MCMORRAN HOUSE PRELIMINARY HISTORIC ASSESSMENT McMorran House, 1931 Lane County Historical Museum University of Oregon Campus Planning Campus Planning and Facilities Management March 2022 McMorran House, 1931 Lane County Historical Museum Additional information about the history of the McMorran House is available in the UO McMorran House and Gardens History Report which can be found on the CPFM website: https://cpfm.uoregon.edu Refer also to resources available in Design and Construction. Historic images are courtesy the UO Archives unless noted otherwise. Building drawings are available from the Design and Construction Offi ce. PROJECT CONTACTS Liz Thorstenson, Planning Associate Christine Thompson, Director UNIVERSITY OF OREGON CAMPUS PLANNING CAMPUS PLANNING AND FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1276 University of Oregon Eugene, Oregon 97403-1276 https://cpfm.uoregon.edu MCMORRAN HOUSE PRELIMINARY HISTORIC ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 Signifi cance ......................................................................................................................... 1 Timeline .............................................................................................................................. 3 Surveyed Areas and Rankings Exterior............................................................................................................................. 5 North Facade..................................................................................................................... 7 East Facade........................................................................................................................ 9 West Facade...................................................................................................................... 11 South Facade..................................................................................................................... 13 Interior Basement .......................................................................................................... 15 Interior First Floor .......................................................................................................... 17 Interior Second Floor .................................................................................................... 23 Interior Third Floor ........................................................................................................ 25 Details of Surveyed Areas Exterior .............................................................................................................................. 26 Opal Clark Memorial Rose Garden ........................................................................... 27 Original Basalt Entry Steps and Walkway ................................................................ 29 Original Walkway, Ironwork, and Basalt Wall .......................................................... 30 Garden Details................................................................................................................. 31 Treatment Recommendations .................................................................................... 34 Appendices: Appendix A: Historic Ranking Methodology ...................................................... 37 Appendix B: 1924 Floor Plans, Sections, & Details ............................................. 39 Appendix C: McMorran House and Gardens History Report Excerpts .......... 48 Appendix D: Secretary of the Interior ‘s Standards for Rehabilitation .... 60 Appendix E: City of Eugene Zoning Map for the McMorran House ...... 61 INTRODUCTION This assessment identifi es the historic features of the McMorran House exterior (including landscape elements) and interior spaces. Understanding the building’s historic signifi cance is the fi rst step to evaluating and preserving its valuable architectural and landscape features. This assessment is intended to be used as a resource when making recommendations for treatment of the McMorran House during any alterations or additions. The assessed areas are shown on the Surveyed Areas and Ranking maps (pg. 5). Each area with potential historic signifi cance is assigned a ranking of primary, secondary, tertiary, or non- contributing. This ranking is based on the level of historic signifi cance (high, medium, or low) and level of integrity, defi ned as the degree to which the key historic elements are evident today (excellent, good, fair, or poor). Refer to Appendix A for a full description of the ranking methodology. SIGNIFICANCE The McMorran House is an example of the Tudor Revival and Norman Farmhouse styles, has high historic signifi cance, good integrity and excellent condition, and is currently a “primary” ranked historic building by the City of Eugene. It is likely eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, under criteria C (distinctive architecturally), and is identifi ed as a primary resource for the UO campus. (Refer to Appendix C, pg. 57). Building History (excerpts from the UO McMorran House and Gardens History Report): The McMorran House was built for George McMorran in 1925 during a time when Eugene was experiencing its largest building and population boom, in accordance with the designs of Roscoe D. Hemenway, a respected architect, and George H. Otten, landscape architect. George McMorran, was a man who greatly infl uenced the commercial life of Eugene and was also deeply involved in the organization and life of the community. George McMorran sold the house to the University of Oregon in 1941. Every resident thereafter has been a president of the University of Oregon and, therefore, has had a profound impact on the university. Roscoe D. Hemenway, a UO graduate and an acclaimed Portland architect known for his period revival style residential work, designed the McMorran house. The house is an excellent example of the Tudor Revival/Norman Farmhouse-style exemplifi ed by its steeply-pitched, hipped roof; massive chimneys; dominant façade with decorative brickwork; oriel window; and pronounced entryway. The expansive gardens are likely the work of George H. Otten, another UO grad and well-known Oregon landscape architect. The McMorran Estate was one of at least four large estates occupying much of the land around the Fairmount Loop. All were built on the steeply sloping land with panoramic views of the city below. (Refer to Appendix C for more details and description of the house and Fairmount neighborhood history). ALTERATIONS The McMorran house has been well cared for by the University of Oregon since 1941. All repairs and remodels to the house and gardens have been carefully monitored to preserve the original character and style of the house. In 1940, the left side of the dormer window in the guest bedroom on the second fl oor was squared off . From 1950 through 1998, various maintenance and upgrades, including garden improvements, were added (see Timeline, pg. 3). In 1998, a major kitchen remodel and expansion were added to accommodate the hosting McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 1 University of Oregon Campus Planning McMorran House, October 1998 McMorran House, December 2009 The Register Guard, 10/12/1998 of large events by the UO president. A bathroom in the basement was upgraded to meet accessibility standards, and an elevator was added next to the kitchen to serve this bathroom. These interior changes prompted additional alterations to the south and east facades (see Timeline, pg. 3). Several additional alterations and maintenance improvements were made from 2005 - 2010 (see Timeline, pg. 3). (Also, refer to Appendix C). In 1987, the McMorran House was identifi ed by the City of Eugene as a primary historic property in the South University and Fairmount Neighborhoods Cultural Resources Inventory. This meant that it had a strong potential for status as a City Landmark or for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. (Refer to Appendix C). The McMorran House is a primary resource for the UO campus, due to its high signifi cance associated with early 20th Century University of Oregon and the Fairmount Neighborhood development, George McMorran, association with signifi cant events, and architectural excellence and distinction. The house and gardens have been extremely well maintained and cared for by UO, and are both in excellent condition. (Refer to Appendix C). Washburne Park Washburne House McMorran House Jewett House Chancellor’s House Fellman Jewett House 1925 - Sanborn Map (1925) - Fairmount Loop 2 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning TIMELINE - MAJOR REMODELS 1924: McMorran House designed by Architect Roscoe 1925: McMorran House built at 2315 McMorran D. Hemenway. Street. "Community" tennis courts also built on the land south of the house at this time. 1940: The left side of the dormer window in the guest bedroom on the second fl oor was squared off . 1941: McMorran House purchased by University of Oregon on September 17. 1950: Copper-framed window screens added in living room. 1954: The kitchen was upgraded. 1969 - 1975: A series of changes to the house and landscape were made including: • A large rear, south-facing patio surrounding the original pin oak, designed by Professor Mac Ruff . The design included a rock retaining wall creating an elevated planting area for rhododendrons, azaleas, and small trees. • A rose garden was planted between the new patio and the house. In 1993 this became the Opal Clark Memorial Garden. • Conversion of the bedroom adjacent to the master bedroom into a large dressing room (it was later converted to a study some time after 1975). • The addition of a bar in the basement pool room. 1980: Panel added to house draperies above windows in the dining room. 1989: Reroofi ng and maintenance work were completed. 1995: Raised beds for vegetable gardens were 1996: A spa was built at the west end of the garden, added at the east end of the back (south) lawn. designed by then UO student Jeff Urban, and was donated to the McMorran House property by the President Frohnmayer and his wife, Lynn. 1998 - 1999: The back rock garden/herb garden was expanded. Other landscape improvements were made as a collaboration between Lynn Frohnmayer and student Dryden Jenney. McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 3 University of Oregon Campus Planning TIMELINE - MAJOR REMODELS (CONT.) 1998: The kitchen was remodelled and expanded to accommodate the hosting of large events by the president. A bathroom in the basement was upgraded to meet accessibility standards, and an elevator was added next to the kitchen to serve this bathroom. These interior changes prompted the following alterations to the south (rear) and east (side) façades: • The master bedroom and bathroom were expanded to encompass the sleeping porch. Three of the original sleeping porch casement windows were replaced, the stucco was patched, and a new wrought-iron guardrail was added to match the existing one when the roof line on the southeast corner was lowered. McMorran House, October 1998 • The original kitchen windows and guardrail on the fi rst fl oor of the south elevation were The Register Guard, 10/12/1998 removed to accommodate the expansion of the kitchen, and three new windows and doors were added to match those that remained. • An exterior lighting fi xture on the southeast corner was relocated. • On the east elevation, the two existing garage 2005: The west-facing sunroom was altered doors to the basement were removed and (new ceiling, posts, and other work), and the replaced by a single garage door and a pedestrian door. house radiators were boxed in. • The original exterior staircase on the east façade was removed and the newly exposed concrete Stained glass window in the entry presented wall was painted to match the rest of the to the Frohnmayers by David Schlicker (design exterior. A new section of basalt wall was built, inspired by the historic Johnson Hall skylight). with stairs leading up to the rear entrance. • The roof line was preserved by the addition of two iron-railed decks on the south and east sides. pre 2009 (dates not known): The small lavatory In addition, the second fl oor hall bathroom was remodeled around this time (1998?) and the small in the entrance hall was removed and the round window was plastered over. coat closet was expanded. South sun porch and library combined into one room, original bookshelves removed. Tapestries were added then removed some years later from the dining 2009 - 2010: room. • Reroofi ng • The original oak fl oors in the living room, lounge, and dining room were exposed after the white carpeting was removed • The 1970s bar in the basement was removed and 2018: Section of the north basalt wall was the room converted into a library. planned to be replaced by Allen Ash. Intent • The master bedroom and study were connected was to sequentially replace the mortared basalt by reopening the original doorway. wall with a more long-lived (likely originally • The shower in the second fl oor bathroom was intended) dry-stack wall as the need arose. remodelled. (Allen Ash replaced many dry stack walls • The master bathroom was re-tiled and the tub around the Fairmount Neighborhood and is an was replaced with a shower. experienced, renowned stone mason with a specialty in dry-stack walls.) 4 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning SURVEYED AREAS & RANKINGS Exterior Features of Note: • Prominent front (North) facade • Steeply-pitched roof and prominent cross gables • Massive chimneys with decorative brickwork Note: • Dominant, elaborate front entrance Refer to pg. 26 for more information • Semi-hexagonal oriel window about key landscape features • Multi-paned casement windows with lead cames • Overall character and setting McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 5 University of Oregon Campus Planning Original Basalt Steps Original Rock Post for (re-treaded 2008) Lighting Fixture Original Handrail KEY Original Original Brick Walkway Basalt ((hhandrails added 2008) Trees surrounded by Retaining a dashed circle are Wall of historic significance Original Rock Post for Lighting Fixture Japanese Brick Path (2003) Maple Big Leaf Original Maple Spa Location of Brick Originaall Original 1996 Path Handrail Steps Rock wall Douglas Fir repaired (2007) Rock wall Oak Porch repaired/built (1998) enclosed McMorran House Apple (died c.2005. Last remnant of apple Beech orchard on property- Opal Clark pre 1920s) Memorial Zarkova Kitchen RRose Garden addition (((11999933)) 1999988 Hemlock Fence Back Patio (2005) (1970s & 1998 Raised addition) Vegetable Filbert Beds (1995) Cedar Rock Retaining Pine Wall (c. 1970s) N Laurel Hedge Ranking Key: Primary Secondary Non- Key References: contributing McMorran House and Gardens History: H:\Departments\Planning\CAMPUS PLANNING SECTION\Historic Preservation\Campus History - Projects Docs Info Photos\ McMorran House\McMorran Report\McMorranReport_2016-01-20 Folder UO Summary Table of Historic Rankings & Designations: https://cpfm.uoregon.edu/sites/cpfm2.uoregon.edu/fi les/histallindex_11-18-20151_0.pdf Page 3 McMorran House Exterior Historic Rankings 1 SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY RANKED SPACES NORTH FACADE AND ENTRANCE Level of Historic Signifi cance: High • primary facade • facade contributes to the overall character of the McMorran House and Gardens • original decorative brickwork and cast-stone trim Level of Integrity: Excellent SUMMARY OF EXTERIOR SECONDARY RANKED SPACES EAST FACADE AND ENTRANCE Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium • secondary facade • facade contributes to the character of the McMorran House and Gardens • quality of the architectural craftsmanship and details Level of Integrity: Excellent SOUTH FACADE Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium • secondary facade • facade contributes to the character of the McMorran House and Gardens • quality of the architectural craftsmanship and details Level of Integrity: Good WEST FACADE Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium • secondary facade • contributes to the character of the McMorran House and Gardens • quality of the architectural craftsmanship and details Level of Integrity: Good SETTING Physical association with overall character and setting of the McMorran House and Gardens SOUTHEAST FACADE AND ENTRANCE Level of Historic Signifi cance: Non-contributing 6 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning NORTH FACADE RANKING: PRIMARY LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: HIGH LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: EXCELLENT EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: • Prominent front (North) facade • Steeply-pitched roof and prominent cross gables • Massive chimneys with decorative brickwork • Dominant, elaborate front entrance • Semi-hexagonal oriel window McMorran House, North Entry, 2009 • Multi-paned casement windows with lead cames McMorran House, North Elevation Construction Drawing, 1924 McMorran House, North Elevation, 1931 McMorran House, North Elevation, 2009 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 7 University of Oregon Campus Planning ALTERATIONS: McMorran House, North Elevation, 1989 Roof Remodel 8 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning EAST FACADE RANKING: SECONDARY LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: MEDIUM LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: GOOD EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: • Steeply-pitched roof and prominent cross gables • Massive chimneys with decorative brickwork • Multi-paned casement windows with lead cames McMorran House, East Elevation McMorran House, East Elevation, 2009 The Register Guard, 10/12/1998 McMorran House, East Elevation sketch, 1924 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 9 University of Oregon Campus Planning ALTERATIONS: 10 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning East Elevation Demolitions East Elevation Additions Construction drawings showing 1998 remodel / alterations WEST FACADE RANKING: SECONDARY LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: MEDIUM LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: GOOD EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: • Steeply-pitched roof and prominent cross gables • Massive chimneys with decorative brickwork • Multi-paned casement windows with lead cames McMorran House, West Elevation, 2009 McMorran House, West Elevation, 1931 McMorran House, West Elevation sketch, 1924 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 11 University of Oregon Campus Planning ALTERATIONS: 1996 - West Elevation showing a circular window, which is missing from more recent photographs. (Image courtesy of Cindy Cords, Offi ce of the President.) 2009 - North/West facade showing circular window missing and living porch is enclosed (date unknown). 2009 - West facade showing enclosed living porch (date unknown). 12 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning SOUTH FACADE RANKING: SECONDARY LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: MEDIUM LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: GOOD EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: • Steeply-pitched roof and prominent cross gables • Massive chimneys with decorative brickwork • Multi-paned casement windows with lead cames McMorran House, South Elevation, 2009 McMorran House, South Elevation, 1931 McMorran House, South Elevation, 1924 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 13 University of Oregon Campus Planning ALTERATIONS: South Elevation Demolitions South Elevation Additions Construction drawings showing 1998 remodel / alterations 14 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR - BASEMENT McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 15 University of Oregon Campus Planning Surveyed Areas & Rankings - Preliminary Interior 2009 Basement Floor Plan Ranking Key: Other: Primary Secondary Tertiary Non- Not contributing original BASEMENT SECONDARY RANKED SPACES BILLIARDS ROOM Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium Level of Integrity: Good Basement Billiards Room Fireplace, 2021 Basement Billiards Room Fireplace, 1981 16 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR - FIRST FLOOR McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 17 University of Oregon Campus Planning Surveyed Areas & Rankings - Preliminary Interior SSS111000111 2009 First Floor Plan Vestibule DDiinniinngg RRoooomm 110044 LLiivviinngg PPoorrccchh LLiivviinngg RRoooomm 110011AA 110011 LLiibbrraarryy 110022 KKiittcchheenn EE110011 110033 VV11000333 ((pprreevviioouussllyy aa sseeppaarraattee ssuunn rroooomm)) 110033AA Ranking Key: Other: Primary Secondary Tertiary Non- Not contributing original FIRST FLOOR SECONDARY RANKED SPACES FIRST FLOOR GATHERING SPACES: LIVING ROOM, LIVING PORCH, DINING ROOM, AND LIBRARY MAIN STAIR CONFIGURATION AND MATERIALS Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium Level of Integrity: Good 1st Floor Living Room, 1932 (Courtesy William R. Riley) 1st Floor Living Room, 2021 18 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning 1st Floor Dining Room, 1932 (Courtesy William R. Riley) 1st Floor Dining Room, 1981 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 19 University of Oregon Campus Planning 1st Floor Living Porch, 1981 1st Floor Living Porch, 2021 20 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning 1st Floor Library, 1981 1st Floor Library, 2010 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 21 University of Oregon Campus Planning Main Stair, 1981 Main Stair, 2021 22 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR - SECOND FLOOR McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 23 University of Oregon Campus Planning Surveyed Areas & Rankings - Preliminary Interior SSS222000111 2009 Second Floor Plan BBaatthhh 2200999 CCClll.. 222000888 MMaasstteerr BBeeddrroooomm 220077 GGuueesstt rroooomm CCll.. BBBaatthhh 220011 SSS2222000333 SSS22200022222 220077AAA 22000111AAA BBeeddrroooomm CCClll.. 220022 220044AA CCll... 2220066AA 220011BB WWaallkk--iinn--CClloosseett ((pprreevviioouussllyy aa DDeecckk bbeeddrroooomm,, tthheenn aa ssttuuddyy)) BBaatthh 220066 PPoorrcchh DDeecckk Ranking Key: Other: Primary Secondary Tertiary Non- Not contributing original SECOND FLOOR SECONDARY & TERTIARY RANKED SPACES MASTER BEDROOM, BEDROOMS, "SUN DECK", MAIN STAIR CONFIGURATION & MATERIALS Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium Level of Integrity: Good Master Bedroom, 1981 Master Bedroom, 2010 24 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR - THIRD FLOOR ADDITIONAL SECONDARY RANKED SPACES ROOM 301 & 303: "MAID'S" BEDROOM & BATH Level of Historic Signifi cance: Medium Level of Integrity: Good McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 25 University of Oregon Campus Planning Surveyed Areas & Rankings - Preliminary Interior 2009 Third Floor Plan Ranking Key: Other: Primary Secondary Tertiary Non- Not contributing original DETAILS OF SURVEYED AREAS - EXTERIOR PRIMARY-RANKED LANDSCAPE AREAS Original Basalt Steps Original Rock Post for (re-treaded 2008) Lighting Fixture ginal drail Original Original Brick Walkway Basalt (handrails added 2008) by Retaining e Wall Original Rock Post for Lighting Fixture Brick Path (2003) Original Spa Location of Brick Original Original 1996 Path Handrail Steps Rock wall repaired (2007) Rock wall Porch repaired/built (1998) enclosed McMorran House Apple (died c.2005. Last remnant of apple orchard on property- Opal Clark pre 1920s) Memorial Kitchen Rose Garden addition (1993) 1998 Fence Back Patio (2005) (1970s & 1998 Raised addition) Vegetable Beds (1995) Rock Retaining Wall (c. 1970s) N Laurel Hedge Ranking Key: Primary Secondary Non- contributing Opal Clark Memorial Rose Garden (1993) Original basalt entry steps Original walkway, ironwork, and basalt wall 26 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning OPAL CLARK MEMORIAL ROSE GARDEN (1993) RANKING: PRIMARY LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: HIGH LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: GOOD EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: • Historic rose bed "The home of the University of Oregon president and family, McMorran House is surrounded by bountiful beds, swaths of lawn and several patios. The garden is a mix of mature maples, cedar, viburnums and other shrubs; perennials such as pulmonaria, euphorbia and penstemon; abundant annuals; a Mediterranean bed of lavender, rosemary, and thyme; a rose garden honoring Opal Clark, a former First Lady of McMorran House; and Opal Clark Memorial Rosegarden (2009) raised beds for vegetables. There are ancient rhododendron trees in the side yard, and adolescent rhodies in a recently renovated bed at the back." - 10th Annual KLCC in Bloom Garden Tour, Ten Exquisite Gardens, June 22, 2003, held in the College Hill and Fairmount Neighborhoods Patio on the south side (2009) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 27 University of Oregon Campus Planning OPAL CLARK MEMORIAL ROSE GARDEN (1993) South garden, Opal Clark Memorial Rosegarden (2009) South garden, Opal Clark Memorial Rosegarden (2009) 28 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning ORIGINAL BASALT ENTRY STEPS & WALKWAY RANKING: PRIMARY EXISTING EXTERIOR FEATURES OF NOTE: LEVEL OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE: HIGH • Basalt wall, steps, and pillars LEVEL OF INTEGRITY: GOOD • Brick walkway • Iron handrails and baskets Original basalt steps on the edge of the front (north) garden (2009) Original walkway in the front garden (2009) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 29 University of Oregon Campus Planning ORIGINAL WALKWAY, IRONWORK, AND BASALT WALL Original walkway and ironwork in the front garden (2009) Driveway on the east with parts of the original basalt wall (2009) 30 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning NORTH GARDEN DETAILS South garden, Pin Oak (2009) North garden, Old Cedar (2009) North garden, Old Japanese Maple (2009) North garden, Old Douglas Firs (2009) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 31 University of Oregon Campus Planning NORTH GARDEN DETAILS North Garden (2009) Juncture of Old / New Brick Paths (2009) Exterior Basalt Wall (2009) Old / New Basalt Wall (2009) 32 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning SOUTH GARDEN DETAILS South garden, Patio looking west (2009) South garden, Patio looking east (2009) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 33 University of Oregon Campus Planning TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS The following treatment recommendations are based on the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties and their associated Guidelines. The Standards are four distinct approaches towards the treatment of historic properties: Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration, and Reconstruction. “The Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties are regulatory for all grant-in-aid projects assisted through the National Historic Preservation Fund.” The Guidelines “off er general design and technical recommendations to assist in applying the Standards to a specifi c property.... The Guidelines are advisory, not regulatory.” Together, the Standards and Guidelines “provide a framework and guidance for decision- making about work or changes to a historic property.” (NPS, The Secretary of the Interior’s Standards, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards.htm) One of the most commonly used Standards approach for the treatment historic properties is Rehabilitation and is the most likely Standard to be applicable to Villard Hall if it undergoes any future work. Rehabilitation is the approach that “acknowledges the need to alter or add to a historic property to meet continuing or changing uses while retaining the property’s historic character” (NPS, Four Approaches to the Treatment of Historic Properties, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/four- treatments.htm) The following are a summary of the Guidelines for Rehabilitation, ranked in order of procedure: 1. Identify, Retain, and Preserve historic materials and features 2. Protect and Maintain historic materials and features 3. Repair historic materials and features (in-kind where possible) 4. Replace deteriorated historic materials and features (in-kind where possible) (NPS, Rehabilitation: The Approach, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/four-treatments/standguide/rehab/rehab_ approach.htm) Like the Guidelines, the intention of these recommendations are “to assist the long-term preservation of property’s signifi cance through the preservation of historic materials and features.” (NPS, Introduction to the Standards, http://www.nps.gov/tps/standards/rehabilitation/rehab/stand.htm) EXTERIOR The character and the quality of craft and materials of the exterior of the McMorran House play a signifi cant part in the architectural character of the building. In addition, the McMorran House contributes to the spatial quality and architectural character of it's surrounding landscape and gardens. The treatment of the overall exterior of the McMorran House, especially its primary and secondary ranked landscapes, facades, and north entry, should be completed in such a way that it does not diminish the overall historic character of the building. 34 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning LANDSCAPES • Identify, Retain and Preserve landscape features of the McMorran House that are important in defi ning its overall historic character and its historic relationship between the building and the landscape. Pay particular attention to the primary and secondary ranked landscapes. This includes the north entry sequence and associated historic walkways and paths, vegetation, landforms, walls, and furnishings. • Protect and maintain the building and building site by providing proper drainage to assure that water does not erode foundation walls; drain toward the building; nor damage or erode the landscape. Preserve important landscape features, including ongoing maintenance of historic plant material. Provide continued protection of masonry, wood, and architectural metals which comprise the building and site features through appropriate cleaning, rust removal, limited paint removal, and re-application of protective coating systems. • Repair features of the landscape by reinforcing historic materials before considering replacement. • If an entire feature of the landscape is too deteriorated to repair and if the overall form and detailing are still evident, replace the feature in kind. Physical evidence from the deteriorated feature should be used as a model to guide the new work. If using the same kind of material is not technically or economically feasible, then a compatible substitute material may be considered. • If a historic landscape feature is completely missing, design and construct a new feature. It may be based on historical, pictorial, and physical documentation; or be a new design that is compatible with the historic character of the building and site. • When required by new use, design new exterior landscapes which are compatible with the historic character of the site and which preserves the historic relationship between the building or buildings and the landscape. Remove non-signifi cant buildings, additions, or landscape features which detract from the historic character of the site. FACADES • Identify, Retain and Preserve the features and details of the facade that are important in defi ning the overall historic character of the building. This includes the exterior masonry walls, their composition, and their details such as decorative brickwork. Pay particular attention to the primary and secondary ranked facades. • Protect and maintain the masonry and wood details by providing proper drainage so that water does not stand on fl at, horizontal surfaces or accumulate in curved decorative features. Clean these facade elements only when necessary to halt deterioration or remove heavy soiling and clean only with the gentlest method possible. • Where there is evidence of deterioration in the mortar joints of the masonry walls and other masonry features, repair by repointing the mortar joints. Repair masonry features by patching, piecing-in, or consolidating the masonry using recognized preservation methods. Repair may also include the limited replacement in kind--or with compatible substitute material--of those extensively deteriorated or missing parts of masonry features when there are surviving prototypes. Where possible, preserving exterior fi nish in areas that are still intact. McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 35 University of Oregon Campus Planning ENTRANCES • Identify, Retain and Preserve the original entrance and its functional and decorative features that are important in defi ning the overall historic character of the building. Pay particular attention to the primary ranked entrance. This includes, but is not limited to, the northern entrance, its landscaping, exterior stairs, porches, and other signifi cant character-defi ning features. • Protect and maintain the masonry, wood, and architectural metal that comprise entrances through appropriate surface treatments such as cleaning, rust removal, limited paint removal, and re-application of protective coating systems. • Repair by reinforcing the historic materials. Repair will also generally include the limited replacement in kind--with compatible substitute material--of those extensively deteriorated or missing parts of repeated features where there are surviving prototypes. INTERIOR • Portions of the interior of the McMorran House has been altered since it was completed. Very little remains on the southeast interior (kitchen) in terms of spacial layout or materials that were original to the building. Many other interior features, however, remain intact. SPACES • Identify, retain and preserve signifi cant interior spaces. Of primary interest is consider the potential to retain the original layout of fi rst fl oor gathering spaces, and second fl oor bedrooms. • In terms of new additions or alterations, accommodate service functions such as bathrooms, mechanical equipment, and offi ce machines as required by the building’s new use in tertiary or non-contributing spaces. FEATURES AND FINISHES • Retain and preserve interior features and fi nishes that are important in defi ning the overall historic character of the building. In general, consider interior fi nishes that accent interior features and the original window openings and trim. • Protect and maintain masonry, wood, and architectural metals which comprise interior features through appropriate surface treatments such as cleaning, rust removal, limited paint removal, and reapplication of protective coatings systems. Repaint with colors that are appropriate to the historic building. Abrasive cleaning should only be considered after other, gentler methods have been proven ineff ective. • Repair interior features and fi nishes by reinforcing the historic materials. Repair will also generally include the limited replacement in kind--or with compatible substitute material--of those extensively deteriorated or missing parts of repeated features when there are surviving prototypes. • In terms of alterations, reuse decorative material or features that have had to be removed during the rehabilitation work including wall and baseboard trim, door molding, panelled doors, and simple wainscoting; and relocating such material or features in areas appropriate to their historic placement. For more information, please refer to the attached Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation (Department of Interior regulations, 36 CFR 67) in Appendix D. 36 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning APPENDIX A - HISTORIC RANKING METHODOLOGY excerpt from pp. 44-46 of the Campus Heritage Landscape Plan: 1.0 Landscape Preservation Guidelines and Description of Historic Resources Signifi cance: SIGNIFICANCE “the meaning or value ascribed The actual evaluation of signifi cance was based upon the process developed to a structure, landscape, object, for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, in which a resource or site based on the National must demonstrate signifi cance based upon one or more of the following Register criteria for evaluation…” criteria: A. Association with signifi cant events that have made a signifi cant Integrity: contribution to the broad patterns of campus or community history. “the authenticity of a property’s B. Association with signifi cant persons. historic identity, evinced C. Distinctive architecturally because it by the survival of physical - embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of characteristics that existed construction; during the property’s historic or prehistoric period…” - represents the work of a master; - possesses high artistic value; or Source: National Park Service, Guidelines for the Treatment of - represents a signifi cant and distinguishable entity whose components Cultural Landscapes, p. 5 may lack individual distinction. (Note: Criterion D, which addresses archeological signifi cance, was not applicable to any campus resources.) Four levels of signifi cance were designated and used to rank each historic Integrity criteria evaluated for each resource. The levels and their criteria were: of the twenty-one landscape areas • high signifi cance – considerable contribution to the history of the surveyed: campus and its growth. • medium signifi cance – noteworthy contribution the history of the Location/Setting – Are campus and its growth. important elements still in • low signifi cance – discernible contribution to the history of the cam- their original location and pus and its growth. confi guration? • very low signifi cance/no signifi cance – no discernible importance to Design – How has the general structure of the landscape the history of the campus and its growth. changed since its period of There is always room for debate about a resource’s level of signifi cance, as signifi cance? this determination is not a strictly objective exercise. Though the rationale Materials – Are original for determining a specifi c level might never be entirely irrefutable, it should materials/vegetation that were be defendable. It also needs to be recognized that a resource’s signifi cance used to structure and shape the might change as important connections to the campus character are landscape still present? eventually realized or discovered. Workmanship – Does the landscape retain characteristic INTEGRITY workmanship from the period of signifi cance? Integrity is the degree to which the key elements that comprise a resource’s Feeling – Does the landscape signifi cance are still evident today. evoke the period of signifi cance? Evaluation of integrity is based upon the National Register process–- Association – Is it possible defi ning the essential physical features that represent it’s signifi cance and to associate elements of the determining whether they are still present and intact enough to convey their landscape with signifi cant signifi cance. For example, if a building is deemed signifi cant because of its people or events? exterior detailing and materials (criterion C), one would evaluate whether those items have remained relatively unaltered. If this is the case, the resource has excellent integrity. McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 37 University of Oregon Campus Planning Criteria were developed and used in the survey process to help determine each landscape area’s level of integrity (described at left). Integrity is ascertained based on the specifi c era (or eras) of signifi cance for that particular landscape area. Four levels of integrity were established and applied to each landscape area: • excellent integrity – retains a very high percentage of original fabric, and the original design intent is ap- parent. • good integrity – retains a signifi cant percentage of original fabric, with a discernible design intent. • fair integrity – original fabric is present, but diminished. • poor integrity – contains little historic fabric, and the original design intent is diffi cult to discern. RANKING LEVELS Historic rankings were determined by evaluating two factors: the resource’s historic signifi cance and its integrity. Using a matrix (below), an historic ranking for each resource was determined based on one of four ranking levels: primary, secondary, tertiary, and non-contributing. Primary Ranking Resources that have a high level of historic signifi cance and excellent or good integrity (likely to be eligible for listing in the National Register). Secondary Ranking Resources that have a reduced level of signifi cance and good or excellent integrity. Also, resources that have a high level of historic signifi cance but fair integrity (possibly eligible for listing in the National Register). Tertiary Ranking Resources that have a reduced (medium) level of historic signifi cance but compromised (fair) integrity. Also, resources that have integrity but lack noteworthy signifi cance at this time as an individual resource. These resources could contribute to the historic signifi cance of a large grouping or district, though they are likely not eligible for listing individually in the National Register. Non-Contributing Ranking Resources that lack noteworthy signifi cance or have severely compromised integrity. They do not contribute to the historic signifi cance of a large grouping or district and are not eligible for listing in the National Register. high historic medium historic low historic very low or no signifi cance signifi cance signifi cance historic sig. excellent integrity primary ranking secondary ranking tertiary ranking non-contributing good integrity primary ranking secondary ranking tertiary ranking non-contributing fair integrity secondary ranking tertiary ranking tertiary ranking non-contributing poor integrity non-contributing non-contributing non-contributing non-contributing Matrix used to determine the historic ranking levels for the landscape areas and buildings under study. 38 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning APPENDIX B - 1924 FLOOR PLANS, SECTIONS, & DETAILS BASEMENT FLOOR (1924) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 39 University of Oregon Campus Planning FIRST FLOOR (1924) 40 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning SECOND FLOOR (1924) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 41 University of Oregon Campus Planning THIRD FLOOR (1924, TRACED FROM ORIGINAL DRAWING) 42 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning SECTION AND ROOF PLAN (1924) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 43 University of Oregon Campus Planning DOOR AND WINDOW DETAILS (1924) 44 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR ELEVATION AND DETAILS (1924) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 45 University of Oregon Campus Planning INTERIOR PLAN, ELEVATION, AND DETAILS (1924) 46 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning ADDITIONAL DETAILS (1924) McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 47 University of Oregon Campus Planning APPENDIX C - MCMORRAN HOUSE AND GARDENS HISTORY REPORT EXCERPTS Resource Identification Current Building Name: McMorran House or President’s House Historic Building Name: McMorran Estate or McMorran House Building Address: 2315 McMorran Street Ranking: Oregon State Board of Higher Education - Secondary City of Eugene - Primary Architectural description: Architectural Style Classification: Tudor Revival and Norman Farmhouse Building Plan (footprint shape): Rectangular Number of Stories: Three, and basement Foundation Materials: Poured Concrete Primary Exterior Wall Material(s): Stucco Secondary Exterior Wall Material: Brick Roof Configuration/Type: Hipped Primary Roof Material: Wood Shingles Primary Window Type: Casement Primary Window Material: Wood Decorative Features and Materials: Massive decorative chimney; decorative brickwork on primary façade; steeply-pitched, hipped roof; prominent entrance with Tudor arch and cast-stone trim; oriel window on primary façade Landscape Features: Basalt retaining walls and steps, iron handrails and baskets, brick walkway, Pin Oak, Douglas Firs, Japanese Maples, Big Leaf Maple, Beech and Cedars, Opal Clark Memorial Rose Garden Date of Construction: 1925 Architect: Roscoe D. Hemenway Landscape Architect: George H. Otten (likely, not confirmed) Moved? No Alterations: Refer to time lines. Original Use(s)/Function(s): McMorran family residence Current Use(s)/Function(s): University President’s Residence/Venue for special university social functions Area(s) of Significance: Architecture (Criterion C) Period of Significance: 1925 48 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning McMorran House Introduction The McMorran House was built for George McMorran in 1925 during a time when Eugene was experiencing its largest building and population boom, in accordance with the designs of Roscoe D. Hemenway, a respected architect and George H. Otten, landscape architect. George McMorran, was a man who greatly influenced the commercial life of Eugene and was also deeply involved in the organization and life of the community. George McMorran sold the house to the University of Oregon in 1941. Every resident thereafter has been a president of the University of Oregon and, therefore, has had a profound impact on the university. Roscoe D. Hemenway, a UO graduate and an acclaimed Portland architect known for his period revival style residential work, designed the McMorran house. The house is an excellent example of the Tudor Revival/Norman Farmhouse-style exemplified by its steeply-pitched, hipped roof; massive chimneys; dominant façade with decorative brickwork; oriel window; and pronounced entryway. The expansive gardens are likely the work of George H. Otten, another UO grad and well-known Oregon landscape architect. At the time the house was built in 1925, the Fairmount neighborhood was newly established. The McMorran Estate was one of at least four large estates occupying much of the land around the Fairmount Loop. All were built on the steeply sloping land with panoramic views of the city below. The adjacent estates were the Hampton Church House (also known as Treetops and now the Chancellor’s House), the Washburne Estate, and the Fellman Jewett Residence. The McMorrans, Washburnes, and Jewetts were linked by familial and business ties. George McMorran had a very successful business partnership with Carl Washburne that flourished for over 25 years. The Washburnes and Jewetts were related by marriage. George McMorran lived on the estate with his family until the University of Oregon purchased the house and a small portion of its gardens in 1941. Since then, the house has served as the official residence of the university president as well as the venue for many social functions hosted by the president The McMorran house has been well cared for by the University of Oregon since 1941. All repairs and remodels to the house and gardens have been carefully monitored to preserve the original character and style of the house. Continued care of the McMorran House will ensure that this historically significant resource will be preserved and available for use by successive University of Oregon presidents and the campus community for many years to come. Page 1 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 49 University of Oregon Campus Planning Roscoe Deleur Hemenway: Architect Roscoe Deleur Hemenway was born in Cottage Grove, Oregon on February 12 1899. He later moved to Portland and attended Portland public schools before entering the University of Oregon. Upon graduation from the University of Oregon, Hemenway moved to Philadelphia for some time and most likely began practicing architecture there. He returned to Oregon in about 1923 and began practicing in Portland. His earliest recorded building in Oregon is a house built in 1923 for a “Miss Johnson.” According to the Oregon State Board of Architects, Roscoe Hemenway was first registered in Oregon on July 29, 1927. His application shows that the registration was granted in reciprocity meaning that he was a registered architect in another state prior to Oregon. This fact supports the idea that he may have practiced under a Pennsylvania license for some years before taking his Oregon license. A job list of Hemenway’s work at the Oregon Historical Society shows that he designed two hundred and fifty-four houses during his thirty-six years of practice in Oregon. Most of the projects were built in Portland, where Hemenway’s practice was located. Only twenty-four Hemenway-designed residences were built outside of Portland (specific locations not known). Hemenway specialized in single-family residential architecture and built only three apartment buildings, one barn, one parish building, and one commercial structure. Hemenway’s clientele was largely made up of the Portland elite. He designed primarily for well-to-do clients who lived in the prestigious neighborhoods of Portland’s west hills as well as Laurelhurst, Alameda, Dunthorpe, and Lake Oswego. Hemenway built almost exclusively in the period revival styles popular in Oregon during the 1920s, ‘30s, and ‘40s. Like many builders of the time, he created designs in a myriad of revival styles, although much of his later work was in the Colonial Revival style. Only one residence designed by Hemenway, the streamlined, modern Hudson Residence (1937) in Portland, strayed from his trademark use of period revival styles (National Register of Historic Places Nomination Form: Psi Alpha Chi Omega House - p. 13). The McMorran House, one of his early projects, is an excellent example of the Tudor Revival and Norman Farmhouse styles. Hemenway designed at least one other residence in Eugene, also a period revival style building, which was Hemenway’s forte. The Psi Alpha Chi Omega Sorority House located at 1461 Alder Street has housed the sorority for over seventy-five years. It was designed by Hemenway in 1925 and was completed soon after October 1926, one year after the completion of the McMorran House. The Psi Alpha Chi Omega Sorority House is listed in the National Register of Historic Places both as an excellent example of the Tudor Revival style and as the finest (and potentially the only) example of a Jacobethan Revival style building in Eugene. Roscoe Hemenway died of a heart attack on July 26, 1959 and was survived by his wife, Martha Johnson Hemenway, and his daughter. Page 3 50 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning George H. Otten: Landscape Architect George Otten (b. 1889) completed his bachelor’s degree at the University of Oregon in 1911, after which he worked and studied under Ferruccio Vitale between 1911 and 1915. He continued his studies at Columbia University in New York, graduating with his master’s degree in 1915, and at the University of Montpelier in France until 1919. During World War I, George Otten served in the U.S. Army. He returned to Portland in 1919 and married Ruth Ann Ralston. He was a landscape architect/engineer for the Highway Department of the State of Oregon between 1935-42 and completed many noteworthy landscape architecture projects throughout his career (Capitol’s Who’s Who for Oregon 1936-38). Otten is closely associated with the original landscaping of some of the more imposing properties in the Fairmount Neighborhood. The earliest example of this was his 1911 bachelor’s thesis, which was based on a design for the Hampton Church House at 2237 Spring Boulevard. This house is now the residence of the chancellor of the University of Oregon. Among his most successful residential projects was the design for the extensive gardens of the Washburne Estate in 1920, 4.86 acres of which now comprise the Washburne Park. While not confirmed, it is believed that the Washburnes likely recommended Otten to George McMorran, their business partner, when he built his house on the property neighboring theirs in 1925. Further research is required to confirm whether Otten was actually responsible for the landscape design of the McMorran Gardens. Key Projects: • Oregon State Capitol grounds including the sunken garden • Portland Swan Island Airport • White Shield Home (now the Salvation Army White Shield Center) • First 9 holes on the Rose City Golf Course (1923) • Landscaping for the Temple Beth Israel • Landscape work for properties in Ralph Lloyd Center Area including Lloyd’s Golf Course (1930) • Placement of Timberline Lodge • Alignment of Columbia River highway • Alderwood Country Club • Private residences of Aaron Frank, A.E. Otis, Harry Grelin, and Carl G. Washburne. The private practice that George H. Otten and his father established in Portland continues to function under the management of his son, George W. Otten, and his granddaughter, Janet Otten. Page 5 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 51 University of Oregon Campus Planning George McMorran George McMorran was a naturalized U.S. citizen, born in Canada in 1876. In Eugene he was a prominent businessman, one of the owners of the McMorran and Washburne Department Store, and was considered a leading citizen. The other owner was a Eugene native, Carl Washburne, who lived on the property neighboring the McMorrans and was also highly active in the Eugene community. The McMorran and Washburne partnership was extremely successful from its inception in 1910 until George McMorran sold his shares in the business to Carl Washburne in 1937. The partners started off in the dry goods industry, working initially from a single small room. Within a year of opening, however, McMorran and Washburne became one of the most popular stores in Eugene, and its owners were obliged to relocate the store twice to progressively larger premises on Willamette Street to accommodate the growth of their business. In 1918 McMorran and Washburne purchased Samson Friendly’s business, S.H. Friendly McMorran and Washburne Deparment Store and Company, their largest (southwest corner of East Broadway and Willamette Street) competitor (and founding McMorran and Washburne Department Store History and Evaluation regent of the university for which the first dormitory on campus was named). In 1921 they bought the Tiffany Building (then known as the Cockerline and Weatherbee building), on the northeast corner of 8th Avenue and Willamette Street. This building is still intact and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. It was around this particularly prosperous time for the store that both George McMorran and Carl Washburne Willamette Street, looking south from 9th Avenue (East Broadway) McMorran and Washburne Deparment Store at far right Page 6 52 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning purchased their large residential properties in the Fairmount Neighborhood and designed and built their homes there. Soon the partnership shifted its focus from dealing with dry goods to become a fully-fledged department store and this, along with the store’s immediate success, necessitated still larger premises. They purchased the southwest corner lot on Willamette and East Broadway in 1924 although they soon razed the existing building and hired A.E. Doyle, an extremely successful Portland architect, to design the McMorran and Washburne Department Store. The grand opening on September 3, 1927 drew a crowd of more than 23,000 people who were enthusiastic in their support of the new building. In 1937 George McMorran sold his shares of the partnership to Carl Washburne. The store continued to operate until 1939 when the department store was sold to J.C Penney. It had been the “longest operating and last remaining locally owned department store in Eugene.” (McMorran and Washburne Department Store History and Evaluation). The building underwent substantial alterations while under the ownership of J.C Penney including the addition of two floors. However, it is believed that many of the original features remain intact under the existing façade. The McMorrans sold their house to the University of Oregon in 1941, three years before George McMorran’s death in 1944. The university purchased the house to serve as the official residence of the university president. Since 1941 nine of ten university presidents and their families have occupied the house during their terms of service to the University of Oregon. • Donald and Roxanne Erb, 1941-43 • Harry and Leigh Newburn, 1945-54 • O. Meredith and Marian Wilson, 1954-60 • Arthur and Bernice Flemming, 1961-68 • Robert and Opal Clark, 1969-1975 • William Boyd, 1975-80 (lived in another residence but used the McMorran House for university and public functions) • Paul and Vivian Olum, 1981-89 (lived in another residence but used the McMorran House for university and public functions) • Myles and Peg Brand, 1989-94 • David and Lynn Frohnmayer, 1994-2009 • Richard and Jan Lariviere, 2009-2011 • Robert M. Berdahl, 2011-2012, interim • Michael R and Karol Gottfredson, 2012-2014 • Scott and Wendy Coltrane, 2014 - 2015, interim • Michael H. Schill, 2015 - present Page 7 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 53 University of Oregon Campus Planning Development of Fairmount Loop 1890: Fairmount was platted, dedicated and recorded with the county on November 4 as a town separate from Eugene. 1903-4: Fairmount was annexed into Eugene. 1908: 1,000 trees were ordered for planting in Fairmount; mainly Lindens, Horse Chestnuts, Maples, and Walnuts. 1909: An extension of the street railway line from the university ran through what was to be known as the Fairmount Loop. 1910: The Hampton Church House (also known as Treetops and the Chancellor’s House) was built at 2237 Spring Boulevard. In 1911 George H. Otten (the landscape architect who would later design the gardens for the Washburne Estate and possibly the McMorran Estate as well) wrote his bachelor’s degree thesis, “Drawings and specifications for landscape gardening surrounding Mrs. Alton Hampton’s residence, Fairmount Heights, Eugene Or.” The Hampton Church property was purchased by the University of Oregon on February 24, 1938, to be used as the official residence of the chancellor. The Fellman Jewett House was built at 2550 Fairmount Boulevard to the designs of architect J. Hunzicker. The Fellmans occupied the house until 1921. Mary Jewett (a widow) lived here from 1921 to 1938 with her two children: Narcissa (who would later marry Carl Washburne), and Wilson Jewett. This house has since been awarded a secondary ranking by the City of Eugene. 1912: The Sanborn map from 1912 shows the properties inside the Fairmount Boulevard loop without any formal subdivisions. These properties were owned by fruit growers; orchards occupied the land that was later built upon. One apple tree at the east end of the McMorran House property was the only remnant of the original Gravenstein apple orchard that was on the property (see site plan - p. 9). Unfortunately this tree was removed in 2005 due to disease. 1912 Sanborn Map - Fairmount Loop Page 9 54 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning 1920: The Washburne house (primary ranking from the City of Eugene) was built at 2425 Fairmount Boulevard (Heirloom Homesteads gives 1916 as the date for the construction of the Washburne house, the 1920 construction date is more widely used and accepted as accurate). This year was part of a particularly lucrative period for the McMorran and Washburne partnership in the dry goods business, only two years after they had bought out their biggest competitor, S.H. Friendly and Company. The house was built in the Colonial/Dutch Revival Style, which was very popular in Eugene at the time. The Washburne Estate was extensive and included the land now known as Washburne Park. The grounds and gardens of the estate were designed by George H. Otten and are an excellent example of early 20th century private estate design. The Washburnes were responsible Images and brief descriptions showing the Jewett, Washburne and McMorran Houses from Style and Vernacular: A Guide to the Architecture of Lane County, Oregon Page 10 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 55 University of Oregon Campus Planning for building the “community” wading pool and swimming area, both of which still exist in the Park grounds, although the wading pool was drained when the City of Eugene ordered that all such pools be fenced in. The estate remained under the ownership of the Washburnes at least until Narcissa Washburne passed away in November 1961, at which time the Minnie L. Washburne Memorial Park was established as a 4.86-acre public park. A 2-foot to 4-foot basalt wall bounds the west side of the park, and two sets of steps lead upwards to the park from Agate Street, one set on the northwest corner and one set in the center of the wall. The original wading pool still exists, although now it has been drained. A number of sources state that the park was donated to the City of Eugene, although a draft for the National Register Application for the South University Neighborhood states that the City of Eugene purchased the park in 1961 for $10,000. The City of Eugene later expanded the park with the purchase of a portion of the hillside south of E. 21st Avenue. 1921: Wilson H. Jewett, Mrs. Washburne’s brother, constructed a residence on the southern end of their property. At this time the part of the property occupied by the new house was sectioned off from the rest of the Washburne estate, and the address of the Jewett house was given as 2465 Fairmount Boulevard (see Sanborne map - p. 3). Wilson Jewett lived there with his wife and son until Wilson’s death in 1975. The Jewett house has since been given a secondary ranking by the City of Eugene. Washburne Park McMorran House Washburne House Jewett House Chancellor’s House Fellman Jewett 1962 - Sanborn Map (1925 - 62) - Fairmount Loop (with overlay showing existing conditions) 56 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning Construction Drawings Showing 1998 Remodel South Elevation Demolitions South Elevation Additions East Elevation Demolitions East Elevation Additions Page 14 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 57 University of Oregon Campus Planning Historic Status and Significance The evaluation of the house’s historic significance was based upon a process developed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, in which a resource must demonstrate significance based upon one or more of the following criteria: A. Association with significant events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of campus or community history. B. Association with significant persons. C. Distinctive architecturally because it • embodies distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; • represents the work of a master; • possesses high artistic value; or • represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. The McMorran House’s historic significance has been evaluated by the City of Eugene as part of a neighborhood cultural resources survey and by the Oregon State Board of Higher Education. Both evaluations determined that it is likely to be eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places: • In May 1974, the OUS Ad Hoc Committee on Properties of Historical and/or Architectural Value designated the McMorran House as a Property of Secondary Significance which meant that it would be recommended for consideration in future planning of the university. • In 1987, the McMorran House was identified by the City of Eugene as a primary historic property in the South University and Fairmount Neighborhoods Cultural Resources Inventory. This meant that it had a strong potential for status as a City Landmark or for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. The McMorran House appears to be eligible for listing based upon National Register Criterion C. It embodies distinctive characteristics of two architectural styles, and it is a good representation of the work of a significant Oregon architect, Roscoe Deleur Hemenway. In addition, it is possibly the work of the notable landscape architect George H. Otten. The house has some significance based on Criterion B. However, while the house is associated with a significant Eugene businessman, George McMorran, other extant Eugene properties are more closely connected with his significance. In addition, numerous presidents of the University of Oregon have lived in the house since 1941; however, this alone does not establish a level of historic significance given that most have lived in the house within the last 50 years. Integrity: Overall, the McMorran House possesses good integrity. The primary (north) façade has remained relatively unchanged over the years. The rear (south) façade has undergone some significant alterations, especially since the 1980s; however, the changes were made with great attention to maintaining the character and overall unity of the exterior. The side façades (east Page 17 58 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning and west) also have been somewhat altered since the 1940s. The garden appears to have experienced the most change over time, with the addition of many planting beds, screening hedges, and the spa, which was built on the west side of the garden. Some important original elements remain intact: the parts of the original basalt wall on the north and east sides of the property; the brick walkway up to the main entrance from the stairway on the north; two Douglas Firs, two Beeches, a Cedar, a Big-Leaf Maple and a Japanese Maple in the front garden; and a Pin Oak on the back patio. Two of the original lighting fixtures also remain: the main entrance exterior fixture and the main staircase pendant fixture. Condition: The house and gardens have been extremely well maintained and cared for by the University of Oregon, and are both in excellent condition. Distinctive Architecture (Criterion C) The McMorran House has been described as an example of a number of different architectural styles including Tudor Revival, Norman Farmhouse, English Norman Country, and Norman English style. The most appropriate of these classifications appear to be Tudor Revival and Norman Farmhouse. Tudor Revival style houses are known for the the following characteristics: • steeply pitched roofs, usually side gables (less commonly hipped or front gables); • a façade dominated by one or more prominent cross gables, usually steeply-pitched; • decorative (i.e. not structural) half-timbering; • tall, narrow windows, usually in multiple groups and with multi-pane glazing; and • massive chimneys commonly crowned by decorative chimney pots. (A Field Guide to American Houses, Virginia McAlester New York: Knopf, 1984) The identifying features of the Norman Farmhouse style are: • tall, steeply pitched, hipped roofs (occasionally gables in the towered subtype) without dominant front-facing cross gables; • eaves commonly flared upward at roof-wall junction; and • brick, stone, or stucco wall cladding, sometimes with decorative half-timbering. (A Field Guide to American Houses, Virginia McAlester New York: Knopf, 1984) The McMorran house has a very prominent front façade; a varied, steeply-pitched, hipped roof massing; subordinate cross gables; and decorative brickwork on the front façade and on the two massive chimneys. The main entrance is articulated with cast-stone trim surrounding a Tudor arch and projecting into the surrounding brickwork. The foremost cross-gable houses a semi- hexagonal oriel window, which is multi-paned, as are all the other casement and double-hung windows throughout the house. Thus it shows excellent examples of some of the major defining characteristics of these two styles. Page 18 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 59 University of Oregon Campus Planning APPENDIX D - SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION The Standards for Rehabilitation (codifi ed in 36 CFR 67 for use in the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives program) address the most prevalent treatment. “Rehabilitation” is defi ned as “the process of returning a property to a state of utility, through repair or alteration, which makes possible an effi cient contemporary use while preserving those portions and features of the property which are signifi cant to its historic, architectural, and cultural values.” THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR’S STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION The Standards (Department of Interior regulations, 36 CFR 67) pertain to historic buildings of all materials, construction types, sizes, and occupancy and encompass the exterior and the interior, related landscape features and the building’s site and environment as well as attached, adjacent, or related new construction. The Standards are to be applied to specifi c rehabilitation projects in a reasonable manner, taking into consideration economic and technical feasibility. 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defi ning characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 3. Each property shall be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or architectural elements from other buildings, shall not be undertaken. 4. Most properties change over time; those changes that have acquired historic signifi cance in their own right shall be retained and preserved. 5. Distinctive features, fi nishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. 7. Chemical or physical treatments, such as sandblasting, that cause damage to historic materials shall not be used. The surface cleaning of structures, if appropriate, shall be 60 McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment University of Oregon Campus Planning undertaken using the gentlest means possible. 8. Signifi cant archeological resources aff ected by a project shall be protected and preserved. If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures shall be undertaken. 9. New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be diff erentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment. 10. New additions and adjacent or related new construction shall be undertaken in such a manner that if removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be unimpaired. APPENDIX E - CITY OF EUGENE ZONING MAP FOR THE MCMORRAN HOUSE The McMorran House is located within the following City of Eugene zone: R-1 - Low-Density Residential McMorran House Preliminary Historic Assessment 61 University of Oregon Campus Planning