -q cz O © * P T 0 O CO c— c— <N t- X X X c © to CO CU C 0 > w + hJ rH CN Cl CM CO X X X CO 10 
1 
© £ © © •H jJ © + 
10 + 
u + 
rH 0 0 X X X X + ^ c © © rH 
TJ fO Ll Ll + 0 TJ C 4-> 3 p + CD 0 CO O 0 CD O m l£> O ID CM 0 VD CM CN CD X X X X X Q> TJ u © 3 4-1 CO -» OS 0 0 T O CO m m O 0 0 X x p X X X a •H 0 C £ W a 3 -» TJ VD Cl Cl r- r- y X 0: X X X c £ to 0 -V c c © 0 0 X X X X X CO 0 0 0 3: 3 1 CrtJ 0 X X X X + Ll O TJ CS -H u O "J O C CO CJ 4-1 TJ CD to rH 0 0 O O 0 O O m 0 0 0 m 0 Cl in 0 0 X X CC m CLJ CQ U •L CO (0 © a © O fcx O 0 O CO c— 0 X X &"< l«-» Q 
CM <0 «H •c c 0 -H P I * 
JZ P a 0 C ^ ^ 0 VD -3- CD 0 CN 0 y X X X J VD 0 r-c rH rH * U-I <3. >1 Ll •r| O 0 > © •r| 3 1 p 0 X CP rt C 0 0 L> L. z P O to Cl 0 Cl O 0 m O in 0 in CN y. X X X Li c 
<0 0 JZ © 0 © to 0 O CO m 0 X X E- X X >: + © •H c n 10 CO 
0 to f j •H to 73 © * c ro 
© Li rJ ^ 0 VD 0 CO 0 O 0 X X X X l-q X X X X .Q £ * 
rH 
3 
© 
S •r| < 4H 14 P X X 3 O © O LO C P ul 1-5 Ll nj CD 0 0 O O 0 0 O m 0 O 0 X X X X X X X X X X X CJ ro Ll rH 10 \ or; 0 0 O CO X X X X X X X E^  X X >•, © CO c 4-1 E-" a> c 4-1 CJ TJ X X X X X X X X a: X X X 0 CO 0 c > CP C c © —1 rH 0 X X X X y, X X X X P 0 CO (0 © •c © 3 I cr. TJ 0 X X X • • X X X X >: CM Ll rH £ c -J CO O —1 3 © CA TJ 
© © 3 c 4-1 CD to «H 0 0 O O 0 c O in 0 O 0 X X X X X X rH X X a: X X x X •H CO 4-1 -H O p to © ^ E-" O 0 0 O CO X X X :4 X 3 X X F- X X X X O X 4-1 UJ 'r| t> z JZ a C «• X X y X X X 73 X X J X X X X 73 * •r| CP 2: N. P 0 rH 0 © X X X X y. y O X X X X X X © 1 CO u 03 O + Ll 1 4-1 0 X X 4-1 m ro u X © -» O to 0 O O O 0 0 O m 0 O O 3 X X y X X X X X X X X X Li * rH CO M 10 W 2 O O CO T3 X X •• X X X X © X X E-" X X X O c— CM TJ CD 0 r- 0 O X X © X X X 0 X X P X a 0 0 fO 0 st 0 2: X X rH X X X -ri X X X X X © 0 X 0 CN 
>, + SO © 
- QJ 
3 © p .. QJ 
X 
a •< ro a 
X -
£ 
- 3 TJ •• O «—1 
- > Ll 
© 
X 
rH © 
X © X rH to t 
Li 
© + 
0 
CO "© M © + £ TJ CO w 3 aj rH E 0 0 •rl E 0 a Q. to © > a 3 © w © at 
3 rH 
P O ro O •• TJ at rH CO u. e P 3 E- > to •0 O Q 0 © Q 3 0 © -H JZ P X rH «£ O © 3 > rH rH rH a 0 a u V-l JZ 2: P 0 3 c £ JZ * P y t4H © + u c O rH > 0 TJ rH O to ro 4-1 P nj 0 p rH ct 0 0 0 + Ci U-I •O cn-, P <0 © 0 (0 © > X ro 0 nj eC T5 O P > O O 3 r| O p u © in 0 >. © TJ 73 (J TJ ro "J + 4-1 O ro -» © 0 £ u. 4-1 CO £ 4-1 73 Li < > O rH •H -H 0 O -H £ rH cn u J3 E © © © 0 O ^ nj Ll © Li © p JZ © 3 © -u © CU 4-1 JH 3 ro P P rH fO rH Q> © 3 © >» P © Li Li TJ iH M IH Z © Ll a Jj © -a Ll a > c Cr c rH 10 Ci TJ •H © U. TD C •H •«-( •H a P > > to c CO > "J to Li "J D a-» 4J 
x > + jJ D, O 0 -r! fO 0 <0 u C TJ c c 10 X X © -H H iH 0 ro c O 0 O © n Q 0 £ JZ JZ JZ a a + O CU < X w < x u o: P > CD 0 a, n »-< 3 a. a. CC U. '_) U CM L> CJ EL 2: > CM u S to to to to < < * 2 + X 
03 O-."0 Cu 
o 
* 1 o o o o o o o m VO o vo OJ ro | vo vO m i X X m CD eh Lu + CM 
cC 1 o o o cn • 1 to VO CM 1 X X E-* Ol 4-» 
1 CN > T> C 
1 
1 C 03 
r-l f ,_; o VO ro 1 J vo T • I O 1 X X X X rf CN <o r- 3 a ro 3 1 CU TJ 1 1 X X 4J r-i t— + O 1 -<H 3 1 1 3 00 • £D 1 Ifi m o m o o o m o a\ O 1 m CD CM 1 X X (X X X O 03 CN + t- 1 U o r- o t— o cn r~ r- > 1 1*1 ro OJ VO 1 X X E- X X X < X o> 4-J > a c VO >v 1 r-l • 1 X X J X X -H TO tu + to 1 o o 1 O 1 X X X X X * EH CU 03 1 4-J o 1 1 IX '4H u i to o o o o o o o m c o o X 1 X A X X 1 X X + X X X o ro c 0i r 43 i o o CTi 'A X 1 A X X 1 X X E- X X X cu Lj o O * 03 i O X 1 X X X X 1 X X -q X x H o> Lj > •H + Lj i o X 1 X — X X X 1 X X X X X ^ o- 3 > + 4-1 •A X X X + •z X 
u O M * to + o •rf CD o X 0) * i o o o o o o o m o o o X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X tn IH OJ c W + JZ a; i o o o cr. A X 1 X y. X 1 X X E- X X ^ 4H O ^ u 4-J TJ i A X J X X X X 1 X X cs X X X CJ <0 O « ro <$ U-l % m C 1 c 03 o X 1 X X X X 1 y. :< >! X X H M ro 0J O -+ 3 1 OI TJ o A X 1 X X i X X X X X E-Or u CU O 1 -<H 3 1 i ^ TJ ^ a. m I to o o o o o o o m CO o CD m O 1 CO CTi OJ CTi 1 r-i IO lu IX X X CN bu to JJ ro X o 03 + t- 1 a m o m m o Ct m m • 1 VO Ol CM OJ 1 •c- E- X X X rH U CU (X 0J > + 4-J i a c vc T 1 T • 1 ra C 1 -J X X X O O 0) 03 E 03 + to 1 o o 1 rH 1 X X X CO + 4-1 o CO •r~i >, CC 3 ^ + ro 1 4-J o J 1 Ol JZ in O ro w I tn in o m o o m ra m ro o m in i cn CD 1 CP r- lu X X x- 0) -V •o o Ll u 'O c o 03 t i m o m m o CTi vo vo • i cr. T I E- >i X X C 4 03 tn CO CL c o > CO + -J i •—i rH CO 1 CO Ol • J vo hJ X X «u + (0 
1 01 £ 
03 Oi 
•H 
4-1 0J * (0 4 CJ + 
i l-H rH o i rH I ^ OI CO X X X X X * 
c 
03 0) rH 
T-i "O 3 ro U t M + O TJ 4J 3 4-J + i o o o o o o o iA o o o X. X I X X X J X X X X X 0» 4 •H TJ u a) 3 XJ VJ + CL. 1 TJ o o o CJ\ X 1 X X X X 1 X X E- X X X CL + iJ -rH o c E CO a 3 M TJ 1 03 X X 1 X X y. X 1 X X X X X X < c E bu O + 1 rH 03 1—I O X X 1 X X X 1 X X X X X tn * o 0 o — 3 3 1 rH •o o X I X X 1 X X X Ll 4, a TJ CN co -H U O 1 0 3 j 3 «J + o C co e» JJ •a CO 1 M rH o o o o o o O m o o o X X 1 X >; X X 1 X X CC X X X + X to ro 0) o •H 0) o t- 1 4-J a o o O cn X 1 X X X x r X X E- X X X y to rvj r . a JZ 4J 1 C c X X 1 X X X X J X X X X X X HH + rt >, CN <0 •H o c o 'rH 4J > 0) * 0) 03 * 4-J 3 1 O i a 
1-1 
o 
r-l ^ o X X J i 
X X X X 1 i X 
X X X X X X cn U fO C o o CJ u X 4-1 o 1 c o o o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X X W + c 4.J ro o JZ 03 4-J r-» * 03 Ui 1 o o CTi X X 1 X X X 1 X X E- X X X 0» + •H c 
in o L3 tn T3 tn 03 J 1 o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X hJ X X X -Q + rH 03 to V) •H 0J VO + Ll J o X X 1 X X X 1 x X X X X E + 3 E •<H a. 4-J 4-1 M X m + 4J X X — X X >: 3 + O 03 4H O "H 4-1 to C t Q rH 
LU L3 JJ ro m 1 m o m o o m o m CD o CO X X 1 X X X X 1 X X * X X X UJ ro rH (0 e: 1 TJ o vo o vo vo o CTi VO vo X X 1 X X X 1 X X E- X X X 0) + CO c Jj H oi c u 1-3 T3 J 03 X X I X X X X ] X X <X X X X JZ + o to o c > o 0) c J rH 03 o X X 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X + 4-1 J. o HJ 10 01 TJ 03 -H 03 3 I rH TJ X X 1 X X X 1 -- X X X X X Ol Lj rH E C -3 W — + O 1 o 3 1 1 03 in + •o <l) 03 3 c 4-1 x: dj 1 u o o o o o o o m ro o ro X X 1 X X X X ) rH X X (X X X X y. •«H + ra +J rH O to a> E- J 4-J u o <j\ o cr. CTi o CTi m m x X 1 X V X X i 3 X X E- X X X X o s: JJ Ll M > + JZ I c OJ CM •« X X 1 X X A 1 TJ X X -J X X X X -rl cn E 4-J 1 o o 03 X X 1 X X X X 1 o y X X X X X 03 -r CO AI U + ^ O 4 Lj 1 u rH 1 1 X X 4-1 * m ro u ,T 0) + O I c c o o o o o CJ m o 3 r>! ro 1 o <jj m I < X •c- < X Ll + an M ro to S; 1 o t— o r- t— o cr. r— r- •c • • 1 r- O 1 43 • E- X O -v t— Ol 
XJ CD O iJ I o O NT OJ 1 03 m m • 1 U O r- J X r a + o O ro o nt I o X 1 rH O ] •<H X 0) + o 
x o OJ c o 
>> + ro + rH , 0> f I 
- 03 
3 4-J a> CL •• ra CL 
• ' 1 
E ( 
3 TJ •• 
0 rH 
1 
«• 1 
> Li 
03 rH 03 0) rH tn 
Lj , 
0) * 
o 
CD •H 03 E 1 TJ to to 3 03 rH g 13 15 H 1 X o d a i cn 03 > d 3 01 tn ® 3 
3 + 4-J Q ^ ro I O •• r- dj rH to o 3 Eh j > <0 <0 1 a o o JTJ 0) a 3 Q 03 -» X •H + •z x: jJ X rH a. o 03 •m 3 > r-i a i >> CJ a o r 4-1 JZ X jJ LJ 3 c x: x: 3 + •H IM a> 03 -r u C I rH G > u rH T3 -r- r-f O ro ro O 1 Jj 4-J .13 i o -1-5 C G o u a O T 4-1 n CO Pi + 4-1 ro 01 1 0 so 0) > JZ (0 0 ro < n O Ll > o a 2 1 •<h a M u 43 1 m 0 >1 01 TJ TJ u TJ ro ra 4-1 o ro * a> O E ( M 4-J (0 E JJ T- M •H PC > a rH •H -H O I O H CZ E I Ll n E a> a> a> 0 0 ro LJ o> LI * 01 01 1 4-1 JZ 0) 3 03 3 4-1 03 CL +J 3 CO 4-J 4J rH 1 H) rH 01 0) 3 1 03 > JJ 03 LJ Ll T) Lj Ll Ll 01 -« Lj a 4-J <u + Ll a > 1 C rr c •—1 to o rf TJ -rf 0) U-. U-. TJ c •H -H rH 1 a MH > r-f | > ra tn > nJ ro Li ro a CL H ^ t E-
X > 4 4-1 a 0 1 c •i-t ro 0 ro L) c TJ c c to X X 0) •H U U O 1 ro c o o 0 1 01 3 0 3 o X X JZ JZ a a o + CU -» l-H UJ < 3 3 1 u au j > m a •"H a. •"H I""1 D CL cu Oi U-. U CJ U. 1 U CJ CL X > 1 tl OJ u X w tn in tn St a. z -* X 
Attachment "5" 
R-2 Residential Density 
Development 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
January 22, 2010 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 5 
Derivation of Potential Residential Density (based on provisions within City Ordinance 723) 
5 acres * 43,560 SF/acre = 217,800 SF 
217,800 SF - 25% roads, offsets, easements = 163,350 SF Usable 
• Assuming 18 units per typical apartment structure 
First two units 
= 10,000 SF (first two units) + (2 units * 200 SF lawn/unit) + (2 units * 300 SF parking/unit) 
= 11,000 SF 
16 Additional units 
= 16 units * 200 lawn + 16 units * 300 parking + 16 units * 2/100 SF/unit 
= 40,000 SF 
18 Unit Apartment Building 
=11,000 SF +40,000 SF 
= 51,000 SF 
Total Buildings 
=163,350 / 51,000 = 3 Buildings 
• Assuming final building has more than 18 units to utilize remaining land 
=163,350 SF - 51,000 SF/Building * 3 Buildings 
10,350 SF = (x units * 200 SF lawn/unit + x * 300 parking/unit + x * 2,000 SF/unit) 
x = 4 units 
Total Residential Units 
= 3 Buildings * 18 units per building + 4 units 
= 58 units multifamily units, or 11.6 units per acre per five acres 
= 232 apartment units on 20 acres or 174 units on 15 acres 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Attachment "6" 
Bend-La Pine Trip 
Generation Study 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G I P L A N N I N G 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
3 5 4 SW U p p e r Ter race Drive. Sui te 101, B e n d O r e g o n 9 7 7 0 2 5 4 1 3 1 2 8 3 0 0 5 4 1 3 1 2 4 5 8 5 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: October 14, 2008 
To: John M. Rexford 
Project tt: 9140 
Bend-La Pine Schools 
520 NW Wall Street 
Bend, Oregon 97701-2699 
F rom : Joe Bessman, P.E. 
Subject: Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
PURPOSE 
The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize measured trip generation rates for elementary 
schools in Bend during the weekday p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Standard reference 
manuals contain trip generation data for elementary schools during the weekday a.m. peak hour 
(7:00 to 9:00 a.m.) and during the afternoon school peak hour (2:00 to 4:00 p.m.), but no data is 
available for the evening commute period. This time period is commonly used to assess off-site 
impacts of schools to the transportation system. 
This study identifies elementary school trip generation data during the weekday p.m. peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic, and was prepared based on surveys of four elementary schools located 
within Bend. The study methodology and resultant trip generation rates are summarized herein. 
As defined within Trip Generation, 7,h Edition, elementary schools serve grades kindergarten 
through fifth or sixth grade, are typically centrally located within residential communities to 
facilitate access, and provide bus service to students within specific geographic boundaries. The 
ITE land use category for elementary schools includes both public and private elementary schools 
within the dataset, although data for this study was collected exclusively at public schools. 
As identified within the Trip Generation manual, school bus utilization may vary significantly 
between elementary schools, and may result in varying trip rates between school sites. Potential 
factors for school bus utilization could include the proximity of bus service, service boundaries, 
transportation infrastructure, crime, income, or other factors. School bus utilization data was not 
collected as the purpose of this trip generation study is to identify characteristics specific to the 
Bend-La Pine School District, and specifically to elementary schools within the City of Bend. 
Available data contained within the standard reference materials includes elementary school 
surveys during the weekday p.m. peak hour of the generator only. This coincides with the end of 
AVAILABLE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DATA 
FILENAME: C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\JBESSMAN\DESKJOP\PROJECTFILES\9140\FINAL\TRIPGENMEMO.DOC 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
October 14, 2008 
Project #; 9140 
Page 2 
the school day, which typically occurs between 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. However, the critical off-
site transportation analysis period typically coincides with the evening commute period (4:00 to 
6:00 p.m.), which does not occur simultaneously with elementary school peak trip generation. No 
standard data is available within the ITE manual related to elementary school trip characteristics 
during the weekday evening commute period, when limited after-school activities or staff trips 
represent the primary uses. 
As part of new elementary school projects for the City of Hillsboro School District, trip generation 
studies were conducted at several locations during the critical weekday p.m. commute period 
(4:00 to 6:00 p.m.). These studies showed that the schools' trip generation rates during the 
evening commute period were approximately 30 percent of the peak school trip rates that 
occurred in the afternoon. Given the unique characteristics of Bend (population, service 
boundaries, and bus ridership), a trip generation study was conducted to assess trip generation 
rates applicable to local conditions. 
TRIP GENERATION STUDY 
Four school sites were selected for analysis throughout the City of Bend. School sites selected 
were those that were in operation for at least two years, were centrally located within residential 
communities, include typical school hours and amenities, contain defined attendance boundaries, 
and include configurations that would allow the separation of trips from those associated with 
surrounding uses. The school sites selected for the survey, data collection dates, street address, 
and year 2008/2009 enrollment data are identified in Table 1. The attachments include the school 
attendance boundary map illustrating the location of the elementary schools and the areas served. 
Table 1 
Elementary School Characteristics 
School Name Data Collection Dates 
School 
Enrollment Street Address 
Pine Ridge Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 540 
19840 SW Hollygrape St 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
R E Jewell Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 557 
20550 Murphy Rd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Juniper Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 509 
1300 NE Norton Ave 
Bend, Oregon 97701 
Elk Meadow Elementary Tuesday September 16, 2008 568 
60880 Brookswood Blvd 
Bend, Oregon 97702 
Each of the ingress/egress points at the school sites were videotaped on September 16, 2008, two 
weeks after the start of school to ensure that school attendance patterns had normalized. It should 
be noted that many of the schools are situated adjacent to public parks, and trips associated with 
the ball fields or adjacent parks could not be entirely separated. During the surveys, the weather 
was sunny with a high temperature of 90 degrees. Accordingly, it is expected that the trip 
generation studies are conservatively high given the higher usage of the adjacent ball fields than 
during the majority of the school year. As trips during the evening commute period likely reflect 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
October 14, 2008 
Project #: 9140 
Page 3 
low levels of student trips to and from the school, the potential impact of weather on student 
mode choice is not expected to have a significant impact on the measured trip generation rates. 
Intersection traffic counts were simultaneously conducted at nearby collector and arterial 
intersections to identify the time period with peak traffic volumes on the adjacent roadway 
system. Given the relatively low school volumes, this hour represents the time period when the 
combination of site-generated traffic and roadway volumes are expected to peak. The peak hour 
of adjacent street traffic identified in the study typically occurred just prior to the 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 
period, with exception of counts collected near Juniper Elementary which identified an earlier 
peak hour between 4:25 and 5:25 p.m. 
TRIP GENERATION RESULTS 
Videotapes collected at the school ingress/egress points were manually reviewed in five-minute 
increments coinciding with the peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Trip rates on a per-student 
basis were calculated at each of the four school sites, and a weighted average was applied to 
generate a local elementary school trip generation rate on a per-student basis. A summary of the 
trip generation data for each school is provided in Table 2 and Figure 1, and worksheets from the 
data collection efforts are included in the attachments. 
Table 2 
Measured Trip Generation Rates (Weekday PM Peak Hour) 
School Name 
Student 
Enrollment 
Weekday PM Peak Hour of 
Adjacent Street Traffic 
Trips Per 
Student 
°/o 
Trips I n 
% 
Trips Out 
Pine Ridge Elementary 540 4:50 to 5:50 p.m. 0.16 40 60 
R E Jewell Elementary 557 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.09 68 32 
Juniper Elementary 509 4:25 to 5:25 p.m. 0.15 52 48 
Elk Meadow Elementary 568 4:55 to 5:55 p.m. 0.12 58 42 
Weighted Average Trip Generation Rate 0.131 55% 45% 
'The weighted average is calculated by dividing the sum of all trips or trip ends by the sum of all independent variable 
units (total school trips / total student enrollment). 
Based on the resultant trip generation rates, trip generation rates for elementary schools within 
the Bend La Pine School District were identified as 0.13 trips per student during the weekday 
p.m. peak hour of adjacent street traffic, with 55 percent of the trips inbound and 45 percent of the 
trips outbound. This local trip rate is approximately half of the national trip rate of 0.28 trips per 
student during the weekday peak hour of generator (2:00 to 4:00 p.m. time period). 
We trust that the information contain herein adequately summarizes the trip generation 
characteristics of elementary schools within the City of Bend. Please let us know if you have any 
questions or need any additional information to review the analysis findings. 
Attachments: Traffic count worksheets 
School Attendance Area Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Elementary School 
(520) 
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students 
On a: Weekday, 
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, 
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 
Number of Studies: 4 
Average Number of Students: 544 
Directional Distribution: 55% entering, 45% exiting 
Trip Generation per Student 
A v e r a g e Rate R a n g e of R a t e s S tandard Deviat ion 
0 . 1 3 0 . 0 9 - 0 . 1 6 0 . 0 3 
Data Plot and Equation 
1 0 0 -
<n 
•o 
c 
UJ 
.S! o 
0) > 
Q> CO ffl 
Q) > 
< 
80-
X 
X 
4 0 -
5 0 0 5 2 0 5 4 0 560 5 8 0 
X = Number of Students 
X Actual Data Points 
Fitted Curve Equation: Not given 
Average Rate 
R = ! 
Elementary School Trip Generat ion Study Kit telson & Associates, Inc. 
saaiyifssisB 
i 1 
f 1° 
I % 
1 I 
i* r 3" I f a 
i I 1° 
i" r r 
6 5 i s 
3 J 
i I. i. 1. „ . lm _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ i 
S" 6° " 1 ° — — " . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ! i 3 I I 1 3 
tl i i t I' * I i ?2 s ? a s s z I 
II M 
fiill 5 ,s 3 -a , isl J SS H gl hi ss ,1 „ - | § 3 5 | millililllliiillllllll I ilJJiJiliJfS33IS!3iS3?IS | So So B ? 3 6 * 8s^ sBna>i3ssasa2?8fias?sas * asepnfiRfisflSBSBsssfisisyssiB a see::fiss>stssiBS8S2fi[J8n?«s*i 
a,* I nil I 1 ? Urn li fi |2 
mail HHt i i i ii u If 

e o o e e o o e o o o o o 
> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
D O O O O O O O O C 
3 O O O O O C 
o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O C >00000 
J O O O O O O O O O C 
I O O O O O O O O J O O O O O O O O O C 
3 O O O O O C 
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 
J O O O O O O O O O C 
3 O O O O O C 
O O O O O O c JOOOOOOOC 
J O O O O O O O O O C O O O O o c o o o o o c 
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 
3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 
5 y o 2s 
M It 
si 
6 1 3 s « o I s 5 £0 fi I IDiUOOO 
s s a ? ° 01 'I ijf 
Sgmiu 
WJ 
U) LL) ^ LL) X a a a a. a 
SOOOOOOOO 
y 522222222222 d 22222S ^ CLCLQ.CLCLQ.eLCLCLa.CLa. o a. a. a. a. a. a. 
^ if V tt' TT" % V ui iW iri £ri 0 jf - - - - — - - - -
S S 2 S S 2 S 2 2 Z 5 5 
CLQ.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.CL NPirll'JI/lWOQ'-rfi 
s „ 5 
£ > ? 1 a 

\ s i l s l l s l a ! ! ? ? 
eeeszsssssBKasafcgsssagaa 
r 
5 
i i 
r i 
r l1 r 
i ! 
3' 
"sstfisssRfcfcecxssRssfifisas 
| IllllflllSllllfilSI 
ilii I 
mil 
mn I W H m W W i W f f i ! B N B S H W 8 S M I 
1! ii 


3 1 i- i- i 
I 
r r r 
S 3 S S 
c i: c c : : : : : : : : ; 
[' s° I I 
"„ !„ s s. 
r r s" j -"—'"-"- -—"--"0 
I I i I | s |S ] — 
s i s i 
Is I3 »•• 
I ? § a 2 
l i e s ? 
S S 8 3 I f I 5 » s . . . J . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J-
a S a 3 a 
1° l" f " j " " - " " — " " " " " " " = 
§ S 1 3 £ 
5 5 £ - 5 3 I s a s 
S° s= 
j . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J„ 
I 3 5 , l ! 5 1 
I ! S 3 
'„„„.„.=.„...=.====.«,,.== ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 
!<!»s j" jj" g j " , — — — — — — — — - • — — — - — — — — 
w ^ i 1 9 i I 2*232212122222221*2*25*1 | HZiiilliiUiiUiUllill f 5 5 3 s | 8 S H s p . n > : H « 9 a a * g s s ^ sisssfiRSssssssBssa'isH '^ijss 
!!!!„ I i ! M\ \\ ~ h " ~ l l Jill i 1 I Illfl Ij If pi 



p Is 
r 
1 ! 
I- i" r 
i i I I r r r r 8 3 I $ 
i» fs i*m r 
i s I s 
[5 f= i* I I % I E; s = 5= 
l | 3 5 s ! s i ! ° 5= 
I I K 5 
f 3 a a I ==„=<,====„.=====,„, 
1 
r r 5" • |° s. s= ®„ ===„====,,,,.==„===.=„„ s. 
5* j r i °°°° °°° °°°°° s S 5 S s I 
S 3 8°° 
I S I I I ! 5 I 
I S° 5" j — — " — = = 
}e * * "» ® = 1 „„=„,_„.„ . » = „ . „ „ s= = ==== = ^ = = = 
ii r i" If l? * i I s 
if S !o E*. ' = = S======================== S=„===== = = ======,= ===== = = ======================== 
s: I If SI f il° l r el ? ° sf° ° l ii - » 1" i s 1 iiimiuiiiiiiiiiiinii 1 iiiiiiiuiuiuiiiuiiu 1 iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 
h §j| s ilH 1 1 1 Jijis s? si 
ii iiHil Hiit z i i i m l 1j Ii Ii 
Bend Area Elementary School Boundaries 
__ _ _ _ _ _ 
i' l* .1 i; 
I 1 i 
V ' 
'S 
f ' 
f -
b 
i 1 r ' / 1 
h " ' W 1 1 , r ~ 1 ' . 
r' hAt1 •' ^• r ^ 
--/-•>. i * ' , ' in ' 
I ft-
•:Tll! 1 i I 
' -'J 
• L' V 1 
a s 1 mmt 
i r ' P Z Z k . t k - * 
I 
' ^ x - l / y i x ... s- v •N _ V ^ 
1 \ 
—I /I 
\ \-A i 1 ^ I 
\ \ - ! 
V 
I 1 1 I • t 1 1 
A 
N 
PrrtadWKlM 
0 0.45 0.9 1.8 2.7 
Attachment n7" 
City of Madras Roadway 
Classification Map 
NORTH (NOT TO SCALE', 
LEGENO 
$TATEWI06 HIGHWAY SEGMENT CLASSIFICATIONS EXISTING crrv 
RURAL EXPRESSWAY 
URBAN OTHER 
SPECIAL TRANSPORTATION AREA 
URBAN BUSINESS AREA 
CITY EXPRESSWAY 
ARTERIAL 
MAJOR COLLECTOR 
MINOR COLLECTOR 
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP 
K ' : f 
CITY OF MADRAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND 
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN UPDATE G5\ 
I M euo MvS^ CTlOM O G S 
Attachment "8" 
Project Scoping Letter 
K I T T E L S O N & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 
T R A N S P O R T A T I O N E N G I N E E R I N G / P L A N N I N G 
354 S W U p p e r Ter race Drive, Sui te 101, Bend . O r e g o n 9 7 7 0 2 54 i 31 2 , 8 3 0 0 541 3 1 2 4 5 8 5 
MEMORANDUM 
Date: December 10, 2009 Project #: 10028.0 
To: Nick Snead, City of Madras 
Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County 
Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 
From: Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 
Cc: DJ Heffernan, Angelo Planning Group 
Project: 
Subject: 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
Transportation Planning Rule Scoping 
The purpose of this memorandum is to document transportation analysis scoping to rezone 20 
acres of land located in Jefferson County from Range Land (RL) to include this land within the 
City's Urban Growth Boundary as Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning. This scoping was 
prepared for consistency with the requirements identified within Oregon Administrative Rule 
(OAR) 660-12-0060 (Transportation Planning Rule, TPR), which contains the applicable criteria for 
a zone change analysis. The purpose of the TPR analysis is to ensure the transportation system 
can accommodate the allowable land uses and that any significant affects are mitigated. 
The land included in the rezone is generally located south of Ashwood Road, east of the Jefferson 
County Middle School, and south of the existing ballfields near Bean Drive. The property is 
within the Yarrow Master Planned Community and its rezone to accommodate a school is 
consistent with the approved Yarrow Concept Plan. The location of the property is generally 
shown in Figure 1, and the identification of the approximately 20-acre future school property on 
the Yarrow Concept Plan is illustrated in Figure 2. No specific development or entitlements are 
being pursued as part of this zone change. 
Note that while specific parcel boundaries have not yet been identified, the general location of the 
property south of Ashwood and east of Bean Drive within the future school boundary location 
shown on the Yarrow Concept Plan provides adequate information to accurately assess the 
transportation system impacts. Specific definition of the property will be provided as part of the 
zone change application pending further area refinement with City and County staff. 
LAND DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS 
Two reasonable development scenarios were identified to assess the potential transportation 
impact of rezoning 20-acres from Range Land to Multiple Family Residential Zoning. The two 
scenarios reflect County and City zoning provisions and are presented below. 
« 
FILENAME: 10028SCOP1NGLTR.DOC 
r 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December 2009 
J / i 
& 
i 
i* Strouri Rd 
/ 
* 1 J * £ s 
? # / 1 
/ ^ JL © 
NEPolkSf 
i 
3* 
S z m 
IS 2 
<2 
Nt- Jefferson &J / 
/V U« St / ME Louoks Rd 
sa 
HE Louchs Rd NE Louckl Rd 
S J 
<3" 
?B7j 
H 
'nflAT C/OS7 
Keyn 2 e:..-i 
N£ ChajtnutSl 
Q £ 
/ * S * 
I § s I a s 
t> NE Oak Si 
Oal< Street Pari* 
s 
I 
I 
ie 
t*e 
Bucigtl In 
to 
SOPPV ISI 
$ a 
5 
NE Oak SI 
.z 
Cornier ft 
H 0 NEASt 
lie a qt Moiruin Wew 
HoepftaiDlrttt 
© 
NEASt 
Sean Peik 
"Veitflrn 
jb tnn 
B m O: er 
^ £ CwnmJ? § 
* Pa>k 5 
« * aecst* 5 5 
i ? s 
| a a B 
« Madras ^ BED St 
s ot 
NE 0 St 
^ SEC 81 1 i 
b a 
endsh'p 
© © 
SEuSi 
SEE St 
SEC St 
31 a 
SE E 8 
D c 
s § 
se 
.wo st 
§ © 
M < > 
$03 
t 
in ^ 
(S ? Q.IIB5 
g S» i . .;ISI:IKH'I 
a 
St Buff st 
Wist, SE I St VI 
£ 
9 
a 
SEHSt 
I ffi 
H 
B | &E J St 
SED*v»St 
-SE Tr«c*a St 
8E Butt St V 
© 
a ^ 6 E L S | 
Imagery obtained trom maps.google.com 
Mt Jefferaon 
kKilComettfy 
% 
9 
NE Rk^aidi tn 
Z tn 
I 
Ashvwood HiJ $ 
f 
SEwSJgl 
EA*hwugd Rd 
Juniper 
HlS Path 
Q. 
O 
(NQScfkLE) ? 
• 
SITE 
SITE VICINITY MAP 
MADRAS, OREGON 
•Sjpi K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
Is^J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December 2009 
•Sjpi K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , I nc . 
I s ^ J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
YARROW MASTER PLAN I 
^ MADRAS, OREGON 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
December 10, 2009 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 4 
Range Land (RL) Development Potential 
The Range Land zoning is one of three designations for Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) lands within 
Jefferson County. The RL zoning is intended to preserve predominantly non-irrigated agricultural 
lands for livestock grazing. The RL zoning requires that non-farm residences contain a minimum 
of 40 acres. A variety of non-residential uses are permitted within the RL zoning, though these 
uses require more acreage than the 20-acres proposed for the rezone and all are considered low 
intensity uses. Accordingly, under the existing zoning the trip generation potential is severely 
limited, and for analysis purposes it was conservatively assumed to be none. 
Multiple Family Residential (R-2) Development Potential 
The Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning category provides for higher-density single-family 
uses and attached residential uses, to include apartments and townhomes. The R-2 zoning also 
allows parks and community centers as outright uses. Schools, churches, libraries, and other 
government buildings are allowed as conditional uses. 
The City of Madras zoning provisions, as contained within Ordinance 723, were reviewed to 
identify density ranges and allowable uses within the R-2 zoning. Conditional uses are typically 
not considered as part of a zone change analysis. However, as the intent of the rezone is to 
ultimately allow for a new elementary school, this specific conditional use was reviewed to 
ensure that a reasonable development scenario considers the impacts of this intended future use. 
Review of the City zoning provisions identified the following outright allowable uses: 
• Single family residential 
• Multi-family residential 
• Public park, recreation areas, community centers 
Based on the uses shown above, multi-family residential was identified as the most intense 
outright land use from a trip generation perspective. Review of the required building space, 
parking allocations, lawn space, and typical road and infrastructure allocations identified a 
resultant reasonable maximum density of 11.6 attached residential units per acre, or 
approximately 232 total attached residential units on 20-acres. Additional details on the development 
of residential densities are included as an attachment. 
Conversations with the project team identified that a future school would likely comprise five 
acres of the overall land, with the remainder retained for residential uses. The most likely school 
type would be an elementary school given the regional needs. A new elementary school could be 
expected to serve an enrollment of approximately 350 students. This would result in a second 
potential development scenario that would include 174 attached residential units (11.6 units/acre 
* 15 acres = 174 units) and a 350-student elementary school (remaining five acres).. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
December 10, 2009 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 5 
TPR ANALYSIS SCOPING 
Trip Generation 
Trip generation estimates were prepared for both R-2 zoning scenarios to determine which land 
use combination resulted in a higher overall trip generation potential during the critical weekday 
evening commute period (one hour between 4:00 and 6:00 p.m.). Trip generation estimates for 
each of the scenarios were prepared based on surveys of similar sites. Residential trip generation 
estimates were prepared based on data contained within the Institute of Transportation 
Engineer's (ITE's) standard reference Trip Generation, 8"' Edition, using the Apartment land use 
category (Land Use Code 220). Trip generation estimates for the elementary school were prepared 
using surveys of schools within the City of Bend, which contain slightly lower trip generation 
rates than national surveys of elementary schools (0.13 trips per student versus 0.15 trips per 
student) but are expected to better represent local characteristics. The attachments contain the Bend-
La Pine Elementary School Trip Generation study. 
While the location of the elementary school is expected to support the surrounding Yarrow 
neighborhood, complement the adjacent middle school, and benefit from the adjacent ballfields, 
additional trip discounts were not applied to the trip rates obtained from the Bend-LaPine school 
district facilities. Table 1 summarizes the trip generation potential of the two scenarios. 
Table 1 R-2 Development Scenarios Trip Generation Potential 
Land Use ITE Code Size 
Weekday PM 
Peak Hour 
Total In Out 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Only Scenario 
Apartments 220 232 Units 145 94 51 
Proposed R-2 Zoning: Residential Plus Elementary School Scenario 
Apartments 220 174 Units 113 74 39 
Elementary School N/A 350 Students 46 25 21 
Total Trips 159 99 60 
*Trip rate reflects data collected at elementary schools in central Oregon 
As shown in Table \, future development of the 20-acres with an elementary school (comprising 
five acres) and residential uses (comprising 15 acres) provides a reasonable worst-case 
development scenario. This scenario was found to generate 14 more weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips than build-out with residential uses alone. 
Trip Distribution and Trip Assignment 
The estimated trip distribution pattern of primary site-generated trips associated with the 
proposed UGB amendment and rezone was determined through review of existing traffic 
patterns, the locations of other elementary schools, residential destinations, and review of existing 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
December 10, 2009 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 6 
school attendance boundary maps. The resultant trip distribution patterns were separated by 
residential and school trips, and are illustrated in Figures 3 and 4. As shown, the pattern 
highlights that the majority of trips would be headed west toward the City center and US 97 
corridor. Trips destined toward US 97 are expected to distribute onto the parallel routes (Loucks, 
City View, or B Street) based on their ultimate travel destination. Both trip distribution patterns 
reflect a regional draw as the school trips are primarily associated with faculty and staff during 
the evening commute period. 
The difference between the Range Land zoning trip generation potential (assumed to be none) 
and the proposed Multiple Family Residential (R-2) zoning trips (shown in Table 1) during the 
critical weekday p.m. peak hour were assigned to the roadway network based on the trip 
distribution patterns and routing, as illustrated in Figure 5. Figure 5 includes a sum of the total 
additional vehicles that could occur at nearby collector and arterial intersections. 
Study Intersections 
Based on a review of the potential increase in trips with the proposed zoning (as shown in Figure 
5), the following five intersections of collector and arterial roadways are proposed for inclusion in 
the traffic study. 
1. Ashwood/Bean Drive (could be impacted by 137 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
2. Ashwood/City View (could be impacted by 119 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
3. B Street/Kinkade Road (could be impacted by 76 additional weekday p.m. peak hour 
trips) 
4. B Street/Ashwood (could be impacted by 66 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
5. B Street/10 ,h Street (could be impacted by 55 additional weekday p.m. peak hour trips) 
These intersections are those that could experience more than 50 additional weekday p.m. peak 
hour trips with the rezone/UGB amendment, or those that could experience a significant increase 
in total volume with the amendment1. The City of Madras roadway classification map is included in the 
attachments. 
It should be noted that additional assessment of localized queuing and operations during the 
school peak periods may be required at the time of site plan application/land use entitlements. 
However, as the purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to provide consistency with the 
adopted Transportation System Plan (TSP), only the weekday p.m. peak hour operations are 
applicable to the TPR analysis. 
1 The City of Madras Technical Memorandum #2B contains traffic study guidelines that identify study area 
intersections as those that experience a 10 percent volume increase as a result of a proposed land use 
action. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December 2009 
ESTIMATED RESIDENTIAL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
•Sjpi K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc. 
I s ^ J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December 2009 
r 
8 S- I i 
V 
ESTIMATED ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRIP DISTRIBUTION PATTERN 
MADRAS, OREGON 
I S p j K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . 
I S f c ) TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
Imagery obtained from maps.google.com 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment December 2009 
b 
1 
e 
9-
£ 
TEV=TOTAL ENTERING VOLUME 
TOTAL ADDITIONAL WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR TRIP POTENTIAL 
MADRAS, OREGON 
Imagery obtained Irom maps.google.com 
•Sjpi K i t t e l s o n & A s s o c i a t e s , Inc . 
Is^J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING / PLANNING 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
December 10, 2009 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 10 
Jefferson County traffic study requirements identify that a Level of Service "C" or higher should 
be maintained at all County intersections. The City of Madras TSP identifies a target Level of 
Service (LOS) "D" for signalized intersections, LOS "E" for unsignalized intersections (or LOS F 
with a volume-to-capacity ratio below 0.95). 
Study Periods 
The purpose of the Transportation Planning Rule is to ensure that the proposed zone change will 
continue to be consistent with the system planning required under OAR 660-12. To assess 
consistency, the horizon analysis period is selected based on the horizon period of the adopted 
Transportation System Plan. The Jefferson County TSP considers a horizon year of 2027 and the 
City's TSP assesses year 2020 conditions. Accordingly, the applicable horizon period will vary 
throughout the study area based on roadway jurisdiction. All traffic volume forecasts will be 
obtained from the applicable TSP or based on continued application of the approved growth rates 
where otherwise unavailable. Table 2 summarizes the study intersections, roadway jurisdiction, 
applicable performance standards, and horizon analysis year required for compliance with the 
TPR.2 
Table 2 Summary of Intersection Performance Standards 
Intersection Jurisdiction 
Traffic 
Control1 
Performance 
Standard 
Horizon 
Period 
Ashwood Road/ 
Bean Drive 
Jefferson County TWSC LOS C Year 2027 
Ashwood Road/ 
City View City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v /c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
B Street / 
Kinkade Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v /c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
B Street / 
Ashwood Road City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v /c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
B Street / 
10 th Street City of Madras TWSC 
LOS E/ 
v /c < 0.95 
Year 2020 
'TWSC: Two-way stop-control led (unsignalized) 
Recent or Upcoming Roadway Improvements 
There are three identified public improvement projects within the vicinity of the property. 
• The J Street improvements will include traffic signal upgrades at the US 97 northbound 
and southbound couplet, realignment of the southern couplet terminus, and roadway 
widening. The J Street project is identified on the Draft 2010-2013 State Transportation 
Improvement Program (STIP) and is likely to be funded by the horizon period (note that 
2 Additional discussion on applicable horizon periods can be found within Section 3.2.01 of ODOT's 
publication Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) Reviews: Guidelines for Implementing OAR 660-12-0060, which 
can be found at the following link: http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TDfrP/docs/TPR/tprGuidelines.pdf. 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Madras Elementary School UGB Amendment 
December 10, 2009 
Project #: 10028.0 
Page 11 
while the improvement is likely to occur, a reasonably likely determination has not been 
provided by ODOT). 
• The Fairground Road extension is identified as a new east-west route within the City of 
Madras on the Transportation System Plan. Similarly, the roadway extension is likely to 
be provided within the planning horizon. 
• The City View to J Street connection has been recently completed. This new connection 
provides convenient and direct access from the proposed lands to US 97. 
The recent construction of the City View connection will provide convenient access to the south. 
The future funding and reasonably likely determinations for the J Street 
realignment/improvements and the Fairgrounds extension are not critical to the proposed UGB 
amendment as it will not affect the selection of study intersections, assumed intersection 
configurations, or result in modifications to the demand-based regional trip distribution patterns 
included herein. As a result, to be conservative, neither the J Street realignment/improvements 
nor the Fairgrounds extension will be assumed in the traffic analysis. 
NEXT STEPS 
Please provide written comments or concurrence on the proposed analysis scope at your earliest 
convenience. If you have any questions on these materials please call us at (541) 312-8300. 
Attachments 
1. Residential Density Development 
2. Bend - La Pine School District Elementary School Trip Generation Study 
3. City of Madras Roadway Classification Map 
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Bend, Oregon 
Attachment "9" 
Proposed R-2 Zoning 
LOS Worksheets 
U 4-1 tx- c >, qj rn l E 73 
^ £0 « 
TF) LD C OJ ^ O 
U OTJ o x c in (J o trt £0 o 
>. CJ ^ H •H <0 
c 4-> «>-• 0 C ID V) 0) M 
RH £ H Q) Q) 
U r-i —I •U UJ ro 
c c: .-j 
1>J CC UP 
Cw d) <u > O oj c. cj 
I U U CC » 
co o ^ <N 3 o - o O 10 t 
1 1 £ 
S "O 
r0 '—I 4-J •H O -H O O T3 
O X C trt U O 
1ft M U < >. o M! H -H 
ro C W W O C <G ifj 0) VJ G E-« o) a> 4-1 j—I '—I +J U1 (C 
i -M 4-» 15 Q V, D> ; d> O SI 0) -.H 3 £ n) Q. D.,C -M ^ o a-H -H 4-1 3 C ) ll E ^ ^ m O O • ID H h H fli oi U 
QJ ro e TJ 
7j ^ 
» £H lf> to O C <U 3 O 4-» <H U H U -H O H U O TJ 
O JZ C o u o 
0) to U t > u M H C 4-J Uw O C TO 
W U J-l 
E h O) a) 
+ 
1 O o 1 o o o O o o 
IC 1 O 1 o 
+ TJ 1 "D 1 » f r - U + c r a* ai 1 
3 r 4J -a O 1 
(N o r u 3 ] 
0) (N m r -H r~< O o 1 VD o O o CP o E- i 6 u O J CD o CD CO «J 4-) 1 S-l c 1 
cu + + l/J i a> 1 
a) 1 CU 
4J i o o 1 CO o CO O CO VO 
C a» i 1 OJ o r>j rn 
O 03 \ O 1 m m m 
CP 0) n i r 
<1' > + Jj U -H + ifi GO o J-i -C i o o i ID o m O o ID OJ P fO a) JZ (X r O [ n o m m 
o O C + >i > 4-1 "D 1 T3 T i 
o (0 ac u + V c i A) a) i 1-1 fO a< u i JJ "D 
w A; U x) Q. a) o 1 4-J 3 i 
TJ 03 U rH ro 0) <u CO 1 -H o o r en en O o cr. 4-J ro 0) C rf. + U u E- i e u O 1 o VD 
o s cu a V + I u c i 
(1) <u 0) > + w 1 <u i 
en 32 a: E ro J-I ft i O 1 O CU 3 o fl) UJ i o o i o G o o o o u U c > <u £/) + i i o 
O CU c > o + a i O 1 
in (1) ft H > —f i i 
1 e "O .UJ + * ro a) O i-i "D O u 
C <u U W •<H ID i o o l cr> o CT> o o a\ 
u 0) 0j 3 3 4J VH <u + CC i O 1 o vo 
o c £ Et a - u •H a) > *a i <u 1 
t-H E D J-I > <u c 1 i a) ] 
O o Ut + i U < + P i ro T5 
OJ 03 <0 u o ] .c J to LD C flQ 1 Cu G o 1 a j o CD o o CO 
<u D o 0) TJ + H i U O 1 CN o CN (N 
CN 4-5 o O + JJ + ^ 1 4-» c J LO IT) ID OJ 03 4-J H .c <1> + + 4-) 1 -H 1 
•H O •H > 4-> + <1> 1 •—1 
C u O Ti M O U + Jj O i a o o 1 m o <n o tTi 
<0 o .c c a) £ 4J + <v in 1 (f) 1 m o m m to U o to to 0) t O I to W u CO + * * u i 1 
•H < U-l c JZ + 4-J u u o o + JJ + t ) 
lu <S J-I •H •H t o o 1 O o o o O o fO 4-1 .—I 4-> N * a: i O 1 O 
c 4-J U-i a> nj 4J * a "D i a) 1 
o c nj > u o c i tn tt) i 
ff) (1) U a) U + <U * o CD 3 I ro •0 o ( 
—1 B E- CL + o + O 1 -C 3 1 
(1) 01 o +J ffi 1 cu •—i o o 1 o o o o o o 4-1 H Ifi + i u o r o t-i U ro s i J-> c i 
•<H U U 1 -H r 
to O X m u a i 
fO h O i a o o 1 o o o o C o 
M o + 2 1 KTi 1 o 
"D O + 1 o I 
fO o 4 O 1 1 
E OL * <v (U + <l) c CO 1 l •—i o o a> 1 \ 3 aj 4J 
•H o >, e 1 c l TJ to 3 
4-» O o U 1 a) 1 O T5 m ft lu o « e 2 JZ j j a) 1 £ <—' < o n 
o •H •—1 U c M 1 O •—i > H 
CO E- iB 4J ro <U 1 o •3) tf Q) > sz ro ro 
u a E i; o E i ^ 4-> [0 | E u •<H T5 T> •H 
CJ •A -H <v u <1) i x : <l) I 3 <D s 4J 0) <v 4J Jj u If) 4J U| Q. > 1 c CP c IX C 1 H n O -H *a T5 •H 
s c > O a 4J a . o 1 o •H M + ro I o ro u C T5 T5 c 
cu + U o + l/l <c 1 o E > ^ I > £0 13 M < < 
o in o O o CJ o 0 ] O 0 O 0 1 O O O O 0 0 < 0 IN CT\ o o 1 0 O [ O O O 0 4-J 
J r- I O 0 + o 1 O 1 O O O a 
1 1 * 0 3 o ID O r-f o o 0 a\ O CD 1 r- r- iD O 0 0 03 0 o cr. a\ tTi o o C3"i | ID KO m 10 U? 0 X 1 r- CI 1 r- r- •H •"-1 o •"-1 •-• 1 0 O 1 0 * 0 O •-• •-• h U-i 
o ID o •T o o TT I <31 O r- i r- r- iD 0 0 0 03 Ch * 0 (G o a^  ID ID c o ID 1 m VO a? VO | n U? 0 + Lb ki m fn m j r- cn | r- r- t-< o .—1 1 O 0 1 0 0 O ^ 2 X 
O -H o in r* o r- o o R- J 0 VO •T r-i [ r- r- «N OJ 0 CN tu to U-i o en m fn o o m 1 ifi cn C-t 10 | 0 ID 0 hJ I r- iD 1 0 O U TO o 1 0 O 1 0 O O r-« H H 
1 1 E- 4-J 
o in m o ro o o m j 0 KO cn 1 r- r- (N OJ 0 (N {Q R-1 * 0? o cn r- r- o o r- 1 ID a\ VO 0 1 0 u*> 0 .—1 j r- 0 O 0 O o I rH 0 O 0 0 O 4J 0 
1 i o ID o o o o o 0 1 O 0 O 0 ! 0 0 O 0 0 O < 0 + TJ O o O. o o I u~> 0 O 1 0 0 O 0 TO 1 R- 1 0 O + 10 O 1 O 1 0 0 O C Q) a) /-« 
0 T» o ID m o m o o m i 0 m (N r- 1 m ID •D in 0 ID U 0 •H •O o cr\ r- r- o o r- 1 ID CD <N (N n 0 •H j r- M 1 00 CO o 1 0 O I 0 0 O OJ (N 1 I + tj •0 1 J + O C o ID VO o o o V0 J 0 ro \£> iD 1 n LO iD iD 0 LTJ U 0 If) ro o cr. ID o o iD J ID CD VD <N { CN ir> VO 0 r-« to ID ID ID 1 1— CD CO < > o t-H 1 0 r-* (••J 1 0 0 O <N R-* f-J M 
I 1 U CP ro o LTJ i-l o t~f o o t-H J O ro <N cn l m m iD U-1 O iD O c u o CTi o o TT J ID CO r- 1 c-a m VO O •H c 1 r- 00 a> a) O i—r 1 R-* 0 O J 0 0 O (N (N S E 
+ 0 <i) P •—s o iD O o O o o O 1 O 0 O 0 i 0 0 O O O O < O w o C3"i o o 1 ifi 0 O L 0 0 O O CO 1 r~ 1 O O 0 (0 o •—1 1 O 1 " O 0 O 0 ro 1 ( 0J + O-J VH 1 1 •—1 T> o iD O o O o o O 1 <D O 0 O 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 rf O N3 o cr. o o J •—1 ID 0 O 1 TJ O 0 O 0 £ 1 d r- 1 O • O O o .—1 /-> ] •Q -H R-* O 1 2 O 0 0 1 
1 0 I <D o ID O o O o o O J X 0 O O 0 1 CO 0 0 O O O O < O CD o cn o o 1 iD O O 1 •<H O 0 O O r- CI 1 2 r- L to • O O 0 O o I-F 1 0 —< O 1 > 0 0 O O 
•—1 0 lu 1 ro + X •—L IT 1 c a -r*> QJ CD 0) •—1 o e 1 JJ < <0 .—i a T) .C > £ o a l 0 •• -U | a) 0 ro JZ < 0) O G> •H •r*> 3 > •—i 1 •H d) <u ro I > •• > >. u a> •—1 > s cr •H T) • i—I T5 •r*> -r*> 0 J 4-J C E CO 1 JJ u 0 0 N > a> N > * 'W •r*> < -C- o 4-» a) T> TJ > 1 ro ro 4J 1 •H ro 2: V <U N p .—{ > + >4-1 O < > o u < < •—i 1 U J W to •—i T 0 O c E > QJ ro J-i I-) p 3 ro J 0 \ 3 <a ro 1 ro \ 4J 0) 3 A3 u a M M a <13 [u lu T> TJ u u. G ) JJ JJ c c 1 a n M <U H •—1 <v •r*> to S H In X 01 a) u J "H 1 ro ra TJ (0 •<H 1 ro 0 M H O a) CO T5 Q u o OJ CU a: a: a> 1 to tn ELI | u > L> ID > a N ft X 
-J U"> IS) o o C i <JI CJ o o O C; CD C." X X J3 C'l t 
J-. fn CD O CD o o o O O - R"! C: >; X O ^ 
C * 
CO •C c^  o •ji "J -Xi O UN O X X O O i 
1 3T ui X 
N A 
< 
ra' X M X X ;< N X ^ X X X - X J- .X t (L. .ti :< X X X X X X X X t-W X V' x X X X X X X X X X X X ft 
RO >; X X X X X X X + Q U) X y. X X X X X X X y. X X X X :<! X A, O Z1 X X X X X X X X < X N X * X X X X x * £ Z o 
X y. X :< X X X X X X X x » Y) 
IN 3 «M P X X X >: >: X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X * j o o a 3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A CJ o I/) X _i o r. X r. X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X N X X X - c-J W >: X X X X X X X X :< X X >; X X X X -» E--U X) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
'G 03 A1 
IJ RO G) P 
U £ A. P o <1 x X y y. X X X X X y. X X X X r. X X X X X X X -» O X e "D A' P X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X .X X X CN o Ci. VL o > u y. X x X v. x X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X. X X + •O 
P © x -H o X X X X >: ;< X X X X X X X X + A> 
O cu c >. Or 4-» P S X X X X X X X X X X X X X V, X X X X - iii 1/1 a> <0 0) ro y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X V. X X X X -» I "D E c <u "5 IJ VJ + U c 01 VJ tn a) --1 6 0) 0) O c «-• o c a O «-i 4J .. o r-\ £ t—1 si. CD •H a! L+H c a o CC Qj JJ O1 JJ c u eg CD « IT? UJ i—1 3 a ri •H o (0 U c c. ^ e v QJ CP <M £ Vl 0) 0) o o o <D 3 cr> a M Vl O" c <y 0 <-J P -H •H a *—i + JJ 1—1 Q O" tn o •a: 
CO f0 <-H p 4J o o + A> o a o O CP 3 tr L» o -H H> > * a M O > Vl CP <5  V) o CP c u O •D 4-» E + ^ D m •—i c JZ o "D JJ O Cu c rtj o x c A (j a> + j-i O o 4J Cu Vl a> 4J CT a* c P 'H •"D (0 o o D-X u -» w D. Vi 2 ill <y 3 3 c H H Ql O p X V) \n o e A D & c a o p Vl •H a •J] ra ra c 3 •H < o O U + xz o ro a o a a> Vl JZ ro V m , O Vj > o u c 3 u ai (1) •• a -I o o 4-1 3 i/i :> O U. u -H O lu ID c e O D 0) u L+H i—1 •D H -J 4J ro "O <SJ 4. N fD •H 2 O 4J c c o O a> a •H 3 w c -H 3 c w Vl + CO 
A« » P Q> ^ E- Vl f0 -H -H J-L a c en Vl o •r\ a; c a; 3 O + o o c fD —i + <y V CD CC u ro a> or O •H c JZ 4-1 U e •o o (0 0> Vi "A + a <0 li C 10 W I E- c: Cb w in tn •H H a Vl 4-1 •o c \ 1—1 e E-> ro + M 0) 0) <D 0) 3 C C J 1—1 o O' o c > ro C (0 Vl (0 < ro * a> 0) P P Qj 0) c c o U tj 3 o o 4J a Vl •H CP UJ Vl p ra 3 tu * 
P r—1 r—I a) -» W tj M fij 1TJ 1—1 O D O c H a 3 Vl C 3 c a -o a 
4J CJ a a> 3) O ^  Cu E- E— a> I—i <0 JJ to o JJ Vl •H e H tu •q 4-1 + •H CL, e r—1 CL, to 0) > riJ D1 o --i X < 3 c (0 a> f CQ a O^  c c 4J AJ a u. Vt •H 4-1 O •H 4-1 ro E-« <y -f in 0> o 0) E- > C 1-i M >, CP VL ro M ra m ) a > 3 c E + M •H £ •H -H 3 0) 4) o c a> c JZ CC <> U a fl) 0) •H O Vl P 4J "D > O •H C j-l W CT E- i-q -H o. o cu 'O I—i <0 o VL ^ 3 3 (0 * o fC t- 0) a o a> Vi V) 0) a> o 3 CP JZ E-> Hi 3 * T OJ G) a> a c -P <4-1 4-1 a> o s 4J M 3 0) a 'J >-3 •r-i .« d IJ) * c JZ C M a nj O O Q, D. c •u 0) •H 0) u I—i a> o <0 O 4J 
*-> a> u m o -J 0) a 1—1 Qj 4J 3 o •H c. tn Vl 0) '+-( Hi < * CO 
f • a> c c to O u. a. c a x: c c RO c 4' c 
O c M lw '4-1 o o c 0} D a 3 tn o c o u ro fo X 0) LD > a o o •O •H -H V-l "O a- CP C o •«H M rl >J -H • Of 'J -J •H c P 4-1 D 0) c c c c c c a P 3 E 3 * 
<0 4J •H M M -P Vl M t- 4-) •H -rJ E- M •H Vl Vl a M JJ o- o 3 C.' T >J o <11 nj o W a' a) (0 O O in « « D^  to <T> o< o 0 O 3 c ro a> , a; o a' o a tx P 3 O o p a JJ a. o cr-a a *-> a E £ o o '4-1 a a to a. <H X o o Vl c C a >, u a 3 3 •o M U a> "O a a 0 m o Vl CU H -H H jy » 
T rtl u < w o Z Z < Cu Cu >-3 ti: o o w o W f j X CL CU 71 S .i -
o o n 
+ A X X A X O r :< X X X X X X o O o o o O CM 
cc o X A X X X X X X X X x o O o o o A A o 4J 
r + "D c X X A X y, X X X >'. X X X X X X X X X X X ^  ^ ^ rH --i A A o + 3 a 
> 
3 o i o A 0) T3 
>: X X X X X X A A * Ci p 3 <D 03 <N CO o 6f O O o 3 o m o o o c o o X cr> o CT\ o o cr> o •Z, o E- o E- O 2 A o o o o o o X V£> o VH o o o < X 
fl) 4-1 o X CL( w <1) 1 A c ^ ^ rH rH ^ X o rH o ^ ^ o 
A A r f 
* E-« of. <4-1 <M <N A in o o o o o >: cr> O cr\ o o cr> A o 2 ro c E- o o o o o o X V£> o vo o o o Vl o o J r X E-« CP o o o a» A z X M o 
CD o Vj E- i—1 <N A X o o o o o o X. o o o A o 0> d-i <SJ 3 -> cc o cc i—1 X o o o o o o CT» X o a> o o a-. o rJ o O Vl •o A. X X A CJ ro o CC) X o X l—l <—1 O X O iH o E- H ro a + 3 l A <D X A A l- p u. 41 O "D I—f / "O ro « 03 C\J CD o 4P o o A o 3 o X O o o o o o X o vo o o M> A A o CD p <0 a) E- o E- O z <—1 X o o o o o o Os X' o cr. o o cn o ft 
U 
<D 
CL c o * 4-1 [/> a: A U c X X ,J l-i ^  i—l r-! ^ O X x ^ o ^ ^ o A t-< ; o o o 
•M S -H *o 0) + fD 1 o A A + X <N O OJ 4-1 o > f U3 X o C-l X X X X X X X X X o o O o o o "O u Vl P tD xz •H + 5< X X X >: X X y. o o o o o A "D o <1) w O OJ c P P + >A o W X X X X X X X y. X <D (0 tn 
\ 
a> £ TO "O 3 a 01 s r0 -r cz + X 0) X X X X X X X X X X ^  ^ ^ ^ O 
4-1 ro o -* c <D rH *D P ^ + 4-1 3 o "O 
TH C o o tn * a: <N <N O Vl o o o o o o CO cr» o OP o m n P o •H •D a 0} u c 4J , CC o E- m o cn o o o o cr» cn o CO o Cl CO O O ..A o £ 3 o •—I + •D J V V < E 
TH < "D •H tf C o o o o c o o (1) P 3 1 1—1 V 0) V D *A 
CM £0 v> <—l 03 0) + O © •O o c w c -H £ 5 CO —1 a; CM CM CD 0 o V o 3 o M o o o o o o CO <n o •D o m m V o £0 1TJ <u a o ro 0) 3 E- 3 o E- rH TH O z rH m o cr, o o o o cr> cn o Ci cn CO o to 
C-J •H 4J CL, r-f + 4J x: "O J V U V >, 
<N TO •iH r—1 O 4J <D a O o * > f 
J_J 3 1 o T. <D V c l-i ^ o r 1 rH o o ^ o ^ o o V * Vl ro 
C O o "O E O c: eg -H eg o o o o o o CO a> o 00 o in d o c p iTJ o xz c 0) U <D 1 4-) m c E- 3 r-l V tj\ o o o o tj\ cr> o CO o CTK CO V o •r| c •"D w u o o •x W J o o J *D .—1 A> 
tn W U •ri 3 + •H O V o o O o o o V V £ •H < > o +J + x: - p - s - 4> o M a U o 3 > P - ro - 0) - CI) V Q L3 Vl V o CU 4- N X o -r-i eg <—1 X H X x X x X X X o o o o o 3 o U ro <M V) CM N . CC o X -G -H V 3 >.' 3 X ;< X X X X o o o o o X, V V o CO c •p <w + V I—i X tf T3 X •D X X X X X X X X o o to o c ro >4-1 c X V O X O X y. X X X X X E V V o o CQ 
(ft a) Vl o 3 1 P o c A> E Z X X X X X X X CN iH 
£ + O o V •o V •o 
<1> a) «—i P tn X o CM a? o dp o o o 3 o 0) X •O X X y. X X X X X o o o o o o o ro 4J .-i a) w E- CD o X 4J rH o 2 V i—1 <n M x X X X X X X o o o o o 4J V V o u E P w ro > x: C X TO u ro X < X X X X X X o •H 4J 0) CO X Vl V c U X X X, x X X X X X t-< p V V o M m O CO u 1 >-3 o 3 Cu + n> E- O X o 4-> CM V •I—L X O X X X X X X X x o o o o o V V o CO VJ •z •a X <0 «—1 •q x -H X X X X X X X X o o o o o 4J o r- <•-1 *o J a» o X to V < >'. P X •A X X X c V V o o TO ST P X X RJ V. X X X X X y. R-< 0) o o 
c - tn 3 - 4J 3 a "d Vl E-^  4J 
- M 3 
f~> f-«T-| •r~< 
- £ 
4J 
tn •O © 
x o <y 
•H *a a VI c X •H M M X Gi p — tt) •O •o -D -o •o •o *D -D 3 <D a Vl rH 
4J < 3 a s X X <D X 0) o MJ W w -n rf < < < < a. rX, < 4-1 >: ri xz P O Vl T3 <D \ N. a-o > p TO < •o •n "D ro o + -r| u c V) M o W -H R—1 > cr- a (1) •r-i Vl M O w xz < CP a -o <D •p 4J 4-» 4J c Cu •r-i ro D) a ID c a a ro c 4J E- 0-i tn a< a a-o a) C P fS •r-i ro ru ro TO rH LW o 
+ O £ o V) o 3 > 41 T/> 3 o — o 0) •—I t/i T3 -D •H w w W w o 32 to H V) <U G) <D « 0) If) a) •o .X i—1 E-> JJ •O a rU cn ro H c AC Vl a p > X c C c X C in X ro M W A> <4-1 U cc E - I E > M M tn 0) X> w tn rH >~H o CP I-H 
E a O U ro TO Vl M TO 3 Vl c u — u c a) Vl <0 3 Vi E-E- <D y tn c 0) o •H 0) 
D. •f < 2 X vj J * O r>P (J CL. CD < u W X J X O Cu CD < A: Qj a 5: A. Q u TO a X 
C 
<£ 
c 
O 5 
O •73 
A3 
IT •R 
u X CU 
O £ 
CN o 
VJ 
O CU T > I a- ft 
I £ 
RJ c A 
A: A> o e 
rt! 
O 
03 if) C 
0) o fN -H (N RO 4-J 
-H -rH c O C "C ro o x c 
TO u O 
TN t/i 
-<-T < 
> U 
U -T! IJ -1-1 
A3 V? 
"4H o fO to 0} i-i 
E E-
A) a; 
4-J r-t U! (C •H 
u: Vi C 
ro <y .J IJ 
3 3 a. iJ 
• o a. m --fij 01 Q) 
— u 
• > > —I «3 kj 
O •—I 4' > a) in 
•Jt at 
ru V 
JZ 3 
• O O O O : 
O O O O O O fJ < 
LO o O r O o o CI o <y> o O a LD o r- o r- o cn 
tc o (N O <N o G\ o o •a- LD CO 1 fN ro KD o CO JJ CD "O a) r- r- r~ r- o 
0) c 10 aj O o o 1 •• O O o CN r-i o 
0) CD CO 3 I rj I at fN 
M ro o JZ 3 -U tn OJ o O ir- o LO o o LO o iO o LD a O LD 1 <u o tr ro A? 1 3 «-" LO o r- o r~ u Ol u o CO o 00 o CTl o o o O o 1 H LO CD n 1 73 CM ro <x> o o 
x Li C m ro ro 1 3 r- 1 o • i- r-•rt O 1 "D o I X O o o RJ CD ij I 1 O ! LT| 
o a o o (N o CVJ o o C-J o LO in o UL o o LO 1 E o CO n 1 10 TH LO o r~ o r~ u a\ 
Z to Ir. o LD LD o A\ LO LD o o LO iT) CO T1 1 -H (N n o r-C-, o I i r- CN I to • r~ r- o 
u 
a> a) aj o I O o o t >. O o o (N <N o 
c 
o 
J0 o >i a) E c 3 0) to U 3 o —i O OJ 
I U< I ro 1 c 
I < •J} 
0) —1 u, •O JZ > 
CD 
0.' I> ra 0) O •a CO ro h, o > 5 r: I dl o ra JZ < 0) o a >: 
« Z x: JJ a) X < o H ) f ro I > - u 0) > Cr •H r U c M O > t-< —1 •o o to 1 i-' U a u > 0) > nJ JJ ro a> o m O 0) > ro ro < ~o O M O •O T> i ro I ro >" 0) Q —I > 
A E <U o E u 4-J E JJ -H •O "D ••H cr, > o 'J < 75 J u '-n c E >1 01 -O ro co •H ij a) JJ x a> 3 <1» -U d' 4-J 3 3 u I xj 0) 3 ro M (N 14 ij to VJ a > c a- c ai c cn o •H •O ~o at •o w u. c 0) -i 0) co X t-C >- G a -U a o o •i-i •H + ro o ro u C ~o ~o c o X X aj 0 (J J 1 'V F "3 o M M O Q) to V Q u i . w-1 o CO s o OS 2 i-3 i> CD ID < < o rw cu cr, OJ s Ls- 1 'O u! 1 u > U o > a 3 < ia X 
c u"; o*. r-iD r~ f i i—i 
R- - LD o o 
o o o o c _-
o o 
* 1 o o o o o o o o r o o J o o r o o o o o o (N OS 1 o o . o o 1 <x> r co r- 4J •n 1 I * T3 c 1 o ^ o o o o 1 1 f 1 o o ! r-i o C>J o Ol o 3 a 3 o i t f 1 t r P u p 
<V m I r- ro o LH O r- LD CD ro [ CD 1 CM 1 ID vo £N a\ o "O E- 1 LO o [ rH 1 LD I vo CO X ro o 4-J CD • o CTl i • o ID o •<-t cu JZ u I * CO 0) 1 o c 
1-1 O c o i «-< i 1 I
 1-1 CN fN t- <M at K c r- o LT) O LO CD ro 1 a> CTl 1 <N ( Ul f"> v£> Cl a\ ro 2 ro C i o • VD r- 1 H 1 LD i CO M c CO • o cn O LD o H cn 0) 1 o O o o 1 i-t T-t (N CN a1 3 z X Li at o -.-I CD o M 3 t r- o O o o LO f o CO ( 00 I r~ r- LO r>] a\ c. to IV 3 c* CC t o » O o o 1 <N t ID i r^  o ID rl o O o 1 iN r-i ro 'if U ro o tn X o c r o o a 1 i—i I —1 <N OJ H M ro o + 3 t 1 1 u o o i 1 r ^ "O ro CN m t r- fO o t? o o o ID 1 o CO 1 CD t? i r~ r- ID CN CTl o to +J ro a> X E- i o • o o o 1 <N 1 ID i r- O ID u s: cu u JJ o f-H I CN CN m tr O o 0) (0 1 o o o r-1 1 >-t <N OJ 4J o o •r-j X T) <U + + ro l 1 I JZ <N O Cu O > id 1 o o o o CD o o o 1 o O 1 o O r o o O o O o TJ u k 4-J X -H ( o o - o o o 1 <N 1 VO r- <y to O a. c >t VJ 4J o • o o t O O o o o CO LO ro O <1  ro 1 o o o o { I-i Ci OJ c cu 1 v> a s c cu "O i at M o TJ c 4) o in Q) ( o CN O o o r- Ol 1 CO r- t <N O iD ro r- iD •H TJ o 0) 0) c l-J CC 1 CO o • o o o 1 1-t 1 ID ) vo CD Hi •<-t O s c n a + T3 CO • T-H CTl 1 • iD <x> CD X n r£ o •H c r o o o r i—i OJ OJ O m '/) •H 4-J 4J O 0) - + p o i i i i 1 I u o TJ c (0 a c ro M 6 + CO I ul CO o (N O o o <J\ 1 CO r C'j O fO D ro r- lD CO ro 0) o 4J 0) 3 e- I CO o • O o o 1 •-> 1 LD i ^ CO to (N i_> •H 3 a 4-J Z JZ CD » cn i • ID vo CO < >» <N ro •H o 4-J •H (X E o O > + CU + cu + 4-J 3 1 o i o o 1 .-1 1 ! 1-1 C~—' ^ OJ OJ a< C u o T3 O X + o 1 LD o <N O o o r- cn r oo r- 1 <N O ro iD ro LD c ro o JZ C (J o <1> 4J + to i m o • O o o r i-i [ LD i ir- CD -H c to u o X n to + CD « cn i iD vo CO 0) so co u -o 3 1 o O o iH T-H OJ E -•H < (U o 4-J -C T O 4} >t o o 3 4-J -r Q lu •-a M •<-t -1-t o U* r^ + 1 o o o o o o o o 1 o o 1 O O ( o o O a o O UJ ro "4H ro M cc I o o • O o 1 <N I VD 1 CO CO c 4J "4H jj + "O O • o o i o O o o O o CO o c ro at tt) + c 1 o O o o [ r-l CN eg o ro V) a> u a tt) + 3 I i 1 C-J M e H ^ + o i l 1 TJ a» Q) 0) J-> + M 1 o ro o O O o o o o I o c r o O 1 o o O o o O ro 4J (M ro u -1-t + to + X E- 1 o o • o o • o o o o 1 <N 1 o 1 vo o 1 CO o o o o X 
> s 4-J 1 o o o o 1 .-• OI i (0 o M cn + i< 1 1 I lD ro H a) o 1 o o o o o o o o 1 o o 1 o o 1 o o o o o o CD co + s ( o o • o o o 1 <N [ VO J CO r- r) 
~O t-H •J o • o 1 o o o o o o o ra VJ 1 o t-i o o o 1 i-H CN OJ o 
X O 
I C o + 1 a' <y .. 1 •• 1 VJ I u 1 u u 
o 
CO <i> 0) 1 H CL VJ u 73 a) 1 o CL t o A i o a 0 a O A 
> »-• + 1 o >. o > < p 1 4-J X 1 4-J X 1 u JZ -p 4-J X >; -<-t a» U + x: 4-J 1 >H 4J E M cu 1 u 4-J 1 o 4-J 1 o 4-J 0 JJ u 4-J S-4 i-3 0) -w u c i (J 1-H O ro ro U 3 1 .15 o i ro ID I ro o m ID ro CO f—1 (0 + N o | -N. ro ro 0) 0) < a 1 U. r^  1 Ui CO 1 u cr> Ui a\ u. cn VJ o 
U 4, o e 1 C > Ui k M >> r A® 1 EF JC 1 rfc eP ^ RTP A. ra M CU -K M tu 1 <V C7< 4J 4-J H <N « X r-i r x CN I JZ <N X OJ M a 
•-1 » a > i cu M o • • to V) U X 1 4-J X 1 4-" X i i-> X 4J X 4J X t-
X c + a o 1 VJ M M r-i & a ro <N u t o U r LO (J l o U ID (J 00 U OJ 1 I-1 + I o < a. C* 3 ZD (M C* X I r- X 1 CO X 1 cr> X Ol X Ol X 
U XJ 
Cu C >. dl fO 
-row ci u c tt) 3 o U H ro -1 4-» n O >r1 U O "O 
OT CO U 
« >.0 
u T> 
• I-i T5 a« 4-' G > (U x •-< 
•o -rt < 
ro •r-i Ll £ ro ai 3 u a n m o o 
> o u U O D 0) O fu CO CN 
f-; 1 i o o o cr o o o 0 1 * o o 1 X i 1 
A 1 i ,-t ,-i o x o r-i o 1 A i) 1 i 1 "D 1 i 1 a 1 i o o ^ 1 H 1 X i o o o V*J> J- J A o: 1 X i 1 
o 1 i ^ 1 
A 
or. V A X i X X X X o o o 1 A o Q x 1 i X X X X cr- o o o 1 o 
•< i A X X 1 A v i * i X >' X x >• x 1 o 
•A 
A Q 
/" i j X X X N o o o o J / to o X i j X X X X X o o o o 1 o rJ X A i i X X X 1 A i X i X X X X X >: X 1 c> C A a> i i X X X X ;< X X 1 
ri CO o o 0 o o i LO i o o o o o o m 1 o 
£•« o <—| i ! o o O o o o o o r- t o A U i 1 X 1 O c i I o o 1-4 o 1 A i 1 1 A (N.' i 1/1 I o o o o o X o in o o vn 1 o i 1 o o o o o r- o o r- 1 13 o G> j i 1 X 1 if If: a1 j 1 X o o I 4-J x: o iT> 0> z 3 O X CN o r 1 x X X X X o o o o o 1 jJ o •H r^  :< j X 1 X X X X X X X CD o o o o I u o X v i 1 X X X X 1 V < X r X 1 X X X X X X X r o 6 ai i 1 X X X X X X X I / •c i 1 1 o X O cc-o o o V o i X 1 X X X X X X o o o o o 1 V o If: c o i X 1 X X >: X X X X o o o o o 1 o tn X u i 1 X X X X X 1 V V < x c i 1 X X X X X 1 o . o V i 1 1 V V cn o C-l i 1 >: X X X X X X o o o o o 1 o 3 V i X 1 X X X V. X X X o o o o i V V o o T3 i X 1 X X X X X X 1 <—1 x O V i 1 X X X N X X X V V o 3 - 2f — Q) G v - Q a) V V D u: 1 H o m o o o o o> o CO o 1 3 o o 1 3 } :i o o o o o cr> J*. o CO o cr> CD 1 TJ V V o j.. 
< 1 TJ 1 TJ 1 o 1 0 1 O o o o o o o 1 s \ o c a> 1 X 1 2! 1 CN V T> 1 1 1 M • / V D5 -H cr-oW o o o a o 1 <D 1 T- r J o o o o •-C CD G CD o UT 1 o o o p j j o V J <0 l V o cn o o o o (T> cn o CD o Jl CD t 4-1 V V o O >3 CO u 1 TO » < 1 o M V J o 1 o tH <—1 O o O o o I ro \ / V M j i a ( (u CC <N <N V u 1 o o f) o o o CO o U) 1 V V CJ E~ ro J o LD 1 -H o c o o o o CTl o CD o CO 1 u o r-o CO V i < I 4-« r c V V o 
( i ro O o o rH C3 o i a) — M — E o 1 3 t 4-1 a 1 u •r 1 Hi "a <L) CO a (0 c u X a: 4-J a> 1 ro •n "O "D T) 1 3 0) a Li 3 a 1-4 3 sx X X a' N <u U 1 >M Cl 1 to •r~i < a; 4-> >, o TJ OJ N N Q. TD > 4-J 1 ro i "D 1 U ro E- o H 
13 to "-C > cr a 01 •r-C M 1 (0 CJ 1 « SZ Q v. 1 Cl' tu o a ro c -M f- UJ 10 CJ. 1 CL 1 0, 0) c 1 -» <-H to o 3 > tt; •H to 1 o 1 O •H > a* (Y; U IJ1 1 > "O fa TJ ro <11 HI !/? D 10 0) TJ A; ro 4-J E~ 1 j J X "D u cl 1 ''j c < ^ a c c in X ro M 0) a' "H u cC i s: > ro 'Ji v.: r - o CP i—I H ro IZ CJ ro L. ro u C x I U U 01 M ro 3 o t" o 0) >-3 qfc a: j u CP to Cu CO o t*l dp 1 X vi 1 X X <3 nl -I cu X X u. 1 Q u to Ci 
1 m -r 
-r <11 -r 
ro •V cu 
•f 
C •V o •r a» a> t M -r CO o M CN 3 -> O O O X •V ro at Ll J>! •0 RJ -> 4J to 0) o X CU •f U) o •r~i X CM O CU 0) •f Li 4J c O Or c >, ro + in a ro i—i 1 e -a TJ M c OJ 0) u tt) <D a o c E » + 
< to -r o Li CN CO to ra to 13 c u •f a> ZD o •V 4-J •H <M CN ro 4-> o •H o •H •r c. o o TJ Ll (0 o xz C 0) 10 o o Z3 w to u e •H d! 3 J-4 o C CM te •H ro a) -r C jj •r o c ro 4-1 10 0) Ll rH E E- 10 01 a' •H 4-) 1—1 4-J hi ro T) •r •H a) 
Si o u ro H Ll -r VJ O TJ a ro a> 
X *—i -k 
a Q> 3 cn 
<u + 4J + o cu z 
r c. 0 c 0 ( r no - '.0 O rr. <r •0 1 
O cn r- f") c? rr. r 
a [ K iJ i> 1 PS 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 OJ O 0 a< 0 0 0 n L. d> CC 3 O O O O O 0 0 3 O 0 O 0 OJ VP 0 v) O C.: 0 c v> X Ci c: 0 O CD i-H rt> O 3 Li O O OJ OJ r- O 01 O CM lO 0 •X' CT-ro 41 E- O •£> eg 
a Cu O -p 0 C^  01 X •0 O — O i-H X O <D ro OJ b ft. 0 u r- O OJ O O: 0 cu Li J-I x: •H m O c vr- CM iD O 0. c >, M 4-J 4-1 •-) 0 r>4 m at >13 O OJ 0 •—1 0 j £ a x -c 01 L: c: OJ cr. 0 O O CJ 0 0 0 0 O CD O o> OJ c P CC 0 O 0 c 0 OJ 0 c E 0 c: 0 0 0 O •—1 0 •H ft •I c 0 0 0 0 0 •H p 3 1 CN tn 4J (0 O CO 0 c ro Li E 01 0 rn C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O <1} 0 Li 4) "3 f- 0 O 0 0 0 OJ vC C4 •H 3 CL H JZ 0 0 O 0 O CM ro —1 a a OJ 4J 0 0 0 0 0 -H E > a> 3 c 0 0 73 0 X u O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O ro 0 C 0 O 0) to 0 O 0 0 0 OJ LO O X to >-\ 0 0 O 0 O 
<0 to O "O 0 0 0 0 •H <11 O u JZ 
>4 >1 u H O j-i U. Ll -H M O U> in m O ro 0 0 0 r- CO m OJ CO TO U-l ro OJ \ CC cn O 0 0 0 in C 4-1 -p 73 r- CD 0 ro O c ro OJ OJ C 0 0 0 1-1 i-H to <B M a <11 P ] 
/-I E p Li O 
A) a) 0) m m r> O ro 0 0 0 T r- CD TM -p •—1 u to p ro O 0 0 0 iD ij u ro -H R— CTJ 0 rj •H 0 0 0 r-i cn 0 Li co w J ro a» 0 m O n 0 0 0 r- CO ro CN ro Li to f j O 0 0 0 in 
n OS + r~ CO 0 'O ro 4-1 O 1—1 0 O i-H i-H s c 
•—1 0 £1 OJ Li L( 1? H O 14 U -C T> a» O O C> 
> O >1 O > ^ 3 I-S JZ tJ sz a- 'J x 1 j > P JJ E e U JJ (J JJ H-l 0) u O >—L O ro ro u 3 ro 0 ro in ro ro ro •u aj < a CM r~ u. CD a E C > L| u M effi <*> u <y a •H O* 4J 4-J <H JZ OJ OJ 
> <y Li 0 0} 10 LL X j_> 2 W S u LL M M a Q. ro u O O in O Cu < 5: O < Cu 0 3 O CJ O X X CO X 
• o 
VD if) VL> • 
•—I i—I 
vO m vo • 
JZ OJ E o u cn IT 
P -C 0 -U nj m tn «TV «#> 
X OJ § 
a-, x 
o o 
• o 
o O r— • o 
JZ CN 4-J 21 CD U 
+ + x X X >: :< X X X X X X X X y X X X X X X X X >: X + 4-1 X X X X X x' a X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X OJ 10 x X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X y, X X X X X X + 4J OJ 1 0J X X X x X X X X X X :< X X X X X X X X X X 3 5 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X •A X X X X X -r a UD •0 * + y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y X •< X X X X X ^ + a JJ p <y < + 
+ B 
0 X ro 4J 0 VD vo vo i-H 01 a\ 0 r— <y> i-H 0 0 o\ ro IN r— 0 0 X X 0 m m m + r4 Cu ro to + + jJ CO 0 O 0 0 *r CO 0 VD in CO 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 X X X .X 0 0 r- + * + t-cc. 44 44 ro r^  r— r— 0 0 >—1 in CO O OJ cc 0 X v. OJ r-l O 0 O * s ro c c U) m in in ro X X + >4 0 kl •Y X X •Y cr» 3 + 0' P * Ll O •r4 CD O M JZ X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + to U-l OJ 3 j_> X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X- -r >-) 44 0 O 4) p X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X * CJ ro 0 to X H-l 0 :< X X X X X X X X X X X X K X X X X X X X X X + EH >4 1—1 ro 10 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X * H -p Ll "O -X ro "O 01 + •R X X X X X X X 
x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -» + 1-1 ^ to 4-J ro 0J j j + •H O E cu j_> 0 0 01 •H x X X > X X X X X y. .*< X X X !< X X X X X X X X X X Jj 0 0 S tJ 0) 4J X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x + x: fN 0 cu VI O > Li X X :< X X X X X X X X X X X X' X X X X X X X X X x -R 73 u Li 4-J 0> JZ •H O :< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + O CO 0 QJ c >1 Qj J_> +J X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + W in 1 0 E "O 0) 2 ro c + X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X * X X X X X X -R + a) 0J H •H TJ A: 4-J H + 0 TJ i-H O C 0) D Li O w c a> JJ * •Y -H J -H O c i a 0 + •U 0 H ,E £ < ai •H >—1 0 m JZ a 44 + O P£ 4-J cu 4-J CP -p G a T) OJ tt m LD to G c ro Ll 0) E „ H cu „ 3 01 4-J a & OJ •H •H E u 0 (0 C ro 01 D O Q <D 3 a u Li cr c 0J 4-1 0 + OJ J-J •H •H a •—1 J-J 3 •H ro cr CO (9 Jj + ft >1 OJ ro 1—l 4-J 4-J 0 O 0) O * O 0 CP 3 cr M J 0 Li •r-l O •H ro > 01 u a Ll 0 > L( o> ro cn L| ro + D1 ro c O O T> JJ 2 M p U) •H c JZ 0 TJ 4-1 0 u. + C JJ ro O JZ C u 01 j j Q 0 i i Cu Li 0) 4-1 0J c 4-1 •H c 0 w 0 O a Li CO a M 01 z 0) 0) P 3 EH JJ 0 0 4-1 0) 
Ifi 10 u E P 3 U) > c a 0 —1 4J 0) Li -H a CO ro 1—1 .H * E •H 5 0 4J + JZ O ro a > u 3 0' L| 4-1 JZ ro L»J G> ^ + O 0J 0 0 0 3 4-J M 0) SJ a >_) 0 >, CT j-i 3 <0 > E a •H £ v3 M •H 0 Cu m O C E 0 3 0) 0 l-l •H 4-1 Jj •• + ta ro M-J OJ \ ro •H !Zi O -p c c <D 0 0J -H 3 ll e —1 3 c CO ^ + CO e 4-1 »W a> JJ 0) j p Ll ro •H •H 4-1 Li a c t4-l o> Ll 0 •-1 01 0' 01 P ^ 0 to 0 c ro •H 0) + c O OL 0 ro 01 oi 0 iH c JZ Jj bi E •n4-1 + 0 ro 
ifj a) Li •H 0> ro Ll c (0 (0 to H OJ <4-1 Li to to -H E- 0 w 4J TJ OJ Li •H E H ro Lf >-i OJ 0) 0) 01 s C c —1 O cr 0 c > ro c tt M to < ro TJ 0) OJ 4-J cu 0! c 0 M M 0J 0 4-1 a Li •H C Ll Jj ro 3 + JJ 0) to M L| ro ro —i 3 P O -H —1 a P JJ c P c 0 a X 4-J U ro Q O a) 13 j CM H E-< OJ H ro JJ ro 0 0 JJ M •H c El a> TJ J-" -» JJ cu E —1 Cu j ro 0) > •H ro tt 0 —i JZ ^ 3 1 (0 0 <u CO 0) c c 4-J 4_) u to -H 4-J >, O -•-1 4J CP B- 0 + ro E-4 u 01 H > M H-i U-l > - Li ro Ll ro Xi "H IA a 4J 44 > 3 c E -r CO Ll •H E -H 0) 0) u c 01 c JZ Ll CC D Li a ro O •a 0 M j_) 4-» > r— 01 •O > OJ U •H c 4J CO to P -1 hJ •H Oj Q cu ro •0 1—1 ro 0 U 3 M 3 44 « + 0 0 ro M £ 0) 0 0 d> Ll to O 0' 0J O 3 cr JZ E-« 0) p -» 0 QJ OJ OJ a c 4-J <H <H 0) 0 5 u i-t 3 0J 44 iJ ta t- v^ l 0 •H to c sz C Lf 4-1 a ro U-l O O a. a 0 ro Qj -H 0) 0 H o» 0 It O 4J TJ * 0 + 4-1 a) CD 4-» 0 01 a 1—i >—1 CU 4-1 3 0 -H c to M 0) 4-1 QJ < CD 0) U-l •H CP 0) W C C co 0 u. fu 0 1—1 JZ c C ro c 0J O 4-J c Ll 0) U-J O O c 0J p 2 CO 0 c O 0 ro J ro X •a O JZ 0J U> > a 0 O •O -a -H M •0 cn E 0 -H u -H j i-q J4 + •H U-l 1—l 0) u i-q c 0) 4-J 3 0) c G •H C c c C a P 3 JZ E 3 •» u-l 0) CO ro 4-J -H M L( +J H M t- 4-1 -H E- Ll •H M Ll a L| JJ K a> 3 G f- -»• U-l 0 
> M 0 0) ro O « 0) 0) CO 0 0 10 to W CP W CP CP 0 O O 3 1—1 E —i + ro Li 4) 01 M a 0) O X> XS p a a 4-j 3 O O 4-1 O a w a 0 C" -a 4J + M a 4J a 0 4J U-l a E E 0 0 U-l a a to m a M-i X 0 44 0 H c c 4-1 + T-a >1 O m a 3 •0 J-i 0) TJ a a O »w a <4-1 4-1 ro M 0) M Si •a •H •r4 0J + cu I-I -r < 0 < U 0 3 2 < cu Cu < 0 0 -1 U 0 u w 5: A- i-i cu to S 00 -I I 
LIJ c y, r-j 3 CC O "C o to X o ra Q. 3 vi a> o o rC in i-i (0 0) E-. u fi. 01 O E •H O 11 10 o «-' .c > j j n «TJ 4J H o r. >. u m u .J 4) 3 £ re i E "O a. c: *D A; S u l-l c: <13 o o <0 d a> 0) O w >-> a. o c -H .H r-u -i tr c o 0) (0 3 n m fji —i C <11 O CO 15 c •d crE QJ 111 o ill -H 3 E-OJ P P Crt .H i 0) X eg (0 4» C O + 0) o -H O ~ :> r VI 3 c u o -D + P 0 10 0 X c 01 E 41 * CO CO to o o U U M ••i 
tn CO L> •H X 3 + X 
—i < > p + p >, O V< O 3 * o UJ 1-5 14 -H 03 O tu (0 CO o CM T3 o c ro 4-i ^ a) c: to 41 vi o » 4) 3 —1 e E-< 4 ^ o a> a> * P D3 •—i at * CO E-p cd OS > XZ p a» u 2G o + CQ Vl A3 E-< 0 VJ Z 
T> J HI s 
i £ £ C 
* t 
o 
£ a1 
a E tf c 
v a. o i \T. r * O r 
•-1 "O ro • t 
M cn x X X J^  X X E-_J •0 CL "O X >: X X c X X X £-. o C2 o o c o o o o o o o o 0 Q' 
1> o o o o o C-o c> o 0 O x X X o o o o 0 0 O U X X y. X in OJ o X o o O O X X X X O <x O c> o o o o 0 :< X x •rH Y. X P D y O .O X X X X o o o o O o o OJ o c. 0 C ~o o o O o 3 o 0 0 c 0 a -st> 0 \a O o o /[) cr c 0 O") 0 cn V) a C) o fj P VD a o ill o 1-1 C rH 4» CQ 4> O p cn 0 p> E 0 cr> 13 0 4) T-c J 35 0 > vo 0 VD X c O (0 u H D a» o Vi 0 4) •0 3 0 0 0 P CN 0 PT « 4-1 Li CQ 0 R- C R- O ro 0 cn (0 r R 0 r 4) f i 0 ro < u CNJ O c v« « 
A> P o a= 3 n CP to 0- 0 c N a; p •—1 0 in cu 0 CD -H jJ 3 u u Ui R- r- 0 R- 0 
0 a> 11 c R- r~ R- M M ro 3 OJ w 4> CP t-H 0 0 
Cf Vl > c O Hi U3 0 0 0 0 o p 4J in 0 in >> cn 0 crt aC o o c: C u CNJ CM G (Nl P R- 0 r- O 0 •H O 
4-1 O •—1 u r-J 
CP •1> 4) ra a« M e E ID c r-i CM O CM ar- 0 r-D m 3 •H •H rH vc VD O (0 cn 0 cn U 4) O t-. E- Ok 0 r- r O r- (j ro 0 cn 0) CM xz a rH CO If) (M LT, 
CM w 0 0 O 0 m 0 m r-i j rH c C \o vc O C (M 0 n 0 M O (0 o 0 O 0 r- t— r~ O -r> cn (0 c -H •H 0 O' P P 4-1 -D -H X ai rti ro (0 .. CD c O Vl y. in x i) a> 01 c a P P "O 0 4J a TJ a OS .c 4' D a e o >i 3 3 (0 < •H 4-1 Vl £ rH E •H 3 E-< a a yi a u E 0 TJ <13 C E- p rH E rO u E 4J (0 m 4-> •H LU a) rH 0 10 o 5 (D 0 0 a) P u-r U> SJ Vl ~c (0 ai > Vl > u u w (.1 QJ Vl c to a> a> a> P ^ 4-1 0} c rH p 3 •H xz 10 15 6 4J JJ P 0 Vi *D c g w w 4> CP U P u C-l a M W c w P H 4' 10 •H a & >. c 10 VI cr 4» (0 u 0 a 0 Q- + c a 0 CU •-2 E-< Z) Ci r/i en o M m < Ln + Q. a- O' ru n tl. <4-< > > JJ <r O I) * n D cu 
* * 1 O 0 O fr ro O in O X X X X X X y. X A X * Ol a: 1 O O CO y. y. X X X X X X E-« X X X + JJ T> 1 <D X y. X X X X X DC X X X 3 J c 1 1—1 1- 0 X X X X X X X X X X a 
* 3 1 1 -H *D O X X X X X X X x X jj CM « 0 1 0 3 3 4> CQ 1 M rH O 0 O <Xi n O in O X X X X X X •A + DC X X X X 0 1 P O rH VC O yo r* O CO X y. y. X X X X X E- X y. X X X ro 4J 1 C C cn cn cn X X X X X (J X X >: H Cb Sf + t/> 1 O •-H 0 X X X X X X y. X X X X X + E- 4H 03 1 1 U O U 4H P 3J 1 c O O m r- O in CI O CM CM CM CN CM CD X X g A3 c a* * (U 1 r> CM O CM CM O CO Ci CO VO O E-< X X SJ 14 0 0) 0 -» a J 1 O <N CM ro 0 r* vl X y. X tH CP > -H + Vi 1 rH 0 rH X X X -t 4 •H > JJ X X z X v< JJ Vi « w 0 •H CD 0 Vl to 4) « 1 r- O O O O in 0 O O X y, X X X X X X X X X CO CM 3 C W A x: CL' 1 -d O O O 10 OJ CM X X X X X y. X X E- X X J in 0 O 14 JJ TJ 1 4) X X, X X X X X X X X cd a) 0 w X 03 "P * 0 1 rH ai rH 0 X X X X X X X X X E-< M C  4-1 O + 3 I 1 rH ~o X X X X y, v. X X X E-< p St v< P rH D 1 O 3"0 10 u < CQ 1 Vl O ro O r- O m O y. X X X y. y. X ££ X X M <n 4-1 to 0 41 + E- 1 P U O CO O cc CM 0 O CO X X X y. X v. X E- V. X X X rH O £ a, 0. 41 > + 1 c c CM CM X X X X X X X V X X X O O 0) a» E Qi * m 1 0 t-i 0 N X X X X X X X X X X P O n X aL 3 -J * co 1 1 0 O X x: (Nl O & rH U3 1 c 0 O 0 O 0 0 O m ra O O X X X X X X X X X X X X 0) + *D u 14 p c O a 1 3 O O CD X X X X X X X X E-< X X c a» CO O Cb c O > 1/3 + j 1 O X X X X X X X J 'X X X nj (0 in 4) 10 10 + 1 0 X X X X X X X X X X c a) 1 7} JJ 4> 0 % X - X X X 4» RH -5 M nj u Vl U T> rH c <0 3 p + 1 0 O 0 O 0 0 O in 0 O O X X X X X X X X X X 4> •V T> U (13 0) 3 P v> + CC 1 O O O CD X X X X X X X E-« X X X a. -H 0 c E 3 a 3 T> 1 X X X y. X X X 05 X X X E •a E O ^ c 1 c 4) X X X :< X X X X X X to 0 O 3 * 3 1 1 tft-U 0 X :< X X X X X X X Vl O T3 CM a tn O 0 1 -H 3 10 O C 
in 15 c -D cn 1 CO c O O c-O C2 O in 0 O O X X X X X X X OH X X X X 0 V) ra 4> Z) 0 03 O JJ 1 U O O O CO X X X X X X X E-« X X X CM 4-1 •H O £ 41 x: 1 a c X X X y X X X J X X X X n fl! CM to 1—1 p H P 4> P 1 0 0 X X x X X X X X X X X X + 0 Vl •H 0 > 4> 3 r f 4-> O X CP <T> 
C u 0 T> E P 4-1 O 1 CO 0 O O 0 1/1 in O in k£> O VC in CD CM CM X X X X X X Vl + c P (0 0 xz C 03 CO O + 0) CO 1 O O CO t— O 0 X X E-« X X X 41 + •H c 
»-) Vi u O U5 "O <13 -J 1 O t— cn r- cn ro X X >-1 X X X rH 11 
V) U) O 4! XZ M 1 0 0 X X X ,x £ 3 t: -rl <t N p jj X X X 3 O <U Vl u O •rl 0 CO + C + Q Uu Vi •H rH 1 CD O CD 0 in cn O in r O CM m 0 0 "0 X, X X X X UJ ro rH ro N aL 1 O O CM O CO OJ in a» cn 0 X E-« X X 4> + CO c M <13 C P so •d 1 vo cn CM r* X X CC X X X x: 0 w 0 c (0 a> t c ai 0 0 X X X X P 0 ro tn 03 Vl 0) •H 4» 3 1 1 cr. t> O X X X X > CM Vl rH E tH J t/> 0 1 -rl 3 a» + tn "O 11 4) c .P X , m 1 'Si O O 0 0 O c O in 0 O 0 m 0 CM r- cn 0 •H X X + DC in cn vo CD vo CQ + •rl Q p rH rH CO 0) + E- 1 u O O CD ijj cn CM 0 3 X X H O E p u 10 > T- X 1 a c r* r*- ro "O X X >-1 in 0 CM CM + "D -H p as Jj 1 0 M •—1 0 4> 0 O X X 0) tn 0 U (23 O + Vl 1 1 4-1 O M E 4J in ra E" X 4> t 0 1 CO m O ro 0 O ro O in in O in 3 i-r m 0 in ai in X X X X X M CO u W * z 1 <—1 O O CO "D * .. vo CM 0 <13 y. X E-« X X X O r- r>i -d 0 ro 1 O 0 r-ro 4) r-cn ro 0 X X i-l X X X a 0 O 1T1 0 3S 1 t—* 0 E rH 0 H X X y. y X 41 + O 
X 0 >1 * - a» - 3 - > X X X Vl + 0 CM C <13 * r a - TJ •• Vl + O 41 1 3 0) P ai ro CL E O rH <13 rH <13 a> rH CO -». a* CO 0} -H 41 « £ t -0 -n W 3 4> rH £ O ID •H E 0 a a t/j .. <13 > a 3 4> CO 4) Q + JJ Q + A3 i 0 •• •O CD rH <Z Uu £ 3 E-< ^ > Q ro O P 0 R) <13 a Q Q 41 X •H Z JZ P E ^ a. O V4 3 > rH t-l rH a 0 CL (J E P (J 3 c A x: XI + 3 •rl 4» 4) u c 1 -H 0 rH > E-< -I T> O fC 10 0 4-1 4-J rtJ N O rH C a 0 U O * O CP * 4-1 10 0 1 O </3 41 > xz ro |Q < Tj 0 P > u u 3 •H U 4-1 O 0) m 0 >1 4» T> T> L> T5 10 <0 -» 4-1 O 10 + 4» 0 E 1 VI p w £ JJ T> TJ •H < > O H -H 0 U rl C rH CT Vl -0 £ 03 4» 43 O O + <0 Vl <1  14 „ <D u a> 1 p xz a» 3 4' 3 P a» 03 P in 3 G P P rH <0 rH fl) 4» 3 ai >4J a» M Vl -0 M 14 03 Vi a. 
P 4» + Vi a > 1 c CP c r-t m O "D -H 41 UJ Uj T5 C H P > rH > (0 c t/> > in •0 Vl (0 a a + JJ E-« 
> * 4-1 CL 0 1 0 •H Q 0 rtJ M C •d C !/) X X 4> -H M M O nj C O O O 41 3 0 Q 0 X X xz X a a* O 
S 4 ct > to 1 u J > CQ CD M <c I-1 a. Q. CC Uu U (J Uu U u Q. E > J eg (J E to to to CO a. <C -n z -f X 
CO o Vj 
<N 3 a-
o "O 
o CO 0 c rc a 3 
a> 
TJ o r m 
I J ro 0) E « 
U E o . 
<y O 1) n 
rH o ro 
o CU iJ . c UJ 
M ro 
o n . C 0) 
m o ro 3 X i E x> a 
TJ A : e T3 
c 0) o o 
o o <15 •_> N u cc 
c e JS <H 1— 
a ' H < c: 
o o ro 3 
CN CD CO - 4 c 0) o 
CO C" c o d) 
d) 3 o ro H H 
CM i-» •H CO .—1 x : 
OJ ns —1 0 a) c 
O i-i p > 
U 0 TJ TJ 0 
fO o .c c o S o t o 
»-) co o o o CJ o 
co VI •H X 3 
•H < 4-J JZ >, o u o V) 
b< •-0 •<H o o Ut SC 
C3 C/3 o cS 
c <4-1 C-i •o 
o C ro <4-1 c 
CO ai M o cu 
—i E H O 
CD ai w x j m 
u <—i CD to H 
u ro > x : 
u o u 
V/ 0 an M ro H o 
O O C O t 
O O G- TJ 44 3 
Jn ro JZ -h 3 H iJ M 
O M TJ CD S M HUi •n (0 3 0) Q' <1> Q} -u' • 
owxnxoaiai cu qj a T» E e o 
e I O It H . a ,-P 8-. 
U) C IQ J) C O • 
j X X X X X X 
>: X X a" a 
>; X O X X < O X X C x ri i_> >-H >: t-to < X JH X c: J •y o o fN' c. 
•A -J r- f-' C; r- o O o o <-o m at a> z ii •TJ -<H Ji o a; o X X C.» X X o 0) X >: X X O X X X 4J a y. X —I >; X u 
£ X X O X X a r_> D x >: X X c :•: X X Er-e< o CJ o G o o o a> n u o o o cr O o o O -V X X X X .J IM o o a o o U X >: X X o X X 
« o O o o o O X X X c .-< X Q o o c o o o •H X X •H X TJ o Xi x >: >: X U X X X o o O CJ UJ o o o o c 3 o o o o 3 o 3 o o o a vi- o k£> O U o o o ro o ro (0 o o o U x; *J vo <x c CJ o 0) C r-H 0) CD ro <u o CU <NI CN o fN E CM O r-i C *0 o\ C. o a-. 0) u") o IO J 0) (N CN o CN > o r-C o 0 H s u <D o v> U o i TJ 3 Oi cn o a\ 4J ^ a \£> 10 o O a r- o r- o r- o r- CO -H ID ijj o \C 0) ro o ro < o c M CO 4J o 0} 3 S3 cn -H CL O 3 C e> U •—i r-r- o r- to o a\ 3 'J 4-J r- r- o i- o K£> <—i 0J ai c \o kO \o ro 3 3 m D> o O cn M > q a 0) U} •H CO CO o rv o JJ IO tO o LO > cr o vT» CO o c O CN CN o CN a t- o r- o 0 •H •<H c 0 <—1 0 OJ <y 0) <4-1 ro 
£ e ro c o o c o 0.V0 o KO H •H -H O vo o UJ ro co o CO u CU CJ vO vo o \e U ro o ro ~ 
rH m "sT o o o o o rH r-C C c C VO o C ro o o o 0 0 0 VO vo O •H o JJ JJ •• u ro •0 ro '—i ro .. CO t-> iJ 4-J c u o »H TJ o *-> a TJ Clj 3 3 3 D 3 > O > 3 ro N' ro a a CO C. ^ 4J Q. O G o -H 
•P. . H ro u E ^ ro 0 0 u •H O O ai u 'H o LJ ro CO C CJ c U U JH c ro x: ro -+J 0) >-i a E 5 » -H CO c CO £H cr cr D" -i a. ro c o a -T c: "O a o + c a o 
+ CL cn rr OI + >5 _c * Cu U-l > - a * a o + H-« ra Cu 
+ — + 
j o o O m o o o X X X X X 1 X X A X f\J 
an 1 o o o o CO X X X X X X I X X H X X X 4-J 
1 * 55 + 
• g i d> 
1 «—I 0) I-H ^ o X X X X X X X X X X 1 X 1 X X X X cc X X X X X X * 3 a 
CTl 
i ; + 
3 
O 
1 <—i TJ 
I O 3 
o X X X X i 
i 
X X X 
y 
+ 
4-J 
3 
(1) en r l i h r - o r - o GO o m OJ o CM X X X X X X I X X n : X X X X + + o 
0» H 1 4-J o o CN o Ol CN o CO cn cn X X X X X X 1 x X H y. X X X 
^ 
B t f t 
u t c c O) CM Ol Ol CM >', X X X X X 1 X X N X X X -H 
CU to 
a> 
1 O i—i 
r u 
c-1 o X X X X X X I 
I 
X X X X X X 
X 
H 
OS m 
s 1 c \o o \ o o ~n cn o t n CO o CO rH (N CN CO CTl et. cr> < >: 
S 
nj 
c cu + 1 D o o CO i n m r» o o o | X M 
o cu o + TJ i J i o "3" OJ OJ r o r o o r» - J X o r» 
D> > •H + O i o G t V 
4' •H > -» 0 + X 
I-i tJ 3 * o -H 
CO o M ro D + i OJ o CN o o OJ o m CO o CO x X X X >: i X X X X X M UH 
OJ 3 c CO + CO a: 1 TJ o CO o r o r o o CO r o CO X X X X X X 1 v. X H X X X t - J 44 
o O M < TJ 1 0J X X X X X X 1 X X a : X X X CJ ffl 
o CO X 0) 4-1 + c J fi 0J o X X X X X X ( X X X X X H ro u O + 3 1 •—1 TJ y. X X X X 1 X X X X H U 
S t M 4J <—1 o 1 O 3 1 / ro V4 < <—i -» (0 1 Li •—1 o CN o r - CT\ o i n o X X X X X X DC >• X X x X W 
JJ ro 0) O 0) -» E-i 1 4-1 O o vo o CO cn o CO CO X X X X y. X 1 X X E-i X X X + «—1 
o s : cu a d) > + 1 c c OJ OJ X X X •A X [ X X X X X X O o 
o at E CU r ir; 1 O H o X X X X X 1 X X X X X 4-' o 
r-1 •r-> E cc 3 - J + ro 1 o o 1 X JZ 
OJ o a . •H QJ 1 c o o o o o o o m o o o X X X X X 1 X X X X X" X OJ TJ o 
M 4-1 c O d> -0 1 D o o CO X X X X X X 1 X X H X X X e 0J CO 
o cu c >, o > CO -)• i o X X X X X 1 X X - J X X X ro + to 
m 
1 
0) 
E 
ro 
TJ 
•H 
u <y + 
ro 
o + 
1 ^ o X X X -
X X X X 1 X X 
X 
X X 
X 
X 
X 
«—i c 
CD 
a 
.—i 
TJ M ro M M * u TJ 
C cu 4J 3 4J « 1 o o o G o O o ir , o o o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X O -H TJ 
o 0) 0) 3 4-J CO -r a : 1 o o o CO X X X X X 1 X H X y. X a - J •H 
o c 3 a 3 H -). TJ 1 X X X X X J X X cc X X X X 
E Cu O + c I c a) rH o X X X X X X 1 X X X X >; CO 
o o EC - 3 1 CP TJ o X X X X X 1 X X X X X w O TJ 
OJ CO CO o o 1 -H 3 ( ro O C 
(0 a c TJ m 1 to '—1 o o o o o o O U"i o o o X X X X X 1 X X cc X X X X l; CO ro 
<5J CD 0 ai 0 H 1 0 o o G CO X X X X X 1 X X E-< x X X X 
OJ 4J •<H o JZ JZ I a c X X X X X X 1 X X t J X X X 4H + <3 
OJ ro <—i 
o 
JJ 
•<H 
•1-4 > 4J 0) * + 
4J 
3 
1 O n 
I JJ o ^ 
rH O X X X X X X i 
1 
X X X X X X 
X + Ol 
JH 
c o o TJ M x TJ 4J O 1 (O o G o o o o O i n o o o X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X Ll c 4J ro o JZ c cu o O -» (1) t o i o O CO X X X X X 1 X X X X >1 4> •<H c 
^ CO u o CO TJ o d) t J i o X X X X X X 1 X X - J X X X .—I 0) 
CO t_> <5J OJ * M i o X X X X X 1 X X X E E 
H •M M JZ j j X X - X X X 3 O 0) 
u o o CO CO C a —{ lu •JS M -<H < i T o o i n CA O m o CN ro CO rH X X X X X CJ ro 4-1 —1 ro a : i o Ol o CN OJ O CO n CTl a\ O 1 X X e - X X 0) + CO c t-> 4-1 a< c »-) - CD TJ i VD n OJ r - r - X X a : X X X o LO 
o c nj > CP d) c 1 C 0) o O 1 X X X X 4-J o ro 
CO 0) w <u 1} 1 CP TJ o 1 X X X X OJ LI 
•H 6 e-i w • * o 1 •«-< 3 1 cu to TJ 
G; c c +J cc 1 t o 1-1 o o o o o O O m o o o m o o \D CD O 1 rH X X a : m CO cn CO CD * •<H <3 
4J <—1 <—i o t o 4> + e - 1 o o O CD CO CO CO O 1 3 X X E-1 CO o X 
JJ CO ro > + JZ i a c CO CO TJ X X j m o OJ OJ TJ 
.-c 4-1 4J 1 0 w o <u O 1 0 X X CD 
CO o o CD f t + Ll 1 4J o 1 E l-l m ro H <U + o 1 (O r o o r o o o o m cn o 3 v m o \ o ai i X X + X X X LI CO 
M W ~f r o r o CO o CO CO CO TJ ' . . vo >"0 O 1 0) X X £-« X X X O r» Ol 
TJ o i o O VD m a t o O X X X X X a o o ro o r o s o J •<H X X X X X <D o 
s : o CJ c 
> , + 
a + 
a» 
T j 
- 0) <— 
3 0' •4H 4J CJ 
a •• ra a. e 
- 3 
TJ 
O -H 
I > w 
d) 
X 
1-1 o 
X X 
i-H 1—1 CO -I 
J-J 
ai 
o 
CO 
rH 
'a j 
-<H 1) ^ E r TJ CO m CD £ o o •<H X O d a i t o •• d) > a 3 CD to <11 Q + 3 i-H 4J Q .» ro i O •* •b cn .-i ro Cu E o 3 fr-! > ro ro ( a a o nj 1) Q a Q r J • <D X -H z JZ 4J E o !H 3 > 'H «-! a >, o 0 O 1 4-1 JZ E +J u 3 q JZ ^ + 3 •H 4-1 
1> (U + o c R . - I •• o 1-1 > H •H TJ O (D in o 4J JJ ro 1 O 4J C a o o O 4 a * 4H 
4J ro a> 1 O CO 4> •> JZ ro ro < TJ 0 4J > Ij o 2 •H O +J o O 1 m o >1 d) TJ TJ o TJ ro ro + m o 
JH ro + d) o E 1 M u •A 6 4J •H "D TJ •<H < > o — -H -H o U -H c £ 1 >—( cr. w . o OJ OJ CD o O * ro Li 
4 T d) CJ 1 4-1 JZ 1) 3 C 3 J j (IJ <u 4J Li 3 ro 4-J 4-J i-H Itj r-4 a" 0J 3 1 <1> > . 4J CD w LI TJ LI Li J-J + <u u Cu 
4-J 0) + M a > 1 C CP c -H V) O -H TJ TJ •1-4 QJ u . u , TJ c •H -H <-l a ' - M 4J > -H 1 > ro c to > nj ro LI ro a a + 4-1 ^ 
x c > -» 4J a. o 1 O -<H ro O ro c TV TJ C Hi X X <U •<H U U o f0 c o o O 1 0) 3! o a o JZ , e JZ JZ a a + o cu n < 5 t o < S I O a : > £0 e> n < < Cu cu CC U, U U •L) U cu X > 1 J CN o E t o t o t o CO < < • 21 + X 
1 c f-i 3 O 
CO O) f-« 1-1 iO 0J 15 
c 0 o 
?! CO rj 3 c. 
o u o r/5 rr O r . CD a 3 1 In a> O O : n TO a> H U £ a . GJ 0 -o CO CM 2: - h a «i> ru I 
O 0, i J _c > TD 
M ra i j - h 
O CL >. l J 0) 4-1 
t n 11 (0 a 2 ro 
E -O 
T> A; G u n 
C 0) O dJ a> 
6 0) Q> IJ N O tx. 
o C E 3 •H H T J 
5 "U H < C 
O 0< ro 3 
CM CD CO rH c CD O 
w o c •H O
1 £ 03 
0} 0 ran 3 fU 
CM P P V) RH 0 XZ 
IN ra P a> c 0 (C 4J 
•H o •H a D > 3 
C u o ~o 0) O 
fl] o X c (DSD "D CO 10 u 0 O O M ro 10 tSl 0 •H I 3 M •• 1 < > P C M >. 0 n o p H 
Iw t* u --H 11 O I K ro in 0 a. 
c i_i 4-> T J 
o nj a> C 
w a) Li O a> 3 
E E - n O 
0) at rH 4-J CQ 
4-> a) l / l H 
4 J ( j r*5 > XZ "H 4-1 a) 4-1 10 O r 3 CQ H TO H O 
s 
T3 m •J 
CQ * 
E 
c 0 •H p 0 
a) d (0 
0) 
s a 0 
a . 2. 
C O O O O 0' 
Vi ft> XZ -H 
' X fj a tt) ' 
X 
!fl XZ Cl> il> 0) 0.-D " C -H 3 H t-f 
ra a) ,. i a> jj -i_> o> c i : E co c tn o> cr« o -J H Cu -H -H a H >, i h o Q to to o f 
X x X X X X X 
r> y, X o.» y X y c si X A X X •u -A 0 X X 0 >• 0 X' X iJ CO X X X vj X c; ill rH 0 r-j CM 0 fl. T_) r- r- 0 0 0 c 'O CM CM 13 ro y O •H •X 
ay 0 In v; X >; X V X >: n M 0 a> X X X O X X X 0 a. x X X -H X X X E CO X X X £) X X ft a 0 T) X X X X C X X X 0' 0 O O O O O 0 0 O 0 <L' 0 0 O 0 X X X X y. c 0 cz O O O 0 0 x X X X cr X (0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y. X X c X X X a. O 0 0 O CD —•: x >: •rf x X D CD 0 XI x X X X X O 0 0 -A O 0 0 O c 3 
X O O 0 O 0 3 vc- •x> y O (0 O O m 14} 0 ir> 1—1 0 
O 0 xz n r^ i ro iJ CM 
0 J! O O C -H O u u t i l CM I N 0 CM £ VD 0 VD 
><) 73 vn VTJ 0 \fj \D •Si 0 3) cn m ro 0 CO > VD 0 VP Vi c 0 fl U 2 OJ O CO Li 
rH ~o 3 i"H 0 P rH 0 ;j CQ O a co CO c r> O O 0 0 
•rl vo vc-0 VD (IJ T 0 0 C CO 
4-> O a> 3 ^ 
H 0 . O 3 a' •H . - l 0 w r- 0 r-y Ui ro 0 ro ^ cn 0 c. HI at c VO vo \o Vl CO ro 3 w at O 1 0 . H a Vl t> c •44 a) w •H <0 a- 0 00 m O in Vi u 4-1 vD VD 0 VD >.r- O r-0 c c U CM CM 0 CM 4-» f-O r-0 M 0 O OJ 0 4—1 ra E P rt) c a. ct\ 0 CTl O. r-i O CM M O CM 0 CM ro O O 0 E" cu ( J vD vo 0 VD L> -c-O 
rH ,-i 
fM ri m Cr. CD O O tc 
a c c C r-f CM O CM c a\ O 0% 
0 0 O O VD VO vi) 0 r> ro 
•H •H p 4-1 4-» •• i J 
ro ro nj rH ra -n p 4-> D -Q O a CL 3 X5 3 > 0 < > 3 ro ra a CO 3 Q. rH £ 4-» a u u E !0 E ^ ro u E 4-1 R3 0 O a) i 0 c r l 0 c a) 4-» 
U m to c u c: O v« ( 1 CL Vi c 
xz nj ro -H e u 4-J at <M Q. 4-» E 0 •> -H 10 c > 'H (0 4-» Cr cr rH <1» CD O U (j a •F C a 0 + C O. 0 
+ O, cr- cr> cr «D -Q +J > > > D. Q. * t-1 a 0 * —' OJ 
o o •o 
O rH O CN TO 0 m "T 0 "T X X X X X X 1 'A X -v X X X + + CM oi -Q 0 O 0 CO X y y. X K 1 X X H X X X + P 
r * 0 T3 C at rH 0) ,_; 0 X X X :< X X X X X 1 X J X X X X X X X X X X * + 3 CL 3 I •H T; 0 X X y. X X 1 X X X X X -V P O 0 3 1 3 1—1 CQ Vl rH CM 0 VO CD 0 IT- 0 X X X X •A \ X X * os X X X + X + + O H 4-1 O r- 0 r- CN 0"! 0 CO in m y. X y X y. X 1 X X E- 3 y. X X ^ W P C C CM CO M X X X X X 1 X X •-1 x X + -H iU to 0 ^ (—1 0 X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X + E- UH Qj T3 0) 1 0 0 1 X + t£ <M «J 3: c 0 O rH CJ 0 in 0 CN CM n ro O 1 CO < >; X + X S fQ c at . O D 0 0 CO r- 0 0 0 1 E" X X X + Vl 0 at (2; 0 Cl ro 0 J-3 X X E-cr J> •H 0 O J X X X ^ 0: •H at X X z X V4 P T> 0 •H 0 n (0 r0 0 vo O O 0 in r- 0 r- X X X X X 1 X X > X X * + to UH CM 3 C to e: T3 0 0 0 X X X X X X 1 X X E- X X X hJ UH 0 0 Vl c T5 a) X X X X X X 1 X X X X X to ro 0 to X •M •rl C rH d) 0 X X X X J X X X X X E- Vl >0 p O - 3 1 rH X) 0 X X X X x 1 X X X X X P Vi P rH O O 3 1 ^ "O ro Vl < H CO V4 rH 0 O in 0 m m 0 m y. X X X X 1 X X * cr: X X * X * + w 4J ro at 0 E» p 0 CC 0 CO 0 00 Vfl Vfl X X X X X 1 'A X H X X X X 1—1 0 E A* a 0/ p c c CN CM CN X X X X X X 1 X X X X X X O 0 a) a> E £0 O n 0 y. X X y. X X 1 X X X X X > P 0 •n E of. 3 ro l 0 0 1 V. xz CM O cu U c 0 O O 0 m 0 01 T VD l£> 0 1 0 O Ct X X X + X OJ * TJ 0 Vl 4-] c O 0 0 CO 10 0 1 H X X X cz T 0) in O CL, c >. 0 > 0 oj M • 1 0 •J X X X flj + CO in 1 Q) £ «J •0 -H -P + u rH 0 
rH 0 J X X X X X rH * c a) a> rH T3 V ro Vi ^ + 0 •O c av P D P 0 O O 0 m 0 <M ro •1 VO VD 0 1 X X * X X X + 0' * -H -c u 0) E 0) 3 P ex. 0 0 0 CO m cn a 0 1 X X H y X X a ? ^ •rl 0 c a 3 T5 VO ro ro VD VD • 1 X X X X E < e l±4 C C 0) rH 0 0 1 X X y. X X CO X 0 0 3 3 j CUT) 0 1 X X X X i-i « u n CM CO to u O •H 3 1 ft * 0 c £0 <D (iJ c *c X) ai to rH O O O 0 IT> 0 m 0 0 0 1 X X + 1—1 0 m O CQ 0 \ V nj 0 <D O ro H O O 0 00 ro 0 0 0 1 X X E- * V ef. -M •H U X O xz a c VO •Kj-T • X y. X ,3 ^  0 <u » >, CM ro •rl 0 4-1 •H M > 4-1 0) • -p 3 J O n P 0 ^ ^ 0 0 » J X X ^ + cr Vl ro c O 0 •D Vl E at -P 0 to VG O VD O CN CO 0 in at 0 cn rH m CM CN I y, X * X X n * cz P <0 0 xz C 0 •O VD 0) to O 0 CO ro Ct\ (Tt 0 1 X X E- X X X • •rl CZ CO CO U tSl O U CO X) O ; O 01 Vl J 0 ^ ,_; 0 r- C*> VD CO ro • 1 0 1 X y X X X X X X X X ix rH 3 CD 6 •H U-i fj C p X X X 3 + O 0J 
> O 0 •rl •H to cz + a rH d Vi -H •H u: O O rH tN 0 in 0 CN IN CO CO in in 0 1 y. x + X X X -T + Ul ro 14J rH ro tsZ 0 O 0 CO VD r- r- 0 1 X X E-« X X X 0) * CO C -P 14J 0) C P CQ T) VD CO C-. r- r- • J X X cr: X X X xz * 0 CO 0 c f5 > 0) + c c a> 0 0 J X X X X X p * 0 ro 
V) 0) Vl 0) •rl CD + 3 » cn XJ 0 1 •• X X X X X + CN Vl H^ £ f- CO Vi O •H 3 \ 01 CO * X) 0 0) c p CO IO rH O ro O O Cl 0 in 0 M 0 a> CM 0 rH X X + a: VD m CD in ca •H 4 rt 
4-1 .—1 rH 0 (O H 0 O 0 CD r-l 0 0 0 1 P X X E- ro 0 E 4J U ro xz a c .. V£) VD • 1 •v X ij 0 CO ro T) * •rl P E s. p 0 O V 0 I 0 X X i-» 0) r 1 
OJ O 0 CQ Vl l -P 0 H J E f » m ro Vi H X 
s 0 z to VD O O VD O O VO 0 0 IT, a> r^  0 3 rH X) • m cn CO u~> o> 0 1 X 0) X X -> X H X X y. X X + ^ * 2 * r- A> r-i XJ 0 m 0 0 r- CO 0) vo ro ro . 1 a y. X r-3 X X X D. + 0 0 
NJ 0 0 E •H 0 1 -H X X X X X 9 * 0 E 0 c 0 rH <11 
- a> •H 3 4« U-i -P 0} D, ro Cu E 
- 3 T3 O rH J 1 
> Vi 01 
X 
rH d) 
X 
0) 
X 
rH 1« H CO 
r + 
0) t 
0 
CD ^ a) •rl E T5 W • « 'w 3 ai E O 13 -H E p a a \ to •• 0) > d 3 a> to S 3 3 r X rH Q «J O "O CC rH ra iu E 0 3 E- > nj ro 1 0 Q O ro at Q Q 2 * •rl O z xz P E --f < 0 u 3 > •H rH a U a L) 1 •44 xz E P O 3 C 3 XZ xz * -rl •M DJ 0 c -H O > E-rH X) •N O ra ro ci U 4-1 ra ^ J 0 P rH c a O 0 u O - 14-J •n CO Pi P nj <1> 0 co OJ > XZ nj ro < T3 O P > O O 3 -rl O u-l O a> I in 0 >, 0) T5 TJ O X) n «j •44 0 Vl 0 0 E V» P 10 E -p •rl T5 T3 •<H rf > 0 rH •<H -H 0 U -H C E 1 rH cn Vi Xi E 0) 0) OJ 0 0 ro Vi <1> 0) Vl CD p xz 0J 3 0) 3 P 0) OJ -P Vi 3 CO P P rH CO rH a< a> 3 \ 0) >. P 0) l-l Vi T5 ^ Vi L| 0> + Vl a 
P Vl a > c cr c rH W 0 -H TJ X) •rl at U. t. c •H -rl rH Q, P > rH I > ro c to > ro m Vi ro a a P * E-E c a 0 0 -H ro O nj Vl C X) T> c to X X 0" U Vl ,0 ra c 0 0 0 1 a) se O Q 0 XZ xz xz xz p. 0. O + 
04 •r < to < s U a: > OT a »-« < < W CL, a or u* U U U* '_> u CU E > \ (J CN u 3 E 10 to to to < < Z •» X 
1 C 
Q OJ <i> O 
i i 
3 C 
O . 3 
OJ 
a-rg 3 O 0 VJ TJ O m O ro a i L< Q> C CC 32 4-" 'D 4> 
U £ CL c a> o TJ T: CN £ 0 <u ro r\i o CL. 4-" JR > UJ ro a. C >. u 0« u <xt U ro 3 S ro 
1 E a C 
TJ E TJ M C <D o Q' Q> 
QJ C.l N 4-" a; 3 C E yz H rH a 
•0 -1 < c o <D ro D r-i CO to —1 C QJ C 
to o c •rl cr> c ca 
QJ o o ro -r| 3 E-CN 4-J <H w to r—I sz CN ro M OJ c o + 3 4-J •«H o Q o > > Q> 3 
C o o TJ -« -H o ro o JT C QJ S QJ + > CO o o U U M -j 
to CO (J -r| a: d + > < > 4-J > 4-) Ll > (J Ll O P -H -6 Ll <u o t1-1 -v CJ ro f l CO o a: 
C 4J CN + TJ 
O ro QJ c 
to GJ Ll o + ^ 3 —1 E E~ O 
QJ GJ rH * 4-J CD u rH rH <U + VJ 4-J CJ ro X u QJ 4J to o + CD Li ro 0 M •z 
TJ •r o^ HJ •o M 
2: + ^ 
+ o + -r| + 4-" 
* U IJ c . Vl iD a; , Ll 0 E .« Q> W a> 
a 
Oj "I ^ a c s 
j o a. a o .D r_- r- cr c> cr< 
CN • OL O CN" • .N <y .-< -H H 
x x c> x Y- x 
• o o o o c o o c 
O O O C5 o .- o o o o e. 
O Q) X X X X O 
o U X N X X Cr X X X O O X X X X C X X X 
c o o o 3 'j O • • ro • .TJ -COO U WO Cb 
> 0 0 0 0 O Jj X X X X U . 
a VD o -o t—I *—I Cv *—1 O-fn ro o fO 
O VC O 'O 
fn o ri u yo • \D C H rH —l a> E cn o cn 
A CN O (NJ > r~ o r» 
p eg VN o a vtno c io r- r- o r-
4-1 r-' o o m o n o n o n 
) CO CO O CD » o o o • u n • 
•h m in o m j j LO LO o in 
<JCN<NO<NJ 
co o ai 
>ICD O CO U r- o r-
c j r - r -c : r -Ofnom 
\d o 
C CO O CO On • fO 
M £ 
3 -H J-J O ^ "U • -<h i ; to ss • to a> a> 5 a u c i a> <L» ro • > r>. Oj ,-t ( 
o co x to .c OJ a* 
H <u a) a. t> E m e o «h e c H 
ro ro < i ro • 
- TJ NJ CJ > L< > 
J QJ C -H U 3 H ) di tn 
1 Q. H 
1 CO CO 
U -H u U t '—i >, c t- i-i + a* L? co < cj » o. c> 
2 u 
O •• QJ cj ro •• co 
JZ ro ~ 
O! •• -, Q, M cr c + H 4> 
^ CT'.y rf jQ U I 
O J O RH I ! O J-I Q. TJ A 
3 a p > 3 ro et ro 
CL. .3 O. H '-• !-• N I I , > 
in E ' o. o c O • •"J 
" (J U U Q, 
au u o 
J E 4-J ro H O O <K 4J 
•I O CL M C 4 H tl HI 
^ -i Hi U 'O C. O r c a o . CC n U - O CL 
* 
+ cc -a o 
— + TJ OJ i CTv + C rH <1) 
m 3 rH TJ o fN * o 0 3 
rH + cn Li rH OJ + H 4-J o TH 
cr 4-J c c ro a J CO 0 Or QJ u O 
" + s c c Q' + 3 a 
0 U * Q) J 
cn > -H •r| 
d' > + > Ll 4-J JJ + CO o V4 QJ > fN 3 CO + 4J cs: TJ 
O O •H TJ OJ O CO IE "H ^ u c rH QJ ro 4J O + 3 i rH TJ O 
# M •id 4-J rH O O 3 
TJ ro L| < —1 <r CO M rH jJ ro OJ 0 QJ + E- 4J O 
(J E a . a > * {J c c 
QJ QJ QJ CO o )-! CN s f£ J + ro 1 O O <N o" cu rH ua c Li u c V + 
O CU c > o > CO + HJ O 
i n OJ ro -H to * 
1 E T? {J U 
«—1 TJ ^ ro 
c OJ 4J 4-J + 
(J OJ GJ D 4J 0) + cs o 
o c i 3: a + TJ «—1 1—t E U, 0 + c c <u 
o O 3 * 3 tn TJ o CN CO to u + o •H p 
to o c TJ CTl CO rH OJ o o Q) + E-* O o CN u O £1 X2 a c CN ro rH 4J -H 4-J 3 4-J o 
-r| 0 -r| OJ D 1 4J o 
C CJ o T5 Li H 4J O CO ro O £1 c QJ > CD + Q) CO 
•-> VJ u o CO QJ J o 
CO CO U > C-J f Li 
•H < <M 4J * 4-1 
Ll >1 O o -r| •r| + CO t-3 u rH U ro <4-1 a; o c 4J <4-1 QJ JJ •f CO T> 
o c ro > cr Ol c c QJ 
to a) L| U •H OJ T CP TJ o rH E Ll 0 3 
Q> OJ U CO (O rH 
L' rH rH D CO CJ + H u IJ U ro > + x: a c •<H 4-J E +J o o U ca o + 1 4J o ro E- X Q> + 0 to M CO * 
TJ o VO J o ro o 
E o >, -CN c rt + 
o .—I + QJ •w <y » E 4J o + ro 
U jr jJ 
QJ o -» o C •—i 
CO 4J ro a1 0 to V4 ro * OJ o E Ll 4-J CO <y Q> M Q> 4-J £1 OJ 
2 4J <u + M a > c cr c c > > 4J a 0 o •r| ro 
cu < + CO < E u j 
o o o o o O o LO O o C 1 X X 1 x X X 
o o CO J X  X X X 1 >J 1 X X X 
o J X X 1 X X X 
J X X 1 X X X 
o o o o cn a» o m vO o vO | X X 1 X X X 
o •q- CN VO o CD X X I X X X 
cv <N Ol cn PI 1 X 1 X X X rH <-" o 1 X X 1 X X X 
CO o CO o CO C-J o m i n o i n I r-t OJ 1 ^ CO 
m o i n r - o CO CO CD 1 r-' cn CTl 
i O) 1 CN CN 
*~t o I 1 rH 
CD o a? c o <JJ o m o rH 1 X X 1 X X X 
o o CO OJ OJ 1 X X 1 X X X I X >; i X X X TH o 1 N X J :< y X 
1 X X 1 x X y. 
o O o G r^  r c m m o m i tt X 1 X X X 
r - o c CO LO 1 X X ) X X X OJ OJ CN 1 X X 1 X X 
o 1 X X 1 
v
X X 
o o o O o O o i n o o O 1 X X 1 X X 
o o CO 1 X 1 X X X 1 X X 1 X X X 
o 1 X X J X X 
— fc X — 
o o o O <3 o o U'I o c O 1 X X J X X y 
o o CD 1 X 1 X X 
1 X X I X X X c- 1 X X 1 X X X 
J X 1 x X X 
o o o O O o c m o o o X X 1 X ^ 
o c CD \ X > X X X 1 X 1 X X X •"I o I X X J X X X 
o o o o o o o U*l o o O J X X 1 X X 
o 1 X X J X X J X X 1 X X o J X X 1 X X X 
X x — 
CO o VJD o r - ro o i n CO o vO J OJ ro ( m a? CO o CN r - o CO CD CD I m CO CO 1 VO fO | OJ r-' r-
^ o 1 1 1 1 
o o o o o o o i n O o 1 O I m 1 o 1 VO 
o o CO 1 OJ 
1 r - cn fO 
o 1 Q> 1 
1 rH 1 
ro o fO o o ro o m Ol o cr. I 3 to i KD r -fO o fO ro o 00 ro ro I TJ • a. 
1 O \Q ro I ® t— ro ro TH o s 1 rH QJ 3 
•—I cu •• TJ •• 
D Q> l u j J OJ 1 ro a E I O rH TJ -r\ tn <4-1 3 Q> rH E 1 o u H 1 E O a 
O *b 03 rH ro E o 3 I £-• 1 > ro 
E rH a. 0 3 > rH | rH rH O. 1 U o rH > H TJ rH O 1 ro ro S 1 4J iJ ro QJ > £1 ro ro TJ O 4J > 1 'J O 3 1 •rl (J u o 
E Jj -r| n TJ •r| < > o -H I •H ->-H 0 1 O -r| c 
3 Q) 3 4J QJ QJ 4-J Ll 3 CO 1 4-J M rH 1 ro rH a> OJ rH o •r| TJ TJ •r| Q> u. TJ C 1 •H r| rH 1 a «4-i JJ > 
o ro u c TJ TJ c to X re Q> •rl 1 u u 0 1 ro c o o 
> cn ID 1—t < < >-• a Qj cu CC Pu 1 u u bu J o u cu E 
CJ O 
x r y. X X X X + •4 X I X X H X X X 4-J x r X £4 X X 3 
X 1 X X X X X a i X X X X X 4J i 3 
X 1 X X a: X X X x + o X 1 X X e* X X X X X X 1 X X X X X -H 
X 1 X X X X X •A E-* 4H i £4 4H r- i Ol o X X X y p 10 
O 1 E-1 X X X CL| Ll 
o CO J X X tH O 1 X X X 
X X z X 
o •r| 
X 1 X X X X + + CO <4-1 X I X X E- X X X + J M-l 
X J X X .X X X Ul ro 
X X X X E-* M 
j X X X X X E-r 4J i ^ >. i X X cd X X X 5 to 
X 1 X X E-1 X X X X rH 
X 1 X X -J X X X X o o >. I X X X X X {J o I X 
X J X X X X X X GJ TJ o 
5. 1 X X E- X X c * QJ to X 1 X X J X X ro > to 
X J X X X X X c <D 
X X X QJ rH M * o TJ x T X X X X X 0' * TJ 
X J X X E-* X X a * ^ •r| 
y, i X X cc X X > E 
X 1 X X X X X to + 1 X X X X X u o TJ 1 ro + o c 
X J X + OS X X >•- X + 'i * 31 ro 
X 1 X X E-1 X X X X to 
X 1 x X J X X 4H * < > 
X 1 X X X X X X tH 
i X CP ro 
X > X X X X X X M + c 4-J 
X 1 X X X X X GJ * •H c 
X 1 X X J X X X •O + rH Q> 
X 1 X X X X e ; 3 E 
X X X 3 * o OJ 
C ^ Q 
X X X X CJ 
X X H X X GJ • CO 
X X X X X -C * o 'ii 
O 1 X X X X X 4J ^ o ro 
1 •• -A X X X X OJ L| 
1 <9 to t TJ 
O 1 rH X a: CO <J. 03 cn m •r| + r j O 1 3 X X H CD CJ E 
TJ X X J in o OJ CN TJ + 
O 1 o y. X I-H QJ -r 1 f E 4J * in 
X X + X X X ^ * CO I-H 1 QJ X X H X X X O * r - Ol 
O X X J X X a o o o r H X X X X x QJ + o 
— £» X X X ^ * o t-l 
OJ rH QJ OJ rH rH CO 0> + CD 01 O. 1 CO •• CD > a p to 0) Q 3 + •H ro i O Q o ro <y o O r5 01 -» X -rl 
U 1 4-i £2 E {J u 3 c jr M 3 f •H <4-1 
o o rH c a o o o <y » 4H 0) 1 LO o >1 QJ TJ T> o 'O ro ro 4H 0 E 1 rH cn Ll A E 01 OJ 0J o o ro Lj 
3 r Q) M QJ Lj u TJ u L» Li 0» » Ll 
f-H 1 > ro c CO > ro ro M ro a a + C-l O 1 0) o Q 0 £1 £1 £1 a a o + 
> i J OJ u a E to CO CO to < < Z -» •X. 
111 1 o cz la •{ c a X x X X -o >: X X M o X X X o X >: x tn CM o X H >: Q, 03 p CO •< X X n X X a: n? o c il o G o a. vc o vc CL o ,1 CLi IJ n o ro 
c. Xi vo vo d> o Z) 0 0) n-. a -X o a.' o •u o y, X (.' X y. IS, 3 a: 0; X X X O X X X j O o v; "O 01 o CL X X X X •H X X JJ O to i; O c V3 t CO X X X r? x X f-« rO CL 3 <0 a T3 X X X c X X H M a» O 4' o G o o o o 3> o o o o o o o o 4' tD TJ 03 nr. 1 oW ai O Vi c o o o o o CI o c CI X X A X X X y. It a» 1 O o O 4J o >i-i O o o o o O X X X cr x X X E a. 4-J o CM til o o o o O X X X c X X d) O -a to IM o Q o o o o o o o X X y. •H X X 4-J 
? -H o 33 A3 d> SJ X >: X X 1H .V X X o xz > U o G o o o o CO o G o o c 3 4-» fij .c o o o 3 o D CO CC o a o 01 O cz U <13 j o ro o o o o VD o in OJ rO 3 E CO o 10 o o o u •q T r-i c i E t> a c L-J o ai o a Q) T) £ •o Vl a 03 CJ C 03 o <13 0) P td ro fl o ro E CM o •H u a< <13 o 0! 01 f!) -o o C e O 03 uO o m J o c E £ H rH TJ 01 17" c > VO o vo TJ -f < c U XL C o o Q) Q 3 IJ ro V •r| E CJ <N tu to C 0) O a> a a Vl o to LD c •rl cr 5 00 1 cP 13 -{ "D 3 r~ o r- 4-J O o o CO ai Z) o •rl 3 H 1 O o o IJ ro o G U) o U*l a vc o CO CM w •H 05 <13 .e •rt tTi Ol o cn 03 CM o IN < (N nj a) c o > u CM c U to •w O -<•1 Q 3 > •<•1 3 fl1 I—I 4J o a> 3 .Q c-c u o m Vl O C  •H a. O 3 c ro o X c a) 2 a) Q m a» 4-1 •H t- r- o r- C/J CD o UJ M 
r> to a o o (J J lJ 3 O 4J Ci. m m o m CO o CD co u -<-( X 3 C 01 0/ <1) c ON rr> cn Vl CM <N 3 < > 4-J CO a: 3 n 01 I—l o O o Vi o 3 a» lM a > C Ij-I a u, -5 •H 0) o Lu CQ 03 u •H o C^J o iN OJ lM m o iX. o H 4-1 o o o o o CO c j_> lM OJ u "D O c c u CM o 4-J CO o 00 o o c fO 0) c o •H o to ai u o 03 3 1 JJ o •H u IN E H Vl O 03 03 rtj 01 ai 4-> CD I 0i» R** ® Vi E £ ro C C'I o CM a cr- o ai i-i a) cn t-. 1 o o o "D 3 •r| •r| o \D U> o VO ro m o m u Cd nj > XZ a) O r- CL. u <T> a\ o Cv (J CM o CM I-I a» Q) CM XZ CO O •J CQ u 1 a I—l m 
FLJ T-" O t/j m IN m Vl Z CM to m in o u-| o a. r-•o r- •J 1 C c c CD ro o CO C CM o CM o co o >0 o D o o cn Ol cn O CM CM <0 c •r| •r\ -r| •H o c 4J 4-» 4-» o •d -H X 0) m CO re fC m «. ro •H c 0 co w XZ a) 4> C a P iJ 0 M o O 4-» a p. 
)J Vl ro x: •H $ •V a E o 3 3 3 •S > < > 3 n) a; ro X L> 3 -H u Vl £ £ •H 3 •H t-. a a to £ a u u -H S3 IJ c o Vi -a 01 ro c •H H rH rH E E E fO £ u Rl MH o i x: a. 0) £ rH O <0 <n O o 03 O O o o a) 4-» vi a E I G; Oi to 'O !G CLl > Vi > I) o ra to t) U c'i c Vl L' QJ Vi c ft) 1 vi G3 1 > X- tf> 4> 01 ai 4-J j*; 4-» Qi c >—1 4J 3 XZ ro •H aJ u MH 4-J VI 01 Vi 10 ts C £ V) C to 01 c U •H J-> Vi (J CM a -u E E o c * -H Vl J-> fr< Q 0 1 4' Vi 03 43 ro -H a •H •-4 •H c fO Vi tr r <U ro u o V a o ^ <z a o cu n S 1 X t3 CU CL. J H n Q to CO u w < t a 0' cr> O"-> <0 ,X3 Lu <44 > > > 4-J IX * a - H a: u + ^ a. 
* OJ O CM o r- ai o m rH 
+ CC "0 o O o 
1 CO 4 TJ c 01 —1 0) rH ^ G U-* 3 i rH TJ rH CO + o O 3 CQ Vi rH n O ro o m CO o m CD 0) U O CP. O cn r CO o co cn c c CM CM CO • ro m M 10 o o CU 1) i a O 0) c o a o o o o o m o 
C 03 * > D o o CO o o * -r| j O cr •r| + Vl o a- •rt > + Q Vi 4J u * ro o Vl 0) + c o o o o o o o m o CM 3 to * ro CC TJ O o o ro o O <D XJ 4) o X "4-r + CD C rH 03 o fO u O + 3 i rH Xf o Vi iJ rH + O O 3 
n m Vi <c rH „ CQ Vi rH cn o Ol o n o in t 4-1 Q 03 O 0) + t-< 4-J 0 rH a\ o cn r- r- o CO o o E a. Q. > ^ 4-J c c • CM 41 4' a> f CO o (-1 I-H o CM Ct. j ro a o CM O CU U) c cn o cn o o o IT) IT) Vi 4-1 c O 01 * o T o ro r~ O Qj c o CO + j rH m 0) ro ro -k o 1 £ TJ 4J U * T> ro C 0) 4-J 4-J v 00 o CO o o CD o LTl Vi? u 0) 0) 3 4J W f CC o T o o co m o c £ 3 a Vi + TJ 
S. E Lu o + CZ c 03 rH c-o o 3 I rr> -o o CM CQ to (J o •r| a to O c XJ CQ to rH o o O G o o o m o 01 D o 4) E-i O o o CO CM 4-1 •H a xz <y XZ a c nj •H 4J •r| > 4-J o o •H O •H > •r| 3 1 4J o C o O "D Vi E Vl 4-J o to CO o fO O o m vo CO o xz C tu a cr. + tu to o rH o CO rH (0 to u cn o u to T> c + <N -». tu Vi J o ^ ^ o •H < lM ft) 4-J Vl u o •H <y CO tu ic 
c 
Vi nj 4-J 
•H 
lM MH 41 
rH ai 
4-J + B"
 
-a CC o 
o o o O O o o o G m o CO 
o C <0 > CP 0) c c tu rH o to CD Vi 01 •H 0) 3 1 Cr-TJ o E £-1 Vi o -M 3 4) 0) 4-J xz • m to rH o o O O o o o m o 4-» rH Z2 co 0) + t-. O o o o 00 Jj U r0 > * .c a c 
•H E ^ + j j o o CO O U CQ (-• + Vl 1 j j o to f-< X 0) + o « o o o o o o o m o Vi CO z o o CO T> <0 o o r- + J o o o CN O •H 4-J o 
^ * tu * O 
* 
41 £ <0 2 i : •U 
- 0) rH 3 TJ O E rH 3 
4> 
aq rH O 
MH MH <0 rl 
j j 3 Cu 41 £ .. 3 41 a * o c O > H •v to C" • 4-J to tu o tu > xz <0 1*3 <C Ti O Vi « + a) o £ Vi 4-J to E •H TJ •u •H < > 41 Vi + 4) Vl 4) j j XZ tu 3 41 3 4-» 03 0) 4-1 H 4-J tU f Vi a > c O> c rH to o •H TJ TJ •H tu U* U* 
£ c > + 4-1 a O o •r| ro O to Vl C TJ •v C CO X X 
QJ M 4 ; 01 a: E u oc •J > CD iD 4 l-H D Cu Oi 
u o TJ 
O *—I X X X v X X ( X X + X X X * CM 
X X y. X X X C X X X X X (J 
X X X X X 1 X X oi >: X X 3 
X X X X X X 1 X X X X X Q. 
X x X X X 1 X X X y V I-i 
1 Q 3 
O CD X X X X X X 1 X X Od X X X + X + o 
cr. X X X X X X 1 x X {-< X X X X X 
CO X y. X X X 1 X X u l X X X X 
X X X X X X 1 X X X X MH 
1 X OS lM 
o o X X X X X 1 X X t X X X + >• O ro 
X X X y. x i X X X X i . Vl 
X X X X X X 1 X X • J X X X 
X X X X X 1 X X X X X 
X X - X X z " x 
o o a x X X X X 1 X X X X * IX) <4J 
X X X X x x i y. X t - X X X + • J m 
X X X X X 1 X X orf X X X w fi) 
X X X X X 1 X X X :c X {-< 
X X X X X 1 y X X X X E-I 4-J 
O V %• X X X >. 1 X X Cd X X X * X * ^ "to o X X >i X X X 1 y. X E- X X X X + CM X X X X X 1 X X J X X X X o o 
X X X X x x r X X X X X X p Q 
O U> CM a . I-H rH m 1 m VD < X X X * X 0) + TJ O r- O VD VD rH 1 H X X X C 4 41 Vi CM rH • | ro hJ X X ro + to i-H O I X X X c 03 
X X 03 rH Vl O TJ O VD CM ro r o CM CM <r 1 X X X X >. * 4 4 • H *o 
LO O m m o i X X f- X X X CL + J •H VP r o VD VD • 1 X X c t X X X E O 1 X X X X >: CO * 1 X X X X X ^ + O XJ 1 ro * O C o o LO O o O O 1 X X CM CD a) co a3 o + to <0 m VD CN O 1 X E-> cn CO va cn CM CM • 1 y. X hJ T o r o CO >M I < O I X X <-H Vl 
1 cn to 
o vo m r- CO i n vn i X X + X X X T M + c J-J 
m CD m o i x X E- X X X 03 * -r| c 
o cn a \ CM CM • I X X J X X X J2 * 01 O 1 X X X X E + 3 5 
X X 2 •» O 
c: -r Q »-l 
o o X X X X X 1 X X X X X + + w 
X >: X X X 1 X X E- X X X 03 • CD 
:< V. X X X X 1 J: X CC X X X o to 
X X X X X X 1 X X X X 4J , O r0 
X X X X X I •• X X X X X * CM Vi i 03 to + ~c o o X X X X X I rH X X cc X X X - X + •r| t ro 
X X X X X X 1 3 X X EH X X X X U X 
•• X X X X X X 1 TJ X X J X X X T> + v x X X X y x i O X X X X X 43 * 1 i E X t-> + m o o 3 X X y X X X 1 X X + X X X H Vl * CTJ 
"O X X • • X X X X 1 tu X X H X X X o * r- OI 
0 X X 4) X y X X 1 0 X X X X a + o o 
E X X rH X x1 x x i •rl X X X X X a> * o 
X X -- 3 > X X X VL J, o a TJ •• i M 
. . ai <o a E O RH 4> R-L 0) a rH .. rH IJ) 41 * CO 4> 
RH C o e) •w E O d •• a r t o 0) > a 3 0) l/> a) Q 3 + 
O 3 H > ro . NJ I a a o CO 0) a Q Q 3 41 + •H > *—l r-J fH a O a, o t E +J (J 3 c y xz xz a •r| o io <0 4-1 4-J A3 --- 1 o ^ c CJ o V o Ci r 14-1 - r i p > U 0 3 •H O 4-J O 03 1 i n o >, 0) •u TJ O TJ ro TO lM O 
U rH •rl -r| o O H c E 1 rH ON Vl .Q E 41 0) 41 o o TO Vl 
3 10 4-J 4-J 10 rH 4' 43 3 1 03 >^ 4-i 03 Vi Vi •u n VI VI 4> + Vi Cu 
TJ c •rl r| rH a UJ > rH 1 > <0 CO > ro m Vi <0 a a. 4J > EH ai -r| k u 0 ro C O O O I tu i 3 o Q 0 xz xz xz xz a a o + CC u a Cu O U a> E i> 1 hJ CM u a E CO t o t o t o < < z X 
O O o o O i—i 
cc o G cr. 
T> o o o 
1 C 
3 
O 0J Q of- •ii CO iN o Ol i n o i n ^ 
o U-i c c CD o 'O Cl o ro f l o o o 
'.) CN o O) 
Q' u Li o i 
o ro ai Q 
c 0) o n. O 
o c . •r> o o o 
o T1 O 
CL O III 2 
Li ro •H O 
O V* CJ Li A V OJ O IN V2 
OJ 3 |J cf. D> o o ro O Cl J 
O O Li TJ 4-1 CL a i cr. o n W 
O to X o C £ to XJ F-« 
I - I ro A I Q. tt e-
Lt u a> O 0' ^ a> 
"C rr. OP Qj CD Ct> o IT. o 
»-> ro <21 i' o U-l f-i CJ o\ cr. o cn o> CO O ro 
o i J •ft o o OJ OJ o OJ C O o 
QJ O O to IV rg OJ og "rf Ll 
(*"> E •H O Ol ro i CJ Ll 
OJ o CU *J JZ > UJ c 3 t j 
Ll ro W -H 3 to m o Vi- O \C QJ 
O n. r >• U A> UJ , - j ro o OJ o r J CO 
i n cu ro 3 E ro u r^ i ro 4-1 c 
1 E •q a c U QJ u rg OJ M l-H QJ 
D E T> ^ CD ro QJ o 
c 0) O 01 4J i J X X X e X X X •H 
U 0) U N U PS o n) •D X X X QJ X X X >-3 o c i 3 : •H - 1 <ii QJ tj> X X X > X X 
I-I I-I "D R-T TJ; c CO L( T> c X X O X • X o o» ro 3 »-J o QJ -H X X X X s X X X o 
cc to H C 0) O o O o o O O QJ O o o o o o O O O o o o a o to c: Li o 
to o c •H o> 6 CD tat5 Jf> QJ o G o -H O o o rH O o o o o o T3 -H X X x X x x V) 
QJ 13 o ro - h 3 H vr> o o o c j o CD O o o o o o o O ro O X X X u X X X to 
OJ •H L-J CO »—i 4-1 JZ CN O i - i o o o o M X X X QJ X X 
CM 4J QJ C O QJ 4-1 u CM o 0 o c o o o o o U CO X X X • X 
•H o -H Q 3 > QI 3 a> P o Qs to X X X X .Q X x x O1 
U o •c M O CO o o o o o o o o H o o o o o CU c o 3 c 
to D _c c QJ E QJ |J CO \ o Ol o o o o IJ o o o o o o CO o r - •rl 
!0 0 o O { J M CO 3 O tj o o o Ui o cr. o o> rH 
CO CO o •rt X 3 0J o OJ - o o CJ c Li m • i n 3 
-H < > «-» JZ tt 3 O to o QJ I-H o rH rH O 
> u LI o A *J a u > N c O 
Cu Li -H 0) o u, TJ- QJ CC O X X X X X X ro <4-1 CO o \ (X o 4-1 o X X X X >, y. N X CD 
C 4J 4-J •o o O c c o u X X X X IJ X X X O o ro <M QJ c o X X X •H X • X O 
CO 0> o Q» 3 1 -I-J 0 o y. X X X u X X x OJ 
E f - Ll O OJ Q' QL J j \ V-l ro 
0) 0) I J CD OY5 0> Li E g ro o c X X X a X X X 
4-1 0J CO H o o o TJ U-l 3 •H •H i—I o o y. X X X ro X X X <J 
4-) LO ro > JZ QJ o E-I Q o u X X X X u X x x 
•rl U 0J t-> QL OJ . c X X X X • X 
its to O ^ M 1 a I-h o X X X X X X X i n ro f - O to i n CN 1 in 
Li 2 OJ •VJ o o o o y? o r-
t j CD >J rH C C C c o c CO O ro o ro •—I O ro 0 0 o o UJ • y? 
E ro c H H -rl •H rH rH d 
c se 0 i-l |J |J 4-1 
TJ -H — X CD ro ro ro ro M ro 00 
H O C/j X CO -C QL a< cu c a I-I 4-1 4-J o o u a TJ CL 
|J i - ro X •rl 01 ai a t j E o >, 3 3 3 > Q C r£ ro X 
X' 3 ri Li e t j E c 3 •H E-< Q> a to o 3 14- > CJ n U H 
QJ O C O Li TJ OJ ro c •H E- 4-1 i-H E CJ <n £ ro 
£0 ro <y U. a) E O ro ro 0 o •- QL o P . •11 o ai AJ •4-1 
o H ai CO 3 Li v ro CD > u > u c j ro CO c c ; c ; c c. u c ro 
QJ L, a to 0' c> OJ 4-1 4-1 QJ c rH 4-1 D •H JZ ro ro •H E 4-1 o Ifc. ^ QJ Li 
i J ro O c E to c to QJ a> O -rf |J Ll o r j * a 4J £ O1 V) CO 4-J H 
C a o u Ql ro -rl a. -H rl a H > c ro Ll cr cr r r + iH <U ro .. O o 0 a TJ c Q. O 
Du »-» < s: T. CD a. CL. >-3 E-I 3 >-3 Q CO CO u n to < * n. CP Ci cr- « ID .Q +J U. UH > > > I J ri. * a r-» 3 CJ a. 
O o o o G o o in o O O X X J X X X X I X X X X X -r 
O 
N 
OS o o o cn X X 1 X X X X j X X H X X X. 4-i rH 1 X •Q C QJ rH O X X X i X J X X X X X X X I I X X X X CC. >: X X X X X 3 a f- X 3 I O>TJ o X X J X X X I X X X X X 4-1 X O •H 3 1 I 3 X CQ CO in o m o o in o m cn o <T» in O 1 OJ r- ro j X X PS X X -V X Cb O QJ X H O o CO O CO a? o cn CO U> CD C-1 OJ ro I X X EH X X X X X O1ro tu 4-1 a c CO cn I X X X X -rl o i—I o 1 OJ ro I X X 'A X X X U-4 a, QJ 4J 1 I X Ol <H JJ SS CO m o m o ro CO o m R- o R- w M I r^ cn o X R X X + a X + >: S ro C QJ • QJ m o m to o o~> r- r- in o X i X X E- X X Ll o QJ O QJ •J G » l-H i—i r* ro t X I X X >-1 X X EH o> > •rl Ll rl o 1 l-H X r X X X X ^ Q> > +J X X X 25 X VJ »J Ll CO O -rf 
CO o Ll ro 0J in o m o o m o m c- o R- r-j ro J r* OJ OJ i X cn r to OJ 3 c to JZ O O T o cn ro cn j X X o >-3 4-1 o O Ll 4-1 T3 \o ro r CTi <o CO i X X Ol OJ C. CJ '3 o to X GJ c 01 rH O i r X X OJ O-J Ll l-H ro I-I o 3 i a» O rH 1 I X X F- 4-1 =tc tH _id 4-1 l-H O -H 3 1 I ^ 
TJ ro Li < ca CO rH o o o O o o O in R- o r- m O 1 CO CTl o m I X X CC X + Cb M cn 4-1 ro Ql O 0J F- O G O T o cn at cn C-L CO I y. X E-" X X X u V a. a 0J 4-J a c OJ I X X >-3 X X X OJ o O Q) QJ E QJ CO o T— o I OJ T I X :< >: X O Jj O cn S OZ i-3 ro JJ O I I o SZ OJ o cu i-H CJ CO o o o o o o O IT/ o o o X X 1 X X X X I X X X X X » ot 0J TJ o 
M 4-1 c o 0J o o o-i X X J X l X X X X I X X F- X X c 01 l/J a, c >, o > CO O X X X X X j X X J X X X ro to m , QJ £ ro 'O -rl 4-1 0J ro U rH l-H O X X I x — X X X X I X X X X X X X X rH c 0J 01 rH T> M ro Ll X VH o TJ l-H C QJ +J 3 I-I o O O G o o o m CO o CO X X I X X X I X X + X X X -«. ai -rf TJ o Cl Ql 3 4-1 CO a •o O W O CO to o cn <05 UJ X 1 X X X X I X X x X X a HI -H o £ S a 3 Ll 73 0J X X 1 X X X X I y. X OS X X E M E Cu o c rH <21 <-• o X X 1 X X X X I x X X X X CO o O 3 I l-H T3 X X 1 X X X I X1 X X X M o TJ OJ CD to {J O O 3 1 j ro o G to ID c T3 co Li m o m o CD CO o m vc o vo X X 1 X X j 3 X a. X X X + X O to ro QJ o 0J O E-I 4J U O R- o r* CO o cn vo vo X I X X X X I X E- x X X X OJ -M -H o JZ 4-1 JZ c c in • m m vo VD X X 1 X X X A j X X X X x X 4H et, >, CN ro -rl rH o 4-1 •ri > 4-1 QJ OJ ai 4-J 3 J o u ^ l-H i-H rH i—i o X X 1 R X X X X I I X X X X >. X X CP Ll ro C o 0 N Li Z Li 4-1 o o o o o c o m o OJ ro I o r- r- r- I VO r- FT X vo • X Ll c ro o sz c <1> 4-J QJ CO O vo o vo vo O CTl r- r- a> cn I X 0J •rl c n to 0 o to 73 CO S 0J ^ o OJ • OJ OJ OJ CN OJ 1 in j o X o r- •9 CJ to CO u <U Li l-H o r l-H o j X E 3 E 
EZ M JZ Cu HJ 3 O 0> rl 0 o -rl 4-1 CO C Q rH Cu t-Q Li •H CO o o o o o o o m o o O X X I X X X X I X X X X X + CJ ro l-H ro \ > OS •O o o O Ol X X 1 X X X X I X X H X X X CD CO 
C 4-1 A> c JJ o f-a •O QJ X X J X X X X I X X OS X X •x JZ O to o c ro > CP CJ c 4' l-H o X X 1 X X X X I Y X X X 4-1 O ro CO QJ Li Q» -H GJ 3 "O o X X 1 X X X X X X >; OJ Ll rH E H J to Ll o o 3 1 1 0J to •o 
0J QJ c |J jr ca Li o o o o o o o m o o O X X 1 X Y X X 1 i-H X X OJ X X X - X rl 1V I-I rH rH 13 to QJ JJ O o o C Ol X X 1 X X X 1 3 X X X X X X o E 4-1 LJ ro > sz C c X X 1 X X X X 1 TJ X X >-3 X X X X TJ •rl -M 2 N 4-1 o rH rH o 0) x X 1 X X y y 1 O X X X X X X <1> 1 5cS CO o U c. Ll o o 1 1 E X 4J in ro H X 0J o c o o o o o G M o o O 3 X V, 1 X X X X 1 X X X X X + X Ll CD Ll to z D o o cr. T X X 1 »» X X X X 1 Q> X X E~< X X X O r- OJ •O o CD >-3 o G X X 1 QJ X X X J O X X J X X X a G o ro o rH rH O E X X 1 rH X X X X 1 -rl X X X X X <1> o 
Z 0 01 C 
o 
>, ro 
0J 
- aj 
3 .. Ql <H 4-J ai 
X Qi •• <D CL 
X — 
E 1 
3 TJ •• O rH 
— > t JH 1 0J 
X 
rH Ol 
X 
0J 
X 
" to 
M 
0J 
o 
CO / 01 
•ri QJ E T3 -n co <4-1 3 0J rH E CD CJ •rf r E O a Q. t (0 41 > cl 3 01 to 0J 3 3 4-1 Q ro O •• T3 03 ro Ui E D 3 H 1 > ro ro I O O o ro QJ § 3 a 0J X -rl o 25 sz 4-1 E rH < o 'H 3 > i-t rH a i U a u I JZ E ul u 3 X SI 3 •rl <*H 01 0J o c O rH > f-1 TJ -J- o <o ra 3 I 4-1 4-J ro \ 1 O Jj rH C o O o o o <*H to O1 4-J ro Q' o CO aj > .c m ro < TJ O u > a o 3 1 •H U JJ o 0J 1 m o QJ T3 TJ U TJ ro ro <4-4 O Ll ro QJ o E 4-1 to e 4-1 rl T> "O vH fit > CJ rH •rt -H O I U -rl c | 1 l-H at Ll .Q E ai QJ QJ o o ra M QJ Ll QJ M QJ 4-J JZ QJ 3 QJ 3 4-> aj QJ Jj Li 3 ro J-I 4-J ro rH a QJ 1 0J >* 4-1 QJ Ll M •o u Ll J4 QJ M a |J OJ JH a > c CP c rH to 0 H •O TJ •H Q) U-i b. TJ c •'f -H a ^ 4-J > 1 i> ca c CO > ro ro Li ro a a 4-1 f- ^ c 4-J a O o -rl ro o ro u c •0 TJ c co x X Cl .-t ll U O 1 ro c o o o 1 0J a o 3 o sz SI JZ r. a a & >-« < 10 fit X {J tx >-3 > £0 CD hH < fit hH 3 CU CU u. O O £u- 1 U U CU E > 1 J OJ O E 01 CO to to < <T Z X 
M a a. c >> QJ ro I E T) *o 
• c <u U C< ID c e 3 
» at to co o c (DD O 
DOT) O X C co o o w to u 
« >,u wj LJ rl ro M C *J '+H o c ro 10 QJ M M E E-« <1J CD 
Ll O 3 0) O U, CO o 
•X "O c p 1 JJ o 0) c £Q 3> JL 
4J - o o o «W g 
'/) CM 0) 1 rC 
£ ,.1 
z a 
cC CO C E— 3 l XJ H O a> CD CD ic H o o o >4-J 4J o u ro 1 Ul cy CO c 
QJ •'J -rl Pi TJ c 3 1 iJ CJ o QJ O 00 Itp Of 41 CO 
{ - o o o U-L cn 
JJ SZ ^ o> u O CN a> QL rH o CO c 
JJ CO "S CO I J JJ 
QJ 3 0) o 
JJ 4-1 Q 
X Pi o CD 
*J "O o O a) c C a> 3 •r J-l CN o 0) u CO A3 DV •• Q) LL CO H m o o TJ'M a o 
JZ QJ o 
JJ tt) CN JZ u 1 a r-H o CO LD s CN 
• J o 
ztt rH O ro o s o •O CO M c •• o u ro JZ M 
x: 3 4-J L( -rl 
O C O LJ QJ «W ro 0) -C •• X XJ H Ui '•Ll o E QL A) -V. CO SS O 
A» VI 0) > TJ CO 4' Q> 0) u a > 5> Q TJ U c £ H CL o D LL QL ai ro -H 
I - ^ < E i a ^ Q. J H 
u o *D 
o o o o o O o m 13 o vo CN ro i o m y, X r- cr. ro ft, OJ cc o o o Ol rH CO m m OJ X X E-i o u rH 1 •V r- • -q C QJ I-H l-H o r-l rH VO ro 1 1 vo N-o X X '.< X 04 OJ CO oi l-H 3 a Ol 3 a>*o 1 X X JJ rH o -H 3 1 a 3 m CD Wl l-H m o m o ro CO o m ro o ro in O | o ro in X X OZ X X X * c Cu O QJ T- o o r- o r- o <Ti cn iTi r- X X t-« X X X X tn a c CO rH X X X X X OJ -rl ro f (0 o I-H l-H r-H o 1 i-H o X X X X X l-H M Oi <U 4-1 o R Cu •M 
+ jJ S CO o o o o o o o m o o O .>: X 1 X x X X X X X X X k £ nj C ai 0) o o CTi X X 1 X X X X X T- >: X X M o CD u QJ ».i o X X 1 X X X X X iJ X X X E-H cr> •H M o X 1 X X X X X X X X X Qi •H fc- 4-1 X X — X X X z X U 4J Ll CO Q -rl CD o M nj QJ o o o o o o o m o o O X 1 X X X X X X X X » CO 4-1 CN 3 c CO JZ a o o o Ol X X 1 X X X y. X X E-i y. X rJ <i-l O O M 4-1 TJ X X 1 X X X X X CC X X X CJ ro O to X CU 4H m c C QJ o X J X X X X' • / >: X X E-H Ll i-H ro 4-1 O * 3 i Di TJ o X X ! X X X X X X X X T- -u LJ M Jj rH O -rH 3 1 Cu / TJ ro ro cC i-H CD CO rH o o o o o o o m CO o CD m O I R- CN VO VO cn Cu tc y. X X 4 r-4J Q> o QJ T- U m o m o cn m m o C'J ro r- E- X X X rH u E Oi a QJ > j j a c rH m i-H o HJ X X X i—i o o a> a> E QJ CO o w I-H o 1 X X ro o •n 3 ro i o T JZ 
OJ O & rH w Ui in o m o o m o o ro m i CD i-* m r- CM X X X j> 01 TJ o Ll 4J e O QJ in o m m o cn CD IO CN cn CO O T- X X X c 0J CO o CL c >, o J> ^ i-H rH rH r- ro i CD OJ «3< cn rJ X X ro CO m 1 Cl) E ro TJ •rl JJ CU ro L> i-H o 1 OJ r-m X X X X c 01 a> rH i-H TJ a ro LJ Li o TJ i-H c 0) L> 3 4J o o o o o o o m O o o X X 1 X X X X X X X X X -f 0- •rl TJ u a) a 3 CO K •c o o o cn X X X X X X T-" x X a •H o c E 3 a 3 Ll TJ 01 X ^ i X X X X X CC x X X E E Cu O C rH a> o X X 1 X X X X X X X X CO o o S 3 J rH TJ o X 1 y, X X X X X X TH u T> CN CD CO CJ o O 3 1 ITS o c CO O q TD CD JH rH o o o o o o o u-i O o O X X 1 X X X X X CC X X >; * X O CO ro a> o Q> O T- J^ u o o o cn X 1 X X X X X X E-H X X x CN 4-1 •H o X 4-1 JZ c c X X 1 X X X X X X P X X X X M rii >> CN ro M O 4J •rl •rl > jJ 0) QJ (U + Jj o I O l-H u o rH c- X X 1 1 X X X X X X X X X X X O CP M ro C u O TJ Ll 22 Ll 4t o c o o o o o o o m o o o X X 1 X X X X y. X X X X * X TH c n ro O JZ c QJ CO QJ CO D o o Ol X X 1 X X X X X X E-H X X X 0' •H c n o o CO TJ CO QJ J o X X 1 X X X X X X X X £> rH a> to CO o a> M 1—' o X X 1 X X X X X X X X 6 3 t: •rl < 4-t M , JZ CO X X — X X X 3 o QJ M >i u O jJ CO C Q rH Cu ii M •rl rH m m o m o OJ r- o m o CN X X 1 X X X X X X X X X UL ro M ro "S C£ TJ o IO o CO co o Ol Ol cn X X 1 X X X X X T-« X X X QJ CD 
C «w 0' c TJ 0) X X 1 X X X X X X X X X SZ O (0 o c ro > cr aJ c rH Ql o X X 1 X x X X y, X X X X u O ro w 0) u 11 -rl QJ 3 i rH TJ X X 1 X X •• X X X X y OJ Li i-H £ E- J Li O O 3 1 a> CD TJ <11 0) c AJ JZ CO M rH o o o o m in o m CO o CO X X 1 X X X X rH X X + Cu X X X * X •rt ro (J i~H rH D . to QJ E-H 4-1 O o cr> o Ol l-H o o Ol vo X X 1 X X X 3 X X E-H X X >: X a E jJ U flj > JZ c c l-H cl CN OJ X X 1 y. X X X X X X X TJ •H 4J E \ Jj O l-H rH o l-H rH QJ X X 1 X X X X o y. X X X X 4> J M CO o LJ u Ll 1 o .—1 1 E X LL in ro T-« X QJ O c o o o o o o o m o 3 r-i ro 1 o CO CO «T X «r eC X M CO M to Z ^ r- o r- r- o cn R- r- TJ • r- o 0) • E-H X O r- OJ TJ o cn He J o CM 1 QJ m m o o r- rJ X d r- a o o ro o O E 1 rH r-l o •H X 01 a 
E o CN c o * 
>1 ro -H + -K 
- OJ i-H 3 Qi "i-i ^ o Cu •• o a E L 
3 TJ O rH 
- > M QJ 01 0' rH CO 
M 
QJ 
d 
CD OJ •H Ql 6 -ri CO 4H 3 QJ I-H E e? -rH 1 E O a a cr, .. QJ > a 3 QJ CO 01 Q 3 rH J^ Q ro O •• g CD ro Cu E o 3 E-H 1 > ro ro o a O ro QJ a Q a 01 X •H U z _C J-I E rH •3c o H 3 > rH I—1 a i >1 o a u U-l SZ E iJ L> 3 C r4 sz X 3 •rH 4H 0J 0) u c rH o rH > rH TJ rH O ro ro D i 4J 4J ro "S o «-> r-l c c* o u o a In CO CP 4J ro Qi o co QJ > X nj ro < TJ O 4J > o o 3 I •rl O JJ o 0) m o >i QJ T? TJ L> TJ ro ro "4-1 O Li ro 0) o E >H 4J £ Jj •H TJ TJ -H < > o rH -H H O I O -rl c E r-H cn M JD g 01 0) QJ o o ro Li QJ M QJ M QJ x: QJ O <U 3 01 QJ 4-1 M 3 4J 4J rH 1 ITJ rH Q> 01 3 tt) >i QJ M M TJ u M M 01 ^ a 4-1 0J M a > G tr» c rH <0 o •H TJ TJ rH a» Cu T> -H -H rH J (J p rH > ro c CO > ro ro LI ro QJ a 4-1 2 C > a o o 3 o ro M C "O TD c 0) X X QJ •H O 1 ro c O o O QJ K o 3 0 ji sz sz sz CU a O CL n < CO ri: E O a: > to o M < < D a Oi a Cu U CJ Cu I D u OJ X > OJ L) X to to in if) < <T Z X 
4 CC 
c 3 £ 
O O r- a. c -X U i/» a; 
o CD U3 2 Vl O CD o CD 3 o O to (M 0) t-J ^ •J O «. cu 3 <-1 .H UJ o t/j tu a a) . E-« I—l ra E o > in r- E-" 3C V cu «—' 
TJ to 
J.) ID 
O E 
0) 
>. TO -a 3 a- ai o 4J •1-1 1 
o (U •o M 4-1 O 4-1 s rH CT> a« CU C JS. U T to 0) o r- vo c 
l E CX <1) 0) 4) 
•O "D 0) o « o o O • c G) CC H ID r l 
o 4> P > tn »-i xr r- J 
c 5 M 5) 
ra W J-l CD <u • 
cn •rH CD o > -a- vo 
•H V) to I-H o 
- ffl JJ > co o 
w o •H rH m S m 
to 
QJ <0 o CQ If) 
4-1 c < ro ^ < w •H O 4) TO ro CP 
o o CO 4.) > D1 cn c 
o .c c (J <1) •H -H •H in O o ra >-3 g 4-1 
w t/> •H a •H •H 3 
4-) £ 2 E Q •H Ci •d V •o I 1 
c aj C 4-1 o 4-> 4-1 o 
o c o 41 41 O 
CO <1) 4) CD CM 
W £ o 14 M 
0) 0) -H 4-1 4-> 
4-1 rH to to O 
4-> w 4-4 
•rl fO -C 
w M 4-> 4-> m ro H in M S \ r-
T> rH 4-> 4-> o TO in 0) CD 
E M O c 
CD 
M 
CD o 
H 0 •rl 
4-1 
11 
<1) 
•/I 
4J to 4-> to CD X -H 
tt> 
<1) a. m 
4-> H C -A- :tr 
v> u w w -< 
V) Q) -t e 0) 4J . 
u m u 
<M <M 
Q) E O Q. £ cu Cu O a O Q • a "O •H U-l o TO E 
iw 
tO 
14 m 
H c o r-
CD 
CM 
rH c -H o O 
ro o 4-> o 
4-> •H 3 c o rH o u X) o / 
E-
CD 
. . a) 
ro 
CD 
M 
4-> 
•rl 
4-1 ro 
CO 
X 
CD 
rH -H 
o > C u C V) •H MH 
"D M 4) •H 3 •r—I 
14 C a 4-J 4-> U> CJ w Oi «4-l O 
ro ro £ 4) SJ K CD •r l nj M 
C E 3 E ro a a x : 4-J U-l M Cu 
4) £ rH o a •r l -H 4-1 3 c EH / U 0 0 4) E >H 14 ra O o w U > (3 w EH E- CU CC U X 
£ 1 & -H 
« 01 4-> 
Vi -H (DOS 4J 
<0 r~! I -H 0 
U 0 Id o sz c 
to u o 
tO C/> -H < vJ 
u *a ro c 
C 4-> o 
cu cu -H 
H *H 
4-> CJ 
U O 
TJ 
1 o o i o o O O o o o m o o o O O O I o o o O I O o o o o o a. o o-i 
UZ 1 o J o o cr. o o 1 m o o 1 o o o o 4-) 
T> [ *D I 1 r- 1 o o 3 
1 r- ro C I a> 0) i I-H o 1 o 1 o o o CL co m a 1 4-J TJ O J 1 I 4-J r- m o 1 -V 1 1 I o 3 
0) CQ i ( o o 1 m o m o o in o cn o CT> o o 01 1 o o o O 1 LQ CM o VO u CM * "Z O O' o H i E O o CD CD o cn CO CD o o CD 1 m o o M I o C-l <M o < X (TJ 4-J 1 Vl C J 1 r- r- l IN CM J CU CO I a> I-H 1 I-H o 1 o o O ro E- "4-1 
a< i a. O 1 1 I cc «H vi 4-J » i o O 1 m o in o CO CD o •JI r- o r- o o r^  i o o M I VO CM VO CT> o CT> o LO o to c 3 a> i 1 <5 in VO o cn R- [— o o R- I M VO o R- 1 CM 1— O & Vl 
o o 03 i-l i r- O I a\ cn H cr X o> Jg j I o 1 o I—L I—I I o O O 
o> > 4-J •z X v» -H n o -r| 
CD o ro 4J JZ J o o 1 m o m o o o m r- o r - o o [— 1 o cr. O L (N CO CO o CO u ro w 
CM a> ro 0) tn I O I o O cr. •C o o M CT> CD 1 o CM o 
o Cu c X > 4-J *D 1 TJ 1 1 r- R- L CM CM CJ ro O « Vl s C 1 0) 0) 1 i-H o I-H i-H 1 o o l o O o ro ro EH VI ro E o> o a 1 4-J T» 1 l E-at M Cu 4-> a 0) o I P a I 1 1 
TJ Vl .H ro CO GQ o o 1 o o o o o o r- o r- o o r- 1 o CM VO 1 VO CM CD o a> u ro ^ to 
4-1 ro >, O < u i E u o o cn o o •<R 1 m <T> in CM I o CM (N o U 2 ro a. s P 1 Vl c 1 i-H rH 1 r- I (M CM o o a> TJ 0) > CO 1 0) J o 1 O C 1 1 o O O cn «-• co 4-J O o ^ E -t ro fO 1 cu O 1 1 1 JZ o 0} 3 o W 1 o o 1 o o o CD o o o m o o o o a O 1 o O o O 1 o O O CJ o ra a. o *D o 
M 4-i 0) c r—1 > 0) in 1 I o o CTi o o 1 U*l O o 1 o O o o 0) Oj cu e Ec o O TJ Q 1 T o | 1 1— 1 o o to 
m CM •H > >—( tw 1 1 o 1 o 1 o O o c <u 
I 6 U 4-> ro 4) o <0 H Tl TJ ro 0) U CP u Tl 
r4 C 0) u Vi O> -H ro 1 o C3 1 o o o O o o o in CD o cn o o CO 1 O O o cn t (N O o < CM -<H T3 o 01 4-> a 3 •H 4-J Vi 1 (C o VD vo o cr, o o VO 1 U") CC o o 1 i—L 1— o •J rH 
o c i ro a 4J 4-J •H ai > TJ 1 0) t rH 1 m in E I—L cn E 3 -<H Vi > ai c I (0 0) 1 o 1 o rH | o O o o -r| O U. E U < J 3 I ro T> O 1 1 1 o T> CM CD o o J JZ 1 1 1 0 C CO CJj •H 1 CO i a. o O 1 ^ o O a> cn o m vc o sf o o VO 1 o o o in | m o VD o o o CQ r- CO ro 
ai E a> TJ t-" I O CM 1 r- G [— CC' o Ci o o VO 1 m cn o m j m + 1— r- o to CM 4-> u C» u JZ 1 4-J c r U7 U"> VD VD VO 1 r- ft > CM ro 1 4J M I O o R I cn I o o o J-H Vi •H O > P O 1 1 I CJ" to 
C o 0 to M 0) 4-J o i a o o L CJ o O O o o o m •5T o o o o o o cn l o o CO r- o r- < ro c ro o x: c A> E 4J CD in 1 w I VD o VD vo o cn r- r- o o R- I m CD o O 1 CM r- CM o -<H c CO o 0 10 t.1 03 (J I CM CM M r-i (M CM 1 r- m in a; (0 IT.i to Vl I I o 1 O «-• o o O 3 6 -H PC 4-1 <u c JZ 4J O 0) 
>« -H O 0 4-J U) Q Cu TJ •<H I o o I O o O O o a o m o o o o o O | o o o O 1 o o O o o o st o u ro C 4-J OS I o | o o cn o o 1 m o o ] o o O o CO c 4-> o a> ro T> 1 OJ T 1 1 I o D o CO 
o c u Vi c 1 CO 0) 1 o 1 o 1 «• o o O o ro 
CO 0) A> a o CO r- 3 I ro TJ O 1 1 J 0) CM Vl 
E a j a o m O 1 JZ o 1 1 I * TJ 
0) ai -H o 4-1 ffl 1 cu R-l o o 1 o o O O o o o m o o O o o O I 0J O o o O 1 3 O o o o o o Ft o + ro 
4-1 >—( W I o O 1 o o cn o o 1 rH U"> o o I 73 o O O o U E 4J CJ i-l s x: 1 P c 1 1 3 r- 1 o • o o •H ro u J_J I •<-( M 1 I-H o I-H rH 1 TJ rH o I E O o o ( CO Vl X u O J I O 1 * m ro E- o I a o o J o o O o o o o in O o o o o O I E O o o O 1 to o o o c o o < o CD 
Vl o 2 I m 1 o o cn o o 1 iTt o o 1 -rj O o O o r- CM 
T) -H o CD 1 O I 1 3 r- 1 CO • o o o O ro ro o U 1 1 I-H o i-H rH 1 O rH o 1 >, o o o C 
E 4-> CM 0) 0J a> rH H o 
o C CO i—i I 1 tu 1 ra * X E- O ai 1 1 a> 4H r - i a> i c 0) 0) 0) -H o E I c 1 TJ CO D rH 0 E I 4-1 < to Q. "b JZ > rH 
4-J ai 0) u ro 1 0) 1 O •• •q 0Q H ro U E o > 3 1 o •• 4-J 1 01 o ro JZ a. a> 0 O» + y. -r| in E z x: 4-1 0) 1 E •—i a. G u > •H a) 0J ro I >1 > > I (_> A> •H > E •H "4-1 •H -H u c 1 Vl 1 O > E- rH •o rH TJ O 1 4-1 c E to 1 4-1 4-1 U s > 0) s > U_L 
4-J ro a> 1 o l/i O a» > JZ ro ro < O 4-1 G) T» TJ > 1 ro ro 4-J I •rl ro E s A> s a > 4n o 
• o> OJ c- E 1 t^ 4-J to T E ••H TJ *D •H < > o U a. < rH I Vl rl (0 to rH | o tn c E >, 0) X) ro Vi 
-H CO -H <Y V( 0) 1 4-1 £Z 0) 1 o a) ? 4-1 0) 0) (J D o ro I P a a) ro I ro 4-1 0) 3 ro Vi a CM V( CL 
4-J O CO 4-J Vl a > [ c O' c a! C I r-i to o •H TJ TJ a) u. u* T5 T5 CJ u. C 1 4-J P c C 1 a rH -•H 0) H 0) V) E E-< ^ 
E >. o Q, 4-J a o 1 o M •H + ro I o ro h c T> TJ c w 0) 0) u ^ •rl ! ro ro TJ ro •H 1 ro o U Vi 0 0) to TJ Q (J cu u (J O to ft E I (_> cr. E > -a t > CQ ID w < a. •"H D cu cu tc 0£ CK E U. 1 tn to a. -i Cu l u > U A > a a. >2 X + DC 
o l/* O oj o _ u") o o CO CO 1- V X o CN «-• V c r- r- o X ai cr. r- o o o CN X X r- X VO '0 X 
1 c; j oj f^J X CN C5 o ° fN X X 
f- X X o O V 
TJ x - u - * Ct 
OJ < - 2 if 
rtj X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. V x X >. X x >: X X « Cu ro >: X X X X X X X X X X X X X >. X x :<: X X 7 t-Ul to ;*: x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A >. X X X CC Li fc X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X X X N X X X * C 3 c Ul >: X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A a. O O L( X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x ; X 3 <3> E-* z Li o CO o fa X X x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X K X X X X X x -» w M CD W 4-i X X X X X X X X >: X X X >: X X X X X X X X X X * j o a' 3 X x >; X X X X X X X X X X X N X X X X X X -i UJ LO O X X x X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X X X H ro E CO X X X X X X X X X X X >: X X X X X X X X X X X X X + E-. 
* w TJ Cu TJ (1! X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + iC 4-1 ra > AJ i u E ro AJ o 
<1J •q •H X X x X X X >; X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -I AJ CJ E TJ <1J + 4J X >: x X X X X X X X x X X X X X X X X X X X X X + o 0J L| o > Ll x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + TJ L| «-i 0J ll) X •H -r o X x >: X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X + 4) Qj c 3s CU AJ TJ z X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -c X X A V; •SI , <1J E 4J E ro •+ c -> X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X -» c 4! TJ -a «-i Ll * > O c Li CO 0J * cr> •H o «u 4-1 o c AJ •H 
£ 
-i O c E ID a o •-i I-I o rH rf tp •H rf •H o <M c a o .H cc 4-J E CL 4-1 CP Ll « c o CM to AJ 10 QJ 4 3 Q. OJ -H o CO O •H c Li E I CL cr- a rH E Ll to <L> O E o CU 3 T cr> o Li cn c Q) U-l o to CN AJ •H a 4-J 3 rH ro cr CO 4J < fN OJ •H rH O 1 4-1 rtl o > * W a p 0 0 > u cr 3 Ll cr cr Li It CJ In o I CP c o 0 (0 AJ E a rH c X o T> 4-J O c ro o X c a u 4) * 4-J ~ o o 4-1 Cu Li dJ 4J cr o C l-» •H CO o o a co a u z rH 4) 0) 3 3 c Ll 4' O 4J •-1 H- rH to co •H E a + 3 u > e Q. o rH AJ dJ Ll 'H a: w ro rH ro I * 3 -H < 4-J o O 4-J + X o ro a > o 3 4) Ll 1M ro Cu 4> <4H + O Ll >, u o 3 + AJ Li 0) 41 a j o >1 AJ CP AJ 3 CO > a Ui V5 Li TJ o Lu f^ O c £ o 3 dJ u TJ rH -H 4-1 4-1 - + ro C TJ CN 10 •H o 4-J c 0) o a» o> •H 3 H c rH 3 C 10 Ll + CO c AJ o a* AJ ai ro -r| -r| 4-J Li Q. rH c CP Li 0 •r| Q) cr QJ 3 o o C u t£3 OS u ro OJ PC 0 -H C X J-J CJ E 4J - o to GJ •H ro m c CO to CO E-« cc CL Ll CO to •r| H u 4J TJ u + CN E u ro OJ OJ dJ d| > c c J rH o CP O c > iC c to U to t£ ro + 0) (1) •H 4-) AJ CU 0) c o Li Ll % OJ o +J a Li •H cr> u Li 4-) ro 3 u, ^ I-i M <JJ CO Li Li ro ro 3 a o c -H a 3 L| c 3 c O r-l u 4-J u Q <U (U J j CM E-. E-« 41 rH ro AJ ro o o 4-J M •rl c E- dJ 1 TJ Li 4-1 + H ro CL e CL. J ro OJ > -H It CO o X < 3 c * CO u OJ 4) o> c c 4J 4-J rj cc to AJ > Ll o -H 4J ro CP H dJ + ul E-. O 4J E-> c L» 4-i >, CP M ra M ro (0 a 4-) «J-I > 3 e E + Li •H E •H 3 dJ CU u C OJ c X L( cc Ql Ll a ro 01 0 VJ <-i 4-J .k r-TJ > CD L) •H C AJ CO to •H a. 0 cu •"0 TJ rH ro o >-1 VJ 3 «JH to 1 o ro ro Ll dc E-i 4J O o as u- £0 D dJ 0) u 3 tv X E- QJ 3 + E 4-J <U OJ OJ a c 4-J 0) o J-I M 3 M dJ m AJ m CL) E- J o o CJ c X C Ll <A4 D, 10 O o O. Q. 0 ro dJ dJ u o> o ro o AJ TJ Z E-i AJ 4J O o QJ Q. rH rH CL AJ 3 o -r| c CO LI Q) *+H 4> e£, ± CD •H cr a> f'l c c O Ul Cu C a X c c ro C C> C o 4J c Ll Ql 4-= O o c Qi 3 X) 3 to o c o o ro -i ro c - X X OJ CP CJ C TJ Li TJ D> cr E o •rl VJ -H *H U _1 •H c a> 4J 4) c c •H C c c a U 3 X E 3 * QJ ro rH 4J •rl L. Li JJ H U -rt •r| E-. Ll •H Li a Li 1-J Li CP Q> 3 QJ H + l^ i > o a> ro o CO a; 0) CO c o to CO CO cn to cr CJi o o 0 3 rH E rH nj a> 3 o X) 3 p. a 4-1 0 o AJ o a LI a 0 CPH CP 4-J » Ll a o Ul <4-1 o. E E •r~i o o <+4 a a CO «4-l Q. 4H UH X o <+4 o Li C C f-a >, O '4-1 a 3 TJ u Ll 41 a a o «4_i a 4H ro Li 41 s-i X •H -H -M QJ i (X * rf o < Ul o •z cf. Cl. QJ cT, o o U] o CL) U] E a. Oi H CO E yj ^ + 
C 3 O O CP X 
o s ra 
0) TJ 
• c QJ O Q) 4J 
c E ro n < cr> •M - ta 4-> W O 'H 
QJ 3 E 4-1 m < I 
O X c w o o CO CO -H 
•H td <y > •u o > J, ra r "i + 
4-1 4-1 -P + 
3 41 CO + 
a E c + E u + O <n a« -* U c J-J 
O H + 
TJ -H RT T a> -M + «h ro <u + •rt u e + ro QJ 3 -r 
4J a - H -r 
Oj o o + 
> O AJ H V4 o 3 1 <y o £M J CO OJ •• 
c + o * -H -> 
X o Ol X X X X X X X X X o o o o o 
CC O X i-H A X X X X X X X X x o o o o o TJ X X X X :< X X X C X A X X X X X X X X i-H i-H 3 I O 01 X X X X X X X X 0 A TJ CO CN CO O dp o o o 3 o X o o o o o o X X o o o o o 
£•« E-« o 2; A rH X o o o o o o X X o o o o o AJ O X X X CO A c X i-H X X 4J I O S CN A o O c. X X o X o i-H o o i-H o o o X o A VO o vo o o VO J A X X X 
A X X X o o rH o 
H OJ OJ A X o o o o o o VD X o vo o m CN cC O cC X o o o o o o cn X o cn o CTl at TJ A X X C X rH i-H o X o o o 3 A a) X o TJ CO OJ CN O C* o o A o 3 X o o o o o o VD X o vo o in fN E-« i-H E-« o z X o o o o o o CTl X o cn o cn cn 4J cC A O X X CO c X d X o i-H o a ro 1 o A UJ X ra OJ X X X X X X X X ra o o o o X X X X X X X X X o o o o o •J o Li X X X, X X X X X X X QJ X X >: X X * X X X 
CN 
jJ 
O o TT o o o o m X o o o o o 
a rH cc l-H X o cn o o o o CO x o CO o o CD TJ V X X c X o o X o O 3 i o V QJ X o QJ TJ rH OJ OJ CO o o V o 3 o X o r^ o X X o X X o o m O c-< 3 ot E o z rH X o cn o X X o X X o cn o cr. cr. X TJ V u X X X X X AJ O c X o X X X X o o o 3 1 E O 0) V O rH CN Ll o o X X o X in o o o o o ifi c J 3 rH V CN ot o X X o X CO o a? o o CO o TJ X X X •H o v H o X X X o d rH o - AJ - E - a; - 10 V - © - Q» - rH N X o •r~i OJ X rH X x X X x X X X o o o O o 3 
cc -H O X T> rH V 3 X 3 X X X X X X X o o o O o TJ TJ rH X rf Tf X TJ X X X X X X X o C -H X V O X O X X X X X X X X E 3 i AJ o c 4J E E x X X X X X X o o V TJ Ll to X o •rl CN CO O <}f o o o 3 o 4J -r-i X x X X X X X X o o o o o o 
£-« 4i o X +J rH o V to TJ X :< X X X X X o o o o o 4-> X C X ro a ro X < X X X X X X X o AJ ro X Ll v c u X X y. X X X X X X ro M J o 3 c u, o y. o 4-1 CN V •n X O X X X X X X X X o o o o o 
•z TJ X CC rH TJ X W X X X X X X X X o o o o o 4-1 CU o X cn v < 1-1 X X X X X X X c 4-1 X X ro x X X X X X •A rH rH QJ - to - AJ - Ll - E 3 3 AJ 3 4-1 a •• TJ Li H u .. •r~i T~1 -n •r~i to TJ fx to c x •H Ll Ll X cc AJ 0J TJ TJ TJ TJ TJ TJ TJ TJ 3 
< 3 a +J "Sr X X 4J QJ o m tt to TJ rf < < < < < rf rf X AJ o Li TJ M Q> Q- TJ > 4-J ro rf TJ •O •v o c CO L| O tO -H J-H > a > 4J L. to o to X rf CP A TJ QJ 4-1 1-1 i-i JJ rf ro OJ CL cn c CL S ro c AJ E-CL CO a. o. CL TJ QJ c i-i rf M ro ro ro ro 0 E o to 1-1 O 4> 3 > 41 CO 3 o O "H QJ •rl CO TJ TJ •w CO CO to to >> VH QJ QJ QJ to to 01 TJ ro -P rH E-i AJ 3 TJ ^ ro rf rf CO ro 
CL > E c c c E C to X ro VH to QJ Vl-r O cc E rH E > ro L» to 4J TJ E VH u, rH —i 
CL O L) ro ro J U nj L| Li ro 3 Li c X o o c 4J M ro 3 Ll E- QJ o CO c QJ 
< E X J # X J U <fp O Cu CJ < u CJ dfi X <w X ^ X 'JJ cu Q3 rf CC cu X n E Ui O 
A /> + O T A A O -» • 
A A C3 + 
A A •+ O 
A / O v 
A A «H + 
A A O + O + 
A / • rH + 
A A + 
A A O » O + 
A / • + 
A A -» 
4J O + O O 4 V rf • + 
c. o o 0 o o o o C- Si o s£l c; o '-C o r- c U'l CD C> xr CC o ZD O » a; o o cr. o m O CM 
7 O c o <J  
.-i - - _ ^  r- o c;" ^ c CM •o 
VD 3 O 
1 r 3 a 
0) at c. C' Ji o OJ o X) o V^I o o o o n o z O c a:- o (T» o cr. o O lM o TO tj C- r-j cu ir, 
a? l £ ^ o 
rH 
^ ° o O c- r-, CO cs: 4J o o o o o CO o o CJ> o CJ CJ < G C 3 a> o o CJ o o o o O O 
O A O t-
X 0J u A o o O O 
0 C/» O cu o TO 4-J JZ O o O O o O O A o o o O c c- cr o O o o CJ o < to CM TO 0) X. CC o o o cn o o o o o 1J o CL, c X > TD G O + w o (A Vi C <u 4' o o o o o TO E fl» 'J 3 I 4-J o P V, Q. 0J o 4-1 3 l—r TJ M TO CO il) o o CI o o o o o CJ 3D o CO o o a? O o o r^  o '-C o u 
4J TO >. O U t- E U m o u-> in o cn m o o m o o m o eg u r TO a •H 4-J u c r- r- m n O o a» 0) >•. to to t o o o o CO o ex. E rH TO TO i cu o o OJ 3 O •H Cd o <3 o m o o o in f j o n o o to o o o o VD cn CO o OJ a m -. J-l 4-1 0) •-{ > 0) CO m o m a> in <i> o VJ VD o in <N vo G 0J <H Cu c Sr o o n hJ 1—1 r- o n Cl to OJ > rH d o o G o c E 4.J TO 0) o at o 73 •D TO 0) u cr c OJ >4 cn •H TO rH o o o o c o o o o i/i o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O o < O + •H •J 4' 4-J 3 3 •H 4-J M PC c o o cn o o c o o o o O O c TO a 4-» 4J •H 0J •o 0J r- o o 5 £71 e 3 •H > c (0 0) o o o o o o •H o a U 3 1 TO *a o u r-i CD 4-1 L) o JZ 3 + o 10 o -H ca Cu rH o o c- o o o o o o i0 o o o o o o o o o o o o o O o < o + to OJ E a.' x> E-' O o o o cn o o vn o o o o o O to 
<M o o 4-1 x: r o o < CM TO •H o l > X! iJ 
jj 3 , •H <H 1-1 o r-l R*4 o rH rH ^ o o o o rH + -i c o o to u <1> 4-' O a o o o O o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O o o t c TO o JZ c 0J E 0J tf) CO o o cn o o m o o o O o O •H >3 to CD o CTJ o -H tf) co * < Vi vJ o ^ rH o rH r rH o o O o o rH o rH 3 -H < +J c JT 4-J + 0 •H o o 4-J to Q £u >4 TJ -H in o o m o in o CN r- O in CM o N o o CM o lO n CD C7> <3\ Ci O <3\ < + TO c rH 4J a: o o IXJ CM CD o Ci cn c o o <3\ m CD a\ iJD vo O CD c 4J o 11 TO 4-1 •3 *a 0) r- CI Ci O o c L) > M c to 0) rH O rH T-H o a . . O O o O to OJ 0J OJ o CD c- 3 i TO *a I—l OJ rH E U a o o JZ 3 rH 0) 4) •H o 4-J —1 CQ cu rH o o o o o o in in o m CD o CD o O QJ O VD <T> 3 CC- ai <3\ Cl O a» < 
4J H «M to E- U o cn o cr\ rH o o cn vo VO o o VO rH m aci r~ -G r^ VD VD O rH + 4J CJ t-t JZ 4-1 fZ rH CM CM CM CM 3 VO O • cn a» + •H TO u 4-J •r| J-l rH o rH TJ 1 i o CM E O o o CO U nr ^ M i rH 0 m TO [-< O a o c O o o o o CJ CJ in o o O E o VD o to CD Ci <J\ <J\ o cn «C M o t/J r~ o R- R- o r r~ o o C- in CO rH •H -sr VO VD o R-
•o o CR> HJ o 3c CO • cn cn O TO TO o dr. U rH o rH O rH o O >lO O o rH E jj O t-
CM 
* 
•H T) 
0) 
V) 
0) rH 
0) 
E c 
- 0) 
3 •c •r-i OJ 10 
"44 4J 3 OJ —1 
rH 
O CU E 
- rH 
u 
c 
TO 
to 01 CL •o JZ 41 > 
o 
CD 
4J OJ 0J U TO o TD CQ rH TO CL. E o t> 3 o c 4-J 0) U TO jr. < Q> O > CO x: 4' E r-J < o 3 —1 -H 0) 0 >. •• > > U 4' > o , '•i •H O c rH O rH > 6- rH T) •—t TJ O 4J C £ U) 4-1 4J o L) OJ tw E- TO 4! o 41 > x: TO TO eC •a o 4-J 0) TJ TJ > TO TO •H TO E a) Ij-i V E O O E U to E 4-J •H TJ TJ tf > u O ft < •—t U hJ V) CO o to IZ E 41 J) TO 
>H CO ^ 0) 4J OJ 3 <!) jJ 0) 4J 4J }4 3 3 TO 3 0' TO TO u> Q) 3 TO >4 ^ I'M T-
JJ u to 4-J u a > c D"' (- rH to o •H •O TJ •H ai u. CM •o T3 CJ tv, C 4-J 4-» c fZ C,rH -H <J  4> w. P 
X >, o a 4-1 a o o TO TO MC •D TJ c V) X at <3> L) hJ TO TO *o •H TO O u M O OJ to 73 Q o , cu 1-1 u hJ o Crt < A L) a.' E r—1 > CQ I-" a. a. 0u a. CC CC CU E C/J V) a. u > u O > a D tt uz + 
o 
o T> 
+ 1 o O o o o o o 1 o o 1 o o 1 o o f o o O CM cc 1 o o o o 1 CM 1 VO 1 CD I I-H C- 4-1 n 1 * TJ c 1 o I-H o o o o o o 1 1 rH o | o o 1 CM CM O 3 a 
* 3 o 1 1 1 1 J 1 Q 4-1 3 0) m 1 c o o C-r- o rH CM 1 cn vo 1 00 1 VO CO ( ro Tl m o CP TJ E- 1 CM o CM cr» J rH l m i r- J o m :< TO O 4-1 CM o CM 1 • CM ro ro ul •H CU JZ * to 4) r o l rH o o o 1 rH 1 1 rH i 1 CM <N S »H "H Ui 4) Se 1 Cl o vo r- r- o CO J c. 1 m 1 o CO vo VD CD O TO C 3 E I CM o CV tn 1 I-H 1 in I 1 c. r> cu U o o o m J \o CO cr» o <N H IT" X 4J + 1 o rH o o o 1 rH i n r-j rH ^ 4' 3 Z a VJ 0J O •H o TO 3 1 CM o o o o CO I ro I t- ro i ui CO VD rH Cl to "H CM 0) O CC \ CM o o o o 1 rH I m i r- 1 o m hJ O Oa *o CM o 1 Cr m \P CJ TO O to O C 1 O rH o o I-H 1 rH 1 i-H I eg CM E- U —t TO E o 3 1 1 1 E-' ul =tt VJ a< o O 1 1 1 T3 to 1 CM O o o o "<T CD 1 cn ro I t- ro i in CO 1 rH VO o\ isC to 4-J ro >. t- t CM o o o o C I-H I m i r- I O m rH U E TO u 4-1 o CM f . ro VD O O 0) TJ X (0 1 O rH o o I-H 1 I-H 1 rH 1 CN 4J o o ^ — T3 <u TO 1 1 i JZ I-H O 0J o > U r o O o o ra o o o 1 o o I O o 1 o o 1 o o o o TJ O n 4-1 41 4-f JZ -H l o o o o o 1 CM l vo 1 GD I rH r- <3> to I-H CU c M t-J 4-J TJ o o o f o o o o o to m 4) O 4) TO 4) 1 o rH o o o 1 rH j rH 1 IN c 41 i E a E c 4J <u rH 'O TJ 01 Ul TO o I-H c 0' PC CO 4) 1 o O VD o m r- r- 1 o o 1 CD C- i t- o I m «? CO ro -H 73 u OJ 4-J C J-) + •H CC ( r- O C-vo 1 CM I m i t- 1 o in J •H o c E TO C O rH j J TJ I-H o 1 CM CM ro ro E I-H —r < cn o - h cq •H C I o o o o 1 I-H I CM CM 
o •H •H 4J 3 ( 1 j u • o 
CM DJ 4-J JJ TO <u O i 1 i 0 c 
to L5 •H TOME 1 ca 1 o CO O m o m CM vo o 1 CD I t - O i r - r - 1 r o i n r - m (0 TO OJ n E -M 4) 3 t-« ( t - O r - vo 1 rH I i n 1 cn 
<M 4-J 3 CL rH 4-J j r . m C- 1 • <Ti i n VO a\ r o <3 >. 
CM TO rH 1 a o o 4) 4-1 i o rH o o o 1 rH 1 rH CM i •—i <M 1 <—i CM r o Vl •H 0 e > 4) 3 i r i cr> TO C U o (0 O E Vl O 1 o O CD o m r- CM o I o\ VO 1 C- CM J rH o CTi i n c 4J 
CD O x : c U U 0 ) 4-J t o I O C- VD 1 rH 1 i n i I o •H c 
to u o X u t o hJ <N o r o 1 r o i n vo C- rH <D (0 to •H TJ P < o rH o o o 1 I-. 1 rH 1 CM CM E -H < 4-J 4) O 4J sz o 4) 
> •H I-H O 3 4-J Q rH CM M 73 •H O h l o O o o o o o o 1 o G 1 O o 1 o o 1 o o O o t d TO c TO CM ^ DC 1 o O o o o 1 CM 1 VD 1 CD r - CD 
c 4J o 4-J 4-1 TJ o o o o o o o o o to 
0 u 4) 0J c 1 o I-I o o o i rH J rH 1 <N fM o TO 
CO CD Q 4J 3 i 1 1 Vl rH E u Vl O \ T 1 TJ 
41 4) •H 4t 4-1 CQ 1 o r o O o o o o o o r O o 1 O o J O o 1 o o o o TO 4-J rH <4-1 O t o E- \ o O o o o 1 CM 1 VD 1 CD 1 i-H r- o X 4-1 U •H JZ o o O [ • o o o o o 
-H TO > 4J 1 o o o o 1 •-< 1 rH 1 CM oJ ( (0 M l-l •3 Vl 1 1 1 i n TO E-« 4» 0 1 G o o o o o o o r o o i O o I O o 1 o o o o rH <E> M tn z 1 o o o o o 1 CM 1 VO 1 CD 1 rH r- C- rg *o rH CD i-q o o o r • o o o o o o o TO TO "4H 1 c o a> o 1 rH 1 i-H 1 Tsl rg o 4-1 
o E-« 
o 
rH c o i 4) QJ I Vl ( Vl 1 Vl 1 V4 -
o 
CO 
^ 0J 
4) + J <H a vi u TT 4) f o a 1 O a 1 o ci I o & o a rH 
> 4J 1 O o > < < 3 1 4J JZ 1 4J JZ 1 4J JZ 1 4J JZ 4-J JZ -H 
<U u x : 4-J ( >I H 4J E E Vl 4) l u 4J 1 O 4-> 1 u u> 1 u 4J o 4J -r| UH 
4) o c 1 U rH o TO TO Vl 3 1 TO o 1 TO m 1 TO o 1 TO TO CO '4H TO 41 1 "-V TO TO 4) 4) < a 1 CM r - 1 tu CD 1 Cm Cl 1 UJ Cl tu crv l+J O 
* Vi 0 E f c > u, Vl Vl M 1 <N> 1 *> n I de n 1 Ai <«» TO Vl 
4) Vl 4) 1 01 -r| Cl 4J 4J rH CM 1 JZ PI 1 XI iN I JZ CM \ JZ CM JZ CM Vl D. 4-1 a > 1 4) Vl o CO (0 u SJ ( 4J £ I 4J E 1 4J E 1 4-1 E 4-1 £ P ^ 
E a o 1 Vl Vl Vl a a TO u i O u 1 m U 1 o u 1 m U 00 D 
E •f y-t < E r D < a 3 u a x i r- a- 1 CO X 1 Ci X 1 <Jt X CTi X X 
C 3 o o O' T. 
o to H HI 2 « L Q. 
i i a 
u o to o -c c 10 u o 
CO CO -ri rf AJ >» -H < L "D fO C C AJ o 
<tJ -C -H AJ AJ AJ 3 dJ a. s c 
O ~ > E 
QJ U O 
S O U W O P 11 O Cu CO JN 
1 CN 
cc. o r/. 1 
C 1 A a 1 JJ o 1 a .n 1 o o o 3 1 fit 1 o J A 1 S o 1 Cl X 1 C- X 1 A 
— A 
* O 1 CN f. o*. o X 1 TJ Y. 1 \ C 1 3 1 QJ O 1 m 1 a.< o o o o E-< 1 rH z 
AJ 1 A U to 1 ro 1 CJ 1 CN H-J 1 D rJ J 1 Q' 
AJ SZ 
AJ o 1 CN O •r-l az o 1 i-l X 1 •H cz X J X 3 o I 0J 
O 1 QJ 1 TJ 1 NJ Y o [ CN cc o oV5 o o V o 3 1 3 o X 1 i-l O 
AJ SZ T TJ X 1 V u 4-J 1 O X c 3 o 1 0 V 0 X c 1 I-H Cl 4-J CO 1 C y. I 3 V CO 1 O o X 1 TJ 
^ J O 
sz . — AJ — S 
AJ — ro V in 1 ri erf CN C-J J H o V 
AJ TJ .J L rf 
C I -H 1 V 3 1 AJ rH 1 c a» O 1 o V TJ 
AJ CQ OS Cl 1 -H <N oc cn o o o 3 CO E-< 1 Q> o fr- 1 AJ rH o z V rH 1 C I ro O 
AJ i ro 1 'H V 
^ ) i J I-I 1 3 n 
O a: <N i «-I CN V z 1 TJ fr> i ro tH cn J 1 QJ o t CO V 3fc F AJ i — CO — AJ 1 p I p i a il H •H 1 TJ a CO i cz SZ -r| i-l M X cc 1 rf 3 CL IJ JZ X X Ql a» AJ C i a •o > 
IJ C J w a 1 v. a > 01 •«H ro Ql 1 Q- C? i N ^ th to o E CO I o :t a; CO P QJ QJ o tj i 0) QJ TJ AC ro 4-J rH AJ C- > i rr c: (Z i S: C 10 X ro u CO a» U-l a Q. 0 i 6 n ,-j i-i 1 o ro >-t M ro p u c X M rf 1 X J •u- 1 X J o <* u Cu as rf u u 
X o o o o 
X- X X X X 
X X X X X X X X X 
x x x \ x x x 
OOO X x o x o o o o o o O O O X X O X vo O O O ve . . • x V • X • • • • • -rt H H X X «-" X O r-l O .-1 €-1 O 
x x x o o o o o 
X X X o o o o o X X X 
X X X X X X X x x  x x x x x X X X X X X X X T-i C X X X X X X X X 
X X X X X X x X O I x x >. x x x x x o < x :< x x x x x x • x x x x x x x Y. «H . 
X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x . 
o o a» • 4-J f-t 
m ^ T3 m rf 
i O O I-I O I-I o o 
-I—. O CM O O O O CTl <TS o o o in VO •oomooocf f i cnocno iJ ico 
c-lOi—ll—II-HC-IOOC-IOI-IOO 
ro -NTJ -• TJ TJ TJ "B "B T> 'O CO TV < T-t rf rf • • rf ri. rf rf < rf TJ -R-co -C < O- a TJ • • •. QI (-• 4J AJ AJ 
D, 73 01 C 4J rf - N - N ^ (0 FLJ U HJ O H > <U H CO "D "D -H tfl (/) W CO 3 TJ -X ai < rf 01 E s> ro ^  co ai u 2 L ti< 
M V V o _ j-i v v o 
co 'O OJ 
P 0 a n •n4J >. aJ 
T- ro H CJ 
>< TJra TJ ro ^ c rf —I o WH 
o QJ AJ c § ro 
H rf CP -H 4J CO C3 -H QJ D E 
C AJ O o c u 
CO QJ 
TJ •—I ro ro E 4-J 
E 
1? 
~ f.-( o CC o 0 o If) O") o-. o OJ 1 o r J-, OJ o 
o o KV 1 c C) • ' 
° 
o .4 J rN r 
h CJ 
<y «vr o o c o a. 1 IM rj •z. 
t~ o un o o tn r. V) o 1 !M t\J 
4-J ai 
a» X o c o o o o o o O o O o o c 3 o c o 1-J r- J, o O o o O o o c u a> I rg r>l a-' 3 Q< o CO o 3 o c o o o O o o I o o o o (NJ a> DS o o eg vo a? r-o 73 o o o o O o LiJ o CO c c a o o l rj c4 —1 cr v o 3 
Cu o o •o fa o r- £fj r- (T> I CO O") r-4-> TO H o IN 
O r TO 0 i j c« o r- <T\ o 
(0 x n O o *o a) TO I 'C o cu > Cxi ri o rs' r^  o VD CD O; IX- fg 1 CTi M *-> cu JZ •H eg o tv cr. f) J cr. f) CU c & u 4-J JJ a * o uO r- CO <j>. i—l 01 a) o a) TO cu > c O o o 1 rH rg c 1 E a s C >J <u o T> 73 (V M TO c (V iX co (V O' JL o o o o O o o o o o O o \ O o O O 
L» a» *-> c 4-J M * tx. o o o o vD m r- -1 o C i TO c o U j, T> o o o o o o O o> o wH + C o o o o 1 <N rsj c o •H 4-1 s + 3 1 eg a} 4-J 4-J TO <JJ O o W u •H TO U £ i + m c- o o c o o o o o o o o o o o <0 QJ £ t-> a) 3 E- o o o o o eg vO CTi r-rg a o. #—f JZ CJ o o o o o o o < 
C\> TO t—f 1 a o O (U > 4-J o o o o 1 OJ r-j D» -H o E > a.' , 3 1 c U o CO o £ M + O o o o o c o o o o o o O o 1 O o o o TO O -C c u O CU u > m o o o o o eg vD CD 1 i—1 r- •H 
tfi u o X M cn a iJ o o c o o o o o —1 
co on -H •o p o o o o —1 I eg rg 
T1 < 4-J 0) o c + 0 >. -H i—i o p 4-J + a £ u T3 o u. i f i + v\ o m o o o -SJ- r^  CL> CTi ai o f r- in f) rg TO C TO eg •v , cc IX- o o o o i r- o CD c 4-J o -iJ 4-> + T5 r-j CN SJ? 0) in cn o o c o 0) 0) -» c o 1—I o c 1—I —i rg f i—i rg rsj eg G to <u a a» + p 1 E o n + 0 0) 0) •H 0) 4-> ra o ro o o o r- CC <Ti O I r- in rO 4-J «W o l/l + H o o o o -SJ- in \ r- O o Jj u vt •H c. rg eg KO i—i n in CTi •H TO > 4-J o I—1 o o I—1 —I r-j n eg cr. M M ^ * M m TO H a) o CTi o m o o o r- CO cr, tr. o i r- m m M m 2 \£> o o o o •cr u") i r- o r-TJ cr. ,4 t\j fNJ \£> f) in CTi o TO TO <H •AP + O o o eg IN eg CM 
£ 4-J o o O C + H G + 0) u u 1 u H CD ai <H * a i-t 6 •o •D o O O O O O I 0 & Q o 
> 4-> U >. o < Z3 4-> JZ si *J J: I J-> si 4-J JZ 
Q> '•> + JZ c-. £ E! V-l a vj i-i O 4-> a 4-> 1 o 4-J o J a) o c (J •—i u TO m M TO o m vn m O 1 TO in IT3 CO «n - TO 0 «TJ TO d> <1) c tij r- bu CO u. Ol 1 u. <T\ tu cr 'M i-i + o 6 :> M u >1 at' JC of df ±1 1 cft> &H A: n:-
« w a) fl' c 4J (•< SL CN SI rg JZ r^ i 1 JZ rg JZ CM 4-> - a > c o w « 4-J S 4-J p S S 4-J s Cw E c * a o u l-r a a TO t\J u O U m U o O I m u CD vJ CL, E ID < A. O •-J a X. r - x: CD X <T\ X 1 cn X crt X 
+ •A X X X y X X X X X X X X V X X X X X x x X X + 
4J X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X A X X X X X X X X X 
W y. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N* X X y. X X X X X X 
rg 0) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X y. X X >: X + 
s 'A X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X •A •A >, X X X X X X Y. -* 
x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X N X y X X X X X X 
- a * 
a) < + + + 
TO 4-J J J o LO m u") CNJ f ) o X CD o o o p- m o X in c> i—i X CD o O CL. TO JJ o LO IX; m \£> o X Ifi o CO o o o I - r - 00 X X r- o ID X •—1 vD \£> 
cn m X rg X X X • 
L4 TO CNJ CJ rg X eg o o o X o 1—I x o o O 
c P c U1 rg OJ rg X OJ X X X 
o o M -r X X X X 
o X P 
4' H 
o TO 
0) 
4-J S- rt X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X >• X 
rsj U-4 4-J X X X X X X X X X X X X y. X X X y. y. X X X X X X X X 
O cu CU 3 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X •A X X X X X X X X X 
o o hJ O :< X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x x X TO 2 cn x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
M cu 73 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
•o a) + 4-J TO >, 4-> 
o £ <15 4-J 
0) "O •H si v. X X >: X X X X X X X X X :< X Y. •A X X X X X .X 
i-i H £ *tJ 0) 4-3 >5 X V, x X X X X X X V. X X x X X X V. X y. X % X X V. X X 
•—i o 0) M o > M X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 
M 4-J 0) 0) x: -H O X X X X X X X X X X X x :< X X X X X X x x X X 
•—i cu c s cu 4J 4-> *o 2 ; X X X X X X X X X X x X X y X X X X X X X y. X X X X X 
cn G> a) TO 0) X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x X X 
1 £ E c 4-> + 
•—i T3 T3 4-J u TO + 
C M U) 0) D1 
o <11 j J O c 4-J •H * 
o c TO a o «—J 4J 4-J o £ 
•—i CP 0) 'H o >H c . c a <4-1 
o •W ct 4-J S + CU 4-J cr* 4-1 - c 
rg CO 4-> TO 0) -H p OJ -H + 
to ID •H c M £ J CU CP a> i-c E 
0) D S o a) P + Cn a r j M cr- c <y u-4 o CM 4-J •H Q,<-J 4-J 3 A TO t r cr » ^ 4-J + eg TO «—J 1 -l-J o 0 IU O 3 o a CP M o 
•H O <13 0) a a u o > u O" <TJ 0 m M TO c o o to -U z M 3 a -H c JZ 0 4-J O tu TO o si c u a) 4-> O o 4-J Uf M a) 4-J CP a C 4-J + 
U) 0 o a x M tn a M 2 <n (V P 3 c V-t 0J o -U -U 
in M •H E 3 p ID > c a o #—f 4-J <D M •H qi CO TO f-H TO c >H 
•H < o o 4-J j : 0 TO a > o 3 (T M .C TO Cf d) <4-1 M >, •H u o 3 4-> 0) 0) a •J o >» 4-J cr 4J 3 to > e 
Cu M T3 o Cu tn ID C £ o 3 0) o "4-1 r-A "D 4-J 4-J 
C T3 CM TO -H O c c 0) o 0) —I 3 {4 c P C (0 U 
c JJ o 0) 0) J VJ ra M 4-J M a c IH a> t i o •H a) cr a) 3 o c C u >H 0) c O u TO 0) o •H c 4-] (j e JJ 
V) CD •H 0) TO M C cn to 01 H (X? a - •H M CO CO •H E-« o (0 4-J 73 o 
—f £ u TO VJ hJ 0) <D a) 0) 3 c c •J o cr O c TO c CO M CO < TO 
<u d) •H 4-J 4-J CU 0J c O M M 3 0) o a u •H Cu t l 4-J 4J >H VS 0) M M M TO TO <-4 P P O c -H >H a 3 U C 3 c a -r-i c 4-» U a * Q> <U e) v-3 Cl4 t - t-« 03 i—< TO 4-> TO o o O u •H c E-» a> \ Ti V4 4-J 
-H TO CU E >H CL, •J rC 0) > •H TO (0 o 3 
» u 0) •H 0) cr C c JJ 4-J u CC CO •H j j > a O -H U TO Cr E-« 0) TO E-" o 0) E-" c U v> v t >. o> M TO M re A 3 Q, 4J (4J > 3 C e 
U •H E •H •H 3 a) 0) u c 0) c X M at a) U a TO OJ •H O M 4-J 4-J * 
T3 > CTi u M C 4-J in Vi •J •H QJ o CU TO T3 i-H TO o P M 3 m to * TO TO U E- a) u o 0) L4 w o a) a) 0 p c r jz e-« G> P -U 0) d) o a c <M <4-1 G' o 3 4-J M >H 3 Ai a) w 4-J w u H r^ 
o w c •i j : c u a TO <4-1 o o CU a O TO CJ •H O O a o TO o 4-J 73 + 
H 0 4-J a) ID Vi o J 0) r-i >H CU 3 o •H c m M 0) VI 0) 
Vf -H cn a) u c c CO o u- Eb c Cf •-> ^ H c c TO c a> c 
o c M (U <4-1 <4-1 o o c a> 3 £} 7 (0 o c o O TO J TO C + 
o si a) ID > o> n o T3 -H •H M 73 o> a> £ o> o -H •H r^ M 
a) o i- j •H c 01 4-J 4-J a) c c •H C C c cz a 4j a u JZ £ 3 
Q) w TO 4-J •H M 4J H u 4-J •H •H M •H M M a M 4-J u cn d) 3 01 E-» + 
> M O <D TO o « a) 0) W O o OT U) CO CT> CO CTI tr> 0 O 0 3 •H e I-H 
0) <D M >-H P O 3 a cu 4-» 3 0 0 4-J o Cu a O cn -H CP 4-J 
•J 4-J a o j J a £ e o o "4-J a a m (M Q. «H X o o V4 C C C U-J 
S c a U <4-1 a 3 3 73 M M 4) a o <4-1 iw TO M JZ M M •H a? 
a , -y + < u u o z z a. CU Cu < o o u o cu w S a, t-5 a, £H l/l J + 
s 
•o 
Appendix G: ODOT Letter Regarding Reasonably Likely 
Determination for US 97/J Street Improvements 
Ikl Kidoiigcski, Go^ Bima-
Department of Transportation 
Robert W. Brynnt 
Region 4 Manager 
63055 N. Hwy 97 
Bend, OR 97701 
(5-41) 388-6180 
FAX: (541) 388-6231 
FILE CODE: 
February 2, 2010 
Nick Snead 
Community Development Director 
71 SE "D" St 
Madras, OR 97740 
Subject: Madras UGB Expansion TPR Analysis; Reasonably Likely Determination 
Dear Mr. Snead, 
The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) appreciates the opportunity to review and 
comment on the transportation study prepared for Madras UGB Expansion and related TPR 
Analysis. We received this study from Kittelson and Associates on January 22,2010, Oui 
planning staff also reviewed the City's plan amendment application and DLCD's recent 
response. 
As part of the UGB expansion, the City of Madras is considering a 20-acre rezone of Range 
Land to R-2 Residential uses, including a new elementary school. The proposed amendment is 
located at the outskirts of town,'near the intersection of Ashwood Road and Bean Drive. Neither 
Toads are state facilities; however, the traffic study concluded that the proposed rezone has a 
significant effect on the US97/'T' Street intersections (degraded operation with incremental trips 
within the planning horizon). This is an important state facility where ODOT and the City are 
planning significant improvements in the near future. 
On January 21,2010, pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060(4)(b), the City has written ODOT 
requesting a determination as to whether planned state highway improvements at US97/ "J" 
Street are not only included in the City's TSP, but also: 
o Funded for construction in the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); 
e Part of a regional transportation system plan; or 
» If neither of the above, the planned improvements are reasonably likely to be provided by 
the end of the TSP planning period. 
ODOT offers the following comments in response: 
1. US97 is a Statewide level highway facility and a freight route. 
2. The City of Madras completed a TSP Amendment in 2005 to address the anticipated 
failure of the US 97/"J" Street intersections. 
3. A preferred concept was identified by the City and ODOT as shown on the project 
website http://ci.madras.or.us/public works/pw hwy97southY.shtml. The concept 
includes cost estimates, right-of-way needs, and a double-line sketch of the preferred 
roadway alignment. 
Mi. Nick Snead 
February 2, 2010 
Page 2 of 2 
4. Funding for the construction of the US 97/"J" Street improvements is included in the 
Draft 2010-2013 STIP, which is expected to be approved in October 2010. The "J" 
Street improvements are not on the current 2008-11 STIP list. At this time, there is a gap 
between funding identified in the Draft STIP and cost estimates submitted by t^ie project 
team. However, the City has been collecting transportation System Development 
Charges slated specifically for US97/"J" Street improvements. 
Based on ODOT's review of the circumstances associated with future improvements to US97/"J" 
Street intersections, it is our opinion that the necessary improvements are reasonably likely to 
occur by the end of the planning period. ODOT has reached this conclusion based on the 
following factors: 
1. The planned improvements are listed on the Draft 2010-2013 STIP and will likely be 
approved. 
2. The planned improvements are located on a statewide freight route, an important facility 
that will likely receive future funding. 
3. The City of Madras has land use regulations that allow the City to impose conditions on 
future development if such conditions are needed to avoid or remedy a significant effect. 
These include ordinances enabling transportation System Development Charges for 
US97/"J" Street improvements and City approval of the proposed intersection redesign. 
4. ODOT has a positive working relationship with the City of Madras and collaboratively 
funded other projects in the area. We are confident that the City, ODOT and other 
partners will be able to fund the needed US97/"J" Street improvements. 
This reasonably likely determination does not constitute a commitment on the part of ODOT to 
fond the planned improvements at US97/"J" Street. Further, this written statement applies only 
to the subject property and only to this specific proposed amendment. It does not apply to any 
future amendments that may rely upon the same project. Instead, future proposed amendments 
will require a new written statement from ODOT, (see 
http://www.oregon,gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/TPR/tprOuideli nes. pd f. Section 3.2.09) 
ODOT appreciates the opportunity to provide you with this written statement. If you have any 
questions, or need more information, please contact Ana Jovanovic, ODOT Region 4 Planning 
office, at (541) 388-6046 or email ana.iovanovic@.odot.state.or.us. 
incerely, 
Robert Bryant, PE \ 
Region 4 Manager \ 
cc via e-mail: M&r-lcRfwabaugh, DLCD; Joe Bessman, Kittelson & Assoc, Inc.; DJ Heffernan, 
Angelo Planning Group; Jon Skidmore, Jefferson County Planning Director; Matt Garrett, 
ODOT Director; Jerri Bollard, ODOT TDD Manager; Pat Creedican, ODOT District 10 Manager 
rage 1 u i l 
Nick Snead 
From: JOVANOVIC Ana [Ana.JOVANOVIC@odot.state.or us] 
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:34 PM 
To: Nick Snead 
Cc: RADABAUGH Mark; Joe Bessman; DJ Heffernan; Jon Skidmore 
Subject: RE: Madras UBG expansion & TRP Analysis 
Nick, 
Here is ODOT's Reasonably Likely Determination letter for Madras UGB Expansion and TPR Analysis. Please 
contact me if you have any questions. 
Thank you, 
Ana 
Ana Jovanovic 
ODOT Region 4 Program and Planning 
541 388.6046 
ana.jovanovic@odot.slale.or us 
From: Nick Snead [mailto:nsnead@ci.madras.or.us] 
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 8:49 AM 
To: JOVANOVIC Ana 
Subject: Madras UBG expansion & TRP Analysis 
Ana, 
Good morning! I hope you had a good weekend as well. I am writing to determine the status of ODOT's review of 
our TPR study submitted by Kittleson & Associates related to the 37 acre UGB expansion proposal. Can you give 
me an update? 
"There are no short cuts to any place worth going' 
-Beverly Sills-
Nicholas S. Snead 
2/5/2010 
Community Development Director 
City of Madras 
(541)475-3388 
Email: nsnead@ci.madras.or.us 
Visit the City of Madras at http://ci.madras.or.us/ 
2/5/2010 
Appendix H: Urban Growth Area Management 
Agreement (UGAMA) (April 2006) 
N -
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement 
For the City of Madras 
This agreement is entered into by the City of Madras, an incorporated municipality in the State 
of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "City" and Jefferson County, a political subdivision of the 
State of Oregon, hereby referred to as the "County". 
RECITALS 
WHEREAS, the City of Madras and Jefferson County are authorized pursuant to Oregon 
Revised Statutes (ORS) Chapter 190 to enter into an Intergovernmental Management Agreement 
for performance of functions which either governmental unit has the authority to perform; and 
WHEREAS, this Management Agreement also constitutes a cooperative agreement under 
ORS Chapter 195; and 
WHEREAS, Goal 14 [Urbanization] requires that the City and the County establish an 
urban growth boundary to identify and separate urbanizable land from rural and that the 
establishment and change of urban growth boundaries shall be through a cooperative process 
between the City and County; and 
WHEREAS, pursuant to provisions in Goal 2 [Land Use Planning], the City and County 
are required to have coordinated and consistent comprehensive plans which establish an Urban 
Growth Boundary (UGB) and a plan for the Urban Growth Area (UGA) within the boundary; 
and, 
WHEREAS, the City and County share a common concern regarding the accommodation 
of population growth and utilization of lands within the UGB; and 
WHEREAS, the City and County consider it mutually advantageous to establish this 
Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA) for the purpose of facilitating the 
orderly transition from rural to urban land uses and to enable the City to plan for and provide 
urban services such as sewer, water and street facilities in a timely, orderly and cost effective 
manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; 
NOW, THEREFORE THE CITY OF MADRAS AND JEFFERSON COUNTY 
MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 
1. INTENT OF AGREEMENT 
1.1. To establish standards and procedures for review and action on proposed land use actions 
and related matters noted within this agreement pertaining to lands within the UGA; 
1.2. To transfer authority and jurisdiction over current planning activities, land use decisions, 
provision of urban services and code enforcement within the UGA from the County to the 
City; 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 1 
1.3. To benefit the public through reduction of governmental processes; and, 
1 .4. To establish procedures for City and County consideration of expansions to the UGA. 
2, DEFINITIONS 
For the purpose of this agreement, the following definitions shall apply: 
2.1. Board: the Jefferson County Board of Commissioners. 
2.2. City: the City of Madras. 
2.3. Council: the Madras City Council. 
2.4 County: Jefferson County. 
2.5. Land Use Decision: A final decision or determination concerning the adoption, 
amendment or application of statewide planning goals, a comprehensive plan provision or 
a land use regulation. 
2.6. Public Facilities Plan: A document or documents describing the water, sewer and 
transportation facilities which are to support the land uses designated in the appropriate 
acknowledged comprehensive plans. 
2.7. Urban Growth Area (UGA): The area between the Madras City Limits and the Madras 
Urban Growth Boundary, as designated on the City's and the County's Comprehensive 
Plan Maps. 
2.8. Urban Growth Boundary (UGB): The boundary line which separates lands to be 
urbanized and eventually incorporated into the City of Madras from the surrounding rural 
lands under the County's jurisdiction. 
2.9. Urban Growth Area Management Agreement (UGAMA): This Intergovernmental 
Agreement between the City and County that coordinates the management of land use 
and development within the City of Madras UGA. 
2.10. Urbanizable Lands: Lands inside the Urban Growth Area that are designated for future 
urban development when public facilities and services can be provided by the City. 
3. URBANIZATION PROCESS 
3.1 The UGA shall be managed to maintain the potential for future urban development until 
such time as the land is annexed into the City and is converted to urban land. 
3.2. Conversion of urbanizable land to urban development can occur when public facilities 
and services are available and adequate to serve urban levels of development, or the land 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 2 
M - 4 1 
is annexed into the City and zoned for urban development 
3.3. Rural levels of development within the UGA shall be sited in such a way as to not 
interfere with urban levels of development and services when conversion from 
urbanizable land to urban lands occurs. 
3.4. Extension of City services within the UGA may be permitted when approved by the City. 
Establishment or extension of sewer systems outside the UGB is prohibited except to 
mitigate a public health hazard in accordance with the provisions of OAR 660-011-0060. 
4. UGA ADMINISTRATION RESPONSIBILITIES 
4.1. The City shall have responsibility for administration and decision making authority 
regarding all land use applications within the UGA except applications for amendments 
to the UGB, as provided in Section 6. 
4.2. The City shall have responsibility for annexation of lands in the UGA. Lands outside the 
UGA shall not be annexed unless the UGB is also amended to include the territory to be 
annexed. 
5. PROCESS FOR LAND USE APPLICATIONS WITHIN THE UGA 
5.1. Land Use applications shall be processed through the City Community Development 
Department 
5.2. Notice of all land use applications within the UGA shall be sent to the County 
Community Development Department and to any other affected County agencies and 
other applicable special service districts for review and comment prior to any decision by 
the City. Such agencies or districts shall be given ten business days in which to provide 
comments on the application. 
5.3. In making its decision, the City shall consider all comments received under § 5.2. 
5.4. The County, any agency or special service district that provides comments on the 
application shall be mailed a copy of the land use decision and shall have standing to 
appeal the City's decision. 
6. PROCESS FOR URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY AMENDMENTS 
6.1. Amendments to the UGB, including amendments to the City's and County's 
comprehensive plan maps, may be initiated by the City, the County, or a property 
owner(s). 
6.2. An application to amend the UGB shall be filed with the City Community Development 
Department along with the applicable City and County plan amendment fees. The City 
shall forward a copy of the application to the County Community Development 
Department, together with the County's plan amendment fee, within five working days of 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 3 
the date the application is filed. 
6.3. The City and County Planning Commissions shall each conduct a public hearing 
regarding the application. At their discretion, the Planning Commissions may hold a 
joint hearing rather than separate hearings. 
6.4. The recommendation of the City and County Planning Commissions shall be forwarded 
to the City Council, who shall hold a public hearing to consider the proposed amendment 
to the UGB. The decision of the City Council shall be forwarded to the County Board of 
Commissioners. 
6.5. The Board of Commissioners shall conduct a public hearing and make a final decision on 
whether the UGB should be amended. 
6.6. If the City and County disagree on the proposed amendments, a joint meeting of the City 
Council and Board of County Commissioners may be held to attempt to resolve the 
differences. Both jurisdictions may also request a dispute resolution process to resolve 
the differences. 
6.7 If the governing bodies are not able to come to mutual agreement there shall be no 
change to the UGB. 
7. OTHER LAND USE ACTIVITIES 
7.1. The City and County agree to mutually review any proposed action on public 
improvement projects and similar programs, projects or proposals that apply to the UGA. 
7.2. The City shall be responsible for public facilities planning within the UGA. The City 
shall coordinate with any affected Comity agency in the development of a public facilities 
plan for the UGA. 
7.3. The County shall be responsible for administering the state Building Code and issuing 
building permits for all construction within the UGA, until such time as the City has its 
own state-approved building code program. 
8. ROADS 
8.1. Public rights-of-way within the UGA shall be accepted by the City upon annexation of 
adjacent lands. 
8.2. The City shall accept jurisdiction over County roads within the UGA that have a 
pavement condition index (PCI) of 70 or above. If the PCI is below 70, the County may 
structurally overlay the road to raise the PCI above 70, at which time the City shall accept 
jurisdiction over the road. Nothing contained in this subsection shall restrict the City from 
accepting jurisdiction over a road or public right-of-way within the UGA that does not 
meet such minimnm standards. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 4 
41-06 
8.3 When a parcel in the UGA is initially partitioned or subdivided and creation of a street is 
required, development shall proceed initially with streets to City road standards 
8.4 Streets in subdivisions and PUDs shall be developed to the City's improvement standards 
8.5. All unpaved county roads, excluding public usage roads, within the UGA shall be graded 
biannually by the County until the City has accepted jurisdiction over Hie road. 
9. FEES 
9.1. Applications for land use permits, including all land use appeals within the UGA, shall be 
accompanied by a fee set by the City. 
9.2. Applications for UGB Amendments shall be accompanied by fees set by the County in 
addition to any City fees. 
9.3. System Development Charges for lands within the UGA will be collected by the County, 
prior to the issuance of building permits. 
10. ENFORCEMENT 
The City shall be responsible for enforcement of land use regulations within the UGA. 
11. AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION 
11.1. This agreement may be amended at any time by mutual agreement of both parties, after 
public hearing and adoption by both the City Council and the Board of Commissioners. 
11.2 Any modifications to this agreement shall be consistent with the City and County 
Comprehensive Plans and the statewide planning goals. 
11.3. This agreement may be terminated by either party under the following procedure: 
a. Written notice of intent to terminate this Agreement shall be sent to the other 
party at least forty-five (45) days prior to taking any action, including the 
publication of public hearing notices in order to provide ample time for resolution 
of differences, or amendment to comprehensive plans. 
b. A public hearing shall be held by the party considering termination. That party 
shall give the other party at least 20 days prior notice of the scheduled hearing 
date. The 20 day period shall be used by both parties to seek resolution of 
differences. Both parties shall also request a collaborative conflict resolution 
process to resolve differences that remain. 
c. Public notice of hearings shall be in accordance with applicable statutes and local 
ordinances. 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 5 
e. This agreement is necessary for compliance with, at minimum, statewide planning 
Goals 2 and 14. If this agreement is terminated without adoption of a new 
agreement, jurisdiction and authority over all planning activities and land use 
decisions within the UGA shall revert to the County. Therefore, this agreement 
may not be terminated without adoption of a new agreement. 
12. TIME OF EFFECTIVENESS 
This agreement shall not become effective until properly executed by both the City and the 
County. Upon execution, this agreement shall supersede all previous Urban Growth Area 
Management Agreements. 
13. SEVERABILITY 
The Provisions within this agreement are severable. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of 
this agreement is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, said invalidity shall 
not impair or affect the validity of the remaining portions of the agreement 
ADOPTED this -5*-day of / l ^ J j L . , 2006. 
iRAS, OREGON 
fck Allen, Mayor / 
ATTEST: 
JEFFERSON COUNTY, OREGON 
Bill Bellamy, Commissi' 
A/UiA ZtsJu 
M a r y Z ^ f c e , C o m m i s s i o n e r 
Date: ty^d. Sl&Ot* 
URBAN GROWTH AREA MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT 13