Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150 
Salem, Oregon 97301-2524 
Phone: (503) 373-0050 
First Floor/Costal Fax: (503) 378-6033 
Second Flo or/Director's Office: (503) 378-5518 
Web Address: http:/ /www.oregon.gov/LCD 
Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor 
NOTICE OF ADOPTED AMENDMENT 
August 21, 2006 
TO: Subscribers to Notice of Adopted Plan 
or Land Use Regulation Amendments 
FROM: Mara Ulloa, Plan Amendment Program Specialist 
SUBJECT: City of Newberg Plan Amendment 
DLCD File Number 008-06 
The Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) received the attached notice of 
adoption. A copy of the adopted plan amendment is available for review at the DLCD office in 
Salem and the local government office. 
Appeal Procedures* 
DLCD ACKNOWLEDGMENT or DEADLINE TO APPEAL: September 5,2006 
This amendment was submitted to DLCD for review 45 days prior to adoption. Pursuant to 
ORS 197.830 (2)(b) only persons who participated in the local government proceedings leading to 
adoption of the amendment are eligible to appeal this decision to the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA). 
If you wish to appeal, you must file a notice of intent to appeal with the Land Use Board of Appeals 
(LUBA) no later than 21 days from the date the decision was mailed to you by the local government. 
If you have questions, check with the local government to determine the appeal deadline. Copies of 
the notice of intent to appeal must be served upon the local government and others who received 
written notice of the final decision from the local government. The notice of intent to appeal must be 
served and filed in the form and manner prescribed by LUBA, (OAR Chapter 661, Division 10). 
Please call LUBA at 503-373-1265, if you have questions about appeal procedures. 
*NOTE: THE APPEAL DEADLINE IS BASED UPON THE DATE THE DECISION 
WAS MAILED BY LOCAL GOVERNMENT. A DECISION MAY HAVE 
BEEN MAILED TO YOU ON A DIFFERENT DATE THAN IT WAS MAILED 
TO DLCD. AS A RESULT YOUR APPEAL DEADLINE MAY BE EARLIER 
THAN THE ABOVE DATE SPECIFIED. 
Cc: Gloria Gardiner, DLCD Urban Planning Specialist 
Jason Locke, DLCD Regional Representative 
Barton Brierly, City of Newberg 
<paa> yaI 
2 Notice of Adoption 
THIS FORM M U S T B E MAILED TO DLCD 
WITHIN 5 WORKING DAYS AFTER THE FINAL DECISION 
P E R O R S 197 .610 , O A R C H A P T E R 6 6 0 - D I V I S I O N 18 
¥ 
A' 
m. 
P: 
: : DEPT DF 
AUG 1 5 2006 
LAND CONSERVATION 
AND DEVELOPMENT 
For DLCD Use Only 
Jurisdiction: City of Newberg 
Date of Adoption: 8/7/2006 
Local file number: CPA-06-05/ZMA-06-05 
Date Mailed: 8/11/2006 
Date original Notice of Proposed Amendment was mailed to DLCD: 5/2/2006 
I I Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 
I I Land Use Regulation Amendment 
I I New Land Use Regulation 
3 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 
Ex] Zoning Map Amendment 
• Other: 
Summarize the adopted amendment. Do not use technical terms. Do not write "See Attached". 
Comprehensive Plan designation change from Medium Density Residential to 
Public Quasi/Public in order to construct a park for a portion of tax lot 3220-1400. 
A similar size portion of land on tax lot 3220-1101 will change from Pubic 
Quasi/Public to Medium Density Residential. The zoning designation is 
proposed to change from AF-10 to R-2 and AF-10 to CF (Community Facility). 
Describe how the adopted amendment differs from the proposed amendment. If it is the same, write "SAME". 
If you did not give Notice for the Proposed Amendment, write "N/A". 
N/A 
Plan Map Changed from: PQ and MDR to: MDR and P Q 
Zone Map Changed from: AF-10 to: R-2 and CF 
Location: Tax Lot 3220 1101 and 3220 1400 Acres Involved: 34.5 total 
Specify Density: Previous: 10 acre minimum per du New: MDR/8.8 A/du 
Applicable Statewide Planning Goals: 1-14 
Was and Exception Adopted? • YES NO 
DLCDFileNo.: 
Did the Department of Land Conservation and Development receive a Notice of Proposed Amendment... 
Forty-five (45) days prior to first evidentiary hearing? [X] Yes ED No 
If no, do the statewide planning goals apply? Q Yes O No 
If no, did Emergency Circumstances require immediate adoption? Q Yes • No 
Affected State or Federal Agencies, Local Governments or Special Districts: 
Yamhill County. ODOT 
Local Contact: B a r t o n Br ie r ley 
Address: P.O. Box 970 
Zip Code + 4: 97132-
Phone: (503)537-1240 Extension; 
City: Newberg 
Email Address: nplan@ci.newberg.or.us 
ADOPTION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 
This form must be mailed to DLCD within 5 working days after the final decision 
per ORS 197.610, OAR Chapter 660 - Division 18. 
1. Send this Form and TWO (2) Copies of the Adopted Amendment to: 
ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST 
DEPARTMENT OF LAND CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT 
635 CAPITOL STREET NE, SUITE 150 
SALEM, OREGON 97301-2540 
2. Submit TWO (2) copies the adopted material, if copies are bounded please submit TWO (2) 
complete copies of documents and maps. 
3. Please Note: Adopted materials must be sent to DLCD not later than FIVE (5) working days 
following the date of the final decision on the amendment. 
4. Submittal of this Notice of Adoption must include the text of the amendment plus adopted findings 
and supplementary information. 
5. The deadline to appeal will not be extended if you submit this notice of adoption within five working 
days of the final decision. Appeals to LUBA may be filed within TWENTY-ONE (21) days of the 
date, the Notice of Adoption is sent to DLCD. 
6. In addition to sending the Notice of Adoption to DLCD, you must notify persons who 
participated in the local hearing and requested notice of the final decision. 
7. Need More Copies? You can copy this form on to 8-1/2x11 green paper only; or call the DLCD 
Office at (503) 373-0050; or Fax your request to:(503) 378-5518; or Email your request to 
mara.ulloa@state.or.us - ATTENTION: PLAN AMENDMENT SPECIALIST. 
J:\pa\paa\forms\form2word. doc revised: 7/7/2005 
•7 
ORDINANCE No. 2006-2652 
AN ORDINANCE DECLARING THAT PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH 
OF E. 3RD ST., EAST OF EVEREST RD., AND WEST OF SPORTSMAN 
AIRPARK, YAMHILL COUNTY TAX LOT 3 2 2 0 - 1 1 0 1 AND -1400 , BE 
ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF NEWBERG, WITHDRAWN FROM THE 
NEWBERG RURAL FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, AND THAT THE 
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP BE CHANGED TO M D R AND PARKS, 
AND THE ZONE CHANGED TO R - 2 / C F / M - 3 / S C / A R O / B I , SUBJECT 
TO A PUBLIC VOTE 
RECITALS: 
1. On March 31, 2006, an application for annexation and consent to annex was submitted by 
Newberg Communities, LLC for property located south of E. 3rd St., east of Everest Rd., and 
west of Sportsman Airpark, Yamhill County Tax Lot 3220-1101 and -1400, consisting of 34.5 
acres. The applicant submitted a concurrent comprehensive plan map amendment/zoning map 
amendment to exchange the designation for a portion of the property to Parks/CF and MDR/R-2. 
The applicant submitted a signed Measure 37 waiver for both of the properties. 
2. After proper notice, on August 7, 2006 at the hour of 7:00 PM in the Newberg Public Safety 
Building, 401 E. Third, the City Council held a public hearing on the item: accurately stated 
objections to jurisdiction, bias, and ex-parte contact; considered public testimony; examined the 
record; heard the presentation from staff and the applicant; examined and discussed the 
appropriate criteria to judge the project (as listed in the staff report); considered all relevant 
information regarding the item; and deliberated. 
3. The Council finds that the requirements of the City of Newberg Comprehensive Plan and 
Newberg Development Code regarding annexations have been met. 
T H E CITY OF NEWBERG ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: 
1. The City Council adopts the findings, which are attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated 
herein by reference. 
2. Owners understand that annexation in to the city must be approved by the voters of the City. The 
City may place the matter before the voters of the City at a Primary or biennial General Election 
(an election held in May and November of each even-numbered year), unless otherwise approved 
by resolution of the City Council. 
City of Newberg: O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCEL ORD & RESO\Councii 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE ] 
3. At this time, the City does not have to pay any election costs to place a matter on the ballot 
before the voters at a Primary or biennial General Election. The State of Oregon, which conducts 
the election, has the authority and may change the rules to require the City to pay some costs. In 
which case, the applicant/owners will be required to pay their proportionate share of such costs. 
The City Council directs that all costs associated with placing the item on the ballot be paid for 
by the applicant/owners. This includes but is not limited to noticing, signage, advertising, and 
costs assessed by the Yamhill County Clerk to place the item on the ballot. Owners may be 
required to place monies in escrow to cover such costs of election(s). 
4. Should this annexation request be approved by a majority of the electorate of the City of 
Newberg at the election date as identified by resolution of the City Council, the property shall be 
annexed and the following events shall occur: 
A. It is hereby ordered and declared that the property shown in Exhibit B and 
described in Exhibit C, is annexed and withdrawn from the Newberg Rural Fire 
Protection District. 
B. The territory shown in Exhibit B and described in Exhibit C, shall be zoned R-
2/CF/M-3/SC/ARO/BI, as shown on the map. The "Newberg, Oregon Zoning 
Map" shall be amended to indicate this change. 
C. The Recorder of the City of Newberg is hereby authorized and directed to make 
and submit to the Secretary of State, the Department of Revenue, the Yamhill 
County Elections Officer, and the Assessor of Yamhill County, a certified copy 
of the following documents: 
1. A copy of this ordinance. 
2. A map identifying the location of said territory. 
^ E F F E C T I V E D A T E of this ordinance is 3 0 days after the adoption date, which is: September 6T H , 2 0 0 6 . 
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Newberg, Oregon, this 7th day of August, 2006, by the 
following votes: 
A Y E : 5 N A Y : 2 ABSENT: 0 ABSTAIN: 0 
Bob Stewart, Mayor 
" . - . LEGISL^IVE HIST^ : • ^ 
By and through Planning Commission Committee at 6/22/2006 meeting. 
City of Newberg-. O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
EXHIBIT A: ANNEXATION/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT/ZONE MAP 
AMENDMENT Findings 
ANX-06-007/CPA-06-005/ZMA-06-005 
Tax lot 3220-1101,-1400 
§ 151.262 - TYPE HI ANNEXATION CRITERIA 
A. The following conditions must be met prior to or concurrent with City processing of any 
annexation request: 
1. The subject site must be located within the Newberg Urban Growth Boundary or Newberg 
Urban Reserve Areas. 
Finding: The subject site is within Newberg's urban growth boundary. 
2. The subject site must be contiguous to the existing City limits. 
Finding: The site is bordered on the north by the City limits boundary. 
B. An application for an annexation may be granted through a Type III procedure only if the 
proposal conforms to the annexation criteria found in NDC § 151.262, as follows: 
1. The proposed use for the site complies with the Newberg comprehensive plan and with the 
designation on the Newberg comprehensive plan map. If a redesignation of the plan map is 
requested concurrent with annexation, the uses allowed under the proposed designation must 
comply with the Newberg comprehensive plan. 
Finding: Tax lot -1101 has a Public-Quasi/Public comprehensive plan designation and tax lot -1400 has 
a Medium Density Residential/Industrial comprehensive plan designation. The applicant has 
requested a concurrent comprehensive plan map amendment change from PQ to MDR/P for 
tax lot 3220-1101 and comprehensive plan change from MDR to P for a portion of tax lot 
3220-1400. The remaining portion of tax lot -1400 will be zoned R-2 and M-3 which is 
consistent with the comprehensive plan designation of MDR and IND. 
2. An adequate level of urban services must be available, or made available, within three years 
time of annexation. An adequate level of urban services shall be defined as: 
(a) Municipal sanitary sewer and water service meeting the requirements enumerated in 
the Newberg comprehensive plan for provision of these services. 
(b) Roads with an adequate design capacity for the proposed use and projected future 
uses. JVhere construction of the road is not deemed necessary within the three-year time 
period, the city shall note requirements such as dedication of right-of-way, waiver of 
remonstrance against assessment for road improvement costs, or participation in other 
City of N e w b e r g - . O R D I N A N C E 2006-2652 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
traffic improvement costs, for application at the appropriate level of the planning process. 
The city shall also consider public costs for improvement and the ability of the city to 
provide for those costs. 
Finding: As indicated below, upon development, public utilities will have adequate capacity to 
accommodate the future demands of the area. 
Water: Upon development, the water mainline in E 3rd Street must be extended through Tax lot 3220-
1300 to the site. 
Sanitary sewer: Upon development, the sewer lines will connect to the existing mainline located at the 
southern end of the property. 
Stormwater: Upon development, the stormwater system will outfall to the south or east into Hess Creek. 
Roads: Upon development, local street extensions from E. 3rd Street will be required. 
3. Findings documenting the availability of police, fire, parks, and school facilities and services 
shall be made to allow for conclusionary Findings either for or against the proposed 
annexation. The adequacy of these services shall be considered in relation to annexation 
proposals. 
Finding: Police services are currently provided to the area outside the City by Yamhill County Sheriffs 
Office. Newberg Rural Fire District currently provides fire service. The proposed annexation will shift 
police and fire services to the City. The fiscal analysis calculation estimated that the annual revenues 
from the annexation will improve the level of public safety provided in the City. The current level of 
public safety service for the city is 3.1 FTE (full time employees) per 1000 people. The annexed 
properties, when developed, would generate revenue at a rate of 3.4 FTE per 1000, which will help 
improve the overall level of public safety provided within the city. The residential development on the 
site would create additional demand for parks and school services, which will be offset by the system 
development charge for parks and State per pupil funding for schools. The development of the site will 
not have adverse affects on the availability of police, fire, parks, and school facilities and services forthe 
community as a whole. The site will provide future park space for residents. 
4. The burden for providing the Findings for divisions (A), (B) and (C) of this section is placed 
upon the applicant 
Finding: The applicant has provided written Findings for this section. 
5. The City Council may annex properties where urban services are not and cannot practically 
be made available within the three year time fratne noted in division (B) above, but where 
annexation is needed to address a health hazard, to annex an island, to address sewer or water 
connection issues for existing development, to address specific legal or contract issues, to 
annex property where the timing and provision of adequate services in relation to development 
is or will be addressed through legislatively adopted specific area plans or similar plans, or to 
address similar situations. In these cases, absent a specific legal or contractual constraint, the 
City of N e w b e r g - . O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
Council shall apply an interim zone, such as a limited use overlay, that would limit 
developtnent of the property until such time as the services become available. 
Finding: Urban services can be made available within the three year time frame. 
§ 151.122 - TYPE III COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 
CRITERIA. 
A. The proposed change is consistent with and promotes the objectives of the Newberg 
Comprehensive Plan and this Code. 
1. Comprehensive Plan Description 
areas shall be located throughout the planning area in order to minimize travel distances to recreation 
Finding: The request is to exchange the location of 4.5 acres of Park and Medium Density Residential 
comprehensive plan designations within the same site. The exchange of designation will allow for a 
more efficient use of the site. The MDR designation on the northern portion will be adjacent to other 
residential development and the Parks designation for the park area will be in southern portion near the 
stream corridor. The residential concept plan is single-family housing on small lots, approximately 6 
units per acres (excluding the Stream Corridor area). This meets the development standards for the MDR 
designation, however, is far below the maximum density of 9 units/acre. In order to reach the planned 
density, future requirements may include duplex or multi-family only in the MDR designation, excluding 
detached single-family homes. Services will be required at the time of development. This meets the 
objective of the MDR designation. 
The proposed Park will be adjacent to other Park designated land, with a concept plan for a future park 
area by Chchalcm Park and Rccrcstion District. The public commcnt letter rcccivcd by a neighbor to the 
west of the site had concern for overcrowding in residential neighborhoods. The Medium Density 
Residential designation allows for single-family homes placed on medium sized lots, with room for 
private outdoor space. Additionally, the park will serve the new residents of the neighborhood with 
further open space opportunity. The park area will also act as a buffer between established 
City of Newberg-. O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
neighborhoods to the west and the new residential development. 
City of Newberg-. O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESOVCouncil 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 6 
2. Development Code - Description and Purpose 
facilities, primely by public agencies or non-profit organizations; It encourages the X 
Coinprehensiye P l ^ The CF preserv, 
District is' 
Comprehe 
as determined b 
srisive Plan; It may also be corisi^ent with any other designation of the Comprehensive Plan 
g j t e i a i f e i f i i i l i g B i ^ 
Finding: The proposed R-2 district would be consistent with the proposed MDR comprehensive plan 
district. The proposed use is for single-family homes, which is consistent with the R-2 zone 
requirements. The proposal is for 5 units per acre which will not exceed the maximum 8.8 dwelling units 
per acre as allowed in the R-2 zone. In order for actual build out to better meet the planned density zone 
requirements, future development regulations such as excluding detached single-family homes, 
minimum density requirements or incentives, or so forth may take place. Thus, it is possible that the 
applicant's concept development plan (detached single-family units at 6 dwelling units per acre) may not 
ultimately be the plan that is approved for this site. The proposed CF district is intended for a future park 
with preservation of natural and open resources. This is consistent with the Parks (P) comprehensive 
plan designation. 
3. Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies 
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT GOAL: To maintain a Citizen Involvement Program that offers citizens the 
opportunity for involvement in all phases of the planning process. — , : ^ . 
Finding: The process of holding a public hearing before the Planning Commission and City Council for 
approval of this request is consistent with providing citizens an opportunity to have involvement in the 
land use process. 
City of N e w b e r g - . O R D I N A N C E 2006-2652 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
HOUSING GOAL: To provide for a diven »ity in the type, density and location of housing within the City to 
ensure thai there is an adequate supply of affo rdable housing units to meet the needs of City residents ' of various 
•' income levelsvvyy 
HOUSING^ DENS^ (a): Densil y rather than housing type shall be the most important development 
; critena ^ d sHall Se. used tbcl^sij^ different 
H n i i Q i N r iriffNsiTV p h i r r v ^ - pticitipc;chfti11/1 Ha' ^ c trillnii?c* ITrKftti A^Pntniri T^ P'ticifx/* Q'iinitc nlar' x i u U o l n w U t i l i o l l I l yLiU^ I ^u). idjgci 
these plaim^; densities^ proyidmg:. positr 
T ttit%rn,t firi rr-1i vrol^  11 r ^ V^ i^ -v y . 
Uyll^ UtCj dUyj^ lU. UC, JLUilUyVo.;: y Uall iyiCUiUUl JJCiLlbUy* lUULo JJCI L. 
r encoUrag^ development to occur aVor near;; 
incentives-^ such p i l o t s i^; averaging, whi j C i i i ^ f e i n ^ 
• jUUijJi U[V 111g 11VdUiiiiy^t^t^c^ 
HOUSING LOCATION POLICY (aj: Me< 
High-density areas should be easily accessibl 
iiuiriand hi^-diensity ^ea^ 
id should not cause traffic to move th^^ 
s to aheriai streets. They should also be located near commercial 
. services anu pupiic open spaces.. • .. • 
offering a greater variety of housing and redu 
11 en^urage innovation in housing types and design as a means Of 
cinglipusmg costs, v; . v u v 
residential ^ e s and encourage innovative de1 
jrban area, land use policies will attempt to provide abroad range of 
;eiopmenUeclmi(^^ ; : 
income housings in the R-2 and R-3 zones. 
1 encourage incentive-based ^ordable h for low and very low 
Finding: The request is to exchange the location of 4.5 acres of the Parks and MDR comprehensive plan 
designations within the same site. The net result of the exchange is the same number of R-2 zoned acres 
available for future housing. The exchange of designation will cluster the residential development 
together on the northern portion of the site. This will allow for a more efficient use of city services while 
creating an open space to the south for residents to enjoy. This single-family housing on small lots meets 
the housing mix policy for a mix of housing types. 
TRANSPORTATION GOAL 2: Establish consistent policies which require concurrent: consideration- of 
transportation/land use system impacts. 
TRANSPORTATION POLICY: Transportation improvements shall be used to guide urban development and 
shall be designed to serve anticipated future needs. ' y ' 
TRANSPORTATION GOAL 9: Create effective circulation and access for the local transportation system. 
Promote reliance on multiple modes of transportation and reduce reliance on the automobile. 
TRANSPORTATION POLICIES: 
c: Develop a system of roads which provide for efficient movement of traffic, considering the general design 
guidelines below: - y y . - V o • ; v 1 
5) Local Streets. Xocal streets provide direct access to adjoining properties and connect to collector streets. 
Finding: The request is to exchange the location of 4.5 acres of the Parks and MDR comprehensive plan 
designations within the same site. The exchange of designation will cluster the residential development 
together on the northern portion of the site, creating a more efficient circulation and use of transportation 
infrastructure. 
City of N e w b e r g - . O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
olicies and 
ENERGY; PLAIWINCr PQLIC encourage ^ergy-efficient development patterns:; Such 
patteriis shall include the niiMire of compatible lajid uses iand'a'Compactness o^ urban development • 
Finding: Exchanging the MDR and Park designations to be clustered together would contribute to a 
more compact and energy-efficient development and help implement this policy. 
B. Public facilities and services are or can be reasonably made available to support the uses 
allowed by the proposed change. 
Finding: Water is not currently available at the site, but the applicant has submitted a utility plan that 
shows how it could be reasonably extended from E. 3rd Street. Sanitary sewer may connect the existing 
sewer line at the southern end of the property. The storm water system will outfall into the Hess Creek 
to the south or east. 
CONCLUSION FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENT /ZONING MAP 
AMENDMENT: 
The request to change the designation to Medium Density Residential for the northern portion of the site 
and to Parks for the southern portion meets the comprehensive plan policies. The change will create a 
more efficient use of the site for future residential and park development. 
DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 
1. Division of State Lands: Prior to development a removal-fill permit may be required, a permit 
may be required by the Corps of Engineers (503-808-4373), and a wetland 
determination/delineation report will be needed. 
2. Planning Division: Applicant must apply for a lot line adjustment between tax lot 3220-1101 
and -1400 prior to residential or park development. 
City of Newberg-. O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 I 
j 
I 
MAP 
EXHIBIT 
ANNEXATION 
N e w b e r g P l a n n i n g Fi le No . 
L o c a t i o n : SE 1 / 4 S e c t i o n 2 0 , T. 3 S., R. 2 W., WM., 
R. E v e r e s t DLC # 5 2 , C i t y o f N e w b e r g , 
Y a m h i l l C o u n t y , O r e g o n 
Tax L o t : 3 2 2 0 - 1101 & 1 4 0 0 
center of the X I Richard Everest DLC£52 
D a t e : 2 3 M a r c h 2 0 0 6 
TL 3220-1300 
SCKKW'W 23.662 chains & West 17.473 chains from the center of the Richard Everest DLC#52 
West ^ 1 7 . 
c!ty limits line pending the results of the Way 2005 X. election 
/ 
TL 3220-1100 
Oy, O-t^  
SB9'46*59" W 
'TL 3220-1400--.' .25.5 Acres* . 
'-SABASTfAN ' Jnstr. £199912319 
4-73 chains 
S c a l e : 1" = 4 0 0 ' 
CHEHALEM •'• -•.-/-•.• PARK tc REO.'-. '. • "0/STRICT 
1L3220-5101 9.0 Acres .'•'I ',.•.•' Parcel I of :j,'-'-V '. ' ' Partition Plot ' .' 97-61 -••/• 
S39'T38*35"E 
260.34* 120.53'-'-
Legend 
= area to be annexed 
TL 3220-300 
W a t t D u n c k e l & A s s o c . 
3 7 6 5 R ivers ide Dr ive 
McMinnvi l le , O r e g o n 9 7 1 2 8 
P h o n e : 5 0 3 - 4 7 2 - 7 9 0 4 
Fox: 5 0 3 - 4 7 2 - 0 3 6 7 
E m a i l : m a t d u n c k e l @ v e r i r o n . n e 
R E G I S T E R E D 
PROFESSIONAL 
LAND SURVEYOR 
500r-'.p. 
S69"25'E 
O R E G O N 
M A T T H E W E. D U N C K E L 
V . - ^ 2 . ' •• J 
Renewable 31 December. 2007 
5766 
Description: Annexation of 34.5 
acres 
File: ANX-06-007/CPA-06-005/ 
ZMA-06-005 
Date: August 7,2006 
EXHIBIT "B" 
ANNEXATION MAP 
Tax Lot: Tax lot 3220-1101, -
1400 
Location: S. of E. 3rd St., east of 
Everest Rd., and west of Sportsman 
Airpark 
Application By: Newberg 
Communities, LLC 
City of Newberg-. ORDINANCE 2006-2652 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2 
EXHIBIT "C" - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 
A tract of land tn Section 20, Township 3 South, Range 2 West, Yamhill County, 
Oregon, being more particularly described as follows: 
Beginning at a point that Is South 00°04' West 23.662 chains and West 17.473 
chains West of the center of the Richard Everest Donation Land Claim #52, 
said point being the northwest corner of that tract of (and described In deed 
from RENAISCANCE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION to RANDALL S. SEBASTIAN 
and recorded in Instrument No. 199912319, Yamhill County Deed Records; 
thence South 00°04'20" East 545.41 feet along the west line of said 
SEBASTIAN tract to the northeast corner of Parcel I of Yamhill County Partition 
Plat No. 97-61; thence South 89°46'59" West 293.06 feet to the northwest 
corner of said Parcel 1; thence South 11°56'45" West 417.75 feet along the 
west line of said Parcel 1; thence South 00°05'00* West 672.76 feet to the 
southwest corner of said Parcel 1; thence South 89°38'35" East 260.34 feet 
along the south Sine of said Parcel 1 to the west line of said SEBASTIAN tract; 
thence South 00Q24' East 693,00 feet to the southwest corner of said tract; 
thence South 89°25' East 500 feet; thence In a northeasterly direction to the 
junction of two small creeks; thence in a northerly direction up one of said 
creeks to a point that is 500 feet east of the point of beginning; thence West 
500 feet to the point of beginning. 
City of N e w b e r g - . O R D I N A N C E 2 0 0 6 - 2 6 5 2 
Z:\COUNCIL ORD & RESO'.Council 2006\02006-2652.R2006-2665.doc PAGE 2