Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street, Suite 150 
Salem, OR 97301-2540 
(503)373-0050 
Fax (503) 378-5518 
www.lcd.state.or.us 
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor 
NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 
March 6, 2007 
TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan 
or Land Use Regulation Amendments 
FROM. Mara Ulloa, Plan Amendment Program Specialist 
SUBJECT: Eugene/Springfield Metro Plan Amendment 
DLCD File Number 002-06 
The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of 
adoption. A copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in 
Salem and the local government office. 
Appeal Procedures* 
DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: March 22,2007 
This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review 45 days prior to adoption. Pursuant to 
ORS 197.830 (2)(b) only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to 
adoption of the amendment are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA). 
If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. 
If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of 
the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received 
written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be 
served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). 
Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. 
*NOTE: THE APPEAL DEADLINE IS BASED UPON THE DATE THE DECISION 
WAS MAILED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. A DECISION MAY HAVE 
BEEN MAILED TO YOU ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN IT WAS MAILED 
TO DLCD. AS A RESULT YOUR APPEAL DEADLINE MAY BE EARLIER 
THAN THE ABOVE DATE SPECIFIED. 
Cc: Gloria Gardiner, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist 
Marguerite Nabeta, DLCD Regional Representative 
Matthew Crall, DLCD Transportation Planner 
Ann Siegenthaler, Eugene/Springfield Metro 
<paa> ya/ 
1 2 DLCD 
Notice of Adoption 
THIS FORM MUST BE MAILED TO DLCD 
WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION 
PER ORS 197.610, OAR CHAPTER 660 - DIVISION 18 
LJ In person Q electronic Q mailed 
A 
T 
£ 
S 
T 
A 
nil 
e* 
d e p t OF 
toAh 0 2 2007 
U N O CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
For 1)1,CI) Use Onlv 
Jurisdiction: CITY OF EUGENE Local file number MA-06-2 and z-06-9 
Date Of Adoption: February 26, 2007 Date Mailed: March I, 2007 
Was a Notice of Proposed Amendment (Form 1) mailed to DLCD? ye s Date: August 3, 2006 
• Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 0 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
• Land Use Regulation Amendment H Zoning Map Amendment 
• New Land Use Regulation • Other: 
Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". 
Eugene City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20377 amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area 
General Plan (Metro Plan) diagram to amend the Metro Plan designation and zoning of the property known as 
the Oregon Motor Pool Site (Map 17-03-3044 Tax Lot 8900). The ordinance specifically amends the Metro 
Plan designation for the subject parcel from High Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development 
Designation to Commercial/Nodal Development Designation; and rezones the subject parcel from l-2fTD Light-
Medium Industrial with Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development Overlay Zones to C-2/TD/ND 
Community Commercial with Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development overlay zones. 
Does the Adoption differ from proposal? Please select one NO 
Plan Map Changed from: HDR/MU/ND to: COMMERCIAL/NODAL DEVELOPMENT 
Zone Map Changed from: I-2/TD to: C-2/TD/ND 
Location: 445 Pearl street, Eugene, OR Acres Involved: 1.718 
Specify Density' Previous: None; existing parking lot New: Unknown, commercial or mixed 
Applicablestatewideplanning goals: 
15 16 17 18 19 
Was an Exception Adopted? • YES 0 NO 
Did DLCD receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... Yes 
45-days prior to first evidentiary hearing? 
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? 
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? 
ID Yes 
• Yes 
• Yes 
• No 
• No 
• No 
Z.E 
DLCD file No. 
Please list all affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: 
City of Eugene 
Local Contact: Ann Siegenthaler 
Address: Planning Division 
p.. 99 West 10th Avenue 
Uty" Eugene, OR 97401 ^ 
Phone: (54$682 - 5452 Extension: 
Fax Number:54i -682 5572 
E-mail Address: ann.siegenthaler@ci.eugene.or.us 
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision 
per ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18. 
1 Send this Form and TWO Complete Copies (documents and maps) of the Adopted Amendment to: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
2. Electronic Submittals: At least one hard copy must be sent by mail or in person, but you may also submit 
an electronic copy, by either email or FTP. You may connect to this address to FTP proposals and 
adoptions: webserver.lcd.state.or.us. To obtain our Username and password for FTP, call Mara Ulloa at 
503-373-0050 extension 238, or by emailing mara.uIloa@state.or.us. 
3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days 
following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 
4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings 
and supplementary information. 
5. The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working 
days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the date, 
the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 
6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who 
participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 
7. Need More Copies? You can now access these forms online at http://www.lcd.state.or.us/. Please 
print on 8-1/2x11 green paper only. You may also call the DLCD Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax 
your request to: (503) 378-5518; or Email your request to mara.ulloa@state.or.us - ATTENTION: 
PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
http://www.lcd.state.or.us/LCD/forms.shtml Updated September 25, 2006 
ORDINANCE NO. 20377 
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE-SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN 
AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) DIAGRAM TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY 
IDENTIFIED AS MAP 17-03-30-44, TAX LOT 8900 (OREGON MOTOR POOL SITE) 
FROM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/MIXED USE/NODAL DEVELOPMENT 
DESIGNATION TO COMMERCIAL/NODAL DEVELOPMENT DESIGNATION; 
REZONING THE PROPERTY FROM I-2/TD LIGHT-MEDIUM INDUSTRIAL WITH 
TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONE TO C-2/TD/ND 
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL WITH TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND 
NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONES; AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY 
CLAUSE. 
The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: 
A. On April 21, 2006, the State of Oregon Administrative Services submitted an 
application for a Type II Metro Plan diagram amendment and concurrent zone change to 
redesignate and rezone property identified as Map 17-03-30-44, Tax Lot 8900, referred to as the 
Oregon Motor Pool site. The applicant requested a Metro Plan designation change from High 
Density Residential / Mixed Use / Nodal Development to Commercial / Nodal Development 
designation. The zone change requested would change the site's zoning from I-2/TD, Light-
Medium Industrial with Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone to C-2/TD/ND, 
Community Commercial with Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development Overlay 
Zones. 
B. Following receipt of the City's completeness review comments the applicant 
provided supplemental materials on June 8, 2006, July 14, 2006, and July 24, 2006. On July 28, 
2006, at the applicant's request, the application was deemed complete without submission of 
additional requested information. On August 21, 2006 the applicant submitted additional revised 
findings for Goal 12. 
C. This proposal came to the City of Eugene for action pursuant to procedures for 
amendment and refinement of the Metro Plan described in the Metro Plan and Chapter 9 of the 
Eugene Code, 1971 (EC), which establishes the Eugene City Council as the approval body for 
Type II Metro Plan diagram amendments located within the incorporated city limits of Eugene. 
D. On August 3, 2006, notice of the proposed Metro Plan amendment and zone 
change was mailed to the Department of Land Conservation and Development as required by 
provisions of the Eugene Code, 1971 and in accordance with state statutes. 
E. Referral comments were requested on July 27, 2006 after receipt of the initial 
application, and on August 2, 2006 after supplemental materials were received, from the Oregon 
Department of Transportation (ODOT), the City of Springfield, Lane County, the Downtown 
Neighbors Association, and to City departments. 
F. Notice of the September 19, 2006 Planning Commission public hearing was 
mailed to the applicant, owners and occupants of property within 500 feet of the subject 
property, the Downtown Neighborhood Association, and other interested parties who had 
requested notice on August 18, 2006. Notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was 
Ordinance - 1 
also posted in accordance with EC 9.7415(5) on August 17, 2006 and published in the Register 
Guard on August 30, 2006. 
G. On September 19, 2006, the Eugene Planning Commission held a public hearing 
on the application and left the record open for additional information. 
H. On October 30, 2006, the Eugene Planning Commission continued its 
deliberations on the application and voted to recommend approval of the request as revised by 
the applicant. 
I. On November 10, 2006, notice of the Eugene City Council public hearing was 
mailed to the applicant, neighborhood association, and those who had requested to be placed on 
the interested parties list for the Metro Plan amendment. Notice was also published in the 
Register Guard, and the notice and text of this Ordinance posted on the City's web site on 
November 5, 2006. 
I. The Eugene City Council held a public hearing on the request on November 20, 
2006, and is now ready to take action on the requested amendment. 
THE CITY OF EUGENE DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 
Section 1. The above findings, and the findings set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto 
and incorporated herein by this reference are hereby adopted. 
Section 2. The Metro Plan Diagram land use designation for the property identified 
as Map 17-03-30-44, Tax Lot 8900, referred to as the State Motor Pool site, is amended from 
High Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development designation to Commercial/Nodal 
Development designation as depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by 
this reference. 
Section 3. The zoning for the property identified as Map 17-03-30-44, Tax Lot 8900, 
referred to as the Oregon Motor Pool site, is rezoned from I-2/TD, Light-Medium Industrial with 
Transit Oriented Development Overlay Zone to C-2/TD/ND Community Commercial with 
Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development Overlay Zones, as depicted on Exhibit B 
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 
Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this 
Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent 
jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and that 
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. 
Passed by the City Council this Approved by the Mayor this 
NOW, THEREFORE, 
Ordinance - 2 
EXHIBIT A 
Attachment A 
Staff Findings 
(Revised October 16, 2006) 
Oregon State Motor Pool Site (MA 06-2, Z 06-9) 
Metro Plan Diagram Amendments 
The proposed amendment would change the current Metro Plan land use designation of High Density 
Residential/ Mixed Use/Nodal Development to Commercial/Nodal Development. The High Density 
Residential designation is intended for multi-unit developments of typically over 20 units per acre. 
The Mixed Use designation is typically applied within a designated Special Area Plan, however, the 
subject parcel is not located within a Special Area. There is no corresponding zoning that implements 
this designation. The Nodal Development designation has been applied to all the downtown area to 
recognize Eugene's central business district as a mixed-use, pedestrian-friendly center, pursuant to 
OAR 660-012-0060(7). 
Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3) requires that the following criteria be applied to a Metro Plan diagram 
amendment: 
(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted by 
the Land Conservation and Development Commission, and 
(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. 
As discussed below, after review of additional materials submitted by the applicant, staff finds that the 
Metro Plan diagram amendment criteria in both EC 9.7730(3)(a) and (b)are satisfied by the proposal. 
Staff findings relative to the amendment criteria in EC 9.7730(3) (with criteria in bold italics) are 
presented below. 
(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant Statewide Planning Goals adopted 
by the Land Conservation and Development Commission. 
The applicant states that at the time of adoption of the Downtown Plan that "Goal findings were made 
on all applicable Statewide Goals and the Downtown Plan, including the specific policies that called 
for redesignation of particular parcels..." and that, therefore, "the direction of the Downtown Plan with 
regard to this parcel is not conditional upon any additional findings of need or land use inventory 
considerations" (applicant's letter to City of Eugene June 8, 2006). Staff does not concur with the 
applicant's conclusion that Statewide Goal findings have already been made supporting the specific 
proposed Plan amendment. Below are staff findings relative to the proposal's consistency with all 
Statewide Goals. 
Goal 1 Citizen Involvement: To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opportunity 
for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process. 
In its land use code, the City has State-acknowledged provisions for citizen involvement that ensure 
the opportunity for citizens to be involved m all phases of the planning process and that set out 
requirements for such involvement. The proposed action does not amend these citizen involvement 
provisions. The process for reviewing the proposed amendment complies with Goal 1 since it complies 
with, and surpasses the requirements of, the State-acknowledged citizen involvement provisions. 
The City of Eugene land use code implements Statewide Planning Goal 1 by requiring that notice of 
proposed amendments be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption Consideration of the 
amendments begins with a City of Eugene Planning Commission public hearing on September 19, 
2006. On August 3. 2006, the City mailed notice of the proposed plan amendments and zone change 
to the Department of Land Conservation and Development, as required by the Eugene Code and m 
accordance with State statutes. Referral comments were requested on June 27, 2006, after the initial 
application and on August 2, 2006, after supplemental materials were received. Referrals were sent to 
the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), City of Springfield, Lane County, the Downtown 
Neighbors Association and to City departments, consistent with the Eugene Code. On August 18, 
2006, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was mailed to the applicant, and owners and 
occupants of property within 500 feet of the subject property, the Downtown Neighborhood 
Association, and other interested parties who requested notice, in accordance with the Eugene Code. 
On August 30, 2006, notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Register-
Guard., in accordance with the Eugene Code. On August 17, 2006, notice was also posted m 
accordance with EC 9.7415(5). In addition to public meetings and mailed notices, printed materials 
related to these proceedings were made available to the public at Planning and Development 
Department offices. An additional public hearing before the Eugene City Council will be scheduled 
following Planning Commission action. Notice to interested and affected parties will be provided for 
that hearing. 
The process for adopting this amendment is consistent with Goal 1 since it complies with, and 
surpasses the requirements of the State's citizen involvement provisions. 
Goal 2 - Land Use Planning: To establish a land use planning process and policy framework as a 
basis for all decisions and actions related to use of land and to assure an adequate factual base for 
such decisions and actions. 
The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) is the policy tool that provides a 
basis for decision-makmg m this area. The Metro Plan was acknowledged by the State in 1982 to be in 
compliance with statewide planning goals. These findings and record show that there is an adequate 
factual base for decisions to be made concerning the proposed amendments. Goal 2 requires that plans 
be coordinated with the plans of affected governmental units and that opportunities be provided for 
review and comment by affected governmental units. To comply with the Goal 2 coordination 
requirement, the City coordinated the review of the proposed amendments with all affected 
governmental units. Specifically, notice was mailed to the State Department of Land Conservation and 
Development, Oregon Department of Transportation, Lane County, and the City of Springfield. There 
are no Goal 2 exceptions required for this amendment. Therefore, the amendment is consistent with 
Statewide Planning Goal 2 
Goal 3 - Agricultural Land. To presen>e and maintain agricultural lands. 
Goal 3 is not applicable to this amendment as the subject property and actions do not affect any 
agricultural plan designation or use. Goal 3 excludes lands inside an acknowledged urban growth 
boundary from the definition of agricultural lands. Since the subject property is entirely within its 
acknowledged urban growth boundary, Goal 3 is not relevant and the amendment does not affect the 
area's compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 3 
Goal 4 - Forest Land: To conser\'e forest lands. 
Goal 4 is not applicable to this amendment as the subject parcel and actions do not affect any forest 
plan designation or use. Goal 4 does not apply within urban growth boundaries; therefore it does not 
apply to the subject property, which is within Eugene's UGB (OAR 660-006-0020). Therefore, Goal 4 
is not relevant and the amendment does not affect the area's compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 
4. 
Goal 5 - Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources: To consent open space and 
protect natural and scenic resources. 
OAR 660-023-0250 does not require local governments to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a post 
acknowledgement plan amendment (PAPA) unless the PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. The subject 
property does not include any Goal 5 resource site. The proposed amendment does not create or 
amend a list of Goal 5 resources, does not amend a plan or code provision adopted in order to protect a 
significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific requirements of Goal 5, and does not amend the 
acknowledged Urban Growth Boundary. Therefore, the proposed amendment is consistent with 
Statewide Planning Goal 5. 
Goal 6 - Air, Water and Land Resources Quality: To maintain and improve the quality of the air, 
water, and land resources of the state. 
Goal 6 addresses waste and process discharges from development, and is aimed at protecting air, water 
and land from impacts from those discharges. Nothing in the proposal or the character of the site or 
potential uses indicates a future development that would compromise air, water and land resources. 
The proposal does not amend the metropolitan area's air, water quality or land resource policies. 
Therefore, the amendment is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 6. 
Goal 7 - Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards: To protect life and property from natural 
disasters and hazards. 
Goal 7 requires that local government planning programs include provisions to protect people and 
property from natural hazards such as floods, land slides, earthquakes and related hazards, tsunamis 
and wildfires. The subject property is relatively flat in the midst of an urban area, and is not located 
within known areas of natural disasters or hazards. The subject property is outside the FEMA flood 
zone and is not subject to hazards normally associated with steep slopes, wildfires, or tsunamis. Other 
hazards, such as earthquakes and severe winter storms can be mitigated at the time of development 
based on accepted building codes and building techniques. Therefore, this amendment is consistent 
with Statewide Planning Goal 7. 
Goal 8 - Recreational Needs. To satisfy the recreational needs of the citizens of the state and visitors 
and, where appropriate, to provide for the siting of necessary recreational facilities including 
destination resorts. 
Goal 8 ensures the provision of recreational facilities to Oregon citizens and is primarily concerned 
with the provision of those facilities in non-urban areas of the state. There are no public or private 
recreational facilities on or adjacent to the State Motor Pool site. Therefore, the proposed amendment 
will not impact the provision of recreational facilities, nor will it affect access to existing or future 
recreational facilities. Therefore, the amendment is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 8. 
Goal 9 - Economic Development: To provide adequate opportunities throughout the state for a variety 
of economic activities vital to the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon's citizens. 
The proposed Plan designation for the subject 1 7-acre parcel is Commercial. The Administrative Rule 
for Statewide Planning Goal 9 (OAR 660, Division 9) requires cities to evaluate the supply and 
demand of commercial land relative to community economic objectives. The 1992 Eugene 
Commercial Lands Study is acknowledged for compliance with the requirements of Goal 9 and its 
Administrative Rule. As discussed below, the proposed amendment is consistent with the Eugene 
Commercial Lands Study. It will have little real effect on the supply of commercial land. The 
proposed amendment would change the property's plan designation from one that supports limited 
commercial use (High Density Residential/Mixed Use) to another that supports a wider range of 
commercial uses (Commercial). Both designations would also allow high density residential 
construction. The additional designation of Nodal Development, which does not change the base zone 
or densities, would not change. As a result, the potential change in the level of commercial use on this 
1 7 acre parcel would have a relatively insignificant impact on the total supply of commercial land. 
The Metropolitan Industrial Lands Special Study (1991) addresses the industrial land supply. The 
subject site was not part of the industrial lands inventory; i.e., it was not counted as a potential site for 
future industrial development or as needed to satisfy the city's 20-year industrial land supply. Lands 
considered available for industrial uses are typically those which have an Industrial plan designation. 
The subject parcel does not currently have an Industrial designation (but has an 1-2 zoning). Therefore, 
the proposed plan amendment (residential to commercial) would have no effect on the supply of 
available industrial land as predicted by the Industrial Lands Special Study. 
The Eugene Commercial Lands Study contains several policies applicable to the proposed amendment. 
The applicant concludes that that Policies 2.0, 8.0, 17.0 and implementation strategies 17.1 and 17.3 
apply (applicant's letter to City July 24, 2006). While the proposal is not inconsistent with those 
policies, staff does not agree that those policies apply. However, a number of policies in the Study do 
support a Commercial designation of the subject parcel. Applicable policies are discussed below. 
Promote redevelopment of existing commercial areas and compact, dense growth by 
encouraging businesses to revitalize and reuse existing commercial sites. (Policy 6) 
The proposed amendment to Commercial would not actively further the reuse and 
intensification of existing commercial sites, as it opens up a new site to commercial 
development. However, to the extent that the amendment maintains compact urban 
development in the downtown core, as anticipated in the Downtown Plan, the proposal is not 
inconsistent with this policy. The amendment may encourage reuse of a parking lot (a low 
intensity "industrial" use) into a more compact urban uses, such as retail, commercial, housing, 
or a combination of these uses. 
Promote neighborhood-oriented commercial facilities and community commercial areas rather 
than additional major retail centers. (Policy 11) 
The proposed amendment would encourage centralized commercial development m the 
downtown area rather than in outlying major retail centers, and could promote the development 
of other commercial areas downtown, such as the adjacent 5th Street Market. On its own, the 
subject site, at 1.7 acres, is not large enough to support an "additional major retail center." 
Concentrate development in existing commercial areas to minimize traffic impacts on the rest 
of the city. (Policy 12) 
The subject parcel is located in the downtown core, an area that both the Metro Plan and 
Downtown Plan refinement plan envision as an area of compact, high density commercial and 
residential development. The proposed amendment furthers this policy. 
Eugene Downtown Plan policies also support a Commercial/Nodal Development Designation for the 
subject parcel (see findings under criterion (3)(b) below for further discussion of applicable Downtown 
Plan policies. Specifically, Policy 2 in "Building a Downtown" states: 
Facilitate downtown redevelopment by re-designating and rezoning underutilized properties, 
such as surface parking lots, to a commercial land use designation and a commercial zone such 
as C-2 or C-3. (Policy 2) 
The existing parking lot is arguably an underutilized area. In addition, the Eugene Downtown 
Plan identifies the subject property as a "Downtown Development Opportunity Area" (Map 1). 
Approval of a plan amendment to Commercial/Nodal Development is supported by the policies in the 
Eugene Commercial Lands Study and the Downtown Plan. Based on the above discussion, the 
amendment is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 9. 
Goal 10 - Housing: To provide for the housing needs of the citizens of the state. 
Goal 10 requires that communities plan for and maintain an inventory of buildable residential land for 
needed housing units. The property affected by the proposed amendments was not included in the 
supply of land available for residential development, as documented in the adopted 1999 Residential 
Lands and Housing Study (Ordinance No. 20159, 1999). That study excluded from consideration as 
"buildable land" vacant land that was owned by a public agency and not intended for residential 
development. The subject property has been in the ownership of the State of Oregon since 1980, 
according to the applicant. Therefore, changing the land use designation from residential uses will not 
affect the adopted residential lands inventory. 
Based on fact that the amendment would have no effect on the adopted residential land supply, the 
proposed amendment is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 10. 
Goal 11 - Public Facilities and Services: To plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient 
arrangement of public facilities and sendees to serve as a framework for urban and rural development. 
The area affected by the amendments has long been located inside the city limits (annexed between 
1864 and 1900). Adequate access to the City's stormwater system, public wastewater lines, water and 
power are available to the site. The existing level of public facilities and service is adequate to serve 
the needs of existing and future development. The provision of this amendment does not affect the 
planning or development of future public facilities or services. Therefore, the amendment is consistent 
with Statewide Planning Goal 11 
Goal 12 - Transportation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic transportation 
system. 
As discussed below, based on additional transportation information submitted by the applicant, staff 
finds that the proposal is consistent with Statewide Goal 12. 
Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon 
Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0060. The TPR states that when land use changes, including 
amendments to acknowledged comprehensive plans, significantly affect transportation facilities, 
measures must be put in place to assure that the allowed land uses are consistent with the function and 
capacity of those transportation facilities. Several streets border the site affected by the proposed 
amendments. Those streets are: Pearl Street, High Street, and 4th Avenue. On the south is the 
Southern Pacific RR right of way. Pearl and High streets are classified as Major Collectors on the 
City of Eugene Street Classification Map, adopted in 1999. The Eugene-Spnngfield Metropolitan Area 
Transportation Plan (TransPlan) provides the regional policy framework through which the TPR is 
implemented at the local level Implementation of transportation system improvements specific to the 
downtown area are accomplished through the Central Area Transportation Study (CATS). 
A determination of potential impacts on local transportation facilities is a prerequisite to approval of 
the proposed amendment from High Density Residential to Commercial. Pursuant to OAR 660-012-
0060(1), the State TPR requires a determination of which transportation facilities will experience a 
"significant effect" as a result of the proposed plan amendment, and defines what constitutes a 
significant effect. A plan amendment is considered to significantly affect a transportation facility if, 
for example, the amendment will reduce the performance of the transportation facility below the 
minimum acceptable performance standard (often described in terms of Level of Service standards or 
vehicle/capacity ratios). If a local government determines that an amendment would significantly 
affect a transportation facility, the local government must put in place measures to assure that the 
allowed land uses are consistent with the identified "function, capacity and performance standards" of 
the facility ((OAR 660-012-0060(1)). An example of such a measure is a minor street improvement. 
OAR 660-012-0060(3) describes additional circumstances under which the City could approve the 
amendment, including instances in which the applicant demonstrates that the existing transportation 
facility is already performing below minimum acceptable performance standards and that the 
development resulting from the proposed amendment mitigates the impacts in a manner that avoids 
further degradation of the transportation facility. 
The applicant maintains that additional transportation information is not needed to demonstrate 
compliance with Statewide Goal 12 (applicant's letter to City dated October 10, 2006, pg. 2), because 
the proposal complies with Goal 12 based on: 1) earlier Council findings for the Downtown Plan 
adoption, 2) the Nodal Development/Transit Oriented Development zoning of the area; and 3) the 
Central Area Transportation Study (CATS). 
1) The applicant argues that the 2004 City Council findings related to the adoption of the 
Downtown Plan are sufficient to demonstrate Goal 12 compliance for the current proposal 
(applicant's letter to City dated June 8, 2006) The applicant argues that, since the Downtown 
Plan contains a policy that specifically directs redesignation of the subject parcel, the same 
findings made for all Downtown Plan policies can be transferred to this current redesignation 
action. Staff does not concur with this argument. 
The Downtown Plan has no land use diagram, and no redesignations or rezones were approved 
concurrent with the Downtown Plan adoption. The Plan policy in question is: "Facilitate 
downtown redevelopment by re-designating and rezoning underutilized properties, such as 
surface parking lots, to a commercial land use designation and a commercial zone such as C-2 
orC-3" (Policy 2). Contrary to what the applicant suggests, this policy is not parcel-specific. It 
applies to a number of unspecified properties downtown that are "underutilized," some of which 
may also be surface parking lots at any given time. While this policy does apply to the subject 
parcel, it did not have the effect of redesignating the site. It is a general policy directing that 
underutilized properties downtown should be redesignated, but does not itself redesignate those 
properties. 
The applicant notes that the Council findings for the Downtown Plan stated that "No change in 
the functional classification of these streets is intended to result from this Plan..." and that "the 
Plan does not, by its adoption, allow types or levels of land uses which would result in 
inconsistencies with the functional classification of a transportation facility..." (applicant's letter 
to City July 24, 2006). However, those earlier findings do not obviate the requirement for the 
current proposal to comply with OAR 660-012-0060(1), which requires a determination of 
"significant effects" on transportation facilities as a result of the current proposed plan 
amendment. A change from a High Density Residential designation to a Commercial designation 
can result in allowable uses that would increase the potential number of vehicle trips, with 
potentially significant effects on transportation facilities. Although general Downtown Plan 
policies were acknowledged as consistent with Statewide goals, that acknowledgement is 
insufficient to conclude that the redesignation of a specific parcel without further analysis is 
consistent with Statewide goals. Staff does not agree that 2004 Downtown Plan findings are 
sufficient for the current proposal, and finds that additional information is needed to demonstrate 
the proposal's consistency with Statewide Goal 12. 
2) Although the subject parcel is within a Nodal Development area and Transit Oriented 
Development overlay zone, and future development will meet the multi-modal goals of these 
designations (applicant's revised findings August 21, 2006), having those designations in itself is 
not sufficient evidence that the land use change will have no significant effect on transportation 
facilities. 
3) CATS, an implementation plan, identifies future transit routes and contains policies that promote 
an improved pedestrian system (applicant's revised findings August 21, 2006). However, these 
strategies are not specific to the proposed amendment, and CATS does not evaluate whether the 
allowable uses on the site would have a significant effect on a transportation facility, nor does it 
identify specific measures that would mitigate identified impacts stemming from a plan 
amendment pursuant to the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060(1) 
To meet the requirements of OAR 660-012-0060 it is necessary to evaluate the proposed amendment 
relative to criteria outlined in the TPR used to determine "significant effect." According to City of 
Eugene Public Works Engineering, this requires data such as trip generation, trip distribution and 
assignment (or similar data, depending on uses, traffic patterns, surrounding streets, etc., that describes 
existing and anticipated traffic levels) and comparative analysis of each of these under existing plan 
designation(s) and proposed plan designation(s). Empirical data on a wide range of land uses is 
available from the Trip Generation report published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, 
which is the industry standard utilized nationwide to determine traffic impacts of development. Once 
the local government has determined "significant effect," there are a number of remedies for 
applications that to enable plan amendments to comply with the TPR. 
The applicant's original application materials were revised with additional transportation data 
(submitted on October 10, 2006). The data submitted includes trip generation estimates for allowable 
uses under the existing HDR designation and for allowable uses under the proposed Commercial 
designation. These estimates assume the following: that allowable uses under a HDR designation 
would be ground floor retail with 2 additional floors of residential uses; that allowable uses under a 
Commercial designation would be ground floor retail with an additional floor of office; and that up to 
one-half of the parcel area could be covered in structures (with remaining area absorbed by parking, 
circulation, landscaping, etc.). Staff concurs that these are reasonable assumptions based on the site, 
current market conditions, and typical zoning requirements. The applicant's trip generation analysis 
estimates that less than 200 additional weekday trips would be generated by a change from a HDR to a 
Commercial designation, and approximately 36 additional weekday peak hour trips would be 
generated under proposed designations. Based on City engineering staffs knowledge of existing traffic 
volumes and existing roadway capacity, surrounding streets are currently operating at between LOS A 
and LOS C Given the traffic volumes anticipated in the applicant's trip generation analysis, staff 
believes that the proposed designations will not result in a significant impact on the function, capacity 
or performance standards of these transportation facilities. Therefore, staff finds that the proposed 
change complies with the State TPR Statewide Goal 12. 
Goal 13 - Energy Conservation: To conserve energy. 
The proposed plan amendment does not specifically impact energy conservation. Therefore, the 
proposal is consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 13 
Goal 14 - Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land 
use. 
The amendment does not effect the transition from rural to urban land use, as the subject property is 
already within the City limits. Therefore, Statewide Planning Goal 14 does not apply. 
Goal 15 - Willamette River Greenway: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural, 
scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette 
River as the Willamette River Greenway. 
The subject property is not within the boundaries of the Willamette River Greenway. Therefore, 
Statewide Planning Goal 15 does not apply. 
Goals 16 through 19 - Estuanne Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, and Ocean 
Resources: 
There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources related to the property effected by 
these amendments. Therefore, these goals are not relevant and the amendment will not affect 
compliance with Statewide Planning Goals 16 through 19. 
(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. 
The Metro Plan diagram amendment to re-designate 1 7 acres of land from High Density 
Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development to Commercial/Nodal Development will not create an 
internal conflict with the remainder of the Metro Plan. No text or other diagram changes are necessary 
to ensure internal consistency with the proposed diagram amendments, adoption of this amendment 
will not make the Metro Plan internally consistent. 
Consistency with Metro Plan policies: 
The applicant concludes that "...findings were made at the time of adoption of the Downtown Plan. 
The change of the Metro Plan map, when that change is only to make it conform with the text of the 
adopted refinement plan, and now the Metro Plan, should not require new findings of Metro Plan 
consistency" (applicant's letter to City June 8, 2006). Staff does not concur with the applicant's 
conclusion. That the refinement plan was earlier found to be consistent with the Metro Plan is not 
sufficient evidence that the specific plan amendment proposed is consistent with the Metro Plan. Staff 
presents findings below as evidence that the proposed Metro Plan diagram amendment is consistent 
with the policy direction contained in the Metro Plan. The following Metro Plan polices are applicable 
to the requested amendment: 
Residential Land Use and Housing Element: 
Generally locate higher density residential development near employment or commercial services, in 
proximity to major transportation systems or within transportation-efficient nodes. (Policy A. 11) 
Encourage residential developments in or near downtown core areas in both cities. (Policy A. 19) 
The current Metro Plan designation of the parcel is High Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal 
Development. The Metro Plan also contains the following cautionary statement related to the 
residential land supply: "While all medium and high density allocations shown on the Metro Plan 
Diagram may not be needed during the planning period, there protection for these uses is important 
because available sites meeting pertinent location standards are limited" (pg. II-G-3). However, the 
proposed amendment has been found to have no actual effect on the buildable residential land supply 
(as noted in findings for Goal 10 under EC 9.7730(3)(b) above). In addition, the proposed designation 
of Commercial/Nodal Development would accommodate both multi-unit residential and commercial 
uses. 
The applicant claims that a High Density Residential designation is not appropriate for the subject 
parcel. This is due to the fact that: 
1) The parcel is surrounded by commercial, industrial and office uses (applicant's letter to City July 
24, 2006 pg. 5). Staff does not agree that this makes the site unsuitable for High Density 
Residential Uses, which are anticipated in the Downtown Plan and often located within compact 
commercial centers and next to office uses. The site is also proximate to other housing, parks, 
and other amenities for residents. 
2) The applicant states that the parcel is also not suited for residential uses due to the parcel's 
configuration . The parcel is only 130 feet deep on the west (Pearl Street) side, with the longest 
boundary along the railroad (written statement April 13, 2006 pg. 3). It is not clear how this 
configuration makes the site difficult to develop in high density housing. The site is substantially 
larger than that accommodating the TATE Condominiums on Olive Street or the Aurora Housing 
building at 11th Avenue and Oak, for examples. 
3) The case is made that the subject parcel is unlikely to develop into high density housing due to its 
location adjacent to the railroad tracks (written statement April 13, 2006 pg. 3). Noise and 
vibration from the rail use would conflict with residential use. The application materials also 
state that affordable housing would be the most likely high density residential use for such a site 
and, as such, it would not qualify under HUD rules since the noise levels would be deemed 
unacceptable for residences (State of Oregon letter July 16, 2003 submitted as background). In 
addition, the applicant concludes that the corresponding high density residential zoning (R-3 or 
R-4), which would require the development of 30 units on the site and on-site parking, would be 
difficult for that site. Under the Eugene land use code, a high density residential designation 
would typically require minimum densities of 20-30 unit/acre (however, on-site parking would 
not be required by the land use code, as the parcel is located in a Parking Exempt Area (Map 
9.6410(4)(a)). Staff concurs that noise mitigation for residential development in such a location 
could be costly, particularly the per/unit cost for lower densities. The applicant states that the 
only commercial development that would be allowed under R-3 or R-4 zoning is neighborhood 
commercial (C-l) development, which would not be financially feasible (written statement April 
13, 2006 pg. 3). Under the land use code, R-3 or R-4 zoning allows limited, typically C-l-style 
development. A Commercial designation with commercial zoning would allow a much wider 
range of commercial uses. 
Whether or not it is likely that the subject parcel would be redeveloped to High Density Residential 
uses, or how financially feasible it is to do so is not made clear the application. Nonetheless, a diagram 
change to a Commercial/Nodal Development designation is not inconsistent with Metro Plan policies 
related to residential land use. 
Economic Element: 
Increase the amount of undeveloped land zoned for light industrial and commercial uses correlating 
the effective supply in terms or suitability and availability with the projects of demand. (Policy B.6) 
The subject parcel, a small City of Eugene-owned parking area to the northwest, and the EWEB 
property immediately east of the site are the only sites zoned Light Medium Industrial (1-2) in this area. 
None of these are in active industrial use. On the north and west side, adjacent properties are in office 
use. The 5th Street Market commercial area is to the south. Given these adjacent uses and zoning, it is 
more likely that there will be a demand for commercial uses, rather than industrial uses, on these 
properties. 
Consistency with applicable refinement plan: 
The proposed amendment is also internally consistent to the extent that it is consistent with applicable 
refinement plans. Policies in the Downtown Plan encourage both high density residential and 
commercial development in the downtown area, as noted in the staff findings related to Zone Change 
criterion 9.8865(2) (discussed below). A change to a Commercial designation for this parcel would 
accommodate both commercial and residential uses, and would be internally consistent with the Metro 
Plan and its refinement plan policies. 
Zone Change 
The proposed zone change is from Light-Medium Industrial with Transit Oriented Development 
overlay zone (I-2/TD) to Community Commercial with Transit Oriented Development overlay zone 
and Nodal Development overlay zone (C-2/TD/ND). The proposed zoning of C-2 allows 
neighborhood commercial development, community commercial development and residential 
development (no minimum or maximum densities specified). 
Eugene Code Section 9.8865 requires that the following criteria (in bold and italic) be applied to a 
Zone Change. 
(1) The proposed change is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan. The 
written text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro Plan diagram 
where apparent conflicts or inconsistencies exist 
Approval of the zone change is dependent upon approval of the Metro Plan diagram amendment from 
High Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development to a designation of Commercial/Nodal 
Development. The findings related to consistency with the Metro Plan under EC 9.7730(3)(b) above, 
are incorporated herein by reference. 
(2) The proposed zone change is consistent with applicable adopted refinement plans. In 
the event of inconsistencies between these plans and the Metro Plan, the Metro Plan 
controls. 
The applicable refinement plan is the Eugene Downtown Plan (adopted April 2004). The Downtown 
Plan does not provide a land use diagram, instead relying on the Metro Plan diagram. Therefore, the 
land use designations between the two plans are consistent. The following policies from the Eugene 
Downtown Plan are applicable to this amendment: 
"Strong Regional Center" policies: 
Downtown development shall support the urban qualities of density, vitality, livability and 
diversity to create a downtown, urban environment. (Policy 2) 
Existing use of the subject property is low density surface parking, which does not have the 
qualities of density, vitality, etc. envisioned for the downtown area. The proposed change from 
Industrial (1-2) to Commercial (C2) could promote redevelopment with these characteristics. In 
addition, the Eugene Downtown Plan identifies the subject property as a "Downtown 
Development Opportunity Area" (Map 1). 
"Building a Downtown" policies: 
Facilitate downtown redevelopment by re-designating and rezoning underutilized properties, 
such as surface parking lots, to a commercial land use designation and a commercial zone such 
as C-2 or C-3. (Policy 2) 
The proposed zone change furthers this policy direction. Currently, the property is a surface 
parking lot zoned Industrial (1-2). It is the type of "underutilized" downtown property that this 
policy was specifically crafted to address. A zone change to Commercial (C-2) would support 
implementation of this policy. 
"Living Downtown" policies: 
Stimulate multi-unit housing in the downtown core and on the edges of downtown for a variety 
of income levels and ownership opportunities. (Policy 1) 
The current industrial zoning of the site does not allow multi-unit housing. A zone change 
from Industrial (1-2) to Commercial (C2) makes multi-unit housing possible at this site, 
furthering this policy goal. The parcel is included in the Multi-Unit Property Tax Exemption 
Area Boundary (MUPTE) and in the Vertical Housing Tax Exemption Zone Area (Map 2), 
where development qualifies for incentives for high density housing downtown. 
Reinforce residential use in neighborhoods abutting the commercial core to help contain 
commercial activity in downtown and maintain the historic character and livability of adjacent 
neighborhoods. (Policy 2) 
The proposed zone change would have a neutral to positive effect on neighborhoods abutting 
the commercial core. In making additional land available downtown for higher density 
development, the proposal promotes the containment of higher density housing and commercial 
uses to the downtown area, preserving surrounding neighborhoods. In doing so, the zone 
change would be consistent with this policy. 
The policies in the Downtown Plan arguably support both high density residential and commercial 
development of the subject parcel. However, while residential uses on this site would be supported by 
the Plan, there is strong policy basis for a commercial designation, as noted in B-D Policy 2: 
"Facilitate downtown redevelopment by re-designating and rezoning underutilized properties, such as 
surface parking lots, to a commercial land use designation and a commercial zone such as C-2 or C-
3. " A C-2 zone does not mandate residential development, but allows a mix of commercial and 
residential development. Based on the above discussion, staff finds that the proposed zone change to 
C-2/ND is consistent with the policies in the Downtown Plan. Further, the zone change will not 
remove the Transit Oriented Development overlay zone from the subject property, and will add the 
Nodal Development overlay zone anticipated in the 2004 adoption of the Downtown Plan, all actions 
that support the compact, mixed use land patterns envisioned in the Downtown Plan. 
(3) The uses and density that will be allowed by the proposed zoning in the location of the 
proposed change can be served through the orderly extension of key urban facilities 
and services. 
The following key urban facilities and services, as defined in the Metro Plan, are currently available to 
the subject property, or can be extended in an orderly and efficient manner to serve future 
development: wastewater service, stormwater service, water service, fire and emergency medical 
services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, 
communication facilities, and public schools on a district-wide basis. Details related to 
how/when/where those facilities and services are provided remain to be resolved in the context of any 
future development proposal. 
In regards to transportation, the findings under EC 9.7730(3)(a) under Statewide Planning Goals 12, 
above, are incorporated herein by reference. 
(4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting requirements set 
out for the specific zone in: (a) EC 9.2150 Commercial Zone Siting Requirements. 
For this proposed zone change, there are no applicable siting requirements as referenced in the above 
criterion. The commercial zone siting requirements at EC 9.2150 only affect properties proposed for 
C-l or C-4 zoning. There are no siting requirements in the Eugene Code for the Nodal 
Development/ND overlay zone. 
(5) In cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(3), the property owner 
shall enter into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the area is 
maintained as a natural resource area for a minimum of 50 years. 
The above criterion is not applicable, as the proposed zone change does not include application of the 
NR zone. 
3RD 
Area to be redesignated f rom 
High Density Resident ia l /Mixed Use/Noda l Deve lopment Designat ion 
to Commerc ia l /Noda l Deve lopment Designat ion 
| 
-
! 
i i j 
I ........ 1 
! " 1 
L 1 
b r o 
4TH AVE 
Map 17-03-30-44, 
Tax Lot 8900 
Area to be re zoned from 
I-2 Zone /TD Overlay Zone 
to C-2 Zone,TO O/erlay Zone/Nodal Development Overlay Zon 
r n " • 
! 
L 1 J 
n 
i 
b v 
X 
6T H AVE 
EXHIBIT B 
Oregon State Motor Pool Site 
Metro Plan Redesignation and Zone Change 
City of Eugene 
Planning Division 
99 West 10th Avenue 
Eugene, OR 97401 
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 
To Participants, Interested Parties, Applicants 
I certify that on _ I mailed a copy of the attached Notice 
by causing the same to be deposited in the United States Mail at Eugene, Oregon, enclosed in a 
sealed envelope with postage paid. 
-
Sign Name L / 
Print Name 
ATTACHMENTS Notice of Decision 
Mailing list of parties to which Notice mailed 
Planning & Development 
Planning 
City of Eugene 
99 West 10th Avenue 
Eugene, Oregon 97401 
(541)682-5377 
(541)682-5572 FAX 
www.eugene-or.gov 
NOTICE OF DECISION 
March 1, 2007 
On February 26, 2007, the Eugene City Council adopted Ordinance No. 20377 amending the Eugene-
Sprmgfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) diagram to amend the Metro Plan 
designation and zoning of the property known as the Oregon Motor Pool Site (Map 17-03-3044 Tax 
Lot 8900). 
This ordinance specifically amends the Metro Plan designation for the subject parcel from High 
Density Residential/Mixed Use/Nodal Development Designation to Commercial/Nodal Development 
Designation; and rezones the subject parcel from I-2/TD Light-Medium Industrial with Transit 
Oriented Development and Nodal Development Overlay Zones to C-2/TD/ND Community 
Commercial with Transit Oriented Development and Nodal Development overlay zones (City files 
(MA 06-2 and Z 06-9). 
The amendment, zone change, findings and related materials can be reviewed at 1st Floor Reception, 
Atrium Building, 99 West 10th Avenue, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 
All decisions of the elected officials are final. Persons who participated either orally or in writing in 
the local government proceedings leading to adoption of the amendments may appeal the decision to 
the Land Use Board of Appeals within 21 days of the decision. Appeals to the Oregon Land Use 
Board of Appeals are governed by ORS 197.825 to 197.845. 
For additional information, please contact: 
Ann Siegenthaler, Associate Planner 
City of Eugene Planning Division 
99 West 10th Avenue 
Eugene, OR 97401 
E-mail: ann.siegenthaler@ci.eugene.or.us 
Phone: (541) 682-5452 
Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160®" 
Interested Parties: 
Oregon Motor Pool Site (MA 06-2) 
(MA06-2) 
TOM PETERSON 
DOWNTOWN NEIGHBORS ASSOCIAT 
1178 CHARNELTON STREET 
EUGENE, OR 97401 
(MA06-2) 
GARY MCNEEL 
COE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING 
858 PEARL 
*********ROUTE OR EMAIL***** 
(MA06-2) 
ROXIE CUELLAR 
HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION 
2053 LAURA STREET 
SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 
1-800-G0-AVERY 
(MA06-2) 
WILLIAM FOSTER 
*OREGON STATE OF 
155 COTTAGE STREET NE 
SALEM, OR 97301 
(MA06-2) 
MAJESKA SEESE-GREEN 
WHITEAKER COMMUNITY COUNCIL 
P.O. BOX 11692 
EUGENE, OR 97440 
(MA06-2) 
TERRY CONNOLLY 
EUGENE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 
P.O. BOX 1107 
EUGENE, OR 97440-1107 
(MA06-2) 
KENT HOWE 
LANE COUNTY 
125 E 8TH AVE 
EUGENE, OR 97401 
MVEIXY® SlbU^ 
(MA06-2) 
JAMES W. SPICKERMAN 
GLEAVES SWEARINGEN ET AL 
PO BOX 1147 
EUGENE, OR 97440 
(MA06-2) 
GREG MOTT 
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD 
225 FIFTH STREET 
SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 
(MA06-2) 
LORI SEGAL 
GOAL ONE COALITION 
642 CHARNELTON SUITE 100 
EUGENE OR 97401 
®09kS < D A U 3 A V M 
©09IS »MBqe6 9| zesmm 
apidej eBeipas e a6ejjrioqi).ue uotssaaduii 
City of Eugene 
Planning Division 
99 West 10th Avenue 
Eugene, OR 97401 
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING 
To DLCD 
I certify that on / / [ mailed a copy of the attached Notice and 
attachments to the Department of Land Conservation and Development by causing the same to be 
deposited in the United States Mail at Eugene, Oregon, enclosed in a sealed envelope with 
postage paid. 
Print Name 
ATTACHMENTS: DLCD "green form" Notice of Adoption 
Ordinance adopting Plan amendment and zone change 
Adopted findings 
Map of subject parcel for which Plan re-designation and re-zone adopted 
Certificate of mailing, mailing list, and Notice of Decision mailed to 
participants, interested parties, and applicant 
Certificate of mailing to DLCD